Q6_K vs Q6_K_L

#1
by mahdisml - opened

i couldn't find good information about "Q6_K vs Q6_K_L" (speed and accuracy and ...)
all articles and discussions are about "IQ4 vs Q4 vs Q5 vs Q6" 😞

The only difference is that Q6_K_L uses Q8_0 for embed/output weights instead of Q6_K, so it could have slightly higher performance

In practice it's hard to find much difference, especially for the larger weights. Q2_K vs Q2_K_L is where the only major difference is seen.

Frankly, Q6 is already so close to Q8 that the + _L is pretty much a waste of VRAM and compute time, it's better spent on context length.

yeah i mostly agree, I don't necessarily recommend them over the regular ones, but some people do, and I'm nothing if not a people pleaser...

The only difference is that Q6_K_L uses Q8_0 for embed/output weights instead of Q6_K, so it could have slightly higher performance

In practice it's hard to find much difference, especially for the larger weights. Q2_K vs Q2_K_L is where the only major difference is seen.

Thank you so much ! πŸ™πŸ™

Interesting ... what would you say is the better approach to go ... a Q5_K_L or a Q6_K ... when it comes to a good ratio for speed/quality and a great context window?

I'd probably just use Q6_K for the improved quality πŸ€—

Sign up or log in to comment