text
stringlengths
7
5k
degree_of_toxicity
float64
0
1
contains_offensive_word
int64
0
1
label
int64
0
1
How the hell do I know the difference between your user page and talk page?
0.263306
1
0
(UTC) I see that the List of people from San Francisco was voted to remain, I have followed that lead as these lists will only grow larger and cannot remain on the main city page with cluttering it up. 06:38, 22 September 2007
0.000602
0
0
douchebag fremantle suck ass dipshit support a real team that has actually won a premiership u prick
0.99322
1
1
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jacques Cartier. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk - Contribs) "
0.000568
0
0
) Look, another good little Marxist.
0.003533
0
0
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 2000
0.000968
0
0
Hypocricy and Jealousy I want to let everyone here know that the author deleted my articles when I attempted to create new ones. This is due to the author's insecurites and racist views about the accuracy of my info. I know that many of you feel the same. But don't worry. We'll definitely get around this and the racist author.
0.264965
1
1
My homeboy got a hoe number on house arrest ... i said that's good she won't ask to go anywhere
0.009573
0
1
Triston Rockwell Triston is gay and he has a small penis.
0.99097
1
1
RT @iAintAsianTho: you see her nudes? she must have beat her own pussy up RT @DonDippa: Salute http://t.co/gxmym20q9L
0.978716
1
1
RT @VersaceLaFlare: All bitches cheat. You just gotta acknowledge its gonna happens so when it does it’ll hurt less.
0.972165
1
1
I will hunt you down and kill you, you useless piece of shit
0.993507
1
1
Life's a bitch So am I
0.985855
1
1
@InfidelAlie that should read suck on my bacon encrusted middle finger Muslim twats
0.996136
1
0
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
0.000667
0
0
" Your Signature The following is a passage from Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages === Images === Images of any kind should not be used in signatures. Many concerns have been raised over the use of images in signatures, and they are considered to serve no use to the encyclopedia project. Images in signatures should not be used for several reasons: they are an unnecessary drain on server resources, and could cause server slowdown a new image can be uploaded in place of the one you chose, making your signature a target for possible vandalism and Denial-of-service attacks they reduce searchability, making pages more difficult to read they make it more difficult to copy text from a page they are potentially distracting from the actual message in most browsers images do not scale with the text, making lines with images higher than those without they clutter up the ""file links"" list on the image page every time you sign on a different talk page images in signatures give undue prominence to a given user's contribution I believe you were not aware of this, but please remove the image from your signature. Thank you,  ►  "
0.000669
0
0
Stub |listas=Engelbert 03 Of The Marck
0.001175
0
0
This guy is a fat kike who likes spending time with his parents in an ash tray ahahaha
0.942214
1
1
" Incorrect template warnings I thought of you when making this edit a few minutes ago. ofShalott "
0.000587
0
0
RT @Hi__________Bye: "@UglyAssAyeKay: Ugh I fuckin hate when this bitch don't answer my calls ewwwwwww @Hi__________Bye" ugh I hate her ass…
0.998245
1
1
" there I think I got it taken care of '''''' ( T) "
0.000602
0
0
(reset indent) Ignore policy? You can't even point us to the relevant policy! Nonetheless, how could Wiki possibly decide an article that has a criticism section could be a Featured Article? Controversial subject? PETA? Really? - list all the controversial items for me please. I did not ignore your response; I thought my answer was clear but I'll ride the donkey for ya. A single section containing criticisms is an example of a poorly structured article as it means that people reading about a subject have to look in the section about it for the 'non-criticism' and then a second section to see if there is any criticism. This is a statement to which I have refuted wholly by showing you an example of an article that is not porrly (rather, superbly) written; also, the criticism section does nothing but DESCRIBE the criticism involved with the topic (eg. why/how/what re criticism of the Canadian Charter...) See? Naming a section 'Criticisms' or something similar is giving Wikipedia a POV. Specious. We wish to DESCRIBE the criticisms, not create them. We therefore need a section do do so. (I concur, though; forking is counter-productive. Man you got a little pet name for everything.) *...such a section is normally just a troll magnet and POV magnet, making things difficult to manage. First, that is tantamount to cutting off your nose to spite your face: crappy articles because a good one would attract undue attention? That's silliness. Moreover, good articles are far less likely to be attacked by vandals. And lastly, protect the pages once well-written - don't make drivel out of the article just because writing it correctly (i.e., like the featured articles) would attract attention. Change the management method instead. On top of all that, I submit that this PETA/AR debacle is so controversial for no other reason than that the articles are poorly written. They are biased, they are agenda-driven, they lack recognition (DESCRIPTION) of criticisms and they are quite obviously over-protected and coddled over by people who truly don't want criticism to see the light of day. Now, please list all the controversial items re PETA for me please.
0.031847
0
0
Oh! I found out what his knickers are in a not about, Kev said 'fuck off idiot' in his edit summary to his first defacement of our talk page! ROFLMAO! That's brilliant, nice work Kev, making friends already. P Please make friends with the LESS crazy type of wiki-fascist PLEASE? xAidenx
0.972872
1
1
Archive I just archived a bunch of discussion, mostly from almost a year ago. I hope I've done it right (I've never archived before). The link is at the top.
0.000554
0
0
farooq abdullah is better known as farooq dand (ox).........for being a great stupid person in the history of kashmir
0.767742
1
1
" language Some noteworthy (and quite convincing) work has been done by Alexander Vovin that suggests that the Xiongnu spoke a Yeniseian language similar to Ket. This is definitely worth mentioning on the page. Vovin, Alexander. ""Did the Xiongnu speak a Yeniseian language?"". Central Asiatic Journal 44/1 (2000), pp. 87-104. -Andrew"
0.000577
0
0
Sorry, Carol, for being difficult; I believe your heart is in the right place. I can humbly suggest the following RS's on this matter. including a sidebar noting one quote by Freeman as a favorite of his critics , as well as , and . talk
0.000538
0
0
If you only like cheese pizza you're a pussy. Stay away from me and my lovely combination pizza
0.975888
1
1
@user Maybe James to You? All these Women as Rape Victims don't deserve Respect and Dignity or Justice ? RAPE is FELONY A CRIME =PRISON
0.482067
1
0
YOu are one sick individual. The amount of lies you tell... wow... I am speechless. May God have Mercy on your soul.
0.83589
1
1
Recreation of Mani Nouri Hi cirt, i wish to recreate the page of Mani Nouri. I read the discussion and i believe that i can make a new page with more sources and credibility. Thanks, please consider it. Appreciate it.
0.00055
0
0
True, but you'll notice that details are only released six months ahead of J1, so any immediate response to a real innovation would be an SVP or price action. For instance the 3.0 l V6 on Commodore has not inspired ANY activity here, we're just going to watch and see if it tanks. The failure of the 3.2 litre I6 in the marketplace is still a sore point! It was actually quite a nice engine, with a turbo it would be great.
0.000616
0
0
Yo iono wat u talkin bout i fixed jibbs page cause someone else waz sayin fake shit bouthim so dont start wit me or we will have problems.
0.9494
1
1
Goethean and me I would like you to know I have known Goethean for 6 years now on wikipeida and hes a rotten thug of the worst kind. The kind that hides but not willing to play fair is intellectually true to his believes or ideas of fairness. If you think I'm wrong then look at this thug's history and you will see I'm right. The only way with Goethean is his way, or no way, he as no respect for those that think different and is a bigoted thug.
0.57645
1
1
I’m logging out RT @Shakez843: ah man RT @OfficiallyIce: The bartenders be sellin pussy too? I thought only the strippers sold pussy.
0.920671
1
1
" Fallout shelters I removed a two-part unsourced statement. There is no source to back up the statement that ""popular opinion"" is that ""short term survival would be futile"" after a nuclear attack. It also said that fallout shelters are no longer maintained. Whilst they are certainly no longer maintained to the standards which they once were, the blanket statement is incorrect. "
0.000591
0
0
Hello Viridae. I think you should help me with this user who has been reverting everything I do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/216.30.182.60 He has reverted one of my edits in the article List of billionaires 2007. The IP should be blocked.
0.000637
0
0
" You've managed to say what I tried to in far more words above. I'd only add that sometimes clarity is a serious issue and forces our hand. For instance, the Ainu people don't like that name and would prefer to be referred to as Utari, but only they and people who study their history (like myself) know that name, so we refer to them on Wikipedia as the Ainu. It has nothing to do with us forcing some colonial name on them, it's just the most recognizable name. (話して下さい) "
0.000575
0
0
For your information: you´re an idiot too!! and a liar. For your information: you´re an idiot too!! Where did I request that the Inflation Myths article be deleted? Liar and idiot!!
0.989294
1
1
Chelsea Zinn What? You are requesting to delete a profile for which there are thousands of others on Wikipedia. It's a pornstar, deal with it. what are you reasons for deleting it anyway? Devout Christian? Block me for doing the right thing? Haha. Stop being such a tough guy. You and I both know there is no reason to delete it. Stop right now.
0.131996
1
0
Book of Job, Edit September 4th Next time you revert someone's edit, try not to trash the entire page.
0.026853
0
0
Get off your high horse, buddy. Don't act as if you own wiki... it's a public website. Perhaps you should invest your time and effort into something that you are not as emotionally charged about. kthnxbye.
0.084779
0
0
" why did they remove my comment ""good Boy""? You guys are a bunch of commies."
0.605229
1
1
@user He is going to destroy america like he has done to many of his businesses he does care about middle or lesser america and americans he only cares for himself and the top 1% who hopefully see the light soon before they have no countries to sell their products to
0.058024
0
1
You are so fake & I'm going to put you on blast bitch.
0.995921
1
1
Regarding Your Message Can you please be more specific instead of just shouting at me?
0.000697
0
1
Oi Wankstain == Fuck off you ignorant cunt, yeah? Revert this you arsewipe, REVERT ME LOLOLOLOL COCKSUCKER ==
0.997805
1
1
I honestly don't care what you do. You have utterly and complately sidetracked and destroyed what was meant to be a discussion on the sources or rather lack of used on the article of Frances Farmer. I find your conduct and behaviour beyond bizarre, incivil, highly unconstructive and inappropriate. I don't think you are interested in discussing the topic. I do believe you have issues and I find your threats and warnings absurd, as they would be more suitable for you. Hence I will warn you too, as I think it is long overdue. Your wild accusations equate to the pot calling the kettle black. You are more than welcome to read WP:DICK the essay, minority consensus btw, because clearly incivility and personal attacks appear to be a case of habit with you. I don't need to. I don't need to. Afterall nothing else can explain your angry tantrums. To repeat your words, I will not sit by and allow you to continue to be incivil, launch the personal attacks that you have here and be a veritable insult factory. But thanks for mocking me with things I say. I simply will not. I hav attempted to have a decent communication with you and all I asked was a civil tone. Clearly conducting yourself like a mature grown up is too much of a challange. This explains your repeated and foul attacks. You are the type the discourages editors to edit. I suggest you read the policy on WP:CIVILWP:NPA, seeing as you are intent on breaching them. Mark my words, you have been and are incivil to me. And I have now twice told you to stay out of my talkpage. You are not welcome (Is English your first language? Doubtful.) Disagrement is one thing, but blatant evasion of questions/concerns posed and repreated incivility and hostility is more than I can accept. This is now how you reach consensus. You will have to learn to argue your case like others do, and NPOV plays an underlying condition. I can not take you seriously. You are free to make any report you want to. I can simply not work with your horrible attitude which has been and is unpleasent. Stop it. I have attempted to have a fruitful discussion with you, but you have made this impossible. Period.
0.096859
0
0
No idea. But I think the unauthenticated votes casted by both sides have by now to be indented out. Not removed since someone may authenticate them later but indented to be excluded in counting.
0.000618
0
0
MURDER HER RT @RepMyCityX: When u fuck with crazy bitches shit like this happens :( Feel bad for ol boy http://t.co/IjacWo6OB8
0.997648
1
1
Yawn. I shouldn't worry, , no-one else ever apologises on this site! Anyway, from the article itself there's no indication that the MA came from Cambridge: could it have come from elsewhere, perhaps? (talk)
0.000726
0
0
I'm tryna turn M's to B's innis bitch and I ain't never paid to be wit no bitch!
0.991277
1
1
" I think there are passages in Proudhon that read like minarchism. But there are just as many others if not more that don't. Whatever Larry Gambone says (I see that's where you've been taking your Proudhon quotes from, which is I guess why you never give decent references), there is certainly inconsistency - or at least, a greater degree of complexity than I think you are willing or able to accept, in Proudhon's work. But then who isn't inconsistent? As I said, it's not hard to find quotes in Proudhon that are against anarchism or that support property (in the full-blown sense). That doesn't mean that he was never an anarchist. I think 'On the general idea of the revolution in the 19th century' has his fullest discussion of the state and of his version of an anarchist society. It's definitely worth reading, and is widely available in english (though unfortunately I don't think it's on the net). In Section IV (On the principle of authority) you can find for example: ""We conclude without fear that the revolutionary formula should not be direct legislation, nor direct government, nor simplified government; it is no more government."" ""Neither monarchy, nor aristocracy, nor even democracy, where this third term implies some or other government acting in the name of the people and calling itself the people. No authority, no government, even of the people: there is the revolution."" And there's plenty more in that vein. 'What Is Property', which is on the net, is not as clear but he does also call all forms of government illegitimate there. "
0.000711
0
0
As soon as bitches get on a come up you got that one bitch that CANT Wait to tell ppl your downfall before the come up 😐😐. #Haters
0.997005
1
1
&& some of you hoes too... http://t.co/yJPSMAS4k2
0.368475
1
1
Need info on another strike The article needs some info on the doctors' strike following the government's refusal to grant them salaries for the period for which they had been protesting the new OBC quotas.
0.000686
0
0
" Generally right You write ""If white racists were to start editing articles about black people, they'd be banned immediately by admins or the community."" I generally agree with the rest of your points, but I think that Wikipedia has demonstrated that ""racial realists,"" will be given a great deal of room before being banned by ArbCom along with the people that tried to stop them - for example - Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race_and_intelligence. "
0.010262
0
0
Blnguyen|Blnguyen]] is going too far, and somebody needs to review his actions. [[User:
0.000667
0
0
These bitches love me. These niggas copy
0.996557
1
1
@StriveForLight Report me for what bitch? You need to read the Twitter rules and guidelines. This ain't Facebook cunt.
0.947474
1
1
STARBLIND and HYPER-INDIVIDUALIST @YAHOO.COM ARE PART OF THE HOAX! A geneologist expert has been brought in to verify the previous article. Several of the points have already been proven with verifiable facts and evidence. Yet, when those point are made evidently clear both starbling and [email protected] continue to ignore it and chose not to respond. The true hoax on this Barbaro family page is that these two individuals are trying to ignore verifiable evidence and have set out to destroy good knowledge for everyone- verifiable knowledge. Starblind has decided to put what ever he wants on the page but can not provide a single source of evidence to validate his selection. These two hoaxers have only one desire, but to detroy good validated information for the public and to extend turmoil. These two hoaxers continually make attempts to stop progress and provide no real solutions for Wikipedia problems . I suggest that Starblind be removed from Wikipedia editing. He is a trouble maker of the highest category and ignores reason.
0.005145
0
0
i gonna block your bitch ass bongwarrior- SQUAD_500
0.998087
1
1
Excuse me, here's your nose. I found it in my business hoe.
0.172416
1
1
YOUR A JERK!!!!!!! You are a jerk yo lazy butt!
0.994992
1
1
Sitush is an asshole...die you dog
0.996225
1
1
your gay douche like gay porno ahaghagagagaa
0.986717
1
1
You really are out of control Georgie. Other than calling you what you are ugly (pictures don't lie), arrogant, and arbitrary, you have never been threatened, only harassed (deservedly) by Wikzilla. I mean any moron who goes ahead and range blocks several million people really cannot be all that smart. Go ahead, range block again. Do you really think you stopped her the first time? All you did was piss off thousands of potential contributors.162.84.182.50
0.797063
1
1
Beta I am indeed a Beta at the Gamma Kappa chapter of the University of North Dakota. We recently redesigned our website and I decided to add the link in the List of Beta Theta Pi chapters page. I noticed that there were other chapters that had website but no links in the page. I am also currently working on completing the chapter list. What chapter are you with? Yours in ___kai____,
0.000623
0
0
" I'm not so sure. Most of those references are just short announcements of ""these people are here at this time"". An article that gives longer, more in-depth coverage is what is really needed. Citation 5 is close, but if you can find anything longer, especially something that shows how it meets the notability guidelines, it would be helpful. (Talk) "
0.000531
0
0
It's iguanas out this bitch n er thing
0.981547
1
1
and trying to maintain this color is gonna be a fuckin bitch like i washed my hair once and it already started going blonde again idk idk
0.998184
1
1
" Yes, I do realize a lot of people made contributions to the article when I approached it. This is why I made a lot of effort to get other opinions on the rewrite and what the article should cover. See Talk:Sex#Rewrite of article, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biology#Sex, and Wikipedia talk:Version_1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics#Sex. No secret has been made of this rewrite—you can see how difficult it has been to get feedback. This article obviously had no ""steward"", as you so aptly describe on your userpage. I chose to become that steward when I proposed and made the rewrite. I would eventually like to take this core article to FA and it's been difficult to get any feedback. Perhaps you didn't realize it, but a ""see also"" section is deprecated, material should be covered within the body of the article. This came up during the Genetics FAC. I'm sorry your link got removed; I thought I had covered everything in the article. As I noted on the talk page, I think the article should have a top level section on evolution and I think this link could eventually go in there. I like you. I'm surprised, hurt, and disappointed that you're so quick to be angry with me. In my past experience (and up to now with the Sex article), I've been too hesitant to throw away old material and too slow to rewrite. Because I got no response to my proposal, and because the article was so poorly written, I went ahead and did it. Wikipedia encourages us to be bold. , who works on Gender, seemed happy with it. ✉ ✍ "
0.001084
0
0
In Re Abuse of Dr. Larry Sanger I have opted to retire forever from this project and join the more credible project of Citizendium, where my new Associate of Science degree in Human Development might actually be useful to me as an editor in the areas of psychology and human development and counseling theories. I am shamed and appalled by the policies enacted on this wiki and its BRUTAL suppression of dissenting opinions. And I am sickened by your grabs for power and glory by re-writing history and claiming sole credit for Wikipedia, when the truth is otherwise. Dr. Larry Sanger's claim to co-foundership here is more credible than your claims of sole credit, and no not because he's the doctorate holder and you're not. I believe him because he reads more to me in my judgment more authentic about his feelings and he's more a straight shooter than you. Dr. Sanger also strikes me as more merciful than you and tends to keep Citizendium policy in line with the rights of freedom of expression guaranteed under US national and state laws and international law. So I hope you understand my reason to leave this project, forever. Farewell Mr. Wales.
0.001181
0
0
RT @OhSnapsItsShaq: Having hoes fun till you lose that girl that you really wanted over them hoes ..
0.488377
1
1
Stevenson-Perez, the concepts in this section have been covered in other articles; literally hundreds of editors have added their wisdom to those articles. Perhaps a few more links to the other articles in the encyclopedia are in order.
0.000554
0
0
I've been reading different campaign articles on wikipedia for about a year and this article is very good and indepth. Deleting half the article makes no sense so I would ask the individual who keeps doing this to please stop.
0.000779
0
0
LIBCD7173 2. This is even backed up at Music Australia. Who has the Liberation release and what is the numbers? (meow) 03:03, 25 July
0.000669
0
0
It would help to make separate votes on each of the articles to merge, and come to a consensus on each of them on its own.
0.000536
0
0
OK YOU. LIKE I SAID THIS IS MY WORLD, I DECIDE WHAT HAPPENS. IF I SAY LIL CHRIS DIED OF MALARIA, THEN IT HAPPENED. END OF. JUST ME SAYING IT AUTOMATICALLY MAKES IT TRUE, THEREFORE IT IS AN ACCURATE EDIT. GET IT?
0.026281
0
1
RT @lildurk_: Never have kids by a fan bitch if so cop #signedtothestreets2 lol
0.901625
1
1
I know bitches be mad as shit when they friends borrow their clothes & its a bunch of girls in her IG comments sayin how cute the outfit is
0.93863
1
1
hey dickwads. stop hijacking this wiki. these are the final days of ytmnd. they need to be documented. PS BY THE WAY, you're a fucking idiot for believing a wiki article as fact. do a whois lookup. fucking wikinazis. oopssorryguys.ytmnd.com/
0.996771
1
1
Cuāuhtlahtoāni Hello Akapochtli. You seem to be the original author of the article Cuāuhtlahtoāni. This article is very hard to understand. Copy editing can be done by others, but the information in the article is almost impossible to salvage. Could you please do your best to clarify what the article is trying to say? Thanks in advance.
0.000565
0
0
fuck fuckBold text
0.99626
1
1
"@k_eazy26: Facts what baldheaded bitch made this shit. 👊👊😫😒 http://t.co/fDYojpT9Xg" Lmao 😩😂
0.981993
1
1
Stupid bitch at Church's didn't give me my fucking BBQ sauce so now I gotta eat some dry ass chicken strips 😓
0.998345
1
1
Hello How are you? Have you had sexual relations with any black men recently?
0.921331
1
1
Cholas and Vijayanagar empires are worth the mention. Vijayanagar can be mentioned for its temple architecture and Hampi (a world heritage site). Cholas can be mentioned for their detailed record keeping in the temples of Tamil Nadu.
0.000557
0
0
" What a stupid, user-unfriendly, badly-designed bot! If that's what it is, then instead of blandly and repeatedly plastering ""INVALID"" all over the page, it could have noted the missing content and it could have been fixed straight away. And I wouldn't trust the administrators too much - you'll see they've already deleted a similar photograph for the same entry which actually showed the person who invented the black box. "
0.631666
1
1
@JUSxDOiT I was hangin' on them corners late Pockets wasn't straight, bitch! I ain't gon make it at this rate, dawg.. Know what I'm sayin?
0.952229
1
1
RT @Now_Thats_Fresh: Any song with Tyga in it is trash
0.43398
1
1
they blame it on the alchohol but claim the truth come out when they drunk..they defend the hoe being a hoe, you backward ass mofos
0.93808
1
1
Thank you for deleting the page Wadi’a Maswadeh I wont to thank you for deleting the page Wadi’a Maswadeh!!! You didnot answred to my questions in the talk page and directly deleted the page!! it is a miss respect!!! As I know Wikipedea is not a personnal website and respect is an obligation here! Despite the page meat the wikipedia rules I did not get a justifaction of the reasons of the deletion!!!!
0.013387
0
0
" I know there was a kind of Schism, when the Bulgarian Curch declared Autonomy from the Ecumenical Patriarchate, but the last was not acknowledging it. Thus, there were Bulgarian ""Patriarchs"" (of the Exarchate) and Metropolitans (of the Patriarcahte) for the same territory. But, I do not know more details and I need to study a lot, in order to contribute at this time "
0.000553
0
0
Pizza, a salad and alcohol is all I want.....my cravings need to be met or I'm a rude bitch
0.902944
1
1
RT @LesaMonroe: You bitches are grade A weird.
0.993726
1
1
Hitlers sex children Its obvious that shitler only wanted these kids for his own perverse sexual desires. I demand you change the article and if you dont then you're a fucking racist scumbag who needs to be sent to the moon with the rest of the goonbats
0.998271
1
1
My Talk Page Why can't I blank my own talk page, ass?
0.961451
1
1
and my bitch so bad that I'm never ever cheating
0.986601
1
1
Article length As of 16 Sep 2006, the article body (not including Intro and References) is less than 5,700 words long and 51KB in size. This is less than the suggested 6,000 to 10,000 word length which Wikipedia:Article size notes as the limit at which readers may tire of reading a page. It is, however, larger than the 30-50KB recommended article size. Its large size, despite its reasonable length, is due to the large number of footnotes and citations. Subsequent edits should try not to significantly increase the overall size of the article body.
0.000594
0
0