id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA2900 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2018 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 2641</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 2564</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>3139</td><td>91</td><td>3048</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>3561</td><td>115</td><td>3446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>3994</td><td>140</td><td>3854</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>4357</td><td>169</td><td>4188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>25807</td><td>1269</td><td>24538</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense in accordance with sfas no . 112 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postemployment benefits 201d by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 2643 , $ ( 3418 ) and $ 8400 , respectively , during the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the company has an accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in the amount of $ 63863 and $ 56172 at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . a facility fee of 8 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 2030 , is paid annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 37 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 for the credit facility which are being amortized straight- line over three years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility or prior facilities totaled $ 2353 , $ 2477 and $ 2717 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2008 or december 31 , 2007 . the majority of credit facility lenders are customers or affiliates of customers of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 .
Question: what is the expected benefit payments in 2010?
Answer: 3139.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Answer: 2641.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2010 to 2009?
Answer: 1.18856
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.18856
Question: what about the ratio for expected subsidy receipts in 2010 to 2009?
Answer: 1.18182
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.18182
Question: what is the change in the growth rates among these two?
| 0.00675 |
CONVFINQA2901 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2018 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 2641</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 2564</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>3139</td><td>91</td><td>3048</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>3561</td><td>115</td><td>3446</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>3994</td><td>140</td><td>3854</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>4357</td><td>169</td><td>4188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>25807</td><td>1269</td><td>24538</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense in accordance with sfas no . 112 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postemployment benefits 201d by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 2643 , $ ( 3418 ) and $ 8400 , respectively , during the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the company has an accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in the amount of $ 63863 and $ 56172 at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . a facility fee of 8 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 2030 , is paid annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 37 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 for the credit facility which are being amortized straight- line over three years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility or prior facilities totaled $ 2353 , $ 2477 and $ 2717 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2008 or december 31 , 2007 . the majority of credit facility lenders are customers or affiliates of customers of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 .
Question: what is the expected benefit payments in 2010?
Answer: 3139.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Answer: 2641.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2010 to 2009?
Answer: 1.18856
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.18856
Question: what about the ratio for expected subsidy receipts in 2010 to 2009?
Answer: 1.18182
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.18182
Question: what is the change in the growth rates among these two?
Answer: 0.00675
Question: what is the ratio of accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in 2008 to 2007?
| 1.13692 |
CONVFINQA2902 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1362.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>161.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1520.5</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .
Question: what was the change in the net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2015 to 2016?
| 158.3 |
CONVFINQA2903 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1362.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>161.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1520.5</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .
Question: what was the change in the net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 158.3
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that net revenue in 2015?
| 0.11621 |
CONVFINQA2904 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1362.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>161.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1520.5</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .
Question: what was the change in the net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 158.3
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that net revenue in 2015?
Answer: 0.11621
Question: what, again, was the decline in the net revenue over that period?
| 158.3 |
CONVFINQA2905 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consume significant amounts of energy , and we may in the future incur additional or increased capital , operating and other expenditures from changes due to new or increased climate-related and other environmental regulations . we could also incur substantial liabilities , including fines or sanctions , enforcement actions , natural resource damages claims , cleanup and closure costs , and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury under environmental and common laws . the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977 and local anti-bribery laws , including those in brazil , china , mexico , india and the united kingdom ( where we maintain operations directly or through a joint venture ) , prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of influencing official decisions . our internal control policies and procedures , or those of our vendors , may not adequately protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed or alleged to have been committed by our employees , agents or vendors . any such violations could lead to civil or criminal monetary and non-monetary penalties and/or could damage our reputation . we are subject to a number of labor and employment laws and regulations that could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our operational flexibility . additionally , changing privacy laws in the united states ( including the california consumer privacy act , which will become effective in january 2020 ) , europe ( where the general data protection regulation became effective in 2018 ) and elsewhere have created new individual privacy rights , imposed increased obligations on companies handling personal data and increased potential exposure to fines and penalties . item 1b . unresolved staff comments there are no unresolved sec staff comments . item 2 . properties we operate locations in north america , including the majority of u.s . states , south america , europe , asia and australia . we lease our principal offices in atlanta , ga . we believe that our existing production capacity is adequate to serve existing demand for our products and consider our plants and equipment to be in good condition . our corporate and operating facilities as of september 30 , 2019 are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>segment</td><td>number of facilities owned</td><td>number of facilities leased</td><td>number of facilities total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corrugated packaging</td><td>112</td><td>61</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consumer packaging</td><td>84</td><td>55</td><td>139</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and significant regional offices</td><td>2014</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>196</td><td>126</td><td>322</td></tr></table> the tables that follow show our annual production capacity by mill at september 30 , 2019 in thousands of tons , except for the north charleston , sc mill which reflects our capacity after the previously announced machine closure expected to occur in fiscal 2020 . our mill system production levels and operating rates may vary from year to year due to changes in market and other factors , including the impact of hurricanes and other weather-related events . our simple average mill system operating rates for the last three years averaged 94% ( 94 % ) . we own all of our mills. .
Question: what is the amount of facilities that is owned by the company?
| 196.0 |
CONVFINQA2906 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consume significant amounts of energy , and we may in the future incur additional or increased capital , operating and other expenditures from changes due to new or increased climate-related and other environmental regulations . we could also incur substantial liabilities , including fines or sanctions , enforcement actions , natural resource damages claims , cleanup and closure costs , and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury under environmental and common laws . the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977 and local anti-bribery laws , including those in brazil , china , mexico , india and the united kingdom ( where we maintain operations directly or through a joint venture ) , prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of influencing official decisions . our internal control policies and procedures , or those of our vendors , may not adequately protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed or alleged to have been committed by our employees , agents or vendors . any such violations could lead to civil or criminal monetary and non-monetary penalties and/or could damage our reputation . we are subject to a number of labor and employment laws and regulations that could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our operational flexibility . additionally , changing privacy laws in the united states ( including the california consumer privacy act , which will become effective in january 2020 ) , europe ( where the general data protection regulation became effective in 2018 ) and elsewhere have created new individual privacy rights , imposed increased obligations on companies handling personal data and increased potential exposure to fines and penalties . item 1b . unresolved staff comments there are no unresolved sec staff comments . item 2 . properties we operate locations in north america , including the majority of u.s . states , south america , europe , asia and australia . we lease our principal offices in atlanta , ga . we believe that our existing production capacity is adequate to serve existing demand for our products and consider our plants and equipment to be in good condition . our corporate and operating facilities as of september 30 , 2019 are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>segment</td><td>number of facilities owned</td><td>number of facilities leased</td><td>number of facilities total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corrugated packaging</td><td>112</td><td>61</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consumer packaging</td><td>84</td><td>55</td><td>139</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and significant regional offices</td><td>2014</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>196</td><td>126</td><td>322</td></tr></table> the tables that follow show our annual production capacity by mill at september 30 , 2019 in thousands of tons , except for the north charleston , sc mill which reflects our capacity after the previously announced machine closure expected to occur in fiscal 2020 . our mill system production levels and operating rates may vary from year to year due to changes in market and other factors , including the impact of hurricanes and other weather-related events . our simple average mill system operating rates for the last three years averaged 94% ( 94 % ) . we own all of our mills. .
Question: what is the amount of facilities that is owned by the company?
Answer: 196.0
Question: and what is the total of those facilities?
| 322.0 |
CONVFINQA2907 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consume significant amounts of energy , and we may in the future incur additional or increased capital , operating and other expenditures from changes due to new or increased climate-related and other environmental regulations . we could also incur substantial liabilities , including fines or sanctions , enforcement actions , natural resource damages claims , cleanup and closure costs , and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury under environmental and common laws . the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977 and local anti-bribery laws , including those in brazil , china , mexico , india and the united kingdom ( where we maintain operations directly or through a joint venture ) , prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of influencing official decisions . our internal control policies and procedures , or those of our vendors , may not adequately protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed or alleged to have been committed by our employees , agents or vendors . any such violations could lead to civil or criminal monetary and non-monetary penalties and/or could damage our reputation . we are subject to a number of labor and employment laws and regulations that could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our operational flexibility . additionally , changing privacy laws in the united states ( including the california consumer privacy act , which will become effective in january 2020 ) , europe ( where the general data protection regulation became effective in 2018 ) and elsewhere have created new individual privacy rights , imposed increased obligations on companies handling personal data and increased potential exposure to fines and penalties . item 1b . unresolved staff comments there are no unresolved sec staff comments . item 2 . properties we operate locations in north america , including the majority of u.s . states , south america , europe , asia and australia . we lease our principal offices in atlanta , ga . we believe that our existing production capacity is adequate to serve existing demand for our products and consider our plants and equipment to be in good condition . our corporate and operating facilities as of september 30 , 2019 are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>segment</td><td>number of facilities owned</td><td>number of facilities leased</td><td>number of facilities total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corrugated packaging</td><td>112</td><td>61</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consumer packaging</td><td>84</td><td>55</td><td>139</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and significant regional offices</td><td>2014</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>196</td><td>126</td><td>322</td></tr></table> the tables that follow show our annual production capacity by mill at september 30 , 2019 in thousands of tons , except for the north charleston , sc mill which reflects our capacity after the previously announced machine closure expected to occur in fiscal 2020 . our mill system production levels and operating rates may vary from year to year due to changes in market and other factors , including the impact of hurricanes and other weather-related events . our simple average mill system operating rates for the last three years averaged 94% ( 94 % ) . we own all of our mills. .
Question: what is the amount of facilities that is owned by the company?
Answer: 196.0
Question: and what is the total of those facilities?
Answer: 322.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total does that amount represent?
| 0.6087 |
CONVFINQA2908 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consume significant amounts of energy , and we may in the future incur additional or increased capital , operating and other expenditures from changes due to new or increased climate-related and other environmental regulations . we could also incur substantial liabilities , including fines or sanctions , enforcement actions , natural resource damages claims , cleanup and closure costs , and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury under environmental and common laws . the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977 and local anti-bribery laws , including those in brazil , china , mexico , india and the united kingdom ( where we maintain operations directly or through a joint venture ) , prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of influencing official decisions . our internal control policies and procedures , or those of our vendors , may not adequately protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed or alleged to have been committed by our employees , agents or vendors . any such violations could lead to civil or criminal monetary and non-monetary penalties and/or could damage our reputation . we are subject to a number of labor and employment laws and regulations that could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our operational flexibility . additionally , changing privacy laws in the united states ( including the california consumer privacy act , which will become effective in january 2020 ) , europe ( where the general data protection regulation became effective in 2018 ) and elsewhere have created new individual privacy rights , imposed increased obligations on companies handling personal data and increased potential exposure to fines and penalties . item 1b . unresolved staff comments there are no unresolved sec staff comments . item 2 . properties we operate locations in north america , including the majority of u.s . states , south america , europe , asia and australia . we lease our principal offices in atlanta , ga . we believe that our existing production capacity is adequate to serve existing demand for our products and consider our plants and equipment to be in good condition . our corporate and operating facilities as of september 30 , 2019 are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>segment</td><td>number of facilities owned</td><td>number of facilities leased</td><td>number of facilities total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corrugated packaging</td><td>112</td><td>61</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consumer packaging</td><td>84</td><td>55</td><td>139</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and significant regional offices</td><td>2014</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>196</td><td>126</td><td>322</td></tr></table> the tables that follow show our annual production capacity by mill at september 30 , 2019 in thousands of tons , except for the north charleston , sc mill which reflects our capacity after the previously announced machine closure expected to occur in fiscal 2020 . our mill system production levels and operating rates may vary from year to year due to changes in market and other factors , including the impact of hurricanes and other weather-related events . our simple average mill system operating rates for the last three years averaged 94% ( 94 % ) . we own all of our mills. .
Question: what is the amount of facilities that is owned by the company?
Answer: 196.0
Question: and what is the total of those facilities?
Answer: 322.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total does that amount represent?
Answer: 0.6087
Question: and what is the amount of facilities that are for consumer packaging?
| 139.0 |
CONVFINQA2909 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consume significant amounts of energy , and we may in the future incur additional or increased capital , operating and other expenditures from changes due to new or increased climate-related and other environmental regulations . we could also incur substantial liabilities , including fines or sanctions , enforcement actions , natural resource damages claims , cleanup and closure costs , and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury under environmental and common laws . the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977 and local anti-bribery laws , including those in brazil , china , mexico , india and the united kingdom ( where we maintain operations directly or through a joint venture ) , prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of influencing official decisions . our internal control policies and procedures , or those of our vendors , may not adequately protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed or alleged to have been committed by our employees , agents or vendors . any such violations could lead to civil or criminal monetary and non-monetary penalties and/or could damage our reputation . we are subject to a number of labor and employment laws and regulations that could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our operational flexibility . additionally , changing privacy laws in the united states ( including the california consumer privacy act , which will become effective in january 2020 ) , europe ( where the general data protection regulation became effective in 2018 ) and elsewhere have created new individual privacy rights , imposed increased obligations on companies handling personal data and increased potential exposure to fines and penalties . item 1b . unresolved staff comments there are no unresolved sec staff comments . item 2 . properties we operate locations in north america , including the majority of u.s . states , south america , europe , asia and australia . we lease our principal offices in atlanta , ga . we believe that our existing production capacity is adequate to serve existing demand for our products and consider our plants and equipment to be in good condition . our corporate and operating facilities as of september 30 , 2019 are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>segment</td><td>number of facilities owned</td><td>number of facilities leased</td><td>number of facilities total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corrugated packaging</td><td>112</td><td>61</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consumer packaging</td><td>84</td><td>55</td><td>139</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and significant regional offices</td><td>2014</td><td>10</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>196</td><td>126</td><td>322</td></tr></table> the tables that follow show our annual production capacity by mill at september 30 , 2019 in thousands of tons , except for the north charleston , sc mill which reflects our capacity after the previously announced machine closure expected to occur in fiscal 2020 . our mill system production levels and operating rates may vary from year to year due to changes in market and other factors , including the impact of hurricanes and other weather-related events . our simple average mill system operating rates for the last three years averaged 94% ( 94 % ) . we own all of our mills. .
Question: what is the amount of facilities that is owned by the company?
Answer: 196.0
Question: and what is the total of those facilities?
Answer: 322.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total does that amount represent?
Answer: 0.6087
Question: and what is the amount of facilities that are for consumer packaging?
Answer: 139.0
Question: what percentage, then, does this amount represent?
| 0.43168 |
CONVFINQA2910 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock from 2008 to 2009?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA2911 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 49</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>63</td><td>80</td><td>92</td><td>94</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>45</td><td>52</td><td>59</td><td>49</td><td>63</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 6.0
Question: how much does that change represent, in percentage, in relation to the state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock of 2008?
| 0.12245 |
CONVFINQA2912 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
| -74.0 |
CONVFINQA2913 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -74.0
Question: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?
| 919.0 |
CONVFINQA2914 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -74.0
Question: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?
Answer: 919.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.08052 |
CONVFINQA2915 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -74.0
Question: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?
Answer: 919.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.08052
Question: and what is the natural gas marketed in 2012?
| 709.0 |
CONVFINQA2916 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -74.0
Question: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?
Answer: 919.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.08052
Question: and what is the natural gas marketed in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: and in 2011?
| 845.0 |
CONVFINQA2917 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -74.0
Question: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?
Answer: 919.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.08052
Question: and what is the natural gas marketed in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: and in 2011?
Answer: 845.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -136.0 |
CONVFINQA2918 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
costs . our 2012 results were lower than 2011 when we realized $ 53.1 million in premium-services margins and our storage and marketing margins consisted of $ 96.0 million from realized seasonal price differentials and marketing optimization activities , and $ 87.7 million of storage demand costs . in addition , we recognized a loss on the change in fair value of our nonqualifiying economic storage hedges of $ 1.0 million in 2012 compared with a gain of $ 8.5 million in 2011 . our premium services were impacted negatively by lower natural gas prices and decreased natural gas price volatility . the impact of our hedge strategies and the inability to hedge seasonal price differentials at levels that were available to us in the prior year significantly reduced our storage margins . we also experienced reduced opportunities to optimize our storage assets , which negatively impacted our marketing margins . we realized a loss in our transportation margins of $ 42.4 million in 2012 compared with a loss of $ 18.8 million in 2011 , due primarily to a $ 29.5 million decrease in transportation hedges . our transportation business continues to be impacted by narrow price location differentials and the inability to hedge at levels that were available to us in prior years . as a result of significant increases in the supply of natural gas , primarily from shale gas production across north america and new pipeline infrastructure projects , location and seasonal price differentials narrowed significantly beginning in 2010 and continuing through 2012 . this market change resulted in our transportation contracts being unprofitable impacting our ability to recover our fixed costs . operating costs decreased due primarily to lower employee-related expenses , which includes the impact of fewer employees . we also recognized an expense of $ 10.3 million related to the impairment of our goodwill in the first quarter 2012 . given the significant decline in natural gas prices and its effect on location and seasonal price differentials , we performed an interim impairment assessment in the first quarter 2012 that reduced our goodwill balance to zero . 2011 vs . 2010 - the factors discussed in energy services 2019 201cnarrative description of the business 201d included in item i , business , of this annual report have led to a significant decrease in net margin , including : 2022 a decrease of $ 65.3 million in transportation margins , net of hedging , due primarily to narrower location price differentials and lower hedge settlements in 2011 ; 2022 a decrease of $ 34.3 million in storage and marketing margins , net of hedging activities , due primarily to the following : 2013 lower realized seasonal storage price differentials ; offset partially by 2013 favorable marketing activity and unrealized fair value changes on nonqualifying economic storage hedges ; 2022 a decrease of $ 7.3 million in premium-services margins , associated primarily with the reduction in the value of the fees collected for these services as a result of low commodity prices and reduced natural gas price volatility in the first quarter 2011 compared with the first quarter 2010 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in financial trading margins , as low natural gas prices and reduced natural gas price volatility limited our financial trading opportunities . additionally , our 2011 net margin includes $ 91.1 million in adjustments to natural gas inventory reflecting the lower of cost or market value . because of the adjustments to our inventory value , we reclassified $ 91.1 million of deferred gains on associated cash flow hedges into earnings . operating costs decreased due primarily to a decrease in ad valorem taxes . selected operating information - the following table sets forth certain selected operating information for our energy services segment for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>operating information</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>natural gas marketed ( bcf )</td><td>709</td><td>845</td><td>919</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>natural gas gross margin ( $ /mcf )</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>physically settled volumes ( bcf )</td><td>1433</td><td>1724</td><td>1874</td></tr></table> natural gas volumes marketed and physically settled volumes decreased in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to decreased marketing activities , lower transported volumes and reduced transportation capacity . the decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 was due primarily to lower volumes transported and reduced transportation capacity . transportation capacity in certain markets was not utilized due to the economics of the location price differentials as a result of increased supply of natural gas , primarily from shale production , and increased pipeline capacity as a result of new pipeline construction. .
Question: what is the net change in the natural gas marketed from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -74.0
Question: what is the natural gas marketed in 2010?
Answer: 919.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.08052
Question: and what is the natural gas marketed in 2012?
Answer: 709.0
Question: and in 2011?
Answer: 845.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -136.0
Question: what about about the percentage change from 2011 to 2012?
| -0.16095 |
CONVFINQA2919 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: combined, what was the interest income for 2013 and the interest income taking into account a 100-basis-point increase in interest rates?
| 41.1 |
CONVFINQA2920 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: combined, what was the interest income for 2013 and the interest income taking into account a 100-basis-point increase in interest rates?
Answer: 41.1
Question: and if the there was a decrease in the interest rate?
| 8.3 |
CONVFINQA2921 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
Question: what was the price of lilly in 2018?
| 259.88 |
CONVFINQA2922 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
Question: what was the price of lilly in 2018?
Answer: 259.88
Question: what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
| 159.88 |
CONVFINQA2923 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
Question: what was the price of lilly in 2018?
Answer: 259.88
Question: what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 159.88
Question: what is the percent change?
| 1.5988 |
CONVFINQA2924 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
Question: what was the price of lilly in 2018?
Answer: 259.88
Question: what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 159.88
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 1.5988
Question: what was the value of the s&p in 2018 less a $100 initial investment?
| 50.33 |
CONVFINQA2925 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
Question: what was the price of lilly in 2018?
Answer: 259.88
Question: what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 159.88
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 1.5988
Question: what was the value of the s&p in 2018 less a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 50.33
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.5033 |
CONVFINQA2926 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>lilly</td><td>peer group</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dec-13</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dec-14</td><td>$ 139.75</td><td>$ 114.39</td><td>$ 113.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec-15</td><td>$ 175.21</td><td>$ 116.56</td><td>$ 115.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dec-16</td><td>$ 157.03</td><td>$ 112.80</td><td>$ 129.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dec-17</td><td>$ 185.04</td><td>$ 128.90</td><td>$ 157.22</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dec-18</td><td>$ 259.88</td><td>$ 136.56</td><td>$ 150.33</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .
Question: what was the price of lilly in 2018?
Answer: 259.88
Question: what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 159.88
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 1.5988
Question: what was the value of the s&p in 2018 less a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 50.33
Question: what was the percent change?
Answer: 0.5033
Question: what is the difference in percent changes?
| 1.0955 |
CONVFINQA2927 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2007 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 1817</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>78828</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>13714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1894998</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2292895</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>$ 4283493</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accreted value of the discount and premium of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes</td><td>1791</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 4285284</td></tr></table> 4 . acquisitions during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , the company used cash to acquire a total of ( i ) 293 towers and the assets of a structural analysis firm for approximately $ 44.0 million in cash ( ii ) 84 towers and 6 in-building distributed antenna systems for approximately $ 14.3 million and ( iii ) 30 towers for approximately $ 6.0 million in cash , respectively . the tower asset acquisitions were primarily in mexico and brazil under ongoing agreements . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company also completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . pursuant to which the company acquired approximately 7800 towers and 100 in-building distributed antenna systems . under the terms of the merger agreement , in august 2005 , spectrasite , inc . merged with a wholly- owned subsidiary of the company , and each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock converted into the right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s class a common stock . the company issued approximately 169.5 million shares of its class a common stock and reserved for issuance approximately 9.9 million and 6.8 million of class a common stock pursuant to spectrasite , inc . options and warrants , respectively , assumed in the merger . the final allocation of the $ 3.1 billion purchase price is summarized in the company 2019s annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . the acquisitions consummated by the company during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with sfas no . 141 201cbusiness combinations 201d ( sfas no . 141 ) . the purchase prices have been allocated to the net assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company primarily acquired its tower assets from third parties in one of two types of transactions : the purchase of a business or the purchase of assets . the structure of each transaction affects the way the company allocates purchase price within the consolidated financial statements . in the case of tower assets acquired through the purchase of a business , such as the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , the company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition . the excess of the purchase price paid by the company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill . in the case of an asset purchase , the company first allocates the purchase price to property and equipment for the appraised value of the towers and to identifiable intangible assets ( primarily acquired customer base ) . the company then records any remaining purchase price within intangible assets as a 201cnetwork location intangible . 201d .
Question: what was the total cash for towers acquisitions, in dollars?
| 6000000.0 |
CONVFINQA2928 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2007 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 1817</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>78828</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>13714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1894998</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2292895</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>$ 4283493</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accreted value of the discount and premium of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes</td><td>1791</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 4285284</td></tr></table> 4 . acquisitions during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , the company used cash to acquire a total of ( i ) 293 towers and the assets of a structural analysis firm for approximately $ 44.0 million in cash ( ii ) 84 towers and 6 in-building distributed antenna systems for approximately $ 14.3 million and ( iii ) 30 towers for approximately $ 6.0 million in cash , respectively . the tower asset acquisitions were primarily in mexico and brazil under ongoing agreements . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company also completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . pursuant to which the company acquired approximately 7800 towers and 100 in-building distributed antenna systems . under the terms of the merger agreement , in august 2005 , spectrasite , inc . merged with a wholly- owned subsidiary of the company , and each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock converted into the right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s class a common stock . the company issued approximately 169.5 million shares of its class a common stock and reserved for issuance approximately 9.9 million and 6.8 million of class a common stock pursuant to spectrasite , inc . options and warrants , respectively , assumed in the merger . the final allocation of the $ 3.1 billion purchase price is summarized in the company 2019s annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . the acquisitions consummated by the company during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with sfas no . 141 201cbusiness combinations 201d ( sfas no . 141 ) . the purchase prices have been allocated to the net assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company primarily acquired its tower assets from third parties in one of two types of transactions : the purchase of a business or the purchase of assets . the structure of each transaction affects the way the company allocates purchase price within the consolidated financial statements . in the case of tower assets acquired through the purchase of a business , such as the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , the company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition . the excess of the purchase price paid by the company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill . in the case of an asset purchase , the company first allocates the purchase price to property and equipment for the appraised value of the towers and to identifiable intangible assets ( primarily acquired customer base ) . the company then records any remaining purchase price within intangible assets as a 201cnetwork location intangible . 201d .
Question: what was the total cash for towers acquisitions, in dollars?
Answer: 6000000.0
Question: what was, then, the average price for each tower, based on that total cash?
| 200000.0 |
CONVFINQA2929 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2014</td><td>192580</td><td>$ 58.02</td><td>164800</td><td>$ 490000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2014</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 59.25</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 463000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2014</td><td>199796</td><td>$ 60.78</td><td>190259</td><td>$ 451000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>860504</td><td>-</td><td>823187</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .
Question: what was the total number of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes in october?
| 27780.0 |
CONVFINQA2930 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2014</td><td>192580</td><td>$ 58.02</td><td>164800</td><td>$ 490000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2014</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 59.25</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 463000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2014</td><td>199796</td><td>$ 60.78</td><td>190259</td><td>$ 451000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>860504</td><td>-</td><td>823187</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .
Question: what was the total number of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes in october?
Answer: 27780.0
Question: and what was it in december?
| 9537.0 |
CONVFINQA2931 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2014</td><td>192580</td><td>$ 58.02</td><td>164800</td><td>$ 490000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2014</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 59.25</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 463000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2014</td><td>199796</td><td>$ 60.78</td><td>190259</td><td>$ 451000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>860504</td><td>-</td><td>823187</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .
Question: what was the total number of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes in october?
Answer: 27780.0
Question: and what was it in december?
Answer: 9537.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total for the two months?
| 37317.0 |
CONVFINQA2932 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2014</td><td>192580</td><td>$ 58.02</td><td>164800</td><td>$ 490000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2014</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 59.25</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 463000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2014</td><td>199796</td><td>$ 60.78</td><td>190259</td><td>$ 451000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>860504</td><td>-</td><td>823187</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .
Question: what was the total number of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes in october?
Answer: 27780.0
Question: and what was it in december?
Answer: 9537.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total for the two months?
Answer: 37317.0
Question: and how much does this combined total represent in relation to the total number of shares purchased in the last quarter of 2014, in percentage?
| 0.04337 |
CONVFINQA2933 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at the beginning of the year</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual for warranties</td><td>198</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>warranty expense incurred for the year</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at the end of the year</td><td>$ 231</td><td>$ 167</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of warranty reserves at the end of 2006?
| 167.0 |
CONVFINQA2934 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at the beginning of the year</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual for warranties</td><td>198</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>warranty expense incurred for the year</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at the end of the year</td><td>$ 231</td><td>$ 167</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of warranty reserves at the end of 2006?
Answer: 167.0
Question: what was the balance end the end of 2005?
| 231.0 |
CONVFINQA2935 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at the beginning of the year</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual for warranties</td><td>198</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>warranty expense incurred for the year</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at the end of the year</td><td>$ 231</td><td>$ 167</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of warranty reserves at the end of 2006?
Answer: 167.0
Question: what was the balance end the end of 2005?
Answer: 231.0
Question: what is the net difference?
| -64.0 |
CONVFINQA2936 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at the beginning of the year</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual for warranties</td><td>198</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>warranty expense incurred for the year</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at the end of the year</td><td>$ 231</td><td>$ 167</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of warranty reserves at the end of 2006?
Answer: 167.0
Question: what was the balance end the end of 2005?
Answer: 231.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: -64.0
Question: what was the 2005 balance?
| 231.0 |
CONVFINQA2937 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at the beginning of the year</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual for warranties</td><td>198</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>warranty expense incurred for the year</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at the end of the year</td><td>$ 231</td><td>$ 167</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of warranty reserves at the end of 2006?
Answer: 167.0
Question: what was the balance end the end of 2005?
Answer: 231.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: -64.0
Question: what was the 2005 balance?
Answer: 231.0
Question: what is the net difference over that?
| -0.27706 |
CONVFINQA2938 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2010 through december 31 , 2015. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>49.75</td><td>55.94</td><td>122.75</td><td>151.59</td><td>185.25</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones us financials index</td><td>100.00</td><td>87.16</td><td>110.56</td><td>148.39</td><td>170.04</td><td>170.19</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in the value of an investment in e*trade financial corporation from 2010 to 2015?
| 85.25 |
CONVFINQA2939 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2010 through december 31 , 2015. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>49.75</td><td>55.94</td><td>122.75</td><td>151.59</td><td>185.25</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones us financials index</td><td>100.00</td><td>87.16</td><td>110.56</td><td>148.39</td><td>170.04</td><td>170.19</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the change in the value of an investment in e*trade financial corporation from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 85.25
Question: what return does this represent?
| 0.8525 |
CONVFINQA2940 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a black-scholes option-pricing model was used for purposes of estimating the fair value of state street 2019s employee stock options at the grant date . the following were the weighted average assumptions for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 , respectively : risk-free interest rates of 3.99% ( 3.99 % ) , 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) and 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) ; dividend yields of 1.08% ( 1.08 % ) , .73% ( .73 % ) and .92% ( .92 % ) ; and volatility factors of the expected market price of state street common stock of .30 , .30 and .30 . the estimated weighted average life of the stock options granted was 4.1 years for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 . o t h e r u n r e a l i z e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e i n c o m e ( l o s s ) at december 31 , the components of other unrealized comprehensive income ( loss ) , net of related taxes , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 96</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> note j shareholders 2019 rights plan in 1988 , state street declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock . in 1998 , the rights agreement was amended and restated , and in 2001 , the rights plan was impacted by the 2-for-1 stock split . accordingly , a right may be exercised , under certain conditions , to purchase one eight-hundredths share of a series of participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $ 132.50 , subject to adjustment . the rights become exercisable if a party acquires or obtains the right to acquire 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock or after commencement or public announcement of an offer for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock . when exercisable , under certain conditions , each right entitles the holder thereof to purchase shares of common stock , of either state street or of the acquirer , having a market value of two times the then-current exercise price of that right . the rights expire in september 2008 , and may be redeemed at a price of $ .00125 per right , subject to adjustment , at any time prior to expiration or the acquisition of 10% ( 10 % ) of state street 2019s common stock . under certain circumstances , the rights may be redeemed after they become exercisable and may be subject to automatic redemption . note k regulatory matters r e g u l a t o r y c a p i t a l state street is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies . failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that , if undertaken , could have a direct material effect on state street 2019s financial condition . under capital adequacy guidelines , state street must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of state street 2019s assets , liabilities and off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices . state street 2019s capital amounts and classification are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . 42 state street corporation .
Question: what was the change in unrealized gains from 2000 to 2001?
| 77.0 |
CONVFINQA2941 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a black-scholes option-pricing model was used for purposes of estimating the fair value of state street 2019s employee stock options at the grant date . the following were the weighted average assumptions for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 , respectively : risk-free interest rates of 3.99% ( 3.99 % ) , 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) and 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) ; dividend yields of 1.08% ( 1.08 % ) , .73% ( .73 % ) and .92% ( .92 % ) ; and volatility factors of the expected market price of state street common stock of .30 , .30 and .30 . the estimated weighted average life of the stock options granted was 4.1 years for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 . o t h e r u n r e a l i z e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e i n c o m e ( l o s s ) at december 31 , the components of other unrealized comprehensive income ( loss ) , net of related taxes , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 96</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> note j shareholders 2019 rights plan in 1988 , state street declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock . in 1998 , the rights agreement was amended and restated , and in 2001 , the rights plan was impacted by the 2-for-1 stock split . accordingly , a right may be exercised , under certain conditions , to purchase one eight-hundredths share of a series of participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $ 132.50 , subject to adjustment . the rights become exercisable if a party acquires or obtains the right to acquire 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock or after commencement or public announcement of an offer for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock . when exercisable , under certain conditions , each right entitles the holder thereof to purchase shares of common stock , of either state street or of the acquirer , having a market value of two times the then-current exercise price of that right . the rights expire in september 2008 , and may be redeemed at a price of $ .00125 per right , subject to adjustment , at any time prior to expiration or the acquisition of 10% ( 10 % ) of state street 2019s common stock . under certain circumstances , the rights may be redeemed after they become exercisable and may be subject to automatic redemption . note k regulatory matters r e g u l a t o r y c a p i t a l state street is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies . failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that , if undertaken , could have a direct material effect on state street 2019s financial condition . under capital adequacy guidelines , state street must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of state street 2019s assets , liabilities and off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices . state street 2019s capital amounts and classification are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . 42 state street corporation .
Question: what was the change in unrealized gains from 2000 to 2001?
Answer: 77.0
Question: and what were those gains in 2000?
| 19.0 |
CONVFINQA2942 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a black-scholes option-pricing model was used for purposes of estimating the fair value of state street 2019s employee stock options at the grant date . the following were the weighted average assumptions for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 , respectively : risk-free interest rates of 3.99% ( 3.99 % ) , 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) and 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) ; dividend yields of 1.08% ( 1.08 % ) , .73% ( .73 % ) and .92% ( .92 % ) ; and volatility factors of the expected market price of state street common stock of .30 , .30 and .30 . the estimated weighted average life of the stock options granted was 4.1 years for the years ended december 31 , 2001 , 2000 and 1999 . o t h e r u n r e a l i z e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e i n c o m e ( l o s s ) at december 31 , the components of other unrealized comprehensive income ( loss ) , net of related taxes , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 96</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> note j shareholders 2019 rights plan in 1988 , state street declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock . in 1998 , the rights agreement was amended and restated , and in 2001 , the rights plan was impacted by the 2-for-1 stock split . accordingly , a right may be exercised , under certain conditions , to purchase one eight-hundredths share of a series of participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $ 132.50 , subject to adjustment . the rights become exercisable if a party acquires or obtains the right to acquire 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock or after commencement or public announcement of an offer for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of state street 2019s common stock . when exercisable , under certain conditions , each right entitles the holder thereof to purchase shares of common stock , of either state street or of the acquirer , having a market value of two times the then-current exercise price of that right . the rights expire in september 2008 , and may be redeemed at a price of $ .00125 per right , subject to adjustment , at any time prior to expiration or the acquisition of 10% ( 10 % ) of state street 2019s common stock . under certain circumstances , the rights may be redeemed after they become exercisable and may be subject to automatic redemption . note k regulatory matters r e g u l a t o r y c a p i t a l state street is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies . failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that , if undertaken , could have a direct material effect on state street 2019s financial condition . under capital adequacy guidelines , state street must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of state street 2019s assets , liabilities and off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices . state street 2019s capital amounts and classification are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . 42 state street corporation .
Question: what was the change in unrealized gains from 2000 to 2001?
Answer: 77.0
Question: and what were those gains in 2000?
Answer: 19.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to these 2000 unrealized gains, in percentage?
| 4.05263 |
CONVFINQA2943 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. .
Question: what was the value of nonvested rsus at the end of 2013?
| 3859.0 |
CONVFINQA2944 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. .
Question: what was the value of nonvested rsus at the end of 2013?
Answer: 3859.0
Question: what was the value at the start?
| 4822.0 |
CONVFINQA2945 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. .
Question: what was the value of nonvested rsus at the end of 2013?
Answer: 3859.0
Question: what was the value at the start?
Answer: 4822.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| -963.0 |
CONVFINQA2946 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. .
Question: what was the value of nonvested rsus at the end of 2013?
Answer: 3859.0
Question: what was the value at the start?
Answer: 4822.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: -963.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.19971 |
CONVFINQA2947 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities vornado 2019s common shares are traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cvno . 201d quarterly high and low sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 were as follows : year ended year ended december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 dividends</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>dividends</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1st</td><td>$ 93.53</td><td>$ 82.12</td><td>$ 0.69</td><td>$ 78.40</td><td>$ 61.25</td><td>$ 0.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2nd</td><td>98.42</td><td>86.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>86.79</td><td>70.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>3rd</td><td>98.77</td><td>72.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>89.06</td><td>68.59</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4th</td><td>84.30</td><td>68.39</td><td>0.69</td><td>91.67</td><td>78.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr></table> as of february 1 , 2012 , there were 1230 holders of record of our common shares . recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we issued 20891 common shares upon the redemption of class a units of the operating partnership held by persons who received units , in private placements in earlier periods , in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate . the common shares were issued without registration under the securities act of 1933 in reliance on section 4 ( 2 ) of that act . information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k and such information is incorporated by reference herein . recent purchases of equity securities in december 2011 , we received 410783 vornado common shares at an average price of $ 76.36 per share as payment for the exercise of certain employee options. .
Question: in december of 2011, what was the full value of the vornado common shares received as payment for the exercise of certain employee options?
| 31367389.88 |
CONVFINQA2948 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities vornado 2019s common shares are traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cvno . 201d quarterly high and low sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 were as follows : year ended year ended december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 dividends</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>dividends</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1st</td><td>$ 93.53</td><td>$ 82.12</td><td>$ 0.69</td><td>$ 78.40</td><td>$ 61.25</td><td>$ 0.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2nd</td><td>98.42</td><td>86.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>86.79</td><td>70.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>3rd</td><td>98.77</td><td>72.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>89.06</td><td>68.59</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4th</td><td>84.30</td><td>68.39</td><td>0.69</td><td>91.67</td><td>78.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr></table> as of february 1 , 2012 , there were 1230 holders of record of our common shares . recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we issued 20891 common shares upon the redemption of class a units of the operating partnership held by persons who received units , in private placements in earlier periods , in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate . the common shares were issued without registration under the securities act of 1933 in reliance on section 4 ( 2 ) of that act . information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k and such information is incorporated by reference herein . recent purchases of equity securities in december 2011 , we received 410783 vornado common shares at an average price of $ 76.36 per share as payment for the exercise of certain employee options. .
Question: in december of 2011, what was the full value of the vornado common shares received as payment for the exercise of certain employee options?
Answer: 31367389.88
Question: and in this same year, what was the high price of common shares and dividends per share for the first quarter?
| 93.53 |
CONVFINQA2949 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities vornado 2019s common shares are traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cvno . 201d quarterly high and low sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 were as follows : year ended year ended december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 dividends</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>dividends</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1st</td><td>$ 93.53</td><td>$ 82.12</td><td>$ 0.69</td><td>$ 78.40</td><td>$ 61.25</td><td>$ 0.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2nd</td><td>98.42</td><td>86.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>86.79</td><td>70.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>3rd</td><td>98.77</td><td>72.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>89.06</td><td>68.59</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4th</td><td>84.30</td><td>68.39</td><td>0.69</td><td>91.67</td><td>78.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr></table> as of february 1 , 2012 , there were 1230 holders of record of our common shares . recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we issued 20891 common shares upon the redemption of class a units of the operating partnership held by persons who received units , in private placements in earlier periods , in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate . the common shares were issued without registration under the securities act of 1933 in reliance on section 4 ( 2 ) of that act . information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k and such information is incorporated by reference herein . recent purchases of equity securities in december 2011 , we received 410783 vornado common shares at an average price of $ 76.36 per share as payment for the exercise of certain employee options. .
Question: in december of 2011, what was the full value of the vornado common shares received as payment for the exercise of certain employee options?
Answer: 31367389.88
Question: and in this same year, what was the high price of common shares and dividends per share for the first quarter?
Answer: 93.53
Question: what was it for the fourth quarter?
| 84.3 |
CONVFINQA2950 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities vornado 2019s common shares are traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cvno . 201d quarterly high and low sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 were as follows : year ended year ended december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 dividends</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>dividends</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1st</td><td>$ 93.53</td><td>$ 82.12</td><td>$ 0.69</td><td>$ 78.40</td><td>$ 61.25</td><td>$ 0.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2nd</td><td>98.42</td><td>86.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>86.79</td><td>70.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>3rd</td><td>98.77</td><td>72.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>89.06</td><td>68.59</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4th</td><td>84.30</td><td>68.39</td><td>0.69</td><td>91.67</td><td>78.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr></table> as of february 1 , 2012 , there were 1230 holders of record of our common shares . recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we issued 20891 common shares upon the redemption of class a units of the operating partnership held by persons who received units , in private placements in earlier periods , in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate . the common shares were issued without registration under the securities act of 1933 in reliance on section 4 ( 2 ) of that act . information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k and such information is incorporated by reference herein . recent purchases of equity securities in december 2011 , we received 410783 vornado common shares at an average price of $ 76.36 per share as payment for the exercise of certain employee options. .
Question: in december of 2011, what was the full value of the vornado common shares received as payment for the exercise of certain employee options?
Answer: 31367389.88
Question: and in this same year, what was the high price of common shares and dividends per share for the first quarter?
Answer: 93.53
Question: what was it for the fourth quarter?
Answer: 84.3
Question: which one, then, was greater?
| yes |
CONVFINQA2951 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis we believe our credit ratings are primarily based on the credit rating agencies 2019 assessment of : 2030 our liquidity , market , credit and operational risk management practices ; 2030 the level and variability of our earnings ; 2030 our capital base ; 2030 our franchise , reputation and management ; 2030 our corporate governance ; and 2030 the external operating environment , including the assumed level of government support . certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . we allocate a portion of our gce to ensure we would be able to make the additional collateral or termination payments that may be required in the event of a two-notch reduction in our long-term credit ratings , as well as collateral that has not been called by counterparties , but is available to them . the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>$ 1534</td><td>$ 1303</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2500</td><td>2183</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 1534 $ 1303 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2500 2183 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets . consequently , we believe that traditional cash flow analysis is less meaningful in evaluating our liquidity position than the excess liquidity and asset-liability management policies described above . cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses . year ended december 2012 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.66 billion to $ 72.67 billion at the end of 2012 . we generated $ 9.14 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we generated $ 7.52 billion in net cash from financing activities from an increase in bank deposits , partially offset by net repayments of unsecured and secured long-term borrowings . year ended december 2011 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.22 billion to $ 56.01 billion at the end of 2011 . we generated $ 23.13 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we used net cash of $ 6.91 billion for financing activities , primarily for repurchases of our series g preferred stock and common stock , partially offset by an increase in bank deposits . year ended december 2010 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 1.50 billion to $ 39.79 billion at the end of 2010 . we generated $ 7.84 billion in net cash from financing activities primarily from net proceeds from issuances of short-term secured financings . we used net cash of $ 6.34 billion for operating and investing activities , primarily to fund an increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell and an increase in cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes , partially offset by cash generated from a decrease in securities borrowed . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 87 .
Question: what was the difference in additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade between 2011 and 2012?
| 966.0 |
CONVFINQA2952 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis we believe our credit ratings are primarily based on the credit rating agencies 2019 assessment of : 2030 our liquidity , market , credit and operational risk management practices ; 2030 the level and variability of our earnings ; 2030 our capital base ; 2030 our franchise , reputation and management ; 2030 our corporate governance ; and 2030 the external operating environment , including the assumed level of government support . certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . we allocate a portion of our gce to ensure we would be able to make the additional collateral or termination payments that may be required in the event of a two-notch reduction in our long-term credit ratings , as well as collateral that has not been called by counterparties , but is available to them . the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>$ 1534</td><td>$ 1303</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2500</td><td>2183</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 1534 $ 1303 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2500 2183 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets . consequently , we believe that traditional cash flow analysis is less meaningful in evaluating our liquidity position than the excess liquidity and asset-liability management policies described above . cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses . year ended december 2012 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.66 billion to $ 72.67 billion at the end of 2012 . we generated $ 9.14 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we generated $ 7.52 billion in net cash from financing activities from an increase in bank deposits , partially offset by net repayments of unsecured and secured long-term borrowings . year ended december 2011 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.22 billion to $ 56.01 billion at the end of 2011 . we generated $ 23.13 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we used net cash of $ 6.91 billion for financing activities , primarily for repurchases of our series g preferred stock and common stock , partially offset by an increase in bank deposits . year ended december 2010 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 1.50 billion to $ 39.79 billion at the end of 2010 . we generated $ 7.84 billion in net cash from financing activities primarily from net proceeds from issuances of short-term secured financings . we used net cash of $ 6.34 billion for operating and investing activities , primarily to fund an increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell and an increase in cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes , partially offset by cash generated from a decrease in securities borrowed . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 87 .
Question: what was the difference in additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 966.0
Question: and the value for additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in 2012?
| 1534.0 |
CONVFINQA2953 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis we believe our credit ratings are primarily based on the credit rating agencies 2019 assessment of : 2030 our liquidity , market , credit and operational risk management practices ; 2030 the level and variability of our earnings ; 2030 our capital base ; 2030 our franchise , reputation and management ; 2030 our corporate governance ; and 2030 the external operating environment , including the assumed level of government support . certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . we allocate a portion of our gce to ensure we would be able to make the additional collateral or termination payments that may be required in the event of a two-notch reduction in our long-term credit ratings , as well as collateral that has not been called by counterparties , but is available to them . the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td><td>as of december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>$ 1534</td><td>$ 1303</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2500</td><td>2183</td></tr></table> in millions 2012 2011 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 1534 $ 1303 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2500 2183 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets . consequently , we believe that traditional cash flow analysis is less meaningful in evaluating our liquidity position than the excess liquidity and asset-liability management policies described above . cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses . year ended december 2012 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.66 billion to $ 72.67 billion at the end of 2012 . we generated $ 9.14 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we generated $ 7.52 billion in net cash from financing activities from an increase in bank deposits , partially offset by net repayments of unsecured and secured long-term borrowings . year ended december 2011 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.22 billion to $ 56.01 billion at the end of 2011 . we generated $ 23.13 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we used net cash of $ 6.91 billion for financing activities , primarily for repurchases of our series g preferred stock and common stock , partially offset by an increase in bank deposits . year ended december 2010 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 1.50 billion to $ 39.79 billion at the end of 2010 . we generated $ 7.84 billion in net cash from financing activities primarily from net proceeds from issuances of short-term secured financings . we used net cash of $ 6.34 billion for operating and investing activities , primarily to fund an increase in securities purchased under agreements to resell and an increase in cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes , partially offset by cash generated from a decrease in securities borrowed . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 87 .
Question: what was the difference in additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 966.0
Question: and the value for additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade in 2012?
Answer: 1534.0
Question: so what was the percentage of additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade over additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade?
| 0.62973 |
CONVFINQA2954 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what was the beginning mezzanine capital facility?
| 3.5 |
CONVFINQA2955 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what was the beginning mezzanine capital facility?
Answer: 3.5
Question: so what was the change as a percentage?
| 0.28571 |
CONVFINQA2956 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in apple inc value from 2008 to 2013?
| 331.0 |
CONVFINQA2957 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in apple inc value from 2008 to 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: what was the price of apple in 2008?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA2958 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in apple inc value from 2008 to 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: what was the price of apple in 2008?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 3.31 |
CONVFINQA2959 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
areas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 14810</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1801</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .
Question: what was the value of north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?
| 12.5 |
CONVFINQA2960 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
areas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 14810</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1801</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .
Question: what was the value of north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?
Answer: 12.5
Question: what is that value multiplied by 1000?
| 12500.0 |
CONVFINQA2961 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
areas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 14810</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1801</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .
Question: what was the value of north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?
Answer: 12.5
Question: what is that value multiplied by 1000?
Answer: 12500.0
Question: what were the sales in 2013?
| 14810.0 |
CONVFINQA2962 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
areas exceeding 14.1 million acres ( 5.7 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods production , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of the temple-inland packaging operations from the date of acquisition in february 2012 and the results of the brazil packaging business from the date of acquisition in january 2013 . in addition , due to the acquisition of a majority share of olmuksa international paper sabanci ambalaj sanayi ve ticaret a.s. , ( now called olmuksan international paper or olmuksan ) net sales for our corrugated packaging business in turkey are included in the business segment totals beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and the operating profits reflect a higher ownership percentage than in previous years . net sales for 2013 increased 12% ( 12 % ) to $ 14.8 billion compared with $ 13.3 billion in 2012 , and 42% ( 42 % ) compared with $ 10.4 billion in 2011 . operating profits were 69% ( 69 % ) higher in 2013 than in 2012 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than in 2011 . excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , the divestiture of three containerboard mills and other special items , operating profits in 2013 were 36% ( 36 % ) higher than in 2012 and 59% ( 59 % ) higher than in 2011 . benefits from the net impact of higher average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix ( $ 749 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 73 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 64 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 16 million ) and higher input costs ( $ 102 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2013 include costs of $ 62 million associated with the integration of temple-inland , a gain of $ 13 million related to a bargain purchase adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey , and a net gain of $ 1 million for other items , while operating profits in 2012 included costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging business of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 14810</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1801</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales were $ 12.5 billion in 2013 compared with $ 11.6 billion in 2012 and $ 8.6 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 1.8 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with the integration of temple-inland and other special items ) compared with $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion excluding costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 . sales volumes decreased in 2013 compared with 2012 reflecting flat demand for boxes and the impact of commercial decisions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher mainly due to the realization of price increases for domestic containerboard and boxes . input costs were higher for wood , energy and recycled fiber . freight costs also increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2012 . manufacturing operating costs decreased , but were offset by inflation and higher overhead and distribution costs . the business took about 850000 tons of total downtime in 2013 of which about 450000 were market- related and 400000 were maintenance downtime . in 2012 , the business took about 945000 tons of total downtime of which about 580000 were market-related and about 365000 were maintenance downtime . operating profits in 2013 included $ 62 million of costs associated with the integration of temple-inland . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . looking ahead to 2014 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to increase for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days offset by the impact from the severe winter weather events impacting much of the u.s . input costs are expected to be higher for energy , recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime spending is expected to be about $ 51 million higher with outages scheduled at six mills compared with four mills in the 2013 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . however , operating profits will be negatively impacted by the adverse winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 . emea industrial packaging net sales in 2013 include the sales of our packaging operations in turkey which are now fully consolidated . net sales were $ 1.3 billion in 2013 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were $ 43 million ( $ 32 .
Question: what was the value of north american industrial packaging net sales in 2013?
Answer: 12.5
Question: what is that value multiplied by 1000?
Answer: 12500.0
Question: what were the sales in 2013?
Answer: 14810.0
Question: what is the proportion of sales attributed to na industrial packaging?
| 0.84402 |
CONVFINQA2963 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2011</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>150.6</td><td>116.0</td><td>128.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>198.5</td><td>153.6</td><td>174.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>206.3</td><td>174.6</td><td>201.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>197.8</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>229.3</td><td>198.2</td><td>243.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the share price for citi between 12/31/16 and 12/31/11?
| 129.3 |
CONVFINQA2964 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2011</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>150.6</td><td>116.0</td><td>128.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>198.5</td><td>153.6</td><td>174.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>206.3</td><td>174.6</td><td>201.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>197.8</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>229.3</td><td>198.2</td><td>243.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the share price for citi between 12/31/16 and 12/31/11?
Answer: 129.3
Question: and the difference in share price for s&p500 during this time?
| 98.2 |
CONVFINQA2965 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2011</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>150.6</td><td>116.0</td><td>128.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>198.5</td><td>153.6</td><td>174.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>206.3</td><td>174.6</td><td>201.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>197.8</td><td>177.0</td><td>198.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>229.3</td><td>198.2</td><td>243.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the share price for citi between 12/31/16 and 12/31/11?
Answer: 129.3
Question: and the difference in share price for s&p500 during this time?
Answer: 98.2
Question: so what was the proportion of price change for citi to the price change for s&p500?
| 1.3167 |
CONVFINQA2966 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 515</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td></tr></table> 2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to .
Question: what was the value of free cash flow in 2009?
| 515.0 |
CONVFINQA2967 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 515</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td></tr></table> 2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to .
Question: what was the value of free cash flow in 2009?
Answer: 515.0
Question: what is the value for 2008?
| 825.0 |
CONVFINQA2968 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 515</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td></tr></table> 2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to .
Question: what was the value of free cash flow in 2009?
Answer: 515.0
Question: what is the value for 2008?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -310.0 |
CONVFINQA2969 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 515</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td></tr></table> 2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to .
Question: what was the value of free cash flow in 2009?
Answer: 515.0
Question: what is the value for 2008?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -310.0
Question: what is the 2008 value?
| 825.0 |
CONVFINQA2970 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 asset utilization 2013 in response to economic conditions and lower revenue in 2009 , we implemented productivity initiatives to improve efficiency and reduce costs , in addition to adjusting our resources to reflect lower demand . although varying throughout the year , our resource reductions included removing from service approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of our road locomotives and 18% ( 18 % ) of our freight car inventory by year end . we also reduced shift levels at most rail facilities and closed or significantly reduced operations in 30 of our 114 principal rail yards . these demand-driven resource adjustments and our productivity initiatives combined to reduce our workforce by 10% ( 10 % ) . 2022 fuel prices 2013 as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters of 2008 , fuel prices dropped dramatically , reaching $ 33.87 per barrel in december 2008 , a near five-year low . throughout 2009 , crude oil prices generally increased , ending the year around $ 80 per barrel . overall , our average fuel price decreased by 44% ( 44 % ) in 2009 , reducing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . we also reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) during the year , saving approximately 40 million gallons of fuel . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; increased use of distributed locomotive power ; fuel conservation programs ; and improved network operations and asset utilization all contributed to this improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled $ 3.2 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 515 million in 2009 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-544 ( 544 )</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 515</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td></tr></table> 2010 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training , and by engaging our employees . we will continue implementing total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc is designed to establish , maintain , reinforce , and promote safe practices among co-workers . this process allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . reducing grade-crossing incidents is a critical aspect of our safety programs , and we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings ; install video cameras on locomotives ; and educate the public about crossing safety through our own programs , various industry programs , and other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 to build upon our success in recent years , we will continue evaluating traffic flows and network logistic patterns , which can be quite dynamic from year-to-year , to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations , remove network variability and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to adjust manpower and our locomotive and rail car fleets to .
Question: what was the value of free cash flow in 2009?
Answer: 515.0
Question: what is the value for 2008?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -310.0
Question: what is the 2008 value?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.37576 |
CONVFINQA2971 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr></table> research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .
Question: what is the net change in value of research and development expenses from 2013 to 2014?
| 1.0 |
CONVFINQA2972 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of pps , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha america inc . cellulose derivatives strategic ventures . our cellulose derivatives ventures generally fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay dividends based on each ventures' performance in the preceding year . in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we received cash dividends of $ 115 million , $ 92 million and $ 83 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our cellulose derivatives ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states of america ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2014 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2014 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr></table> research and development our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 86 million , $ 85 million and $ 104 million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . aoplus ae , aoplus ae2 , aoplus ae3 , ateva ae , avicor ae , britecoat ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx 2122 , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , duroset ae , ecovae ae , factor ae , fortron ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , impet ae , mowilith ae , nutrinova ae , qorus 2122 , riteflex ae , sunett ae , tcx 2122 , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vantageplus 2122 , vantage ae2 , vectra ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc. .
Question: what is the net change in value of research and development expenses from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 1.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.01176 |
CONVFINQA2973 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 integration of new projects . during 2010 , the following projects were acquired or commenced commercial operations : project location fuel aes equity interest ( percent , rounded ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project</td><td>location</td><td>fuel</td><td>gross mw</td><td>aes equity interest ( percent rounded )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ballylumford</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>gas</td><td>1246</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>jhrh ( 1 )</td><td>china</td><td>hydro</td><td>379</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nueva ventanas</td><td>chile</td><td>coal</td><td>272</td><td>71% ( 71 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>st . nikola</td><td>bulgaria</td><td>wind</td><td>156</td><td>89% ( 89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>guacolda 4 ( 2 )</td><td>chile</td><td>coal</td><td>152</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dong qi ( 3 )</td><td>china</td><td>wind</td><td>49</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>huanghua ii ( 3 )</td><td>china</td><td>wind</td><td>49</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>st . patrick</td><td>france</td><td>wind</td><td>35</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>north rhins</td><td>scotland</td><td>wind</td><td>22</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>kepezkaya</td><td>turkey</td><td>hydro</td><td>28</td><td>51% ( 51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>damlapinar ( 4 )</td><td>turkey</td><td>hydro</td><td>16</td><td>51% ( 51 % )</td></tr></table> damlapinar ( 4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . turkey hydro 16 51% ( 51 % ) ( 1 ) jianghe rural electrification development co . ltd . ( 201cjhrh 201d ) and aes china hydropower investment co . ltd . entered into an agreement to acquire a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in this joint venture in june 2010 . acquisition of 35% ( 35 % ) ownership was completed in june 2010 and the transfer of the remaining 14% ( 14 % ) ownership , which is subject to approval by the chinese government , is expected to be completed in may 2011 . ( 2 ) guacolda is an equity method investment indirectly held by aes through gener . the aes equity interest reflects the 29% ( 29 % ) noncontrolling interests in gener . ( 3 ) joint venture with guohua energy investment co . ltd . ( 4 ) joint venture with i.c . energy . key trends and uncertainties our operations continue to face many risks as discussed in item 1a . 2014risk factors of this form 10-k . some of these challenges are also described above in key drivers of results in 2010 . we continue to monitor our operations and address challenges as they arise . development . during the past year , the company has successfully acquired and completed construction of a number of projects , totaling approximately 2404 mw , including the acquisition of ballylumford in the united kingdom and completion of construction of a number of projects in europe , chile and china . however , as discussed in item 1a . 2014risk factors 2014our business is subject to substantial development uncertainties of this form 10-k , our development projects are subject to uncertainties . certain delays have occurred at the 670 mw maritza coal-fired project in bulgaria , and the project has not yet begun commercial operations . as noted in note 10 2014debt included in item 8 of this form 10-k , as a result of these delays the project debt is in default and the company is working with its lenders to resolve the default . in addition , as noted in item 3 . 2014legal proceedings , the company is in litigation with the contractor regarding the cause of delays . at this time , we believe that maritza will commence commercial operations for at least some of the project 2019s capacity by the second half of 2011 . however , commencement of commercial operations could be delayed beyond this time frame . there can be no assurance that maritza will achieve commercial operations , in whole or in part , by the second half of 2011 , resolve the default with the lenders or prevail in the litigation referenced above , which could result in the loss of some or all of our investment or require additional funding for the project . any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s operating results or financial position . global economic conditions . during the past few years , economic conditions in some countries where our subsidiaries conduct business have deteriorated . although the economic conditions in several of these countries have improved in recent months , our businesses could be impacted in the event these recent trends do not continue. .
Question: what portion of total mw from acquired or commenced commercial operations in 2010 are related to ballylumford in the united kingdom?
| 0.5183 |
CONVFINQA2974 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 integration of new projects . during 2010 , the following projects were acquired or commenced commercial operations : project location fuel aes equity interest ( percent , rounded ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project</td><td>location</td><td>fuel</td><td>gross mw</td><td>aes equity interest ( percent rounded )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ballylumford</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>gas</td><td>1246</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>jhrh ( 1 )</td><td>china</td><td>hydro</td><td>379</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nueva ventanas</td><td>chile</td><td>coal</td><td>272</td><td>71% ( 71 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>st . nikola</td><td>bulgaria</td><td>wind</td><td>156</td><td>89% ( 89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>guacolda 4 ( 2 )</td><td>chile</td><td>coal</td><td>152</td><td>35% ( 35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>dong qi ( 3 )</td><td>china</td><td>wind</td><td>49</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>huanghua ii ( 3 )</td><td>china</td><td>wind</td><td>49</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>st . patrick</td><td>france</td><td>wind</td><td>35</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>north rhins</td><td>scotland</td><td>wind</td><td>22</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>kepezkaya</td><td>turkey</td><td>hydro</td><td>28</td><td>51% ( 51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>damlapinar ( 4 )</td><td>turkey</td><td>hydro</td><td>16</td><td>51% ( 51 % )</td></tr></table> damlapinar ( 4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . turkey hydro 16 51% ( 51 % ) ( 1 ) jianghe rural electrification development co . ltd . ( 201cjhrh 201d ) and aes china hydropower investment co . ltd . entered into an agreement to acquire a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in this joint venture in june 2010 . acquisition of 35% ( 35 % ) ownership was completed in june 2010 and the transfer of the remaining 14% ( 14 % ) ownership , which is subject to approval by the chinese government , is expected to be completed in may 2011 . ( 2 ) guacolda is an equity method investment indirectly held by aes through gener . the aes equity interest reflects the 29% ( 29 % ) noncontrolling interests in gener . ( 3 ) joint venture with guohua energy investment co . ltd . ( 4 ) joint venture with i.c . energy . key trends and uncertainties our operations continue to face many risks as discussed in item 1a . 2014risk factors of this form 10-k . some of these challenges are also described above in key drivers of results in 2010 . we continue to monitor our operations and address challenges as they arise . development . during the past year , the company has successfully acquired and completed construction of a number of projects , totaling approximately 2404 mw , including the acquisition of ballylumford in the united kingdom and completion of construction of a number of projects in europe , chile and china . however , as discussed in item 1a . 2014risk factors 2014our business is subject to substantial development uncertainties of this form 10-k , our development projects are subject to uncertainties . certain delays have occurred at the 670 mw maritza coal-fired project in bulgaria , and the project has not yet begun commercial operations . as noted in note 10 2014debt included in item 8 of this form 10-k , as a result of these delays the project debt is in default and the company is working with its lenders to resolve the default . in addition , as noted in item 3 . 2014legal proceedings , the company is in litigation with the contractor regarding the cause of delays . at this time , we believe that maritza will commence commercial operations for at least some of the project 2019s capacity by the second half of 2011 . however , commencement of commercial operations could be delayed beyond this time frame . there can be no assurance that maritza will achieve commercial operations , in whole or in part , by the second half of 2011 , resolve the default with the lenders or prevail in the litigation referenced above , which could result in the loss of some or all of our investment or require additional funding for the project . any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s operating results or financial position . global economic conditions . during the past few years , economic conditions in some countries where our subsidiaries conduct business have deteriorated . although the economic conditions in several of these countries have improved in recent months , our businesses could be impacted in the event these recent trends do not continue. .
Question: what portion of total mw from acquired or commenced commercial operations in 2010 are related to ballylumford in the united kingdom?
Answer: 0.5183
Question: what about related to nueva ventana?
| 0.11314 |
CONVFINQA2975 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loans sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s dus program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loan sales</td><td>-</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 54</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and gnma , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality . key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan 2019s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor , including underwriting standards , delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party , sufficient collateral valuation , and the validity of the lien securing the loan . as a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations , investors may request pnc to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans . these investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make- whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when , after review of the claim , we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor 2019s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred , such breach has not been cured , and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan . depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor , we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days , although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time . with the exception of the sales the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 199 .
Question: what was the net change in commercial mortgage recourse obligations in 2011?
| -7.0 |
CONVFINQA2976 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loans sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s dus program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loan sales</td><td>-</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 54</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and gnma , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality . key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan 2019s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor , including underwriting standards , delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party , sufficient collateral valuation , and the validity of the lien securing the loan . as a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations , investors may request pnc to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans . these investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make- whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when , after review of the claim , we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor 2019s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred , such breach has not been cured , and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan . depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor , we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days , although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time . with the exception of the sales the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 199 .
Question: what was the net change in commercial mortgage recourse obligations in 2011?
Answer: -7.0
Question: what was that change over the 2010 value?
| -0.12963 |
CONVFINQA2977 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>investments</td><td>other assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 1240</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net</td><td>-409 ( 409 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases sales other settlements and issuances net</td><td>11</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net transfers in and/or out of level 3</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>$ 813</td><td>$ 64</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date</td><td>$ -366 ( 366 )</td><td>$ -17 ( 17 )</td></tr></table> total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what is the sum between the absolute number of the realized and unrealized losses of 2008 and the investments at the end of 2008?
| 1222.0 |
CONVFINQA2978 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>investments</td><td>other assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 1240</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net</td><td>-409 ( 409 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases sales other settlements and issuances net</td><td>11</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net transfers in and/or out of level 3</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>$ 813</td><td>$ 64</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date</td><td>$ -366 ( 366 )</td><td>$ -17 ( 17 )</td></tr></table> total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what is the sum between the absolute number of the realized and unrealized losses of 2008 and the investments at the end of 2008?
Answer: 1222.0
Question: how much does the absolute number of the realized and unrealized losses of 2008 represents in relation to that sum?
| 0.3347 |
CONVFINQA2979 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average long-term debt from 2013 to 2014, in billions?
| 0.89 |
CONVFINQA2980 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average long-term debt from 2013 to 2014, in billions?
Answer: 0.89
Question: and how much is that in millions?
| 890.0 |
CONVFINQA2981 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sl green realty corp . it happens here 2012 annual report 85 | 85 in april a02011 , we purchased sitq immobilier , a subsid- iary of caisse de depot et placement du quebec , or sitq 2019s , 31.5% ( 31.5 % ) economic interest in 1515 a0 broadway , thereby consoli- dating full ownership of the 1750000 a0square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at $ 1.23 a0 billion . this valuation was based on a negotiated sales agreement and took into consideration such factors as whether this was a distressed sale and whether a minority dis- count was warranted . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 458.8 a0million mortgage encumbering the property . we rec- ognized a purchase price fair value adjustment of $ 475.1 a0mil- lion upon the closing of this transaction . this property , which we initially acquired in may a02002 , was previously accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures . in january a0 2011 , we purchased city investment fund , or cif 2019s , 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) a0interest in 521 a0fifth avenue , thereby assum- ing full ownership of the 460000 a0 square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at approximately $ 245.7 a0 million , excluding $ 4.5 a0 million of cash and other assets acquired . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 140.0 a0 million mortgage encumbering the property . we recognized a purchase price fair value adjust- ment of $ 13.8 a0million upon the closing of this transaction . in april a02011 , we refinanced the property with a new $ 150.0 a0mil- lion 2-year mortgage which carries a floating rate of interest of 200 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . in connection with that refinancing , we acquired the fee interest in the property for $ 15.0 a0million . the following summarizes our allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these 2011 acquisitions ( amounts in thousands ) : 51 east 180 110 east 1515 521 fifth 42nd street maiden lane 42nd street broadway avenue land fffd$ 44095 $ 191523 $ 34000 $ 2002 2008462700 $ 110100 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>51 east 42nd street</td><td>180 maiden lane</td><td>110 east 42nd street</td><td>1515 broadway</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land</td><td>$ 44095</td><td>$ 191523</td><td>$ 34000</td><td>$ 462700</td><td>$ 110100</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>building</td><td>33470</td><td>233230</td><td>46411</td><td>707938</td><td>146686</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>above market lease value</td><td>5616</td><td>7944</td><td>823</td><td>18298</td><td>3318</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired in-place leases</td><td>4333</td><td>29948</td><td>5396</td><td>98661</td><td>23016</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets net of other liabilities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>27127</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>assets acquired</td><td>87514</td><td>462645</td><td>86630</td><td>1314724</td><td>283120</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-3693 ( 3693 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>below market lease value</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>84417</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>80724</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>purchase price allocation</td><td>$ 80000</td><td>$ 442325</td><td>$ 84304</td><td>$ 1234000</td><td>$ 257143</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net consideration funded by us at closing</td><td>$ 81632</td><td>$ 81835</td><td>$ 2744</td><td>$ 259228</td><td>$ 70000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>equity and/or debt investment held</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 16000</td><td>$ 40942</td><td>$ 41432</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 65000</td><td>$ 458767</td><td>$ 140000</td></tr></table> net consideration funded by us at closing fffd$ 81632 $ 200281835 $ 20022744 $ 2002 2008259228 $ 200270000 equity and/or debt investment held fffd 2014 2014 $ 16000 $ 2002 2002 200840942 $ 200241432 debt assumed fffd$ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 65000 $ 2002 2008458767 $ 140000 2010 acquisitions | in january 2010 , we became the sole owner of 100 a0church street , a 1.05 a0million square foot ( unau- dited ) office tower located in downtown manhattan , following the successful foreclosure of the senior mezzanine loan at the property . our initial investment totaled $ 40.9 a0million , which was comprised of a 50% ( 50 % ) a0interest in the senior mezzanine loan and two other mezzanine loans at 100 a0 church street , which we acquired from gramercy capital corp . ( nyse : a0gkk ) , or gramercy , in the summer of a0 2007 . at closing of the foreclo- sure , we funded an additional $ 15.0 a0million of capital into the project as part of our agreement with wachovia bank , n.a . to extend and restructure the existing financing . gramercy declined to fund its share of this capital and instead trans- ferred its interests in the investment to us at closing . the restructured $ 139.7 a0million mortgage carries an interest rate of 350 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . the restructured mortgage , which was scheduled to mature in january a0 2013 , was repaid in march a02011 . in august a0 2010 , we acquired 125 a0 park avenue , a manhattan office tower , for $ 330 a0million . in connection with the acquisition , we assumed $ 146.25 a0million of in-place financ- ing . the 5.748% ( 5.748 % ) interest-only loan matures in october a02014 . in december a02010 , we completed the acquisition of various investments from gramercy . this acquisition included ( 1 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) a0interest in the leased fee at 885 a0third avenue for approximately $ 39.3 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 120.4 a0million , ( 2 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) interest in the leased fee at 2 a0 herald square for approxi- mately $ 25.6 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 86.1 a0 million and , ( 3 ) a0 the entire leased fee interest in 292 a0madison avenue for approximately $ 19.2 a0mil- lion plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 59.1 a0million . these assets are all leased to third a0party operators. .
Question: what was the value of the consolidated interests?
| 245.7 |
CONVFINQA2982 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sl green realty corp . it happens here 2012 annual report 85 | 85 in april a02011 , we purchased sitq immobilier , a subsid- iary of caisse de depot et placement du quebec , or sitq 2019s , 31.5% ( 31.5 % ) economic interest in 1515 a0 broadway , thereby consoli- dating full ownership of the 1750000 a0square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at $ 1.23 a0 billion . this valuation was based on a negotiated sales agreement and took into consideration such factors as whether this was a distressed sale and whether a minority dis- count was warranted . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 458.8 a0million mortgage encumbering the property . we rec- ognized a purchase price fair value adjustment of $ 475.1 a0mil- lion upon the closing of this transaction . this property , which we initially acquired in may a02002 , was previously accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures . in january a0 2011 , we purchased city investment fund , or cif 2019s , 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) a0interest in 521 a0fifth avenue , thereby assum- ing full ownership of the 460000 a0 square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at approximately $ 245.7 a0 million , excluding $ 4.5 a0 million of cash and other assets acquired . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 140.0 a0 million mortgage encumbering the property . we recognized a purchase price fair value adjust- ment of $ 13.8 a0million upon the closing of this transaction . in april a02011 , we refinanced the property with a new $ 150.0 a0mil- lion 2-year mortgage which carries a floating rate of interest of 200 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . in connection with that refinancing , we acquired the fee interest in the property for $ 15.0 a0million . the following summarizes our allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these 2011 acquisitions ( amounts in thousands ) : 51 east 180 110 east 1515 521 fifth 42nd street maiden lane 42nd street broadway avenue land fffd$ 44095 $ 191523 $ 34000 $ 2002 2008462700 $ 110100 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>51 east 42nd street</td><td>180 maiden lane</td><td>110 east 42nd street</td><td>1515 broadway</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land</td><td>$ 44095</td><td>$ 191523</td><td>$ 34000</td><td>$ 462700</td><td>$ 110100</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>building</td><td>33470</td><td>233230</td><td>46411</td><td>707938</td><td>146686</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>above market lease value</td><td>5616</td><td>7944</td><td>823</td><td>18298</td><td>3318</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired in-place leases</td><td>4333</td><td>29948</td><td>5396</td><td>98661</td><td>23016</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets net of other liabilities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>27127</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>assets acquired</td><td>87514</td><td>462645</td><td>86630</td><td>1314724</td><td>283120</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-3693 ( 3693 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>below market lease value</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>84417</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>80724</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>purchase price allocation</td><td>$ 80000</td><td>$ 442325</td><td>$ 84304</td><td>$ 1234000</td><td>$ 257143</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net consideration funded by us at closing</td><td>$ 81632</td><td>$ 81835</td><td>$ 2744</td><td>$ 259228</td><td>$ 70000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>equity and/or debt investment held</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 16000</td><td>$ 40942</td><td>$ 41432</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 65000</td><td>$ 458767</td><td>$ 140000</td></tr></table> net consideration funded by us at closing fffd$ 81632 $ 200281835 $ 20022744 $ 2002 2008259228 $ 200270000 equity and/or debt investment held fffd 2014 2014 $ 16000 $ 2002 2002 200840942 $ 200241432 debt assumed fffd$ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 65000 $ 2002 2008458767 $ 140000 2010 acquisitions | in january 2010 , we became the sole owner of 100 a0church street , a 1.05 a0million square foot ( unau- dited ) office tower located in downtown manhattan , following the successful foreclosure of the senior mezzanine loan at the property . our initial investment totaled $ 40.9 a0million , which was comprised of a 50% ( 50 % ) a0interest in the senior mezzanine loan and two other mezzanine loans at 100 a0 church street , which we acquired from gramercy capital corp . ( nyse : a0gkk ) , or gramercy , in the summer of a0 2007 . at closing of the foreclo- sure , we funded an additional $ 15.0 a0million of capital into the project as part of our agreement with wachovia bank , n.a . to extend and restructure the existing financing . gramercy declined to fund its share of this capital and instead trans- ferred its interests in the investment to us at closing . the restructured $ 139.7 a0million mortgage carries an interest rate of 350 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . the restructured mortgage , which was scheduled to mature in january a0 2013 , was repaid in march a02011 . in august a0 2010 , we acquired 125 a0 park avenue , a manhattan office tower , for $ 330 a0million . in connection with the acquisition , we assumed $ 146.25 a0million of in-place financ- ing . the 5.748% ( 5.748 % ) interest-only loan matures in october a02014 . in december a02010 , we completed the acquisition of various investments from gramercy . this acquisition included ( 1 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) a0interest in the leased fee at 885 a0third avenue for approximately $ 39.3 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 120.4 a0million , ( 2 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) interest in the leased fee at 2 a0 herald square for approxi- mately $ 25.6 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 86.1 a0 million and , ( 3 ) a0 the entire leased fee interest in 292 a0madison avenue for approximately $ 19.2 a0mil- lion plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 59.1 a0million . these assets are all leased to third a0party operators. .
Question: what was the value of the consolidated interests?
Answer: 245.7
Question: what was the interest rate of cifs?
| 0.499 |
CONVFINQA2983 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sl green realty corp . it happens here 2012 annual report 85 | 85 in april a02011 , we purchased sitq immobilier , a subsid- iary of caisse de depot et placement du quebec , or sitq 2019s , 31.5% ( 31.5 % ) economic interest in 1515 a0 broadway , thereby consoli- dating full ownership of the 1750000 a0square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at $ 1.23 a0 billion . this valuation was based on a negotiated sales agreement and took into consideration such factors as whether this was a distressed sale and whether a minority dis- count was warranted . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 458.8 a0million mortgage encumbering the property . we rec- ognized a purchase price fair value adjustment of $ 475.1 a0mil- lion upon the closing of this transaction . this property , which we initially acquired in may a02002 , was previously accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures . in january a0 2011 , we purchased city investment fund , or cif 2019s , 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) a0interest in 521 a0fifth avenue , thereby assum- ing full ownership of the 460000 a0 square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at approximately $ 245.7 a0 million , excluding $ 4.5 a0 million of cash and other assets acquired . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 140.0 a0 million mortgage encumbering the property . we recognized a purchase price fair value adjust- ment of $ 13.8 a0million upon the closing of this transaction . in april a02011 , we refinanced the property with a new $ 150.0 a0mil- lion 2-year mortgage which carries a floating rate of interest of 200 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . in connection with that refinancing , we acquired the fee interest in the property for $ 15.0 a0million . the following summarizes our allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these 2011 acquisitions ( amounts in thousands ) : 51 east 180 110 east 1515 521 fifth 42nd street maiden lane 42nd street broadway avenue land fffd$ 44095 $ 191523 $ 34000 $ 2002 2008462700 $ 110100 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>51 east 42nd street</td><td>180 maiden lane</td><td>110 east 42nd street</td><td>1515 broadway</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land</td><td>$ 44095</td><td>$ 191523</td><td>$ 34000</td><td>$ 462700</td><td>$ 110100</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>building</td><td>33470</td><td>233230</td><td>46411</td><td>707938</td><td>146686</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>above market lease value</td><td>5616</td><td>7944</td><td>823</td><td>18298</td><td>3318</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired in-place leases</td><td>4333</td><td>29948</td><td>5396</td><td>98661</td><td>23016</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets net of other liabilities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>27127</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>assets acquired</td><td>87514</td><td>462645</td><td>86630</td><td>1314724</td><td>283120</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-3693 ( 3693 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>below market lease value</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>84417</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>80724</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>purchase price allocation</td><td>$ 80000</td><td>$ 442325</td><td>$ 84304</td><td>$ 1234000</td><td>$ 257143</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net consideration funded by us at closing</td><td>$ 81632</td><td>$ 81835</td><td>$ 2744</td><td>$ 259228</td><td>$ 70000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>equity and/or debt investment held</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 16000</td><td>$ 40942</td><td>$ 41432</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 65000</td><td>$ 458767</td><td>$ 140000</td></tr></table> net consideration funded by us at closing fffd$ 81632 $ 200281835 $ 20022744 $ 2002 2008259228 $ 200270000 equity and/or debt investment held fffd 2014 2014 $ 16000 $ 2002 2002 200840942 $ 200241432 debt assumed fffd$ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 65000 $ 2002 2008458767 $ 140000 2010 acquisitions | in january 2010 , we became the sole owner of 100 a0church street , a 1.05 a0million square foot ( unau- dited ) office tower located in downtown manhattan , following the successful foreclosure of the senior mezzanine loan at the property . our initial investment totaled $ 40.9 a0million , which was comprised of a 50% ( 50 % ) a0interest in the senior mezzanine loan and two other mezzanine loans at 100 a0 church street , which we acquired from gramercy capital corp . ( nyse : a0gkk ) , or gramercy , in the summer of a0 2007 . at closing of the foreclo- sure , we funded an additional $ 15.0 a0million of capital into the project as part of our agreement with wachovia bank , n.a . to extend and restructure the existing financing . gramercy declined to fund its share of this capital and instead trans- ferred its interests in the investment to us at closing . the restructured $ 139.7 a0million mortgage carries an interest rate of 350 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . the restructured mortgage , which was scheduled to mature in january a0 2013 , was repaid in march a02011 . in august a0 2010 , we acquired 125 a0 park avenue , a manhattan office tower , for $ 330 a0million . in connection with the acquisition , we assumed $ 146.25 a0million of in-place financ- ing . the 5.748% ( 5.748 % ) interest-only loan matures in october a02014 . in december a02010 , we completed the acquisition of various investments from gramercy . this acquisition included ( 1 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) a0interest in the leased fee at 885 a0third avenue for approximately $ 39.3 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 120.4 a0million , ( 2 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) interest in the leased fee at 2 a0 herald square for approxi- mately $ 25.6 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 86.1 a0 million and , ( 3 ) a0 the entire leased fee interest in 292 a0madison avenue for approximately $ 19.2 a0mil- lion plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 59.1 a0million . these assets are all leased to third a0party operators. .
Question: what was the value of the consolidated interests?
Answer: 245.7
Question: what was the interest rate of cifs?
Answer: 0.499
Question: what is the product of the value of consolidated interests by the interest rate?
| 122.6043 |
CONVFINQA2984 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sl green realty corp . it happens here 2012 annual report 85 | 85 in april a02011 , we purchased sitq immobilier , a subsid- iary of caisse de depot et placement du quebec , or sitq 2019s , 31.5% ( 31.5 % ) economic interest in 1515 a0 broadway , thereby consoli- dating full ownership of the 1750000 a0square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at $ 1.23 a0 billion . this valuation was based on a negotiated sales agreement and took into consideration such factors as whether this was a distressed sale and whether a minority dis- count was warranted . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 458.8 a0million mortgage encumbering the property . we rec- ognized a purchase price fair value adjustment of $ 475.1 a0mil- lion upon the closing of this transaction . this property , which we initially acquired in may a02002 , was previously accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures . in january a0 2011 , we purchased city investment fund , or cif 2019s , 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) a0interest in 521 a0fifth avenue , thereby assum- ing full ownership of the 460000 a0 square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at approximately $ 245.7 a0 million , excluding $ 4.5 a0 million of cash and other assets acquired . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 140.0 a0 million mortgage encumbering the property . we recognized a purchase price fair value adjust- ment of $ 13.8 a0million upon the closing of this transaction . in april a02011 , we refinanced the property with a new $ 150.0 a0mil- lion 2-year mortgage which carries a floating rate of interest of 200 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . in connection with that refinancing , we acquired the fee interest in the property for $ 15.0 a0million . the following summarizes our allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these 2011 acquisitions ( amounts in thousands ) : 51 east 180 110 east 1515 521 fifth 42nd street maiden lane 42nd street broadway avenue land fffd$ 44095 $ 191523 $ 34000 $ 2002 2008462700 $ 110100 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>51 east 42nd street</td><td>180 maiden lane</td><td>110 east 42nd street</td><td>1515 broadway</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land</td><td>$ 44095</td><td>$ 191523</td><td>$ 34000</td><td>$ 462700</td><td>$ 110100</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>building</td><td>33470</td><td>233230</td><td>46411</td><td>707938</td><td>146686</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>above market lease value</td><td>5616</td><td>7944</td><td>823</td><td>18298</td><td>3318</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired in-place leases</td><td>4333</td><td>29948</td><td>5396</td><td>98661</td><td>23016</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets net of other liabilities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>27127</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>assets acquired</td><td>87514</td><td>462645</td><td>86630</td><td>1314724</td><td>283120</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-3693 ( 3693 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>below market lease value</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>84417</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>7514</td><td>20320</td><td>2326</td><td>80724</td><td>25977</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>purchase price allocation</td><td>$ 80000</td><td>$ 442325</td><td>$ 84304</td><td>$ 1234000</td><td>$ 257143</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net consideration funded by us at closing</td><td>$ 81632</td><td>$ 81835</td><td>$ 2744</td><td>$ 259228</td><td>$ 70000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>equity and/or debt investment held</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 16000</td><td>$ 40942</td><td>$ 41432</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>debt assumed</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 65000</td><td>$ 458767</td><td>$ 140000</td></tr></table> net consideration funded by us at closing fffd$ 81632 $ 200281835 $ 20022744 $ 2002 2008259228 $ 200270000 equity and/or debt investment held fffd 2014 2014 $ 16000 $ 2002 2002 200840942 $ 200241432 debt assumed fffd$ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 65000 $ 2002 2008458767 $ 140000 2010 acquisitions | in january 2010 , we became the sole owner of 100 a0church street , a 1.05 a0million square foot ( unau- dited ) office tower located in downtown manhattan , following the successful foreclosure of the senior mezzanine loan at the property . our initial investment totaled $ 40.9 a0million , which was comprised of a 50% ( 50 % ) a0interest in the senior mezzanine loan and two other mezzanine loans at 100 a0 church street , which we acquired from gramercy capital corp . ( nyse : a0gkk ) , or gramercy , in the summer of a0 2007 . at closing of the foreclo- sure , we funded an additional $ 15.0 a0million of capital into the project as part of our agreement with wachovia bank , n.a . to extend and restructure the existing financing . gramercy declined to fund its share of this capital and instead trans- ferred its interests in the investment to us at closing . the restructured $ 139.7 a0million mortgage carries an interest rate of 350 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . the restructured mortgage , which was scheduled to mature in january a0 2013 , was repaid in march a02011 . in august a0 2010 , we acquired 125 a0 park avenue , a manhattan office tower , for $ 330 a0million . in connection with the acquisition , we assumed $ 146.25 a0million of in-place financ- ing . the 5.748% ( 5.748 % ) interest-only loan matures in october a02014 . in december a02010 , we completed the acquisition of various investments from gramercy . this acquisition included ( 1 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) a0interest in the leased fee at 885 a0third avenue for approximately $ 39.3 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 120.4 a0million , ( 2 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) interest in the leased fee at 2 a0 herald square for approxi- mately $ 25.6 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 86.1 a0 million and , ( 3 ) a0 the entire leased fee interest in 292 a0madison avenue for approximately $ 19.2 a0mil- lion plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 59.1 a0million . these assets are all leased to third a0party operators. .
Question: what was the value of the consolidated interests?
Answer: 245.7
Question: what was the interest rate of cifs?
Answer: 0.499
Question: what is the product of the value of consolidated interests by the interest rate?
Answer: 122.6043
Question: what is the value time 1000000?
| 122604300.0 |
CONVFINQA2985 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
portion of the death benefits directly from the insurance company and the company receives the remainder of the death benefits . it is currently expected that minimal cash payments will be required to fund these policies . the net periodic pension cost for these split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $ 5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . the company has recorded a liability representing the actuarial present value of the future death benefits as of the employees 2019 expected retirement date of $ 51 million and $ 58 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively . deferred compensation plan the company amended and reinstated its deferred compensation plan ( 201cthe plan 201d ) effective june 1 , 2013 to reopen the plan to certain participants . under the plan , participating executives may elect to defer base salary and cash incentive compensation in excess of 401 ( k ) plan limitations . participants under the plan may choose to invest their deferred amounts in the same investment alternatives available under the company's 401 ( k ) plan . the plan also allows for company matching contributions for the following : ( i ) the first 4% ( 4 % ) of compensation deferred under the plan , subject to a maximum of $ 50000 for board officers , ( ii ) lost matching amounts that would have been made under the 401 ( k ) plan if participants had not participated in the plan , and ( iii ) discretionary amounts as approved by the compensation and leadership committee of the board of directors . defined contribution plan the company and certain subsidiaries have various defined contribution plans , in which all eligible employees may participate . in the u.s. , the 401 ( k ) plan is a contributory plan . matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees 2019 contributions . the company 2019s expenses for material defined contribution plans for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 44 million , $ 42 million and $ 48 million , respectively . beginning january 1 , 2012 , the company may make an additional discretionary 401 ( k ) plan matching contribution to eligible employees . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company made no discretionary matching contributions . 8 . share-based compensation plans and other incentive plans stock options , stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plan the company grants options to acquire shares of common stock to certain employees and to existing option holders of acquired companies in connection with the merging of option plans following an acquisition . each option granted and stock appreciation right has an exercise price of no less than 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant . the awards have a contractual life of five to fifteen years and vest over two to four years . stock options and stock appreciation rights assumed or replaced with comparable stock options or stock appreciation rights in conjunction with a change in control of the company only become exercisable if the holder is also involuntarily terminated ( for a reason other than cause ) or quits for good reason within 24 months of a change in control . the employee stock purchase plan allows eligible participants to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 20% ( 20 % ) of eligible compensation on an after-tax basis . plan participants cannot purchase more than $ 25000 of stock in any calendar year . the price an employee pays per share is 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the company 2019s stock on the close of the first trading day or last trading day of the purchase period . the plan has two purchase periods , the first from october 1 through march 31 and the second from april 1 through september 30 . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , employees purchased 1.5 million , 1.4 million and 2.2 million shares , respectively , at purchase prices of $ 43.02 and $ 50.47 , $ 34.52 and $ 42.96 , and $ 30.56 and $ 35.61 , respectively . the company calculates the value of each employee stock option , estimated on the date of grant , using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 9.52 , $ 9.60 and $ 13.25 , respectively , using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>22.1% ( 22.1 % )</td><td>24.0% ( 24.0 % )</td><td>28.8% ( 28.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.9% ( 0.9 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.9</td><td>6.1</td><td>6.0</td></tr></table> the company uses the implied volatility for traded options on the company 2019s stock as the expected volatility assumption required in the black-scholes model . the selection of the implied volatility approach was based upon the availability of .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2013?
| 22.1 |
CONVFINQA2986 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
portion of the death benefits directly from the insurance company and the company receives the remainder of the death benefits . it is currently expected that minimal cash payments will be required to fund these policies . the net periodic pension cost for these split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $ 5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . the company has recorded a liability representing the actuarial present value of the future death benefits as of the employees 2019 expected retirement date of $ 51 million and $ 58 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively . deferred compensation plan the company amended and reinstated its deferred compensation plan ( 201cthe plan 201d ) effective june 1 , 2013 to reopen the plan to certain participants . under the plan , participating executives may elect to defer base salary and cash incentive compensation in excess of 401 ( k ) plan limitations . participants under the plan may choose to invest their deferred amounts in the same investment alternatives available under the company's 401 ( k ) plan . the plan also allows for company matching contributions for the following : ( i ) the first 4% ( 4 % ) of compensation deferred under the plan , subject to a maximum of $ 50000 for board officers , ( ii ) lost matching amounts that would have been made under the 401 ( k ) plan if participants had not participated in the plan , and ( iii ) discretionary amounts as approved by the compensation and leadership committee of the board of directors . defined contribution plan the company and certain subsidiaries have various defined contribution plans , in which all eligible employees may participate . in the u.s. , the 401 ( k ) plan is a contributory plan . matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees 2019 contributions . the company 2019s expenses for material defined contribution plans for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 44 million , $ 42 million and $ 48 million , respectively . beginning january 1 , 2012 , the company may make an additional discretionary 401 ( k ) plan matching contribution to eligible employees . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company made no discretionary matching contributions . 8 . share-based compensation plans and other incentive plans stock options , stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plan the company grants options to acquire shares of common stock to certain employees and to existing option holders of acquired companies in connection with the merging of option plans following an acquisition . each option granted and stock appreciation right has an exercise price of no less than 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant . the awards have a contractual life of five to fifteen years and vest over two to four years . stock options and stock appreciation rights assumed or replaced with comparable stock options or stock appreciation rights in conjunction with a change in control of the company only become exercisable if the holder is also involuntarily terminated ( for a reason other than cause ) or quits for good reason within 24 months of a change in control . the employee stock purchase plan allows eligible participants to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 20% ( 20 % ) of eligible compensation on an after-tax basis . plan participants cannot purchase more than $ 25000 of stock in any calendar year . the price an employee pays per share is 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the company 2019s stock on the close of the first trading day or last trading day of the purchase period . the plan has two purchase periods , the first from october 1 through march 31 and the second from april 1 through september 30 . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , employees purchased 1.5 million , 1.4 million and 2.2 million shares , respectively , at purchase prices of $ 43.02 and $ 50.47 , $ 34.52 and $ 42.96 , and $ 30.56 and $ 35.61 , respectively . the company calculates the value of each employee stock option , estimated on the date of grant , using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 9.52 , $ 9.60 and $ 13.25 , respectively , using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>22.1% ( 22.1 % )</td><td>24.0% ( 24.0 % )</td><td>28.8% ( 28.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.9% ( 0.9 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.9</td><td>6.1</td><td>6.0</td></tr></table> the company uses the implied volatility for traded options on the company 2019s stock as the expected volatility assumption required in the black-scholes model . the selection of the implied volatility approach was based upon the availability of .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2013?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what about in 2012?
| 24.0 |
CONVFINQA2987 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
portion of the death benefits directly from the insurance company and the company receives the remainder of the death benefits . it is currently expected that minimal cash payments will be required to fund these policies . the net periodic pension cost for these split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $ 5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . the company has recorded a liability representing the actuarial present value of the future death benefits as of the employees 2019 expected retirement date of $ 51 million and $ 58 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively . deferred compensation plan the company amended and reinstated its deferred compensation plan ( 201cthe plan 201d ) effective june 1 , 2013 to reopen the plan to certain participants . under the plan , participating executives may elect to defer base salary and cash incentive compensation in excess of 401 ( k ) plan limitations . participants under the plan may choose to invest their deferred amounts in the same investment alternatives available under the company's 401 ( k ) plan . the plan also allows for company matching contributions for the following : ( i ) the first 4% ( 4 % ) of compensation deferred under the plan , subject to a maximum of $ 50000 for board officers , ( ii ) lost matching amounts that would have been made under the 401 ( k ) plan if participants had not participated in the plan , and ( iii ) discretionary amounts as approved by the compensation and leadership committee of the board of directors . defined contribution plan the company and certain subsidiaries have various defined contribution plans , in which all eligible employees may participate . in the u.s. , the 401 ( k ) plan is a contributory plan . matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees 2019 contributions . the company 2019s expenses for material defined contribution plans for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 44 million , $ 42 million and $ 48 million , respectively . beginning january 1 , 2012 , the company may make an additional discretionary 401 ( k ) plan matching contribution to eligible employees . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company made no discretionary matching contributions . 8 . share-based compensation plans and other incentive plans stock options , stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plan the company grants options to acquire shares of common stock to certain employees and to existing option holders of acquired companies in connection with the merging of option plans following an acquisition . each option granted and stock appreciation right has an exercise price of no less than 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant . the awards have a contractual life of five to fifteen years and vest over two to four years . stock options and stock appreciation rights assumed or replaced with comparable stock options or stock appreciation rights in conjunction with a change in control of the company only become exercisable if the holder is also involuntarily terminated ( for a reason other than cause ) or quits for good reason within 24 months of a change in control . the employee stock purchase plan allows eligible participants to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 20% ( 20 % ) of eligible compensation on an after-tax basis . plan participants cannot purchase more than $ 25000 of stock in any calendar year . the price an employee pays per share is 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the company 2019s stock on the close of the first trading day or last trading day of the purchase period . the plan has two purchase periods , the first from october 1 through march 31 and the second from april 1 through september 30 . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , employees purchased 1.5 million , 1.4 million and 2.2 million shares , respectively , at purchase prices of $ 43.02 and $ 50.47 , $ 34.52 and $ 42.96 , and $ 30.56 and $ 35.61 , respectively . the company calculates the value of each employee stock option , estimated on the date of grant , using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 9.52 , $ 9.60 and $ 13.25 , respectively , using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>22.1% ( 22.1 % )</td><td>24.0% ( 24.0 % )</td><td>28.8% ( 28.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.9% ( 0.9 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.9</td><td>6.1</td><td>6.0</td></tr></table> the company uses the implied volatility for traded options on the company 2019s stock as the expected volatility assumption required in the black-scholes model . the selection of the implied volatility approach was based upon the availability of .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2013?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 24.0
Question: what is the total for 2012 and 2013?
| 46.1 |
CONVFINQA2988 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
portion of the death benefits directly from the insurance company and the company receives the remainder of the death benefits . it is currently expected that minimal cash payments will be required to fund these policies . the net periodic pension cost for these split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $ 5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . the company has recorded a liability representing the actuarial present value of the future death benefits as of the employees 2019 expected retirement date of $ 51 million and $ 58 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively . deferred compensation plan the company amended and reinstated its deferred compensation plan ( 201cthe plan 201d ) effective june 1 , 2013 to reopen the plan to certain participants . under the plan , participating executives may elect to defer base salary and cash incentive compensation in excess of 401 ( k ) plan limitations . participants under the plan may choose to invest their deferred amounts in the same investment alternatives available under the company's 401 ( k ) plan . the plan also allows for company matching contributions for the following : ( i ) the first 4% ( 4 % ) of compensation deferred under the plan , subject to a maximum of $ 50000 for board officers , ( ii ) lost matching amounts that would have been made under the 401 ( k ) plan if participants had not participated in the plan , and ( iii ) discretionary amounts as approved by the compensation and leadership committee of the board of directors . defined contribution plan the company and certain subsidiaries have various defined contribution plans , in which all eligible employees may participate . in the u.s. , the 401 ( k ) plan is a contributory plan . matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees 2019 contributions . the company 2019s expenses for material defined contribution plans for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 44 million , $ 42 million and $ 48 million , respectively . beginning january 1 , 2012 , the company may make an additional discretionary 401 ( k ) plan matching contribution to eligible employees . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company made no discretionary matching contributions . 8 . share-based compensation plans and other incentive plans stock options , stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plan the company grants options to acquire shares of common stock to certain employees and to existing option holders of acquired companies in connection with the merging of option plans following an acquisition . each option granted and stock appreciation right has an exercise price of no less than 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant . the awards have a contractual life of five to fifteen years and vest over two to four years . stock options and stock appreciation rights assumed or replaced with comparable stock options or stock appreciation rights in conjunction with a change in control of the company only become exercisable if the holder is also involuntarily terminated ( for a reason other than cause ) or quits for good reason within 24 months of a change in control . the employee stock purchase plan allows eligible participants to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 20% ( 20 % ) of eligible compensation on an after-tax basis . plan participants cannot purchase more than $ 25000 of stock in any calendar year . the price an employee pays per share is 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the company 2019s stock on the close of the first trading day or last trading day of the purchase period . the plan has two purchase periods , the first from october 1 through march 31 and the second from april 1 through september 30 . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , employees purchased 1.5 million , 1.4 million and 2.2 million shares , respectively , at purchase prices of $ 43.02 and $ 50.47 , $ 34.52 and $ 42.96 , and $ 30.56 and $ 35.61 , respectively . the company calculates the value of each employee stock option , estimated on the date of grant , using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 9.52 , $ 9.60 and $ 13.25 , respectively , using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>22.1% ( 22.1 % )</td><td>24.0% ( 24.0 % )</td><td>28.8% ( 28.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.9% ( 0.9 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.9</td><td>6.1</td><td>6.0</td></tr></table> the company uses the implied volatility for traded options on the company 2019s stock as the expected volatility assumption required in the black-scholes model . the selection of the implied volatility approach was based upon the availability of .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2013?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 24.0
Question: what is the total for 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 46.1
Question: what about adding 2011?
| 74.9 |
CONVFINQA2989 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
portion of the death benefits directly from the insurance company and the company receives the remainder of the death benefits . it is currently expected that minimal cash payments will be required to fund these policies . the net periodic pension cost for these split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $ 5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . the company has recorded a liability representing the actuarial present value of the future death benefits as of the employees 2019 expected retirement date of $ 51 million and $ 58 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively . deferred compensation plan the company amended and reinstated its deferred compensation plan ( 201cthe plan 201d ) effective june 1 , 2013 to reopen the plan to certain participants . under the plan , participating executives may elect to defer base salary and cash incentive compensation in excess of 401 ( k ) plan limitations . participants under the plan may choose to invest their deferred amounts in the same investment alternatives available under the company's 401 ( k ) plan . the plan also allows for company matching contributions for the following : ( i ) the first 4% ( 4 % ) of compensation deferred under the plan , subject to a maximum of $ 50000 for board officers , ( ii ) lost matching amounts that would have been made under the 401 ( k ) plan if participants had not participated in the plan , and ( iii ) discretionary amounts as approved by the compensation and leadership committee of the board of directors . defined contribution plan the company and certain subsidiaries have various defined contribution plans , in which all eligible employees may participate . in the u.s. , the 401 ( k ) plan is a contributory plan . matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees 2019 contributions . the company 2019s expenses for material defined contribution plans for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 44 million , $ 42 million and $ 48 million , respectively . beginning january 1 , 2012 , the company may make an additional discretionary 401 ( k ) plan matching contribution to eligible employees . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company made no discretionary matching contributions . 8 . share-based compensation plans and other incentive plans stock options , stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plan the company grants options to acquire shares of common stock to certain employees and to existing option holders of acquired companies in connection with the merging of option plans following an acquisition . each option granted and stock appreciation right has an exercise price of no less than 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant . the awards have a contractual life of five to fifteen years and vest over two to four years . stock options and stock appreciation rights assumed or replaced with comparable stock options or stock appreciation rights in conjunction with a change in control of the company only become exercisable if the holder is also involuntarily terminated ( for a reason other than cause ) or quits for good reason within 24 months of a change in control . the employee stock purchase plan allows eligible participants to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 20% ( 20 % ) of eligible compensation on an after-tax basis . plan participants cannot purchase more than $ 25000 of stock in any calendar year . the price an employee pays per share is 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the company 2019s stock on the close of the first trading day or last trading day of the purchase period . the plan has two purchase periods , the first from october 1 through march 31 and the second from april 1 through september 30 . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , employees purchased 1.5 million , 1.4 million and 2.2 million shares , respectively , at purchase prices of $ 43.02 and $ 50.47 , $ 34.52 and $ 42.96 , and $ 30.56 and $ 35.61 , respectively . the company calculates the value of each employee stock option , estimated on the date of grant , using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 9.52 , $ 9.60 and $ 13.25 , respectively , using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>22.1% ( 22.1 % )</td><td>24.0% ( 24.0 % )</td><td>28.8% ( 28.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.9% ( 0.9 % )</td><td>0.8% ( 0.8 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>2.2% ( 2.2 % )</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.9</td><td>6.1</td><td>6.0</td></tr></table> the company uses the implied volatility for traded options on the company 2019s stock as the expected volatility assumption required in the black-scholes model . the selection of the implied volatility approach was based upon the availability of .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2013?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what about in 2012?
Answer: 24.0
Question: what is the total for 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 46.1
Question: what about adding 2011?
Answer: 74.9
Question: what is the average for three years?
| 24.96667 |
CONVFINQA2990 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
have access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions . at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million . historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-458 ( 458 )</td><td>-935 ( 935 )</td><td>-800 ( 800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 601</td><td>$ 371</td><td>$ 51</td></tr></table> operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 . higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 . in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 . voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 . investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 . increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .
Question: what is 1 times 1000?
| 1000.0 |
CONVFINQA2991 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
have access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions . at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million . historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-458 ( 458 )</td><td>-935 ( 935 )</td><td>-800 ( 800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 601</td><td>$ 371</td><td>$ 51</td></tr></table> operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 . higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 . in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 . voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 . investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 . increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .
Question: what is 1 times 1000?
Answer: 1000.0
Question: what is that less 100?
| 900.0 |
CONVFINQA2992 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
| 118.0 |
CONVFINQA2993 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
Answer: 118.0
Question: and for 2005?
| 145.0 |
CONVFINQA2994 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
Answer: 118.0
Question: and for 2005?
Answer: 145.0
Question: combined, what is the total value for these years?
| 263.0 |
CONVFINQA2995 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
Answer: 118.0
Question: and for 2005?
Answer: 145.0
Question: combined, what is the total value for these years?
Answer: 263.0
Question: and including 2004?
| 351.0 |
CONVFINQA2996 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .
Question: what was the other income for 2006?
Answer: 118.0
Question: and for 2005?
Answer: 145.0
Question: combined, what is the total value for these years?
Answer: 263.0
Question: and including 2004?
Answer: 351.0
Question: so what was the average for this value during this time?
| 117.0 |
CONVFINQA2997 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended</td><td>operating premises leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>656</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>621</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>554</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>481</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2712</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total operating lease liability for 2014 and 2015?
| 1328.0 |
CONVFINQA2998 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended</td><td>operating premises leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>656</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>621</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>554</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>481</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2712</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total operating lease liability for 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 1328.0
Question: and including 2016?
| 1949.0 |
CONVFINQA2999 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended</td><td>operating premises leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>656</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>621</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>554</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>481</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2712</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total operating lease liability for 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 1328.0
Question: and including 2016?
Answer: 1949.0
Question: so what was the average during these years?
| 649.66667 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.