Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Pushpanjali
commited on
Commit
·
bce64d2
1
Parent(s):
97b6676
adding files
Browse files- yolo_functions.py +555 -0
yolo_functions.py
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
import cv2
|
2 |
+
import numpy as np
|
3 |
+
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
|
4 |
+
import random
|
5 |
+
import hashlib
|
6 |
+
import os
|
7 |
+
import numpy as np
|
8 |
+
import hashlib
|
9 |
+
import random
|
10 |
+
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
|
11 |
+
import cv2
|
12 |
+
import easyocr
|
13 |
+
import pytesseract
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
from ultralytics import YOLO
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
# 1. Load a YOLOv8 segmentation model (pre-trained weights)
|
20 |
+
model = YOLO("best.pt")
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
+
def get_label_color_id(label_id):
|
23 |
+
"""
|
24 |
+
Generate a consistent BGR color for a numeric label_id by hashing the ID.
|
25 |
+
This ensures that each numeric ID always maps to the same color.
|
26 |
+
"""
|
27 |
+
label_str = str(int(label_id))
|
28 |
+
# Use the MD5 hash of the label string as a seed
|
29 |
+
seed_value = int(hashlib.md5(label_str.encode('utf-8')).hexdigest(), 16)
|
30 |
+
random.seed(seed_value)
|
31 |
+
# Return color in BGR format
|
32 |
+
return (
|
33 |
+
random.randint(50, 255), # B
|
34 |
+
random.randint(50, 255), # G
|
35 |
+
random.randint(50, 255) # R
|
36 |
+
)
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
def segment_large_image_with_tiles(
|
39 |
+
model,
|
40 |
+
large_image_path,
|
41 |
+
tile_size=1080,
|
42 |
+
overlap=60, # Overlap in pixels
|
43 |
+
alpha=0.4,
|
44 |
+
display=True
|
45 |
+
):
|
46 |
+
"""
|
47 |
+
1. Reads a large image from `large_image_path`.
|
48 |
+
2. Tiles it into sub-images of size `tile_size` x `tile_size`,
|
49 |
+
stepping by (tile_size - overlap) to have overlap regions.
|
50 |
+
3. Runs `model.predict()` on each tile and accumulates all polygons (in global coords).
|
51 |
+
4. For each class, merges overlapping polygons by:
|
52 |
+
- filling them on a single-channel mask
|
53 |
+
- finding final contours of the connected regions
|
54 |
+
5. Draws merged polygons onto an overlay and alpha-blends with the original image.
|
55 |
+
6. Returns the final annotated image (in RGB) and a dictionary of merged contours.
|
56 |
+
"""
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
# Read the large image
|
59 |
+
image_bgr = cv2.imread(large_image_path)
|
60 |
+
if image_bgr is None:
|
61 |
+
raise ValueError(f"Could not load image from {large_image_path}")
|
62 |
+
|
63 |
+
# Convert to RGB (for plotting consistency)
|
64 |
+
image_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(image_bgr, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
|
65 |
+
H, W, _ = image_rgb.shape
|
66 |
+
|
67 |
+
# Dictionary to store raw polygon coords for each class
|
68 |
+
# (before merging)
|
69 |
+
class_mask_dict = {}
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
# Step size with overlap
|
72 |
+
step = tile_size - overlap if overlap < tile_size else tile_size
|
73 |
+
|
74 |
+
# ------------------------
|
75 |
+
# 1) Perform Tiled Inference
|
76 |
+
# ------------------------
|
77 |
+
for top in range(0, H, step):
|
78 |
+
for left in range(0, W, step):
|
79 |
+
bottom = min(top + tile_size, H)
|
80 |
+
right = min(left + tile_size, W)
|
81 |
+
|
82 |
+
tile_rgb = image_rgb[top:bottom, left:right]
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
# Run YOLOv8 model prediction
|
85 |
+
results = model.predict(tile_rgb)
|
86 |
+
if len(results) == 0:
|
87 |
+
continue
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
+
# Typically, results[0] holds the main predictions
|
90 |
+
pred = results[0]
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
# Check if we have valid masks
|
93 |
+
if (pred.masks is None) or (pred.masks.xy is None):
|
94 |
+
continue
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
+
tile_masks_xy = pred.masks.xy # list of polygon coords
|
97 |
+
tile_labels = pred.boxes.cls # list of class IDs
|
98 |
+
|
99 |
+
# Convert to numpy int if needed
|
100 |
+
if hasattr(tile_labels, 'cpu'):
|
101 |
+
tile_labels = tile_labels.cpu().numpy()
|
102 |
+
tile_labels = tile_labels.astype(int).tolist()
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
# Accumulate polygon coords in global space
|
105 |
+
for label_id, polygon in zip(tile_labels, tile_masks_xy):
|
106 |
+
# Convert polygon float coords to int points in shape (N,1,2)
|
107 |
+
polygon_pts = polygon.reshape((-1, 1, 2)).astype(np.int32)
|
108 |
+
|
109 |
+
# Offset the polygon to the large image coords
|
110 |
+
polygon_pts[:, 0, 0] += left # x-offset
|
111 |
+
polygon_pts[:, 0, 1] += top # y-offset
|
112 |
+
|
113 |
+
if label_id not in class_mask_dict:
|
114 |
+
class_mask_dict[label_id] = []
|
115 |
+
class_mask_dict[label_id].append(polygon_pts)
|
116 |
+
|
117 |
+
# -----------------------------------------
|
118 |
+
# 2) Merge Overlapping Polygons For Each Class
|
119 |
+
# by rasterizing them in a mask and then
|
120 |
+
# finding final contours
|
121 |
+
# -----------------------------------------
|
122 |
+
merged_class_mask_dict = {}
|
123 |
+
for label_id, polygons_cv in class_mask_dict.items():
|
124 |
+
# Create a blank mask (single channel) for the entire image
|
125 |
+
mask = np.zeros((H, W), dtype=np.uint8)
|
126 |
+
|
127 |
+
# Fill all polygons for this label on the mask
|
128 |
+
for pts in polygons_cv:
|
129 |
+
cv2.fillPoly(mask, [pts], 255)
|
130 |
+
|
131 |
+
# Now findContours to get merged regions
|
132 |
+
# Use RETR_EXTERNAL so we just get outer boundaries of each connected region
|
133 |
+
contours, _ = cv2.findContours(
|
134 |
+
mask,
|
135 |
+
mode=cv2.RETR_EXTERNAL,
|
136 |
+
method=cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE
|
137 |
+
)
|
138 |
+
|
139 |
+
# Store final merged contours
|
140 |
+
merged_class_mask_dict[label_id] = contours
|
141 |
+
|
142 |
+
# -----------------------
|
143 |
+
# 3) Draw Merged Polygons
|
144 |
+
# -----------------------
|
145 |
+
overlay = image_rgb.copy()
|
146 |
+
for label_id, contours in merged_class_mask_dict.items():
|
147 |
+
color_bgr = get_label_color_id(label_id)
|
148 |
+
for cnt in contours:
|
149 |
+
# Fill each contour on the overlay
|
150 |
+
cv2.fillPoly(overlay, [cnt], color_bgr)
|
151 |
+
|
152 |
+
# 4) Alpha blend
|
153 |
+
output = cv2.addWeighted(overlay, alpha, image_rgb, 1 - alpha, 0)
|
154 |
+
|
155 |
+
# 5) Optional Display
|
156 |
+
if display:
|
157 |
+
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 12))
|
158 |
+
plt.imshow(output)
|
159 |
+
plt.axis('off')
|
160 |
+
plt.title("Segmentation on Large Image (Overlapped Tiles + Merged Polygons)")
|
161 |
+
plt.show()
|
162 |
+
|
163 |
+
return output, merged_class_mask_dict
|
164 |
+
|
165 |
+
def usable_data(img_results, image_1):
|
166 |
+
"""
|
167 |
+
Extract bounding boxes, centers, and polygon areas from the segmentation
|
168 |
+
results for a single image. Returns a dictionary keyed by label,
|
169 |
+
with each value a list of object data: { 'bbox', 'center', 'area' }.
|
170 |
+
"""
|
171 |
+
width, height = image_1.width, image_1.height
|
172 |
+
image_data = {}
|
173 |
+
for key in img_results.keys():
|
174 |
+
image_data[key] = []
|
175 |
+
for polygon in img_results[key]:
|
176 |
+
polygon = np.array(polygon)
|
177 |
+
|
178 |
+
# Handle varying polygon shapes
|
179 |
+
# If shape is (N, 1, 2) e.g. from cv2 findContours
|
180 |
+
if polygon.ndim == 3 and polygon.shape[1] == 1 and polygon.shape[2] == 2:
|
181 |
+
polygon = polygon.reshape(-1, 2)
|
182 |
+
elif polygon.ndim == 2 and polygon.shape[1] == 1:
|
183 |
+
polygon = np.squeeze(polygon, axis=1)
|
184 |
+
|
185 |
+
# Now we expect polygon to be (N, 2):
|
186 |
+
xs = polygon[:, 0]
|
187 |
+
ys = polygon[:, 1]
|
188 |
+
|
189 |
+
# Bounding box
|
190 |
+
xmin, xmax = xs.min(), xs.max()
|
191 |
+
ymin, ymax = ys.min(), ys.max()
|
192 |
+
bbox = (xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax)
|
193 |
+
|
194 |
+
# Center
|
195 |
+
centerX = (xmin + xmax) / 2.0
|
196 |
+
centerY = (ymin + ymax) / 2.0
|
197 |
+
x = width/2
|
198 |
+
y = height/2
|
199 |
+
# Direction
|
200 |
+
dx = x - centerX
|
201 |
+
dy = centerY - y # Invert y-axis for proper orientation
|
202 |
+
if dx > 0 and dy > 0:
|
203 |
+
direction = "NE"
|
204 |
+
elif dx > 0 and dy < 0:
|
205 |
+
direction = "SE"
|
206 |
+
elif dx < 0 and dy > 0:
|
207 |
+
direction = "NW"
|
208 |
+
elif dx < 0 and dy < 0:
|
209 |
+
direction = "SW"
|
210 |
+
elif dx == 0 and dy > 0:
|
211 |
+
direction = "N"
|
212 |
+
elif dx == 0 and dy < 0:
|
213 |
+
direction = "S"
|
214 |
+
elif dy == 0 and dx > 0:
|
215 |
+
direction = "E"
|
216 |
+
elif dy == 0 and dx < 0:
|
217 |
+
direction = "W"
|
218 |
+
else:
|
219 |
+
direction = "Center"
|
220 |
+
|
221 |
+
|
222 |
+
# Polygon area (Shoelace formula)
|
223 |
+
# area = 0.5 * | x0*y1 + x1*y2 + ... + x_{n-1}*y0 - (y0*x1 + y1*x2 + ... + y_{n-1}*x0 ) |
|
224 |
+
area = 0.5 * np.abs(
|
225 |
+
np.dot(xs, np.roll(ys, 1)) - np.dot(ys, np.roll(xs, 1))
|
226 |
+
)
|
227 |
+
|
228 |
+
image_data[key].append({
|
229 |
+
'bbox': bbox,
|
230 |
+
'center': (centerX, centerY),
|
231 |
+
'area': area,
|
232 |
+
"direction": direction
|
233 |
+
})
|
234 |
+
return image_data
|
235 |
+
|
236 |
+
import cv2
|
237 |
+
import numpy as np
|
238 |
+
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
|
239 |
+
|
240 |
+
def plot_differences_on_image1(
|
241 |
+
image1_path,
|
242 |
+
mask_dict1, # e.g., label_name -> list of contours for image1
|
243 |
+
image2_path,
|
244 |
+
mask_dict2, # e.g., label_name -> list of contours for image2
|
245 |
+
display=True
|
246 |
+
):
|
247 |
+
"""
|
248 |
+
Compare two images (and their object masks). Plot all differences on Image 1 only:
|
249 |
+
- Red: Objects that are missing on Image 1 (present in Image 2 but not Image 1).
|
250 |
+
- Green: Objects that are missing on Image 2 (present in Image 1 but not Image 2).
|
251 |
+
|
252 |
+
:param image1_path: Path to the first image
|
253 |
+
:param mask_dict1: dict[label_name] = [contour1, contour2, ...] for the first image
|
254 |
+
:param image2_path: Path to the second image
|
255 |
+
:param mask_dict2: dict[label_name] = [contour1, contour2, ...] for the second image
|
256 |
+
:param display: If True, shows the final overlay with matplotlib.
|
257 |
+
:return: A tuple:
|
258 |
+
- overlay1 (numpy array in RGB) with all differences highlighted
|
259 |
+
- list_of_differences: Names of labels with differences
|
260 |
+
- difference_masks: A dict with keys "missing_on_img1" and "missing_on_img2",
|
261 |
+
where each key maps to a list of contours (original format) for the respective differences.
|
262 |
+
"""
|
263 |
+
|
264 |
+
# Read both images
|
265 |
+
img1_bgr = cv2.imread(image1_path)
|
266 |
+
img2_bgr = cv2.imread(image2_path)
|
267 |
+
if img1_bgr is None or img2_bgr is None:
|
268 |
+
raise ValueError("Could not read one of the input images.")
|
269 |
+
|
270 |
+
# Convert to RGB
|
271 |
+
img1_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(img1_bgr, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
|
272 |
+
img2_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(img2_bgr, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
|
273 |
+
|
274 |
+
# Check matching dimensions
|
275 |
+
H1, W1, _ = img1_rgb.shape
|
276 |
+
H2, W2, _ = img2_rgb.shape
|
277 |
+
if (H1 != H2) or (W1 != W2):
|
278 |
+
raise ValueError("Images must be the same size to compare masks reliably.")
|
279 |
+
|
280 |
+
# Prepare an overlay on top of Image 1
|
281 |
+
overlay1 = img1_rgb.copy()
|
282 |
+
|
283 |
+
# Take the union of all labels in both dictionaries
|
284 |
+
all_labels = set(mask_dict1.keys()).union(set(mask_dict2.keys()))
|
285 |
+
|
286 |
+
# Colors:
|
287 |
+
RED = (255, 0, 0) # (R, G, B)
|
288 |
+
GREEN = (0, 255, 0) # (R, G, B)
|
289 |
+
|
290 |
+
# Track differences
|
291 |
+
list_of_differences = []
|
292 |
+
difference_masks = {
|
293 |
+
"missing_on_img1": {}, # dict[label_name] = list of contours
|
294 |
+
"missing_on_img2": {}, # dict[label_name] = list of contours
|
295 |
+
}
|
296 |
+
|
297 |
+
for label_id in all_labels:
|
298 |
+
# Create binary masks for this label in each image
|
299 |
+
mask1 = np.zeros((H1, W1), dtype=np.uint8)
|
300 |
+
mask2 = np.zeros((H1, W1), dtype=np.uint8)
|
301 |
+
|
302 |
+
# Fill polygons for label_id in Image 1
|
303 |
+
if label_id in mask_dict1:
|
304 |
+
for cnt in mask_dict1[label_id]:
|
305 |
+
cv2.fillPoly(mask1, [cnt], 255)
|
306 |
+
|
307 |
+
# Fill polygons for label_id in Image 2
|
308 |
+
if label_id in mask_dict2:
|
309 |
+
for cnt in mask_dict2[label_id]:
|
310 |
+
cv2.fillPoly(mask2, [cnt], 255)
|
311 |
+
|
312 |
+
# Missing on Image 1 (present in Image 2 but not in Image 1)
|
313 |
+
# => mask2 AND (NOT mask1)
|
314 |
+
missing_on_img1 = cv2.bitwise_and(mask2, cv2.bitwise_not(mask1))
|
315 |
+
|
316 |
+
# Missing on Image 2 (present in Image 1 but not in Image 2)
|
317 |
+
# => mask1 AND (NOT mask2)
|
318 |
+
missing_on_img2 = cv2.bitwise_and(mask1, cv2.bitwise_not(mask2))
|
319 |
+
|
320 |
+
# Extract contours of differences
|
321 |
+
contours_missing_on_img1, _ = cv2.findContours(
|
322 |
+
missing_on_img1, cv2.RETR_EXTERNAL, cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE
|
323 |
+
)
|
324 |
+
contours_missing_on_img2, _ = cv2.findContours(
|
325 |
+
missing_on_img2, cv2.RETR_EXTERNAL, cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE
|
326 |
+
)
|
327 |
+
|
328 |
+
# Store contours in difference masks
|
329 |
+
if contours_missing_on_img1:
|
330 |
+
difference_masks["missing_on_img1"][label_id] = contours_missing_on_img1
|
331 |
+
if contours_missing_on_img2:
|
332 |
+
difference_masks["missing_on_img2"][label_id] = contours_missing_on_img2
|
333 |
+
|
334 |
+
# If there are differences, track the label name
|
335 |
+
if contours_missing_on_img1 or contours_missing_on_img2:
|
336 |
+
list_of_differences.append(label_id)
|
337 |
+
|
338 |
+
# Color them on the overlay of Image 1:
|
339 |
+
for cnt in contours_missing_on_img1:
|
340 |
+
cv2.drawContours(overlay1, [cnt], -1, RED, -1) # highlight in red
|
341 |
+
for cnt in contours_missing_on_img2:
|
342 |
+
cv2.drawContours(overlay1, [cnt], -1, GREEN, -1) # highlight in green
|
343 |
+
|
344 |
+
# Display if required
|
345 |
+
if display:
|
346 |
+
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 8))
|
347 |
+
plt.imshow(overlay1)
|
348 |
+
plt.title("Differences on Image 1\n(Red: Missing on Image 1, Green: Missing on Image 2)")
|
349 |
+
plt.axis("off")
|
350 |
+
plt.show()
|
351 |
+
|
352 |
+
return overlay1, list_of_differences, difference_masks
|
353 |
+
|
354 |
+
def preprocess_image(image_path):
|
355 |
+
"""
|
356 |
+
1) Load and prepare the image for further analysis.
|
357 |
+
2) Convert to grayscale, optionally binarize or threshold.
|
358 |
+
3) Return the processed image.
|
359 |
+
"""
|
360 |
+
img = cv2.imread(image_path)
|
361 |
+
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
|
362 |
+
|
363 |
+
# Optional: adaptive thresholding for clearer linework
|
364 |
+
# thresholded = cv2.adaptiveThreshold(gray, 255, cv2.ADAPTIVE_THRESH_GAUSSIAN_C,
|
365 |
+
# cv2.THRESH_BINARY, 11, 2)
|
366 |
+
|
367 |
+
return gray
|
368 |
+
|
369 |
+
def detect_lines_and_grid(processed_image):
|
370 |
+
"""
|
371 |
+
1) Detect major horizontal/vertical lines using Hough transform or morphological ops.
|
372 |
+
2) Identify grid lines by analyzing line segments alignment.
|
373 |
+
3) Returns lines or grid intersections.
|
374 |
+
"""
|
375 |
+
edges = cv2.Canny(processed_image, 50, 150, apertureSize=3)
|
376 |
+
|
377 |
+
# Hough line detection for demonstration
|
378 |
+
lines = cv2.HoughLinesP(edges, 1, np.pi/180, threshold=100,
|
379 |
+
minLineLength=100, maxLineGap=10)
|
380 |
+
# Here you would parse out vertical/horizontal lines, cluster them, etc.
|
381 |
+
|
382 |
+
return lines
|
383 |
+
|
384 |
+
def run_ocr(processed_image, method='easyocr'):
|
385 |
+
"""
|
386 |
+
1) Use an OCR engine to detect text (room labels, dimensions, etc.).
|
387 |
+
2) 'method' can switch between Tesseract or EasyOCR.
|
388 |
+
3) Return recognized text data (text content and bounding boxes).
|
389 |
+
"""
|
390 |
+
text_data = []
|
391 |
+
|
392 |
+
if method == 'easyocr':
|
393 |
+
reader = easyocr.Reader(['en', 'ko'], gpu=False)
|
394 |
+
result = reader.readtext(processed_image, detail=1, paragraph=False)
|
395 |
+
# result structure: [ [bbox, text, confidence], ... ]
|
396 |
+
for (bbox, text, conf) in result:
|
397 |
+
text_data.append({'bbox': bbox, 'text': text, 'confidence': conf})
|
398 |
+
else:
|
399 |
+
# Tesseract approach
|
400 |
+
config = r'--psm 6'
|
401 |
+
tess_result = pytesseract.image_to_data(processed_image, config=config, output_type=pytesseract.Output.DICT)
|
402 |
+
# parse data into a structured list
|
403 |
+
for i in range(len(tess_result['text'])):
|
404 |
+
txt = tess_result['text'][i].strip()
|
405 |
+
if txt:
|
406 |
+
x = tess_result['left'][i]
|
407 |
+
y = tess_result['top'][i]
|
408 |
+
w = tess_result['width'][i]
|
409 |
+
h = tess_result['height'][i]
|
410 |
+
conf = tess_result['conf'][i]
|
411 |
+
text_data.append({
|
412 |
+
'bbox': (x, y, x+w, y+h),
|
413 |
+
'text': txt,
|
414 |
+
'confidence': conf
|
415 |
+
})
|
416 |
+
return text_data
|
417 |
+
|
418 |
+
def detect_symbols_and_rooms(processed_image):
|
419 |
+
"""
|
420 |
+
1) Potentially run object detection (e.g., YOLO, Detectron2) to detect symbols:
|
421 |
+
- Doors, balconies, fixtures, etc.
|
422 |
+
2) Segment out rooms by combining wall detection + adjacency.
|
423 |
+
3) Return data about room polygons, symbols, etc.
|
424 |
+
"""
|
425 |
+
# Placeholder: real implementation would require a trained model or rule-based approach.
|
426 |
+
# For demonstration, return empty data.
|
427 |
+
rooms_data = []
|
428 |
+
symbols_data = []
|
429 |
+
return rooms_data, symbols_data
|
430 |
+
|
431 |
+
|
432 |
+
|
433 |
+
def blueprint_analyzer(image_path):
|
434 |
+
"""
|
435 |
+
Orchestrate the entire pipeline on one image:
|
436 |
+
1) Preprocess
|
437 |
+
2) Detect structural lines
|
438 |
+
3) OCR text detection
|
439 |
+
4) Symbol/room detection
|
440 |
+
5) Compute area differences or summarize
|
441 |
+
"""
|
442 |
+
processed_img = preprocess_image(image_path)
|
443 |
+
|
444 |
+
lines = detect_lines_and_grid(processed_img)
|
445 |
+
text_data = run_ocr(processed_img, method='easyocr')
|
446 |
+
|
447 |
+
|
448 |
+
return lines, text_data
|
449 |
+
|
450 |
+
|
451 |
+
|
452 |
+
system_prompt = """You are given two construction blueprint images along with their segmentation data.
|
453 |
+
|
454 |
+
Do not present any numeric bounding box or area values in your final answer.
|
455 |
+
Instead, produce a concise, high-level descriptive summary of the differences, using relative location references or known blueprint areas (e.g., “balcony,” “bathroom,” “central hallway,” etc.).
|
456 |
+
Treat two objects as identical (and thus ignore them) if:
|
457 |
+
They have the same label/class, and
|
458 |
+
Their center coordinates are very close.
|
459 |
+
If possible, provide an OCR-based overview of changed text or lines in those areas. For example, mention if the balcony area contains new textual annotations or if certain labels have been removed/added.
|
460 |
+
Output the result in brief, correct Markdown summarizing only the differences between the images (e.g., newly added structures, missing items, changed labeling or text).
|
461 |
+
Remember: No numeric bounding box or area data should be included in the final response. Use location references (“in the top-right corner,” “in the balcony,” etc.) and class names to describe changes.
|
462 |
+
"""
|
463 |
+
|
464 |
+
system_prompt_2 = """You are analyzing two construction blueprint images (Image 1 and Image 2). Each image has a set of detected objects, including “areas” like Balconies, Rooms, Hallways, etc., and smaller objects like Doors, Walls, or Stairs.
|
465 |
+
|
466 |
+
Key Points:
|
467 |
+
|
468 |
+
An object is considered to belong to an area if the object's center lies within or very close to that area’s bounding box.
|
469 |
+
Two objects in different images are considered the same object if:
|
470 |
+
They share the same label/class, and
|
471 |
+
Their centers are very close in coordinates. In such a case, ignore them (do not list them) because they have not changed significantly.
|
472 |
+
Focus only on describing the differences between Image 1 and Image 2, such as:
|
473 |
+
New objects or areas that appear in Image 2 but not in Image 1 (and vice versa).
|
474 |
+
Changes in labeling or text (e.g., from an OCR perspective).
|
475 |
+
Changes in object location or area assignment.
|
476 |
+
Do NOT output numeric bounding boxes, polygon areas, or center coordinates in your final explanation. Instead, provide a relative or area-based description (e.g., “The door is now located in the balcony,” “There are two new doors in the living room,” “A new label is added near the main hallway,” etc.).
|
477 |
+
Produce a concise and correct Markdown summary that highlights only significant differences.
|
478 |
+
|
479 |
+
"""
|
480 |
+
|
481 |
+
system_prompt_3 = """You are analyzing two construction blueprint images (Image 1 and Image 2). For each image, you have:
|
482 |
+
|
483 |
+
A set of objects (walls, doors, stairs, etc.) along with information on their labels and centers.
|
484 |
+
A set of “areas” (e.g., “Balcony,” “Living Room,” “Hallway,” “Bathroom,” etc.) with bounding boxes to identify where each area is located.
|
485 |
+
Task Requirements:
|
486 |
+
Identify differences between Image 1 and Image 2:
|
487 |
+
Newly added objects in Image 2 that were not in Image 1.
|
488 |
+
Missing objects in Image 2 that were in Image 1.
|
489 |
+
Objects that have changed location or have changed labels.
|
490 |
+
Text or label changes, if available.
|
491 |
+
For missing or newly added objects, describe their location in terms of relative position or known areas (not raw coordinates):
|
492 |
+
For example, say “the missing doors were originally near the top-left corner, adjacent to the main hallway,” or “new walls have been added in the southeast corner, near the living room.”
|
493 |
+
Avoid including numeric bounding boxes, polygon areas, or centers in the final explanation.
|
494 |
+
If two objects (one in Image 1 and one in Image 2) have the same label and nearly identical centers, consider them the same object and do not report them as a difference.
|
495 |
+
Whenever possible, use known area labels to describe positions (e.g., “within the dining area,” “just north of the bathroom,” “adjacent to the balcony,” etc.).
|
496 |
+
Return a concise and correct Markdown summary with these differences, focusing on where changes occur.
|
497 |
+
"""
|
498 |
+
|
499 |
+
system_prompt_4 = """You are given two sets of data from two blueprint images (Image 1 and Image 2). Along with each image’s extracted objects, you have:
|
500 |
+
A set of objects (walls, doors, stairs, etc.) along with information on their labels and centers.
|
501 |
+
A set of “areas” (e.g., “Balcony,” “Living Room,” “Hallway,” “Bathroom,” etc.) with bounding boxes to identify where each area is located.
|
502 |
+
|
503 |
+
A “nearest reference area” for each object, including a small textual description of distance and direction (e.g., “Door #2 is near the Balcony to the east”).
|
504 |
+
Identifications of which objects match across the two images (same label and close centers).
|
505 |
+
Your Task
|
506 |
+
Ignore any objects that match between the two images (same label, nearly identical location).
|
507 |
+
Summarize the differences: newly added or missing objects, label changes, and any changes in object location.
|
508 |
+
Use the relative position data (distance/direction text) to describe where each new or missing object is/was in terms of known areas (e.g., “the missing wall in the northern side of the corridor,” “the new door near the balcony,” etc.).
|
509 |
+
Do not output raw numeric distances, bounding boxes, or polygon areas in your final summary. Instead, give a natural-language location description (e.g., “near the east side of the main hallway,” “slightly south of the balcony,” etc.).
|
510 |
+
Provide your answer in a concise Markdown format, focusing only on significant differences."""
|
511 |
+
|
512 |
+
# user_prompt = f"""I have two construction blueprint images, Image 1 and Image 2, and here are their segmentation results (with bounding boxes, centers, and areas). Please compare them and provide a short Markdown summary of the differences, ignoring any objects that match in both images:
|
513 |
+
|
514 |
+
# Image 1:
|
515 |
+
# image: {image_1}
|
516 |
+
|
517 |
+
# json
|
518 |
+
# Copy
|
519 |
+
# {image_1_data}
|
520 |
+
# Image 2:
|
521 |
+
# image: {image_2}
|
522 |
+
# json
|
523 |
+
# Copy
|
524 |
+
# {image_2_data}
|
525 |
+
|
526 |
+
# Please:
|
527 |
+
|
528 |
+
# Compare the two images in terms of architectural/structural changes.
|
529 |
+
# Ignore objects that appear in both images (same label & near-identical centers).
|
530 |
+
# Refer to changes in relative location or in known blueprint areas (e.g. “balcony,” “living room,” “main hallway”), not numeric bounding boxes or polygon areas.
|
531 |
+
# Include mentions of new text or lines if any appear based on an OCR-like analysis.
|
532 |
+
# Output only the differences in a concise Markdown summary."""
|
533 |
+
|
534 |
+
# user_prompt_2 = f"""I have two construction blueprint images, Image 1 and Image 2, and here are their segmentation results (with bounding boxes, centers, and areas). Please compare them and provide a short Markdown summary of the differences, ignoring any objects that match in both images:
|
535 |
+
|
536 |
+
# Image 1:
|
537 |
+
# image: {image_1}
|
538 |
+
|
539 |
+
# json
|
540 |
+
# Copy
|
541 |
+
# {image_1_data}
|
542 |
+
# Image 2:
|
543 |
+
# image: {image_2}
|
544 |
+
# json
|
545 |
+
# Copy
|
546 |
+
# {image_2_data}
|
547 |
+
|
548 |
+
# Please:
|
549 |
+
|
550 |
+
# Ignore objects that appear in both images with matching labels and nearly identical centers.
|
551 |
+
# Use the bounding boxes of recognized “areas” (like “Balcony,” “Living Room,” “Bathroom,” etc.) to determine which area new or changed objects belong to. For instance, if a door’s center is inside or very close to the balcony’s bounding box, treat that door as being “in the balcony.”
|
552 |
+
# Do not display any raw bounding box coordinates, center points, or numeric area values in your final response.
|
553 |
+
# Summarize only the differences (e.g., newly added objects, missing objects, changed textual labels) in a brief Markdown format.
|
554 |
+
# Mention if there are text/label changes (e.g., from an OCR perspective) in any particular area or region"""
|
555 |
+
|