section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 4
388
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| answer
dict | validated_answers
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years did the European Coal and Steel Community exist? | c65cd3fc-86f6-4c8f-80da-8fa090b1a497 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | What happened last, formation of the EEC or the European Union? | de9f84ba-a7cd-41a2-a7da-4f7b51682eb8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"European Union"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years passed between the formation of the European Coal and Steel Community and it becoming the European Economic Community? | 51e1473c-9de9-463a-8d7e-cfba0c394794 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | What was the first incarnation of what eventually became the European Union? | 01a86231-74fc-452d-a8bb-fc4a5501fdd4 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"European Coal and Steel Community"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many things did the US help to establish? | d2a2ef99-6dd3-48c8-8365-336621bf9312 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | Which was established second,General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade World Trade Organization | 09f20aeb-13bb-44bf-8fd4-2803fed8367c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"World Trade Organization"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years since governments have negotiated managed-trade agreement the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement? | 7e9f284c-8d21-42f9-8ba2-33868e893bf7 | {
"number": "36",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years was it called the European Coal and Steel community before it changed it name to European Economic Community? | 000c2eba-1405-4b6d-8080-3cc62fd58dea | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | What Trade agreement happened first, North American Free Trade Agreement or Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement? | 95875ad5-5450-432b-aaab-6c4e533b98c0 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"American Free Trade Agreement"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years later did the EEC change their name a third time to European Union? | 4c4b10ff-4fee-464b-8741-36dd7ef4f573 | {
"number": "35",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | Which trade agreement was negotiated first, the North American Free Trade Agreement or the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement? | 20c8ad77-6cb8-476c-b0b0-4e9beee80e19 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"North American Free Trade Agreement"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years after six countries joined formed the European Coal and Steel Community did it become the European Economic Community? | f2e79c6f-ee8e-4b53-9de8-1b71f4a539a5 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | What was its name first, the European Coal and Steel Community or the European Economic Community? | 7d9d30ff-90d4-4d4a-abd0-cc5247aae663 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"European Coal and Steel Community"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_602 | Since the end of World War II, in part due to industrial size and the onset of the Cold War, the United States has often been a proponent of reduced tariff-barriers and free trade. The U.S. helped establish the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization ; although it had rejected an earlier version in the 1950s . Since the 1970s, U.S. governments have negotiated managed-trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s, the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement in 2006, and a number of bilateral agreements . In Europe, six countries formed the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which became the European Economic Community in 1958. Two core objectives of the EEC were the development of a common market, subsequently renamed the single market, and establishing a customs union between its member states. After expanding its membership, the EEC became the European Union in 1993. The European Union, now the world's largest single market, has concluded free trade agreements with many countries around the world. | How many years after it was named the EEC did it become the European Union? | f3156a77-5eca-4cbb-9052-fb32a9584984 | {
"number": "35",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | How many points did the Texans win by? | 9a62ca02-a254-4df2-94d0-c71246d3972a | {
"number": "10",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | How many touchdowns did Ben Tate have? | c9ac4af2-3fb5-4cb3-bf55-4e44b512f64f | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | In what quarter did Jacksonville score? | 7c60d92a-db57-4dcf-b2bf-a4c8236b1921 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"3rd quarter"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | Who scored the first points of the game? | d0d5c41b-2422-4856-95a0-607bc0318472 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Shayne Graham"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | How many points were scored in total? | 471f2471-835a-4405-8e9e-27f7eae619f5 | {
"number": "31",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | Which jaguars halfback caught a TD pass from Blaine Gabbert? | 3d901ab5-ae87-4c6b-a6f4-4caf558a9ea1 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Maurice-Jones Drew"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2398 | (2012 Jacksonville Jaguars season)The Texans entered their first division clash of the season looking to establish their will on the ground. Behind a punishing ground attack with Arian Foster and Ben Tate, as well as an efficient defensive effort led by second year defensive lineman J.J. Watt, the Texans dominated the game with a time of possession of 43:17 on their way to a 27-7 victory in Jacksonville. With the win, the Texans improved to 2-0 for the 3rd straight season. On the first drive, Houston drove 60 yards aided by Tate and took a 3-0 lead on a Shayne Graham 31 yard field goal. The Jaguars mounted a drive into Texan territory but they had to punt from the 44. Both teams went three-and-out on their next drive. After a long pass play, the Texans were at the 1. 2 plays later Arian Foster ran it in from the 1 to make it 10-0. Two drives later Houston scored on an 8-yard run from Ben Tate. At halftime it was 17-0 Texans. In the 3rd quarter, quarterback Matt Schaub threw an interception returned to the Houston 37. Jacksonville scored in just 2 plays on a Td pass from Blaine Gabbert to running back Maurice-Jones Drew. It was 17-7. Then the Texans made a 17 play drive resulting in a 2-yard Ben Tate touchdown to make it 24-7. The Texans would get a field goal to make it 27-7, and that would end the game. | How many points were scored by both teams total in the first half? | 5582bf7e-4430-43de-a9c5-717971b0c908 | {
"number": "17",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many years the lifetime of the Kingdom of Kurdistan? | d082d2f2-f514-4986-8eee-644b1e4a7812 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many years did it take Sheykh Mahmud to return after losing to British? | 8d72b048-2149-4695-bbb2-e4d62722fd64 | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many months was Sheykh exiled? | a84063ee-0a71-44ce-b917-103a2fe97079 | {
"number": "12",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many months did the Kingdom of Kurdistan exist? | 7ea40766-3b49-4b3c-a8ce-4e64187d1cd8 | {
"number": "22",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many days was Mahmud exiled? | 13bb7612-7836-4620-8f0b-6829f2461550 | {
"number": "365",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many months did the Kingdom of Kurdistan last? | c6f5e0bd-355a-4f58-a3f7-256d15379a49 | {
"number": "22",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | Which happeded first, the exile of Sheykh Mahmud, or him retreating to the mountains? | 0ed9b4a6-de8d-4377-8b2d-0d188c8bfdda | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"exiled to India"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many years after British Iraqui rule began did Sheykh Mahmud reach terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq? | 640045fa-b0d7-46cc-9229-368bf8dbc51e | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | What happened first - British Iraqi rule, or the Mahmud Barzanji revolts? | 900c7ef5-f980-48f5-be00-a8f197d9b389 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Mahmud Barzanji revolts"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | How many months did the Kingdom of Kurdistan last? | 398750a2-3dc1-4524-bf89-b7e821915a37 | {
"number": "22",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_947 | Mahmud Barzanji revolts were a series of armed uprisings by Kurdish Sheykh Mahmud Barzanji against the Iraqi authority in newly conquered British Mesopotamia and later the British Mandate in Iraq. Following his first insurrection in May 1919, Sheykh Mahmud was imprisoned and eventually exiled to India for a one-year period. When returning, he was once again appointed a governor, but shortly revolted again declaring himself as the ruler of the Kingdom of Kurdistan. The Kingdom of Kurdistan lasted from September 1922 - July 1924. With British forces greatly exceeding his in ammunition and training, the defeat finally subdued the region to central British Iraqi rule in 1924. Sheykh Mahmud retreated into mountains, and eventually reached terms with the independent Kingdom of Iraq in 1932, over his return from the underground. Sheykh Mahmud revolts are considered the first chapter of the modern Iraqi-Kurdish conflict. | What happened first, imprisonment of Sheykh Mahmud or the British Mandate in Iraq? | af5233fe-aed5-48ff-9dfe-96121fb17143 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the British Mandate in Iraq"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many percent of the student population are not Louisiana residents? | 06231db9-e173-4a82-94e7-bdabb55d5ba7 | {
"number": "15",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many percent of the student body does not identify as white? | ca3126ad-25aa-4909-9381-ac8a9b2e6dee | {
"number": "30.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many more percent of students are women than men? | cf038a0f-f927-4cb2-82e9-d936f30f31ee | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
".4"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many states in the United States do not have residents attending Louisiana Tech? | 401fa2ba-62c9-40b2-b893-ec1671c57900 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many percent of students at Louisiana Tech are not international students? | 7abbdbf0-8ae4-413d-9d9e-d45b286206b7 | {
"number": "96",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many states and countries are represented at Lousiana Tech? | 5ab90f87-bc6f-4835-9657-1de5bb1bbf83 | {
"number": "111",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | Which is the second largest group of the students by residency? | 80f01992-3e63-416a-a7b0-5e0516408454 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"out-of-state students"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | What is the second largest group racially at Louisiana Tech? | 798c665b-a1ef-4f46-bf2f-7b003b9433b3 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"black"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many percent of students at Lousiana Tech do not identify as white or black? | bf5a3371-016e-4c4e-bdb1-518ff5a3a76a | {
"number": "17.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many percent more of students identify as white as opposed to international? | f4420379-5f0f-4c37-80f2-302138c81db2 | {
"number": "65.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many combined states and foreign countries do Louisiana Tech students come from? | 5f6b2fba-a72c-4481-9393-ade16ba4eca9 | {
"number": "111",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | How many percent of students are not from Louisiana? | 5d0c9aff-6179-4217-8193-68dd07155614 | {
"number": "15",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | Are more students at Louisiana Tech white or black? | c2846801-ff8d-4931-80a9-ad4d4cf7f39b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2556 | As of the Fall 2017 quarter, Louisiana Tech had an all-time record high enrollment of 12,873 students pursuing degrees in five academic colleges. The student body has members from every Louisiana parish, 47 U.S. states, and 64 foreign countries. Louisiana residents account for 85.0% of the student population, while out-of-state students and international students account for 11.1% and 4.0% of the student body, respectively. The student body at Louisiana Tech is 69.4% white, 13.3% black, 3.8% international students, and 13.5% other or "unknown" ethnicity. The student body consists of 50.2% women and 49.8% men. | Which did the student population account more of, out-of-state or international? | 3a263a3b-1aae-4e03-bbc5-ca759997d990 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"out-of-state"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many points did the Bears win over the Vikings? | 97c2f300-4cfd-4692-ba0e-f4a490f9383f | {
"number": "10",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many points did the Bears win by? | d8bb04b4-4e15-49d6-b8c3-b4248261ed11 | {
"number": "10",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many points did the Bears score against the Vikings? | 983adff0-6bcf-4e74-b038-f76face5fb52 | {
"number": "23",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many points did the Vikings score against the Bears? | bb66cdcc-d177-4135-94d7-89b7ce30f922 | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | how many points did the bears win by? | a0fec36c-3279-423e-b10d-57bcd09cfe91 | {
"number": "23",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | how many points did the vikings make? | 58f867b6-35cb-406c-a7d9-86548f3822ae | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many points did both teams score combined? | 49f93a0c-39d7-4fa5-8ff2-eab23203b126 | {
"number": "36",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many points were there in difference between the winning and losing team? | 5274c442-93cc-4ddd-933f-cc25f7474c38 | {
"number": "10",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_78 | After the loss to New England, the Bears returned to Soldier Field to play the Minnesota Vikings. The weather conditions were harsh throughout the game; the below-freezing temperatures and swirling winds provided a clichéd background for a rivalry game in the "Black and Blue Division". Despite a marginal offensive performance, the Bears managed to defeat the Vikings 23-13. With their tenth win of the season, the Bears secured their second consecutive NFC North Title. Additionally, the Bears became the first team in the NFL to clinch a playoff berth, and remained tied for the NFL's best record. | How many total points were scored? | e0f38b47-cb31-4b54-a69f-a03c819a368b | {
"number": "36",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many more Navy and Marine personnel were there than civilians? | b7a40aa6-9ec9-49de-a1a9-b6b9f5cd2c2e | {
"number": "10300",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many homeports in the US are larger than the Naval Base? | 2162c591-0899-4464-99c4-ea57b3679052 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | Which dod the Naval Base have more of, Navy and Marine personnel, or civilians? | e03ac7c8-f08b-4e27-89a7-e94ef1e0be48 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Navy and Marine personnel"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many types of vessels did the Charleston Naval Shipyard repair? | 626c3097-6e9d-415a-b78b-e14fbd43b522 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | Joint base Charleston serves how many service personnel? | 6b150e93-958b-4731-aef7-c057b2e15c40 | {
"number": "79000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many servicemen personnel served the navel base during the cold war? | d796e530-3158-45a9-86ff-6808d381961a | {
"number": "23500",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many UGM type missles were stored and maintained by U.S. Marine Corps Security Force company? | d77a0f3f-fd5b-49a5-a07a-ffd485d439e0 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many more Navy and Marine personnel were there compared to civilians at the Naval Base during the Cold War? | 2f5cb485-adad-485d-948c-d7dcbdd76297 | {
"number": "10300",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many different types of people does Joint Base Charleston provide services to? | fb8055ce-e0eb-4296-9d43-dc6d04581721 | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | How many different types of machines did the Charleston Naval Shipyard repair? | 147ef0b7-461b-4fd2-8e51-a0d1e3cec910 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | Other than destroyers and cruisers, what types of ships did they fix? | 2fbd0450-96b1-46cb-8838-d5d4c9ceb13c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"frigates",
"submarine tenders",
"submarines"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_320 | Charleston, North Charleston, Goose Creek, and Hanahan are home to branches of the United States military. During the Cold War, the Naval Base became the third largest U.S. homeport, with 23,500 Navy and Marine personnel, and 13,200 civilians serving over 80 ships and submarines. In addition, the combined facilities of the Naval Base and Weapons Station created the largest U.S. submarine port. The Charleston Naval Shipyard repaired frigates, destroyers, cruisers, submarine tenders, and submarines. Also during this period, the shipyard conducted refueling of nuclear submarines. The Weapons Station was the Atlantic Fleet's loadout base for all nuclear ballistic missile submarines. Two SSBN "Boomer" squadrons and a submarine tender were homeported at the Weapons Station, while one SSN attack squadron, Submarine Squadron 4, and a submarine tender were homeported at the Naval Base. At the 1996 closure of the station's Polaris Missile Facility Atlantic , over 2,500 nuclear warheads and their UGM-27 Polaris, UGM-73 Poseidon, and UGM-96 Trident I delivery missiles were stored and maintained, guarded by a U.S. Marine Corps security force company. In 2010, the Air Force base and Naval Weapons Station merged to form Joint Base Charleston. Today, Joint Base Charleston, supporting 53 military commands and federal agencies, provides service to over 79,000 airmen, sailors, soldiers, Marines, coast guardsmen, Department of Defense civilians, dependents, and retirees. | During the Cold War how many Navy and Marine personnel and civilians worked at the base? | 6af7b432-0849-4d3a-b0eb-b9e218163828 | {
"number": "36700",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_981 | An important element the Revolution's legacy is the 1917 Constitution. It was pushed forward by populist generals within Carranza's government to undermine the popular support that Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata held. It was not written by liberal elites or the military itself, but rather young radicalized professionals, giving the document some authenticity for the peasantry. The document brought numerous reforms demanded by populist factions of the revolution, with article 27 empowering the state to expropriate resources deemed vital to the nation. These included expropriation of hacienda lands and redistribution to peasants. Article 27 also empowered the government to expropriate holdings of foreign companies, most prominently seen in the 1938 expropriation of oil. In Article 123 the constitution codified major labor reforms, including an 8-hour work day, a right to strike, equal pay laws for women, and an end to exploitative practices such as child labor and company stores. The constitution strengthened restrictions on the Roman Catholic Church in Mexico. In the early 1990s, the government introduced reforms to the constitution that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property and its restrictions on religious institutions. Just as the government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari was amending significant provisions of the constitution, Metro Constitución de 1917 station was opened. | The 1917 Constitution was written by who? | 8bf68cfb-a64c-4dad-8b28-3e7ad72b74d3 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"young radicalized professionals,"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_981 | An important element the Revolution's legacy is the 1917 Constitution. It was pushed forward by populist generals within Carranza's government to undermine the popular support that Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata held. It was not written by liberal elites or the military itself, but rather young radicalized professionals, giving the document some authenticity for the peasantry. The document brought numerous reforms demanded by populist factions of the revolution, with article 27 empowering the state to expropriate resources deemed vital to the nation. These included expropriation of hacienda lands and redistribution to peasants. Article 27 also empowered the government to expropriate holdings of foreign companies, most prominently seen in the 1938 expropriation of oil. In Article 123 the constitution codified major labor reforms, including an 8-hour work day, a right to strike, equal pay laws for women, and an end to exploitative practices such as child labor and company stores. The constitution strengthened restrictions on the Roman Catholic Church in Mexico. In the early 1990s, the government introduced reforms to the constitution that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property and its restrictions on religious institutions. Just as the government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari was amending significant provisions of the constitution, Metro Constitución de 1917 station was opened. | The 1917 Constitution was empowered by who? | 39c921b4-adb5-43f0-a12d-16278e937d71 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"populist generals within Carranza's government"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_981 | An important element the Revolution's legacy is the 1917 Constitution. It was pushed forward by populist generals within Carranza's government to undermine the popular support that Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata held. It was not written by liberal elites or the military itself, but rather young radicalized professionals, giving the document some authenticity for the peasantry. The document brought numerous reforms demanded by populist factions of the revolution, with article 27 empowering the state to expropriate resources deemed vital to the nation. These included expropriation of hacienda lands and redistribution to peasants. Article 27 also empowered the government to expropriate holdings of foreign companies, most prominently seen in the 1938 expropriation of oil. In Article 123 the constitution codified major labor reforms, including an 8-hour work day, a right to strike, equal pay laws for women, and an end to exploitative practices such as child labor and company stores. The constitution strengthened restrictions on the Roman Catholic Church in Mexico. In the early 1990s, the government introduced reforms to the constitution that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property and its restrictions on religious institutions. Just as the government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari was amending significant provisions of the constitution, Metro Constitución de 1917 station was opened. | Who wrote the 1917 Constitution? | e3e10727-d163-4ea8-9fe4-aa8f912b5468 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"rather young radicalized professionals"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_981 | An important element the Revolution's legacy is the 1917 Constitution. It was pushed forward by populist generals within Carranza's government to undermine the popular support that Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata held. It was not written by liberal elites or the military itself, but rather young radicalized professionals, giving the document some authenticity for the peasantry. The document brought numerous reforms demanded by populist factions of the revolution, with article 27 empowering the state to expropriate resources deemed vital to the nation. These included expropriation of hacienda lands and redistribution to peasants. Article 27 also empowered the government to expropriate holdings of foreign companies, most prominently seen in the 1938 expropriation of oil. In Article 123 the constitution codified major labor reforms, including an 8-hour work day, a right to strike, equal pay laws for women, and an end to exploitative practices such as child labor and company stores. The constitution strengthened restrictions on the Roman Catholic Church in Mexico. In the early 1990s, the government introduced reforms to the constitution that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property and its restrictions on religious institutions. Just as the government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari was amending significant provisions of the constitution, Metro Constitución de 1917 station was opened. | Who recieved land because of Article 27? | b3ad70e0-932c-4227-9012-ebf1082f77cc | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"peasants"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_981 | An important element the Revolution's legacy is the 1917 Constitution. It was pushed forward by populist generals within Carranza's government to undermine the popular support that Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata held. It was not written by liberal elites or the military itself, but rather young radicalized professionals, giving the document some authenticity for the peasantry. The document brought numerous reforms demanded by populist factions of the revolution, with article 27 empowering the state to expropriate resources deemed vital to the nation. These included expropriation of hacienda lands and redistribution to peasants. Article 27 also empowered the government to expropriate holdings of foreign companies, most prominently seen in the 1938 expropriation of oil. In Article 123 the constitution codified major labor reforms, including an 8-hour work day, a right to strike, equal pay laws for women, and an end to exploitative practices such as child labor and company stores. The constitution strengthened restrictions on the Roman Catholic Church in Mexico. In the early 1990s, the government introduced reforms to the constitution that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property and its restrictions on religious institutions. Just as the government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari was amending significant provisions of the constitution, Metro Constitución de 1917 station was opened. | Roughly how many years was the 1917 Constitution in place before it was reformed? | a993f01e-b95f-486e-a5ac-9a6c69e99aa7 | {
"number": "73",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_981 | An important element the Revolution's legacy is the 1917 Constitution. It was pushed forward by populist generals within Carranza's government to undermine the popular support that Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata held. It was not written by liberal elites or the military itself, but rather young radicalized professionals, giving the document some authenticity for the peasantry. The document brought numerous reforms demanded by populist factions of the revolution, with article 27 empowering the state to expropriate resources deemed vital to the nation. These included expropriation of hacienda lands and redistribution to peasants. Article 27 also empowered the government to expropriate holdings of foreign companies, most prominently seen in the 1938 expropriation of oil. In Article 123 the constitution codified major labor reforms, including an 8-hour work day, a right to strike, equal pay laws for women, and an end to exploitative practices such as child labor and company stores. The constitution strengthened restrictions on the Roman Catholic Church in Mexico. In the early 1990s, the government introduced reforms to the constitution that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property and its restrictions on religious institutions. Just as the government of Carlos Salinas de Gortari was amending significant provisions of the constitution, Metro Constitución de 1917 station was opened. | How many full decades were there between the passage of the 1917 Constitution and the enactment of of reforms that rolled back the government's power to expropriate property? | f448a9b7-c8d6-41c6-8b44-2e6606675f80 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_29 | On 12 January, the Tsar appointed Dmitri Feodorovich Trepov as governor in St Petersburg and dismissed the Minister of the Interior, Pyotr Sviatopolk-Mirskii, on 18 February 1905. He appointed a government commission "to enquire without delay into the causes of discontent among the workers in the city of St Petersburg and its suburbs" in view of the strike movement. The commission was headed by Senator NV Shidlovsky, a member of the State Council, and included officials, chiefs of government factories, and private factory owners. It was also meant to have included workers' delegates elected according to a two-stage system. Elections of the workers delegates were, however, blocked by the socialists who wanted to divert the workers from the elections to the armed struggle. On 5 March 1905, the Commission was dissolved without having started work. Following the assassination of his uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei Aleksandrovich, on 17 February 1905, the Tsar made new concessions. On 18 February 1905 he published the Bulygin Rescript, which promised the formation of a consultative assembly, religious tolerance, freedom of speech and a reduction in the peasants' redemption payments. On 24 and 25 May 1905, about 300 Zemstvo and municipal representatives held three meetings in Moscow, which passed a resolution, asking for popular representation at the national level. On 6 June 1905, Nicholas II had received a Zemstvo deputation. Responding to speeches by Prince Sergei Trubetskoi and Mr Fyodrov, the Tsar confirmed his promise to convene an assembly of people's representatives. | The Tsar appointed Dmitri Feodorovich Trepov as governor in St. Petersburg on what date? | b14439ed-9885-4d57-b064-74d392d3a615 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "12",
"month": "January",
"year": "1905"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_29 | On 12 January, the Tsar appointed Dmitri Feodorovich Trepov as governor in St Petersburg and dismissed the Minister of the Interior, Pyotr Sviatopolk-Mirskii, on 18 February 1905. He appointed a government commission "to enquire without delay into the causes of discontent among the workers in the city of St Petersburg and its suburbs" in view of the strike movement. The commission was headed by Senator NV Shidlovsky, a member of the State Council, and included officials, chiefs of government factories, and private factory owners. It was also meant to have included workers' delegates elected according to a two-stage system. Elections of the workers delegates were, however, blocked by the socialists who wanted to divert the workers from the elections to the armed struggle. On 5 March 1905, the Commission was dissolved without having started work. Following the assassination of his uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei Aleksandrovich, on 17 February 1905, the Tsar made new concessions. On 18 February 1905 he published the Bulygin Rescript, which promised the formation of a consultative assembly, religious tolerance, freedom of speech and a reduction in the peasants' redemption payments. On 24 and 25 May 1905, about 300 Zemstvo and municipal representatives held three meetings in Moscow, which passed a resolution, asking for popular representation at the national level. On 6 June 1905, Nicholas II had received a Zemstvo deputation. Responding to speeches by Prince Sergei Trubetskoi and Mr Fyodrov, the Tsar confirmed his promise to convene an assembly of people's representatives. | How many months after the appointments to Ministry had the Tsar confirmed his promise to the people and their representatives? | 2c6b8a1f-9fa1-4bff-b60f-c5e947e8f0bb | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_29 | On 12 January, the Tsar appointed Dmitri Feodorovich Trepov as governor in St Petersburg and dismissed the Minister of the Interior, Pyotr Sviatopolk-Mirskii, on 18 February 1905. He appointed a government commission "to enquire without delay into the causes of discontent among the workers in the city of St Petersburg and its suburbs" in view of the strike movement. The commission was headed by Senator NV Shidlovsky, a member of the State Council, and included officials, chiefs of government factories, and private factory owners. It was also meant to have included workers' delegates elected according to a two-stage system. Elections of the workers delegates were, however, blocked by the socialists who wanted to divert the workers from the elections to the armed struggle. On 5 March 1905, the Commission was dissolved without having started work. Following the assassination of his uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei Aleksandrovich, on 17 February 1905, the Tsar made new concessions. On 18 February 1905 he published the Bulygin Rescript, which promised the formation of a consultative assembly, religious tolerance, freedom of speech and a reduction in the peasants' redemption payments. On 24 and 25 May 1905, about 300 Zemstvo and municipal representatives held three meetings in Moscow, which passed a resolution, asking for popular representation at the national level. On 6 June 1905, Nicholas II had received a Zemstvo deputation. Responding to speeches by Prince Sergei Trubetskoi and Mr Fyodrov, the Tsar confirmed his promise to convene an assembly of people's representatives. | How many days was the period between appointing Trepov and dismissing Sviatopolk-Mirskii? | a648d37d-deff-4938-b9f7-16aa2945c5a7 | {
"number": "37",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_29 | On 12 January, the Tsar appointed Dmitri Feodorovich Trepov as governor in St Petersburg and dismissed the Minister of the Interior, Pyotr Sviatopolk-Mirskii, on 18 February 1905. He appointed a government commission "to enquire without delay into the causes of discontent among the workers in the city of St Petersburg and its suburbs" in view of the strike movement. The commission was headed by Senator NV Shidlovsky, a member of the State Council, and included officials, chiefs of government factories, and private factory owners. It was also meant to have included workers' delegates elected according to a two-stage system. Elections of the workers delegates were, however, blocked by the socialists who wanted to divert the workers from the elections to the armed struggle. On 5 March 1905, the Commission was dissolved without having started work. Following the assassination of his uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei Aleksandrovich, on 17 February 1905, the Tsar made new concessions. On 18 February 1905 he published the Bulygin Rescript, which promised the formation of a consultative assembly, religious tolerance, freedom of speech and a reduction in the peasants' redemption payments. On 24 and 25 May 1905, about 300 Zemstvo and municipal representatives held three meetings in Moscow, which passed a resolution, asking for popular representation at the national level. On 6 June 1905, Nicholas II had received a Zemstvo deputation. Responding to speeches by Prince Sergei Trubetskoi and Mr Fyodrov, the Tsar confirmed his promise to convene an assembly of people's representatives. | Was the commission Trepov created comprised only of students? | c56acbd3-6732-40cb-9a26-7443de29dea8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"included officials, chiefs of government factories, and private factory owners"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_29 | On 12 January, the Tsar appointed Dmitri Feodorovich Trepov as governor in St Petersburg and dismissed the Minister of the Interior, Pyotr Sviatopolk-Mirskii, on 18 February 1905. He appointed a government commission "to enquire without delay into the causes of discontent among the workers in the city of St Petersburg and its suburbs" in view of the strike movement. The commission was headed by Senator NV Shidlovsky, a member of the State Council, and included officials, chiefs of government factories, and private factory owners. It was also meant to have included workers' delegates elected according to a two-stage system. Elections of the workers delegates were, however, blocked by the socialists who wanted to divert the workers from the elections to the armed struggle. On 5 March 1905, the Commission was dissolved without having started work. Following the assassination of his uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei Aleksandrovich, on 17 February 1905, the Tsar made new concessions. On 18 February 1905 he published the Bulygin Rescript, which promised the formation of a consultative assembly, religious tolerance, freedom of speech and a reduction in the peasants' redemption payments. On 24 and 25 May 1905, about 300 Zemstvo and municipal representatives held three meetings in Moscow, which passed a resolution, asking for popular representation at the national level. On 6 June 1905, Nicholas II had received a Zemstvo deputation. Responding to speeches by Prince Sergei Trubetskoi and Mr Fyodrov, the Tsar confirmed his promise to convene an assembly of people's representatives. | Did the Bulygin Rescript include the repeal of voting requirements? | c633701f-5ee4-44d7-bacf-a93bdfce6f78 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"consultative assembly, religious tolerance, freedom of speech and a reduction in the peasants' redemption payments."
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many territorial holdings were enlarged during the Treaty of London? | e7c86ffc-9d65-454d-91ec-56cbb3b462ae | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years did Austria-Hungary occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina? | 0986b161-19f5-45f7-8ff1-887bd5a4e1fd | {
"number": "30",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years had the Ottomans controlled Bosnia and Herzegovina before 1908? | 3f244569-be8f-4ec8-af30-d33ce810c171 | {
"number": "30",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many countries did Bulgaria attack on June 16, 1913? | 7c7efd14-b82b-4ce4-b074-f6b890cde1ce | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | Which Balkan War lasted less than 60 days, the First Balkan War or the Second Balkan War? | a217ca2c-0471-407b-b369-7a156a0ce7f1 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Second Balkan War"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years did the Bosnian crisis last? | 8cba8d9e-4870-4c23-ba2f-ba6f9ff0f6fd | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years after the Bosnian crisis was the First Balkan War fought? | d3c4150a-8bc0-48e5-9756-24ae568bb10b | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | What date did the Second Balkan War end? | 911e7d23-130f-467c-8c99-7100cd83e000 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "19",
"month": "July",
"year": "1913"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many countries did Bulgaria attack? | 5509a819-f670-4e87-a366-d25ca3bbd8b5 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | When did the Second Balkan War begin? | 6bcb3553-a608-4f5a-ba23-43d5a444e2af | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "16",
"month": "June",
"year": "1913"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many territories did Austria-Hungary annex? | 93f19e10-5edd-43b2-b7fc-9899f9feee04 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years did Austria-Hungary occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina before officially annexing it? | e93ee816-ef72-4d78-87c3-52725274d2a9 | {
"number": "30",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years did the Bosnian crisis last? | ee4431b2-4295-4e1b-9396-1921ed2dd3db | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years had Austria-Hungary occupied the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909? | 15e18071-c11d-4e5b-8236-2d7698c2a2a1 | {
"number": "30",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many years did the First Balkan War last? | 63c64510-b0aa-4acf-8d3a-ec7e6b2c1d9a | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many Ottoman territories were annexed? | 159ab6f6-10d4-4057-a761-56c4d8bd83ad | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many areas had increased territories due to the Treaty of London? | aa15d21c-083c-4ceb-b0f2-985e7187e046 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1657 | Austria-Hungary precipitated the Bosnian crisis of 1908-1909 by officially annexing the former Ottoman territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which it had occupied since 1878. This angered the Kingdom of Serbia and its patron, the Pan-Slavic and Orthodox Russian Empire. Russian political manoeuvring in the region destabilised peace accords that were already fracturing in the Balkans, which came to be known as the "powder keg of Europe." In 1912 and 1913, the First Balkan War was fought between the Balkan League and the fracturing Ottoman Empire. The resulting Treaty of London further shrank the Ottoman Empire, creating an independent Albanian state while enlarging the territorial holdings of Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece. When Bulgaria attacked Serbia and Greece on 16 June 1913, it lost most of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece, and Southern Dobruja to Romania in the 33-day Second Balkan War, further destabilising the region. The Great Powers were able to keep these Balkan conflicts contained, but the next one would spread throughout Europe and beyond. | How many areas did Bulgaria attack on June 16 1913? | d0df878a-88f5-4c7d-bae4-da9934866798 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_279 | In 1592 King Naresuan sent two different forces to the cities of Dawei and Tenasserim. The first, under the command of Phraya Chakri, had 50,000 troops to attack Tenasserim. The second unit, under the command of Phraya Phra Khlang, had 50,000 troops to capture Dawei. Dawei and Tenasserim were cities in Thailand during Sukhothai period, which the Burmese had captured. However, the Governor of Tenasserim learned of the Siamese plans and sent an urgent message to the King of Pagu, Nanda Bayin, who ordered an army to oppose the Siamese.:139-140 Tenasserim resisted the siege for 15 days while the siege of Dawei lasted 20 days, before the Siamese were successful in capturing both cities. Both consented to be subject to Ayutthaya as in the past.:140 After Phraya Chakri captured Tenasserim city, he captured Mergui and the boats in the port, which included 3 foreign sloops and 150 other boats. He then sent Phraya Thep Archun by sea to Tavoy so as to assist Phraya Phra Khlang if the Burmese advanced that far. Phraya Chakri then marched with a force of 30,000 to Tavoy by land, leaving a garrison of 10,000 at Tenasserim under Phraya Sri Sainarong. Simultaneously, Phraya Phra Khlang sent 100 boats and 5,000 men under Phraya Phichai Songkhram and Phraya Ram Khamhaeng to assist Phraya Chakri.:141 The Burmese had sent 200 boats and 10,000 men under the command of Samin Ubkong and Samin Phataba. This Burmese flotilla was caught in the middle of the Siamese flotillas advancing from the north and south. Many Burmese boats were sunk, some beached their boats and fled, while the rest sailed away. Saming Ubakong was killed and 500 men were captured.:141-142 | Which lasted longer, the seige of Tenasserim or the seige of Dawei? | 428842dd-42a8-4ad5-9b18-6edccb7859b5 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the siege of Dawei"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_279 | In 1592 King Naresuan sent two different forces to the cities of Dawei and Tenasserim. The first, under the command of Phraya Chakri, had 50,000 troops to attack Tenasserim. The second unit, under the command of Phraya Phra Khlang, had 50,000 troops to capture Dawei. Dawei and Tenasserim were cities in Thailand during Sukhothai period, which the Burmese had captured. However, the Governor of Tenasserim learned of the Siamese plans and sent an urgent message to the King of Pagu, Nanda Bayin, who ordered an army to oppose the Siamese.:139-140 Tenasserim resisted the siege for 15 days while the siege of Dawei lasted 20 days, before the Siamese were successful in capturing both cities. Both consented to be subject to Ayutthaya as in the past.:140 After Phraya Chakri captured Tenasserim city, he captured Mergui and the boats in the port, which included 3 foreign sloops and 150 other boats. He then sent Phraya Thep Archun by sea to Tavoy so as to assist Phraya Phra Khlang if the Burmese advanced that far. Phraya Chakri then marched with a force of 30,000 to Tavoy by land, leaving a garrison of 10,000 at Tenasserim under Phraya Sri Sainarong. Simultaneously, Phraya Phra Khlang sent 100 boats and 5,000 men under Phraya Phichai Songkhram and Phraya Ram Khamhaeng to assist Phraya Chakri.:141 The Burmese had sent 200 boats and 10,000 men under the command of Samin Ubkong and Samin Phataba. This Burmese flotilla was caught in the middle of the Siamese flotillas advancing from the north and south. Many Burmese boats were sunk, some beached their boats and fled, while the rest sailed away. Saming Ubakong was killed and 500 men were captured.:141-142 | How many cities did the Siamese capture? | c277e14d-387e-4901-9968-f303eed1674a | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_279 | In 1592 King Naresuan sent two different forces to the cities of Dawei and Tenasserim. The first, under the command of Phraya Chakri, had 50,000 troops to attack Tenasserim. The second unit, under the command of Phraya Phra Khlang, had 50,000 troops to capture Dawei. Dawei and Tenasserim were cities in Thailand during Sukhothai period, which the Burmese had captured. However, the Governor of Tenasserim learned of the Siamese plans and sent an urgent message to the King of Pagu, Nanda Bayin, who ordered an army to oppose the Siamese.:139-140 Tenasserim resisted the siege for 15 days while the siege of Dawei lasted 20 days, before the Siamese were successful in capturing both cities. Both consented to be subject to Ayutthaya as in the past.:140 After Phraya Chakri captured Tenasserim city, he captured Mergui and the boats in the port, which included 3 foreign sloops and 150 other boats. He then sent Phraya Thep Archun by sea to Tavoy so as to assist Phraya Phra Khlang if the Burmese advanced that far. Phraya Chakri then marched with a force of 30,000 to Tavoy by land, leaving a garrison of 10,000 at Tenasserim under Phraya Sri Sainarong. Simultaneously, Phraya Phra Khlang sent 100 boats and 5,000 men under Phraya Phichai Songkhram and Phraya Ram Khamhaeng to assist Phraya Chakri.:141 The Burmese had sent 200 boats and 10,000 men under the command of Samin Ubkong and Samin Phataba. This Burmese flotilla was caught in the middle of the Siamese flotillas advancing from the north and south. Many Burmese boats were sunk, some beached their boats and fled, while the rest sailed away. Saming Ubakong was killed and 500 men were captured.:141-142 | Did more of Phraya Chakri's troops march with a force, or remain at a garrison? | d14fb5e9-f053-4a01-836f-2fa491adee85 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"marched with a force"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_279 | In 1592 King Naresuan sent two different forces to the cities of Dawei and Tenasserim. The first, under the command of Phraya Chakri, had 50,000 troops to attack Tenasserim. The second unit, under the command of Phraya Phra Khlang, had 50,000 troops to capture Dawei. Dawei and Tenasserim were cities in Thailand during Sukhothai period, which the Burmese had captured. However, the Governor of Tenasserim learned of the Siamese plans and sent an urgent message to the King of Pagu, Nanda Bayin, who ordered an army to oppose the Siamese.:139-140 Tenasserim resisted the siege for 15 days while the siege of Dawei lasted 20 days, before the Siamese were successful in capturing both cities. Both consented to be subject to Ayutthaya as in the past.:140 After Phraya Chakri captured Tenasserim city, he captured Mergui and the boats in the port, which included 3 foreign sloops and 150 other boats. He then sent Phraya Thep Archun by sea to Tavoy so as to assist Phraya Phra Khlang if the Burmese advanced that far. Phraya Chakri then marched with a force of 30,000 to Tavoy by land, leaving a garrison of 10,000 at Tenasserim under Phraya Sri Sainarong. Simultaneously, Phraya Phra Khlang sent 100 boats and 5,000 men under Phraya Phichai Songkhram and Phraya Ram Khamhaeng to assist Phraya Chakri.:141 The Burmese had sent 200 boats and 10,000 men under the command of Samin Ubkong and Samin Phataba. This Burmese flotilla was caught in the middle of the Siamese flotillas advancing from the north and south. Many Burmese boats were sunk, some beached their boats and fled, while the rest sailed away. Saming Ubakong was killed and 500 men were captured.:141-142 | Which did the Burmese flotilla have more of, boats or men? | bc784faa-c40b-49aa-8f64-38e2c137e124 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"men"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
Subsets and Splits