id
int64
0
12.9M
type
large_stringclasses
5 values
by
large_stringlengths
2
15
time
timestamp[us]
title
large_stringlengths
0
198
text
large_stringlengths
0
99.1k
url
large_stringlengths
0
6.6k
score
int64
-1
5.77k
parent
int64
1
30.4M
top_level_parent
int64
0
30.4M
descendants
int64
-1
2.53k
kids
large list
deleted
bool
1 class
dead
bool
1 class
41,789,100
comment
eastbound
2024-10-09T15:39:28
null
&gt; Would Chrome have gained that much popularity if Google hadn&#x27;t been the most used search engine, nay, website in the world?<p>Yes, Chrome was absolutely superior to Firefox in every way at the beginning.<p>&gt; impossible for new entrants unless they invest billions<p>All industries require that you invest billions, and it’s to compensate the civilization-long effort of R&amp;D that the other company did. Reasoning-by-absurd: Should Boeing display all the plans of the band new Dreamliner so that it doesn’t take billions for new competitors to emerge? Should all companies make their blueprint public so they can have immediate competition? No, Google invested in browsers and set up new norms in WWW in exchange for their position on the market. The benefit to the general population has been excellent WWW norms, to be honest.<p>I’m thinking outside the law framework but to me, no corporation should be have 51% market share. But that’s wishful thinking, not the law (also, market share is something economists struggle to define).
null
null
41,788,377
41,787,290
null
[ 41790111, 41789339 ]
null
null
41,789,101
comment
that_guy_iain
2024-10-09T15:39:34
null
&gt; This is a game that can only be played by people with lawyers though.<p>WP Engine has those lawyers. But also, there is a good chance of a class action because it affects so many people. I&#x27;ve seen talk of a class action but I don&#x27;t know how much is just talk.
null
null
41,788,858
41,788,704
null
null
null
null
41,789,102
comment
DamnInteresting
2024-10-09T15:39:41
null
I&#x27;ve been using WordPress non-stop since 2005. I even hoped to someday work for Automattic. I applied and got through the initial process, but with a young child and a full-time job, I couldn&#x27;t make time for the laborious &quot;trial&quot; part of the interview, so my application was put on indefinite pause. It pains me to watch this unfolding series of unforced errors. I hope WordPress survives.
null
null
41,791,369
41,791,369
null
null
null
null
41,789,103
comment
drewcoo
2024-10-09T15:39:44
null
&gt; I have no idea what fair beer means.<p>I think it&#x27;s deep fried.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wikihow.life&#x2F;Cook-Deep-Fried-Beer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wikihow.life&#x2F;Cook-Deep-Fried-Beer</a>
null
null
41,788,985
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,104
comment
jauntywundrkind
2024-10-09T15:39:46
null
No power consumption info, no info on what governor settings Ubuntu setup. As happy as I would be to notch such a notable Linux win, also would like the real details on what&#x27;s happening here.
null
null
41,788,557
41,788,557
null
[ 41789448 ]
null
null
41,789,105
comment
JohnFen
2024-10-09T15:39:46
null
&gt; is there no escape from 9-5 as a concept?<p>There is absolutely an escape from that as a concept, but it involves a tradeoff: if you&#x27;re willing to live on a reduced income, you can gain more time not working.<p>Also, as you&#x27;ve noticed, being self-employed means you will be working more, not less. The wins of self-employment are other things, not the ability to work less.<p>&gt; Are all these books about working 2 hours a week while making millions, are just BS?<p>Unequivocally yes. There are a handful of people who&#x27;ve pulled that off (and they aren&#x27;t the ones writing those books), but the odds of you being one of them are so low as be approximately zero, in part because it involves a whole lot of pure luck.
null
null
41,788,960
41,788,960
null
[ 41790623 ]
null
null
41,789,106
comment
ktosobcy
2024-10-09T15:39:48
null
As a Pole I&#x27;m also fairly annoyed by having to use English daily ;)
null
null
41,789,057
41,787,647
null
[ 41789235 ]
null
null
41,789,107
comment
tptacek
2024-10-09T15:39:48
null
This is all very reasonable, but when you look at contemporaneous accounts of what those Latvians, Lithuanians, and Ukrainians were writing in their Chicago newspapers, it gets a lot less reasonable --- there was a strong undercurrent of Holocaust denial.
null
null
41,785,285
41,776,721
null
[ 41800926 ]
null
null
41,789,108
comment
keybored
2024-10-09T15:39:50
null
We can follow and make all sorts of rules. What you cannot do:<p>- Unicode has only one apostrophe (the ASCII one literally named that)<p>When Unicode says<p>- 2019 is preferred for apostrophe<p>You can’t appeal to Unicode and then ignore them in the next breath.
null
null
41,784,294
41,752,023
null
[ 41789497 ]
null
null
41,789,109
comment
mbrumlow
2024-10-09T15:39:51
null
I don’t believe sharing was all that common. But the difference in your story is voluntary sharing.<p>Once the hunter demands water for meat it becomes an exchange, and is the basis of our capitalist society.<p>Taxes in that system would be more like 10 men who did not hunt or gather demanded you give them food and water or they would beat your face in.
null
null
41,784,927
41,780,569
null
[ 41793298 ]
null
null
41,789,110
comment
simonw
2024-10-09T15:39:52
null
There&#x27;s some useful context around the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fair.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fair.io&#x2F;</a> initiative in this GitHub issue from May: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;fairsource&#x2F;fair.io&#x2F;issues&#x2F;14">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;fairsource&#x2F;fair.io&#x2F;issues&#x2F;14</a>
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,111
comment
theamk
2024-10-09T15:39:54
null
Depends on the direction.<p>If data diode points to outside, like a power plant exporting its status to web, then photosensor can be completely taken over. Sure, the web page might be completely bogus, but there will be no disruption in power plant&#x27;s system. The hardware design guarantees it. That is the strongest case for data diodes.<p>If data diode points to inside, like a power plant getting new data from the outside, then sure, photosensor software is a concern, but since it&#x27;s relatively simple, this would not be my biggest worry. I&#x27;d worry about app that runs on target PC and receives files; if file is an archive, about un-archiver exploits; an finally about the files themselves. If there a doc, are you sure it&#x27;s not exploiting Word? If there is an update, are you sure it&#x27;s not trojaned? Are you sure users are not click on the executable thinking it&#x27;s a directory?
null
null
41,786,285
41,779,952
null
null
null
null
41,789,112
comment
llm_nerd
2024-10-09T15:39:55
null
There are such an enormous array of possible influences on this, most likely being the power profile.<p>By default Windows on a laptop (in this case a Zenbook S 14 with Core Ultra 7 256V) uses a reduced power mode where it limits the max frequency and is less aggressive in scaling up core frequency because of the greatly reduced return per unit of power (which can destroy battery life and make heat profiles unacceptable).<p>This comparison makes no mention of the power profile, nor does it observe battery usage if applicable.<p>This looks like a misleading if not completely useless clickbait comparison. Others mentioned schedulers, and while schedulers can account account for a percent or two difference across this sort of wide workload, instead a huge disparity is seen.
null
null
41,788,762
41,788,557
null
[ 41791198, 41789335 ]
null
null
41,789,113
comment
cortesoft
2024-10-09T15:39:58
null
I often find discussions of these sorts, whether for python or other open source projects, get so focused on purity of concept that they totally forget practicality
null
null
41,788,360
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,789,114
comment
pessimizer
2024-10-09T15:40:00
null
&gt; Mozilla already tried making Bing the default. They went back to Google eventually, probably because Google paid them, but I would guess the user response was probably negative too. That&#x27;s just a guess however.<p>I doubt that people who would never think to change their default search engine would complain about the choice of search engines. Google vastly overpays for the privilege of being the default search engine because the existence of firefox protects their browser monopoly. Microsoft gets no such benefit, so I assume they wanted to reduce their payment to a more rational value 4 or 5 orders of magnitude smaller than the half-billion from Google.
null
null
41,788,498
41,787,290
null
null
null
null
41,789,115
story
user070223
2024-10-09T15:40:04
More women than men have added their DNA to the human gene pool
null
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/sep/24/women-men-dna-human-gene-pool
2
null
41,789,115
1
[ 41789363 ]
null
null
41,789,116
comment
AlexandrB
2024-10-09T15:40:11
null
It&#x27;s not in bad faith to say that there&#x27;s a cognitive load to having longer line lengths or, god forbid, wrapped lines when you&#x27;re trying to figure out what the code is actually <i>doing</i> with that data the variables represent. Obviously the Python &quot;except&quot; case being discussed is not a big deal in this regard, but you made a blanket statement about character count being no big deal because of big hard drives and IDEs.
null
null
41,789,025
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,789,117
comment
skeptrune
2024-10-09T15:40:11
null
Agreed. Frustrates me to no end that some of the most loved OSS projects don&#x27;t have quality helm&#x2F;Kube guides and basically say &quot;here&#x27;s a docker compose, you&#x27;re on your own.&quot; The &quot;it&#x27;s open source, but our operator is closed&quot; makes my head steam sometimes.<p>I wish they would just go source available so they can provide a higher quality product.
null
null
41,788,939
41,788,461
null
[ 41789520 ]
null
null
41,789,118
comment
toast0
2024-10-09T15:40:17
null
[dead]
null
null
41,782,698
41,782,118
null
null
null
true
41,789,119
story
bookofjoe
2024-10-09T15:40:17
The Psychology of Inventive Creativity (1956) [pdf]
null
https://wumm-project.github.io/Texts/Altshuller/Psychology-1956-en.pdf
1
null
41,789,119
0
null
null
null
41,789,120
story
null
2024-10-09T15:40:19
null
null
null
null
null
41,789,120
null
null
true
null
41,789,121
comment
rubslopes
2024-10-09T15:40:22
null
My argument was that &quot;7 was good and 10 was bad&quot; is something I say now and I will still say in the future, as it has been for past versions.
null
null
41,787,720
41,782,302
null
null
null
null
41,789,122
comment
arthurgrunewald
2024-10-09T15:40:23
null
[dead]
null
null
41,772,624
41,772,624
null
null
null
true
41,789,123
comment
eloisius
2024-10-09T15:40:25
null
The “|” operator was already used for set unions and binary OR, so it’s a little late to reserve it for control flow. Personally I don’t mind having a “dict union” operator at all.
null
null
41,788,948
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,789,124
comment
echelon
2024-10-09T15:40:25
null
It keeps AWS from gobbling up your business for free. In that sense, it&#x27;s strictly better.
null
null
41,789,014
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,125
comment
dekhn
2024-10-09T15:40:26
null
It solidly answered the question: &quot;Is evolutionary sequence relationship and structure data sufficient to predict a large fraction of the structures that proteins adopt&quot;. the answer, surprising few, is that the data we have indeed can be used to make general predictions (even outside of the training classes), and also surprising many, that we can do so with a minimum of evolutionary sequence data.<p>That people are arguing about the finer details of what it gets wrong is support for its value, not a detriment.
null
null
41,788,401
41,786,101
null
[ 41789714 ]
null
null
41,789,126
comment
shortrounddev2
2024-10-09T15:40:26
null
It&#x27;s an interesting view because I find neatly compartmentalized functions easier to read and less error prone, though he does point out that copying chunks of code such as vector operations can lead to bugs when you forget to change some variable. I guess it depends on the function. Something like<p><pre><code> Vector c = dotProduct(a, b); </code></pre> is readable enough and doesn&#x27;t warrant inlining, I think. There&#x27;s nothing about `dotProduct` that I would expect to have any side effects, especially if its prototype looks like:<p><pre><code> Vector dotProduct(Vector const&amp; a, Vector const&amp; b) const;</code></pre>
null
null
41,788,722
41,758,371
null
[ 41789179 ]
null
null
41,789,127
comment
TheSecondMouse
2024-10-09T15:40:30
null
I&#x27;ve noticed this a lot lately too. Convoluted install process for a non-production setup (without a guide for production quality), outdated docs; but only from open-source software that has a paid for SaaS variant (looking at you Supabase). Not that these companies owe me anything, but I do feel that these strategies diminish the open-source scene.
null
null
41,788,939
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,128
comment
smohare
2024-10-09T15:40:36
null
[dead]
null
null
41,788,761
41,788,026
null
null
null
true
41,789,129
comment
alwa
2024-10-09T15:40:36
null
It seems that it doesn’t so much “have a very clear definition” as a small faction are attempting to create a definition.<p>What is clear about “with minimal restrictions to protect the producer’s business model”? Don’t business models change over time? Doesn’t this suggest that if I were to stake my venture on such a “fair” element of software, it would be fine unless I turned out to succeed, in which case the producer could rightfully box me out (or, more likely, extort a ransom)?<p>Which, I suppose, is a roundabout way of saying: “fair” to whom? Such an “author-first source-available” license may well prevent the specific unfairness of AWS-style snarfage, but would seem to open the door to different kinds of unfairness years down the line. The absolutism of the OSS “zealots” seems much clearer, even with all its tradeoffs.
null
null
41,788,967
41,788,461
null
[ 41789395, 41789178 ]
null
null
41,789,130
comment
mattlondon
2024-10-09T15:40:38
null
&quot;idiot&#x27;s apostrophe&quot; or to call it another way &quot;how the English speakers do it&quot; is quite offensive to a native English speaker! Thanks Germany.
null
null
41,787,647
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,789,131
comment
Tyr42
2024-10-09T15:40:41
null
Sometimes it&#x27;s easier to define some vocabulary and then use it. Like defining push and pop on a stack vs stack[++ix] = blah and blah = stack[ix--].<p>And avoids needing to think about it being prefix or postfix after you don&#x27;t that one time.<p>But at other times it&#x27;s insufferable, when the abstraction is leaky and unintuitive.
null
null
41,787,915
41,758,371
null
null
null
null
41,789,132
comment
JumpCrisscross
2024-10-09T15:40:44
null
&gt; <i>side effect benefit of big kahuna companies mainly on the significant breakthrough and game changing research output</i><p>“Given that production could be carried on without any organization, Coase asks, &#x27;Why and under what conditions should we expect firms to emerge?&#x27; Since modern firms can only emerge when an entrepreneur of some sort begins to hire people, Coase&#x27;s analysis proceeds by considering the conditions under which it makes sense for an entrepreneur to seek hired help instead of contracting out for some particular task. The traditional economic theory of the time suggested that, because the market is ‘efficient’ (that is, those who are best at providing each good or service most cheaply are already doing so), it should always be cheaper to contract out than to hire.<p>Coase noted, however, that there are a number of transaction costs to using the market; the cost of obtaining a good or service via the market is actually more than just the price of the good. Other costs, including search and information costs, bargaining costs, keeping trade secrets, and policing and enforcement costs, can all potentially add to the cost of procuring something via the market. This suggests that firms will arise when they can arrange to produce what they need internally, and somehow avoid these costs.<p>There is a natural limit to what can be produced internally, however. Coase notices ‘decreasing returns to the entrepreneur function’, including increasing overhead costs and increasing propensity for an overwhelmed manager to make mistakes in resource allocation. This is a countervailing cost to the use of the firm.<p>Coase argues that the size of a firm (as measured by how many contractual relations are ‘internal’ to the firm and how many ‘external’) is a result of finding an optimal balance between the competing tendencies of the costs outlined above. In general, making the firm larger will initially be advantageous, but the decreasing returns indicated above will eventually kick in, preventing the firm from growing indefinitely.”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Nature_of_the_Firm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Nature_of_the_Firm</a>
null
null
41,784,599
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,789,133
story
giuliomagnifico
2024-10-09T15:40:46
China boosts quantum computer production with self-developed chips
null
https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article/3281699/tech-war-china-boosts-quantum-computer-production-self-developed-chips-amid-us-sanctions
1
null
41,789,133
0
null
null
null
41,789,134
comment
account42
2024-10-09T15:40:52
null
Even without the targeting, advertising is still psychological manimpulation trying to get you to act in someone elses best interest instead of your own. Why would you allow that in your computer in any form?
null
null
41,786,918
41,786,012
null
[ 41801538 ]
null
null
41,789,135
comment
atomic128
2024-10-09T15:40:53
null
Eventually, large language models will be the end of open source. That&#x27;s ok, just accept it.<p>Large language models are used to aggregate and interpolate intellectual property.<p>This is performed with no acknowledgement of authorship or lineage, with no attribution or citation.<p>In effect, the intellectual property used to train such models becomes anonymous common property.<p>The social rewards (e.g., credit, respect) that often motivate open source work are undermined.<p>That&#x27;s how it ends.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,136
comment
dataflow
2024-10-09T15:41:05
null
&gt; force more characters for the same functionality<p>This is actually a good thing in some cases (possibly this one). Risky stuff should inherently be harder to do than safer stuff, otherwise people will reach for the risky alternatives when they don&#x27;t need to, just to save time - or because they don&#x27;t realize the risk.<p>Or at least, that&#x27;s often the case. What&#x27;s lacking here is evidence that this is actually happening. I can believe it, but evidence is necessary for breaking the language.
null
null
41,788,338
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,789,137
comment
simonw
2024-10-09T15:41:06
null
Is &quot;open weights&quot; open washing?<p>I thought calling LLM weights that are openly available but not OSI-compatible open source &quot;open source&quot; was open washing, but I didn&#x27;t think there were any problems at all with the term &quot;open weights&quot;.
null
null
41,789,074
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,138
comment
Ono-Sendai
2024-10-09T15:41:21
null
I dunno. O(n^2) is for sure a bug. But O(nlogn) I think is reasonable.
null
null
41,789,041
41,758,371
null
[ 41789496 ]
null
null
41,789,139
comment
sumtechguy
2024-10-09T15:41:26
null
Wonder if it is putting things onto p-cores more aggressively. Would need to the power graphs at the same time to see that.
null
null
41,788,876
41,788,557
null
null
null
null
41,789,140
comment
plesner
2024-10-09T15:41:27
null
If someone on my team or in my company proposed to break most of our python code for no substantial reason, unless they were pretty junior I would count that as a real red flag against their judgement.<p>How do people land on the python steering council exactly?
null
null
41,788,360
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,789,141
comment
missedthecue
2024-10-09T15:41:33
null
Wages won&#x27;t ever eat up 100% of the productivity gains. That defeats the point of investing in productivity gains. If you have ten ditch diggers, but then buy a steamshovel, the operator of the steamshovel earns more than the ditch diggers, but doesn&#x27;t earn 10 salaries.<p>I am from a developing country. There aren&#x27;t a lot of super rich here. In fact there isn&#x27;t much wealth at all. Having some greater gini coefficient doesn&#x27;t mean you have more wealth, inequality really isn&#x27;t a relevant measure.<p>If raising wages was the only component to development, Somalia could simply set their minimum wage to $50 an hour and watch the country soar. Wages follow development, not the other around.
null
null
41,783,889
41,780,569
null
null
null
null
41,789,142
comment
abeppu
2024-10-09T15:41:41
null
... but even before the rule change, in virtue of being a proper name, if the proprietor calls it &quot;Eva&#x27;s Blumenladen&quot;, and it&#x27;s marked as such, wasn&#x27;t it proper usage to refer to it that way? If I call my English business, &quot;Joes Cafe&quot; (intentionally not using an apostrophe), wouldn&#x27;t it be <i>incorrect</i> for people to refer to it in writing as &quot;Joe&#x27;s Cafe&quot;?
null
null
41,789,002
41,787,647
null
[ 41789832, 41796503 ]
null
null
41,789,143
comment
kaibee
2024-10-09T15:41:51
null
Idk man, I&#x27;m pretty sure I consume a lot fewer labor hours than a billionaire with a super-yacht. The thing to focus on is how many labor-hours someone is consuming. When a billionaire allocates ~20 people of labor-hours every day to maintaining that super-yacht, that means there&#x27;s ~20 people fewer labor hours for services for everyone else. And building that super-yacht also consumed a lot of high-skill labor hours.
null
null
41,783,432
41,780,569
null
[ 41789683, 41792736 ]
null
null
41,789,144
comment
leetharris
2024-10-09T15:41:58
null
Agreed.<p>Source available is also useful in high end environments to ensure security and reduce loopholes.<p>This is very helpful for software used by security agencies, for example.
null
null
41,788,930
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,145
comment
joshAg
2024-10-09T15:42:09
null
It&#x27;s not meaningless, the author just doesn&#x27;t like it. Open-source and source available were always meant to be watered-down versions of the FSF&#x27;s free software specifically to be more palatable to businesses. That&#x27;s not a bug and it&#x27;s not even a feature. It&#x27;s the freaking mission statement.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,146
comment
kreyenborgi
2024-10-09T15:42:18
null
&gt; but I couldn&#x27;t get the clerk at the store to understand what was wrong.<p>I would have loved to watch that conversation :-)
null
null
41,788,899
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,789,147
comment
ktosobcy
2024-10-09T15:42:21
null
I wouldn&#x27;t mind for English to have &quot;standardisation body&quot; akin to French or German one (or RAE for Spanish) that could maybe get rid of backward, dumb spelling ;)<p>(see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;English-language_spelling_reform" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;English-language_spelling_refo...</a>)
null
null
41,788,256
41,787,647
null
[ 41789584, 41789798, 41789227, 41789917, 41789394, 41790054, 41790290, 41791405, 41794171, 41789404, 41789852 ]
null
null
41,789,148
comment
eru
2024-10-09T15:42:29
null
Elixir&#x27;s &#x27;pipes&#x27; always felt very hacky to me. (But so does most of the language, compared to Erlang.)
null
null
41,788,948
41,788,026
null
[ 41789234 ]
null
null
41,789,149
comment
simonw
2024-10-09T15:42:30
null
&quot;Fair source&quot; means more than just &quot;not open source&quot; - see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fair.io&#x2F;about&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fair.io&#x2F;about&#x2F;</a><p>IMO the most interesting part of the fair source definition is the commitment to &quot;delayed Open Source publication&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensource.org&#x2F;delayed-open-source-publication" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensource.org&#x2F;delayed-open-source-publication</a>
null
null
41,789,063
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,150
comment
null
2024-10-09T15:42:33
null
null
null
null
41,787,361
41,786,012
null
null
true
null
41,789,151
comment
Throwawayhahzoh
2024-10-09T15:42:35
null
Telling someone to &quot;Please consult an attorney&quot; when they ask if you can check the box if you pay for ACF Pro sure qualifies as inserting FUD into the ecosystem to my non-lawyer mind.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;JavierCasares&#x2F;status&#x2F;1843963074904227945" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;JavierCasares&#x2F;status&#x2F;1843963074904227945</a>
null
null
41,787,993
41,791,369
null
null
null
null
41,789,152
comment
jascha_eng
2024-10-09T15:42:35
null
Making up a new name really? I have an open source project that I am thinking about monetizing. In the end as an author you actually have to choose a sensible license set-up for that project.<p>If this then counts as open-source or not really only matters for marketing purposes. And a new term will not have the same effect for that. If I put fair-source on my landing page it just means I have to explain more.<p>People that really care about the license will read the license. People that don&#x27;t really care will be fine with generic terms imo and don&#x27;t need the classification.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,153
comment
Heff
2024-10-09T15:42:48
null
That&#x27;s a really nice implementation. I feel like it should be easy for that to support videos too, if desired. I assume it&#x27;s just using a media element under the hood.
null
null
41,785,646
41,780,297
null
null
null
null
41,789,154
comment
g-b-r
2024-10-09T15:42:50
null
Is that really common?
null
null
41,788,414
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,789,155
comment
phkahler
2024-10-09T15:42:53
null
&gt;&gt; I fail to see how this is even being considered.<p>To me it stinks of an ego-centric person thinking they&#x27;re a &quot;language developer&quot; and knowing better than the actual users of the language what&#x27;s best for them. Just because something can be misused doesn&#x27;t mean you have to take it away.<p>I haven&#x27;t noticed, but since Rust came along is there a trend among languages to enforce &quot;safer&quot; programming at the language level? I could see that kind of thinking getting way out of hand. If that&#x27;s the case, I would see this one as &quot;I&#x27;m going to save the world with this dumb little change that breaks things for a bunch of people!&quot;<p>I would hope a PEP like this came about from frequent user requests but that doesn&#x27;t seem to be the case.
null
null
41,788,338
41,788,026
null
[ 41789984, 41790106, 41790077, 41789867, 41789774 ]
null
null
41,789,156
story
LorenDB
2024-10-09T15:42:55
NOAA drops scientist's ashes into the eye of Category 5 Milton
null
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/10/scientists-ashes-dropped-into-hurricane-miltons-eye-as-final-tribute/
3
null
41,789,156
0
[ 41789382 ]
null
null
41,789,157
comment
kstrauser
2024-10-09T15:43:06
null
Hard disagree there. It was way too easy to get yourself into an incompatibility hell with the old resolver, where package A relied on transitive dependency X v1.2 and package B needed X v2.1. Which version of X you got depended on whether you installed A or B first.<p>Yes, the new version <i>did</i> mean I had to straighten out a few projects that were already working before, but they were working by coincidence because my code paths weren’t stumbling across the incompatibilities. The problem already existed. The new resolver just exposed it.
null
null
41,788,932
41,788,026
null
[ 41789885 ]
null
null
41,789,158
comment
2OEH8eoCRo0
2024-10-09T15:43:13
null
Open Source has already been open washed. It used to mean you get the source code. Now it comes with all extra &quot;freedom&quot; stipulations.
null
null
41,789,074
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,159
comment
Imustaskforhelp
2024-10-09T15:43:15
null
After reading the article , here&#x27;s what I would argue Fair source actually means that a project is source available except it doesn&#x27;t intend on hurting the end user in the sense that most people wouldn&#x27;t find the difference , generally the difference is that the parent company of the project is the only one able to provide its services of hosting it for other people etc.<p>this is its 2nd points in a gest (though fair source doesn&#x27;t necessarily implicate that its only for hosting , the 2nd point is somewhat vague but decent enough because they want more companies under the umbrella)<p>this and delayed open source<p>I kind of agree with this sentiment. Primarily because there is time spent in making something , and I would like to see returns on it as well but I do feel like &quot;open source&quot; is good thing<p>this is the thing where my morales can somewhat agree is that though it doesn&#x27;t fit osi definition , I am somewhat Ok with it . It&#x27;s a compromise that I see myself , a somewhat hard core foss guy to agree to .<p>so I am probably going to use it in any of my projects<p>either this or massive agpl &#x2F; sspl<p>or if I am feeling generous and its not a business then MIT license
null
null
41,788,930
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,160
comment
logicziller
2024-10-09T15:43:22
null
Source Available means exactly what it says, and I don&#x27;t need to look up a definition somewhere. From what I understand, I can view the source code and verify that a software does what it claims and does not have some hidden nastiness.<p>What the hell does &quot;Fair Source&quot; even imply? Fair to whom, the author or the users? Stop with the bullshit already.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
[ 41789461, 41789213 ]
null
null
41,789,161
comment
DinoDad13
2024-10-09T15:43:23
null
I love it when the top comments on a hacker news thread is justifying monopolies. Fuck economics right?
null
null
41,784,599
41,784,287
null
[ 41789212, 41789639, 41789222 ]
null
null
41,789,162
comment
tomjen3
2024-10-09T15:43:24
null
I mean ditch SAML. We use Keycloak as a SAML to OpenId translator, essentially, so if we could get JWT tokens from our IdPs directly, we wouldn&#x27;t need Keycloak.
null
null
41,785,379
41,769,842
null
null
null
null
41,789,163
comment
b5n
2024-10-09T15:43:34
null
So we&#x27;ve moved on from open washing to full on source laundering lmao.<p>I&#x27;d like to buy a beer for the &#x27;zealot&#x27; that buried themselves so far underneath the author&#x27;s skin that they were compelled to write this useless article.<p>This is currently the top post, feeling pretty disappointed in you hn.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,164
story
mooreds
2024-10-09T15:43:40
Death and the Digital Estate
null
https://workshop.vennfactory.com/p/death-and-the-digital-estate
1
null
41,789,164
0
null
null
null
41,789,165
comment
lawls
2024-10-09T15:43:49
null
This is America, the land of opportunity. The tools are already at the Justice Department for them to wield. If they do not use them, that is on them for a lack of willpower. Why not try and see something through for a change?
null
null
41,789,016
41,789,016
null
null
null
null
41,789,166
comment
ahaucnx
2024-10-09T15:43:53
null
We open sourced our air quality monitor (firmware &amp; hardware) under CC-BY-SA.<p>The SA (share-a-like) gives quite a lot of protection in regards to the concerns that the author rises as most companies that would take our source code would not be willing to keep it open and also probably not so keen to attribute us as originators.<p>I think what also many people forget is that the source-code is actually only a small part of business success. In my opinion the network, reputation and community that a company builds has much more value than the actual code.<p>We went fully open source hardware more than 2 years ago and it was probably one of our best decisions as a company.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,167
comment
ChrisMarshallNY
2024-10-09T15:43:54
null
<i>&gt; allows use, modification, and redistribution with minimal restrictions to protect the producer’s business model</i><p>That part is not something that a lot of folks running &quot;source-available&quot; want. It may have nothing to do with competition.<p>I license most of my stuff as MIT. It allows folks to reuse the source in any way they want (few people do, which is fine by me). Just don&#x27;t come crying to me, if you mess things up.<p>I can easily envision authors of open-source projects being hit, if their stuff gets caught up in things like breaches, malware, or scamming. In many cases (in the US), the suits may not have merit, but they are still a major distraction. Just the suit can be crippling, and many suits can&#x27;t be anti-SLAPPed.<p>There&#x27;s a few reasons that I like to open my source:<p>- It allows folks to ensure that my stuff doesn&#x27;t violate anyone else&#x27;s IP.<p>- I would like to hear if I have made any big mistakes. Sometimes, someone may see that I&#x27;m doing something in a boneheaded way, and offer a correction (sometimes, in a nasty way, but I still appreciate the help).<p>- If there are problems with things like App Store reviews, or SDK bugs, the ability to point to the entire project, is helpful.<p>- I am sincerely interested in &quot;giving back,&quot; and genuinely hope that folks (even if they are a bit &quot;rough around the edges&quot;), can learn from it.<p>On another note, I suspect that the use of &quot;zealots&quot; throughout the post, may be to encourage passionate response. Many folks like all the clicks that outrage brings.
null
null
41,788,967
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,168
comment
that_guy_iain
2024-10-09T15:43:55
null
I have no idea. But considering how many people are getting banned from contributing, a fork seems more and more likely imo.
null
null
41,788,824
41,788,704
null
null
null
null
41,789,169
comment
bdangubic
2024-10-09T15:44:02
null
Learning new technology and&#x2F;or working on a new project is a monster of a task. And the way to make it manageable is as-always - break it up into smaller tasks. Every large task is just a bunch of small ones in disguise so break it apart and then work on manageable smaller tasks. You will also get a small dopamine hit after completing each smaller task which will keep you going.<p>&quot;AI&quot; is very good at helping you tear apart a big task into smaller manageable ones so you can get help there if you get stuck on how to make this happen. Godspeed!
null
null
41,788,455
41,788,455
null
null
null
null
41,789,170
comment
eesmith
2024-10-09T15:44:10
null
Yeah, no. I know I&#x27;ll mistakenly do<p><pre><code> except Exception: resource.rollback() raise </code></pre> instead of<p><pre><code> except BaseException: resource.rollback() raise </code></pre> and it&#x27;s going to be really hard to insert a test case which ensures I really handled KeyboardInterrupt and the like.
null
null
41,788,026
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,789,171
comment
deknos
2024-10-09T15:44:14
null
How do you know, that any application you run is actually the source you read?<p>How do you know, that the application is actually working if you cannot build it properly (because i see cases of buildrecipes missing)
null
null
41,788,930
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,172
comment
ChrisArchitect
2024-10-09T15:44:20
null
[dupe]<p>Discussion on login link instead of generic top-level: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41787409">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41787409</a>
null
null
41,787,136
41,787,136
null
null
null
null
41,789,173
comment
null
2024-10-09T15:44:29
null
null
null
null
41,786,182
41,782,534
null
null
true
null
41,789,174
comment
archgoon
2024-10-09T15:44:35
null
It is this argument, about what benefits the jaguars <i>themselves</i> bring to the farmers, that is unfortunately lacking from the article.<p>Thank you for the additional context.
null
null
41,788,685
41,787,967
null
null
null
null
41,789,175
comment
DinoDad13
2024-10-09T15:44:44
null
The anti-trust case isn&#x27;t about Google&#x27;s LLM business.
null
null
41,784,910
41,784,287
null
[ 41797044 ]
null
null
41,789,176
story
felix089
2024-10-09T15:44:53
Show HN: FinetuneDB – AI fine-tuning platform to create custom LLMs
Hey HN! We’re building FinetuneDB (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;finetunedb.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;finetunedb.com&#x2F;</a>), an LLM fine-tuning platform. It enables teams to easily create and manage high-quality datasets, and streamlines the entire workflow from fine-tuning to serving and evaluating models with domain experts. You can check out our docs here: (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.finetunedb.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.finetunedb.com&#x2F;</a>)<p>FinetuneDB exists because creating and managing high-quality datasets is a real bottleneck when fine-tuning LLMs. The quality of your data directly impacts the performance of your fine-tuned models, and existing tools didn’t offer an easy way for teams to build, organize, and iterate on their datasets. We’ve been working closely with our pilot customers, both AI startups and more traditional businesses like a large newspaper, which is fine-tuning models on their articles to automate content generation in their tone of voice.<p>The platform is built with an end-to-end workflow in mind, from dataset building, fine-tuning, serving, and evaluating outputs. The centerpiece is a version-controlled, no-code dataset manager where you can upload existing datasets in JSONL, use production data, or collaborate with domain experts to create high-quality datasets for custom use cases. We also offer evaluation workflows that allow non-technical contributors to annotate data, review model outputs, and refine responses (LLM-as-judge also available).<p>We offer:<p>- A free tier for developers and hobbyists who want to streamline dataset management.<p>- Business-tier with full feature access for teams, using per-seat pricing.<p>- A custom tier for model hosting, custom integrations, and self-hosting.<p>Most users still use OpenAI models, but if you&#x27;re working with open-source LLMs, we offer pay-as-you-go pricing for serverless inference for Llama and Mistral models with up to €100 in free credits to get started.<p>We&#x27;re in public beta right now, so any feedback—whether it’s about features, usability, or anything else—would be incredibly valuable.<p>If you&#x27;ve worked on fine-tuning models before or are curious about custom LLMs, we’d love to hear from you. Our goal is to make the fine-tuning process more accessible and help more companies leverage their data and domain experts to create custom LLMs.<p>Thanks for checking it out!
https://finetunedb.com
145
null
41,789,176
64
[ 41796847, 41798211, 41800497, 41798713, 41798854, 41797438, 41799645, 41789486, 41794063, 41791716, 41791910, 41799661, 41791921, 41794772, 41789835, 41794004, 41792182, 41789777 ]
null
null
41,789,177
comment
kube-system
2024-10-09T15:44:57
null
I find it ironic that all of the confusion and controversy around both the terms &quot;open source&quot; (and &quot;free software&quot;) have highlighted the importance and justification of trade marks. What these movements could really benefit from are legally-protected trade descriptors that mean exactly what the originator means, and nothing different. But instead the internet is full of endless arguments about what these words mean, because FSF&#x2F;OSI didn&#x27;t have the foresight (or desire?) to advocate for unique trademarkable names.<p>OSI made a mistake when they borrowed the term &quot;Open Source&quot; from the intelligence community and RMS made a mistake when he presumed that everyone on the planet would understand that &quot;free as in beer&quot; wasn&#x27;t what he meant. Ultimately, while these groups were had great thought about software licensing, they weren&#x27;t great with communication, branding, or marketing.<p>I think we&#x27;d all be better off if we just started using &quot;OSI Open Source&quot; where that was what was actually meant. Trying to redefine words or phrases with existing connotations is a futile exercise.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,178
comment
Imustaskforhelp
2024-10-09T15:44:58
null
agreed.<p>I do want to see a proper definition which could be explained better legally.<p>But the idea is pretty good in my opinion (unless you are one of those people who want open source to be free labour for your company)
null
null
41,789,129
41,788,461
null
[ 41789307 ]
null
null
41,789,179
comment
AlotOfReading
2024-10-09T15:45:02
null
That&#x27;s a pure function, which he says should be the goal. It&#x27;s impure functions that he&#x27;s talking about.
null
null
41,789,126
41,758,371
null
null
null
null
41,789,180
comment
toomuchtodo
2024-10-09T15:45:05
null
Indeed, its a trap. There are many ways out, all have tradeoffs. Find the way out you are most comfortable with. Spend less, earn more, save more, invest prudently. These are the levers available to you to achieve an outcome.
null
null
41,788,960
41,788,960
null
null
null
null
41,789,181
comment
ta1243
2024-10-09T15:45:12
null
I&#x27;ve run ubuntu for most of the last 20 years and my desktop has barely changed. It was excellent in 2006, it is excellent now. It gets out of my way and doesn&#x27;t change from one year to the next (or if there are changes they are so gradual I don&#x27;t notice)<p>Installation of ubuntu went seriously downhill since they moved to subiquity though, but its something I can live with once every 5 years or so when I get a new laptop.
null
null
41,788,937
41,788,557
null
[ 41789729 ]
null
null
41,789,182
comment
DamonHD
2024-10-09T15:45:20
null
I have spent almost no time on other people&#x27;s payrolls (other than 1Y as part of a buyout) and have made it to semi-retirement with money in the bank, so avoiding 9-5 absolutely can be done.
null
null
41,788,960
41,788,960
null
[ 41790629 ]
null
null
41,789,183
comment
flobosg
2024-10-09T15:45:25
null
AlphaFold2 has correctly predicted novel folds: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s42003-022-03357-1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s42003-022-03357-1</a>
null
null
41,786,908
41,786,101
null
[ 41801248 ]
null
null
41,789,184
comment
pkteison
2024-10-09T15:45:35
null
Fair source sounds like a really bad idea. The problem is if you let someone else define what reasonable limits to competition are, you end up in court and learn that it can be anything. Say a company sells me fair source, but I don’t like the company so I fire them and take over for myself? Well, now I get to try to convince a court that I’m not competing, despite clearly having cost them one customer. Just study the history of the constitutions commerce clause, where everything can and has been construed to affect interstate commerce.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,185
comment
Lerc
2024-10-09T15:45:41
null
The paper has an odd feel about it to me too. Doing a gate estimation as a text explanation without a diagram makes it too easy to miss some required part. It wouldn&#x27;t need to be a full gate level explanation but blocks labeled &#x27;adder&#x27;.<p>Seeing the name de Vries in the first paragraph didn&#x27;t help my sense of confidence either.
null
null
41,785,016
41,784,591
null
[ 41792005 ]
null
null
41,789,186
comment
atsmyles
2024-10-09T15:45:50
null
I&#x27;m fine with the idea of &quot;fair source&quot;, but not the name. It should be named for what it is, &quot;ajar source&quot;.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,789,187
comment
adam_arthur
2024-10-09T15:45:59
null
I switched to Ubuntu recently on a Thinkpad Z16 and had some compatibility and battery life issues.<p>I think Linux is great for more mainstream models that have already been out for a few years, but unfortunately I can&#x27;t recommend if you&#x27;re buying a new or more niche machine.<p>It&#x27;s really a shame, as I absolutely don&#x27;t like the direction either Microsoft or Apple is going. I keep ending up back at MBP due to overall polish&#x2F;hardware quality, but I prefer linux to MacOS. I hope Asahi Linux can get fully up-to-date with latest models and resolve the various QoL issues
null
null
41,788,937
41,788,557
null
[ 41789419, 41789237, 41789329 ]
null
null
41,789,188
story
atorok
2024-10-09T15:46:01
null
null
null
1
null
41,789,188
null
[ 41789189 ]
null
true
41,789,189
comment
atorok
2024-10-09T15:46:02
null
Another version of the how to draw an owl, this time for real
null
null
41,789,188
41,789,188
null
null
null
null
41,789,190
comment
treve
2024-10-09T15:46:20
null
If you only ever support HTML, but not the wider web linking syntax &#x2F; IANA Link Relationships registry that might be fine, but I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s ideal for a new protocol.
null
null
41,762,818
41,761,873
null
null
null
null
41,789,191
comment
card_zero
2024-10-09T15:46:25
null
Which one?
null
null
41,789,094
41,788,461
null
[ 41790356 ]
null
null
41,789,192
comment
anonzzzies
2024-10-09T15:46:25
null
i enjoy my holidays in my garden writing code. been creating them (holidays) since i could program which is now almost 45 years. I always have more fun <i>in hindsight</i> than my friends who do whatever &#x27;the public likes&#x27; and took insta shots. each their own: if you can find joy in your head, it is easy to be happy forever.<p>* you obviously need the means to do this ; I went for money early on and I regret it but then again; I basically have been living of interest for most of my life now from selling my first company that literally almost killed me, 2 times (ambulances and the whole crap).
null
null
41,763,190
41,763,190
null
null
null
null
41,789,193
comment
bluGill
2024-10-09T15:46:31
null
The state of nature is it is your property so long as you can protect it. There are lots of different ways to do that. Many animals have concepts of owned territory which they protect in various ways.
null
null
41,787,910
41,780,569
null
[ 41789957 ]
null
null
41,789,194
comment
rcarmo
2024-10-09T15:46:40
null
Well, it’s certainly increased the number of “lean” startups that are just churning out (and repeatedly pivoting to) different OpenAI wrappers.<p>As someone who does startup investment advisory, I started cutting through all the “AI for X” hype and asking directly for ARR and pipeline figures. Either your idea has paying customers or it just isn’t worth investing in, AI or not…
null
null
41,786,457
41,786,457
null
null
null
null
41,789,195
comment
null
2024-10-09T15:46:57
null
null
null
null
41,788,557
41,788,557
null
null
true
null
41,789,196
comment
llm_nerd
2024-10-09T15:46:59
null
&gt;What else was the &quot;Out-of-the-box&quot; Windows installation trying to do while they were running the benchmark?<p>It&#x27;s trying to maximize the performance to power usage ratio out of the box. The default power profile is very conservative, which on a laptop means better battery life and reduced heat. Given that this comparison didn&#x27;t do even <i>rudimentary</i> power consumption, heat, or CPU frequency scaling measures, it is overwhelmingly likely as the difference.<p>&gt; there are dozens of things clamoring for the attention of the scheduler and using CPU<p>Linux machines have hundreds of processes too. It simply doesn&#x27;t matter in 2024. That isn&#x27;t a factor and isn&#x27;t relevant, nor is the scheduler to blame.<p>This is a silly misleading benchmark that is de facto clickbait. Pretty surprisedto see it doing well here.
null
null
41,788,876
41,788,557
null
null
null
null
41,789,197
comment
carapace
2024-10-09T15:47:06
null
It wasn&#x27;t recent by Internet time but when the debate on walrus operator drove out the BDF<i>L</i> that was the obvious break. Python has been circling the drain ever since. A lot of motion, yes, but to what end?<p>- - - -<p>Oh! How could I forget!? The creeps actually banned Tim Peters!
null
null
41,788,859
41,788,026
null
[ 41792942 ]
null
null
41,789,198
comment
RegnisGnaw
2024-10-09T15:47:16
null
Do they go around threatening fines and suspension of their business license?
null
null
41,788,978
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,789,199
comment
null
2024-10-09T15:47:23
null
null
null
null
41,788,360
41,788,026
null
null
true
null