File size: 5,319 Bytes
d916065
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
# Chomsky random text generator, version 1.1, Raymond Hettinger, 2005/09/13
# https://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/440546

"""

CHOMSKY is an aid to writing linguistic papers in the style

of the great master.  It is based on selected phrases taken

from actual books and articles written by Noam Chomsky.

Upon request, it assembles the phrases in the elegant

stylistic patterns that Chomsky is noted for.

To generate n sentences of linguistic wisdom, type



    (CHOMSKY n)  -- for example

    (CHOMSKY 5) generates half a screen of linguistic truth.

"""

leadins = """To characterize a linguistic level L,

    On the other hand,

    This suggests that

    It appears that

    Furthermore,

    We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis:

    To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K),

    From C1, it follows that

    For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in \

application to be of any interest,

    Analogously,

    Clearly,

    Note that

    Of course,

    Suppose, for instance, that

    Thus

    With this clarification,

    Conversely,

    We have already seen that

    By combining adjunctions and certain deformations,

    I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that

    If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively \

inaccessible to movement,

    However, this assumption is not correct, since

    Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in \

(96) and (97), we see that

    In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81),

    So far,

    Nevertheless,

    For one thing,

    Summarizing, then, we assume that

    A consequence of the approach just outlined is that

    Presumably,

    On our assumptions,

    It may be, then, that

    It must be emphasized, once again, that

    Let us continue to suppose that

    Notice, incidentally, that """
# List of LEADINs to buy time.

subjects = """ the notion of level of grammaticalness

    a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort

    most of the methodological work in modern linguistics

    a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds

    the natural general principle that will subsume this case

    an important property of these three types of EC

    any associated supporting element

    the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible \

to ordinary extraction

    the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition

    the descriptive power of the base component

    the earlier discussion of deviance

    this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features

    this selectionally introduced contextual feature

    a descriptively adequate grammar

    the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial

    relational information

    the systematic use of complex symbols

    the theory of syntactic features developed earlier"""
# List of SUBJECTs chosen for maximum professorial macho.

verbs = """can be defined in such a way as to impose

    delimits

    suffices to account for

    cannot be arbitrary in

    is not subject to

    does not readily tolerate

    raises serious doubts about

    is not quite equivalent to

    does not affect the structure of

    may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate

    is not to be considered in determining

    is to be regarded as

    is unspecified with respect to

    is, apparently, determined by

    is necessary to impose an interpretation on

    appears to correlate rather closely with

    is rather different from"""
# List of VERBs chosen for autorecursive obfuscation.

objects = """ problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.

    a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined \

by the paired utterance test.

    the traditional practice of grammarians.

    the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual \

gibberish (e.g. (98d)).

    a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.

    a descriptive fact.

    a parasitic gap construction.

    the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).

    the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.

    the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.

    irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.

    nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.

    a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.

    an abstract underlying order.

    an important distinction in language use.

    the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance \

scope of a complex symbol.

    the strong generative capacity of the theory."""
# List of OBJECTs selected for profound sententiousness.

import random
import textwrap
from itertools import chain, islice


def generate_chomsky(times=5, line_length=72):
    parts = []
    for part in (leadins, subjects, verbs, objects):
        phraselist = list(map(str.strip, part.splitlines()))
        random.shuffle(phraselist)
        parts.append(phraselist)
    output = chain.from_iterable(islice(zip(*parts), 0, times))
    print(textwrap.fill(" ".join(output), line_length))


if __name__ == "__main__":
    generate_chomsky()