id
stringlengths 6
9
| query
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| answer
stringlengths 2
16
| text
stringlengths 26
367
|
|---|---|---|---|
finqa800 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . share repurchases and dividends share repurchases share repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : .
||2018|2017|
|number of shares repurchased|10.7|9.6|
|amount paid|$ 736.9|$ 610.7|
|weighted average cost per share|$ 69.06|$ 63.84|
as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no repurchased shares pending settlement . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2018 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.1 billion . dividends in october 2018 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.375 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 121.0 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2019 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the period . diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding , which include , where appropriate , the assumed exercise of employee stock options , unvested rsus and unvested psus at the expected attainment levels . we use the treasury stock method in computing diluted earnings per share. .
Question: what was the total cash dividend declared from 2016 to 2018
Answer: | 1338.5 | what was the total cash dividend declared from 2016 to 2018 |
finqa801 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2015 is shown in the following table . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or is part of a facility restructuring. .
|location|approximate square footage|
|alpharetta georgia|260000|
|jersey city new jersey|109000|
|arlington virginia|102000|
|sandy utah|66000|
|menlo park california|63000|
|new york new york|52000|
all facilities are leased at december 31 , 2015 . all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 regional branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet . item 3 . legal proceedings information in response to this item can be found under the heading "legal matters" in note 19 2014 commitments , contingencies and other regulatory matters to part ii . item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data in this annual report and is incorporated by reference into this item . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of the square footage in alpharetta georgia to jersey city new jersey
Answer: | 2.38532 | as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of the square footage in alpharetta georgia to jersey city new jersey |
finqa802 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased slightly , by $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and a lower effective income tax rate , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , lower other income , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 2408.8|
|retail electric price|69.0|
|transmission equalization|-6.5 ( 6.5 )|
|volume/weather|-6.7 ( 6.7 )|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|-17.2 ( 17.2 )|
|other|-9.0 ( 9.0 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 2438.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to changes in transmission investments , including entergy louisiana 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase .
Question: if the same changes to net income that occured in 2015 compared to 2014 recurred in 2016 , what would 2016 net revenue have been?
Answer: | 2439.0 | if the same changes to net income that occured in 2015 compared to 2014 recurred in 2016 , what would 2016 net revenue have been? |
finqa803 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 .
|( in millions )|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2014|2013|
|client deposits ( 1 )|$ 195276|$ 182268|$ 167470|$ 143043|
client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what is the percent change in average cds that were excluded between 2013 and 2014?
Answer: | 1.748 | what is the percent change in average cds that were excluded between 2013 and 2014? |
finqa804 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2013|2014|2015|2016|thereafter|total|
|property mortgages|$ 52443|$ 568649|$ 647776|$ 270382|$ 556400|$ 2278190|$ 4373840|
|revolving credit facility|2014|2014|2014|2014|350000|2014|350000|
|trust preferred securities|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|100000|100000|
|senior unsecured notes|119423|2014|98578|657|274804|777194|1270656|
|capital lease|1555|1555|1555|1592|1707|42351|50315|
|ground leases|33429|33429|33429|33429|33533|615450|782699|
|estimated interest expense|312672|309280|269286|244709|212328|470359|1818634|
|joint venture debt|176457|93683|123983|102476|527814|800102|1824515|
|total|$ 695979|$ 1006596|$ 1174607|$ 653245|$ 1956586|$ 5083646|$ 10570659|
.
Question: by how much does the total joint venture debt from 2012-2016 exceed the joint venture debt after 2016?
Answer: | 224311.0 | by how much does the total joint venture debt from 2012-2016 exceed the joint venture debt after 2016? |
finqa805 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: frequency ( aehf ) system , orion , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , and mobile user objective system ( muos ) . operating profit for our space systems business segment includes our share of earnings for our investment in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|net sales|$ 7958|$ 8347|$ 8161|
|operating profit|1045|1083|1063|
|operating margins|13.1% ( 13.1 % )|13.0% ( 13.0 % )|13.0% ( 13.0 % )|
|backlog at year-end|20500|18100|16000|
2013 compared to 2012 space systems 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 389 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 305 million for commercial satellite programs due to fewer deliveries ( zero delivered during 2013 compared to two for 2012 ) ; and about $ 290 million for the orion program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 130 million for government satellite programs due to net increased volume ; and about $ 65 million for strategic and defensive missile programs ( primarily fbm ) due to increased volume and risk retirements . the increase for government satellite programs was primarily attributable to higher volume on aehf and other programs , partially offset by lower volume on goes-r , muos , and sbirs programs . space systems 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 38 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million for the orion program due to lower volume and risk retirements and about $ 30 million for government satellite programs due to decreased risk retirements , which were partially offset by higher equity earnings from joint ventures of approximately $ 35 million . the decrease in operating profit for government satellite programs was primarily attributable to lower risk retirements for muos , gps iii , and other programs , partially offset by higher risk retirements for the sbirs and aehf programs . operating profit for 2013 included about $ 15 million of charges , net of recoveries , related to the november 2013 restructuring plan . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 15 million lower for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011 . space systems 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 20 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 60 million from commercial satellite programs due to increased deliveries and reserves recorded in 2011 ; and about $ 40 million from the orion program due to higher risk retirements and increased volume . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of approximately $ 45 million from lower volume and risk retirements on certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs ) ; about $ 20 million from lower risk retirements and lower volume on the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011 ; and approximately $ 20 million from lower equity earnings as a decline in launch related activities at ula partially was offset by the resolution of contract cost matters associated with the wind-down of united space alliance ( usa ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 15 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula in 2013 ) represented approximately $ 300 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of this segment 2019s operating profit during 2013 . during 2012 and 2011 , total equity earnings recognized by space systems from ula , usa , and the u.k . atomic weapons establishment joint venture represented approximately $ 265 million and $ 285 million , or 24% ( 24 % ) and 27% ( 27 % ) of this segment 2019s operating profit. .
Question: what were average net sales for space systems from 2011 to 2013 in millions?
Answer: | 8155.33333 | what were average net sales for space systems from 2011 to 2013 in millions? |
finqa806 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of 30 september 2016 and 2015 , there were no assets or liabilities classified as discontinued operations relating to the homecare business . 5 . business restructuring and cost reduction actions the charges we record for business restructuring and cost reduction actions have been excluded from segment operating income . cost reduction actions in fiscal year 2016 , we recognized an expense of $ 33.9 ( $ 24.0 after-tax , or $ .11 per share ) for severance and other benefits related to cost reduction actions which resulted in the elimination of approximately 700 positions . the expenses related primarily to the industrial gases 2013 americas and the industrial gases 2013 emea segments . the following table summarizes the carrying amount of the accrual for cost reduction actions at 30 september severance and other benefits .
||severance and other benefits|
|2016 charge|$ 33.9|
|amount reflected in pension liability|-.9 ( .9 )|
|cash expenditures|-20.4 ( 20.4 )|
|currency translation adjustment|.3|
|30 september 2016|$ 12.9|
business realignment and reorganization on 18 september 2014 , we announced plans to reorganize the company , including realignment of our businesses in new reporting segments and other organizational changes , effective as of 1 october 2014 . as a result of this reorganization , we incurred severance and other charges . in fiscal year 2015 , we recognized an expense of $ 207.7 ( $ 153.2 after-tax , or $ .71 per share ) . severance and other benefits totaled $ 151.9 and related to the elimination of approximately 2000 positions . asset and associated contract actions totaled $ 55.8 and related primarily to a plant shutdown in the corporate and other segment and the exit of product lines within the industrial gases 2013 global and materials technologies segments . the 2015 charges related to the segments as follows : $ 31.7 in industrial gases 2013 americas , $ 52.2 in industrial gases 2013 emea , $ 10.3 in industrial gases 2013 asia , $ 37.0 in industrial gases 2013 global , $ 27.6 in materials technologies , and $ 48.9 in corporate and other . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , an expense of $ 12.7 ( $ 8.2 after-tax , or $ .04 per share ) was incurred relating to the elimination of approximately 50 positions . the 2014 charge related to the segments as follows : $ 2.9 in industrial gases 2013 americas , $ 3.1 in industrial gases 2013 emea , $ 1.5 in industrial gases 2013 asia , $ 1.5 in industrial gases 2013 global , $ 1.6 in materials technologies , and $ 2.1 in corporate and other. .
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the decrease observed in the expense for severance and other benefits?
Answer: | -0.83678 | considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the decrease observed in the expense for severance and other benefits? |
finqa807 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. .
||shares available for issuance|shares available for future grant|shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum|expect to make new awards|
|amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 )|11.7|5.1|2.3|yes|
|2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )|15.8|3.1|0.0|no|
|2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )|12.8|9.0|0.0|no|
|rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 )|7.9|5.9|0.0|no|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. .
Question: what was the average stock price in 2019? ( $ )
Answer: | 42.19048 | what was the average stock price in 2019? ( $ ) |
finqa808 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: nike , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) such agreements in place . however , based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . in the ordinary course of its business , the company is involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships , product liability claims , trademark rights , and a variety of other matters . the company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . note 16 2014 restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company took necessary steps to streamline its management structure , enhance consumer focus , drive innovation more quickly to market and establish a more scalable , long-term cost structure . as a result , the company reduced its global workforce by approximately 5% ( 5 % ) and incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $ 195 million , primarily consisting of severance costs related to the workforce reduction . as nearly all of the restructuring activities were completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , the company does not expect to recognize additional costs in future periods relating to these actions . the restructuring charge is reflected in the corporate expense line in the segment presentation of pre-tax income in note 19 2014 operating segments and related information . the activity in the restructuring accrual for the year ended may 31 , 2009 is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|restructuring accrual 2014 june 1 2008|$ 2014|
|severance and related costs|195.0|
|cash payments|-29.4 ( 29.4 )|
|non-cash stock option and restricted stock expense|-19.5 ( 19.5 )|
|foreign currency translation and other|3.5|
|restructuring accrual 2014 may 31 2009|$ 149.6|
the accrual balance as of may 31 , 2009 will be relieved throughout fiscal year 2010 and early 2011 , as severance payments are completed . the restructuring accrual is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . as part of its restructuring activities , the company reorganized its nike brand operations geographic structure . in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , nike brand operations were organized into the following four geographic regions : u.s. , europe , middle east and africa ( collectively , 201cemea 201d ) , asia pacific , and americas . in the fourth quarter of 2009 , the company initiated a reorganization of the nike brand business into a new operating model . as a result of this reorganization , beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , the nike brand operations will consist of the following six geographies : north america , western europe , central/eastern europe , greater china , japan , and emerging markets . note 17 2014 divestitures on december 17 , 2007 , the company completed the sale of the starter brand business to iconix brand group , inc . for $ 60.0 million in cash . this transaction resulted in a gain of $ 28.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008. .
Question: what was the percentage gain on the sale of starter brand business?
Answer: | 0.91083 | what was the percentage gain on the sale of starter brand business? |
finqa809 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the aggregate purchase price consideration was approximately us$ 417.0 million . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: .
||( in thousands )|
|cash paid|$ 373519|
|fair value of shares to be acquired through a follow-on merger|34054|
|fair value of equity awards allocated to purchase consideration|9383|
|total purchase consideration|$ 416956|
|goodwill|247482|
|identifiable intangibles assets acquired|108867|
|cash and other assets acquired|137222|
|liabilities assumed|-76615 ( 76615 )|
|total purchase allocation|$ 416956|
goodwill of $ 247.5 million , which is generally not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of springsoft 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to eight years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $ 6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . these costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services . fair value of equity awards : pursuant to the merger agreement , the company assumed all the unvested outstanding stock options of springsoft upon the completion of the merger and the vested options were exchanged for cash in the merger . on october 1 , 2012 , the date of the completion of the tender offer , the fair value of the awards to be assumed and exchanged was $ 9.9 million , calculated using the black-scholes option pricing model . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . non-controlling interest : non-controlling interest represents the fair value of the 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) of outstanding springsoft shares that were not acquired during the tender offer process completed on october 1 , 2012 and the fair value of the option awards that were to be assumed or exchanged for cash upon the follow-on merger . the fair value of the non-controlling interest included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration was $ 42.8 million and is disclosed as a separate line in the october 31 , 2012 consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity . during the period between the completion of the tender offer and the end of the company 2019s fiscal year on october 31 , 2012 , the non-controlling interest was adjusted by $ 0.5 million to reflect the non-controlling interest 2019s share of the operating loss of springsoft in that period . as the amount is not significant , it has been included as part of other income ( expense ) , net , in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what percentage of total purchase allocation is goodwill?
Answer: | 0.59354 | what percentage of total purchase allocation is goodwill? |
finqa810 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|plant ( including nuclear fuel )|$ 727|
|decommissioning trust funds|252|
|other assets|41|
|total assets acquired|1020|
|purchased power agreement ( below market )|420|
|decommissioning liability|220|
|other liabilities|44|
|total liabilities assumed|684|
|net assets acquired|$ 336|
subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a "cessation event" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .
Question: what is the total amount amortized to revenue in the last three years , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: | 179.0 | what is the total amount amortized to revenue in the last three years , ( in millions ) ? |
finqa811 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during the 2015 annual review of goodwill , management proceeded directly to the two-step quantitative impairment test for two reporting units as follows : global rolled products segment and the soft alloys extrusion business in brazil ( hereafter 201csae 201d ) , which is included in the transportation and construction solutions segment . the estimated fair value of the global rolled products segment was substantially in excess of its respective carrying value , resulting in no impairment . for sae , the estimated fair value as determined by the dcf model was lower than the associated carrying value . as a result , management performed the second step of the impairment analysis in order to determine the implied fair value of the sae reporting unit 2019s goodwill . the results of the second-step analysis showed that the implied fair value of the goodwill was zero . therefore , in the fourth quarter of 2015 , alcoa recorded a goodwill impairment of $ 25 . the impairment of the sae goodwill resulted from headwinds from the recent downturn in the brazilian economy and the continued erosion of gross margin despite the execution of cost reduction strategies . as a result of the goodwill impairment , there is no goodwill remaining for the sae reporting unit . goodwill impairment tests in prior years indicated that goodwill was not impaired for any of the company 2019s reporting units , except for the primary metals segment in 2013 ( see below ) , and there were no triggering events since that time that necessitated an impairment test . in 2013 , for primary metals , the estimated fair value as determined by the dcf model was lower than the associated carrying value . as a result , management performed the second step of the impairment analysis in order to determine the implied fair value of primary metals 2019 goodwill . the results of the second-step analysis showed that the implied fair value of goodwill was zero . therefore , in the fourth quarter of 2013 , alcoa recorded a goodwill impairment of $ 1731 ( $ 1719 after noncontrolling interest ) . as a result of the goodwill impairment , there is no goodwill remaining for the primary metals reporting unit . the impairment of primary metals 2019 goodwill resulted from several causes : the prolonged economic downturn ; a disconnect between industry fundamentals and pricing that has resulted in lower metal prices ; and the increased cost of alumina , a key raw material , resulting from expansion of the alumina price index throughout the industry . all of these factors , exacerbated by increases in discount rates , continue to place significant downward pressure on metal prices and operating margins , and the resulting estimated fair value , of the primary metals business . as a result , management decreased the near-term and long-term estimates of the operating results and cash flows utilized in assessing primary metals 2019 goodwill for impairment . the valuation of goodwill for the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis is considered a level 3 fair value measurement , which means that the valuation of the assets and liabilities reflect management 2019s own judgments regarding the assumptions market participants would use in determining the fair value of the assets and liabilities . intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized while intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the periods benefited . the following table details the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : .
|segment|software|other intangible assets|
|alumina|7|15|
|primary metals|6|37|
|global rolled products|9|14|
|engineered products and solutions|7|32|
|transportation and construction solutions|8|23|
equity investments . alcoa invests in a number of privately-held companies , primarily through joint ventures and consortia , which are accounted for using the equity method . the equity method is applied in situations where alcoa has the ability to exercise significant influence , but not control , over the investee . management reviews equity investments for impairment whenever certain indicators are present suggesting that the carrying value of an investment is not recoverable . this analysis requires a significant amount of judgment from management to identify events or circumstances indicating that an equity investment is impaired . the following items are examples of impairment indicators : significant , sustained declines in an investee 2019s revenue , earnings , and cash .
Question: what is the variation between the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by primary metals segment , in years?
Answer: | 31.0 | what is the variation between the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by primary metals segment , in years? |
finqa812 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements investments in funds that calculate net asset value per share cash instruments at fair value include investments in funds that are valued based on the net asset value per share ( nav ) of the investment fund . the firm uses nav as its measure of fair value for fund investments when ( i ) the fund investment does not have a readily determinable fair value and ( ii ) the nav of the investment fund is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of investment company accounting , including measurement of the underlying investments at fair value . the firm 2019s investments in funds that calculate nav primarily consist of investments in firm-sponsored funds where the firm co-invests with third-party investors . the private equity , credit and real estate funds are primarily closed-end funds in which the firm 2019s investments are not eligible for redemption . distributions will be received from these funds as the underlying assets are liquidated and it is estimated that substantially all of the underlying assets of existing funds will be liquidated over the next seven years . the firm continues to manage its existing funds taking into account the transition periods under the volcker rule of the u.s . dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act ( dodd-frank act ) , although the rules have not yet been finalized . the firm 2019s investments in hedge funds are generally redeemable on a quarterly basis with 91 days 2019 notice , subject to a maximum redemption level of 25% ( 25 % ) of the firm 2019s initial investments at any quarter-end . the firm currently plans to comply with the volcker rule by redeeming certain of its interests in hedge funds . the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . the table below presents the fair value of the firm 2019s investments in , and unfunded commitments to , funds that calculate nav. .
|in millions|as of december 2012 fair value of investments|as of december 2012 unfunded commitments|as of december 2012 fair value of investments|unfunded commitments|
|private equity funds1|$ 7680|$ 2778|$ 8074|$ 3514|
|credit funds2|3927|2843|3596|3568|
|hedge funds3|2167|2014|3165|2014|
|real estatefunds4|2006|870|1531|1613|
|total|$ 15780|$ 6491|$ 16366|$ 8695|
1 . these funds primarily invest in a broad range of industries worldwide in a variety of situations , including leveraged buyouts , recapitalizations and growth investments . 2 . these funds generally invest in loans and other fixed income instruments and are focused on providing private high-yield capital for mid- to large-sized leveraged and management buyout transactions , recapitalizations , financings , refinancings , acquisitions and restructurings for private equity firms , private family companies and corporate issuers . 3 . these funds are primarily multi-disciplinary hedge funds that employ a fundamental bottom-up investment approach across various asset classes and strategies including long/short equity , credit , convertibles , risk arbitrage , special situations and capital structure arbitrage . 4 . these funds invest globally , primarily in real estate companies , loan portfolios , debt recapitalizations and direct property . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 127 .
Question: the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . what percentage was this of the remaining funds at 12/31/21?
Answer: | 0.48916 | the firm redeemed approximately $ 1.06 billion of these interests in hedge funds during the year ended december 2012 . what percentage was this of the remaining funds at 12/31/21? |
finqa813 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: reporting unit 2019s related goodwill assets . in 2013 , we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $ 195 million , net of state tax benefits . see 201ccritical accounting policies - goodwill 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and 201cnote 1 2013 significant accounting policies 201d for more information on this impairment charge . changes in u.s . or foreign tax laws , including possibly with retroactive effect , and audits by tax authorities could result in unanticipated increases in our tax expense and affect profitability and cash flows . for example , proposals to lower the u.s . corporate income tax rate would require us to reduce our net deferred tax assets upon enactment of the related tax legislation , with a corresponding material , one-time increase to income tax expense , but our income tax expense and payments would be materially reduced in subsequent years . actual financial results could differ from our judgments and estimates . refer to 201ccritical accounting policies 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and 201cnote 1 2013 significant accounting policies 201d of our consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our significant accounting policies and use of estimates . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . at december 31 , 2013 , we owned or leased building space ( including offices , manufacturing plants , warehouses , service centers , laboratories , and other facilities ) at 518 locations primarily in the u.s . additionally , we manage or occupy various u.s . government-owned facilities under lease and other arrangements . at december 31 , 2013 , we had significant operations in the following locations : 2022 aeronautics 2013 palmdale , california ; marietta , georgia ; greenville , south carolina ; fort worth and san antonio , texas ; and montreal , canada . 2022 information systems & global solutions 2013 goodyear , arizona ; sunnyvale , california ; colorado springs and denver , colorado ; gaithersburg and rockville , maryland ; valley forge , pennsylvania ; and houston , texas . 2022 missiles and fire control 2013 camden , arkansas ; orlando , florida ; lexington , kentucky ; and grand prairie , texas . 2022 mission systems and training 2013 orlando , florida ; baltimore , maryland ; moorestown/mt . laurel , new jersey ; owego and syracuse , new york ; akron , ohio ; and manassas , virginia . 2022 space systems 2013 huntsville , alabama ; sunnyvale , california ; denver , colorado ; albuquerque , new mexico ; and newtown , pennsylvania . 2022 corporate activities 2013 lakeland , florida and bethesda , maryland . in november 2013 , we committed to a plan to vacate our leased facilities in goodyear , arizona and akron , ohio , and close our owned facility in newtown , pennsylvania and certain owned buildings at our sunnyvale , california facility . we expect these closures , which include approximately 2.5 million square feet of facility space , will be substantially complete by the middle of 2015 . for information regarding these matters , see 201cnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 201d of our consolidated financial statements . the following is a summary of our square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the facilities that we plan to vacate as mentioned above ( in millions ) : owned leased u.s . government- owned total .
||owned|leased|u.s . government- owned|total|
|aeronautics|5.8|2.7|14.2|22.7|
|information systems & global solutions|2.5|5.7|2014|8.2|
|missiles and fire control|4.2|5.1|1.3|10.6|
|mission systems and training|5.8|5.3|0.4|11.5|
|space systems|8.5|1.6|7.9|18.0|
|corporate activities|3.0|0.9|2014|3.9|
|total|29.8|21.3|23.8|74.9|
we believe our facilities are in good condition and adequate for their current use . we may improve , replace , or reduce facilities as considered appropriate to meet the needs of our operations. .
Question: what percentage of total square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2013 is in missiles and fire control?
Answer: | 0.14152 | what percentage of total square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2013 is in missiles and fire control? |
finqa814 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company 2019s 2017 reported tax rate includes $ 160.9 million of net tax benefits associated with the tax act , $ 6.2 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges , and net tax benefits of $ 25.3 million associated with discrete tax items . in connection with the company 2019s initial analysis of the impact of the tax act , as noted above , a provisional net discrete tax benefit of $ 160.9 million was recorded in the period ended december 31 , 2017 , which includes $ 321.0 million tax benefit for recording deferred tax assets and liabilities at the u.s . enacted tax rate , and a net expense for the one-time transition tax of $ 160.1 million . while the company was able to make an estimate of the impact of the reduction in the u.s . rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the one-time transition tax , it may be affected by other analyses related to the tax act , as indicated above . special ( gains ) and charges represent the tax impact of special ( gains ) and charges , as well as additional tax benefits utilized in anticipation of u.s . tax reform of $ 7.8 million . during 2017 , the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $ 39.7 million related to excess tax benefits , resulting from the adoption of accounting changes regarding the treatment of tax benefits on share-based compensation . the extent of excess tax benefits is subject to variation in stock price and stock option exercises . in addition , the company recorded net discrete expenses of $ 14.4 million related to recognizing adjustments from filing the 2016 u.s . federal income tax return and international adjustments due to changes in estimates , partially offset by the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in state tax matters . during 2016 , the company recognized net expense related to discrete tax items of $ 3.9 million . the net expenses were driven primarily by recognizing adjustments from filing the company 2019s 2015 u.s . federal income tax return , partially offset by settlement of international tax matters and remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the application of updated tax rates in international jurisdictions . net expense was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax asset and liability positions and the release of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of statute of limitations in non-u.s . jurisdictions . during 2015 , the company recognized net benefits related to discrete tax items of $ 63.3 million . the net benefits were driven primarily by the release of $ 20.6 million of valuation allowances , based on the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets and the ability to recognize a worthless stock deduction of $ 39.0 million for the tax basis in a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: .
|( millions )|2017|2016|2015|
|balance at beginning of year|$ 75.9|$ 74.6|$ 78.7|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|3.2|8.8|5.8|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|-|2.1|0.9|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|-4.9 ( 4.9 )|-1.0 ( 1.0 )|-8.8 ( 8.8 )|
|reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations|-14.0 ( 14.0 )|-5.5 ( 5.5 )|-1.6 ( 1.6 )|
|settlements|-10.8 ( 10.8 )|-2.0 ( 2.0 )|-4.2 ( 4.2 )|
|assumed in connection with acquisitions|10.0|-|8.0|
|foreign currency translation|2.1|-1.1 ( 1.1 )|-4.2 ( 4.2 )|
|balance at end of year|$ 61.5|$ 75.9|$ 74.6|
the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized would have affected the effective tax rate by $ 47.1 million as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 57.5 million as of december 31 , 2016 and $ 59.2 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 the company released $ 0.9 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.4 million related to interest and penalties , respectively . the company had $ 9.3 million , $ 10.2 million and $ 13.1 million of accrued interest , including minor amounts for penalties , at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | -0.18972 | what is the percentage change in the balance of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017? |
finqa815 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2009 net revenue|$ 4694|
|volume/weather|231|
|retail electric price|137|
|provision for regulatory proceedings|26|
|rough production cost equalization|19|
|ano decommissioning trust|-24 ( 24 )|
|fuel recovery|-44 ( 44 )|
|other|12|
|2010 net revenue|$ 5051|
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .
Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue is due to the retail electric price?
Answer: | 0.38375 | what portion of the net change in net revenue is due to the retail electric price? |
finqa816 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: .
|balance at january 1 2011|$ 23788|
|increases in current period tax positions|1525|
|decreases in current period tax positions|-3734 ( 3734 )|
|balance at december 31 2011|$ 21579|
|increases in current period tax positions|0|
|decreases in current period tax positions|-2059 ( 2059 )|
|balance at december 31 2012|$ 19520|
|increases in current period tax positions|0|
|decreases in current period tax positions|-5965 ( 5965 )|
|balance at december 31 2013|$ 13555|
included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. .
Question: by how much did the company's valuation allowance change from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | -0.30558 | by how much did the company's valuation allowance change from 2012 to 2013? |
finqa817 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : .
||2016|2015|2014|
|second generation tenant improvements|$ 24622|$ 28681|$ 51699|
|second generation leasing costs|27029|24471|37898|
|building improvements|7698|8748|9224|
|total second generation capital expenditures|$ 59349|$ 61900|$ 98821|
|development of real estate investments|$ 401442|$ 370466|$ 446722|
|other deferred leasing costs|$ 38410|$ 30790|$ 31503|
second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: in 2015 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure that wassecond generation leasing costs
Answer: | 0.79477 | in 2015 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure that wassecond generation leasing costs |
finqa818 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2013|2014|2015|2016|thereafter|total|
|property mortgages|$ 52443|$ 568649|$ 647776|$ 270382|$ 556400|$ 2278190|$ 4373840|
|revolving credit facility|2014|2014|2014|2014|350000|2014|350000|
|trust preferred securities|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|100000|100000|
|senior unsecured notes|119423|2014|98578|657|274804|777194|1270656|
|capital lease|1555|1555|1555|1592|1707|42351|50315|
|ground leases|33429|33429|33429|33429|33533|615450|782699|
|estimated interest expense|312672|309280|269286|244709|212328|470359|1818634|
|joint venture debt|176457|93683|123983|102476|527814|800102|1824515|
|total|$ 695979|$ 1006596|$ 1174607|$ 653245|$ 1956586|$ 5083646|$ 10570659|
.
Question: a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 would increase our annual interest cost by what average amount , in millions?
Answer: | 11.65 | a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 would increase our annual interest cost by what average amount , in millions? |
finqa819 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2012|$ -27.5 ( 27.5 )|$ 28.4|
|2011|-7.4 ( 7.4 )|7.7|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . during 2012 , we entered into and exited forward-starting interest rate swap agreements to effectively lock in the benchmark rate related to our 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2023 , which we issued in november 2012 . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 . we had $ 2590.8 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2012 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term investment-grade securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2012 and 2011 , we had interest income of $ 29.5 and $ 37.8 , respectively . based on our 2012 results , a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 26.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2012 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2012 were the brazilian real , euro , indian rupee and the south african rand . based on 2012 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 5% ( 5 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2012 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what was the total amount of interest income combined in 2011 and 2012 , in millions?
Answer: | 67.3 | what was the total amount of interest income combined in 2011 and 2012 , in millions? |
finqa820 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: it can issue debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , warrants , share purchase contracts or share purchase units without a predetermined limit . securities can be sold in one or more separate offerings with the size , price and terms to be determined at the time of sale . emerson 2019s financial structure provides the flexibility necessary to achieve its strategic objectives . the company has been successful in efficiently deploying cash where needed worldwide to fund operations , complete acquisitions and sustain long-term growth . at september 30 , 2017 , $ 3.1 billion of the company 2019s cash was held outside the u.s . ( primarily in europe and asia ) , $ 1.4 billion of which income taxes have been provided for , and was generally available for repatriation to the u.s . under current tax law , repatriated cash may be subject to u.s . federal income taxes , net of available foreign tax credits . the company routinely repatriates a portion of its non-u.s . cash from earnings each year , or otherwise when it can be accomplished tax efficiently , and provides for u.s . income taxes as appropriate . the company has been able to readily meet all its funding requirements and currently believes that sufficient funds will be available to meet the company 2019s needs in the foreseeable future through operating cash flow , existing resources , short- and long-term debt capacity or backup credit lines . contractual obligations at september 30 , 2017 , the company 2019s contractual obligations , including estimated payments , are as follows : amounts due by period less more than 1 2013 3 3 2013 5 than ( dollars in millions ) total 1 year years years 5 years long-term debt ( including interest ) $ 5342 428 1434 966 2514 .
|( dollars in millions )|amounts due by period total|amounts due by period less than 1 year|amounts due by period 1 - 3years|amounts due by period 3 - 5years|amounts due by period more than5 years|
|long-term debt ( including interest )|$ 5342|428|1434|966|2514|
|operating leases|536|171|206|80|79|
|purchase obligations|746|655|71|14|6|
|total|$ 6624|1254|1711|1060|2599|
purchase obligations consist primarily of inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements . the table above does not include $ 2.0 billion of other noncurrent liabilities recorded in the balance sheet and summarized in note 19 , which consist primarily of pension and postretirement plan liabilities , deferred income taxes and unrecognized tax benefits , because it is not certain when these amounts will become due . see notes 11 and 12 for estimated future benefit payments and note 14 for additional information on deferred income taxes . financial instruments the company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices , and selectively uses derivative financial instruments , including forwards , swaps and purchased options to manage these risks . the company does not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes . the value of derivatives and other financial instruments is subject to change as a result of market movements in rates and prices . sensitivity analysis is one technique used to forecast the impact of these movements . based on a hypothetical 10 percent increase in interest rates , a 10 percent decrease in commodity prices or a 10 percent weakening in the u.s . dollar across all currencies , the potential losses in future earnings , fair value or cash flows are not material . sensitivity analysis has limitations ; for example , a weaker u.s . dollar would benefit future earnings through favorable translation of non-u.s . operating results , and lower commodity prices would benefit future earnings through lower cost of sales . see notes 1 , and 8 through 10 . critical accounting policies preparation of the company 2019s financial statements requires management to make judgments , assumptions and estimates regarding uncertainties that could affect reported revenue , expenses , assets , liabilities and equity . note 1 describes the significant accounting policies used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements . the most significant areas where management judgments and estimates impact the primary financial statements are described below . actual results in these areas could differ materially from management 2019s estimates under different assumptions or conditions . revenue recognition the company recognizes a large majority of its revenue through the sale of manufactured products and records the sale when products are shipped or delivered , title and risk of loss pass to the customer , and collection is reasonably assured . in certain circumstances , revenue is recognized using the percentage-of- completion method , as performance occurs , or in accordance with asc 985-605 related to software . sales arrangements sometimes involve delivering multiple elements , which requires management judgment that affects the amount and timing of revenue recognized . in these instances , the revenue assigned to each element is based on vendor-specific objective evidence , third-party evidence or a management estimate of the relative selling price . revenue is recognized for delivered elements if they have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and performance related to the undelivered items is probable and substantially in the company 2019s control , or the undelivered elements are inconsequential or perfunctory and there are no unsatisfied contingencies related to payment . the vast majority of deliverables are tangible products , with a smaller portion attributable to installation , service or maintenance . management believes that all relevant criteria and conditions are considered when recognizing revenue. .
Question: what percent of total contractual obligations is due to long-term debt ( including interest ) ?
Answer: | 0.80646 | what percent of total contractual obligations is due to long-term debt ( including interest ) ? |
finqa821 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: .
||2018|2017|2016|
|intrinsic value|$ 9|$ 10|$ 18|
|exercise proceeds|7|11|15|
|income tax benefit realized|2|3|6|
stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .
Question: what was average income tax benefit realized for the three year period?
Answer: | 3.66667 | what was average income tax benefit realized for the three year period? |
finqa822 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements note 20 . regulation and capital adequacy the federal reserve board is the primary regulator of group inc. , a bank holding company under the bank holding company act of 1956 ( bhc act ) and a financial holding company under amendments to the bhc act effected by the u.s . gramm-leach-bliley act of 1999 . as a bank holding company , the firm is subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements that are computed in accordance with the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital requirements ( which are based on the 2018basel 1 2019 capital accord of the basel committee ) . these capital requirements are expressed as capital ratios that compare measures of capital to risk-weighted assets ( rwas ) . the firm 2019s u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries , including gs bank usa , are subject to similar capital requirements . under the federal reserve board 2019s capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action that is applicable to gs bank usa , the firm and its u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries must meet specific capital requirements that involve quantitative measures of assets , liabilities and certain off- balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory reporting practices . the firm and its u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries 2019 capital amounts , as well as gs bank usa 2019s prompt corrective action classification , are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . many of the firm 2019s subsidiaries , including gs&co . and the firm 2019s other broker-dealer subsidiaries , are subject to separate regulation and capital requirements as described below . group inc . federal reserve board regulations require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum tier 1 capital ratio of 4% ( 4 % ) and a minimum total capital ratio of 8% ( 8 % ) . the required minimum tier 1 capital ratio and total capital ratio in order to be considered a 201cwell-capitalized 201d bank holding company under the federal reserve board guidelines are 6% ( 6 % ) and 10% ( 10 % ) , respectively . bank holding companies may be expected to maintain ratios well above the minimum levels , depending on their particular condition , risk profile and growth plans . the minimum tier 1 leverage ratio is 3% ( 3 % ) for bank holding companies that have received the highest supervisory rating under federal reserve board guidelines or that have implemented the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital measure for market risk . other bank holding companies must have a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% ( 4 % ) . the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2012|as of december 2011|
|tier 1 capital|$ 66977|$ 63262|
|tier 2 capital|$ 13429|$ 13881|
|total capital|$ 80406|$ 77143|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 399928|$ 457027|
|tier 1 capital ratio|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|13.8% ( 13.8 % )|
|total capital ratio|20.1% ( 20.1 % )|16.9% ( 16.9 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|7.3% ( 7.3 % )|7.0% ( 7.0 % )|
rwas under the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital requirements are calculated based on the amount of market risk and credit risk . rwas for market risk are determined by reference to the firm 2019s value-at-risk ( var ) model , supplemented by other measures to capture risks not reflected in the firm 2019s var model . credit risk for on- balance sheet assets is based on the balance sheet value . for off-balance sheet exposures , including otc derivatives and commitments , a credit equivalent amount is calculated based on the notional amount of each trade . all such assets and exposures are then assigned a risk weight depending on , among other things , whether the counterparty is a sovereign , bank or a qualifying securities firm or other entity ( or if collateral is held , depending on the nature of the collateral ) . tier 1 leverage ratio is defined as tier 1 capital under basel 1 divided by average adjusted total assets ( which includes adjustments for disallowed goodwill and intangible assets , and the carrying value of equity investments in non-financial companies that are subject to deductions from tier 1 capital ) . 184 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in risk-weighted assets in millions between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: | -57099.0 | what was the change in risk-weighted assets in millions between 2011 and 2012? |
finqa823 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: assumed health care cost trend rates for the u.s . retiree health care benefit plan as of december 31 are as follows: .
||2017|2016|
|assumed health care cost trend rate for next year|7.50% ( 7.50 % )|6.75% ( 6.75 % )|
|ultimate trend rate|5.00% ( 5.00 % )|5.00% ( 5.00 % )|
|year in which ultimate trend rate is reached|2028|2024|
a one percentage point increase or decrease in health care cost trend rates over all future periods would have increased or decreased the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the u.s . retiree health care benefit plan as of december 31 , 2017 , by $ 1 million . the service cost and interest cost components of 2017 plan expense would have increased or decreased by less than $ 1 million . deferred compensation arrangements we have a deferred compensation plan that allows u.s . employees whose base salary and management responsibility exceed a certain level to defer receipt of a portion of their cash compensation . payments under this plan are made based on the participant 2019s distribution election and plan balance . participants can earn a return on their deferred compensation based on notional investments in the same investment funds that are offered in our defined contribution plans . as of december 31 , 2017 , our liability to participants of the deferred compensation plans was $ 255 million and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets . this amount reflects the accumulated participant deferrals and earnings thereon as of that date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we held $ 236 million in mutual funds related to these plans that are recorded in long-term investments on our consolidated balance sheets , and serve as an economic hedge against changes in fair values of our other deferred compensation liabilities . we record changes in the fair value of the liability and the related investment in sg&a as discussed in note 8 . 11 . debt and lines of credit short-term borrowings we maintain a line of credit to support commercial paper borrowings , if any , and to provide additional liquidity through bank loans . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had a variable-rate revolving credit facility from a consortium of investment-grade banks that allows us to borrow up to $ 2 billion until march 2022 . the interest rate on borrowings under this credit facility , if drawn , is indexed to the applicable london interbank offered rate ( libor ) . as of december 31 , 2017 , our credit facility was undrawn and we had no commercial paper outstanding . long-term debt we retired $ 250 million of maturing debt in march 2017 and another $ 375 million in june 2017 . in may 2017 , we issued an aggregate principal amount of $ 600 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt . the offering consisted of the reissuance of $ 300 million of 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) notes due in 2021 at a premium and the issuance of $ 300 million of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) notes due in 2024 at a discount . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offerings were $ 605 million , net of the original issuance discount and premium , and were used for the repayment of maturing debt and general corporate purposes . in november 2017 , we issued a principal amount of $ 500 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt due in 2027 . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offering were $ 494 million , net of the original issuance discount , and were used for general corporate purposes . in may 2016 , we issued a principal amount of $ 500 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt due in 2022 . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offering were $ 499 million , net of the original issuance discount , and were used toward the repayment of a portion of $ 1.0 billion of maturing debt retired in may 2016 . in may 2015 , we issued a principal amount of $ 500 million of fixed-rate , long-term debt due in 2020 . we incurred $ 3 million of issuance and other related costs . the proceeds of the offering were $ 498 million , net of the original issuance discount , and were used toward the repayment of a portion of the debt that matured in august 2015 . we retired $ 250 million of maturing debt in april 2015 and another $ 750 million in august 2015 . texas instruments 2022 2017 form 10-k 51 .
Question: by how many percentage points did the health care cost trend rate for next year increase in 2017?
Answer: | 0.75 | by how many percentage points did the health care cost trend rate for next year increase in 2017? |
finqa824 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: operating expenses operating expenses were $ 2.9 billion , an increase of 8% ( 8 % ) over 2000 . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , operating expenses grew 10% ( 10 % ) . expense growth in 2001 of 10% ( 10 % ) is significantly lower than the comparable 20% ( 20 % ) expense growth for 2000 compared to 1999 . state street successfully reduced the growth rate of expenses as revenue growth slowed during the latter half of 2000 and early 2001 . the expense growth in 2001 reflects higher expenses for salaries and employee benefits , as well as information systems and communications . o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s ( dollars in millions ) 2001 2000 1999 change adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) .
|( dollars in millions )|2001|2000|1999|change 00-01|adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 )|
|salaries and employee benefits|$ 1663|$ 1524|$ 1313|9% ( 9 % )|11% ( 11 % )|
|information systems and communications|365|305|287|20|22|
|transaction processing services|247|268|237|-8 ( 8 )|-7 ( 7 )|
|occupancy|229|201|188|15|16|
|other|363|346|311|5|7|
|total operating expenses|$ 2867|$ 2644|$ 2336|8|10|
|number of employees|19753|17604|17213|12||
( 1 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet expenses related to salaries and employee benefits increased $ 139million in 2001 , or $ 163millionwhen adjusted for the formation of citistreet . the adjusted increase reflects more than 2100 additional staff to support the large client wins and new business from existing clients and acquisitions . this expense increase was partially offset by lower incentive-based compensation . information systems and communications expense was $ 365 million in 2001 , up 20% ( 20 % ) from the prior year . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , information systems and communications expense increased 22% ( 22 % ) . this growth reflects both continuing investment in software and hardware , aswell as the technology costs associated with increased staffing levels . expenses related to transaction processing services were $ 247 million , down $ 21 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) . these expenses are volume related and include external contract services , subcustodian fees , brokerage services and fees related to securities settlement . lower mutual fund shareholder activities , and lower subcustodian fees resulting from both the decline in asset values and lower transaction volumes , drove the decline . occupancy expensewas $ 229million , up 15% ( 15 % ) . the increase is due to expenses necessary to support state street 2019s global growth , and expenses incurred for leasehold improvements and other operational costs . other expenses were $ 363 million , up $ 17 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) . these expenses include professional services , advertising and sales promotion , and internal operational expenses . the increase over prior year is due to a $ 21 million increase in the amortization of goodwill , primarily from acquisitions in 2001 . in accordance with recent accounting pronouncements , goodwill amortization expense will be eliminated in 2002 . state street recorded approximately $ 38 million , or $ .08 per share after tax , of goodwill amortization expense in 2001 . state street 2019s cost containment efforts , which reduced discretionary spending , partially offset the increase in other expenses . state street corporation 9 .
Question: what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 1999 to 2000?
Answer: | 0.02272 | what is the growth rate in the number of employees from 1999 to 2000? |
finqa825 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period fiscal 2020|payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022|payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024|payments due by period thereafter|
|long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )|$ 9714.1|$ 550.8|$ 939.8|$ 2494.3|$ 5729.2|
|operating lease obligations ( 2 )|930.4|214.3|316.4|193.6|206.1|
|capital lease obligations ( 3 )|168.9|6.4|8.7|2.9|150.9|
|purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )|2293.5|1607.0|292.5|206.7|187.3|
|total|$ 13106.9|$ 2378.5|$ 1557.4|$ 2897.5|$ 6273.5|
( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what percent of longterm debt payments are deferred until after 2024?
Answer: | 0.58978 | what percent of longterm debt payments are deferred until after 2024? |
finqa826 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our initial estimate of fraud losses , fines and other charges on our understanding of the rules and operating regulations published by the networks and preliminary communications with the networks . we have now reached resolution with and made payments to the networks , resulting in charges that were less than our initial estimates . the primary difference between our initial estimates and the final charges relates to lower fraud related costs attributed to this event than previously expected . the following table reflects the activity in our accrual for fraud losses , fines and other charges for the twelve months ended may 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) : .
|balance at may 31 2012|$ 67436|
|adjustments|-31781 ( 31781 )|
|subtotal|35655|
|payments|-35655 ( 35655 )|
|balance at may 31 2013|$ 2014|
we were insured under policies that provided coverage of certain costs associated with this event . the policies provided a total of $ 30.0 million in policy limits and contained various sub-limits of liability and other terms , conditions and limitations , including a $ 1.0 million deductible per claim . as of fiscal year 2013 , we received assessments from certain networks and submitted additional claims to the insurers and recorded $ 20.0 million in additional insurance recoveries based on our negotiations with our insurers . we will record receivables for any additional recoveries in the periods in which we determine such recovery is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated . a class action arising out of the processing system intrusion was filed against us on april 4 , 2012 by natalie willingham ( individually and on behalf of a putative nationwide class ) ( the 201cplaintiff 201d ) . specifically , ms . willingham alleged that we failed to maintain reasonable and adequate procedures to protect her personally identifiable information ( 201cpii 201d ) which she claims resulted in two fraudulent charges on her credit card in march 2012 . further , ms . willingham asserted that we failed to timely notify the public of the data breach . based on these allegations , ms . willingham asserted claims for negligence , violation of the federal stored communications act , willful violation of the fair credit reporting act , negligent violation of the fair credit reporting act , violation of georgia 2019s unfair and deceptive trade practices act , negligence per se , breach of third-party beneficiary contract , and breach of implied contract . ms . willingham sought an unspecified amount of damages and injunctive relief . the lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the northern district of georgia . on may 14 , 2012 , we filed a motion to dismiss . on july 11 , 2012 , plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend her complaint , and on july 16 , 2012 , the court granted that motion . she then filed an amended complaint on july 16 , 2012 . the amended complaint did not add any new causes of action . instead , it added two new named plaintiffs ( nadine and robert hielscher ) ( together with plaintiff , the 201cplaintiffs 201d ) and dropped plaintiff 2019s claim for negligence per se . on august 16 , 2012 , we filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs 2019 amended complaint . the plaintiffs filed their response in opposition to our motion to dismiss on october 5 , 2012 , and we subsequently filed our reply brief on october 22 , 2012 . the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation recommending dismissal of all of plaintiffs 2019 claims with prejudice . the plaintiffs subsequently agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice , with each party bearing its own fees and costs . this was the only consideration exchanged by the parties in connection with plaintiffs 2019 voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the lawsuit . the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice on march 6 , 2013 . note 3 2014settlement processing assets and obligations we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa . these designations are dependent upon member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsoring us and our adherence to the standards of the networks . we have primary financial institution sponsors in the various markets where we facilitate payment transactions with whom we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements . these agreements allow us to route transactions under the member banks 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa . in certain markets , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship. .
Question: what portion of the beginning balance of accrual for fraud losses is regulated through adjustments?
Answer: | 0.47128 | what portion of the beginning balance of accrual for fraud losses is regulated through adjustments? |
finqa827 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 1% ( 1 % ) driven by a favorable foreign currency translation of 2% ( 2 % ) and was partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decline in dispositions , net of acquisitions and other . organic revenue was flat primarily resulting from strong growth in the capital market transactions and advisory business , partially offset by declines in global facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 . in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 . operating margin improvement was primarily driven by revenue growth , reduced costs of restructuring initiatives and realization of the benefits of those restructuring plans , which was partially offset by the negative impact of expense increases related to investment in the business , lease termination costs , legacy receivables write-off , and foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions .
|years ended december 31,|2011|2010|2009|
|revenue|$ 4501|$ 2111|$ 1267|
|operating income|448|234|203|
|operating margin|10.0% ( 10.0 % )|11.1% ( 11.1 % )|16.0% ( 16.0 % )|
in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and .
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011
Answer: | 1.13216 | what was the percent of the increase in the revenue from 2010 to 2011 |
finqa828 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: .
|performance share units|grants|
|outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )|556186|
|granted ( 1 )|354660|
|vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients|-136058 ( 136058 )|
|outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )|774788|
( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what percentage of the fair value of performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was relates to to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013?
Answer: | 0.84884 | what percentage of the fair value of performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was relates to to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013? |
finqa829 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents ( 4 ) the increase in cash flows was primarily due to the timing of inventory purchases and longer payment terms with certain vendors . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: .
|( in days )|december 31 , 2017|december 31 , 2016|december 31 , 2015|
|days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )|52|51|48|
|days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )|12|12|13|
|days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )|-45 ( 45 )|-44 ( 44 )|-40 ( 40 )|
|cash conversion cycle|19|19|21|
( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of accounts receivable , net at the end of the period , divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of sales for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of sales for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle was 19 days at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by higher net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as saas , software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the consolidated statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . this also results in a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sales in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle was 19 and 21 days at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the increase in dso was primarily driven by higher net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as saas , software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 15 million in 2017 compared to 2016 . capital expenditures increased $ 17 million to $ 81 million from $ 64 million for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , primarily related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 289 million in 2016 compared to 2015 . the decrease in cash used was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of cdw uk in 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures decreased $ 26 million to $ 64 million from $ 90 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively , primarily due to spending for our new office location in 2015 . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 514 million in 2017 compared to 2016 . the increase was primarily driven by changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 228 million and by share repurchases during 2017 , which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 167 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see part ii , item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase in cash used for accounts payable-inventory financing was primarily driven by the termination of one of our inventory financing agreements in the fourth quarter of 2016 , with amounts .
Question: in data what was the average cash conversion cycle for the three year period?
Answer: | 19.66667 | in data what was the average cash conversion cycle for the three year period? |
finqa830 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index .
|date|pmi|pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )|s&p 500 index|
|december 31 2010|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|
|december 31 2011|$ 139.80|$ 114.10|$ 102.10|
|december 31 2012|$ 154.60|$ 128.00|$ 118.50|
|december 31 2013|$ 167.70|$ 163.60|$ 156.80|
|december 31 2014|$ 164.20|$ 170.10|$ 178.30|
|december 31 2015|$ 186.20|$ 179.20|$ 180.80|
( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
Answer: | 0.054 | what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2015? |
finqa831 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: approved by the board of directors on april 21 , 2004 and expired on april 30 , 2006 . sources and uses in financing activities during 2005 related primarily to uses for the payment of a dividend ( $ 54.0 million ) and stock repurchase ( $ 26.7 million ) , and a source of cash from the issuance of common shares related to the exercise of employee stock options , the related tax benefit , and the employee stock purchase plan ( $ 9.7 million ) . cash dividends paid to shareholders were $ 162.5 million , $ 107.9 million , and $ 54.0 million during fiscal years 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . we believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital and other cash requirements at least through the end of fiscal 2010 . contractual obligations and commercial commitments future commitments of garmin , as of december 29 , 2007 , aggregated by type of contractual obligation .
|contractual obligations|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than 1 year|payments due by period 1-3 years|payments due by period 3-5 years|payments due by period more than 5 years|
|operating leases|$ 43438|$ 6581|$ 11582|$ 9263|$ 16012|
|purchase obligations|5078|422|2251|2405|0|
|total|$ 48516|$ 7003|$ 13833|$ 11668|$ 16012|
operating leases describes lease obligations associated with garmin facilities located in the u.s. , taiwan , the u.k. , and canada . purchase obligations are the aggregate of those purchase orders that were outstanding on december 29 , 2007 ; these obligations are created and then paid off within 3 months during the normal course of our manufacturing business . off-balance sheet arrangements we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk market sensitivity we have market risk primarily in connection with the pricing of our products and services and the purchase of raw materials . product pricing and raw materials costs are both significantly influenced by semiconductor market conditions . historically , during cyclical industry downturns , we have been able to offset pricing declines for our products through a combination of improved product mix and success in obtaining price reductions in raw materials costs . inflation we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business , financial condition or results of operations . if our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures , we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases . our inability or failure to do so could adversely affect our business , financial condition and results of operations . foreign currency exchange rate risk the operation of garmin 2019s subsidiaries in international markets results in exposure to movements in currency exchange rates . we generally have not been significantly affected by foreign exchange fluctuations .
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations and commercial commitments future commitments of garmin , as of december 29 , 2007 are due to purchase obligations?
Answer: | 0.10467 | what percentage of total contractual obligations and commercial commitments future commitments of garmin , as of december 29 , 2007 are due to purchase obligations? |
finqa832 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 .
|total cumulative return|2012|2013|2014|2015|2016|
|edwards lifesciences|$ 127.54|$ 93.01|$ 180.17|$ 223.42|$ 265.06|
|s&p 500|116.00|153.58|174.60|177.01|198.18|
|s&p 500 healthcare equipment index|117.42|150.28|181.96|194.37|207.46|
.
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for edwards lifesciences for the five years ended 2016?
Answer: | 1.6506 | what was the percentage cumulative total return for edwards lifesciences for the five years ended 2016? |
finqa833 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .
|quarter|dividends paid per share 2018|dividends paid per share 2017|
|first|$ 2.00|$ 1.82|
|second|2.00|1.82|
|third|2.00|1.82|
|fourth|2.20|2.00|
|year|$ 8.20|$ 7.46|
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .
Question: what is the percentage change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.0992 | what is the percentage change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018? |
finqa834 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in february 2008 , we issued $ 300.0 million of 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) series o cumulative redeemable preferred shares . the indentures ( and related supplemental indentures ) governing our outstanding series of notes also require us to comply with financial ratios and other covenants regarding our operations . we were in compliance with all such covenants as of december 31 , 2007 . sale of real estate assets we utilize sales of real estate assets as an additional source of liquidity . we pursue opportunities to sell real estate assets at favorable prices to capture value created by us as well as to improve the overall quality of our portfolio by recycling sale proceeds into new properties with greater value creation opportunities . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investments ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; and 2022 other contractual obligations property investments we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively ( in thousands ) : .
||2007|2006|2005|
|recurring tenant improvements|$ 45296|$ 41895|$ 60633|
|recurring leasing costs|32238|32983|33175|
|building improvements|8402|8122|15232|
|totals|$ 85936|$ 83000|$ 109040|
dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.91 , $ 1.89 and $ 1.87 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we also paid a one-time special dividend of $ 1.05 per share in 2005 as a result of the significant gain realized from an industrial portfolio sale . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . debt maturities debt outstanding at december 31 , 2007 totaled $ 4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) maturing at various dates through 2028 . we had $ 3.2 billion of unsecured notes , $ 546.1 million outstanding on our unsecured lines of credit and $ 524.4 million of secured debt outstanding at december 31 , 2007 . scheduled principal amortization and maturities of such debt totaled $ 249.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 and $ 146.4 million of secured debt was transferred to unconsolidated subsidiaries in connection with the contribution of properties in 2007. .
Question: in 2007 what was the percent of the total recurring capital expenditures that was associated with recurring leasing costs
Answer: | 0.37514 | in 2007 what was the percent of the total recurring capital expenditures that was associated with recurring leasing costs |
finqa835 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 3 ) refer to note 2 201csummary of significant accounting principles and practices 201d for further information . 13 . employee benefitsp y defined contribution savings plans aon maintains defined contribution savings plans for the benefit of its employees . the expense recognized for these plans is included in compensation and benefits in the consolidated statements of income . the expense for the significant plans in the u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canada is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|years ended december 31|2018|2017|2016|
|u.s .|$ 98|$ 105|$ 121|
|u.k .|45|43|43|
|netherlands and canada|25|25|27|
|total|$ 168|$ 173|$ 191|
pension and other postretirement benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension and postretirement health and welfare plans that provide retirement , medical , and life insurance benefits . the postretirement health care plans are contributory , with retiree contributions adjusted annually , and the aa life insurance and pension plans are generally noncontributory . the significant u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants. .
Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.k.?
Answer: | 43.66667 | considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average expense for the significant plans in the u.k.? |
finqa836 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: weighted average fair values and valuation assumptions used to value performance unit and performance stock grants during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 were as follows: .
||2016|2015|2014|
|weighted average fair value of grants|$ 119.10|$ 80.64|$ 119.27|
|expected volatility|32.48% ( 32.48 % )|29.35% ( 29.35 % )|32.18% ( 32.18 % )|
|risk-free interest rate|1.15% ( 1.15 % )|1.07% ( 1.07 % )|1.18% ( 1.18 % )|
expected volatility is based on the term-matched historical volatility over the simulated term , which is calculated as the time between the grant date and the end of the performance period . the risk-free interest rate is based on a 3.25 year zero-coupon risk-free interest rate derived from the treasury constant maturities yield curve on the grant date . at december 31 , 2016 , unrecognized compensation expense related to performance units totaled $ 10 million . such unrecognized expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 3.0 years . pension plans . eog has a defined contribution pension plan in place for most of its employees in the united states . eog's contributions to the pension plan are based on various percentages of compensation and , in some instances , are based upon the amount of the employees' contributions . eog's total costs recognized for the plan were $ 34 million , $ 36 million and $ 41 million for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . in addition , eog's trinidadian subsidiary maintains a contributory defined benefit pension plan and a matched savings plan . eog's united kingdom subsidiary maintains a pension plan which includes a non-contributory defined contribution pension plan and a matched defined contribution savings plan . these pension plans are available to most employees of the trinidadian and united kingdom subsidiaries . eog's combined contributions to these plans were $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 5 million for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . for the trinidadian defined benefit pension plan , the benefit obligation , fair value of plan assets and accrued benefit cost totaled $ 8 million , $ 7 million and $ 0.3 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2016 , and $ 9 million , $ 7 million and $ 0.2 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2015 . in connection with the divestiture of substantially all of its canadian assets in the fourth quarter of 2014 , eog has elected to terminate the canadian non-contributory defined benefit pension plan . postretirement health care . eog has postretirement medical and dental benefits in place for eligible united states and trinidad employees and their eligible dependents , the costs of which are not material . 8 . commitments and contingencies letters of credit and guarantees . at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , eog had standby letters of credit and guarantees outstanding totaling approximately $ 226 million and $ 272 million , primarily representing guarantees of payment or performance obligations on behalf of subsidiaries . as of february 20 , 2017 , there were no demands for payment under these guarantees. .
Question: what is the variation observed in the risk-free interest rate during 2015 and 2016?
Answer: | 0.0008 | what is the variation observed in the risk-free interest rate during 2015 and 2016? |
finqa837 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: properties , plants , and equipment . properties , plants , and equipment are recorded at cost . depreciation is recorded principally on the straight-line method at rates based on the estimated useful lives of the assets . the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : .
|segment|structures|machinery and equipment|
|global rolled products|31|21|
|engineered products and solutions|29|17|
|transportation and construction solutions|27|19|
gains or losses from the sale of assets are generally recorded in other income , net ( see policy below for assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations ) . repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . interest related to the construction of qualifying assets is capitalized as part of the construction costs . properties , plants , and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets ( asset group ) may not be recoverable . recoverability of assets is determined by comparing the estimated undiscounted net cash flows of the operations related to the assets ( asset group ) to their carrying amount . an impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of the assets ( asset group ) exceeds the estimated undiscounted net cash flows . the amount of the impairment loss to be recorded is calculated as the excess of the carrying value of the assets ( asset group ) over their fair value , with fair value determined using the best information available , which generally is a discounted cash flow ( dcf ) model . the determination of what constitutes an asset group , the associated estimated undiscounted net cash flows , and the estimated useful lives of assets also require significant judgments . goodwill and other intangible assets . goodwill is not amortized ; instead , it is reviewed for impairment annually ( in the fourth quarter ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist or if a decision is made to sell or exit a business . a significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred . such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions , negative developments in equity and credit markets , adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates , increases in input costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows , or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods , among others . the fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill . goodwill is allocated among and evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment . arconic has eight reporting units , of which four are included in the engineered products and solutions segment , three are included in the transportation and construction solutions segment , and the remaining reporting unit is the global rolled products segment . more than 70% ( 70 % ) of arconic 2019s total goodwill is allocated to two reporting units as follows : arconic fastening systems and rings ( afsr ) ( $ 2200 ) and arconic power and propulsion ( app ) ( $ 1647 ) businesses , both of which are included in the engineered products and solutions segment . these amounts include an allocation of corporate 2019s goodwill . in november 2014 , arconic acquired firth rixson ( see note f ) , and , as a result recognized $ 1801 in goodwill . this amount was allocated between the afsr and arconic forgings and extrusions ( afe ) reporting units , which is part of the engineered products and solutions segment . in march and july 2015 , arconic acquired tital and rti , respectively , ( see note f ) and recognized $ 117 and $ 298 , respectively , in goodwill . the goodwill amount related to tital was allocated to the app reporting unit and the amount related to rti was allocated to arconic titanium and engineered products ( atep ) , a new arconic reporting unit that consists solely of the acquired rti business and is part of the engineered products and solutions segment . in reviewing goodwill for impairment , an entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not ( greater than 50% ( 50 % ) ) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . if an entity elects to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that an impairment is more likely than not , the entity is then required to perform the .
Question: what is the difference between firth rixson's goodwill and the rti's?
Answer: | 1503.0 | what is the difference between firth rixson's goodwill and the rti's? |
finqa838 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .
|date|citi|s&p 500|s&p financials|
|31-dec-2010|100.00|100.00|100.00|
|30-dec-2011|55.67|102.11|82.94|
|31-dec-2012|83.81|118.45|106.84|
|31-dec-2013|110.49|156.82|144.90|
|31-dec-2014|114.83|178.28|166.93|
|31-dec-2015|110.14|180.75|164.39|
.
Question: what was the overall percentage growth of the cumulative total return for citi from 2010 to 2015
Answer: | 0.1014 | what was the overall percentage growth of the cumulative total return for citi from 2010 to 2015 |
finqa839 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 9 . debt - continued our revolving credit facility and senior unsecured notes contain financial covenants which require us to maintain minimum interest coverage ratios and limit our debt to market capitalization ratios . we believe that we have complied with all of our financial covenants as of december 31 , 2007 . on may 9 , 2006 , we executed supplemental indentures with respect to our senior unsecured notes due 2007 , 2009 and 2010 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) , pursuant to our consent solicitation statement dated april 18 , 2006 , as amended . holders of approximately 96.7% ( 96.7 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes consented to the solicitation . the supplemental indentures contain modifications of certain covenants and related defined terms governing the terms of the notes to make them consistent with corresponding provisions of the covenants and defined terms included in the senior unsecured notes due 2011 issued on february 16 , 2006 . the supplemental indentures also include a new covenant that provides for an increase in the interest rate of the notes upon certain decreases in the ratings assigned by rating agencies to the notes . in connection with the consent solicitation we paid an aggregate fee of $ 2241000 to the consenting note holders , which will be amortized into expense over the remaining term of the notes . in addition , we incurred advisory and professional fees aggregating $ 1415000 , which were expensed in 2006 . the net carrying amount of properties collateralizing the notes and mortgages payable amounted to $ 10.920 billion at december 31 , 2007 . as at december 31 , 2007 , the principal repayments required for the next five years and thereafter are as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) .
|year ending december 31,|amount|
|2008|$ 526768|
|2009|478269|
|2010|778320|
|2011|1071195|
|2012|609546|
|thereafter|5473734|
.
Question: for the year ending december 31 , 2008 , were principal payments greater than 2009?
Answer: | yes | for the year ending december 31 , 2008 , were principal payments greater than 2009? |
finqa840 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: troubled debt restructurings ( tdrs ) a tdr is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty . tdrs result from our loss mitigation activities , and include rate reductions , principal forgiveness , postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization , and extensions , which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral . additionally , tdrs also result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc . in those situations where principal is forgiven , the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off . some tdrs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest , as restructured , and result in potential incremental losses . these potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall alll estimate . the level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions . once a loan becomes a tdr , it will continue to be reported as a tdr until it is ultimately repaid in full , the collateral is foreclosed upon , or it is fully charged off . we held specific reserves in the alll of $ .4 billion and $ .5 billion at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , for the total tdr portfolio . table 67 : summary of troubled debt restructurings in millions december 31 december 31 .
|in millions|december 312014|december 312013|
|total consumer lending|$ 2041|$ 2161|
|total commercial lending|542|578|
|total tdrs|$ 2583|$ 2739|
|nonperforming|$ 1370|$ 1511|
|accruing ( a )|1083|1062|
|credit card|130|166|
|total tdrs|$ 2583|$ 2739|
( a ) accruing tdr loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans . loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc and loans to borrowers not currently obligated to make both principal and interest payments under the restructured terms are not returned to accrual status . table 68 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as tdrs as well as the change in the recorded investments as a result of the tdr classification during 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . additionally , the table provides information about the types of tdr concessions . the principal forgiveness tdr category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness . these types of tdrs result in a write down of the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place . the rate reduction tdr category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral . the tdrs within this category result in reductions to future interest income . the other tdr category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc , as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers . in some cases , there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan . this is most common within the commercial loan portfolio . when there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio , the principal forgiveness concession was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in table 68 . for example , if there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as principal forgiveness . second in priority would be rate reduction . for example , if there is an interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as a rate reduction . in the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan , concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligations to pnc would be prioritized and included in the other type of concession in the table below . after that , consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio . 138 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what were total specific reserves in the alll in billions at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 for the total tdr portfolio?
Answer: | 0.9 | what were total specific reserves in the alll in billions at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 for the total tdr portfolio? |
finqa841 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as described above , the borrowings are extended on a non-recourse basis . as such , there is no credit or market risk exposure to us on the assets , and as a result the terms of the amlf permit exclusion of the assets from regulatory leverage and risk-based capital calculations . the interest rate on the borrowings is set by the federal reserve bank , and we earn net interest revenue by earning a spread on the difference between the yield we earn on the assets and the rate we pay on the borrowings . for 2008 , we earned net interest revenue associated with this facility of approximately $ 68 million . separately , we currently maintain a commercial paper program under which we can issue up to $ 3 billion with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issue . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , $ 2.59 billion and $ 2.36 billion , respectively , of commercial paper were outstanding . in addition , state street bank currently has board authority to issue bank notes up to an aggregate of $ 5 billion , including up to $ 2.48 billion of senior notes under the fdic 2019s temporary liquidity guarantee program , instituted by the fdic in october 2008 for qualified senior debt issued through june 30 , 2009 , and up to $ 1 billion of subordinated bank notes ( see note 10 ) . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , no notes payable were outstanding , and at december 31 , 2008 , all $ 5 billion was available for issuance . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 657 million , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . at december 31 , 2008 , no balance was due on this line of credit . note 9 . restructuring charges in december 2008 , we implemented a plan to reduce our expenses from operations and support our long- term growth . in connection with this plan , we recorded aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million in our consolidated statement of income . the primary component of the plan was an involuntary reduction of approximately 7% ( 7 % ) of our global workforce , which reduction we expect to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of 2009 . other components of the plan included costs related to lease and software license terminations , restructuring of agreements with technology providers and other costs . of the aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million , $ 243 million related to severance , a portion of which will be paid in a lump sum or over a defined period , and a portion of which will provide related benefits and outplacement services for approximately 2100 employees identified for involuntary termination in connection with the plan ; $ 49 million related to future lease obligations and write-offs of capitalized assets , including $ 23 million for impairment of other intangible assets ; $ 10 million of costs associated with information technology and $ 4 million of other restructuring costs . the severance component included $ 47 million related to accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation . in december 2008 , approximately 620 employees were involuntarily terminated and left state street . the following table presents the activity in the related balance sheet reserve for 2008 . ( in millions ) severance lease and write-offs information technology other total .
|( in millions )|severance|lease and asset write-offs|information technology|other|total|
|initial accrual|$ 250|$ 42|$ 10|$ 4|$ 306|
|payments and adjustments|-20 ( 20 )|-25 ( 25 )|-10 ( 10 )|-1 ( 1 )|-56 ( 56 )|
|balance at december 31 2008|$ 230|$ 17|2014|$ 3|$ 250|
.
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of the outstanding commercial papers from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: | 0.09746 | what is the percentage change in the balance of the outstanding commercial papers from 2007 to 2008? |
finqa842 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: it can issue debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , warrants , share purchase contracts or share purchase units without a predetermined limit . securities can be sold in one or more separate offerings with the size , price and terms to be determined at the time of sale . emerson 2019s financial structure provides the flexibility necessary to achieve its strategic objectives . the company has been successful in efficiently deploying cash where needed worldwide to fund operations , complete acquisitions and sustain long-term growth . at september 30 , 2017 , $ 3.1 billion of the company 2019s cash was held outside the u.s . ( primarily in europe and asia ) , $ 1.4 billion of which income taxes have been provided for , and was generally available for repatriation to the u.s . under current tax law , repatriated cash may be subject to u.s . federal income taxes , net of available foreign tax credits . the company routinely repatriates a portion of its non-u.s . cash from earnings each year , or otherwise when it can be accomplished tax efficiently , and provides for u.s . income taxes as appropriate . the company has been able to readily meet all its funding requirements and currently believes that sufficient funds will be available to meet the company 2019s needs in the foreseeable future through operating cash flow , existing resources , short- and long-term debt capacity or backup credit lines . contractual obligations at september 30 , 2017 , the company 2019s contractual obligations , including estimated payments , are as follows : amounts due by period less more than 1 2013 3 3 2013 5 than ( dollars in millions ) total 1 year years years 5 years long-term debt ( including interest ) $ 5342 428 1434 966 2514 .
|( dollars in millions )|amounts due by period total|amounts due by period less than 1 year|amounts due by period 1 - 3years|amounts due by period 3 - 5years|amounts due by period more than5 years|
|long-term debt ( including interest )|$ 5342|428|1434|966|2514|
|operating leases|536|171|206|80|79|
|purchase obligations|746|655|71|14|6|
|total|$ 6624|1254|1711|1060|2599|
purchase obligations consist primarily of inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements . the table above does not include $ 2.0 billion of other noncurrent liabilities recorded in the balance sheet and summarized in note 19 , which consist primarily of pension and postretirement plan liabilities , deferred income taxes and unrecognized tax benefits , because it is not certain when these amounts will become due . see notes 11 and 12 for estimated future benefit payments and note 14 for additional information on deferred income taxes . financial instruments the company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices , and selectively uses derivative financial instruments , including forwards , swaps and purchased options to manage these risks . the company does not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes . the value of derivatives and other financial instruments is subject to change as a result of market movements in rates and prices . sensitivity analysis is one technique used to forecast the impact of these movements . based on a hypothetical 10 percent increase in interest rates , a 10 percent decrease in commodity prices or a 10 percent weakening in the u.s . dollar across all currencies , the potential losses in future earnings , fair value or cash flows are not material . sensitivity analysis has limitations ; for example , a weaker u.s . dollar would benefit future earnings through favorable translation of non-u.s . operating results , and lower commodity prices would benefit future earnings through lower cost of sales . see notes 1 , and 8 through 10 . critical accounting policies preparation of the company 2019s financial statements requires management to make judgments , assumptions and estimates regarding uncertainties that could affect reported revenue , expenses , assets , liabilities and equity . note 1 describes the significant accounting policies used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements . the most significant areas where management judgments and estimates impact the primary financial statements are described below . actual results in these areas could differ materially from management 2019s estimates under different assumptions or conditions . revenue recognition the company recognizes a large majority of its revenue through the sale of manufactured products and records the sale when products are shipped or delivered , title and risk of loss pass to the customer , and collection is reasonably assured . in certain circumstances , revenue is recognized using the percentage-of- completion method , as performance occurs , or in accordance with asc 985-605 related to software . sales arrangements sometimes involve delivering multiple elements , which requires management judgment that affects the amount and timing of revenue recognized . in these instances , the revenue assigned to each element is based on vendor-specific objective evidence , third-party evidence or a management estimate of the relative selling price . revenue is recognized for delivered elements if they have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and performance related to the undelivered items is probable and substantially in the company 2019s control , or the undelivered elements are inconsequential or perfunctory and there are no unsatisfied contingencies related to payment . the vast majority of deliverables are tangible products , with a smaller portion attributable to installation , service or maintenance . management believes that all relevant criteria and conditions are considered when recognizing revenue. .
Question: what percent of total contractual obligations is due to purchase obligations?
Answer: | 0.11262 | what percent of total contractual obligations is due to purchase obligations? |
finqa843 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: credit commitments and lines of credit the table below summarizes citigroup 2019s credit commitments : in millions of dollars u.s . outside of u.s . december 31 , december 31 .
|in millions of dollars|u.s .|outside ofu.s .|december 312018|december 31 2017|
|commercial and similar letters of credit|$ 823|$ 4638|$ 5461|$ 5000|
|one- to four-family residential mortgages|1056|1615|2671|2674|
|revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties|10019|1355|11374|12323|
|commercial real estate construction and land development|9565|1728|11293|11151|
|credit card lines|605857|90150|696007|678300|
|commercial and other consumer loan commitments|185849|102918|288767|272655|
|other commitments and contingencies|2560|761|3321|3071|
|total|$ 815729|$ 203165|$ 1018894|$ 985174|
the majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards . commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees . such fees ( net of certain direct costs ) are deferred and , upon exercise of the commitment , amortized over the life of the loan or , if exercise is deemed remote , amortized over the commitment period . commercial and similar letters of credit a commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments . citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay the supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit . when a letter of credit is drawn , the customer is then required to reimburse citigroup . one- to four-family residential mortgages a one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase . revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit . a home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage . commercial real estate , construction and land development commercial real estate , construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects . both secured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line , as well as undistributed loan proceeds , where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress payments . however , this line only includes those extensions of credit that , once funded , will be classified as total loans , net on the consolidated balance sheet . credit card lines citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards . the credit card lines are cancelable by providing notice to the cardholder or without such notice as permitted by local law . commercial and other consumer loan commitments commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans , purchase third-party receivables , provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities and invest in the form of equity . other commitments and contingencies other commitments and contingencies include committed or unsettled regular-way reverse repurchase agreements and all other transactions related to commitments and contingencies not reported on the lines above . unsettled reverse repurchase and securities lending agreements and unsettled repurchase and securities borrowing agreements in addition , in the normal course of business , citigroup enters into reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements , as well as repurchase and securities lending agreements , which settle at a future date . at december 31 , 2018 , and 2017 , citigroup had $ 36.1 billion and $ 35.0 billion unsettled reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements , respectively , and $ 30.7 billion and $ 19.1 billion unsettled repurchase and securities lending agreements , respectively . for a further discussion of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed , and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned , including the company 2019s policy for offsetting repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements , see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2017 are credit card lines?
Answer: | 0.68851 | what percentage of total credit commitments as of december 31 , 2017 are credit card lines? |
finqa844 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. .
||2010|2009|2008|
|trading during non-u.s . hours|13% ( 13 % )|9% ( 9 % )|11% ( 11 % )|
|trading through telecommunication hubs|8|7|8|
available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .
Question: what was the average percent of trading through telecommunication hubs for 2008-2010 ? \\n
Answer: | 7.66667 | what was the average percent of trading through telecommunication hubs for 2008-2010 ? \\n |
finqa845 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 555.3|
|volume/weather|-4.5 ( 4.5 )|
|transmission equalization|4.5|
|other|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 554.9|
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 97 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in the residential and commercial sectors and a decrease in sales volume in the unbilled sales period . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to the addition in 2011 of transmission investments that are subject to equalization . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 57.5 million in gross wholesale revenues due to an increase in sales to affiliated customers , partially offset by a decrease of $ 26.9 million in power management rider revenue . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power. .
Question: based on the review of the net revenue changes what was ratio of the volume/weather to the transmission equalization
Answer: | -1.0 | based on the review of the net revenue changes what was ratio of the volume/weather to the transmission equalization |
finqa846 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the discount rate used to measure pension obligations is determined by comparing the expected future benefits that will be paid under the plan with yields available on high quality corporate bonds of similar duration . the impact on pension expense of a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate in the current environment is an increase of $ 18 million per year . this sensitivity depends on the economic environment and amount of unrecognized actuarial gains or losses on the measurement date . the expected long-term return on assets assumption also has a significant effect on pension expense . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the asset allocation policy currently in place . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligations will be disbursed . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of u.s . equity securities have historically returned approximately 9% ( 9 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) and 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were +6.50% ( +6.50 % ) , +15.48% ( +15.48 % ) , and +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2014 was 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) , down from 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for 2013 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 6.75% ( 6.75 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return can cause expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 9 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate pretax pension expense of $ 9 million in 2015 compared with pretax income of $ 7 million in 2014 . this year-over-year expected increase in expense reflects the effects of the lower expected return on asset assumption , improved mortality , and the lower discount rate required to be used in 2015 . these factors will be partially offset by the favorable impact of the increase in plan assets at december 31 , 2014 and the assumed return on a $ 200 million voluntary contribution to the plan made in february 2015 . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2015 estimated expense as a baseline . table 26 : pension expense 2013 sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase/ ( decrease ) to 2015 pension expense ( in millions ) .
|change in assumption ( a )|estimatedincrease/ ( decrease ) to 2015pensionexpense ( in millions )|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate|$ 18|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets|$ 22|
|.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate|$ 2|
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . notwithstanding the voluntary contribution made in february 2015 noted above , we do not expect to be required to make any contributions to the plan during 2015 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 13 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . 66 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: for pension expense , does a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate have a greater impact than a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets?
Answer: | no | for pension expense , does a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate have a greater impact than a .5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets? |
finqa847 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2008 2007 2006 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2008|2007|2006|
|gasoline|756|791|804|
|distillates|375|377|375|
|propane|22|23|23|
|feedstocks and special products|100|103|106|
|heavy fuel oil|23|29|26|
|asphalt|76|87|91|
|total ( a )|1352|1410|1425|
|average sales price ( dollars per barrel )|$ 109.49|$ 86.53|$ 77.76|
total ( a ) 1352 1410 1425 average sales price ( dollars per barrel ) $ 109.49 $ 86.53 $ 77.76 ( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd in 2006 . on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard . this change resulted in lower refined products sales volumes for 2008 , 2007 and the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under our previous accounting practices . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . gasoline and distillates 2013 we sell gasoline , gasoline blendstocks and no . 1 and no . 2 fuel oils ( including kerosene , jet fuel , diesel fuel and home heating oil ) to wholesale marketing customers in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . we sold 47 percent of our gasoline volumes and 88 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis in 2008 . the demand for gasoline is seasonal in many of our markets , with demand typically being at its highest levels during the summer months . we have blended fuel ethanol into gasoline for over 15 years and began increasing our blending program in 2007 , in part due to federal regulations that require us to use specified volumes of renewable fuels . we blended 57 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2008 , 41 mbpd in 2007 and 35 mbpd in 2006 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and by government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline , which is also blended with ethanol , in parts of our marketing territory , including : chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin and hartford , illinois . we also sell biodiesel-blended diesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . in 2007 , we acquired a 35 percent interest in an entity which owns and operates a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in clymers , indiana . we also own a 50 percent interest in an entity which owns a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in greenville , ohio . the greenville plant began production in february 2008 . both of these facilities are managed by a co-owner . propane 2013 we produce propane at all seven of our refineries . propane is primarily used for home heating and cooking , as a feedstock within the petrochemical industry , for grain drying and as a fuel for trucks and other vehicles . our propane sales are typically split evenly between the home heating market and industrial consumers . feedstocks and special products 2013 we are a producer and marketer of petrochemicals and specialty products . product availability varies by refinery and includes benzene , cumene , dilute naphthalene oil , molten maleic anhydride , molten sulfur , propylene , toluene and xylene . we market propylene , cumene and sulfur domestically to customers in the chemical industry . we sell maleic anhydride throughout the united states and canada . we also have the capacity to produce 1400 tons per day of anode grade coke at our robinson refinery , which is used to make carbon anodes for the aluminum smelting industry , and 2700 tons per day of fuel grade coke at the garyville refinery , which is used for power generation and in miscellaneous industrial applications . in september 2008 , we shut down our lubes facility in catlettsburg , kentucky , and sold from inventory through december 31 , 2008 ; therefore , base oils , aromatic extracts and slack wax are no longer being produced and marketed . in addition , we have recently discontinued production and sales of petroleum pitch and aliphatic solvents . heavy fuel oil 2013 we produce and market heavy oil , also known as fuel oil , residual fuel or slurry at all seven of our refineries . another product of crude oil , heavy oil is primarily used in the utility and ship bunkering ( fuel ) industries , though there are other more specialized uses of the product . we also sell heavy fuel oil at our terminals in wellsville , ohio , and chattanooga , tennessee . asphalt 2013 we have refinery based asphalt production capacity of up to 102 mbpd . we market asphalt through 33 owned or leased terminals throughout the midwest and southeast . we have a broad customer base , including .
Question: based on average sales price , how much refined product sales revenue did mro achieve in 2008?
Answer: | 148030.48 | based on average sales price , how much refined product sales revenue did mro achieve in 2008? |
finqa848 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .
|in billions of dollars|2008|2007|2006|
|proceeds from new securitizations|$ 1.2|$ 10.5|2014|
|cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows|0.5|2014|2014|
cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what was the difference in billions of proceeds from new securitizations from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: | -9.3 | what was the difference in billions of proceeds from new securitizations from 2007 to 2008? |
finqa849 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc . ( acquired by the company in march 2018 ) , time warner , inc . ( acquired by at&t inc . in june 2018 ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 . two peer companies , scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc. , were acquired in 2018 . the stock performance chart shows the peer group including scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc . and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
||december 312013|december 312014|december 312015|december 312016|december 312017|december 312018|
|disca|$ 100.00|$ 74.58|$ 57.76|$ 59.34|$ 48.45|$ 53.56|
|discb|$ 100.00|$ 80.56|$ 58.82|$ 63.44|$ 53.97|$ 72.90|
|disck|$ 100.00|$ 80.42|$ 60.15|$ 63.87|$ 50.49|$ 55.04|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 111.39|$ 110.58|$ 121.13|$ 144.65|$ 135.63|
|peer group incl . acquired companies|$ 100.00|$ 116.64|$ 114.02|$ 127.96|$ 132.23|$ 105.80|
|peer group ex . acquired companies|$ 100.00|$ 113.23|$ 117.27|$ 120.58|$ 127.90|$ 141.58|
equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: did the b series stock's 5 year performance beat the s&p 500?
Answer: | no | did the b series stock's 5 year performance beat the s&p 500? |
finqa850 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 .
|year ended december 31dollars in millions|2012|2011|
|net interest income|$ 9640|$ 8700|
|net interest margin|3.94% ( 3.94 % )|3.92% ( 3.92 % )|
changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 .
Question: dodd-frank was responsible for what time negative impact , in millions , on revenue in 2011 and 2012?
Answer: | 389.0 | dodd-frank was responsible for what time negative impact , in millions , on revenue in 2011 and 2012? |
finqa851 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 78 of 98 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 17 . financial instruments and risk management ( continued ) at december 31 , 2006 , the company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements in europe with notional amounts of 20ac135 million paying fixed rates . approximately $ 4 million of net gain associated with these contracts is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at december 31 , 2006 , of which $ 0.8 million is expected to be recognized in the consolidated statement of earnings during 2007 . approximately $ 1.1 million of net gain related to the termination or deselection of hedges is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at december 31 , 2006 . the amount recognized in 2006 earnings related to terminated hedges was insignificant . the fair value of all non-derivative financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts with the exception of long-term debt . rates currently available to the company for loans with similar terms and maturities are used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt based on discounted cash flows . the fair value of derivatives generally reflects the estimated amounts that we would pay or receive upon termination of the contracts at december 31 , 2006 , taking into account any unrealized gains and losses on open contracts. .
|( $ in millions )|2006 carryingamount|2006 fairvalue|2006 carryingamount|fair value|
|long-term debt including current portion|$ 2311.6|$ 2314.1|$ 1482.9|$ 1496.6|
|unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivative contracts|2013|3.7|2013|-0.1 ( 0.1 )|
foreign currency exchange rate risk our objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to protect foreign cash flows and earnings from changes associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes through the use of cash flow hedges . in addition , we manage foreign earnings translation volatility through the use of foreign currency options . our foreign currency translation risk results from the european euro , british pound , canadian dollar , polish zloty , serbian dinar , brazilian real , argentine peso and chinese renminbi . we face currency exposures in our global operations as a result of purchasing raw materials in u.s . dollars and , to a lesser extent , in other currencies . sales contracts are negotiated with customers to reflect cost changes and , where there is not a foreign exchange pass-through arrangement , the company uses forward and option contracts to manage foreign currency exposures . such contracts outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , expire within four years and there are no amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these contracts. .
Question: what is the unrealized gain ( in millions ) on the hedges of long-term debt for 2006?
Answer: | 2.5 | what is the unrealized gain ( in millions ) on the hedges of long-term debt for 2006? |
finqa852 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 74 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 5 . the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage- backed securities , u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , obligations of u.s . states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2017 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 248.0 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 10 for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 92 201397 . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , see market risk management on pages 121-128 . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .
|as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )|2017|2016|2015|
|securities gains/ ( losses )|$ -78 ( 78 )|$ 132|$ 190|
|afs investment securities ( average )|219345|226892|264758|
|htm investment securities ( average )|47927|51358|50044|
|investment securities portfolio ( average )|267272|278250|314802|
|afs investment securities ( period-end )|200247|236670|238704|
|htm investment securities ( period-end )|47733|50168|49073|
|investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )|247980|286838|287777|
afs investment securities ( average ) 219345 226892 264758 htm investment securities ( average ) 47927 51358 50044 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 267272 278250 314802 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 200247 236670 238704 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 47733 50168 49073 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 247980 286838 287777 .
Question: for 2017 , were available for sale securities on average greater than held to maturity securities?
Answer: | yes | for 2017 , were available for sale securities on average greater than held to maturity securities? |
finqa853 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( c ) effective january 1 , 2019 , these assets were transferred from the products pipelines business segment to the natural gas pipelines business segment . ( d ) effective january 1 , 2019 , a small number of terminals were transferred between the products pipelines and terminals business segments . competition our products pipelines 2019 pipeline operations compete against proprietary pipelines owned and operated by major oil companies , other independent products pipelines , trucking and marine transportation firms ( for short-haul movements of products ) and railcars . our products pipelines 2019 terminal operations compete with proprietary terminals owned and operated by major oil companies and other independent terminal operators , and our transmix operations compete with refineries owned by major oil companies and independent transmix facilities . terminals our terminals business segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines business segment ) and all of our petroleum coke , metal and ores facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act-qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products between u.s . ports . the following summarizes our terminals business segment assets , as of december 31 , 2018 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .
||number|capacity ( mmbbl )|
|liquids terminals ( a )|52|89.6|
|bulk terminals|34|2014|
|jones act tankers|16|5.3|
_______ ( a ) effective january 1 , 2019 , a small number of terminals were transferred between the terminals and products pipelines business segments . competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our jones act-qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets . our co2 business segment produces , transports , and markets co2 for use in enhanced oil recovery projects as a flooding medium for recovering crude oil from mature oil fields . our co2 pipelines and related assets allow us to market a complete package of co2 supply and transportation services to our customers . we also hold ownership interests in several oil-producing fields and own a crude oil pipeline , all located in the permian basin region of west texas. .
Question: what percent of storage facilities are liquid terminals
Answer: | 0.5098 | what percent of storage facilities are liquid terminals |
finqa854 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards .
||shares available for awards|shares subject to outstanding awards|
|2009 global incentive plan|2322450|2530454|
|2004 stock incentive plan|-|5923147|
upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what portion of the total shares subject to outstanding awards is under the 2004 stock incentive plan?
Answer: | 0.29933 | what portion of the total shares subject to outstanding awards is under the 2004 stock incentive plan? |
finqa855 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .
|december 31 ( in dollars )|2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|2015|
|jpmorgan chase|$ 100.00|$ 80.03|$ 108.98|$ 148.98|$ 163.71|$ 177.40|
|kbw bank index|100.00|76.82|102.19|140.77|153.96|154.71|
|s&p financial index|100.00|82.94|106.78|144.79|166.76|164.15|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|102.11|118.44|156.78|178.22|180.67|
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: what was the 5 year return of the s&p 500 index?
Answer: | 0.8067 | what was the 5 year return of the s&p 500 index? |
finqa856 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 5829|
|retail electric price|289|
|louisiana business combination customer credits|107|
|volume/weather|14|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|-17 ( 17 )|
|other|-43 ( 43 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 6179|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue is due to retail electric price?
Answer: | 0.82571 | what portion of the net change in net revenue is due to retail electric price? |
finqa857 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: of sales , competitive supply gross margin declined in south america , europe/africa and the caribbean and remained relatively flat in north america and asia . large utilities gross margin increased $ 201 million , or 37% ( 37 % ) , to $ 739 million in 2001 from $ 538 million in 2000 . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2001 and 2000 , large utilities gross margin increased 10% ( 10 % ) to $ 396 million in 2001 . large utilities gross margin as a percentage of revenues increased to 30% ( 30 % ) in 2001 from 25% ( 25 % ) in 2000 . in the caribbean ( which includes venezuela ) , large utility gross margin increased $ 166 million and was due to a full year of contribution from edc which was acquired in june 2000 . also , in north america , the gross margin contributions from both ipalco and cilcorp increased . growth distribution gross margin increased $ 165 million , or 126% ( 126 % ) to $ 296 million in 2001 from $ 131 million in 2000 . excluding businesses acquired during 2001 and 2000 , growth distribution gross margin increased 93% ( 93 % ) to $ 268 million in 2001 . growth distribution gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 18% ( 18 % ) in 2001 from 10% ( 10 % ) in 2000 . growth distribution business gross margin , as well as gross margin as a percentage of sales , increased in south america and the caribbean , but decreased in europe/africa and asia . in south america , growth distribution margin increased $ 157 million and was 38% ( 38 % ) of revenues . the increase is due primarily to sul 2019s sales of excess energy into the southeast market where rationing was taking place . in the caribbean , growth distribution margin increased $ 39 million and was 5% ( 5 % ) of revenues . the increase is due mainly to lower losses at ede este and an increase in contribution from caess . in europe/africa , growth distribution margin decreased $ 10 million and was negative due to losses at sonel . in asia , growth distribution margin decreased $ 18 million and was negative due primarily to an increase in losses at telasi . the breakdown of aes 2019s gross margin for the years ended december 31 , 2001 and 2000 , based on the geographic region in which they were earned , is set forth below. .
|north america|2001 $ 912 million|% ( % ) of revenue 25% ( 25 % )|2000 $ 844 million|% ( % ) of revenue 25% ( 25 % )|% ( % ) change 8% ( 8 % )|
|south america|$ 522 million|30% ( 30 % )|$ 416 million|36% ( 36 % )|25% ( 25 % )|
|caribbean*|$ 457 million|25% ( 25 % )|$ 226 million|21% ( 21 % )|102% ( 102 % )|
|europe/africa|$ 310 million|22% ( 22 % )|$ 371 million|29% ( 29 % )|( 16% ( 16 % ) )|
|asia|$ 101 million|15% ( 15 % )|$ 138 million|22% ( 22 % )|( 27% ( 27 % ) )|
* includes venezuela and colombia . selling , general and administrative expenses selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 38 million , or 46% ( 46 % ) , to $ 120 million in 2001 from $ 82 million in 2000 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 1% ( 1 % ) in 2001 and 2000 . the overall increase in selling , general and administrative expenses is due to increased development activities . interest expense , net net interest expense increased $ 327 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , to $ 1.5 billion in 2001 from $ 1.1 billion in 2000 . net interest expense as a percentage of revenues increased to 16% ( 16 % ) in 2001 from 15% ( 15 % ) in 2000 . net interest expense increased overall primarily due to interest expense at new businesses , additional corporate interest expense arising from senior debt issued during 2001 to finance new investments and mark-to-market losses on interest rate related derivative instruments. .
Question: 2001 north american revenues were what in millions?
Answer: | 3648.0 | 2001 north american revenues were what in millions? |
finqa858 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: commodity prices risk : the company manages commodity price risks through negotiated supply contracts , price protection agreements and forward contracts . 3m used commodity price swaps as cash flow hedges of forecasted commodity transactions to manage price volatility , but discontinued this practice in the first quarter of 2015 . the related mark-to-market gain or loss on qualifying hedges was included in other comprehensive income to the extent effective , and reclassified into cost of sales in the period during which the hedged transaction affected earnings . value at risk : the value at risk analysis is performed annually to assess the company 2019s sensitivity to changes in currency rates , interest rates , and commodity prices . a monte carlo simulation technique was used to test the impact on after-tax earnings related to financial instruments ( primarily debt ) , derivatives and underlying exposures outstanding at december 31 , 2015 . the model ( third-party bank dataset ) used a 95 percent confidence level over a 12-month time horizon . the exposure to changes in currency rates model used 18 currencies , interest rates related to three currencies , and commodity prices related to five commodities . this model does not purport to represent what actually will be experienced by the company . this model does not include certain hedge transactions , because the company believes their inclusion would not materially impact the results . the risk of loss or benefit associated with exchange rates was higher in 2015 due to a greater mix of floating rate debt and a rising interest rate environment in the u.s . interest rate volatility increased in 2015 , based on a higher mix of floating rate debt and the use of forward rates . the following table summarizes the possible adverse and positive impacts to after-tax earnings related to these exposures . adverse impact on after-tax positive impact on after-tax earnings earnings .
|( millions )|adverse impact on after-tax earnings 2015|adverse impact on after-tax earnings 2014|adverse impact on after-tax earnings 2015|2014|
|foreign exchange rates|$ -254 ( 254 )|$ -164 ( 164 )|$ 273|$ 173|
|interest rates|-13 ( 13 )|-4 ( 4 )|9|3|
|commodity prices|-1 ( 1 )|-1 ( 1 )|1|1|
in addition to the possible adverse and positive impacts discussed in the preceding table related to foreign exchange rates , recent historical information is as follows . 3m estimates that year-on-year currency effects , including hedging impacts , had the following effects on pre-tax income : 2015 ( $ 390 million decrease ) and 2014 ( $ 100 million decrease ) . this estimate includes the effect of translating profits from local currencies into u.s . dollars ; the impact of currency fluctuations on the transfer of goods between 3m operations in the united states and abroad ; and transaction gains and losses , including derivative instruments designed to reduce foreign currency exchange rate risks and the negative impact of swapping venezuelan bolivars into u.s . dollars . 3m estimates that year-on-year derivative and other transaction gains and losses had the following effects on pre-tax income : 2015 ( $ 180 million increase ) and 2014 ( $ 10 million increase ) . an analysis of the global exposures related to purchased components and materials is performed at each year-end . a one percent price change would result in a pre-tax cost or savings of approximately $ 70 million per year . the global energy exposure is such that a ten percent price change would result in a pre-tax cost or savings of approximately $ 40 million per year . global energy exposure includes energy costs used in 3m production and other facilities , primarily electricity and natural gas. .
Question: what was the net foreign exchange rate in 2015 in millions
Answer: | 19.0 | what was the net foreign exchange rate in 2015 in millions |
finqa859 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other expense , net , decreased $ 6.2 million , or 50.0% ( 50.0 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to the year ended december 31 , 2003 . the decrease was primarily due to a reduction in charges on disposal and transfer costs of fixed assets and facility closure costs of $ 3.3 million , reduced legal charges of $ 1.5 million , and a reduction in expenses of $ 1.4 million consisting of individually insignificant items . interest expense and income taxes interest expense decreased in 2004 by $ 92.2 million , or 75.7% ( 75.7 % ) , from 2003 . this decrease included $ 73.3 million of expenses related to the company 2019s debt refinancing , which was completed in july 2003 . the $ 73.3 million of expenses consisted of $ 55.9 million paid in premiums for the tender of the 95 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior subordinated notes , and a $ 17.4 million non-cash charge for the write-off of deferred financing fees related to the 95 20448% ( 20448 % ) notes and pca 2019s original revolving credit facility . excluding the $ 73.3 million charge , interest expense was $ 18.9 million lower than in 2003 as a result of lower interest rates attributable to the company 2019s july 2003 refinancing and lower debt levels . pca 2019s effective tax rate was 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 42.3% ( 42.3 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . the higher tax rate in 2003 is due to stable permanent items over lower book income ( loss ) . for both years 2004 and 2003 tax rates are higher than the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) due to state income taxes . year ended december 31 , 2003 compared to year ended december 31 , 2002 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december 31 , 2003 and 2002 are set forth below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2003 2002 change .
|( in millions )|2003|2002|change|
|net sales|$ 1735.5|$ 1735.9|$ -0.4 ( 0.4 )|
|income before interest and taxes|$ 96.9|$ 145.3|$ -48.4 ( 48.4 )|
|interest expense net|-121.8 ( 121.8 )|-67.7 ( 67.7 )|-54.1 ( 54.1 )|
|income ( loss ) before taxes|-24.9 ( 24.9 )|77.6|-102.5 ( 102.5 )|
|( provision ) benefit for income taxes|10.5|-29.4 ( 29.4 )|39.9|
|net income ( loss )|$ -14.4 ( 14.4 )|$ 48.2|$ -62.6 ( 62.6 )|
net sales net sales decreased by $ 0.4 million , or 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2003 from the year ended december 31 , 2002 . net sales increased due to improved sales volumes compared to 2002 , however , this increase was entirely offset by lower sales prices . total corrugated products volume sold increased 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) to 28.1 billion square feet in 2003 compared to 27.5 billion square feet in 2002 . on a comparable shipment-per-workday basis , corrugated products sales volume increased 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) in 2003 from 2002 . shipments-per-workday is calculated by dividing our total corrugated products volume during the year by the number of workdays within the year . the lower percentage increase was due to the fact that 2003 had one more workday ( 252 days ) , those days not falling on a weekend or holiday , than 2002 ( 251 days ) . containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers decreased 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) to 445000 tons for the year ended december 31 , 2003 from 477000 tons in the comparable period of 2002 . income before interest and taxes income before interest and taxes decreased by $ 48.4 million , or 33.3% ( 33.3 % ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2003 compared to 2002 . included in income before interest and taxes for the twelve months .
Question: containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers decreased by how many tons in the year ended december 31 , 2003 from 2002?
Answer: | 32000.0 | containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers decreased by how many tons in the year ended december 31 , 2003 from 2002? |
finqa860 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii , item 7 until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.74% ( 4.74 % ) . the proceeds from these notes were used to repay commercial paper borrowings . 0160 on april 20 , 2006 , the schlumberger board of directors approved a share repurchase program of up to 40 million shares of common stock to be acquired in the open market before april 2010 , subject to market conditions . this program was completed during the second quarter of 2008 . on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 , of which $ 1.43 billion had been repurchased as of december 31 , 2009 . the following table summarizes the activity under these share repurchase programs during 2009 , 2008 and ( stated in thousands except per share amounts and prices ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .
||total cost of shares purchased|total number of shares purchased|average price paid per share|
|2009|$ 500097|7825.0|$ 63.91|
|2008|$ 1818841|21064.7|$ 86.35|
|2007|$ 1355000|16336.1|$ 82.95|
0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 5.3 billion in 2009 , $ 6.9 billion in 2008 and $ 6.3 billion in 2007 . the decline in cash flow from operations in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily driven by the decrease in net income experienced in 2009 and the significant pension plan contributions made during 2009 , offset by an improvement in working capital requirements . the improvement in 2008 as compared to 2007 was driven by the net income increase experienced in 2008 offset by required investments in working capital . the reduction in cash flows experienced by some of schlumberger 2019s customers as a result of global economic conditions could have significant adverse effects on their financial condition . this could result in , among other things , delay in , or nonpayment of , amounts that are owed to schlumberger , which could have a material adverse effect on schlumberger 2019s results of operations and cash flows . at times in recent quarters , schlumberger has experienced delays in payments from certain of its customers . schlumberger operates in approximately 80 countries . at december 31 , 2009 , only three of those countries individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one represented greater than 0160 during 2008 and 2007 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved increases in the quarterly dividend of 20% ( 20 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) , respectively . total dividends paid during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 1.0 billion , $ 964 million and $ 771 million , respectively . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 2.4 billion in 2009 , $ 3.7 billion in 2008 and $ 2.9 billion in 2007 . capital expenditures in 2008 and 2007 reflected the record activity levels experienced in those years . the decrease in capital expenditures in 2009 as compared to 2008 is primarily due to the significant activity decline during 2009 . oilfield services capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 2.4 billion for the full year 2010 as compared to $ 1.9 billion in 2009 and $ 3.0 billion in 2008 . westerngeco capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 0.3 billion for the full year 2010 as compared to $ 0.5 billion in 2009 and $ 0.7 billion in 2008. .
Question: by how much did the average price per share decrease from 2007 to 2009?
Answer: | -0.22954 | by how much did the average price per share decrease from 2007 to 2009? |
finqa861 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: reasonably possible that such matters will be resolved in the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate that the resolution of these matters would result in any material impact on our results of operations or financial position . foreign jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from 3 to 5 years . years still open to examination by foreign tax authorities in major jurisdictions include australia ( 2003 onward ) , canada ( 2002 onward ) , france ( 2006 onward ) , germany ( 2005 onward ) , italy ( 2005 onward ) , japan ( 2002 onward ) , puerto rico ( 2005 onward ) , singapore ( 2003 onward ) , switzerland ( 2006 onward ) and the united kingdom ( 2006 onward ) . our tax returns are currently under examination in various foreign jurisdictions . the most significant foreign tax jurisdiction under examination is the united kingdom . it is reasonably possible that such audits will be resolved in the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate that the resolution of these audits would result in any material impact on our results of operations or financial position . 13 . capital stock and earnings per share we are authorized to issue 250 million shares of preferred stock , none of which were issued or outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 . the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings available to common stockholders . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the denominator for diluted earnings per share is weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards . the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|2006|
|weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share|227.3|235.5|243.0|
|effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards|1.0|2.0|2.4|
|weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share|228.3|237.5|245.4|
weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 227.3 235.5 243.0 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 1.0 2.0 2.4 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 228.3 237.5 245.4 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , an average of 11.2 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , an average of 3.1 million and 7.6 million options , respectively , were not included . during 2008 , we repurchased approximately 10.8 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 68.72 per share for a total cash outlay of $ 737.0 million , including commissions . in april 2008 , we announced that our board of directors authorized a $ 1.25 billion share repurchase program which expires december 31 , 2009 . approximately $ 1.13 billion remains authorized under this plan . 14 . segment data we design , develop , manufacture and market orthopaedic and dental reconstructive implants , spinal implants , trauma products and related surgical products which include surgical supplies and instruments designed to aid in orthopaedic surgical procedures and post-operation rehabilitation . we also provide other healthcare-related services . revenue related to these services currently represents less than 1 percent of our total net sales . we manage operations through three major geographic segments 2013 the americas , which is comprised principally of the united states and includes other north , central and south american markets ; europe , which is comprised principally of europe and includes the middle east and africa ; and asia pacific , which is comprised primarily of japan and includes other asian and pacific markets . this structure is the basis for our reportable segment information discussed below . management evaluates operating segment performance based upon segment operating profit exclusive of operating expenses pertaining to global operations and corporate expenses , share-based compensation expense , settlement , certain claims , acquisition , integration and other expenses , inventory step-up , in-process research and development write-offs and intangible asset amortization expense . global operations include research , development engineering , medical education , brand management , corporate legal , finance , and human resource functions , and u.s . and puerto rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics . intercompany transactions have been eliminated from segment operating profit . management reviews accounts receivable , inventory , property , plant and equipment , goodwill and intangible assets by reportable segment exclusive of u.s and puerto rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics and corporate assets . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 058000000 ***%%pcmsg|58 |00011|yes|no|02/24/2009 19:25|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: percent change of average shares outstanding when taking dilution into consideration in 2008?
Answer: | 0.0044 | percent change of average shares outstanding when taking dilution into consideration in 2008? |
finqa862 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: to determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the specified vesting period . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , options for 12759000 and 12337000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 90.86 and $ 106.08 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 86 million , $ 37 million and $ 4 million , respectively . the total tax benefit recognized related to compensation expense on all share-based payment arrangements during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 56 million , $ 37 million and $ 38 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 208 million , $ 118 million and $ 41 million , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 31 million , $ 14 million and $ 1 million , respectively . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 24535159 at december 31 , 2013 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 25712719 shares at december 31 , 2013 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2013 , we issued approximately 2.6 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 include 27076 , 25620 and 27090 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which is accounted for as a liability until such awards are paid to the participants in cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full for these awards on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals , generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee ( 201cp&cc 201d ) of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to certain incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/share unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 3 years to 5 years . beginning in 2013 , we incorporated several enhanced risk- related performance changes to certain long-term incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics on both an absolute basis and relative to our peers , final payout amounts will be subject to reduction if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to waive any or all of this reduction under certain circumstances . these awards have either a three- year or a four-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2013 to certain executives as part of annual bonus deferral criteria . these units , payable solely in stock , vest ratably over a four-year period and contain the same risk- related discretionary criteria noted in the preceding paragraph . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 64.77 , $ 60.68 and $ 63.25 per share , respectively . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 63 million , $ 55 million and $ 52 million , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 124 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/share unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average grant date fair value nonvested restricted stock/ weighted- average grant date fair value .
|shares in thousands december 31 2012|nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 1119|weighted- average grant date fair value $ 61.14|nonvested restricted stock/ share units 3061|weighted- average grant date fair value $ 60.04|
|granted|926|64.36|1288|65.06|
|vested/released|-326 ( 326 )|58.26|-674 ( 674 )|55.22|
|forfeited|-72 ( 72 )|62.02|-192 ( 192 )|62.37|
|december 31 2013|1647|$ 63.49|3483|$ 62.70|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 187 .
Question: for 2013 , what was the change in shares in thousands of nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares?
Answer: | 528.0 | for 2013 , what was the change in shares in thousands of nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares? |
finqa863 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .
|2008|$ 317|
|2009|275|
|2010|236|
|2011|214|
|2012|191|
|later years|597|
|total minimum payments required|$ 1830|
aon corporation .
Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
Answer: | -0.13249 | what is the percentual decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009? |
finqa864 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : .
||2009|2008|
|acquired rights to use technology|$ 84313|$ 90643|
|investments|63526|76589|
|security and other deposits|11692|16087|
|prepaid royalties|12059|9026|
|deferred compensation plan assets|9045|7560|
|restricted cash|4650|7361|
|prepaid land lease|3209|3185|
|prepaid rent|1377|2658|
|other|1394|3420|
|other assets|$ 191265|$ 216529|
acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .
Question: what is the growth rate in the other assets from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: | -0.11668 | what is the growth rate in the other assets from 2008 to 2009? |
finqa865 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
||12/9/2013|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|12/31/2015|
|american airlines group inc .|$ 100|$ 103|$ 219|$ 175|
|amex airline index|100|102|152|127|
|s&p 500|100|102|114|113|
purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .
Question: by how much did american airlines group inc . common stock out preform the s&p 500 index over the 4 year period?
Answer: | 0.48 | by how much did american airlines group inc . common stock out preform the s&p 500 index over the 4 year period? |
finqa866 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion . net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively . index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 . the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion . fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 .
|( in millions )|december 31 2013|net inflows ( outflows )|market change|fx impact|december 31 2014|
|asset allocation and balanced|$ 169604|$ 18387|$ -827 ( 827 )|$ -4132 ( 4132 )|$ 183032|
|target date/risk|111408|10992|7083|-872 ( 872 )|128611|
|fiduciary|60202|-474 ( 474 )|14788|-8322 ( 8322 )|66194|
|multi-asset|$ 341214|$ 28905|$ 21044|$ -13326 ( 13326 )|$ 377837|
flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 . institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum . the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: in 2014 , what percent of the multi asset value was the value of of asset allocation and balanced?
Answer: | 0.48442 | in 2014 , what percent of the multi asset value was the value of of asset allocation and balanced? |
finqa867 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups . the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc . the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc . which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc . s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
||2006|2007|2008|2009|2010|
|cme group inc .|$ 139.48|$ 188.81|$ 58.66|$ 96.37|$ 93.73|
|s&p 500|115.80|122.16|76.96|97.33|111.99|
|old peer group|155.58|190.78|72.25|76.11|87.61|
|new peer group|155.58|190.78|72.25|76.11|87.61|
.
Question: did the cme group outperform the new peer group?
Answer: | yes | did the cme group outperform the new peer group? |
finqa868 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: .
||2015|2014|2013|
|expected volatility|14.93% ( 14.93 % )|17.78% ( 17.78 % )|19.37% ( 19.37 % )|
|risk-free interest rate|1.07% ( 1.07 % )|0.75% ( 0.75 % )|0.40% ( 0.40 % )|
|expected life ( years )|3.0|3.0|3.0|
|grant date fair value per share|$ 62.10|$ 45.45|$ 40.13|
the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the growth rate of the grant date fair value of rsus vested from 2013 to 2014
Answer: | 0.22222 | what was the growth rate of the grant date fair value of rsus vested from 2013 to 2014 |
finqa869 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company . one consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written . statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2014 201cdowngrades in our financial strength or credit ratings , which may make our products less attractive , could increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt , which would have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations and liquidity . 201d statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .
||2014|2013|
|u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013|$ 7157|$ 6639|
|property and casualty insurance subsidiaries|8069|8022|
|total|$ 15226|$ 14661|
statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 , increased by $ 518 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of $ 788 , net income from non-variable annuity business of $ 187 , increases in unrealized gains from other invested assets carrying values of $ 138 , partially offset by returns of capital of $ 500 , and changes in reserves on account of change in valuation basis of $ 100 . effective april 30 , 2014 the last domestic captive ceased operations . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance increased by $ 47 , primarily due to statutory net income of $ 1.1 billion , and unrealized gains on investments of $ 1.4 billion , largely offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 2.5 billion . the company also held regulatory capital and surplus for its former operations in japan until the sale of those operations on june 30 , 2014 . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what portion of the total statutory surplus is related to property and casualty insurance subsidiaries in 2014?
Answer: | 0.52995 | what portion of the total statutory surplus is related to property and casualty insurance subsidiaries in 2014? |
finqa870 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) .
|2018|$ 550|
|2019|397|
|2020|300|
|2021|1017|
|2022|497|
.
Question: is the long term debt maturing in 2021 greater than 2022?
Answer: | yes | is the long term debt maturing in 2021 greater than 2022? |
finqa871 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of our common stock registered pursuant to section 12 of the exchange act during the quarter ended december 31 , 2016 . period ( a ) number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions ) .
|period ( a )|total number of shares purchased|average price paid per share|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b )|amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions )|
|september 26 2016 2013 october 30 2016|1294018|$ 235.56|1293734|$ 4015|
|october 31 2016 2013 november 27 2016|712100|$ 254.42|711974|$ 3834|
|november 28 2016 2013 december 31 2016|1281651|$ 259.81|1270668|$ 3504|
|total|3287769 ( c )|$ 249.09|3276376||
total 3287769 ( c ) $ 249.09 3276376 ( a ) we close our books and records on the last sunday of each month to align our financial closing with our business processes , except for the month of december , as our fiscal year ends on december 31 . as a result , our fiscal months often differ from the calendar months . for example , september 26 , 2016 was the first day of our october 2016 fiscal month . ( b ) in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market at prices per share not exceeding the then-current market prices . on september 22 , 2016 , our board of directors authorized a $ 2.0 billion increase to the program . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . this includes purchases pursuant to rule 10b5-1 plans . the program does not have an expiration date . ( c ) during the quarter ended december 31 , 2016 , the total number of shares purchased included 11393 shares that were transferred to us by employees in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock units . these purchases were made pursuant to a separate authorization by our board of directors and are not included within the program. .
Question: what was the average number of shares repurchased per month for the 3 months ending december 31 , 2016?
Answer: | 1095923.0 | what was the average number of shares repurchased per month for the 3 months ending december 31 , 2016? |
finqa872 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . these costs are being amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings results from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 1666|
|nuclear realized price changes|-149 ( 149 )|
|rhode island state energy center|-44 ( 44 )|
|nuclear volume|-36 ( 36 )|
|fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement|41|
|nuclear fuel expenses|68|
|other|-4 ( 4 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 1542|
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , although the average revenue per mwh shown in the table below for the nuclear fleet is slightly higher because it includes revenues from the fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement with exelon , the amortization of the palisades below-market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue . the effect of the amortization of the palisades below-market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 . see 201cnuclear .
Question: what would net revenue have been in 2016 if there wasn't a gain from the fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement?
Answer: | 1501.0 | what would net revenue have been in 2016 if there wasn't a gain from the fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement? |
finqa873 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : .
|2013|$ 516|
|2014|556|
|2015|542|
|2016|513|
|2017|486|
|thereafter|1801|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 4414|
other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: | 0.44379 | what was the percentage change in rent expense under operating leases from 2011 to 2012? |
finqa874 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual obligations significant contractual obligations as of december 30 , 2017 were as follows: .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than1 year|payments due by period 1 20133 years|payments due by period 3 20135 years|payments due by period more than5 years|
|operating lease obligations|$ 1245|$ 215|$ 348|$ 241|$ 441|
|capital purchase obligations1|12068|9689|2266|113|2014|
|other purchase obligations and commitments2|2692|1577|1040|55|20|
|tax obligations3|6120|490|979|979|3672|
|long-term debt obligations4|42278|1495|5377|8489|26917|
|other long-term liabilities5|1544|799|422|190|133|
|total6|$ 65947|$ 14265|$ 10432|$ 10067|$ 31183|
capital purchase obligations1 12068 9689 2266 113 2014 other purchase obligations and commitments2 2692 1577 1040 55 20 tax obligations3 6120 490 979 979 3672 long-term debt obligations4 42278 1495 5377 8489 26917 other long-term liabilities5 1544 799 422 190 133 total6 $ 65947 $ 14265 $ 10432 $ 10067 $ 31183 1 capital purchase obligations represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property , plant and equipment . they were not recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 30 , 2017 , as we had not yet received the related goods nor taken title to the property . 2 other purchase obligations and commitments include payments due under various types of licenses and agreements to purchase goods or services , as well as payments due under non-contingent funding obligations . 3 tax obligations represent the future cash payments related to tax reform enacted in 2017 for the one-time provisional transition tax on our previously untaxed foreign earnings . for further information , see 201cnote 8 : income taxes 201d within the consolidated financial statements . 4 amounts represent principal and interest cash payments over the life of the debt obligations , including anticipated interest payments that are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets . debt obligations are classified based on their stated maturity date , regardless of their classification on the consolidated balance sheets . any future settlement of convertible debt would impact our cash payments . 5 amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities . derivative instruments are excluded from the preceding table , as they do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid . 6 total excludes contractual obligations already recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as current liabilities , except for the short-term portions of long-term debt obligations and other long-term liabilities . the expected timing of payments of the obligations in the preceding table is estimated based on current information . timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different , depending on the time of receipt of goods or services , or changes to agreed- upon amounts for some obligations . contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services included in 201cother purchase obligations and commitments 201d in the preceding table include agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on intel and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . for obligations with cancellation provisions , the amounts included in the preceding table were limited to the non-cancelable portion of the agreement terms or the minimum cancellation fee . for the purchase of raw materials , we have entered into certain agreements that specify minimum prices and quantities based on a percentage of the total available market or based on a percentage of our future purchasing requirements . due to the uncertainty of the future market and our future purchasing requirements , as well as the non-binding nature of these agreements , obligations under these agreements have been excluded from the preceding table . our purchase orders for other products are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons . in addition , some of our purchase orders represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements . contractual obligations that are contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones have been excluded from the preceding table . most of our milestone-based contracts are tooling related for the purchase of capital equipment . these arrangements are not considered contractual obligations until the milestone is met by the counterparty . as of december 30 , 2017 , assuming that all future milestones are met , the additional required payments would be approximately $ 2.0 billion . for the majority of restricted stock units ( rsus ) granted , the number of shares of common stock issued on the date the rsus vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees . the obligation to pay the relevant taxing authority is excluded from the preceding table , as the amount is contingent upon continued employment . in addition , the amount of the obligation is unknown , as it is based in part on the market price of our common stock when the awards vest . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 38 .
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations do capital purchase obligations make up as of december 30 2017?
Answer: | 0.183 | what percentage of total contractual obligations do capital purchase obligations make up as of december 30 2017? |
finqa875 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( d ) securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . except for the information concerning equity compensation plans below , the information required by item 12 is incorporated by reference to the company 2019s 2004 proxy statement under the caption 2018 2018security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management . 2019 2019 the following table provides information about shares of aes common stock that may be issued under aes 2019s equity compensation plans , as of december 31 , 2003 : securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans ( as of december 31 , 2003 ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) number of securities remaining available for number of securities future issuance under to be issued upon weighted-average equity compensation exercise of exercise price plans ( excluding outstanding options , of outstanding options , securities reflected plan category warrants and rights warrants and rights in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . 29061549 13.80 16720238 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 ) . 11754222 13.09 225609 .
|plan category|( a ) number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights|( b ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights|( c ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|29061549|13.80|16720238|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 )|11754222|13.09|225609|
|total|40815771|13.59|16945847|
( 1 ) the aes corporation 2001 non-officer stock option plan ( the 2018 2018plan 2019 2019 ) was adopted by our board of directors on october 18 , 2001 . this plan did not require approval under either the sec or nyse rules and/or regulations . eligible participants under the plan include all of our non-officer employees . as of the end of december 31 , 2003 , approximately 13500 employees held options under the plan . the exercise price of each option awarded under the plan is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date of the option . options under the plan generally vest as to 50% ( 50 % ) of their underlying shares on each anniversary of the option grant date , however , grants dated october 25 , 2001 vest in one year . the plan shall expire on october 25 , 2011 . the board may amend , modify or terminate the plan at any time . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018related party transactions 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on april 28 , 2004 , which information is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services the information required by this item will be contained in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on april 28 , 2004 and is hereby incorporated by reference. .
Question: at the end of 2003 , what would total proceeds be for the company if all remaining shares in the plan were exercised?
Answer: | 554686327.89 | at the end of 2003 , what would total proceeds be for the company if all remaining shares in the plan were exercised? |
finqa876 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in december , our board of directors ratified its authorization of a stock repurchase program in the amount of 1.5 million shares of our common stock . as of december 31 , 2010 no shares had been repurchased . we have paid dividends for 71 consecutive years with payments increasing each of the last 19 years . we paid total dividends of $ .54 per share in 2010 compared with $ .51 per share in 2009 . aggregate contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2010 , is as follows: .
|( dollars in millions ) contractual obligations|( dollars in millions ) total|( dollars in millions ) less than1 year|( dollars in millions ) 1 - 3years|( dollars in millions ) 3 - 5years|more than5 years|
|long-term debt|$ 261.0|$ 18.6|$ 181.2|$ 29.2|$ 32.0|
|fixed rate interest|22.4|6.1|9.0|5.1|2.2|
|operating leases|30.2|7.2|7.9|5.4|9.7|
|purchase obligations|45.5|45.5|-|-|-|
|total|$ 359.1|$ 77.4|$ 198.1|$ 39.7|$ 43.9|
as of december 31 , 2010 , the liability for uncertain income tax positions was $ 2.7 million . due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding timing of potential future cash flows associated with these liabilities , we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period in which these liabilities might be paid . we utilize blanket purchase orders to communicate expected annual requirements to many of our suppliers . requirements under blanket purchase orders generally do not become committed until several weeks prior to the company 2019s scheduled unit production . the purchase obligation amount presented above represents the value of commitments considered firm . results of operations our sales from continuing operations in 2010 were $ 1489.3 million surpassing 2009 sales of $ 1375.0 million by 8.3 percent . the increase in sales was due mostly to significantly higher sales in our water heater operations in china resulting from geographic expansion , market share gains and new product introductions as well as additional sales from our water treatment business acquired in november , 2009 . our sales from continuing operations were $ 1451.3 million in 2008 . the $ 76.3 million decline in sales from 2008 to 2009 was due to lower residential and commercial volume in north america , reflecting softness in the domestic housing market and a slowdown in the commercial water heater business and was partially offset by strong growth in water heater sales in china and improved year over year pricing . on december 13 , 2010 we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our electrical products company to regal beloit corporation for $ 700 million in cash and approximately 2.83 million shares of regal beloit common stock . the transaction , which has been approved by both companies' board of directors , is expected to close in the first half of 2011 . due to the pending sale , our electrical products segment has been accorded discontinued operations treatment in the accompanying financial statements . sales in 2010 , including sales of $ 701.8 million for our electrical products segment , were $ 2191.1 million . our gross profit margin for continuing operations in 2010 was 29.9 percent , compared with 28.7 percent in 2009 and 25.8 percent in 2008 . the improvement in margin from 2009 to 2010 was due to increased volume , cost containment activities and lower warranty costs which more than offset certain inefficiencies resulting from the may flood in our ashland city , tn water heater manufacturing facility . the increase in profit margin from 2008 to 2009 resulted from increased higher margin china water heater volume , aggressive cost reduction programs and lower material costs . selling , general and administrative expense ( sg&a ) was $ 36.9 million higher in 2010 than in 2009 . the increased sg&a , the majority of which was incurred in our china water heater operation , was associated with selling costs to support higher volume and new product lines . additional sg&a associated with our 2009 water treatment acquisition also contributed to the increase . sg&a was $ 8.5 million higher in 2009 than 2008 resulting mostly from an $ 8.2 million increase in our china water heater operation in support of higher volumes. .
Question: what percentage of total aggregate contractual obligations is composed of long-term debt?
Answer: | 0.72682 | what percentage of total aggregate contractual obligations is composed of long-term debt? |
finqa877 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds and separate accounts that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2015|year ended december 2014|year ended december 2013|
|equity securities|$ 3781|$ 4579|$ 4974|
|debt securities and loans|1655|2246|2044|
|total net revenues1|5436|6825|7018|
|operating expenses|2402|2819|2686|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 3034|$ 4006|$ 4332|
1 . net revenues related to our consolidated investments , previously reported in other net revenues within investing & lending , are now reported in equity securities and debt securities and loans , as results from these activities ( $ 391 million for 2015 ) are no longer significant principally due to the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 . reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation . 2015 versus 2014 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 . this decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance . in addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments . although net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of the year impacted results . concern about the outlook for the global economy continues to be a meaningful consideration for the global marketplace . if equity markets continue to decline or credit spreads widen further , net revenues in investing & lending would likely continue to be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.40 billion for 2015 , 15% ( 15 % ) lower than 2014 , due to lower depreciation and amortization expenses , primarily reflecting lower impairment charges related to consolidated investments , and a reduction in expenses related to the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.03 billion in 2015 , 24% ( 24 % ) lower than 2014 . 2014 versus 2013 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.83 billion for 2014 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2013 . net revenues from investments in equity securities were lower due to a significant decrease in net gains from investments in public equities , as movements in global equity prices during 2014 were less favorable compared with 2013 , as well as significantly lower net revenues related to our consolidated investments , reflecting a decrease in operating revenues from commodities-related consolidated investments . these decreases were partially offset by an increase in net gains from investments in private equities , primarily driven by company-specific events . net revenues from debt securities and loans were higher than 2013 , reflecting a significant increase in net interest income , primarily driven by increased lending , and a slight increase in net gains , primarily due to sales of certain investments during 2014 . during 2014 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events , including initial public offerings and financings , and strong corporate performance , as well as net gains from sales of certain investments . operating expenses were $ 2.82 billion for 2014 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2013 , reflecting higher compensation and benefits expenses , partially offset by lower expenses related to consolidated investments . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.01 billion in 2014 , 8% ( 8 % ) lower than 2013 . 64 goldman sachs 2015 form 10-k .
Question: in millions for 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , what were the largest amount of debt securities and loans?
Answer: | 2246.0 | in millions for 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , what were the largest amount of debt securities and loans? |
finqa878 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. .
|( $ in millions )|2015|2014|2013|
|research and development 2013 total|$ 505|$ 509|$ 479|
|less depreciation on research facilities|19|17|16|
|research and development net|$ 486|$ 492|$ 463|
legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what were average advertising costs for the three year period , in millions?
Answer: | 285.33333 | what were average advertising costs for the three year period , in millions? |
finqa879 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our wholesale segment our wholesale segment sells our products to leading upscale and certain mid-tier department stores , specialty stores , and golf and pro shops , both domestically and internationally . we have continued to focus on elevating our brand by improving in- store product assortment and presentation , as well as full-price sell-throughs to consumers . as of the end of fiscal 2014 , our ralph lauren-branded products were sold through over 11000 doors worldwide and we invested $ 53 million of capital in related shop- within-shops primarily in domestic and international department and specialty stores . our products are also sold through the e- commerce sites of certain of our wholesale customers . the primary product offerings sold through our wholesale channels of distribution include menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , and home furnishings . our collection brands 2014 ralph lauren women's collection and black label and men's purple label and black label 2014 are distributed worldwide through a limited number of premier fashion retailers . department stores are our major wholesale customers in north america . in latin america , our wholesale products are sold in department stores and specialty stores . in europe , our wholesale sales are a varying mix of sales to both department stores and specialty stores , depending on the country . in japan , our wholesale products are distributed primarily through shop-within-shops at premier and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is weighted to men's and women's blue label . in the greater china and southeast asia region and australia , our wholesale products are sold mainly at mid and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is primarily weighted to men's and women's blue label . we also distribute product to certain licensed stores operated by our partners in latin america , europe , and asia . in addition , our club monaco products are distributed through select department stores and specialty stores in europe . we sell the majority of our excess and out-of-season products through secondary distribution channels worldwide , including our retail factory stores . worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 29 , 2014: .
|location|number of doors|
|the americas ( a )|6459|
|europe|4864|
|asia ( b )|130|
|total|11453|
( a ) includes the u.s. , canada , and latin america . ( b ) includes australia , china , japan , the philippines , and thailand . in addition , chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 2800 doors as of march 29 , 2014 . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2014 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our total wholesale revenues , with macy's , inc . ( "macy's" ) representing approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our total wholesale revenues . our products are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm , and panama . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores , and to differentiate the presentation of our products . as of march 29 , 2014 , we had approximately 22000 shop-within-shops in our primary channels of distribution dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 100 to 9200 square feet . shop-within-shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases .
Question: what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 29 , 2014 where in asia ?
Answer: | 0.01135 | what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 29 , 2014 where in asia ? |
finqa880 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: class a ordinary shares of aon plc are , at present , eligible for deposit and clearing within the dtc system . in connection with the closing of the merger , we entered into arrangements with dtc whereby we agreed to indemnify dtc for any stamp duty and/or sdrt that may be assessed upon it as a result of its service as a depository and clearing agency for our class a ordinary shares . in addition , we have obtained a ruling from hmrc in respect of the stamp duty and sdrt consequences of the reorganization , and sdrt has been paid in accordance with the terms of this ruling in respect of the deposit of class a ordinary shares with the initial depository . dtc will generally have discretion to cease to act as a depository and clearing agency for the class a ordinary shares . if dtc determines at any time that the class a ordinary shares are not eligible for continued deposit and clearance within its facilities , then we believe the class a ordinary shares would not be eligible for continued listing on a u.s . securities exchange or inclusion in the s&p 500 and trading in the class a ordinary shares would be disrupted . while we would pursue alternative arrangements to preserve our listing and maintain trading , any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of the class a ordinary shares . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . we have offices in various locations throughout the world . substantially all of our offices are located in leased premises . we maintain our corporate headquarters at 8 devonshire square , london , england , where we occupy approximately 225000 square feet of space under an operating lease agreement that expires in 2018 . we own one building at pallbergweg 2-4 , amsterdam , the netherlands ( 150000 square feet ) . the following are additional significant leased properties , along with the occupied square footage and expiration . property : occupied square footage expiration .
|property:|occupiedsquare footage|leaseexpiration dates|
|4 overlook point and other locations lincolnshire illinois|1224000|2017 2013 2024|
|2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas|414000|2020|
|dlf city and unitech cyber park gurgaon india|413000|2014 2013 2015|
|200 e . randolph street chicago illinois|396000|2028|
|2300 discovery drive orlando florida|364000|2020|
|199 water street new york new york|319000|2018|
|7201 hewitt associates drive charlotte north carolina|218000|2015|
the locations in lincolnshire , illinois , the woodlands , texas , gurgaon , india , orlando , florida , and charlotte , north carolina , each of which were acquired as part of the hewitt acquisition in 2010 , are primarily dedicated to our hr solutions segment . the other locations listed above house personnel from both of our reportable segments . in november 2011 , aon entered into an agreement to lease 190000 square feet in a new building to be constructed in london , united kingdom . the agreement is contingent upon the completion of the building construction . aon expects to move into the new building in 2015 when it exercises an early break option at the devonshire square location . in september 2013 , aon entered into an agreement to lease up to 479000 square feet in a new building to be constructed in gurgaon , india . the agreement is contingent upon the completion of the building construction . aon expects to move into the new building in phases during 2014 and 2015 upon the expiration of the existing leases at the gurgaon locations . in general , no difficulty is anticipated in negotiating renewals as leases expire or in finding other satisfactory space if the premises become unavailable . we believe that the facilities we currently occupy are adequate for the purposes for which they are being used and are well maintained . in certain circumstances , we may have unused space and may seek to sublet such space to third parties , depending upon the demands for office space in the locations involved . see note 9 "lease commitments" of the notes to consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8 of this report for information with respect to our lease commitments as of december 31 , 2013 . item 3 . legal proceedings . we hereby incorporate by reference note 16 "commitments and contingencies" of the notes to consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8 of this report. .
Question: how many square feet of the occupied space will expire during 2020?
Answer: | 778000.0 | how many square feet of the occupied space will expire during 2020? |
finqa881 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : .
||2002|2001|2000|
|net loss as reported|$ -1141879 ( 1141879 )|$ -450094 ( 450094 )|$ -194628 ( 194628 )|
|less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect|-38126 ( 38126 )|-50540 ( 50540 )|-51186 ( 51186 )|
|pro-forma net loss|$ -1180005 ( 1180005 )|$ -500634 ( 500634 )|$ -245814 ( 245814 )|
|basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported|$ -5.84 ( 5.84 )|$ -2.35 ( 2.35 )|$ -1.15 ( 1.15 )|
|basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma|$ -6.04 ( 6.04 )|$ -2.61 ( 2.61 )|$ -1.46 ( 1.46 )|
fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively . fair values were determined based on quoted market prices . the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation . the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs . the requirements of sfas no . 143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 . the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations . in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no . 144 supersedes sfas no . 121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions . sfas no . 144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no . 121 . in addition , sfas no . 144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no . 30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d . however , sfas no . 144 retains the requirement in apb no . 30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions . the scope of sfas no . 144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no . 142 . the company implemented sfas no . 144 on january 1 , 2002 . accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: | -0.36429 | what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2001 to 2002? |
finqa882 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds and separate accounts that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2015|year ended december 2014|year ended december 2013|
|equity securities|$ 3781|$ 4579|$ 4974|
|debt securities and loans|1655|2246|2044|
|total net revenues1|5436|6825|7018|
|operating expenses|2402|2819|2686|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 3034|$ 4006|$ 4332|
1 . net revenues related to our consolidated investments , previously reported in other net revenues within investing & lending , are now reported in equity securities and debt securities and loans , as results from these activities ( $ 391 million for 2015 ) are no longer significant principally due to the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 . reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation . 2015 versus 2014 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 . this decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance . in addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments . although net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of the year impacted results . concern about the outlook for the global economy continues to be a meaningful consideration for the global marketplace . if equity markets continue to decline or credit spreads widen further , net revenues in investing & lending would likely continue to be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.40 billion for 2015 , 15% ( 15 % ) lower than 2014 , due to lower depreciation and amortization expenses , primarily reflecting lower impairment charges related to consolidated investments , and a reduction in expenses related to the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.03 billion in 2015 , 24% ( 24 % ) lower than 2014 . 2014 versus 2013 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.83 billion for 2014 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2013 . net revenues from investments in equity securities were lower due to a significant decrease in net gains from investments in public equities , as movements in global equity prices during 2014 were less favorable compared with 2013 , as well as significantly lower net revenues related to our consolidated investments , reflecting a decrease in operating revenues from commodities-related consolidated investments . these decreases were partially offset by an increase in net gains from investments in private equities , primarily driven by company-specific events . net revenues from debt securities and loans were higher than 2013 , reflecting a significant increase in net interest income , primarily driven by increased lending , and a slight increase in net gains , primarily due to sales of certain investments during 2014 . during 2014 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events , including initial public offerings and financings , and strong corporate performance , as well as net gains from sales of certain investments . operating expenses were $ 2.82 billion for 2014 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2013 , reflecting higher compensation and benefits expenses , partially offset by lower expenses related to consolidated investments . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.01 billion in 2014 , 8% ( 8 % ) lower than 2013 . 64 goldman sachs 2015 form 10-k .
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2014?
Answer: | 0.67092 | what percentage of total net revenues in the investing & lending segment is attributable to equity securities in 2014? |
finqa883 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 90 table 30 : total deposits average balance december 31 years ended december 31 .
|( in millions )|december 31 2017|december 31 2016|december 31 2017|2016|
|client deposits|$ 180149|$ 176693|$ 158996|$ 156029|
|wholesale cds|4747|10470|4812|14456|
|total deposits|$ 184896|$ 187163|$ 163808|$ 170485|
short-term funding our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 2.84 billion and $ 4.40 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad 1.40 billion , or approximately $ 1.11 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding we have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration to meet current commitments and business needs , including accommodating the transaction and cash management needs of our clients . in addition , state street bank , a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company , also has authorization to issue up to $ 5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include : 2022 diverse and stable core earnings ; 2022 relative market position ; 2022 strong risk management ; 2022 strong capital ratios ; 2022 diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; 2022 strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and 2022 preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by : 2022 providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors ; 2022 increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products ; 2022 serving markets ; and 2022 engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets , which could increase the related cost of funds . in turn , this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients , which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments ; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts . a majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , of this form 10-k . other funding sources , such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements , for which there are no explicit triggers , could also be adversely affected. .
Question: what is the percentage change in of total assets from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | -0.01211 | what is the percentage change in of total assets from 2016 to 2017? |
finqa884 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) .
|tier 1 common under basel i rules|$ 148887|
|adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans|1474|
|add back of basel i deductions ( a )|1780|
|deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards|-741 ( 741 )|
|all other adjustments|-198 ( 198 )|
|estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules|$ 151202|
|estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )|$ 1590873|
|estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )|9.5% ( 9.5 % )|
estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .
Question: for basel adjustments , what would tier 1 capital have declined absent adjustments related to aoci and basel adjustments?\\n
Answer: | 3254.0 | for basel adjustments , what would tier 1 capital have declined absent adjustments related to aoci and basel adjustments?\\n |
finqa885 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|9|
|trademarks|9|
|acquired rights to use technology|10|
|backlog|2|
|other intangibles|4|
income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what is the average yearly amortization expense related to purchased technology?
Answer: | 16.66667 | what is the average yearly amortization expense related to purchased technology? |
finqa886 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents ( 4 ) the increase in cash flows was primarily due to the timing of inventory purchases and longer payment terms with certain vendors . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: .
|( in days )|december 31 , 2017|december 31 , 2016|december 31 , 2015|
|days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )|52|51|48|
|days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )|12|12|13|
|days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )|-45 ( 45 )|-44 ( 44 )|-40 ( 40 )|
|cash conversion cycle|19|19|21|
( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of accounts receivable , net at the end of the period , divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of sales for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of sales for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle was 19 days at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by higher net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as saas , software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the consolidated statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . this also results in a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sales in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle was 19 and 21 days at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the increase in dso was primarily driven by higher net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as saas , software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 15 million in 2017 compared to 2016 . capital expenditures increased $ 17 million to $ 81 million from $ 64 million for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , primarily related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 289 million in 2016 compared to 2015 . the decrease in cash used was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of cdw uk in 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures decreased $ 26 million to $ 64 million from $ 90 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively , primarily due to spending for our new office location in 2015 . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 514 million in 2017 compared to 2016 . the increase was primarily driven by changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 228 million and by share repurchases during 2017 , which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 167 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see part ii , item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase in cash used for accounts payable-inventory financing was primarily driven by the termination of one of our inventory financing agreements in the fourth quarter of 2016 , with amounts .
Question: what was the average capital expenditures , in millions , for 2016 and 2015?
Answer: | 77.0 | what was the average capital expenditures , in millions , for 2016 and 2015? |
finqa887 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents item 2 . properties flight equipment and fleet renewal as of december 31 , 2016 , american operated a mainline fleet of 930 aircraft . in 2016 , we continued our extensive fleet renewal program , which has provided us with the youngest fleet of the major u.s . network carriers . during 2016 , american took delivery of 55 new mainline aircraft and retired 71 aircraft . we are supported by our wholly-owned and third-party regional carriers that fly under capacity purchase agreements operating as american eagle . as of december 31 , 2016 , american eagle operated 606 regional aircraft . during 2016 , we increased our regional fleet by 61 regional aircraft , we removed and placed in temporary storage one embraer erj 140 aircraft and retired 41 other regional aircraft . mainline as of december 31 , 2016 , american 2019s mainline fleet consisted of the following aircraft : average seating capacity average ( years ) owned leased total .
||average seating capacity|average age ( years )|owned|leased|total|
|airbus a319|128|12.8|19|106|125|
|airbus a320|150|15.5|10|41|51|
|airbus a321|178|4.9|153|46|199|
|airbusa330-200|258|5.0|15|2014|15|
|airbusa330-300|291|16.4|4|5|9|
|boeing737-800|160|7.7|123|161|284|
|boeing757-200|179|17.9|39|12|51|
|boeing767-300er|211|19.5|28|3|31|
|boeing777-200er|263|16.0|44|3|47|
|boeing777-300er|310|2.8|18|2|20|
|boeing787-8|226|1.3|17|2014|17|
|boeing787-9|285|0.2|4|2014|4|
|embraer 190|99|9.2|20|2014|20|
|mcdonnell douglasmd-80|140|22.0|25|32|57|
|total||10.3|519|411|930|
.
Question: what was the net change in airliner count during 2016?
Answer: | -16.0 | what was the net change in airliner count during 2016? |
finqa888 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: .
||12/07|12/08|12/09|12/10|12/11|12/12|
|fidelity national information services inc .|100.00|70.08|101.93|120.01|117.34|157.38|
|s&p 500|100.00|63.00|79.67|91.67|93.61|108.59|
|s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services|100.00|68.26|99.41|97.33|118.68|151.90|
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .
Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/12?
Answer: | 0.5738 | what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/12? |
finqa889 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: equity equity at december 31 , 2014 was $ 6.6 billion , a decrease of $ 1.6 billion from december 31 , 2013 . the decrease resulted primarily due to share repurchases of $ 2.3 billion , $ 273 million of dividends to shareholders , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 760 million , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion . the $ 760 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss from december 31 , 2013 , primarily reflects the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 504 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 an increase of $ 260 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , 2022 net derivative gains of $ 5 million , and 2022 net investment losses of $ 1 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions .
|years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )|2014|2013|2012|
|revenue|$ 7834|$ 7789|$ 7632|
|operating income|1648|1540|1493|
|operating margin|21.0% ( 21.0 % )|19.8% ( 19.8 % )|19.6% ( 19.6 % )|
the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2014 , pricing was flat on average globally , and we would still consider this to be a "soft market." in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds . additionally , continuing through 2014 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of continued weakness in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets . weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe have reduced our customers' demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results . risk solutions generated approximately 65% ( 65 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 . revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients . our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients' policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates . we operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage . specifically , we address the highly specialized .
Question: what is the difference between the average and the 2014's operating margin?
Answer: | 0.00867 | what is the difference between the average and the 2014's operating margin? |
finqa890 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: $ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) .
||year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )|
|income from discontinued operations before income taxes|$ 5367|
|income tax expense|-942 ( 942 )|
|income from discontinued operations net|4425|
|gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes|14479|
|income tax expense|-1978 ( 1978 )|
|gain on sale of discontinued operations net|12501|
|income from discontinued operations net|$ 16926|
transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy .
Question: according to line 1 , how much is each individual hep common unit worth?
Answer: | 2e-05 | according to line 1 , how much is each individual hep common unit worth? |
finqa891 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 11 . stock repurchase program : during fiscal 2007 , the company's board of directors authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $ 500000 of the company's common stock plus related expenses . the new program cancelled and replaced the remaining portion of the previous $ 300000 stock repurchase program . the program allows the company to repurchase its common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time in accordance with the requirements of the securities and exchange commission . during fiscal 2007 , the company repurchased 8341 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $ 285869 , or an average price of $ 34.27 per share , of which 1330 shares of common stock were repurchased under the previous $ 300000 stock repurchase program . as of december 29 , 2007 , 77 shares have been repurchased at an aggregate cost of $ 2959 and remained unsettled . during fiscal 2007 , the company retired 6329 shares previously repurchased under the stock repurchase programs . at december 29 , 2007 , the company had $ 260567 remaining under the current stock repurchase program . subsequent to december 29 , 2007 , the company repurchased 4563 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $ 155350 , or an average price of $ 34.04 per share . during fiscal 2006 , the company retired 5117 shares of common stock which were previously repurchased under the company 2019s prior stock repurchase program . these shares were repurchased during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 at an aggregate cost of $ 192339 , or an average price of $ 37.59 per share . 12 . income taxes : as a result of the adoption of fin 48 on december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded an increase of $ 2275 to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding decrease in its balance of retained earnings . the following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal year ended december 29 , 2007: .
|balance at december 31 2006|$ 16453|
|gross increases related to prior period tax positions|1279|
|gross decreases related to prior period tax positions|-1853 ( 1853 )|
|gross increases related to current period tax positions|5340|
|settlements|-539 ( 539 )|
|expiration of statute of limitations|-271 ( 271 )|
|balance at december 29 2007|$ 20409|
as of december 29 , 2007 the entire amount of unrecognized tax benefits , if recognized , would reduce the company 2019s annual effective tax rate . with the adoption of fin 48 , the company provides for interest and penalties as a part of income tax expense . during fiscal 2007 , the company accrued potential penalties and interest of $ 709 and $ 1827 , respectively , related to these unrecognized tax benefits . as of december 29 , 2007 , the company has recorded a liability for potential penalties and interest of $ 1843 and $ 4421 , respectively . prior to the adoption of fin 48 , the company classified interest associated with tax contingencies in interest expense . the company has not provided for any penalties associated with tax contingencies unless considered probable of assessment . the company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months . during the next 12 months , it is possible the company could conclude on $ 2000 to $ 3000 of the contingencies associated with unrecognized tax uncertainties due mainly to settlements and expiration of statute of limitations ( including tax benefits , interest and penalties ) . the majority of these resolutions would be achieved through the completion of current income tax examinations. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the stock price from average price of 2005 and 2006 to the average price of 2007?
Answer: | -0.08832 | what is the percentage change in the stock price from average price of 2005 and 2006 to the average price of 2007? |
finqa892 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: welltower inc . notes to consolidated financial statements is no longer present ( and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth ) . the valuation allowance rollforward is summarized as follows for the periods presented ( in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2017 2016 2015 .
|2016|year ended december 31 2017 2016|year ended december 31 2017 2016|year ended december 31 2017|
|beginning balance|$ 96838|$ 98966|$ 85207|
|expense ( benefit )|30445|-2128 ( 2128 )|13759|
|ending balance|$ 127283|$ 96838|$ 98966|
as a result of certain acquisitions , we are subject to corporate level taxes for any related asset dispositions that may occur during the five-year period immediately after such assets were owned by a c corporation ( 201cbuilt-in gains tax 201d ) . the amount of income potentially subject to this special corporate level tax is generally equal to the lesser of ( a ) the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a reit asset , or ( b ) the actual amount of gain . some but not all gains recognized during this period of time could be offset by available net operating losses and capital loss carryforwards . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we acquired certain additional assets with built-in gains as of the date of acquisition that could be subject to the built-in gains tax if disposed of prior to the expiration of the applicable ten-year period . we have not recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of the potential built-in gains tax based on our intentions with respect to such properties and available tax planning strategies . under the provisions of the reit investment diversification and empowerment act of 2007 ( 201cridea 201d ) , for taxable years beginning after july 30 , 2008 , the reit may lease 201cqualified health care properties 201d on an arm 2019s-length basis to a trs if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an 201celigible independent contractor . 201d generally , the rent received from the trs will meet the related party rent exception and will be treated as 201crents from real property . 201d a 201cqualified health care property 201d includes real property and any personal property that is , or is necessary or incidental to the use of , a hospital , nursing facility , assisted living facility , congregate care facility , qualified continuing care facility , or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients . we have entered into various joint ventures that were structured under ridea . resident level rents and related operating expenses for these facilities are reported in the consolidated financial statements and are subject to federal , state and foreign income taxes as the operations of such facilities are included in a trs . certain net operating loss carryforwards could be utilized to offset taxable income in future years . given the applicable statute of limitations , we generally are subject to audit by the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and subsequent years . the statute of limitations may vary in the states in which we own properties or conduct business . we do not expect to be subject to audit by state taxing authorities for any year prior to the year ended december 31 , 2011 . we are also subject to audit by the canada revenue agency and provincial authorities generally for periods subsequent to may 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions , and by the u.k . 2019s hm revenue & customs for periods subsequent to august 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions . at december 31 , 2017 , we had a net operating loss ( 201cnol 201d ) carryforward related to the reit of $ 448475000 . due to our uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets , we have not recorded a deferred tax asset related to nols generated by the reit . these amounts can be used to offset future taxable income ( and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed ) , if any . the reit will be entitled to utilize nols and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that reit taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid . the nol carryforwards generated through december 31 , 2017 will expire through 2036 . beginning with tax years after december 31 , 2017 , the tax cuts and jobs act ( 201ctax act 201d ) eliminates the carryback period , limits the nols to 80% ( 80 % ) of taxable income and replaces the 20-year carryforward period with an indefinite carryforward period. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017?
Answer: | 0.31439 | what is the percentage change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017? |
finqa893 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 85 the total intrinsic value of rsus ( defined as the value of the shares awarded at the current market price ) vested and outstanding in 2017 was $ 17 million and $ 38 million , respectively . the total fair value of rsus vested in 2017 was $ 19 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested rsus , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years . note 12 . equity common stock we are authorized to issue 2 billion shares of class a common stock , 1.25 billion shares of class b common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock each of which have a par value of $ 0.0001 per share . on july 3 , 2017 , each share of baker hughes common stock was converted into one share of class a common stock in the company . the number of class a common stock and class b common stock shares outstanding at december 31 , 2017 is 422 million and 707 million , respectively . we have not issued any preferred stock . ge owns all the issued and outstanding class b common stock . each share of class a and class b common stock and the associated membership interest in bhge llc form a paired interest . while each share of class b common stock has equal voting rights to a share of class a common stock , it has no economic rights , meaning holders of class b common stock have no right to dividends and any assets in the event of liquidation of the company . former baker hughes stockholders immediately after the completion of the transactions received a special one-time cash dividend of $ 17.50 per share paid by the company to holders of record of the company's class a common stock . in addition , during 2017 the company declared and paid regular dividends of $ 0.17 per share and $ 0.18 per share to holders of record of the company's class a common stock during the quarters ended september 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . the following table presents the changes in number of shares outstanding ( in thousands ) : class a common class b common .
||class a common stock|class b common stock|
|balance at december 31 2016|2014|2014|
|issue of shares on business combination at july 3 2017|427709|717111|
|issue of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units ( 1 )|290|2014|
|issue of shares on exercises of stock options ( 1 )|256|2014|
|stock repurchase program ( 2 ) ( 3 )|-6047 ( 6047 )|-10126 ( 10126 )|
|balance at december 31 2017|422208|706985|
( 1 ) share amounts reflected above are net of shares withheld to satisfy the employee's tax withholding obligation . ( 2 ) on november 2 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized bhge llc to repurchase up to $ 3 billion of its common units from the company and ge . the proceeds of this repurchase are to be used by bhge to repurchase class a common stock of the company on the open market , which if fully implemented would result in the repurchase of approximately $ 1.1 billion of class a common stock . the class b common stock of the company , that is paired with repurchased common units , was repurchased by the company at par value . the $ 3 billion repurchase authorization is the aggregate authorization for repurchases of class a and class b common stock together with its paired unit . bhge llc had authorization remaining to repurchase up to approximately $ 2.5 billion of its common units from bhge and ge at december 31 , 2017 . ( 3 ) during 2017 , we repurchased and canceled 6046735 shares of class a common stock for a total of $ 187 million . we also repurchased and canceled 10126467 shares of class b common stock from ge which is paired together with common units of bhge llc for $ 314 million. .
Question: what is the balance of class a common stock as a percentage of class b common stock?
Answer: | 0.5972 | what is the balance of class a common stock as a percentage of class b common stock? |
finqa894 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: .
|company|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro|
|entergy arkansas|4774|1668|1823|1209|74|
|entergy gulf states louisiana|3317|1980|974|363|-|
|entergy louisiana|5424|4265|1159|-|-|
|entergy mississippi|3229|2809|-|420|-|
|entergy new orleans|764|764|-|-|-|
|entergy texas|2538|2269|-|269|-|
|system energy|1071|-|1071|-|-|
|total|21117|13755|5027|2261|74|
( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the "portfolio transformation strategy" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .
Question: what portion of the total capabilities is generated from nuclear station for entergy as a whole?
Answer: | 0.23805 | what portion of the total capabilities is generated from nuclear station for entergy as a whole? |
finqa895 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) .
|period|total number of shares purchased|average price paid per share|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a )|amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions )|
|october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012|842445|$ 93.38|842445|$ 2522|
|october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012|872973|90.86|872973|2443|
|november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012|1395288|92.02|1395288|2315|
|total|3110706|$ 92.07|3110706|$ 2315|
( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .
Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during december 2012 , in millions?
Answer: | 128.3944 | what is the total value of repurchased shares during december 2012 , in millions? |
finqa896 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual obligations the following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of december 28 , 2013: .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than1 year|payments due by period 1 20133 years|payments due by period 3 20135 years|payments due by period more than5 years|
|operating lease obligations|$ 870|$ 208|$ 298|$ 166|$ 198|
|capital purchase obligations1|5503|5375|125|2014|3|
|other purchase obligations and commitments2|1859|772|744|307|36|
|long-term debt obligations3|22372|429|2360|3761|15822|
|other long-term liabilities4 5|1496|569|663|144|120|
|total6|$ 32100|$ 7353|$ 4190|$ 4378|$ 16179|
capital purchase obligations1 5503 5375 125 2014 3 other purchase obligations and commitments2 1859 772 744 307 36 long-term debt obligations3 22372 429 2360 3761 15822 other long-term liabilities4 , 5 1496 569 663 144 120 total6 $ 32100 $ 7353 $ 4190 $ 4378 $ 16179 1 capital purchase obligations represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property , plant and equipment . they were not recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 28 , 2013 , as we had not yet received the related goods or taken title to the property . 2 other purchase obligations and commitments include payments due under various types of licenses and agreements to purchase goods or services , as well as payments due under non-contingent funding obligations . funding obligations include agreements to fund various projects with other companies . 3 amounts represent principal and interest cash payments over the life of the debt obligations , including anticipated interest payments that are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets . any future settlement of convertible debt would impact our cash payments . 4 we are unable to reliably estimate the timing of future payments related to uncertain tax positions ; therefore , $ 188 million of long-term income taxes payable has been excluded from the preceding table . however , long- term income taxes payable , recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , included these uncertain tax positions , reduced by the associated federal deduction for state taxes and u.s . tax credits arising from non- u.s . income taxes . 5 amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets , including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities . expected required contributions to our u.s . and non-u.s . pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans of $ 62 million to be made during 2014 are also included ; however , funding projections beyond 2014 are not practicable to estimate . 6 total excludes contractual obligations already recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as current liabilities except for the short-term portions of long-term debt obligations and other long-term liabilities . contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services , included in other purchase obligations and commitments in the preceding table , include agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on intel and that specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . for obligations with cancellation provisions , the amounts included in the preceding table were limited to the non-cancelable portion of the agreement terms or the minimum cancellation fee . we have entered into certain agreements for the purchase of raw materials that specify minimum prices and quantities based on a percentage of the total available market or based on a percentage of our future purchasing requirements . due to the uncertainty of the future market and our future purchasing requirements , as well as the non-binding nature of these agreements , obligations under these agreements are not included in the preceding table . our purchase orders for other products are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons . in addition , some of our purchase orders represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was the percent of the pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans included in the total other long-term liabilities as of december 28 , 2013
Answer: | 0.04144 | what was the percent of the pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans included in the total other long-term liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 |
finqa897 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: which , $ 44.9 million , or $ 38.2 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months . we also enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity 2019s functional currency . as a result , any foreign currency translation gains/losses recognized in earnings under sfas no . 52 , 201cforeign currency translation 201d are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period . other comprehensive income 2013 other comprehensive income refers to revenues , expenses , gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized foreign currency hedge gains and losses , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows ( in millions ) : balance at december 31 , comprehensive income ( loss ) balance at december 31 .
||balance at december 31 2006|other comprehensive income ( loss )|balance at december 31 2007|
|foreign currency translation|$ 267.7|$ 101.1|$ 368.8|
|foreign currency hedges|-22.6 ( 22.6 )|-22.8 ( 22.8 )|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|
|unrealized gains ( losses ) on securities|-0.5 ( 0.5 )|-1.4 ( 1.4 )|-1.9 ( 1.9 )|
|unrecognized prior service cost and unrecognized ( gain ) / loss in actuarial assumptions|-35.4 ( 35.4 )|4.2|-31.2 ( 31.2 )|
|accumulated other comprehensive income|$ 209.2|$ 81.1|$ 290.3|
treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of shareholders equity . we may reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . accounting pronouncements 2013 in june 2006 , the fasb issued interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , an interpretation of fas 109 , accounting for income taxes 201d ( fin 48 ) , to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions . see our income tax disclosures in note 11 for more information regarding the adoption of fin 48 . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans 2013 an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this statement requires recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position . sfas no . 158 also requires recognition in other comprehensive income of certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules , as well as modifies the timing of reporting and adds certain disclosures . the statement provides recognition and disclosure elements to be effective as of the end of the fiscal year after december 15 , 2006 and measurement elements to be effective for fiscal years ending after december 15 , 2008 . we adopted sfas no . 158 on december 31 , 2006 . see our pension and other postretirement disclosures in note 10 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( r ) , 201cshare-based payment 201d , which is a revision to sfas no . 123 . sfas 123 ( r ) requires all share-based payments to employees , including stock options , to be expensed based on their fair values . we adopted sfas 123 ( r ) on january 1 , 2006 using the modified prospective method and did not restate prior periods . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , 201cfair value measurements 201d , which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this statement does not require any new fair value measurements , but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information . sfas no . 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years . in february 2008 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( fsp ) no . sfas 157-2 , which delays the effective date of certain provisions of sfas no . 157 relating to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of sfas no . 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . in february 2007 , the fasb issued sfas no . 159 , 201cthe fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities 2013 including an amendment of fasb statement no . 115 201d ( sfas no . 159 ) . sfas no . 159 creates a 201cfair value option 201d under which an entity may elect to record certain financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon their initial recognition . subsequent changes in fair value would be recognized in earnings as those changes occur . the election of the fair value option would be made on a contract-by-contract basis and would need to be supported by concurrent documentation or a preexisting documented policy . sfas no . 159 requires an entity to separately disclose the fair z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 7 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what percent of gains were lost due to foreign currency hedges?
Answer: | 0.1231 | what percent of gains were lost due to foreign currency hedges? |
finqa898 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .
||2017|2016|2015|
|ifs|$ 4630|$ 4525|$ 3809|
|gfs|4138|4250|2361|
|corporate and other|355|466|426|
|total consolidated revenues|$ 9123|$ 9241|$ 6596|
integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2017?
Answer: | 0.45358 | what percentage of total consolidated revenues was gfs segment in 2017? |
finqa899 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis supplemental financial information and disclosures income tax matters effective tax rate from continuing operations .
||2017|2016|2015|
|u.s . gaap|40.1% ( 40.1 % )|30.8% ( 30.8 % )|25.9% ( 25.9 % )|
|adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1|30.8% ( 30.8 % )|31.6% ( 31.6 % )|32.3% ( 32.3 % )|
adjusted effective income tax rate 2014 non-gaap1 30.8% ( 30.8 % ) 31.6% ( 31.6 % ) 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) 1 . beginning in 2017 , income tax consequences associated with employee share-based awards are recognized in provision for income taxes in the income statements but are excluded from the intermittent net discrete tax provisions ( benefits ) adjustment as we anticipate conversion activity each year . see note 2 to the financial statements on the adoption of the accounting update improvements to employee share-based payment accounting . for 2015 , adjusted effective income tax rate also excludes dva . for further information on non-gaap measures , see 201cselected non-gaap financial information 201d herein . the effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2017 included an intermittent net discrete tax provision of $ 968 million , primarily related to the impact of the tax act , partially offset by net discrete tax benefits primarily associ- ated with the remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of multi-year irs tax examinations . the tax act , enacted on december 22 , 2017 , significantly revised u.s . corporate income tax law by , among other things , reducing the corporate income tax rate to 21% ( 21 % ) , and implementing a modified territorial tax system that includes a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries ; imposes a minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income ( 201cgilti 201d ) and an alternative base erosion and anti-abuse tax ( 201cbeat 201d ) on u.s . corpora- tions that make deductible payments to non-u.s . related persons in excess of specified amounts ; and broadens the tax base by partially or wholly eliminating tax deductions for certain historically deductible expenses ( e.g. , fdic premiums and executive compensation ) . we recorded an approximate $ 1.2 billion net discrete tax provision as a result of the enactment of the tax act , primarily from the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets using the lower enacted corporate tax rate . this provi- sion incorporates the best available information as of the enactment date as well as assumptions made based upon our current interpretation of the tax act . our estimates may change as we receive additional clarification and implementa- tion guidance from the u.s . treasury department and as the interpretation of the tax act evolves over time . the ultimate impact of the income tax effects of the tax act will be deter- mined in connection with the preparation of our u.s . consoli- dated federal income tax return . taking into account our current assumptions , estimates and interpretations related to the tax act and other factors , we expect our effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2018 to be approximately 22% ( 22 % ) to 25% ( 25 % ) , depending on factors such as the geographic mix of earnings and employee share- based awards ( see 201cforward-looking statements 201d ) . subsequent to the release of the firm 2019s 2017 earnings on january 18 , 2018 , certain estimates related to the net discrete tax provision associated with the enactment of the tax act were revised , resulting in a $ 43 million increase in the provi- sion for income taxes and a reallocation of impacts among segments . this decreased diluted eps and diluted eps from continuing operations by $ 0.03 and $ 0.02 in the fourth quarter and year ended december 31 , 2017 , respectively . on a business segment basis , the change resulted in an $ 89 million increase in provision for income taxes for wealth management , a $ 45 million decrease for institutional securi- ties , and a $ 1 million decrease for investment management . the effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2016 included intermittent net discrete tax benefits of $ 68 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of multi- year irs tax examinations , partially offset by adjustments for other tax matters . the effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2015 included intermittent net discrete tax benefits of $ 564 million , primarily associated with the repatriation of non-u.s . earn- ings at a cost lower than originally estimated due to an internal restructuring to simplify the legal entity organization in the u.k . u.s . bank subsidiaries we provide loans to a variety of customers , from large corpo- rate and institutional clients to high net worth individuals , primarily through our u.s . bank subsidiaries , morgan stanley bank n.a . ( 201cmsbna 201d ) and morgan stanley private bank , national association ( 201cmspbna 201d ) ( collectively , 201cu.s . bank subsidiaries 201d ) . the lending activities in the institutional securities business segment primarily include loans and lending commitments to corporate clients . the lending activ- ities in the wealth management business segment primarily include securities-based lending that allows clients to borrow december 2017 form 10-k 52 .
Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2017?
Answer: | 9.3 | what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2017? |