metadata

language: es
license: CC-BY 4.0
tags:
  - spanish
  - roberta
pipeline_tag: fill-mask
widget:
  - text: Fui a la librería a comprar un <mask>.

Version 1 (beta): July 15th, 2021
Version 1: July 19th, 2021

Motivation

According to Wikipedia, Spanish is the second most-spoken language in the world by native speakers (>470 million speakers, only after Chinese, and the fourth including those who speak it as a second language). However, most NLP research is still mainly available in English. Relevant contributions like BERT, XLNet or GPT2 sometimes take years to be available in Spanish and, when they do, it is often via multilanguage versions which are not as performant as the English alternative.

At the time of the event there were no RoBERTa models available in Spanish. Therefore, releasing one such model was the primary goal of our project. During the Flax/JAX Community Event we released a beta version of our model, which was the first in Spanish language. Thereafter, on the last day of the event, the Barcelona Supercomputing Center released their own RoBERTa model. The precise timing suggests our work precipitated this publication, and such increase in competition is a desired outcome of our project. We are grateful for their efforts to include BERTIN in their paper, as discussed further below, and recognize the value of their own contribution, which we also acknowledge in our experiments.

Models in Spanish are hard to come by and, when they do, they are often trained on proprietary datasets and with massive resources. In practice, this means that many relevant algorithms and techniques remain exclusive to large technological corporations. This motivates the second goal of our project, which is to bring training of large models like RoBERTa one step closer to smaller groups. We want to explore technieque that make training this architectures easier and faster, thus contributing to the democratization of Deep Learning.

BERTIN

BERTIN is a series of BERT-based models for Spanish. The current model hub points to the best of all RoBERTa-base models trained from scratch on the Spanish portion of mC4 using Flax. All code and scripts are included.

This is part of the Flax/Jax Community Week, organized by HuggingFace and TPU usage sponsored by Google Cloud.

The aim of this project was to pre-train a RoBERTa-base model from scratch during the Flax/JAX Community Event, in which Google Cloud provided free TPUv3-8 to do the training using Huggingface's Flax implementations of their library.

Spanish mC4

mC4 is a multilingual variant of the C4, the Colossal, Cleaned version of Common Crawl's web crawl corpus. While C4 was used to train the T5 text-to-text Transformer models, mC4 comprises natural text in 101 languages drawn from the public Common Crawl web-scrape and was used to train mT5, the multilingual version of T5.

The Spanish portion of mC4 (mc4-es) contains about 416 million samples and 235 billion words in approximately 1TB of uncompressed data.

$ zcat c4/multilingual/c4-es*.tfrecord*.json.gz | wc -l
416057992

$ zcat c4/multilingual/c4-es*.tfrecord-*.json.gz | jq -r '.text | split(" ") | length' | paste -s -d+ - | bc
235303687795

Perplexity sampling

The large amount of text in mC4-es makes training a language model within the time constraints of the Flax/JAX Community Event by HuggingFace problematic. This motivated the exploration of sampling methods, with the goal of creating a subset of the dataset that allows well-performing training with roughly one eighth of the data (~50M samples) and in approximately half the training steps.

In order to efficiently build this subset of data, we decided to leverage a technique we call perplexity sampling and whose origin can be traced to the construction of CCNet (Wenzek et al., 2020) and their work extracting high quality monolingual datasets from web-crawl data. In their work, they suggest the possibility of applying fast language-models trained on high-quality data such as Wikipedia to filter out texts that deviate too much from correct expressions of a language (see Figure 1). They also released Kneser-Ney models for 100 languages (Spanish included) as implemented in the KenLM library (Heafield, 2011) and trained on their respective Wikipedias.

In this work, we tested the hypothesis that perplexity sampling might help reduce training-data size and training times, while keeping the performance of the final model.

Methodology

In order to test our hypothesis, we first calculated the perplexity of each document in a random subset (roughly a quarter of the data) of mC4-es and extracted their distribution and quartiles (see Figure 2).

With the extracted perplexity percentiles, we created two functions to oversample the central quartiles with the idea of biasing against samples that are either too small (short, repetitive texts) or too long (potentially poor quality) (see Figure 3).

The first function is a Stepwise that simply oversamples the central quartiles using quartile boundaries and a factor for the desired sampling frequency for each quartile, obviously given larger frequencies for middle quartiles (oversampling Q2, Q3, subsampling Q1, Q4). The second function weighted the perplexity distribution by a Gaussian-like function, to smooth out the sharp boundaries of the Stepwise function and give a better approximation to the desired underlying distribution (see Figure 4).

We adjusted the factor parameter of the Stepwise function, and the factor and width parameter of the Gaussian function to roughly be able to sample 50M samples from the 416M in mc4-es (see Figure 4). For comparison, we also sampled randomly mC4-es up to 50M samples as well. In terms of sizes, we went down from 1TB of data to ~200GB.

Figure 5 shows the actual perplexity distributions of the generated 50M subsets for each of the executed subsampling procedures. All subsets can be easily accessed for reproducibility purposes using the bertin-project/mc4-es-sampled dataset. Since the validation set was too small to extract a 10% (5M) of the samples using perplexity-sampling with the same factor and width, in our experiments we decided to sample from the training sets. In the bertin-project/mc4-es-sampled dataset, the validation set pulls the samples from the original mc4.

from datasets import load_dataset

for config in ("random", "stepwise", "gaussian"):
    mc4es = load_dataset(
        "bertin-project/mc4-es-sampled",
        config,
        split="train",
        streaming=True
    ).shuffle(buffer_size=1000)
    for sample in mc4es:
        print(config, sample)
        break

Random sampling displayed the same perplexity distribution of the underlying true distribution, as can be seen in Figure 6.

We then used the same setup as Liu et al. (2019) but trained only for half the steps (250k) on a sequence length of 128. In particular, Gaussian trained for the 250k steps, while Random was stopped at 230k and Stepwise at 180k (this was a decision based on an analysis of training performance and the computational resources available at the time).

Then, we continued training the most promising model for a few steps (~25k) more on sequence length 512. We tried two strategies for this, since it is not easy to find clear details about this change in the literature. It turns out this decision had a big impact in the final performance.

For Random sampling we trained with seq len 512 during the last 20 steps of the 250 training steps, keeping the optimizer state intact. Results for this are underwhelming, as seen in Figure 7:

For Gaussian sampling we started a new optimizer after 230 steps with 128 seq len, using a short warmup interval. Results are much better using this procedure. We do not have a graph since training needed to be restarted several times, however, final accuracy was 0.6873 compared to 0.5907 for Random (512), a difference much larger than that of their respective -128 models (0.6520 for Random, 0.6608 for Gaussian).

Results

Our first test, tagged beta in this repository, refers to an initial experiment using Stepwise on 128 sequence length and trained for 210k steps. Two nearly identical versions of this model can be found, one at bertin-roberta-base-spanish and the other at flax-community/bertin-roberta-large-spanish (do note this is not our best model!). During the community event, the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) in association with the National Library of Spain released RoBERTa base and large models trained on 200M documents (570GB) of high quality data clean using 100 nodes with 48 CPU cores of MareNostrum 4 during 96h. At the end of the process they were left with 2TB of clean data at the document level that were further cleaned up to the final 570GB. This is an interesting contrast to our own resources (3xTPUv3-8 for 10 days to do cleaning, sampling, taining, and evaluation) and makes for a valuable reference. The BSC team evaluated our early release of the model beta and the results can be seen in Table 1.

Our final models were trained on a different number of steps and sequence lengths and achieve different—higher—masked-word prediction accuracies. Despite these limitations it is interesting to see the results they obtained using the early version of our model. Note that some of the datasets used for evaluation by BSC are not freely available, therefore it is not possible to verify the figures.

Table 1. Evaluation made by the Barcelona Supercomputing Center of their models and BERTIN (beta, seq len 128).

Dataset	Metric	RoBERTa-b	RoBERTa-l	BETO	mBERT	BERTIN
UD-POS	F1	0.9907	0.9901	0.9900	0.9886	0.9904
Conll-NER	F1	0.8851	0.8772	0.8759	0.8691	0.8627
Capitel-POS	F1	0.9846	0.9851	0.9836	0.9839	0.9826
Capitel-NER	F1	0.8959	0.8998	0.8771	0.8810	0.8741
STS	Combined	0.8423	0.8420	0.8216	0.8249	0.7822
MLDoc	Accuracy	0.9595	0.9600	0.9650	0.9560	0.9673
PAWS-X	F1	0.9035	0.9000	0.8915	0.9020	0.8820
XNLI	Accuracy	0.8016	WiP	0.8130	0.7876	WiP

All of our models attained good accuracy values, in the range of 0.65, as can be seen in Table 2:

Table 2. Accuracy for the different language models.

Model	Accuracy
bertin-project/bertin-roberta-base-spanish	0.6547
bertin-project/bertin-base-random	0.6520
bertin-project/bertin-base-stepwise	0.6487
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian	0.6608
bertin-project/bertin-base-random-exp-512seqlen	0.5907
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian-exp-512seqlen	0.6873

We are currently in the process of applying our language models to downstream tasks.

Table x.

Dataset	Metric	BERT-m	BERT-wwm	BSC-BNE	Beta	Random	Stepwise	Gaussian	Random-512	Gaussian-512
CoNLL 2002-POS	F1	0.9629	0.9642	0.9659	0.9638	0.9656	0.9656	0.9662	0.9660	0.9662
CoNLL 2002-POS	F1	0.9687	0.9700	0.9707	0.9690	0.9704	0.9707	0.9709	0.9707	0.9714

SQUAD-es

Using sequence length 128 we have achieved exact match 50.96 and F1 68.74.

POS

All models trained with max length 512 and batch size 8, using the CoNLL 2002 dataset.

Table 3. Results for POS.

Model	F1	Accuracy
bert-base-multilingual-cased	0.9629	0.9687
dccuchile/bert-base-spanish-wwm-cased	0.9642	0.9700
BSC-TeMU/roberta-base-bne	0.9659	0.9707
bertin-project/bertin-roberta-base-spanish	0.9638	0.9690
bertin-project/bertin-base-random	0.9656	0.9704
bertin-project/bertin-base-stepwise	0.9656	0.9707
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian	0.9662	0.9709
bertin-project/bertin-base-random-exp-512seqlen	0.9660	0.9707
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian-exp-512seqlen	0.9662	0.9714

NER

All models trained with max length 512 and batch size 8, using the CoNLL 2002 dataset.

Table 4. Results for NER.

Model	F1	Accuracy
bert-base-multilingual-cased	0.8539	0.9779
dccuchile/bert-base-spanish-wwm-cased	0.8579	0.9783
BSC-TeMU/roberta-base-bne	0.8700	0.9807
bertin-project/bertin-roberta-base-spanish	0.8725	0.9812
bertin-project/bertin-base-random	0.8704	0.9807
bertin-project/bertin-base-stepwise	0.8705	0.9809
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian	0.8792	0.9816
bertin-project/bertin-base-random-exp-512seqlen	0.8616	0.9803
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian-exp-512seqlen	0.8764	0.9819

PAWS-X

All models trained with max length 512 and batch size 8. These numbers are surprising both for the repeated instances of 0.5765 accuracy and for the large differences in performance. However, experiments have been repeated several times and the results are consistent.

Table 5. Results for PAWS-X.

Model	Accuracy
bert-base-multilingual-cased	0.5765
dccuchile/bert-base-spanish-wwm-cased	0.8720
BSC-TeMU/roberta-base-bne	0.5765
bertin-project/bertin-roberta-base-spanish	0.5765
bertin-project/bertin-base-random	0.8800
bertin-project/bertin-base-stepwise	0.8825
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian	0.8875
bertin-project/bertin-base-random-exp-512seqlen	0.6735
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian-exp-512seqlen	0.8965

XNLI

Table 6. Results for XNLI with sequence length 256 and batch size 32.

Model	Accuracy
bert-base-multilingual-cased	0.7852
dccuchile/bert-base-spanish-wwm-cased	0.8186
BSC-TeMU/roberta-base-bne	0.8178
bertin-project/bertin-base-random	0.7745
bertin-project/bertin-base-stepwise	0.7820
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian	0.7942
bertin-project/bertin-base-random-exp-512seqlen	0.7723
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian-exp-512seqlen	0.7878

Table 7. Results for XNLI with sequence length 512 and batch size 16.

Model	Accuracy
bert-base-multilingual-cased	WIP
dccuchile/bert-base-spanish-wwm-cased	WIP
BSC-TeMU/roberta-base-bne	WIP
bertin-project/bertin-base-random	WIP
bertin-project/bertin-base-stepwise	WIP
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian	WIP
bertin-project/bertin-base-random-exp-512seqlen	0.7799
bertin-project/bertin-base-gaussian-exp-512seqlen	0.7843

Conclusions

With roughly 10 days worth of access to 3xTPUv3-8, we have achieved remarkable results surpassing previous state of the art in a few tasks, and even improving document classification on models trained in massive supercomputers with very large—private—and highly curated datasets.

The experience has been incredible and we feel this kind of events provide an amazing opportunity for small teams on low or non-existent budgets to learn how the big players in the field pre-train their models. The trade-off between learning and experimenting, and being beta-testers of libraries (Flax/JAX) and infrastructure (TPU VMs) is a marginal cost to pay compared to the benefits such access has to offer.

We hope our work will set the basis for more small teams playing and experimenting with language models training on smaller subsets of huge datasets with reduced training times, since the performance of our models is on par with those trained on big machines for longer times.

Team members

Javier de la Rosa (versae)
Eduardo González (edugp)
Paulo Villegas (paulo)
Pablo González de Prado (Pablogps)
Manu Romero (mrm8488)
María Grandury (mariagrandury)

Useful links

References

CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data, Guillaume Wenzek, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Alexis Conneau, Vishrav Chaudhary, Francisco Guzmán, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), p. 4003-4012, May 2020.
Heafield, K. (2011). KenLM: faster and smaller language model queries. In Proceedings of the EMNLP2011 Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation.