text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
rule number 1 never fuck wit ah bitter babymama dey gon spray u str8 up.... Erica u losing cool points hoe | 0.996165 | 1 | 1 |
. If you are a troll, don't post here! | 0.513441 | 1 | 0 |
I was so glad to read...
this.
At least there are places in the world that ignore pathetic claims and whining from silly retarded bints with nothing better to do. A bit of rape never hurt anyone anyway. Who the hell do you feminists think you are anyway? Know your place! | 0.929659 | 1 | 1 |
It is often difficult to know what to do when RS conflict. Is there a RS that discusses conflicting RSs?
Why does the newly added range map show Scotland (and perhaps the north of England) in green? | 0.000635 | 0 | 0 |
Only negro to keep adding baby fat as they got older. | 0.892575 | 1 | 1 |
It's more that linking to Amazon favours a particular retailer. We should cite the publisher, not a seller. Guy () | 0.000576 | 0 | 0 |
i'd go to jamaica n attend those wild dancehall events, to jus five star frog splash a bitch off a tree n get on #WSHH | 0.959666 | 1 | 1 |
Ironhold, please listen to me, my cousin hacked my account, when that happened. I did not write what he wrote to you. I am sorry for whatever he did. Honestly! I am not joking. Please just think about, why would I want to to that? Remember I trying to prove myself mature, respectable here on Wikipedia. This is not the first time; he hacked this account maybe about three other times previous to this, or more. Anyway, I have changed my password. So no more of that. I would never vandalize! | 0.002852 | 0 | 0 |
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vg6JFoMT-rU/VXsXZVG1yHI/AAAAAAAARI0/uq_ezjbivCE/s1600/NUP_169329_0001%2B%2Bchicago%2Bmed%2Bkey%2Bart%2Biliketowatchtvblogspot.JPG
heres the link to the image, which is free, I don't exactly know how to update images. | 0.001871 | 0 | 0 |
The undesirables RT @KingHorseDick: @viaNAWF 😭😭😭😭😭 these bitches big bruh | 0.925117 | 1 | 1 |
Quit hurting these women Cuz I'm tired of all the bitterness a nigga gotta go through Cuz you a hoe ass nigga. | 0.995584 | 1 | 1 |
I agree with what Rebelguys2 said above. There are reasons to keep the POV tag. | 0.000592 | 0 | 0 |
"
I've said it before and I'll say it again. I've been dragged through WQA a couple of times that I can remember, but I'd never bother to do it to anyone else. It's just a pathetic waste of time; ""Mummy, Mummy, Malleus was rude to me."" Live with it bitch. Fatuorum " | 0.880362 | 1 | 1 |
Get out my talk page you smelling wog! | 0.972104 | 1 | 1 |
@Michellelevin_ pussy | 0.927666 | 1 | 1 |
Current thinking
One line of thought is that 'paraphrenia' is basically a psychotic illness (e.g. schizophrenia). The differences (e.g. preservation of personality)
are simply due to the fact that the psychosis starts later, and so the person's personality has already formed (v.s Schizophrenia which often starts
early, and therefore disrupts personality development). I don't have a specific reference for this but might look for one at some point! | 0.00108 | 0 | 0 |
@FlawlesS_Dv @AboutStrafe @NexSmitsky I also like how I'M called the hoe when I've been saying stop. | 0.016394 | 0 | 1 |
ramgarhia surnames
virdi, matharu, hunjan, shinda is ramgarhia surnames not other low caste surnames yea its big problem what done in wiki pedia full on shit 86.166.250.11 | 0.727363 | 1 | 1 |
"
After a careful reading of the FDIC 2008 Assessment Rates memorandum I am confident that I have summarized the results correctly and I have added the answer to the ""total insured deposits"" question to the article. My source is from March 2008 so more recent figures, if available, would be welcome. — " | 0.000508 | 0 | 0 |
“@JennerAcosta: Sleep over with guys doesn't mean we gonna fuck. TRUST ME” you're a bitch for denying them pussy | 0.996163 | 1 | 1 |
“@21Cvasquez: My brother is a bitch, pussy, faggot, etc.” you just like getting beat up don't you? | 0.997005 | 1 | 1 |
Thinking about trying to get pussy like.....@trestiffer http://t.co/08cQV2vCcx | 0.958247 | 1 | 1 |
I HATE YOU
LISTEN YOU MOTHERFUCKER, STAY OUT OF MY WAY, DONT TELL ME IM VANDALISING STUFF OR ILL COME AND VANDALISE YOU UGLY FACE. ILL COME FIND YOU AND MUSHHHHHHHHH YOU FAT ASS UP!!!!! and thanks for showing me the sandbox.
MUGAMBO | 0.996258 | 1 | 1 |
Pressure on Spain’s maritime border: Boatloads of #Illegal #Migrants Storm Spanish Tourist Beaches & Scatter #StopTheInvasion #Unregistered #UnVetted | 0.002797 | 0 | 1 |
"==Move==
This article should be moved to Dietrich of Altenburg. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen.
The preposition ""von"" can easily be translated with the English ""of"" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames.
Discussion" | 0.000566 | 0 | 0 |
"
Villaged, if the information is included in a footnote, it's not missing from the article. But as to the point you made, it's probably not terribly productive to get into various users' motivations for editing in certain ways. I have no doubt that some users edit this article in an attempt at apologetics and to make Smith look as good as possible. I have no doubt that some users edit it to discredit Smith and make him look as bad as possible. (There are also many who attempt neither, of course, and try to be ""fair"".) I've seen editors throw accusations at each other both ways on issues such as this, and it tends to go nowhere and doesn't really help things. I find that for each individual editor, it's best if I just assume good faith, even when I know that there will in fact be some percentage of them who edit in bad faith. When I disagree with a particular editor on an editing issue, it's just not fair for me to assume that they are editing in bad faith, because I think most of them will not be. (talk) " | 0.000576 | 0 | 0 |
Ain't nothing funnier then watching somebody live a complete different life on the internet I be like "who this hoe think she foolin" | 0.342617 | 1 | 1 |
@Rachijuana I popped a Molly every day last year #beat#that#bitch | 0.958044 | 1 | 1 |
"
Sabra and Shatila - a genocide ?
Hi Jayjg,
UNO voted in 1982 a resolution that it was an ""act of genocide"".
The information has been added in Genocides in history's article.
I wonder if this fully respects NPov ?
See " | 0.00059 | 0 | 0 |
Tick tack toe linin' up yo hoe | 0.608392 | 1 | 1 |
REDIRECT Talk:Great Divide Brewing Company | 0.000603 | 0 | 0 |
why is it top listed in google?
change it | 0.000996 | 0 | 0 |
Hirschfeld a transvestite?
I wonder where to find proof of Hirschfeld being himself a transvestite. Any pictures? | 0.004934 | 0 | 0 |
editing my talk page
Listen!, GSK I am sick of finding you're frickin, lame advice on my talk page. KEEP YOUR NOSE IN YOUR OWN BUSINESS! From now no more speedy deletion, warnings, or blockage of editing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOW SHUT UP, YOU MORON!!! | 0.981627 | 1 | 1 |
Nope, didn't forget, just been busy - will find the time to look into it over the weekend. | 0.000577 | 0 | 0 |
"
Addiction is a choice made by the user
The following is at the start of the article:
This can make freebase drugs even more powerfully ""addictive"" than their salt equivalents, bearing in mind that addiction is a choice made by the user.
That addiction is a choice made by the user rather than a dependency caused by alterations in the brain's chemistry is clearly an unorthodox view to say the least, so I propose removing it ASAP.
I vote it be removed under NPOV. Oh, wait. This whole point and counter point are totally off-topic- they belongs in e.g. addiction.
Self-referencing
The link to Freebasing refers back to the page, but I dont know how to fix that, so I ask someone who know to do so.
" | 0.000721 | 0 | 0 |
RT @IzzeTheProducer: You wonder why I call you bitch ... You wonder why I call you bitch -2pac | 0.991085 | 1 | 1 |
1980s
:File:1980s decade portrait.png
That image has already been cleared. | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
Work is such a bitch right now | 0.986384 | 1 | 1 |
"
Well it seems that even providing a reference, some cunt has ""blocked me from editing"". It gives further evidence to the dishonesty, unintelligence, and desire to suppress information which I expounded on ""Jimbo's"" page.
Here is the reference for ""pussy pelmet"" I gave.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/under-the-counter-with-lindsay-calder-1251446.html
The block was for ""disruptive editing"", clearly this is a lie, or if an honest mistake, it is made by someone of extremely low intelligence.
If you can give an alternative believable explanation I'd like to here it." | 0.135319 | 1 | 1 |
", a section which i had written most of, if i recall correctly.
conclusion
oldwindybear was using an article plagiarizing major portions from me to serve as verification of his historical credentials, so that he could insert POV into something else written by me — the same guy he's written of above, ""...frankly, your moronic language lends no credance to anything you say regarding this or any other historical subject.""
if that's the case, he'd better get busy deleting ""his"" article! ROFL
please
i haven't the heart to participate in this article anymore, but would somebody please revert the POV at least oldwindybear inserted? i put in my time. surely there's a knowledgeable B&C; freak out there who can at least stand guard for a while, if not improve the article from even its pre-vandalism state.
note to oldwindybear
before you insert your allegations once again (hopefully somewhere that doesn't break up my signed comment), you may want to consider some immutable truths which i hoped you would have noticed before launching the terribly wrong rant i just removed from within my signed comments. (unlike you, i do not want somebody else's words attributed to me):
the version i quoted above as ""wikipedia"" in the comparison is entirely from 12:03, 20 June 2005 UTC.
you claim to have contributed to the article as and .
the first edit by in the article was 20:21, 5 September 2005 UTC.
the first edit by in the article was 20:06, 4 September 2005 UTC.
therefore, you did not write a single word of the article version in the comparison above.
please take a moment to let that sink in: you did not write a single word of the article version in the comparison above.
you also misapprehend the definition of plagiarism. it has nothing to do with copyright. you used entire blocks of words of other authors (primarily me), and credited yourself as the author. that is plagiarism.
though my initial contributions to the article are readily viewable in the history (and later as another user and several IPs), i want to steer away from the ""i wrote x amount"" aspect, because the article was and is a collaborative effort. the troubling part, not only for me, but also for the owner of the site to which you submitted ""your"" article, is that you used whole blocks from a wikipedia article to which you contributed not a single word, and not only put your name to it, but did not even cite wikipedia as a source.
contrary to the fraudulent hiding of your sources while merely peppering whole blocks of material you stole, i did write the actual unquoted prose in my contributions myself, while citing clearly all of my sources. despite your assertion, the version you stole from stated explicitly, ""Known primarily for robbing banks, he preferred smaller jobs, robbing grocery stores and filling stations at a rate far outpacing the ten to fifteen bank robberies attributed to him and the Barrow gang."" as with everything else in the wikipedia side of the comparison, none of that is your writing. neither, as has been raised and explained several times already, were you the first in this article to raise the issue of legality with regard to the killing of bonnie parker. this has all been explained. please do not bully other users into holding your hand. take a moment. review the article history. review the discussion. slow down and pay attention.
in short, there isn't a leg to stand on if attempting to rebut my charge of plagiarism. you did not arrive on the scene until over 2 months had passed from when the version in the comparison was written. i'll say again: you did not contribute a single syllable to it. yet you lifted whole sections from it, changing very little — in some cases none — and put your name to it. that, sir, is the very definition of plagiarism, and it doesn't matter whether i or any other editor wrote the source material you took; you wrote none of it. the partial copying at the beginning (which you picked out to rebut) was what i already labeled as only ""minor lifting"". be honest. it gets far worse. it gets embarrassingly worse. please don't try to fabricate stories which anybody poring through the history can instantly recognize as vapor. the sad part is that the entire facade of ""your article"" was as an excuse for you to insert even more POV into articles. if you don't understand WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, etc. after so many people have tried explaining them to you, perhaps wikipedia isn't the plac | 0.012787 | 0 | 0 |
@iAM_tRoyal5 lol I would've beat that hoe up | 0.669188 | 1 | 1 |
Get a life you fucking loser. If you have any other questions about me, don't ask me, ask Katie Goulet. Here is a picture of her. | 0.997278 | 1 | 1 |
Niggas gossip like hoes man I ain't wid that shit | 0.99271 | 1 | 1 |
RT @LivingLegend10: “@_herLIPStho: “@keepupwithle: She got the body of a faggot . http://t.co/XkyO6DrMsH” 😩😭”😭😭😭😭😭😭 | 0.841135 | 1 | 1 |
The correct term for this section is sex not gender. The two words are not interchangeable. Sex is a biological thing, gender is not. Gender is a psychological thing, a sociological thing. Don't be afraid of sex. It's a word. Write it. Say it. Grow up. | 0.057523 | 0 | 0 |
Well there's been a lot said, if I can just address Kolzene's point first. I don't quite understand your suggestion that the article needs to be split into 3 different ones, what would these different articles be? Firstly let's just overview what is already in place, we've got this article: Technocratic movement (and the sub-articles like Technate, etc.), we've got Technocracy (which is just a disambiguation page), Technocracy (bureaucratic) and Technocrat (derogatory). Then we have Network of European Technocrats, which is part of the broader Technocratic movement. So what you're saying is we need a Technocracy Incorporated article, specifically about that group, detached from the main article in the same way as NET? Well, I suppose that could be done, but remember that that article did already once exist and was then merged with this one. What would this article contain if all the Tech Inc. stuff were taken out and put in a different article? I have to say, I think further splitting of the articles will only create an even more confusing array of definitions for readers. Perhaps we should think about reformatting the above articles into a more reasonable arrangement. The article Technocracy used to be a lot bigger and gave more info on the different groups and definitions of the term, but it was recently trimmed down to something very small, (which I was against doing BTW). So to start from the beginning, we have the word Technocracy, which has acquired many different meanings, one meaning being a Bureaucratic oligarchy of Scientists, this is addressed in the Technocracy (bureaucratic) and Technocrat (derogatory) articles and isn't really relevant here. The other meaning, the one we are concerned with here is that used by the Technical Alliance and Tech Inc. and subsequently adopted by several other groups in 1930's. Then NET, which was essentially a direct branching from Tech Inc., just in Europe, but has adopted it's own ideas, some of which are different to Tech Inc's. I don't really know what is the best way to proceed yet, but I don't think anything should be split or deleted without a lot more discussion. | 0.00061 | 0 | 0 |
I'm referring to the slightly hysterical remarks concerning Edwards, and this somewhat curious passage;
Pearse in his address to his court martial and his prediction of future events in history would no doubt contrast Edwards assertion - When I was a child of ten I went down on my knees by my bedside one night and promised God that I should devote my life to an effort to free my country. I have kept that promise. First among all earthly things, as a boy and as a man, I have worked for Irish freedom. I have helped to organize, to arm, to train, and to discipline my fellow countrymen to the sole end that, when the time came, they might fight for Irish freedom. The time, as it seemed to me, did come and we went into the fight. I am glad that we did, we seem to have lost, we have not lost. To refuse to fight would have been to lose, to fight is to win, we have kept faith with the past, and handed a tradition to the future… I assume I am speaking to Englishmen who value their own freedom, and who profess to be fighting for the freedom of Belgium and Serbia. Believe that we too love freedom and desire it. To us it is more desirable than anything else in the world. If you strike us down now we shall rise again and renew the fight. You cannot conquer Ireland; you cannot extinguish the Irish passion for freedom; if our deed has not been sufficient to win freedom then our children will win it by a better deed | 0.001066 | 0 | 0 |
Conferences are a problem I've been meaning to work on. There are only a very few conference series in the world for which there are truly substantial third party references, but there are many of great importance: the situation is similar to journals. In practice, tho we don't word it that way, the effective criterion for journals is that papers there are highly cited (as measured by the impact factor from Journal Citation Reports). This can apply to conferences also. The difference is that for most conferences, the papers there are preliminary results and not rigorously peer reviewed & therefore not highly cited as compared with journal papers by the same authors. There are two classes of exceptions: ones where the papers are major review articles in the field, and ones in engineering where they are the basic means of publication. I'm not sure about this one. Ido not think it is one of these exceptions, and I think the publications are mainly just abstracts, as is common with many conferences. I would need to check, & I cannot do it this week.
But personally, I would include in WP articles about all journals used as references here, and all major conference series, however, I doubt this would have consensus. The compromise solution is therefore to write the articles about the sponsoring society and have a section on the conference. That is probably the best thing to do here.
The main thing I think we want to avoid is writing articles on individual conferences in a series. This would amount to our being a nonselective index or bibliography. '''''' ( talk ) | 0.000669 | 0 | 0 |
No comments either way, so being bold and reverting to previous image. | 0.000676 | 0 | 0 |
Black cock is significantly larger than non-black cock. | 0.971148 | 1 | 1 |
"
Really, i'm pleading. talk " | 0.000625 | 0 | 0 |
@chris_hardardt7 pussy? | 0.948272 | 1 | 1 |
this article is just wrong. cash reserves deposited at a central bank allow banks to MULTIPLY their money by the reserve requirement. 1 dollar may be turned into 9 with a 1:9 ratio.
if the chequebook money created by the bank is deposited at another bank they are now required to keep a portion of it as a reserve. see
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hfXavRTM4Fg&feature;=related
why can't i edit the article to make it accurate? | 0.000611 | 0 | 0 |
What a joker you are. European parliament has no power to do anything. It is non binding because it is not serious and silly reports like that are not meant to be serious. what is more important is that we ruled your ancestors for centuries and trying to put negative images of turks in the turkey page is not going to change that. This is not a place for you to get your 'revenge'. Go and edit the golden dawn wikipedia because your ideas will only be welcome there. | 0.832821 | 1 | 1 |
"
Dear soldier of the Wikipedia neo-nazi/communist dictatorship
What the hell are you tlaking about. I did not re-creat any article about the formal Australian Worker's Party formaly known as the New Communist Party of Australia. I think you are high on the lies told by storm front. You the hell listens to storm front. Oh my god Wikipedia is becomeing a dumping ground for neo-nazis and altra lefties. Since I am the voice of reason. I just have to say one thing. Pleas read my reply to storm front. Here it is - Okay okay. Lats just get the fatcs right. This is what some nazi said on storm front
"" Peter Watson (of Warwick, Qld.) has claimed to represent all sorts of groups, and - in forums - likes to pretend he is several people at the same time. He has a habit of claiming to be the President of organisations he has made up on the internet. He says he is 14 (or 16) years old.""
Answere:- No I have not supported lotsd of groups. I have only supported the CPW , AWP (formally known as the NCPA). I was never a member of the People's Think Tank Association plus the PTTA never had a president. Plus I have only ever been one person. And that person is Peter Watson. This nazi must have a lot of time on his hands to look for information on me. So I can only come up with only one conclusion and that is simply that this man has no social or sex life. So I can only say on thing ""go get a life man and get a women"".
Peter was President of the ""People's Think Tank Association"" based in Warwick, which he says ""split from the Communist Party of Australia just recently and they publish the Caller""
Answere:- I was never the president of the PTTA. The PTTA was never ever created. The Caller was a fake news paper. As fare as I know it was only ever printed once by some nazi. Since the PTTA was never realy so how cna it split from the CPA. So many questions and not enough answeres. The man just doesn't have a life.
Peter was ""President of the New Communist Party of Australia"" and ""Chairman of the Central Committee"" (this is in his Communist International News)
Answere:- I was the president but not the had of the NCPA. I was the chairman of the central commitee. But as you might know the NCPA and the AWP are the same group. The AWP change its name to NCPA but change it's name back soon after remember you stupid nazi.
Peter was ""President of the Communist Party of Warwick""
Answere:- Only for a short number of times in the hsitory fot he party that I was the presidnet of it.
Peter also says: ""the New Communist Party of Australia (NCPA) , The People Think Tank Association (PTTA) and the Communist Socialist Workers Front (CSWF) did dissolve and absorbed into the Australia First Party (AFP)"".
Answere:- The Communist Socialist Worker's Front never ever was created and never was real. It just goes to show that nazis just makes things up to help them selvs. The PTTA was never real. If you are aksing why I made the CSWF and the PTTA up well it was just for fun.
Peter has also set up the ""Australian Worker's Party""
Answere:- This nazi (FairDinkum) is a idiot. I have said this many times that it was started in april was a split from the CPW that changed it's name to NCPA than change it's name back to AWP when it was kicked out fo the AFP. Not only are nazis stupid like FairDinkum but they also don't listen.
I am a Communist and believe in Marxist-Leninism. I am not retarted. Plus I am not troubled person or retarted. I have never said in my life that I was the king of the Communists or the Nazis. Once more the nazis made some thing up to make them selvs look better and sound better than other people." | 0.584544 | 1 | 1 |
RT @erinfbaaby: “@2chainzz2pumps: Girl ugly denna hoe 😔” what's this then :/ http://t.co/YbXiFwTugu | 0.065695 | 0 | 1 |
My Talk Page ==
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? YOU ARE LIKE THE 5TH PERSON IN THE LAST 2 HOURS TO THROW SOME STUPID CRAP ONTO MY TALK PAGE!!! STOP EDITING MY TALK PAGE!!! I DO NOT APPRECIATE BEING HARASSED LIKE THIS, I AM NEW TO WIKIPEDIA AND DO NOT APPRECIATE HAVING USELESS GARBLE ON MY TALK PAGE WHEN IT IS FOR PEOPLE TO TALK TO ME, NOT HAVE STUPID CRAP POSTED ON THERE, STAY OFF OF MY TALK PAGE!!!! thank you
== | 0.97126 | 1 | 1 |
of Wikipedia and its rules must be interpreted oppositely to declaration. So far, go fuck yourself | 0.993035 | 1 | 1 |
"
In addition, the first quote discusses the condition of man himself (ie without God) of man as being bored/miserable: ""9 Diversion.'If man were happy the less diverted the happier he would be, like the Saints and Gods'-'Yes but is not happiness the ability to be amused by diversion?'-'No because that comes from elsewhere and from outside...'"". Both points are relevant alone or together and are clearly related which is why they are in the same book." | 0.000764 | 0 | 0 |
as licking butt kissing face-up-jimbos-ass-butt-kissing | 0.996895 | 1 | 1 |
Very interesting, but stupid
Strange and interesting how William Tell and Robin Hood are dismissed as fictional when guys like Yue Fei, Jumong, and Zhou Tong are accepted as historical despite little *real* evidence. So someone centuries ago wrote a biography...so what? That's proof? Few have even heard of these unknown chink archers. 70.49.242.137 | 0.337096 | 1 | 1 |
I will shove a live tuna fish in your mouth and pull the tail!
i am still in love with her. burp. | 0.531814 | 1 | 1 |
Viral is a faggot mother fucker in the shit of the crap stritting. | 0.998628 | 1 | 1 |
"
Oh hi. Long story short so I won't be ""ranting"" (or what not) this time:
So Sjones is wikihounding me constantly for nearly a year now, and his pal Bridies is also obsessed with me to the point of where the great most of his entire activity here on Wikipedia in the 5 months was all about how to rid of me (while I've substantionally adited hundreds of different articles during the same period, over 5,000 in total since March 2012). That's just not normal. Btw, right now I'm blocked because I referred to this wikihounding by ""stalking"" (which is just semantics really, apparently they call it ""cyberbullying"" now outside the Wikipedia).
Now, GAs. Basically what The Devil's Advocate wrote in his comment - and this example of the so-called ""additional evidence"" (as it was called by Sjones in his wikihounding thread) is indeed a good example of ""evidence"", as it shows what is actually this ""problem"" with me - and it's that I actually know (and obey) all the policies, rules and guidelines (including but not limited to everything regarding GAs and their reviewing process), while many reviewers don't know, and even when they're informed about the rules and guidelines (the proper ones, because in this case the reviewer was misinformed by some other apparently uninformed users, strangely including at least 1 admin) they might even flatly and completely refuse to acknowledge and use them (here, the reviewer's invoking ""ignore all rules"" instead of admitting the wrong). I'm all for proper reviewing, instead of incorrect/arbitrary, which is why I've opened this thread recently (aftter this very debacle, precisely) because the scale of this problem (various types of bad reviewing) is pretty alarming, and some reviewers' blatant refusal to play by rules after they're being informed about them is just absolutely unacceptable (that's my opinion, at least, but I can't see how could I be any wrong with being right).
" | 0.002215 | 0 | 0 |
@ozwashere What the fuck is wrong with you. You can't call urself a man if u call a girl a bitch. Ur a fuckin loser bro | 0.997515 | 1 | 1 |
Plaid shorts bitches | 0.978362 | 1 | 1 |
"
I haven't touched, much less ""vandalized"", any article. Ever. Who is ""we"", and what ""consensus"" are you talking about? Read the comments above. I just read the talk page at Talk:Espresso and see you've done the exactly the same thing there to Wikipedia. Promoting a falsehood for no apparent reason. Congrats. And please stop harassing me and accusing me of being a ""sockpuppet"" and a ""vandal"". Leave me alone. 193.109.199.35 " | 0.096425 | 0 | 0 |
The so called sourced information is sourced from garbage. The bottom line is the information is wrong, and it doesn't matter what the rules are when someone is posting blatantly false information and then justifying this slanderous and false information because it has a source. Vandalism is continuing to insist in posting false information when you've been told it is false. And again, I couldn't care less about the rules, it has nothing to do with understanding them, it has to do with posting lies and continuing to do so. You've basically made this page completely useless to anyone who wants to know the true history of Clan Davidson and for that, you are about as low as one can go. This page is now a fairy tale with no basis in fact and what comes around goes around my little friend. | 0.029754 | 0 | 0 |
DO YOU SPIT OR SWALLOW??????? | 0.887564 | 1 | 1 |
RT @CallMeRenee_: @1inkkofrosess @Bojieasx ohh bitch you might pass lol | 0.946424 | 1 | 1 |
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u
shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u shitty nigger fuck i love d3$1r# (@/\/+u | 0.998955 | 1 | 1 |
Oh you kimchi eater, why don't you just stop being such an idiot and admit the fact? | 0.985854 | 1 | 1 |
Randi was born a DICK. Randi will never overcome being a DICK. The end. | 0.972371 | 1 | 1 |
"
Stick it up your bottom as far as it will go then add another 6"" . That should take the smile of your smug fucking ugly face 8-)" | 0.997235 | 1 | 1 |
ok. maybe you are right maybe you are wrong.we all have our own opinions. | 0.000673 | 0 | 0 |
"
DYK for Wilfried Dietrich
On March 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with from the article Wilfried Dietrich, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " | 0.000628 | 0 | 0 |
"If you talk back to me you ain't getting no pussy."
Me: http://t.co/vgnwcFgvSJ | 0.965036 | 1 | 1 |
@Meeeesh1395 @Ajbernal17 bitch im always out | 0.978058 | 1 | 1 |
fuck you cuntard, cheeks baroni is a local figure up here, let his legend live on!
-cheeks | 0.997194 | 1 | 1 |
You shrew.
Your blocks are a joke, much like your life. Hope you die a painful death, or live in America the rest of your (equally bad things). | 0.972933 | 1 | 1 |
Hey M(asturbator)O(f)L(ies)O(r)B(rainsick)O(pinions)
I see, such Idiots like you never give up! Fortunately I know that you are not a Pole, but a f... bastard who wants to destroy the reputation of every real Pole who has some intelligence! | 0.986207 | 1 | 1 |
That is the best idea yet. — 0918 • 2007-12-13 21:05Z | 0.000625 | 0 | 0 |
Disbarment complaint
Can this article please reflect news that there is an attempt to have him disbarred? These news articles talk about it. 140.247.141.165 | 0.001034 | 0 | 0 |
"
The reference to Shirley Temple's Pussy is true. Not sure about Stinky Toilet Paper, but is was most likely just a name tossed around when they changed their name. Like many early 90s grunge bands, STP was playing clubs and bars. Because of the genre, it was not uncommon for a band to have a less than polite name. That was fine when you were local, but not so much if you wanted a major label or radio to brand you. Nobody knows about Shirley Temple's Pussy, because they changed their name before releasing ""Core."" How do I know this? Did I go to an early STP concert? No, BUT, Eddie Vedder mentioned them at a concert held at ""The Off Ramp"" in Seattle, when Pearl Jam played a secret concert there on October 1993. It was just one of those names you don't forget..." | 0.040337 | 0 | 0 |
, particularly when there is serious scholarly debate about the issue(s) | 0.000571 | 0 | 0 |
@Mids_areForkids lmao im bein foreal fuck all them bitches like that! | 0.998095 | 1 | 1 |
How is it not justified including the emergency hotline on this page? 1800 100 188, people may need to use it, if Hurricane Katrina featured the hotline number during it's rampage, how come we can't feature it here for a short while until the cyclone is over? | 0.000604 | 0 | 0 |
"
Willke / Akin
More on Willke and Akin:
""Akin's decision to release the letter from Dr. Jack Willke, founder of the International Right to Life Federation, sends a mixed message from the GOP congressman, who has apologized repeatedly for having said ""legitimate rape"" rarely leads to pregnancy.""
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-todd-akin-touts-support-from-man-who-popularized-theories-on-rape-20120821,0,6626759.story
A mention of this should be added. " | 0.000748 | 0 | 0 |
RT @Bigboybeezy: “@IgnoreAllLaws: Pick one http://t.co/TBWonqMnJV” the girl behind the bar who ain't being a hoe | 0.14276 | 1 | 1 |
Why do you support such vandals as peruvianllama and naconkantari? You use to be cool man. Now you're just GAY. | 0.962378 | 1 | 1 |
"@DiamondLoudKush: The fuck be wrong with these bitches?" Nobody knows | 0.996516 | 1 | 1 |
HEY, GUESS WHAT!
IT'S ME ON A WHOLE NEW RANGE!
AND I STILL HAVE THOUSANDS OF SOCKS. WHEN I FEEL LESS LAZY I WILL GET SOME AUTO CONFIRMED SO I CAN DO MORE GOOD WORK WITH THE TAG AND ACCUSATIONS OF PAEDOPHILIA. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA | 0.565445 | 1 | 1 |
"
The quotation marks are there because it's an HTML thing. Just to avoid any problems I'd prefer if you just added the quotation marks regardless.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) " | 0.000578 | 0 | 0 |
"==DreamGuy usertalk page edits==
Here's how it works: either you stop trolling the guy's page, or we up and block you. Consider this your final warning on the matter. If it happens again, you're done. - (cast a spell) " | 0.019812 | 0 | 0 |
@GrizzboAdams @wyattnuckels I'm on that straight Cali kush bitch don't kill my vibe | 0.995445 | 1 | 1 |
Perhaps youtube contributions could be referenced as part of the history and development of the use of means of communication and media by the individuals and institutions of the Baha'i Faith. We go back to the Greatest Holy Leaf using the telegraph, through the first computers at the World Center, the radio stations, on to individuals at university using early internet forms and individuals and institutions using BBSes... I could easily see YouTube as an extension of that series. There is more than one article on such a history but perhaps none have gone much newer than 1992-ish times. | 0.000571 | 0 | 0 |
Just got into with some chic in Rally's parking lot bitch speeding through the parking lot and almost hit my niece 😡😡 | 0.60912 | 1 | 1 |
RT @B_Laff: “@JRohrCockblock: im a faggot” @JohnnyRohrCock | 0.860409 | 1 | 1 |
keep this civil and make sure we | 0.001171 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits