section_id
stringlengths 5
12
| passage
stringlengths 103
9.68k
| question
stringlengths 4
388
| query_id
stringlengths 36
36
| answer
dict | validated_answers
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years since first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's wall were made to it was inaugurated as a public garden? | 3bf4905f-f9d3-485f-a123-9b750fc0b687 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many other fortifications were restored? | 8747adb9-0660-4bc3-92c3-ec7affe2ee2a | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years passed between the rediscovery of the medieval walls of Mdina and first plans to undertake a major restoration? | 4f809468-845a-47dd-ac20-aa0d14fc9934 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years passed between first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls and work beginning? | 1c04cefa-d26d-4c98-8894-06b718ab3afe | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years did the work on the restoration of Mdina's walls take to become fully completed? | 5e0a6eaa-e33a-4924-b90b-bf3aa3e7b360 | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years did the ERDF-financed work take to be completed? | 3d736769-6c89-4c76-8fd3-dc38eb8d737b | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years after sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered were the first plans made to start restoring them? | 8279d4dd-f864-45e8-b554-3480ffd93b09 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many cities were included in the project to restore the fortifications? | a2e1bbe9-e3e3-4378-9de7-883f40cb8c4a | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years after the restoration plans were made did work begin? | 8bab7e3d-ab0e-4558-be84-e73025fcafb5 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | After the work began, how many years passed until steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes? | 7ab00892-b75a-4d05-8c15-cb2543778ec9 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_574 | Sections of the medieval walls of Mdina were rediscovered by Dr. Stephen C. Spiteri and Mario Farrugia while they were surveying the bastions in 2002. The first plans to undertake a major restoration of Mdina's walls were made in 2006, as part of a project that also included restoration of the fortifications of Valletta, Birgu and the Cittadella. In the case of Mdina, the main focus was to consolidate the terrain, since the city is built on a blue clay plateau which is prone to subsidence. The multimillion-euro restoration was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Works began in early 2008 by the Restoration Unit. The process of restoration was documented by Dr. Spiteri. In 2011, steel rods were inserted into D'Homedes Bastion in order to prevent the walls from slipping down the clay slopes. The ditch was inaugurated as a public garden in March 2013. All ERDF-financed work was completed in late 2013, but the Restoration Directorate later restored other parts of the fortifications, including the northern walls, St. Peter Bastion and the area around Greeks Gate. The project was fully completed in early 2016. | How many years was it between the rediscovery of the walls and full completion of the work? | f3ca7875-d925-4432-88a7-76f5f388d183 | {
"number": "14",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | How many yards was his touchdown run? | 6b2a16eb-01ae-4667-9766-fe887076fd6e | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | How many fumbles did Tatum Bell have? | 163cff30-67c3-4239-8458-e0c38fc0c459 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | How many turnovers did Jake Plummer commit? | 9563d8e9-968d-4809-a0d9-b73ecccbc14e | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | How many 1 yard rushing touchdowns were there? | 82225614-0ec7-4bbc-9324-74ad34451519 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | Which team scored points first? | 1e0974b4-b8d0-4713-9f3b-d92deb5689b7 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"The Broncos"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | Which runningback had the most rushing yards of the game? | 198ebe6f-4683-4f71-a285-da5a728aa10a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Steven Jackson"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | How many touchdowns were scored? | b226c901-8410-43b5-83d0-d08a2e8e74b3 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_124 | The Broncos opened the regular season on the road against the St. Louis Rams on September 10 in the Edward Jones Dome. The game was primarily a defensive battle, with only one touchdown scored in the entire game, and the Rams won 18-10. Jake Plummer struggled throughout the game, throwing 3 interceptions, losing a fumble, and being sacked 4 times, 2 of them by Leonard Little. Tatum Bell also lost a fumble, but ran for 103 yards. Rookie Mike Bell ran for 58 yards and scored the only touchdown in the entire game late in the second quarter on a 1-yard run. Kicker Jeff Wilkins provided all of the scoring for the Rams, making 6 field goals, tying a franchise record, while running back Steven Jackson was one of the few bright spots for the Rams offense, running for 121 yards. The five turnovers by the Broncos was the most for them since the 2000 season. The Broncos would start their season at 0-1. | Which team scored more points in the game? | d3703e2c-f778-408b-99e9-828fa763a112 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Rams"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | What event happened first, the completion of Academy Palace or the publishing of the academic journal Rad? | c1c4142b-2f23-494f-965c-f2d2eda4f8ad | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Palace was completed in 1880",
"academic journal Rad in 1867"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | How many years passed between creation of The Academy and it's renewal by Bishop Strossmayer? | 46bc09bd-b4d1-4368-818f-d53de30c33a1 | {
"number": "205",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | How many years passed between the creation of The Academy and the publication of Ljetopis? | 04d572f8-8df7-46d6-9eb2-f00042d259de | {
"number": "218",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | What chair was Franjo Rački? | 7911459e-997f-47e7-8110-5fd7e2ae4c20 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"the first"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | How many people were JAZU members | 7c3e0b9c-51de-4232-99f9-a334f28c53a5 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | How many years before the academy was renewed? | 8fdf44b5-b17c-4bb8-b411-9df2f50d9af4 | {
"number": "205",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_380 | After some years of deliberations by the Croatian Parliament and the Emperor Franz Joseph, it was finally sanctioned by law in 1866. The official sponsor was Josip Juraj Strossmayer, while the first Chairman of the Academy was the distinguished Croatian historian Franjo Rački. Đuro Daničić was elected for secretary general of the Academy, where he played a key role in preparing the Academy's Dictionary, "Croatian or Serbian Dictionary of JAZU". The Academy's creation was the logical extension of the University of Zagreb, the institution initially created in 1669 and also renewed by bishop Strossmayer in 1874. Bishop Strossmayer also initiated the building of the Academy Palace in the Zrinjevac park of Zagreb, and the Palace was completed in 1880. In 1884, the Palace also became a host of The Strossmayer Gallery of Old Masters that contained 256 works of art . The same is today one of the most prominent art galleries in Zagreb. The Academy started publishing the academic journal Rad in 1867. In 1882, each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals. In 1887, the Academy published the first "Ljetopis" as a year book, as well as several other publications in history and ethnology. Ivan Supek, Mihailo Petrović, Dragutin Gorjanović-Kramberger and Lavoslav Ružička were JAZU members. | How many years passed from when the Academy was renewed before each of the individual scientific classes of the Academy started printing their own journals | 115b6830-5a16-4cb7-8f74-8c22bcdde541 | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | Who exhumed the chiefs body and how many times? | 27510120-5d47-4e8c-8fc2-e28f1ca784fc | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"those who wanted their picture",
"at least twice"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | What groups received 160 acre land allotments? | cabe21db-7d02-4e9c-83eb-855b7273647a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Posey's band",
"Chief Polk's band"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | How many total acres did Posey's band and Polk's band receive after the Bluff War? | 00a96cbc-eb15-4b88-a871-1a5fde69299c | {
"number": "320",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | Which happened first, the discovery of Posey's body, or the release of the Ute prisoners? | 72df813d-f5c0-4182-b4a0-8c1250e16605 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Posey's body was discovered"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | How many times was Posey's body exhumed? | 5bb3c77b-3c57-433b-8e13-a04c57548bb3 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | Who adapted more quickly to the new way of life, the Allen Canyon Utes or the Southern Utes? | 80f5d375-90fc-4810-9dda-6046f7866fe1 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Southern Utes"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | How many people died in the conflict? | 4377acdb-19a4-44e3-9a38-e08aead38f02 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | How many men died in the Bluff War of 1915? | 7edef3a3-60c4-41a0-83c7-158cefe13953 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | In what year did Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop die? | 1f908c78-10a8-4dea-8314-05d5d4bf880c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1915"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | Which two Indian groups participated in the Bluff War of 1915? | 62251a3f-a5c7-4fd7-9222-0803b619ba70 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Ute and Paiute"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1199 | Seventy-nine of the Ute and Paiute prisoners were taken to Blanding and put in the compound, they were released a few days later when Posey's body was discovered in Comb Wash. Marshal Jesse Ray Ward was taken to the location of Posey's remains by a party of Utes, there he officially identified the body and certified the chief's death. Marshal Ward had Posey's body buried in an unmarked grave with the idea of preventing the patrolling posses from disturbing it. The plan fell through and the chief's body was exhumed at least twice by those who wanted their picture taken with the corpse. The last of the Ute Wars was over and after Posey's band was released from Blanding they returned to the Allen Canyon area, having received 160 acre land allotments. Chief Polk's band, which participated in the 1915 Bluff War, also received 160 acre allottments around Montezuma Canyon. The natives agreed to abandon their nomadic ways, take up farming, and allow their children to be enrolled in Indian schools. Adjusting to the new way of life was slow for Posey's band and throughout the 1920s they continued to live in either tents or traditional hogans, a type of earthen hut, while other Utes were living in houses. In 1930 the superindendent of the Consolidated Ute Agency said that the natives of Allen Canyon were "at least 40 years behind the Southern Utes ." Chief Posey and the son of Joe Bishop were the sole fatalities during the conflict. There were no casualties on the Americans' side though the natives killed one of the posse's horses and narrowly missed several men. | How many bans received 160 acre allotments? | 49383bbc-c69f-4361-aef1-46ec45a74094 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_652 | By 9 September 1922, the Turkish army had entered Smyrna, with the Greek authorities having left two days before. Large scale disorder followed, with the Christian population suffering under attacks from soldiers and Turkish inhabitants. The Greek archbishop Chrysostomos had been lynched by a mob which included Turkish soldiers, and on September 13, a fire from the Armenian quarter of the city had engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city, leaving the city devastated. The responsibility for the fire is a controversial issue; some sources blame Turks, and some sources blame Greeks or Armenians. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Greeks and Armenians were killed in the fire and accompanying massacres. According to the population exchange treaty signed by both the Turkish and Greek governments, Greek orthodox citizens of Turkey and Turkish and Greek Muslim citizens residing in Greece were subjected to the population exchange between these two countries. Approximately 1,500,000 Orthodox Christians, being ethnic Greeks and ethnic Turks from Turkey and about 500,000 Turks and Greek Muslims from Greece were uprooted from their homelands. M. Norman Naimark claimed that this treaty was the last part of an ethnic cleansing campaign to create an ethnically pure homeland for the Turks Historian Dinah Shelton similarly wrote that "the Lausanne Treaty completed the forcible transfer of the country's Greeks." A large part of the Greek population was forced to leave their ancestral homelands of Ionia, Pontus and Eastern Thrace between 1914-22. These refugees, as well as Greek Americans with origins in Anatolia, were not allowed to return to their homelands after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. | How many treaties were made? | 43cd6bef-496a-4d5c-9097-b2b190e39cac | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_652 | By 9 September 1922, the Turkish army had entered Smyrna, with the Greek authorities having left two days before. Large scale disorder followed, with the Christian population suffering under attacks from soldiers and Turkish inhabitants. The Greek archbishop Chrysostomos had been lynched by a mob which included Turkish soldiers, and on September 13, a fire from the Armenian quarter of the city had engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city, leaving the city devastated. The responsibility for the fire is a controversial issue; some sources blame Turks, and some sources blame Greeks or Armenians. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Greeks and Armenians were killed in the fire and accompanying massacres. According to the population exchange treaty signed by both the Turkish and Greek governments, Greek orthodox citizens of Turkey and Turkish and Greek Muslim citizens residing in Greece were subjected to the population exchange between these two countries. Approximately 1,500,000 Orthodox Christians, being ethnic Greeks and ethnic Turks from Turkey and about 500,000 Turks and Greek Muslims from Greece were uprooted from their homelands. M. Norman Naimark claimed that this treaty was the last part of an ethnic cleansing campaign to create an ethnically pure homeland for the Turks Historian Dinah Shelton similarly wrote that "the Lausanne Treaty completed the forcible transfer of the country's Greeks." A large part of the Greek population was forced to leave their ancestral homelands of Ionia, Pontus and Eastern Thrace between 1914-22. These refugees, as well as Greek Americans with origins in Anatolia, were not allowed to return to their homelands after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. | How many days after the Turkish army's entry into Smyrna did a fire destroy the waterfront? | 96df35c2-4c0a-401b-9182-45e6cd1a7e23 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_652 | By 9 September 1922, the Turkish army had entered Smyrna, with the Greek authorities having left two days before. Large scale disorder followed, with the Christian population suffering under attacks from soldiers and Turkish inhabitants. The Greek archbishop Chrysostomos had been lynched by a mob which included Turkish soldiers, and on September 13, a fire from the Armenian quarter of the city had engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city, leaving the city devastated. The responsibility for the fire is a controversial issue; some sources blame Turks, and some sources blame Greeks or Armenians. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Greeks and Armenians were killed in the fire and accompanying massacres. According to the population exchange treaty signed by both the Turkish and Greek governments, Greek orthodox citizens of Turkey and Turkish and Greek Muslim citizens residing in Greece were subjected to the population exchange between these two countries. Approximately 1,500,000 Orthodox Christians, being ethnic Greeks and ethnic Turks from Turkey and about 500,000 Turks and Greek Muslims from Greece were uprooted from their homelands. M. Norman Naimark claimed that this treaty was the last part of an ethnic cleansing campaign to create an ethnically pure homeland for the Turks Historian Dinah Shelton similarly wrote that "the Lausanne Treaty completed the forcible transfer of the country's Greeks." A large part of the Greek population was forced to leave their ancestral homelands of Ionia, Pontus and Eastern Thrace between 1914-22. These refugees, as well as Greek Americans with origins in Anatolia, were not allowed to return to their homelands after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. | Approximately how many people were uprooted from their homes as a result of the Treaty of Lausanne? | 3d948b5b-8882-4203-8fb6-7b4c274b66af | {
"number": "2000000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_652 | By 9 September 1922, the Turkish army had entered Smyrna, with the Greek authorities having left two days before. Large scale disorder followed, with the Christian population suffering under attacks from soldiers and Turkish inhabitants. The Greek archbishop Chrysostomos had been lynched by a mob which included Turkish soldiers, and on September 13, a fire from the Armenian quarter of the city had engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city, leaving the city devastated. The responsibility for the fire is a controversial issue; some sources blame Turks, and some sources blame Greeks or Armenians. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Greeks and Armenians were killed in the fire and accompanying massacres. According to the population exchange treaty signed by both the Turkish and Greek governments, Greek orthodox citizens of Turkey and Turkish and Greek Muslim citizens residing in Greece were subjected to the population exchange between these two countries. Approximately 1,500,000 Orthodox Christians, being ethnic Greeks and ethnic Turks from Turkey and about 500,000 Turks and Greek Muslims from Greece were uprooted from their homelands. M. Norman Naimark claimed that this treaty was the last part of an ethnic cleansing campaign to create an ethnically pure homeland for the Turks Historian Dinah Shelton similarly wrote that "the Lausanne Treaty completed the forcible transfer of the country's Greeks." A large part of the Greek population was forced to leave their ancestral homelands of Ionia, Pontus and Eastern Thrace between 1914-22. These refugees, as well as Greek Americans with origins in Anatolia, were not allowed to return to their homelands after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. | Across how many years was the Greek population forced to leave their ancestral homelands? | 1391eecf-866d-4bb2-864c-adfa535e2825 | {
"number": "8",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_652 | By 9 September 1922, the Turkish army had entered Smyrna, with the Greek authorities having left two days before. Large scale disorder followed, with the Christian population suffering under attacks from soldiers and Turkish inhabitants. The Greek archbishop Chrysostomos had been lynched by a mob which included Turkish soldiers, and on September 13, a fire from the Armenian quarter of the city had engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city, leaving the city devastated. The responsibility for the fire is a controversial issue; some sources blame Turks, and some sources blame Greeks or Armenians. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Greeks and Armenians were killed in the fire and accompanying massacres. According to the population exchange treaty signed by both the Turkish and Greek governments, Greek orthodox citizens of Turkey and Turkish and Greek Muslim citizens residing in Greece were subjected to the population exchange between these two countries. Approximately 1,500,000 Orthodox Christians, being ethnic Greeks and ethnic Turks from Turkey and about 500,000 Turks and Greek Muslims from Greece were uprooted from their homelands. M. Norman Naimark claimed that this treaty was the last part of an ethnic cleansing campaign to create an ethnically pure homeland for the Turks Historian Dinah Shelton similarly wrote that "the Lausanne Treaty completed the forcible transfer of the country's Greeks." A large part of the Greek population was forced to leave their ancestral homelands of Ionia, Pontus and Eastern Thrace between 1914-22. These refugees, as well as Greek Americans with origins in Anatolia, were not allowed to return to their homelands after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. | What forced the Greeks to move? | 993a8808-ed2f-4871-b611-6acdbb63d54f | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Lausanne Treaty"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_652 | By 9 September 1922, the Turkish army had entered Smyrna, with the Greek authorities having left two days before. Large scale disorder followed, with the Christian population suffering under attacks from soldiers and Turkish inhabitants. The Greek archbishop Chrysostomos had been lynched by a mob which included Turkish soldiers, and on September 13, a fire from the Armenian quarter of the city had engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city, leaving the city devastated. The responsibility for the fire is a controversial issue; some sources blame Turks, and some sources blame Greeks or Armenians. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Greeks and Armenians were killed in the fire and accompanying massacres. According to the population exchange treaty signed by both the Turkish and Greek governments, Greek orthodox citizens of Turkey and Turkish and Greek Muslim citizens residing in Greece were subjected to the population exchange between these two countries. Approximately 1,500,000 Orthodox Christians, being ethnic Greeks and ethnic Turks from Turkey and about 500,000 Turks and Greek Muslims from Greece were uprooted from their homelands. M. Norman Naimark claimed that this treaty was the last part of an ethnic cleansing campaign to create an ethnically pure homeland for the Turks Historian Dinah Shelton similarly wrote that "the Lausanne Treaty completed the forcible transfer of the country's Greeks." A large part of the Greek population was forced to leave their ancestral homelands of Ionia, Pontus and Eastern Thrace between 1914-22. These refugees, as well as Greek Americans with origins in Anatolia, were not allowed to return to their homelands after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. | How many days passed between the Turkish army entering Smyrna and the fire that engulfed the Christian waterfront of the city? | 6d216994-0d47-4687-8ffc-3f62a9ef181e | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years did John Roberts attempt to reforest the island? | d60e561f-1e85-4100-a447-035befe07aec | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many different years did they have floods? | 86f345ba-5448-4e7a-aaa8-2029a12ef4f0 | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | Which year was the first flood? | 0feca51c-c548-4dee-bbcb-49adcaabfd9c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": "1732"
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years for Isaac Pyke to make serious suggestion to move population to Mauritius? | 59b47b62-8b7e-40a6-bd4f-06a456f703b0 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many more years was Isaac Pyke governor compared to John Roberts? | c9e45b12-1df8-4acb-b9f2-a9bc04db44d0 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years was there a connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods? | 9ed7c9b8-414f-418a-ad8c-58836afa472f | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years was John Roberts governor? | 3ab8cec8-c5dd-4a70-9fb3-163692026088 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years after rats were observed building nests in trees did an outbreak of plague occur that was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India? | b3ac1101-62b1-4c6f-8e86-887b6d27798f | {
"number": "12",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years after a visitor commented that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges were soldiers employed in killing the wild cats? | 2c6d1ace-9410-469a-bb92-a0867ddf72b8 | {
"number": "40",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years after Isaac Pyke become governor did he make a serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius? | 6245ff8d-7968-4487-a7c3-40dc3aec12cf | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | Who was governor first, John Roberts or Isaac Pyke? | e91c3711-923b-4dc6-930b-1e883dbbfc75 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"John Roberts"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years was Isaac Pyke governor? | 82c5d716-6499-44b9-9182-4461f2668da5 | {
"number": "5",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years after governor John Roberts left office was an ordinance passed to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in goat population? | 3a0d6668-0e9a-407f-8685-de86f323e4bf | {
"number": "20",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years was John Roberts governor? | c0d662f9-ef94-4b47-a826-1455ec8340e1 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_2070 | The clearance of the indigenous forest for the distillation of spirits, tanning and agricultural development began to lead to shortage of wood by the 1680s. The numbers of rats and goats had reached plague proportions by the 1690s, leading to the destruction of food crops and young tree shoots. Neither an increase on duty on the locally produced Arrack (drink) nor a duty on all firewood helped reduce the deforestation whilst attempts to reforest the island by governor John Roberts (1708–1711) were not followed up by his immediate successors. The Great Wood, which once extended from Deadwood Plain to Prosperous Bay Plain, was reported in 1710 as not having a single tree left standing. An early mention of the problems of soil erosion was made in 1718 when a waterspout broke over Sandy Bay, on the southern coast. Against the background of this erosion, several years of drought and the general dependency of St Helena, in 1715 governor Isaac Pyke (1714–1719) made the serious suggestion to the Company that appreciable savings could be made by moving the population to Mauritius, evacuated by the French in 1710. However, with the outbreak of war with other European countries, the Company continued to subsidise the island because of its strategic location. An ordinance was passed in 1731 to preserve the woodlands through the reduction in the goat population. Despite the clear connection between deforestation and the increasing number of floods (in 1732, 1734, 1736, 1747, 1756 and 1787) the East India Company’s Court of Directors gave little support to efforts by governors to eradicate the goat problem. Rats were observed in 1731 building nests in trees two feet across, a visitor in 1717 commenting that the vast number of wild cats preferred to live off young partridges than the rats. An outbreak of plague in 1743 was attributed to the release of infected rats from ships arriving from India. By 1757, soldiers were employed in killing the wild cats. | How many years after a visitor commented on the vast number of wild cats that preferred to live off young partridges were soldiers employed to kill the wild cats? | cb54bf8d-cfa4-4944-b348-bca0bf64af08 | {
"number": "40",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many men did Ieyasu lose at the fort? | 6b3f8eff-b0ba-4688-b418-c805d1fe7f03 | {
"number": "1500",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many more men did Ieyasu have attacking Imafuku than they had defending it? | 8ca23d8d-edf6-48b3-9d5f-6c9857c8f7fd | {
"number": "900",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | What happened first: Ieyasu began the siege or Shogun's armies were repelled? | 1f5d7989-717e-47e5-b4a8-08fa4823f138 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Ieyasu began the siege"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | What happened second: Ieyasu began the siege or Shogun's armies were repelled? | 30245bf9-f951-4484-8ce7-7ca529ddc354 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Shogun's armies were repelled"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many months did the siege last? | 940e1eb2-f749-4003-a954-d74be0b76a4f | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | Which group was larger during the attack on the Imafuku village, Ieyasu's forces or the defending forces? | f5eca0d4-df89-4371-9b40-2cdb3e45ad6d | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Ieyasu's forces"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many more men did Ieyasu's forces have compared to the defending forces when they attacked Imafuku? | 15e230ee-b891-4517-8b33-f407566f74b0 | {
"number": "900",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | What did Ieyasu's forces do earlier, attack Imafuku or siege the Osaka Castle? | f82cebff-8090-41c1-b0ac-14a2827a7a2a | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"attack Imafuku"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | What did Ieyasu's forces do later, destroy the fort by the Kizu River or attack Imafuku? | 9f4bc236-e46b-4619-8e4a-b0ee29faa767 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"attack Imafuku"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many times did Sanada and his men break through the siege lines? | 6ab76fad-a296-4153-bbea-09c1ddd0e217 | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many days later did Ieyasu attack the village of Imafuku? | 408c6431-418c-41fe-b344-26e3434eb0c1 | {
"number": "7",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many weeks later did Ieyasu attack the village of Imafuku? | 0d651ff2-d8c1-43dd-b4b3-61f7a9003cf0 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many more men did Ieyasu have than the defending force? | b70d132f-4ffa-4cfa-b25d-62423df3d4d8 | {
"number": "900",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1412 | The siege began on 19 November, when Ieyasu led 3,000 men across the Kizu River, destroying the fort there. A week later, he attacked the village of Imafuku with 1,500 men, against a defending force of 600. With the aid of a squad wielding arquebuses, the shogunate forces claimed another victory. Several more small forts and villages were attacked before the siege of Osaka Castle itself began on 4 December. The Sanada-maru was an earthwork barbican defended by Sanada Yukimura and 7,000 men, on behalf of the Toyotomi. The Shogun's armies were repeatedly repelled, and Sanada and his men launched a number of attacks against the siege lines, breaking through thrice. Ieyasu then resorted to artillery as well as men to dig under the walls. On 22 January the Winter Siege was ended, with Toyotomi Hideyori pledging to not rise in rebellion. He also allowed Ieyasu to tear down the walls of the outer layer of defenses, and fill in the outer moat of Osaka Castle. | How many men were fighting at the village of Imafuku attack? | c5683138-e524-44b3-8159-699a10d804cf | {
"number": "2100",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many for the minimum was the red army's number of infantry? | ad297a9c-d404-479e-a297-486fc6a8e5b3 | {
"number": "108000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many for the minimum was the red army's number of cavalry? | 6d99f508-b98c-4437-91bf-36083d58f208 | {
"number": "11000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many for the minimum was the red army's number of machine guns? | 4e5ba362-9f11-4b8e-9ef6-c3c7dc598b4f | {
"number": "2913",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | Did the Red Army have more infantry or cavalry? | 4aed796a-a455-4d45-b43f-24d89eded917 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"infantry"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | Did the Red Army have more artillery pieces or machine guns? | 906b7998-b768-4608-bd50-0986cb0abd99 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"artillery pieces"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | For every Polish sodier, how many did the Soviets have? | 35879f20-c460-426a-a787-623be58da054 | {
"number": "4",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many more infantry did the Northwest Front have than cavalry? | c91905ab-7d12-438b-8d07-13503f5e9866 | {
"number": "97000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many armies were to push west? | 12b9297d-57bf-459f-b4b9-008b6bde699f | {
"number": "3",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many more infantry was there than cavalry under General Mikhail Tukhachevsky? | a5e2902c-2ade-46a7-a8b6-41375b5ecd97 | {
"number": "97000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | Did the Red Army have more infantry or cavalry? | 07e21263-bb54-4a91-b370-861ae0a32540 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"infantry"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | Who had more troops, the Soviets, or the Poles? | a8bfc0eb-96d5-4794-9189-568942c2ad01 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"The Soviets"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many more infantry than cavalry did the Red Army have? | 79664fc5-8ec1-42a8-b66a-2e3a352fc09e | {
"number": "97000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many total artillery and machine guns did the Red Army have? | 7713d0b1-c17b-4c34-bb55-c50697d5c527 | {
"number": "3635",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | Did the Red Army have more artillery pieces or machine guns? | 26a74181-b1ad-422f-80e6-5feac358d401 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"machine guns"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many total infantry and cavalry did the Red Army have? | c017f43e-b073-46d8-9e06-4b477a13dff7 | {
"number": "119000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | Did the Red Army have more artillery pieces or machine guns? | 59d55e80-b121-4c99-bf4f-3390719c95a5 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"machine guns"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
history_1175 | Against the Polish line the Red Army gathered its Northwest Front led by the young General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. Their numbers exceeded 108,000 infantry and 11,000 cavalry, supported by 722 artillery pieces and 2,913 machine guns. The Soviets at some crucial places outnumbered the Poles four-to-one.Tukhachevsky launched his offensive on 4 July, along the Smolensk-Brest-Litovsk axis, crossing the Auta and Berezina rivers. The northern 3rd Cavalry Corps, led by Gayk Bzhishkyan , were to envelop Polish forces from the north, moving near the Lithuanian and Prussian border . The 4th, 15th, and 3rd Armies were to push west, supported from the south by the 16th Army and Mozyr Group. For three days the outcome of the battle hung in the balance, but Soviet numerical superiority proved decisive and by 7 July Polish forces were in full retreat along the entire front. However, due to the stubborn defense by Polish units, Tukhachevsky's plan to break through the front and push the defenders southwest into the Pinsk Marshes failed. | How many more infantry than cavalry were there in the Red Army? | d2d4ae74-bc69-4ca1-aded-f3a452790ca0 | {
"number": "97000",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [],
"date": [],
"spans": [],
"worker_id": [],
"hit_id": []
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | Which team got on the board first? | 4b16d906-a188-4445-9d93-5b85914b81ea | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Philadelphia"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many points did the Giants get on the board with? | 5f8762aa-c54a-485f-9dc1-25e17cb5b7ba | {
"number": "6",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many touchdown passes did McNabb throw over 50 yards? | c481f49a-7c35-4862-9438-c692f1c24a54 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many points did the Eagles core in the first quarter? | c4697414-f345-4371-a142-e67c6d324c4d | {
"number": "13",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many of their last two games did the Giants win coming in to this game? | 9a7f0f17-7a81-4a9d-b14a-77a99e7742cc | {
"number": "0",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many touchdowns were in the first quarter? | 25dbbdbf-42ea-4ba5-b1f1-4b279fc94ce5 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | Which player scored second? | 35129440-e436-47bc-9ed3-ce800ef3c55c | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"Brent Celek"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many touchdowns did Philadelphia score in the first quarter? | b16c0dda-7904-4bdd-944c-b8d1a779f679 | {
"number": "2",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many touchdown passes did Donovan McNabb throw in the first quarter? | c355195c-04e5-4bb6-8c44-e61b6e0c4308 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | How many touchdown passes did Eli Manning throw in the second quarter? | c112c07d-033b-4372-a5d2-287a0dad3618 | {
"number": "1",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
nfl_1554 | Trying to end a two-game losing streak, the Giants went into Lincoln Financial Field for a crucial Week 8 game with the Philadelphia Eagles, as the divisional lead was up for grabs. New York trailed greatly in the first quarter as Eagles fullback Leonard Weaver got a 41-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Donovan McNabb's 17-yard touchdown pass to tight end Brent Celek (with a blocked PAT). Philadelphia would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 30-yard field goal from kicker David Akers. The Giants would get on the board as quarterback Eli Manning found tight end Kevin Boss on an 18-yard touchdown pass, but the Eagles continued their scoring as McNabb completed a 54-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver DeSean Jackson and a 23-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. Philadelphia would begin the third quarter with an increase to their lead as Akers nailed a 35-yard field goal. New York tried to rally as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 35-yard field goal, followed by running back Ahmad Bradshaw. However, the Eagles would seal the win in the fourth quarter as running back LeSean McCoy got a 66-yard touchdown run. | In which quarter did McNabb throw the most touchdown passes? | c460126b-bd1c-4b50-a39f-e8af01d4efb2 | {
"number": "",
"date": {
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
},
"spans": [
"second quarter"
],
"worker_id": "",
"hit_id": ""
} | {
"number": [
""
],
"date": [
{
"day": "",
"month": "",
"year": ""
}
],
"spans": [
[]
],
"worker_id": [
""
],
"hit_id": [
""
]
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.