illorca commited on
Commit
79a6fc4
1 Parent(s): ee37fa5

Readme update

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ pinned: false
16
  The traditional evaluation of NLP labeled spans with precision, recall, and F1-score leads to double penalties for
17
  close-to-correct annotations. As [Manning (2006)](https://nlpers.blogspot.com/2006/08/doing-named-entity-recognition-dont.html)
18
  argues in an article about named entity recognition, this can lead to undesirable effects when systems are optimized for these traditional metrics.
19
- Building on his ideas, [Katrin Ortmann (2022)](https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.150.pdf) develops FairEval.
20
 
21
  ## How to Use
22
  FairEval outputs the error count (TP, FP, etc.) and resulting scores (Precision, Recall and F1) from a reference list of
 
16
  The traditional evaluation of NLP labeled spans with precision, recall, and F1-score leads to double penalties for
17
  close-to-correct annotations. As [Manning (2006)](https://nlpers.blogspot.com/2006/08/doing-named-entity-recognition-dont.html)
18
  argues in an article about named entity recognition, this can lead to undesirable effects when systems are optimized for these traditional metrics.
19
+ To address these issues, this metric provides an implementation of FairEval, proposed by [Ortmann (2022)](https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.150.pdf).
20
 
21
  ## How to Use
22
  FairEval outputs the error count (TP, FP, etc.) and resulting scores (Precision, Recall and F1) from a reference list of