Datasets:

AshtonIsNotHere

/

biosift-nli

like 2

Effects of trazodone hydrochloride and imipramine on polysomnography in healthy subjects.

Polysomnography was performed on eight healthy men with trazodone hydrochloride, imipramine and placebo. Trazodone hydrochloride increased slow wave sleep significantly. Imipramine prolonged rapid eye movement (REM) latency and decreased the percentage of REM sleep significantly. Trazodone decreased stages 1 and 2 sleep, while imipramine increased it. These findings suggest that the antidepressive effect of trazodone might be different from that of imipramine with the suppression of REM sleep.

This study has a target disease

Effects of trazodone hydrochloride and imipramine on polysomnography in healthy subjects.

Polysomnography was performed on eight healthy men with trazodone hydrochloride, imipramine and placebo. Trazodone hydrochloride increased slow wave sleep significantly. Imipramine prolonged rapid eye movement (REM) latency and decreased the percentage of REM sleep significantly. Trazodone decreased stages 1 and 2 sleep, while imipramine increased it. These findings suggest that the antidepressive effect of trazodone might be different from that of imipramine with the suppression of REM sleep.

This study does not have a target disease

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study has human subjects

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not have human subjects

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not contain population size information

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study has a target drug

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not have a target drug

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study has a target disease

Mortality from tuberculous meningitis reduced by steroid therapy.

In this study of 99 tuberculous meningitis patients from Cali, Colombia, treatment with steroids (in conjunction with antituberculous drugs) was shown to be more effective in reducing mortality than treatment with antibacterial drugs alone. Results further suggest that low dosages of steroids (1 mg/kg of prednisone daily for r 30 days) are equally effective in treating the disease as high dosages (10 mg/kg of prednisone at the start of treatment, gradually reduced over a 30-day period). These results are band 4(-43 and -kk mg/100 ml) demonstrated cerebral release. Arterial blood hyperammonemia can be detoxified safely in the brain as long as the levels do not exceed approximately 300 mug/100 ml. Beyond that level lactic acidosis is observed, particularly in cerebral venous drainage. Arterial blood hyperammonemia was also related to the extent of alveolar hyperventilation. These findings are very similar to those seen in experimental hyperammonemia and support the concept that neurotoxicity in children with Reye's syndrome is at least partly due to impaired oxidative metabolism secondary to hyperammonemia.

This study does not have a target disease

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study has human subjects

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not have human subjects

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not contain population size information

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study has a target drug

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not have a target drug

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study has a target disease

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis.

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

This study does not have a target disease

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study has human subjects

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not have human subjects

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not contain population size information

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study has a target drug

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not have a target drug

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study has a target disease

Prognosis of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma who achieve complete response after CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation as an initial treatment.

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy has been mostly applied to patients with untreated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Because the long-term outcome of patients with PTCL, especially those achieving complete response (CR), has not been fully elucidated, we retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive patients initially treated with CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy, without high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/auto-SCT). Median overall and progression-free survivals in all 78 patients were 44 and 17 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62 months. In the 53 patients achieving CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 21 months, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year RFSs were 46, 45, and 36%, respectively. Although our results showed an unfavorable outcome for PTCL as a whole, those who achieved CR following CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy did not always have a poor outcome without the consolidation of HDC/auto-SCT; in particular, 45% of the 65 years or younger patients were alive without disease at 5 years.

This study does not have a target disease

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study has human subjects

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not have human subjects

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not contain population size information

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study has a target drug

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not have a target drug

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study has a target disease

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease) in Children.

To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease focusing on cases with prolonged fever. This was a retrospective study of children diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease from March 2003 to February 2015 in South Korea. Electronic medical records were searched for clinical and laboratory manifestations. Among 86 histopathologically confirmed cases, the mean age was 13.2 (SD ± 3.1) years, and male to female ratio was 1:1.32. Cervical lymph node enlargement, found in 85 of the patients (99%), was predominantly unilateral in 64 (75%), and involved the cervical lymph node level V in 67 (81%). Fever was present in 76% of the cases, with a median duration of 9 days (IQR 0.25-17.0). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high fever peak ≥ 39.0°C (P = .010) and presentation with ≥ 2 systemic symptoms other than fever (P = .027) were factors that were significantly associated with longer fever duration. As the size of the largest lymph node's short diameter increased, the fever duration increased (P = .015). Leukopenia (P = .022) also had a significant association with a longer fever duration. Patients with sonographic findings of conglomerated enlarged lymph nodes had a longer median duration of fever compared with those with separate enlarged lymph nodes (11 vs 4.5 days, P = .019). Patients with high fever, more systemic symptoms, leukopenia, and larger lymph nodes with a conglomerated distribution may benefit from early recognition and selective consideration of corticosteroid therapy.

This study does not have a target disease

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study has human subjects

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not have human subjects

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study contains population size or sample size information

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not contain population size information

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study has a target drug

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not have a target drug

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study has a target disease

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

This study does not have a target disease

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study has human subjects

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not have human subjects

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study contains population size or sample size information

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not contain population size information

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study has a target drug

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not have a target drug

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study has a target disease

[Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) have been the standard therapy for multiple myeloma for more than 25 years. Although they produce an objective response in 50-60% of patients, complete remission (CR) is rare and the median survival period is generally 24 to 30 months. Many combination chemotherapeutic agents have been used and resulted in approximately 70% objective response, but the median duration of survival has not significantly been improved. VAD regimen is effective for many patients with myeloma resistant to MP therapy. Furthermore, VAD-cyclosporin combination induces responses in approximately 40% of patients with VAD-resistant myeloma, with increased expression of the multi-drug resistant gene (MDR). Intravenous administration of high dose-melphalan also produces responses in approximately 30% of patients with myeloma resistant to VAD. Interferon-alpha therapy with an alkylating agent-glucocorticoid regimen, shows a higher response rate but similar survival time, compared with those obtained with the MP therapy alone. High-dose therapy with transplantation is promising. High-dose therapy combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation improves the response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with myeloma, demonstrated in the prospective, randomized trial by Attal et al. Total therapy by Barlogie et al. consisted of non-cross-resistant induction regimens, followed by a double autotransplantation (AT) procedure. Compared with the outcome of patients receiving standard therapy, dose intensification with double AT produces not only higher CR rates but also significantly extends EFS and OS in previously untreated patients with myeloma. The reduced mortality rate associated with transplantation, and development of new chemotherapeutic agents will lead to future improvements of the therapy for multiple myeloma.

This study does not have a target disease

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study has a cohort study or clinical trial

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not have any comparison patient group

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study has human subjects

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not have human subjects

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study contains population size or sample size information

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not contain population size information

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not have any quantitative outcomes

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study has a target drug

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not have a target drug

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study has a target disease

A controlled trial of twice daily triamcinolone oral inhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

National and international guidelines recommend inhaled anti-inflammatory medications for patients with all but the mildest forms of asthma. Patients may also be more compliant with twice daily dosing. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (triamcinolone acetonide), 400 microg bid, in mild-to-moderate asthma patients. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 7- to 21-day baseline and 6-week treatment period. Adult mild-to-moderate asthma patients poorly controlled by beta2-agonists alone were randomized to receive placebo (48) or triamcinolone acetonide (53). Patients recorded daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates on diary cards. Clinic spirometry measures included FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF. Triamcinolone acetonide treatment resulted in improvement from baseline of 17% for FEV1 (P < .0001); 44% for albuterol use (P = .0009); 9% for FVC (P = .0185); 19% for PEF (P = .0011); 42% for FEF25-75% (P < .0001); 8% for FEV1/FVC (P = .0016); 36% for daytime, 39% for nighttime, and 38% for total asthma symptoms (P < or = .0001); and 12% for morning, and 10% for evening PEF (P < or = .001). These changes were highly significant when compared with placebo (P < or = .0185). Significant improvement for all variables was demonstrated within 1 to 2 weeks of active treatment, and maintained for most variables over the 6-week treatment phase. Both treatments were well tolerated. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently with placebo; pharyngitis was reported more frequently with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide, administered twice daily, can effectively and safely treat patients with milder forms of asthma. In these patients, triamcinolone acetonide improves asthma symptoms and decreases the need for as-needed beta2-agonists.

This study does not have a target disease