id
int64
0
12.9M
type
large_stringclasses
5 values
by
large_stringlengths
2
15
time
timestamp[us]
title
large_stringlengths
0
198
text
large_stringlengths
0
99.1k
url
large_stringlengths
0
6.6k
score
int64
-1
5.77k
parent
int64
1
30.4M
top_level_parent
int64
0
30.4M
descendants
int64
-1
2.53k
kids
large list
deleted
bool
1 class
dead
bool
1 class
41,792,000
comment
monacobolid
2024-10-09T19:59:31
null
I see no backlinks, no "what links to here" section.
null
null
41,749,680
41,749,680
null
null
null
null
41,792,001
comment
mullingitover
2024-10-09T19:59:38
null
&gt; Suffering is the default state of man, and our current system has done far more to eradicate said suffering than any other.<p>This seems like gaslighting. Of all the takes, &quot;You were meant to suffer, so if I made you suffer and then I did stuff to reduce the suffering you should be grateful&quot; is certainly one of them.
null
null
41,791,677
41,790,026
null
null
null
null
41,792,002
comment
linotype
2024-10-09T19:59:43
null
So are parents to blame for RTO then? I’m starting to wonder as the child-free folks I know are producing more WFH than they were pre pandemic.
null
null
41,791,570
41,791,570
null
[ 41792306 ]
null
null
41,792,003
comment
inheritedwisdom
2024-10-09T20:00:10
null
I’d read that…I’d love to hear an Acquired podcast on the path of Long Distance Discount Services -&gt; WorldCom -&gt; MCI -&gt; Verizon. They laid down a lot of fiber.
null
null
41,791,339
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,004
comment
int_19h
2024-10-09T20:00:11
null
This particular case is probably not the best example, though, given that the lack of apostrophe for &quot;its&quot; is inconsistent with its use for possessive case for regular nouns in the same circumstances. If we really wanted to maximize readability, we&#x27;d use apostrophe for possession everywhere (including &quot;he&#x27;s&quot; for &quot;his&quot;) and use something else entirely to denote the contraction of &quot;is&quot; and &quot;has&quot; - preferably two different markers since these can also be ambiguous in many cases. Or vice versa, use apostrophe for contraction and e.g. hyphen for possessive: &quot;it&#x27;s&quot; vs &quot;it-s&quot; etc.
null
null
41,790,017
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,792,005
comment
brcmthrowaway
2024-10-09T20:00:12
null
Because of the twisted mentat?
null
null
41,789,185
41,784,591
null
[ 41793311 ]
null
null
41,792,006
comment
vips7L
2024-10-09T20:00:15
null
<p><pre><code> class MyException extends Exception { @Override public Throwable fillInStackTrace() { return this; } }</code></pre>
null
null
41,790,035
41,776,878
null
null
null
null
41,792,007
comment
aleph_minus_one
2024-10-09T20:00:19
null
Your argument is exactly a central part of the point that I raised.
null
null
41,788,044
41,786,101
null
null
null
null
41,792,008
comment
null
2024-10-09T20:00:24
null
null
null
null
41,791,010
41,790,295
null
null
true
null
41,792,009
comment
ryandrake
2024-10-09T20:00:36
null
This is a good point. When I started working remotely, I was really clear with my spouse that this doesn&#x27;t mean that I&#x27;m suddenly available to supervise the kid, do work around the house, go pick things up at the store, and so on, just because I was physically at home. I&#x27;m still working just as if I was in the office, just without having to drive to a separate building.
null
null
41,791,941
41,791,570
null
[ 41792273 ]
null
null
41,792,010
comment
jjeaff
2024-10-09T20:00:40
null
I&#x27;m kind of surprised it is not still the norm. Apple, Google, MSFT have all done quite well with their non-founder leadership.
null
null
41,782,783
41,771,331
null
null
null
null
41,792,011
comment
eesmith
2024-10-09T20:00:48
null
I don&#x27;t see mention of someone working full-time while also doing full-time child care. I see people who have part-time child care who now need full-time, like:<p>&gt; A sales-team member who&#x27;s a parent said they started searching for additional childcare arrangements<p>and<p>&gt; Under the hybrid model, one worker was able to leave the office at lunchtime to manage pickup times and shared childcare duties with their partner, who worked from home. The worker said managers were flexible about people signing on later from home to complete their hours.<p>&gt; Their productivity numbers had not fallen, they added.
null
null
41,791,941
41,791,570
null
null
null
null
41,792,012
comment
sahmeepee
2024-10-09T20:00:52
null
Playwright (and axe) is a good option, but how do I have confidence it&#x27;s performing the test correctly and repeatably? If the test seems flaky how do I know it&#x27;s the software and not randomness of the AI part? I want tests to be predictable.
null
null
41,789,633
41,789,633
null
[ 41792048 ]
null
null
41,792,013
comment
returningfory2
2024-10-09T20:01:06
null
I think right now that&#x27;s not as much of an issue as the 80&#x2F;46 numbers suggest. If, say, the Democrats had 80&#x2F;100 votes just from representing that 46% of the population, that would be bad. But that&#x27;s not how the two parties distribute right now. Big states can be Democrat (California, New York) or Republican (Texas, Florida). Small states can be Democrat (Vermont, Delaware) or Republican (the Dakotas).<p>The Republicans do end up with a small (up to 5%) advantage in the Senate but that&#x27;s it. Nothing remotely close to the Labour party getting a near supermajority in the Commons from 34% of the vote. It&#x27;s simply much much worse in practice than the situation in the United States.
null
null
41,743,594
41,729,325
null
null
null
null
41,792,014
comment
jszymborski
2024-10-09T20:01:07
null
Wild.
null
null
41,788,752
41,786,146
null
null
null
null
41,792,015
comment
CameronBanga
2024-10-09T20:01:17
null
For fun, I just tried to create an account and used WPEngine.com as my email domain.<p>I got the following error: &quot;You cannot use that email address to signup. There are problems with them blocking some emails from WordPress. Please use another email provider.&quot;
null
null
41,791,369
41,791,369
null
[ 41803539 ]
null
null
41,792,016
comment
mgsouth
2024-10-09T20:01:28
null
We&#x27;re in general agreement about the purpose of unit tests. I disagree on a couple of points.<p>Tests do <i>not</i> document the API. No test is complete, and for that reason alone can&#x27;t completely document anything. For example, a good API might specify that &quot;the <i>sender</i> must be non-null, and must be valid per RFC blah.&quot; There&#x27;s no way to test that inclusively, to check all possible inputs. You can&#x27;t use the test cases to deduce &quot;we must meet RFC blah.&quot; You might <i>suspect</i> it, but you&#x27;d be risking undefined behavior it you stray from input that doesn&#x27;t exactly match the test cases. And before anyone objects &quot;the API docs can be incomplete too,&quot; well, that true. But the point is that a written API has vastly more descriptive power than a set of test cases. (The same applies to &quot;self-documenting code&quot;. Bah humbug.) There&#x27;s also the objection &quot;but you can&#x27;t guarentee cases you don&#x27;t test!&quot; Also true. That&#x27;s reality. _You can never test all your intended behavior._ You pick your test cases to do the best you can, and change your cases as problems pop up.<p>The other thing I would shy away from is including throwaway tests in the framework. Throwaways are a thing, developers use them all the time, but don&#x27;t make them unwanted stepchildren--poorly (incompletely?) designed, slapped together, limited scope, confusing for another developer (including time-traveling self) to wade through and decide whether this is a real failure or just bogus test. They&#x27;re tech debt. <i>Less frequently used</i> tests are another matter. For example, release-engineering tests that only get run against release candidates. But these should be just as much real, set in stone, as any other deliverable.<p>Which I guess is a third viewpoint nuance difference. I treat tests as being part of the package just as much as any other deliverable. They morph and shift as APIs change, or dependencies mutate, or bugs are found. They aren&#x27;t something that can be put to the side and left to vegetate.
null
null
41,789,481
41,758,371
null
[ 41792198 ]
null
null
41,792,017
comment
null
2024-10-09T20:01:30
null
null
null
null
41,790,993
41,790,026
null
null
true
null
41,792,018
comment
dekhn
2024-10-09T20:01:31
null
This approach has many problems; in particular, it lacks an intelligent backoff. A looping service will get continuously restarted.<p>It doesn&#x27;t handle service dependencies. What if I only want my service to run when I&#x27;m on network and VPN is disabled?<p>And I can think of a lot more. All these things have been implemented in init, or in systemd, for decades.
null
null
41,791,854
41,764,578
null
[ 41792919 ]
null
null
41,792,019
comment
sigh_again
2024-10-09T20:01:31
null
Making currencies a concrete implementation is a terrible idea. There is no benefit to it at all, except throwing OOP into something that doesn&#x27;t need it. A single Money class covers all needed cases, the difference between USD and BTC is... everything. Different smallest denominations, different formats, different everything. You don&#x27;t even need concrete implementations<p><pre><code> private data class Money&lt;T&gt;(val name: String, val amount: Int) { operator fun &lt;U : T&gt; plus(other: Money&lt;U&gt;): Money&lt;T&gt; { return Money(name, amount + other.amount) } fun &lt;U&gt; plus(other: Money&lt;U&gt;, converter: (Money&lt;U&gt;) -&gt; Money&lt;T&gt;): Money&lt;T&gt; { return converter(other) + this } } private object EUR private object USD val eur = Money&lt;EUR&gt;(&quot;EUR&quot;, 10) val usd = Money&lt;USD&gt;(&quot;USD&quot;, 20) usd + eur &#x2F;&#x2F; error </code></pre> This gives you entirely user defined currencies, does not pollute the global scope with unneeded currencies, allows you to plug in any conversion technique (pop off, make a network call), and fails if you try to add USD and EUR without converting one into the other.<p>Currencies should always be the user&#x27;s responsibility to provide.
null
null
41,787,972
41,776,878
null
[ 41802277 ]
null
null
41,792,020
comment
qz94
2024-10-09T20:01:38
null
It does sound like we&#x27;re hindering the model a bit by allowing negative weights to exist instead of sending them through, say, a ReLU. But, dealing with this might be an easier problem than you think for the model.<p>In the first diagram with the attention weights, there actually are some negative scores in the noise section. But, the attention to that section is very small anyway. All the second attention map needs to do is predict the noise in the first one -- a task that can be done very accurately, because it has full access to the input of the first.<p>To refer back to their real-world comparison, noise-canceling headphones have access to what your ear hears through a microphone, so they can output exactly the right cancellation signal. Similarly, the second attention map knows what&#x27;s being input into the first one, so it can output a corresponding cancellation signal. It&#x27;s not perfect -- just as noise-canceling headphones aren&#x27;t perfect -- but it still gets you 99% of the way there, which is enough to boost performance.
null
null
41,779,537
41,776,324
null
[ 41792475 ]
null
null
41,792,021
comment
nomat
2024-10-09T20:01:40
null
&gt; allowing smaller brands to compete<p>to name a few: LISEN, Qifutan, Loncaster, YKYI, Holikme and SXhyf. And who could forget VWMYQ?
null
null
41,791,759
41,784,287
null
[ 41797125 ]
null
null
41,792,022
comment
SvenL
2024-10-09T20:01:41
null
Hanging all day in meetings also feels like not working full time…I have to admit, there are meetings where I sit with my child’s and build legos. Those are the most productive meetings I have…
null
null
41,791,941
41,791,570
null
null
null
null
41,792,023
comment
exac
2024-10-09T20:01:43
null
&gt; The aim of Open Source is not and has never been to enable reproducible software.<p>Okay, well just because you have the domain name &quot;opensource.org&quot; doesn&#x27;t give you the ability to speak for the community, and the community&#x27;s understanding of the term.<p>opensource.org is irrelevant.
null
null
41,791,426
41,791,426
null
[ 41792112, 41792063 ]
null
null
41,792,024
comment
hluska
2024-10-09T20:01:44
null
I just spent a stupid amount of money for a chance at getting Teddy Ruxpin. I’m feeling remarkably dumb right now but your words make me feel better.
null
null
41,791,596
41,790,295
null
[ 41792266 ]
null
null
41,792,025
comment
ASUfool
2024-10-09T20:01:50
null
You could be like Doug Hopkins here in Arizona and start a firm to buy hauses.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.doughopkins.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.doughopkins.com&#x2F;</a>
null
null
41,791,633
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,792,026
comment
guestbest
2024-10-09T20:01:50
null
Thanks. I’ll look it over
null
null
41,785,430
41,764,578
null
null
null
null
41,792,027
comment
hydrogen7800
2024-10-09T20:01:59
null
Wow, so what&#x27;s the mechanism here? It seems like layered or nested stepper motors, with the magnets and coils replaced by liquid surface tension and electrostatic impulse to move droplet from one electrode to another?
null
null
41,766,087
41,766,087
null
null
null
null
41,792,028
comment
creato
2024-10-09T20:02:11
null
Are those other deep-pocketed suitors not under antitrust scrutiny themselves at the moment? Maybe they would be first in the firing line of the DoJ if they had bought DeepMind instead?
null
null
41,790,502
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,029
comment
blackeyeblitzar
2024-10-09T20:02:35
null
A reinforcement of definitions is needed. Open weights is NOT open source. But there are people like Meta that are rampantly open washing their work. The point of open source is that you can recreate the product yourself, for example by compiling the source code. Clearly the equivalent for an LLM is being able to retrain the model to produce the weights. Yes I realize this is impractical without access to the hardware, but the transparency is still important, so we know how these models are designed, and how they may be influencing us through biases&#x2F;censorship.<p>The only actually open source model I am aware of is AI2’s OLMo (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.allenai.org&#x2F;olmo-open-language-model-87ccfc95f580" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.allenai.org&#x2F;olmo-open-language-model-87ccfc95f5...</a>), which includes training data, training code, evaluation code, fine tuning code, etc.<p>The license also matters. A burdened license that restricts what you can do with the software is not really open source.<p>I do have concerns about where OSI is going with all this. For example, why are they now saying that reproducibility is not a part of the definition? These two paragraphs below contradict each other - what does it mean to be able to “meaningfully fork” something and be able to make it more useful if you don’t have the ingredients to reproduce it in the first place?<p>&gt; The aim of Open Source is not and has never been to enable reproducible software. The same is true for Open Source AI: reproducibility of AI science is not the objective. Open Source’s role is merely not to be an impediment to reproducibility. In other words, one can always add more requirements on top of Open Source, just like the Reproducible Builds effort does.<p>&gt; Open Source means giving anyone the ability to meaningfully “fork” (study and modify) a system, without requiring additional permissions, to make it more useful for themselves and also for everyone.
null
null
41,791,426
41,791,426
null
[ 41796117, 41792410 ]
null
null
41,792,030
comment
ta1243
2024-10-09T20:02:36
null
The goal of almost all search engines is to direct people to adverts, not to give them the results.<p>Even when you do get the results your after, and get sent to the page you want, the goal of that page is to serve you adverts, not to give you the content you want.
null
null
41,789,991
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,031
story
gjvc
2024-10-09T20:02:36
PatternFly 6 Beta
null
https://staging-v6.patternfly.org/
2
null
41,792,031
0
null
null
null
41,792,032
comment
wewtyflakes
2024-10-09T20:02:37
null
Right now we are constrained to using the DOM of webpages. This is because we need some reasonable way to detect what parts of a UI are interactable or not (though we do some magic to do this); this would be a bigger challenge for arbitrary desktop apps. Also, there would be new security aspects that would have to be meticulously considered if we were to allow an agent to control arbitrary desktop apps. Constraining the agent to the browser has nice alignment in this way.
null
null
41,791,638
41,789,633
null
null
null
null
41,792,033
comment
runako
2024-10-09T20:02:49
null
Lots of legit reasons. Some I have seen:<p>- kids do remote school for whatever reason. This works when parent is at home, but not if parent is at the office.<p>- kids are &lt; age when it&#x27;s okay to leave them at home, but &gt; age when it&#x27;s okay for them to walk home from school.<p>- Have to be at work at 9, school drop-off starts at 8:35. School is 45 minutes from the office.<p>There are a lot of ways people organize their lives.<p>The cool thing about sales teams is you don&#x27;t have to micromanage them in the office as they are one of the few teams in the company where results are unambiguous.
null
null
41,791,941
41,791,570
null
[ 41793812, 41792159 ]
null
null
41,792,034
comment
adventured
2024-10-09T20:02:56
null
Big tech is very good for the US. They&#x27;re far more difficult to compete with in terms of scale and the resources they can deploy, than small companies. It more easily enables the US to suffocate the tech efforts of other competing nations. Giving this advantage up is extraordinarily moronic by the US. There is no benefit to the US by making it easier for the rest of the world to compete with the US golden geese. The DOJ isn&#x27;t thinking that far ahead, they&#x27;re playing a game of agenda.
null
null
41,791,321
41,784,287
null
[ 41792508, 41794368 ]
null
null
41,792,035
comment
LorenPechtel
2024-10-09T20:03:01
null
Yup. Dogfood everything you can. Too often I&#x27;ve seen things that could never have made it out the door if whoever designed them actually used them or worked with those who used them.
null
null
41,789,834
41,781,777
null
null
null
null
41,792,036
story
speckx
2024-10-09T20:03:08
Corn sweat is real, and it's made heat in the Midwest even more uncomfortable
null
https://www.npr.org/2024/09/03/nx-s1-5094251/corn-sweat-is-real-and-its-made-extreme-heat-in-the-midwest-even-more-uncomfortable
19
null
41,792,036
4
[ 41793549, 41792682 ]
null
null
41,792,037
comment
Zigurd
2024-10-09T20:03:14
null
Tesla has transcended future expectations. Everybody knows FSD will be ready by the end of the year. I mean next year. It&#x27;s the world&#x27;s biggest meme stock.
null
null
41,791,927
41,789,358
null
null
null
null
41,792,038
comment
jschrf
2024-10-09T20:03:27
null
Your newest team member sounds like someone worth holding onto.
null
null
41,789,396
41,758,371
null
null
null
null
41,792,039
comment
stonethrowaway
2024-10-09T20:03:29
null
They’ll probably justify it using some outdated Gartner shit anyway.
null
null
41,791,975
41,791,570
null
null
null
null
41,792,040
comment
kps
2024-10-09T20:03:33
null
Belongs to members of your family? Nickname yourself ‘Hop’, and it&#x27;s Hops&#x27; kins&#x27;.
null
null
41,791,633
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,792,041
comment
rkharsan64
2024-10-09T20:03:43
null
There&#x27;s nothing wrong with caring for your child. The cause of this situation is insufficient paternal leaves, not having and raising children.<p>If you as an employer provide a leave of just 15 days for the father (I&#x27;ve seen really big companies do this), and just a few months for the mother, don&#x27;t be surprised if people lose productivity or just straight up leave when they have children.<p>Most EU countries have great paternal leave policies. Most other countries could learn something from them.<p>Somehow, it has become acceptable to forget raising a family for the sake of working, and it&#x27;s disheartening to see people actually defend companies when they set these policies.<p>Edit with some more thoughts:<p>95% of all the time you will spend with your parents is gone. [1]<p>If your child is raised by a caretaker, you&#x27;re losing a huge chunk of all the time you&#x27;ll get with them. On your deathbed, would you feel proud of having delivered another feature instead of spending a bit more time with your family and children?<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;seeyourfolks.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;seeyourfolks.com&#x2F;</a>
null
null
41,791,941
41,791,570
null
[ 41792828, 41792507 ]
null
null
41,792,042
comment
JamesSwift
2024-10-09T20:03:43
null
And then on the other end of the spectrum you have Ice-cold Handoffs as practiced by Microsoft.<p>Good luck to any poor soul caught in the spider-web of microsofts online support as they play hot-potato with you while denying culpability, and forcing you to do all the legwork. Sending you through multiple github repos &#x2F; discord &#x2F; support forums where it becomes increasingly obvious these teams do not get along and want little to do with each other, let alone you.
null
null
41,765,127
41,765,127
null
[ 41795618 ]
null
null
41,792,043
comment
jimbob45
2024-10-09T20:03:44
null
You&#x27;re implying that none of them are on part-time daycare because they should easily be able to convert to full-time daycare now. That is false. You cannot simply convert up if the daycare does not have capacity, to say nothing of the associated costs.
null
null
41,791,941
41,791,570
null
null
null
null
41,792,044
comment
morningsam
2024-10-09T20:03:50
null
CPython doesn&#x27;t, but there is Mypyc [1] which compiles statically typed Python to faster C extensions leveraging the type information. As usual, this comes with tons of limitations [2]<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mypyc.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;stable&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mypyc.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;stable&#x2F;</a><p>[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mypyc.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;stable&#x2F;differences_from_python.html#unsupported-features" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mypyc.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;stable&#x2F;differences_from_pyth...</a>
null
null
41,790,243
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,792,045
comment
bonoboTP
2024-10-09T20:03:50
null
It was big blind luck that the laws of planetary motion turned out to be so simple. There&#x27;s no reason to think that protein folding can similarly be reduced to some elegant description without needing large blackbox models.
null
null
41,787,694
41,786,101
null
null
null
null
41,792,046
story
janandonly
2024-10-09T20:03:58
Lake Michigan Stonehenge – What Have Researchers Learned? – Illinois Fishing Hub
null
https://www.illinoisfishinghub.com/lake-michigan-stonehenge/
2
null
41,792,046
0
null
null
null
41,792,047
comment
jcheng
2024-10-09T20:04:09
null
Can you explain how that works? Why would either the for-profit entity or the executives get a tax deduction because one of the stakeholders is a nonprofit?
null
null
41,791,672
41,790,026
null
[ 41794017 ]
null
null
41,792,048
comment
wewtyflakes
2024-10-09T20:04:17
null
For running the axe test itself, once the agent has decided to run it, is a dedicated tool to run an off-the-shelf axe script. The axe script itself does not change from run to run, so assuming you are running the test on the same page, you should get the same result.
null
null
41,792,012
41,789,633
null
[ 41792870 ]
null
null
41,792,049
comment
arp242
2024-10-09T20:04:21
null
That works for people like you or me who are good faith applicants and wouldn&#x27;t want to waste anyone&#x27;s time. But people like you or me aren&#x27;t really the problem.<p>The real problem is spam. Of those 2,000 I bet at least 75% are just useless time wasters (no work authorisation, wrong TZ, complete mismatch in what was asked for, outright fraud, etc.) They&#x27;re just shot-gunning everything. Much of this is probably bot&#x27;d.<p>Like most spam, you can&#x27;t really lose by sending it: it&#x27;s free to send and there is no global &quot;time wasting shitdicks&quot; blacklist to put these people on (many companies don&#x27;t even keep internal list for this). So you can endlessly vomit in everyone&#x27;s face and never suffer any consequences.
null
null
41,791,858
41,790,585
null
[ 41792244 ]
null
null
41,792,050
comment
rootusrootus
2024-10-09T20:04:26
null
The implied assertion with that metric is that every individual taxpayer should pay the same amount. That seems like a hard sell.
null
null
41,783,721
41,780,569
null
null
null
null
41,792,051
story
nelblu
2024-10-09T20:04:26
20 Years of Gym Rat
null
http://muffin.man.s3-website.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/
2
null
41,792,051
1
[ 41792052 ]
null
null
41,792,052
comment
nelblu
2024-10-09T20:04:26
null
I wrote this for myself so it&#x27;s mostly rambling but figured I&#x27;d share in case someone finds it useful.
null
null
41,792,051
41,792,051
null
null
null
null
41,792,053
comment
Iulioh
2024-10-09T20:04:32
null
Bad things happened because tool, tool bad , very good argument.<p>Put yourself in the mind of someone making a THING, how do you plan to reach your possible customers for THING?<p>THING is the best in class, better than the competition but how would you make the world aware of THING existing?
null
null
41,791,592
41,784,287
null
[ 41792281 ]
null
null
41,792,054
story
ta1243
2024-10-09T20:04:36
NBC News Lite Version
null
https://lite.nbcnews.com/news/welcome-nbc-news-lite-rcna94312
2
null
41,792,054
2
[ 41792094, 41792798 ]
null
null
41,792,055
story
zuhayeer
2024-10-09T20:04:38
Software Engineer Pay Heatmap Across the US
null
https://levels.fyi/heatmap
206
null
41,792,055
144
[ 41792305, 41793100, 41792502, 41793604, 41793913, 41793969, 41793757, 41792748, 41799294, 41801554, 41792293, 41802489, 41800127, 41793407, 41793123, 41792793, 41793655, 41793329, 41793497, 41792512, 41797057, 41793114, 41796976, 41793928, 41792788, 41792933, 41792596, 41792457, 41792616, 41793044, 41792431, 41793436, 41792850, 41792571, 41793224, 41792770, 41797040, 41793637, 41796392, 41793052, 41792310 ]
null
null
41,792,056
comment
sorenjan
2024-10-09T20:04:54
null
Don&#x27;t play their game where they pretend that their net worth is proportional to their achievements.
null
null
41,790,993
41,790,026
null
null
null
null
41,792,057
comment
rimunroe
2024-10-09T20:04:57
null
&gt; You can, in theory use very strong lint rules (disallow `as` operator in favour of Zod, disallow postfix ! operator), but no actual codebase that I&#x27;ve worked on has these checks. Even the ones with the strictest checks enabled have gaps.<p>That&#x27;s surprising. I&#x27;ve worked on a few codebases with reasonably mature TS usage and they&#x27;ve all disallowed as&#x2F;!&#x2F;any without an explicit comment to disable the rule and explain why the use is required there.
null
null
41,791,780
41,764,163
null
null
null
null
41,792,058
comment
johnny22
2024-10-09T20:04:58
null
a good linter rule would have exceptions for loop variables by context by just by name like i, j, k. Often just by name is good enough at least for a solo dev or small team. I require them to be at least 3 chars EXCEPT those.<p>For example: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;clang.llvm.org&#x2F;extra&#x2F;clang-tidy&#x2F;checks&#x2F;readability&#x2F;identifier-length.html#cmdoption-arg-IgnoredLoopCounterNames" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;clang.llvm.org&#x2F;extra&#x2F;clang-tidy&#x2F;checks&#x2F;readability&#x2F;i...</a>
null
null
41,789,660
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,792,059
comment
null
2024-10-09T20:05:21
null
null
null
null
41,791,871
41,745,798
null
null
true
null
41,792,060
comment
skeaker
2024-10-09T20:05:25
null
Other groups doing this too doesn&#x27;t make it okay. Nobody should be forming exclusionary groups where all the shots are called and business decisions are made.
null
null
41,786,754
41,785,265
null
null
null
null
41,792,061
comment
blackeyeblitzar
2024-10-09T20:05:27
null
Why should the “old guard” not have to have the say when they came up with the idea of open source? It is misleading to adopt terminology with well known definitions and abuse it. People like Meta are free to use some other terminology that isn’t “open source” to describe their models, which I cannot reproduce because they’ve release nothing except weights and inference code.
null
null
41,791,691
41,791,426
null
[ 41793937 ]
null
null
41,792,062
comment
hn_throwaway_99
2024-10-09T20:05:28
null
That&#x27;s just a lesson that capitalism is insatiable. Early on, Google didn&#x27;t have personalized ads and they were <i>still</i> making money hand over fist just because search queries are an excellent signal into stuff you may want to buy. But in &quot;line must always go up&quot; fashion, there is even more money to be squeezed out if they surveille everything you do to personalize ads. Same thing happened with Facebook. They had a ton of data about what ads to show you solely based on your interactions on Facebook&#x27;s (now also Instagram&#x27;s) site and apps, but they could make even more money if they tracked you everywhere online in order to increase their ad click-through rates.
null
null
41,791,929
41,784,287
null
[ 41792141, 41793486 ]
null
null
41,792,063
comment
FrustratedMonky
2024-10-09T20:05:30
null
I agree.<p>&quot;never been to enable reproducible software&quot;<p>I&#x27;d say, sure &quot;Never&quot; is a big word.<p>Having open code that everyone can read and run, was partly to allow for reproducibility. In the closed world, how is anybody reproducing anything, being open does enable that.
null
null
41,792,023
41,791,426
null
[ 41792121 ]
null
null
41,792,064
comment
runako
2024-10-09T20:05:35
null
&quot;RTO&quot; honestly is better characterized as &quot;RTO+H&quot; because there is no expectation that people will _stop_ working at home after RTO, just that they will have the same amount of work to do and now fewer waking hours to do it.
null
null
41,791,570
41,791,570
null
null
null
null
41,792,065
comment
felix089
2024-10-09T20:05:38
null
To get the outcome you want, RAG (retrieval augmented generation) would be the way to go, not fine-tuning. Fine-tuning doesn&#x27;t make the model memorize specific content like a book. It teaches new behaviors or styles. RAG allows the model to access and reference the book during inference. Our platform focuses on fine-tuning with structured datasets, so data needs to be in a specific format.<p>This is a very common topic, so I wrote a blog post that explains the difference between fine-tuning and RAG if you&#x27;re interested: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;finetunedb.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;fine-tuning-vs-rag" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;finetunedb.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;fine-tuning-vs-rag</a>
null
null
41,791,910
41,789,176
null
[ 41792196, 41793990 ]
null
null
41,792,066
comment
jjulius
2024-10-09T20:05:40
null
If anybody is as confused as I was, the quote in this comment is from a separate article from weeks back...<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;artificial-intelligence&#x2F;openai-remove-non-profit-control-give-sam-altman-equity-sources-say-2024-09-25&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;artificial-intelligence&#x2F;o...</a>
null
null
41,790,993
41,790,026
null
null
null
null
41,792,067
comment
pdonis
2024-10-09T20:05:47
null
Peter Thiel made a similar argument about monopolies years ago. As I pointed out then [1], the argument only shows that monopoly is good for the monopolist; it doesn&#x27;t actually show that monopolies are good for society as a whole.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.peterdonis.com&#x2F;opinions&#x2F;monopoly-money.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.peterdonis.com&#x2F;opinions&#x2F;monopoly-money.html</a>
null
null
41,789,800
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,068
comment
nomat
2024-10-09T20:05:49
null
if you aren&#x27;t considering the fact that your data is what enabled these companies to become such massive giants in the first place, you may be living outside of the EU.
null
null
41,791,995
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,069
comment
farouqaldori
2024-10-09T20:05:50
null
There hasn&#x27;t been a significant demand for the Python SDK yet, so for now we suggest interacting with the API directly.<p>With that being said, feel free to email us with your use-case, I could build the SDK within a few days!
null
null
41,791,921
41,789,176
null
[ 41793585, 41792197 ]
null
null
41,792,070
comment
zahlman
2024-10-09T20:05:51
null
Python 3 made entire classes of errors impossible:<p>* Beginners don&#x27;t introduce ACE exploits into their program from the get-go, because `input` is what `raw_input` was before and the &quot;convenient&quot; wrapper using `eval` was no longer available - so instructors were forced to teach students about explicit type conversions, like they should have been doing the whole time.<p>* You can&#x27;t get `UnicodeDecodeError` from calling `.encode`, or `UnicodeEncodeError` from calling `.decode`, because you&#x27;re never in the position of pretending that a sequence of bytes is a &quot;string&quot;. There&#x27;s no illogical &quot;basestring&quot; type and no `str` objects with ambiguous semantics - `.decode` and `.encode` do what they say, and belong to separate types. These problems resulted in a huge mess of duplicate Q&amp;A on Stack Overflow full of incorrect advice from people with no clue what they were doing, and empowered people to ignore essential truths about Unicode until it blew up into a bigger problem.<p>* Similarly, when you read from a text file, you actually get text now.<p>* `print` used to be confusing and have weird ambiguities and tons of special syntax. Being a function means it can be taught the same way as any other function call; plus you get use as a higher-order function, unpacking operators (you can&#x27;t do `print(*range(10))` in 2.x).<p>* `1000000000 in range(1000000000)` no longer hangs. `xrange` <i>does not solve this problem</i> (although it does improve matters quite a bit by avoiding high memory usage).<p>* Sorting heterogeneous lists correctly produces an error, rather than an ordering so strange as to merit its own Stack Overflow Q&amp;A (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;stackoverflow.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;3270680" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;stackoverflow.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;3270680</a> and many duplicates). (You can still replicate the old order if you want.)<p>* `isinstance(x, int)` doesn&#x27;t fail because of `x` being too large. This was a bizarre speed bump in such a high-level language.<p>* You can write &#x27;£&#x27; in your source code and you only have to declare an encoding if you use something other than UTF-8 (which Python correctly identified as the eventual winner).<p>When Python 3.2 came out I found it to be a breath of fresh air. By 3.4 I was already starting to wonder why so many others were dragging their feet on migrating.
null
null
41,790,969
41,788,026
null
null
null
null
41,792,071
comment
galdor
2024-10-09T20:05:52
null
Yes, it can be compiled and packaged so that I can one day install it as any other package, in my case on FreeBSD.<p>And of course it&#x27;s not just about avoid recompilation, there are a lot of features I want to add.
null
null
41,791,936
41,790,619
null
null
null
null
41,792,072
comment
rootusrootus
2024-10-09T20:05:59
null
If he were doing it competitively, I don&#x27;t understand the strategy. His name was leaked, not announced, and since he is dead he cannot feel like he won the competition.
null
null
41,789,473
41,780,569
null
null
null
null
41,792,073
comment
tedunangst
2024-10-09T20:06:02
null
It&#x27;s funny that layer 7 remains in the vernacular. Nobody talks about layer 6 proxies. Or occasionally somebody will mention a layer 3 proxy. But never layer 5.
null
null
41,790,619
41,790,619
null
[ 41794345, 41792282, 41794673, 41795951, 41797179, 41800066, 41794608, 41793508, 41792591 ]
null
null
41,792,074
comment
Ekaros
2024-10-09T20:06:03
null
With &quot;source available&quot; I understand that I am very likely buying a product. Unless it is something like &quot;freeware&quot;. I probably don&#x27;t need the source, but at least I might have option to check how something works or verify something. Or even use it to report a bug, which I then have to hope they fix.<p>At least it is a step up from close source software. Which I am fine with. Most of the time I don&#x27;t really need to know how something works anyway.
null
null
41,788,461
41,788,461
null
null
null
null
41,792,075
story
hacxx
2024-10-09T20:06:03
null
null
null
1
null
41,792,075
null
null
null
true
41,792,076
comment
int_19h
2024-10-09T20:06:47
null
There&#x27;s an obvious upside for those people. Is there any obvious downside for everyone else?
null
null
41,791,627
41,787,647
null
[ 41802910 ]
null
null
41,792,077
story
TBetaCollective
2024-10-09T20:06:55
null
null
null
1
null
41,792,077
null
[ 41792078 ]
null
true
41,792,078
comment
TBetaCollective
2024-10-09T20:06:56
null
We&#x27;re thrilled to unveil Blitz, your new gateway to global funding and opportunities!<p>Blitz is designed to connect Africa&#x27;s brightest innovators with the resources they need to turn groundbreaking ideas into reality. Whether you’re a startup, social enterprise, or academic innovator, Blitz bridges the funding gap with smart matchmaking, vetted opportunities, and a centralized hub tailored just for you.<p>What Blitz Offers:<p>- Startups: Scale quickly with access to global investors and resources. - Social Enterprises: Amplify your impact with the right funding and partnerships. - Academic Innovators: Connect with industry and funding opportunities for your research.<p>Get Started: Join the waitlist and be among the first to experience Blitz&#x27;s innovative platform.<p>Visit Blitz here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blitz.thebetacollective.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blitz.thebetacollective.com&#x2F;</a>
null
null
41,792,077
41,792,077
null
null
null
null
41,792,079
comment
galdor
2024-10-09T20:06:58
null
You would be surprised by how many infrastructures have software running without any container :) I&#x27;m running FreeBSD on my servers so containers are out, but even if I was Linux, why would I use containers for base services?
null
null
41,791,903
41,790,619
null
[ 41792665, 41792126 ]
null
null
41,792,080
comment
api
2024-10-09T20:07:10
null
The most important thing -- and I doubt this would ever happen -- would be to break off the identity (OAuth) provider and make it some kind of public non-profit. One company should not own the identity layer for such a huge chunk of the Internet, and <i>so</i> many people use Google for this.
null
null
41,784,287
41,784,287
null
[ 41792734 ]
null
null
41,792,081
comment
rcarmo
2024-10-09T20:07:12
null
I got it to work under Piku (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;piku.github.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;piku.github.io</a>) in much the same way (since I support uwsgi, that bit was trivial).<p>I did have to hardcode the data path, and I think having some form of export&#x2F;snapshot would help as well, but submitting a patch might be a fun weekend project.
null
null
41,788,077
41,749,680
null
null
null
null
41,792,082
comment
wizee
2024-10-09T20:07:22
null
It seems to be a gross exaggeration to say most Python code from 5 years ago doesn&#x27;t work on current Python versions. Python 3 was mainstream a decade ago, and almost all code written for Python 3.3 or 3.4 still works on Python 3.13. Maybe some libraries have had breaking changes, but at least for common libraries like Numpy, Scipy, and Matplotlib, most code from a decade ago still works fine.
null
null
41,791,876
41,788,026
null
[ 41792104 ]
null
null
41,792,083
comment
api
2024-10-09T20:07:40
null
GPUs are better but I&#x27;m thinking of even tighter coupling, like an integrated architecture.
null
null
41,787,816
41,784,591
null
null
null
null
41,792,084
comment
LorenPechtel
2024-10-09T20:07:47
null
Yes, .NET. I really love how an uncaught exception in a secondary thread simply causes a silent termination of the thread. In the development environment (C#) things work normally but a release version silently eats them.
null
null
41,787,260
41,781,777
null
[ 41793565 ]
null
null
41,792,085
comment
someluccc
2024-10-09T20:07:49
null
Like I said in my comment. All of those things are things you can PAY FOR, today! To multi-trillion dollar corporations! The time you can go back to giving away your money for things google gives away for free is… now!<p>Excellent criticism too that the evil monopolist that devilishly gives away extremely useful and value-add products and services in order to expand its evil monopoly is also famously criticized by the victims of those free data-mining products for sometimes discontinuing them without giving them proper notice! Surely Google can’t just stop mistreating them without adequate prior notice!
null
null
41,791,985
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,086
comment
bobmcnamara
2024-10-09T20:08:04
null
32b float can match your desktop. Really just takes a few compiler flags(like avoiding -funsafe-math), setting rounding modes, and not using the 80bit Intel mode(largely disused after 64bit transition).
null
null
41,791,381
41,784,591
null
[ 41801301 ]
null
null
41,792,087
comment
burnte
2024-10-09T20:08:10
null
&gt; I wonder if they shared the &quot;data&quot; in the memo. Otherwise, this should be considered a magical myth that the company&#x27;s leadership simply believes.<p>They never share the data. The data is &quot;management wants it that way.&quot; I manage a completely remote team, I couldn&#x27;t care less if they were in person, they work fantastically this way.
null
null
41,791,975
41,791,570
null
[ 41792204 ]
null
null
41,792,088
comment
partiallypro
2024-10-09T20:08:28
null
If Wordpress cuts off all your security updates on a whim, and you suddenly have to support that code base...uh, that&#x27;s a seismic problem.
null
null
41,791,250
41,791,369
null
null
null
null
41,792,089
comment
dartos
2024-10-09T20:08:36
null
&gt; A) Do you pay them? - No: then yes it is free<p>And here we see the ostrich. When faced with the horrors of reality, sticks its head in the sand. It’s simpler in there.
null
null
41,791,995
41,784,287
null
[ 41792191, 41792124 ]
null
null
41,792,090
comment
saghm
2024-10-09T20:08:47
null
My family is all from either New England or New York, so it might not just be a Midwestern thing anymore!
null
null
41,791,348
41,787,647
null
null
null
null
41,792,091
comment
wonger_
2024-10-09T20:08:55
null
This is not a YouTube problem or a live sports problem, it&#x27;s just that a video player&#x27;s progress bar spoils results of recorded games.<p>A thoughtful production team could add a &quot;spoiler block&quot; to the ending of short matches, like here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;IGaG3X_-CIM?si=PIwmn8Phgnq2kUMM&amp;t=1220" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;IGaG3X_-CIM?si=PIwmn8Phgnq2kUMM&amp;t=1220</a><p>Or the community could create a spolier-free viewing site, like here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vods.co&#x2F;melee?event=27501" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vods.co&#x2F;melee?event=27501</a>
null
null
41,791,842
41,791,842
null
[ 41793514 ]
null
null
41,792,092
comment
htrp
2024-10-09T20:09:03
null
Did infosys actually get equity when they donated to it as a nonprofit?
null
null
41,791,730
41,790,026
null
[ 41792448 ]
null
null
41,792,093
comment
thierrydamiba
2024-10-09T20:09:05
null
The confusing thing about this strategy to me is-ok let’s say I give you my email and I hate the product.<p>What benefit do you get from that?<p>Are you going to send me an email reminding me to try it again? That’s going straight to spam.<p>If I like the product-at some point I’ll have to sign up, and then you have my email.<p>Why the intermediate step? The only thing that comes to mind is limiting resource usage? If it’s just free people might use it just to use it-but isn’t that kind of the point of a demo?
null
null
41,790,757
41,788,246
null
[ 41793228 ]
null
null
41,792,094
comment
ta1243
2024-10-09T20:09:12
null
This is a great way to see the news -- 15kBytes to load<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lite.nbcnews.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;science-news&#x2F;hurricane-milton-storm-surge-florida-rcna174597" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lite.nbcnews.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;science-news&#x2F;hurricane-milt...</a><p>Loading the equivalent &quot;full&quot; browser is 1,000 times that size, and that&#x27;s with things like ublock origin blocking the adverts.
null
null
41,792,054
41,792,054
null
null
null
null
41,792,095
comment
int_19h
2024-10-09T20:09:12
null
It is rather telling that Quebec had to repeatedly to use the &quot;notwithstanding clause&quot; of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms (which is basically a legal way for the province of saying &quot;fuck you, we don&#x27;t care about your pesky rights&quot;) to do that: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Section_33_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms#Uses" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Section_33_of_the_Canadian_Cha...</a>
null
null
41,790,494
41,787,647
null
[ 41792264 ]
null
null
41,792,096
comment
logifail
2024-10-09T20:09:24
null
&gt; Being able to accumulate capital, at least without having to resort to extreme violence is also about as &quot;unnatural&quot; as it gets..<p>(This is a genuine clarifying question, because I&#x27;m struggling here) are you suggesting that saving is somehow unnatural?
null
null
41,790,741
41,780,569
null
[ 41792378, 41792239, 41792340 ]
null
null
41,792,097
comment
flustercan
2024-10-09T20:09:36
null
What would one do with a command line SSH tunnel manager?
null
null
41,785,511
41,785,511
null
null
null
null
41,792,098
comment
novia
2024-10-09T20:09:42
null
Many parts of Google today are acquisitions: YouTube, Android, Doubleclick, and many more.
null
null
41,791,744
41,784,287
null
null
null
null
41,792,099
comment
saghm
2024-10-09T20:09:49
null
&gt; And the domain the company uses is &quot;unos.com&quot;, so at the corporate entity has accepted the name.<p>Yeah, I&#x27;ve heard servers there say &quot;welcome to Uno&#x27;s&quot;, so I know I&#x27;ve already lost the battle. Like I said, it&#x27;s not a rational annoyance though, so that doesn&#x27;t make me feel any better when I hear it.
null
null
41,791,972
41,787,647
null
null
null
null