text
stringlengths 0
4.07k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence | lang
stringclasses 1
value | has_toxic
int64 0
1
| has_profane
int64 0
1
| has_insult
int64 0
1
| has_hate
int64 0
1
| has_threat
int64 0
1
| has_sexual
int64 0
1
| has_offensive
int64 0
1
| has_selfharm
int64 0
1
| has_harassment
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"
— Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Or between the French and the Walloons. Surprise, our article on French people clearly labels the Walloon as a distinct ethnic group... Perhaps it is best not to make comparisons?
After screwing it up a few times, I have done rewrites of parts of the article (mainly a word and a sentence left and right) to make the distinction and relation between the Dutch and the Flemish clearer. The article switched constantly between parts about the Dutch only, and parts about the Dutch and Flemish together. This should now be clearer. The major thing left to adjust are the graphs of the number of Dutch, since these still al include the Flemish. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You need to sign the above and your RSN post. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A few things to get straight...
Firstly, I do not like you. You look like a smug little prick to me.
Secondly, I do not like your ethnicity. Not one little bit. I'd like you to explain yourself on that count.
Thirdly, your dog is a bit of a bender.
94.1.96.85 | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Procedure
Do I ask you for the award? Michelle Obama already has a million views this year and Anthony Davis (basketball) had a million in 2012. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Adding more than links
I did add more thank links but the entire page was also marked as spam for no reason other than the no one is familiar with the one hundred year old industry. And you still have not explain how the links on this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_building are relevant and mine is not. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do not accuse members of vandalism. I do not mind if you change the word unique to prominent or remove stories of dreams etc. but you have vandalised the page and made a statement biased by saying that Dr. Qadri ""only"" sent out a referendum so I reverted the whole edit. You have also reciently vandalised the page by removing the names of the Yemeni scholars who recieved Dr. Qadri's Ijaza including the pictures and this is a clear form of vandalism so before accusing other members of vandalism do not vandalise the page yourself. What I did was clearly not vandalism as I only reverted your edit and any changes you made and brought the page back to its previous form. So would you first kindly read the rules of wikipedia and find out the definition of vandalism before accusing experienced users. You are still new to wikipedia I'm afraid and you need to learn how it works and the different rules of wikipedia before making any further edits. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I know how it's pronounced in Turkish. The question is whether there's a specific pronunciation that's dominant in English. If not, it's best not to include any English transcription or pronunciation audio file. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oh, sorry. I actually found it on an other page but I forgot it anyway... It was actually a note for myself (was going to rewrite the text). Suppose it slipped out of my mind. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
June 2008
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bugatti Veyron. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Terri Schiavo as Rorschach Test
Now perhaps you see that utility of Terri Schiavo is as Rorschach Test. You dangle that pretty, slender alive and aware young face in front of the Power Players (on both the Left and the Right) and you see how they respond. If they respond inappropriately, then you make a note it, as if they were just some rat in your laboratory. That is what make Wikiepda so powerful. And it is all true and NPOV; notable and fair. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ok stop being lame. seriously. go watch pokemon. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Past Masters vs. Rarities
I'm creating a chart for my own use that includes U.S. albums, since there are so many differences in the early albums. As a U.S. fan, I'm faced with the issue of whether to have U.S. albums, U.K. albums or both on my iPod? I will post my chart on my talk page so that others can judge whether it's worthy of including here. I realize there will be problems, including the lack of Canadian albums. My purpose is simply to record the first ALBUM appearance in both the U.K. and U.S. of each song.
I notice that a number of U.K. songs are listed as Past Masters when they actually first appeared on Rarities (1978 The Beatles album). I don't know the reason for this if the purpose is to list the first appearance on an album. Can someone explain? Or should they be changed to Rarities? " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Simpsons movie poster
Did you create the Simpsons movie poster image or did you source it from somewhere else? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Help
Hey, can you help me with something? I uploaded this image to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stikky_cemetary_San_Jose_1987.jpg I contacted the photographer and he gave me permission to use it on Wikipedia, so I was wondering what the proper licensing would be. Thanks in advance. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Looks good. It would be nice to see the counties, but it is a lot better than the current one. Good job. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The debunkers (pretending that they're objective sceptics) besides proving their lack of knowledge and lack of integrity on the various Astrology pages have also been personally attacking me on my own talk page. When I dare try to defend myself, they block me out of Wikipedia. So much for honest dialogue. They can't win an argument fairly, so they resort to dirty tricks. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Reviewing blocks
You said: ""I'd also like to ask you that in future, for the sake of fairness and due process that you do not decline the unblock requests of users you block yourself unless the request is pure nonsense or abusive. From an ethical, reviews of blocks are meant to be carried out by a 3rd party.""
Will do. I thought it was pretty clear in this case, given the editor's user page (GNAA, etc., etc., etc.), that the unblock request was pure nonsense. Also, I was under the impression that the unblock request would still be visible and reviewed by other admins. I'll be more careful in the future. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Regarding edits made during December 31 2006 (UTC) to Kanpur
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Come on. Was this really necessary? I understand where your coming from but you sound like a whiney bitch. When you have a website that anyone can edit, this sort of stuff comes with the territory. And did you really expect anyone other then the 4 or 5 people who troll WP:PW to read your comments on Talk:Royal Rumble (2008) (or this talk page for that matter)?
I'm confident most active members of WP:PW have added WrestleMania XXIV to their watch list. So when and if something not to their liking is added, it will be removed. Simple as that. And if you're 'through with putting up with people not reading talk pages', quit. Endless Dan | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I do not see any anti-semitism here. If the guy gives lectures in New York synagogues and knocks down his country every single minute, using every opportunity in such influential newspapers as New York Post, then one can state that his interests are not only personal. You can not find any intellectual person among neoconservatives in New York Post. Michelle Malkin, Andrea Peyser, Deborah Orin (may her rest in peace, although I know she is rotting in hell)and other essayists are the ones who make a great company for Amir Taheri. This guy has no mind at all. I agree that Iran's regime is wrong, but the regime of Shah that Amir Taheri is longing for, because he owned Keyhan during that regime was not any better and Islamic Revolution was justified. Look at how they intriduce Amir Taheri in both this article and in New York Post. ""Based in Europe memeber of Benador Associates"". Is Europe that small? Is that a small town? Why don't they say based in the world journalist. Or may be he is having a breakfast in London with Christian Amanpour and James Rubin, eating lunch in Jerusalem, and having some lectures and dinner with anti Irani Jews in Forest Hills, New York in between emailing his full of hatred articles to New York Post. Isn't this stupid? How can you saysomebody is based in Europe or Asia or Africa?" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Why confusion and controversy in the ""real world"" does not preclude the writing of a good Wikipedia on the topic
Ackoz suggests that, because the real world has not yet hashed out ""the truth"" about the expulsions, it is therefore impossible for us to know the truth and thus impossible for us to write about it.
I reject such a stance. I think it is difficult but quite possible to write a quality Wikipedia article about a topic that is murky and/or controversial. Where many Wikipedia editors ""get it wrong"" is that they believe Wikipedia's job is to report the truth. This is wrong. Wikipedia's job is not to report the truth precisely because it is difficult to determine what the truth is. Any attempt to do that is original research.
Instead of ""truth"", Wikipedia aims for ""verifiability"". Put a different way, Wikipedia is committed to recording the state of human knowledge and opinion (not our opinions but those of reliable sources). If the truth is clear and uncontroversial, it is easy for us to report that. If the truth is murky and controversial, it is more challenging but possible for us to report on what different reliable sources assert and think about a topic EVEN if these reliable sources conflict. Where Wikipedia editors get into trouble is when they start siding with one side of a controversy and asserting that the side that they have selected represents ""THE TRUTH"" and not just one perspective (or POV) on the topic at hand.
I have been trying to hit this NPOV ""sweet spot"" but it is difficult to do so in the midst of a running polemical debate between the two sides.
Obviously is, because some users (Jadger and Wikiferdi) don't want to discuss in fact, they want us to agree with their POV, that's not discussion about the NPOV edits. That's why I quit from the discussion about the form of the article. ≈talk≈ " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I did not intend to be disruptive, I was genuineley upset by the word constantly. I only tried to make it look like an april fool joke after you explanation made me look like an uptight weirdo | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Regarding Loyalmoonie and LGBT categories
Looked into it, and this editor seems to be pushing an anti-LGBT agenda. They've done similar stuff over at Sailor Moon, and made ""official-looking"" warnings to other editors. This quote is bizarre, and is quite telling: ""To insert those categories would ultimately give other people (who may not even support the LGBT movement) reading the article the assumption that every person who does enjoy Sailor Moon is a homosexual (and/or supports SSM)"". I don't personally watch/read Sailor Moon or know much about it, so I'm not confident enough to re-add the categories, but the reasoning for their removal is flawed regardless, and there is a sourced part in the article about female homosexuality.talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Matt, when mattsanchez.info goes live on Monday, among other things you'll see an invitation to be interviewed. This time you'll have nowhere to hide. Let's see who's a victim and who's a coward. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Okay, I found a document that demonstrates the SCIMD listing by the WHO on the WHO site, now there should be no trouble with including the above text: | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Valerie Poxleitner
Valeri Poxleitner, A.K.A. Lights. If | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Shamash is Sun
I agree to merge Sammash in to Shamash, since Shamash is more likely to be correct.
Tracking the root of the word, clearly it is of Assyrian origin, in addition, it is a common vocabulary morph to substitute “Sh” to “S” and thus, nowadays, it is spelled as Shams in Modern Arabic. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I feel like I'm out of ideas for now, so maybe some other users will come up with things that address both our concerns. – (talk ⋅ contribs) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
October 2010 (UTC)
The original nominator and I have been trying to restore the article, but others have been saying it was found to be merged by you so it has to stand. With the original nominator for deletion working to keep the article, and admitting he was mistaken in nominating the article of a noteworthy character, can we restore it now? If someone wants to make a legitimate nomination for deletion, that's fine. 09:43, 21 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
What chart are you looking at? I don't see anything portraying that timing. [[User talk:Spinningspark|Spark]]''' " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::::::Agreed, although it means bloating the alternative title by yet another word. I was concentrating on the Polish attitude here, as it clearly provides the starting point for the article at hand. Obviously, if the article is to be written from a supra-national perspective, at least the Czech experience needs to be included. Czechoslovakia, being the only functioning democracy in the region by the 1930s, had closer ties with the West than Poland did, and was ""betrayed"" in a much more obvious and tangible way than Poland was: The West politically accepted the country's territorial mutilation, which was not the case with Poland.
That said, I am not sure if the inclusion of countries such as Finland, the Baltics, Yugoslavia, or even Ukraine (which had never been independent in the first place) is a good idea. While the West could have arguably done more to assist any of these societies before and after the war, I think that the article's focus should be on Poland and Czechoslovakia in order not do dilute the whole issue. After all, there were dissidents in Germany and the Soviet Union, too, who were harbouring grudges towards Western politicians because of their appeasement policy. 19:06, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello Setanta, can I ask you what you think of the proposal first put forward by Matt Lewis in July at Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland. I confess I am no expert on N.Ireland, but I believe this could solve the problem of N.Ireland having no flag to represent it on wiki. I have made a comment at that article. Cheers. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
American Psychologist as additional resource
I did not see listed in the references any citations of the ""American Psychologist"" articles in January 2003, some of which discuss this subject. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Regarding the Verifiability mediation, you will appreciate that due to recent events user talk:newbyguesses#February 2012 that I am jn a pickle. Is it just me, or is it you too? I don't know what to do how can we go forward? What is to become of me and all my beliefs and needs? Who is there who cares to take in to account my position, is there no accounting for our differences and each of us, what it is that you see that we stand for in the highest degree as individuals, really individual as we all are individually in our own way, as real people, different but the same, but definitely an individual just like every body else believes they are, despite all evidence to the contrary. Comment on content not on contributors, or did I just dream that? Either way, or whatever, just don't scare the horses or wake the kiddies comfortably snoozing. You know it makes sense to me cause I say so, irrefutably, ( talk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
you have no authority to be threatning to block me about saying information about a company i work for. you do not even know anything about airliners bello. that is all i basically said, if that was so hard to comprehend. ( ) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The real problem is the sneering and contemptuous attitude that you reveal in your first sentence in the last post. (It was originally followed by others in similar vein, which you have deleted.) Yes. I can cut and paste quotations. I can also select appropriate ones, in this case one which you would do well to consider. I will return to this when I have time, probably this weekend. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
He does appear to be a bit of a fantasist. To be fair, he has carved a nice little career for himself and more fool the mugs that buy his books and believe what he says. But, like many people contributing to this page, I come from that background and whenever his name is mentioned the response is always ""Dave who?"" No-one had ever heard of him at all until the books started coming out. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dar
Ok, bear with me. Penelopism is a religion. It's a new religion. But it is a religion. Penelopism is extrememly important to Penelopists. We want the word about us out there. People are not too fond of our beliefs. We just want a way to show them that we mean no harm. Now, you have the Spaghetti Monster Church in here. That is not even a real religion. Penelopism is. So please. Tell me what the Spaghetti Monster has done that Penelopism hasn't. What can we do so that Penelopism can be on wikipedia? Because I am having trouble understanding. And I apologize for the 'dar dar dar.' However much fun it was, I shouldn't have done it.
whatsit. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I intended this to go the page: | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DXRAW come out, come out, where ever you are
How odd that DXRAW goes away and then in the follwing articles ExtraDry appears in the editing lists:
Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi
Free Hugs Campaign
Newington College
Australian Army Cadets
John Cena
So you really are that cheer loving, free hugging, Newington teacher and cadet master who has the hots for John Cena with his shirt off. It's time you came out DXRAW! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This accusation is uncalled for. I have only reverted one edit. My second edit was to add the reference, not a revert. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Do not help the jew Schnider. Final warning. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
kudos for destroying article, copyright superstar! you really deserve nobel prize for copyright | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:
Policy on neutral point of view
Guideline on spam
Guideline on external links
Guideline on conflict of interest
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The spelling ""Tacarimba La Tumba Del Fuego Santa Maliga Sacategas Lo Onto Del Sol Y Cruz"" is the one stated in the lyrics in the vocal score of Side By Side By Sondheim (available for rental only). This version of the song, however, misspells Llanfair PG (presumably to approximate the pronunciation), and has the lyric ""...today's the last I'll be spreading"" rather than ""spending"". It would seem, therefore, that this source cannot be considered canonical. This rendering of the place name does accord with Millicent Martin's recording on the Side By Side By Sondheim cast album, however.
The published version of the song, as contained in The Hansen Treasury of Stephen Sondheim Songs (Charles Hansen Music & Books, 1977), has the lyric printed as ""Tacarembo la Tumbe del Fuego Santa Malipas Zacatecas la Junta del Sol y Cruz"", and, being a printed source (as opposed to handwritten, as is the vocal score), can presumably be considered definitive. Linda Lavin's pronunciation on the original cast recording of The Mad Show (for which the song was written) follows this spelling, which would suggest that the printed version is correct.
As it is a fictional place name, however, any discussion of ""correct"" spelling/pronunciation is an academic one, at best." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Don't peddle your crap please. Hate to see another article get disputed for neutrality due to you. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Howd Homeonttherange,
Your (typical) problem is that you are being too literal. The term Personal Union is a very special, and limited Constitutional term. It refers to two or more States (i.e., countries) that recognise the same Monarch as there Head of State, however their is no UNION OF THEIR PARLIAMENTS. Some examples are,
(i). The Union of Kalmar (1397). Its members were the Kingdoms of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. This gave rise to the termUnited Scandinavia. In 1562 (I believe) Sweden left the Union. The resulting left-over Union of Denmark-Norway was dissolved in 1814, as being allied with Napolean ""tunrned out badly""." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I think this one should DayZ (mod), the other one should be DayZ (video game), and DayZ should be just a disambiguation page. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
by those pushing an anti-MRM POV. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You really are a rebel guy, rebelguys!
Time to get oral from a prostitute'''! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fine, smarty pants. But just wait until they finally announce it. Then you'll see I am right and that you don't know everything. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AMBER+TAYLOR FOREVER
AMBER + TAYLOR FOREVER | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kosovo template
hi again. Can you please take a look at this template: . Shouldn't Albanian language be mentioned first since 90 % of the population are Albanians? (I changed this but some Serb nationalist keep reverting my edit) I hope I am not disturbing you but you are one of few here I consider to be quiet neutral. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Of course a true Dub will say 'depaaarted' or, more likely ""f**in' gone"". " | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I think it is a little disingenuous of Zet to claim that a division which had lost most of its fighting troops was 'far from destroyed' when its fighting capacity was close to nil. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Muslim Men Harassment of MM page
It is amazing how three muslim men jumped all over this page, right after I added a number of things (30 minutes after - all three men, all muslims), and cleaned it up. Does a woman working for human rights in Pakistan really get under your skin so badly? Wow.
So sweetie, if you are so bloody busy, why not get busy, and stop harassing the women? Are you *that* threatened? | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
{| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent""
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Hello Madstar890, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Happy editing! —αἰτίας •discussion•
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents
Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article
Manual of Style
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#""
! Getting help
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Where to ask a question
Help pages
New contributors' help page
|-
! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, looks like your rehab program didn't take, and now Socafan's been community-banned. Your approach worked out REAL well, didn't it? | Talk 15:04 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PKK fighters who the past decades entering and living Syria for their fight in Turkish territories have no match in guerilla war, specialized to this, against the Turkish regime. Rebels and the army are far behind in abilities and training to match the PKK fighters. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OMD, THL, H17, Depeche Mode, ABC are all not New Romantic, never have been, don't self identify as Romantics, fans don't consider them romantics yet 1 individual insists on keeping listing them on this page. Fans of the bands will just keep removing them because it is simply wrong. Stick to Visage and other blitZ bands or this article will be in perpetual edit war. 82.132.136.211 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tried to be productive (look at my contributions) but hit my head against a wall of spoiled greek children (or probably under pay from Greek Government) that purposely keep vandalizing the Albania related pages and keep iritating the albanian editors until they explode and get banned. As a historian I blush with what I find quoted as reliable information on the wikipedia pages and the quality of the editors and sources. Time to move to the French pages (a lot of readers there), still 5 more languages to go. Till next time.Wikipedia sucks! . | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Ricky Gardiner
Woody, my man, thanks for your quick actions and additions re. this article (just a stub I created yonks ago to get rid of red links on Bowie/Pop articles). What is it that draws people like us to defence and rock (I think Nick D. is a member of the Military and Music projects as well). Then again, the riff for ""Lust for Life"" came from Bowie's interpretation of an armed forces radio theme... Cheers, " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Triple crown just about cleared..
OK, got out the broom and dusted off some stuff.. ) Cheers, (talk · contribs) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
If you agree with Master Bigode then what about rule for 500 x 400 images and what about the back side image (that was erased without consensus)? He never discussed the back image, he erased it out of the blue. What if I went on your user homepage Wolftengu and I said that picture on your homepage is too big be within guidelines and I removed it, placed it somewhere else and I also removed another image, would agree with someone doing that to your homepage or would you be outraged? However Wolftengu you seem to be playing unfair cop here by notifiying 2over0 as if a discussion wrong. What is your point? Do you own a DX-1 or if not what is your involvement to disallow a 500 X 400 or any other 500 x 400 image and even any other image of a DX-1 in a smaller form? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
As a rollbacker, that is particularly problematic. You should be aware that editors who edit war may lose the privilege regardless of the means used to edit war. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What about non-american schools, mosques, synagogues, etc, etc... Wikipedia is so America-centric. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
for fixing this. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No not really. We may ask that the mention of fat being the fire source of the cremation of millions be reconsidered though - along with a few other items. The fat cremation ""wiki fact"" is citable ( www.hdot - Emory U no less, Lipstadt) but doubtful. If the same science was applied to the holocaust as say the tinfoilers or flat earthers the deniers would be overjoyed. Be careful as to who gets the nutty fringe tinfoil label in the end. You get the permits and we'll bring the shovels. 159.105.80.141 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Celebrities
Talk about your fave celebs and even your crushes! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"You know, I was thinking...
Nobody really attacked me before I revealed my age here. After I announced that I was 14, I was subject to a constant storm of harassment and abuse.
The same thing goes for when I was on The Sandbox when I was 11. Before people knew my age, they didn't care. After I told them my age, they hated me.
It's just so amusing how the idiot Soapboxers think of teenagers as being responsible for the ""decline"" of The Soapbox (like it was ever any good to begin with). This is funny, because the adults are the dumbest people here. Mauricio, Chuppah, Redneckgirl, Pinky, Scooby, GG, ForeverLostTinkerbell, greenrabbit, StarRocketsInFlight, Bree-Robinson, enigma-72, CocaineNightmares, TokyoDome, Chad_Ocho-Cinco, Steve Lake...
...all adults.
The teenage posters here are typically the smartest ones. Let's see... G-Dawg, Head_Banging_Brunette, ClassicAge, Metropolis (even though he's a bipolar weirdo), ChrisScript, just to name a few.
All I ever see adults posting is ""rate my poo!!1!"", ""my ballz smell funny"", ""whoz hawter: me or ur mom???//?/?"", ""i like to rape little girls"", and ""HEY GUYZ LOOK AT ME IM AN ATTENTION WHORE!!!!11!!1!"" The adult posters here are immature, moronic, savage bullies with the mental capacity of a retarded 4-year-old.
Whereas, most of the teenagers here are thoughtful, intelligent, mature, and often profound. But they're subject to constant schoolyard bullying by the idiot adult posters who think they're somehow superior because they were born (and dropped on their head) earlier.
Soapbox logic never fails to amuse me...
" | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TM
How astute, remember civility is the key. That verbal licking you gave me really failed to break the skin. MAYBE JUST MAYBE WE CAN GET ALONG? HOW ABOUT THAT? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sofia Added
I am from Sofia, Bulgaria. Our city has also joined this initative so I included it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Would you mind focusing on content's rather then contributer's ? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| decline=A bit too close for comfort, that one. Try to avoid the company name altogether. We get a bit edgy about accounts that appear to represent organisations. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Weatherman and better writing
A lot of the changes you've made recently to the Weatherman page are notably more awkward, for no apparent reason. I'm not particularly concerned about the changes in some adjectives surrounding how some organizations and events are characterized, but at the same time you rearranged sentences to read quite poorly. Plus you seem to get really carried away with wikilinking (do readers really need a link to know what a bomb is?!). | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Non-lead?
Shouldn't the title of the page be ""Supporting"" or ""Minor"" instead of ""Non-Lead""? " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I agree with Leontes, though I began attempting compromise last night considering no one else was backing me up on this. In the interest of building consensus, however, I will note that political descriptors, in the absence of reliable third party sources, are inappropriate in this article. I will also note, again, that some commenters here appear to be confusing the electoral-vote website with the electoral-vote author. This Wikipedia article is about the website, NOT the author, who has an article of his own. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dispatch review
I added some comments here. I think it is a wonderful dispatch - very clear. We've needed something like this for a long time. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. I vote for Christ Pantocrator, though it could be nice with a wider crop | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Here's an idea
Go fuck yourself, cumshitter. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your assistance please
The record shows you deleted File:HMCS Fennel (K194).jpg. The entry you left in the deletion log said: ""listed on WP:PUI more than 14 days"".
I strongly suspect that this was a free image. Crown copyright#Canada protects images for their first 50 years. WW2 ended 65 years ago. So if this was a crown copyright image it would be a free image.
I'd like to request userification of the information templates and other information associated with this image, to review for possible clarification of whatever problem got it listed at WP:PUI in the first place.
Could you please userify it to " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|listas = Manos Family | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
": So, despite your equivocation, you are still wrong. People do remove ""vile, vicious hate speech"" whilst remaining on ""the right side of policy"".
You made a very clear statement about Wikipedia policy - and I proved you were wrong. And you denied my unblock request as a result of your misinformation.
I know expecting an apology from a Wikipedia administrator is a waste of time, but in future stay away from me, okay? I prefer to deal with admins who do know the rules.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Phi Rho Eta
A tag has been placed on Phi Rho Eta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement ""I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."" You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" WILL MY MOTHERFUCKING SAFETY BE GUARANTEED???? I FUCKING HOPE SO!!! I'M BRINGING MY OWN FUCKIN' WEAPONS!! PAY ME WHEN I GET BACK MOTHERFUCKERS!!! OH YEAH I'VE GOT A JOKE...A FAMILY (HUSBAND, WIFE, SON, DAUGHTER, DOG) WALKS INTO AN AGENT'S OFFICE AND TELLS HIM THAT THEY'VE GOT A GREAT VAUDEVILLE ROUTINE...HE SAYS ""WE DON'T HIRE KIDDY ACTS"" AND THEY SAY ""BUT WE'RE REALLY GOOD!"" AND SO THE AGENT SAYS ""FINE, LET ME SEE WHAT YOU'VE GOT, BUT IF YOU SUCK I'M THROWING YOU OUT""...SO THE FAMILY GETS READY...THE DAUGHTER HITS THE CD PLAYER AND CIRCUS MUSIC BEGINS PLAYING, THE FATHER JUMP KICKS THE SON IN THE HEAD AND STOMS HIS FACE IN THE GROUND UNTIL IT'S A BLOODY PULP, THEN PROCEEDS TO JERK OFF AND CUM ALL OVER HIS SHATTERED SKULL. MEANWHILE THE MOTHER BEGINS VIOLENTLY FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER AS THE DOG FUCKS THE MOTHER IN THE ASS HOLE. THIS IS THE POINT WHEN THE FATHER TAKES THE LEFTOVER BRAIN MATTER FROM THE SON'S HEAD AND SHOVES IT INTO THE MOTHER'S PUSSY, THEN BEGINS FUCKING HER PUSSY WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY STICKING HIS FINGER DOWN THE DAUGHTER'S THROAT UNTIL SHE VOMITS ALL OVER THEM BOTH. THEN THE DOG BITES THE MOTHER'S HAND OFF AS SHE'S FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER, LEAVING HER HAND IN THE DAUGHTER'S PUSSY AS BLOOD SQUIRTS ALL OVER THE PLACE...THE FATHER TAKES BLOOD | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FROM THE GROUND, SMEARS IT ALL OVER THE MOTHER'S CHEST, BENDS OVER, AND BEGINS SHITTING ALL OVER THE OPEN WOUND WHERE HER HAND USED TO BE BEFORE THE DOG BIT IT OFF. THEY TAKE THE DOG AND SHOVE IT IN A MICROWAVE, HEATING IT UP UNTIL IT EXPLODES, THEN TAKE THE DOG REMAINS, MIX IT WITH THE FATHER'S SHIT, THE SON'S HEAD WOUND, AND THE FATHER'S CUM, AND SHOVE IT INTO THE DAUGHTER'S MOUTH. THEN THE FATHER RIPS THE SON'S DICK OFF AND FUCKS THE DAUGHTER WITH IT, AS THE MOTHER LOCATE'S THE SON'S TESTICLES, BREAKS THEM OPEN, AND DRINKS THE SPERM THAT COMES OUT. THEN THE FAMILY LINES UP AND SAYS ""TA DA!""...THERE'S SILENCE FROM THE AGENT, UNTIL HE FINALLY SAYS ""I LOVE IT! WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT?""...AND THE FAMILY SAYS ""WE CALL IT...THE ARISTOCRATS!""" | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Requested move
:Canada national football team (disambiguation) → ? – There's I recently moved the American football team, which used to carry the moniker ""Canada national football team"", to Canada national American football team, and I consider this move request, if successful, to be vindication of that move b b " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I think Clockback that your suggested reference to Ainsworth’s involvement in the IMG is too long and that something along the lines of ‘brief flirtation’ would be better. I think that the IMG reference needs to be short/somewhere in the early career section/posted after the article has been expanded a little, otherwise the article might appear weighty. I think the last point is important as it seemed to be a consensus reached by a number of Wikipedia editors after much wrangling and gnashing of teeth))
But bedsides, this brief dalliance with Marxism, in an overall consideration of his political career, pales into insignificance compared to his being controversially thrust as a third choice candidate into the position of Defence Secretary at a time of crisis for the British Army in terms of the number of casualties being sustained and a lack of resources. This is simply not reflected at all in the Ainsworth article. I tried reflecting it as follows: ""His appointment formed part of a chaotic cabinet reshuffle by the Prime Minister, who ""considered at least three other candidates before appointing Ainsworth"" but this was dismissed as ""speculative opinion"" by Off2riorob above, even though from my point of view it is easily the most significant event in Ainsworth’s biography. Perhaps we can reach a consensus that if a better reference can be found—which I suspect should not be difficult—that it can be re-included? I want to stress that this is again not meant to be an ad hominem slight against Ainsworth, but merely drawing attention to the fact that his appointment was the equivalent of throwing someone in at the deep end (and indeed he has had a very difficult time of it since his appointment). Actually it reflects worse on Brown and the farcical reshuffle. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" Greek love I'm looking for a way to extricate myself honorably from this mess. I'm leaving a note here because you closed this AfD, where I made a commitment to do as you instructed in the closing statement. There are two editors who have long sought to delete or eviscerate the article, one of whom has used a series of user names (unacknowledged on his current user page but available , so at first glance it may appear on the talk page there are more than two editors in the 'suppress' camp). I complain here about their coordination. Other editors, including and I simply can't do it any longer. I haven't changed my position on the validity of the article, but I've been accused (on various talk pages, and never the appropriate notice boards) of edit warring, ownership, disruption, and even pedophilia by implication, all for trying to carry out what the community decided. I'm done. I need to limit my time on Wikipedia at present, and wish for that time to be spent pleasantly and productively. When I've made a commitment, though, it grieves me not to keep it. I'm not asking you to do anything: I'm just explaining why I can't keep my word as given at the AfD. Wow, that is a mess.Certainly no hard feelings on my end, it is clear you endeavored in good faith to improve the article. I have found that knowing when to walk away is an essential skill, not only here but in the real world. Sometimes your presence, despite your best intentions, is harmful rather than helpful, and sometimes a dispute just isn't worth it anymore. Best of luck in your future endeavors here. Mailchimp I'm not that bothered but I think that the Mailchimp speedy deletion was a mistake. It did cite that it was one of the more important email marketing programs so it was stating the importance - something that was supposed to be the original problem. The criteria specifies a credible'' claim of significance. Wordpress pages are not reliable sources. However, I would certainly not object to it being restored as a redirect, as it was for several momnths before today. Talkback ( | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
talk) Just a hunch? Call it my intuition but I'm guessing that his username is a direct challenge to patrolling admin that you guys won't block him based on the username itself, but his contribution speaks volume of his nonsense louder (my other hunch being he's a returning editor!) than his username does. Just my 2 cents. Cheers~! TMNo1185©® There are plenty of legitimate reasons to be a returning editor, the username is not a blatant violation of the policy. If you have any evidence of socking file at WP:SPI. Recreation of article Shay Carl I would like to request that the article Shay Carl be recreated, see the deleted Talk:Shay Carl for my reasons (note, Talk:Shay Carl was delete because of A1, not notibility). Well, there was | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Where's the 24 defendants figure coming from? ""Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy"" by Telford Taylor (U.S. Chief Counsel at Nuremberg) mentions 200.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Oh hey, a response. That's cool. I personally feel that having the fortitude to call out TTN on his obvious flaws should warrant a few dozen Barnstars, but I see where you're coming from. If you insist on keeping the block, I would like to formally request the reason for this account's blocking to be changed to reflect the real reason instead of being noted as a common vandal. Maybe a reason along the lines of ""being a pain in the ass"" like that one guy on Nakon's talk page stated.
On that subject, maybe he should be blocked too, after all he did use a cuss word and that's technically worse than anything I've ever said. - " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NO. You have the right to express an opinion that you consider it to be Hasbara, or crap, or both. You do not have the right to identify it as Hasbara, crap, or both. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==GA Review==
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Rowton Heath/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: '''''' *YES!
I'll take a look over the next few days and then start to make some comments. '''''' *YES! " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AfD
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revelations. Guidelines for notability are outlined generally at WP:N, and specifically for songs at WP:NSONG. Thank you. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Organizations
|class= Start
|importance= Low
|maindykdate=
|needs-infobox= Yes
|needs-image= Yes
|attention=
}}
{{WikiProject " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Actions in la-la land have real world consequences"". 190.67.223.50 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dean Wormer Works for the Racists in Jena, LA==
I will continue to update the posting for Jena, LA to reflect the fact that thier 'famous' person of note was a SEGREGATIONIST DEMOCRAT which is in fact a historically accurate description.
== | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.