answer
stringlengths 2
16
| text
stringlengths 520
16.2k
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
0.18337 | Context:dollar general corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 3 . merger ( continued ) merger as a subsidiary of buck . the company 2019s results of operations after july 6 , 2007 include the effects of the merger . the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 7.1 billion , including direct costs of the merger , and was funded primarily through debt financings as described more fully below in note 7 and cash equity contributions from kkr , gs capital partners vi fund , l.p . and affiliated funds ( affiliates of goldman , sachs & co. ) , and other equity co-investors ( collectively , the 2018 2018investors 2019 2019 of approximately $ 2.8 billion ( 316.2 million shares of new common stock , $ 0.875 par value per share , valued at $ 8.75 per share ) . also in connection with the merger , certain of the company 2019s management employees invested in and were issued new shares , representing less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the outstanding shares , in the company . pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement , the former holders of the predecessor 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.50 per share , received $ 22.00 per share , or approximately $ 6.9 billion , and all such shares were acquired as a result of the merger . as discussed in note 1 , the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with applicable purchase accounting provisions . because of this accounting treatment , the company 2019s assets and liabilities have properly been accounted for at their estimated fair values as of the merger date . the aggregate purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon an assessment of their relative fair values as of the merger date . the allocation of the purchase price is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|cash and cash equivalents|$ 349615|
|short-term investments|30906|
|merchandise inventories|1368130|
|income taxes receivable|40199|
|deferred income taxes|57176|
|prepaid expenses and other current assets|63204|
|property and equipment net|1301119|
|goodwill|4338589|
|intangible assets|1396612|
|other assets net|66537|
|current portion of long-term obligations|-7088 ( 7088 )|
|accounts payable|-585518 ( 585518 )|
|accrued expenses and other|-306394 ( 306394 )|
|income taxes payable|-84 ( 84 )|
|long-term obligations|-267927 ( 267927 )|
|deferred income taxes|-540675 ( 540675 )|
|other liabilities|-208710 ( 208710 )|
|total purchase price assigned|$ 7095691|
the purchase price allocation included approximately $ 4.34 billion of goodwill , none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill balance at january 30 , 2009 decreased $ 6.3 million from the balance at february 1 , 2008 due to an adjustment to income tax contingencies as further discussed in note 6. .
Question: what percentage of the purchase price was hard assets? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
no | Context:table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|9|
|trademarks|9|
|acquired rights to use technology|10|
|backlog|2|
|other intangibles|4|
income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: was the weighted average useful life for trademarks greater than that of acquired rights to use technology? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.16398 | Context:shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .
||12/31/02|12/31/03|12/31/04|12/31/05|12/31/06|12/31/07|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 119.89|$ 139.55|$ 124.88|$ 127.08|$ 122.64|
|s&p 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 128.68|$ 142.68|$ 149.69|$ 173.33|$ 182.85|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 131.84|$ 168.39|$ 188.00|$ 206.46|$ 209.40|
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2003 to 2004? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
228.02 | Context:14 2018 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2018 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .
||2013|2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|
|jkhy|100.00|128.02|141.48|193.46|233.19|296.19|
|peer group|100.00|137.07|171.80|198.44|231.11|297.44|
|s&p 500|100.00|124.61|133.86|139.20|164.11|187.70|
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2013 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . dst systems , inc. , which had previously been part of the peer group , was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a public company . as a result , dst systems , inc . has been removed from the peer group and stock performance graph . the stock performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. .
Question: what was the percentage growth of the jkhy | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
16.66667 | Context:adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 . we elected to use the step 1 quantitative assessment for our reporting units and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill . there is no significant risk of material goodwill impairment in any of our reporting units , based upon the results of our annual goodwill impairment test . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2014 , 2013 or 2012 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|10|
|trademarks|8|
|acquired rights to use technology|8|
|localization|1|
|other intangibles|3|
software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . taxes collected from customers we net taxes collected from customers against those remitted to government authorities in our financial statements . accordingly , taxes collected from customers are not reported as revenue. .
Question: what is the yearly amortization rate related to the purchased technology? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-1836.0 | Context:assets measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis our non-marketable equity securities , equity method investments , and certain non-financial assets , such as intangible assets and property , plant and equipment , are recorded at fair value only if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized in the current period . if an impairment or observable price adjustment is recognized on our non-marketable equity securities during the period , we classify these assets as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . we classified non-marketable equity securities and non-marketable equity method investments as level 3 . impairments recognized on these investments held as of december 29 , 2018 were $ 416 million ( $ 537 million held as of december 30 , 2017 and $ 153 million held as of december 31 , 2016 ) . financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include non-marketable equity securities and equity method investments that have not been remeasured or impaired in the current period , grants receivable , loans receivable , reverse repurchase agreements , and our short-term and long-term debt . prior to the adoption of the new financial instrument standard , our non-marketable cost method investments were disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis . the carrying amount and fair value of our non-marketable cost method investments as of december 30 , 2017 were $ 2.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively . these measures are classified as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . as of december 29 , 2018 , the aggregate carrying value of grants receivable , loans receivable , and reverse repurchase agreements was $ 833 million ( the aggregate carrying amount as of december 30 , 2017 was $ 935 million ) . the estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value and is categorized as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy based on the nature of the fair value inputs . for information related to the fair value of our short-term and long-term debt , see 201cnote 15 : borrowings . 201d note 17 : other comprehensive income ( loss ) the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) by component and related tax effects for each period were as follows : ( in millions ) unrealized holding ( losses ) on available-for -sale equity investments unrealized holding ( losses ) on derivatives actuarial valuation and other pension expenses translation adjustments and other total .
|( in millions )|unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale equity investments|unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives|actuarial valuation and other pension expenses|translation adjustments and other|total|
|december 31 2016|$ 2179|$ -259 ( 259 )|$ -1280 ( 1280 )|$ -534 ( 534 )|$ 106|
|other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications|2765|605|275|-2 ( 2 )|3643|
|amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )|-3433 ( 3433 )|-69 ( 69 )|103|509|-2890 ( 2890 )|
|tax effects|234|-171 ( 171 )|-61 ( 61 )|1|3|
|other comprehensive income ( loss )|-434 ( 434 )|365|317|508|756|
|december 30 2017|1745|106|-963 ( 963 )|-26 ( 26 )|862|
|impact of change in accounting standards|-1745 ( 1745 )|24|-65 ( 65 )|-4 ( 4 )|-1790 ( 1790 )|
|opening balance as of december 31 2017|2014|130|-1028 ( 1028 )|-30 ( 30 )|-928 ( 928 )|
|other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications|2014|-310 ( 310 )|157|-16 ( 16 )|-169 ( 169 )|
|amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )|2014|9|109|8|126|
|tax effects|2014|48|-56 ( 56 )|5|-3 ( 3 )|
|other comprehensive income ( loss )|2014|-253 ( 253 )|210|-3 ( 3 )|-46 ( 46 )|
|december 29 2018|$ 2014|$ -123 ( 123 )|$ -818 ( 818 )|$ -33 ( 33 )|$ -974 ( 974 )|
financial statements notes to financial statements 97 .
Question: what is the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2018? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
183379.0 | Context:entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 32452|
|2010|35138|
|2011|50421|
|2012|39067|
|2013|26301|
|years thereafter|137858|
|total|321237|
|less : amount representing interest|73512|
|present value of net minimum lease payments|$ 247725|
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: not including years 'thereafter' , what is the total lease payments ? ( in $ thousands ) | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
12.39 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 26 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report $ 41.7 billion . nii was reduced by a lower volume of commercial loans and lower spreads on investment securities . as a compo- nent of nii , trading-related net interest income of $ 2.1 billion was up 13% ( 13 % ) from 2002 due to a change in the composition of , and growth in , trading assets . the firm 2019s total average interest-earning assets in 2003 were $ 590 billion , up 6% ( 6 % ) from the prior year . the net interest yield on these assets , on a fully taxable-equivalent basis , was 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) , compared with 2.09% ( 2.09 % ) in the prior year . noninterest expense year ended december 31 .
|( in millions )|2003|2002|change|
|compensation expense|$ 11695|$ 10983|6% ( 6 % )|
|occupancy expense|1912|1606|19|
|technology and communications expense|2844|2554|11|
|other expense|5137|5111|1|
|surety settlement and litigation reserve|100|1300|-92 ( 92 )|
|merger and restructuring costs|2014|1210|nm|
|total noninterest expense|$ 21688|$ 22764|( 5 ) % ( % )|
technology and communications expense in 2003 , technology and communications expense was 11% ( 11 % ) above the prior-year level . the increase was primarily due to a shift in expenses : costs that were previously associated with compensation and other expenses shifted , upon the commence- ment of the ibm outsourcing agreement , to technology and communications expense . also contributing to the increase were higher costs related to software amortization . for a further dis- cussion of the ibm outsourcing agreement , see support units and corporate on page 44 of this annual report . other expense other expense in 2003 rose slightly from the prior year , reflecting higher outside services . for a table showing the components of other expense , see note 8 on page 96 of this annual report . surety settlement and litigation reserve the firm added $ 100 million to the enron-related litigation reserve in 2003 to supplement a $ 900 million reserve initially recorded in 2002 . the 2002 reserve was established to cover enron-related matters , as well as certain other material litigation , proceedings and investigations in which the firm is involved . in addition , in 2002 the firm recorded a charge of $ 400 million for the settlement of enron-related surety litigation . merger and restructuring costs merger and restructuring costs related to business restructurings announced after january 1 , 2002 , were recorded in their relevant expense categories . in 2002 , merger and restructuring costs of $ 1.2 billion , for programs announced prior to january 1 , 2002 , were viewed by management as nonoperating expenses or 201cspecial items . 201d refer to note 8 on pages 95 201396 of this annual report for a further discussion of merger and restructuring costs and for a summary , by expense category and business segment , of costs incurred in 2003 and 2002 for programs announced after january 1 , 2002 . provision for credit losses the 2003 provision for credit losses was $ 2.8 billion lower than in 2002 , primarily reflecting continued improvement in the quality of the commercial loan portfolio and a higher volume of credit card securitizations . for further information about the provision for credit losses and the firm 2019s management of credit risk , see the dis- cussions of net charge-offs associated with the commercial and consumer loan portfolios and the allowance for credit losses , on pages 63 201365 of this annual report . income tax expense income tax expense was $ 3.3 billion in 2003 , compared with $ 856 million in 2002 . the effective tax rate in 2003 was 33% ( 33 % ) , compared with 34% ( 34 % ) in 2002 . the tax rate decline was principally attributable to changes in the proportion of income subject to state and local taxes . compensation expense compensation expense in 2003 was 6% ( 6 % ) higher than in the prior year . the increase principally reflected higher performance-related incentives , and higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs , primarily as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions . for a detailed discussion of pension and other postretirement benefit costs , see note 6 on pages 89 201393 of this annual report . the increase pertaining to incentives included $ 266 million as a result of adopting sfas 123 , and $ 120 million from the reversal in 2002 of previously accrued expenses for certain forfeitable key employ- ee stock awards , as discussed in note 7 on pages 93 201395 of this annual report . total compensation expense declined as a result of the transfer , beginning april 1 , 2003 , of 2800 employees to ibm in connection with a technology outsourcing agreement . the total number of full-time equivalent employees at december 31 , 2003 was 93453 compared with 94335 at the prior year-end . occupancy expense occupancy expense of $ 1.9 billion rose 19% ( 19 % ) from 2002 . the increase reflected costs of additional leased space in midtown manhattan and in the south and southwest regions of the united states ; higher real estate taxes in new york city ; and the cost of enhanced safety measures . also contributing to the increase were charges for unoccupied excess real estate of $ 270 million ; this compared with $ 120 million in 2002 , mostly in the third quarter of that year. .
Question: what would pre-tax interest income be , in billions , for 2003 , based on the return on interest bearing assets? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
68.38636 | Context:edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . employee benefit plans ( continued ) equity and debt securities are valued at fair value based on quoted market prices reported on the active markets on which the individual securities are traded . the insurance contracts are valued at the cash surrender value of the contracts , which is deemed to approximate its fair value . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , at december 31 , 2014 , are expected to be paid ( in millions ) : .
|2015|$ 3.7|
|2016|5.5|
|2017|4.2|
|2018|4.2|
|2019|4.1|
|2020-2024|32.3|
as of december 31 , 2014 , expected employer contributions for 2015 are $ 5.8 million . defined contribution plans the company 2019s employees in the united states and puerto rico are eligible to participate in a qualified 401 ( k ) and 1165 ( e ) plan , respectively . in the united states , participants may contribute up to 25% ( 25 % ) of their eligible compensation ( subject to tax code limitation ) to the plan . edwards lifesciences matches the first 3% ( 3 % ) of the participant 2019s annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a dollar-for-dollar basis . edwards lifesciences matches the next 2% ( 2 % ) of the participant 2019s annual eligible compensation to the plan on a 50% ( 50 % ) basis . in puerto rico , participants may contribute up to 25% ( 25 % ) of their annual compensation ( subject to tax code limitation ) to the plan . edwards lifesciences matches the first 4% ( 4 % ) of participant 2019s annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a 50% ( 50 % ) basis . the company also provides a 2% ( 2 % ) profit sharing contribution calculated on eligible earnings for each employee . matching contributions relating to edwards lifesciences employees were $ 12.8 million , $ 12.0 million , and $ 10.8 million in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . the company also has nonqualified deferred compensation plans for a select group of employees . the plans provide eligible participants the opportunity to defer eligible compensation to future dates specified by the participant with a return based on investment alternatives selected by the participant . the amount accrued under these nonqualified plans was $ 28.7 million and $ 25.9 million at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . common stock treasury stock in may 2013 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the company to purchase up to $ 750.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time until december 31 , 2016 . in july 2014 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program providing for an additional $ 750.0 million of repurchases without a specified end date . stock repurchased under these programs will be used to offset obligations under the company 2019s employee stock option programs and reduce the total shares outstanding . during 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , the company repurchased 4.4 million , 6.8 million , and 4.0 million shares , respectively , at an aggregate cost of $ 300.9 million , $ 497.0 million , and $ 353.2 million , respectively , including shares purchased under the accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreements described below and shares .
Question: what was the average purchase price of company repurchased shares in 2014? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
431.0 | Context:jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 103 2011 compared with 2010 net income was $ 822 million , compared with $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 391 million , compared with $ 588 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 836 million , a decrease of $ 403 million , primarily related to net write-downs on private investments and the absence of prior year gains on sales . noninterest expense was $ 238 million , a decrease of $ 85 million from the prior treasury and cio reported net income of $ 1.3 billion , compared with net income of $ 3.6 billion in the prior year . net revenue was $ 3.2 billion , including $ 1.4 billion of security gains . net interest income in 2011 was lower compared with 2010 , primarily driven by repositioning of the investment securities portfolio and lower funding benefits from financing the portfolio . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 918 million , compared with a net loss of $ 2.9 billion in the prior year . net revenue was $ 103 million , compared with a net loss of $ 467 million in the prior year . noninterest expense was $ 2.9 billion which included $ 3.2 billion of additional litigation reserves , predominantly for mortgage-related matters . noninterest expense in the prior year was $ 5.5 billion which included $ 5.7 billion of additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury is responsible for , among other functions , funds transfer pricing . funds transfer pricing is used to transfer structural interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk of the firm to treasury and cio and allocate interest income and expense to each business based on market rates . cio , through its management of the investment portfolio , generates net interest income to pay the lines of business market rates . any variance ( whether positive or negative ) between amounts generated by cio through its investment portfolio activities and amounts paid to or received by the lines of business are retained by cio , and are not reflected in line of business segment results . treasury and cio activities operate in support of the overall firm . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs investment portfolio . unrealized gains and losses on securities held in the afs portfolio are recorded in other comprehensive income . for further information about securities in the afs portfolio , see note 3 and note 12 on pages 196 2013214 and 244 2013248 , respectively , of this annual report . cio also uses securities that are not classified within the afs portfolio , as well as derivatives , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . securities not classified within the afs portfolio are recorded in trading assets and liabilities ; realized and unrealized gains and losses on such securities are recorded in the principal transactions revenue line in the consolidated statements of income . for further information about securities included in trading assets and liabilities , see note 3 on pages 196 2013214 of this annual report . derivatives used by cio are also classified as trading assets and liabilities . for further information on derivatives , including the classification of realized and unrealized gains and losses , see note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report . cio 2019s afs portfolio consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities and corporate and municipal debt securities . treasury 2019s afs portfolio consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2012 , the total treasury and cio afs portfolios were $ 344.1 billion and $ 21.3 billion , respectively ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio afs portfolios was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 244 2013248 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s afs portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 127 2013133 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , and cio var and the firm 2019s nontrading interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 163 2013169 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 securities gains ( a ) $ 2028 $ 1385 $ 2897 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 358029 330885 323673 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 365421 355605 310801 .
|as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )|2012|2011|2010|
|securities gains ( a )|$ 2028|$ 1385|$ 2897|
|investment securities portfolio ( average )|358029|330885|323673|
|investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )|365421|355605|310801|
|mortgage loans ( average )|10241|13006|9004|
|mortgage loans ( period-end )|7037|13375|10739|
( a ) reflects repositioning of the investment securities portfolio. .
Question: would would 2011 net income have been without the private equity segment ( in millions ) ? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
13.0 | Context:indemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . in connection with pooled settlements , we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction . for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels . in certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans , we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders , brokers and other third-parties ( e.g. , contract underwriting companies , closing agents , appraisers , etc. ) . depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim , we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly . our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations ( e.g. , their capital availability or whether they remain in business ) or factors that limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties ( e.g. , contractual loss caps , statutes of limitations ) . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity , and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second- lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made , demand patterns observed to date and/or expected in the future , and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . to estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties , we consider the following factors : ( i ) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio ( both actual and estimated future defaults ) , ( ii ) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims , ( iii ) estimated probable future repurchase claims , considering information about file requests , delinquent and liquidated loans , resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions , ( iv ) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims ( 201crescission rate 201d ) , and ( v ) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral , make-whole settlement , or indemnification . see note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . the following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters . table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 .
|dollars in millions|december 31 2012|september 30 2012|june 30 2012|march 31 2012|december 312011|
|2004 & prior|$ 11|$ 15|$ 31|$ 10|$ 11|
|2005|8|10|19|12|13|
|2006|23|30|56|41|28|
|2007|45|137|182|100|90|
|2008|7|23|49|17|18|
|2008 & prior|94|215|337|180|160|
|2009 2013 2012|38|52|42|33|29|
|total|$ 132|$ 267|$ 379|$ 213|$ 189|
|fnma fhlmc and gnma % ( % )|94% ( 94 % )|87% ( 87 % )|86% ( 86 % )|88% ( 88 % )|91% ( 91 % )|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 .
Question: for 2012 quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims , what was the change in millions between originations from first and second quarter of 2006? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
20.926 | Context:common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
||december 312008|december 312009|december 312010|december 312011|december 312012|december 312013|
|disca|$ 100.00|$ 216.60|$ 294.49|$ 289.34|$ 448.31|$ 638.56|
|discb|$ 100.00|$ 207.32|$ 287.71|$ 277.03|$ 416.52|$ 602.08|
|disck|$ 100.00|$ 198.06|$ 274.01|$ 281.55|$ 436.89|$ 626.29|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 123.45|$ 139.23|$ 139.23|$ 157.90|$ 204.63|
|peer group|$ 100.00|$ 151.63|$ 181.00|$ 208.91|$ 286.74|$ 454.87|
equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the five year average uncompounded annual return for the s&p 500? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
11530.0 | Context:112 / sl green realty corp . 2017 annual report 20 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings as of december a031 , 2017 , the company and the operating partnership were not involved in any material litigation nor , to management 2019s knowledge , was any material litigation threat- ened against us or our portfolio which if adversely determined could have a material adverse impact on us . environmental matters our management believes that the properties are in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal , state and local ordinances and regulations regarding environmental issues . management is not aware of any environmental liability that it believes would have a materially adverse impact on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . management is unaware of any instances in which it would incur significant envi- ronmental cost if any of our properties were sold . employment agreements we have entered into employment agreements with certain exec- utives , which expire between december a02018 and february a02020 . the minimum cash-based compensation , including base sal- ary and guaranteed bonus payments , associated with these employment agreements total $ 5.4 a0million for 2018 . in addition these employment agreements provide for deferred compen- sation awards based on our stock price and which were valued at $ 1.6 a0million on the grant date . the value of these awards may change based on fluctuations in our stock price . insurance we maintain 201call-risk 201d property and rental value coverage ( includ- ing coverage regarding the perils of flood , earthquake and terrorism , excluding nuclear , biological , chemical , and radiological terrorism ( 201cnbcr 201d ) ) , within three property insurance programs and liability insurance . separate property and liability coverage may be purchased on a stand-alone basis for certain assets , such as the development of one vanderbilt . additionally , our captive insurance company , belmont insurance company , or belmont , pro- vides coverage for nbcr terrorist acts above a specified trigger , although if belmont is required to pay a claim under our insur- ance policies , we would ultimately record the loss to the extent of belmont 2019s required payment . however , there is no assurance that in the future we will be able to procure coverage at a reasonable cost . further , if we experience losses that are uninsured or that exceed policy limits , we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those plan trustees adopted a rehabilitation plan consistent with this requirement . no surcharges have been paid to the pension plan as of december a031 , 2017 . for the pension plan years ended june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 257.8 a0million , $ 249.5 a0million , and $ 221.9 a0million . our contributions to the pension plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . the health plan was established under the terms of collective bargaining agreements between the union , the realty advisory board on labor relations , inc . and certain other employees . the health plan provides health and other benefits to eligible participants employed in the building service industry who are covered under collective bargaining agreements , or other writ- ten agreements , with the union . the health plan is administered by a board of trustees with equal representation by the employ- ers and the union and operates under employer identification number a013-2928869 . the health plan receives contributions in accordance with collective bargaining agreements or participa- tion agreements . generally , these agreements provide that the employers contribute to the health plan at a fixed rate on behalf of each covered employee . for the health plan years ended , june a030 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , the plan received contributions from employers totaling $ 1.3 a0billion , $ 1.2 a0billion and $ 1.1 a0billion , respectively . our contributions to the health plan represent less than 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) of total contributions to the plan . contributions we made to the multi-employer plans for the years ended december a031 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are included in the table below ( in thousands ) : .
|benefit plan|2017|2016|2015|
|pension plan|$ 3856|$ 3979|$ 2732|
|health plan|11426|11530|8736|
|other plans|1463|1583|5716|
|total plan contributions|$ 16745|$ 17092|$ 17184|
401 ( k ) plan in august a01997 , we implemented a 401 ( k ) a0savings/retirement plan , or the 401 ( k ) a0plan , to cover eligible employees of ours , and any designated affiliate . the 401 ( k ) a0plan permits eligible employees to defer up to 15% ( 15 % ) of their annual compensation , subject to certain limitations imposed by the code . the employees 2019 elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401 ( k ) a0plan . during a02003 , we amended our 401 ( k ) a0plan to pro- vide for discretionary matching contributions only . for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a matching contribution equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 6% ( 6 % ) of annual compensation was made . for the year ended december a031 , 2017 , we made a matching contribution of $ 728782 . for the years ended december a031 , 2016 and 2015 , we made matching contribu- tions of $ 566000 and $ 550000 , respectively. .
Question: what were the greatest health plan contributions in thousands? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.40604 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.26 billion for 2011 , 2% ( 2 % ) higher than 2010 . during 2011 , average volatility levels increased and equity prices in europe and asia declined significantly , particularly during the third quarter . the increase in net revenues reflected higher commissions and fees , primarily due to higher market volumes , particularly during the third quarter of 2011 . in addition , net revenues in securities services increased compared with 2010 , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances . equities client execution net revenues were lower than 2010 , primarily reflecting significantly lower net revenues in shares . the net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 , compared with a net gain of $ 198 million ( $ 188 million and $ 10 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2010 . institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by increased concerns regarding the weakened state of global economies , including heightened european sovereign debt risk , and its impact on the european banking system and global financial institutions . these conditions also impacted expectations for economic prospects in the united states and were reflected in equity and debt markets more broadly . in addition , the downgrade in credit ratings of the u.s . government and federal agencies and many financial institutions during the second half of 2011 contributed to further uncertainty in the markets . these concerns , as well as other broad market concerns , such as uncertainty over financial regulatory reform , continued to have a negative impact on our net revenues during 2011 . operating expenses were $ 12.84 billion for 2011 , 14% ( 14 % ) lower than 2010 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , primarily resulting from lower net revenues , lower net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings ( 2010 included $ 550 million related to a settlement with the sec ) , the impact of the u.k . bank payroll tax during 2010 , as well as an impairment of our nyse dmm rights of $ 305 million during 2010 . these decreases were partially offset by higher brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , principally reflecting higher transaction volumes in equities . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.44 billion in 2011 , 35% ( 35 % ) lower than 2010 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , real estate , consolidated investment entities and power generation facilities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|in millions|year ended december 2012|year ended december 2011|year ended december 2010|
|icbc|$ 408|$ -517 ( 517 )|$ 747|
|equity securities ( excluding icbc )|2392|1120|2692|
|debt securities and loans|1850|96|2597|
|other|1241|1443|1505|
|total net revenues|5891|2142|7541|
|operating expenses|2666|2673|3361|
|pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )|$ 3225|$ -531 ( 531 )|$ 4180|
2012 versus 2011 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.89 billion and $ 2.14 billion for 2012 and 2011 , respectively . during 2012 , investing & lending net revenues were positively impacted by tighter credit spreads and an increase in global equity prices . results for 2012 included a gain of $ 408 million from our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , net gains of $ 2.39 billion from other investments in equities , primarily in private equities , net gains and net interest income of $ 1.85 billion from debt securities and loans , and other net revenues of $ 1.24 billion , principally related to our consolidated investment entities . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.67 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.23 billion in 2012 , compared with a pre-tax loss of $ 531 million in 2011 . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 55 .
Question: what percentage of total net revenues in 2012 where due to equity securities ( excluding icbc ) revenues? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
24.8 | Context:entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and distribution rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2016|2015|2014|2013|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 22503|$ 6154|$ 2815|$ 19573|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 6.4 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 5.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 3.8 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the entergy louisiana waterford 3 nuclear fuel company variable interest entity and there were no cash borrowings outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy louisiana obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 450 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entities . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits . hurricane isaac in june 2014 the lpsc voted to approve a series of orders which ( i ) quantified $ 290.8 million of hurricane isaac system restoration costs as prudently incurred ; ( ii ) determined $ 290 million as the level of storm reserves to be re-established ; ( iii ) authorized entergy louisiana to utilize louisiana act 55 financing for hurricane isaac system restoration costs ; and ( iv ) granted other requested relief associated with storm reserves and act 55 financing of hurricane isaac system restoration costs . entergy louisiana committed to pass on to customers a minimum of $ 30.8 million of customer benefits through annual customer credits of approximately $ 6.2 million for five years . approvals for the act 55 financings were obtained from the louisiana utilities restoration corporation and the louisiana state bond commission . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the august 2014 issuance of bonds under act 55 of the louisiana legislature. .
Question: if the entergy louisiana commitment for customer benefits was limited to four years , how much would customers receive in millions? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
7.0 | Context:stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: .
||2008|2007|2006|
|balance at january 1|$ 2014|$ 16|$ 2|
|increase ( decrease ) in fair value|-9 ( 9 )|-6 ( 6 )|75|
|reclassifications to earnings|2|-10 ( 10 )|-61 ( 61 )|
|balance at december 31|$ -7 ( 7 )|$ 2014|$ 16|
net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund , available-for-sale investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values . using quoted market prices and market interest rates , the company determined that the fair value of long- term debt at december 31 , 2008 was $ 2.8 billion , compared to a carrying value of $ 4.1 billion . since considerable judgment is required in interpreting market information , the fair value of the long-term debt is not necessarily indicative of the amount which could be realized in a current market exchange . equity price market risk at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s available-for-sale equity securities portfolio had an approximate fair market value of $ 128 million , which represented a cost basis of $ 125 million and a net unrealized loss of $ 3 million . these equity securities are held for purposes other than trading . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 105000000 ***%%pcmsg|102 |00022|yes|no|02/23/2009 19:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the percent change in balance of stockholder equity from the beginning to the end of 2006? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
7317.28 | Context:we have experienced disputes with customers and suppliers 2014such disputes may lead to increased tensions , damaged relationships or litigation which may result in the loss of a key customer or supplier . we have experienced certain conflicts or disputes with some of our customers and service providers . most of these disputes relate to the interpretation of terms in our contracts . while we seek to resolve such conflicts amicably and have generally resolved customer and supplier disputes on commercially reasonable terms , such disputes may lead to increased tensions and damaged relationships between ourselves and these entities , some of whom are key customers or suppliers of ours . in addition , if we are unable to resolve these differences amicably , we may be forced to litigate these disputes in order to enforce or defend our rights . there can be no assurances as to the outcome of these disputes . damaged relationships or litigation with our key customers or suppliers may lead to decreased revenues ( including as a result of losing a customer ) or increased costs , which could have a material adverse effect on us . our operations in australia expose us to changes in foreign currency exchange rates 2014we may suffer losses as a result of changes in such currency exchange rates . we conduct business in the u.s . and australia , which exposes us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , approximately 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) of our consolidated revenues originated outside the u.s. , all of which were denominated in currencies other than u.s . dollars , principally australian dollars . we have not historically engaged in significant hedging activities relating to our non-u.s . dollar operations , and we may suffer future losses as a result of changes in currency exchange rates . internet access to reports we maintain an internet website at www.crowncastle.com . our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , and current reports on form 8-k ( and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13 ( a ) or 15 ( d ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) are made available , free of charge , through the investor relations section of our internet website at http://investor.crowncastle.com/edgar.cfm as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with , or furnish it to , the securities and exchange commission . in addition , our corporate governance guidelines , business practices and ethics policy and the charters of our audit committee , compensation committee and nominating & corporate governance committees are available through the investor relations section of our internet website at http://investor.crowncastle.com/edgar.cfm , and such information is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it . item 2 . properties our principal corporate offices are located in houston , texas ; canonsburg , pennsylvania ; and sydney , australia . location property interest ( sq . ft. ) use .
|location|property interest|size ( sq . ft. )|use|
|canonsburg pa|owned|124000|corporate office|
|houston tx|leased|24300|corporate office|
|sydney australia|leased|15527|corporate office|
in the u.s. , we also lease and maintain five additional regional offices ( called 201carea offices 201d ) located in ( 1 ) albany , new york , ( 2 ) alpharetta , georgia , ( 3 ) charlotte , north carolina , ( 4 ) louisville , kentucky and ( 5 ) phoenix , arizona . the principal responsibilities of these offices are to manage the leasing of tower space on a local basis , maintain the towers already located in the region and service our customers in the area . as of december 31 , 2004 , 8816 of the sites on which our u.s . towers are located , or approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our u.s . portfolio , were leased , subleased or licensed , while 1796 or approximately 17% ( 17 % ) were owned in fee or through .
Question: about how many towers were leased or subleased in 2004? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.04701 | Context:westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) at september 30 , 2018 and september 30 , 2017 , gross net operating losses for foreign reporting purposes of approximately $ 698.4 million and $ 673.7 million , respectively , were available for carryforward . a majority of these loss carryforwards generally expire between fiscal 2020 and 2038 , while a portion have an indefinite carryforward . the tax effected values of these net operating losses are $ 185.8 million and $ 182.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , exclusive of valuation allowances of $ 161.5 million and $ 149.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , we had state tax credit carryforwards of $ 64.8 million and $ 54.4 million , respectively . these state tax credit carryforwards generally expire within 5 to 10 years ; however , certain state credits can be carried forward indefinitely . valuation allowances of $ 56.1 million and $ 47.3 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , have been provided on these assets . these valuation allowances have been recorded due to uncertainty regarding our ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate taxing jurisdiction . the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at beginning of fiscal year|$ 219.1|$ 177.2|$ 100.2|
|increases|50.8|54.3|24.8|
|allowances related to purchase accounting ( 1 )|0.1|12.4|63.0|
|reductions|-40.6 ( 40.6 )|-24.8 ( 24.8 )|-10.8 ( 10.8 )|
|balance at end of fiscal year|$ 229.4|$ 219.1|$ 177.2|
( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . adjustments in fiscal 2016 relate to the combination and the sp fiber acquisition . consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2018 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.5 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2018 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable. .
Question: in 2018 what was the percentage change in the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-586.0 | Context:note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .
|( losses ) earnings ( in millions )|( losses ) earnings 2014|( losses ) earnings 2013|2012|
|currency translation adjustments|$ -3929 ( 3929 )|$ -2207 ( 2207 )|$ -331 ( 331 )|
|pension and other benefits|-3020 ( 3020 )|-2046 ( 2046 )|-3365 ( 3365 )|
|derivatives accounted for as hedges|123|63|92|
|total accumulated other comprehensive losses|$ -6826 ( 6826 )|$ -4190 ( 4190 )|$ -3604 ( 3604 )|
reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 . the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business . in addition , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of a subsidiary . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products . the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco . as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , pmi had $ 71 million and $ 74 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement . these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 . note 19 . rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc . ( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc . ( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand . the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period . rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh . the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .
Question: what was the change in total accumulated other comprehensive losses in millions from 2012 to 2013? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.85271 | Context:at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .
|in millions|2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|thereafter|
|lease obligations|$ 171|$ 133|$ 97|$ 74|$ 59|$ 162|
|purchase obligations ( a )|3170|770|642|529|453|2404|
|total|$ 3341|$ 903|$ 739|$ 603|$ 512|$ 2566|
( a ) includes $ 3.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 215 million , $ 231 million and $ 205 million for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 94 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2013 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 51 million to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other : in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 42 million at december 31 , 2013 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . the company has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and continues to collect information from the epa and other parties relative to the site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the complaint and for future remediation costs . the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st . regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling . also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company . in mid-2011 , the suit was transferred from the district court for the eastern district of wisconsin to the district court for the western .
Question: in 2015 what percentage of at december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is due to purchase obligations? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.10787 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis 82 jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report net interest income excluding markets-based activities ( formerly core net interest income ) in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of cib 2019s markets-based net interest income and related assets . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . net interest income excluding cib markets-based activities data year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2015 2014 2013 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 44620 $ 44619 $ 44016 less : markets-based net interest income 4813 5552 5492 net interest income excluding markets ( a ) $ 39807 $ 39067 $ 38524 average interest-earning assets $ 2088242 $ 2049093 $ 1970231 less : average markets- based interest-earning assets 493225 510261 504218 average interest- earning assets excluding markets $ 1595017 $ 1538832 $ 1466013 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) 2.23% ( 2.23 % ) net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets 0.97 1.09 1.09 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) 2.63% ( 2.63 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 80 . 2015 compared with 2014 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 740 million in 2015 to $ 39.8 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 56.2 billion to $ 1.6 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2015 predominantly reflected higher average loan balances and lower interest expense on deposits . the increase was partially offset by lower loan yields and lower investment securities net interest income . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest-earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 4 basis points to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for 2014 compared with 2013 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 543 million in 2014 to $ 39.1 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 72.8 billion to $ 1.5 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2014 predominantly reflected higher yields on investment securities , the impact of lower interest expense , and higher average loan balances . the increase was partially offset by lower yields on loans due to the run-off of higher-yielding loans and new originations of lower-yielding loans . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average balance of deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest- earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 9 basis points to 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) for 2014. .
|year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates )|2015|2014|2013|
|net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b )|$ 44620|$ 44619|$ 44016|
|less : markets-based net interest income|4813|5552|5492|
|net interest income excluding markets ( a )|$ 39807|$ 39067|$ 38524|
|average interest-earning assets|$ 2088242|$ 2049093|$ 1970231|
|less : average markets-based interest-earning assets|493225|510261|504218|
|average interest-earning assets excluding markets|$ 1595017|$ 1538832|$ 1466013|
|net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis|2.14% ( 2.14 % )|2.18% ( 2.18 % )|2.23% ( 2.23 % )|
|net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets|0.97|1.09|1.09|
|net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets|2.50% ( 2.50 % )|2.54% ( 2.54 % )|2.63% ( 2.63 % )|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 82 jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report net interest income excluding markets-based activities ( formerly core net interest income ) in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of cib 2019s markets-based net interest income and related assets . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . net interest income excluding cib markets-based activities data year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2015 2014 2013 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 44620 $ 44619 $ 44016 less : markets-based net interest income 4813 5552 5492 net interest income excluding markets ( a ) $ 39807 $ 39067 $ 38524 average interest-earning assets $ 2088242 $ 2049093 $ 1970231 less : average markets- based interest-earning assets 493225 510261 504218 average interest- earning assets excluding markets $ 1595017 $ 1538832 $ 1466013 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) 2.23% ( 2.23 % ) net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets 0.97 1.09 1.09 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) 2.63% ( 2.63 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 80 . 2015 compared with 2014 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 740 million in 2015 to $ 39.8 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 56.2 billion to $ 1.6 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2015 predominantly reflected higher average loan balances and lower interest expense on deposits . the increase was partially offset by lower loan yields and lower investment securities net interest income . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest-earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 4 basis points to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for 2014 compared with 2013 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 543 million in 2014 to $ 39.1 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 72.8 billion to $ 1.5 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2014 predominantly reflected higher yields on investment securities , the impact of lower interest expense , and higher average loan balances . the increase was partially offset by lower yields on loans due to the run-off of higher-yielding loans and new originations of lower-yielding loans . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average balance of deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest- earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 9 basis points to 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) for 2014. .
Question: in 2015 what was the percent of the markets-based net interest income to the net interest income 2013 managed basis | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
137.76667 | Context:hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued .
||( in thousands )|
|2018|$ 148716|
|2019|132547|
|2020|119639|
|2021|107400|
|2022|102884|
|thereafter|857454|
|total|$ 1468640|
transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what was the average storage costs from 2015 to 2017 in millions | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.16873 | Context:entering 2006 , industrial packaging earnings are expected to improve significantly in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter 2005 . average price realizations should continue to benefit from price in- creases announced in late 2005 and early 2006 for linerboard and domestic boxes . containerboard sales volumes are expected to drop slightly in the 2006 first quarter due to fewer shipping days , but growth is antici- pated for u.s . converted products due to stronger de- mand . costs for wood , freight and energy are expected to remain stable during the 2006 first quarter , approach- ing fourth quarter 2005 levels . the continued im- plementation of the new supply chain model at our mills during 2006 will bring additional efficiency improve- ments and cost savings . on a global basis , the european container operating results are expected to improve as a result of targeted market growth and cost reduction ini- tiatives , and we will begin seeing further contributions from our recent moroccan box plant acquisition and from international paper distribution limited . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and gen- eral economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of con- sumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging 2019s 2005 net sales of $ 2.6 bil- lion were flat compared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) higher com- pared with 2003 . operating profits in 2005 declined 22% ( 22 % ) from 2004 and 31% ( 31 % ) from 2003 as improved price realizations ( $ 46 million ) and favorable operations in the mills and converting operations ( $ 60 million ) could not overcome the impact of cost increases in energy , wood , polyethylene and other raw materials ( $ 120 million ) , lack-of-order downtime ( $ 13 million ) and other costs ( $ 8 million ) . consumer packaging in millions 2005 2004 2003 .
|in millions|2005|2004|2003|
|sales|$ 2590|$ 2605|$ 2465|
|operating profit|$ 126|$ 161|$ 183|
bleached board net sales of $ 864 million in 2005 were up from $ 842 million in 2004 and $ 751 million in 2003 . the effects in 2005 of improved average price realizations and mill operating improvements were not enough to offset increased energy , wood , polyethylene and other raw material costs , a slight decrease in volume and increased lack-of-order downtime . bleached board mills took 100000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 65000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 40000 tons of downtime in 2004 , none of which was market related . during 2005 , restructuring and manufacturing improvement plans were implemented to reduce costs and improve market alignment . foodservice net sales were $ 437 million in 2005 compared with $ 480 million in 2004 and $ 460 million in 2003 . average sales prices in 2005 were up 3% ( 3 % ) ; how- ever , domestic cup and lid sales volumes were 5% ( 5 % ) lower than in 2004 as a result of a rationalization of our cus- tomer base early in 2005 . operating profits in 2005 in- creased 147% ( 147 % ) compared with 2004 , largely due to the settlement of a lawsuit and a favorable adjustment on the sale of the jackson , tennessee bag plant . excluding unusual items , operating profits were flat as improved price realizations offset increased costs for bleached board and resin . shorewood net sales of $ 691 million in 2005 were essentially flat with net sales in 2004 of $ 687 million , but were up compared with $ 665 million in 2003 . operating profits in 2005 were 17% ( 17 % ) above 2004 levels and about equal to 2003 levels . improved margins resulting from a rationalization of the customer mix and the effects of improved manufacturing operations , including the successful start up of our south korean tobacco operations , more than offset cost increases for board and paper and the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates in canada . beverage packaging net sales were $ 597 million in 2005 , $ 595 million in 2004 and $ 589 million in 2003 . average sale price realizations increased 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 , principally the result of the pass-through of higher raw material costs , although the implementation of price increases continues to be impacted by com- petitive pressures . operating profits were down 14% ( 14 % ) compared with 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) compared with 2003 , due principally to increases in board and resin costs . in 2006 , the bleached board market is expected to remain strong , with sales volumes increasing in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2005 for both folding carton and cup products . improved price realizations are also expected for bleached board and in our foodservice and beverage packaging businesses , al- though continued high costs for energy , wood and resin will continue to negatively impact earnings . shorewood should continue to benefit from strong asian operations and from targeted sales volume growth in 2006 . capital improvements and operational excellence initiatives undertaken in 2005 should benefit operating results in 2006 for all businesses . distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in many business segments . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in general economic conditions , although the .
Question: was percentage of consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales in 2005? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.17087 | Context:american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements u.s . acquisitions 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company acquired 548 towers through multiple acquisitions in the united states for an aggregate purchase price of $ 329.3 million and contingent consideration of approximately $ 4.6 million . the acquisition of these towers is consistent with the company 2019s strategy to expand in selected geographic areas and have been accounted for as business combinations . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation .
||purchase price allocation|
|non-current assets|$ 442|
|property and equipment|64564|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|260898|
|current liabilities|-360 ( 360 )|
|long-term liabilities|-7802 ( 7802 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 317742|
|goodwill ( 2 )|16131|
( 1 ) consists of customer relationships of approximately $ 205.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 55.5 million . the customer relationships and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 20 years . ( 2 ) goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the domestic rental and management segment . the allocation of the purchase price will be finalized upon completion of analyses of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed . south africa acquisition 2014on november 4 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with cell c ( pty ) limited to purchase up to approximately 1400 existing towers , and up to 1800 additional towers that either are under construction or will be constructed , for an aggregate purchase price of up to approximately $ 430 million . the company anticipates closing the purchase of up to 1400 existing towers during 2011 , subject to customary closing conditions . other transactions coltel transaction 2014on september 3 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the exclusive use rights for towers in colombia from colombia telecomunicaciones s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccoltel 201d ) until 2023 , when ownership of the towers will transfer to the company at no additional cost . pursuant to that agreement , the company completed the purchase of exclusive use rights for 508 towers for an aggregate purchase price of $ 86.8 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . the company expects to complete the purchase of the exclusive use rights for an additional 180 towers by the end of 2011 , subject to customary closing conditions . the transaction has been accounted for as a capital lease , with the aggregated purchase price being allocated to property and equipment and non-current assets . joint venture with mtn group 2014on december 6 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group limited ( 201cmtn group 201d ) to establish a joint venture in ghana ( 201ctowerco ghana 201d ) . towerco ghana , which will be managed by the company , will be owned by a holding company of which a wholly owned american tower subsidiary will hold a 51% ( 51 % ) share and a wholly owned mtn group subsidiary ( 201cmtn ghana 201d ) will hold a 49% ( 49 % ) share . the transaction involves the sale of up to 1876 of mtn ghana 2019s existing sites to .
Question: based on the agreement what was the average price completed the purchase of exclusive use rights to the towers in 2010 in millions | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
1.78788 | Context:item a01b . unresolved staff comments e*trade 2018 10-k | page 24 item a02 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december a031 , 2018 is shown in the following table . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or space that is part of a facility restructuring. .
|location|approximate square footage|
|alpharetta georgia|236000|
|jersey city new jersey|132000|
|arlington virginia|107000|
|sandy utah|85000|
|menlo park california|63000|
|denver colorado|58000|
|chicago illinois|46000|
|new york new york|31000|
all facilities are leased at december a031 , 2018 . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 regional financial centers , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet . item a03 . legal proceedings information in response to this item can be found under the heading litigation matters in note 21 2014 commitments , contingencies and other regulatory matters in this annual report and is incorporated by reference into this item . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the ratio of the square footage in alpharetta georgia to jersey city new jersey as of december 2018 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
59054.0 | Context:mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) equity awards was $ 30333 , $ 20726 and $ 19828 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the income tax benefit related to options exercised during 2009 was $ 7545 . the additional paid-in capital balance attributed to the equity awards was $ 197350 , $ 135538 and $ 114637 as of december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . on july 18 , 2006 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the mastercard incorporated 2006 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( the 201cdirector plan 201d ) . the director plan provides for awards of deferred stock units ( 201cdsus 201d ) to each director of the company who is not a current employee of the company . there are 100 shares of class a common stock reserved for dsu awards under the director plan . during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , the company granted 7 dsus , 4 dsus and 8 dsus , respectively . the fair value of the dsus was based on the closing stock price on the new york stock exchange of the company 2019s class a common stock on the date of grant . the weighted average grant-date fair value of dsus granted during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 168.18 , $ 284.92 and $ 139.27 , respectively . the dsus vested immediately upon grant and will be settled in shares of the company 2019s class a common stock on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant . accordingly , the company recorded general and administrative expense of $ 1151 , $ 1209 and $ 1051 for the dsus for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for dsus was $ 410 , $ 371 and $ 413 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 18 . commitments at december 31 , 2009 , the company had the following future minimum payments due under non-cancelable agreements : capital leases operating leases sponsorship , licensing & .
||total|capital leases|operating leases|sponsorship licensing & other|
|2010|$ 283987|$ 7260|$ 25978|$ 250749|
|2011|146147|4455|17710|123982|
|2012|108377|3221|15358|89798|
|2013|59947|36838|10281|12828|
|2014|13998|2014|8371|5627|
|thereafter|25579|2014|22859|2720|
|total|$ 638035|$ 51774|$ 100557|$ 485704|
included in the table above are capital leases with imputed interest expense of $ 7929 and a net present value of minimum lease payments of $ 43845 . in addition , at december 31 , 2009 , $ 63616 of the future minimum payments in the table above for leases , sponsorship , licensing and other agreements was accrued . consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 39586 , $ 42905 and $ 35614 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . consolidated lease expense for automobiles , computer equipment and office equipment was $ 9137 , $ 7694 and $ 7679 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in january 2003 , mastercard purchased a building in kansas city , missouri for approximately $ 23572 . the building is a co-processing data center which replaced a back-up data center in lake success , new york . during 2003 , mastercard entered into agreements with the city of kansas city for ( i ) the sale-leaseback of the building and related equipment which totaled $ 36382 and ( ii ) the purchase of municipal bonds for the same amount .
Question: what was the average rental expense from 2007 to 2009 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
1.05631 | Context:2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .
|millions of dollars|2009|2008|2007|
|cash provided by operating activities|$ 3234|$ 4070|$ 3277|
|cash used in investing activities|-2175 ( 2175 )|-2764 ( 2764 )|-2426 ( 2426 )|
|dividends paid|-544 ( 544 )|-481 ( 481 )|-364 ( 364 )|
|free cash flow|$ 515|$ 825|$ 487|
2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to .
Question: what percent of free cash flow was distributed to shareholders in 2009? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.08704 | Context:5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: .
||2018|2017|2016|
|risk free rate|1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )|0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )|0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )|
|dividend yield|3.884% ( 3.884 % )|3.573% ( 3.573 % )|3.634% ( 3.634 % )|
|volatility|15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )|20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )|18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )|
|requisite service period|3 years|3 years|3 years|
the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .
Question: what was the percent of the change in the in the dividend yield from 2017 to 2018 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.05768 | Context:ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : .
|2008|$ 193101|
|2009|605762|
|2010|282138|
|2011|303191|
|2012|527221|
|thereafter|1436263|
|total maturities|3347676|
|unamortized fair value adjustment|19669|
|unamortized commission fees and discounts|-6846 ( 6846 )|
|senior notes payable and other debt|$ 3360499|
.
Question: what was the percent of the maturities as of 2008 as part of the total maturities | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
9.99 | Context:part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 8 , 2006 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 12.59 . holders there were approximately 114 holders of record of our common stock as of march 8 , 2006 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of -pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
||high|low|
|november 5 2004 to december 31 2004|$ 24.41|$ 12.75|
|january 1 2005 to march 31 2005|$ 15.95|$ 9.64|
|april 1 2005 to june 30 2005|$ 13.87|$ 9.83|
|july 1 2005 to september 30 2005|$ 14.09|$ 9.99|
|october 1 2005 to december 31 2005|$ 13.14|$ 10.64|
.
Question: for the period july 1 2005 to september 30 2005 , what was the lowest share price> | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
25.7 | Context:item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2013|$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )|$ 27.9|
|2012|-27.5 ( 27.5 )|28.4|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: in 2013 what was the net amount that was received from increasing and decreasing interest rates , including interest income? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.07331 | Context:12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .
|in millions of dollars|december 31 , 2017|december 31 , 2016|
|receivables from customers|$ 19215|$ 10374|
|receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations|19169|18513|
|total brokerage receivables ( 1 )|$ 38384|$ 28887|
|payables to customers|$ 38741|$ 37237|
|payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations|22601|19915|
|total brokerage payables ( 1 )|$ 61342|$ 57152|
payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .
Question: what was the percentage increased in the total brokerage payables from 2016 to 2017 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.6 | Context:between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of 7.8 percent compared to an expected rate of return of 6.9 percent ) . 2022 2015 net mark-to-market loss of $ 179 million - primarily due to the difference between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of ( 2.0 ) percent compared to an expected rate of return of 7.4 percent ) which was partially offset by higher discount rates at the end of 2015 compared to 2014 . the net mark-to-market losses were in the following results of operations line items: .
|( millions of dollars )|years ended december 31 , 2017|years ended december 31 , 2016|years ended december 31 , 2015|
|cost of goods sold|$ -29 ( 29 )|$ 476|$ 122|
|selling general and administrative expenses|244|382|18|
|research and development expenses|86|127|39|
|total|$ 301|$ 985|$ 179|
effective january 1 , 2018 , we adopted new accounting guidance issued by the fasb related to the presentation of net periodic pension and opeb costs . this guidance requires that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost . service cost is required to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period . the other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside the subtotal for income from operations . as a result , components of pension and opeb costs , other than service costs , will be reclassified from operating costs to other income/expense . this change will be applied retrospectively to prior years . in the fourth quarter of 2017 , the company reviewed and made changes to the mortality assumptions primarily for our u.s . pension plans which resulted in an overall increase in the life expectancy of plan participants . as of december 31 , 2017 these changes resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 290 million . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company adopted new mortality improvement scales released by the soa for our u.s . pension and opeb plans . as of december 31 , 2016 , this resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 200 million . in the first quarter of 2017 , we announced the closure of our gosselies , belgium facility . this announcement impacted certain employees that participated in a defined benefit pension plan and resulted in a curtailment and the recognition of termination benefits . in march 2017 , we recognized a net loss of $ 20 million for the curtailment and termination benefits . in addition , we announced the decision to phase out production at our aurora , illinois , facility , which resulted in termination benefits of $ 9 million for certain hourly employees that participate in our u.s . hourly defined benefit pension plan . beginning in 2016 , we elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows . service and interest costs in 2017 and 2016 were lower by $ 140 million and $ 180 million , respectively , under the new method than they would have been under the previous method . this change had no impact on our year-end defined benefit pension and opeb obligations or our annual net periodic benefit cost as the lower service and interest costs were entirely offset in the actuarial loss ( gain ) reported for the respective year . we expect our total defined benefit pension and opeb expense ( excluding the impact of mark-to-market gains and losses ) to decrease approximately $ 80 million in 2018 . this decrease is primarily due to a higher expected return on plan assets as a result of a higher asset base in 2018 . in general , our strategy for both the u.s . and the non-u.s . pensions includes ongoing alignment of our investments to our liabilities , while reducing risk in our portfolio . for our u.s . pension plans , our year-end 2017 asset allocation was 34 a0percent equities , 62 a0percent fixed income and 4 percent other . our current u.s . pension target asset allocation is 30 percent equities and 70 percent fixed income . the target allocation is revisited periodically to ensure it reflects our overall objectives . the u.s . plans are rebalanced to plus or minus 5 percentage points of the target asset allocation ranges on a monthly basis . the year-end 2017 asset allocation for our non-u.s . pension plans was 40 a0percent equities , 53 a0percent fixed income , 4 a0percent real estate and 3 percent other . the 2017 weighted-average target allocations for our non-u.s . pension plans was 38 a0percent equities , 54 a0percent fixed income , 5 a0percent real estate and 3 a0percent other . the target allocations for each plan vary based upon local statutory requirements , demographics of the plan participants and funded status . the frequency of rebalancing for the non-u.s . plans varies depending on the plan . contributions to our pension and opeb plans were $ 1.6 billion and $ 329 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2017 contributions include a $ 1.0 billion discretionary contribution made to our u.s . pension plans in december 2017 . we expect to make approximately $ 365 million of contributions to our pension and opeb plans in 2018 . we believe we have adequate resources to fund both pension and opeb plans . 48 | 2017 form 10-k .
Question: what were mandatory contributions to our pension and opeb plans in billions in 2017? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
6.78 | Context:part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .
|2003 first quarter|high $ 4.04|low $ 2.72|2002 first quarter|high $ 17.84|low $ 4.11|
|second quarter|8.37|3.75|second quarter|9.17|3.55|
|third quarter|7.70|5.91|third quarter|4.61|1.56|
|fourth quarter|9.50|7.57|fourth quarter|3.57|0.95|
holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .
Question: what was the difference in the low price for the first quarter of 2003 and the high price for the fourth quarter of 2003? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.11944 | Context:dividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock . on february 16 , 2007 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2007 dividend in the amount of $ 0.475 per share , payable on march 30 , 2007 to stockholders of record on march 20 , 2007 . we expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2007 . our board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis . because the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above . please see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy . our stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan . see 201cnote 15 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k . director and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table summarizes information with respect to our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2006 : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 ) . . 1118051 $ 24.27 8373727 equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders ( 2 ) . . 18924 n/a 1145354 .
|plan category|( a ) number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants andrights|( b ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights|( c ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a )|
|equity compensation plans approved by stockholders ( 1 )|1118051|$ 24.27|8373727|
|equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders ( 2 )|18924|n/a|1145354|
|total|1136975|$ 24.27|9519081|
( 1 ) these plans consist of ( i ) the 1987 incentive compensation program ( employee plan ) ; ( ii ) the theratx , incorporated 1996 stock option/stock issuance plan ; ( iii ) the 2000 incentive compensation plan ( employee plan ) ( formerly known as the 1997 incentive compensation plan ) ; ( iv ) the 2004 stock plan for directors ( which amended and restated the 2000 stock option plan for directors ( formerly known as the 1997 stock option plan for non-employee directors ) ) ; ( v ) the employee and director stock purchase plan ; ( vi ) the 2006 incentive plan ; and ( vii ) the 2006 stock plan for directors . ( 2 ) these plans consist of ( i ) the common stock purchase plan for directors , under which our non-employee directors may receive common stock in lieu of directors 2019 fees , ( ii ) the nonemployee director deferred stock compensation plan , under which our non-employee directors may receive units convertible on a one-for-one basis into common stock in lieu of director fees , and ( iii ) the executive deferred stock compensation plan , under which our executive officers may receive units convertible on a one-for-one basis into common stock in lieu of compensation. .
Question: what is the percentage of number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights compared to number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.04117 | Context:results of operations and the estimated fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition . pro forma results of operations for the business combinations completed during fiscal 2016 have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions , individually and in the aggregate , would not have been material to cadence 2019s financial results . the fair values of acquired intangible assets and assumed liabilities were determined using significant inputs that are not observable in the market . for an additional description of these fair value calculations , see note 16 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements . a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s president , chief executive officer , or ceo , and director , owned less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the acquired companies , and mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transaction and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transaction . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transaction . a financial advisor provided a fairness opinion to cadence in connection with the transaction . 2014 acquisitions during fiscal 2014 , cadence acquired jasper design automation , inc. , or jasper , a privately held provider of formal analysis solutions based in mountain view , california . the acquired technology complements cadence 2019s existing system design and verification platforms . total cash consideration for jasper , after taking into account adjustments for certain costs , and cash held by jasper at closing of $ 28.7 million , was $ 139.4 million . cadence will also make payments to certain employees through the third quarter of fiscal 2017 subject to continued employment and other conditions . cadence also completed two other business combinations during fiscal 2014 for total cash consideration of $ 27.5 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 2.1 million . acquisition-related transaction costs transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 1.1 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 3.7 million during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 8 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2016 and 2015 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) .
||gross carryingamount ( in thousands )|
|balance as of january 3 2015|$ 553767|
|effect of foreign currency translation|-1995 ( 1995 )|
|balance as of january 2 2016|551772|
|goodwill resulting from acquisitions|23579|
|effect of foreign currency translation|-2587 ( 2587 )|
|balance as of december 31 2016|$ 572764|
cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
Question: what portion of the total carrying amount is generated by the goodwill from acquisitions? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.375 | Context:american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 19 . subsequent events 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes and warrants offering 2014in january 2003 , the company issued 808000 units , each consisting of ( 1 ) $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( ati notes ) and ( 2 ) a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock of the company , for gross proceeds of $ 420.0 million . the gross offering proceeds were allocated between the ati notes ( $ 367.4 million ) and the fair value of the warrants ( $ 52.6 million ) . net proceeds from the offering aggregated approximately $ 397.0 million and were or will be used for the purposes described below under amended and restated loan agreement . the ati notes accrue no cash interest . instead , the accreted value of each ati note will increase between the date of original issuance and maturity ( august 1 , 2008 ) at a rate of 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) per annum . the 808000 warrants that were issued together with the ati notes each represent the right to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock at $ 0.01 per share . the warrants are exercisable at any time on or after january 29 , 2006 and will expire on august 1 , 2008 . as of the issuance date , the warrants represented approximately 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( assuming exercise of all warrants ) . the indenture governing the ati notes contains covenants that , among other things , limit the ability of the issuer subsidiary and its guarantors to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness , create liens , pay dividends or make other equity distributions , enter into agreements restricting the restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability to pay dividends , purchase or redeem capital stock , make investments and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies . the ati notes rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness , including all indebtedness outstanding under the credit facilities , and are structurally senior in right of payment to all existing and future indebtedness of the company . amended and restated loan agreement 2014on february 21 , 2003 , the company completed an amendment to its credit facilities . the amendment provides for the following : 2022 prepayment of a portion of outstanding term loans . the company agreed to prepay an aggregate of $ 200.0 million of the term loans outstanding under the credit facilities from a portion of the net proceeds of the ati notes offering completed in january 2003 . this prepayment consisted of a $ 125.0 million prepayment of the term loan a and a $ 75.0 million prepayment of the term loan b , each to be applied to reduce future scheduled principal payments . giving effect to the prepayment of $ 200.0 million of term loans under the credit facility and the issuance of the ati notes as discussed above as well as the paydown of debt from net proceeds of the sale of mtn ( $ 24.5 million in february 2003 ) , the company 2019s aggregate principal payments of long- term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2003|$ 268496|
|2004|131262|
|2005|195082|
|2006|538479|
|2007|1065437|
|thereafter|1408783|
|total|$ 3607539|
.
Question: of the amount agreed by the company for the prepayment on the term loans what was the percentage for the term loan a | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
140.15 | Context:state street bank issuances : state street bank currently has authority to issue up to an aggregate of $ 1 billion of subordinated fixed-rate , floating-rate or zero-coupon bank notes with a maturity of five to fifteen years . with respect to the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) subordinated bank notes due 2018 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the notes on april 15 and october 15 of each year , and the notes qualify as tier 2 capital under regulatory capital guidelines . with respect to the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) subordinated notes due 2016 and the floating-rate subordinated notes due 2015 , state street bank is required to make semi-annual interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the 5.30% ( 5.30 % ) notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year beginning in july 2006 , and quarterly interest payments on the outstanding principal balance of the floating-rate notes on march 8 , june 8 , september 8 and december 8 of each year beginning in march 2006 . the notes qualify as tier 2 capital under regulatory capital guidelines . note 10 . commitments and contingencies off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets and standby letters of credit . the total potential loss on unfunded commitments , standby and commercial letters of credit and securities finance indemnifications is equal to the total contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to unrelated third parties. .
|( in millions )|2006|2005|
|indemnified securities financing|$ 506032|$ 372863|
|liquidity asset purchase agreements|30251|24412|
|unfunded commitments to extend credit|16354|14403|
|standby letters of credit|4926|5027|
on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . in certain circumstances , we may indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities totaling $ 527.37 billion and $ 387.22 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit and liquidity asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of the commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . in the normal course of business , we provide liquidity and credit enhancements to asset-backed commercial paper programs , or 201cconduits . 201d these conduits are more fully described in note 11 . the commercial paper issuances and commitments of the conduits to provide funding are supported by liquidity asset purchase agreements and backup liquidity lines of credit , the majority of which are provided by us . in addition , we provide direct credit support to the conduits in the form of standby letters of credit . our commitments under liquidity asset purchase agreements and backup lines of credit totaled $ 23.99 billion at december 31 , 2006 , and are included in the preceding table . our commitments under seq 83 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-dm_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:10:46 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of cash and u.s . government securities held as collateral for indemnified securities on loans in 2006? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.10134 | Context:e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. .
||2007|2006|2005|
|net debt to net capital at the end of the year|54.6% ( 54.6 % )|49.4% ( 49.4 % )|51.5% ( 51.5 % )|
|effect of subtracting cash from debt|3.0% ( 3.0 % )|2.9% ( 2.9 % )|1.6% ( 1.6 % )|
|debt to capital at the end of the year|57.6% ( 57.6 % )|52.3% ( 52.3 % )|53.1% ( 53.1 % )|
net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .
Question: what is the growth rate of debt to capital ratio from 2006 to 2007? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.16175 | Context:the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) .
|2007|$ 117|
|2008|140|
|2009|203|
|2010|263|
|2011|328|
|next 5 years|2731|
1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .
Question: what is the percentage change in the capital and statutory surplus from 2005 to 2006? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
3.08158 | Context:item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations results of operations 2013 highmount 2013 ( continued ) highmount 2019s revenues , profitability and future growth depend substantially on natural gas and ngl prices and highmount 2019s ability to increase its natural gas and ngl production . in recent years , there has been significant price volatility in natural gas and ngl prices due to a variety of factors highmount cannot control or predict . these factors , which include weather conditions , political and economic events , and competition from other energy sources , impact supply and demand for natural gas , which determines the pricing . in recent months , natural gas prices decreased significantly due largely to increased onshore natural gas production , plentiful levels of working gas in storage and reduced commercial demand . the increase in the onshore natural gas production was due largely to increased production from 201cunconventional 201d sources of natural gas such as shale gas , coalbed methane , tight sandstones and methane hydrates , made possible in recent years by modern technology in creating extensive artificial fractures around well bores and advances in horizontal drilling technology . other key factors contributing to the softness of natural gas prices likely included a lower level of industrial demand for natural gas , as a result of the ongoing economic downturn , and relatively low crude oil prices . due to industry conditions , in february of 2009 highmount elected to terminate contracts for five drilling rigs at its permian basin property in the sonora , texas area . the estimated fee payable to the rig contractor for exercising this early termination right will be approximately $ 23 million . in light of these developments , highmount will reduce 2009 production volumes through decreased drilling activity . in addition , the price highmount realizes for its gas production is affected by highmount 2019s hedging activities as well as locational differences in market prices . highmount 2019s decision to increase its natural gas production is dependent upon highmount 2019s ability to realize attractive returns on its capital investment program . returns are affected by commodity prices , capital and operating costs . highmount 2019s operating income , which represents revenues less operating expenses , is primarily affected by revenue factors , but is also a function of varying levels of production expenses , production and ad valorem taxes , as well as depreciation , depletion and amortization ( 201cdd&a 201d ) expenses . highmount 2019s production expenses represent all costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities . the principal components of highmount 2019s production expenses are , among other things , direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits , repairs and maintenance , materials , supplies and fuel . in general , during 2008 highmount 2019s labor costs increased primarily due to higher salary levels and continued upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the increased competition for skilled workers . in response to these market conditions , in 2008 highmount implemented retention programs , including increases in compensation . production expenses during 2008 were also affected by increases in the cost of fuel , materials and supplies . the higher cost environment discussed above continued during all of 2008 . during the fourth quarter of 2008 the price of natural gas declined significantly while operating expenses remained high . this environment of low commodity prices and high operating expenses continued until december of 2008 when highmount began to see evidence of decreasing operating expenses and drilling costs . highmount 2019s production and ad valorem taxes increase primarily when prices of natural gas and ngls increase , but they are also affected by changes in production , as well as appreciated property values . highmount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method , which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties . highmount 2019s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs , as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs , well performance , and revisions due to changing commodity prices . presented below are production and sales statistics related to highmount 2019s operations: .
|year ended december 31|2008|2007 ( a )|
|gas production ( bcf )|78.9|34.0|
|gas sales ( bcf )|72.5|31.4|
|oil production/sales ( mbbls )|351.3|114.0|
|ngl production/sales ( mbbls )|3507.4|1512.9|
|equivalent production ( bcfe )|102.0|43.8|
|equivalent sales ( bcfe )|95.7|41.2|
|average realized prices without hedging results:|||
|gas ( per mcf )|$ 8.25|$ 5.95|
|ngl ( per bbl )|51.26|51.02|
|oil ( per bbl )|95.26|83.37|
|equivalent ( per mcfe )|8.48|6.65|
.
Question: what is the 2008 rate of increase in oil production/sales? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.01147 | Context:note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations|284.5|287.8|299.3|
|weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards|2.3|2.8|3.8|
|weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations|286.8|290.6|303.1|
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) . consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting . under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales . accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s . gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value . accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million . the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows . in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office . the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes . the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach . divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange . the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos . as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock . we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction . based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares . in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses . the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 . the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what is the percentage change in weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations from 2017 to 2018? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.14358 | Context:the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments are extended to investment-grade and non-investment-grade corporate borrowers . commitments to investment-grade corporate borrowers are principally used for operating liquidity and general corporate purposes . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with contingent acquisition financing and other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . commitments that are extended for contingent acquisition financing are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 25.70 billion and $ 26.88 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 550 million and $ 768 million of protection had been provided as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of retail and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.09 billion and $ 2.10 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements for office space expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . $ in millions december 2017 .
|$ in millions|as of december 2017|
|2018|$ 299|
|2019|282|
|2020|262|
|2021|205|
|2022|145|
|2023 - thereafter|771|
|total|$ 1964|
rent charged to operating expenses was $ 273 million for 2017 , $ 244 million for 2016 and $ 249 million for 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 163 .
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments are due in 2019? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
26938.0 | Context:the city council 2019s advisors and entergy new orleans . in february 2018 the city council approved the settlement , which deferred cost recovery to the 2018 entergy new orleans rate case , but also stated that an adjustment for 2018-2019 ami costs can be filed in the rate case and that , for all subsequent ami costs , the mechanism to be approved in the 2018 rate case will allow for the timely recovery of such costs . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt and preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2017|2016|2015|2014|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 12723|$ 14215|$ 15794|$ 442|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 1.4 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 150 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and securities issuances . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized not only by the ferc , but also by the city council , and the current city council authorization extends through june 2018 . entergy new orleans , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the algiers asset transfer . as a provision of the settlement agreement approved by the city council in may 2015 providing for the algiers asset transfer , it was agreed that , with limited exceptions , no action may be taken with respect to entergy new orleans 2019s base rates until rates are implemented .
Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2017 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.03302 | Context:table of contents marketaxess holdings inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of this standard had no material effect on the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of operations . reclassifications certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years 2019 financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation . such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income . on march 5 , 2008 , the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of greenline financial technologies , inc . ( 201cgreenline 201d ) , an illinois-based provider of integration , testing and management solutions for fix-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income , equity and other exchange-based products , and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of tradehelm , inc. , a delaware corporation that was spun-out from greenline immediately prior to the acquisition . the acquisition of greenline broadens the range of technology services that the company offers to institutional financial markets , provides an expansion of the company 2019s client base , including global exchanges and hedge funds , and further diversifies the company 2019s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products . the results of operations of greenline are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was $ 41.1 million , comprised of $ 34.7 million in cash , 725923 shares of common stock valued at $ 5.8 million and $ 0.6 million of acquisition-related costs . in addition , the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $ 3.0 million in cash , subject to greenline attaining certain earn- out targets in 2008 and 2009 . a total of $ 1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target , bringing the aggregate consideration to $ 42.4 million . the 2009 earn-out target was not met . a total of $ 2.0 million of the purchase price , which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims , was distributed to the sellers in march 2009 . the shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of greenline were released in two equal installments on december 20 , 2008 and december 20 , 2009 , respectively . the value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period . the purchase price allocation is as follows ( in thousands ) : the amortizable intangibles include $ 3.2 million of acquired technology , $ 3.3 million of customer relationships , $ 1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $ 0.5 million of tradenames . useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles , respectively . the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes . the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the company for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as if the acquisition of greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented , after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments . these pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the company 2019s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented . the pro forma financial information 3 . acquisitions .
|cash|$ 6406|
|accounts receivable|2139|
|amortizable intangibles|8330|
|goodwill|29405|
|deferred tax assets net|3410|
|other assets including investment in tradehelm|1429|
|accounts payable accrued expenses and deferred revenue|-8701 ( 8701 )|
|total purchase price|$ 42418|
.
Question: what percentage of the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.46647 | Context:visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) require the company to redeem all class c ( series ii ) common stock at any time after december 4 , 2008 . therefore , in march 2008 , the company reclassified all class c ( series ii ) common stock at its then fair value of $ 1.125 billion to temporary equity on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding reduction in additional paid-in-capital of $ 1.104 billion and accumulated income ( deficit ) of $ 21 million . the company accreted this stock to its redemption price of $ 1.146 billion , adjusted for dividends and certain other adjustments , on a straight-line basis , from march 2008 to october 2008 through accumulated income . see note 4 2014visa europe for a roll-forward of the balance of class c ( series ii ) common stock . the following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding by class at september 30 , 2008 and the impact of the october 2008 redemptions and subsequent conversion of the remaining outstanding shares of class c ( series iii and series iv ) to class c ( series i ) shares and the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding after the october 2008 redemptions in total and on as converted basis : shares issued and outstanding september 30 , october 2008 redemptions conversion to class c ( series i ) following immediate conversion to class c ( series i ) converted post october redemptions .
|shares issued and outstanding|at september 30 2008|october 2008 redemptions|conversion to class c ( series i )|following immediate conversion to class c ( series i )|as converted post october 2008 redemptions|
|class a common stock|447746261|2014|2014|447746261|447746261|
|class b common stock ( 1 )|245513385|2014|2014|245513385|175367482|
|class c ( series i ) common stock|124097105|2014|27499203|151596308|151596308|
|class c ( series ii ) common stock|79748857|-79748857 ( 79748857 )|2014|2014|2014|
|class c ( series iii ) common stock|62213201|-35263585 ( 35263585 )|-26949616 ( 26949616 )|2014|2014|
|class c ( series iv ) common stock|549587|2014|-549587 ( 549587 )|2014|2014|
|total shares issued and outstanding|959868396|-115012442 ( 115012442 )|2014|844855954|774710051|
( 1 ) all voting and dividend payment rights are based on the number of shares held multiplied by the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date , as discussed below . subsequent to the ipo and as a result of the initial funding of the litigation escrow account , the conversion rate applicable to class b common stock was approximately 0.71 shares of class a common stock for each share of class b common stock . special ipo cash and stock dividends received from cost method investees , net of tax several of the company 2019s cost method investees are also holders of class c ( series i ) common stock and therefore participated in the initial share redemption in march 2008 . certain of these investees elected to declare a special cash dividend to return to their owners on a pro rata basis , the proceeds received as a result of the redemption of a portion of their class c ( series i ) common stock . the dividends represent the return of redemption proceeds . as a result of the company 2019s ownership interest in these cost method investees , the company received approximately $ 21 million of special dividends from these investees during the third fiscal quarter and recorded a receivable of $ 8 million in prepaid and other assets on its consolidated balance sheet at september 30 , 2008 for a dividend declared by these investees during the fourth fiscal quarter . in addition , another investee elected to distribute its entire ownership in the company 2019s class c ( series i ) common stock through the distribution of these shares to its investors on a pro rata basis . as a result , the company received 525443 shares of its own class c ( series i ) common stock during the fourth fiscal quarter and recorded $ 35 million in treasury stock . the value of the treasury stock was calculated based on sales prices of other recent class c ( series i ) stock transactions by other class c .
Question: what portion of the total shares issued and outstanding are class a common stock? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.46206 | Context:notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and credit facilities of certain subsidiaries . the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 857.3 and $ 619.4 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to credit facilities was $ 395.6 and $ 336.5 as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 .
||2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|thereafter|total|
|deferred acquisition payments|$ 76.9|$ 31.6|$ 25.1|$ 8.9|$ 26.9|$ 11.4|$ 180.8|
|redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1|34.7|76.5|32.9|3.9|3.1|4.2|155.3|
|total contingent acquisition payments|$ 111.6|$ 108.1|$ 58.0|$ 12.8|$ 30.0|$ 15.6|$ 336.1|
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2016 . these estimated payments of $ 25.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2017 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2018 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 4 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters in the normal course of business , we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company is in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies . the company confirmed that one of its standalone domestic agencies has been contacted by the department of justice antitrust division for documents regarding video production practices and is cooperating with the government. .
Question: what portion of total contingent acquisition payments is used for redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
9.0 | Context:individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment . specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent . for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance . a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses . the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower . effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio . in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses . if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses . we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods . during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices . this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review . valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit . goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 . judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments . reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment . estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium . management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit . there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units . in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data . the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : .
|reporting unit|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2012|
|retail brokerage|$ 1791.8|$ 1791.8|
|market making|2014|142.4|
|total goodwill|$ 1791.8|$ 1934.2|
.
Question: as of december 31 , 2013 what was the ratio of the goodwill to the other intangible assets net of amortization | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
53.1 | Context:system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2016|2015|2014|2013|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 33809|$ 39926|$ 2373|$ 9223|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .
Question: as of december 31 , 2016 , what is the remaining capacity ( in millions ) for the credit facility scheduled to expire in may 2019? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.38554 | Context:fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) .
||as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )|
|infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg|39|
|infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg|32|
|infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg|27|
research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .
Question: what was the percentage growth of the cash dividends from 2012 to 2014 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.5117 | Context:organizations evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions ( or disposals ) of assets or businesses , with the expectation that fewer will qualify as acquisitions ( or disposals ) of businesses . the asu became effective for us on january 1 , 2018 . these amendments will be applied prospectively from the date of adoption . the effect of asu 2017-01 will be dependent upon the nature of future acquisitions or dispositions that we make , if any . in october 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-16 , 201cincome taxes ( topic 740 ) : intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory . 201d the amendments in this update state that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory , such as intellectual property and property and equipment , when the transfer occurs . we will adopt asu 2016-16 effective january 1 , 2018 with no expected effect on our consolidated financial statements . in june 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-13 , 201cfinancial instruments - credit losses ( topic 326 ) : measurement of credit losses on financial instruments . 201d the amendments in this update change how companies measure and recognize credit impairment for many financial assets . the new expected credit loss model will require companies to immediately recognize an estimate of credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of the financial assets ( including trade receivables ) that are in the scope of the update . the update also made amendments to the current impairment model for held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities and certain guarantees . the guidance will become effective for us on january 1 , 2020 . early adoption is permitted for periods beginning on or after january 1 , 2019 . we are evaluating the effect of asu 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements . in january 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-01 , 201cfinancial instruments - overall ( subtopic 825-10 ) : recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities . 201d the amendments in this update address certain aspects of recognition , measurement , presentation and disclosure of financial instruments . the amendments in this update supersede the guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories ( that is , trading or available-for-sale ) and require equity securities ( including other ownership interests , such as partnerships , unincorporated joint ventures and limited liability companies ) to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through earnings . equity investments that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or result in consolidation of an investee are not included within the scope of this update . the amendments allow equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values to be remeasured at fair value either upon the occurrence of an observable price change or upon identification of an impairment . the amendments also require enhanced disclosures about those investments . we will adopt asu 2016-01 effective january 1 , 2018 with no expected effect on our consolidated financial statements . note 2 2014 acquisitions active network we acquired the communities and sports divisions of athlaction topco , llc ( 201cactive network 201d ) on september 1 , 2017 , for total purchase consideration of $ 1.2 billion . active network delivers cloud-based enterprise software , including payment technology solutions , to event organizers in the communities and health and fitness markets . this acquisition aligns with our technology-enabled , software driven strategy and adds an enterprise software business operating in two additional vertical markets that we believe offer attractive growth fundamentals . the following table summarizes the cash and non-cash components of the consideration transferred on september 1 , 2017 ( in thousands ) : .
|cash consideration paid to active network stockholders|$ 599497|
|fair value of global payments common stock issued to active network stockholders|572079|
|total purchase consideration|$ 1171576|
we funded the cash portion of the total purchase consideration primarily by drawing on our revolving credit facility ( described in 201cnote 7 2014 long-term debt and lines of credit 201d ) . the acquisition-date fair value of 72 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what portion of the total purchase consideration is paid in cash? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
881.7444 | Context:entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2017|$ 17188|
|2018|17188|
|2019|17188|
|2020|17188|
|2021|17188|
|years thereafter|257812|
|total|343752|
|less : amount representing interest|309393|
|present value of net minimum lease payments|$ 34359|
.
Question: what are the implicit interest costs for the 2018 lease payments , in thousands? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.22917 | Context:in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 .
|years ended ( in millions )|dec 302017|dec 312016|dec 262015|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 22110|$ 21808|$ 19018|
|net cash used for investing activities|-15762 ( 15762 )|-25817 ( 25817 )|-8183 ( 8183 )|
|net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities|-8475 ( 8475 )|-5739 ( 5739 )|1912|
|net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents|$ -2127 ( 2127 )|$ -9748 ( 9748 )|$ 12747|
operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the percent of the growth of the capital expenditures from 2016 to 2017 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.09518 | Context:( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions .
|years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )|2015|2014|2013|
|revenue|$ 7426|$ 7834|$ 7789|
|operating income|1506|1648|1540|
|operating margin|20.3% ( 20.3 % )|21.0% ( 21.0 % )|19.8% ( 19.8 % )|
the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what was the percentage change in working capital in 2014 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
333.4 | Context:57 annual report 2010 duke realty corporation | | level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability , either directly or indirectly . level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets , as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability ( other than quoted prices ) , such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability , which are typically based on an entity 2019s own assumptions , as there is little , if any , related market activity . in instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy , the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety . our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability . use of estimates the preparation of the financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period . the most significant estimates , as discussed within our summary of significant accounting policies , pertain to the critical assumptions utilized in testing real estate assets for impairment as well as in estimating the fair value of real estate assets when an impairment event has taken place . actual results could differ from those estimates . ( 3 ) significant acquisitions and dispositions 2010 acquisition of remaining interest in dugan realty , l.l.c . on july 1 , 2010 , we acquired our joint venture partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in dugan realty , l.l.c . ( 201cdugan 201d ) , a real estate joint venture that we had previously accounted for using the equity method , for a payment of $ 166.7 million . dugan held $ 28.1 million of cash at the time of acquisition , which resulted in a net cash outlay of $ 138.6 million . as the result of this transaction we obtained 100% ( 100 % ) of dugan 2019s membership interests . at the date of acquisition , dugan owned 106 industrial buildings totaling 20.8 million square feet and 63 net acres of undeveloped land located in midwest and southeast markets . dugan had a secured loan with a face value of $ 195.4 million due in october 2010 , which was repaid at its scheduled maturity date , and a secured loan with a face value of $ 87.6 million due in october 2012 ( see note 8 ) . the acquisition was completed in order to pursue our strategy to increase our overall allocation to industrial real estate assets . the following table summarizes our allocation of the fair value of amounts recognized for each major class of assets and liabilities ( in thousands ) : .
|real estate assets|$ 502418|
|lease related intangible assets|107155|
|other assets|28658|
|total acquired assets|$ 638231|
|secured debt|$ 285376|
|other liabilities|20243|
|total assumed liabilities|$ 305619|
|fair value of acquired net assets ( represents 100% ( 100 % ) interest )|$ 332612|
fair value of acquired net assets ( represents 100% ( 100 % ) interest ) $ 332612 we previously managed and performed other ancillary services for dugan 2019s properties and , as a result , dugan had no employees of its own and no .
Question: what is the total equity value of dugan realty llc , in million dollar? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.3264 | Context:table of contents finance lease obligations the company has a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 164000 square feet located in alajuela , costa rica , to be used as a manufacturing and office facility . the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs , and in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 , the company was deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period . the building was completed in fiscal 2008 , and the company has recorded the fair market value of the building and land of $ 15.1 million within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets . at september 24 , 2011 , the company has recorded $ 1.6 million in accrued expenses and $ 16.9 million in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet . the term of the lease , which commenced in may 2008 , is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive 5-year terms . at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions . based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment . therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements are being depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years . future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 24 , 2011: .
|fiscal 2012|$ 1616|
|fiscal 2013|1672|
|fiscal 2014|1731|
|fiscal 2015|1791|
|fiscal 2016|1854|
|thereafter|3643|
|total minimum payments|12307|
|less-amount representing interest|-4017 ( 4017 )|
|total|$ 8290|
the company also has to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility . as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs . the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 was deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period . the $ 13.2 million fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet . at september 24 , 2011 , the company has recorded $ 1.0 million in accrued expenses and $ 15.9 million in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet . the term of the lease is for a period of approximately 12 years commencing on november 14 , 2006 with the option to extend for two consecutive 5-year terms . based on its asc 840-40 analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment . therefore , the improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the leasehold improvements are being depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of up to 35 years . source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law . past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .
Question: what portion of the total future minim lease payments is dedicated to interest payments? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.35546 | Context:average cost of debt from 7.1% ( 7.1 % ) to an effective rate of 6.9% ( 6.9 % ) . the inclusion of the offsetting interest income from short-term investments reduced this effective rate to 6.26% ( 6.26 % ) . other financing activities during 2011 included the issuance of approximately 0.3 million shares of treasury stock for various incentive plans and the acquisition of 1.0 million shares of treasury stock primarily related to restricted stock withholding taxes . payments of restricted stock withholding taxes totaled $ 30 million . off-balance sheet variable interest entities information concerning off-balance sheet variable interest entities is set forth in note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 72 through 75 of item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for discussion . liquidity and capital resources outlook for 2014 capital expenditures and long-term debt international paper expects to be able to meet projected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2014 through current cash balances and cash from operations . additionally , the company has existing credit facilities totaling $ 2.0 billion . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2013 . the company 2019s financial covenants require the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $ 9 billion and a total debt-to- capital ratio of less than 60% ( 60 % ) . net worth is defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock plus any cumulative goodwill impairment charges . the calculation also excludes accumulated other comprehensive income/ loss and nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities . the total debt-to-capital ratio is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus net worth . at december 31 , 2013 , international paper 2019s net worth was $ 15.1 billion , and the total-debt- to-capital ratio was 39% ( 39 % ) . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capital structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2013 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 , were as follows: .
|in millions|2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|thereafter|
|maturities of long-term debt ( a )|$ 661|$ 498|$ 571|$ 285|$ 1837|$ 5636|
|debt obligations with right of offset ( b )|2014|2014|5185|2014|2014|2014|
|lease obligations|171|133|97|74|59|162|
|purchase obligations ( c )|3170|770|642|529|453|2404|
|total ( d )|$ 4002|$ 1401|$ 6495|$ 888|$ 2349|$ 8202|
( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to effect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2013 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.2 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.2 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 72 through 75 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . ( c ) includes $ 3.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( d ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 146 million . we consider the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 , to be indefinitely reinvested and , accordingly , no u.s . income taxes have been provided thereon . as of december 31 , 2013 , the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $ 900 million . we do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the united states to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business , including liquidity needs associated with our domestic debt service requirements . pension obligations and funding at december 31 , 2013 , the projected benefit obligation for the company 2019s u.s . defined benefit plans determined under u.s . gaap was approximately $ 2.2 billion higher than the fair value of plan assets . approximately $ 1.8 billion of this amount relates to plans that are subject to minimum funding requirements . under current irs funding rules , the calculation of minimum funding requirements differs from the calculation of the present value of plan benefits ( the projected benefit obligation ) for accounting purposes . in december 2008 , the worker , retiree and employer recovery act of 2008 ( wera ) was passed by the u.s . congress which provided for pension funding relief and technical corrections . funding .
Question: in 2015 what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2013 was attributable to maturities of long-term debt? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.81857 | Context:entergy mississippi may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . a0 a0entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2017|2016|2015|2014|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 1633|$ 10595|$ 25930|$ 644|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2018 . no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december a031 , 2017 . a0 a0in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . as of december a031 , 2017 , a $ 15.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits . entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . formula rate plan in march 2016 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2016 test year filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s projected earned return for the 2016 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth . the filing showed a $ 32.6 million rate increase was necessary to reset entergy mississippi 2019s earned return on common equity to the specified point of adjustment of 9.96% ( 9.96 % ) , within the formula rate plan bandwidth . in june 2016 the mpsc approved entergy mississippi 2019s joint stipulation with the mississippi public utilities staff . the joint stipulation provided for a total revenue increase of $ 23.7 million . the revenue increase includes a $ 19.4 million increase through the formula rate plan , resulting in a return on common equity point of adjustment of 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) . the revenue increase also includes $ 4.3 million in incremental ad valorem tax expenses to be collected through an updated ad valorem tax adjustment rider . the revenue increase and ad valorem tax adjustment rider were effective with the july 2016 bills . in march 2017 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth , resulting in no change in rates . in june 2017 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that entergy .
Question: what was the percent of the joint stipulation approve revenue increase based on formula rates | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.04268 | Context:analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 46.6 million , $ 99.2 million and $ 130.6 million , respectively , and the total amount of proceeds received by the company from exercise of these options during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 61.5 million , $ 122.6 million and $ 200.1 million , respectively . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 29 , 2016 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share .
||restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )|weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share|
|restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015|2698|$ 47.59|
|units granted|1099|$ 51.59|
|restrictions lapsed|-905 ( 905 )|$ 44.30|
|forfeited|-202 ( 202 )|$ 50.34|
|restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 2016|2690|$ 50.11|
as of october 29 , 2016 , there was $ 112.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.4 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ 62.8 million , $ 65.6 million and $ 57.4 million , respectively . common stock repurchases the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 6.2 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2016 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 147.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.4 billion under this program . an additional $ 792.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . as a result of the company's planned acquisition of linear technology corporation , see note 6 , acquisitions , of these notes to consolidated financial statements , the company temporarily suspended the common stock repurchase plan in the third quarter of 2016 . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the total grant-date fair value of shares vested in 2016 compare to 2015? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
3283603.0 | Context:american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2003 , aggregate principal payments of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2004|$ 77622|
|2005|115444|
|2006|365051|
|2007|728153|
|2008|808043|
|thereafter|1650760|
|total cash obligations|3745073|
|accreted value of original issue discount of the ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) notes|-339601 ( 339601 )|
|accreted value of the related warrants|-44247 ( 44247 )|
|balance as of december 31 2003|$ 3361225|
the holders of the company 2019s convertible notes have the right to require the company to repurchase their notes on specified dates prior to their maturity dates in 2009 and 2010 , but the company may pay the purchase price by issuing shares of class a common stock , subject to certain conditions . obligations with respect to the right of the holders to put the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes have been included in the table above as if such notes mature on the date of their put rights in 2006 and 2007 , respectively . ( see note 19. ) 8 . derivative financial instruments under the terms of the credit facilities , the company is required to enter into interest rate protection agreements on at least 50% ( 50 % ) of its variable rate debt . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure is limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2003 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding that include an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at an interest rate of 5% ( 5 % ) ) and expire in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , liabilities related to derivative financial instruments of $ 0.0 million and $ 15.5 million are reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 0.3 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 0.2 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 5.9 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 3.2 million ) into results of operations . during the year ended december 31 , 2002 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 9.1 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 4.9 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 19.5 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 10.5 million ) into results of operations . hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million and a loss of approximately $ 2.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively , which are recorded in loss on investments and other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for those periods . the company records the changes in fair value of its derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges in loss on investments and other expense . the company does not anticipate reclassifying any derivative losses into its statement of operations within the next twelve months , as there are no amounts included in other comprehensive loss as of december 31 , 2003. .
Question: what will be the balance of aggregate principal payments of long-term debt as of december 31 , 2004 , assuming that no new debt is issued? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
38.0 | Context:2003 and for hedging relationships designated after june 30 , 2003 . the adoption of sfas 149 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . in may 2003 , the fasb issued statement of financial accounting standards no . 150 ( 201csfas 150 201d ) , 201caccounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity . 201d sfas 150 requires that certain financial instruments , which under previous guidance were accounted for as equity , must now be accounted for as liabilities . the financial instruments affected include mandatory redeemable stock , certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets and certain obligations that can be settled with shares of stock . sfas 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after may 31 , 2003 , and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after june 15 , 2003 . the adoption of sfas 150 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 2 . acquisitions on may 19 , 2003 , we purchased the technology assets of syntrillium , a privately held company , for $ 16.5 million cash . syntrillium developed , published and marketed digital audio tools including its recording application , cool edit pro ( renamed adobe audition ) , all of which have been added to our existing line of professional digital imaging and video products . by adding adobe audition and the other tools to our existing line of products , we have improved the adobe video workflow and expanded the products and tools available to videographers , dvd authors and independent filmmakers . in connection with the purchase , we allocated $ 13.7 million to goodwill , $ 2.7 million to purchased technology and $ 0.1 million to tangible assets . we also accrued $ 0.1 million in acquisition-related legal and accounting fees . goodwill has been allocated to our digital imaging and video segment . purchased technology is being amortized to cost of product revenue over its estimated useful life of three years . the consolidated financial statements include the operating results of the purchased technology assets from the date of purchase . pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material . in april 2002 , we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of accelio . accelio was a provider of web-enabled solutions that helped customers manage business processes driven by electronic forms . the acquisition of accelio broadened our epaper solution business . at the date of acquisition , the aggregate purchase price was $ 70.2 million , which included the issuance of 1.8 million shares of common stock of adobe , valued at $ 68.4 million , and cash of $ 1.8 million . the following table summarizes the purchase price allocation: .
|cash and cash equivalents|$ 9117|
|accounts receivable net|11906|
|other current assets|4735|
|purchased technology|2710|
|goodwill|77009|
|in-process research and development|410|
|trademarks and other intangible assets|1029|
|total assets acquired|106916|
|current liabilities|-18176 ( 18176 )|
|liabilities recognized in connection with the business combination|-16196 ( 16196 )|
|deferred revenue|-2360 ( 2360 )|
|total liabilities assumed|-36732 ( 36732 )|
|net assets acquired|$ 70184|
we allocated $ 2.7 million to purchased technology and $ 0.4 million to in-process research and development . the amount allocated to purchased technology represented the fair market value of the technology for each of the existing products , as of the date of the acquisition . the purchased technology was assigned a useful life of three years and is being amortized to cost of product revenue . the amount allocated to in-process research and development was expensed at the time of acquisition due to the state of the development of certain products and the uncertainty of the technology . the remaining purchase price was allocated to goodwill and was assigned to our epaper segment ( which was renamed intelligent documents beginning in fiscal 2004 ) . in accordance with sfas no . 142 .
Question: what is the average price of common stock of adobe used in the acquisition of accelio? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
18.59296 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis 82 jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report net interest income excluding markets-based activities ( formerly core net interest income ) in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of cib 2019s markets-based net interest income and related assets . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . net interest income excluding cib markets-based activities data year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2015 2014 2013 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 44620 $ 44619 $ 44016 less : markets-based net interest income 4813 5552 5492 net interest income excluding markets ( a ) $ 39807 $ 39067 $ 38524 average interest-earning assets $ 2088242 $ 2049093 $ 1970231 less : average markets- based interest-earning assets 493225 510261 504218 average interest- earning assets excluding markets $ 1595017 $ 1538832 $ 1466013 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) 2.23% ( 2.23 % ) net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets 0.97 1.09 1.09 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) 2.63% ( 2.63 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 80 . 2015 compared with 2014 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 740 million in 2015 to $ 39.8 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 56.2 billion to $ 1.6 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2015 predominantly reflected higher average loan balances and lower interest expense on deposits . the increase was partially offset by lower loan yields and lower investment securities net interest income . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest-earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 4 basis points to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for 2014 compared with 2013 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 543 million in 2014 to $ 39.1 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 72.8 billion to $ 1.5 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2014 predominantly reflected higher yields on investment securities , the impact of lower interest expense , and higher average loan balances . the increase was partially offset by lower yields on loans due to the run-off of higher-yielding loans and new originations of lower-yielding loans . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average balance of deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest- earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 9 basis points to 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) for 2014. .
|year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates )|2015|2014|2013|
|net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b )|$ 44620|$ 44619|$ 44016|
|less : markets-based net interest income|4813|5552|5492|
|net interest income excluding markets ( a )|$ 39807|$ 39067|$ 38524|
|average interest-earning assets|$ 2088242|$ 2049093|$ 1970231|
|less : average markets-based interest-earning assets|493225|510261|504218|
|average interest-earning assets excluding markets|$ 1595017|$ 1538832|$ 1466013|
|net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis|2.14% ( 2.14 % )|2.18% ( 2.18 % )|2.23% ( 2.23 % )|
|net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets|0.97|1.09|1.09|
|net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets|2.50% ( 2.50 % )|2.54% ( 2.54 % )|2.63% ( 2.63 % )|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 82 jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report net interest income excluding markets-based activities ( formerly core net interest income ) in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of cib 2019s markets-based net interest income and related assets . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . net interest income excluding cib markets-based activities data year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2015 2014 2013 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 44620 $ 44619 $ 44016 less : markets-based net interest income 4813 5552 5492 net interest income excluding markets ( a ) $ 39807 $ 39067 $ 38524 average interest-earning assets $ 2088242 $ 2049093 $ 1970231 less : average markets- based interest-earning assets 493225 510261 504218 average interest- earning assets excluding markets $ 1595017 $ 1538832 $ 1466013 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) 2.23% ( 2.23 % ) net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets 0.97 1.09 1.09 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) 2.63% ( 2.63 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 80 . 2015 compared with 2014 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 740 million in 2015 to $ 39.8 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 56.2 billion to $ 1.6 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2015 predominantly reflected higher average loan balances and lower interest expense on deposits . the increase was partially offset by lower loan yields and lower investment securities net interest income . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest-earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 4 basis points to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for 2014 compared with 2013 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 543 million in 2014 to $ 39.1 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 72.8 billion to $ 1.5 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2014 predominantly reflected higher yields on investment securities , the impact of lower interest expense , and higher average loan balances . the increase was partially offset by lower yields on loans due to the run-off of higher-yielding loans and new originations of lower-yielding loans . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average balance of deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest- earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 9 basis points to 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) for 2014. .
Question: in 2015 what was the percentage change in the net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities from 2014 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
yes | Context:stock-based compensation we did not recognize stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock options granted before 2003 as permitted under accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , 201caccounting for stock issued to employees , 201d ( 201capb 25 201d ) . effective january 1 , 2003 , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 , 201caccounting for stock- based compensation , 201d as amended by sfas 148 , 201caccounting for stock-based compensation-transition and disclosure , 201d prospectively to all employee awards granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . we did not restate results for prior years upon our adoption of sfas 123 . since we adopted sfas 123 prospectively , the cost related to stock- based employee compensation included in net income for 2005 was less than what we would have recognized if we had applied the fair value based method to all awards since the original effective date of the standard . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas 123r 201cshare- based payment , 201d which replaced sfas 123 and superseded apb 25 . sfas 123r requires compensation cost related to share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value . we adopted sfas 123r effective january 1 , 2006 , using the modified prospective method of transition , which required the provisions of sfas 123r be applied to new awards and awards modified , repurchased or cancelled after the effective date . it also required changes in the timing of expense recognition for awards granted to retirement-eligible employees and clarified the accounting for the tax effects of stock awards . the adoption of sfas 123r did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements . the following table shows the effect on 2005 net income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 , as amended , to all outstanding and unvested awards . pro forma net income and earnings per share ( a ) .
|in millions except for per share data|2005|
|net income|$ 1325|
|add : stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income net of related tax effects|54|
|deduct : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards net of related taxeffects|-60 ( 60 )|
|pro forma net income|$ 1319|
|earnings per share||
|basic-as reported|$ 4.63|
|basic-pro forma|4.60|
|diluted-as reported|$ 4.55|
|diluted-pro forma|4.52|
( a ) there were no differences between the gaap basis and pro forma basis of reporting 2006 net income and related per share amounts . see note 18 stock-based compensation plans for additional information . recent accounting pronouncements in december 2007 , the fasb issued sfas 141 ( r ) , 201cbusiness combinations . 201d this statement will require all businesses acquired to be measured at the fair value of the consideration paid as opposed to the cost-based provisions of sfas 141 . it will require an entity to recognize the assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date , measured at their fair values as of that date . sfas 141 ( r ) requires the value of consideration paid including any future contingent consideration to be measured at fair value at the closing date of the transaction . also , restructuring costs and acquisition costs are to be expensed rather than included in the cost of the acquisition . this guidance is effective for all acquisitions with closing dates after january 1 , 2009 . in december 2007 , the fasb issued sfas 160 , 201caccounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements , an amendment of arb no . 51 . 201d this statement amends arb no . 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . it clarifies that a noncontrolling interest should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements . this statement requires expanded disclosures that identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent 2019s owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of an entity . this guidance is effective january 1 , 2009 . we are currently analyzing the standard but do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements . in november 2007 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( 201csab 201d ) no . 109 , that provides guidance regarding measuring the fair value of recorded written loan commitments . the guidance indicates that the expected future cash flows related to servicing should be included in the fair value measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . sab 109 is effective january 1 , 2008 , prospectively to loan commitments issued or modified after that date . the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position . in june 2007 , the aicpa issued statement of position 07-1 , 201cclarification of the scope of the audit and accounting guide 201cinvestment companies 201d and accounting by parent companies and equity method investors for investments in investment companies 201d ( 201csop 07-1 201d ) . this statement provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the aicpa audit and accounting guide investment companies ( 201cguide 201d ) and whether the specialized industry accounting principles of the guide should be retained in the financial statements of a parent company of an investment company or an equity method investor in an .
Question: was diluted-as reported net income per share greater than diluted-pro forma net income per share? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.21795 | Context:an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) .
|( dollars in millions )|2001 ( 1 )|2000|1999 ( 2 )|change 00-01|adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )|
|servicing fees|$ 1624|$ 1425|$ 1170|14% ( 14 % )|14% ( 14 % )|
|management fees|511|581|600|-12 ( 12 )|-5 ( 5 )|
|foreign exchange trading|368|387|306|-5 ( 5 )|-5 ( 5 )|
|processing fees and other|329|272|236|21|21|
|total fee revenue|$ 2832|$ 2665|$ 2312|6|8|
( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what is the percent change of servicing fees between 1999 and 2000? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.14037 | Context:as of december 31 , 2006 , we also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through july 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , our contractual obligations were ( in thousands ) : contractual obligation total less than 1 year 1 2013 3 years 1 2013 5 years more than 5 years .
|contractual obligation|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than 1 year|payments due by period 1 2013 3 years|payments due by period 1 2013 5 years|payments due by period more than 5 years|
|operating leases|$ 37899|$ 5320|$ 10410|$ 9371|$ 12798|
|total|$ 37899|$ 5320|$ 10410|$ 9371|$ 12798|
the above table does not include orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk . interest rate sensitivity our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio . the fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates . under our current policies , we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . we attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk , market risk and reinvestment risk . we mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities . we have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio , and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments . foreign currency exchange risk although most of our revenue is realized in u.s . dollars , some portions of our revenue are realized in foreign currencies . as a result , our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets . the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their respective local currencies . accordingly , the accounts of these operations are translated from the local currency to the u.s . dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date for the balance sheet accounts , and using the average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense accounts . the effects of translation are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders 2019 equity. .
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations are due in less than one year? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
16.0 | Context:the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2008 2007 2006 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2008|2007|2006|
|gasoline|756|791|804|
|distillates|375|377|375|
|propane|22|23|23|
|feedstocks and special products|100|103|106|
|heavy fuel oil|23|29|26|
|asphalt|76|87|91|
|total ( a )|1352|1410|1425|
|average sales price ( dollars per barrel )|$ 109.49|$ 86.53|$ 77.76|
total ( a ) 1352 1410 1425 average sales price ( dollars per barrel ) $ 109.49 $ 86.53 $ 77.76 ( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd in 2006 . on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard . this change resulted in lower refined products sales volumes for 2008 , 2007 and the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under our previous accounting practices . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . gasoline and distillates 2013 we sell gasoline , gasoline blendstocks and no . 1 and no . 2 fuel oils ( including kerosene , jet fuel , diesel fuel and home heating oil ) to wholesale marketing customers in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . we sold 47 percent of our gasoline volumes and 88 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis in 2008 . the demand for gasoline is seasonal in many of our markets , with demand typically being at its highest levels during the summer months . we have blended fuel ethanol into gasoline for over 15 years and began increasing our blending program in 2007 , in part due to federal regulations that require us to use specified volumes of renewable fuels . we blended 57 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2008 , 41 mbpd in 2007 and 35 mbpd in 2006 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and by government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline , which is also blended with ethanol , in parts of our marketing territory , including : chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin and hartford , illinois . we also sell biodiesel-blended diesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . in 2007 , we acquired a 35 percent interest in an entity which owns and operates a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in clymers , indiana . we also own a 50 percent interest in an entity which owns a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in greenville , ohio . the greenville plant began production in february 2008 . both of these facilities are managed by a co-owner . propane 2013 we produce propane at all seven of our refineries . propane is primarily used for home heating and cooking , as a feedstock within the petrochemical industry , for grain drying and as a fuel for trucks and other vehicles . our propane sales are typically split evenly between the home heating market and industrial consumers . feedstocks and special products 2013 we are a producer and marketer of petrochemicals and specialty products . product availability varies by refinery and includes benzene , cumene , dilute naphthalene oil , molten maleic anhydride , molten sulfur , propylene , toluene and xylene . we market propylene , cumene and sulfur domestically to customers in the chemical industry . we sell maleic anhydride throughout the united states and canada . we also have the capacity to produce 1400 tons per day of anode grade coke at our robinson refinery , which is used to make carbon anodes for the aluminum smelting industry , and 2700 tons per day of fuel grade coke at the garyville refinery , which is used for power generation and in miscellaneous industrial applications . in september 2008 , we shut down our lubes facility in catlettsburg , kentucky , and sold from inventory through december 31 , 2008 ; therefore , base oils , aromatic extracts and slack wax are no longer being produced and marketed . in addition , we have recently discontinued production and sales of petroleum pitch and aliphatic solvents . heavy fuel oil 2013 we produce and market heavy oil , also known as fuel oil , residual fuel or slurry at all seven of our refineries . another product of crude oil , heavy oil is primarily used in the utility and ship bunkering ( fuel ) industries , though there are other more specialized uses of the product . we also sell heavy fuel oil at our terminals in wellsville , ohio , and chattanooga , tennessee . asphalt 2013 we have refinery based asphalt production capacity of up to 102 mbpd . we market asphalt through 33 owned or leased terminals throughout the midwest and southeast . we have a broad customer base , including .
Question: what was the increase of blended ethanol into gasoline in 2008 from 2007 , in mmboe? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
464.1 | Context:credit agency ratings our long-term debt credit ratings as of february 16 , 2007 were ba3 with negative outlook , b creditwatch negative and b with negative outlook , as reported by moody 2019s investors service , standard & poor 2019s and fitch ratings , respectively . a downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to access capital and could result in more stringent covenants and higher interest rates under the terms of any new indebtedness . contractual obligations the following summarizes our estimated contractual obligations at december 31 , 2006 , and their effect on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods: .
||2007|2008|2009|2010|2011|thereafter|total|
|long-term debt1|$ 2.6|$ 2.8|$ 257.0|$ 240.9|$ 500.0|$ 1247.9|$ 2251.2|
|interest payments|122.0|116.1|107.1|93.6|75.1|74.1|588.0|
|non-cancelable operating lease obligations|292.3|265.2|237.4|207.9|181.9|861.2|2045.9|
|contingent acquisition payments2|47.2|34.2|20.8|2.5|2.0|3.1|109.8|
contingent acquisition payments 2 47.2 34.2 20.8 2.5 2.0 3.1 109.8 1 holders of our $ 400.0 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes may require us to repurchase their notes for cash at par in march 2008 . these notes will mature in 2023 if not converted or repurchased . 2 we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information . we have not included obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans in the contractual obligations table . our funding policy regarding our funded pension plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the plans 2019 funded status . the funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors , including returns on invested assets , level of market interest rates and levels of voluntary contributions to the plans . declines in long-term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans . for 2007 , we do not expect to contribute to our domestic pension plans , and expect to contribute $ 20.6 to our foreign pension plans . we have not included our deferred tax obligations in the contractual obligations table as the timing of any future payments in relation to these obligations is uncertain . derivatives and hedging activities we periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements and forward contracts to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to mitigate foreign exchange volatility . in may of 2005 , we terminated all of our long-term interest rate swap agreements covering the $ 350.0 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured notes and $ 150.0 of the $ 500.0 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior unsecured notes . in connection with the interest rate swap termination , our net cash receipts were $ 1.1 , which is recorded as an offset to interest expense over the remaining life of the related debt . we have entered into foreign currency transactions in which various foreign currencies are bought or sold forward . these contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions . the changes in value of these forward contracts have been recorded in other income or expense . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had contracts covering $ 0.2 and $ 6.2 , respectively , of notional amount of currency and the fair value of the forward contracts was negligible . the terms of the 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes include two embedded derivative instruments and the terms of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes and our series b preferred stock each include one embedded derivative instrument . the fair value of these derivatives on december 31 , 2006 was negligible . the interpublic group of companies , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : y31000 pcn : 036000000 ***%%pcmsg|36 |00005|yes|no|02/28/2007 01:12|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what is the total expected cash payments for obligations in 2007? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
10986.66667 | Context:annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .
|period|sharespurchased ( a )|averagepricepaid pershare|sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms|maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms|
|october 2008|25394|$ -|-|19201518|
|november 2008|7526|-|-|19201518|
|december 2008|40|-|-|19201518|
|total|32960|$ -|-|19201518|
( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .
Question: what was the average monthly shares repurchased in the 4th quarter 2008? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.6061 | Context:shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|12/31/2015|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 103.88|$ 107.87|$ 158.07|$ 171.77|$ 160.61|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 102.11|$ 118.43|$ 156.77|$ 178.22|$ 180.67|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 100.01|$ 107.49|$ 151.97|$ 190.08|$ 158.23|
.
Question: what is the five year performance of ups class b common stock? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.03264 | Context:note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|
|notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042|$ 5642|$ 5308|
|notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2013 to 2036|1080|1239|
|other debt|478|19|
|total long-term debt|7200|6966|
|less : unamortized discounts|-892 ( 892 )|-506 ( 506 )|
|total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts|6308|6460|
|less : current maturities of long-term debt|-150 ( 150 )|2014|
|total long-term debt net|$ 6158|$ 6460|
in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . on september 9 , 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering consisting of $ 500 million maturing in 2016 with a fixed interest rate of 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) , $ 900 million maturing in 2021 with a fixed interest rate of 3.35% ( 3.35 % ) , and $ 600 million maturing in 2041 with a fixed interest rate of 4.85% ( 4.85 % ) . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the notes is payable on march 15 and september 15 of each year , beginning on march 15 , 2012 . in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . in august 2011 , we entered into a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a group of banks and terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that was to expire in june 2012 . the credit facility expires august 2016 , and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under either facility through december 31 , 2012 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with banking institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2012 or 2011 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 150 million due in 2013 and $ 952 million due in 2016 . interest payments were $ 378 million in 2012 , $ 326 million in 2011 , and $ 337 million in 2010. .
Question: what is the percentage change in interest payments from 2010 to 2011? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.42451 | Context:unit shipments increased 49% ( 49 % ) to 217.4 million units in 2006 , compared to 146.0 million units in 2005 . the overall increase was driven by increased unit shipments of products for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by decreased unit shipments of products for iden technology . for the full year 2006 , unit shipments by the segment increased in all regions . due to the segment 2019s increase in unit shipments outpacing overall growth in the worldwide handset market , which grew approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 , the segment believes that it expanded its global handset market share to an estimated 22% ( 22 % ) for the full year 2006 . in 2006 , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) compared to 2005 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the geographic and product-tier mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 and increased approximately 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . asp is impacted by numerous factors , including product mix , market conditions and competitive product offerings , and asp trends often vary over time . in 2006 , the largest of the segment 2019s end customers ( including sales through distributors ) were china mobile , verizon , sprint nextel , cingular , and t-mobile . these five largest customers accounted for approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2006 . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sold products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 38% ( 38 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 65% ( 65 % ) of the segment 2019s 2006 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were china , brazil , the united kingdom and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol ( 201cip 201d ) video and broadcast network interactive set-tops ( 201cdigital entertainment devices 201d ) , end-to- end video delivery solutions , broadband access infrastructure systems , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment ( 201cbroadband gateways 201d ) to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems ( 201cwireless networks 201d ) , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers . in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 27% ( 27 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 and 26% ( 26 % ) in 2005 . ( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2007 20142006 2006 20142005 years ended december 31 percent change .
|( dollars in millions )|years ended december 31 2007|years ended december 31 2006|years ended december 31 2005|years ended december 31 2007 20142006|2006 20142005|
|segment net sales|$ 10014|$ 9164|$ 9037|9% ( 9 % )|1% ( 1 % )|
|operating earnings|709|787|1232|( 10 ) % ( % )|( 36 ) % ( % )|
segment results 20142007 compared to 2006 in 2007 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) to $ 10.0 billion , compared to $ 9.2 billion in 2006 . the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects a 27% ( 27 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decrease in net sales of wireless networks . net sales of digital entertainment devices increased approximately 43% ( 43 % ) , reflecting increased demand for digital set-tops , including hd/dvr set-tops and ip set-tops , partially offset by a decline in asp due to a product mix shift towards all-digital set-tops . unit shipments of digital entertainment devices increased 51% ( 51 % ) to 15.2 million units . net sales of broadband gateways increased approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , primarily due to higher net sales of data modems , driven by net sales from the netopia business acquired in february 2007 . net sales of wireless networks decreased 1% ( 1 % ) , primarily driven by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , despite competitive pricing pressure . on a geographic basis , the 9% ( 9 % ) increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in all geographic regions . the increase in net sales in north america was driven primarily by higher sales of digital entertainment devices , partially offset by lower net sales of iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in asia was primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower net sales of cdma infrastructure equipment . the increase in net sales in emea was , primarily due to higher net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by lower demand for iden and cdma infrastructure equipment . net sales in north america continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment 2019s business , accounting for 52% ( 52 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2007 , compared to 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2006 . 60 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
Question: what was the percentage change in the operating earnings from 2005 to 2007 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.05007 | Context:the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2009|2008|2007|
|gasoline|830|756|791|
|distillates|357|375|377|
|propane|23|22|23|
|feedstocks and special products|75|100|103|
|heavy fuel oil|24|23|29|
|asphalt|69|76|87|
|total|1378|1352|1410|
|average sales price ( dollars per barrel )|$ 70.86|$ 109.49|$ 86.53|
we sell gasoline , gasoline blendstocks and no . 1 and no . 2 fuel oils ( including kerosene , jet fuel and diesel fuel ) to wholesale marketing customers in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . we sold 51 percent of our gasoline volumes and 87 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis in 2009 . the demand for gasoline is seasonal in many of our markets , with demand typically being at its highest levels during the summer months . we have blended ethanol into gasoline for over 20 years and began expanding our blending program in 2007 , in part due to federal regulations that require us to use specified volumes of renewable fuels . ethanol volumes sold in blended gasoline were 60 mbpd in 2009 , 54 mbpd in 2008 and 40 mbpd in 2007 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and by government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline , which is also blended with ethanol , in parts of our marketing territory , including : chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin , and hartford , illinois . we also sell biodiesel-blended diesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . we produce propane at all seven of our refineries . propane is primarily used for home heating and cooking , as a feedstock within the petrochemical industry , for grain drying and as a fuel for trucks and other vehicles . our propane sales are typically split evenly between the home heating market and industrial consumers . we are a producer and marketer of petrochemicals and specialty products . product availability varies by refinery and includes benzene , cumene , dilute naphthalene oil , molten maleic anhydride , molten sulfur , propylene , toluene and xylene . we market propylene , cumene and sulfur domestically to customers in the chemical industry . we sell maleic anhydride throughout the united states and canada . we also have the capacity to produce 1400 tons per day of anode grade coke at our robinson refinery , which is used to make carbon anodes for the aluminum smelting industry , and 5500 tons per day of fuel grade coke at the garyville refinery , which is used for power generation and in miscellaneous industrial applications . in early 2009 , we discontinued production and sales of petroleum pitch and aliphatic solvents at our catlettsburg refinery . we produce and market heavy residual fuel oil or related components at all seven of our refineries . another product of crude oil , heavy residual fuel oil , is primarily used in the utility and ship bunkering ( fuel ) industries , though there are other more specialized uses of the product . we have refinery based asphalt production capacity of up to 108 mbpd . we market asphalt through 33 owned or leased terminals throughout the midwest and southeast . we have a broad customer base , including approximately 675 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we sell asphalt in the wholesale and cargo markets via rail and barge . we also produce asphalt cements , polymer modified asphalt , emulsified asphalt and industrial asphalts . in 2007 , we acquired a 35 percent interest in an entity which owns and operates a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in clymers , indiana . we also own a 50 percent interest in an entity which owns a 110-million-gallon-per-year ethanol production facility in greenville , ohio . the greenville plant began production in february 2008 . both of these facilities are managed by a co-owner. .
Question: what percentage of refined product sales consisted of asphalt in 2009? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.23 | Context:in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net .
||2002|2001|2000|
|net sales|$ 5742|$ 5363|$ 7983|
|cost of sales|4139|4128|5817|
|gross margin|$ 1603|$ 1235|$ 2166|
|gross margin percentage|28% ( 28 % )|23% ( 23 % )|27% ( 27 % )|
.
Question: what was the lowest gross margin percentage? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.3982 | Context:the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
||12/28/02|1/3/04|1/1/05|12/31/05|12/30/06|12/29/07|
|cadence design systems inc .|100.00|149.92|113.38|138.92|147.04|139.82|
|s & p 500|100.00|128.68|142.69|149.70|173.34|182.87|
|nasdaq composite|100.00|149.75|164.64|168.60|187.83|205.22|
|s & p information technology|100.00|147.23|150.99|152.49|165.32|192.28|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock for the period ending 12/29/07? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.15728 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 89 $ 65.35 billion and $ 87.20 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . table 29 : components of average hqla by type of ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 .
|( in millions )|december 31 2017|december 31 2016|
|excess central bank balances|$ 33584|$ 48407|
|u.s . treasuries|10278|17770|
|other investment securities|13422|15442|
|foreign government|8064|5585|
|total|$ 65348|$ 87204|
with respect to highly liquid short-term investments presented in the preceding table , due to the continued elevated level of client deposits as of december 31 , 2017 , we maintained cash balances in excess of regulatory requirements governing deposits with the federal reserve of approximately $ 33.58 billion at the federal reserve , the ecb and other non-u.s . central banks , compared to $ 48.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . the lower levels of deposits with central banks as of december 31 , 2017 compared to december 31 , 2016 was due to normal deposit volatility . liquid securities carried in our asset liquidity include securities pledged without corresponding advances from the frbb , the fhlb , and other non- u.s . central banks . state street bank is a member of the fhlb . this membership allows for advances of liquidity in varying terms against high-quality collateral , which helps facilitate asset-and-liability management . access to primary , intra-day and contingent liquidity provided by these utilities is an important source of contingent liquidity with utilization subject to underlying conditions . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , we had no outstanding primary credit borrowings from the frbb discount window or any other central bank facility , and as of the same dates , no fhlb advances were outstanding . in addition to the securities included in our asset liquidity , we have significant amounts of other unencumbered investment securities . the aggregate fair value of those securities was $ 66.10 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , compared to $ 54.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . these securities are available sources of liquidity , although not as rapidly deployed as those included in our asset liquidity . measures of liquidity include lcr , nsfr and tlac which are described in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 , business , of this form 10-k . uses of liquidity significant uses of our liquidity could result from the following : withdrawals of client deposits ; draw- downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or to purchase securities , generally provided through lines of credit ; and short-duration advance facilities . such circumstances would generally arise under stress conditions including deterioration in credit ratings . a recurring significant use of our liquidity involves our deployment of hqla from our investment portfolio to post collateral to financial institutions and participants in our agency lending program serving as sources of securities under our enhanced custody program . we had unfunded commitments to extend credit with gross contractual amounts totaling $ 26.49 billion and $ 26.99 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . these amounts do not reflect the value of any collateral . as of december 31 , 2017 , approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year . since many of our commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . information about our resolution planning and the impact actions under our resolution plans could have on our liquidity is provided in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 . business , of this form 10-k . funding deposits we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our average client deposit balances were denominated in u.s . dollars , approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in eur , 10% ( 10 % ) in gbp and 10% ( 10 % ) in all other currencies . for the past several years , we have frequently experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of each fiscal quarter or the end of the fiscal year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances. .
Question: what portion of the total investments is held in u.s . treasuries as of december 31 , 2017? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.48611 | Context:stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 .
|as of december 31,|2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|2015|
|alcoainc .|$ 100|$ 57|$ 58|$ 72|$ 107|$ 68|
|s&p 500 aeindex|100|102|118|157|178|181|
|s&p 500 aematerials index|100|90|104|130|139|128|
s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .
Question: what was the percentual increase observed in the alcoainc . investment during 2013 and 2014? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.13462 | Context:kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases 2014 the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 0.8 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , of approximately $ 5.9 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.3 million , $ 4.4 million and $ 4.4 million , respectively . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2011 , $ 5.2 and $ 3.4 ; 2012 , $ 4.1 and $ 2.6 ; 2013 , $ 3.8 and $ 2.3 ; 2014 , $ 2.9 and $ 1.7 ; 2015 , $ 2.1 and $ 1.3 , and thereafter , $ 2.8 and $ 1.6 , respectively . leveraged lease 2014 during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the fasb 2019s lease guidance . as of december 31 , 2010 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million and the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 33.4 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .
||2010|2009|
|remaining net rentals|$ 37.6|$ 44.1|
|estimated unguaranteed residual value|31.7|31.7|
|non-recourse mortgage debt|-30.1 ( 30.1 )|-34.5 ( 34.5 )|
|unearned and deferred income|-34.2 ( 34.2 )|-37.0 ( 37.0 )|
|net investment in leveraged lease|$ 5.0|$ 4.3|
10 . variable interest entities : consolidated operating properties 2014 included within the company 2019s consolidated operating properties at december 31 , 2010 are four consolidated entities that are vies and for which the company is the primary beneficiary . all of these entities have been established to own and operate real estate property . the company 2019s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership of the properties . these entities were deemed vies primarily based on the fact that the voting rights of the equity investors are not proportional to their obligation to absorb expected losses or receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity 2019s activities are conducted on behalf of the investor which has disproportionately fewer voting rights . the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these vies as a result of its controlling financial interest . during 2010 , the company sold two consolidated vie 2019s which the company was the primary beneficiary. .
Question: what is the growth rate in revenues generated through subleasing in 2010? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.31148 | Context:( 1 ) adjusted other income ( expense ) excludes pension settlement charges of $ 37 million , $ 128 million , and $ 220 million , for the years ended 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . ( 2 ) adjusted items are generally taxed at the estimated annual effective tax rate , except for the applicable tax impact associated with estimated restructuring plan expenses , legacy litigation , accelerated tradename amortization , impairment charges and non-cash pension settlement charges , which are adjusted at the related jurisdictional rates . in addition , tax expense excludes the tax impacts from the sale of certain assets and liabilities previously classified as held for sale as well as the tax adjustments recorded to finalize the 2017 accounting for the enactment date impact of the tax reform act recorded pursuant torr sab 118 . ( 3 ) adjusted net income from discontinued operations excludes the gain on sale of discontinued operations of $ 82 million , $ 779 million , and $ 0 million for the years ended 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . adjusted net income from discontinued operations excludes intangible asset amortization of $ 0 million , $ 11rr million , and $ 120 million for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . the effective tax rate was further adjusted for the applicable tax impact associated with the gain on sale and intangible asset amortization , as applicable . free cash flow we use free cash flow , defined as cash flow provided by operations minus capital expenditures , as a non-gaap measure of our core operating performance and cash generating capabilities of our business operations . this supplemental information related to free cash flow represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our financial statements . the use of this non-gaap measure does not imply or represent the residual cash flow for discretionary expenditures . a reconciliation of this non-gaap measure to cash flow provided by operations is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|years ended december 31|2018|2017|2016|
|cash provided by continuing operating activities|$ 1686|$ 669|$ 1829|
|capital expenditures used for continuing operations|-240 ( 240 )|-183 ( 183 )|-156 ( 156 )|
|free cash flow provided by continuing operations|$ 1446|$ 486|$ 1673|
impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations we conduct business in more than 120 countries and sovereignties and , because of this , foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations have a significant impact on our business . foreign currency exchange rate movements may be significant and may distort true period-to-period comparisons of changes in revenue or pretax income . therefore , to give financial statement users meaningful information about our operations , we have provided an illustration of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on our financial results . the methodology used to calculate this impact isolates the impact of the change in currencies between periods by translating the prior year 2019s revenue , expenses , and net income using the current year 2019s foreign currency exchange rates . translating prior year results at current year foreign currency exchange rates , currency fluctuations had a $ 0.08 favorable impact on net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2018 . currency fluctuations had a $ 0.12 favorable impact on net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , when 2016 results were translated at 2017 rates . currency fluctuations had no impact on net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , when 2015 results were translated at 2016 rates . translating prior year results at current year foreign currency exchange rates , currency fluctuations had a $ 0.09 favorable impact on adjusted net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2018 . currency fluctuations had a $ 0.08 favorable impact on adjusted net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , when 2016 results were translated at 2017 rates . currency fluctuations had a $ 0.04 unfavorable impact on adjusted net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , when 2015 results were translated at 2016 rates . these translations are performed for comparative purposes only and do not impact the accounting policies or practices for amounts included in the financial statements . competition and markets authority the u.k . 2019s competition regulator , the competition and markets authority ( the 201ccma 201d ) , conducted a market investigation into the supply and acquisition of investment consulting and fiduciary management services , including those offered by aon and its competitors in the u.k. , to assess whether any feature or combination of features in the target market prevents , restricts , or distorts competition . the cma issued a final report on december 12 , 2018 . the cma will draft a series of orders that will set out the detailed remedies , expected in first quarter of 2019 , when they will be subject to further public consultation . we do not anticipate the remedies to have a significant impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial position or business . financial conduct authority the fca is conducting a market study to assess how effectively competition is working in the wholesale insurance broker sector in the u.k . in which aon , through its subsidiaries , participates . the fca has indicated that the purpose of a market study is to assess the extent to which the market is working well in the interests of customers and to identify features of the market that may impact competition . depending on the study 2019s findings , the fca may require remedies in order to correct any features found .
Question: considering the years 2017 and 2018 , what is the percentual increase observed in capital expenditures used for continuing operations? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.28313 | Context:our digital media business consists of our websites and mobile and video-on-demand ( 201cvod 201d ) services . our websites include network branded websites such as discovery.com , tlc.com and animalplanet.com , and other websites such as howstuffworks.com , an online source of explanations of how the world actually works ; treehugger.com , a comprehensive source for 201cgreen 201d news , solutions and product information ; and petfinder.com , a leading pet adoption destination . together , these websites attracted an average of 24 million cumulative unique monthly visitors , according to comscore , inc . in 2011 . international networks our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks . this segment generates revenues primarily from fees charged to operators who distribute our networks , which primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers , and from advertising sold on our television networks and websites . discovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks , which are distributed in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami . international networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with one to twelve networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world . at december 31 , 2011 , international networks operated over 150 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities . our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2011 : education and other our education and other segment primarily includes the sale of curriculum-based product and service offerings and postproduction audio services . this segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , and to a lesser extent student assessment and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content . our education business also participates in corporate partnerships , global brand and content licensing business with leading non-profits , foundations and trade associations . other businesses primarily include postproduction audio services that are provided to major motion picture studios , independent producers , broadcast networks , cable channels , advertising agencies , and interactive producers . content development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers . substantially all content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which includes some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies with which we have developed long-standing relationships , as well as independent producers . our production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed . substantially all produced content includes programming which we engage third parties to develop and produce while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights in exchange for paying all development and production costs . coproduced content refers to program rights acquired that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop . coproduced programs are typically high-cost projects for which neither we nor our coproducers wish to bear the entire cost or productions in which the producer has already taken on an international broadcast partner . licensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties . global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .
|global networks discovery channel|international subscribers ( millions ) 213|regional networks dmax|international subscribers ( millions ) 47|
|animal planet|166|discovery kids|37|
|tlc real time and travel & living|150|liv|29|
|discovery science|66|quest|23|
|discovery home & health|48|discovery history|13|
|turbo|37|shed|12|
|discovery world|27|discovery en espanol ( u.s. )|5|
|investigation discovery|23|discovery famillia ( u.s. )|4|
|hd services|17|||
.
Question: the largest network is what percent larger than the second largest based on subscribers?\\n | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
2.66286 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis 120 jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report $ 12.0 billion , and jpmorgan clearing 2019s net capital was $ 6.6 billion , exceeding the minimum requirement by $ 5.0 billion . in addition to its minimum net capital requirement , jpmorgan securities is required to hold tentative net capital in excess of $ 1.0 billion and is also required to notify the sec in the event that tentative net capital is less than $ 5.0 billion , in accordance with the market and credit risk standards of appendix e of the net capital rule . as of december 31 , 2012 , jpmorgan securities had tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and notification requirements . j.p . morgan securities plc ( formerly j.p . morgan securities ltd. ) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of jpmorgan chase bank , n.a . and is the firm 2019s principal operating subsidiary in the u.k . it has authority to engage in banking , investment banking and broker-dealer activities . j.p . morgan securities plc is regulated by the u.k . financial services authority ( 201cfsa 201d ) . at december 31 , 2012 , it had total capital of $ 20.8 billion , or a total capital ratio of 15.5% ( 15.5 % ) which exceeded the 8% ( 8 % ) well-capitalized standard applicable to it under basel 2.5 . economic risk capital jpmorgan chase assesses its capital adequacy relative to the risks underlying its business activities using internal risk-assessment methodologies . the firm measures economic capital primarily based on four risk factors : credit , market , operational and private equity risk. .
|year ended december 31 ( in billions )|yearly average 2012|yearly average 2011|yearly average 2010|
|credit risk|$ 46.6|$ 48.2|$ 49.7|
|market risk|17.5|14.5|15.1|
|operational risk|15.9|8.5|7.4|
|private equity risk|6.0|6.9|6.2|
|economic risk capital|86.0|78.1|78.4|
|goodwill|48.2|48.6|48.6|
|other ( a )|50.2|46.6|34.5|
|total common stockholders 2019equity|$ 184.4|$ 173.3|$ 161.5|
( a ) reflects additional capital required , in the firm 2019s view , to meet its regulatory and debt rating objectives . credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale businesses ( cib , cb and am ) and consumer business ( ccb ) . credit risk capital for the wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and from declines in the value of the portfolio due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which the allowance for credit losses is maintained . the capital methodology is based on several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation . credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based on product and other relevant risk segmentation . actual segment-level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . the decrease in credit risk capital in 2012 was driven by consumer portfolio runoff and continued model enhancements to better estimate future stress credit losses in the consumer portfolio . see credit risk management on pages 134 2013135 of this annual report for more information about these credit risk measures . market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of the portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market variables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , and securities and commodities prices , taking into account the liquidity of the financial instruments . results from daily var , weekly stress tests , issuer credit spreads and default risk calculations , as well as other factors , are used to determine appropriate capital levels . market risk capital is allocated to each business segment based on its risk assessment . the increase in market risk capital in 2012 was driven by increased risk in the synthetic credit portfolio . see market risk management on pages 163 2013169 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures . operational risk capital operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems , human factors or external events . the operational risk capital model is based on actual losses and potential scenario-based losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment . the increase in operational risk capital in 2012 was primarily due to continued model enhancements to better capture large historical loss events , including mortgage-related litigation costs . the increases that occurred during 2012 will be fully reflected in average operational risk capital in 2013 . see operational risk management on pages 175 2013176 of this annual report for more information about operational risk . private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately- and publicly-held securities , third-party fund investments , and commitments in the private equity portfolio , within the corporate/private equity segment , to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations . in addition to negative market fluctuations , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk. .
Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the 3 credit risk to the market risk | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
811.97482 | Context:as noted above , as a result of these sales , these regulated subsidiaries are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented . therefore , the amounts , statistics and tables presented in this section refer only to on-going operations , unless otherwise noted . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenue for 2012 and number of customers from continuing operations as well as an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2012 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total .
|new jersey|operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0|% ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % )|number of customers 639838|% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )|estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5|% ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % )|
|pennsylvania|557.7|21.7% ( 21.7 % )|658153|20.8% ( 20.8 % )|2.2|19.3% ( 19.3 % )|
|missouri|279.5|10.9% ( 10.9 % )|455730|14.4% ( 14.4 % )|1.5|13.2% ( 13.2 % )|
|illinois ( a )|256.4|10.0% ( 10.0 % )|308014|9.8% ( 9.8 % )|1.2|10.5% ( 10.5 % )|
|indiana|198.7|7.8% ( 7.8 % )|289068|9.2% ( 9.2 % )|1.2|10.5% ( 10.5 % )|
|california|193.3|7.5% ( 7.5 % )|174188|5.5% ( 5.5 % )|0.6|5.3% ( 5.3 % )|
|west virginia ( b )|125.0|4.9% ( 4.9 % )|172159|5.4% ( 5.4 % )|0.6|5.3% ( 5.3 % )|
|subtotal ( top seven states )|2249.6|87.7% ( 87.7 % )|2697150|85.4% ( 85.4 % )|9.8|86.0% ( 86.0 % )|
|other ( c )|314.8|12.3% ( 12.3 % )|461076|14.6% ( 14.6 % )|1.6|14.0% ( 14.0 % )|
|total regulated businesses|$ 2564.4|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|3158226|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|11.4|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|
( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois . ( b ) west virginia-american water company , which we refer to as wvawc , and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our operating subsidiaries in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee , and virginia . approximately 87.7% ( 87.7 % ) of operating revenue from our regulated businesses in 2012 was generated from approximately 2.7 million customers in our seven largest states , as measured by operating revenues . in fiscal year 2012 , no single customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our annual operating revenue . overview of networks , facilities and water supply our regulated businesses operate in approximately 1500 communities in 16 states in the united states . our primary operating assets include approximately 80 surface water treatment plants , 500 groundwater treatment plants , 1000 groundwater wells , 100 wastewater treatment facilities , 1200 treated water storage facilities , 1300 pumping stations , 90 dams and 46000 miles of mains and collection pipes . our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . we generally own the land and physical assets used to store , extract and treat source water . typically , we do not own the water itself , which is held in public trust and is allocated to us through contracts and allocation rights granted by federal and state agencies or through the ownership of water rights pursuant to local law . maintaining the reliability of our networks is a key activity of our regulated businesses . we have ongoing infrastructure renewal programs in all states in which our regulated businesses operate . these programs consist of both rehabilitation of existing mains and replacement of mains that have reached the end of their useful service lives . our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water . drought , governmental restrictions , overuse of sources of water , the protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water . we employ a variety of measures to ensure that we have adequate sources of water supply , both in the short-term and over the long-term . the geographic diversity of our service areas tends to mitigate some of the economic effect of weather extremes we .
Question: what is the approximate revenue per customer in the regulated businesses? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
297.0 | Context:the following table provides the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter: .
||amount|
|2019|$ 17|
|2020|15|
|2021|12|
|2022|11|
|2023|6|
|thereafter|80|
the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company , and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 147 million and $ 150 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs . as of december 31 , 2018 , the minimum annual future rental commitment under the operating leases for the portion of the facilities funded by the partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitments are $ 4 million in 2019 through 2023 , and $ 59 million thereafter . note 20 : segment information the company 2019s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which separate financial information is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions and assess performance . the company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment , the regulated businesses segment . the company also operates market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within non-reportable operating segments , collectively referred to as the market-based businesses . the regulated businesses segment is the largest component of the company 2019s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 16 states . the company 2019s primary market-based businesses include the homeowner services group , which provides warranty protection programs to residential and smaller commercial customers ; the military services group , which provides water and wastewater services to the u.s . government on military installations ; and keystone , which provides water transfer services for shale natural gas exploration and production companies. .
Question: the carrying value of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset totaled how much in millions for december 31 , 2018 and 2017? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-49.0 | Context:masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . segment information ( continued ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 229 million , $ 241 million and $ 246 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 2 ) excluded from net sales were intra-company sales between segments of approximately two percent of net sales in each of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 3 ) included in net sales were sales to one customer of $ 2143 million , $ 1984 million and $ 1993 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such net sales were included in the following segments : cabinets and related products , plumbing products , decorative architectural products and other specialty products . ( 4 ) net sales from the company 2019s operations in the u.s . were $ 5793 million , $ 5394 million and $ 5618 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 5 ) net sales , operating ( loss ) profit , property additions and depreciation and amortization expense for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 excluded the results of businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 6 ) included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2012 was an impairment charge for other intangible assets as follows : other specialty products 2013 $ 42 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2011 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : cabinets and related products 2013 $ 44 million ; plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; decorative architectural products 2013 $ 75 million ; and other specialty products 2013 $ 374 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2010 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; and installation and other services 2013 $ 697 million . ( 7 ) general corporate expense , net included those expenses not specifically attributable to the company 2019s segments . ( 8 ) the charge for litigation settlement , net in 2012 primarily relates to a business in the installation and other services segment and in 2011 relates to business units in the cabinets and related products and the other specialty products segments . ( 9 ) long-lived assets of the company 2019s operations in the u.s . and europe were $ 2795 million and $ 567 million , $ 2964 million and $ 565 million , and $ 3684 million and $ 617 million at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 10 ) segment assets for 2012 and 2011 excluded the assets of businesses reported as discontinued operations in the respective years . p . severance costs as part of the company 2019s continuing review of its operations , actions were taken during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 to respond to market conditions . the company recorded charges related to severance and early retirement programs of $ 36 million , $ 17 million and $ 14 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such charges are principally reflected in the statement of operations in selling , general and administrative expenses and were paid when incurred . q . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|2010|
|income from cash and cash investments|$ 6|$ 8|$ 6|
|other interest income|1|1|1|
|income from financial investments net ( note e )|24|73|9|
|other items net|-4 ( 4 )|-5 ( 5 )|-9 ( 9 )|
|total other net|$ 27|$ 77|$ 7|
other items , net , included realized foreign currency transaction losses of $ 2 million , $ 5 million and $ 2 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , as well as other miscellaneous items. .
Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2011 to 2012? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
407.0 | Context:american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2007 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2008|$ 1817|
|2009|1241|
|2010|78828|
|2011|13714|
|2012|1894998|
|thereafter|2292895|
|total cash obligations|$ 4283493|
|accreted value of the discount and premium of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes|1791|
|balance as of december 31 2007|$ 4285284|
4 . acquisitions during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , the company used cash to acquire a total of ( i ) 293 towers and the assets of a structural analysis firm for approximately $ 44.0 million in cash ( ii ) 84 towers and 6 in-building distributed antenna systems for approximately $ 14.3 million and ( iii ) 30 towers for approximately $ 6.0 million in cash , respectively . the tower asset acquisitions were primarily in mexico and brazil under ongoing agreements . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company also completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . pursuant to which the company acquired approximately 7800 towers and 100 in-building distributed antenna systems . under the terms of the merger agreement , in august 2005 , spectrasite , inc . merged with a wholly- owned subsidiary of the company , and each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock converted into the right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s class a common stock . the company issued approximately 169.5 million shares of its class a common stock and reserved for issuance approximately 9.9 million and 6.8 million of class a common stock pursuant to spectrasite , inc . options and warrants , respectively , assumed in the merger . the final allocation of the $ 3.1 billion purchase price is summarized in the company 2019s annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . the acquisitions consummated by the company during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with sfas no . 141 201cbusiness combinations 201d ( sfas no . 141 ) . the purchase prices have been allocated to the net assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company primarily acquired its tower assets from third parties in one of two types of transactions : the purchase of a business or the purchase of assets . the structure of each transaction affects the way the company allocates purchase price within the consolidated financial statements . in the case of tower assets acquired through the purchase of a business , such as the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , the company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition . the excess of the purchase price paid by the company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill . in the case of an asset purchase , the company first allocates the purchase price to property and equipment for the appraised value of the towers and to identifiable intangible assets ( primarily acquired customer base ) . the company then records any remaining purchase price within intangible assets as a 201cnetwork location intangible . 201d .
Question: what is the total number of towers acquired in the last three years? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
910987.0 | Context:table of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .
|period|total number ofshares purchased|average pricepaid per share|total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs|maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs|
|october 2018|1360987|$ 66.34|1360987|$ 859039458|
|november 2018|450000|$ 61.36|450000|$ 831427985|
|december 2018|912360|$ 53.93|810000|$ 787613605|
|total for october to december 2018|2723347||2620987||
during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .
Question: what was the range of shares bought between oct and dec 2018? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.0538 | Context:management 2019s discussion and analysis 114 jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable counterparties to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2017|2016|
|interest rate|$ 24673|$ 28302|
|credit derivatives|869|1294|
|foreign exchange|16151|23271|
|equity|7882|4939|
|commodity|6948|6272|
|total net of cash collateral|56523|64078|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )|-16108 ( 16108 )|-22705 ( 22705 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 40415|$ 41373|
( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 56.5 billion and $ 64.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . derivative receivables decreased predominantly as a result of client- driven market-making activities in cib markets , which reduced foreign exchange and interest rate derivative receivables , and increased equity derivative receivables , driven by market movements . derivative receivables amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 16.1 billion and $ 22.7 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 29.0 billion and $ 31.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 40.4 billion and $ 41.4 billion at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential .
Question: credit derivatives for 2017 were what percent of the foreign exchange derivatives? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.6 | Context:investment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . see note 14 2014income taxes for additional information . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net on the consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other , net on the consolidated statements of operations . afudc is provided in the following table for the years ended december 31: .
||2018|2017|2016|
|allowance for other funds used during construction|$ 24|$ 19|$ 15|
|allowance for borrowed funds used during construction|13|8|6|
environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its market-based businesses are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the subsidiary to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the subsidiary agreed to pay $ 1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021 . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 4 million and $ 6 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the gains and losses on the effective portion of cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated cash-flow hedges is recognized in current-period earnings. .
Question: by how much did allowance for other funds used during construction increase from 2016 to 2018? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
7.5 | Context:table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|9|
|trademarks|9|
|acquired rights to use technology|10|
|backlog|2|
|other intangibles|4|
income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: for the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets , what was the average weighted average useful life ( years ) for purchased technology and customer contracts and relationships? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
2.64516 | Context:marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 7 . dispositions outside-operated norwegian properties 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 . pilot travel centers 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc . sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million . immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment . operated irish properties 2013 on december 17 , 2008 , we agreed to sell our operated properties located in ireland for proceeds of $ 180 million , before post-closing adjustments and cash on hand at closing . closing is subject to completion of the necessary administrative processes . as of december 31 , 2008 , operating assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale , as disclosed by major class in the following table : ( in millions ) 2008 .
|( in millions )|2008|
|current assets|$ 164|
|noncurrent assets|103|
|total assets|267|
|current liabilities|62|
|noncurrent liabilities|199|
|total liabilities|261|
|net assets held for sale|$ 6|
8 . discontinued operations on june 2 , 2006 , we sold our russian oil exploration and production businesses in the khanty-mansiysk region of western siberia . under the terms of the agreement , we received $ 787 million for these businesses , plus preliminary working capital and other closing adjustments of $ 56 million , for a total transaction value of $ 843 million . proceeds net of transaction costs and cash held by the russian businesses at the transaction date totaled $ 832 million . a gain on the sale of $ 243 million ( $ 342 million before income taxes ) was reported in discontinued operations for 2006 . income taxes on this gain were reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward . exploration and production segment goodwill of $ 21 million was allocated to the russian assets and reduced the reported gain . adjustments to the sales price were completed in 2007 and an additional gain on the sale of $ 8 million ( $ 13 million before income taxes ) was recognized . the activities of the russian businesses have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006 . revenues applicable to discontinued operations were $ 173 million and pretax income from discontinued operations was $ 45 million for 2006. .
Question: what is the current ratio for 2008? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.67317 | Context:the liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit . obligations and commitments as part of its ongoing operations , the company enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements , lease agreements , and unconditional purchase obligations ( i.e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices , such as 201ctake-or-pay 201d contracts ) . the unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the company . capital lease and debt obligations , which totaled $ 3.5 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are currently recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations , which totaled $ 1.7 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet , in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . a summary of the company 2019s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2008 was as follows ( including obligations of discontinued operations ) : .
|( $ in millions ) contractual obligations|( $ in millions ) total|( $ in millions ) less than 1 year|( $ in millions ) 1-3 years|( $ in millions ) 3-5 years|after 5 years|
|long-term debt|$ 3531.4|$ 15.4|$ 521.6|$ 751.8|$ 2242.6|
|lease obligations|514.9|89.2|148.1|106.9|170.7|
|purchase obligations|1199.6|1078.6|104.0|16.3|0.7|
|total|$ 5245.9|$ 1183.2|$ 773.7|$ 875.0|$ 2414.0|
the purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect approximately $ 374 million of open purchase orders , some of which are not legally binding . these purchase orders are settlable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year . the company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations . the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of may 25 , 2008 was approximately 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) . the company consolidates the assets and liabilities of certain entities from which it leases corporate aircraft . these entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities . the amounts reflected in contractual obligations of long-term debt , in the table above , include $ 54 million of liabilities of these variable interest entities to the creditors of such entities . the long-term debt recognized as a result of consolidating these entities does not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities . as of may 25 , 2008 , the company was obligated to make rental payments of $ 67 million to the variable interest entities , of which $ 7 million is due in less than one year , $ 13 million is due in one to three years , and $ 47 million is due in three to five years . such amounts are not reflected in the table , above . as part of its ongoing operations , the company also enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event ( e.g. , guarantee debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform ) . in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles , the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s .
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2008 was due to long-term debt? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
4006.5 | Context:december 31 , 2018 . alcoa corporation will supply all required raw materials to arconic and arconic will process the raw materials into finished can sheet coils ready for shipment to the end customer . tolling revenue for the two months ended december 31 , 2016 was approximately $ 37 million . in 2017 , demand in the automotive end market is expected to continue to grow due to the growing demand for innovative products and aluminum-intensive vehicles . demand from the commercial airframe end market is expected to be flat in 2017 as the ramp up of new programs is offset by customer destocking and lower build rates for aluminum intensive wide-body programs . sales to the packaging market are expected to decline due to continuing pricing pressure within this market and the ramp-down of the north american packaging operations . net productivity improvements are anticipated to continue . engineered products and solutions .
||2016|2015|2014|
|third-party sales|$ 5728|$ 5342|$ 4217|
|atoi|$ 642|$ 595|$ 579|
the engineered products and solutions segment produces products that are used primarily in the aerospace ( commercial and defense ) , commercial transportation , and power generation end markets . such products include fastening systems ( titanium , steel , and nickel superalloys ) and seamless rolled rings ( mostly nickel superalloys ) ; investment castings ( nickel superalloys , titanium , and aluminum ) , including airfoils and forged jet engine components ( e.g. , jet engine disks ) , and extruded , machined and formed aircraft parts ( titanium and aluminum ) , all of which are sold directly to customers and through distributors . more than 75% ( 75 % ) of the third-party sales in this segment are from the aerospace end market . a small part of this segment also produces various forged , extruded , and machined metal products ( titanium , aluminum and steel ) for the oil and gas , industrial products , automotive , and land and sea defense end markets . seasonal decreases in sales are generally experienced in the third quarter of the year due to the european summer slowdown across all end markets . generally , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are mostly the u.s . dollar , british pound and the euro . in july 2015 , arconic completed the acquisition of rti , a global supplier of titanium and specialty metal products and services for the commercial aerospace , defense , energy , and medical device end markets . the purpose of the acquisition was to expand arconic 2019s range of titanium offerings and add advanced technologies and materials , primarily related to the aerospace end market . in 2014 , rti generated net sales of $ 794 and had approximately 2600 employees . the operating results and assets and liabilities of rti have been included within the engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition . in march 2015 , arconic completed the acquisition of tital , a privately held aerospace castings company with approximately 650 employees based in germany . tital produces aluminum and titanium investment casting products for the aerospace and defense end markets . in 2014 , tital generated sales of approximately $ 100 . the purpose of the acquisition was to capture increasing demand for advanced jet engine components made of titanium , establish titanium- casting capabilities in europe , and expand existing aluminum casting capacity . the operating results and assets and liabilities of tital have been included within the engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition . in november 2014 , arconic completed the acquisition of firth rixson , a global leader in aerospace jet engine components . firth rixson manufactures rings , forgings , and metal products for the aerospace end market , as well as other markets requiring highly-engineered material applications . the purpose of the acquisition was to strengthen arconic 2019s aerospace business and position the company to capture additional aerospace growth with a broader range of high-growth , value-add jet engine components . firth rixson generated sales of approximately $ 970 in 2014 and had 13 operating facilities in the united states , united kingdom , europe , and asia employing approximately 2400 people combined . the operating results and assets and liabilities of firth rixson have been included within the engineered products and solutions segment since the date of acquisition. .
Question: what is the total amount of dollars received from aerospace end market sales in 2015? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.01 | Context:sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business our distribution centers , which we refer to as operating companies , distribute nationally-branded merchandise , as well as products packaged under our private brands . products packaged under our private brands have been manufactured for sysco according to specifi cations that have been developed by our quality assurance team . in addition , our quality assurance team certifi es the manufacturing and processing plants where these products are packaged , enforces our quality control standards and identifi es supply sources that satisfy our requirements . we believe that prompt and accurate delivery of orders , competitive pricing , close contact with customers and the ability to provide a full array of products and services to assist customers in their foodservice operations are of primary importance in the marketing and distribution of foodservice products to our customers . our operating companies offer daily delivery to certain customer locations and have the capability of delivering special orders on short notice . through our approximately 12800 sales and marketing representatives and support staff of sysco and our operating companies , we stay informed of the needs of our customers and acquaint them with new products and services . our operating companies also provide ancillary services relating to foodservice distribution , such as providing customers with product usage reports and other data , menu-planning advice , food safety training and assistance in inventory control , as well as access to various third party services designed to add value to our customers 2019 businesses . no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of sysco 2019s total sales for the fi scal year ended june 28 , 2014 . we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fi scal years were as follows: .
|type of customer|2014|2013|2012|
|restaurants|62% ( 62 % )|61% ( 61 % )|63% ( 63 % )|
|healthcare|9|10|10|
|education government|9|8|8|
|travel leisure retail|8|8|8|
|other ( 1 )|12|13|11|
|totals|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|
( 1 ) other includes cafeterias that are not stand alone restaurants , bakeries , caterers , churches , civic and fraternal organizations , vending distributors , other distributors and international exports . none of these types of customers , as a group , exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented . sources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers , both domestic and international , none of which individually accounts for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our purchases . these suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise , as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers . purchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies . we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products . the program covers the purchasing and marketing of sysco brand merchandise , as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers , encompassing substantially all product lines . sysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers , although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs . we also focus on increasing profi tability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels , which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies , while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers . this includes the construction and operation of regional distribution centers ( rdcs ) , which aggregate inventory demand to optimize the supply chain activities for certain products for all sysco broadline operating companies in the region . currently , we have two rdcs in operation , one in virginia and one in florida . working capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash fl ow from operations , commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings . see the discussion in 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , liquidity and capital resources 201d at item 7 regarding our liquidity , fi nancial position and sources and uses of funds . credit terms we extend to our customers can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness . we monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary . a majority of our sales orders are fi lled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed . we generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand . the level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life , supplier order fulfi llment lead times and customer demand . we also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities . we take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 30 days or more. .
Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2013 to 2014? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.0375 | Context:marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements expected long-term return on plan assets 2013 the expected long-term return on plan assets assumption for our u.s . funded plan is determined based on an asset rate-of-return modeling tool developed by a third-party investment group which utilizes underlying assumptions based on actual returns by asset category and inflation and takes into account our u.s . pension plan 2019s asset allocation . to determine the expected long-term return on plan assets assumption for our international plans , we consider the current level of expected returns on risk-free investments ( primarily government bonds ) , the historical levels of the risk premiums associated with the other applicable asset categories and the expectations for future returns of each asset class . the expected return for each asset category is then weighted based on the actual asset allocation to develop the overall expected long-term return on plan assets assumption . assumed weighted average health care cost trend rates .
||2018|2017|2016|
|initial health care trend rate|n/a|8.00% ( 8.00 % )|8.25% ( 8.25 % )|
|ultimate trend rate|n/a|4.70% ( 4.70 % )|4.50% ( 4.50 % )|
|year ultimate trend rate is reached|n/a|2025|2025|
n/a all retiree medical subsidies are frozen as of january 1 , 2019 . employer provided subsidies for post-65 retiree health care coverage were frozen effective january 1 , 2017 at january 1 , 2016 established amount levels . company contributions are funded to a health reimbursement account on the retiree 2019s behalf to subsidize the retiree 2019s cost of obtaining health care benefits through a private exchange ( the 201cpost-65 retiree health benefits 201d ) . therefore , a 1% ( 1 % ) change in health care cost trend rates would not have a material impact on either the service and interest cost components and the postretirement benefit obligations . in the fourth quarter of 2018 , we terminated the post-65 retiree health benefits effective as of december 31 , 2020 . the post-65 retiree health benefits will no longer be provided after that date . in addition , the pre-65 retiree medical coverage subsidy has been frozen as of january 1 , 2019 , and the ability for retirees to opt in and out of this coverage , as well as pre-65 retiree dental and vision coverage , has also been eliminated . retirees must enroll in connection with retirement for such coverage , or they lose eligibility . these plan changes reduced our retiree medical benefit obligation by approximately $ 99 million . plan investment policies and strategies 2013 the investment policies for our u.s . and international pension plan assets reflect the funded status of the plans and expectations regarding our future ability to make further contributions . long-term investment goals are to : ( 1 ) manage the assets in accordance with applicable legal requirements ; ( 2 ) produce investment returns which meet or exceed the rates of return achievable in the capital markets while maintaining the risk parameters set by the plan's investment committees and protecting the assets from any erosion of purchasing power ; and ( 3 ) position the portfolios with a long-term risk/ return orientation . investment performance and risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment meetings and periodic asset and liability studies . u.s . plan 2013 the plan 2019s current targeted asset allocation is comprised of 55% ( 55 % ) equity securities and 45% ( 45 % ) other fixed income securities . over time , as the plan 2019s funded ratio ( as defined by the investment policy ) improves , in order to reduce volatility in returns and to better match the plan 2019s liabilities , the allocation to equity securities will decrease while the amount allocated to fixed income securities will increase . the plan's assets are managed by a third-party investment manager . international plan 2013 our international plan's target asset allocation is comprised of 55% ( 55 % ) equity securities and 45% ( 45 % ) fixed income securities . the plan assets are invested in ten separate portfolios , mainly pooled fund vehicles , managed by several professional investment managers whose performance is measured independently by a third-party asset servicing consulting fair value measurements 2013 plan assets are measured at fair value . the following provides a description of the valuation techniques employed for each major plan asset class at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash and cash equivalents are valued using a market approach and are considered level 1 . equity securities 2013 investments in common stock are valued using a market approach at the closing price reported in an active market and are therefore considered level 1 . private equity investments include interests in limited partnerships which are valued based on the sum of the estimated fair values of the investments held by each partnership , determined using a combination of market , income and cost approaches , plus working capital , adjusted for liabilities , currency translation and estimated performance incentives . these private equity investments are considered level 3 . investments in pooled funds are valued using a market approach , these various funds consist of equity with underlying investments held in u.s . and non-u.s . securities . the pooled funds are benchmarked against a relative public index and are considered level 2. .
Question: what was the difference in the initial health care trend rate and the ultimate trend rate in 2016? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.71984 | Context:on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: .
||2008|2007|
|goodwill|$ 1167.5|$ 745.7|
|developed product technology 2014 gross|3035.4|1767.5|
|less accumulated amortization|-346.6 ( 346.6 )|-162.6 ( 162.6 )|
|developed product technology 2014 net|2688.8|1604.9|
|other intangibles 2014 gross|243.2|142.8|
|less accumulated amortization|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|-38.0 ( 38.0 )|
|other intangibles 2014 net|197.8|104.8|
|total intangibles 2014 net|$ 4054.1|$ 2455.4|
goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .
Question: what percentage of total intangibles-net in 2007 were comprised of developed product technology-gross? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.76786 | Context:gain or loss on ownership change in map results from contributions to map of certain environmental capital expenditures and leased property acquisitions funded by marathon and ashland . in accordance with map 2019s limited liability company agreement , in certain instances , environmental capital expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 5.822 billion in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 6.040 billion in 2003 from 2002 . the increases are primarily in the rm&t segment and result from higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 105 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 97 million in 2003 from 2002 . the increase in 2004 was primarily due to increased stock-based compensation and higher costs associated with business transformation and outsourcing . our 2004 results were also impacted by start-up costs associated with the lng project in equatorial guinea and the increased cost of complying with governmental regulations . the increase in 2003 was primarily due to increased employee benefit expenses ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . additionally , during 2003 , we recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . inventory market valuation reserve ( 2018 2018imv 2019 2019 ) is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . generally , we will establish an imv reserve when crude oil prices fall below $ 22 per barrel . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 25 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 . the decrease in 2004 is primarily due to an increase in interest income . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of a reduction in interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 9 million , $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2004 , 2003 and 2002 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 230 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 . map income was higher in 2004 compared to 2003 and in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . minority interest in loss of equatorial guinea lng holdings limited , which represents gepetrol 2019s 25 percent ownership interest , was $ 7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from gepetrol 2019s share of start-up costs associated with the lng project in equatorial guinea . provision for income taxes increased by $ 143 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , primarily due to $ 388 million and $ 720 million increases in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 36.6 percent compared to 36.6 percent and 42.1 percent for 2003 and 2002 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , we recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: .
||2004|2003|2002|
|statutory tax rate|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|
|effects of foreign operations ( a )|1.3|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|5.6|
|state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects|1.6|2.2|3.9|
|other federal tax effects|-1.3 ( 1.3 )|-0.2 ( 0.2 )|-2.4 ( 2.4 )|
|effective tax rate|36.6% ( 36.6 % )|36.6% ( 36.6 % )|42.1% ( 42.1 % )|
( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in .
Question: by what percent did effects of foreign operations decrease from 2002 to 2004? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
0.81045 | Context:entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2004|2003|2002|2001|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 1413|$ 1783|$ 3500|$ 9208|
money pool activity provided $ 0.4 million of entergy new orleans' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 1.7 million in 2003 , and provided $ 5.7 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 15.5 million in 2004 primarily due to capital expenditures related to a turbine inspection project at a fossil plant in 2003 and decreased customer service spending . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 23.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to the maturity of $ 14.9 million of other temporary investments in 2002 and increased construction expenditures due to increased customer service spending . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 7.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the costs and expenses related to refinancing $ 75 million of long-term debt in 2004 and an increase of $ 2.2 million in common stock dividends paid . net cash used in financing activities increased $ 1.5 million in 2003 primarily due to additional common stock dividends paid of $ 2.2 million . in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 . the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 . the issuances and redemptions are not shown on the cash flow statement because the proceeds from the issuances were placed in a trust for use in the redemptions and never held as cash by entergy new orleans . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details on long- term debt . uses of capital entergy new orleans requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .
Question: what are the receivables from the money pool as a percentage of additional common stock dividends paid in 2003? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.248 | Context:notes to consolidated financial statements 196 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report credit and funding adjustments when determining the fair value of an instrument , it may be necessary to record adjustments to the firm 2019s estimates of fair value in order to reflect counterparty credit quality , the firm 2019s own creditworthiness , and the impact of funding : 2022 credit valuation adjustments ( 201ccva 201d ) are taken to reflect the credit quality of a counterparty in the valuation of derivatives . cva are necessary when the market price ( or parameter ) is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty . as few classes of derivative contracts are listed on an exchange , derivative positions are predominantly valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters . an adjustment therefore may be necessary to reflect the credit quality of each derivative counterparty to arrive at fair value . the firm estimates derivatives cva using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected credit exposure across all of the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty , and then estimates losses as a result of a counterparty credit event . the key inputs to this methodology are ( i ) the expected positive exposure to each counterparty based on a simulation that assumes the current population of existing derivatives with each counterparty remains unchanged and considers contractual factors designed to mitigate the firm 2019s credit exposure , such as collateral and legal rights of offset ; ( ii ) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty , as derived from observed or estimated cds spreads ; and ( iii ) estimated recovery rates implied by cds , adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in cds spreads , which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk . as such , the firm estimates derivatives cva relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate . 2022 dva is taken to reflect the credit quality of the firm in the valuation of liabilities measured at fair value . the dva calculation methodology is generally consistent with the cva methodology described above and incorporates jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread as observed through the cds market to estimate the probability of default and loss given default as a result of a systemic event affecting the firm . structured notes dva is estimated using the current fair value of the structured note as the exposure amount , and is otherwise consistent with the derivative dva methodology . 2022 the firm incorporates the impact of funding in its valuation estimates where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument . as a result , the fair value of collateralized derivatives is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap ( 201cois 201d ) rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty . effective in 2013 , the firm implemented a fva framework to incorporate the impact of funding into its valuation estimates for uncollateralized ( including partially collateralized ) over- the-counter ( 201cotc 201d ) derivatives and structured notes . the firm 2019s fva framework leverages its existing cva and dva calculation methodologies , and considers the fact that the firm 2019s own credit risk is a significant component of funding costs . the key inputs are : ( i ) the expected funding requirements arising from the firm 2019s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements ; ( ii ) for assets , the estimated market funding cost in the principal market ; and ( iii ) for liabilities , the hypothetical market funding cost for a transfer to a market participant with a similar credit standing as the firm . upon the implementation of the fva framework in 2013 , the firm recorded a one time $ 1.5 billion loss in principal transactions revenue that was recorded in the cib . while the fva framework applies to both assets and liabilities , the loss on implementation largely related to uncollateralized derivative receivables given that the impact of the firm 2019s own credit risk , which is a significant component of funding costs , was already incorporated in the valuation of liabilities through the application of dva . the following table provides the credit and funding adjustments , excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities , reflected within the consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2014|2013|
|derivative receivables balance ( a )|$ 78975|$ 65759|
|derivative payables balance ( a )|71116|57314|
|derivatives cva ( b )|-2674 ( 2674 )|-2352 ( 2352 )|
|derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c )|-380 ( 380 )|-322 ( 322 )|
|structured notes balance ( a ) ( d )|53772|48808|
|structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e )|1152|952|
derivative receivables balance ( a ) $ 78975 $ 65759 derivative payables balance ( a ) 71116 57314 derivatives cva ( b ) ( 2674 ) ( 2352 ) derivatives dva and fva ( b ) ( c ) ( 380 ) ( 322 ) structured notes balance ( a ) ( d ) 53772 48808 structured notes dva and fva ( b ) ( e ) 1152 952 ( a ) balances are presented net of applicable cva and dva/fva . ( b ) positive cva and dva/fva represent amounts that increased receivable balances or decreased payable balances ; negative cva and dva/fva represent amounts that decreased receivable balances or increased payable balances . ( c ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included derivatives dva of $ 714 million and $ 715 million , respectively . ( d ) structured notes are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that are measured at fair value based on the firm 2019s election under the fair value option . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included $ 943 million and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , of financial instruments with no embedded derivative for which the fair value option has also been elected . for further information on these elections , see note 4 . ( e ) at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , included structured notes dva of $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .
Question: at december 31 , 2014 what was the structured notes fva balance in billions? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
-0.0142 | Context:shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .
||12/31/05|12/31/06|12/31/07|12/31/08|12/31/09|12/31/10|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 101.76|$ 98.20|$ 78.76|$ 84.87|$ 110.57|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 115.79|$ 122.16|$ 76.96|$ 97.33|$ 111.99|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 109.82|$ 111.38|$ 87.52|$ 103.79|$ 131.59|
.
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for united parcel service inc . versus the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/10? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
1.76364 | Context:entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: .
||2002|2001|
|de@r at end of period|$ 15.2 million|$ 5.5 million|
|average de@r for the period|$ 10.8 million|$ 6.4 million|
ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the percent change in daily earnings at risk at the end of the period from 2001 to 2002? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
742.733 | Context:entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2004 , for the next five years are as follows: .
||( in thousands )|
|2005|$ 467298|
|2006|$ 75896|
|2007|$ 199539|
|2008|$ 747246|
|2009|$ 512584|
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur . the long-term securities issuances of entergy corporation , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and system energy also are limited to amounts authorized by the sec . under its current sec order , and without further authorization , entergy corporation cannot incur additional indebtedness or issue other securities unless ( a ) it and each of its public utility subsidiaries maintain a common equity ratio of at least 30% ( 30 % ) and ( b ) the security to be issued ( if rated ) and all outstanding securities of entergy corporation that are rated , are rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating agency . under their current sec orders , and without further authorization , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , and entergy mississippi cannot incur additional indebtedness or issue other securities unless ( a ) the issuer and entergy corporation maintains a common equity ratio of at least 30% ( 30 % ) and ( b ) the security to be issued ( if rated ) and all outstanding securities of the issuer ( other than preferred stock of entergy gulf states ) , as well as all outstanding securities of entergy corporation , that are rated , are rated investment grade . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures and implementation of fin 46 entergy implemented fasb interpretation no . 46 , "consolidation of variable interest entities" effective december 31 , 2003 . fin 46 requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among their investors . variable interest entities ( vies ) , generally , are entities that do not have sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its operations without additional financial support from its equity interest holders and/or the group of equity interest holders are collectively not able to exercise control over the entity . the primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity's expected losses , receives a majority of its expected residual returns , or both as a result of holding the variable interest . a company may have an interest in a vie through ownership or other contractual rights or obligations . entergy louisiana capital i , entergy arkansas capital i , and entergy gulf states capital i ( trusts ) were established as financing subsidiaries of entergy louisiana , entergy arkansas , and entergy gulf states .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2004 , in millions? | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.At the end of your response provide the finale answer in this format Answer: |
Subsets and Splits