text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
I agree - the whole tone of the article feels driven by a hatred of automobiles - it needs to be essentially gutted for weasel wording, rhetoric, POV statements and rewritten in a neutral tone that plays up the benefits as much as the detractions. | 0.000807 | 0 | 0 |
After reading that, why should anyone believe ANYTHING else your article says about Lara? Because you continue to be BLINDED by your ENTRENCHED very far left wing viewpoint, you guys BLEW a perfectly good chance to be a go-to source for information about a person very much in the news. | 0.001506 | 0 | 0 |
@LimitlessMudi @YoDeddyUgly Y'all both trash | 0.92092 | 1 | 1 |
wikipedia editor is a noble profession for shut-ins and cyber hermits
guess it wasnt what you dreamed of as a kid? | 0.294157 | 1 | 0 |
"
{| style=""border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"" width=""100%""
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%""|
Hello Sousadolphin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Satori Son
{| style=""border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px"" width=""100%""
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial
How to edit a page
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Manual of Style
Be bold in editing
How to write a great article
WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources
Neutral Point of View
Point of View
Verifiability
Uploading images
Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! Getting Help
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
New contributors' help page
Where to ask a question
Help Desk
Frequently Asked Questions
|-
! Getting along
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Wikiquette
Civility
Sign your posts
Wikipedians
Conflict resolution
|-
! | 0.000941 | 0 | 0 |
F UCK YOU
F UCK YOU SUGGESTBOT | 0.996623 | 1 | 1 |
Merge discussion for Sol Biderman Collection
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sol Biderman Collection , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. | 0.000513 | 0 | 0 |
Nigga i wus graduating RT @i_EaT_PIE: If you wasn't in the 6th grade in 1996, you a hoe | 0.944645 | 1 | 1 |
"
Yeah, right. You're so ""busy"" you're answering questions on other people's talk pages which DON'T CONCERN YOU! lol
Have you even seen Mark Walters play? ROFL!" | 0.73387 | 1 | 1 |
"
It all depends on what you call free energy and what you call suppression. IMHO there are so many different free energy machines it's just hilarious. Knowing that makes the reason for suppressing them down all to obvious. If some one is getting stalked then you just take their word for it.
The main criticism of the theory is that these devices are absent in the market because they do not and cannot work.
Here the excuse to ignore it is the ignorance it self. The tool of suppression is the argument the devices don't exist, but this is also the excuse for never looking at them at the same time. We cant have it both ways? Either the machines don't work or the theory is wrong. We cant assume the machines must work because the theory has to be wrong just like we cant assume the theory must be right because the machines cant work. Most people will continue not believing it's real even after being confronted with such device. They will stand there screaming about the laws of thermodynamics. People like the inventors twin brother, or their wife. Not very likely to convince a wikipedian if you cant convince your wife now it is? The suppression is not so much executed by special interest groups as by the mainstream dogma. The dogma is however much supported by the special interests.
Signs of real professional free energy suppression you can see here on wikipedia. Every actor in history is worthy of his own page but weird inventions not confirmed by mainstream science (working or not is irrelevant) apparently cant have a page here. The few free energy machines still having their own wikipedia page are full of rant how crackpots try to destroy the laws of thermodynamics and how nutterish they are, not your usual trolling but the work of experts. Take the introduction of the Water fuel cell. ""the source of this addition energy has not been scientifically identified therefore the theory is treated with skepticism."" There was barely any theory, it just worked! And it has not been investigated. The way it's treated is not worthy of being in the description. An encyclopedia should not instruct it's readers behaviour? Tell me how to treat things huh? ""such a practice conforms to the parameters of perpetual motion, hence conclusive scientific investigation would either verify violation of thermodynamic law or identify the source of claimed additional energy."" But if there isn't going to be any scientific analysis - ever! then the laws of thermodynamics are nonsense. If the best scientists can do is preach the laws then it's just not very likely they are right about the topic. Then it says: ""At least one car prototype, reportedly powered by a water fuel cell, has been assembled."" HUH what? but but but?? You know what I mean? ""Meyer's claims about the Water Fuel Cell and the car that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996."" His wiki use to say
http://web.archive.org/web/20050106215257/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer
""It failed to work during a required demonstration of the water-fueled car. An Ohio court found Stanley Meyer guilty of fraud in a case brought against him by disgruntled investors."" So he was scammed by his own investors. What kind of person would do that with a known to work invention? And why was this important information deleted? Then it says: Stanley Meyer was granted patents in the United States and abroad starting in 1989. The verifiability, and scientific basis, of the patents are controversial. Now I know the water motor patents where granted after a working model was displayed. You can see it in the application number. There is no other way to get a patent on an electrolysis cell. Because of those laws of thermodynamics you know? You do know about those right? You can see free energy suppression live at work when you see that the world famous American inventor Stanley Meyer was not worthy of his own wikipedia page. It's obvious he cant have a page because that would violate conservation of energy right? Paul Pantone does have his own page where again the working of his device is denied by no-witness, The GEET page however describes a Hindi film? BTW Paul was also scammed by his investors? ha-ha? Yull Brown is also not worthy of his own page? Makes it kind of hard to write about free energy suppression when the suppressed and murdered inventors are not allowed the light of day? What about William A. Rhodes? Dennis klein then? no? Isaac de Rivaz? Daniel Dingle? etc etc?? At least we still have the Oxyhydrogen page right? haha? This is how free energy suppression is done. I would love to make a page for each one of them with most credible references but it's just not going to be allowed. The wall of propaganda is much to thick. I can think of better ways to kill myself. ha-ha ''here. I'll also take the opportunity to remind you that we a | 0.003162 | 0 | 0 |
Youre an idiot!
No one vandalized the gregory brothers page. Someone editted undually a posting I made on that site. Get a life. 155.85.1.253 | 0.97345 | 1 | 1 |
Unclear
The Section disscussing his appearance on Geroge Lopez is VERY un-clear. I think it requires a clean up. I would do it myself but don't know what it's even about, so won't try. | 0.000671 | 0 | 0 |
Michigan Militia
Hello Zorro III, I deleted a wrong link to Oklahoma City a year ago or so without further watching it. Now I find it again . The german link goes to a chapter of Oklahoma City, which is all wrong. This would eventually correspond to Oklahoma City bombing which is also wrong of course. To say it short: The link is wrong, since I´m not able to change, write or modify scripts I would be grateful if you could take care of that. Thanks in advance , I´ll be watching your talk page of course. Have a nice day | 0.000554 | 0 | 0 |
PAGE GO DIE YOU STUPID ARSEWHOLE AUTOMATED FILTER | 0.994339 | 1 | 1 |
“@BixxhMakeMeRich: If u ask me, every bitch gay”or "bi" | 0.967893 | 1 | 0 |
@DanielSizelove @Conrad_MLG get on cunt | 0.899168 | 1 | 0 |
Wow fucken Bradley sucks ass. And his coach said this niggah can play for Barcelona hahahahahaha | 0.998396 | 1 | 1 |
Im order to be a real nicca you gotta be Real ... Nicca! | 0.06104 | 0 | 1 |
@MichhelleAshley who is this we..? I dont love hoes | 0.083213 | 0 | 1 |
Lmfao custy bitches be like ( ) come on in | 0.9862 | 1 | 1 |
"
Rankings in lead
Recent good faith edits to the lead regarding rankings removed some existing text about various rankings while adding reference a new ranking that was incorrectly attributed to Newsweek instead of Financial Times.
Furthermore, this information in the lead becomes out of sync with detailed rankings in the Rankings section (which was already out of sync even before the aforementioned edits).
Based on guidelines for into text to ""summarize the most important points covered in an article"", I will move the specific rankings from the lead to the Rankings section. The lead will continue to have the existing sentence ""UCLA is consistently ranked high in college and university rankings."" This will hopefully make the article easier to maintain, not to mention benefit the reader with a shorter lead and access to accurate rankings details in a single section of the article. " | 0.000524 | 0 | 0 |
September 2013 (UTC)
==
How many times a day do we say this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wish_of_the_day.jpg
Enjoy your day.
13:47, 24 | 0.000865 | 0 | 0 |
omg everybody knows she's a lesbian. come out, emma. duh! | 0.839049 | 1 | 1 |
@Nick_504_ bitch who scarry am not backing down from no fuck nigga the fuck you talking bout hoe ass nigga stop dat talking and pull up | 0.998503 | 1 | 1 |
@Im_Thirst Shin's a faggot. I'm glad your chipped him. | 0.967372 | 1 | 1 |
Shout out to you ungrateful, inconsiderate bitches... I'm taking this shot for you...... Yea, you 😉😘 | 0.993822 | 1 | 1 |
, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Like. eh, OK for me now, I can't add more. - 23:38 | 0.000666 | 0 | 0 |
":""Straighten up"" is an uncivil comment made by Wikipedia administrator pschemp.
" | 0.022294 | 0 | 0 |
To clarify: the NMFS proposed listing belugas and held a public discussion. The Alaska scientists put their case at the public forum in the document Kelly's talking about. And then the NMFS published a review I mentioned which rejects the claims of the Alaska scientists. And seeing as its federal scientists who get to decide whether or not the belugas get listed as endangered, that's pretty important information. | 0.000539 | 0 | 0 |
"== ""mujahideen"" ==
wheres your proof of mujahideen in kosovo, an article about bosnia, how stupid is that, there was no mujahideen in kosovo
" | 0.746796 | 1 | 1 |
@user ICE doing it's job. And stop obfuscating the immigration issue by conflating the terms "immigrant" with "illegal alien". If they're here illegally, they broke U.S. law and need to go back. | 0.019708 | 0 | 1 |
Course I don't want to be blocked and I'm not requesting it. I'm not surprised that an article about Buddhist sex abuse cases generates controversy. But I am very surprised I wasn't notified about a discussion to delete the page and that after repeatedly asking concerned parties to raise their issues on the article's talk page were never taken up.
Nor was I engaging in a personal attack. I was simply responding to the individual's request for advice and being helpful.
As I advised him or her that individual should not be surprised that deleting material about someone so charismatic and controversial as Ole Nydahl is likely to generated a heated response. Speaking strictly for myself (but I know I'm speaking for Ole too) being free to speak my mind plainly ('robustly' as the individual concerned would say) about the issues is the sort of thing I would be prepared to give up this life for. Even a wiki account (imagine).
Thank you. Appreciated. | 0.00074 | 0 | 0 |
What do you think about that one File:Vineyards in Napa Valley.jpg? I mean Napa Valley is an important vineyards region, and there's no single image from there. | 0.000593 | 0 | 0 |
I'm a total niggercocksucking faggot. | 0.997287 | 1 | 1 |
PERSIAN? GODDAMN MUSLIM TERRORIST? I HOPE YOU GET NUKED, SLUT | 0.997331 | 1 | 1 |
Hey, Nazi dude:
Sherpa derpa derp | 0.833764 | 1 | 1 |
WP:GUNS importance assessment
As you surmised, the ten percent standard is intended to be interpreted as an order of magnitude, rather than a difference between a disqualified 9 percent and a qualified 11 percent. I am certainly open to alternative suggestions to clarify the criterion; but I disagree about the absence of sources to define an order of magnitude quantification.
The American gun culture includes a large number of writers who emphasize opinions rather than pursuing statistics. As the internet allows anyone to screen for information sources confirming an existing bias, such authors may be well represented by conventional search-engine algorithms. I personally enjoyed articles by Elmer Keith and Jack O'Connor relating divergent first-hand experiences hunting with light or heavy bullets; but I sought out articles by Julian Hatcher to find results of side-by-side scientific method comparisons.
I believe sources are available to quantify the features qualifying as top importance articles. It may be difficult to find quantification in the popular press (including the anti-gun press); but well-researched sources are worth the effort required to find them.
Assessment of importance requires a fundamental understanding of the subject; and the amount of time required will vary inversely with the experience of the editor. I wouldn't encourage you to undertake this assessment task with an unrealistic impression of the knowledge or time required. As a practical matter, however, you may understand the subject well enough to know the answer after reading the article. If you think the subject represented more than ten percent of the firearms or ammunition, it's probably a top importance article; but it's probably not top importance if you have doubts. I doubt your decisions on that basis will be challenged; but it shouldn't be an unreasonable task to find documentation on the few which might be. | 0.000551 | 0 | 0 |
On a google search , just about 90% of the pages for the National Rugby League, so I think that makes a good case for a redirect with a link to NRL (Disambiguation). This was the original edit here. | 0.000561 | 0 | 0 |
I support that. Create a table. Regards | 0.000575 | 0 | 0 |
Ok that makes sense as an argument, I have to admit I did not delve that deep into the case. PS please sign your comments using four tildes ~~~~ which will be automatically replaced with user id and time stamp. | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hello! Peyton Bowen is not the appropriate place to post information about yourself, because it is in the part of Wikipedia where encyclopaedic articles are written. A ""userpage"" at . Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. talk " | 0.000572 | 0 | 0 |
"
And, as a show of good faith, I've actually updated the bio, tidied it up a bit, etc. It definitely is our mission to have articles on notable individuals, and this article undoubtedly falls within that scope. Your contributions so far are appreciated. t/c " | 0.000525 | 0 | 0 |
"
Bastard Child
Does anyone know if Obama was born out of wedlock, and is a ""bastard"" child? 24.27.130.12 " | 0.792268 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Chuck_Strangers: When I say faggot it just means someone who is fucking weak... | 0.993872 | 1 | 1 |
Gum drop looking bitch commenting on peoples looks | 0.966959 | 1 | 1 |
RT @TAXSTONE: Shout out to all them bitches who don't own no designer shit and still look better than all YALL bitches with everything desi… | 0.993971 | 1 | 1 |
Please cite this information in the article if you want your edits to be validated by other editors. Talk Contributions | 0.000528 | 0 | 0 |
Dispute on SCOTUS case
Just to let you know that there is a dispute on this SCOTUS case, Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (see talk page). Third opinions welcomed... Cheers, | 0.000615 | 0 | 0 |
What the fuck? Ur a dick, urv never even been 2 helensville ya mommas boi!!! | 0.997485 | 1 | 1 |
Cycles Chart
I believe that the previous cycle chart has been used for many years and is very easy to read and understand. It also included the flag for each cycle's global destination. I also feel that it should be left as is and not changed. Thnaks. | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
JL;J;ALSDFSML;KFJSDF THIS MAN LIKES TO SUCK MAJOR DICKS. | 0.996464 | 1 | 1 |
RT @JaredFayne_54: And apparently I sound like a country hick. Perks of being from Kentucky | 0.094713 | 0 | 1 |
"
The changes you made went far beyond simply changing the capitalization of Greaser. Your edits amounted to changing the article to reflect your interpretation of the book, which is not acceptable. In addition, you made the plot summary too long, which is also not acceptable. Please state here, in clear terms, what edits you think need to be made to the plot, so that other editors can respond. -''''''The'FortyFive' " | 0.000627 | 0 | 0 |
February 2014 (UTC)
Official confirmation given. 220.245.146.235 18:16, 6 | 0.000641 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia is not a persons personal page but a places of facts based on good references. this seems to have been brought up several years ago and anti-gay is the correct term, and match's the good references. anything else would be a npov violation. 96.231.161.128 | 0.023205 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thats fine, and to be honest I understand you confusion. I had to say that to him, warn him, bur thats done now and I want to let it go. It gives me the creeos by now, and I have no problem with being blocked, at all. Ceoil " | 0.001158 | 0 | 0 |
@ShareA40Ounce bad bitch with an open mouth | 0.994718 | 1 | 1 |
Johar, Surinder Singh (1998). Holy Sikh shrines. New Delhi: M D Publications. p. 46. ISBN 978-81-7533-073-3. OCLC 44703461. 3. Singh, Bhagat Lakshman (1995). Short Sketch of the Life and Work of Guru Govind Singh, The Tenth and Last Guru. Laurier Books Ltd. /AES. p. 96. ISBN 978-81-206-0576-3. OCLC 55854929. 4. Singh, Prithi Pal (2007). The History of Sikh Gurus. Lotus Books. p. 146. ISBN 978-81-8382-075-2. 5. Singh, Dalip (1992). Guru Gobind Singh and Khalsa Discipline. Amritsar: Singh Bros. p. 256. ISBN 978-81-7205-071-9. OCLC 28583123 | 0.00078 | 0 | 0 |
"
it was there until teh admin changed it to full proctection but the bot hasnt came along and updated the page (talk - contrib) " | 0.000618 | 0 | 0 |
Pissed of Nigger + A lot of computers in my school = A lotta Vadalizm
Ha... ya can suck my dick, I told ya nigga ta unblock me but you didn't so know ya ganna pay anyone who banned me in the past is ganna get fuked over HARD! | 0.998272 | 1 | 1 |
The Encyclopedia Brittanica names this as Bolzano-Bozen, but, yes, of course that is POV. | 0.000632 | 0 | 0 |
“@cierravillela yeah it's really far and it's alright if you like living by a whole lot of hicks haha | 0.014194 | 0 | 1 |
ledgend status
although this is not something that can be technically claimed, i think it has to be mentioned the status that he has gained as ledgend online and on T.V | 0.000679 | 0 | 0 |
HEY BUTTFACE
YOUR A STUPID LIKE TIMBERLY ELIZABETH BUTTFACE YOU BUTTACE | 0.982634 | 1 | 1 |
Iknow a couple mf that does this, there favorite line i wouldnt Do that thats Young. bitch STOPP ' YOUR young minded | 0.95485 | 1 | 1 |
"
non-NPOV + inaccurate information
Regarding the piece of text ""Since most of those hadith are on the authority of Abu Huraira, most Shia dismiss them as a sad examples of what happens when all Sahaba are counted as trustworthy: A clear breach in Tawhid, the belief that God is above its creation.""
Reasons for removal:
Abu Huraira is one of the most prolific muhaddithin and a source of many of the sahih hadith.
The phrase ""most shia"" does not cite any authority or text and could therefore be completely fabricated. Not to mention that there are over a dozen subsects among the shi`a.
""sad examples of what happens"" <- that's a non-NPOV (non-Neutral Point Of View)
See God as one sees the full moon or the sun in the sky. Or seeing part of God on the day of judgement is not a contradiction that God is above His (not ""its"") creatures in every respect." | 0.000801 | 0 | 0 |
Here's your fucking reference. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/102406.htm#_Toc174854655 | 0.990572 | 1 | 1 |
"
Let me see if I understand you, nameless ""member of the public"". Your saying both the chyron and the lovely Harris Faulkner were mistaken as I published no articles for WND.com on this trip, but had several pieces run on both the hard news side of Foxnews.com and the Fox Forum? You'd also like to know how much I was paid? Am I the only one who finds these questions inappropriate and creepy? Am I supposed to discuss my salary on here to appease an anonymous ""editor"" I suspect is a sockpuppet for a person who has been banned on numerous occasions? Can we get serious here, or are people of the caliber of User talk:75.74.77.2 going to continue to grope along each and every slippery tangent both real and perceived? Am I supposed to now justify that I'm a journalist? Surely we can mover forward, and a step toward moving forward would be to eliminate the anonymous contributions of sniper editors who are not dealing with the facts, but are in a quagmire of fantasy conspiracy. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm trying to take this format seriously, but it's these silly games that make it difficult. I'm a professional writer who lives from my pen. I'm privileged and honored to do so. Comments by the above editor are insulting to my intelligence.
" | 0.001073 | 0 | 0 |
JdWolff (the mentally imbalanced loser) wryfully strikes again . . . Some people always just seem to allow their utter incoherence to get the better of them.
As a white Medical doctor , I am totally disgusted by the General Medical Council (GMC) and strongly support the 'Fire and Brimestone' approach of the Abolish the GMC Campaign.
The GMC Press Office directly connives with the Tabloids to blast their own screaming headlines all over the place - so the Abolish the GMC guys have every right to choose the very same style if they so wish.
JdWolff should go take a long cold shower - as his bias STINKS ! | 0.630221 | 1 | 1 |
Douche bag, know the band Sublime before you tell me that i did something wrong
it clearly is stated in many interviews and even in their documentary that Miguel Happoldt did everything that the band members didn't know.
know your shit | 0.97726 | 1 | 1 |
Concerning sources only from certain published astrologers and for Non-neutral point of view attitude in the traits area
1) Many areas of this article do not represent a worldwide point of view, do not forget that astrologers may differ in their interpretation.
There are some legitimate sources from some Western-type astrologers like Goodman for example but these astrologers do not represent all the Worldwide astrological community. It would be better if there were additions from even more legititate astrologers from all over the world and not only from certain known Western ones
2) In the traits area there is clearly a tendency for Non-Npov attitude were only positive traits have added there in a overwhelming and exaggerating manner and almost no negative traits at all. Aquarius have negative traits too but it seems the editor that added the latest traits had picked only positive traits and did not added the negative ones for his personal reasons... | 0.000635 | 0 | 0 |
wanna blank this cuz i'm liberal | 0.027758 | 0 | 0 |
@BRIdifferent good dnt be a sucker for these sad mad bitches, | 0.997083 | 1 | 1 |
Still since it is officially a lääni it should be mentioned as such in the list of Finnish läänit. | 0.000775 | 0 | 0 |
Ummmm.... In case your Communist, Nazi super left self did not realize it. Someone else made the last edit, and I agreed to it. That is the way it is done in a democracy, or does that just chill you. Should I hide my family from you now before you and your Nazis come and rape and kill us for disagreeing with you? | 0.797616 | 1 | 1 |
, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! | 0.000727 | 0 | 0 |
Your edits to Zodiac Killer article have been reverted. Please remember that editors have spent a great deal of time to make articles accurate and truthful. Your edits are disruptive and do nothing to advance the aims of Wikipedia. Thank you, | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
"
Updated thanks! Talk " | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
I was hoping that and might have been your edits (they looked medical ). The one about panic and exhaustion, I thought may have been an anecdote, possibly reported somewhere. I'll keep searching for sources.
I've copyedited Simon Mitchell a bit and commented at WP:Articles for deletion/Captain Trevor Jackson, calling for a keep on Simon Mitchell. You should comment there when you get a moment to spare. I'll find time later to see if Captain Trevor Jackson has sufficient notability to justify it, but WP:BLP1E may be a problem. | 0.000619 | 0 | 0 |
RT @StevStiffler: If her bio says "Only God can judge me" she's a hoe. | 0.774358 | 1 | 1 |
I'll try to keep an eye on that article. | 0.000631 | 0 | 0 |
Fuck You
Hi Netmonger, Because of you I am not going to edit wikipedia any more, I dont care whether you are Mystic or Arsath or Lahiru_k , the fact is RaveenS is the one who suspected you to be Arsath, now you too seem to be good pals, Wikipedia is too fucking complicated for me. I am in Sri Lanka these days, and was concentrating on my book so was inactive in wikipedia, and I dont want to waste anymore of my time here thanks to you and my circle of untrustworthy friends. Fuck you!!! | 0.998451 | 1 | 1 |
Never lettin dat nigguh used twitter in my phone again | 0.559534 | 1 | 1 |
Consensus is mispelled
And you are guilty, Tony. | 0.033821 | 0 | 0 |
I went from smart car to a bitch with some smart lips. | 0.917399 | 1 | 1 |
Well, I'm against Benito Juarez and I'm not an ultra-right or conservative.... I think that there are many lies about him, he is just the started of the nasty political leaders that we still have in our country. Juarez killed many innocent people and did a lot of damage to Mexico... | 0.087696 | 0 | 0 |
The moment when you truly believe ur a fucking pice of trash it's a lovely felling ... | 0.995639 | 1 | 1 |
The more serious perspective obviously wasn't present from the outset. The situation has changed with the news of physical abuse. __ | 0.000634 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your FYI about ""my"" edits
Did not make any edits whatsoever on the Vice President of the USA page for Wikipedia. There may be additional individuals logging in under this User Talk address." | 0.000576 | 0 | 0 |
"
See also, Byzantium and the Arabs in the ourth Century by Irfan Shahid which states: ""If the beginnings of pre-Islamic Arabic poetry cannot be determined with accuracy, it can be safely assumed that the composition of Arabic poetry goes back to at least the fourth century AD."" talk " | 0.000578 | 0 | 0 |
RT @_xchaazelle: most of the bitches he fw not old enough to get a ID 😂😂so what that tell you 💁 | 0.951944 | 1 | 1 |
Thanks
Thanks for the suggestions and help. I'm a bit new to this so I'm still figuring a lot of stuff out. Sorry if I'm causing any problems! | 0.000578 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please note that Miley's article is referenced in Nuclear Energy Encyclopedia: Science, Technology, and Applications, edited by Steven Krivit and Jay H. Lehr, page 538, reference number 132. And Krivit put Miley's articles in the ""Selected Papers"" section of his New Energy Times website because he believes that Miley's article is scientifically important and I concur with his judgment. If you think that you are smarter than Krivit then you just go ahead and delete the reference to Miley's article on transmutations in thin films. " | 0.000598 | 0 | 0 |
RT @from_Hadria: When you listening to a bitch complaining about a nigga that ain’t even hers. http://t.co/Z09qLImXGE | 0.988236 | 1 | 1 |
Have you got a copyright free up to date one? Please add it if you do. | 0.000578 | 0 | 0 |
"
The article looks well on its way now, but yes, I'll certainly be supporting in a day or two. I just want to read it through again to see if anything leaps out at me.
I'll mention one thing that's niggled at me for a while, which is if it's possible to be, as it were, more precise about the ambiguities of the Band-only tracks in the lead text of the Columbia Records compilation section. For instance, it states, ""According to Fraboni, four new songs by the Band were also recorded in preparation for the album's official release, one of which, a cover of Chuck Berry's 'Going Back to Memphis', did not end up being included."" I wonder if something like this should be added: ""However, there is no scholarly consensus that the three songs on the album Fraboni says were recorded in 1975—""Bessie Smith"", ""Ain't No More Cane"" and ""Don't Ya Tell Henry""—were, in fact, recorded then."" (On the other hand, it seems far more likely to me that Fraboni/Griffin is right than Bowman, so I dunno...)— " | 0.000566 | 0 | 0 |
So, what do you propose? | 0.000693 | 0 | 0 |
No it's not vandalism, its the truth. | 0.001246 | 0 | 0 |
RT @JustHad_that: Good pussy 💦🐱 comes with a smart ass mouth 👄👅 & a crazy ass attitude 😒💯 | 0.987371 | 1 | 1 |
@aerinblazin right 😂😭 okay bitch | 0.976029 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits