text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|
Prague Spring
I think that Prague Spring deserves more than two sentences in this article. | 0.000585 | 0 | 0 |
RT @rellyOnSMASH: that shoot em up shit is cool but gimme some shit i can play in front of bitches my nigga...gimme some jiggy shit i ca ... | 0.997897 | 1 | 1 |
These cheetos taste likka steak right nah boy these bitches going DUMB!! | 0.995301 | 1 | 1 |
I feel like that niggah Pac these bitches set me up. | 0.99152 | 1 | 1 |
this particular edit may not reach wikipedia's standards for constructivity (depending, of course, on what those standards are)> However, this was one of many changes which you reverted needlessly. Furthermore, I think it verges on racist to suggest that my ethnicity should mean you should keep an eye on my important work on this website. | 0.000768 | 0 | 0 |
Can you stop reverting my edits as they do NOT constitute vandalism | 0.002991 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you for your kind reply. Judging from the sources I have, I think the concept of spatial tense is only relevant in the context of the artificial language Lojban. The statement that several natural languages have spatial tense as defined in the article is still an unsubstantiated claim, so imho it should be pulled out pending evidence. Part of the problem is the very name of the concept. 'Tense' has the connotation of 'time'. In fact, grammatical tense is frequently (if loosely) defined as 'location in time'. Thus, it doesn't really make sense to talk about 'spatial tense'; it would be like talking about 'temporal place'.
Since the only relevant use of the concept stems from Lojban grammar, I think it would be best to start the article out of the Lojban perspective, defining spatial tense as Lojban grammar defines it. And since spatial tense (according to Lojban grammar) is merely 'obligated expression of location', the broader context of the article should be the expression of space in language. And this is where observations about the connection between language and the way we perceive the world come in. The way I see it, the spatial cases of the Hopi language (one of the many languages that do very interesting things with space) don't really belong in an article about an invented, English-inspired, grammatical category. What we are really missing is a decent article about the way languages deal with location and space. Which is something I added to my to do list. — (talk) 16:55, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0.000546 | 0 | 0 |
Amanda Bynes is crazy, idc what else y'all wanna call it but da bitch been crazy. | 0.98059 | 1 | 1 |
For someone who is saying he wants to work together, you are putting a lot of oppressive restrictions on what you will accept in terms of wording. For someone who is saying he wants to work together, you certainly don't get into it right by starting out with a series of hostile deletions without comment (see the Shotokan change history log). | 0.000702 | 0 | 0 |
Bitches be 17 in the 9th grade talking about " where my bae at ?" No bitch , where ya credits at? | 0.979264 | 1 | 1 |
i love your profile
LOOK HOE I DONT APPRECIATE YOU MESSING UP LAS VEGAS FOR ME
I HOPE YOU SUCK A BIG FAT ONE AND HAVE A GREAT DAY YOU
NERD
COMPUTERFREAK
SUCK A FAT ONE!
SRH FOR LIFE
HOME SKILLIN BUISCUT | 0.993332 | 1 | 1 |
Nobody on planet Earth more protective than bull dykes | 0.71209 | 1 | 1 |
hi
hey could u plz get rid of 22 armdale? | 0.002989 | 0 | 0 |
WikiProject Business & Economics|class=|importance=}}
{{ | 0.000797 | 0 | 0 |
FYI, I managed to find that verification you were looking for Mr Lane -94.192.243.100 | 0.000738 | 0 | 0 |
Forehead vandal
Hello, Moriori. Regardung this and [
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chewing_gum&curid;=288636&diff;=562489628&oldid;=562488005 this revert] you made, you may be interested to know more about this forehead/gum matter. Thanks for being there to revert this vandal. | 0.000763 | 0 | 0 |
dirty slutty bitch tramp
ass hole pussy | 0.998578 | 1 | 1 |
"
I try to explain who these Human rights experts(!). They are protest Turkish army and police. They never protest Pkk and his terrorist actions. Even they kill babies and rape womans.
In 2005 a terrorist enter Turkish goverment's building with bomb, Turkish Intelligent Service had already reported the turkish police about that event. Turkish police warn him hunderds of times to dont detonate the bomb. But he have tried to detonate bomb but he can't(because of nervous)then he started to escape. 2 minutes later he tried again but Turkish Special Forces shot down him with sniper shot. And Human Rights Organisation blame Turkish police and said that this is an attack to human rights.
For these reasons the founder of Human Right Organisitaion Adalet Ağaoğlu retired from leadership. And she says H.R.O is become a pkk supporter, terrosit organisation. The sentences here but i cant translate them because my english level is not good.
""Terör artıyor, terörle birlikte IHD’nin tutumu daha bir tartışılır hale geldi. Orada neler yaşandığını biliyorum. En temel hak olan insanın yaşama hakkını korumak amacıyla kurduğumuz bir dernek, öldürülen insanlara sahip çıkmıyor. O zaman kimin insan haklarını savunuyoruz sorusu geliyor akla. PKK terörü karşısında tavır almayan insan hakları derneği olur mu?""
" | 0.038197 | 0 | 0 |
"
I didn't realize discussion was required to prevent dirsuption to the enyclopedia. Thanks for the note. –xeno talk " | 0.000623 | 0 | 0 |
@Barbod6FCB. Wigga wigga wigga wigga wigga | 0.350345 | 1 | 1 |
U no flip that dick? (ps. thankx for the block) | 0.967962 | 1 | 1 |
"::I am simply asking that WIKI stands be applied and not the sensibilites of a warring faction. I would agree that this is not high on any scale of importance, what the issue is to me is that is WIKI going to allow open editing o nthis article or is Pats1 going to get to delete anyhting he chooses and claim ""non-notable"". If so then greater WIKI principles are violated because one guy thinks he WP:OWNS an article and he and his followers can ""shout-down"" dissenters by false claims of majority rules. So, to the substance. I don't want to overstate the importance of this, but I don't want it to be understeded either, the speech is what it is, nothing more nothing less. I don't think making comparisons to other players and their speeches suits this discussion because I could point out hundreds of things in NFL project articles that are not ""notable"" in someone's opinions. So, on the merits this is verifiable and it is a NPOV. It is notable because it is national press. I have never seen that conference mentioned in USA Today ever. I have read that paper since 1985 or so. Now, could I have missed it in previous years? Sure. However, I think it got national news becasue of WHO was speaking. That ends the discussion, really. A separate discussion is whether it should be in the article, but one step at a time. It is notable under wiki standards. Under wiki guidelines, yes. Is it NPOV? yes. Is is verfiable? Yes. Can it be deleted because of ""majority rule""? No. Should a real WP:CONSENSUS be reached? Yes.72.0.36.36
" | 0.00074 | 0 | 0 |
In context that he was a founder-member, 'played with' is fine to mean he was still a member: if wished you could clarify by saying 'he continued to play with them...' but it would be a bit long-winded. The second 'Melos' bluelink is entirely optional: the article isn't long enough to make it really necessary, but repeat bluelinks from the intro paragraph into the main text are not uncommon and do sometimes help. I can't decide if 'premiere' for the Britten works should be singular or plural. A footnote source for the appointments at Michigan would help, as this is told 'on trust'.If there is more to add, it would be nice to draw the sentences together a little more into two or three paragraphs. But these are minutiae, quite at your discretion....! - all is well. | 0.000704 | 0 | 0 |
Vedic proofs
From the current version of the article:
More recently, Shri Bharati Krishna Tirthaji in his book[5] claimed ancient Indian Hindu Vedic proofs for the Pythagoras Theorem.
I know nothing about Vedic Mathematics, so I thought I'd ask the question here... Is this assertion notable enough to warrant a mention ? If yes, we should probably expand a bit (what are these proofs ? if there are not known, why is it believed that they exists ? etc). On the other hand, if it is just a lonely claim, we can probably remove this. | 0.000581 | 0 | 0 |
"
The real problem is that User:Musical_Linguist has a personal grudge against me and vigorously hunts for and reverts all of my attempts at dialog with the rest of the Wikipeida community. Clearly, Wikipedia, with 1,000,000 articles is now big enough for the two of us, but she a pretty and polite female and so she has the upper hand. She seems to have nothing to offer the Bill of attainder aritcle except to hit the undo button if she thinks that I have effected any changes. Surely, she has a personal motivation directed towards me personally. That is not really how adminship is supposed to work, is it: that an admin can hold a grudge and personally hunt down an individual other person? Is there not some mechanism by which she can be instructed to direct her attention away from my activities and let the other 800 Wikipedia admins perform the job of protecting Wikipeida from Andrew William Morrow? If the problem is truly Andrew William Morrow, then it will be obvious to the other admins, but in fact, that has not been the case. Oh sure, there has been the occasional problem (if you look at my Wikipedia work as indexed on my web site, you will see that I choose to focus on controversial biographies with a high content of U.S. case law). This Irish woman has nothing to offer the articles she has personally targeted via this tool Template:Pinktulip except to hit the undo button. She has done no research. She has conducted no dialog with other editors. Like you, she always claims to be ""too busy"" to engage in any actual dialog, but she has plenty of time to sit around and chat with her Catholic pro-life friends and hit the undo button every time she sees non-vandalism contributions that she simply does not like. As you can see by her user page, she is highly prone to view the work of others through the rather narrow prism of her Pope's worldview. If you study Special:Contributions/Musical Linguist you will see that she spends many, many hours on Wikiepdia every day and note the quick response time of her reverts: She must be monitoring her watch list vigorously. Is this really what you want Wikipedia to be about? Letting admins, no matter how polite, intelligent and pretty impose their worldview on others? Is it such a tragedy to put some horse-blinders on her to say: ""For these specific users and these specific articles, you will stay away. You have had much more than your fair turn at these specific users and these specific articles and now you, dear and valued admin, are being administratively rotated out of them and you will stay rotated out of them for a good, long time."" Is that such a tragedy? Fred: It is only a tragedy if the problem is really within the admin herself, rather than within the targeted or banned user(s). The mature admin would not take such instructions as an insult, but simply as a matter of due course. Musical Linguist is much like the childless woman hovering over someone else's child, ever-ready to snatch the child and claim it for her own. It is a natural impulse, but it requies intervention because it is also a disorderly impulse. All I have done is to flush the woman out by getting her to fill out the ""Pinktulip"" template completely. Her contribution to the information content the articles listed in the Pinktulip template is zero, but but she now exerts total control of them. She is merely a sterile, charming, controlling woman and she should herself now be controlled. She is all process and no results. That is not what Wikipeida was supposed to be about.
AWM " | 0.01443 | 0 | 0 |
I swear to god some hoes look like they take the same exact picture everytime. Change it up for once godamn. #ratchet | 0.250306 | 1 | 1 |
"
I've added a citation for Epicurus being the originator of the ""Problem of Evil"". There's probably a better one available somewhere, but this one will do for now. Not sure whether you were looking for a cite for the theory as a whole or not. I don't see a lot of mainstream media discussion of the ""alternate ending"" theory (except for maybe this article in The Oregon Herald, a publication with which I am unfamiliar), but there's plenty of discussion of it in online sources (reviewers and blogs/message boards): , , , , , , , , , , etc. As such, it's not original research, but it'd be nice to have a firm print citation if someone can find one. - " | 0.000531 | 0 | 0 |
Illegal alien deported 15 times arrested in hit-run crash that hurt 6-year-old #StopTheInvasion #SecureTheBorder | 0.091922 | 0 | 1 |
Sad that girls look up to Kim so much. Like damn she got famous from being a hoe, and making sex tapes. We need to find better role models. | 0.658969 | 1 | 1 |
"
our previous conversation
you fucking shit eating liberal, you make lady bird johnson shake on her tampon. I said fucking sorry for my little brother and you still had to fucking complain. My life is fucking shit. My mother is always yelling at me and my dad beats the shit out of me if I get fucking out of line. My brother's one outlet is wikipedia. He cried when he saw my father smacking me, and his tears clogged his mac book pro's keyboard. we had to go to fucking apple and get a new one, all out of my mom's pocket. then last night i wanted to take this hot pussy from connecticut out in my dad's new rolls-royce and he said fucking no. so you know what I fucking did? I fucking cut his pinky off and didnt snitch like a little bitch like you. I take lazy ass niggers like you and stomp you with my fat nazi heel. you should be FUCKING sorry you ever fucked with me or my dad (Steve Jobs). And if I find out your using Linux, I'll take pity on thee. Cause you're just too stupid to understand shit. i can see your fucking at some fucking computer and you think that you have some power on this fucking site. let me tell you something you little bitch. when i'm doing coke off strippers titties in da clubz, you can just edit some fucking wikipedia articles. i smoke a phat blunt every damn day, and you smoke your mom's fucking tea. So, in closing, as Shakespeare said in Sonnet ninety-four (I believe): ""things turn sourest by their deeds. Lillies that fester smell far worse than (fucking) weeds.""
fuck you and heil hitler.
-n. jobs
ps- if you ever fucking ban this ip again, there is going to be some serious shit thats gonna happen. i know a fucking guy." | 0.998827 | 1 | 1 |
Oppose - They they have a common origin, they have merged into separate styles without different history and elements. It's akin to calling Kenpo as Karate or Kung Fu, or MMA as either an extension of just boxing or wrestling. The Scythian | 0.00116 | 0 | 0 |
"====Gordon Neilson====
→ Walter Gordon Neilson (links to redirect • [ history] • )
deletion, changing a entrys name, adding absurd details, ie the only brothers to debut EXCEPT for . This redirecter has totally ruined all the rugby playing NEILSON brothers biographies. The changing of a lead name as Robert Thomson NEILSON, to just Robert NEILSON makes a mockery of defining people, ie, How many Robert NEILSONs are there compared to his full name of Robert Thomson NEILSON, same goes for Walter Gordon NEILSON, etc. I will admit the original bios needed more filling, but whats happened is offensive. " | 0.000855 | 0 | 0 |
"
Guys, sorry for any trouble I caused. I just started using my Wikipedia account recently. When I read about the secret mailing list fiasco- I wanted to know the truth- so, not knowing that it was decided (for whatever reason) to stop pestering Durova with questions- I asked a simple question- which I did not intend to be a personal attack. Sorry if it was taken that way.
P.S.- I remember someone (I believe it was Neil) citing my message on an anon's talk page against me because of my comment ""I'm looking into your identity."". There's a misunderstanding here. I used to write for a school newspaper and I was doing research on a school computer (not logged in). I found that the IP of the computer I was using had done some bad edits in the past. I decided to write an article about it and also attempt to find who was vandalizing the pages- since it was someone at my school- I never meant it as a stalker-type thing. Sorry if it was taken that way...
" | 0.000767 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for deleting the more contentious material here, Floquenbeam. Appreciated. 193.150.8.160 | 0.00082 | 0 | 0 |
Comment. I was just about to move to Forever in Love (instrumental) when I decided I had better confirm there are no objections. Any objections? | 0.000624 | 0 | 0 |
I know these niglets heard me screaming 😂😂 | 0.141954 | 1 | 1 |
Season 1 Episode 24:Matched
Season 1 Episode 25:Colors of Raven
Season 1 Episode 26:The Left Leg
Season 1 Episode 27:Books
Season 1 Episode 28: | 0.000835 | 0 | 0 |
":::It appears yo are blowing more Sh*&^ out of your rear end. and I have ample evidence that YOU care jack about ""good faith"" except when it benefits you
The VERY FIRST SENTENCE of that book states.
PREFACE.
The object of this book is to show the circumstances under
which the Federal Constitution was ratified by Pennsylvania.
" | 0.905701 | 1 | 1 |
you really care bout dis bitch. my dick all in yo feelings | 0.9976 | 1 | 1 |
WCC POYs
Any interest in helping me knock out Scott Thompson (basketball) and Levy Middlebrooks sometime this weekend? Last two remaining on . If you have a preference as to who you would want to write about let me know. After a long stint helping get the WP:College baseball guys going (I'm sure you noticed that I created 600+ categories for them), I'm circling back around to the usual stomping ground at WP:CBB. I've been in a mood to create CPOYs; I might start tackling them again so that by the start of 2012–13 we're ahead of the curve on catching up. I might alternate between CPOYs and statistical leaders. | 0.000629 | 0 | 0 |
RT @TheFatKidJames: @Von_VonRichter Bro fuck you for leaving! Lol no but have a great time up there and don't forgot about the bros back ho… | 0.99021 | 1 | 1 |
umm
why didnt you say why you reverted my edit about cole being the voice of the wwe other ppl have said he is making it not self proclamed if you disagre you could at lest have the courtsy of saying why not just reverting and expecting me to go with it | 0.002343 | 0 | 0 |
Because you have done it to my edits several times, at the last count I think my own edits have been changed 4 times
hockeyguy676 1/31/2011 | 0.001062 | 0 | 0 |
Looking back at Ruhlen's Guide to the World's Languages, I realize I phrased that ambiguously; there was not meant to be any implication that Cushitic and Semitic grouped together. Apparently, Fleming 1981 divides non-Omotic AA into three branhces: Semitic, Cushitic, and everything else. If he's changed his opinion, that would certainly be worth changing. - 02:04, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC) | 0.000687 | 0 | 0 |
HMMMM....
Uhh...Why are you such an asshole? So I'm not allowed to add a genre to the list? It simply states that I can..and anyone can..hmm...
Fascism at it's finest, eh? | 0.89981 | 1 | 1 |
User CJ DUB Continues to Harass Users
The user, CJ DUB, keeps harassing wiki users. I ask that both editors and users act in banning or blocking him. It's about time.
69.86.162.170
Info About Gormaz Being Oldest Castle In Europe
Infomration backed by 4 or 5 solid references that Gormaz Castle it the oldest castle in Europe was deleted. I want to know why this is so, again, when multiple solid references were provided. Was this move done in bias?
69.86.162.170 | 0.005201 | 0 | 0 |
all texts said to be scripture are completely made up. | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 |
. I would also like to note that this block has prevented me from both participating in the AFD for this article and from adding the information to the article that the blocking admin demands. It seems like exceedingly poor form to delete an article, refuse to engage in discussion with the person who created it, and then block them | 0.00244 | 0 | 0 |
You are inconsistent in your use of the umlaut in Müllerian. | 0.002642 | 0 | 0 |
you're wasting your time biatch you know i'll be back again and again and again with a different IP adress | 0.895493 | 1 | 1 |
Perder es cuestion de metodo
Hi brother, please correct more the ortography of this article, the man who mas created must be traducted in google. | 0.000693 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (talk) " | 0.00052 | 0 | 0 |
"
Vandalism
How's about I stick ""Wankers Haa HAAa"" in your block log ? " | 0.571554 | 1 | 1 |
"
""The fact that most or all of the images you have included are of women demonstrates that you are giving undue weight to ideas of feminine beauty""
Well sexual selection of men is discussed quite extensively. there could be an image of Will Smith, he is mentioned. I find it difficult to believe it's really true that you can't see the relevance of the picture of Naomi Campbell to illustrating what is considered attractive across a range of cultures. And yet again I'll repeat that featured articles make use of images of humans including celebrities to illustrate the featured articles in a far more 'tangential' way than the use of the image of Cambell is, I've given examples above. Featured articles are there to serve as a guide you know! " | 0.000973 | 0 | 0 |
Stop whacking off in the shower queer boy! @Ilovebamf | 0.981815 | 1 | 1 |
"
Oh okay, your point is a little clearer. -) Perhaps the dreaded AN/I would be a better venue for this? I don't think that further discussion here will be very productive... — (Talk • Contribs) " | 0.000638 | 0 | 0 |
don't fucking care if Jewbo wales personally bans me... He's dead meat... | 0.996948 | 1 | 1 |
Please put the gay jokes back on the queer page | 0.840668 | 1 | 1 |
Protected Article?
Why is this article protected? Which administrators would I talk to about entering new information, more specifically into the trivia section. There is some information on this book that I would like to add to this particular article. | 0.000695 | 0 | 0 |
#ultimatepickupline bitch get naked. Works 10 times out of 10 if she's drunk :) | 0.990083 | 1 | 1 |
"
I would suggest that your edit is based on a misinterpretation of the term, as they say, ""being more Catholic than the Pope"". Orientation is only one sense of ""hetero"" or ""homo"", the other being of course the quality of the act. Take a look at the article on Homosexuality, the very top of the intro. " | 0.008413 | 0 | 0 |
LOL
Stop eating shit you nigger!! | 0.99614 | 1 | 1 |
I got the streets in a head lock, I got yo bitch in a leg lock | 0.984264 | 1 | 1 |
Dear Snigbrook
Your days are numbered, the stabbing knife is headed your way! Be prepared for HORRIBLE HORRIBLE THINGS!!!
P.S you are a fucking aspie hahaha | 0.996826 | 1 | 1 |
your retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retarded
your retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retarded your retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retardedyour retarded your retardedyour retarded | 0.985815 | 1 | 1 |
Death to Musulmans! | 0.977145 | 1 | 1 |
GA Review
:This review is transcluded from Talk:MIND MGMT/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: (talk · contribs)
I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Sorry you've had to wait so long for a review, and thanks in advance for your work on this one! | 0.000556 | 0 | 0 |
Poppy give me discounts bitch i get it for the lowww!!!....naw fareal tho | 0.988746 | 1 | 1 |
Loganberry
i will kill u first | 0.870303 | 1 | 1 |
FisherQueen, would you kindly stop following my every move and deleting things off MY user page. Havent you got anything better to do than piss people off on Wikipedia. | 0.700184 | 1 | 1 |
{{unblock|You sorry bastard. You blocked me for removing unwanted edits from my own talk page.below.}} | 0.982777 | 1 | 1 |
RT @DookieWithMe: 😂 RT @itsablackguy: I’m assuming she got a cup on RT @AssholeFrmNY: Her pussy got a bicep b. wtf? http://t.co/Cl4jhGmXpi | 0.959914 | 1 | 1 |
Wording and Clarification, + lack of source
I have two changes that I suggest for the article:
'Parapsychology involves research that does not rely upon scientific modeling'.
This is an unsourced statement, and is a fairly bold statement to make. Whilst it may be true, I would suggest a source be found with examples of said methodological flaws, otherwise it should be removed.
'Critics such as Ray Hyman suggest that parapsychology has no methodological flaws that can explain apparently the successful experimental results that parapsychologists attribute to paranormal explanations, and various critics have classed the field as pseudoscience.'
Now this seems to be intended to be against parapsychology, yet the passage reads that there are no methodological flaws that can explain the results. Given that most attacks on parapsychology are aimed at exposing results as fake or due to methodological issues, this doesn't make sense.
Additionally, 'apparently the successful experimental results' does not read well. If this is intended to be a criticism, then perhaps it should be phrased 'the apparently successful experimental results'.
Finally 'various critics have classed the field as pseudoscience'. I do not have as much of an issue with this, yet the sources given include Hyman and Wiseman, both noted skeptics. Whilst their credentials are solid, the later part of the section names them as independent researchers, which is open to debate given their a priori stance that psychic phenomena do not exist.
Thank you, | 0.00062 | 0 | 0 |
"
I have a better idea.
Tell your ""friend"" to stop fucking stalking me." | 0.98862 | 1 | 1 |
A tag has been placed on Matthew wilhelm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0.000585 | 0 | 0 |
I do not edit or view articles in some specific order. When I see obvious POV-pushing I obviously try to correct. My motivations don't matter ultimately. What matters is NPOV which you ignore. | 0.000739 | 0 | 0 |
@MIKEYMIKEROWAVE @SNEAKERLUKE @wojtata @JoeCushKush yeah I like them too but Im not annoying ass bitch about it. Support them but dont bitch | 0.990447 | 1 | 1 |
Completely garbage article.
Huge amount of POV. | 0.074485 | 0 | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar This is the award for you vandal dids...Hope youlike it. Please yourself..Laguna West metro is just a temporary Metro bacause soon Laguna west metro will be merged to Metro Manila as said to be the metro manila built up area.. Tiga san ka ba ? kasi sobra kang pakialamero. " | 0.001619 | 0 | 0 |
NPOV
As I stated, the article smacks of non-neutral point-of-view, what with three instances of the weasel word arguably. There may be more examples, but those are the ones that jumped out of me. As such, I motion for the reinstating of the {{NPOV}} tag. - · Talk | 0.000575 | 0 | 0 |
Bye! do what you do....!
Hello
My exams are coming and I don't want to waste my time arguing with a mental Named IndianBio.As I have many work to do which include study,study and study and I don't want to failed in my semester exams.I have many work to do in regular life unlike that idiot who wants that to made his presence felt on Wikipedia.I will advice Administrators to check out IndianBio and Gleekvampire accounts.its the case of Sock Puppet on Wikipedia.Indian gave him A batnstar and again vampire hive same barnstat to him.doesn't. Make sense.well he created account gleekvampire to present himself barnstars and support.pls checkout.( ) | 0.609667 | 1 | 1 |
You have the audacity to come here threatening me for saying what is the blatent truth. You are symbolic of... well we shall leave that for others to decide. Good evening and please do not return with your threats. | 0.034001 | 0 | 0 |
You sad cocksucker..stop editing my article otherwise I am going to report you and sue you!!!!!!!!!! | 0.9972 | 1 | 1 |
Batman
I am Batman. You are Spiderman. I win. | 0.009222 | 0 | 0 |
Bulgarians in Albania
What do you think of this? | 0.000822 | 0 | 0 |
As i mentioned in the edit summary (Again, did you even read it?), it was a personal communication. Hence, no references may be obtained. | 0.000556 | 0 | 0 |
"
Elton John has not sold less albums than Queen in the UK, he's had lower sales per album, but the total sales of his albums is the UK is more than Queen. Also the UK RNR Hall Of Fame would have nothing to gain, nothing to loose, by just taking ANY figure. Doesn't mean they checked it by looking at world charts, list of back catalogue sales, etc. Where in my text did I say I didn't like Queen?? Wheatear or not I like them, tolerate them or hate them has nothing to do with it, there is NO source that says ""Queen have world sales of 250 million"". You can't take a bit from one and a bit from the other, you can only use one source. However my point stands, looking at global sales charts, and other sales lists, Queen have not sold 190 million albums, their best selling albums globally are Greatest Hits and Greatest Hits 2 which combined sold 35 million as of now, they havent sold another 155 million besides." | 0.000778 | 0 | 0 |
You have always been a model for good conduct in my recollection. My capacity involved a more in-your-face attitude to other editors who were not aware of the inner workings and prior histories. I was relieved when Wales removed Mccoy's bio, as that was alway's Mccoy's wishes, my experience with McCoy is that he always had multi-conflicting interests due to his PTSD. The inability to get others who were concerned with their own contributions and not McCoy's wishes got me banned - several times! LOL! All I'm asking is that you verify that Wales removed McCoy's bio in the recent past and that should help to eliminate the expansion of McCoy's bio from eating up the Whitman article. (Barring ego's and information right activists.) My apologies for any past infringments! Thanks! 98.94.163.97 | 0.005187 | 0 | 0 |
@gCan28 @JeremyWGR
And then everyone bitches anyways. The guy can't win with the fans we have. We would run Revis out of here in his prime | 0.812887 | 1 | 1 |
Whoever banned me is a fucking idiot.
Why didn't you ban the antisemites? | 0.997098 | 1 | 1 |
Your sockpuppet's account is blocked forever
has been blocked indefinitely. I don't understand how a muslim like you can lie in this month of Ramadan. However you have still , so you are very lucky and you can still enjoy. I will not gain anything if the admins block also . I have just discovered that most of List of British Bangladeshis's articles were created from you. (BUT I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOUR BODY TAKES FIRE WHEN I CREATE ARTICLES ABOUT BRITISH BANGLADESHI MUSLIM'S SCHOLAR) From now on try to be a good editor. May Allah give you tawfeeq. | 0.187353 | 1 | 0 |
I swear Newnan utilities be gettin a nicca .. Bout to start reading my own damn meter | 0.879827 | 1 | 1 |
A tag has been placed on Die Hard 5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0.00066 | 0 | 0 |
I did not overwrite - I deleted
I did not overwrite a discussion. I removed it per WIki guidelines on bio (it says ON TALK pages too). | 0.000707 | 0 | 0 |
Its fucking assholes like you who vandalize wikipedia that really grind my gears. Where the fuck do you get off? Huh? Huh? You think this is funny don't you? Well I sacrificed a career and a marriage to keep unconstructive pigs like you from ruining a good thing like Wikipedia; and if I ever get to see my kids again I know they'll thank me for this. You sir are a prick. And what kind of fucking name is 99.135.144.18 anyway? Oh and your user page sucks noob. 24.61.195.2
P.S. You personally, and not your ip are forever banned from Wikipedia | 0.998108 | 1 | 1 |
Thanks for your comments. I've addressed some or all of them. Would you please take another look and update your comments/add support, note additional criticism, etc? (talk) | 0.00051 | 0 | 0 |
"Wow, again I gotta say, what a disgusting comment. I am glad you are pro child molesting, but this is hardly the place for it (or maybe it is?). Any kind of synthesis that allows you to draw ""consensual sex"" from no blood or damage to the vagina and anus is a) OR and b) still disgusting. One last time, btw, consent is not possible under the age of 18, and especially not while under the influence of alcohol, not to mention ludes. " | 0.758901 | 1 | 1 |
Utopian image
Thanks for the 3RR warning, that should help! | 0.000629 | 0 | 0 |
"
Big O and Dukes
Is putting factually true information on a page ""vandalizing""? Why don't you tell me how I ""vandalized"" the Big O and Dukes page?
The Wikipedia policy is: ""Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism.""
So you, MR. MAN, need to retract your remark, your warning, and anything else. I DID NOT VANDALIZE." | 0.017067 | 0 | 1 |
" Listen up, ""Farix"". Keep this crap up with saying I can't do stuff and you're gonna get it. Got it? Bakutrix" | 0.844551 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.