MicPie/unpredictable_w3-org · Datasets at Hugging Face

task stringlengths 12 101	input stringlengths 5 5.87k	output stringlengths 1 5.47k	options sequence	pageTitle stringlengths 0 151	outputColName stringlengths 1 142	url stringlengths 24 147	wdcFile stringlengths 71 75
94df4e22_een_revisions_of__OWLRL____RIF__Interpretation	[Notation] $i+1$ [Interpretation]	Used within a for(?elt in ?list){ template } this will be replaced by the index of the current ?elt, plus 1.	[]	Difference between revisions of "OWLRL" - RIF	Interpretation	http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=OWLRL&diff=prev&oldid=14693	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00063-ip-10-236-191-2_824834830_10.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] CDATA [Definition]	Character data	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] ID [Definition]	A document-unique identifier	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] IDREF [Definition]	A reference to a document-unique identifier	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] IDREFS [Definition]	A space-separated list of references to document-unique identifiers	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] NAME [Definition]	A name with the same character constraints as ID above	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] NMTOKEN [Definition]	A name composed of only name tokens as defined in XML 1.0 [XML]	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] NMTOKENS [Definition]	One or more whitespace separated NMTOKEN values	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition	[Attribute Type] PCDATA [Definition]	Processed character data	[]	Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules	Definition	http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] xml-stylesheet PI and link [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively [application/xml]	recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] link only [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, linked style sheet was not recognized and document tree was rendered [application/xml]	recognized as XML, linked style sheet was not recognized and document tree was rendered	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] xml-stylesheet PI only [text/html] recognized as HTML, xml-stylesheet PI was not recognized [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively [application/xml]	recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] without xmlns [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, parsing failed due to the omitted xmlns declaration [application/xml]	recognized as XML, parsing failed due to the omitted xmlns declaration	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] without DOCTYPE [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively [application/xml]	recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] without DOCTYPE and xmlns [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively and inline style (incorrectly) worked [application/xml]	recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively and inline style (incorrectly) worked	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] Broken XHTML [text/html] recognized as HTML, well-formedness error was not detected [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] showed blank page [application/xml]	showed blank page	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml	[media type] HTML 4 [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] failed correctly while parsing the DTD [application/xml]	failed correctly while parsing the DTD	[]	XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2	application/xml	http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] RDF terms [Query Forms] SELECT [Modifiers]	DISTINCT	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] triple patterns [Query Forms] CONSTRUCT [Modifiers]	REDUCED	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] Basic graph patterns [Query Forms] DESCRIBE [Modifiers]	PROJECT	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] Groups [Query Forms] ASK [Modifiers]	ORDER BY	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] OPTIONAL [Modifiers]	LIMIT	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] UNION [Modifiers]	OFFSET	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] GRAPH [Modifiers]	GROUP BY	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] NOT EXISTS [Modifiers]	HAVING	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers	[Patterns] EXISTS [Modifiers]	Select expressions	[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]	SPARQL 1.1 Query Language	Modifiers	http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] scheme [match] exact [case]	insensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] userInfo [match] exact [case]	sensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] host [match] endswith [case]	insensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] port [match] exact [case]	sensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] path [match] startswith [case]	sensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] query [match] startswith [case]	sensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] fragment [match] startswith [case]	sensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case	[0] uri [match] regex [case]	sensitive	[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]	W3C Content Labels	case	http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/	32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json
c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules	[Control Type] Text input (including date/time and password fields) [LiveCycle Placement Rules]	Default placement for the label is to the left of the control. If this is not possible, LiveCycle will attempt to place it immediately above the control.	[]	PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents \| Techniques for WCAG 2.0	LiveCycle Placement Rules	http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json
c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules	[Control Type] Checkbox [LiveCycle Placement Rules]	Default placement for the label is to the right of the check box.	[]	PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents \| Techniques for WCAG 2.0	LiveCycle Placement Rules	http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json
c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules	[Control Type] Radio button group [LiveCycle Placement Rules]	Default placement for the label for each individual radio button is to the right of the button. Create a visible caption for the radio button group by creating static text and placing it to the left of or above the group. (See Labeling radio buttons below.)	[]	PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents \| Techniques for WCAG 2.0	LiveCycle Placement Rules	http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json
c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules	[Control Type] Combo box [LiveCycle Placement Rules]	Default placement for the label is to the left of the drop-down list. If this is not possible, LiveCycle will attempt to place it immediately above the control..	[]	PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents \| Techniques for WCAG 2.0	LiveCycle Placement Rules	http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json
c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules	[Control Type] List box [LiveCycle Placement Rules]	Default placement for the label is above the list box.	[]	PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents \| Techniques for WCAG 2.0	LiveCycle Placement Rules	http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json
c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules	[Control Type] Button [LiveCycle Placement Rules]	LiveCycle automatically places the label on the button; it does not have to be positioned manually. Ensure that the button's purpose is properly described in the label text.	[]	PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents \| Techniques for WCAG 2.0	LiveCycle Placement Rules	http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html	32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Geoffrey Sneddon [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Kornel Lesinski [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Stephen Stewart [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Toby Inkster [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Andrew Sidwell [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Nicolas Le Gall [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Doug Wright [Comments] Whilst I believe the approach of annotating/selectively editing the Editor's draft potentially has merit as a platform for discussion within the WG, I believe that actually publishing multiple versions of the same document as official WDs of the WG is just plain confusing. I would not vote against publishing a reformulation of the additional material as separate WG Note. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Michael Puls II [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Larry Masinter [Comments] I think neither "majority" nor "most votes" should be used: if there is not "consensus" and there are votes (rather than straw polls), then one-vote-per-independent organization should be retained (one company has 17 members in "good standing"), and the "good standing" role of "invited experts" who are not actually experts or who do not actually participate should be reevaluated. A vote should not determined by those who are listed as working group members out of courtesy or for the rationale that their IPR disclaimer is needed. As far as IPR is concerned, both drafts contain new, unreviewed material that might trigger a patent review; commit-then-discuss should be evaluated against the patent policy to see if some adjustment is needed. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Martin McEvoy [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] John Drinkwater [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Stephen Axthelm [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Dan Smith [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Joe Williams [Comments] Manu's work can be used but not directly. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Sam Ruby [Comments] In this case could live with either document and in the case of competing technical drafts I would support publishing both; but publishing two drafts simultaneously that differ only in informative content seems like it would cause confusion. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Martin Kliehm [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Matthew Turvey [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Julian Reschke [Comments] Publishing both would create confusion, and also raise the question about which is "the right one". [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] David Håsäther [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Benoit Piette [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Edward O'Connor [Comments] I think each "fork" should go through FPWD (which so far has only happened with formal WG decision-by-vote). Once through FPWD, I think we should always publish new WDs whenever the editor(s) would like to. (I think it wouldn't be a good thing for Manu's draft to also go through FPWD, as it only differs in warnings from Ian's, but nevertheless if we're going to embrace the "anyone can author a spec" idea, we should embrace it fully.) [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Catherine Roy [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] John Kemp [Comments] As mentioned, I think it might be confusing to publish two drafts where one is a superset of the other. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] John Foliot [Comments] If there were technical differences between the 2 documents, my answer would likely have been very different. Since I currently see the "Manu's Draft" version as simply an enhanced copy of the work produced by Ian I see no benefit in making both available as Working Drafts. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Chris Wilson [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Bruce Lawson [Comments] changed my answer, having seen John Foliot's cleverer response: If there were technical differences between the 2 documents, my answer would likely have been very different. Since I currently see the "Manu's Draft" version as simply an enhanced copy of the work produced by Ian I see no benefit in making both available as Working Drafts. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Henri Sivonen [Comments] The purpose of heartbeat WDs is to communicate to the community outside the WG itself, and publishing multiple drafts with only differences in informative statements fails at clear communication. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Jeremy Keith [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Ian Hickson [Comments] If "I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts." wins, please count my vote as YES to both drafts. [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Tantek Çelik [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Jonas Sicking [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] David Hyatt [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Adele Peterson [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Lachlan Hunt [Comments] Publishing two separate drafts that are almost identical except for a few editorial comments about the stability of some random "controversial" sections does not solve any real problems, and will only serve to create confusion among the wider community. Even though I do not support the draft with extra warnings, I would rather see that one published by itself than have both needlessly published together. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Maciej Stachowiak [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Alexey Proskuryakov [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Lee Kowalkowski [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Adam Roben [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Gavin Sharp [Comments] I think publishing multiple drafts would be problematic from a PR perspective. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Robert Marshall [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Shawn Medero [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] David Singer [Comments] I fear having two variants of one document would be confusing. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Shelley Powers [Comments] Two drafts would acknowledge the Editor's work, while providing another document that shows issues of concern. There is no PR problem with this approach--it reflects the current state of the group. On the other hand, I have a difficult time understanding why people who profess support for making information both visible and semantic, would vote for a choice that does neither. [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Charles McCathie Nevile [Comments] Publishing two drafts seems likely to lead to confusion. However I agree with Larry that a serious attempt to reach consensus makes more sense than going through with something that receives a large minority of dissent. I recognise that the decision on how to proceed is up to the chairs, rather than a poll of all comers actually being binding. Please note that Opera Software, with many participants in the group, is not expressing a formal opinion at this time, but rather each participant is free to vote as they see fit, in what we understand to be the spirit of this poll. Should a suggestion such as Larry's be accepted, we would of course submit a single formal vote clarifying that it is such. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Channy Yun [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Cameron McCormack [Comments] While I am happy for the WG to publish multiple documents, I don't think selecting between drafts to publish as the main HTML 5 spec at a given point in time is the best way to proceed. I wonder if David Hyatt should really be listed as editor on whichever documents end up being published, though, given that he has not edited either. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Karl Dubost [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Alex Robinson [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Leif Halvard Silli [Comments] Now is the time to, eventually, display disagreement. [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Jason White [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Roy Fielding [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Ben Adida [Comments] I would prefer that we pick a consistent long-term approach: if we are CTR, then everyone gets to CTR. [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] John Vernaleo [Comments] For what it's worth, I don't feel as strongly about my answer to this question than the other two and can see good reasons for either way. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Masataka Yakura [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Robert O'Callahan [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Adam Barth [Comments] Publishing two very similar editor's drafts would be pretty confusing. If we end up doing that, we should explain what the differences are and why we're choosing to publish both. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Russell Cavell [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Frank Palinkas [What to publish?]	I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json
705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_	[Responder] Philip Jägenstedt [Comments] Publishing multiple drafts would be harmful. Instead of having polls like this we should spend our time discussing the specific issues, possibly resulting in the inclusion/removal of notes or warnings in Ian's draft, but preferably actual solutions. [What to publish?]	I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.	[]	Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System	What to publish?	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results	32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

94df4e22_een_revisions_of__OWLRL____RIF__Interpretation

[Notation] $i+1$ [Interpretation]

Used within a for(?elt in ?list){ template } this will be replaced by the index of the current ?elt, plus 1.

[]

Difference between revisions of "OWLRL" - RIF

Interpretation

http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=OWLRL&diff=prev&oldid=14693

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00063-ip-10-236-191-2_824834830_10.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] CDATA [Definition]

Character data

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] ID [Definition]

A document-unique identifier

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] IDREF [Definition]

A reference to a document-unique identifier

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] IDREFS [Definition]

A space-separated list of references to document-unique identifiers

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] NAME [Definition]

A name with the same character constraints as ID above

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] NMTOKEN [Definition]

A name composed of only name tokens as defined in XML 1.0 [XML]

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] NMTOKENS [Definition]

One or more whitespace separated NMTOKEN values

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

10b38e19_ML___Defining_Abstract_Modules__Definition

[Attribute Type] PCDATA [Definition]

Processed character data

[]

Modularization of XHTML - Defining Abstract Modules

Definition

http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004/abstraction.html

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00056-ip-10-236-191-2_834191597_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] xml-stylesheet PI and link [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively [application/xml]

recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] link only [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, linked style sheet was not recognized and document tree was rendered [application/xml]

recognized as XML, linked style sheet was not recognized and document tree was rendered

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] xml-stylesheet PI only [text/html] recognized as HTML, xml-stylesheet PI was not recognized [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively [application/xml]

recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] without xmlns [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, parsing failed due to the omitted xmlns declaration [application/xml]

recognized as XML, parsing failed due to the omitted xmlns declaration

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] without DOCTYPE [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively [application/xml]

recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] without DOCTYPE and xmlns [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively and inline style (incorrectly) worked [application/xml]

recognized as XML, XHTML-specific semantics were not recognized but the type selector in style sheets matched case-insensitively and inline style (incorrectly) worked

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] Broken XHTML [text/html] recognized as HTML, well-formedness error was not detected [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] showed blank page [application/xml]

showed blank page

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

a40b8cd2_osoft_Internet_Explorer_5_5SP2__application_xml

[media type] HTML 4 [text/html] recognized as HTML [application/xhtml+xml] not supported [text/xml] failed correctly while parsing the DTD [application/xml]

failed correctly while parsing the DTD

[]

XHTML media type test - results: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5SP2

application/xml

http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/MSIE5.5SP2

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00223-ip-10-236-191-2_814436616_0.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] RDF terms [Query Forms] SELECT [Modifiers]

DISTINCT

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] triple patterns [Query Forms] CONSTRUCT [Modifiers]

REDUCED

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] Basic graph patterns [Query Forms] DESCRIBE [Modifiers]

PROJECT

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] Groups [Query Forms] ASK [Modifiers]

ORDER BY

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] OPTIONAL [Modifiers]

LIMIT

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] UNION [Modifiers]

OFFSET

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] GRAPH [Modifiers]

GROUP BY

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] NOT EXISTS [Modifiers]

HAVING

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

053daf17_SPARQL_1_1_Query_Language__Modifiers

[Patterns] EXISTS [Modifiers]

Select expressions

[ [ "D", "I", "S", "T", "I", "N", "C", "T" ], [ "R", "E", "D", "U", "C", "E", "D" ], [ "P", "R", "O", "J", "E", "C", "T" ], [ "O", "R", "D", "E", "R", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "L", "I", "M", "I", "T" ], [ "O", "F", "F", "S", "E", "T" ], [ "G", "R", "O", "U", "P", " ", "B", "Y" ], [ "H", "A", "V", "I", "N", "G" ], [ "S", "e", "l", "e", "c", "t", " ", "e", "x", "p", "r", "e", "s", "s", "i", "o", "n", "s" ] ]

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language

Modifiers

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25-pub-2010-05.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00045-ip-10-236-191-2_820475704_81.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] scheme [match] exact [case]

insensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] userInfo [match] exact [case]

sensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] host [match] endswith [case]

insensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] port [match] exact [case]

sensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] path [match] startswith [case]

sensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] query [match] startswith [case]

sensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] fragment [match] startswith [case]

sensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

d3bcef8c_W3C_Content_Labels__case

[0] uri [match] regex [case]

sensitive

[ [ "i", "n", "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ], [ "s", "e", "n", "s", "i", "t", "i", "v", "e" ] ]

W3C Content Labels

case

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-report-20060803/

32/1438042990603.54_20150728002310-00104-ip-10-236-191-2_812964761_0.json

c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules

[Control Type] Text input (including date/time and password fields) [LiveCycle Placement Rules]

Default placement for the label is to the left of the control. If this is not possible, LiveCycle will attempt to place it immediately above the control.

[]

PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

LiveCycle Placement Rules

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json

c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules

[Control Type] Checkbox [LiveCycle Placement Rules]

Default placement for the label is to the right of the check box.

[]

PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

LiveCycle Placement Rules

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json

c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules

[Control Type] Radio button group [LiveCycle Placement Rules]

Default placement for the label for each individual radio button is to the right of the button. Create a visible caption for the radio button group by creating static text and placing it to the left of or above the group. (See Labeling radio buttons below.)

[]

PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

LiveCycle Placement Rules

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json

c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules

[Control Type] Combo box [LiveCycle Placement Rules]

Default placement for the label is to the left of the drop-down list. If this is not possible, LiveCycle will attempt to place it immediately above the control..

[]

PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

LiveCycle Placement Rules

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json

c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules

[Control Type] List box [LiveCycle Placement Rules]

Default placement for the label is above the list box.

[]

PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

LiveCycle Placement Rules

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json

c5fdb040_ents___Techniques_for_WCAG_2_0__LiveCycle_Placement_Rules

[Control Type] Button [LiveCycle Placement Rules]

LiveCycle automatically places the label on the button; it does not have to be positioned manually. Ensure that the button's purpose is properly described in the label text.

[]

PDF10: Providing labels for interactive form controls in PDF documents | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

LiveCycle Placement Rules

http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/PDF10.html

32/1438042988650.53_20150728002308-00016-ip-10-236-191-2_821561701_0.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Geoffrey Sneddon [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Kornel Lesinski [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Stephen Stewart [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Toby Inkster [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Andrew Sidwell [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Nicolas Le Gall [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Doug Wright [Comments] Whilst I believe the approach of annotating/selectively editing the Editor's draft potentially has merit as a platform for discussion within the WG, I believe that actually publishing multiple versions of the same document as official WDs of the WG is just plain confusing. I would not vote against publishing a reformulation of the additional material as separate WG Note. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Michael Puls II [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Larry Masinter [Comments] I think neither "majority" nor "most votes" should be used: if there is not "consensus" and there are votes (rather than straw polls), then one-vote-per-independent organization should be retained (one company has 17 members in "good standing"), and the "good standing" role of "invited experts" who are not actually experts or who do not actually participate should be reevaluated. A vote should not determined by those who are listed as working group members out of courtesy or for the rationale that their IPR disclaimer is needed. As far as IPR is concerned, both drafts contain new, unreviewed material that might trigger a patent review; commit-then-discuss should be evaluated against the patent policy to see if some adjustment is needed. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Martin McEvoy [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] John Drinkwater [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Stephen Axthelm [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Dan Smith [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Joe Williams [Comments] Manu's work can be used but not directly. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Sam Ruby [Comments] In this case could live with either document and in the case of competing technical drafts I would support publishing both; but publishing two drafts simultaneously that differ only in informative content seems like it would cause confusion. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Martin Kliehm [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Matthew Turvey [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Julian Reschke [Comments] Publishing both would create confusion, and also raise the question about which is "the right one". [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] David Håsäther [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Benoit Piette [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Edward O'Connor [Comments] I think each "fork" should go through FPWD (which so far has only happened with formal WG decision-by-vote). Once through FPWD, I think we should always publish new WDs whenever the editor(s) would like to. (I think it wouldn't be a good thing for Manu's draft to also go through FPWD, as it only differs in warnings from Ian's, but nevertheless if we're going to embrace the "anyone can author a spec" idea, we should embrace it fully.) [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Catherine Roy [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] John Kemp [Comments] As mentioned, I think it might be confusing to publish two drafts where one is a superset of the other. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] John Foliot [Comments] If there were technical differences between the 2 documents, my answer would likely have been very different. Since I currently see the "Manu's Draft" version as simply an enhanced copy of the work produced by Ian I see no benefit in making both available as Working Drafts. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Chris Wilson [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Bruce Lawson [Comments] changed my answer, having seen John Foliot's cleverer response: If there were technical differences between the 2 documents, my answer would likely have been very different. Since I currently see the "Manu's Draft" version as simply an enhanced copy of the work produced by Ian I see no benefit in making both available as Working Drafts. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Henri Sivonen [Comments] The purpose of heartbeat WDs is to communicate to the community outside the WG itself, and publishing multiple drafts with only differences in informative statements fails at clear communication. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Jeremy Keith [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Ian Hickson [Comments] If "I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts." wins, please count my vote as YES to both drafts. [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Tantek Çelik [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Jonas Sicking [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] David Hyatt [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Adele Peterson [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Lachlan Hunt [Comments] Publishing two separate drafts that are almost identical except for a few editorial comments about the stability of some random "controversial" sections does not solve any real problems, and will only serve to create confusion among the wider community. Even though I do not support the draft with extra warnings, I would rather see that one published by itself than have both needlessly published together. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Maciej Stachowiak [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Alexey Proskuryakov [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Lee Kowalkowski [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Adam Roben [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Gavin Sharp [Comments] I think publishing multiple drafts would be problematic from a PR perspective. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Robert Marshall [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Shawn Medero [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] David Singer [Comments] I fear having two variants of one document would be confusing. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Shelley Powers [Comments] Two drafts would acknowledge the Editor's work, while providing another document that shows issues of concern. There is no PR problem with this approach--it reflects the current state of the group. On the other hand, I have a difficult time understanding why people who profess support for making information both visible and semantic, would vote for a choice that does neither. [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Charles McCathie Nevile [Comments] Publishing two drafts seems likely to lead to confusion. However I agree with Larry that a serious attempt to reach consensus makes more sense than going through with something that receives a large minority of dissent. I recognise that the decision on how to proceed is up to the chairs, rather than a poll of all comers actually being binding. Please note that Opera Software, with many participants in the group, is not expressing a formal opinion at this time, but rather each participant is free to vote as they see fit, in what we understand to be the spirit of this poll. Should a suggestion such as Larry's be accepted, we would of course submit a single formal vote clarifying that it is such. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Channy Yun [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Cameron McCormack [Comments] While I am happy for the WG to publish multiple documents, I don't think selecting between drafts to publish as the main HTML 5 spec at a given point in time is the best way to proceed. I wonder if David Hyatt should really be listed as editor on whichever documents end up being published, though, given that he has not edited either. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Karl Dubost [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Alex Robinson [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Leif Halvard Silli [Comments] Now is the time to, eventually, display disagreement. [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Jason White [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Roy Fielding [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Ben Adida [Comments] I would prefer that we pick a consistent long-term approach: if we are CTR, then everyone gets to CTR. [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] John Vernaleo [Comments] For what it's worth, I don't feel as strongly about my answer to this question than the other two and can see good reasons for either way. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Masataka Yakura [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Robert O'Callahan [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Adam Barth [Comments] Publishing two very similar editor's drafts would be pretty confusing. If we end up doing that, we should explain what the differences are and why we're choosing to publish both. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Russell Cavell [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Frank Palinkas [What to publish?]

I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority approval as Working Drafts.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json

705c6c6f_traw_poll_and_Balloting_System__What_to_publish_

[Responder] Philip Jägenstedt [Comments] Publishing multiple drafts would be harmful. Instead of having polls like this we should spend our time discussing the specific issues, possibly resulting in the inclusion/removal of notes or warnings in Ian's draft, but preferably actual solutions. [What to publish?]

I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most votes as a Working Draft.

[]

Results of Questionnaire Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings? - Web-Based Straw-poll and Balloting System

What to publish?

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/results

32/1438042989018.48_20150728002309-00118-ip-10-236-191-2_797452224_5.json