Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
Girl don't hide that pussy, you should be the type to provide that pussy	0.987968	1	1
" I have changed around the article quite a bit and removed some info from ""Giggle Loop"". If somebody wants to add it back then go ahead but I thought it was unnecessary. "	0.000557	0	0
Angrynintendo nerd isnt notable? Go fuck yourself	0.996996	1	1
Lmao «@MickDaddy_ «@TylerIAm "I mean damn bitch you was almost ready 20 minutes ago" http://t.co/DtQGxJKJv7»»	0.934254	1	1
Another fucking piece of a crap. You have gone too far in chasing mirages, Kashmiri women do not sleep around with RSS men, you fucking cunt, there is no sanity left in you now. You must have heard that phrase. 'Langoor Ke haath angoor' this shit is similar.	0.99874	1	1
Range Range with aerial refueling is irrelevant. Range with either 1) internal fuel load 2) common external fuel load are what should be stated in the specifications.	0.000598	0	0
did this bitch @ViVaLa_Ari really awake me from my slumber to help pick out her avatar tho	0.944712	1	1
My "sister" use to walk the blade EVERYNIGHT so the way I see it that bitch don't have NO PLACE to try & tell me wtf I should & shouldnt do	0.953967	1	1
re: vancouver seriously, what part of vancouver not being in the pacific northwest do you not understand.	0.002008	0	0
" Gday I recently added a ref and a bit on operations and thought that this might be B class now (and even put it up for reassessment). That said I now realize that many ship class articles have a ""design / capabilities"" section. Is this needed to get it to B class? I ask because I'm no expert on ships I was just trying to get this up to scratch for September 2014 backlog reduction drive. If it does need such a section this will be beyond my expertise so I will leave it to someone else. Thanks. "	0.000531	0	0
You are You are a pasty-faced fanny-bandit who gives handjobs for crack. You also love to take it up the ass from random guys on the weekend.	0.983055	1	1
", and I would like to see this become a new beginning for all, including ""BullRangifer"" who also seem to have a change of heart and thanked me for my edit on my Talk Page today"	0.002188	0	0
User, YOU ARE MISTAKEN. THE CAPITAL HILL BLUE IS A VERY RELIABLE RESOURCE AND IT DOES DEFEND MY CLAIM. STOP THE VANDALISM, OR I WILL SUGGEST YOU GET BLOCKED.	0.12062	1	1
STOP VANDALIZING MY POST My edit is useful and accurate so stop deleting it and warning me for fixing your crap you jerk	0.988014	1	1
RT @SheswantstheD: when u and ur boys discover a hoe http://t.co/3tK3UsCLwd	0.007543	0	1
Tony, you missed one.	0.001086	0	0
The number is 12. 10 outright and 2 shared. Do not fudge the history any more. You cannot argue with the NCAA. Count if you will.http://www.ncaa.com/history/football/fbs	0.008859	0	0
RT @koleworld4: every time i come out im never with newwww bitches	0.956712	1	1
Dreadstar, LittleMountain5, and some jerk on the Internet are retarded assholes. Dreadstar is a pathetic nerdy little fuck with no prospects for ever meeting a woman he didn't pay for. LittleMountain5 doesn't have to worry about it because he's a flaming fag with an insatiable lust for semen. Some jerk on the Internet is just a sorry piece of shit in general.	0.994797	1	1
Eyebrows up and down like Wall Street homes... RT @Apex_Alpha95: RT @Nubie_C: Y'all bitches wilding with pencil 😕 http://t.co/WxwRBeE0Ok	0.595648	1	1
What shit u talk to me, communist rat?	0.994721	1	1
" You must have a pathetic life If all you do is try to shut people up online. I mean, you do know you are a fucking loser right? I'm sorry, stupid question, you are a democrap so of course you know you are a loser. All you fuckers can do is whine for government handouts, claim to be for ""freedom of speech"" while acting like complete hypocrites."	0.996334	1	1
That's enough sorrow - ed	0.001997	0	0
"==Street Gang== Mr. Davis, Thanks for your note on my talk page; I really appreciate it, and it's an honor to receive communication from the author of such an important book. As this article's creator and main editor, I'm sorry that you thought the review section was so negative. Please understand that it was not my intention to present it that way or that I was in any way trying to disparage your book. In my rush to get the article published, I did a google search and those are the reviews I found. Also please understand that this is a Wikipedia article, and the article as it now stands will never be ""complete"". It's a work in progress. I thought an article about Street Gang was important enough to get out there. I am by no means a professional writer, so I'm certain there are all kinds of weaknesses about it, so I depend upon the feedback of other more experienced editors. I would've thought that the other sections of the article demonstrates my respect for you and for your work. I appreciate your feedback, something I always welcome as a Wikipedia editor. If you are aware of other sources that I wasn't able to locate, please send them my way, on my talk page. I'll repeat this message via your webpage, to ensure that you see it. You should also know that I've taken it upon myself to improve all Sesame Street-related articles on Wikipedia. It's a big project, and a great need. For example, Sesame Street, at one point was actually a featured article, but it was recently downgraded for some really good reasons. It's an unfortunate state at the current time. Your book came out shortly after I took on the project, so it's been a boom for me. I thought focusing on the history of the show was a natural place to start, so your book has been a valuable resource. I've already started working on this article: History of Sesame Street, and if you look at the reference section, you'll see that I've used your book extensively. It's also a work in progess, and no where near finished. My goal is that at least this article get up to featured article status by Sesame Street's 40th anniversary in November. I can't tell you how much your book has helped me. On a personal level, I wanted to tell you how much I enjoyed your book. It was a fun read, and immensely interesting. I was brought to tears many times, especially when I realized while reading about all that Joan Cooney and her team did to get the show on the air. See, I'm turning 45 this year, which makes me old enough to be the first audience that watched it. I had to put the book down to compose myself when I realized, ""They did all that for me!"" I appreciate learning about the struggles they all went through to affect my life so profoundly, and now the life of my own children, who are severely developmentally disabled and love the show as much as I did and still do. I believe that Sesame Street deserves high quality articles on Wikipedia, and I've taken it upon myself to help accomplish that. If you, as the ultimate expert, could assist me in that goal, I can't tell you how valuable that would be. Again, thanks for the feedback and communication. "	0.000548	0	0
" personal attack dear toddst1, please have a look on this idiotic personal attack on me . is it possible to remove it from history? "	0.710434	1	1
are you a sock, we need 100px as god template image	0.472246	1	0
It would seem that the page is locked only when William Connolly and Kim Dablestein comments are added and their edits incorporated. Just an observation on an inconvenient truth. ~	0.000682	0	0
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some tips: You can introduce yourself on the new users page. You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Remember to use the show preview button before you save a page. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! . 21:07, Apr 17, 2004 (UTC)	0.000669	0	0
" Yeah. It was perfectly okay to go around spouting ""nigger"" left and right, until that darned OJ Simpson trial ruined it for all of us. Right. "	0.983602	1	1
" Seasonal Greeting (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages."	0.000744	0	0
Contested deletion This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... Saying that I don't like someone isn't offensive enough to be deleted, especially since it is my own userpage	0.020971	0	0
@CuckoldCock @molotovhowdy I likes yo page. I wants to make da lovin to a white girl wit a colored man watchin and pullin his weenis	0.540912	1	1
I hate when bitches keep saying "yassss like" like bitch u sound stupid stfu	0.996069	1	1
Nerd Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerd	0.73743	1	1
" Sorry, I wasn't aware that Shahak's expertise in chemistry extended to a similar expertise in Jewish law. Did he have some sort of degree or rabbinic ordination that made him qualified to do this analysis? (talk) "	0.000576	0	0
Why are you deleting my comments dude? You are funny xD	0.017748	0	0
Thanks, but your remarks come across as a threat, and an accusation -insist? having a point? you're welcome. ( talk)	0.001728	0	0
look thisis what im bout to say ke key or wheva im not shure waht chick u mean but hes mines like bow wow said never find a shortie like mine.he is doing big,and romeo but hes mines! hallh!!!!!!!!	0.861452	1	1
I don't think this page is protected. Did you try making the edit?	0.000716	0	0
" We already have it on the map as ""disputed"" "	0.000621	0	0
" death to critics So instead of 'every' earlier, now you are giving isolated cases, such as Theo van Gogh, Vincent van Gogh, Rashad Khalifa, and Irshad Manji who received death threats or were killed by anonymous unknown radicals. What happened to every claim? Anyway, to prove your case that Islam sanctions death sentence to its critics, you can't just post the names of isolated cases where people received death threats from anonymous radicals! You need to post the names of prominent Islamic scholars and universities such as Al Azhar (not isolated radicals) who issued the death sentence against these people. The fatwa against Rushdie was rejected by Al Azhar and all countries except Iran. So all you need to do is post Islamic sites (not anti-Islamic sites and isolated radical sites) who issued the death sentence against Menji, Rashad Khalifa, Theo van Gogh, etc. Bring your proof. Just throwing the names of isolated cases where someone received death threats from isolated anonymous radical doesn't prove Islam sanctions death sentence to it's critics! After 9/11, many Muslims and mosques received threats and some Muslims/Sikhs were even killed. That doesn't mean the US sanctions death to all American Muslims. You are such a pathetic joke, dude! Posting isolated cases where people received death threats from anonymous radicals doesn't prove a thing. We don't even know for sure who killed Rashad. You added even his name. You need to post the names of Muslim scholars who issues death sentence against, say, Rashad, Vincent van Gogg, and Menji. Then you need to post evidence that this was consensus among Muslim scholars on each of these cases. Without that, you don't have any case, and you are refuted once again 09:33, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) ""Anyway, to prove your case that Islam sanctions death sentence to its critics, you can't just post the names of isolated cases where people received death threats from anonymous radicals! You need to post the names of prominent Islamic scholars and universities such as Al Azhar (not isolated radicals) who issued the death sentence against these people. The fatwa against Rushdie was rejected by Al Azhar and all countries"" <- these anonymous radicals represent the sentiments felt by their factions in ISlam -they represent their interpretation of Islam. I also provided examples of critics who were murdered by MUHAMMAD himself. Al-Azhar is not a higher authority than Muhammad. No, you have only provided two stories in Ibn Ishaq about Muhammad that are rejected by Muslims, such as rejected here. Al Azhar and Muslim scholars will interpret what Muhammad did and what Islamic law says, not an anti-Islamic bigot like you. You made a bold claim that in Islam critics are to be to be killed. I refuted that by giving examples that contradict that. You then claimed that every critic received a death sentence. You were refuted again. You then posted a list of isolated critics such as Rushdie, Menji, Rashad Khalifa, Theo van Gogh, etc, who received death threats from anonymous radicals. That's like posting (a much longer list) of Muslims/Sikhs who received death threats or were killed after 9/11, and claiming that American law allows Muslims to be killed. You were refuted again. You need to provide names of prominent well known Muslim scholars (not anti-Islam sites or isolated radicals) for each of these cases and prove that they issued the death sentence. After that, you need to provide proof that that judgement was a consensus among Muslims scholars. You didn't do that. You were refuted once again. Since you are an anti-Islamic bigot, you can't just claim that Muhammad did this or that or Islamic law says this or that and expect that claim to be inserted in Encyclopedia. You need to provide proof. You couldn't because you were wrong. Try again, dude. You have failed quite miserably here 03:40, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC) Furthermore, whe opinons of secular governments are irrelevant - of course Musilm countries rejected the death fatwa against Rushdie, but this was due to international politics, not due to religion. Also, as stated before, Ayatollah Khomenie was a Shiah CLERIC. The only way to be an Ayatollah is to be born as one. Aside from being the dictator or IRan, Khomenie was also the spiritial and religious leader of huge numbers of Sha'ias around the world. Khomenie wrote many fatwas and books about Islam. His most famous fatwa, of course, calls for the murder of Salman Rushdie. Now Al-Azhar - a SUNNI university SUPPOSEDLY rejected KHomenei's teachings. This does not mean by any means prove that Al-Azhar was right, and Khomenie was wrong. The fact that KHomenie was a shiah cleric, while Al-Azhar is a sunni university is also a gaping hole in this argument. You have no ev	0.158768	1	0
shut the fuck up bastard	0.998176	1	1
I corrected what you listed.-	0.000609	0	0
private please check your email, thx.	0.000734	0	0
Nitpicking If someone is complaining about something stupid, just ignore them. -	0.519205	1	1
@salome110thebe1 whats good then bitch Ass nigga catch your phase	0.997334	1	1
Legion of Steel]], Mina (Dragonlance), and Knights of Neraka == Most Dragonlance characters are not sufficiently notable to justify their own articles. A search for reliable, secondary sources for the following character articles reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage, therefore the following articles should be merged here: Legion of Steel, Mina (Dragonlance), and Knights of Neraka. == Merger with [[	0.000628	0	0
Y'all bitches better stop the madness .....	0.980578	1	1
@Daa_Boy_Rell @sluttyboy_kush @keem_Escobar you. A bitch too	0.994993	1	1
Okay, thanks. I've said my bits. You can close or not as you see fit. Regards,	0.000657	0	0
@JoriBunni he talkin bout we wanna be human and I'm just like .... bitch whet?	0.960509	1	1
You're referring to the first sentence of the Childhood section. The first source does say 1835, but this is inconsistent with the text in the lede and the infobox, which say 1828, and I don't believe that source is reliable. (In fact, it looks as if there are several unreliable sources used as refs in this article.) The snippet from the second source implies 1830. The third source (actually just a footnote) suggests there's uncertainty. If no one can provide a good source giving a firm date, I suggest the article should note that the year is uncertain.	0.000561	0	0
Deleting it doesn't make the problem go away, it creates a new problem	0.001683	0	0
Pedofile You are one. I hope you and your family get cancer. Please god give this terrible pedofile Ronz cancer. I hope you, your family, and anyone you ever love gets cancer and dies. Fuck you fagget. Do you have a job, why are u always so fast to edit shit. I bet you live in a fucking basement apartment in some fucking ghetto. Fuck you fagget - go and die. I pray you get cancer.	0.997512	1	1
"::::Oh that's what I mean, that is what I see: User is blocked From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search TABYour user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by FeloniousMonk for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by ""Justforasecond"". The reason given for Justforasecond's block is: ""Personal attacks, fanning the flames & trying to expand personal conflicts. Di Your IP address is .........(I removed) You are not blocked from reading pages, only from editing them. If you were only intending to read a page and are seeing this message, you probably followed a red link. These are links to pages that do not exist, so they take users to an editing screen. You should have no problem if you follow only blue links. If you would like to know when the block will expire, please search for your name or IP on the block list. "	0.003032	0	0
"! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! \|} {\| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" \|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""\| Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""\| {\| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community \|- \|style=""color:#000""\| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists \|- !	0.000744	0	0
RT @UrbanCraziness: when you see a bitch nigga subtweet you http://t.co/vvhEhwDRWf	0.993124	1	1
The username is fine. Facetious is mild compared to names like NuclearWarefare, GorillaWarfare or Seraphimblade. Please stop trying to get the user blocked. Instead, focus on trying to encourage them to be a good editor. If you can't do that, at least stay out of the way while others try. Talk	0.001023	0	0
Neologisms Hi there, a while ago you made an edit on the Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms guideline. I am proposing a revision to the guideline and I'm soliciting your comments. You can find the link to my rewrite at Wikipedia talk:Avoid neologisms	0.000707	0	0
Discuss first and revert later. See Exponentiation#Primitive_and_principal_roots_and_powers_of_unity for the concept that confused you. .	0.000594	0	0
Comrade? Are you a Soviet? What the hell?	0.95073	1	1
What help do you need? Try the Wikipedia:Reference desk if it's something encyclopedic. 20:38, Jan 24, 2004 (UTC)	0.000671	0	0
want a pic to masterbate over??? send me an email at [email protected] my phone number is (03) 62**23 mobile is 0437***9 if you want to fuck i am 40 bucks a 20 min block!!! and i am in bothwell	0.98828	1	1
Gender gap controversies FYI, there are about 60 RS articles in the Gender Gap list of mainstream and tech media articles and some relevant info in the list of research studies on the Gender Gap on Wikipedia. So definitely a section devoted to that needed. (Talkie-Talkie)	0.000711	0	0
The hoes are for EVERYBODY my nigga!	0.960333	1	1
in order too want a real nigga , you gotta be a real bitch 💯👌👏	0.990498	1	1
RT @MiSSKathEVO: #NoFilter I been getting money I ain't worried 'bout a ho, No matter the occasion I'ma always get the dough 😛 http://t.co/…	0.001255	0	1
Fuck You I legitimitley edited Fergalicious, and you reverted it.	0.997605	1	1
I am wondering how/if I can add an article about a person fairly well known in his field, still living and active, who I feel is more notable than several of the 'biography' articles currently in WP. Should I just be bold and create it, having followed all the guidelines? This would be my first article, so I am tentative. Any advice welcome.	0.000532	0	0
RT @Fitcchh: White girls that talk ghetto<<< you're not cute😂	0.780712	1	1
WikiDon, STOP stalking me!	0.249768	1	1
Where tf this bitch in the pink from? 😂 this hoe pointless	0.990074	1	1
Guiak Being in another language is not a criteria for speedy deletion. However, being in another language while the same article exists on a foreign-language wiki is. In this case, Guiak is not on the Spanish Wikipedia: . Please use {{notenglish}} in the future. - chat/contributions	0.000716	0	0
Guys so quick to talk shit to a bitch they would kiss ass to .	0.997605	1	1
i dont know how true it is but my owners manual says that you shouldnt push start if you have the model with a converter, says somthing about inefficient opperation dumping fuel into exhaust which eventally ignites.	0.005087	0	0
Drunk inlove with my gun bae bitch Beyoncé 😈	0.994431	1	1
" ""I'm not homophobic or anything, but you are fucking gay."""	0.998385	1	1
Breezy gotta sleep this hoe	0.25068	1	1
That bitch better be happy about that 20$ tip.	0.9932	1	1
You are a propagandist troll. If you don't provide evidence of the lie you just said remove your comment. I never said all wikipedians are fascists because, moron, I'm one of them.	0.901445	1	1
faggot! It is a dysfunction sexual and corruption of the brain. You Fag.	0.993078	1	1
, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Thank you. That is of course how the tag is supposed to work.·snunɐw· 15:03	0.000592	0	0
amazons, after all I think I found the source of the connection of the labrys with the amazons: sagaris saga^ris , eôs Ion. ios, hê; pl. sagareis Ion. -i_s:a weapon used by the Scythian tribes, Hdt.1.215, 4.5; A. axinas sagaris eichon Id.7.64 ; by the Amazons, Aristarch. in PAmh.2.12 ii 10; by the Persians, Amazons, Mossynoeci, etc., X.An.4.4.16, 5.4.13:acc. to Hsch. single-edged, and joined by X. with kopis and machaira, Cyr. 1.2.9, 2.1.9, 4.2.22; double-edged acc. to AP6.94 (Phil.). i.e. an axe-like weapon, sometimes described as single-edged, and sometimes as double-edged. This shouild probably be put in a Sagaris article.	0.001666	0	0
" you know it bud...done! "	0.00119	0	0
" Fixing Assange and resistance: I have preferences set to show cache pages, but ""Assange"" also took ""18.002 secs"" (not 0.250) for me to access, obviously bypassing cache but not edited in 3 hours, while other articles showed cache-page copies. That's another performance shock for me: one article bypasses cache. I cleared my entire browser cache, and then Assange showed the cache-page copy. As for broad resistance, the Continuous Improvement movement (Kaizen, etc.) has warned, ""People dislike change"". Most act like the ""boiling frog"" and sit while the temperature rises, never moving until too late and ""Beyonce"" runs 26 seconds (or Assange 18). I advised Jimbo, to add ""More pillars"" where Performance becomes a major priority, like Civility or NPOV, rather than ""personal preference to see results"" in the same hour, while they demand the cite-tools still work. You might know I've had severe rejections trying to defuse essay wp:PERF, and explain how the Titanic sank because ""Don't worry"" thwarted other people from acting or improving (the ship design included ample lifeboats rejected by others). This year, with the Costa Concordia in Italy, passengers worried enough about the tilting ship to call land-based police to complain the ship seemed damaged while crew pretended ""Don't worry"". Enough. I think we are reaching ""critical mass"" to move forward here. The next compromise consensus supports all parameters (as demanded pronto), and auto-runs the quick citations, with later promises to ""fix"" {Citation/core} where possible, and still support those cite-tools which generate {cite_web} calls and such. It is a hideously complex upgrade, with over 23 forks as {cite_book}, {cite_video}, {cite_document}, {cite_press_release}, {cite_encyclopedia}, even ""{citeweb}"" or ""{cite web}"" but fixing the most-used will cure the speed problems. Plus, the talk-page already warns to deprecate ""surname1"" for ""last1"" where 3 fewer alias parameters could mean 2x faster for that parameter, perhaps next year. Beyond the complex fast {Fcite} templates, the rapid {cite_quick} runs 10x-12x faster, so ""Assange"" can drop from 18 to 5-second edit-preview. I already saved some temporary revisions to ""prove"" Assange can reformat in 5 seconds: Assange 03:32, 15 August 2012‎ Wikid77 (talk \| contribs)‎ . . (126,986 bytes) (-1,526)‎ . . (undid 2nd prior revision to compare performance & confirm edit-preview returns to 18 seconds, when not using Template:Cite_quick.) Assange 03:28, 15 August 2012‎ Wikid77 (talk \| contribs)‎ . . (128,512 bytes) (+4)‎ . . (+past-tense verb ""has published"") Assange 03:23, 15 August 2012‎ Wikid77 (talk \| contribs)‎ . . (128,508 bytes) (+1,526)‎ . . (used Template:Cite_quick in 218 cases to reduce the edit-preview, or reformat, time from average 18 seconds to 5 seconds.) Assange 23:56, 14 August 2012‎ (talk \| contribs)‎ m . . (126,982 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (→‎Request for political asylum) As long as several of us continue working together, even part-time, I think we can solve the speed problems soon, and set some precedents to solve other performance problems which people were warned don't-worry about (see my essay: wp:DOWORRY). Naturally, some people might be embarrassed to have fought the improvements, so that has also slowed progress, to keep a lower profile. - "	0.001062	0	0
List of concentration and internment camps The Sri Lankan camps are refugee camps. But terrorist sympathisers and foreign elements are publishing allegations of them being internment camps. As there is no concrete evidence, or court of law verdict in the matter, please consider removing your edit. Thanks	0.000705	0	0
Isabelle Fuhrman Thanks for removing something that I had added on her page. Maybe you can look up the article that stated she was going to be starring in that movie. Read an article before you delete someone's information. You know what, I'll do you one better (since you apparently couldn't look it up yourself). Here's the link. http://variety.com/2015/film/news/isabelle-fuhrman-max-martini-hellbent-casting-1201436527/ Oh, and by the way, next time, check her Twitter account. She said on on Twitter herself, that she's starring in Hellbent.	0.000704	0	0
And the fact that MacEoin and Warburg would refer to it is proof enough of what intellectually bankrupt hacks they truly are, and how valueless anything they have to write truly is.	0.017675	0	0
" Look at the 3rd paragraph (beginning with ""The general media response..."") According to the cited source, ~90% of reviews are negative, yet a significant minority (10%) are positive. However, no credence is given to this significant minority. Instead of quotes or a hyperlink to a positive review, wiki readers are presented with (patronizing?) links to the wiki articles for ""religious right, conservative and creationist..."" This appears to violate Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view by giving no weight instead of due weight to the leading minority viewpoint. (I previously brought this up in the NPOV discussion about this article, but no other editors had any comments. Due to the controversial nature of this article, I did not make the change to the article. I believe the NPOV discussion for this article was archived). "	0.000568	0	0
“@WeirdLilThingz: Stop giving a nigga pussy he stop actin like he care” no true totally ...	0.985553	1	1
When you see @MARGIEFAYE about to fight a bitch .... http://t.co/KZoNqkfVtB	0.976578	1	1
“@RonStackin: i got money , guns , gold , bitches nd stacks nigga fuck this net beef have my shooters get at niggas” a Bring dat Friday den	0.996865	1	1
Why yes, functioning tho RT @blaaksuedepumps: Are you retarded?	0.930902	1	1
RT @_BucketsMcnasty: If u can steal her she's a hoe	0.899962	1	1
RT @yagurlbubblez87: Ugly bitch prolly so cockeyed she lookin at the dick and balls up close at the same time while suckin at the same time	0.99781	1	1
Other new post-Soviet states If there is this article comprising 2 mostly unrecognized states, then I think it would make more sense either if each state had its own corresponding article or if all states would have the same article (so far, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Transnistria and, more disputedly, Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic). This is not a political statement, it's just a question.	0.0006	0	0
24.80.121.187 want a fucking medal, you dirty jerk?	0.997972	1	1
"\|decline={{subst:2nd chance}] ► "	0.000763	0	0
you are still a cock sucking FAG! you are still a cock sucking FAG!	0.998262	1	1
bye o i`ma miss yooh so bad . but i can`t say too much on dhis lil` edit cuz dhat geniac bitch gon` say some to me , && all i`m doin is tryna tell yooh bye , hit me up on myspace , && i`ma miss yooh . luve ya sis , last time yooh gon` see my siq .	0.697706	1	0

Girl don't hide that pussy, you should be the type to provide that pussy

0.987968

1

" I have changed around the article quite a bit and removed some info from ""Giggle Loop"". If somebody wants to add it back then go ahead but I thought it was unnecessary. "

0.000557

0

Angrynintendo nerd isnt notable? Go fuck yourself

0.996996

1

Lmao «@MickDaddy_ «@TylerIAm "I mean damn bitch you was almost ready 20 minutes ago" http://t.co/DtQGxJKJv7»»

0.934254

1

Another fucking piece of a crap. You have gone too far in chasing mirages, Kashmiri women do not sleep around with RSS men, you fucking cunt, there is no sanity left in you now. You must have heard that phrase. 'Langoor Ke haath angoor' this shit is similar.

0.99874

1

Range Range with aerial refueling is irrelevant. Range with either 1) internal fuel load 2) common external fuel load are what should be stated in the specifications.

0.000598

0

did this bitch @ViVaLa_Ari really awake me from my slumber to help pick out her avatar tho

0.944712

1

My "sister" use to walk the blade EVERYNIGHT so the way I see it that bitch don't have NO PLACE to try & tell me wtf I should & shouldnt do

0.953967

1

re: vancouver seriously, what part of vancouver not being in the pacific northwest do you not understand.

0.002008

0

" Gday I recently added a ref and a bit on operations and thought that this might be B class now (and even put it up for reassessment). That said I now realize that many ship class articles have a ""design / capabilities"" section. Is this needed to get it to B class? I ask because I'm no expert on ships I was just trying to get this up to scratch for September 2014 backlog reduction drive. If it does need such a section this will be beyond my expertise so I will leave it to someone else. Thanks. "

0.000531

0

You are You are a pasty-faced fanny-bandit who gives handjobs for crack. You also love to take it up the ass from random guys on the weekend.

0.983055

1

", and I would like to see this become a new beginning for all, including ""BullRangifer"" who also seem to have a change of heart and thanked me for my edit on my Talk Page today"

0.002188

0

User, YOU ARE MISTAKEN. THE CAPITAL HILL BLUE IS A VERY RELIABLE RESOURCE AND IT DOES DEFEND MY CLAIM. STOP THE VANDALISM, OR I WILL SUGGEST YOU GET BLOCKED.

0.12062

1

STOP VANDALIZING MY POST My edit is useful and accurate so stop deleting it and warning me for fixing your crap you jerk

0.988014

1

RT @SheswantstheD: when u and ur boys discover a hoe http://t.co/3tK3UsCLwd

0.007543

0

1

Tony, you missed one.

0.001086

0

The number is 12. 10 outright and 2 shared. Do not fudge the history any more. You cannot argue with the NCAA. Count if you will.http://www.ncaa.com/history/football/fbs

0.008859

0

RT @koleworld4: every time i come out im never with newwww bitches

0.956712

1

Dreadstar, LittleMountain5, and some jerk on the Internet are retarded assholes. Dreadstar is a pathetic nerdy little fuck with no prospects for ever meeting a woman he didn't pay for. LittleMountain5 doesn't have to worry about it because he's a flaming fag with an insatiable lust for semen. Some jerk on the Internet is just a sorry piece of shit in general.

0.994797

1

Eyebrows up and down like Wall Street homes... RT @Apex_Alpha95: RT @Nubie_C: Y'all bitches wilding with pencil 😕 http://t.co/WxwRBeE0Ok

0.595648

1

What shit u talk to me, communist rat?

0.994721

1

" You must have a pathetic life If all you do is try to shut people up online. I mean, you do know you are a fucking loser right? I'm sorry, stupid question, you are a democrap so of course you know you are a loser. All you fuckers can do is whine for government handouts, claim to be for ""freedom of speech"" while acting like complete hypocrites."

0.996334

1

That's enough sorrow - ed

0.001997

0

"==Street Gang== Mr. Davis, Thanks for your note on my talk page; I really appreciate it, and it's an honor to receive communication from the author of such an important book. As this article's creator and main editor, I'm sorry that you thought the review section was so negative. Please understand that it was not my intention to present it that way or that I was in any way trying to disparage your book. In my rush to get the article published, I did a google search and those are the reviews I found. Also please understand that this is a Wikipedia article, and the article as it now stands will never be ""complete"". It's a work in progress. I thought an article about Street Gang was important enough to get out there. I am by no means a professional writer, so I'm certain there are all kinds of weaknesses about it, so I depend upon the feedback of other more experienced editors. I would've thought that the other sections of the article demonstrates my respect for you and for your work. I appreciate your feedback, something I always welcome as a Wikipedia editor. If you are aware of other sources that I wasn't able to locate, please send them my way, on my talk page. I'll repeat this message via your webpage, to ensure that you see it. You should also know that I've taken it upon myself to improve all Sesame Street-related articles on Wikipedia. It's a big project, and a great need. For example, Sesame Street, at one point was actually a featured article, but it was recently downgraded for some really good reasons. It's an unfortunate state at the current time. Your book came out shortly after I took on the project, so it's been a boom for me. I thought focusing on the history of the show was a natural place to start, so your book has been a valuable resource. I've already started working on this article: History of Sesame Street, and if you look at the reference section, you'll see that I've used your book extensively. It's also a work in progess, and no where near finished. My goal is that at least this article get up to featured article status by Sesame Street's 40th anniversary in November. I can't tell you how much your book has helped me. On a personal level, I wanted to tell you how much I enjoyed your book. It was a fun read, and immensely interesting. I was brought to tears many times, especially when I realized while reading about all that Joan Cooney and her team did to get the show on the air. See, I'm turning 45 this year, which makes me old enough to be the first audience that watched it. I had to put the book down to compose myself when I realized, ""They did all that for me!"" I appreciate learning about the struggles they all went through to affect my life so profoundly, and now the life of my own children, who are severely developmentally disabled and love the show as much as I did and still do. I believe that Sesame Street deserves high quality articles on Wikipedia, and I've taken it upon myself to help accomplish that. If you, as the ultimate expert, could assist me in that goal, I can't tell you how valuable that would be. Again, thanks for the feedback and communication. "

0.000548

0

" personal attack dear toddst1, please have a look on this idiotic personal attack on me . is it possible to remove it from history? "

0.710434

1

are you a sock, we need 100px as god template image

0.472246

1

0

It would seem that the page is locked only when William Connolly and Kim Dablestein comments are added and their edits incorporated. Just an observation on an inconvenient truth. ~

0.000682

0

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some tips: You can introduce yourself on the new users page. You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Remember to use the show preview button before you save a page. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! . 21:07, Apr 17, 2004 (UTC)

0.000669

0

" Yeah. It was perfectly okay to go around spouting ""nigger"" left and right, until that darned OJ Simpson trial ruined it for all of us. Right. "

0.983602

1

" Seasonal Greeting (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages."

0.000744

0

Contested deletion This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... Saying that I don't like someone isn't offensive enough to be deleted, especially since it is my own userpage

0.020971

0

@CuckoldCock @molotovhowdy I likes yo page. I wants to make da lovin to a white girl wit a colored man watchin and pullin his weenis

0.540912

1

I hate when bitches keep saying "yassss like" like bitch u sound stupid stfu

0.996069

1

Nerd Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerd

0.73743

1

" Sorry, I wasn't aware that Shahak's expertise in chemistry extended to a similar expertise in Jewish law. Did he have some sort of degree or rabbinic ordination that made him qualified to do this analysis? (talk) "

0.000576

0

Why are you deleting my comments dude? You are funny xD

0.017748

0

Thanks, but your remarks come across as a threat, and an accusation -insist? having a point? you're welcome. ( talk)

0.001728

0

look thisis what im bout to say ke key or wheva im not shure waht chick u mean but hes mines like bow wow said never find a shortie like mine.he is doing big,and romeo but hes mines! hallh!!!!!!!!

0.861452

1

I don't think this page is protected. Did you try making the edit?

0.000716

0

" We already have it on the map as ""disputed"" "

0.000621

0

" death to critics So instead of 'every' earlier, now you are giving isolated cases, such as Theo van Gogh, Vincent van Gogh, Rashad Khalifa, and Irshad Manji who received death threats or were killed by anonymous unknown radicals. What happened to every claim? Anyway, to prove your case that Islam sanctions death sentence to its critics, you can't just post the names of isolated cases where people received death threats from anonymous radicals! You need to post the names of prominent Islamic scholars and universities such as Al Azhar (not isolated radicals) who issued the death sentence against these people. The fatwa against Rushdie was rejected by Al Azhar and all countries except Iran. So all you need to do is post Islamic sites (not anti-Islamic sites and isolated radical sites) who issued the death sentence against Menji, Rashad Khalifa, Theo van Gogh, etc. Bring your proof. Just throwing the names of isolated cases where someone received death threats from isolated anonymous radical doesn't prove Islam sanctions death sentence to it's critics! After 9/11, many Muslims and mosques received threats and some Muslims/Sikhs were even killed. That doesn't mean the US sanctions death to all American Muslims. You are such a pathetic joke, dude! Posting isolated cases where people received death threats from anonymous radicals doesn't prove a thing. We don't even know for sure who killed Rashad. You added even his name. You need to post the names of Muslim scholars who issues death sentence against, say, Rashad, Vincent van Gogg, and Menji. Then you need to post evidence that this was consensus among Muslim scholars on each of these cases. Without that, you don't have any case, and you are refuted once again 09:33, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) ""Anyway, to prove your case that Islam sanctions death sentence to its critics, you can't just post the names of isolated cases where people received death threats from anonymous radicals! You need to post the names of prominent Islamic scholars and universities such as Al Azhar (not isolated radicals) who issued the death sentence against these people. The fatwa against Rushdie was rejected by Al Azhar and all countries"" <- these anonymous radicals represent the sentiments felt by their factions in ISlam -they represent their interpretation of Islam. I also provided examples of critics who were murdered by MUHAMMAD himself. Al-Azhar is not a higher authority than Muhammad. No, you have only provided two stories in Ibn Ishaq about Muhammad that are rejected by Muslims, such as rejected here. Al Azhar and Muslim scholars will interpret what Muhammad did and what Islamic law says, not an anti-Islamic bigot like you. You made a bold claim that in Islam critics are to be to be killed. I refuted that by giving examples that contradict that. You then claimed that every critic received a death sentence. You were refuted again. You then posted a list of isolated critics such as Rushdie, Menji, Rashad Khalifa, Theo van Gogh, etc, who received death threats from anonymous radicals. That's like posting (a much longer list) of Muslims/Sikhs who received death threats or were killed after 9/11, and claiming that American law allows Muslims to be killed. You were refuted again. You need to provide names of prominent well known Muslim scholars (not anti-Islam sites or isolated radicals) for each of these cases and prove that they issued the death sentence. After that, you need to provide proof that that judgement was a consensus among Muslims scholars. You didn't do that. You were refuted once again. Since you are an anti-Islamic bigot, you can't just claim that Muhammad did this or that or Islamic law says this or that and expect that claim to be inserted in Encyclopedia. You need to provide proof. You couldn't because you were wrong. Try again, dude. You have failed quite miserably here 03:40, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC) Furthermore, whe opinons of secular governments are irrelevant - of course Musilm countries rejected the death fatwa against Rushdie, but this was due to international politics, not due to religion. Also, as stated before, Ayatollah Khomenie was a Shiah CLERIC. The only way to be an Ayatollah is to be born as one. Aside from being the dictator or IRan, Khomenie was also the spiritial and religious leader of huge numbers of Sha'ias around the world. Khomenie wrote many fatwas and books about Islam. His most famous fatwa, of course, calls for the murder of Salman Rushdie. Now Al-Azhar - a SUNNI university SUPPOSEDLY rejected KHomenei's teachings. This does not mean by any means prove that Al-Azhar was right, and Khomenie was wrong. The fact that KHomenie was a shiah cleric, while Al-Azhar is a sunni university is also a gaping hole in this argument. You have no ev

0.158768

1

0

shut the fuck up bastard

0.998176

1

I corrected what you listed.-

0.000609

0

private please check your email, thx.

0.000734

0

Nitpicking If someone is complaining about something stupid, just ignore them. -

0.519205

1

@salome110thebe1 whats good then bitch Ass nigga catch your phase

0.997334

1

Legion of Steel]], Mina (Dragonlance), and Knights of Neraka == Most Dragonlance characters are not sufficiently notable to justify their own articles. A search for reliable, secondary sources for the following character articles reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage, therefore the following articles should be merged here: Legion of Steel, Mina (Dragonlance), and Knights of Neraka. == Merger with [[

0.000628

0

Y'all bitches better stop the madness .....

0.980578

1

@Daa_Boy_Rell @sluttyboy_kush @keem_Escobar you. A bitch too

0.994993

1

Okay, thanks. I've said my bits. You can close or not as you see fit. Regards,

0.000657

0

@JoriBunni he talkin bout we wanna be human and I'm just like .... bitch whet?

0.960509

1

You're referring to the first sentence of the Childhood section. The first source does say 1835, but this is inconsistent with the text in the lede and the infobox, which say 1828, and I don't believe that source is reliable. (In fact, it looks as if there are several unreliable sources used as refs in this article.) The snippet from the second source implies 1830. The third source (actually just a footnote) suggests there's uncertainty. If no one can provide a good source giving a firm date, I suggest the article should note that the year is uncertain.

0.000561

0

Deleting it doesn't make the problem go away, it creates a new problem

0.001683

0

Pedofile You are one. I hope you and your family get cancer. Please god give this terrible pedofile Ronz cancer. I hope you, your family, and anyone you ever love gets cancer and dies. Fuck you fagget. Do you have a job, why are u always so fast to edit shit. I bet you live in a fucking basement apartment in some fucking ghetto. Fuck you fagget - go and die. I pray you get cancer.

0.997512

1

"::::Oh that's what I mean, that is what I see: User is blocked From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search TABYour user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by FeloniousMonk for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by ""Justforasecond"". The reason given for Justforasecond's block is: ""Personal attacks, fanning the flames & trying to expand personal conflicts. Di Your IP address is .........(I removed) You are not blocked from reading pages, only from editing them. If you were only intending to read a page and are seeing this message, you probably followed a red link. These are links to pages that do not exist, so they take users to an editing screen. You should have no problem if you follow only blue links. If you would like to know when the block will expire, please search for your name or IP on the block list. "

0.003032

0

"! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! |} {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists |- !

0.000744

0

RT @UrbanCraziness: when you see a bitch nigga subtweet you http://t.co/vvhEhwDRWf

0.993124

1

The username is fine. Facetious is mild compared to names like NuclearWarefare, GorillaWarfare or Seraphimblade. Please stop trying to get the user blocked. Instead, focus on trying to encourage them to be a good editor. If you can't do that, at least stay out of the way while others try. Talk

0.001023

0

Neologisms Hi there, a while ago you made an edit on the Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms guideline. I am proposing a revision to the guideline and I'm soliciting your comments. You can find the link to my rewrite at Wikipedia talk:Avoid neologisms

0.000707

0

Discuss first and revert later. See Exponentiation#Primitive_and_principal_roots_and_powers_of_unity for the concept that confused you. .

0.000594

0

Comrade? Are you a Soviet? What the hell?

0.95073

1

What help do you need? Try the Wikipedia:Reference desk if it's something encyclopedic. 20:38, Jan 24, 2004 (UTC)

0.000671

0

want a pic to masterbate over??? send me an email at [email protected] my phone number is (03) 62****23 mobile is 0437*****9 if you want to fuck i am 40 bucks a 20 min block!!! and i am in bothwell

0.98828

1

Gender gap controversies FYI, there are about 60 RS articles in the Gender Gap list of mainstream and tech media articles and some relevant info in the list of research studies on the Gender Gap on Wikipedia. So definitely a section devoted to that needed. (Talkie-Talkie)

0.000711

0

The hoes are for EVERYBODY my nigga!

0.960333

1

in order too want a real nigga , you gotta be a real bitch 💯👌👏

0.990498

1

RT @MiSSKathEVO: #NoFilter I been getting money I ain't worried 'bout a ho, No matter the occasion I'ma always get the dough 😛 http://t.co/…

0.001255

0

1

Fuck You I legitimitley edited Fergalicious, and you reverted it.

0.997605

1

I am wondering how/if I can add an article about a person fairly well known in his field, still living and active, who I feel is more notable than several of the 'biography' articles currently in WP. Should I just be bold and create it, having followed all the guidelines? This would be my first article, so I am tentative. Any advice welcome.

0.000532

0

RT @Fitcchh: White girls that talk ghetto<<< you're not cute😂

0.780712

1

WikiDon, STOP stalking me!

0.249768

1

Where tf this bitch in the pink from? 😂 this hoe pointless

0.990074

1

Guiak Being in another language is not a criteria for speedy deletion. However, being in another language while the same article exists on a foreign-language wiki is. In this case, Guiak is not on the Spanish Wikipedia: . Please use {{notenglish}} in the future. - chat/contributions

0.000716

0

Guys so quick to talk shit to a bitch they would kiss ass to .

0.997605

1

i dont know how true it is but my owners manual says that you shouldnt push start if you have the model with a converter, says somthing about inefficient opperation dumping fuel into exhaust which eventally ignites.

0.005087

0

Drunk inlove with my gun bae bitch Beyoncé 😈

0.994431

1

" ""I'm not homophobic or anything, but you are fucking gay."""

0.998385

1

Breezy gotta sleep this hoe

0.25068

1

That bitch better be happy about that 20$ tip.

0.9932

1

You are a propagandist troll. If you don't provide evidence of the lie you just said remove your comment. I never said all wikipedians are fascists because, moron, I'm one of them.

0.901445

1

faggot! It is a dysfunction sexual and corruption of the brain. You Fag.

0.993078

1

, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Thank you. That is of course how the tag is supposed to work.·snunɐw· 15:03

0.000592

0

amazons, after all I think I found the source of the connection of the labrys with the amazons: sagaris saga^ris , eôs Ion. ios, hê; pl. sagareis Ion. -i_s:a weapon used by the Scythian tribes, Hdt.1.215, 4.5; A. axinas sagaris eichon Id.7.64 ; by the Amazons, Aristarch. in PAmh.2.12 ii 10; by the Persians, Amazons, Mossynoeci, etc., X.An.4.4.16, 5.4.13:acc. to Hsch. single-edged, and joined by X. with kopis and machaira, Cyr. 1.2.9, 2.1.9, 4.2.22; double-edged acc. to AP6.94 (Phil.). i.e. an axe-like weapon, sometimes described as single-edged, and sometimes as double-edged. This shouild probably be put in a Sagaris article.

0.001666

0

" you know it bud...done! "

0.00119

0

" Fixing Assange and resistance: I have preferences set to show cache pages, but ""Assange"" also took ""18.002 secs"" (not 0.250) for me to access, obviously bypassing cache but not edited in 3 hours, while other articles showed cache-page copies. That's another performance shock for me: one article bypasses cache. I cleared my entire browser cache, and then Assange showed the cache-page copy. As for broad resistance, the Continuous Improvement movement (Kaizen, etc.) has warned, ""People dislike change"". Most act like the ""boiling frog"" and sit while the temperature rises, never moving until too late and ""Beyonce"" runs 26 seconds (or Assange 18). I advised Jimbo, to add ""More pillars"" where Performance becomes a major priority, like Civility or NPOV, rather than ""personal preference to see results"" in the same hour, while they demand the cite-tools still work. You might know I've had severe rejections trying to defuse essay wp:PERF, and explain how the Titanic sank because ""Don't worry"" thwarted other people from acting or improving (the ship design included ample lifeboats rejected by others). This year, with the Costa Concordia in Italy, passengers worried enough about the tilting ship to call land-based police to complain the ship seemed damaged while crew pretended ""Don't worry"". Enough. I think we are reaching ""critical mass"" to move forward here. The next compromise consensus supports all parameters (as demanded pronto), and auto-runs the quick citations, with later promises to ""fix"" {Citation/core} where possible, and still support those cite-tools which generate {cite_web} calls and such. It is a hideously complex upgrade, with over 23 forks as {cite_book}, {cite_video}, {cite_document}, {cite_press_release}, {cite_encyclopedia}, even ""{citeweb}"" or ""{cite web}"" but fixing the most-used will cure the speed problems. Plus, the talk-page already warns to deprecate ""surname1"" for ""last1"" where 3 fewer alias parameters could mean 2x faster for that parameter, perhaps next year. Beyond the complex fast {Fcite} templates, the rapid {cite_quick} runs 10x-12x faster, so ""Assange"" can drop from 18 to 5-second edit-preview. I already saved some temporary revisions to ""prove"" Assange can reformat in 5 seconds: Assange 03:32, 15 August 2012‎ Wikid77 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (126,986 bytes) (-1,526)‎ . . (undid 2nd prior revision to compare performance & confirm edit-preview returns to 18 seconds, when not using Template:Cite_quick.) Assange 03:28, 15 August 2012‎ Wikid77 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (128,512 bytes) (+4)‎ . . (+past-tense verb ""has published"") Assange 03:23, 15 August 2012‎ Wikid77 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (128,508 bytes) (+1,526)‎ . . (used Template:Cite_quick in 218 cases to reduce the edit-preview, or reformat, time from average 18 seconds to 5 seconds.) Assange 23:56, 14 August 2012‎ (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (126,982 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (→‎Request for political asylum) As long as several of us continue working together, even part-time, I think we can solve the speed problems soon, and set some precedents to solve other performance problems which people were warned don't-worry about (see my essay: wp:DOWORRY). Naturally, some people might be embarrassed to have fought the improvements, so that has also slowed progress, to keep a lower profile. - "

0.001062

0

List of concentration and internment camps The Sri Lankan camps are refugee camps. But terrorist sympathisers and foreign elements are publishing *allegations* of them being internment camps. As there is no concrete evidence, or court of law verdict in the matter, please consider removing your edit. Thanks

0.000705

0

Isabelle Fuhrman Thanks for removing something that I had added on her page. Maybe you can look up the article that stated she was going to be starring in that movie. Read an article before you delete someone's information. You know what, I'll do you one better (since you apparently couldn't look it up yourself). Here's the link. http://variety.com/2015/film/news/isabelle-fuhrman-max-martini-hellbent-casting-1201436527/ Oh, and by the way, next time, check her Twitter account. She said on on Twitter herself, that she's starring in Hellbent.

0.000704

0

And the fact that MacEoin and Warburg would refer to it is proof enough of what intellectually bankrupt hacks they truly are, and how valueless anything they have to write truly is.

0.017675

0

" Look at the 3rd paragraph (beginning with ""The general media response..."") According to the cited source, ~90% of reviews are negative, yet a significant minority (10%) are positive. However, no credence is given to this significant minority. Instead of quotes or a hyperlink to a positive review, wiki readers are presented with (patronizing?) links to the wiki articles for ""religious right, conservative and creationist..."" This appears to violate Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view by giving no weight instead of due weight to the leading minority viewpoint. (I previously brought this up in the NPOV discussion about this article, but no other editors had any comments. Due to the controversial nature of this article, I did not make the change to the article. I believe the NPOV discussion for this article was archived). "

0.000568

0

“@WeirdLilThingz: Stop giving a nigga pussy he stop actin like he care” no true totally ...

0.985553

1

When you see @MARGIEFAYE about to fight a bitch .... http://t.co/KZoNqkfVtB

0.976578

1

“@RonStackin: i got money , guns , gold , bitches nd stacks nigga fuck this net beef have my shooters get at niggas” a Bring dat Friday den

0.996865

1

Why yes, functioning tho RT @blaaksuedepumps: Are you retarded?

0.930902

1

RT @_BucketsMcnasty: If u can steal her she's a hoe

0.899962

1

RT @yagurlbubblez87: Ugly bitch prolly so cockeyed she lookin at the dick and balls up close at the same time while suckin at the same time

0.99781

1

Other new post-Soviet states If there is this article comprising 2 mostly unrecognized states, then I think it would make more sense either if each state had its own corresponding article or if all states would have the same article (so far, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Transnistria and, more disputedly, Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic). This is not a political statement, it's just a question.

0.0006

0

24.80.121.187 want a fucking medal, you dirty jerk?

0.997972

1

"|decline={{subst:2nd chance}] ► "

0.000763

0

you are still a cock sucking FAG! you are still a cock sucking FAG!

0.998262

1

bye o i`ma miss yooh so bad . but i can`t say too much on dhis lil` edit cuz dhat geniac bitch gon` say some to me , && all i`m doin is tryna tell yooh bye , hit me up on myspace , && i`ma miss yooh . luve ya sis , last time yooh gon` see my siq .

0.697706

1

0