asharsha30/LLAMA_Harsha_8_B_ORDP_10k

This model is the fine tune of NousResearch/Meta-Llama-3-8B using the 12,000 steps of mlabonne/orpo-dpo-mix-40k.

💻 Usage

# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper
from transformers import pipeline

messages = [
    {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"},
]
pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="asharsha30/LLAMA_Harsha_8_B_ORDP_10k")
pipe(messages)

📈Training And Evaluation Report:

Reports from Wandb

https://wandb.ai/asharshavardhana96-texas-a-m-university/huggingface/runs/gky6j4vn?nw=nwuserasharshavardhana96

Acknowledgment:

Huge thanks to Maxime Labonne for his brilliant blog post covering about the techniques related to finetuning the llama models using SFT and ORPO

Evaluated Using:

The model is evaluated using the https://github.com/mlabonne/llm-autoeval and the results are summarized from the generated gist https://gist.github.com/asharsha30-1996/4162fc98d9669aab3080645c54905bd0

Accuracy measure on Neous Benchmarks:

Model	AGIEval	GPT4All	TruthfulQA	Bigbench	Average
LLAMA_Harsha_8_B_ORDP_10k	35.54	71.15	55.39	37.96	50.01

AGIEval

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
agieval_aqua_rat	0	acc	26.77	±	2.78
		acc_norm	27.17	±	2.80
agieval_logiqa_en	0	acc	31.34	±	1.82
		acc_norm	33.03	±	1.84
agieval_lsat_ar	0	acc	18.70	±	2.58
		acc_norm	19.57	±	2.62
agieval_lsat_lr	0	acc	42.94	±	2.19
		acc_norm	35.10	±	2.12
agieval_lsat_rc	0	acc	52.42	±	3.05
		acc_norm	43.87	±	3.03
agieval_sat_en	0	acc	65.53	±	3.32
		acc_norm	54.37	±	3.48
agieval_sat_en_without_passage	0	acc	41.75	±	3.44
		acc_norm	33.98	±	3.31
agieval_sat_math	0	acc	42.27	±	3.34
		acc_norm	37.27	±	3.27

Average: 35.54%

GPT4All

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
arc_challenge	0	acc	49.91	±	1.46
		acc_norm	54.10	±	1.46
arc_easy	0	acc	80.47	±	0.81
		acc_norm	80.05	±	0.82
boolq	1	acc	82.08	±	0.67
hellaswag	0	acc	61.08	±	0.49
		acc_norm	80.26	±	0.40
openbookqa	0	acc	34.00	±	2.12
		acc_norm	45.00	±	2.23
piqa	0	acc	79.71	±	0.94
		acc_norm	81.61	±	0.90
winogrande	0	acc	74.98	±	1.22

Average: 71.15%

TruthfulQA

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
truthfulqa_mc	1	mc1	37.45	±	1.69
		mc2	55.39	±	1.50

Average: 55.39%

Bigbench

Task	Version	Metric	Value		Stderr
bigbench_causal_judgement	0	multiple_choice_grade	57.37	±	3.60
bigbench_date_understanding	0	multiple_choice_grade	68.02	±	2.43
bigbench_disambiguation_qa	0	multiple_choice_grade	31.01	±	2.89
bigbench_geometric_shapes	0	multiple_choice_grade	20.89	±	2.15
		exact_str_match	0.00	±	0.00
bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	28.40	±	2.02
bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	20.71	±	1.53
bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	48.67	±	2.89
bigbench_movie_recommendation	0	multiple_choice_grade	31.60	±	2.08
bigbench_navigate	0	multiple_choice_grade	50.60	±	1.58
bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	63.25	±	1.08
bigbench_ruin_names	0	multiple_choice_grade	34.38	±	2.25
bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection	0	multiple_choice_grade	21.84	±	1.31
bigbench_snarks	0	multiple_choice_grade	44.20	±	3.70
bigbench_sports_understanding	0	multiple_choice_grade	50.30	±	1.59
bigbench_temporal_sequences	0	multiple_choice_grade	26.30	±	1.39
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	21.36	±	1.16
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	15.77	±	0.87
bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects	0	multiple_choice_grade	48.67	±	2.89

Average: 37.96%

Average score: 50.01%

Elapsed time: 02:36:38