section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 4
388
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| answer
dict | validated_answers
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_1870 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 37,762 people, 14,005 households, and 9,760 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 15,311 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 93.4% white, 3.5% black or African American, 0.4% Asian, 0.2% American Indian, 1.2% from other races, and 1.1% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.8% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 54.8% were Germans, 9.8% were Irish people, 5.8% were English people, and 5.6% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not from 2 or more races? | 0b882d2f-bd3a-48ce-a9d0-5990186828e6 | {
"number": "98.9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1870 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 37,762 people, 14,005 households, and 9,760 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 15,311 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 93.4% white, 3.5% black or African American, 0.4% Asian, 0.2% American Indian, 1.2% from other races, and 1.1% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.8% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 54.8% were Germans, 9.8% were Irish people, 5.8% were English people, and 5.6% were Americans. | Which group is larger according to the census: people or households? | 41ba588e-e40c-4fad-b128-7ad2a265355f | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"people"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1870 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 37,762 people, 14,005 households, and 9,760 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 15,311 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 93.4% white, 3.5% black or African American, 0.4% Asian, 0.2% American Indian, 1.2% from other races, and 1.1% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.8% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 54.8% were Germans, 9.8% were Irish people, 5.8% were English people, and 5.6% were Americans. | Which group is smaller according to the census: people or households? | bccf45d5-9a10-4ec5-a99d-9d1daac1eb32 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"households"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1870 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 37,762 people, 14,005 households, and 9,760 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 15,311 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 93.4% white, 3.5% black or African American, 0.4% Asian, 0.2% American Indian, 1.2% from other races, and 1.1% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.8% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 54.8% were Germans, 9.8% were Irish people, 5.8% were English people, and 5.6% were Americans. | Which group is larger according to the census: people or families? | 5f9543a2-31cb-4180-883a-276d7ddbe445 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"people"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1870 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 37,762 people, 14,005 households, and 9,760 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 15,311 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 93.4% white, 3.5% black or African American, 0.4% Asian, 0.2% American Indian, 1.2% from other races, and 1.1% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 2.8% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 54.8% were Germans, 9.8% were Irish people, 5.8% were English people, and 5.6% were Americans. | Which group is smaller according to the census: people or families? | badf362e-9ec7-4bf7-a5f4-49a863a70a87 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"families"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2501 | This win snapped a nine-game away losing streak for Tampa Bay dating back to last season. The Buccaneers last road win was against the Vikings in Minnesota in week 2 when the Bucs came back and won 24-20 after trailing 17-0 in the third quarter. Doug Martin held the spotlight on this night. Martin ran the ball 29 times for 135 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown. Martin scored two touchdowns on this night and he had 100 rushing yards before halftime. Adding to that, he caught three passes for 79 yards, in which he scored a 64-yard passing touchdown on a screen play. Martin's 214 total offensive yards is the 5th best single game total in Buccaneer history. Buccaneer QB Josh Freeman had his third consecutive game with three touchdown passes, in which is a new franchise record. Freeman threw for 262 yards and has a streak of consecutive games with a touchdown pass with 10. There were three takeaways in the game, all of them belonging to the Tampa Bay defense. Ronde Barber and Michael Bennett forced fumbles, with the Bucs recovering both of them in the second quarter. Those turnovers were converted into points. This provided the difference in the Bucs 20-10 halftime lead over the Vikings. Leonard Johnson also ended Minnesota's last drive with an interception. Negative plays tackles behind the line of scrimmage have become the Buccaneers' strength this season. They entered Week 8 leading the NFL in that category. The hits kept coming Thursday night as Tampa Bay had seven more tackles for loss, including three sacks. The Tampa Bay defense allowed Adrian Peterson and the Minnesota offense to rush for 141 total rushing yards. The Vikings were the second team this season to rush over 100 yards as the Redskins were the first team to do so with Robert Griffen III. The bucs oline only allowed 1 sack to Jared Allen and the defense. Doug Martin carried the load, becoming the first player in Buccaneers history with 135 rushing yards and 75 receiving yards in the same game. The Bucs finished with 416 yards of total offense. They had 513 yards against New Orleans last Sunday and 463 yards against Kansas City the previous week before playing the Saints. That marks the first time in franchise history that the Bucs have had three straight games with over 400 yards of total offense. The Buccaneers won their sixth straight meeting against the Minnesota Vikings. | Which team was leading at halftime? | f9ca07ca-b25a-47e1-86b2-60c45214b0fe | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the Bucs 20-10 halftime",
"lead over the Vikings"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2501 | This win snapped a nine-game away losing streak for Tampa Bay dating back to last season. The Buccaneers last road win was against the Vikings in Minnesota in week 2 when the Bucs came back and won 24-20 after trailing 17-0 in the third quarter. Doug Martin held the spotlight on this night. Martin ran the ball 29 times for 135 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown. Martin scored two touchdowns on this night and he had 100 rushing yards before halftime. Adding to that, he caught three passes for 79 yards, in which he scored a 64-yard passing touchdown on a screen play. Martin's 214 total offensive yards is the 5th best single game total in Buccaneer history. Buccaneer QB Josh Freeman had his third consecutive game with three touchdown passes, in which is a new franchise record. Freeman threw for 262 yards and has a streak of consecutive games with a touchdown pass with 10. There were three takeaways in the game, all of them belonging to the Tampa Bay defense. Ronde Barber and Michael Bennett forced fumbles, with the Bucs recovering both of them in the second quarter. Those turnovers were converted into points. This provided the difference in the Bucs 20-10 halftime lead over the Vikings. Leonard Johnson also ended Minnesota's last drive with an interception. Negative plays tackles behind the line of scrimmage have become the Buccaneers' strength this season. They entered Week 8 leading the NFL in that category. The hits kept coming Thursday night as Tampa Bay had seven more tackles for loss, including three sacks. The Tampa Bay defense allowed Adrian Peterson and the Minnesota offense to rush for 141 total rushing yards. The Vikings were the second team this season to rush over 100 yards as the Redskins were the first team to do so with Robert Griffen III. The bucs oline only allowed 1 sack to Jared Allen and the defense. Doug Martin carried the load, becoming the first player in Buccaneers history with 135 rushing yards and 75 receiving yards in the same game. The Bucs finished with 416 yards of total offense. They had 513 yards against New Orleans last Sunday and 463 yards against Kansas City the previous week before playing the Saints. That marks the first time in franchise history that the Bucs have had three straight games with over 400 yards of total offense. The Buccaneers won their sixth straight meeting against the Minnesota Vikings. | How many receiving yards did Martin have? | 6ad4ffdd-bce4-45bc-80b7-c7a0087e61fb | {
"number": "79",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2501 | This win snapped a nine-game away losing streak for Tampa Bay dating back to last season. The Buccaneers last road win was against the Vikings in Minnesota in week 2 when the Bucs came back and won 24-20 after trailing 17-0 in the third quarter. Doug Martin held the spotlight on this night. Martin ran the ball 29 times for 135 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown. Martin scored two touchdowns on this night and he had 100 rushing yards before halftime. Adding to that, he caught three passes for 79 yards, in which he scored a 64-yard passing touchdown on a screen play. Martin's 214 total offensive yards is the 5th best single game total in Buccaneer history. Buccaneer QB Josh Freeman had his third consecutive game with three touchdown passes, in which is a new franchise record. Freeman threw for 262 yards and has a streak of consecutive games with a touchdown pass with 10. There were three takeaways in the game, all of them belonging to the Tampa Bay defense. Ronde Barber and Michael Bennett forced fumbles, with the Bucs recovering both of them in the second quarter. Those turnovers were converted into points. This provided the difference in the Bucs 20-10 halftime lead over the Vikings. Leonard Johnson also ended Minnesota's last drive with an interception. Negative plays tackles behind the line of scrimmage have become the Buccaneers' strength this season. They entered Week 8 leading the NFL in that category. The hits kept coming Thursday night as Tampa Bay had seven more tackles for loss, including three sacks. The Tampa Bay defense allowed Adrian Peterson and the Minnesota offense to rush for 141 total rushing yards. The Vikings were the second team this season to rush over 100 yards as the Redskins were the first team to do so with Robert Griffen III. The bucs oline only allowed 1 sack to Jared Allen and the defense. Doug Martin carried the load, becoming the first player in Buccaneers history with 135 rushing yards and 75 receiving yards in the same game. The Bucs finished with 416 yards of total offense. They had 513 yards against New Orleans last Sunday and 463 yards against Kansas City the previous week before playing the Saints. That marks the first time in franchise history that the Bucs have had three straight games with over 400 yards of total offense. The Buccaneers won their sixth straight meeting against the Minnesota Vikings. | How many points were scored in the first half? | 3c116624-2a3e-4602-90a2-2e1ca0887399 | {
"number": "30",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | Which team won the game? | 2ab38b3f-e1b3-49a0-bc15-18082b267b4e | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Indianapolis Colts"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | How many points did the Colts win by? | c56834f1-c4de-431c-a5e9-f49a084871ad | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | Which player scored the first points of the game? | 5cb800a7-5057-433d-a503-ebd1751495f9 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Jacob Tamme"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | Which team won this game? | 8c55cf20-0824-41fd-aea1-dee62cce6a82 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Indianapolis Colt"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | How many total points did the Colts lead with in the fourth quarter? | e2d9b316-2912-4caf-8ae9-7bacba643339 | {
"number": "17",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | How many total points were scored in the third quarter? | 78bafa2c-ab13-49aa-815c-cce6de8c54b0 | {
"number": "37",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | How many touchdowns did the Colts score in the first quarter? | a2dcba36-46a5-485f-88e5-a0dca2a28c3b | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | How many times did Indianapolis score in the first half? | 802b1c03-5203-45b5-b8ad-83a8cbf5a094 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_1887 | In a rematch of the opening game of the season, where the Houston Texans defeated the Indianapolis Colts 34-24, the Colts looked for revenge in their first Monday night game in Indianapolis since 2006. Both defenses came out strong in the beginning with both teams punting on their first drives. On the Colts second possession of the game, Indianapolis drove down the field for a Jacob Tamme touchdown, giving the Colts a 7-0 lead. Going into the second quarter, the Indianapolis offense and defense proved too much for the Texans. Kelvin Hayden took a 25-yard interception to the end zone and gave Indianapolis a 14-0 lead. On the following drive, Houston went down into Colts territory, however was only able to score a field goal ending the Indianapolis shutout. An Adam Vinatieri field goal gave the Colts a 17-3 lead going into halftime. Houston came out of the locker room improved, however Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis offense continued to be productive scoring a touchdown on a Reggie Wayne reception in the beginning of the first half. Following a Matt Schaub touchdown and another Vinatieri field goal, the Colts held a 27-10 lead going into the fourth quarter. With the Houston offense looking improved and the Indianapolis defense struggling, the Texans were able to score a touchdown on an Arian Foster run, while the Colts scored another field goal. With less than two minutes remaining in the game, a fumble by Schaub sealed the game with the final score being 30-17. With the win, Indianapolis moved to 5-2 on the season and held sole possession of first place for the first time in the 2010 season. | How many points were the Texans trailing by at halftime? | de07c48c-4e14-4126-8ef5-005b004f3dac | {
"number": "14",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Who refused to appoint him commander of Namur? | c331ceae-6b21-45c7-82fa-9faad980450d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Van Coehoorn"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Who was appointed as the commander of Namur? | d4aa464a-b80f-402f-adb9-84979e71c7fd | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Van Coehoorn"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Who refused a position as Major-General? | 76dbc2ad-f222-4c60-b2ae-9ae831c673f9 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Van Coehoorn"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Which area was strengthened, the 'inner' Citadel or the 'outer' City area? | 6f3e2c36-a37b-43eb-98d7-34b4649fd227 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the 'inner' Citadel"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Where was his garrison of 5000 too small for the active defense he had planned? | 36de3ced-f59a-41f9-a9c7-9f81af49329e | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the 'outer' City area"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | /When was Van Coehoorn was present at the capture? | 4242b578-1f7f-4f60-8566-48ad6c3ab675 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1690"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | When did Van Coehoorn refused Frederick of Prussia the position he offered him? | af295b27-7984-4009-9d9e-ce08c03a9cb8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1690"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Namur was divided into the city and what else? | 50d2dc27-ac6f-4055-8240-e04913290eca | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"and the Citadel"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | How many years after being offered a position as Major-General was Van Coehoorn appointed commander of Namur? | ca3a52e3-e8fb-49f8-96f5-77be8e824deb | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Which area of Namur failed to be strengthened as the inner Citadel took priority? | d5681a4c-8c85-4ac9-943e-097e0583503c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the 'outer' City area"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Fort William and La Casotte are part of what city? | baa60251-0466-4ca7-a460-91def2f07c9d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Namur"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Which happened first, the capture of Kaiserswerth or Van Coehoorn's appointment to Namur? | 46646a70-771b-4a9e-a8b9-30076acdff17 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the capture of Kaiserswerth"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | How many years after the Nine Years War started was Kaiserswerth and Bonn captured? | 0d770576-de2e-4d44-821d-4921eea87cf9 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | How many years after the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn did William appoint Van Coehoorn commander of Namur? | 1bd420b9-71cb-44ee-be56-0ab27fbcf90f | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | How many years after the outbreak of the Nine Years War did the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn occur? | b76d6e62-1be1-4138-be1b-605525cf3f1e | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | How many years after Van Coehoorn participated in the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn was he appointed commander of Namur? | 47e36c92-0c3d-48c4-93fd-64e420d30b44 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | How many parts was Namur divded into for a defensive strategy? | e4f9f826-daba-4b79-8ffb-bd369d6a41a9 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_971 | There was interest in his ideas but they remained untested; this changed with the outbreak of the 1688-1697 Nine Years War which placed great emphasis on manoeuvre and siege warfare. Van Coehoorn was present at the capture of Kaiserswerth and Bonn in 1690; his exact role is unclear but Frederick of Prussia was impressed enough to offer him a position as Major-General in his army. He refused and in 1691 William appointed him commander of Namur where he was finally able to implement his ideas on defensive strategy. Namur was divided into the 'City' on the flat northern bank of the River Sambre and the Citadel on high ground to the south controlling access to the Sambre and Meuse rivers. Van Coehoorn strengthened the 'inner' Citadel with new outworks at Fort William and La Casotte but did not have time to do the same for the 'outer' City area. His garrison of 5,000 was also too small for the active defence he had planned, many being poorly-trained Spanish troops with little interest in fighting for the Dutch. | Who was offered a position as Major-General? | 5a1c2ad9-f140-43c3-86f5-1be64d9cb851 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Van Coehoorn"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many more percent of the population was white than black? | 09282f52-160b-41de-ac06-4984c0fff0be | {
"number": "61.9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which race has the smallest percentage in the county, Irish or German? | d22a3c7c-d4b0-4a03-b3c9-871760b861c9 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Irish"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many more percentage of Germans than Irish in the county? | 3e90314a-2284-4007-b9f1-f36a6d8dec5d | {
"number": "9.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many more people than families residing in the county? | f79009ac-380e-4acf-a217-b13dec43a862 | {
"number": "14318",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't white? | 988a681f-3190-44d0-a1e4-1e811a3c267a | {
"number": "37.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't African American? | dd4b9a85-5d3a-488f-a47e-1eb4f6b36c15 | {
"number": "99.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't Asian? | 39a180b3-81a0-4475-a303-a82cad6e6d63 | {
"number": "99.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't from two or more races? | 41895359-0067-4095-96f5-2911d02d46eb | {
"number": "97.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't Hispanic or Latino? | 74443ac4-64ae-43e1-8a77-fc43778d5c7e | {
"number": "40.7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't German? | 03217422-9249-4e3c-a42c-c3953b749cf0 | {
"number": "83.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is larger: white or African American? | a58cdc2f-9613-46e3-896c-a492644336bc | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is smaller: white or African American? | 68705400-47b7-4cf0-bf45-14c3f5c06866 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"African American"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is larger: Germans or Irish? | 59be0b68-45a6-4aa1-8d02-e1fb96bebf00 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Germans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is smaller: Germans or Irish? | 2779ff9a-726c-42da-834c-60461ef69d8b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Irish"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is larger: Germans or Americans? | 50b7eb6c-014b-4899-913f-93e14874268b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Germans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is smaller: Germans or Americans? | c79c16c0-18e4-4c0c-8471-b84e2288874c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Americans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Where there more families or households in the county? | 30bb702d-209a-4eae-a1a6-b16033a68a79 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"households"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | What was the highest racial population in the county? | 7d6dbaf1-5fc4-46e3-bf15-e38b30741a6d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | What population was higher, white or Asian? | 99ce21ac-78f0-4992-a0e1-6789ed3eeb72 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which racial groups are smaller than 2%? | 3f0b9660-bffc-4a44-b271-bd8b0979808a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"American Indian",
"Asian",
"African American"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestral groups are at least 6%? | 44e54189-6db2-4bb7-9cd7-393628d1720d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Germans",
"Irish"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestral groups are smaller than 11%? | 03612987-e772-46a5-bfed-136444c105fc | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Irish",
"English",
"Americans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't German? | e78fb382-aa57-458c-8c94-f0c84eb00ee3 | {
"number": "83.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't Irish? | 29868f6c-2b75-4b90-acaa-67057df70153 | {
"number": "93.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't English? | 5c8327c7-5041-4f50-bd62-0a46ef452bd2 | {
"number": "94.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't American? | 683fc227-ec80-49b0-bb90-ee4081f0f9b3 | {
"number": "97.8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestral group is larger: Irish or English? | 593a7336-74bb-49b2-b69e-b46178cde876 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Irish"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestral group is smaller: Irish or English? | 9b0c1794-fada-49da-a9f8-542aea1c71b2 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"English"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group is larger according to the census: people or households? | 6eda001b-4540-46f2-b10d-d4261d51fc1e | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"people"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group is smaller according to the census: people or households? | 0606fbb7-3e8b-4418-9325-967e05a7f27a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"households"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not white? | 3f5becb7-2566-439e-8002-d24573ea8c24 | {
"number": "37.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not American Indian? | 29890884-4e54-4d54-878d-a37ea4402247 | {
"number": "98.1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not Asian? | 4da474a7-b12f-4d6d-8d74-4b1bbab0b77b | {
"number": "99.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not African American? | 46036eae-afee-4a7a-9571-23a82e9ff7c8 | {
"number": "99.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not other races? | c845f050-d7aa-4179-9e90-046940394e31 | {
"number": "68.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not from 2 or more races? | c3624fc5-dcf1-4a7d-9104-ff8ecfc4f5a5 | {
"number": "97.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent of people were not Hispanic? | a946b3d6-426e-4f14-9736-52180427e00c | {
"number": "40.7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent were not German? | d94eff55-9a41-46c6-8fe7-81551cd640bb | {
"number": "83.6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent were not Irish? | a704f349-7982-4ff3-af7c-63d55d9051e0 | {
"number": "93.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent were not english? | a3e64a8e-cba1-46b8-bf2e-e1a10ff792b7 | {
"number": "94.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many percent were not American? | a19d7f76-c987-449d-b930-59089e8514dc | {
"number": "97.8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many more people are there than households? | 38d24bd0-35e9-4771-a931-ea0adfb31157 | {
"number": "13008",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | What all had a higher percentage of racial in the US census 2010 Asian? | 0e8dfb76-1c95-45aa-8121-d22a006f53d8 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white",
"American Indian",
"African American"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many more percentage did the white race have than other races in population density? | e3dec57e-d1e0-4ced-a6d2-06f8c7f6dbb4 | {
"number": "31",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestry had the smallest percentage in 2010? | 63f19b45-e974-46bd-b14d-b5cd6f883f72 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Americans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | What ancestries were higher than the English? | 368f6cd8-a864-454f-bd04-eebe53f5b0d7 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Germans",
"Irish"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many more people in 2010 census than families residing in the county? | 218975c2-3864-4e39-b0a9-879fc9613e81 | {
"number": "14318",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which racial groups are at least 10%? | 8e954a1e-c57a-4717-839d-f73a39f2ebec | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white",
"Hispanic or Latino"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which racial groups are smaller than 2%? | beae4aff-aca1-4fa7-b13d-0fb0de1d3ec1 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"American Indian",
"Asian",
"black or African American",
"two or more races",
"Asian"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestral groups are at least 6%? | 23825c9c-2330-40f6-8967-c482a757303a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Germans",
"Irish"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which ancestral groups are smaller than 6%? | 1d85e544-c522-4095-891d-753040fe976e | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"English",
"Americans"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't white? | 66f88991-43a9-4f47-a46d-50315f86cd9e | {
"number": "37.5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't Asian? | 2d5b18b9-3fbc-4a85-9bb2-cb546452e9dc | {
"number": "99.3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't African American? | e3a45bcd-b5f9-4be4-a34f-9244e8d537be | {
"number": "99.4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | How many in percent from the census weren't from two or more races? | e5af3513-a437-42ee-bef1-d5c2b64d4244 | {
"number": "97.2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is larger: white or African American? | ddd34eb2-cd98-4d53-9a43-c5f909a8900a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"white"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is smaller: white or African American? | 050cc7fe-21b5-41f5-a7d3-d50870a62dba | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"African American"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is larger: Asian or two or more races? | 0519f12f-7a72-4cb2-968c-1e61534e8b3e | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"two or more races"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1874 | As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 18,728 people, 5,720 households, and 4,410 families residing in the county. The population density was . There were 6,242 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the county was 62.5% white, 1.9% American Indian, 0.7% Asian, 0.6% black or African American, 31.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Those of Hispanic or Latino origin made up 59.3% of the population. In terms of ancestry, 16.4% were Germans, 6.8% were Irish people, 5.6% were English people, and 2.2% were Americans. | Which group from the census is smaller: Asian or two or more races? | 8d9c602b-dd5c-4a69-90ee-224d02cdec3f | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Asian"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2725 | Coming off back-to-back home wins to start the season, the Broncos traveled to CenturyLink Field for an interconference duel against the Seattle Seahawks, hoping to avenge their 43-8 blowout loss to the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII. On the Broncos' first possession, Seahawks' safety Kam Chancellor forced a fumble off running back Montee Ball deep in Broncos' territory. The ensuing Seahawks' drive culminated in placekicker Steven Hauschka settling for a 20-yard field goal. The Broncos drove down the field on their next possession, but had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Both teams traded punts on their next two possessions, until the Seahawks re-claimed the lead late in the second quarter, with a 39-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Russell Wilson to wide receiver Ricardo Lockette, then added to their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Wilson to running back Marshawn Lynch just before halftime. After a scoreless third quarter, which included Broncos' defensive tackle Terrance Knighton blocking a 46-yard field goal attempt by Hauschka, Britton Colquitt sent a punt that backed up the Seahawks to their own 8-yard line to begin the fourth quarter. Three plays later, Lynch was tackled in the end zone by linebacker Nate Irving and cornerback Aqib Talib for a Broncos' safety to narrow the Seahawks' lead to 17-5. The Broncos were forced to punt on their first possession of the fourth quarter, and on the Seahawks' next possession, Wilson was intercepted by cornerback Chris Harris, Jr., who advanced the football to the Seahawks' 19-yard line. Five plays later, the Broncos' offense finally got into the end zone, with quarterback Peyton Manning connecting on a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Julius Thomas. The Seahawks were forced to punt on their next possession, and the Broncos' offense got the football with 6:07 remaining in the fourth quarter. On the ninth play of the drive, the Broncos were facing a 3rd-and-11 at the Seahawks' 24-yard line, however, a Manning pass intended for wide receiver Wes Welker was intercepted by Chancellor, who advance all the way to the Broncos' 35-yard line. Five plays later, Hauschka made a 28-yard field goal to increase the Seahawks' lead to 20-12, with 1:04 remaining in the fourth quarter. With no timeouts remaining, Manning engineered an 80-yard drive in only 35 seconds, which included two key pass completions — a 42-yarder to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders and a 12-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas. On the sixth play of the drive, Manning completed a 26-yard touchdown pass to tight end Jacob Tamme, coupled with a two-point conversion pass from Manning to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas to send the game into overtime, tied at 20-20. However, the Seahawks won the overtime coin toss, and methodically marched down the field with a 13-play, 80-yard drive, culminating in a game-winning 6-yard touchdown run by Lynch to end the game. | How many yards was the longest field goal of the first quarter? | 3015dcf5-64e8-4643-ad92-d823acb62c19 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"24-yard"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2725 | Coming off back-to-back home wins to start the season, the Broncos traveled to CenturyLink Field for an interconference duel against the Seattle Seahawks, hoping to avenge their 43-8 blowout loss to the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII. On the Broncos' first possession, Seahawks' safety Kam Chancellor forced a fumble off running back Montee Ball deep in Broncos' territory. The ensuing Seahawks' drive culminated in placekicker Steven Hauschka settling for a 20-yard field goal. The Broncos drove down the field on their next possession, but had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Both teams traded punts on their next two possessions, until the Seahawks re-claimed the lead late in the second quarter, with a 39-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Russell Wilson to wide receiver Ricardo Lockette, then added to their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Wilson to running back Marshawn Lynch just before halftime. After a scoreless third quarter, which included Broncos' defensive tackle Terrance Knighton blocking a 46-yard field goal attempt by Hauschka, Britton Colquitt sent a punt that backed up the Seahawks to their own 8-yard line to begin the fourth quarter. Three plays later, Lynch was tackled in the end zone by linebacker Nate Irving and cornerback Aqib Talib for a Broncos' safety to narrow the Seahawks' lead to 17-5. The Broncos were forced to punt on their first possession of the fourth quarter, and on the Seahawks' next possession, Wilson was intercepted by cornerback Chris Harris, Jr., who advanced the football to the Seahawks' 19-yard line. Five plays later, the Broncos' offense finally got into the end zone, with quarterback Peyton Manning connecting on a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Julius Thomas. The Seahawks were forced to punt on their next possession, and the Broncos' offense got the football with 6:07 remaining in the fourth quarter. On the ninth play of the drive, the Broncos were facing a 3rd-and-11 at the Seahawks' 24-yard line, however, a Manning pass intended for wide receiver Wes Welker was intercepted by Chancellor, who advance all the way to the Broncos' 35-yard line. Five plays later, Hauschka made a 28-yard field goal to increase the Seahawks' lead to 20-12, with 1:04 remaining in the fourth quarter. With no timeouts remaining, Manning engineered an 80-yard drive in only 35 seconds, which included two key pass completions — a 42-yarder to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders and a 12-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas. On the sixth play of the drive, Manning completed a 26-yard touchdown pass to tight end Jacob Tamme, coupled with a two-point conversion pass from Manning to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas to send the game into overtime, tied at 20-20. However, the Seahawks won the overtime coin toss, and methodically marched down the field with a 13-play, 80-yard drive, culminating in a game-winning 6-yard touchdown run by Lynch to end the game. | Who had the longest touchdown reception? | 78c1646b-d4dd-404f-8221-dbad34ba3601 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Ricardo Lockette"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2725 | Coming off back-to-back home wins to start the season, the Broncos traveled to CenturyLink Field for an interconference duel against the Seattle Seahawks, hoping to avenge their 43-8 blowout loss to the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII. On the Broncos' first possession, Seahawks' safety Kam Chancellor forced a fumble off running back Montee Ball deep in Broncos' territory. The ensuing Seahawks' drive culminated in placekicker Steven Hauschka settling for a 20-yard field goal. The Broncos drove down the field on their next possession, but had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Both teams traded punts on their next two possessions, until the Seahawks re-claimed the lead late in the second quarter, with a 39-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Russell Wilson to wide receiver Ricardo Lockette, then added to their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Wilson to running back Marshawn Lynch just before halftime. After a scoreless third quarter, which included Broncos' defensive tackle Terrance Knighton blocking a 46-yard field goal attempt by Hauschka, Britton Colquitt sent a punt that backed up the Seahawks to their own 8-yard line to begin the fourth quarter. Three plays later, Lynch was tackled in the end zone by linebacker Nate Irving and cornerback Aqib Talib for a Broncos' safety to narrow the Seahawks' lead to 17-5. The Broncos were forced to punt on their first possession of the fourth quarter, and on the Seahawks' next possession, Wilson was intercepted by cornerback Chris Harris, Jr., who advanced the football to the Seahawks' 19-yard line. Five plays later, the Broncos' offense finally got into the end zone, with quarterback Peyton Manning connecting on a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Julius Thomas. The Seahawks were forced to punt on their next possession, and the Broncos' offense got the football with 6:07 remaining in the fourth quarter. On the ninth play of the drive, the Broncos were facing a 3rd-and-11 at the Seahawks' 24-yard line, however, a Manning pass intended for wide receiver Wes Welker was intercepted by Chancellor, who advance all the way to the Broncos' 35-yard line. Five plays later, Hauschka made a 28-yard field goal to increase the Seahawks' lead to 20-12, with 1:04 remaining in the fourth quarter. With no timeouts remaining, Manning engineered an 80-yard drive in only 35 seconds, which included two key pass completions — a 42-yarder to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders and a 12-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas. On the sixth play of the drive, Manning completed a 26-yard touchdown pass to tight end Jacob Tamme, coupled with a two-point conversion pass from Manning to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas to send the game into overtime, tied at 20-20. However, the Seahawks won the overtime coin toss, and methodically marched down the field with a 13-play, 80-yard drive, culminating in a game-winning 6-yard touchdown run by Lynch to end the game. | How many touchdowns did Peyton Manning throw in the fourth quarter? | bfeaaa04-01e4-4aa9-94ad-e5e6f6072522 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2725 | Coming off back-to-back home wins to start the season, the Broncos traveled to CenturyLink Field for an interconference duel against the Seattle Seahawks, hoping to avenge their 43-8 blowout loss to the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII. On the Broncos' first possession, Seahawks' safety Kam Chancellor forced a fumble off running back Montee Ball deep in Broncos' territory. The ensuing Seahawks' drive culminated in placekicker Steven Hauschka settling for a 20-yard field goal. The Broncos drove down the field on their next possession, but had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Both teams traded punts on their next two possessions, until the Seahawks re-claimed the lead late in the second quarter, with a 39-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Russell Wilson to wide receiver Ricardo Lockette, then added to their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Wilson to running back Marshawn Lynch just before halftime. After a scoreless third quarter, which included Broncos' defensive tackle Terrance Knighton blocking a 46-yard field goal attempt by Hauschka, Britton Colquitt sent a punt that backed up the Seahawks to their own 8-yard line to begin the fourth quarter. Three plays later, Lynch was tackled in the end zone by linebacker Nate Irving and cornerback Aqib Talib for a Broncos' safety to narrow the Seahawks' lead to 17-5. The Broncos were forced to punt on their first possession of the fourth quarter, and on the Seahawks' next possession, Wilson was intercepted by cornerback Chris Harris, Jr., who advanced the football to the Seahawks' 19-yard line. Five plays later, the Broncos' offense finally got into the end zone, with quarterback Peyton Manning connecting on a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Julius Thomas. The Seahawks were forced to punt on their next possession, and the Broncos' offense got the football with 6:07 remaining in the fourth quarter. On the ninth play of the drive, the Broncos were facing a 3rd-and-11 at the Seahawks' 24-yard line, however, a Manning pass intended for wide receiver Wes Welker was intercepted by Chancellor, who advance all the way to the Broncos' 35-yard line. Five plays later, Hauschka made a 28-yard field goal to increase the Seahawks' lead to 20-12, with 1:04 remaining in the fourth quarter. With no timeouts remaining, Manning engineered an 80-yard drive in only 35 seconds, which included two key pass completions — a 42-yarder to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders and a 12-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas. On the sixth play of the drive, Manning completed a 26-yard touchdown pass to tight end Jacob Tamme, coupled with a two-point conversion pass from Manning to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas to send the game into overtime, tied at 20-20. However, the Seahawks won the overtime coin toss, and methodically marched down the field with a 13-play, 80-yard drive, culminating in a game-winning 6-yard touchdown run by Lynch to end the game. | Which players kicked field goals in the first quarter? | fe882bba-83af-4c5b-a8a5-394a8faf74ac | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Steven Hauschka",
"Brandon McManus"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2725 | Coming off back-to-back home wins to start the season, the Broncos traveled to CenturyLink Field for an interconference duel against the Seattle Seahawks, hoping to avenge their 43-8 blowout loss to the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII. On the Broncos' first possession, Seahawks' safety Kam Chancellor forced a fumble off running back Montee Ball deep in Broncos' territory. The ensuing Seahawks' drive culminated in placekicker Steven Hauschka settling for a 20-yard field goal. The Broncos drove down the field on their next possession, but had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Both teams traded punts on their next two possessions, until the Seahawks re-claimed the lead late in the second quarter, with a 39-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Russell Wilson to wide receiver Ricardo Lockette, then added to their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Wilson to running back Marshawn Lynch just before halftime. After a scoreless third quarter, which included Broncos' defensive tackle Terrance Knighton blocking a 46-yard field goal attempt by Hauschka, Britton Colquitt sent a punt that backed up the Seahawks to their own 8-yard line to begin the fourth quarter. Three plays later, Lynch was tackled in the end zone by linebacker Nate Irving and cornerback Aqib Talib for a Broncos' safety to narrow the Seahawks' lead to 17-5. The Broncos were forced to punt on their first possession of the fourth quarter, and on the Seahawks' next possession, Wilson was intercepted by cornerback Chris Harris, Jr., who advanced the football to the Seahawks' 19-yard line. Five plays later, the Broncos' offense finally got into the end zone, with quarterback Peyton Manning connecting on a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Julius Thomas. The Seahawks were forced to punt on their next possession, and the Broncos' offense got the football with 6:07 remaining in the fourth quarter. On the ninth play of the drive, the Broncos were facing a 3rd-and-11 at the Seahawks' 24-yard line, however, a Manning pass intended for wide receiver Wes Welker was intercepted by Chancellor, who advance all the way to the Broncos' 35-yard line. Five plays later, Hauschka made a 28-yard field goal to increase the Seahawks' lead to 20-12, with 1:04 remaining in the fourth quarter. With no timeouts remaining, Manning engineered an 80-yard drive in only 35 seconds, which included two key pass completions — a 42-yarder to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders and a 12-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas. On the sixth play of the drive, Manning completed a 26-yard touchdown pass to tight end Jacob Tamme, coupled with a two-point conversion pass from Manning to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas to send the game into overtime, tied at 20-20. However, the Seahawks won the overtime coin toss, and methodically marched down the field with a 13-play, 80-yard drive, culminating in a game-winning 6-yard touchdown run by Lynch to end the game. | How many field goals of less than 30 yards did Hauschka kick? | f6fdd594-c3d2-4f0f-a501-30a3005569d2 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2725 | Coming off back-to-back home wins to start the season, the Broncos traveled to CenturyLink Field for an interconference duel against the Seattle Seahawks, hoping to avenge their 43-8 blowout loss to the Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII. On the Broncos' first possession, Seahawks' safety Kam Chancellor forced a fumble off running back Montee Ball deep in Broncos' territory. The ensuing Seahawks' drive culminated in placekicker Steven Hauschka settling for a 20-yard field goal. The Broncos drove down the field on their next possession, but had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by placekicker Brandon McManus. Both teams traded punts on their next two possessions, until the Seahawks re-claimed the lead late in the second quarter, with a 39-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Russell Wilson to wide receiver Ricardo Lockette, then added to their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Wilson to running back Marshawn Lynch just before halftime. After a scoreless third quarter, which included Broncos' defensive tackle Terrance Knighton blocking a 46-yard field goal attempt by Hauschka, Britton Colquitt sent a punt that backed up the Seahawks to their own 8-yard line to begin the fourth quarter. Three plays later, Lynch was tackled in the end zone by linebacker Nate Irving and cornerback Aqib Talib for a Broncos' safety to narrow the Seahawks' lead to 17-5. The Broncos were forced to punt on their first possession of the fourth quarter, and on the Seahawks' next possession, Wilson was intercepted by cornerback Chris Harris, Jr., who advanced the football to the Seahawks' 19-yard line. Five plays later, the Broncos' offense finally got into the end zone, with quarterback Peyton Manning connecting on a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Julius Thomas. The Seahawks were forced to punt on their next possession, and the Broncos' offense got the football with 6:07 remaining in the fourth quarter. On the ninth play of the drive, the Broncos were facing a 3rd-and-11 at the Seahawks' 24-yard line, however, a Manning pass intended for wide receiver Wes Welker was intercepted by Chancellor, who advance all the way to the Broncos' 35-yard line. Five plays later, Hauschka made a 28-yard field goal to increase the Seahawks' lead to 20-12, with 1:04 remaining in the fourth quarter. With no timeouts remaining, Manning engineered an 80-yard drive in only 35 seconds, which included two key pass completions — a 42-yarder to wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders and a 12-yarder to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas. On the sixth play of the drive, Manning completed a 26-yard touchdown pass to tight end Jacob Tamme, coupled with a two-point conversion pass from Manning to wide receiver Demaryius Thomas to send the game into overtime, tied at 20-20. However, the Seahawks won the overtime coin toss, and methodically marched down the field with a 13-play, 80-yard drive, culminating in a game-winning 6-yard touchdown run by Lynch to end the game. | Which players threw touchdown passes of over 20 yards? | 762018c6-cc0d-46e2-93b4-f1b71f9dc85f | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Russell Wilson",
"Peyton Manning"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.