text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|
I've worked it out. You haven't. Get therapy. Goad and harrass someone else, little man. | 0.070593 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Of semitic origin""
This assertion, made in the article lead, is completely without citation therein, and seems to fall back on similarly uncited assertions made in the first paragraph of the following section, ""Origin of the cult"". While it is natural for speculation to run rampant on the basis of the similarity of the name ""Adonis"" and the title ""Adon[i/ai]"", it is truly shameful that this apparent similarity between two completely unrelated languages (Greek=IE, Hebrew=AA) to be passed off as a foregone conclusion, i.e., ""Adonis"" is the Greek realization of the Hebrew ""Adonai"". I am certain volumes must have been written about the apparent etymological similarities between the two, so it seems me intellectually insulting that not only is not a single respectable source brought to bear on the subject, but that not a single source at all is brought forth to support this oft-speculated-upon, but also oft-reputed apparent false friend similarity. talk " | 0.000692 | 0 | 0 |
NPA Warning
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. talk|airports|neutrality | 0.000612 | 0 | 0 |
RT @SirStern: Claim whatever part of her u please, fuck her to bliss or bruise her sweet pussy with a crop till she begs to be your filthy … | 0.998124 | 1 | 1 |
@kieffer_jason u feel like dumb ass don't u pussy boy | 0.996871 | 1 | 1 |
Jk. I'm going to be a pussy about it. I don't want the love of my life seein me all scared and shit. | 0.983277 | 1 | 1 |
Blocked
Ah I see it now it is you, your blocked for exactly these reasons, soapboxing etc. | 0.009773 | 0 | 0 |
And again, I'm removing it. | 0.001161 | 0 | 0 |
"
Be that as it may, it's still a preface and prefaces are ultimately works of puffery. They are not independent, third-party sources at all. If Pons thought Polak's work was so wonderful, I have to ask why he didn't write a review for Le Monde. In my view, most prefaces are the equivalent of someone putting ""testimonials"" on a business website. It's always good to get ""named"" people because it makes the business (like the author) somehow look better. In any case, it should be removed definitely from the lead and put in a lower part of the text (if at all). Currently, it's misleading to open the article with that citation. " | 0.000617 | 0 | 0 |
@Elijahfnbaby bra I'm bout to blaze this bitch | 0.996553 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck that new bitch , that you think you found. | 0.997464 | 1 | 1 |
RT @NotWorldStar: When you drop all your hoes for one person and y'all don't end up together http://t.co/lLViTXweMX | 0.268636 | 1 | 1 |
RT @_tenijieth: I believe there's a hood in heaven cause the devil gots a bad bitch. | 0.934177 | 1 | 1 |
"
48 horse sacrifice association. Tagged as as GRV seems to be sole citable source.
Each-uisge
This article needs to be more careful when the sources are actually discussing the Each-uisge and not kelpie as such. In a number of instance, the source cited (e.g. Lewis Spence) explicity qualifies their statement as being abut the ""water horse (each-uisge) as distinct from kelpie"", and yet the article assigns the attributes to the ""kelpie"". I have tagged some of those relating to the Varner issue as which shows up as [not in citation given (See discussion.)] in the article. These content should be removed from Kelpie and moved to the Each-uisge article, as appropriate. I think there are other statements that need to be checked on this account.
You're arguing from the rather naive false premise that the kelpie, each-uisge and water horse are in fact three different entities, a distinction not universally applied, as the article explains. Why don't you try and see what you can do with the very poor each-uisge article instead of continuing to waste everyone's time here? I'd be interested to see what you can come up with. Corbett " | 0.000703 | 0 | 0 |
POINTLESS SELF INDULGENT GARBAGE !!!!! | 0.958681 | 1 | 1 |
I'm sorry you were born a yank, that isn't my fault but I hear Suicide is a sure fire cure ) please try it and get back to me 94.172.127.37 | 0.733105 | 1 | 1 |
Reactive Web Design | 0.0007 | 0 | 0 |
Since I doubt Scotland or Scandanavia were ever in the Southern Hemisphere I changed it to Northern. | 0.000626 | 0 | 0 |
98.248.32.178 I will set you on fire, I will shoot your ass up. I will cut your penis off and I will shove it down your throat and choke you. I will cut you up big time motherfucker. | 0.993264 | 1 | 1 |
I got .05" of rain yesterday including the bird shit in my gauge. | 0.485881 | 1 | 1 |
Go fuck yourself and block me you cunt. | 0.997813 | 1 | 1 |
"
It depends whether we want Wikipedia to be cutting-edge. It is clear to anyone studying Time Cube that Dr Ray's discovery of the Ineffable 4-Corner Truth renders him worthy of the positions of Greatest Thinker and Wisest Human; he is thus granted the authority to bestow a doctorate upon himself. The only reason not to recognise this doctorate is compliance with the general stupidity that has precluded rapid acceptance of Time Cube.
Well, I myself am not so keen on dumbing down Wikipedia for the stupid and closed-minded people; although some people do seem to be, as evidenced by the censorship of the following material:
In late 2004, and in the midst of a prolific period of Time Cube evaluation marked by his creation of new and inspirational Cubic scriptures, Dr Ray took the Cubic disproof of religious concepts to the next level, by solving the major philosophical question: ""Why something rather than nothing?"" The answer, as published by him on his Time Cube website, related to the principle of opposites (in this case, static rather than dynamic/cyclical opposites), an important element of Cubic geometry: ""Between the opposites, all things are created. As an entity, they exist only as a big zero, seen from space as something and nothing from every possible view.""
It appears that the religious zealots want there to be a lack of solution for ""Why something rather than nothing?"", so that they can use it as a proselytisation/brainwashing tactic. Thus, when the solution is revealed, they cover it up as part of their efforts to prevent awareness of the Cubic Truth, which, as we know, disproves God and exposes religion as an evil Word-scam.
It seems a pity, but in reality, great things don't come easy. We must all fight to break the Word-shackles of religious and Academic-induced 1-corner ignorance, and force teachers to teach Cubicism above evil cubelessness. Humanity's sole hope of salvation lies with 4-corner Cubic knowledge." | 0.010541 | 0 | 0 |
You son of a bitch! You did it again, readers might wanna know this shit. How would you like it if I deleted things you submitted. No one else has a problem with this information, but you do. | 0.995399 | 1 | 1 |
"
A refutation of User:Lord Loxley
As soon as my ban expires, I shall revert the English people page to that which had been agreed by a consensus of editors, though I hope that someone else does so sooner. In the meantime, I shall attempt to address each of the issues raised by User:Lord Loxley's in his ""revisions"".
In the ""related ethnic groups"" section you have included Danes, Norwegians, and Swedes, but excluded Welsh. This makes no sense, and it had been agreed by all editors that the Welsh are among the closest ethnic groups to the English, as anyone familiar with those two peoples knows. Your argument appears to be that the Welsh should not be included because they are English - as a result of the 1536 legislation that annexed Wales to the English kingdom. I can only assume that you have no idea what ethnicity actually means, and I suggest you read the article about it. In short, ethnicity has nothing whatsoever to do with legislation, and the mere annexation of Wales to England did not extinguish Welsh ethnic identity. But you don't need to take my word for it, just look at the Welsh people page. And nor, incidentally, is ethnicity dependent on race or genetics. You have accused me of being a racist, but it is you who are the racist by insisting that ethnicity is defined by race. As for Danes and Norwegians, their inclusion is arguable (though not so much the Swedes - very few of them settled in England). The agreed consensus prior to your unilateral intervention was that no Continental ethnic groups would be included, on the grounds that the inhabitants of the British Isles are much, much closer to each other in terms of culture, history, and language than any groups from mainland Europe. Again, this fact is obvious to anyone who knows them. As a Canadian, it is possible that you may have been ignorant of this. If you are not familiar with a subject, it is probably a good idea not to make edits to its page.
Further down the article you have inserted a sentence saying that the Tudors are the chief representative of the English kingdom. This is not only false, it is also completely irrelevant.
Still further down you have completely mangled the section dealing with the Norman Conquest and its effects. You have deliberately suppressed the historical fact that the English became a conquered nation, and inserted irrelevant descriptions of coats of arms. You then suddenly lurch into a (false) description of Neolithic Britain and Gaul, as if this was in any way relevant to the Norman Conquest. You then mention the Roman Empire and one of its short-lived breakaway states, jumping straight to Offa and Charlemagne, desperate to clutch at any sort of straw that will lend support, however flimsy, to your own preconceived notion that no distinction should be made between the English and the French (despite the obvious fact that these two peoples have a very different language, culture, and ethnic identity). Your mention of the consolidation of kingdoms around capitals such as Winchester and Paris is also completely irrelevant, and your suggestion that the English Channel has been the main focus of English cultural development is demonstrably wrong - the North Sea has been just as important, usually more so.
Moving further down still, you have inserted a whole new section entitled ""Royalty"", and it is here that you expose the full extent of your total misunderstanding of (a) what the article is about, and (b) the English people. English identity is not based on coats of arms as symbols. If you want evidence of this, look at the World Cup, being played in Germany as we speak. The English fans, almost to a man, carry the flag of St. George, and only very rarely the Union Jack. They never, ever carry the royal coat of arms in any form. Being Canadian, I suspect that you have received a rather distorted view of the English through Holywood depictions and the like. The vast majority of English people would laugh in the face of the sort of mediavalist aristocratic fantasy that you are espousing. You then go on to claim that all Englishmen are actually descended from royalty! This is patent nonsense, and once again exposes your own royalist fantasies. The medieval French-speaking monarchy deliberately did not interbreed with its English-speaking subjects. Now, I'm not saying that no genetic material from earlier monarchs exists in the modern English population, but that is not the point. Statistically, every single person on earth might be descended from Julius Caesar, or anyone else you care to name who lived long enough ago. Oh, and French is most definitely not a lingua franca used among Englishmen - we don't need one, because we've already got English. Indeed, English people in general have been notoriously bad at learning foreign languages. And all that guff ab | 0.00146 | 0 | 0 |
"
""We"", it seems like just you as everyone has no issue with this verification process. You seem to be the only holding issue here as no one else is saying anything. Purevolume is a good enough of a source for all others, why not you?" | 0.001317 | 0 | 0 |
Jenna stays pimpin these hoes | 0.586243 | 1 | 1 |
weasel trying to “share risks” w-others👉reluctant to allow others more involvement regarding “appropriate security clearances” in vetting migrants shared by Italy.#Czechia #Visegrad complained of this negligence of Greece/Italy years ago | 0.001041 | 0 | 0 |
So kind from you. Thank you very much! | 0.000548 | 0 | 0 |
I swear to God, I will leave everything on Wikipedia alone, unless it NEEDS to be changed, but that is only if I have proof, not just random guesses. I swear. I promise. Honestly. Truthfully. | 0.003264 | 0 | 0 |
oh...and Kuru:
If you like maps, could you please explain why the maps on wikipedia are such utter
Shi'ite? Brittanica kicks your ass, stomps it down in the dirt, spits on it, and then takes a leak on it...when it comes to maps. So does most any newspaper, journal, etc. | 0.88721 | 1 | 1 |
What? Meghan trainor looks and weighs the same as a fully grown bull 😂😂😂 | 0.7494 | 1 | 1 |
NOW WE CAN GET SOMANY SYLLABUS FROM NET OR OTHER EASY WAY SO THAT WE MAY GET IT ONLINE | 0.000848 | 0 | 0 |
"
Release date of the ""Rules of the Game""
Is it definitely the 18th Dec?? Because I have a copy sitting right here..." | 0.000649 | 0 | 0 |
"
""news and rumour sites""
In the ECW article, you replaced my link with the better on to the Sun's website, which I wasn't able to find. For the record though, pwinsider does report legitamate news regarding pro wrestling and the free site doesn't report things as fact that haven't been verified. I think they are a valid source (the obviously the direct source is much preferred). " | 0.000584 | 0 | 0 |
RT @RaqiThunda: The trick of reality tv is making tacky bitches seem classy & badgering real women with real ethic into submission. It's a … | 0.609095 | 1 | 1 |
RT @joerogan: Dear everyone using "natural" deodorant, it's not working, you stinky bitch. | 0.992315 | 1 | 1 |
WHOEVER THIS IS FUCK OFF | 0.991635 | 1 | 1 |
Yes and no. The original concept for Multics was to have commands execute as separate subsidiary processes (a la Unix). However, Multics processes turned out to be rather expensive (computationally), and so the plan was changed to make them subroutines, called from the command interpreter. (The ability of Multics to dynamically link to a subroutine in any 'file' in the filesystem was a key thing in making this work - you could compile a new command, and then try it out right away, without having to link up a new version of the command interpreter.) Multics did always have the ability for anyone to start a subsidiary process, but it just wasn't used much. (talk) | 0.000573 | 0 | 0 |
hey
way to support nazis, you racist | 0.962041 | 1 | 1 |
PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis PenIS pennnis pneis pensnsnnienSNsn peNis | 0.994181 | 1 | 1 |
Nice edit
Hi Elizabeth, nice reverts on my edits and cool edits!
(FUCK YOU!) | 0.994303 | 1 | 1 |
"
What??
""Some prefer to just pronounce it as ""fuck"""" Huh?" | 0.966991 | 1 | 1 |
RT @OxDictionary: I got bitches"
Definition: I'm with some female friends who don't know that I'm referring to them as bitches. | 0.938142 | 1 | 1 |
"
This is a statement from Wikipedia How to identify reliable source""
""Blogs"" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control. Posts left by readers may never be used as sources''
That website is of ex-BKs so they have lots of information about BK.
Even though authors will of course add some biased content into their books, they are considered reliable.
I did not use the comments in the website. I used the information in home page's about', in which it explains what Brahma Kumaris is.
" | 0.000569 | 0 | 0 |
I think we should upgrade this to a board. | 0.000707 | 0 | 0 |
Yes, exactly. Do you think Taissa should do a big studio film, or keep doing indies? ) | 0.000626 | 0 | 0 |
Fight night tonight, go Cotto. Smack that pompous cunt down in front of millions. #MayweatherCotto | 0.846506 | 1 | 1 |
re last message
why do you act up only when somebody talks about Jewish but you let every piece of garbage out there talk about Islam without any supporting evidence? Listening to FOX news is not enough to learn Islam. They and you have to read Islamic resources before posting their trash up. And you (Vandal Fighter) shouldn't let any trash go through. You are allowing Anti-Islamic stuff but tough on Antisemitism.
You people can't live without Racism and prototyping and discrimination that is based on lies.
WAKE UP PEOPLE''''''
Don't delete this message if you are not a racist | 0.790693 | 1 | 1 |
I've just been investigating page hits for the links from the main page, whilst doing so I noticed a couple of duplicates ... and before you know it came to the conclusion that this line of links Overview · Editing · Questions · Help Contents · Categories · Featured content · A–Z index is uneccessary. About,Help,contents, and featured content are already linked in the sidebar, the editing tutorial can be accessed from intro and about, that leaves questions,categories and a-z, which could be integrated into the side bar. This would bring the content up by one line - not much but an improvement for readers to get more 'meat' right away. | 0.000595 | 0 | 0 |
RT @baeElectronica: bitch, bye 😂 RT @WeAre_XCI: Dawg look at this shit http://t.co/DfOsx3XKQa | 0.978192 | 1 | 1 |
well, the British did win the war. Traditionally, the people who lose wars don't get much of a POV. | 0.00073 | 0 | 0 |
"
I still need my CU mentor. — • Talk • " | 0.000552 | 0 | 0 |
Yuji Takasaki, Steven F. Loy and Hans W. Juergens “Ethnic Differences in the Relationship between Bioelectrical Impedance and Body Size”. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science Vol. 22; 233-235 (2003) . | 0.000695 | 0 | 0 |
This is my "sup bitches" face http://t.co/mqPqzLgCKf | 0.972048 | 1 | 1 |
Just wanted to let you know that I think you're a faggot. Find better things to do with your time. | 0.914883 | 1 | 1 |
Furthermore, we got high-circulation Serbian daily newspapers referring to Miladin Prso (1, 2, 3, 4 (referencing Slovenian coverage that also mentions Miladin), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 + a Croatian web portal referencing the aforementioned Slovenian coverage 11). And then there's the Serbian sports news portals (12, 13, 14, etc, etc....). | 0.000564 | 0 | 0 |
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Klsdjfhsdlkjfhsdjklfh) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it's confusing and it doesn't make sense. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. | 0.000846 | 0 | 0 |
I moved the article, thereby creating that redirect. (talk) | 0.000545 | 0 | 0 |
... Anyway proclamation of the Carolingian empire was viewed as rather upspring than secession. In fact they did not view Irene who blinded her children as legitimate emperor | 0.000912 | 0 | 0 |
After all I have had to endure here (re cypenamine)!!!!, OMS = (Oh my science??) - Is a bit of a inappropriately applied sentiment for describing the (not so eloquent wording) that was the result of my addition of the word alklation etc, which is a grammar issue but does not in any way effect a change to the meaning of the science related statement that you initially wrote), Don't you agree???? | 0.000955 | 0 | 0 |
$60 torch down the drain cause either I was to high and lost it or one of my "niggas" finessed that hoe fuckkkkk ittt | 0.996397 | 1 | 1 |
you are deluded and i advise that you seek some mental help.
why bother signing with no intention of editing in the foreseeable future? why waste time doing that? would you like the contact details of the others involved? i feel sorry for you. i corrected 'favours' for you too. you are pathetic. | 0.864943 | 1 | 1 |
]] Welcome to Wikipedia, Juhko! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on {{#if | 0.000684 | 0 | 0 |
Chick got a man but no edges. Niggas got hoes but no diploma . Damn | 0.987175 | 1 | 1 |
I'LL GIVE YOU $500 TO LET ME CUM ON YOUR FACE | 0.994871 | 1 | 1 |
"
You're asking people to make a resume for you, and you're ""not sure what to call"" my post?
Please note Fkp is herewith starting to post in a hostile tone, and making snide comments completely detached from the subject of discussion. This sort of behavior is essentially how these objective discussions are degraded. (TALK) " | 0.000804 | 0 | 0 |
Comment: It’s incomprehensible that a point of such importance (Symmetry, inflection, the solutions and critical points evaluation) isn’t mentioned within whole article. Moreover, the circle at Figure 4 is unnecessary dislocated above S(s,y_S) omitting even a vertical line up to the center of the circle as done at Figure 2 of “New approach …” by Nickalls R. W. D. (see note 29 again). Tschirnhaus transformation isn’t only unneeded but also responsible for such a failure hence t_S = 0 doesn’t mean that an inflection point S(0,q) doesn’t exist. It seems to me reasonable the unknown t (along with the variables p and q) to be abandoned in favour of graphically grounded ones which are also easier for memorizing. | 0.000678 | 0 | 0 |
No, I didn't say it didn't exist - I just meant to point out that the kind of objectivity you are imposing on our edits and discussions makes little sense when the person we're discussing could quite probably be our old school friend, or our grandmother's neighbour - not because we are deliberately exploiting a COI, but because it couldn't be otherwise. Even trying to protect the anonymity of research participants is kind of farcical in a small population. In light of our culture, I think your rules about objectivity are antagonistic (assuming you're not some mutant kind of New Zealander that is). And I wouldn't be surprised if someone makes a bigger deal out of your behaviour. | 0.000979 | 0 | 0 |
Anyway, I request that my user page and user talk page be replaced with a blocked user template please. Ill be back on a different user I guess. | 0.001707 | 0 | 0 |
"
I'd like to make an edit...
The edit I'm asking to make is kinda a long one. What I did was userfied the article as it previously was, and implemented my edits. Could somebody please copy '''(talk) " | 0.000553 | 0 | 0 |
"
You no for good..rascal...
I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. You mother fucker you bastard u biased ronchos...the bastard gujjar suppporter.. I am a badgujjar and i am a rajput..why are u vandalising our histroy by removing my content..u suckdickeer.. Y u add contents about other castes.. Badgujjars are raghav and are rajputs... u bastard.,..
Proof taht badgujjars are rajputs.. chk.. http://ebadgujar.com/history.html
Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SpacemanSpiff""" | 0.993068 | 1 | 1 |
What a bunch of wanker's | 0.818783 | 1 | 1 |
"
Saw III
Maybe if you paid more attention to the article's history, you would have known that Cigammagicwizard's edits were unsourced speculations posing as fact. Its original research which is not allowed. Its been reverted countless times by other people, yet he keeps on reverting.
The original poster of that information, 81.99.182.121 said when I asked him for a source he responded ""i am the source! cant give you any wevsite sources because it has not been released onto the net, i work for the studio.""
I reported him to the administrators, so he said ""y r u such a rat, bum head? )"" and ""they have never had to deal with tattle-tales like you mr. bum head!""
So maybe you should be less hasty before reverting to fan fiction written by a bunch of thirteen year olds. (Literally...Cigammagicwizard is thirteen years old.) " | 0.198066 | 1 | 0 |
BertilVidet, nobody is talking about your promoscius homosexuality or attacking other contributors like the way you did with your delusions a few weeks ago. I am sure you are mature enough to tolerate this as not whitewashing and not demonizing you, but I can put up a wikipedia article and post all your misdemenaours and actions in your log history there if you want. So you can make a comparison between Mustafa kemal's critics and your own critics. Keep your hands off of good contributions of others and concentrate on your agent provacatour role in Turkey paid by the west to divide the country. Now have a great day for yourself. | 0.189935 | 1 | 0 |
Materialscientist is a racist
Seriously, fuck you man. You continuously delete my photos on the page of Al-Mayassa bint Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, which are all posted with the correct CreativeCommons Share-alike 2.0 or 3.0 license... because you're a racist and the Sheikha appears uncovered in these pictures. When I posted photos of Arab males... you do not challenge them what so ever.
Luckily, I can continue to live my life in the happy company of many friends, family and colleagues... not stationed at a computer 24/7. You're a loser who spends his entire life editing Wikipedia and probably has nothing to show for it. At the end of my life, I'll have had a purpose... a career, family, things I am proud of. You'll just be dust and completely irrelevant to the world... having never done anything more than edited a website. | 0.998089 | 1 | 1 |
"
Said from someone who had some very offensive userboxes on their page till a few days ago. The point in referring to the ads is to reaffirm its historical accuracy which Haymaker ridiculously called into question. WO Please leave me a wb if you reply " | 0.001198 | 0 | 0 |
My bad, I didn't create the article Great Guns! I created Great Guns (cartoon)! If you wish, see THAT version instead, but still I changed the link above. | 0.001932 | 0 | 0 |
Tym 2 lyt dis blunt n holla @ hoes. | 0.160843 | 1 | 1 |
I've added in some replies. Thanks for the help! ) talk | 0.000544 | 0 | 0 |
"
|}
Kahane was a hero and a martyr who fought for Jewish human rights against the savage Arab aggressor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.57.140
Kahane was a hero and a martyr who fought for Jewish human rights against the savage Arab aggressor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.57.140 " | 0.011613 | 0 | 0 |
"
If using hubs there is a limit imposed by the need for a collision to be detected everywhere, iirc it's officially two hubs for fast ethernet (though in practice you may get away with more due to shorter than required delays in the hubs) but hardly anyone uses hubs anymore so this is largely irrelevent in modern network design. Switches either seperate collision domains or eliminate them entirely so this isn't a problem on a switch based network. Eventually the delays would build up to the point where higher level protocols started to time out but the network would have to get huge for that to happen with most protocols.
Practically there are several other troublesome factors. One is that switches rely on storing the mac addresses of every machine on the lan to decide where to send packets. If there are too many machines for the switches to store the switches will ""fail open"" and end up broadcasting traffic they don't know where to send to the whole network. Furthermore being a tree network a lot of traffic will tend to cluster on the center of the tree (the impact of this can be reduced by making those parts of the network higher speed or by using techniques like port trunking)." | 0.000683 | 0 | 0 |
I SIMPLY want to state WHAT the public reaction was. Seeing that you already overly express that it was sad for many people, I wished to express the opposite end of the spectrum. Being in this spectrum, I felt it even more necasery. But if this is just going to be a whine fest fuck it | 0.815433 | 1 | 1 |
"
User:23 editor seems accustomed, like here, only to issuing silly threats and conceited patriarchal condescension, which s/he uses to dismiss as reliable on the topic of extremely virulent homophobia, and indeed by a prime minister of a country (to wit: at a par with Zimbabwe, only an EU candidate country) nonetheless statements made by the Gay Straight Alliance (one of the co-organisers of the Pride Parade), seemingly with the intent of making it appear as if the GSA could possibly be unreliable on the very issue of that very Pride Parade or on the issue of the prime minister's unacceptable discourse about LGBTs and the parade.
I do not understand how could possibly someone... anyone not with a brain but with a head claim that the GSA, the co-organiser of the event cancelled by the homophobe prime minister (who calls gays ""abnormal"" and his own fellow party memmber who supports LGBT people ""a person with a darkened mind because of exposure to pro-LGBT radiation in Brussels""), are an unreliable source on this?" | 0.011984 | 0 | 0 |
Agreed. The extant consensus of at least six parties favors removal of the religion section, over three individuals who seem to demand its inclusion. | 0.000543 | 0 | 0 |
@Leelucas_ 😂😂😂💀💀 alright nah bitch you want play on Twitter. | 0.935211 | 1 | 1 |
| title = Away Kit
}}
{{Football kit
| alt = Football kit (white jersey with two broad, red, horizontal stripes; red shorts with side-stripes; and white socks).
| pattern_la =
| pattern_b =
| pattern_ra =
| pattern_sh = _nikeblack
| pattern_so =
| leftarm = 008000
| body = 008000
| rightarm = 008000
| shorts = 000000
| socks = 008000 | 0.000857 | 0 | 0 |
@LupeFiasco You and @TalibKweli should name a group called MOB - Moaning old bitches | 0.96346 | 1 | 1 |
"
Adam, evidently you do not disprove of mention of the banner, merely mention of the relevant repercussions - that is a violation of WP:WEIGHT and it is a violation WP:NPOV. No one would be fooled into thinking you're shy about deleting stuff you don't like, yet reference to the banner always remains. So what is it about mention of the UEFA fine (you see fit to include the Chairman's ""condemnation"") that so offends you? Is it that it tarnishes the reputation you intend this article to portray? WP:WEIGHT and WP:NPOV are reasons to restore the content, not remove it. " | 0.000954 | 0 | 0 |
PKK not being a banned political party
Gerry, sorry I put the disclaimer before I wrote my explanation, and I had to go, so it has stayed there for a day without any explanation. I now entered my reasons for objecting the listing of PKK as a banned political party in Turkey. Please let me know what you think. Thank you. 16:25, September 9, 2005 (UTC) | 0.000674 | 0 | 0 |
thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot | 0.972865 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck you asshole!
Why did you undo my edit you son of a bitch? | 0.997795 | 1 | 1 |
RT @GODLOVESUGLYY_: You tell me I'm beautiful, like you tell every other bitch. Come on sir. #dobetter | 0.95115 | 1 | 1 |
see your userpage you stupid bitch
heeeeeeeeeeee | 0.995432 | 1 | 1 |
YOU ARE AN AWFUL STINKY PERSON, do not delete my stuff | 0.978963 | 1 | 1 |
, 18 April 2009 (UTC)''' 21:48 | 0.000669 | 0 | 0 |
Please note that your comments are not welcome if you're going to whine to me like a little girl or if you're going jump on my dick because of something I did or said, but if you're a wiseguy that does so anyways, I'm going to laugh my ass off at your faggieness and I'm not going to take your comment seriously. | 0.991284 | 1 | 1 |
$100 bid to go on a date with Zack Morris oh that dreamy son of a bitch | 0.983587 | 1 | 1 |
Hey you!
I LOVE BLACK PEOPLE!!! | 0.28211 | 1 | 0 |
Help With stargate
Sorry about adding the links. As I stated, I felt that there wasn't enough interconnectedness and I didn't know who to make a template. (And stil don't) I am going to delete the sections. If you want to help they are on all race articles, all technology articles, and all articles in the general template. Thanks and sorry | 0.00056 | 0 | 0 |
I disagree. If there are stated suspicions, there should be a cite. You cite ABC News as the source of the memo. If there is a challenge that should be cited too. I do not care if Powerline is mentioned directly. I would do it, but if you think it is too much information fair enough. But the Powerline link should be left there so a viewer can go look at it. 18:16, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) | 0.000606 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.