id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA2000 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and brent average prices widened significantly in 2011 and remained in 2012 in comparison to almost no differential in 2010 . natural gas 2013 a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average henry hub settlement prices for natural gas were lower in 2012 than in recent years . a decline in average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices began in september 2011 and continued into 2012 . although prices stabilized in late 2012 , they have not increased appreciably . our other major natural gas-producing regions are e.g . and europe . in the case of e.g . our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realizations less volatile . because natural gas sales from e.g . are at fixed prices , our worldwide reported average natural gas realizations may not fully track market price movements . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . oil sands mining the osm segment produces and sells various qualities of synthetic crude oil . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or upgrader . sales prices for roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily wcs . in 2012 , the wcs discount from wti had increased , putting downward pressure on our average realizations . the operating cost structure of the osm operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( "aeco" ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 94.15</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wcs ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )</td><td>$ 73.18</td><td>$ 77.97</td><td>$ 65.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )</td><td>$ 2.39</td><td>$ 3.68</td><td>$ 3.89</td></tr></table> wcs ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) $ 73.18 $ 77.97 $ 65.31 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 2.39 $ 3.68 $ 3.89 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our ig operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g . world lng trade in 2012 has been estimated to be 240 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in e.g. , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 3.8 mmt , 4.1 mmt and 3.7 mmt in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in e.g . through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1.1 mmt , 1.0 mmt and 0.9 mmt in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2012 has been estimated to be 49 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of world demand. .
Question: what was the change in the average price per barrel of wcs from 2010 to 2012?
Answer: 7.87
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to the average price per barrel of wcs in 2010?
| 0.1205 |
CONVFINQA2001 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2005, in millions?
| 4800.0 |
CONVFINQA2002 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2005, in millions?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what portion of total sales is generated by uncoated papers sales in 2005?
| 0.61069 |
CONVFINQA2003 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2005, in millions?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what portion of total sales is generated by uncoated papers sales in 2005?
Answer: 0.61069
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2004, in millions?
| 5000.0 |
CONVFINQA2004 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2005, in millions?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what portion of total sales is generated by uncoated papers sales in 2005?
Answer: 0.61069
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2004, in millions?
Answer: 5000.0
Question: what about the total sales in 2004?
| 7670.0 |
CONVFINQA2005 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2005, in millions?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what portion of total sales is generated by uncoated papers sales in 2005?
Answer: 0.61069
Question: what is the total sales of uncoated papers sales in 2004, in millions?
Answer: 5000.0
Question: what about the total sales in 2004?
Answer: 7670.0
Question: what portion is generated by uncoated papers sales?
| 0.65189 |
CONVFINQA2006 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .
Question: what were the number of shares issued to directors in 2001?
| 4800.0 |
CONVFINQA2007 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .
Question: what were the number of shares issued to directors in 2001?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what was the number in 2002?
| 3500.0 |
CONVFINQA2008 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .
Question: what were the number of shares issued to directors in 2001?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what was the number in 2002?
Answer: 3500.0
Question: what is the sum number of shares?
| 8300.0 |
CONVFINQA2009 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .
Question: what were the number of shares issued to directors in 2001?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what was the number in 2002?
Answer: 3500.0
Question: what is the sum number of shares?
Answer: 8300.0
Question: what was the number of issued shares in 2003?
| 3500.0 |
CONVFINQA2010 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .
Question: what were the number of shares issued to directors in 2001?
Answer: 4800.0
Question: what was the number in 2002?
Answer: 3500.0
Question: what is the sum number of shares?
Answer: 8300.0
Question: what was the number of issued shares in 2003?
Answer: 3500.0
Question: what is the total sum?
| 11800.0 |
CONVFINQA2011 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the rent expense for 2011?
| 338.0 |
CONVFINQA2012 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the rent expense for 2011?
Answer: 338.0
Question: and in 2010?
| 271.0 |
CONVFINQA2013 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the rent expense for 2011?
Answer: 338.0
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 271.0
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
| 67.0 |
CONVFINQA2014 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the rent expense for 2011?
Answer: 338.0
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 271.0
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 67.0
Question: and the percentage change over this time?
| 0.24723 |
CONVFINQA2015 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements 40 2016 ppg annual report and form 10-k 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 322 million , $ 324 million and $ 297 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 487</td><td>$ 494</td><td>$ 499</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>21</td><td>18</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 483</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the value for research and development in 2016?
| 466.0 |
CONVFINQA2016 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements 40 2016 ppg annual report and form 10-k 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 322 million , $ 324 million and $ 297 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 487</td><td>$ 494</td><td>$ 499</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>21</td><td>18</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 483</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the value for research and development in 2016?
Answer: 466.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
| 476.0 |
CONVFINQA2017 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements 40 2016 ppg annual report and form 10-k 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 322 million , $ 324 million and $ 297 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 487</td><td>$ 494</td><td>$ 499</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>21</td><td>18</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 483</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the value for research and development in 2016?
Answer: 466.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Answer: 476.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -10.0 |
CONVFINQA2018 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements 40 2016 ppg annual report and form 10-k 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 322 million , $ 324 million and $ 297 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 487</td><td>$ 494</td><td>$ 499</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>21</td><td>18</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 483</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the value for research and development in 2016?
Answer: 466.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Answer: 476.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -10.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2015 value?
| -0.02101 |
CONVFINQA2019 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006</td><td>1107455</td><td>$ 45.86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>852353</td><td>63.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-51206 ( 51206 )</td><td>56.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-63624 ( 63624 )</td><td>49.65</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007</td><td>1844978</td><td>$ 53.61</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: what is the ratio of the 2007 weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stocks to 2006?
| 1.16979 |
CONVFINQA2020 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006</td><td>1107455</td><td>$ 45.86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>852353</td><td>63.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-51206 ( 51206 )</td><td>56.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-63624 ( 63624 )</td><td>49.65</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007</td><td>1844978</td><td>$ 53.61</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: what is the ratio of the 2007 weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stocks to 2006?
Answer: 1.16979
Question: what is that value less 1?
| 0.16979 |
CONVFINQA2021 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 27 2018</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018</td><td>fair value impact may 282017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 33.2</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 25.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.1</td><td>24.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>2.0</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total fair value impact of the interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones, combined, in may 2018?
| 54.5 |
CONVFINQA2022 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 27 2018</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018</td><td>fair value impact may 282017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 33.2</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 25.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.1</td><td>24.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>2.0</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total fair value impact of the interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones, combined, in may 2018?
Answer: 54.5
Question: including the commodity instruments, what then becomes that total?
| 56.4 |
CONVFINQA2023 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 27 2018</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018</td><td>fair value impact may 282017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 33.2</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 25.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.1</td><td>24.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>2.0</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total fair value impact of the interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones, combined, in may 2018?
Answer: 54.5
Question: including the commodity instruments, what then becomes that total?
Answer: 56.4
Question: and including, on top, the equity instruments, what then becomes this total fair value impact?
| 58.4 |
CONVFINQA2024 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>washington mutual acquisition</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>39454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accretion into interest income</td><td>-3232 ( 3232 )</td><td>-4363 ( 4363 )</td><td>-1292 ( 1292 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>changes in interest rates on variable rate loans</td><td>-819 ( 819 )</td><td>-4849 ( 4849 )</td><td>-5543 ( 5543 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other changes in expected cash flows ( a )</td><td>-2396 ( 2396 )</td><td>2137</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31</td><td>$ 19097</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accretable yield percentage</td><td>4.35% ( 4.35 % )</td><td>5.14% ( 5.14 % )</td><td>5.81% ( 5.81 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the balance of total pci consumer loans in 2010?
| 19097.0 |
CONVFINQA2025 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>washington mutual acquisition</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>39454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accretion into interest income</td><td>-3232 ( 3232 )</td><td>-4363 ( 4363 )</td><td>-1292 ( 1292 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>changes in interest rates on variable rate loans</td><td>-819 ( 819 )</td><td>-4849 ( 4849 )</td><td>-5543 ( 5543 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other changes in expected cash flows ( a )</td><td>-2396 ( 2396 )</td><td>2137</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31</td><td>$ 19097</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accretable yield percentage</td><td>4.35% ( 4.35 % )</td><td>5.14% ( 5.14 % )</td><td>5.81% ( 5.81 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the balance of total pci consumer loans in 2010?
Answer: 19097.0
Question: and in 2009?
| 25544.0 |
CONVFINQA2026 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>washington mutual acquisition</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>39454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accretion into interest income</td><td>-3232 ( 3232 )</td><td>-4363 ( 4363 )</td><td>-1292 ( 1292 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>changes in interest rates on variable rate loans</td><td>-819 ( 819 )</td><td>-4849 ( 4849 )</td><td>-5543 ( 5543 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other changes in expected cash flows ( a )</td><td>-2396 ( 2396 )</td><td>2137</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31</td><td>$ 19097</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accretable yield percentage</td><td>4.35% ( 4.35 % )</td><td>5.14% ( 5.14 % )</td><td>5.81% ( 5.81 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the balance of total pci consumer loans in 2010?
Answer: 19097.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 25544.0
Question: so combined, what was the total value for these two years?
| 44641.0 |
CONVFINQA2027 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>washington mutual acquisition</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>39454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accretion into interest income</td><td>-3232 ( 3232 )</td><td>-4363 ( 4363 )</td><td>-1292 ( 1292 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>changes in interest rates on variable rate loans</td><td>-819 ( 819 )</td><td>-4849 ( 4849 )</td><td>-5543 ( 5543 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other changes in expected cash flows ( a )</td><td>-2396 ( 2396 )</td><td>2137</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31</td><td>$ 19097</td><td>$ 25544</td><td>$ 32619</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accretable yield percentage</td><td>4.35% ( 4.35 % )</td><td>5.14% ( 5.14 % )</td><td>5.81% ( 5.81 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the balance of total pci consumer loans in 2010?
Answer: 19097.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 25544.0
Question: so combined, what was the total value for these two years?
Answer: 44641.0
Question: and the average value?
| 22320.5 |
CONVFINQA2028 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , each nonemployee director may receive annually up to 10000 stock options or 4000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . additionally , each nonemployee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to which the director is otherwise entitled through the issuance of stock options or restricted stock units . each option and restricted stock unit award granted in 2011 or prior generally vests in three equal annual installments . each option and restricted stock unit award granted after 2011 generally vests after one year . upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 10000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 6.6 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 5.1% ( 5.1 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>none</td><td>none</td><td>none</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per share</td><td>$ 19.47</td><td>$ 23.93</td><td>$ 22.78</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the percentage change in the fair value per share from 2011 to 2012?
| 1.15 |
CONVFINQA2029 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , each nonemployee director may receive annually up to 10000 stock options or 4000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . additionally , each nonemployee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to which the director is otherwise entitled through the issuance of stock options or restricted stock units . each option and restricted stock unit award granted in 2011 or prior generally vests in three equal annual installments . each option and restricted stock unit award granted after 2011 generally vests after one year . upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 10000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 6.6 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 5.1% ( 5.1 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>none</td><td>none</td><td>none</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per share</td><td>$ 19.47</td><td>$ 23.93</td><td>$ 22.78</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the percentage change in the fair value per share from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.15
Question: and what was that fair value in 2011?
| 22.78 |
CONVFINQA2030 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , each nonemployee director may receive annually up to 10000 stock options or 4000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . additionally , each nonemployee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to which the director is otherwise entitled through the issuance of stock options or restricted stock units . each option and restricted stock unit award granted in 2011 or prior generally vests in three equal annual installments . each option and restricted stock unit award granted after 2011 generally vests after one year . upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 10000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 6.6 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 5.1% ( 5.1 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>none</td><td>none</td><td>none</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.6</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value per share</td><td>$ 19.47</td><td>$ 23.93</td><td>$ 22.78</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the percentage change in the fair value per share from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.15
Question: and what was that fair value in 2011?
Answer: 22.78
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 fair value, in percentage?
| 0.05048 |
CONVFINQA2031 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what is the net increase of a $100 investment in pmi from 2010 to 2015?
| 86.2 |
CONVFINQA2032 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what is the net increase of a $100 investment in pmi from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 86.2
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
| 0.862 |
CONVFINQA2033 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what is the net increase of a $100 investment in pmi from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 86.2
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: 0.862
Question: what is the value of an investment in s&p500 in 2015?
| 180.8 |
CONVFINQA2034 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what is the net increase of a $100 investment in pmi from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 86.2
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: 0.862
Question: what is the value of an investment in s&p500 in 2015?
Answer: 180.8
Question: what is the net change in this investment?
| 80.8 |
CONVFINQA2035 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what is the net increase of a $100 investment in pmi from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 86.2
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: 0.862
Question: what is the value of an investment in s&p500 in 2015?
Answer: 180.8
Question: what is the net change in this investment?
Answer: 80.8
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
| 0.808 |
CONVFINQA2036 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what is the net increase of a $100 investment in pmi from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 86.2
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: 0.862
Question: what is the value of an investment in s&p500 in 2015?
Answer: 180.8
Question: what is the net change in this investment?
Answer: 80.8
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: 0.808
Question: what is the difference of the rate of return between pmi and s&p500?
| 0.054 |
CONVFINQA2037 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the interest expense and penalties amount in 2009?
| 1.7 |
CONVFINQA2038 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the interest expense and penalties amount in 2009?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what was the value in 2008?
| 1.3 |
CONVFINQA2039 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the interest expense and penalties amount in 2009?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what was the value in 2008?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what is the net change?
| 0.4 |
CONVFINQA2040 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the interest expense and penalties amount in 2009?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what was the value in 2008?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 0.4
Question: what was the 2008 value?
| 1.3 |
CONVFINQA2041 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 include $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 3 2007</td><td>$ 9889</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>3861</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of current year</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>$ 18161</td></tr></table> fiscal year 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal year 2009 . two of the unresolved matters are one-time issues and pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertain to the computation of research and development ( r&d ) tax credits and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . these latter two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years . fiscal year 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company have agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues , including the same r&d credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) , and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . with the exception of the analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the interest expense and penalties amount in 2009?
Answer: 1.7
Question: what was the value in 2008?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 0.4
Question: what was the 2008 value?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?
| 0.30769 |
CONVFINQA2042 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .
Question: what was the portion of the anticipated increased in the berths capacity to service european cruise market between 2012 and 2016?
| 0.18065 |
CONVFINQA2043 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .
Question: what was the portion of the anticipated increased in the berths capacity to service european cruise market between 2012 and 2016?
Answer: 0.18065
Question: what was the change in the number of global guests between 2007 and 2011?
| 3641000.0 |
CONVFINQA2044 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .
Question: what was the portion of the anticipated increased in the berths capacity to service european cruise market between 2012 and 2016?
Answer: 0.18065
Question: what was the change in the number of global guests between 2007 and 2011?
Answer: 3641000.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase during this time?
| 0.21952 |
CONVFINQA2045 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 485.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>27.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>27.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-44.3 ( 44.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2009 to 2010?
| 55.1 |
CONVFINQA2046 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 485.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>27.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>27.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-44.3 ( 44.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 55.1
Question: what were net revenues in 2009?
| 485.1 |
CONVFINQA2047 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 485.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>27.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>27.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-44.3 ( 44.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 55.1
Question: what were net revenues in 2009?
Answer: 485.1
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.11358 |
CONVFINQA2048 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . additionally , in connection with the acquisition of solexa , the company assumed stock options granted under the 2005 solexa equity incentive plan ( the 2005 solexa equity plan ) . as of december 30 , 2007 , an aggregate of up to 13485619 shares of the company 2019s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2005 stock plan and the 2005 solexa equity plan . the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . as of december 30 , 2007 , options to purchase 1834384 shares remained available for future grant under the 2005 stock plan and 2005 solexa equity plan . the company 2019s stock option activity under all stock option plans from january 2 , 2005 through december 30 , 2007 is as follows : options weighted- average exercise price . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>options</td><td>weighted- average exercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 2 2005</td><td>6205020</td><td>$ 6.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2992300</td><td>$ 10.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>exercised</td><td>-869925 ( 869925 )</td><td>$ 4.66</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-1001964 ( 1001964 )</td><td>$ 11.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2006</td><td>7325431</td><td>$ 7.96</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>2621050</td><td>$ 27.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>exercised</td><td>-1273119 ( 1273119 )</td><td>$ 7.28</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-314242 ( 314242 )</td><td>$ 12.44</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2006</td><td>8359120</td><td>$ 13.94</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>options assumed through business combination</td><td>1424332</td><td>$ 21.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>granted</td><td>3784508</td><td>$ 40.64</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>exercised</td><td>-2179286 ( 2179286 )</td><td>$ 12.06</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-964740 ( 964740 )</td><td>$ 22.38</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>outstanding at december 30 2007</td><td>10423934</td><td>$ 24.26</td></tr></table> illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total value of granted options in 2006 using the number of options and the weighted-average exercise price?
| 71397402.0 |
CONVFINQA2049 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . additionally , in connection with the acquisition of solexa , the company assumed stock options granted under the 2005 solexa equity incentive plan ( the 2005 solexa equity plan ) . as of december 30 , 2007 , an aggregate of up to 13485619 shares of the company 2019s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2005 stock plan and the 2005 solexa equity plan . the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . as of december 30 , 2007 , options to purchase 1834384 shares remained available for future grant under the 2005 stock plan and 2005 solexa equity plan . the company 2019s stock option activity under all stock option plans from january 2 , 2005 through december 30 , 2007 is as follows : options weighted- average exercise price . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>options</td><td>weighted- average exercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 2 2005</td><td>6205020</td><td>$ 6.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2992300</td><td>$ 10.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>exercised</td><td>-869925 ( 869925 )</td><td>$ 4.66</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-1001964 ( 1001964 )</td><td>$ 11.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2006</td><td>7325431</td><td>$ 7.96</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>2621050</td><td>$ 27.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>exercised</td><td>-1273119 ( 1273119 )</td><td>$ 7.28</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-314242 ( 314242 )</td><td>$ 12.44</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2006</td><td>8359120</td><td>$ 13.94</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>options assumed through business combination</td><td>1424332</td><td>$ 21.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>granted</td><td>3784508</td><td>$ 40.64</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>exercised</td><td>-2179286 ( 2179286 )</td><td>$ 12.06</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-964740 ( 964740 )</td><td>$ 22.38</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>outstanding at december 30 2007</td><td>10423934</td><td>$ 24.26</td></tr></table> illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total value of granted options in 2006 using the number of options and the weighted-average exercise price?
Answer: 71397402.0
Question: and converted to the tens place?
| 71.3974 |
CONVFINQA2050 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what is the value of the investment in ventas at the end of 2007?
| 512.0 |
CONVFINQA2051 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what is the value of the investment in ventas at the end of 2007?
Answer: 512.0
Question: what about at the end of 2002?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA2052 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what is the value of the investment in ventas at the end of 2007?
Answer: 512.0
Question: what about at the end of 2002?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value of this investment?
| 412.0 |
CONVFINQA2053 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what is the value of the investment in ventas at the end of 2007?
Answer: 512.0
Question: what about at the end of 2002?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value of this investment?
Answer: 412.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 4.12 |
CONVFINQA2054 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .
Question: what was net income in 2015?
| 403.1 |
CONVFINQA2055 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .
Question: what was net income in 2015?
Answer: 403.1
Question: what was the value of stock compensation?
| 31.2 |
CONVFINQA2056 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .
Question: what was net income in 2015?
Answer: 403.1
Question: what was the value of stock compensation?
Answer: 31.2
Question: what is the sum total?
| 434.3 |
CONVFINQA2057 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .
Question: what was net income in 2015?
Answer: 403.1
Question: what was the value of stock compensation?
Answer: 31.2
Question: what is the sum total?
Answer: 434.3
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
| 434300000.0 |
CONVFINQA2058 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2020</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9714.1</td><td>$ 550.8</td><td>$ 939.8</td><td>$ 2494.3</td><td>$ 5729.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating lease obligations ( 2 )</td><td>930.4</td><td>214.3</td><td>316.4</td><td>193.6</td><td>206.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations ( 3 )</td><td>168.9</td><td>6.4</td><td>8.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>150.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )</td><td>2293.5</td><td>1607.0</td><td>292.5</td><td>206.7</td><td>187.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13106.9</td><td>$ 2378.5</td><td>$ 1557.4</td><td>$ 2897.5</td><td>$ 6273.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what is the total of the payments due in 2020?
| 2378.5 |
CONVFINQA2059 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2020</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9714.1</td><td>$ 550.8</td><td>$ 939.8</td><td>$ 2494.3</td><td>$ 5729.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating lease obligations ( 2 )</td><td>930.4</td><td>214.3</td><td>316.4</td><td>193.6</td><td>206.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations ( 3 )</td><td>168.9</td><td>6.4</td><td>8.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>150.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )</td><td>2293.5</td><td>1607.0</td><td>292.5</td><td>206.7</td><td>187.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13106.9</td><td>$ 2378.5</td><td>$ 1557.4</td><td>$ 2897.5</td><td>$ 6273.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what is the total of the payments due in 2020?
Answer: 2378.5
Question: and what is the full amount of all payments?
| 13106.9 |
CONVFINQA2060 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2020</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9714.1</td><td>$ 550.8</td><td>$ 939.8</td><td>$ 2494.3</td><td>$ 5729.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating lease obligations ( 2 )</td><td>930.4</td><td>214.3</td><td>316.4</td><td>193.6</td><td>206.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations ( 3 )</td><td>168.9</td><td>6.4</td><td>8.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>150.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )</td><td>2293.5</td><td>1607.0</td><td>292.5</td><td>206.7</td><td>187.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13106.9</td><td>$ 2378.5</td><td>$ 1557.4</td><td>$ 2897.5</td><td>$ 6273.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what is the total of the payments due in 2020?
Answer: 2378.5
Question: and what is the full amount of all payments?
Answer: 13106.9
Question: what percentage, then, of this full amount does that total represent?
| 0.18147 |
CONVFINQA2061 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2020</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9714.1</td><td>$ 550.8</td><td>$ 939.8</td><td>$ 2494.3</td><td>$ 5729.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating lease obligations ( 2 )</td><td>930.4</td><td>214.3</td><td>316.4</td><td>193.6</td><td>206.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations ( 3 )</td><td>168.9</td><td>6.4</td><td>8.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>150.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )</td><td>2293.5</td><td>1607.0</td><td>292.5</td><td>206.7</td><td>187.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13106.9</td><td>$ 2378.5</td><td>$ 1557.4</td><td>$ 2897.5</td><td>$ 6273.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what is the total of the payments due in 2020?
Answer: 2378.5
Question: and what is the full amount of all payments?
Answer: 13106.9
Question: what percentage, then, of this full amount does that total represent?
Answer: 0.18147
Question: in the previous year of that one, what was the number of shares repurchased?
| 2.1 |
CONVFINQA2062 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2020</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9714.1</td><td>$ 550.8</td><td>$ 939.8</td><td>$ 2494.3</td><td>$ 5729.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating lease obligations ( 2 )</td><td>930.4</td><td>214.3</td><td>316.4</td><td>193.6</td><td>206.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations ( 3 )</td><td>168.9</td><td>6.4</td><td>8.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>150.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )</td><td>2293.5</td><td>1607.0</td><td>292.5</td><td>206.7</td><td>187.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13106.9</td><td>$ 2378.5</td><td>$ 1557.4</td><td>$ 2897.5</td><td>$ 6273.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what is the total of the payments due in 2020?
Answer: 2378.5
Question: and what is the full amount of all payments?
Answer: 13106.9
Question: what percentage, then, of this full amount does that total represent?
Answer: 0.18147
Question: in the previous year of that one, what was the number of shares repurchased?
Answer: 2.1
Question: and what was it in 2018?
| 3.4 |
CONVFINQA2063 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2020</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022</td><td>payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024</td><td>payments due by period thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )</td><td>$ 9714.1</td><td>$ 550.8</td><td>$ 939.8</td><td>$ 2494.3</td><td>$ 5729.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating lease obligations ( 2 )</td><td>930.4</td><td>214.3</td><td>316.4</td><td>193.6</td><td>206.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations ( 3 )</td><td>168.9</td><td>6.4</td><td>8.7</td><td>2.9</td><td>150.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )</td><td>2293.5</td><td>1607.0</td><td>292.5</td><td>206.7</td><td>187.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13106.9</td><td>$ 2378.5</td><td>$ 1557.4</td><td>$ 2897.5</td><td>$ 6273.5</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what is the total of the payments due in 2020?
Answer: 2378.5
Question: and what is the full amount of all payments?
Answer: 13106.9
Question: what percentage, then, of this full amount does that total represent?
Answer: 0.18147
Question: in the previous year of that one, what was the number of shares repurchased?
Answer: 2.1
Question: and what was it in 2018?
Answer: 3.4
Question: how much, then, does the 2019 number represent in relation to this 2018 one?
| 0.61765 |
CONVFINQA2064 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
human capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>57.9% ( 57.9 % )</td><td>58.7% ( 58.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )</td><td>( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>56.3% ( 56.3 % )</td><td>56.9% ( 56.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>54.8% ( 54.8 % )</td><td>55.8% ( 55.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the debt to capital in 2012?
| 58.7 |
CONVFINQA2065 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
human capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>57.9% ( 57.9 % )</td><td>58.7% ( 58.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )</td><td>( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>56.3% ( 56.3 % )</td><td>56.9% ( 56.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>54.8% ( 54.8 % )</td><td>55.8% ( 55.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the debt to capital in 2012?
Answer: 58.7
Question: and in 2013?
| 57.9 |
CONVFINQA2066 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
human capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>57.9% ( 57.9 % )</td><td>58.7% ( 58.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )</td><td>( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>56.3% ( 56.3 % )</td><td>56.9% ( 56.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>54.8% ( 54.8 % )</td><td>55.8% ( 55.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the debt to capital in 2012?
Answer: 58.7
Question: and in 2013?
Answer: 57.9
Question: what was the difference in this value between the two years?
| 0.8 |
CONVFINQA2067 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
human capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>57.9% ( 57.9 % )</td><td>58.7% ( 58.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )</td><td>( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>56.3% ( 56.3 % )</td><td>56.9% ( 56.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>54.8% ( 54.8 % )</td><td>55.8% ( 55.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the debt to capital in 2012?
Answer: 58.7
Question: and in 2013?
Answer: 57.9
Question: what was the difference in this value between the two years?
Answer: 0.8
Question: and the specific value for 2013 again?
| 57.9 |
CONVFINQA2068 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
human capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>57.9% ( 57.9 % )</td><td>58.7% ( 58.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )</td><td>( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>56.3% ( 56.3 % )</td><td>56.9% ( 56.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>54.8% ( 54.8 % )</td><td>55.8% ( 55.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the debt to capital in 2012?
Answer: 58.7
Question: and in 2013?
Answer: 57.9
Question: what was the difference in this value between the two years?
Answer: 0.8
Question: and the specific value for 2013 again?
Answer: 57.9
Question: so what was the change between 2012-13 as a percentage?
| 0.01382 |
CONVFINQA2069 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings</td><td>39-40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>furniture fixtures and equipment</td><td>3-10</td></tr></table> improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
Question: what was the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2006, in millions?
| 9.4 |
CONVFINQA2070 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings</td><td>39-40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>furniture fixtures and equipment</td><td>3-10</td></tr></table> improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
Question: what was the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2006, in millions?
Answer: 9.4
Question: and what was that of 2005, also in millions??
| 0.6 |
CONVFINQA2071 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings</td><td>39-40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>furniture fixtures and equipment</td><td>3-10</td></tr></table> improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
Question: what was the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2006, in millions?
Answer: 9.4
Question: and what was that of 2005, also in millions??
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total impairment charges recorded in both of those years, in millions?
| 10.0 |
CONVFINQA2072 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings</td><td>39-40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>furniture fixtures and equipment</td><td>3-10</td></tr></table> improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
Question: what was the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2006, in millions?
Answer: 9.4
Question: and what was that of 2005, also in millions??
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total impairment charges recorded in both of those years, in millions?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what was the the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2004, in millions?
| 0.2 |
CONVFINQA2073 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings</td><td>39-40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>furniture fixtures and equipment</td><td>3-10</td></tr></table> improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
Question: what was the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2006, in millions?
Answer: 9.4
Question: and what was that of 2005, also in millions??
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total impairment charges recorded in both of those years, in millions?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what was the the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2004, in millions?
Answer: 0.2
Question: including 2004, what would then be the total sum of impairment charges recorded in those three years?
| 10.2 |
CONVFINQA2074 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?
| 0.45455 |
CONVFINQA2075 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?
Answer: 0.45455
Question: what is the total principal payments as of march 31,2006?
| 3498.0 |
CONVFINQA2076 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?
Answer: 0.45455
Question: what is the total principal payments as of march 31,2006?
Answer: 3498.0
Question: what is the amount of principal payments due after 2011?
| 1590.0 |
CONVFINQA2077 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>309</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1485</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>1590</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3498</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the total principal payments is due after 2011?
Answer: 0.45455
Question: what is the total principal payments as of march 31,2006?
Answer: 3498.0
Question: what is the amount of principal payments due after 2011?
Answer: 1590.0
Question: what about the amount due from 2007 to 2011?
| 1908.0 |
CONVFINQA2078 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2018 form 10-k annual report ( 8 ) we have incurred other various expenses from specific events or projects that we consider highly variable or have a significant impact to our operating results that we have excluded from our non-gaap financial measures . this includes legal entity and operational restructuring as well as our costs of complying with our dpa with the u.s . government related to certain fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries . under the dpa , which has a three-year term , we are subject to oversight by an independent compliance monitor , which monitorship commenced in july 2017 . the excluded costs include the fees paid to the independent compliance monitor and to external legal counsel assisting in the matter . ( 9 ) represents the tax effects on the previously specified items . the tax effect for the u.s . jurisdiction is calculated based on an effective rate considering federal and state taxes , as well as permanent items . for jurisdictions outside the u.s. , the tax effect is calculated based upon the statutory rates where the items were incurred . ( 10 ) the 2016 period includes negative effects from finalizing the tax accounts for the biomet merger . under the applicable u.s . gaap rules , these measurement period adjustments are recognized on a prospective basis in the period of change . ( 11 ) the 2017 tax act resulted in a net favorable provisional adjustment due to the reduction of deferred tax liabilities for unremitted earnings and revaluation of deferred tax liabilities to a 21 percent rate , which was partially offset by provisional tax charges related to the toll charge provision of the 2017 tax act . in 2018 , we finalized our estimates of the effects of the 2017 tax act based upon final guidance issued by u.s . tax authorities . ( 12 ) other certain tax adjustments in 2018 primarily related to changes in tax rates on deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets recognized in acquisition-related accounting and adjustments from internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . in 2017 , other certain tax adjustments relate to tax benefits from lower tax rates unrelated to the impact of the 2017 tax act , net favorable resolutions of various tax matters and net favorable adjustments from internal restructuring transactions . the 2016 adjustment primarily related to a favorable adjustment to certain deferred tax liabilities recognized as part of acquisition-related accounting and favorable resolution of certain tax matters with taxing authorities offset by internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . ( 13 ) diluted share count used in adjusted diluted eps : year ended december 31 , 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year endeddecember 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>diluted shares</td><td>203.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive shares assuming net earnings</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted diluted shares</td><td>205.0</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in operating cash flows in 2018 compared to 2017 was driven by additional cash flows from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries , lower acquisition and integration expenses and lower quality remediation expenses , as well as certain significant payments made in the 2017 period . in the 2017 period , we made payments related to the u.s . durom cup settlement program , and we paid $ 30.5 million in settlement payments to resolve previously-disclosed fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries as discussed in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . the decline in operating cash flows in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by additional investments in inventory , additional expenses for quality remediation and the significant payments made in the 2017 period as discussed in the previous sentence . these unfavorable items were partially offset by $ 174.0 million of incremental cash flows in 2017 from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries . cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . instrument and property , plant and equipment additions reflected ongoing investments in our product portfolio and optimization of our manufacturing and logistics network . in 2018 , we entered into receive-fixed-rate , pay-fixed-rate cross-currency interest rate swaps . our investing cash flows reflect the net cash inflows from the fixed- rate interest rate receipts/payments , as well as the termination of certain of these swaps that were in a gain position in the year . the 2016 period included cash outflows for the acquisition of ldr holding corporation ( 201cldr 201d ) and other business acquisitions . additionally , the 2016 period reflects the maturity of available-for-sale debt securities . as these investments matured , we used the cash to pay off debt and have not reinvested in any additional debt securities . cash flows used in financing activities were $ 1302.2 million in 2018 . our primary use of available cash in 2018 was for debt repayment . we received net proceeds of $ 749.5 million from the issuance of additional senior notes and borrowed $ 400.0 million from our multicurrency revolving facility to repay $ 1150.0 million of senior notes that became due on april 2 , 2018 . we subsequently repaid the $ 400.0 million of multicurrency revolving facility borrowings . also in 2018 , we borrowed another $ 675.0 million under a new u.s . term loan c and used the cash proceeds along with cash generated from operations throughout the year to repay an aggregate of $ 835.0 million on u.s . term loan a , $ 450.0 million on u.s . term loan b , and we subsequently repaid $ 140.0 million on u.s . term loan c . overall , we had approximately $ 1150 million of net principal repayments on our senior notes and term loans in 2018 . in 2017 , our primary use of available cash was also for debt repayment compared to 2016 when we were not able to repay as much debt due to financing requirements to complete the ldr and other business acquisitions . additionally in 2017 , we had net cash inflows of $ 103.5 million on factoring programs that had not been remitted to the third party . in 2018 , we had net cash outflows related to these factoring programs as we remitted the $ 103.5 million and collected only $ 66.8 million which had not yet been remitted by the end of the year . since our factoring programs started at the end of 2016 , we did not have similar cash flows in that year . in january 2019 , we borrowed an additional $ 200.0 million under u.s . term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s . term loan b . in february , may , august and december 2018 , our board of directors declared cash dividends of $ 0.24 per share . we expect to continue paying cash dividends on a quarterly basis ; however , future dividends are subject to approval of the board of directors and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . as further discussed in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements , our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances. .
Question: what was the change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2016 to 2017?
| -1180.7 |
CONVFINQA2079 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2018 form 10-k annual report ( 8 ) we have incurred other various expenses from specific events or projects that we consider highly variable or have a significant impact to our operating results that we have excluded from our non-gaap financial measures . this includes legal entity and operational restructuring as well as our costs of complying with our dpa with the u.s . government related to certain fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries . under the dpa , which has a three-year term , we are subject to oversight by an independent compliance monitor , which monitorship commenced in july 2017 . the excluded costs include the fees paid to the independent compliance monitor and to external legal counsel assisting in the matter . ( 9 ) represents the tax effects on the previously specified items . the tax effect for the u.s . jurisdiction is calculated based on an effective rate considering federal and state taxes , as well as permanent items . for jurisdictions outside the u.s. , the tax effect is calculated based upon the statutory rates where the items were incurred . ( 10 ) the 2016 period includes negative effects from finalizing the tax accounts for the biomet merger . under the applicable u.s . gaap rules , these measurement period adjustments are recognized on a prospective basis in the period of change . ( 11 ) the 2017 tax act resulted in a net favorable provisional adjustment due to the reduction of deferred tax liabilities for unremitted earnings and revaluation of deferred tax liabilities to a 21 percent rate , which was partially offset by provisional tax charges related to the toll charge provision of the 2017 tax act . in 2018 , we finalized our estimates of the effects of the 2017 tax act based upon final guidance issued by u.s . tax authorities . ( 12 ) other certain tax adjustments in 2018 primarily related to changes in tax rates on deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets recognized in acquisition-related accounting and adjustments from internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . in 2017 , other certain tax adjustments relate to tax benefits from lower tax rates unrelated to the impact of the 2017 tax act , net favorable resolutions of various tax matters and net favorable adjustments from internal restructuring transactions . the 2016 adjustment primarily related to a favorable adjustment to certain deferred tax liabilities recognized as part of acquisition-related accounting and favorable resolution of certain tax matters with taxing authorities offset by internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . ( 13 ) diluted share count used in adjusted diluted eps : year ended december 31 , 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year endeddecember 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>diluted shares</td><td>203.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive shares assuming net earnings</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted diluted shares</td><td>205.0</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in operating cash flows in 2018 compared to 2017 was driven by additional cash flows from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries , lower acquisition and integration expenses and lower quality remediation expenses , as well as certain significant payments made in the 2017 period . in the 2017 period , we made payments related to the u.s . durom cup settlement program , and we paid $ 30.5 million in settlement payments to resolve previously-disclosed fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries as discussed in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . the decline in operating cash flows in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by additional investments in inventory , additional expenses for quality remediation and the significant payments made in the 2017 period as discussed in the previous sentence . these unfavorable items were partially offset by $ 174.0 million of incremental cash flows in 2017 from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries . cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . instrument and property , plant and equipment additions reflected ongoing investments in our product portfolio and optimization of our manufacturing and logistics network . in 2018 , we entered into receive-fixed-rate , pay-fixed-rate cross-currency interest rate swaps . our investing cash flows reflect the net cash inflows from the fixed- rate interest rate receipts/payments , as well as the termination of certain of these swaps that were in a gain position in the year . the 2016 period included cash outflows for the acquisition of ldr holding corporation ( 201cldr 201d ) and other business acquisitions . additionally , the 2016 period reflects the maturity of available-for-sale debt securities . as these investments matured , we used the cash to pay off debt and have not reinvested in any additional debt securities . cash flows used in financing activities were $ 1302.2 million in 2018 . our primary use of available cash in 2018 was for debt repayment . we received net proceeds of $ 749.5 million from the issuance of additional senior notes and borrowed $ 400.0 million from our multicurrency revolving facility to repay $ 1150.0 million of senior notes that became due on april 2 , 2018 . we subsequently repaid the $ 400.0 million of multicurrency revolving facility borrowings . also in 2018 , we borrowed another $ 675.0 million under a new u.s . term loan c and used the cash proceeds along with cash generated from operations throughout the year to repay an aggregate of $ 835.0 million on u.s . term loan a , $ 450.0 million on u.s . term loan b , and we subsequently repaid $ 140.0 million on u.s . term loan c . overall , we had approximately $ 1150 million of net principal repayments on our senior notes and term loans in 2018 . in 2017 , our primary use of available cash was also for debt repayment compared to 2016 when we were not able to repay as much debt due to financing requirements to complete the ldr and other business acquisitions . additionally in 2017 , we had net cash inflows of $ 103.5 million on factoring programs that had not been remitted to the third party . in 2018 , we had net cash outflows related to these factoring programs as we remitted the $ 103.5 million and collected only $ 66.8 million which had not yet been remitted by the end of the year . since our factoring programs started at the end of 2016 , we did not have similar cash flows in that year . in january 2019 , we borrowed an additional $ 200.0 million under u.s . term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s . term loan b . in february , may , august and december 2018 , our board of directors declared cash dividends of $ 0.24 per share . we expect to continue paying cash dividends on a quarterly basis ; however , future dividends are subject to approval of the board of directors and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . as further discussed in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements , our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances. .
Question: what was the change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: -1180.7
Question: and what was the total of cash flows used in investing activities in 2016?
| 1691.5 |
CONVFINQA2080 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2018 form 10-k annual report ( 8 ) we have incurred other various expenses from specific events or projects that we consider highly variable or have a significant impact to our operating results that we have excluded from our non-gaap financial measures . this includes legal entity and operational restructuring as well as our costs of complying with our dpa with the u.s . government related to certain fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries . under the dpa , which has a three-year term , we are subject to oversight by an independent compliance monitor , which monitorship commenced in july 2017 . the excluded costs include the fees paid to the independent compliance monitor and to external legal counsel assisting in the matter . ( 9 ) represents the tax effects on the previously specified items . the tax effect for the u.s . jurisdiction is calculated based on an effective rate considering federal and state taxes , as well as permanent items . for jurisdictions outside the u.s. , the tax effect is calculated based upon the statutory rates where the items were incurred . ( 10 ) the 2016 period includes negative effects from finalizing the tax accounts for the biomet merger . under the applicable u.s . gaap rules , these measurement period adjustments are recognized on a prospective basis in the period of change . ( 11 ) the 2017 tax act resulted in a net favorable provisional adjustment due to the reduction of deferred tax liabilities for unremitted earnings and revaluation of deferred tax liabilities to a 21 percent rate , which was partially offset by provisional tax charges related to the toll charge provision of the 2017 tax act . in 2018 , we finalized our estimates of the effects of the 2017 tax act based upon final guidance issued by u.s . tax authorities . ( 12 ) other certain tax adjustments in 2018 primarily related to changes in tax rates on deferred tax liabilities recorded on intangible assets recognized in acquisition-related accounting and adjustments from internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . in 2017 , other certain tax adjustments relate to tax benefits from lower tax rates unrelated to the impact of the 2017 tax act , net favorable resolutions of various tax matters and net favorable adjustments from internal restructuring transactions . the 2016 adjustment primarily related to a favorable adjustment to certain deferred tax liabilities recognized as part of acquisition-related accounting and favorable resolution of certain tax matters with taxing authorities offset by internal restructuring transactions that provide us access to offshore funds in a tax efficient manner . ( 13 ) diluted share count used in adjusted diluted eps : year ended december 31 , 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year endeddecember 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>diluted shares</td><td>203.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive shares assuming net earnings</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted diluted shares</td><td>205.0</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources cash flows provided by operating activities were $ 1747.4 million in 2018 compared to $ 1582.3 million and $ 1632.2 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in operating cash flows in 2018 compared to 2017 was driven by additional cash flows from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries , lower acquisition and integration expenses and lower quality remediation expenses , as well as certain significant payments made in the 2017 period . in the 2017 period , we made payments related to the u.s . durom cup settlement program , and we paid $ 30.5 million in settlement payments to resolve previously-disclosed fcpa matters involving biomet and certain of its subsidiaries as discussed in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . the decline in operating cash flows in 2017 compared to 2016 was driven by additional investments in inventory , additional expenses for quality remediation and the significant payments made in the 2017 period as discussed in the previous sentence . these unfavorable items were partially offset by $ 174.0 million of incremental cash flows in 2017 from our sale of accounts receivable in certain countries . cash flows used in investing activities were $ 416.6 million in 2018 compared to $ 510.8 million and $ 1691.5 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . instrument and property , plant and equipment additions reflected ongoing investments in our product portfolio and optimization of our manufacturing and logistics network . in 2018 , we entered into receive-fixed-rate , pay-fixed-rate cross-currency interest rate swaps . our investing cash flows reflect the net cash inflows from the fixed- rate interest rate receipts/payments , as well as the termination of certain of these swaps that were in a gain position in the year . the 2016 period included cash outflows for the acquisition of ldr holding corporation ( 201cldr 201d ) and other business acquisitions . additionally , the 2016 period reflects the maturity of available-for-sale debt securities . as these investments matured , we used the cash to pay off debt and have not reinvested in any additional debt securities . cash flows used in financing activities were $ 1302.2 million in 2018 . our primary use of available cash in 2018 was for debt repayment . we received net proceeds of $ 749.5 million from the issuance of additional senior notes and borrowed $ 400.0 million from our multicurrency revolving facility to repay $ 1150.0 million of senior notes that became due on april 2 , 2018 . we subsequently repaid the $ 400.0 million of multicurrency revolving facility borrowings . also in 2018 , we borrowed another $ 675.0 million under a new u.s . term loan c and used the cash proceeds along with cash generated from operations throughout the year to repay an aggregate of $ 835.0 million on u.s . term loan a , $ 450.0 million on u.s . term loan b , and we subsequently repaid $ 140.0 million on u.s . term loan c . overall , we had approximately $ 1150 million of net principal repayments on our senior notes and term loans in 2018 . in 2017 , our primary use of available cash was also for debt repayment compared to 2016 when we were not able to repay as much debt due to financing requirements to complete the ldr and other business acquisitions . additionally in 2017 , we had net cash inflows of $ 103.5 million on factoring programs that had not been remitted to the third party . in 2018 , we had net cash outflows related to these factoring programs as we remitted the $ 103.5 million and collected only $ 66.8 million which had not yet been remitted by the end of the year . since our factoring programs started at the end of 2016 , we did not have similar cash flows in that year . in january 2019 , we borrowed an additional $ 200.0 million under u.s . term loan c and used those proceeds , along with cash on hand , to repay the remaining $ 225.0 million outstanding under u.s . term loan b . in february , may , august and december 2018 , our board of directors declared cash dividends of $ 0.24 per share . we expect to continue paying cash dividends on a quarterly basis ; however , future dividends are subject to approval of the board of directors and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . as further discussed in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements , our debt facilities restrict the payment of dividends in certain circumstances. .
Question: what was the change in cash flows used in investing activities from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: -1180.7
Question: and what was the total of cash flows used in investing activities in 2016?
Answer: 1691.5
Question: how much does that change represent in relation to this 2016 total, in percentage?
| -0.69802 |
CONVFINQA2081 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .
Question: what is the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007?
| 9.09 |
CONVFINQA2082 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .
Question: what is the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007?
Answer: 9.09
Question: and that of 2006?
| 6.79 |
CONVFINQA2083 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .
Question: what is the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007?
Answer: 9.09
Question: and that of 2006?
Answer: 6.79
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007 and 2006?
| 2.3 |
CONVFINQA2084 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2008 , 2007 and 2006 offering periods employees purchased 55764 , 48886 and 53210 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 30.08 , $ 33.93 and $ 24.98 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2008 , 2007 and 2006 were $ 7.89 , $ 9.09 and $ 6.79 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 , 8.8 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk free interest rates</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) 20143.28% ( 20143.28 % )</td><td>4.98% ( 4.98 % ) 20145.05% ( 20145.05 % )</td><td>5.01% ( 5.01 % ) 20145.17% ( 20145.17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td><td>5.02% ( 5.02 % )</td><td>5.08% ( 5.08 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of the shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) 201428.51% ( 201428.51 % )</td><td>27.53% ( 27.53 % ) 201428.74% ( 201428.74 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td><td>28.22% ( 28.22 % )</td><td>29.60% ( 29.60 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in january 2003 , the company issued warrants to purchase approximately 11.4 million shares of its common stock in connection with an offering of 808000 units , each consisting of $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of the company 2019s common stock . these warrants became exercisable on january 29 , 2006 at an exercise price of $ 0.01 per share . as these warrants expired on august 1 , 2008 , none were outstanding as of december 31 , in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 2.0 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these warrants will expire on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase programs 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 18.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 697.1 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase programs , as described below. .
Question: what is the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007?
Answer: 9.09
Question: and that of 2006?
Answer: 6.79
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2007 and 2006?
Answer: 2.3
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the weighted average fair value for the espp shares of 2006?
| 0.33873 |
CONVFINQA2085 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>54.6% ( 54.6 % )</td><td>49.4% ( 49.4 % )</td><td>51.5% ( 51.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td><td>52.3% ( 52.3 % )</td><td>53.1% ( 53.1 % )</td></tr></table> net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .
Question: what was the change in other income for the utility from 2005 to 2006?
| 45.0 |
CONVFINQA2086 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>54.6% ( 54.6 % )</td><td>49.4% ( 49.4 % )</td><td>51.5% ( 51.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td><td>52.3% ( 52.3 % )</td><td>53.1% ( 53.1 % )</td></tr></table> net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .
Question: what was the change in other income for the utility from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase over this time?
| 0.40541 |
CONVFINQA2087 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>54.6% ( 54.6 % )</td><td>49.4% ( 49.4 % )</td><td>51.5% ( 51.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td><td>52.3% ( 52.3 % )</td><td>53.1% ( 53.1 % )</td></tr></table> net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .
Question: what was the change in other income for the utility from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase over this time?
Answer: 0.40541
Question: what was the change in the debt to capital ratio between 2006 and 2007?
| 5.3 |
CONVFINQA2088 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>54.6% ( 54.6 % )</td><td>49.4% ( 49.4 % )</td><td>51.5% ( 51.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td><td>52.3% ( 52.3 % )</td><td>53.1% ( 53.1 % )</td></tr></table> net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .
Question: what was the change in other income for the utility from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 45.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase over this time?
Answer: 0.40541
Question: what was the change in the debt to capital ratio between 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 5.3
Question: and the percentage change of this value?
| 0.10134 |
CONVFINQA2089 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 47760</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>48569</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>49437</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>49959</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>50546</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>103890</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>350161</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>54857</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 295304</td></tr></table> .
Question: what portion of the total minimum lease payments is related to interest?
| 0.15666 |
CONVFINQA2090 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 47760</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>48569</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>49437</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>49959</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>50546</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>103890</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>350161</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>54857</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 295304</td></tr></table> .
Question: what portion of the total minimum lease payments is related to interest?
Answer: 0.15666
Question: what about the portion that is due after 2013?
| 0.29669 |
CONVFINQA2091 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
| 76.08 |
CONVFINQA2092 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for nasdaq transportation?
| 148.92 |
CONVFINQA2093 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for nasdaq transportation?
Answer: 148.92
Question: what was, then, the return for expeditors international of washington inc ., or how much did the change in value represented in relation to the amount invested?
| 0.7608 |
CONVFINQA2094 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for nasdaq transportation?
Answer: 148.92
Question: what was, then, the return for expeditors international of washington inc ., or how much did the change in value represented in relation to the amount invested?
Answer: 0.7608
Question: and what was this return for nasdaq transportation?
| 1.4892 |
CONVFINQA2095 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , "would expect" , "would not expect" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , "provisional" , "plan" , "believe" , "probable" , "reasonably possible" , "may" , "could" , "should" , "intends" , "foreseeable future" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .
Question: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 76.08
Question: and what was that change for nasdaq transportation?
Answer: 148.92
Question: what was, then, the return for expeditors international of washington inc ., or how much did the change in value represented in relation to the amount invested?
Answer: 0.7608
Question: and what was this return for nasdaq transportation?
Answer: 1.4892
Question: what is, then, the difference between the expeditors international of washington inc . return and the nasdaq transportation one?
| -0.7284 |
CONVFINQA2096 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what were net sales in 2012?
| 7457.0 |
CONVFINQA2097 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what were net sales in 2012?
Answer: 7457.0
Question: what were net sales in 2011?
| 7463.0 |
CONVFINQA2098 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what were net sales in 2012?
Answer: 7457.0
Question: what were net sales in 2011?
Answer: 7463.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| -6.0 |
CONVFINQA2099 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what were net sales in 2012?
Answer: 7457.0
Question: what were net sales in 2011?
Answer: 7463.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: -6.0
Question: what was the 2011 value?
| 7463.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.