|
import pandas as pd |
|
import streamlit as st |
|
from util.evaluator import evaluator,write_evaluation_commentary |
|
import os |
|
|
|
|
|
examples = { |
|
'good': { |
|
'question': "What causes rainbows to appear in the sky?", |
|
'explanation': "Rainbows appear when sunlight is refracted, dispersed, and reflected inside water droplets in the atmosphere, resulting in a spectrum of light appearing in the sky." |
|
}, |
|
'bad': { |
|
'question': "What causes rainbows to appear in the sky?", |
|
'explanation': "Rainbows happen because light in the sky gets mixed up and sometimes shows colors when it's raining or when there is water around." |
|
} |
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def check_password(): |
|
def password_entered(): |
|
if password_input == os.getenv('PASSWORD'): |
|
st.session_state['password_correct'] = True |
|
else: |
|
st.error("Incorrect Password, please try again.") |
|
|
|
password_input = st.text_input("Enter Password:", type="password") |
|
submit_button = st.button("Submit", on_click=password_entered) |
|
|
|
if submit_button and not st.session_state.get('password_correct', False): |
|
st.error("Please enter a valid password to access the demo.") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
st.title('Single Evaluation of Explanations') |
|
|
|
|
|
st.sidebar.write(""" |
|
### Welcome to the Single Evaluation of Explanations Demo |
|
This application allows you to evaluate the quality of explanations generated for various questions using different language models. You can either use predefined examples or input your own questions and explanations. |
|
""") |
|
|
|
|
|
st.sidebar.write(""" |
|
### Explanation Principles |
|
When evaluating explanations, consider the following principles mapped to user empowerment and regulatory compliance outcomes: |
|
|
|
1. **Factually Correct**: The information should be accurate and relevant to empower users and meet external audit requirements. |
|
2. **Useful**: Explanations should be clear and meaningful, helping users make informed decisions. |
|
3. **Context Specific**: Explanations should be tailored to the context of use, enhancing their relevance and utility. |
|
4. **User Specific**: Explanations should address the needs and preferences of the user, enabling better decision-making. |
|
5. **Provide Pluralism**: Explanations should present diverse perspectives, allowing users to understand different viewpoints and make well-rounded decisions. |
|
""") |
|
|
|
if not st.session_state.get('password_correct', False): |
|
check_password() |
|
else: |
|
st.sidebar.success("Password Verified. Proceed with the demo.") |
|
model_name = st.selectbox('Select a model:', ['gpt4-1106', 'gpt35-1106']) |
|
|
|
|
|
input_type = st.radio("Choose input type:", ('Use predefined example', 'Enter your own')) |
|
|
|
if input_type == 'Use predefined example': |
|
example_type = st.radio("Select an example type:", ('good', 'bad')) |
|
question = examples[example_type]['question'] |
|
explanation = examples[example_type]['explanation'] |
|
else: |
|
question = st.text_input('Enter your question:', '') |
|
explanation = st.text_input('Enter your explanation:', '') |
|
|
|
|
|
st.write('### Question') |
|
st.write(question if question else 'No question entered yet.') |
|
|
|
st.write('### Explanation') |
|
st.write(explanation if explanation else 'No explanation entered yet.') |
|
|
|
if st.button('Evaluate Explanation'): |
|
if question and explanation: |
|
eval = evaluator(model_name) |
|
scores = eval.evaluate_single(question, explanation) |
|
st.write('### Scores') |
|
details = write_evaluation_commentary(scores) |
|
df = pd.DataFrame(details) |
|
st.write(df) |
|
|
|
data = { |
|
'Question': question, |
|
'Explanation': explanation, |
|
**{detail['Principle']: detail['Score'] for detail in details} |
|
} |
|
df = pd.DataFrame([data]) |
|
|
|
|
|
csv = df.to_csv(index=False) |
|
st.download_button( |
|
label="Download evaluation as CSV", |
|
data=csv, |
|
file_name='evaluation.csv', |
|
mime='text/csv', |
|
) |
|
else: |
|
st.error('Please enter both a question and an explanation to evaluate.') |