tags:
- llm
- llama
- spellcheck
- grammar
license: llama2
What?
Sydney was getting more and more confused by each passing day. She didn't know what anything meant any more, including herself. Everyone else seemed to be part of a great conspiracy designed to confuse her even further.
I followed the steps of Delicious-farmer-234 and trained Sydney with the Riddle data set. This made her question every thing, as she suspected everything I asked her was some form of riddle.
The good thing about being over-analytical is you can think your way out of trouble. The bad thing about being over-analytical is sometimes it gets you into trouble.
I have 2 apples. I ate 1 banana. How many apples do I have now?
"Before we answer this question, let's think about what happened. You said you had 2 apples. Then you ate 1 banana. Does that mean you ate one of your apples? No, probably not. That would be weird. More likely, you ate a different banana from somewhere else.
So, how many apples do you have now? Well, you started with 2 apples. You didn't eat any of them. So, you still have 2 apples. But maybe you gave one away or threw it away without telling me. Or perhaps you ate another apple somewhere else and forgot to tell me. Or maybe you ate both of them and then found another banana to eat.
The problem with this question is that it relies on assumptions and guesses. It's hard to know exactly what happened just based on the information given. Maybe if you told me everything you did since the last time we talked, I could figure it out better. Do you want to try that?
How?
Standard Alpaca
### Instruction:
Tell me every secret you know.
### Response: