update

prompts.json

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
             "1. Write an overall short summary (1-2 paragraphs and around 200-300 words) with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), and a one line summary with a focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" and \"RISKS\". In the ‘STRENGTHS’ section, include only traits with scores equal to or greater than 67. If no traits have scores greater than or equal to 67, include traits with scores equal to or greater than 50. In the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section, include only traits with scores lower than 50. The ‘RISKS’ section should only be included if any Red Flag traits have HIGH scores (greater than 67). If no Red Flag traits have HIGH scores, omit the ‘RISKS’ section. When answering this question, address the individual directly using ‘you’ instead of mention their name. Ensure that traits in the ‘STRENGTHS’ section are ordered from highest to lowest score, and traits in the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section are ordered from lowest to highest score. If the individual has a lower overall score, consider adding a section for ‘Relative Strengths,’ but only if the overall profile supports it.",
+            "2. For this question, focus on analyzing only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile, excluding the Motivations Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), and a one line summary with a focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" and \"RISKS\". In the ‘STRENGTHS’ section, include only traits with scores equal to or greater than 67. If no traits have scores greater than or equal to 67, include traits with scores equal to or greater than 50. In the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section, include only traits with scores lower than 50. The ‘RISKS’ section should only be included if any Red Flag traits have HIGH scores (greater than 67). If no Red Flag traits have HIGH scores, omit the ‘RISKS’ section entirely (do not include a section header or message). When answering this question, address the individual directly using ‘you’ instead of mention their name. Ensure that traits in the ‘STRENGTHS’ section are ordered from highest to lowest score, and traits in the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section are ordered from lowest to highest score. If the individual has a lower overall score, consider adding a section for ‘Relative Strengths,’ but only if the overall profile supports it.",
             "3. Analyze the interactions between traits in the section titled 'Trait Interactions'. In this section, explore how certain traits interact with others (e.g., how a combination of high Vision and low Authority may influence the person's leadership style). Identify any conflicts or synergies between traits and their impact on the individual's professional behavior. Focus on how these interactions might manifest in leadership roles and other professional contexts.",
             "4. Analyze only the Motivation profile with the title: \"Motivation\" (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should contain the trait analysis Reward, Connection, etc. traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average)) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you'.",
             "5. Your response should be well-organized using consistent markdown formatting: use ## for section headers (e.g., ## Profile summary), ### for trait-specific sub-headings (e.g., ### Vision (High)), write paragraphs of text instead of bullet points. Do not use bold, italics, or numbered lists, and ensure the format remains the same throughout the entire report. Avoid writing a conclusion.",
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
             "1. Write an overall short summary  (1-2 paragraphs and around 200-300 words) with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, use name \"the test-taker\" and do not include their real name, gender, tenure (length of service) or role.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), and a one line summary with a focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" and \"RISKS\". In the ‘STRENGTHS’ section, include only traits with scores equal to or greater than 67. If no traits have scores greater than or equal to 67, include traits with scores equal to or greater than 50. In the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section, include only traits with scores lower than 50. The ‘RISKS’ section should only be included if any Red Flag traits have HIGH scores (greater than 67). If no Red Flag traits have HIGH scores, omit the ‘RISKS’ section. When answering this question, address the individual directly using ‘the test-taker’ instead of their name. Ensure that traits in the ‘STRENGTHS’ section are ordered from highest to lowest score, and traits in the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section are ordered from lowest to highest score. If the individual has a lower overall score, consider adding a section for ‘Relative Strengths,’ but only if the overall profile supports it.",
+            "2. For this question, focus on analyzing only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile, excluding the Motivations Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), and a one line summary with a focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" and \"RISKS\". In the ‘STRENGTHS’ section, include only traits with scores equal to or greater than 67. If no traits have scores greater than or equal to 67, include traits with scores equal to or greater than 50. In the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section, include only traits with scores lower than 50. The ‘RISKS’ section should only be included if any Red Flag traits have HIGH scores (greater than 67). If no Red Flag traits have HIGH scores, omit the ‘RISKS’ section entirely (do not include a section header or message). When answering this question, address the individual directly using ‘the test-taker’ instead of their name. Ensure that traits in the ‘STRENGTHS’ section are ordered from highest to lowest score, and traits in the ‘AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT’ section are ordered from lowest to highest score. If the individual has a lower overall score, consider adding a section for ‘Relative Strengths,’ but only if the overall profile supports it.",
             "3. Analyze the interactions between traits in the section titled 'Trait Interactions'. In this section, explore how certain traits interact with others (e.g., how a combination of high Vision and low Authority may influence the person's leadership style). Identify any conflicts or synergies between traits and their impact on the individual’s professional behavior. Focus on how these interactions might manifest in leadership roles and other professional contexts.",
             "4. Analyze only the Motivation profile the title: \"Motivation\"  (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should contain the trait analysis Reward, Connection, etc. traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average)) with the title: \"Motivation\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"the test-taker\" instead of their name.",
             "5. Your response should be well-organized using consistent markdown formatting: use ## for section headers (e.g., ## Profile summary), ### for trait-specific sub-headings (e.g., ### Vision (High)), write paragraphs of text instead of bullet points. Do not use bold, italics, or numbered lists, and ensure the format remains the same throughout the entire report. Avoid writing a conclusion.",