text
stringlengths 833
15.3k
| output
stringlengths 2
16
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>284.5</td><td>287.8</td><td>299.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.8</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>286.8</td><td>290.6</td><td>303.1</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) . consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting . under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales . accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s . gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value . accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million . the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows . in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office . the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes . the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach . divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange . the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos . as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock . we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction . based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares . in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses . the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 . the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
| 286.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 42335</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>33249</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>25149</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>17425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>11750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28581</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 158489</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .
Question: what is the difference in rental expense between 2005 and 2006?
Answer: 6.4
Question: and the specific value for 2005?
Answer: 12.2
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 0.52459 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 317</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>236</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>214</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>597</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum payments required</td><td>$ 1830</td></tr></table> aon corporation .
Question: what is the difference between the net rent expense of the years 2009 and 2008?
| -42.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the increase in cash provided by accounts payable-inventory financing was primarily due to a new vendor added to our previously existing inventory financing agreement . for a description of the inventory financing transactions impacting each period , see note 6 ( inventory financing agreements ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . for a description of the debt transactions impacting each period , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . net cash used in financing activities decreased $ 56.3 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily driven by several debt refinancing transactions during each period and our july 2013 ipo , which generated net proceeds of $ 424.7 million after deducting underwriting discounts , expenses and transaction costs . the net impact of our debt transactions resulted in cash outflows of $ 145.9 million and $ 518.3 million during 2014 and 2013 , respectively , as cash was used in each period to reduce our total long-term debt . for a description of the debt transactions impacting each period , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . long-term debt and financing arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , we had total indebtedness of $ 3.3 billion , of which $ 1.6 billion was secured indebtedness . at december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with the covenants under our various credit agreements and indentures . the amount of cdw 2019s restricted payment capacity under the senior secured term loan facility was $ 679.7 million at december 31 , 2015 . for further details regarding our debt and each of the transactions described below , see note 8 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , the following events occurred with respect to our debt structure : 2022 on august 1 , 2015 , we consolidated kelway 2019s term loan and kelway 2019s revolving credit facility . kelway 2019s term loan is denominated in british pounds . the kelway revolving credit facility is a multi-currency revolving credit facility under which kelway is permitted to borrow an aggregate amount of a350.0 million ( $ 73.7 million ) as of december 31 , 2015 . 2022 on march 3 , 2015 , we completed the issuance of $ 525.0 million principal amount of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2023 which will mature on september 1 , 2023 . 2022 on march 3 , 2015 , we redeemed the remaining $ 503.9 million aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) senior notes due 2019 , plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption , april 2 , 2015 . inventory financing agreements we have entered into agreements with certain financial intermediaries to facilitate the purchase of inventory from various suppliers under certain terms and conditions . these amounts are classified separately as accounts payable-inventory financing on the consolidated balance sheets . we do not incur any interest expense associated with these agreements as balances are paid when they are due . for further details , see note 6 ( inventory financing agreements ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . contractual obligations we have future obligations under various contracts relating to debt and interest payments , operating leases and asset retirement obligations . our estimated future payments , based on undiscounted amounts , under contractual obligations that existed as of december 31 , 2015 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period < 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 4-5 years</td><td>payments due by period > 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>term loan ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1703.4</td><td>$ 63.9</td><td>$ 126.3</td><td>$ 1513.2</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kelway term loan ( 1 )</td><td>90.9</td><td>13.5</td><td>77.4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior notes due 2022 ( 2 )</td><td>852.0</td><td>36.0</td><td>72.0</td><td>72.0</td><td>672.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior notes due 2023 ( 2 )</td><td>735.1</td><td>26.3</td><td>52.5</td><td>52.5</td><td>603.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes due 2024 ( 2 )</td><td>859.7</td><td>31.6</td><td>63.3</td><td>63.3</td><td>701.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating leases ( 3 )</td><td>143.2</td><td>22.5</td><td>41.7</td><td>37.1</td><td>41.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>asset retirement obligations ( 4 )</td><td>1.8</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.5</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4386.1</td><td>$ 194.6</td><td>$ 433.7</td><td>$ 1738.4</td><td>$ 2019.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: as of december 31, 2015, what was the total indebtedness?
Answer: 3.3
Question: and what amount of that was of secured indebtedness?
Answer: 1.6
Question: what amount, then, was of the unsecured one?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what is this amount as a percentage of that total of indebtedness?
Answer: 0.51515
Question: in that same date, what percentage of the total of payments were due by period 1-3 years?
| 0.07415 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
while we have remediated the previously-identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting , we may identify other material weaknesses in the future . in november 2017 , we restated our consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 in order to correctly classify cash receipts from the payments on sold receivables ( which are cash receipts on the underlying trade receivables that have already been securitized ) to cash provided by investing activities ( from cash provided by operating activities ) within our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows . in connection with these restatements , management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the misapplication of accounting standards update 2016-15 . specifically , we did not maintain effective controls over the adoption of new accounting standards , including communication with the appropriate individuals in coming to our conclusions on the application of new accounting standards . as a result of this material weakness , our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 . while we have remediated the material weakness and our management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of december 30 , 2017 , there can be no assurance that our controls will remain adequate . the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations , including judgments used in decision-making , the nature and complexity of the transactions we undertake , assumptions about the likelihood of future events , the soundness of our systems , cost limitations , and other limitations . if other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future or we otherwise must restate our financial statements , it could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations or financial condition , restrict our ability to access the capital markets , require us to expend significant resources to correct the weaknesses or deficiencies , subject us to fines , penalties , investigations or judgments , harm our reputation , or otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 30 , 2017 , we operated 83 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 80 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 30 , 2017 was: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>41</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>europe</td><td>11</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rest of world</td><td>26</td><td>2</td></tr></table> we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business . while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: combined, what was the total owned facilities in the united states and canada?
Answer: 43.0
Question: and the amount in europe?
Answer: 11.0
Question: and the total for all three regions together?
Answer: 54.0
Question: and the amount for the rest of the world?
Answer: 26.0
Question: combined with the other three regions?
Answer: 80.0
Question: and as a percentage of the total operated manufacturing and processing facilities?
| 0.96386 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
1 2 4 n o t e s effective january 1 , 2011 , all u.s . employees , including u.s . legacy bgi employees , will participate in the brsp . all plan assets in the two legacy bgi plans , including the 401k plan and retirement plan ( see below ) , were merged into the brsp on january 1 , 2011 . under the combined brsp , employee contributions of up to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible compensation , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations , will be matched by the company at 50% ( 50 % ) . in addition , the company will continue to make an annual retirement contribution to eligible participants equal to 3-5% ( 3-5 % ) of eligible compensation . blackrock institutional trust company 401 ( k ) savings plan ( formerly the bgi 401 ( k ) savings plan ) the company assumed a 401 ( k ) plan ( the 201cbgi plan 201d ) covering employees of former bgi as a result of the bgi transaction . as part of the bgi plan , employee contributions for participants with at least one year of service were matched at 200% ( 200 % ) of participants 2019 pre-tax contributions up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , and matched 100% ( 100 % ) of the next 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations . the maximum matching contribution a participant would have received is an amount equal to 6% ( 6 % ) of base salary up to the irc limitations . the bgi plan expense was $ 12 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock institutional trust company retirement plan ( formerly the bgi retirement plan ) the company assumed a defined contribution money purchase pension plan ( 201cbgi retirement plan 201d ) as a result of the bgi transaction . all salaried employees of former bgi and its participating affiliates who were u.s . residents on the u.s . payroll were eligible to participate . for participants earning less than $ 100000 in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s total compensation ( base salary , overtime and performance bonus ) up to $ 100000 . for participants earning $ 100000 or more in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s base salary and overtime up to the irc limita- tion of $ 245000 in 2010 . these contributions were 25% ( 25 % ) vested once the participant has completed two years of service and then vested at a rate of 25% ( 25 % ) for each additional year of service completed . employees with five or more years of service under the retirement plan were 100% ( 100 % ) vested in their entire balance . the retirement plan expense was $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock group personal pension plan blackrock investment management ( uk ) limited ( 201cbim 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company , contributes to the blackrock group personal pension plan , a defined contribution plan for all employees of bim . bim contributes between 6% ( 6 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of each employee 2019s eligible compensation . the expense for this plan was $ 22 million , $ 13 million and $ 16 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . defined benefit plans in 2009 , prior to the bgi transaction , the company had several defined benefit pension plans in japan , germany , luxembourg and jersey . all accrued benefits under these defined benefit plans are currently frozen and the plans are closed to new participants . in 2008 , the defined benefit pension values in luxembourg were transferred into a new defined contribution plan for such employees , removing future liabilities . participant benefits under the plans will not change with salary increases or additional years of service . through the bgi transaction , the company assumed defined benefit pension plans in japan and germany which are closed to new participants . during 2010 , these plans merged into the legacy blackrock plans in japan ( the 201cjapan plan 201d ) and germany . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the plan assets for these plans were approximately $ 19 million and $ 10 million , respectively , and the unfunded obligations were less than $ 6 million and $ 3 million , respectively , which were recorded in accrued compensation and benefits on the consolidated statements of financial condition . benefit payments for the next five years and in aggregate for the five years thereafter are not expected to be material . defined benefit plan assets for the japan plan of approximately $ 16 million are invested using a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity securities , debt securities and other investments are used to preserve asset values , diversify risk and achieve the target investment return benchmark . investment strategies and asset allocations are based on consideration of plan liabilities and the funded status of the plan . investment performance and asset allocation are measured and monitored on an ongoing basis . the current target allocations for the plan assets are 45-50% ( 45-50 % ) for u.s . and international equity securities , 50-55% ( 50-55 % ) for u.s . and international fixed income securities and 0-5% ( 0-5 % ) for cash and cash equivalents . the table below provides the fair value of the defined benefit japan plan assets at december 31 , 2010 by asset category . the table also identifies the level of inputs used to determine the fair value of assets in each category . quoted prices significant in active other markets for observable identical assets inputs december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) ( level 1 ) ( level 2 ) 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>quoted prices inactive marketsfor identical assets ( level 1 )</td><td>significant other observable inputs ( level 2 )</td><td>december 31 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity securities</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fixed income securities</td><td>2014</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of plan assets</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> the assets and unfunded obligation for the defined benefit pension plan in germany and jersey were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2010 . post-retirement benefit plans prior to the bgi transaction , the company had requirements to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a closed population based in the united kingdom and through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a post-retirement benefit plan to a closed population of former bgi employees in the united kingdom . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , expenses and unfunded obligations for these benefits were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in addition , through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a requirement to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a .
Question: what was the value for the expense related to personal pension plans in 2010?
Answer: 22.0
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 13.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 9.0
Question: what was the 2009 value?
Answer: 13.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.69231 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .
Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what was that noncontrolling interest in 2009?
Answer: 113.1
Question: how much, then, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to this 2009 interest?
Answer: -0.02387
Question: in that same year of 2010, what was the total par value of the redeemed preferred a units?
Answer: 4840000.0
Question: and how much is that in millions?
| 4.84 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
Answer: 477.0
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?
| 4066.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued in september 2010 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a plan for the company to repurchase up to $ 1 billion of its class a common stock in open market transactions . the company did not repurchase any shares under this plan during 2010 . as of february 16 , 2011 , the company had completed the repurchase of approximately 0.3 million shares of its class a common stock at a cost of approximately $ 75 million . note 18 . share based payment and other benefits in may 2006 , the company implemented the mastercard incorporated 2006 long-term incentive plan , which was amended and restated as of october 13 , 2008 ( the 201cltip 201d ) . the ltip is a shareholder-approved omnibus plan that permits the grant of various types of equity awards to employees . the company has granted restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) , non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) and performance stock units ( 201cpsus 201d ) under the ltip . the rsus generally vest after three to four years . the options , which expire ten years from the date of grant , generally vest ratably over four years from the date of grant . the psus generally vest after three years . additionally , the company made a one-time grant to all non-executive management employees upon the ipo for a total of approximately 440 thousand rsus ( the 201cfounders 2019 grant 201d ) . the founders 2019 grant rsus vested three years from the date of grant . the company uses the straight-line method of attribution for expensing equity awards . compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures . estimates are adjusted as appropriate . upon termination of employment , excluding retirement , all of a participant 2019s unvested awards are forfeited . however , when a participant terminates employment due to retirement , the participant generally retains all of their awards without providing additional service to the company . eligible retirement is dependent upon age and years of service , as follows : age 55 with ten years of service , age 60 with five years of service and age 65 with two years of service . compensation expense is recognized over the shorter of the vesting periods stated in the ltip , or the date the individual becomes eligible to retire . there are 11550000 shares of class a common stock reserved for equity awards under the ltip . although the ltip permits the issuance of shares of class b common stock , no such shares have been reserved for issuance . shares issued as a result of option exercises and the conversions of rsus and psus are expected to be funded primarily with the issuance of new shares of class a common stock . stock options the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation and the resulting weighted- average fair value per option granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free rate of return</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected term ( in years )</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.17</td><td>6.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>32.7% ( 32.7 % )</td><td>41.7% ( 41.7 % )</td><td>37.9% ( 37.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>0.3% ( 0.3 % )</td><td>0.4% ( 0.4 % )</td><td>0.3% ( 0.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average fair value per option granted</td><td>$ 84.62</td><td>$ 71.03</td><td>$ 78.54</td></tr></table> the risk-free rate of return was based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant . the company utilizes the simplified method for calculating the expected term of the option based on the vesting terms and the contractual life of the option . the expected volatility for options granted during 2010 and 2009 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and a blend of the historical volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to .
Question: what was the difference in the risk-free rate from 2009 to 2010?
| 0.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the change in gross reserves from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: -57.1
Question: and how much is this change as a percentage of those gross reserves in 2011?
Answer: -0.11422
Question: during this same year of 2011, how much did the incurred but not reported reserves represent in relation to the total net reserves, in percentage?
| 0.43919 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
through current cash balances and cash from oper- ations . additionally , the company has existing credit facilities totaling $ 2.5 billion . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s financial covenants require the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $ 9 billion and a total debt-to- capital ratio of less than 60% ( 60 % ) . net worth is defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock plus any cumulative goodwill impairment charges . the calcu- lation also excludes accumulated other compre- hensive income/loss and nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities . the total debt- to-capital ratio is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus net worth . at december 31 , 2012 , international paper 2019s net worth was $ 13.9 bil- lion , and the total-debt-to-capital ratio was 42% ( 42 % ) . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2012 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2012 , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 444</td><td>$ 708</td><td>$ 479</td><td>$ 571</td><td>$ 216</td><td>$ 7722</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>5173</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>198</td><td>136</td><td>106</td><td>70</td><td>50</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>3213</td><td>828</td><td>722</td><td>620</td><td>808</td><td>2654</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 3855</td><td>$ 1672</td><td>$ 1307</td><td>$ 6434</td><td>$ 1074</td><td>$ 10517</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to effect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2012 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.2 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.2 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 11 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 69 through 72 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . ( c ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( d ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax bene- fits of approximately $ 620 million . we consider the undistributed earnings of our for- eign subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2012 , to be indefinitely reinvested and , accordingly , no u.s . income taxes have been provided thereon . as of december 31 , 2012 , the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $ 840 million . we do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the united states to sat- isfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business , including liquidity needs asso- ciated with our domestic debt service requirements . pension obligations and funding at december 31 , 2012 , the projected benefit obliga- tion for the company 2019s u.s . defined benefit plans determined under u.s . gaap was approximately $ 4.1 billion higher than the fair value of plan assets . approximately $ 3.7 billion of this amount relates to plans that are subject to minimum funding require- ments . under current irs funding rules , the calcu- lation of minimum funding requirements differs from the calculation of the present value of plan benefits ( the projected benefit obligation ) for accounting purposes . in december 2008 , the worker , retiree and employer recovery act of 2008 ( wera ) was passed by the u.s . congress which provided for pension funding relief and technical corrections . funding contributions depend on the funding method selected by the company , and the timing of its implementation , as well as on actual demo- graphic data and the targeted funding level . the company continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions and elected to make voluntary contributions totaling $ 44 million and $ 300 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . at this time , we expect that required contributions to its plans in 2013 will be approximately $ 31 million , although the company may elect to make future voluntary contributions . the timing and amount of future contributions , which could be material , will depend on a number of factors , including the actual earnings and changes in values of plan assets and changes in interest rates . ilim holding s.a . shareholder 2019s agreement in october 2007 , in connection with the for- mation of the ilim holding s.a . joint venture , international paper entered into a share- holder 2019s agreement that includes provisions relating to the reconciliation of disputes among the partners . this agreement provides that at .
Question: what was the total of lease obligations in the year of 2013, in millions?
Answer: 198.0
Question: and what was the total of purchase obligations in that same year, also in millions?
Answer: 3213.0
Question: what would, then, be the total sum of both of those obligations, in millions?
| 3411.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
available , we do not expect any transactions to have a significant impact on our reported income tax expense . in connection with the completion of the reorganization , we will reevaluate the ability to realize our deferred tax assets related to u.s . operations under the new aon uk corporate structure and we may recognize a non-cash , deferred tax expense upon the conclusion of this evaluation . based on information currently available , we do not expect the additional deferred tax expense , if any , to be significant . the reorganization will result in additional ongoing costs to us . the completion of the reorganization will result in an increase in some of our ongoing expenses and require us to incur some new expenses . some costs , including those related to employees in our u.k . offices and holding board meetings in the u.k. , are expected to be higher than would be the case if our principal executive offices were not relocated to the u.k. . we also expect to incur new expenses , including professional fees and sdrt in connection with settlement of equity-based awards under our stock or share incentive plans , to comply with u.k . corporate and tax laws . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . we have offices in various locations throughout the world . substantially all of our offices are located in leased premises . we maintain our corporate headquarters at 200 e . randolph street in chicago , illinois , where we occupy approximately 355000 square feet of space under an operating lease agreement that expires in 2013 . there are two five-year renewal options at current market rates . we own one building at pallbergweg 2-4 , amsterdam , the netherlands ( 150000 square feet ) . the following are additional significant leased properties , along with the occupied square footage and expiration. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>property:</td><td>occupied square footage</td><td>lease expiration dates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>4 overlook point and other locations lincolnshire illinois</td><td>1224000</td><td>2014 2013 2019</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas</td><td>414000</td><td>2020</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dlf city and unitech cyber park gurgaan india</td><td>383000</td><td>2012 2013 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2300 discovery drive orlando florida</td><td>364000</td><td>2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>devonshire square and other locations london uk</td><td>327000</td><td>2018 2013 2023</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>199 water street new york new york</td><td>319000</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>7201 hewitt associates drive charlotte north carolina</td><td>218000</td><td>2015</td></tr></table> 7201 hewitt associates drive , charlotte , north carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218000 2015 the locations in lincolnshire , illinois , the woodlands , texas , orlando , florida , and charlotte north carolina , each of which were acquired as part of the hewitt acquisition in 2010 , are primarily dedicated to our hr solutions segment . the other locations listed above house personnel from each of our business segments . in november 2011 , aon entered into an agreement to lease 190000 square feet in a new building to be constructed in london , united kingdom . the agreement is contingent upon the completion of the building construction . aon expects to move into the new building in 2015 when it exercises an early break option at the devonshire square location. .
Question: what was the occupied square footage for 2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas?
| 414000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2289</td><td>2289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>207</td><td>197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-849 ( 849 )</td><td>-781 ( 781 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1721</td><td>$ 1791</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. .
Question: what is the net change in property plant and equipment subject to capital leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -70.0
Question: what is the balance of capital lease related to aircrafts in 2015?
Answer: 2289.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 2289.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 0.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
substantially all of the goodwill and other intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of allied are not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented below has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td><td>$ 9244.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income from continuing operations available to common stockholders</td><td>285.7</td><td>423.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>.76</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>.75</td><td>1.09</td></tr></table> the above unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied in december 2008 , we reached a settlement with the doj requiring us to divest of certain operations serving fifteen metropolitan areas including los angeles , ca ; san francisco , ca ; denver , co ; atlanta , ga ; northwestern indiana ; lexington , ky ; flint , mi ; cape girardeau , mo ; charlotte , nc ; cleveland , oh ; philadelphia , pa ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; and fort worth , houston and lubbock , tx . the settlement requires us to divest 87 commercial waste collection routes , nine landfills and ten transfer stations , together with ancillary assets and , in three cases , access to landfill disposal capacity . we have classified the assets and liabilities we expect to divest ( including accounts receivable , property and equipment , goodwill , and accrued landfill and environmental costs ) as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were republic 2019s prior to the merger with allied have been adjusted to the lower of their carrying amounts or estimated fair values less costs to sell , which resulted in us recognizing an asset impairment loss of $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s prior to the merger are recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in accordance with the purchase method of accounting . in february 2009 , we entered into an agreement to divest certain assets to waste connections , inc . the assets covered by the agreement include six municipal solid waste landfills , six collection operations and three transfer stations across the following seven markets : los angeles , ca ; denver , co ; houston , tx ; lubbock , tx ; greenville-spartanburg , sc ; charlotte , nc ; and flint , mi . the transaction with waste connections is subject to closing conditions regarding due diligence , regulatory approval and other customary matters . closing is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2009 . republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements %%transmsg*** transmitting job : p14076 pcn : 106000000 ***%%pcmsg|104 |00046|yes|no|02/28/2009 21:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the income from continuing operations available to common stockholders?
Answer: 285.7
Question: and what were the basic earnings per share?
Answer: 0.76
Question: what, then, can be concluded to be the number of shares available?
Answer: 375.92105
Question: in that same year, what was the revenue?
Answer: 9362.2
Question: and what was it in 2007?
| 9244.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: in october of 2015, what was the total amount spent in the repurchase of shares?
| 43966095.94 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
considered to be the primary beneficiary of either entity and have therefore deconsolidated both entities . at december 31 , 2010 , we held a 36% ( 36 % ) interest in juniperus which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting . our potential loss at december 31 , 2010 is limited to our investment of $ 73 million in juniperus , which is recorded in investments in the consolidated statements of financial position . we have not provided any financing to juniperus other than previously contractually required amounts . juniperus and jchl had combined assets and liabilities of $ 121 million and $ 22 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2008 . for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , we recognized $ 36 million of pretax income from juniperus and jchl . we recognized $ 16 million of after-tax income , after allocating the appropriate share of net income to the non-controlling interests . we previously owned an 85% ( 85 % ) economic equity interest in globe re limited ( 2018 2018globe re 2019 2019 ) , a vie , which provided reinsurance coverage for a defined portfolio of property catastrophe reinsurance contracts underwritten by a third party for a limited period which ended june 1 , 2009 . we consolidated globe re as we were deemed to be the primary beneficiary . in connection with the winding up of its operations , globe re repaid its $ 100 million of short-term debt and our equity investment from available cash in 2009 . we recognized $ 2 million of after-tax income from globe re in 2009 , taking into account the share of net income attributable to non-controlling interests . globe re was fully liquidated in the third quarter of 2009 . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions ( formerly risk and insurance brokerage services ) acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions ( formerly consulting ) partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 6423</td><td>$ 6305</td><td>$ 6197</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1194</td><td>900</td><td>846</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>18.6% ( 18.6 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2010 we continued to see a 2018 2018soft market 2019 2019 , which began in 2007 , in our retail brokerage product line . in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the .
Question: what was the sum of revenues for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 12728.0
Question: what were revenues in 2008?
Answer: 6197.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2008?
Answer: 18925.0
Question: what is the average per year?
| 6308.33333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
leveraged performance units during fiscal 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as leveraged performance units , or lpus . lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , one-third of any earned units converts to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds convert to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . total shareholder return units before fiscal 2015 , certain of our executives were granted total shareholder return ( 201ctsr 201d ) units , which are performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on our total shareholder return over a three-year performance period compared to companies in the s&p 500 . once the performance results are certified , tsr units convert into unrestricted common stock . depending on our performance , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . the target number of tsr units for each executive is set by the compensation committee . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the tsr units , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>$ 37.25</td></tr></table> including the restricted stock , performance units and tsr units described above , the total fair value of share- based awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 17.4 million , $ 15.0 million and $ 28.7 million , respectively . for these share-based awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 28.8 million , $ 19.8 million and $ 28.2 million in the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . our share-based award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 4.8 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of our common stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on 84 2013 global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the number of unvested shares as of may 31, 2016?
Answer: 1606.0
Question: what about the weighted-average grant-date fair value?
Answer: 37.25
Question: what is the total value of the balance of unvested shares at may 31, 2016?
| 59823.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .
Question: on december 20, 2005, what percentage did the total of net tangible assets acquired represent in relation to the purchase price of corphealth , inc.?
Answer: 0.1107
Question: and on that same date, what were the cash and cash equivalents as a portion of the net tangible assets acquired?
| 1.72851 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what was the number of day of sales outstanding in 2015?
Answer: 48.0
Question: what was the number of day of sales outstanding in 2014?
Answer: 42.0
Question: what was the difference?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.14286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 219 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agree- ments 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , ac- quire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable ac- counting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received or paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for a further discussion of the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 187 2013189 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated bal- ance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instru- ments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agree- ments , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 222302</td><td>$ 195328</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>123587</td><td>119630</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 262722</td><td>$ 245692</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned</td><td>10592</td><td>7835</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.3 billion and $ 20.5 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 14.0 billion and $ 7.0 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 4.1 billion and $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the amounts reported in the table above have been reduced by $ 112.7 billion and $ 121.2 billion at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securi- ties borrowed . the firm monitors the market value of the un- derlying securities that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and moni- tored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collat- eral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities bor- rowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices described above on resale and securities borrowed agreements , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment on these agreements as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . for a further discussion of assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements see note 31 on pages 280 2013 281 of this annual report. .
Question: if the fair value resale agreements were excluded, what would the 2010 balance be for securities purchased under resale agreements, in billions?
| 222.302 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 172</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 227</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>136</td><td>156</td><td>154</td><td>189</td><td>230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>151</td><td>195</td><td>231</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of state street in 2015?
Answer: 148.0
Question: what was the value in 2012?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 48.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2012 value?
| 0.48 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) stock-based compensation 2014the company complies with the provisions of sfas no . 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation 2014transition and disclosure 2014an amendment of sfas no . 123 , 201d which provides optional transition guidance for those companies electing to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of sfas no . 123 . the company continues to use accounting principles board opinion no . 25 ( apb no . 25 ) , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d to account for equity grants and awards to employees , officers and directors and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 13 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas no . 123r ) , described below . the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td><td>$ -1163540 ( 1163540 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense associated with modifications net of related tax effect included in net loss asreported</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td><td>-38126 ( 38126 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td><td>$ -1201666 ( 1201666 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td><td>$ -5.95 ( 5.95 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td><td>$ -6.15 ( 6.15 )</td></tr></table> during the year ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , the company modified certain option awards to accelerate vesting and recorded charges of $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million , respectively , and corresponding increases to additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying values of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . as of december 31 , 2004 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.3 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . as of december 31 , 2003 , the carrying amount and fair value of long-term obligations , including current portion , were $ 3.4 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . fair values are based primarily on quoted market prices for those or similar instruments . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matching contribution for periods prior to june 30 , 2004 was 35% ( 35 % ) up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . effective july 1 , 2004 , the plan was amended to increase the company match to 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . the company contributed approximately $ 533000 , $ 825000 and $ 979000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123r , which is a revision of sfas no . 123 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation , 201d and supersedes apb no . 25 , accounting for .
Question: what is the ratio of the the carrying amount to the fair value of long-term obligations in 2004/
| 0.91667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>share awards</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2007</td><td>278</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>400</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2008</td><td>518</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>430</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-159 ( 159 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2009</td><td>762</td><td>42</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .
Question: what was the fair value of share awards vested in 2009?
Answer: 6.2
Question: what was the value in 2007?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 4.5
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2007 value?
| 2.64706 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 21871</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>12322</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>9078</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>6381</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>5422</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>30655</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 85729</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees in 2010?
Answer: 11.7
Question: what was the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees in 2009?
Answer: 10.9
Question: what is the net change for the year?
Answer: 0.8
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.07339 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe . our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil . 2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements . for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a . risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k . spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc . marathon shareholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held . fractional shares of mpc common stock were not distributed and any fractional share of mpc common stock otherwise issuable to a marathon shareholder was sold in the open market on such shareholder 2019s behalf , and such shareholder received a cash payment with respect to that fractional share . a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off . activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in all periods presented in this annual report on form 10-k ( see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2014note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) . overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years . in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti . during much of 2010 , both wti and brent crude oil monthly average prices remained in the $ 75 to $ 85 per barrel range . crude oil prices reached a low of $ 33.98 in february 2009 , following global demand declines in an economic recession , but recovered quickly ending 2009 at $ 79.36 . the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>111.26</td><td>79.51</td><td>61.49</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a )</td><td>$ 4.04</td><td>$ 4.39</td><td>$ 3.99</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) 111.26 79.51 61.49 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 4.04 $ 4.39 $ 3.99 ( a ) settlement date average . our u.s . crude oil production was approximately 58 percent sour in 2011 and 68 percent in 2010 . sour crude contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and brent average prices widened significantly in 2011 to $ 16.15 in comparison to differentials of less than $ 1.00 in 2010 and 2009. .
Question: what was the price of brent crude oil in 2011?
Answer: 111.26
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 79.51
Question: so what was the change in price during this time?
Answer: 31.75
Question: and the value for 2010 again?
| 79.51 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2017?
| 9123.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006</td><td>1107455</td><td>$ 45.86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>852353</td><td>63.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-51206 ( 51206 )</td><td>56.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-63624 ( 63624 )</td><td>49.65</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007</td><td>1844978</td><td>$ 53.61</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: what was the net change in the weighted average grant-date fair value from 2006 to 2007?
| 9.23 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 439</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>345</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>317</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>306</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 - thereafter</td><td>1375</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3189</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .
Question: what is the sum of commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment in 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 14.59
Question: what is the average for these two years?
| 7.295 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
notes to consolidated financial statements fifth third bancorp 81 vii held by the trust vii bear a fixed rate of interest of 8.875% ( 8.875 % ) until may 15 , 2058 . thereafter , the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 500 bp . the bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to convert $ 275 million of the fixed-rate debt into floating . at december 31 , 2008 , the rate paid on the swap was 6.05% ( 6.05 % ) . the jsn vii may be redeemed at the option of the bancorp on or after may 15 , 2013 , or in certain other limited circumstances , at a redemption price of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest . all redemptions are subject to certain conditions and generally require approval by the federal reserve board . subsidiary long-term borrowings the senior fixed-rate bank notes due from 2009 to 2019 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank . the maturities of the face value of the senior fixed-rate bank notes are as follows : $ 36 million in 2009 , $ 800 million in 2010 and $ 275 million in 2019 . the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert $ 1.1 billion of the fixed-rate debt into floating rates . at december 31 , 2008 , the rates paid on these swaps were 2.19% ( 2.19 % ) on $ 800 million and 2.20% ( 2.20 % ) on $ 275 million . in august 2008 , $ 500 million of senior fixed-rate bank notes issued in july of 2003 matured and were paid . these long-term bank notes were issued to third-party investors at a fixed rate of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) . the senior floating-rate bank notes due in 2013 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank . the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 11 bp . the senior extendable notes consist of $ 797 million that currently pay interest at three-month libor plus 4 bp and $ 400 million that pay at the federal funds open rate plus 12 bp . the subordinated fixed-rate bank notes due in 2015 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank . the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate debt into floating rate . at december 31 , 2008 , the weighted-average rate paid on the swaps was 3.29% ( 3.29 % ) . the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2032 and 2033 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of crown in november 2007 . two of the notes pay floating at three-month libor plus 310 and 325 bp . the third note pays floating at six-month libor plus 370 bp . the three-month libor plus 290 bp and the three-month libor plus 279 bp junior subordinated debentures due in 2033 and 2034 , respectively , were assumed by a subsidiary of the bancorp in connection with the acquisition of first national bank . the obligations were issued to fnb statutory trusts i and ii , respectively . the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2035 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of first charter in may 2008 . the obligations were issued to first charter capital trust i and ii , respectively . the notes of first charter capital trust i and ii pay floating at three-month libor plus 169 bp and 142 bp , respectively . the bancorp has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations under the acquired trust preferred securities . at december 31 , 2008 , fhlb advances have rates ranging from 0% ( 0 % ) to 8.34% ( 8.34 % ) , with interest payable monthly . the advances are secured by certain residential mortgage loans and securities totaling $ 8.6 billion . at december 31 , 2008 , $ 2.5 billion of fhlb advances are floating rate . the bancorp has interest rate caps , with a notional of $ 1.5 billion , held against its fhlb advance borrowings . the $ 3.6 billion in advances mature as follows : $ 1.5 billion in 2009 , $ 1 million in 2010 , $ 2 million in 2011 , $ 1 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and thereafter . medium-term senior notes and subordinated bank notes with maturities ranging from one year to 30 years can be issued by two subsidiary banks , of which $ 3.8 billion was outstanding at december 31 , 2008 with $ 16.2 billion available for future issuance . there were no other medium-term senior notes outstanding on either of the two subsidiary banks as of december 31 , 2008 . 15 . commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees the bancorp , in the normal course of business , enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers . the bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks , provide funding , equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities . these instruments and agreements involve , to varying degrees , elements of credit risk , counterparty risk and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the bancorp 2019s consolidated balance sheets . creditworthiness for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the bancorp 2019s credit policies . the bancorp 2019s significant commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows : commitments the bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts . a summary of significant commitments at december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commitments to extend credit</td><td>$ 49470</td><td>49788</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>letters of credit ( including standby letters of credit )</td><td>8951</td><td>8522</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forward contracts to sell mortgage loans</td><td>3235</td><td>1511</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>noncancelable lease obligations</td><td>937</td><td>734</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>81</td><td>52</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>68</td><td>94</td></tr></table> commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend , typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee . since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements . the bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance for the amount of the contract . fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the bancorp 2019s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments totaling $ 195 million and $ 95 million , respectively , included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party . at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 3.3 billion of letters of credit expire within one year ( including $ 57 million issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in dollars and foreign currencies ) , $ 5.3 billion expire between one to five years and $ 0.4 billion expire thereafter . standby letters of credit are considered guarantees in accordance with fasb interpretation no . 45 , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d ( fin 45 ) . at december 31 , 2008 , the reserve related to these standby letters of credit was $ 3 million . approximately 66% ( 66 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the total standby letters of credit were secured as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in the event of nonperformance by the customers , the bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral , which can include commercial real estate , physical plant and property , inventory , receivables , cash and marketable securities . the bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the standby letters of credit using the same dual risk rating system utilized for .
Question: what is the balance of noncancelable lease obligations in 2008?
Answer: 937.0
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 734.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 203.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.27657 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
korea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of dividends received in 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what was the value of dividends received in 2010?
| 71.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 14 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas 123r ) , as further described below . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company reevaluated the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options issued to employees . as a result , the company lowered its expected volatility assumption for options granted after july 1 , 2005 to approximately 30% ( 30 % ) and increased the expected life of option grants to 6.25 years using the simplified method permitted by sec sab no . 107 , 201dshare-based payment 201d ( sab no . 107 ) . the company made this change based on a number of factors , including the company 2019s execution of its strategic plans to sell non-core businesses , reduce leverage and refinance its debt , and its recent merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) management had previously based its volatility assumptions on historical volatility since inception , which included periods when the company 2019s capital structure was more highly leveraged than current levels and expected levels for the foreseeable future . management 2019s estimate of future volatility is based on its consideration of all available information , including historical volatility , implied volatility of publicly traded options , the company 2019s current capital structure and its publicly announced future business plans . for comparative purposes , a 10% ( 10 % ) change in the volatility assumption would change pro forma stock option expense and pro forma net loss by approximately $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . ( see note 14. ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per common share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net loss as reported</td><td>$ -171590 ( 171590 )</td><td>$ -247587 ( 247587 )</td><td>$ -325321 ( 325321 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : stock-based employee compensation expense net of related tax effect included in net loss as reported</td><td>7104</td><td>2297</td><td>2077</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect</td><td>-22238 ( 22238 )</td><td>-23906 ( 23906 )</td><td>-31156 ( 31156 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pro-forma net loss</td><td>$ -186724 ( 186724 )</td><td>$ -269196 ( 269196 )</td><td>$ -354400 ( 354400 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share as reported</td><td>$ -0.57 ( 0.57 )</td><td>$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )</td><td>$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma</td><td>$ -0.62 ( 0.62 )</td><td>$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )</td><td>$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )</td></tr></table> the company has modified certain option awards to revise vesting and exercise terms for certain terminated employees and recognized charges of $ 7.0 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively . in addition , the stock-based employee compensation amounts above for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , include approximately $ 2.4 million of unearned compensation amortization related to unvested stock options assumed in the merger with spectrasite , inc . such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense with corresponding adjustments to additional paid-in capital and unearned compensation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas 123r , which supersedes apb no . 25 , and amends sfas no . 95 , 201cstatement of cash flows . 201d this statement addressed the accounting for share-based payments to employees , including grants of employee stock options . under the new standard .
Question: what was the pro-forma income in 2005?
Answer: 186724000.0
Question: and what was the basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma in that year?
| 0.62 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
leases , was $ 92 million , $ 80 million , and $ 72 million in 2002 , 2001 , and 2000 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2002 , are as follows ( in millions ) : concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product although certain components essential to the company's business are generally available from multiple sources , other key components ( including microprocessors and application-specific integrated circuits , or ( "asics" ) ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources . some other key components , while currently available to the company from multiple sources , are at times subject to industry- wide availability and pricing pressures . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the personal computer industry , and new products introduced by the company often initially utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company's ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company's business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company's requirements . finally , significant portions of the company's cpus , logic boards , and assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , the majority of which occurs in various parts of asia . although the company works closely with its outsourcing partners on manufacturing schedules and levels , the company's operating results could be adversely affected if its outsourcing partners were unable to meet their production obligations . contingencies beginning on september 27 , 2001 , three shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the united states district court for the northern district of california against the company and its chief executive officer . these lawsuits are substantially identical , and purport to bring suit on behalf of persons who purchased the company's publicly traded common stock between july 19 , 2000 , and september 28 , 2000 . the complaints allege violations of the 1934 securities exchange act and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief . the company believes these claims are without merit and intends to defend them vigorously . the company filed a motion to dismiss on june 4 , 2002 , which was heard by the court on september 13 , 2002 . on december 11 , 2002 , the court granted the company's motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action , with leave to plaintiffs to amend their complaint within thirty days . the company is subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , the company does not have a potential liability related to any current legal proceedings and claims that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition , liquidity or results of operations . however , the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty . should the company fail to prevail in any of these legal matters or should several of these legal matters be resolved against the company in the same reporting period , the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected . the parliament of the european union is working on finalizing the waste electrical and electronic equipment directive ( the directive ) . the directive makes producers of electrical goods , including personal computers , financially responsible for the collection , recycling , and safe disposal of past and future products . the directive must now be approved and implemented by individual european union governments by june 2004 , while the producers' financial obligations are scheduled to start june 2005 . the company's potential liability resulting from the directive related to past sales of its products and expenses associated with future sales of its product may be substantial . however , because it is likely that specific laws , regulations , and enforcement policies will vary significantly between individual european member states , it is not currently possible to estimate the company's existing liability or future expenses resulting from the directive . as the european union and its individual member states clarify specific requirements and policies with respect to the directive , the company will continue to assess its potential financial impact . similar legislation may be enacted in other geographies , including federal and state legislation in the united states , the cumulative impact of which could be significant . fiscal years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>42</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>later years</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the minimum lease payments due in 2004?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what about in 2003?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what is the difference between 2003 and 2004?
| -5.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
condition are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted average grant date fair values of psus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>17.23% ( 17.23 % )</td><td>17.40% ( 17.40 % )</td><td>15.90% ( 15.90 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.36% ( 2.36 % )</td><td>1.53% ( 1.53 % )</td><td>0.91% ( 0.91 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 73.62</td><td>$ 72.81</td><td>$ 77.16</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of psus that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus and psus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus and psus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus and psus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling $ 1 million , less than $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at a discount . prior to february 5 , 2019 , the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp was the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three -month purchase period . on july 27 , 2018 , the espp was amended , effective february 5 , 2019 , to permit employee participants to acquire company common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 1.9 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company issued 95 thousand , 93 thousand and 93 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: what was the net change in the grant date fair value per share from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 0.81
Question: what was the value in 2017?
| 72.81 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 included $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2458 million , net of $ 915 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 525</td><td>$ 282</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>466</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>410</td><td>253</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>375</td><td>232</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>339</td><td>243</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2126</td><td>1166</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4241</td><td>$ 2441</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-593 ( 593 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1848</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 631 million in 2012 , $ 637 million in 2011 , and $ 624 million in 2010 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 17 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages .
Question: what was the total future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases in 2012, converted to the thousands place?
Answer: 3600.0
Question: and the total minimum lease payment for operating leases?
Answer: 4241.0
Question: combined, what is this value?
| 7841.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the value of operating leases in 2020 divided by 1000?
Answer: 79.789
Question: what was the value of the rent expense?
Answer: 92.3
Question: what is the difference in values?
Answer: -12.511
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.13555 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
cash flows from operations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fiscal year 2018</td><td>fiscal year 2017</td><td>fiscal year 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests</td><td>$ 2163.0</td><td>$ 1701.1</td><td>$ 1736.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>618.8</td><td>603.6</td><td>608.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>after-taxearnings from joint ventures</td><td>-84.7 ( 84.7 )</td><td>-85.0 ( 85.0 )</td><td>-88.4 ( 88.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>distributions of earnings from joint ventures</td><td>113.2</td><td>75.6</td><td>75.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>77.0</td><td>95.7</td><td>89.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-504.3 ( 504.3 )</td><td>183.9</td><td>120.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan contributions</td><td>-31.8 ( 31.8 )</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-47.8 ( 47.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs</td><td>4.6</td><td>35.7</td><td>118.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>divestitures loss ( gain )</td><td>-</td><td>13.5</td><td>-148.2 ( 148.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>restructuring impairment and other exit costs</td><td>126.0</td><td>117.0</td><td>107.2</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>changes in current assets and liabilities excluding the effects of acquisitions anddivestitures</td><td>542.1</td><td>-194.2 ( 194.2 )</td><td>298.5</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>other net</td><td>-182.9 ( 182.9 )</td><td>-86.3 ( 86.3 )</td><td>-105.6 ( 105.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2841.0</td><td>$ 2415.2</td><td>$ 2764.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , cash provided by operations was $ 2.8 billion compared to $ 2.4 billion in fiscal 2017 . the $ 426 million increase was primarily driven by the $ 462 million increase in net earnings and the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities , partially offset by a $ 688 million change in deferred income taxes . the change in deferred income taxes was primarily related to the $ 638 million provisional benefit from revaluing our net u.s . deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new u.s . corporate tax rate as a result of the tcja . the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in accounts payable of $ 476 million related to the extension of payment terms and timing of payments , and $ 264 million of changes in other current liabilities primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable , trade and advertising accruals , and incentive accruals . we strive to grow core working capital at or below the rate of growth in our net sales . for fiscal 2018 , core working capital decreased 27 percent , compared to a net sales increase of 1 percent . in fiscal 2017 , core working capital increased 9 percent , compared to a net sales decline of 6 percent , and in fiscal 2016 , core working capital decreased 41 percent , compared to net sales decline of 6 percent . in fiscal 2017 , our operations generated $ 2.4 billion of cash , compared to $ 2.8 billion in fiscal 2016 . the $ 349 million decrease was primarily driven by a $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities . the $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in other current liabilities driven by changes in income taxes payable , a decrease in incentive accruals , and changes in trade and advertising accruals due to reduced spending . the change in current assets and liabilities was also impacted by the timing of accounts payable . additionally , we recorded a $ 14 million loss on a divestiture during fiscal 2017 , compared to a $ 148 million net gain on divestitures during fiscal 2016 , and classified the related cash flows as investing activities. .
Question: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2018?
Answer: 2163.0
Question: what was the value for earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests in 2017?
Answer: 1701.1
Question: what is the difference in values between 2017 and 2018?
| 461.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
apply as it has no impact on plan obligations . for 2015 , the healthcare trend rate was 7% ( 7 % ) , the ultimate trend rate was 5% ( 5 % ) , and the year the ultimate trend rate is reached was 2019 . projected benefit payments are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 11.5</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>11.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>9.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 20132026</td><td>35.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates . 17 . commitments and contingencies litigation we are involved in various legal proceedings , including commercial , competition , environmental , health , safety , product liability , and insurance matters . in september 2010 , the brazilian administrative council for economic defense ( cade ) issued a decision against our brazilian subsidiary , air products brasil ltda. , and several other brazilian industrial gas companies for alleged anticompetitive activities . cade imposed a civil fine of r$ 179.2 million ( approximately $ 55 at 30 september 2016 ) on air products brasil ltda . this fine was based on a recommendation by a unit of the brazilian ministry of justice , whose investigation began in 2003 , alleging violation of competition laws with respect to the sale of industrial and medical gases . the fines are based on a percentage of our total revenue in brazil in 2003 . we have denied the allegations made by the authorities and filed an appeal in october 2010 with the brazilian courts . on 6 may 2014 , our appeal was granted and the fine against air products brasil ltda . was dismissed . cade has appealed that ruling and the matter remains pending . we , with advice of our outside legal counsel , have assessed the status of this matter and have concluded that , although an adverse final judgment after exhausting all appeals is possible , such a judgment is not probable . as a result , no provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements . we estimate the maximum possible loss to be the full amount of the fine of r$ 179.2 million ( approximately $ 55 at 30 september 2016 ) plus interest accrued thereon until final disposition of the proceedings . other than this matter , we do not currently believe there are any legal proceedings , individually or in the aggregate , that are reasonably possible to have a material impact on our financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows . environmental in the normal course of business , we are involved in legal proceedings under the comprehensive environmental response , compensation , and liability act ( cercla : the federal superfund law ) ; resource conservation and recovery act ( rcra ) ; and similar state and foreign environmental laws relating to the designation of certain sites for investigation or remediation . presently , there are approximately 33 sites on which a final settlement has not been reached where we , along with others , have been designated a potentially responsible party by the environmental protection agency or are otherwise engaged in investigation or remediation , including cleanup activity at certain of our current and former manufacturing sites . we continually monitor these sites for which we have environmental exposure . accruals for environmental loss contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated . the consolidated balance sheets at 30 september 2016 and 2015 included an accrual of $ 81.4 and $ 80.6 , respectively , primarily as part of other noncurrent liabilities . the environmental liabilities will be paid over a period of up to 30 years . we estimate the exposure for environmental loss contingencies to range from $ 81 to a reasonably possible upper exposure of $ 95 as of 30 september 2016. .
Question: how much does projected benefit payments of 2020 represents in relation to that of 2019?
Answer: 0.95327
Question: what is the difference between that and the number 1 that represents 100%?
| -0.04673 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the company consolidates the assets and liabilities of several entities from which it leases office buildings and corporate aircraft . these entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities . due to the consolidation of these entities , the company reflects in its balance sheet : property , plant and equipment of $ 156 million and $ 183 million , other assets of $ 14 million and $ 12 million , long-term debt of $ 150 million ( including current maturities of $ 6 million ) and $ 192 million ( including current maturities of $ 8 million ) , minority interest liabilities of $ 22 million and $ 6 million , and other accrued liabilities of $ 1 million and $ 0 , as of may 27 , 2007 and may 28 , 2006 , respectively . the liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities . obligations and commitments as part of its ongoing operations , the company enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements , lease agreements , and unconditional purchase obligations ( i.e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices , such as 201ctake-or-pay 201d contracts ) . the unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the company . capital lease and debt obligations , which totaled $ 3.6 billion at may 27 , 2007 , are currently recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations , which totaled $ 645 million at may 27 , 2007 , are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet , in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . a summary of the company 2019s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2007 is as follows ( including obligations of discontinued operations ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions ) contractual obligations</td><td>( $ in millions ) total</td><td>( $ in millions ) less than 1 year</td><td>( $ in millions ) 1-3 years</td><td>( $ in millions ) 3-5 years</td><td>after 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 3575.4</td><td>$ 18.2</td><td>$ 48.5</td><td>$ 1226.9</td><td>$ 2281.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>456.6</td><td>79.4</td><td>137.3</td><td>92.4</td><td>147.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>188.4</td><td>57.5</td><td>69.0</td><td>59.0</td><td>2.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4220.4</td><td>$ 155.1</td><td>$ 254.8</td><td>$ 1378.3</td><td>$ 2432.2</td></tr></table> the company 2019s total obligations of approximately $ 4.2 billion reflect a decrease of approximately $ 237 million from the company 2019s 2006 fiscal year-end . the decrease was due primarily to a reduction of lease obligations in connection with the sale of the packaged meats operations . the company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations . the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of may 27 , 2007 was approximately 7.2%. .
Question: what portion of total obligations is related to long-term debt?
| 0.84717 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .
Question: what was the difference in the total reorganization items net between 2012 and 2013?
| 461.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>direct amount</td><td>ceded to other companies</td><td>assumed from other companies</td><td>net amount</td><td>percentage of amount assumed to net</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 16087</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 3260</td><td>$ 13203</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 14673</td><td>$ 5834</td><td>$ 3458</td><td>$ 12297</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 13562</td><td>$ 5198</td><td>$ 3461</td><td>$ 11825</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net amount in 2008?
| 13203.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
| 118.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values in the tables above . fixed-income securities 2014 devon 2019s fixed-income securities consist of u.s . treasury obligations , bonds issued by investment-grade companies from diverse industries , and asset-backed securities . these fixed-income securities are actively traded securities that can be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . devon 2019s fixed income securities also include commingled funds that primarily invest in long-term bonds and u.s . treasury securities . these fixed income securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . equity securities 2014 devon 2019s equity securities include a commingled global equity fund that invests in large , mid and small capitalization stocks across the world 2019s developed and emerging markets . these equity securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities consisted of investments in u.s . large and small capitalization companies and international large capitalization companies . these equity securities were actively traded securities that could be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities also included a commingled fund that invested in large capitalization companies . these equity securities could be redeemed on demand but were not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . other securities 2014 devon 2019s other securities include commingled , short-term investment funds . these securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by investment managers . devon 2019s hedge fund and alternative investments include an investment in an actively traded global mutual fund that focuses on alternative investment strategies and a hedge fund of funds that invests both long and short using a variety of investment strategies . devon 2019s hedge fund of funds is not actively traded and devon is subject to redemption restrictions with regards to this investment . the fair value of this level 3 investment represents the fair value as determined by the hedge fund manager . included below is a summary of the changes in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchases</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment returns</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchases</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>investment returns</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 90</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net value change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 7.0
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 51.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.13725 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2009</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 160</td><td>$ 222</td><td>$ 367</td><td>$ 272</td><td>$ 407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 173</td><td>$ 207</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 112</td><td>$ 115</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 205</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 115</td><td>$ 152</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in value of apple inc. from 2009 to 2014?
| 307.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr></table> research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .
Question: what is the net change in r&d expense from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 1.0
Question: what is the r&d expense in 2014?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.01176
Question: what is the amount of cash dividends received in 2014?
Answer: 115.0
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what is the net change from 2012 to 2014?
| 32.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
notes to consolidated financial statements note 9 . collateralized agreements and financings collateralized agreements are securities purchased under agreements to resell ( resale agreements or reverse repurchase agreements ) and securities borrowed . collateralized financings are securities sold under agreements to repurchase ( repurchase agreements ) , securities loaned and other secured financings . the firm enters into these transactions in order to , among other things , facilitate client activities , invest excess cash , acquire securities to cover short positions and finance certain firm activities . collateralized agreements and financings are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of setoff exists . interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized over the life of the transaction and included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d respectively . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . the table below presents the carrying value of resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned transactions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under agreements toresell1</td><td>$ 141334</td><td>$ 187789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed2</td><td>136893</td><td>153341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under agreements torepurchase1</td><td>171807</td><td>164502</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitiesloaned2</td><td>13765</td><td>7182</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 securities purchased under agreements to resell 1 $ 141334 $ 187789 securities borrowed 2 136893 153341 securities sold under agreements to repurchase 1 171807 164502 securities loaned 2 13765 7182 1 . substantially all resale and repurchase agreements are carried at fair value under the fair value option . see note 8 for further information about the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine fair value . 2 . as of december 2012 and december 2011 , $ 38.40 billion and $ 47.62 billion of securities borrowed , and $ 1.56 billion and $ 107 million of securities loaned were at fair value , respectively . resale and repurchase agreements a resale agreement is a transaction in which the firm purchases financial instruments from a seller , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to resell the same or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . a repurchase agreement is a transaction in which the firm sells financial instruments to a buyer , typically in exchange for cash , and simultaneously enters into an agreement to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date . the financial instruments purchased or sold in resale and repurchase agreements typically include u.s . government and federal agency , and investment-grade sovereign obligations . the firm receives financial instruments purchased under resale agreements , makes delivery of financial instruments sold under repurchase agreements , monitors the market value of these financial instruments on a daily basis , and delivers or obtains additional collateral due to changes in the market value of the financial instruments , as appropriate . for resale agreements , the firm typically requires delivery of collateral with a fair value approximately equal to the carrying value of the relevant assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition . even though repurchase and resale agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments , they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at the maturity of the agreement . however , 201crepos to maturity 201d are accounted for as sales . a repo to maturity is a transaction in which the firm transfers a security under an agreement to repurchase the security where the maturity date of the repurchase agreement matches the maturity date of the underlying security . therefore , the firm effectively no longer has a repurchase obligation and has relinquished control over the underlying security and , accordingly , accounts for the transaction as a sale . the firm had no repos to maturity outstanding as of december 2012 or december 2011 . 152 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the amount of securities borrowed by the end of 2012, in billions?
Answer: 38.4
Question: and what was it in the end of 2011?
| 47.62 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits ( 1 )</td><td>$ 195276</td><td>$ 182268</td><td>$ 167470</td><td>$ 143043</td></tr></table> client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what is the net change in deposits of clients from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 13008.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.07137 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .
Question: what is the value of an investment in american airlines group in 2015?
Answer: 175.0
Question: what about in 2014?
| 219.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 2009</td><td>24</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 268</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 .
Question: what was the total of interest payments in 2009?
Answer: 201.0
Question: an what was it in 2008?
Answer: 228.0
Question: what was, then, the variation over the year?
Answer: -27.0
Question: and concerning these same payments, what was the ratio of the 2010 ones to the 2009 ones?
Answer: 0.9403
Question: assuming this ratio continues between 2011 and 2010, what will be, in 2011, the total of those payments?
| 177.71642 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.75</td><td>$ 140.39</td><td>$ 145.84</td><td>$ 151.44</td><td>$ 221.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 126.45</td><td>$ 145.49</td><td>$ 148.55</td><td>$ 172.30</td><td>$ 228.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 118.59</td><td>$ 150.30</td><td>$ 150.31</td><td>$ 161.56</td><td>$ 228.42</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of united parcel service inc. in 2013 less a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 121.91
Question: what is that value over 100?
| 1.2191 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 89 $ 65.35 billion and $ 87.20 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . table 29 : components of average hqla by type of ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>excess central bank balances</td><td>$ 33584</td><td>$ 48407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . treasuries</td><td>10278</td><td>17770</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other investment securities</td><td>13422</td><td>15442</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign government</td><td>8064</td><td>5585</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 65348</td><td>$ 87204</td></tr></table> with respect to highly liquid short-term investments presented in the preceding table , due to the continued elevated level of client deposits as of december 31 , 2017 , we maintained cash balances in excess of regulatory requirements governing deposits with the federal reserve of approximately $ 33.58 billion at the federal reserve , the ecb and other non-u.s . central banks , compared to $ 48.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . the lower levels of deposits with central banks as of december 31 , 2017 compared to december 31 , 2016 was due to normal deposit volatility . liquid securities carried in our asset liquidity include securities pledged without corresponding advances from the frbb , the fhlb , and other non- u.s . central banks . state street bank is a member of the fhlb . this membership allows for advances of liquidity in varying terms against high-quality collateral , which helps facilitate asset-and-liability management . access to primary , intra-day and contingent liquidity provided by these utilities is an important source of contingent liquidity with utilization subject to underlying conditions . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , we had no outstanding primary credit borrowings from the frbb discount window or any other central bank facility , and as of the same dates , no fhlb advances were outstanding . in addition to the securities included in our asset liquidity , we have significant amounts of other unencumbered investment securities . the aggregate fair value of those securities was $ 66.10 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , compared to $ 54.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . these securities are available sources of liquidity , although not as rapidly deployed as those included in our asset liquidity . measures of liquidity include lcr , nsfr and tlac which are described in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 , business , of this form 10-k . uses of liquidity significant uses of our liquidity could result from the following : withdrawals of client deposits ; draw- downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or to purchase securities , generally provided through lines of credit ; and short-duration advance facilities . such circumstances would generally arise under stress conditions including deterioration in credit ratings . a recurring significant use of our liquidity involves our deployment of hqla from our investment portfolio to post collateral to financial institutions and participants in our agency lending program serving as sources of securities under our enhanced custody program . we had unfunded commitments to extend credit with gross contractual amounts totaling $ 26.49 billion and $ 26.99 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . these amounts do not reflect the value of any collateral . as of december 31 , 2017 , approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year . since many of our commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . information about our resolution planning and the impact actions under our resolution plans could have on our liquidity is provided in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 . business , of this form 10-k . funding deposits we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our average client deposit balances were denominated in u.s . dollars , approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in eur , 10% ( 10 % ) in gbp and 10% ( 10 % ) in all other currencies . for the past several years , we have frequently experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of each fiscal quarter or the end of the fiscal year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances. .
Question: what is the ratio of 2017 excess central bank balances to 2016 balances?
Answer: 0.69378
Question: what is 1 less that value?
| 0.30622 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) ( a ) intrinsic value is based on a closing stock price as of december 31 , 2016 of $ 75.64 . the weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was estimated to be $ 9.35 , $ 10.67 and $ 9.15 , respectively , using the black-scholes option pricing model with the assumptions below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free interest rate</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.4% ( 20.4 % )</td><td>21.7% ( 21.7 % )</td><td>21.2% ( 21.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected life ( years )</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr></table> the company estimates future forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the company bases the risk-free interest rate that is used in the stock option valuation model on u.s . n treasury securities issued with maturities similar to the expected term of the options . the expected stock volatility factor is determined using historical daily price changes of the company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the option and the impact of any expected trends . the dividend yield assumption is based on the current dividend yield at the grant tt date or management's forecasted expectations . the expected life assumption is determined by calculating the average term from the tt company's historical stock option activity and considering the impact of expected future trends . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 56.44 to $ 79.41 on various dates in 2016 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 61.33 to $ 69.33 on various dates in 20t 15 . the company granted a total of 1 million restricted stock shares at prices ranging from $ 52.85 to $ 64.04 on various dates in 2014 . these shares were granted at the closing market price on the date of grant and vest annually over three years . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we have approximately 3 million and 4 million unvested restricted shares remaining . the december 31 , 2016 balance includes those rsu's converted in connection with the sungard acquisition as noted above . the company has provided for total stock compensation expense of $ 137 million , $ 98 million and $ 56 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is included in selling , general , and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , unless the expense is attributable to a discontinued operation . of the total stock compensation expense , $ 2 million for 2014 relates to liability based awards that will not be credited to additional paid in capital until issued . total d compensation expense for 2016 and 2015 did not include amounts relating to liability based awards . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards is $ 141 million and $ 206 million , respectively , which is expected to be recognized in pre-tax income over a weighted average period of 1.4 years and 1.6 years , respectively . german pension plans our german operations have unfunded , defined benefit plan obligations . these obligations relate to benefits to be paid to germanaa employees upon retirement . the accumulated benefit obligation as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 49 million and $ 48 million , respectively , and the projected benefit obligation was $ 50 million and $ 49 million , respectively . the plan remains unfunded as of december 31 , 2016 . ( 15 ) divestitures and discontinued operations on december 7 , 2016 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the sungard public sector and education ( "ps&e" ) businesses for $ 850 million . the transaction included all ps&e solutions , which provide a comprehensive set of technology solutions to address public safety and public administration needs of government entities as well asn the needs of k-12 school districts . the divestiture is consistent with our strategy to serve the financial services markets . we received cash proceeds , net of taxes and transaction-related expenses of approximately $ 500 million . net cash proceeds are expected to be used to reduce outstanding debt ( see note 10 ) . the ps&e businesses are included in the corporate and other segment . the transaction closed on february 1 , 2017 , resulting in an expected pre-tax gain ranging from $ 85 million to $ 90 million that will .
Question: what was the fair value of options at the end of 2016?
Answer: 9.35
Question: what was the fair value of options at the end of 2015?
Answer: 10.67
Question: what was the change in value from 2015 to 2016?
| -1.32 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .
Question: what is the value of accrued liabilities in 2006?
| 631.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2018 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) default for unsecured financing arrangements , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 30 , 2017 , and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements as of december 31 , 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption , except that the floating rate notes due 2021 may not be redeemed until on or after march 20 , 2019 and such notes do not have any applicable make-whole premium . in addition , we may redeem , at our option , the 2.700% ( 2.700 % ) senior notes due 2020 , the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 , the 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) senior notes due 2022 , the 3.700% ( 3.700 % ) senior notes due 2023 , the 3.550% ( 3.550 % ) senior notes due 2025 , the 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) senior notes due 2035 and the 4.450% ( 4.450 % ) senior notes due 2045 without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2018 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 7798.9 million . the estimated fair value of japan term loan a and japan term loan b , in the aggregate , as of december 31 , 2018 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 294.7 million . the carrying values of u.s . term loan b and u.s . term loan c approximate fair value as they bear interest at short-term variable market rates . we entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed-rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . these fair value hedges were settled in 2016 . in 2016 , we entered into various variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements that were accounted for as cash flow hedges of u.s . term loan b . in 2018 , we entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that we designated as net investment hedges . the excluded component of these net investment hedges is recorded in interest expense , net . see note 13 for additional information regarding our interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 55.0 million . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the weighted average interest rate for our borrowings was 3.1 percent and 2.9 percent , respectively . we paid $ 282.8 million , $ 317.5 million , and $ 363.1 million in interest during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . 12 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income aoci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in aoci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our aoci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , including unrealized gains and losses on net investment hedges , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in aoci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . see note 14 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of aoci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges defined benefit plan items . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td><td>total aoci</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 121.5</td><td>$ -66.5 ( 66.5 )</td><td>$ -138.2 ( 138.2 )</td><td>$ -83.2 ( 83.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aoci before reclassifications</td><td>-135.4 ( 135.4 )</td><td>68.2</td><td>-29.7 ( 29.7 )</td><td>-96.9 ( 96.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to retained earnings ( note 2 )</td><td>-17.4 ( 17.4 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-42.9 ( 42.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>-</td><td>23.6</td><td>12.0</td><td>35.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2018</td><td>$ -31.3 ( 31.3 )</td><td>$ 20.9</td><td>$ -177.0 ( 177.0 )</td><td>$ -187.4 ( 187.4 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in interest paid from 2016 to 2017?
| -45.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
part i item 1 . business . general development of business general : altria group , inc . is a holding company incorporated in the commonwealth of virginia in 1985 . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s wholly-owned subsidiaries included philip morris usa inc . ( 201cpm usa 201d ) , which is engaged predominantly in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes in the united states ; john middleton co . ( 201cmiddleton 201d ) , which is engaged in the manufacture and sale of machine-made large cigars and pipe tobacco , and is a wholly- owned subsidiary of pm usa ; and ust llc ( 201cust 201d ) , which through its wholly-owned subsidiaries , including u.s . smokeless tobacco company llc ( 201cusstc 201d ) and ste . michelle wine estates ltd . ( 201cste . michelle 201d ) , is engaged in the manufacture and sale of smokeless tobacco products and wine . altria group , inc . 2019s other operating companies included nu mark llc ( 201cnu mark 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the manufacture and sale of innovative tobacco products , and philip morris capital corporation ( 201cpmcc 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that maintains a portfolio of finance assets , substantially all of which are leveraged leases . other altria group , inc . wholly-owned subsidiaries included altria group distribution company , which provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to certain altria group , inc . operating subsidiaries , and altria client services inc. , which provides various support services , such as legal , regulatory , finance , human resources and external affairs , to altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . also held approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of the economic and voting interest of sabmiller plc ( 201csabmiller 201d ) , which altria group , inc . accounts for under the equity method of accounting . source of funds : because altria group , inc . is a holding company , its access to the operating cash flows of its wholly- owned subsidiaries consists of cash received from the payment of dividends and distributions , and the payment of interest on intercompany loans by its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s principal wholly-owned subsidiaries were not limited by long-term debt or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or make other distributions with respect to their equity interests . in addition , altria group , inc . receives cash dividends on its interest in sabmiller if and when sabmiller pays such dividends . financial information about segments altria group , inc . 2019s reportable segments are smokeable products , smokeless products and wine . the financial services and the innovative tobacco products businesses are included in an all other category due to the continued reduction of the lease portfolio of pmcc and the relative financial contribution of altria group , inc . 2019s innovative tobacco products businesses to altria group , inc . 2019s consolidated results . altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker reviews operating companies income to evaluate the performance of , and allocate resources to , the segments . operating companies income for the segments is defined as operating income before amortization of intangibles and general corporate expenses . interest and other debt expense , net , and provision for income taxes are centrally managed at the corporate level and , accordingly , such items are not presented by segment since they are excluded from the measure of segment profitability reviewed by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . net revenues and operating companies income ( together with a reconciliation to earnings before income taxes ) attributable to each such segment for each of the last three years are set forth in note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data of this annual report on form 10-k ( 201citem 8 201d ) . information about total assets by segment is not disclosed because such information is not reported to or used by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . segment goodwill and other intangible assets , net , are disclosed in note 4 . goodwill and other intangible assets , net to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 4 201d ) . the accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 . summary of significant accounting policies to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 2 201d ) . the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment and the all other category were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>smokeable products</td><td>87.2% ( 87.2 % )</td><td>84.5% ( 84.5 % )</td><td>83.7% ( 83.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smokeless products</td><td>13.4</td><td>12.2</td><td>12.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>wine</td><td>1.7</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> for items affecting the comparability of the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment , see note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 15 201d ) . narrative description of business portions of the information called for by this item are included in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - operating results by business segment of this annual report on form 10-k . tobacco space altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies include pm usa , usstc and other subsidiaries of ust , middleton and nu mark . altria group distribution company provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies . the products of altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries include smokeable tobacco products comprised of cigarettes manufactured and sold by pm usa and machine-made large altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 3 2/25/15 5:56 pm .
Question: what is the net change in income for smokeless product, relative to total income, from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: -0.3
Question: what was the 2012 value?
| 12.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.03</td><td>$ 108.98</td><td>$ 148.98</td><td>$ 163.71</td><td>$ 177.40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>76.82</td><td>102.19</td><td>140.77</td><td>153.96</td><td>154.71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.94</td><td>106.78</td><td>144.79</td><td>166.76</td><td>164.15</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.44</td><td>156.78</td><td>178.22</td><td>180.67</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: what is the change in value of the s&p from 2010 to 2015?
| 80.67 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items*</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> * corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. .
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: -81.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to those profits in 2004, in percentage?
Answer: -0.04756
Question: and over the subsequent year, what was that change in the operating profits?
| 452.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
Answer: 118.0
Question: and for 2005?
Answer: 145.0
Question: combined, what is the total value for these years?
Answer: 263.0
Question: and including 2004?
Answer: 351.0
Question: so what was the average for this value during this time?
| 117.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents marketaxess holdings inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of this standard had no material effect on the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of operations . reclassifications certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years 2019 financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation . such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income . on march 5 , 2008 , the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of greenline financial technologies , inc . ( 201cgreenline 201d ) , an illinois-based provider of integration , testing and management solutions for fix-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income , equity and other exchange-based products , and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of tradehelm , inc. , a delaware corporation that was spun-out from greenline immediately prior to the acquisition . the acquisition of greenline broadens the range of technology services that the company offers to institutional financial markets , provides an expansion of the company 2019s client base , including global exchanges and hedge funds , and further diversifies the company 2019s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products . the results of operations of greenline are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was $ 41.1 million , comprised of $ 34.7 million in cash , 725923 shares of common stock valued at $ 5.8 million and $ 0.6 million of acquisition-related costs . in addition , the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $ 3.0 million in cash , subject to greenline attaining certain earn- out targets in 2008 and 2009 . a total of $ 1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target , bringing the aggregate consideration to $ 42.4 million . the 2009 earn-out target was not met . a total of $ 2.0 million of the purchase price , which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims , was distributed to the sellers in march 2009 . the shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of greenline were released in two equal installments on december 20 , 2008 and december 20 , 2009 , respectively . the value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period . the purchase price allocation is as follows ( in thousands ) : the amortizable intangibles include $ 3.2 million of acquired technology , $ 3.3 million of customer relationships , $ 1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $ 0.5 million of tradenames . useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles , respectively . the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes . the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the company for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as if the acquisition of greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented , after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments . these pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the company 2019s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented . the pro forma financial information 3 . acquisitions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 6406</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>2139</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortizable intangibles</td><td>8330</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>29405</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred tax assets net</td><td>3410</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets including investment in tradehelm</td><td>1429</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable accrued expenses and deferred revenue</td><td>-8701 ( 8701 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 42418</td></tr></table> .
Question: in 2009, what percentage of the total aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was paid to the sellers based on the 2008 earn-out target?
Answer: 0.03302
Question: and what percentage of the purchase price was due to goodwill?
| 0.69322 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?
Answer: 320.0
Question: and what was the value of the total reorganization items net?
Answer: 2640.0
Question: how much, then, does that amount represent in relation to this value, in percentage?
| 0.12121 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?
Answer: 442.8
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
Answer: 499.9
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: -57.1
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
| 499.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what is the net change in total wholesale credit-related assets from 2012 to 2013?
| 2253.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 1 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2007</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 43.30</td><td>3493426</td><td>$ 449.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2007</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 44.16</td><td>2891719</td><td>$ 322.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2007</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 44.20</td><td>2510425</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total fourth quarter</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 43.27</td><td>8895570</td><td>$ 216.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .
Question: what was the number of shares repurchased in october 2007?
Answer: 3493426.0
Question: and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?
Answer: 43.3
Question: what was, then, the total amount spent in the repurchase of those shares?
| 151265345.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 13 , $ 19 and $ 20 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 19.0 million , $ 4.2 million and $ 15.6 million , respectively . in 2012 , the company granted 931340 shares of restricted class a common stock and 4048 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of 2 to 4 years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 54.5 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2012 , the company also granted 138410 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 7.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2012 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value outstanding at december 31 , 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1432610 $ 57 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weightedaveragegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011</td><td>1432610</td><td>$ 57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1073798</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-366388 ( 366388 )</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-226493 ( 226493 )</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2012</td><td>1913527</td><td>54</td></tr></table> outstanding at december 31 , 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1913527 54 the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 20.9 million , $ 11.6 million and $ 10.3 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , a total of 27768 , 32085 and 21855 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 40260 , 40585 and 37350 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.2 million , $ 2.1 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . 19 . fair value measurements in general , the company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine the fair value of marketable securities and equity investments . level 1 assets generally include u.s . treasury securities , equity securities listed in active markets , and investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices . if quoted prices are not available to determine fair value , the company uses other inputs that are directly observable . assets included in level 2 generally consist of asset- backed securities , municipal bonds , u.s . government agency securities and interest rate swap contracts . asset-backed securities , municipal bonds and u.s . government agency securities were measured at fair value based on matrix pricing using prices of similar securities with similar inputs such as maturity dates , interest rates and credit ratings . the company determined the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts using standard valuation models with market-based observable inputs including forward and spot exchange rates and interest rate curves. .
Question: what was the total value of outstanding balance in 2011?
Answer: 81658770.0
Question: what was the number of shares in 2012?
Answer: 1913527.0
Question: and what was the weighted average grant date fair value of each of these shares?
Answer: 54.0
Question: what was, then, the total value of those shares, or the total value of outstanding balance?
Answer: 103330458.0
Question: and what is, then, the change in this total value of outstanding balance form 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 21671688.0
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to that total value in 2011, in percentage?
| 0.26539 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
Question: what was the value of e*trade financial corp for year ended 12/07?
Answer: 73.05
Question: what is that less an assumed $100 initial investment?
Answer: -26.95
Question: what is that divided by 100?
| -0.2695 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what was the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2009?
Answer: 5.82
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 11.59
Question: what was, then, the change over the years?
| -5.77 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
during 2015 , continued management actions , primarily the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of approximately $ 1.5 billion of delinquent residential first mortgages , including $ 0.9 billion in the fourth quarter largely associated with the transfer of citifinancial loans to held-for-sale referenced above , were the primary driver of the overall improvement in delinquencies within citi holdings 2019 residential first mortgage portfolio . credit performance from quarter to quarter could continue to be impacted by the amount of delinquent loan sales or transfers to held-for-sale , as well as overall trends in hpi and interest rates . north america residential first mortgages 2014state delinquency trends the following tables set forth the six u.s . states and/or regions with the highest concentration of citi 2019s residential first mortgages. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars state ( 1 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>in billions of dollars %ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>in billions of dollars refreshedfico</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>%ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>refreshedfico</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ca</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>754</td><td>$ 18.9</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ny/nj/ct ( 4 )</td><td>12.7</td><td>25</td><td>0.8</td><td>1</td><td>751</td><td>12.2</td><td>20</td><td>1.9</td><td>2</td><td>740</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>va/md</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.2</td><td>2</td><td>719</td><td>3.0</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>8</td><td>695</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>il ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>3</td><td>735</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.5</td><td>9</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fl ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.1</td><td>4</td><td>723</td><td>2.8</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>14</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tx</td><td>1.9</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>2014</td><td>711</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.7</td><td>2014</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>11.0</td><td>21</td><td>1.3</td><td>2</td><td>710</td><td>18.2</td><td>30</td><td>3.3</td><td>7</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 51.5</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>738</td><td>$ 60.1</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>715</td></tr></table> total ( 5 ) $ 51.5 100% ( 100 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 738 $ 60.1 100% ( 100 % ) 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) 4% ( 4 % ) 715 note : totals may not sum due to rounding . ( 1 ) certain of the states are included as part of a region based on citi 2019s view of similar hpi within the region . ( 2 ) ending net receivables . excludes loans in canada and puerto rico , loans guaranteed by u.s . government agencies , loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments ( ltscs ) . excludes balances for which fico or ltv data are unavailable . ( 3 ) ltv ratios ( loan balance divided by appraised value ) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data . ( 4 ) new york , new jersey , connecticut , florida and illinois are judicial states . ( 5 ) improvement in state trends during 2015 was primarily due to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of residential first mortgages , including the transfer of citifinancial residential first mortgages to held-for-sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 . foreclosures a substantial majority of citi 2019s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages . at december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s foreclosure inventory included approximately $ 0.1 billion , or 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) , of the total residential first mortgage portfolio , compared to $ 0.6 billion , or 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) , at december 31 , 2014 , based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory , excluding loans that are guaranteed by u.s . government agencies and loans subject to ltscs . north america consumer mortgage quarterly credit trends 2014net credit losses and delinquencies 2014home equity citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit . fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing . home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then , at the end of the draw period , the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan ( the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry ) . after conversion , the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period . as of december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio of $ 22.8 billion consisted of $ 6.3 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $ 16.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit ( revolving helocs ) . .
Question: as of december 31, 2015, what was the amount of the loans extended under home equity lines of credit?
| 16.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the value of projected payments in 2010?
| 978.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
proved reserves can be added as expansions are permitted , funding is approved and certain stipulations of the joint venture agreement are satisfied . the following table sets forth changes in estimated quantities of net proved bitumen reserves for the year 2008 . estimated quantities of proved bitumen reserves ( millions of barrels ) 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of barrels )</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>421</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revisions ( a )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>extensions discoveries and additions</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>production</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>end of year</td><td>388</td></tr></table> ( a ) revisions were driven primarily by price and the impact of the new royalty regime discussed below . the above estimated quantity of net proved bitumen reserves is a forward-looking statement and is based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , volumes in-place , presently known physical data , recoverability of bitumen , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries could be different than current estimates . for a discussion of the proved bitumen reserves estimation process , see item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 critical accounting estimates 2013 estimated net recoverable reserve quantities 2013 proved bitumen reserves . operations at the aosp are not within the scope of statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 25 , 201csuspension of certain accounting requirements for oil and gas producing companies ( an amendment of financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) statement no . 19 ) , 201d sfas no . 69 , 201cdisclosures about oil and gas producing activities ( an amendment of fasb statements 19 , 25 , 33 and 39 ) , 201d and securities and exchange commission ( 201csec 201d ) rule 4-10 of regulation s-x ; therefore , bitumen production and reserves are not included in our supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities . the sec has recently issued a release amending these disclosure requirements effective for annual reports on form 10-k for fiscal years ending on or after december 31 , 2009 , see item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 accounting standards not yet adopted for additional information . prior to our acquisition of western , the first fully-integrated expansion of the existing aosp facilities was approved in 2006 . expansion 1 , which includes construction of mining and extraction facilities at the jackpine mine , expansion of treatment facilities at the existing muskeg river mine , expansion of the scotford upgrader and development of related infrastructure , is anticipated to begin operations in late 2010 or 2011 . when expansion 1 is complete , we will have more than 50000 bpd of net production and upgrading capacity in the canadian oil sands . the timing and scope of future expansions and debottlenecking opportunities on existing operations remain under review . during 2008 , the alberta government accepted the project 2019s application to have a portion of the expansion 1 capital costs form part of the muskeg river mine 2019s allowable cost recovery pool . due to commodity price declines in the year , royalties for 2008 were one percent of the gross mine revenue . commencing january 1 , 2009 , the alberta royalty regime has been amended such that royalty rates will be based on the canadian dollar ( 201ccad 201d ) equivalent monthly average west texas intermediate ( 201cwti 201d ) price . royalty rates will rise from a minimum of one percent to a maximum of nine percent under the gross revenue method and from a minimum of 25 percent to a maximum of 40 percent under the net revenue method . under both methods , the minimum royalty is based on a wti price of $ 55.00 cad per barrel and below while the maximum royalty is reached at a wti price of $ 120.00 cad per barrel and above , with a linear increase in royalty between the aforementioned prices . the above discussion of the oil sands mining segment includes forward-looking statements concerning the anticipated completion of aosp expansion 1 . factors which could affect the expansion project include transportation logistics , availability of materials and labor , unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions , delays in obtaining or conditions imposed by necessary government and third-party approvals and other risks customarily associated with construction projects . refining , marketing and transportation refining we own and operate seven refineries in the gulf coast , midwest and upper great plains regions of the united states with an aggregate refining capacity of 1.016 million barrels per day ( 201cmmbpd 201d ) of crude oil . during 2008 .
Question: how much did the proved bitumen reserves change over 2008?
Answer: -33.0
Question: and the percentage decline during this time?
Answer: -0.07838
Question: what was the total amount of barrels between the beginning and end of year balances?
Answer: 809.0
Question: so what was the average over this time?
| 404.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what was the difference in rent expenses included in sg&a expenses from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 26.0
Question: what was the rent expense included in sg&a expenses in 2015?
| 83.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 53.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . as an indirect , wholly-owned subsidiary of entergy corporation , entergy new orleans pays dividends from its earnings at a percentage determined monthly . entergy new orleans 2019s long-term debt indentures contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 9074</td><td>$ 21820</td><td>$ 66149</td><td>$ 60093</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through july 2012 . entergy louisiana 2019s ninemile point unit 6 self-build project in june 2011 , entergy louisiana filed with the lpsc an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by entergy louisiana 2019s construction of a combined-cycle gas turbine generating facility ( ninemile 6 ) at its existing ninemile point electric generating station . ninemile 6 will be a nominally-sized 550 mw unit that is estimated to cost approximately $ 721 million to construct , excluding interconnection and transmission upgrades . entergy gulf states louisiana joined in the application , seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the capacity and energy generated by ninemile 6 . the ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% ( 55 % ) to entergy louisiana , 25% ( 25 % ) to entergy gulf states louisiana , and 20% ( 20 % ) to entergy new orleans . in february 2012 the city council passed a resolution authorizing entergy new orleans to purchase 20% ( 20 % ) of the ninemile 6 energy and capacity . if approvals are obtained from the lpsc and other permitting agencies , ninemile 6 construction is .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of receivables from the money pool from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -12746.0
Question: what is the ratio of ninemile 6 mw to the cost of the construction?
| 1.31091 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to growth in the refining segment . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to : 2022 the deferral of increased capacity costs that will be recovered through fuel adjustment clauses ; 2022 the expiration of the evangeline gas contract on january 1 , 2013 ; and 2022 an adjustment to deferred fuel costs recorded in the third quarter 2012 in accordance with a rate order from the puct issued in september 2012 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of this puct order issued in entergy texas's 2011 rate case . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred since march 2010 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso rto . the decommissioning trusts variance is primarily due to lower regulatory credits resulting from higher realized income on decommissioning trust fund investments . there is no effect on net income as the credits are offset by interest and investment income . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012 net revenue</td><td>$ 1854</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mark-to-market</td><td>-58 ( 58 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2013 net revenue</td><td>$ 1802</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 52 million in 2013 primarily due to : 2022 the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges , including additional financial power sales conducted in the fourth quarter 2013 to offset the planned exercise of in-the-money protective call options and to lock in margins . these additional sales did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment , and increases in forward prices after those sales were made accounted for the majority of the negative mark-to-market variance . it is expected that the underlying transactions will result in earnings in first quarter 2014 as these positions settle . see note 16 to the financial statements for discussion of derivative instruments ; 2022 the decrease in net revenue compared to prior year resulting from the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements where entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running . amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below ; and entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: by what amount did the net revenue decrease from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what percentage of this amount is due to nuclear fuel expenses?
| 0.38462 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the sum of the cash flows for 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 2226.0
Question: what is the value of cash flows in 2010?
Answer: 534.0
Question: what is the sum of all 3 years?
Answer: 2760.0
Question: what is the average cash flow per year?
| 920.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
blackrock n 96 n notes in april 2009 , the company acquired $ 2 million of finite- lived management contracts with a five-year estimated useful life associated with the acquisition of the r3 capital partners funds . in december 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi trans- action , the company acquired $ 163 million of finite- lived management contracts with a weighted-average estimated useful life of approximately 10 years . estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows : ( dollar amounts in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 160</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>149</td></tr></table> indefinite-lived acquired management contracts on september 29 , 2006 , in conjunction with the mlim transaction , the company acquired indefinite-lived man- agement contracts valued at $ 4477 million consisting of $ 4271 million for all retail mutual funds and $ 206 million for alternative investment products . on october 1 , 2007 , in conjunction with the quellos transaction , the company acquired $ 631 million in indefinite-lived management contracts associated with alternative investment products . on october 1 , 2007 , the company purchased the remain- ing 20% ( 20 % ) of an investment manager of a fund of hedge funds . in conjunction with this transaction , the company recorded $ 8 million in additional indefinite-lived management contracts associated with alternative investment products . on december 1 , 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi transaction , the company acquired $ 9785 million in indefinite-lived management contracts valued consisting primarily for exchange traded funds and common and collective trusts . indefinite-lived acquired trade names/trademarks on december 1 , 2009 , in conjunction with the bgi transaction , the company acquired trade names/ trademarks primarily related to ishares valued at $ 1402.5 million . the fair value was determined using a royalty rate based primarily on normalized marketing and promotion expenditures to develop and support the brands globally . 13 . borrowings short-term borrowings 2007 facility in august 2007 , the company entered into a five-year $ 2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility ( the 201c2007 facility 201d ) , which permits the company to request an additional $ 500 million of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , up to a maximum of $ 3.0 billion . the 2007 facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortiza- tion , where net debt equals total debt less domestic unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2009 . the 2007 facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2009 , the company had $ 200 million outstanding under the 2007 facility with an interest rate of 0.44% ( 0.44 % ) and a maturity date during february 2010 . during february 2010 , the company rolled over $ 100 million in borrowings with an interest rate of 0.43% ( 0.43 % ) and a maturity date in may 2010 . lehman commercial paper inc . has a $ 140 million participation under the 2007 facility ; however blackrock does not expect that lehman commercial paper inc . will honor its commitment to fund additional amounts . bank of america , a related party , has a $ 140 million participation under the 2007 facility . in december 2007 , in order to support two enhanced cash funds that blackrock manages , blackrock elected to procure two letters of credit under the existing 2007 facility in an aggregate amount of $ 100 million . in decem- ber 2008 , the letters of credit were terminated . commercial paper program on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a com- mercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company may issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3 billion . the proceeds of the commercial paper issuances were used for the financing of a portion of the bgi transaction . subsidiaries of bank of america and barclays , as well as other third parties , act as dealers under the cp program . the cp program is supported by the 2007 facility . the company began issuance of cp notes under the cp program on november 4 , 2009 . as of december 31 , 2009 , blackrock had approximately $ 2 billion of out- standing cp notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and a weighted average maturity of 23 days . since december 31 , 2009 , the company repaid approxi- mately $ 1.4 billion of cp notes with proceeds from the long-term notes issued in december 2009 . as of march 5 , 2010 , blackrock had $ 596 million of outstanding cp notes with a weighted average interest rate of 0.18% ( 0.18 % ) and a weighted average maturity of 38 days . japan commitment-line in june 2008 , blackrock japan co. , ltd. , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company , entered into a five billion japanese yen commitment-line agreement with a bank- ing institution ( the 201cjapan commitment-line 201d ) . the term of the japan commitment-line was one year and interest accrued at the applicable japanese short-term prime rate . in june 2009 , blackrock japan co. , ltd . renewed the japan commitment-line for a term of one year . the japan commitment-line is intended to provide liquid- ity and flexibility for operating requirements in japan . at december 31 , 2009 , the company had no borrowings outstanding on the japan commitment-line . convertible debentures in february 2005 , the company issued $ 250 million aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures ( the 201cdebentures 201d ) , due in 2035 and bearing interest at a rate of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) per annum . interest is payable semi- annually in arrears on february 15 and august 15 of each year , and commenced august 15 , 2005 . prior to february 15 , 2009 , the debentures could have been convertible at the option of the holder at a decem- ber 31 , 2008 conversion rate of 9.9639 shares of common stock per one dollar principal amount of debentures under certain circumstances . the debentures would have been convertible into cash and , in some situations as described below , additional shares of the company 2019s common stock , if during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period the trading price per debenture for each day of such period is less than 103% ( 103 % ) of the product of the last reported sales price of blackrock 2019s common stock and the conversion rate of the debentures on each such day or upon the occurrence of certain other corporate events , such as a distribution to the holders of blackrock common stock of certain rights , assets or debt securities , if the company becomes party to a merger , consolidation or transfer of all or substantially all of its assets or a change of control of the company . on february 15 , 2009 , the debentures became convertible into cash at any time prior to maturity at the option of the holder and , in some situations as described below , additional shares of the company 2019s common stock at the current conversion rate . at the time the debentures are tendered for conver- sion , for each one dollar principal amount of debentures converted , a holder shall be entitled to receive cash and shares of blackrock common stock , if any , the aggregate value of which ( the 201cconversion value 201d ) will be deter- mined by multiplying the applicable conversion rate by the average of the daily volume weighted average price of blackrock common stock for each of the ten consecutive trading days beginning on the second trading day imme- diately following the day the debentures are tendered for conversion ( the 201cten-day weighted average price 201d ) . the company will deliver the conversion value to holders as follows : ( 1 ) an amount in cash ( the 201cprincipal return 201d ) equal to the lesser of ( a ) the aggregate conversion value of the debentures to be converted and ( b ) the aggregate principal amount of the debentures to be converted , and ( 2 ) if the aggregate conversion value of the debentures to be converted is greater than the principal return , an amount in shares ( the 201cnet shares 201d ) , determined as set forth below , equal to such aggregate conversion value less the principal return ( the 201cnet share amount 201d ) . the number of net shares to be paid will be determined by dividing the net share amount by the ten-day weighted average price . in lieu of delivering fractional shares , the company will deliver cash based on the ten-day weighted average price . the conversion rate for the debentures is subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain corporate events , such as a change of control of the company , 193253ti_txt.indd 96 4/2/10 1:18 pm .
Question: what was the change in the estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 3.0
Question: and what was this expense in 2010?
Answer: 157.0
Question: how much, then, in percentage, did that change represent in relation to this 2010 amount?
Answer: 0.01911
Question: and in this same year, what was the estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets as a percentage of the unsecured revolving credit facility?
| 0.0025 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td><td>foreign</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 503</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>2014</td><td>331315</td><td>5509</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>774209</td><td>576780</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2026 to 2030</td><td>423398</td><td>279908</td><td>92412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1197607</td><td>$ 1188003</td><td>$ 98424</td></tr></table> in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .
Question: what was the value of total federal net operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 1197607.0
Question: and for the state?
Answer: 1188003.0
Question: combined, what is the total for these two values?
Answer: 2385610.0
Question: and the amount for foreign?
Answer: 98424.0
Question: what is the total carryforwards for all regions?
Answer: 2484034.0
Question: and the portion of the total net operating loss carryforwards that is state-related?
| 0.47826 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .
Question: what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?
| 2556.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the sum of total minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases?
Answer: 7373.0
Question: what is the value of operating leases in 2009?
Answer: 498.0
Question: what is the value of capital leases in 2008?
Answer: 168.0
Question: what is the sum of those leases?
Answer: 666.0
Question: what is the ratio of the sum of leases to the sum of operating and capital leases?
| 0.09033 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>$ 846258</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103698</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>938087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>108261</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11144 ( 11144 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1035204</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>114180</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-21796 ( 21796 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1127588</td></tr></table> federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 .
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 108261.0
Question: what was the value in 2008?
| 103698.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what was the change in net sales for mst from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: -6.0
Question: and what were those net sales in 2013?
Answer: 7153.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to these 2013 net sales?
| -0.00084 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 291 therefore , are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets until settlement date . the unsettled reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements predominantly consist of agreements with regular-way settlement periods . loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications mortgage repurchase liability in connection with the firm 2019s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with the gses , as described in note 16 , the firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements . the firm has been , and may be , required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the gses ( e.g. , with 201cmake-whole 201d payments to reimburse the gses for their realized losses on liquidated loans ) . to the extent that repurchase demands that are received relate to loans that the firm purchased from third parties that remain viable , the firm typically will have the right to seek a recovery of related repurchase losses from the third party . generally , the maximum amount of future payments the firm would be required to make for breaches of these representations and warranties would be equal to the unpaid principal balance of such loans that are deemed to have defects that were sold to purchasers ( including securitization-related spes ) plus , in certain circumstances , accrued interest on such loans and certain expense . the following table summarizes the change in the mortgage repurchase liability for each of the periods presented . summary of changes in mortgage repurchase liability ( a ) year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 repurchase liability at beginning of period $ 681 $ 2811 $ 3557 net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b ) 53 ( 1561 ) ( 1158 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>repurchase liability at beginning of period</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td><td>$ 3557</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b )</td><td>53</td><td>-1561 ( 1561 )</td><td>-1158 ( 1158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassification to litigation reserve</td><td>2014</td><td>-179 ( 179 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c )</td><td>-459 ( 459 )</td><td>-390 ( 390 )</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repurchase liability at end of period</td><td>$ 275</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td></tr></table> ( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c ) ( 459 ) ( 390 ) 412 repurchase liability at end of period $ 275 $ 681 $ 2811 ( a ) on october 25 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 1.1 billion agreement with the fhfa to resolve , other than certain limited types of exposures , outstanding and future mortgage repurchase demands associated with loans sold to the gses from 2000 to 2008 . ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . private label securitizations the liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the firm in establishing its litigation reserves . on november 15 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 4.5 billion agreement with 21 major institutional investors to make a binding offer to the trustees of 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by j.p.morgan , chase , and bear stearns ( 201crmbs trust settlement 201d ) to resolve all representation and warranty claims , as well as all servicing claims , on all trusts issued by j.p . morgan , chase , and bear stearns between 2005 and 2008 . the seven trustees ( or separate and successor trustees ) for this group of 330 trusts have accepted the rmbs trust settlement for 319 trusts in whole or in part and excluded from the settlement 16 trusts in whole or in part . the trustees 2019 acceptance is subject to a judicial approval proceeding initiated by the trustees , which is pending in new york state court . in addition , from 2005 to 2008 , washington mutual made certain loan level representations and warranties in connection with approximately $ 165 billion of residential mortgage loans that were originally sold or deposited into private-label securitizations by washington mutual . of the $ 165 billion , approximately $ 78 billion has been repaid . in addition , approximately $ 49 billion of the principal amount of such loans has liquidated with an average loss severity of 59% ( 59 % ) . accordingly , the remaining outstanding principal balance of these loans as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 38 billion , of which $ 8 billion was 60 days or more past due . the firm believes that any repurchase obligations related to these loans remain with the fdic receivership . for additional information regarding litigation , see note 31 . loans sold with recourse the firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis . in nonrecourse servicing , the principal credit risk to the firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds ( i.e. , normal servicing advances ) . in recourse servicing , the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans , such as fannie mae or freddie mac or a private investor , insurer or guarantor . losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance , plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property . the firm 2019s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse , thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse totaled $ 6.1 billion and $ 7.7 billion , respectively . the carrying value of the related liability that the firm has recorded , which is representative of the firm 2019s view of the likelihood it .
Question: what is the repurchase liability at year ended december 31, 2014?
Answer: 275.0
Question: and that at year ended december 31, 2013?
| 681.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
other taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .
Question: what was the net change in operating revenue from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: -204.0
Question: what was operating revenue in 2001?
Answer: 6144.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2001 operating revenue?
| -0.0332 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
fair valuation the following table shows the expected versus actual rate of return on plan assets for the u.s . pension and postretirement plans: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected rate of return</td><td>7.75% ( 7.75 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual rate of return</td><td>( 5.42 ) % ( % )</td><td>13.2% ( 13.2 % )</td><td>14.7% ( 14.7 % )</td></tr></table> for the foreign plans , pension expense for 2008 was reduced by the expected return of $ 487 million , compared with the actual return of $ ( 883 ) million . pension expense for 2007 and 2006 was reduced by expected returns of $ 477 million and $ 384 million , respectively . actual returns were higher in 2007 and 2006 than the expected returns in those years . discount rate the 2008 and 2007 discount rates for the u.s . pension and postretirement plans were selected by reference to a citigroup-specific analysis using each plan 2019s specific cash flows and compared with the moody 2019s aa long-term corporate bond yield for reasonableness . citigroup 2019s policy is to round to the nearest tenth of a percent . accordingly , at december 31 , 2008 , the discount rate was set at 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) for the pension plans and at 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) for the postretirement welfare plans . at december 31 , 2007 , the discount rate was set at 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) for the pension plans and 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) for the postretirement plans , referencing a citigroup-specific cash flow analysis . as of september 30 , 2006 , the u.s . pension plan was remeasured to reflect the freeze of benefits accruals for all non-grandfathered participants , effective january 1 , 2008 . under the september 30 , 2006 remeasurement and year-end analysis , the resulting plan-specific discount rate for the pension plan was 5.86% ( 5.86 % ) , which was rounded to 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) . the discount rates for the foreign pension and postretirement plans are selected by reference to high-quality corporate bond rates in countries that have developed corporate bond markets . however , where developed corporate bond markets do not exist , the discount rates are selected by reference to local government bond rates with a premium added to reflect the additional risk for corporate bonds . for additional information on the pension and postretirement plans , and on discount rates used in determining pension and postretirement benefit obligations and net benefit expense for the company 2019s plans , as well as the effects of a one percentage-point change in the expected rates of return and the discount rates , see note 9 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements on page 144 . adoption of sfas 158 upon the adoption of sfas no . 158 , employer 2019s accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement benefits ( sfas 158 ) , at december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded an after-tax charge to equity of $ 1.6 billion , which corresponds to the plans 2019 net pension and postretirement liabilities and the write-off of the existing prepaid asset , which relates to unamortized actuarial gains and losses , prior service costs/benefits and transition assets/liabilities . for a discussion of fair value of assets and liabilities , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 201d on page 18 and notes 26 , 27 and 28 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 192 , 202 and 207. .
Question: what was the net change in the expected return from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.02096 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions used in monte carlo lattice pricing model</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2014% ( 2014 % )</td><td>2014% ( 2014 % )</td><td>2014% ( 2014 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility 2014ansys stock price</td><td>21% ( 21 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term</td><td>2.8 years</td><td>2.8 years</td><td>2.8 years</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>correlation factor</td><td>0.65</td><td>0.60</td><td>0.70</td></tr></table> the company issued 35000 , 115485 and 39900 performance-based restricted stock awards during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . of the cumulative performance-based restricted stock awards issued , defined operating metrics were assigned to 63462 , 51795 and 20667 awards with grant-date fair values of $ 84.61 , $ 86.38 and $ 81.52 during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the grant-date fair value of the awards is being recorded from the grant date through the conclusion of the measurement period associated with each operating metric based on management's estimates concerning the probability of vesting . as of december 31 , 2016 , 7625 units of the total 2014 awards granted were earned and will be issued in 2017 . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 0.4 million , $ 0.4 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively . in addition , in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company granted restricted stock units of 488622 , 344500 and 364150 , respectively , that will vest over a three- or four-year period with weighted-average grant-date fair values of $ 88.51 , $ 86.34 and $ 82.13 , respectively . during 2016 and 2015 , 162019 and 85713 shares vested and were released , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , 838327 , 571462 and 344750 units were outstanding , respectively . total compensation expense is being recorded over the service period and was $ 19.1 million , $ 12.5 million and $ 5.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . in conjunction with a 2015 acquisition , ansys issued 68451 shares of replacement restricted stock with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $ 90.48 . of the $ 6.2 million grant-date fair value , $ 3.5 million , related to partially vested awards , was recorded as non-cash purchase price consideration . the remaining fair value will be recognized as stock compensation expense through the conclusion of the service period . during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the company recorded $ 1.2 million and $ 0.6 million , respectively , of stock compensation expense related to these awards . in conjunction with a 2011 acquisition , the company granted performance-based restricted stock awards . vesting was determined based on the achievements of certain revenue and operating income targets of the entity post-acquisition . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 4.7 million . the company has granted deferred stock awards to non-affiliate independent directors , which are rights to receive shares of common stock upon termination of service as a director . in 2015 and prior , the deferred stock awards were granted quarterly in arrears and vested immediately upon grant . associated with these awards , the company established a non-qualified 409 ( a ) deferred compensation plan with assets held under a rabbi trust to provide directors an opportunity to diversify their vested awards . during open trading windows and at their elective option , the directors may convert their company shares into a variety of non-company-stock investment options in order to diversify their holdings . as of december 31 , 2016 , 5000 shares have been diversified and 184099 undiversified deferred stock awards have vested with the underlying shares remaining unissued until the service termination of the respective director owners . in may 2016 , the company granted 38400 deferred stock awards which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 1.9 million , $ 4.0 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively. .
Question: what is the expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index in 2016?
| 16.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>170.6</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>172.8</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td></tr></table> there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the "debt pool" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the total of weighted-average diluted shares in 2014?
Answer: 172.8
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Answer: 158.7
Question: what was, then, the total of weighted-average diluted shares for the two years?
Answer: 331.5
Question: what was the total of weighted-average diluted shares in 2012?
Answer: 145.8
Question: including, then, 2012, what would be the total of weighted-average diluted shares for the three years, in millions?
Answer: 477.3
Question: and what is the average weighted-average diluted shares between those three years, in millions?
| 159.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2016 , 2017 , and 2018 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>paymentdate</td><td>amountper share</td><td>totalamount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 1.16</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 1.49</td><td>$ 216</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1.90</td><td>$ 262</td></tr></table> on november 2 , 2018 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.50 per share that was paid on january 25 , 2019 to stockholders of record on december 31 , 2018 , for an aggregate amount of $ 68 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in february 2019 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.55 per share payable on april 26 , 2019 to stockholders of record on march 29 , 2019 . stock repurchases our board of directors may authorize the purchase of our common shares . under our share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . on february 14 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common shares expiring on december 31 , 2017 , exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase authorized on february 14 , 2017 . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , less a discount and subject to adjustments pursuant to the terms and conditions of the february 2017 asr , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration . on december 14 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 3.0 billion of our common shares expiring on december 31 , 2020 , exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans. .
Question: what was the amount per share paid in 2018?
Answer: 1.9
Question: what was the amount paid per share in 2017?
Answer: 1.49
Question: what is the ratio of the payments made from 2018 to 2017?
Answer: 1.27517
Question: what is that less 1?
| 0.27517 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
2022 net derivative losses of $ 13 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 6817</td><td>$ 6423</td><td>$ 6305</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1314</td><td>1194</td><td>900</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>19.3% ( 19.3 % )</td><td>18.6% ( 18.6 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2011 we began to see some improvement in pricing ; however , we would still consider this to be a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 which began in 2007 . in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds . in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 . additionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing through 2011 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets . weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results . risk solutions generated approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 . revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients . our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates . we operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage . specifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , health care providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability .
Question: what were net revenues in 2011?
| 6817.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
a summary of the company 2019s significant contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2015 , follows : contractual obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>total</td><td>payments due by year 2016</td><td>payments due by year 2017</td><td>payments due by year 2018</td><td>payments due by year 2019</td><td>payments due by year 2020</td><td>payments due by year after 2020</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portion ( note 10 )</td><td>$ 9878</td><td>$ 1125</td><td>$ 744</td><td>$ 993</td><td>$ 622</td><td>$ 1203</td><td>$ 5191</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest on long-term debt</td><td>2244</td><td>174</td><td>157</td><td>153</td><td>149</td><td>146</td><td>1465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases ( note 14 )</td><td>943</td><td>234</td><td>191</td><td>134</td><td>86</td><td>72</td><td>226</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capital leases ( note 14 )</td><td>59</td><td>11</td><td>6</td><td>4</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unconditional purchase obligations and other</td><td>1631</td><td>1228</td><td>160</td><td>102</td><td>54</td><td>56</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total contractual cash obligations</td><td>$ 14755</td><td>$ 2772</td><td>$ 1258</td><td>$ 1386</td><td>$ 914</td><td>$ 1480</td><td>$ 6945</td></tr></table> long-term debt payments due in 2016 and 2017 include floating rate notes totaling $ 126 million ( classified as current portion of long-term debt ) , and $ 96 million ( included as a separate floating rate note in the long-term debt table ) , respectively , as a result of put provisions associated with these debt instruments . interest projections on both floating and fixed rate long-term debt , including the effects of interest rate swaps , are based on effective interest rates as of december 31 , 2015 . unconditional purchase obligations are defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on the company . included in the unconditional purchase obligations category above are certain obligations related to take or pay contracts , capital commitments , service agreements and utilities . these estimates include both unconditional purchase obligations with terms in excess of one year and normal ongoing purchase obligations with terms of less than one year . many of these commitments relate to take or pay contracts , in which 3m guarantees payment to ensure availability of products or services that are sold to customers . the company expects to receive consideration ( products or services ) for these unconditional purchase obligations . contractual capital commitments are included in the preceding table , but these commitments represent a small part of the company 2019s expected capital spending in 2016 and beyond . the purchase obligation amounts do not represent the entire anticipated purchases in the future , but represent only those items for which the company is contractually obligated . the majority of 3m 2019s products and services are purchased as needed , with no unconditional commitment . for this reason , these amounts will not provide a reliable indicator of the company 2019s expected future cash outflows on a stand-alone basis . other obligations , included in the preceding table within the caption entitled 201cunconditional purchase obligations and other , 201d include the current portion of the liability for uncertain tax positions under asc 740 , which is expected to be paid out in cash in the next 12 months . the company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the long-term payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time ; therefore , the long-term portion of the net tax liability of $ 208 million is excluded from the preceding table . refer to note 8 for further details . as discussed in note 11 , the company does not have a required minimum cash pension contribution obligation for its u.s . plans in 2016 and company contributions to its u.s . and international pension plans are expected to be largely discretionary in future years ; therefore , amounts related to these plans are not included in the preceding table . financial instruments the company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts , options and swaps to hedge against the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash flows denominated in foreign currencies and certain intercompany financing transactions . the company manages interest rate risks using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt . to help manage borrowing costs , the company may enter into interest rate swaps . under these arrangements , the company agrees to exchange , at specified intervals , the difference between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount . the company manages commodity price risks through negotiated supply contracts , price protection agreements and forward contracts. .
Question: as of december 31, 2015, what percentage did the total interest on long-term debt represent in relation to the total contractual cash obligations?
Answer: 0.15208
Question: and what was the total of the floating rate notes included in those long-term debt payments due in 2016?
| 126.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
management 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common shareholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 73597</td><td>$ 71267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities</td><td>-3196 ( 3196 )</td><td>-3468 ( 3468 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions</td><td>-4928 ( 4928 )</td><td>-9091 ( 9091 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other adjustments</td><td>-1213 ( 1213 )</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cet1</td><td>$ 64260</td><td>$ 58219</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basel iii advanced rwas</td><td>$ 577869</td><td>$ 594662</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>basel iii advanced cet1 ratio</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>standardized rwas</td><td>$ 627444</td><td>$ 635092</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standardized cet1 ratio</td><td>10.2% ( 10.2 % )</td><td>9.2% ( 9.2 % )</td></tr></table> although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) . these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 . in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively . 2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds . the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments . 2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions . supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations . under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee . the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments . the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s . banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 . certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 . as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) . we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements . the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies . this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators . 60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the balance of common shareholders by the end of 2014?
| 73597.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 48.6
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 52.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -3.5
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2011, in millions?
Answer: 52.1
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2011 number of shares, in percentage?
| -0.06718 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what portion of total minimum lease payments are due in 2016?
Answer: 0.11622
Question: what is the rent expense in 2011?
| 338.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2017 , we repurchased 37122405 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 110.50 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2017 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>3831636</td><td>$ 113.61</td><td>3800000</td><td>89078662</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3005225</td><td>117.07</td><td>2937410</td><td>86141252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>2718319</td><td>130.76</td><td>2494100</td><td>83647152</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>9555180</td><td>$ 119.58</td><td>9231510</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 323670 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what portion of total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2007?
Answer: 0.401
Question: what is the number of shares attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices during the last quarter of 2017?
Answer: 323670.0
Question: wha about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2017?
| 9555180.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 . as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement . during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 . for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million . this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets . upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td><td>$ -431 ( 431 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>5156</td><td>-4144 ( 4144 )</td><td>17343</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings</td><td>-2208 ( 2208 )</td><td>1136</td><td>-6272 ( 6272 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td></tr></table> the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 . as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement . during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 . for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million . this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets . upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
| 5156.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 17590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>12724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>6951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>5649</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>3669</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>19472</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 66055</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the increase in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s.employees from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 9.7
Question: what is the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s.employees in 2010?
Answer: 11.7
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.82906 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis ( 1 ) includes approximately $ 30 million annually for maintenance capital , which is planned spending on routine capital projects that are necessary to support reliability of service , equipment or systems and to support normal customer growth . ( 2 ) purchase obligations represent the minimum purchase obligation or cancellation charge for contractual obligations to purchase goods or services . for entergy new orleans , almost all of the total consists of unconditional fuel and purchased power obligations , including its obligations under the unit power sales agreement , which is discussed in note 8 to the financial statements . in addition to the contractual obligations given above , entergy new orleans expects to make payments of approximately $ 113 million for the years 2009-2011 related to hurricane katrina and hurricane gustav restoration work and its gas rebuild project , of which $ 32 million is expected to be incurred in 2009 . also , entergy new orleans expects to contribute $ 1.7 million to its pension plan and $ 5.9 million to its other postretirement plans in 2009 . guidance pursuant to the pension protection act of 2006 rules , effective for the 2008 plan year and beyond , may affect the level of entergy new orleans' pension contributions in the future . also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 26.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . sources of capital entergy new orleans' sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans' receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 60093</td><td>$ 47705</td><td>( $ 37166 )</td><td>( $ 37166 )</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . as discussed above in "bankruptcy proceedings" , entergy new orleans issued notes due in three years in satisfaction of its affiliate prepetition accounts payable , including its indebtedness to the entergy system money pool of $ 37.2 million . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through march 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans' short-term borrowing limits . the long- term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through august 2010. .
Question: what is the net change in net receivables from the money pool between from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 12388.0
Question: what is the balance of net receivables from the money pool between in 2007?
Answer: 47705.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.25968 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 293.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>39.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-2.5 ( 2.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-5.1 ( 5.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-8.1 ( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 317.2</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .
Question: what was the total effect of the net gas revenue and volume/weather adjustments on the net revenue in 2016?
Answer: -7.6
Question: and what was the effect of other adjustments?
Answer: -8.1
Question: what was, then, the total effect of these three segments on that net revenue?
| -15.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
2018 emerson annual report | 51 as of september 30 , 2018 , 1874750 shares awarded primarily in 2016 were outstanding , contingent on the company achieving its performance objectives through 2018 . the objectives for these shares were met at the 97 percent level at the end of 2018 and 1818508 shares will be distributed in early 2019 . additionally , the rights to receive a maximum of 2261700 and 2375313 common shares were awarded in 2018 and 2017 , respectively , under the new performance shares program , and are outstanding and contingent upon the company achieving its performance objectives through 2020 and 2019 , respectively . incentive shares plans also include restricted stock awards which involve distribution of common stock to key management employees subject to cliff vesting at the end of service periods ranging from three to ten years . the fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the average of the high and low market prices of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , with compensation expense recognized ratably over the applicable service period . in 2018 , 310000 shares of restricted stock vested as a result of participants fulfilling the applicable service requirements . consequently , 167837 shares were issued while 142163 shares were withheld for income taxes in accordance with minimum withholding requirements . as of september 30 , 2018 , there were 1276200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding . the total fair value of shares distributed under incentive shares plans was $ 20 , $ 245 and $ 11 , respectively , in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , of which $ 9 , $ 101 and $ 4 was paid in cash , primarily for tax withholding . as of september 30 , 2018 , 10.3 million shares remained available for award under incentive shares plans . changes in shares outstanding but not yet earned under incentive shares plans during the year ended september 30 , 2018 follow ( shares in thousands ; assumes 100 percent payout of unvested awards ) : average grant date shares fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>average grant datefair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>4999</td><td>$ 50.33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2295</td><td>$ 63.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earned/vested</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td><td>$ 51.27</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>$ 56.53</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>end of year</td><td>6898</td><td>$ 54.69</td></tr></table> total compensation expense for stock options and incentive shares was $ 216 , $ 115 and $ 159 for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , of which $ 5 and $ 14 was included in discontinued operations for 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in expense for 2018 reflects an increase in the company 2019s stock price and progress toward achieving its performance objectives . the decrease in expense for 2017 reflects the impact of changes in the stock price . income tax benefits recognized in the income statement for these compensation arrangements during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 42 , $ 33 and $ 45 , respectively . as of september 30 , 2018 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares awarded under these plans was $ 182 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . in addition to the employee stock option and incentive shares plans , in 2018 the company awarded 12228 shares of restricted stock and 2038 restricted stock units under the restricted stock plan for non-management directors . as of september 30 , 2018 , 159965 shares were available for issuance under this plan . ( 16 ) common and preferred stock at september 30 , 2018 , 37.0 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the company 2019s stock-based compensation plans . during 2018 , 15.1 million common shares were purchased and 2.6 million treasury shares were reissued . in 2017 , 6.6 million common shares were purchased and 5.5 million treasury shares were reissued . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the company had 5.4 million shares of $ 2.50 par value preferred stock authorized , with none issued. .
Question: how many shares were repurchased during 2018?
Answer: 15.1
Question: what about the number of shares reissued?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what is the net number of shares repurchased?
| 12.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in apple inc value from 2008 to 2013?
| 331.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
our tax returns are currently under examination in various foreign jurisdictions . the major foreign tax jurisdictions under examination include germany , italy and switzerland . it is reasonably possible that such audits will be resolved in the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate that the resolution of these audits would result in any material impact on our results of operations or financial position . 12 . capital stock and earnings per share we have 2 million shares of series a participating cumulative preferred stock authorized for issuance , none of which were outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 . the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings available to common stockholders . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the denominator for diluted earnings per share is weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards . the following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted share computations for the years ending december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share</td><td>235.5</td><td>243.0</td><td>247.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.4</td><td>2.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share</td><td>237.5</td><td>245.4</td><td>249.8</td></tr></table> weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 235.5 243.0 247.1 effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 2.0 2.4 2.7 weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 237.5 245.4 249.8 for the year ended december 31 , 2007 , an average of 3.1 million options to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock . for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , an average of 7.6 million and 2.9 million options , respectively , were not included . in december 2005 , our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $ 1 billion through december 31 , 2007 . in december 2006 , our board of directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program of up to $ 1 billion through december 31 , 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 we had acquired approximately 19345200 shares at a cost of $ 1378.9 million , before commissions . 13 . segment data we design , develop , manufacture and market reconstructive orthopaedic implants , including joint and dental , spinal implants , trauma products and related orthopaedic surgical products which include surgical supplies and instruments designed to aid in orthopaedic surgical procedures and post-operation rehabilitation . we also provide other healthcare related services . revenue related to these services currently represents less than 1 percent of our total net sales . we manage operations through three major geographic segments 2013 the americas , which is comprised principally of the united states and includes other north , central and south american markets ; europe , which is comprised principally of europe and includes the middle east and africa ; and asia pacific , which is comprised primarily of japan and includes other asian and pacific markets . this structure is the basis for our reportable segment information discussed below . management evaluates operating segment performance based upon segment operating profit exclusive of operating expenses pertaining to global operations and corporate expenses , share-based compensation expense , settlement , acquisition , integration and other expenses , inventory step-up , in-process research and development write- offs and intangible asset amortization expense . global operations include research , development engineering , medical education , brand management , corporate legal , finance , and human resource functions , and u.s . and puerto rico based manufacturing operations and logistics . intercompany transactions have been eliminated from segment operating profit . management reviews accounts receivable , inventory , property , plant and equipment , goodwill and intangible assets by reportable segment exclusive of u.s and puerto rico based manufacturing operations and logistics and corporate assets . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 7 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the basic weight shares outstanding of 2007?
Answer: 235.5
Question: and what is that of 2005?
Answer: 247.1
Question: how much does that basic weight shares outstanding of 2007 represents in relation to that of 2005?
Answer: 0.95306
Question: what is the difference between that and the number 1 that represents 100%?
| -0.04694 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
| 331.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .
Question: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?
| 20227000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
table of contents statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries</td><td>$ 6410</td><td>$ 7388</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and casualty insurance subsidiaries</td><td>7645</td><td>7412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14055</td><td>$ 14800</td></tr></table> statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries , decreased by $ 978 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of approximately $ 425 , a $ 200 increase in reserves on a change in valuation basis , $ 200 transfer of the mutual funds business from the u.s . life insurance companies to the life holding company , and an increase in the asset valuation reserve of $ 115 . as a result of the january 2013 statutory gain from the sale of the retirement plans and individual life businesses , the company's pro forma january 2 , 2013 u.s . life statutory surplus was estimated to be $ 8.1 billion , before approximately $ 1.5 billion in extraordinary dividends and return of capital to hfsg holding company . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries increased by $ 233 , primarily due to statutory net income , after tax , of $ 727 , unrealized gains of $ 249 , and an increase in statutory admitted deferred tax assets of $ 77 , capital contributions of $ 14 , and an increase of statutory admitted assets of $ 7 , partially offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 841 . both net income and dividends are net of interest payments and dividends , respectively , on an intercompany note between hartford holdings , inc . and hartford fire insurance company . the company also holds regulatory capital and surplus for its operations in japan . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.1 billion and $ 1.3 billion as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . statutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s . generally accepted accounting principles ( 201cu.s . gaap 201d ) was $ 22.4 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cu.s . stat 201d ) was $ 14.1 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . significant differences between u.s . gaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with u.s . stat include the following : 2022 u.s . stat excludes equity of non-insurance and foreign insurance subsidiaries not held by u.s . insurance subsidiaries . 2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s . gaap while those costs are expensed immediately under u.s . 2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s . gaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under u.s . stat . 2022 the assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves is prescribed under u.s . stat , while the assumptions used under u.s . gaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates . the methodologies for determining life insurance reserve amounts may also be different . for example , reserving for living benefit reserves under u.s . stat is generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines , while under u.s . gaap , those same living benefits may be considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves . the sensitivity of these life insurance reserves to changes in equity markets , as applicable , will be different between u.s . gaap and u.s . stat . 2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s . gaap , while u.s . stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . 2022 u.s . stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s . gaap does not . also , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , u.s . stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s . gaap does not . 2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s . gaap , while under u.s . stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the amount of goodwill is limited. .
Question: what was the statutory surplus in 2012?
Answer: 14055.0
Question: and what was it in 2011?
| 14800.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
Organize your response with headings for the answer and reasons. |
Subsets and Splits