section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 4
388
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| answer
dict | validated_answers
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_1312 | Sources do not agree on a precise number of deaths from the war because of a lack of body counts for confirmation. The number of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds is put at around 59,000 with around 27,000 additional casualties from disease, and between 6,000 and 12,000 wounded. Estimates of Russian Army dead range from around 34,000 to around 53,000 men with a further 9,000 - 19,000 died of disease and around 75,000 captured. The total number of dead for both sides is generally stated as around 130,000 to 170,000. China suffered 20,000 civilian deaths, and financially the loss amounted to over 69 million taels' worth of silver. During many of the battles at sea, several thousand soldiers being transported drowned after their ships went down. There was no consensus about what to do with transported soldiers at sea, and as a result, many of the ships failed or refused to rescue soldiers that were left shipwrecked. This led to the creation of the second Geneva Convention in 1906, which gave protection and care for shipwrecked soldiers in armed conflict. | How many more men of the Russian army were captured than died of disease? | 46418afd-9440-4c71-8a33-b0294c44a8eb | {
"number": "56000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1312 | Sources do not agree on a precise number of deaths from the war because of a lack of body counts for confirmation. The number of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds is put at around 59,000 with around 27,000 additional casualties from disease, and between 6,000 and 12,000 wounded. Estimates of Russian Army dead range from around 34,000 to around 53,000 men with a further 9,000 - 19,000 died of disease and around 75,000 captured. The total number of dead for both sides is generally stated as around 130,000 to 170,000. China suffered 20,000 civilian deaths, and financially the loss amounted to over 69 million taels' worth of silver. During many of the battles at sea, several thousand soldiers being transported drowned after their ships went down. There was no consensus about what to do with transported soldiers at sea, and as a result, many of the ships failed or refused to rescue soldiers that were left shipwrecked. This led to the creation of the second Geneva Convention in 1906, which gave protection and care for shipwrecked soldiers in armed conflict. | How many total of the Japanese Army died in combat or wounds as well as casualties from disease? | d81bfe27-6549-410c-9f15-dedda1261446 | {
"number": "86000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1312 | Sources do not agree on a precise number of deaths from the war because of a lack of body counts for confirmation. The number of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds is put at around 59,000 with around 27,000 additional casualties from disease, and between 6,000 and 12,000 wounded. Estimates of Russian Army dead range from around 34,000 to around 53,000 men with a further 9,000 - 19,000 died of disease and around 75,000 captured. The total number of dead for both sides is generally stated as around 130,000 to 170,000. China suffered 20,000 civilian deaths, and financially the loss amounted to over 69 million taels' worth of silver. During many of the battles at sea, several thousand soldiers being transported drowned after their ships went down. There was no consensus about what to do with transported soldiers at sea, and as a result, many of the ships failed or refused to rescue soldiers that were left shipwrecked. This led to the creation of the second Geneva Convention in 1906, which gave protection and care for shipwrecked soldiers in armed conflict. | Which army suffered more deaths because of disease, Russian or Japanese? | 9a726660-7d1f-4424-b85a-c0506247b262 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Japanese Army"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1312 | Sources do not agree on a precise number of deaths from the war because of a lack of body counts for confirmation. The number of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds is put at around 59,000 with around 27,000 additional casualties from disease, and between 6,000 and 12,000 wounded. Estimates of Russian Army dead range from around 34,000 to around 53,000 men with a further 9,000 - 19,000 died of disease and around 75,000 captured. The total number of dead for both sides is generally stated as around 130,000 to 170,000. China suffered 20,000 civilian deaths, and financially the loss amounted to over 69 million taels' worth of silver. During many of the battles at sea, several thousand soldiers being transported drowned after their ships went down. There was no consensus about what to do with transported soldiers at sea, and as a result, many of the ships failed or refused to rescue soldiers that were left shipwrecked. This led to the creation of the second Geneva Convention in 1906, which gave protection and care for shipwrecked soldiers in armed conflict. | How many more, considering only the low range of estimates, of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds than Russian Army? | 25b5fab9-125b-4cc8-af3b-733fefce76a5 | {
"number": "25000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1312 | Sources do not agree on a precise number of deaths from the war because of a lack of body counts for confirmation. The number of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds is put at around 59,000 with around 27,000 additional casualties from disease, and between 6,000 and 12,000 wounded. Estimates of Russian Army dead range from around 34,000 to around 53,000 men with a further 9,000 - 19,000 died of disease and around 75,000 captured. The total number of dead for both sides is generally stated as around 130,000 to 170,000. China suffered 20,000 civilian deaths, and financially the loss amounted to over 69 million taels' worth of silver. During many of the battles at sea, several thousand soldiers being transported drowned after their ships went down. There was no consensus about what to do with transported soldiers at sea, and as a result, many of the ships failed or refused to rescue soldiers that were left shipwrecked. This led to the creation of the second Geneva Convention in 1906, which gave protection and care for shipwrecked soldiers in armed conflict. | How many more, considering only the high range of estimates, of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds than Russian Army? | 72dc6345-a7f6-404b-b013-d52ac41b1ba8 | {
"number": "6000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1312 | Sources do not agree on a precise number of deaths from the war because of a lack of body counts for confirmation. The number of Japanese Army dead in combat or died of wounds is put at around 59,000 with around 27,000 additional casualties from disease, and between 6,000 and 12,000 wounded. Estimates of Russian Army dead range from around 34,000 to around 53,000 men with a further 9,000 - 19,000 died of disease and around 75,000 captured. The total number of dead for both sides is generally stated as around 130,000 to 170,000. China suffered 20,000 civilian deaths, and financially the loss amounted to over 69 million taels' worth of silver. During many of the battles at sea, several thousand soldiers being transported drowned after their ships went down. There was no consensus about what to do with transported soldiers at sea, and as a result, many of the ships failed or refused to rescue soldiers that were left shipwrecked. This led to the creation of the second Geneva Convention in 1906, which gave protection and care for shipwrecked soldiers in armed conflict. | How many more, considering only the high range of estimates, of Japanese Army died of from disease, than Russian Army? | a48dd00b-2e9b-483e-811c-25e5a62df7f2 | {
"number": "8000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | Who appointed Forbes? | a48edd65-0c49-42e9-bd46-ee23f6ac2565 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Hoover"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | How many years after Sténio Vincent was ected president did Hooverlose his presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt? | 13924d63-d303-4bf8-bb54-94c4d0b0c96d | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | How many years after the last contingent of US Marines depart Haiti did the US finally stop influencing Haiti's external finances? | 8d7a41a0-d501-4f24-a2ea-e6f160d678b2 | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | How many years passed between Roosevelt affirming the disengagement agreement and when the last Marines left? | ce4dcc63-d06a-406a-8245-5ac4f4bf919c | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | How many years after the 1933 disengagement agreement did the US still have financial influence on Haiti? | 06bc5255-7dbb-4360-9dcb-2bdfc1f3ed5b | {
"number": "14",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | What was Roosevelt's job after being Assistant Secretary of the Navy? | 9e60fb28-30b0-476b-8d0a-455ce26ff490 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"President"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | How many years did the U.S Marines retain influence on Haiti's external finances? | 84419dea-cb1d-4e27-bca1-6c85ccb5890f | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | Who was the first president, Hoover or Franklin D. Roosevelt? | 0d697de6-91f6-4220-93e9-a176581057db | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1567 | In 1930, Sténio Vincent, a long-time critic of the occupation, was elected President. By 1930, President Hoover had become concerned about the effects of the occupation, particularly after the December 1929 incident in Les Cayes. Hoover appointed a commission to study the situation, with William Cameron Forbes as the chair.:232-233 The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the U.S. administration had achieved, but it criticized the continued exclusion of Haitian nationals from positions of real authority in the government and the constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Haïti. In more general terms, the commission asserted that "the social forces that created still remain - poverty, ignorance, and the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government." The Hoover administration did not fully implement the recommendations of the Forbes Commission; but United States withdrawal was under way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Franklin D. Roosevelt. The latter as Assistant Secretary of the Navy had overall responsibility for drafting the most recent Haitian constitution; he was a proponent of the "Good Neighbor policy" for the US role in the Caribbean and Latin America. On a visit to Cap-Haïtien in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement agreement. The last contingent of U.S. Marines departed on August 15, 1934 after a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. The U.S. retained influence on Haiti's external finances until 1947. | How many years after Sténio Vincent was elected President did Roosevelt visit Cap-Haïtien? | a2fdcd0e-87ad-4b7a-b592-13d62a2c22f2 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | how many yards did michael spulock start off with? | 9473ae0b-040e-40f4-9afd-464a4178202c | {
"number": "63",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | How many points did the jets fall? | 3fa80f9a-24be-4cfe-a403-8e8bb9032659 | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | what decrease in popularity | ac950c10-1946-48e3-ae60-a4bebda1d81d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"game"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | what fixed out of sunday | 4b07e9fb-7d43-47f2-a4dd-7c997ddbe104 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Night Football"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | Which QB had two turnovers? | e177253c-e503-4852-b630-6cbba64f7a81 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"McElroy"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | How many yards was the shortest touchdown? | 27596fcb-121e-41b9-a594-de4aec2ee25b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"1-yard"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | How many more losses than wins did the Jets have after this game? | 94f3e442-64e3-40b5-93c2-cf7110572f38 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2453 | Due to a decrease in popularity for the game, it was flexed out of Sunday Night Football on NBC and rescheduled to 1:00 PM on CBS. Following the loss to the Titans Rex Ryan announced that Greg McElroy would start for the Jets against the Chargers. Following a 63-yard Michael Spurlock punt return touchdown McElroy led back to back scoring drives ending in 1-yard Shonn Greene touchdowns. The Chargers took over the game in the third quarter with two Philip Rivers touchdowns and a Nick Novak field goal while McElroy was intercepted once and strip-sacked once. With the loss, the Jets fell to 6-9, their first losing season since 2007. | Which player scored the most touchdowns? | dc17592c-b504-4046-a03c-755282db38ed | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Shonn Greene"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | Which happened first, the formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony, or the death of Charles VII? | 4fa9b591-e56d-4456-af85-fa014802b553 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the Quadruple Alliance"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | Which occirred first, the death of Charles VII, or the Peace of Füssen? | 55f1a01d-90aa-4551-8e5a-83fa99d59201 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"death"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | Which event happened first, the Treaty of Warsaw or the death of Charles VII? | 55183aaf-d562-4cef-8669-139c99ccd9f1 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Treaty of Warsaw"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | What happened first, the Treaty of Warsaw or the Peace of Füssen? | 7364db64-0e51-44b9-b39c-a3b522aa7e58 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Treaty of Warsaw"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | Which occurred first, the formation of the Quadruple Alliance or the Peace of Füssen? | dca46324-1f8c-49ce-9234-921a6413676e | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"formation of the Quadruple Alliance"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | How many days had passed from the formation of the Quadruple Alliance and the Peace of Füssen? | 806afb1d-9a34-4fd2-9a40-710d184c33ad | {
"number": "92",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | How many great battles happened in 1745? | b41ce8ac-e99e-412e-a8c5-3a63ff0ae8ed | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | How many countries were in the Quadruple Alliance? | 32f9dc35-94d1-4e9b-9138-34d82d55217f | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | Who was born second: Charles VII or Maximilian III of Bavaria? | 612cba29-2306-4bf5-82cb-990e06b61b87 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Maximilian III of Bavaria"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | What happened first: formation of the Quadruple Alliance or Peace of Füssen? | d94c5e55-38a0-4be9-b306-07186db813c1 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"formation of the Quadruple Alliance"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | How many months passed between the formation of the Quadruple Alliance and the Peace of Füssen? | b71ba23e-d003-4e44-83ad-4a4e5c0879f2 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | How many countries were in the Quadruple Alliance? | 09b78052-9c67-4c01-93c9-d4dd677809d9 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1596 | In 1745 three of the greatest battles of the war occurred: Hohenfriedberg, Kesselsdorf and Fontenoy. The formation of the Quadruple Alliance of Britain, Austria, the Dutch Republic and Saxony was concluded at Warsaw on 8 January 1745 by the Treaty of Warsaw. Twelve days later on 20 January 1745, the death of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles VII, submitted the imperial title to a new election. Charles VII's son and heir, Maximilian III of Bavaria, was not even considered a candidate for the Imperial throne. The Bavarian army was again unfortunate. Caught in its scattered winter quarters , it was driven from point to point by a maneuver by the Austrian army under the joint command of Count Batthyány, Baron Bernklau and Count Browne. All Bavarian garrisons fled to the east. The Bavarian Army under the command of Count Törring was divided and paralyzed. The French in the area under Count Ségur marched to save the day. Count Sègur's force out-numbered the Austrian army under Count Batthyany, yet Sègur and the French army were defeated at the Battle of Pfaffenhofen. The young elector Maximilian III had to abandon Munich once more. The Peace of Füssen followed on 22 April 1745, by which Maximilian III secured his hereditary states on condition of supporting the candidature of the Grand-Duke Francis, consort of Maria Theresa. The "imperial" army ceased ipso facto to exist. | What happened first, the Treaty of Warsaw, or the death of Charles VII? | c6dd3ee7-4bfc-482d-9497-0558120d742c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Treaty of Warsaw"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | Which happened first, the forming of the Tercio de Extranjeros or the Tragic Week? | b6057966-2928-4401-8b7f-f34fbb84a1c5 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Tragic Week of 1909"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | How many (in percentage) of the Foreign Legion in 1919 were actually Spanish? | f08e915f-331a-4401-a81c-644bd09c907d | {
"number": "75",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | Who was the regiment's second commander? | e0f2bdeb-f8db-41f5-8c20-577096e15170 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"then-Col. Francisco Franco"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | How many years after the Tragic Week of 1909 was the Spanish Legion formed? | e71db79c-bf38-45e4-8745-b4b64389b9ee | {
"number": "11",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | Who provided the elite forces that won Spain the war? | 03e5fe91-9df7-425e-ada7-237f181d153b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the Regulares",
"he Spanish Foreign Legion"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | Which was formed first, The Spanish Legion or the Spanish Foreign Legion? | dacd10b7-eadf-40b4-a3bf-2887f0782911 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Spanish Foreign Legion"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1274 | After the Tragic Week of 1909, the Spanish government starting in 1911 tried to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars as much of the Spanish working class had no desire to see their sons sent to Morocco, beginning a policy of what the Spanish historian Jose Alvarez called "Moroccanizing" the conquest of the Rif. Following the difficulties and setbacks that it had experienced in 1909-11, the Spanish army began to adopt much in organization and tactics from the French North African forces garrisoning most of Morocco and neighboring Algeria. Particular attention was paid to the French Foreign Legion and a Spanish equivalent, the Tercio de Extranjeros , known in English as the "Spanish Legion", was formed in 1920. The regiment's second commander was then-Col. Francisco Franco, having risen rapidly through the ranks. In the Rif war, it was the Regulares and the Spanish Foreign Legion founded in 1919 that provided the elite forces that won Spain the war. Less than 25% of this "Foreign Legion" were, in fact, non-Spanish. Harshly disciplined and driven, they quickly acquired a reputation for ruthlessness. As their number grew, the Spanish Legion and the Regulares increasingly led offensive operations after the disasters that had been suffered by the conscript forces. | How many years after the Tragic Week of 1909 did the Spanish government try to raise as many Regulare units as possible to avoid further working class resistance to colonial wars? | 8424cc84-7c75-4dd1-b5f7-520d33d63070 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | What was notable about Paea sacking McNabb in the end zone? | 196f929f-2cf7-450c-93a9-cc4db090d99a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"his NFL debut"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | By how many points was the game won? | 0422cf13-c511-4f0a-b626-4c20e0731d9d | {
"number": "29",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | Who won the game? | 3b34d0bd-4673-488c-9478-cdf94fdc9c50 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"The Bears"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | Who was in possesion of the ball at the start of the game? | bdc0c152-b81e-4c2d-8779-52b8b30da11b | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the Bears"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | How many points total were scored in the game? | 2a6ae524-dec1-4565-8b52-a8035388ab95 | {
"number": "49",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | How many points were scored in the first half of the game? | 5a9654d9-fbbe-426c-b1bf-1106260d93a1 | {
"number": "29",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | How many points were scored in the second half of the game? | 7cc5806b-b10b-4914-82b8-f209d56b3f89 | {
"number": "20",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | How long was the longest touchdown? | e2051996-5b86-47e6-8211-3dc9fdf9873f | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"51-yard"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | Who received the longest pass of the game? | 7b61b793-4415-47d0-9e4e-9c90a4cdb402 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Devin Hester"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | What was the halftime score? | 866532bb-a71c-4680-a17a-0ce483e10035 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"26-3"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | How many total points were scored in the game? | b21bdf62-6bd4-423a-815b-461ffc703af8 | {
"number": "49",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2168 | On Sunday night, the Bears would once again score on all three phases. The offensive line improved, allowing Jay Cutler to be sacked only once. Cutler would complete 21 of 31 passes for 267 yards with two touchdowns and a 115.9 passer rating. On the Bears opening possession, Cutler would fire a 48-yard touchdown pass to Devin Hester; it was the first time that the Bears scored a touchdown on the opening drive. Making his NFL debut, Stephen Paea sacked Donovan McNabb in the end zone for a safety, increasing the score to 9-0. Marion Barber would then score on a 3-yard run. Ryan Longwell would then kick a 37-yard field goal to make the score 16-3, but Cutler's 18-yard pass to Dane Sanzenbacher and Robbie Gould's 51-yard field goal increased the lead to 26-3. In the second half, Vikings defensive end Jared Allen would then force a fumble, and Adrian Peterson would then score, making the score 26-10, but Devin Hester would then return a kickoff 98 yards for a touchdown to increase the lead to 33-10. Gould would then kick two field goals to end the game at 39-10. The Bears defense would record five sacks, including two by Julius Peppers, who started the game despite being listed as "Doubtful" due to a sprained knee. The defense would limit Peterson to just 39 yards, the lowest he recorded against the Bears. | How many points did the Bears win the game by? | 0d0f02f1-fbef-43e1-ab57-816b7ba00c8d | {
"number": "29",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | How many funding periods will there be for Indonesia to achieve their strategic goal of MEF? | 1c84de97-b29c-44a6-a35c-bfaecd2b610b | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | How many years will it take to achieve Indonesia's stretegic goal of MEF? | d90e5336-1e47-4cf8-add9-2fae2697bdc4 | {
"number": "14",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | What will the most funds be used for during the MEF funding periond of 2010-2014? | 497817e3-6ed3-491b-b787-cf09f4212f69 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"for procurement"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | Which was more money to be spent on, procure major weapons systems or procurement? | 00b279ed-0bd8-4165-8ca9-a716a003e657 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"procure major weapons systems"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | Which was less money to be spent on, procurement or maintenance and repair? | 5dfe444e-6ba4-4177-b1f8-5da781d6b57a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"maintenance and repair"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | How many more billions of dollars will be used for the Minimum Essential Force procurement than maintenance and repair? | eeba13b0-c810-486d-aade-b3e7f5677cb3 | {
"number": "1.1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | How many more billions of dollars will be spent to procure major weapons systems than on maintenance and repair? | 225e0ebf-c5c8-4add-ad40-a538eca07500 | {
"number": "11.49",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2264 | From 2010 onwards, military spending in Indonesia was aligned to the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) strategic plan 2010 – 2014 requirements. Under MEF 2010 – 2014 funds of up to Rp150 trillion ($16.41 billion) to spend over five years to procure major weapons systems, Rp50 trillion $5.47 billion) will be used to accelerate achieving the Minimum Essential Force, Rp55 trillion ($6.02 billion) for procurement and Rp45 trillion ($4.92 billion) for maintenance and repair. Subsequent funding would be made available to fund the strategic plans of MEF 2015 - 2019 and MEF 2020 - 2024 to achieve the strategic goal of Minimum Essential Force. | How many years does each strategic plan cross? | bd9a1bbc-ce45-4a9f-af0b-da690293b969 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | How many years did these events span for? | f8d0313f-b8a8-4fc0-a8d6-00a835634f17 | {
"number": "12",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | Around how many months did these events span for? | aac90c4c-4e4c-4de5-9266-900040e882af | {
"number": "144",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | What group had their stronghold on the island of Basilan in January 2002? | 36f89768-070c-4427-ae55-019312314590 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Abu Sayyaf"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | How many months after JSOTF-P disbanded did American forces continue to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team"? | 8c3dbea1-fe9b-4f26-a257-367c7ca816eb | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | How many months after the Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disband did American forces continue to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team"? | eeff895d-4df6-479b-bcfc-f00d149c18cd | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | How many years after American forces ended operating in the Philippines under the names "PACOM Augmentation Team" did American operations within the Philippines against terrorist get renamed Operation Pacific Eagle? | 574e9344-2083-4106-96f5-2052032e2d88 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1643 | In January 2002, the United States Special Operations Command, Pacific deployed to the Philippines to advise and assist the Armed Forces of the Philippines in combating Filipino Islamist groups. The operations were mainly focused on removing the Abu Sayyaf group and Jemaah Islamiyah from their stronghold on the island of Basilan. The second portion of the operation was conducted as a humanitarian program called "Operation Smiles". The goal of the program was to provide medical care and services to the region of Basilan as part of a "Hearts and Minds" program. Joint Special Operations Task Force - Philippines disbanded in June 2014, ending a successful 12-year mission. After JSOTF-P had disbanded, as late as November 2014, American forces continued to operate in the Philippines under the name "PACOM Augmentation Team", until February 24, 2015. By 2018, American operations within the Philippines against terrorist was renamed Operation Pacific Eagle, which involves as many as 300 advisers. | How many years did American forces operate in the Philippines? | 759edb6d-5cd4-4fac-a45a-dbb4c88f0a4a | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years total was the last Mon rebellion flare up? | 556d939a-8793-4b8f-a30a-085742571770 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years in total did the Mon rebellions flare up? | 5998cd79-aefd-4030-88b6-61b657497b6d | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many centuries did the Mon rebellions happen in? | 8251f7b4-8f9a-46e9-bd9b-aab2fda30ec1 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many Mon rebellions occured between 1762 and 1826? | a0c31beb-83bc-46f2-8dba-25a2a693a93d | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | Was the last king of Hanthawaddy executed before or after the Forty Years' War? | d8f3ed24-07fa-426f-b53e-bd75177937b6 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"after"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | Who was usually the winning side, the Burmese-speaking north or the Mons in the south? | 013dc728-cd36-44ca-99d0-b3815d05ddd2 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the Burmese-speaking north"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years passed between the first and second Mon rebellions? | b25312d1-0e40-4e2c-8267-88677797db38 | {
"number": "12",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years were there in the shortest span between any two of the many Mon rebellions in the 1760-1826 period? | fa4e70cd-fbbb-4500-9710-e364ee38692c | {
"number": "9",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | In what year did the final Mon rebellion begin? | 3a6c5039-4273-4c81-93da-7c2cb0309214 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1824"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years after King Anawrahta's conquest of the south was the last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed? | e6efc38e-2c2f-4688-a5cb-a61e8659444a | {
"number": "717",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | For how many years did the longest Mon rebellion last? | 6a206c0f-7635-4557-8253-23458556bcba | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many Mon rebellions flared up between 1762 and 1826? | 280c1cdb-f7ce-4cd4-a4bf-08c45b236176 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years passed between King Anawrahta's conquest of the south and the last king of Hanthawaddy being executed? | 455b26c3-5918-44b7-bdc8-6791dedb7edb | {
"number": "717",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many different Mon rebellions flared up? | 1acac2fb-ff8a-4a77-8485-585bdfa6353f | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years after the 1792 rebellion did the last rebellion flare up? | 39d01f71-8a1a-4b3a-9a73-6f0b3b3d1db5 | {
"number": "32",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years total did Mon rebellions still flare up starting in 1762? | d1104ff2-f928-43ab-864c-17de5ab2e7b6 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_859 | The Konbaung-Hanthawaddy war was the last of the many wars fought between the Burmese-speaking north and the Mon-speaking south that began with King Anawrahta's conquest of the south in 1057. Many more wars had been fought over the centuries. Aside from the Forty Years' War in the 14th and 15th centuries, the south usually had been on the losing side. But this war proved to be the proverbial final nail. For the Mon, the defeat marked the end of their dream of independence. For a long time, they would remember the utter devastation that accompanied the final collapse of their short-lived kingdom. Thousands fled across the border into Siam. One Mon monk wrote of the time: "Sons could not find their mothers, nor mothers their sons, and there was weeping throughout the land". Soon, entire communities of ethnic Burmans from the north began to settle in the delta. Mon rebellions still flared up in 1762, 1774, 1783, 1792, and 1824-1826. Each revolt typically was followed by fresh deportations, Mon flight to Siam, and punitive cultural proscriptions. The last king of Hanthawaddy was publicly humiliated and executed in 1774. In the aftermath of revolts, Burmese language was encouraged at the expense of Mon. Chronicles by late 18th century and early 19th Mon monks portrayed the south's recent history as a tale of unrelenting northern encroachment. By the early 19th century, assimilation and inter-marriage had reduced the Mon population to a small minority. Centuries of Mon supremacy along the coast came to an end. | How many years after King Anawrahta's conquest of the south was the last king of Hanthawaddy publically humiliated and executed? | 5baadd60-9317-4c60-876e-65ed50d3752b | {
"number": "717",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2305 | China is the worlds leading producer of electric bicycles. According to the data of the China Bicycle Association, a government-chartered industry group, in 2004 Chinas manufacturers sold 7.5 million electric bicycles nationwide, which was almost twice 2003 sales; domestic sales reached 10 million in 2005, and 16 to 18 million in 2006. By 2007, electric bicycles were thought to make up 10 to 20 percent of all two-wheeled vehicles on the streets of many major cities. A typical unit requires 8 hours to charge the battery, which provides the range of 25–30 miles (40–50 km), at the speed of around , however people usually illegal override, makes it just like normal motorcycles, capable of reach nearly . A large number of such vehicles is exported from China as well (3 million units, worth 40 billion yuan ($5.8 billion), in 2006 alone), | How many more electric bicycles were sold in 2005 than in 2004? | acfe2d18-7043-4bf6-8fe4-d0a6e8317b63 | {
"number": "2500000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2305 | China is the worlds leading producer of electric bicycles. According to the data of the China Bicycle Association, a government-chartered industry group, in 2004 Chinas manufacturers sold 7.5 million electric bicycles nationwide, which was almost twice 2003 sales; domestic sales reached 10 million in 2005, and 16 to 18 million in 2006. By 2007, electric bicycles were thought to make up 10 to 20 percent of all two-wheeled vehicles on the streets of many major cities. A typical unit requires 8 hours to charge the battery, which provides the range of 25–30 miles (40–50 km), at the speed of around , however people usually illegal override, makes it just like normal motorcycles, capable of reach nearly . A large number of such vehicles is exported from China as well (3 million units, worth 40 billion yuan ($5.8 billion), in 2006 alone), | How many electric bicycles were exported from China in 2006? | 76062c8d-03ce-4932-9a3d-014fa4c9e804 | {
"number": "3000000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2305 | China is the worlds leading producer of electric bicycles. According to the data of the China Bicycle Association, a government-chartered industry group, in 2004 Chinas manufacturers sold 7.5 million electric bicycles nationwide, which was almost twice 2003 sales; domestic sales reached 10 million in 2005, and 16 to 18 million in 2006. By 2007, electric bicycles were thought to make up 10 to 20 percent of all two-wheeled vehicles on the streets of many major cities. A typical unit requires 8 hours to charge the battery, which provides the range of 25–30 miles (40–50 km), at the speed of around , however people usually illegal override, makes it just like normal motorcycles, capable of reach nearly . A large number of such vehicles is exported from China as well (3 million units, worth 40 billion yuan ($5.8 billion), in 2006 alone), | In 2006, how much did electric bicycles exports contribute to the Chinese economy? | 7bad8f38-e3c1-430d-9bc2-c86dad93d467 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"40 billion yuan"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2305 | China is the worlds leading producer of electric bicycles. According to the data of the China Bicycle Association, a government-chartered industry group, in 2004 Chinas manufacturers sold 7.5 million electric bicycles nationwide, which was almost twice 2003 sales; domestic sales reached 10 million in 2005, and 16 to 18 million in 2006. By 2007, electric bicycles were thought to make up 10 to 20 percent of all two-wheeled vehicles on the streets of many major cities. A typical unit requires 8 hours to charge the battery, which provides the range of 25–30 miles (40–50 km), at the speed of around , however people usually illegal override, makes it just like normal motorcycles, capable of reach nearly . A large number of such vehicles is exported from China as well (3 million units, worth 40 billion yuan ($5.8 billion), in 2006 alone), | Which years saw electric bicycle sales of 10 million or more? | 0851e6c2-5e85-47a1-87ac-731703aeb750 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"2005",
"2006"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_2285 | Coming off their Sunday night win over the Colts, the Steelers flew to Reliant Stadium in Houston for a duel with the Houston Texans. Pittsburgh trailed late in the first quarter when Texans quarterback Matt Schaub completed a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end Owen Daniels. Houston would add onto their lead in the second quarter with kicker Neil Rackers getting a 25-yard field goal. The Steelers finally answered in the third quarter with a 3-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall. Pittsburgh would tie the game in the fourth quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Shaun Suisham, but the Texans retook the lead when running back Arian Foster got a 42-yard touchdown run. The Steelers were unable to rally, and Big Ben was intercepted on the Steelers' final drive. | Which player scored the first touchdown, Owen Daniels or Rashard Mendenhall? | b42098fd-08ce-401d-810c-511368578e04 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Owen Daniels"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2285 | Coming off their Sunday night win over the Colts, the Steelers flew to Reliant Stadium in Houston for a duel with the Houston Texans. Pittsburgh trailed late in the first quarter when Texans quarterback Matt Schaub completed a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end Owen Daniels. Houston would add onto their lead in the second quarter with kicker Neil Rackers getting a 25-yard field goal. The Steelers finally answered in the third quarter with a 3-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall. Pittsburgh would tie the game in the fourth quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Shaun Suisham, but the Texans retook the lead when running back Arian Foster got a 42-yard touchdown run. The Steelers were unable to rally, and Big Ben was intercepted on the Steelers' final drive. | How many yards was the shortest touchdown run? | 4b48222b-872c-4ec1-8c7f-3ab7daa459e8 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2285 | Coming off their Sunday night win over the Colts, the Steelers flew to Reliant Stadium in Houston for a duel with the Houston Texans. Pittsburgh trailed late in the first quarter when Texans quarterback Matt Schaub completed a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end Owen Daniels. Houston would add onto their lead in the second quarter with kicker Neil Rackers getting a 25-yard field goal. The Steelers finally answered in the third quarter with a 3-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall. Pittsburgh would tie the game in the fourth quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Shaun Suisham, but the Texans retook the lead when running back Arian Foster got a 42-yard touchdown run. The Steelers were unable to rally, and Big Ben was intercepted on the Steelers' final drive. | Which player scored the first touchdown run of the game? | 092788c6-d165-47e4-bbc4-89fde4db2508 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Rashard Mendenhall"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2285 | Coming off their Sunday night win over the Colts, the Steelers flew to Reliant Stadium in Houston for a duel with the Houston Texans. Pittsburgh trailed late in the first quarter when Texans quarterback Matt Schaub completed a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end Owen Daniels. Houston would add onto their lead in the second quarter with kicker Neil Rackers getting a 25-yard field goal. The Steelers finally answered in the third quarter with a 3-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall. Pittsburgh would tie the game in the fourth quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Shaun Suisham, but the Texans retook the lead when running back Arian Foster got a 42-yard touchdown run. The Steelers were unable to rally, and Big Ben was intercepted on the Steelers' final drive. | Which player had the shortest touchdown scoring play? | bab99c4a-3edf-47e8-999b-f48647b7c553 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Owen Daniels"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_2285 | Coming off their Sunday night win over the Colts, the Steelers flew to Reliant Stadium in Houston for a duel with the Houston Texans. Pittsburgh trailed late in the first quarter when Texans quarterback Matt Schaub completed a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end Owen Daniels. Houston would add onto their lead in the second quarter with kicker Neil Rackers getting a 25-yard field goal. The Steelers finally answered in the third quarter with a 3-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall. Pittsburgh would tie the game in the fourth quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Shaun Suisham, but the Texans retook the lead when running back Arian Foster got a 42-yard touchdown run. The Steelers were unable to rally, and Big Ben was intercepted on the Steelers' final drive. | How many yards was the longest field goal? | f02da014-8b01-4f9d-8ce9-59c20854909b | {
"number": "26",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1381 | In the East, the intended gains of Lebensraum were never attained as fluctuating front-lines and Soviet scorched earth policies denied resources to the German invaders. Unlike in the West, the Nazi racial policy encouraged extreme brutality against what it considered to be the "inferior people" of Slavic descent; most German advances were thus followed by mass executions. Although resistance groups formed in most occupied territories, they did not significantly hamper German operations in either the East or the West until late 1943. In Asia, Japan termed nations under its occupation as being part of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, essentially a Japanese hegemony which it claimed was for purposes of liberating colonised peoples. Although Japanese forces were originally welcomed as liberators from European domination in some territories, their excessive brutality turned local public opinion against them within weeks. During Japan's initial conquest it captured 4,000,000 barrels of oil left behind by retreating Allied forces, and by 1943 was able to get production in the Dutch East Indies up to 50 million barrels , 76 per cent of its 1940 output rate. | How many more million barrels of oil was Japan producing per year in 1943 than it captured from retreating Allied forces during the initial conquest? | 4bcf51a4-a9ce-4e32-9982-52b0aa431c01 | {
"number": "46",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1381 | In the East, the intended gains of Lebensraum were never attained as fluctuating front-lines and Soviet scorched earth policies denied resources to the German invaders. Unlike in the West, the Nazi racial policy encouraged extreme brutality against what it considered to be the "inferior people" of Slavic descent; most German advances were thus followed by mass executions. Although resistance groups formed in most occupied territories, they did not significantly hamper German operations in either the East or the West until late 1943. In Asia, Japan termed nations under its occupation as being part of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, essentially a Japanese hegemony which it claimed was for purposes of liberating colonised peoples. Although Japanese forces were originally welcomed as liberators from European domination in some territories, their excessive brutality turned local public opinion against them within weeks. During Japan's initial conquest it captured 4,000,000 barrels of oil left behind by retreating Allied forces, and by 1943 was able to get production in the Dutch East Indies up to 50 million barrels , 76 per cent of its 1940 output rate. | How many more millions of barrels of oil was Japan able to get production in the Dutch East Indies from the initial conquest to 1943? | e2717e4d-7e2f-4900-a334-db483664a48f | {
"number": "46",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_3431 | After a tough win on the road, the Steelers returned home for Game 1 against the division rival Bengals. The Steelers would score first when Ben Roethlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 7-yard pass to make it 7-0. Later on in the quarter, the Bengals would tie it up when Andy Dalton found Brandon LaFell on a 6-yard pass to make it a 7-7 game. In the second quarter, the Steelers moved back into the lead when Roethlisberger found JuJu Smith-Schuster on a 31-yard pass to make it 14-7. The Bengals tied it up again when Dalton found Tyler Kroft on a 1-yard pass making it 14-14. The Steelers closed the half with 2 field goals kicked by Chris Boswell: From 22 and 24 yards out to retake the lead 17-14 and then make it 20-14 at halftime. In the highly defensive second half, the Steelers managed to score more field goals starting in the third quarter when Boswell went for 2 more, from 41 and 49 yards out, to increase the Steelers' lead from 9 to 12 and making the score change from 23-14 to 26-14. In the last quarter, the Steelers would seal the game when Boswell hit his fifth field goal of the game from 29 yards out to make the final score 29-14. With the win, the Steelers improved to 5-2. The team also picked up their 7th straight win against a divisional opponent and picked up their fifth straight win over the Bengals. | How many touchdowns did Andy Dalton throw? | fc46a153-5090-49ba-931c-5c4cc9ea577c | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_3431 | After a tough win on the road, the Steelers returned home for Game 1 against the division rival Bengals. The Steelers would score first when Ben Roethlisberger found Antonio Brown on a 7-yard pass to make it 7-0. Later on in the quarter, the Bengals would tie it up when Andy Dalton found Brandon LaFell on a 6-yard pass to make it a 7-7 game. In the second quarter, the Steelers moved back into the lead when Roethlisberger found JuJu Smith-Schuster on a 31-yard pass to make it 14-7. The Bengals tied it up again when Dalton found Tyler Kroft on a 1-yard pass making it 14-14. The Steelers closed the half with 2 field goals kicked by Chris Boswell: From 22 and 24 yards out to retake the lead 17-14 and then make it 20-14 at halftime. In the highly defensive second half, the Steelers managed to score more field goals starting in the third quarter when Boswell went for 2 more, from 41 and 49 yards out, to increase the Steelers' lead from 9 to 12 and making the score change from 23-14 to 26-14. In the last quarter, the Steelers would seal the game when Boswell hit his fifth field goal of the game from 29 yards out to make the final score 29-14. With the win, the Steelers improved to 5-2. The team also picked up their 7th straight win against a divisional opponent and picked up their fifth straight win over the Bengals. | How many field goals did Chris Boswell kick? | 18a53ed2-21d8-4b5e-b700-4aecf7bc4bf2 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.