Dataset Viewer
rhetoric_function
stringlengths 20
120
|
|---|
Acknowledging limitation(s) whilst stating a finding or contribution
|
Advising cautious interpretation of the findings
|
Commenting on the findings
|
Commenting on the strengths of the current study
|
Comparing the result: contradicting previous findings
|
Comparing the result: supporting previous findings
|
Contrasting sources with ‘however’ for emphasis
|
Describing previously used methods
|
Describing questionnaire design
|
Describing the characteristics of the participants
|
Describing the limitations of the current study
|
Describing the process: adverbs of manner
|
Describing the process: expressing purpose with for
|
Describing the process: infinitive of purpose
|
Describing the process: sequence words
|
Describing the process: statistical procedures
|
Describing the process: typical verbs in the passive form
|
Describing the process: using + instrument
|
Describing the research design and the methods used
|
Describing what other writers do in their published work
|
Detailing specific limitations
|
Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline
|
Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline: time frame given
|
Establishing the importance of the topic for the world or society
|
Establishing the importance of the topic for the world or society: time frame given
|
Establising the importance of the topic as a problem to be addressed
|
Explaining keywords (also refer to Defining Terms)
|
Explaining the provenance of articles for review
|
Explaining the provenance of the participants
|
Explaining the significance of the current study
|
Explaining the significance of the findings or contribution of the study
|
General comments on the relevant literature
|
General reference to previous research or scholarship: highlighting negative outcomes
|
Giving reasons for personal interest in the research (sometimes found in the humanities, and the applied human sciences)
|
Giving reasons why a particular method was adopted
|
Giving reasons why a particular method was rejected
|
Highlighting inadequacies or weaknesses of previous studies (also refer to Being Critical)
|
Highlighting interesting or surprising results
|
Highlighting significant data in a table or chart
|
Identifying a controversy within the field of study
|
Identifying a knowledge gap in the field of study
|
Implications and/or recommendations for practice or policy
|
Indicating an expected outcome
|
Indicating an unexpected outcome
|
Indicating criteria for selection or inclusion in the study
|
Indicating methodological problems or limitations
|
Indicating missing, weak, or contradictory evidence
|
Indicating the methodology for the current research
|
Indicating the use of an established method
|
Introducing the limitations of the current study
|
Making recommendations for further research work
|
Noting implications of the findings
|
Noting the lack of or paucity of previous research
|
Offering an explanation for the findings
|
Outlining the structure of a short paper
|
Outlining the structure of a thesis or dissertation
|
Pointing out interesting or important findings
|
Previewing a chapter
|
Previous research: A historic perspective
|
Previous research: Approaches taken
|
Previous research: What has been established or proposed
|
Previous research: area investigated as the sentence object
|
Previous research: area investigated as the sentence subject
|
Previous research: highlighting negative outcomes
|
Providing background information: reference to the literature
|
Providing background information: reference to the purpose of the study
|
Reference to previous research: important studies
|
Referring back to the purpose of the paper or study
|
Referring back to the research aims or procedures
|
Referring to a single investigation in the past: investigation prominent
|
Referring to a single investigation in the past: researcher prominent
|
Referring to another writer’s idea(s) or position
|
Referring to data in a table or chart
|
Referring to important texts in the area of interest
|
Referring to previous work to establish what is already known
|
Referring to secondary sources
|
Referring to the literature to justify a method or approach
|
Reporting positive and negative reactions
|
Restating a result or one of several results
|
Setting out the research questions or hypotheses
|
Some ways of introducing quotations
|
Stating a negative result
|
Stating a positive result
|
Stating purpose of the current research with reference to gaps or issues in the literature
|
Stating the aims of the current research (note frequent use of past tense)
|
Stating the focus, aim, or argument of a short paper
|
Stating the purpose of the thesis, dissertation, or research article (note use of present tense)
|
Stating what is currently known about the topic
|
Suggesting general hypotheses
|
Suggesting implications for what is already known
|
Suggestions for future work
|
Summarising the literature review
|
Summarising the main research findings
|
Summarising the results section
|
Summarising the studies reviewed
|
Surveys and interviews: Introducing excerpts from interview data
|
Surveys and interviews: Reporting participants’ views
|
Surveys and interviews: Reporting proportions
|
Surveys and interviews: Reporting response rates
|
Surveys and interviews: Reporting themes
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 9
Size of downloaded dataset files:
4.02 kB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
4.02 kB
Number of rows:
103