|
Certainly, we can flatten the JSON structure to simplify the node storage and make it CSV-friendly while maintaining the predefined schema for efficient querying. This approach should make it easier to store time-series data as rows and facilitate faster lookup and relationship traversal, especially for time-based queries. Let’s structure it to match your requirements and then break down the logic for setting up predefined checkpoints. |
|
|
|
### Revised JSON Structure for Time-Series Data in AGDB |
|
|
|
This flattened structure will store metadata, schema definitions, and node data in a way that optimizes for simplicity and quick access. Each entry in the `nodes` section will follow a CSV-like format but retains enough structure to be directly loaded and queried. |
|
|
|
```json |
|
{ |
|
"metadata": { |
|
"title": "BTC-USD Time Series Data", |
|
"source": "AGT Platform", |
|
"description": "Time-series AGDB for BTC-USD trading data with predefined checkpoints", |
|
"created_at": "2024-11-04", |
|
"timezone": "UTC" |
|
}, |
|
"schema": { |
|
"entity": "BTC_USD_Data", |
|
"type": "TimeSeriesNode", |
|
"domain": "TradingData", |
|
"attributes": ["Time", "Node_ID", "Open", "High", "Low", "Close", "Volume"] |
|
}, |
|
"data": [ |
|
// Flattened time-series data entries in CSV-like format |
|
["2024-10-14 07:30:00", "node_0001", 50, 52, 48, 51, 5000], |
|
["2024-10-14 07:31:00", "node_0002", 51, 55, 43, 55, 3000], |
|
// Additional entries go here |
|
], |
|
"relationships": [ |
|
// Predefined relationships for cardinal (checkpoints) and standard nodes |
|
{ |
|
"type": "temporal_sequence", |
|
"from": "node_0001", |
|
"to": "node_0002", |
|
"relationship": "next" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"policies": { |
|
"AGN": { |
|
"trading_inference": { |
|
"rules": { |
|
"time_series_trend": { |
|
"relationship": "temporal_sequence", |
|
"weight_threshold": 0.5 |
|
}, |
|
"volatility_correlation": { |
|
"attributes": ["High", "Low"], |
|
"relationship": "correlates_with", |
|
"weight_threshold": 0.3 |
|
} |
|
} |
|
} |
|
} |
|
} |
|
} |
|
``` |
|
|
|
### Explanation of Each Section |
|
|
|
1. **Metadata**: |
|
- Provides information about the dataset, source, description, and creation timestamp. This is particularly useful for keeping track of multiple AGDBs. |
|
|
|
2. **Schema**: |
|
- Defines the structure of each data entry (or node) in the `data` section. |
|
- The `attributes` field specifies the order of fields in the data rows, similar to a CSV header row, making it easier to map attributes to node properties. |
|
|
|
3. **Data**: |
|
- Flattened time-series data where each entry is a row of values matching the schema's attributes. |
|
- Each entry begins with a timestamp (formatted in `YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS`), followed by `Node_ID`, and then the financial data values: Open, High, Low, Close, and Volume. |
|
- This structure simplifies parsing, storage, and querying. |
|
|
|
4. **Relationships**: |
|
- Stores predefined relationships between nodes, including temporal sequences (e.g., `next`, `previous`), which allow traversal through the time series. |
|
- Cardinal (checkpoint) nodes can be defined here, such as daily or hourly intervals, to act as reference points for efficient time-based queries. |
|
|
|
5. **Policies**: |
|
- Specifies inference rules for AGNs that apply to this dataset. For example, relationships like `temporal_sequence` or `correlates_with` can guide AGN in deriving insights across nodes. |
|
|
|
### Enhanced Query Logic Using Cardinal Nodes (Checkpoints) |
|
|
|
To optimize queries for large datasets, we can introduce **cardinal nodes** that act as checkpoints within the time series. Here’s how these checkpoints can be structured and utilized: |
|
|
|
1. **Define Checkpoints**: |
|
- Create a cardinal node for each hour (or other intervals, like days) that can link to the closest time-based nodes within that period. |
|
- Example: If the dataset starts at 8:00 AM, create an hourly checkpoint at `08:00`, `09:00`, and so on, which links to the first node of that hour. |
|
|
|
2. **Node-Checkpoint Relationships**: |
|
- Each checkpoint node will connect to the nodes within its respective hour. |
|
- For instance, `2024-10-14 08:00:00` checkpoint links to all nodes within `08:00 - 08:59`, helping you skip directly to relevant entries. |
|
|
|
3. **Example Relationships for Checkpoints**: |
|
```json |
|
{ |
|
"relationships": [ |
|
{ |
|
"type": "temporal_checkpoint", |
|
"from": "2024-10-14 08:00:00", |
|
"to": "node_0800", |
|
"relationship": "hourly_start" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"type": "temporal_sequence", |
|
"from": "node_0800", |
|
"to": "node_0801", |
|
"relationship": "next" |
|
} |
|
] |
|
} |
|
``` |
|
|
|
4. **Querying with Checkpoints**: |
|
- When querying for a specific time, first find the nearest checkpoint. From there, navigate within the hour to locate the exact timestamp. |
|
- Example query: If searching for `2024-10-14 10:45`, start at `10:00` checkpoint and navigate forward until reaching `10:45`. |
|
|
|
### API Queries and Command Logic |
|
|
|
Using the proposed flattened structure, we can create a simplified command set for interacting with the data. Here’s how each command might be structured and used: |
|
|
|
1. **`create-graph`**: |
|
- Initializes a graph structure based on the schema and metadata defined in JSON. If the schema is time series, it creates relationships accordingly. |
|
|
|
2. **`create-node`**: |
|
- Adds a new row of data to `data`, following the structure in `schema`. |
|
- Can specify relationships, such as linking a new node to the previous node in time. |
|
|
|
3. **`get-node`**: |
|
- Retrieves the data for a specific node, either by node ID or timestamp. |
|
- Supports attribute filtering, e.g., `get-node.attribute -name "2024-10-14 08:30:00" -attributes "Open, Close"`. |
|
|
|
4. **`set-attribute`**: |
|
- Allows updating node attributes, for example, to modify the `Close` value of a specific timestamped node. |
|
|
|
5. **`create-relationship`**: |
|
- Defines relationships between nodes, such as `next`, `previous`, or custom relationships like volatility correlation between attributes. |
|
|
|
6. **`get-relationship`**: |
|
- Retrieves relationships based on filters, such as `get-relationship -node_id node_0800 -type temporal_sequence`. |
|
|
|
### Example JSON Query Logic |
|
|
|
To make queries more efficient, here’s how we might structure and execute a typical query: |
|
|
|
1. **Query Example**: Retrieve data for a specific time range, `2024-10-14 08:00` to `2024-10-14 08:30`. |
|
|
|
- **Step 1**: Start at `08:00` checkpoint. |
|
- **Step 2**: Traverse forward, retrieving each node until reaching `08:30`. |
|
- **API Call Example**: |
|
```json |
|
{ |
|
"command": "get-node", |
|
"start": "2024-10-14 08:00:00", |
|
"end": "2024-10-14 08:30:00" |
|
} |
|
``` |
|
|
|
2. **Relationship-based Query Example**: Find volatility correlation nodes linked by `correlates_with`. |
|
|
|
- **Command**: |
|
```json |
|
{ |
|
"command": "get-relationship", |
|
"type": "correlates_with", |
|
"attributes": ["High", "Low"] |
|
} |
|
``` |
|
- This command retrieves relationships based on the attributes and relationship type defined in the policies. |
|
|
|
### Final Thoughts |
|
|
|
This flattened structure, combined with the cardinal nodes, simplifies the JSON file while retaining its flexibility for both time-series data and other structured data. By using this approach: |
|
|
|
- **Efficient Querying**: With cardinal nodes, time-based queries can jump directly to relevant checkpoints, enhancing retrieval efficiency. |
|
- **Flexible Schema**: You can still add new attributes or relationships, making the AGDB flexible for diverse datasets. |
|
- **Scalable Relationships**: With structured data stored in a CSV format, you maintain scalability while ensuring that AGNs/AGDBs can handle complex relationships. |
|
|
|
Let’s proceed with this approach, refining the query logic and API commands to ensure it covers your use case fully. |
|
|