id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA3200 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements equitable discretion and not require refunds for the 20-month period from september 13 , 2001 - may 2 , 2003 . because the ruling on refunds relied on findings in the interruptible load proceeding , which is discussed in a separate section below , the ferc concluded that the refund ruling will be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the rehearing requests in that proceeding . on the second issue , the ferc reversed its prior decision and ordered that the prospective bandwidth remedy begin on june 1 , 2005 ( the date of its initial order in the proceeding ) rather than january 1 , 2006 , as it had previously ordered . pursuant to the october 2011 order , entergy was required to calculate the additional bandwidth payments for the period june - december 2005 utilizing the bandwidth formula tariff prescribed by the ferc that was filed in a december 2006 compliance filing and accepted by the ferc in an april 2007 order . as is the case with bandwidth remedy payments , these payments and receipts will ultimately be paid by utility operating company customers to other utility operating company customers . in december 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc its compliance filing that provides the payments and receipts among the utility operating companies pursuant to the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . the filing shows the following payments/receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>$ 156</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>( $ 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>( $ 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>( $ 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>( $ 43 )</td></tr></table> entergy arkansas made its payment in january 2012 . in february 2012 , entergy arkansas filed for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $ 156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from march 2012 through december 2013 . in march 2012 the apsc issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider , subject to refund . the lpsc and the apsc have requested rehearing of the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . in december 2013 the lpsc filed a petition for a writ of mandamus at the united states court of appeals for the d.c . circuit . in its petition , the lpsc requested that the d.c . circuit issue an order compelling the ferc to issue a final order on pending rehearing requests . in its response to the lpsc petition , the ferc committed to rule on the pending rehearing request before the end of february . in january 2014 the d.c . circuit denied the lpsc's petition . the apsc , the lpsc , the puct , and other parties intervened in the december 2011 compliance filing proceeding , and the apsc and the lpsc also filed protests . calendar year 2013 production costs the liabilities and assets for the preliminary estimate of the payments and receipts required to implement the ferc 2019s remedy based on calendar year 2013 production costs were recorded in december 2013 , based on certain year-to-date information . the preliminary estimate was recorded based on the following estimate of the payments/receipts among the utility operating companies for 2014. .
Question: what portion of the entergy arkansas payment goes to entergy mississippi?
| 0.21154 |
CONVFINQA3201 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements equitable discretion and not require refunds for the 20-month period from september 13 , 2001 - may 2 , 2003 . because the ruling on refunds relied on findings in the interruptible load proceeding , which is discussed in a separate section below , the ferc concluded that the refund ruling will be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the rehearing requests in that proceeding . on the second issue , the ferc reversed its prior decision and ordered that the prospective bandwidth remedy begin on june 1 , 2005 ( the date of its initial order in the proceeding ) rather than january 1 , 2006 , as it had previously ordered . pursuant to the october 2011 order , entergy was required to calculate the additional bandwidth payments for the period june - december 2005 utilizing the bandwidth formula tariff prescribed by the ferc that was filed in a december 2006 compliance filing and accepted by the ferc in an april 2007 order . as is the case with bandwidth remedy payments , these payments and receipts will ultimately be paid by utility operating company customers to other utility operating company customers . in december 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc its compliance filing that provides the payments and receipts among the utility operating companies pursuant to the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . the filing shows the following payments/receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>$ 156</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>( $ 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>( $ 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>( $ 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>( $ 43 )</td></tr></table> entergy arkansas made its payment in january 2012 . in february 2012 , entergy arkansas filed for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $ 156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from march 2012 through december 2013 . in march 2012 the apsc issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider , subject to refund . the lpsc and the apsc have requested rehearing of the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . in december 2013 the lpsc filed a petition for a writ of mandamus at the united states court of appeals for the d.c . circuit . in its petition , the lpsc requested that the d.c . circuit issue an order compelling the ferc to issue a final order on pending rehearing requests . in its response to the lpsc petition , the ferc committed to rule on the pending rehearing request before the end of february . in january 2014 the d.c . circuit denied the lpsc's petition . the apsc , the lpsc , the puct , and other parties intervened in the december 2011 compliance filing proceeding , and the apsc and the lpsc also filed protests . calendar year 2013 production costs the liabilities and assets for the preliminary estimate of the payments and receipts required to implement the ferc 2019s remedy based on calendar year 2013 production costs were recorded in december 2013 , based on certain year-to-date information . the preliminary estimate was recorded based on the following estimate of the payments/receipts among the utility operating companies for 2014. .
Question: what portion of the entergy arkansas payment goes to entergy mississippi?
Answer: 0.21154
Question: and which portion goes to entergy texas?
| 0.27564 |
CONVFINQA3202 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2246.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>180.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>39.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what is the sum of the retail electric price and volume/weather adjustments?
| 219.5 |
CONVFINQA3203 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2246.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>180.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>39.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>miso deferral</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what is the sum of the retail electric price and volume/weather adjustments?
Answer: 219.5
Question: what is net revenue less that sum?
| 2189.3 |
CONVFINQA3204 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of increased volumes in our performance and applied coatings , optical and specialty materials and glass reportable business segments was offset by volume declines in the commodity chemicals reportable business segment . the volume decline in the commodity chemicals reportable business segment was due in part to lost sales resulting from the impact of hurricane rita , as discussed below . cost of sales as a percentage of sales increased to 63.5% ( 63.5 % ) as compared to 63.1% ( 63.1 % ) in 2004 . inflation , including higher coatings raw material costs and higher energy costs in our commodity chemicals and glass reportable business segments increased our cost of sales . selling , general and administrative expense declined slightly as a percentage of sales to 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) despite increasing by $ 56 million in 2005 . these costs increased primarily due to increased advertising in our optical products operating segment and higher expenses due to store expansions in our architectural coatings operating segment . interest expense declined $ 9 million in 2005 , reflecting the year over year reduction in the outstanding debt balance of $ 80 million . other charges increased $ 284 million in 2005 primarily due to pretax charges of $ 132 million related to the marvin legal settlement , net of $ 18 million in insurance recoveries , $ 61 million for the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement , $ 34 million of direct costs related to the impact of hurricanes rita and katrina , $ 27 million for an asset impairment charge in our fine chemicals operating segment , $ 19 million for debt refinancing costs and an increase of $ 12 million for environmental remediation costs . net income and earnings per share 2013 assuming dilution for 2005 were $ 596 million and $ 3.49 respectively , compared to $ 683 million and $ 3.95 , respectively , for 2004 . net income in 2005 included aftertax charges of $ 117 million , or 68 cents a share , for legal settlements net of insurance ; $ 21 million , or 12 cents a share for direct costs related to the impact of hurricanes katrina and rita ; $ 17 million , or 10 cents a share related to an asset impairment charge related to our fine chemicals business ; and $ 12 million , or 7 cents a share , for debt refinancing costs . the legal settlements net of insurance include aftertax charges of $ 80 million for the marvin legal settlement , net of insurance recoveries , and $ 37 million for the impact of the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement . net income for 2005 and 2004 included an aftertax charge of $ 13 million , or 8 cents a share , and $ 19 million , or 11 cents a share , respectively , to reflect the net increase in the current value of the company 2019s obligation relating to asbestos claims under the ppg settlement arrangement . results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2005 2004 2005 2004 industrial coatings $ 2921 $ 2818 $ 284 $ 338 performance and applied coatings 2668 2478 464 451 optical and specialty materials 867 805 158 186 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>net sales 2005</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>net sales 2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial coatings</td><td>$ 2921</td><td>$ 2818</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 338</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance and applied coatings</td><td>2668</td><td>2478</td><td>464</td><td>451</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>optical and specialty materials</td><td>867</td><td>805</td><td>158</td><td>186</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity chemicals</td><td>1531</td><td>1229</td><td>313</td><td>113</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>glass</td><td>2214</td><td>2183</td><td>123</td><td>166</td></tr></table> sales of industrial coatings increased $ 103 million or 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 . sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices in our industrial and packaging coatings businesses and 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . volume was flat year over year as increased volume in automotive coatings was offset by lower volume in industrial and packaging coatings . segment income decreased $ 54 million in 2005 . the decrease in segment income was due to the adverse impact of inflation , including raw materials costs increases of about $ 170 million , which more than offset the benefits of higher selling prices , improved sales margin mix , formula cost reductions , lower manufacturing costs and higher other income . performance and applied coatings sales increased $ 190 million or 8% ( 8 % ) in 2005 . sales increased 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices in all three operating segments , 3% ( 3 % ) due to increased volumes as increases in our aerospace and architectural coatings businesses exceeded volume declines in automotive refinish , and 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . performance and applied coatings segment income increased $ 13 million in 2005 . segment income increased due to the impact of increased sales volumes described above and higher other income , which combined to offset the negative impacts of higher overhead costs to support the growth in these businesses , particularly in the architectural coatings business , and higher manufacturing costs . the impact of higher selling prices fully offset the adverse impact of inflation , including raw materials cost increases of about $ 75 million . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 62 million or 8% ( 8 % ) . sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) due to higher sales volumes in our optical products and silica businesses , which offset lower sales volumes in our fine chemicals business . sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to an acquisition in our optical products business and decreased 1% ( 1 % ) due to lower pricing . segment income decreased $ 28 million . the primary factor decreasing segment income was the $ 27 million impairment charge related to our fine chemicals business . the impact of higher sales volumes described above was offset by higher inflation , including increased energy costs ; lower selling prices ; increased overhead costs in our optical products business to support growth 24 2006 ppg annual report and form 10-k 4282_txt .
Question: in 2005, how much did the income represent in relation to the net sales for the industrial coatings segment?
| 0.09723 |
CONVFINQA3205 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of increased volumes in our performance and applied coatings , optical and specialty materials and glass reportable business segments was offset by volume declines in the commodity chemicals reportable business segment . the volume decline in the commodity chemicals reportable business segment was due in part to lost sales resulting from the impact of hurricane rita , as discussed below . cost of sales as a percentage of sales increased to 63.5% ( 63.5 % ) as compared to 63.1% ( 63.1 % ) in 2004 . inflation , including higher coatings raw material costs and higher energy costs in our commodity chemicals and glass reportable business segments increased our cost of sales . selling , general and administrative expense declined slightly as a percentage of sales to 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) despite increasing by $ 56 million in 2005 . these costs increased primarily due to increased advertising in our optical products operating segment and higher expenses due to store expansions in our architectural coatings operating segment . interest expense declined $ 9 million in 2005 , reflecting the year over year reduction in the outstanding debt balance of $ 80 million . other charges increased $ 284 million in 2005 primarily due to pretax charges of $ 132 million related to the marvin legal settlement , net of $ 18 million in insurance recoveries , $ 61 million for the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement , $ 34 million of direct costs related to the impact of hurricanes rita and katrina , $ 27 million for an asset impairment charge in our fine chemicals operating segment , $ 19 million for debt refinancing costs and an increase of $ 12 million for environmental remediation costs . net income and earnings per share 2013 assuming dilution for 2005 were $ 596 million and $ 3.49 respectively , compared to $ 683 million and $ 3.95 , respectively , for 2004 . net income in 2005 included aftertax charges of $ 117 million , or 68 cents a share , for legal settlements net of insurance ; $ 21 million , or 12 cents a share for direct costs related to the impact of hurricanes katrina and rita ; $ 17 million , or 10 cents a share related to an asset impairment charge related to our fine chemicals business ; and $ 12 million , or 7 cents a share , for debt refinancing costs . the legal settlements net of insurance include aftertax charges of $ 80 million for the marvin legal settlement , net of insurance recoveries , and $ 37 million for the impact of the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement . net income for 2005 and 2004 included an aftertax charge of $ 13 million , or 8 cents a share , and $ 19 million , or 11 cents a share , respectively , to reflect the net increase in the current value of the company 2019s obligation relating to asbestos claims under the ppg settlement arrangement . results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2005 2004 2005 2004 industrial coatings $ 2921 $ 2818 $ 284 $ 338 performance and applied coatings 2668 2478 464 451 optical and specialty materials 867 805 158 186 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>net sales 2005</td><td>net sales 2004</td><td>net sales 2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial coatings</td><td>$ 2921</td><td>$ 2818</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 338</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance and applied coatings</td><td>2668</td><td>2478</td><td>464</td><td>451</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>optical and specialty materials</td><td>867</td><td>805</td><td>158</td><td>186</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity chemicals</td><td>1531</td><td>1229</td><td>313</td><td>113</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>glass</td><td>2214</td><td>2183</td><td>123</td><td>166</td></tr></table> sales of industrial coatings increased $ 103 million or 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 . sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices in our industrial and packaging coatings businesses and 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . volume was flat year over year as increased volume in automotive coatings was offset by lower volume in industrial and packaging coatings . segment income decreased $ 54 million in 2005 . the decrease in segment income was due to the adverse impact of inflation , including raw materials costs increases of about $ 170 million , which more than offset the benefits of higher selling prices , improved sales margin mix , formula cost reductions , lower manufacturing costs and higher other income . performance and applied coatings sales increased $ 190 million or 8% ( 8 % ) in 2005 . sales increased 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices in all three operating segments , 3% ( 3 % ) due to increased volumes as increases in our aerospace and architectural coatings businesses exceeded volume declines in automotive refinish , and 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation . performance and applied coatings segment income increased $ 13 million in 2005 . segment income increased due to the impact of increased sales volumes described above and higher other income , which combined to offset the negative impacts of higher overhead costs to support the growth in these businesses , particularly in the architectural coatings business , and higher manufacturing costs . the impact of higher selling prices fully offset the adverse impact of inflation , including raw materials cost increases of about $ 75 million . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 62 million or 8% ( 8 % ) . sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) due to higher sales volumes in our optical products and silica businesses , which offset lower sales volumes in our fine chemicals business . sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to an acquisition in our optical products business and decreased 1% ( 1 % ) due to lower pricing . segment income decreased $ 28 million . the primary factor decreasing segment income was the $ 27 million impairment charge related to our fine chemicals business . the impact of higher sales volumes described above was offset by higher inflation , including increased energy costs ; lower selling prices ; increased overhead costs in our optical products business to support growth 24 2006 ppg annual report and form 10-k 4282_txt .
Question: in 2005, how much did the income represent in relation to the net sales for the industrial coatings segment?
Answer: 0.09723
Question: and how much did it represent for the performance and applied coatings segment?
| 0.17391 |
CONVFINQA3206 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , and executive officers and corporate governance . pursuant to section 406 of the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 , we have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers that applies to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer , principal accounting officer and controller , and other persons performing similar functions . our code of ethics for senior financial officers is publicly available on our website at www.hologic.com . we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under item 5.05 of current report on form 8-k regarding an amendment to , or waiver from , a provision of this code by posting such information on our website , at the address specified above . the additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 11 . executive compensation . the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . we maintain a number of equity compensation plans for employees , officers , directors and others whose efforts contribute to our success . the table below sets forth certain information as of the end of our fiscal year ended september 27 , 2008 regarding the shares of our common stock available for grant or granted under stock option plans and equity incentives that ( i ) were approved by our stockholders , and ( ii ) were not approved by our stockholders . the number of securities and the exercise price of the outstanding securities have been adjusted to reflect our two-for-one stock splits effected on november 30 , 2005 and april 2 , 2008 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15370814 $ 16.10 19977099 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582881 $ 3.79 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>15370814</td><td>$ 16.10</td><td>19977099</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 )</td><td>582881</td><td>$ 3.79</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>15953695</td><td>$ 15.65</td><td>19977099</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes the following plans : 1997 employee equity incentive plan and 2000 acquisition equity incentive plan . a description of each of these plans is as follows : 1997 employee equity incentive plan . the purposes of the 1997 employee equity incentive plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , adopted by the board of directors in may 1997 , are to attract and retain key employees , consultants and advisors , to provide an incentive for them to assist us in achieving long-range performance goals , and to enable such person to participate in our long-term growth . in general , under the 1997 plan , all employees .
Question: what was the total of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
| 15370814.0 |
CONVFINQA3207 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , and executive officers and corporate governance . pursuant to section 406 of the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 , we have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers that applies to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer , principal accounting officer and controller , and other persons performing similar functions . our code of ethics for senior financial officers is publicly available on our website at www.hologic.com . we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under item 5.05 of current report on form 8-k regarding an amendment to , or waiver from , a provision of this code by posting such information on our website , at the address specified above . the additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 11 . executive compensation . the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . we maintain a number of equity compensation plans for employees , officers , directors and others whose efforts contribute to our success . the table below sets forth certain information as of the end of our fiscal year ended september 27 , 2008 regarding the shares of our common stock available for grant or granted under stock option plans and equity incentives that ( i ) were approved by our stockholders , and ( ii ) were not approved by our stockholders . the number of securities and the exercise price of the outstanding securities have been adjusted to reflect our two-for-one stock splits effected on november 30 , 2005 and april 2 , 2008 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15370814 $ 16.10 19977099 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582881 $ 3.79 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>15370814</td><td>$ 16.10</td><td>19977099</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 )</td><td>582881</td><td>$ 3.79</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>15953695</td><td>$ 15.65</td><td>19977099</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes the following plans : 1997 employee equity incentive plan and 2000 acquisition equity incentive plan . a description of each of these plans is as follows : 1997 employee equity incentive plan . the purposes of the 1997 employee equity incentive plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , adopted by the board of directors in may 1997 , are to attract and retain key employees , consultants and advisors , to provide an incentive for them to assist us in achieving long-range performance goals , and to enable such person to participate in our long-term growth . in general , under the 1997 plan , all employees .
Question: what was the total of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 15370814.0
Question: and what was the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights?
| 16.1 |
CONVFINQA3208 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , and executive officers and corporate governance . pursuant to section 406 of the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 , we have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers that applies to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer , principal accounting officer and controller , and other persons performing similar functions . our code of ethics for senior financial officers is publicly available on our website at www.hologic.com . we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under item 5.05 of current report on form 8-k regarding an amendment to , or waiver from , a provision of this code by posting such information on our website , at the address specified above . the additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 11 . executive compensation . the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . we maintain a number of equity compensation plans for employees , officers , directors and others whose efforts contribute to our success . the table below sets forth certain information as of the end of our fiscal year ended september 27 , 2008 regarding the shares of our common stock available for grant or granted under stock option plans and equity incentives that ( i ) were approved by our stockholders , and ( ii ) were not approved by our stockholders . the number of securities and the exercise price of the outstanding securities have been adjusted to reflect our two-for-one stock splits effected on november 30 , 2005 and april 2 , 2008 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15370814 $ 16.10 19977099 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582881 $ 3.79 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>15370814</td><td>$ 16.10</td><td>19977099</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 )</td><td>582881</td><td>$ 3.79</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>15953695</td><td>$ 15.65</td><td>19977099</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes the following plans : 1997 employee equity incentive plan and 2000 acquisition equity incentive plan . a description of each of these plans is as follows : 1997 employee equity incentive plan . the purposes of the 1997 employee equity incentive plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , adopted by the board of directors in may 1997 , are to attract and retain key employees , consultants and advisors , to provide an incentive for them to assist us in achieving long-range performance goals , and to enable such person to participate in our long-term growth . in general , under the 1997 plan , all employees .
Question: what was the total of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 15370814.0
Question: and what was the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 16.1
Question: what was, then, the total fair value of options , warrants and rights that are issued and approved by by security holders?
| 247470105.4 |
CONVFINQA3209 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part iii item 10 . directors , and executive officers and corporate governance . pursuant to section 406 of the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 , we have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers that applies to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer , principal accounting officer and controller , and other persons performing similar functions . our code of ethics for senior financial officers is publicly available on our website at www.hologic.com . we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under item 5.05 of current report on form 8-k regarding an amendment to , or waiver from , a provision of this code by posting such information on our website , at the address specified above . the additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 11 . executive compensation . the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . we maintain a number of equity compensation plans for employees , officers , directors and others whose efforts contribute to our success . the table below sets forth certain information as of the end of our fiscal year ended september 27 , 2008 regarding the shares of our common stock available for grant or granted under stock option plans and equity incentives that ( i ) were approved by our stockholders , and ( ii ) were not approved by our stockholders . the number of securities and the exercise price of the outstanding securities have been adjusted to reflect our two-for-one stock splits effected on november 30 , 2005 and april 2 , 2008 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15370814 $ 16.10 19977099 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582881 $ 3.79 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>15370814</td><td>$ 16.10</td><td>19977099</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 )</td><td>582881</td><td>$ 3.79</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>15953695</td><td>$ 15.65</td><td>19977099</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes the following plans : 1997 employee equity incentive plan and 2000 acquisition equity incentive plan . a description of each of these plans is as follows : 1997 employee equity incentive plan . the purposes of the 1997 employee equity incentive plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , adopted by the board of directors in may 1997 , are to attract and retain key employees , consultants and advisors , to provide an incentive for them to assist us in achieving long-range performance goals , and to enable such person to participate in our long-term growth . in general , under the 1997 plan , all employees .
Question: what was the total of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 15370814.0
Question: and what was the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 16.1
Question: what was, then, the total fair value of options , warrants and rights that are issued and approved by by security holders?
Answer: 247470105.4
Question: an how much is that, in millions?
| 247.47011 |
CONVFINQA3210 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .
Question: what was the change in value of total current liabilities from 2006 to 2007?
| -42.8 |
CONVFINQA3211 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .
Question: what was the change in value of total current liabilities from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: -42.8
Question: what was the value of total current liabilities in 2006?
| 682.0 |
CONVFINQA3212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .
Question: what was the change in value of total current liabilities from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: -42.8
Question: what was the value of total current liabilities in 2006?
Answer: 682.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| -0.06276 |
CONVFINQA3213 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td><td>$ 20454</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .
Question: what was the interest expense in 2013, in thousands of dollars?
| 8181.0 |
CONVFINQA3214 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td><td>$ 20454</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .
Question: what was the interest expense in 2013, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 8181.0
Question: and what was it in 2012, also in thousands of dollars?
| 20454.0 |
CONVFINQA3215 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td><td>$ 20454</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .
Question: what was the interest expense in 2013, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 8181.0
Question: and what was it in 2012, also in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 20454.0
Question: what was, then, the change in interest expense over the year?
| -12273.0 |
CONVFINQA3216 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td><td>$ 20454</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .
Question: what was the interest expense in 2013, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 8181.0
Question: and what was it in 2012, also in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 20454.0
Question: what was, then, the change in interest expense over the year?
Answer: -12273.0
Question: what was the interest expense in 2012, in thousands of dollars?
| 20454.0 |
CONVFINQA3217 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td><td>$ 20454</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .
Question: what was the interest expense in 2013, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 8181.0
Question: and what was it in 2012, also in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 20454.0
Question: what was, then, the change in interest expense over the year?
Answer: -12273.0
Question: what was the interest expense in 2012, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 20454.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent, in percentage, in relation to the 2012 interest expense?
| -0.60003 |
CONVFINQA3218 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312014</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>market change</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 183032</td><td>$ 12926</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -6731 ( 6731 )</td><td>$ -3391 ( 3391 )</td><td>$ 185836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>128611</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td><td>-1308 ( 1308 )</td><td>-1857 ( 1857 )</td><td>125664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>66194</td><td>3985</td><td>2014</td><td>627</td><td>-6373 ( 6373 )</td><td>64433</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>366</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 377837</td><td>$ 17167</td><td>$ 366</td><td>$ -7413 ( 7413 )</td><td>$ -11621 ( 11621 )</td><td>$ 376336</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .
Question: what was the net change in the balance of asset allocation from 2014 to 2015?
| 2804.0 |
CONVFINQA3219 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2015 equity aum totaled $ 2.424 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 52.8 billion . net inflows included $ 78.4 billion and $ 4.2 billion into ishares and active products , respectively . ishares net inflows were driven by the core series and flows into broad developed market equity exposures , and active net inflows reflected demand for international equities . ishares and active net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 29.8 billion . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2015 at $ 1.422 trillion , increasing $ 28.7 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from december 31 , 2014 . the increase in aum reflected $ 76.9 billion in net inflows , partially offset by $ 48.2 billion in net market depreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2015 , active net inflows of $ 35.9 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield strategies . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income strategies funds , with net inflows of $ 7.0 billion and $ 3.7 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.7 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 3.5 billion . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 50.3 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and high yield bond funds . active and ishares net inflows were partially offset by non-etf index net outflows of $ 9.3 billion . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2015 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2014 net inflows ( outflows ) acquisition ( 1 ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2015 asset allocation and balanced $ 183032 $ 12926 $ 2014 $ ( 6731 ) $ ( 3391 ) $ 185836 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312014</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>acquisition ( 1 )</td><td>market change</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 183032</td><td>$ 12926</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -6731 ( 6731 )</td><td>$ -3391 ( 3391 )</td><td>$ 185836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>128611</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td><td>-1308 ( 1308 )</td><td>-1857 ( 1857 )</td><td>125664</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>66194</td><td>3985</td><td>2014</td><td>627</td><td>-6373 ( 6373 )</td><td>64433</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>366</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>403</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 377837</td><td>$ 17167</td><td>$ 366</td><td>$ -7413 ( 7413 )</td><td>$ -11621 ( 11621 )</td><td>$ 376336</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts represent $ 366 million of aum acquired in the futureadvisor acquisition in october 2015 . the futureadvisor acquisition amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset class net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 17.4 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 7.3 billion to institutional multi-asset class net new business in 2015 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 1.3 billion were primarily due to a large single-client transition out of mutual funds into a series of ishares across asset classes . notwithstanding this transition , retail flows reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 4.6 billion in 2015 . the company 2019s multi-asset class strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 49% ( 49 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 12.9 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites. .
Question: what was the net change in the balance of asset allocation from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 2804.0
Question: what is that change over the 2014 value?
| 0.01532 |
CONVFINQA3220 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2005</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 19.28</td><td>$ 17.30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>21.16</td><td>16.28</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>25.20</td><td>20.70</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>28.33</td><td>22.73</td></tr></table> on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the difference in the share price between 12/31/06 and 2/2207?
| 1.64 |
CONVFINQA3221 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2005</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 19.28</td><td>$ 17.30</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>21.16</td><td>16.28</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>25.20</td><td>20.70</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>28.33</td><td>22.73</td></tr></table> on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the difference in the share price between 12/31/06 and 2/2207?
Answer: 1.64
Question: and the percentage growth?
| 0.04233 |
CONVFINQA3222 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) provide renewal options for terms of 3 to 7 additional years . leases for retail space are for terms of 5 to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2007 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 1.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 151 million , $ 138 million , and $ 140 million in 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2007 , are as follows ( in millions ) : fiscal years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 155</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1425</td></tr></table> accrued warranty and indemnifications the company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on its hardware products . the basic warranty period for hardware products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the end-user . the company also offers a 90-day basic warranty for its service parts used to repair the company 2019s hardware products . the company provides currently for the estimated cost that may be incurred under its basic limited product warranties at the time related revenue is recognized . factors considered in determining appropriate accruals for product warranty obligations include the size of the installed base of products subject to warranty protection , historical and projected warranty claim rates , historical and projected cost-per-claim , and knowledge of specific product failures that are outside of the company 2019s typical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its preexisting warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates . for products accounted for under subscription accounting pursuant to sop no . 97-2 , the company recognizes warranty expense as incurred . the company periodically provides updates to its applications and system software to maintain the software 2019s compliance with specifications . the estimated cost to develop such updates is accounted for as warranty costs that are recognized at the time related software revenue is recognized . factors considered in determining appropriate accruals related to such updates include the number of units delivered , the number of updates expected to occur , and the historical cost and estimated future cost of the resources necessary to develop these updates. .
Question: what was the difference in years between the shortest and longest length of leases for retail space?
| 15.0 |
CONVFINQA3223 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) provide renewal options for terms of 3 to 7 additional years . leases for retail space are for terms of 5 to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2007 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 1.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 151 million , $ 138 million , and $ 140 million in 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2007 , are as follows ( in millions ) : fiscal years . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 155</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1425</td></tr></table> accrued warranty and indemnifications the company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on its hardware products . the basic warranty period for hardware products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the end-user . the company also offers a 90-day basic warranty for its service parts used to repair the company 2019s hardware products . the company provides currently for the estimated cost that may be incurred under its basic limited product warranties at the time related revenue is recognized . factors considered in determining appropriate accruals for product warranty obligations include the size of the installed base of products subject to warranty protection , historical and projected warranty claim rates , historical and projected cost-per-claim , and knowledge of specific product failures that are outside of the company 2019s typical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its preexisting warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates . for products accounted for under subscription accounting pursuant to sop no . 97-2 , the company recognizes warranty expense as incurred . the company periodically provides updates to its applications and system software to maintain the software 2019s compliance with specifications . the estimated cost to develop such updates is accounted for as warranty costs that are recognized at the time related software revenue is recognized . factors considered in determining appropriate accruals related to such updates include the number of units delivered , the number of updates expected to occur , and the historical cost and estimated future cost of the resources necessary to develop these updates. .
Question: what was the difference in years between the shortest and longest length of leases for retail space?
Answer: 15.0
Question: what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year are due after 2012?
| 0.43298 |
CONVFINQA3224 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14953</td><td>$ 14362</td><td>$ 13109</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1699</td><td>1630</td><td>1498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>30100</td><td>30500</td><td>27500</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the change in net sales from 2011 to 2012?
| 591.0 |
CONVFINQA3225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 14953</td><td>$ 14362</td><td>$ 13109</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1699</td><td>1630</td><td>1498</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>30100</td><td>30500</td><td>27500</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the change in net sales from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 591.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the net sales in 2011, in percentage?
| 0.04115 |
CONVFINQA3226 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td><td>$ 29132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>7119</td><td>6997</td><td>5234</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-12356 ( 12356 )</td><td>-12353 ( 12353 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 23773</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td></tr></table> the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2010?
| 23773.0 |
CONVFINQA3227 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td><td>$ 29132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>7119</td><td>6997</td><td>5234</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-12356 ( 12356 )</td><td>-12353 ( 12353 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 23773</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td></tr></table> the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2010?
Answer: 23773.0
Question: what about in 2009?
| 29010.0 |
CONVFINQA3228 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td><td>$ 29132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>7119</td><td>6997</td><td>5234</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-12356 ( 12356 )</td><td>-12353 ( 12353 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 23773</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td></tr></table> the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2010?
Answer: 23773.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Answer: 29010.0
Question: what is the net change in balance of unrecognized tax benefits?
| -5237.0 |
CONVFINQA3229 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td><td>$ 29132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>7119</td><td>6997</td><td>5234</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-12356 ( 12356 )</td><td>-12353 ( 12353 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 23773</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td></tr></table> the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2010?
Answer: 23773.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Answer: 29010.0
Question: what is the net change in balance of unrecognized tax benefits?
Answer: -5237.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.18052 |
CONVFINQA3230 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the "2010 credit agreement" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?
| 0.18 |
CONVFINQA3231 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the "2010 credit agreement" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?
Answer: 0.18
Question: in this same year, what was the amount of the outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds, in millions?
| 119.0 |
CONVFINQA3232 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the "2010 credit agreement" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?
Answer: 0.18
Question: in this same year, what was the amount of the outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds, in millions?
Answer: 119.0
Question: and what was that for the guarantees outstanding?
| 96.0 |
CONVFINQA3233 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the "2010 credit agreement" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?
Answer: 0.18
Question: in this same year, what was the amount of the outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds, in millions?
Answer: 119.0
Question: and what was that for the guarantees outstanding?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what was, then, the full amount of both categories, in millions of dollars?
| 215.0 |
CONVFINQA3234 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the "2010 credit agreement" ) which was subsequently terminated in july 2012 . the 2010 credit agreement provided for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into the 2010 credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the 2010 credit agreement was set to terminate on august 5 , 2013 . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 705 million of which $ 34 million was used as of december 31 , 2012 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 2.27% ( 2.27 % ) as of dec . 31 2012 and 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of december 31 2011</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2012 , total indebtedness was 42% ( 42 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 219 million , $ 212 million and $ 189 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . rental expense for operating leases was $ 233 million , $ 249 million and $ 233 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , are ( in millions ) $ 171 in 2013 , $ 135 in 2014 , $ 107 in 2015 , $ 83 in 2016 , $ 64 in 2017 and $ 135 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds of $ 119 million as of december 31 , 2012 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , guarantees outstanding were $ 96 million and $ 90 million , respectively . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 11 million and $ 13 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 11 million and $ 21 million , as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the fair value of each guarantee was estimated by comparing the net present value of two hypothetical cash flow streams , one based on ppg 2019s incremental borrowing rate and the other based on the borrower 2019s incremental borrowing rate , as of the effective date of the guarantee . both streams were discounted at a risk free rate of return . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit , surety bonds or guarantees is likely . 9 . fair value measurement the accounting guidance on fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy with three levels of inputs used to determine fair value . level 1 inputs are quoted prices ( unadjusted ) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities , are considered to be the most reliable evidence of fair value , and should be used whenever available . level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges . level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: as of december 31, 2012, what was the remaining amount the company had in its restrictive covenant regarding debt to total capitalization?
Answer: 0.18
Question: in this same year, what was the amount of the outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds, in millions?
Answer: 119.0
Question: and what was that for the guarantees outstanding?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what was, then, the full amount of both categories, in millions of dollars?
Answer: 215.0
Question: and how much is that in dollars?
| 215000000.0 |
CONVFINQA3235 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 439</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>345</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>317</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>306</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 - thereafter</td><td>1375</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3189</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .
Question: what was the total amount of commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment in the years of 2011 and 2012, combined, in billions?
| 14.59 |
CONVFINQA3236 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 439</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>345</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>317</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>306</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 - thereafter</td><td>1375</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3189</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .
Question: what was the total amount of commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment in the years of 2011 and 2012, combined, in billions?
Answer: 14.59
Question: and what is the average of that total amount between 2011 and 2012, also in billions?
| 7.295 |
CONVFINQA3237 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely corre- lated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . pr int ing papers net sales for 2012 were about flat with 2011 and increased 5% ( 5 % ) from 2010 . operat- ing profits in 2012 were 31% ( 31 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 25% ( 25 % ) higher than in 2010 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2012 were 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2011 and 25% ( 25 % ) lower than in 2010 . benefits from higher sales volumes ( $ 58 mil- lion ) were more than offset by lower sales price real- izations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 233 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 30 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 32 million ) and other items ( $ 6 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td><td>$ 5940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>599</td><td>872</td><td>481</td></tr></table> north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 331 million compared with $ 423 million ( $ 399 million excluding a $ 24 million gain associated with the repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill ) in 2011 and $ 18 million ( $ 333 million excluding facility clo- sure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were flat with 2011 . average sales margins were lower primarily due to lower export sales prices and higher export sales volume . input costs were higher for wood and chemicals , but were partially offset by lower purchased pulp costs . freight costs increased due to higher oil prices . manufacturing operating costs were favorable reflecting strong mill performance . planned main- tenance downtime costs were slightly higher in 2012 . no market-related downtime was taken in either 2012 or 2011 . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase compared with the fourth quar- ter of 2012 reflecting seasonally stronger demand . average sales price realizations are expected to be relatively flat as sales price realizations for domestic and export uncoated freesheet roll and cutsize paper should be stable . input costs should increase for energy , chemicals and wood . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 19 million lower with an outage scheduled at our georgetown mill versus outages at our courtland and eastover mills in the fourth quarter of 2012 . braz i l ian papers net sales for 2012 were $ 1.1 bil- lion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 and $ 1.1 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits for 2012 were $ 163 million compared with $ 169 million in 2011 and $ 159 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were higher than in 2011 as international paper improved its segment position in the brazilian market despite weaker year-over-year conditions in most markets . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper , but the benefit was more than offset by declining prices for exported paper . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher- margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals , but costs for purchased pulp decreased . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower than in 2011 . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price realizations are expected to increase in the brazilian domestic market due to the realization of an announced sales price increase for uncoated free- sheet paper , but the benefit should be partially offset by pricing pressures in export markets . average sales margins are expected to be negatively impacted by a less favorable geographic mix . input costs are expected to be about flat due to lower energy costs being offset by higher costs for wood , purchased pulp , chemicals and utilities . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 4 million lower with no outages scheduled in the first quarter . operating costs should be favorably impacted by the savings generated by the start-up of a new biomass boiler at the mogi guacu mill . european papers net sales in 2012 were $ 1.4 bil- lion compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2011 and $ 1.3 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 179 million compared with $ 196 million ( $ 207 million excluding asset impairment charges related to our inverurie , scotland mill which was closed in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 197 million ( $ 199 million excluding an asset impairment charge ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 compared with 2011 were higher for uncoated freesheet paper in both europe and russia , while sales volumes for pulp were lower in both regions . average sales price realizations for uncoated .
Question: what is the total net sales of printing papers in north america for 2012, in billions?
| 2.7 |
CONVFINQA3238 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely corre- lated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . pr int ing papers net sales for 2012 were about flat with 2011 and increased 5% ( 5 % ) from 2010 . operat- ing profits in 2012 were 31% ( 31 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 25% ( 25 % ) higher than in 2010 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2012 were 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2011 and 25% ( 25 % ) lower than in 2010 . benefits from higher sales volumes ( $ 58 mil- lion ) were more than offset by lower sales price real- izations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 233 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 30 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 32 million ) and other items ( $ 6 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td><td>$ 5940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>599</td><td>872</td><td>481</td></tr></table> north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 331 million compared with $ 423 million ( $ 399 million excluding a $ 24 million gain associated with the repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill ) in 2011 and $ 18 million ( $ 333 million excluding facility clo- sure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were flat with 2011 . average sales margins were lower primarily due to lower export sales prices and higher export sales volume . input costs were higher for wood and chemicals , but were partially offset by lower purchased pulp costs . freight costs increased due to higher oil prices . manufacturing operating costs were favorable reflecting strong mill performance . planned main- tenance downtime costs were slightly higher in 2012 . no market-related downtime was taken in either 2012 or 2011 . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase compared with the fourth quar- ter of 2012 reflecting seasonally stronger demand . average sales price realizations are expected to be relatively flat as sales price realizations for domestic and export uncoated freesheet roll and cutsize paper should be stable . input costs should increase for energy , chemicals and wood . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 19 million lower with an outage scheduled at our georgetown mill versus outages at our courtland and eastover mills in the fourth quarter of 2012 . braz i l ian papers net sales for 2012 were $ 1.1 bil- lion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 and $ 1.1 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits for 2012 were $ 163 million compared with $ 169 million in 2011 and $ 159 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were higher than in 2011 as international paper improved its segment position in the brazilian market despite weaker year-over-year conditions in most markets . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper , but the benefit was more than offset by declining prices for exported paper . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher- margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals , but costs for purchased pulp decreased . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower than in 2011 . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price realizations are expected to increase in the brazilian domestic market due to the realization of an announced sales price increase for uncoated free- sheet paper , but the benefit should be partially offset by pricing pressures in export markets . average sales margins are expected to be negatively impacted by a less favorable geographic mix . input costs are expected to be about flat due to lower energy costs being offset by higher costs for wood , purchased pulp , chemicals and utilities . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 4 million lower with no outages scheduled in the first quarter . operating costs should be favorably impacted by the savings generated by the start-up of a new biomass boiler at the mogi guacu mill . european papers net sales in 2012 were $ 1.4 bil- lion compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2011 and $ 1.3 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 179 million compared with $ 196 million ( $ 207 million excluding asset impairment charges related to our inverurie , scotland mill which was closed in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 197 million ( $ 199 million excluding an asset impairment charge ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 compared with 2011 were higher for uncoated freesheet paper in both europe and russia , while sales volumes for pulp were lower in both regions . average sales price realizations for uncoated .
Question: what is the total net sales of printing papers in north america for 2012, in billions?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what about in millions?
| 2700.0 |
CONVFINQA3239 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely corre- lated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . pr int ing papers net sales for 2012 were about flat with 2011 and increased 5% ( 5 % ) from 2010 . operat- ing profits in 2012 were 31% ( 31 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 25% ( 25 % ) higher than in 2010 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2012 were 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2011 and 25% ( 25 % ) lower than in 2010 . benefits from higher sales volumes ( $ 58 mil- lion ) were more than offset by lower sales price real- izations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 233 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 30 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 32 million ) and other items ( $ 6 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td><td>$ 5940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>599</td><td>872</td><td>481</td></tr></table> north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 331 million compared with $ 423 million ( $ 399 million excluding a $ 24 million gain associated with the repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill ) in 2011 and $ 18 million ( $ 333 million excluding facility clo- sure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were flat with 2011 . average sales margins were lower primarily due to lower export sales prices and higher export sales volume . input costs were higher for wood and chemicals , but were partially offset by lower purchased pulp costs . freight costs increased due to higher oil prices . manufacturing operating costs were favorable reflecting strong mill performance . planned main- tenance downtime costs were slightly higher in 2012 . no market-related downtime was taken in either 2012 or 2011 . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase compared with the fourth quar- ter of 2012 reflecting seasonally stronger demand . average sales price realizations are expected to be relatively flat as sales price realizations for domestic and export uncoated freesheet roll and cutsize paper should be stable . input costs should increase for energy , chemicals and wood . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 19 million lower with an outage scheduled at our georgetown mill versus outages at our courtland and eastover mills in the fourth quarter of 2012 . braz i l ian papers net sales for 2012 were $ 1.1 bil- lion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 and $ 1.1 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits for 2012 were $ 163 million compared with $ 169 million in 2011 and $ 159 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were higher than in 2011 as international paper improved its segment position in the brazilian market despite weaker year-over-year conditions in most markets . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper , but the benefit was more than offset by declining prices for exported paper . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher- margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals , but costs for purchased pulp decreased . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower than in 2011 . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price realizations are expected to increase in the brazilian domestic market due to the realization of an announced sales price increase for uncoated free- sheet paper , but the benefit should be partially offset by pricing pressures in export markets . average sales margins are expected to be negatively impacted by a less favorable geographic mix . input costs are expected to be about flat due to lower energy costs being offset by higher costs for wood , purchased pulp , chemicals and utilities . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 4 million lower with no outages scheduled in the first quarter . operating costs should be favorably impacted by the savings generated by the start-up of a new biomass boiler at the mogi guacu mill . european papers net sales in 2012 were $ 1.4 bil- lion compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2011 and $ 1.3 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 179 million compared with $ 196 million ( $ 207 million excluding asset impairment charges related to our inverurie , scotland mill which was closed in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 197 million ( $ 199 million excluding an asset impairment charge ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 compared with 2011 were higher for uncoated freesheet paper in both europe and russia , while sales volumes for pulp were lower in both regions . average sales price realizations for uncoated .
Question: what is the total net sales of printing papers in north america for 2012, in billions?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2700.0
Question: what about the total sales of printing papers in 2012?
| 6230.0 |
CONVFINQA3240 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely corre- lated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . pr int ing papers net sales for 2012 were about flat with 2011 and increased 5% ( 5 % ) from 2010 . operat- ing profits in 2012 were 31% ( 31 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 25% ( 25 % ) higher than in 2010 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2012 were 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2011 and 25% ( 25 % ) lower than in 2010 . benefits from higher sales volumes ( $ 58 mil- lion ) were more than offset by lower sales price real- izations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 233 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 30 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 32 million ) and other items ( $ 6 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td><td>$ 5940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>599</td><td>872</td><td>481</td></tr></table> north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 331 million compared with $ 423 million ( $ 399 million excluding a $ 24 million gain associated with the repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill ) in 2011 and $ 18 million ( $ 333 million excluding facility clo- sure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were flat with 2011 . average sales margins were lower primarily due to lower export sales prices and higher export sales volume . input costs were higher for wood and chemicals , but were partially offset by lower purchased pulp costs . freight costs increased due to higher oil prices . manufacturing operating costs were favorable reflecting strong mill performance . planned main- tenance downtime costs were slightly higher in 2012 . no market-related downtime was taken in either 2012 or 2011 . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase compared with the fourth quar- ter of 2012 reflecting seasonally stronger demand . average sales price realizations are expected to be relatively flat as sales price realizations for domestic and export uncoated freesheet roll and cutsize paper should be stable . input costs should increase for energy , chemicals and wood . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 19 million lower with an outage scheduled at our georgetown mill versus outages at our courtland and eastover mills in the fourth quarter of 2012 . braz i l ian papers net sales for 2012 were $ 1.1 bil- lion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 and $ 1.1 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits for 2012 were $ 163 million compared with $ 169 million in 2011 and $ 159 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were higher than in 2011 as international paper improved its segment position in the brazilian market despite weaker year-over-year conditions in most markets . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper , but the benefit was more than offset by declining prices for exported paper . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher- margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals , but costs for purchased pulp decreased . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower than in 2011 . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price realizations are expected to increase in the brazilian domestic market due to the realization of an announced sales price increase for uncoated free- sheet paper , but the benefit should be partially offset by pricing pressures in export markets . average sales margins are expected to be negatively impacted by a less favorable geographic mix . input costs are expected to be about flat due to lower energy costs being offset by higher costs for wood , purchased pulp , chemicals and utilities . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 4 million lower with no outages scheduled in the first quarter . operating costs should be favorably impacted by the savings generated by the start-up of a new biomass boiler at the mogi guacu mill . european papers net sales in 2012 were $ 1.4 bil- lion compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2011 and $ 1.3 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 179 million compared with $ 196 million ( $ 207 million excluding asset impairment charges related to our inverurie , scotland mill which was closed in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 197 million ( $ 199 million excluding an asset impairment charge ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 compared with 2011 were higher for uncoated freesheet paper in both europe and russia , while sales volumes for pulp were lower in both regions . average sales price realizations for uncoated .
Question: what is the total net sales of printing papers in north america for 2012, in billions?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2700.0
Question: what about the total sales of printing papers in 2012?
Answer: 6230.0
Question: what proportion of total sales does sales in north america represent?
| 0.43339 |
CONVFINQA3241 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2007 plan was $ 57.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . employee stock purchase plan 2014the company maintains an employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) for all eligible employees . under the espp , shares of the company 2019s common stock may be purchased during bi-annual offering periods at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period . employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) . the offering periods run from june 1 through november 30 and from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 9.43 , $ 6.65 and $ 7.89 , respectively . at december 31 , 2010 , 8.7 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % ) - 0.23% ( 0.23 % )</td><td>0.29% ( 0.29 % ) - 0.44% ( 0.44 % )</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) - 3.28% ( 3.28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % )</td><td>0.38% ( 0.38 % )</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % ) - 35.27% ( 35.27 % )</td><td>35.31% ( 35.31 % ) - 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) - 28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % )</td><td>35.83% ( 35.83 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately none and 1.7 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these warrants expired on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .
Question: what was the weighted average fair value for the espp shares in 2010?
| 9.43 |
CONVFINQA3242 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2007 plan was $ 57.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . employee stock purchase plan 2014the company maintains an employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) for all eligible employees . under the espp , shares of the company 2019s common stock may be purchased during bi-annual offering periods at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period . employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) . the offering periods run from june 1 through november 30 and from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 9.43 , $ 6.65 and $ 7.89 , respectively . at december 31 , 2010 , 8.7 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % ) - 0.23% ( 0.23 % )</td><td>0.29% ( 0.29 % ) - 0.44% ( 0.44 % )</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) - 3.28% ( 3.28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % )</td><td>0.38% ( 0.38 % )</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % ) - 35.27% ( 35.27 % )</td><td>35.31% ( 35.31 % ) - 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) - 28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % )</td><td>35.83% ( 35.83 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately none and 1.7 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these warrants expired on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .
Question: what was the weighted average fair value for the espp shares in 2010?
Answer: 9.43
Question: and what was it in 2009?
| 6.65 |
CONVFINQA3243 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2007 plan was $ 57.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . employee stock purchase plan 2014the company maintains an employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) for all eligible employees . under the espp , shares of the company 2019s common stock may be purchased during bi-annual offering periods at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period . employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) . the offering periods run from june 1 through november 30 and from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 9.43 , $ 6.65 and $ 7.89 , respectively . at december 31 , 2010 , 8.7 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % ) - 0.23% ( 0.23 % )</td><td>0.29% ( 0.29 % ) - 0.44% ( 0.44 % )</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) - 3.28% ( 3.28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % )</td><td>0.38% ( 0.38 % )</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % ) - 35.27% ( 35.27 % )</td><td>35.31% ( 35.31 % ) - 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) - 28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % )</td><td>35.83% ( 35.83 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately none and 1.7 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these warrants expired on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .
Question: what was the weighted average fair value for the espp shares in 2010?
Answer: 9.43
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 6.65
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 2.78 |
CONVFINQA3244 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2007 plan was $ 57.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . employee stock purchase plan 2014the company maintains an employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) for all eligible employees . under the espp , shares of the company 2019s common stock may be purchased during bi-annual offering periods at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period . employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) . the offering periods run from june 1 through november 30 and from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 9.43 , $ 6.65 and $ 7.89 , respectively . at december 31 , 2010 , 8.7 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % ) - 0.23% ( 0.23 % )</td><td>0.29% ( 0.29 % ) - 0.44% ( 0.44 % )</td><td>1.99% ( 1.99 % ) - 3.28% ( 3.28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.22% ( 0.22 % )</td><td>0.38% ( 0.38 % )</td><td>2.58% ( 2.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of shares</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td><td>6 months</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % ) - 35.27% ( 35.27 % )</td><td>35.31% ( 35.31 % ) - 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>27.85% ( 27.85 % ) - 28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>35.26% ( 35.26 % )</td><td>35.83% ( 35.83 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> 13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately none and 1.7 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these warrants expired on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .
Question: what was the weighted average fair value for the espp shares in 2010?
Answer: 9.43
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 6.65
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 2.78
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to the weighted average fair value for the espp shares in 2009, in percentage?
| 0.41805 |
CONVFINQA3245 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
billion at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $ 27 billion and $ 54 billion , the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications . the decrease from the prior year is in line with the decrease in the notional amount of these indemnifications , which are collateralized . additionally , letters of credit in favor of the company held as collateral amounted to $ 503 million and $ 370 million at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . other property may also be available to the company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications ; however , the value of such property has not been determined . performance risk citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings . where external ratings are used , investment-grade ratings are considered to be baa/bbb and above , while anything below is considered non-investment grade . the citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system . on certain underlying referenced credits or entities , ratings are not available . such referenced credits are included in the 201cnot-rated 201d category . the maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts , which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed . presented in the table below is the maximum potential amount of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of december 31 , 2008 . as previously mentioned , the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged . such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses , if any , on these guarantees. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments non-investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments not rated</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>financial standby letters of credit</td><td>$ 49.2</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>$ 16.4</td><td>$ 94.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance guarantees</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.6</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>67.9</td><td>67.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loans sold with recourse</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securities lending indemnifications</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>47.6</td><td>47.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card merchant processing</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>56.7</td><td>56.7</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>custody indemnifications and other</td><td>18.5</td><td>3.1</td><td>2014</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 73.4</td><td>$ 36.7</td><td>$ 194.8</td><td>$ 304.9</td></tr></table> credit derivatives a credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller sells protection against the credit risk of a particular entity ( 201creference entity 201d or 201creference credit 201d ) . credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events ( commonly referred to as 201csettlement triggers 201d ) . these settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and , in a more limited range of transactions , debt restructuring . credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium . in certain transactions , protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities . the seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount . the company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives , both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account . through these contracts , the company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits . the company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions , to take proprietary trading positions , and to facilitate client transactions . the range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps , total return swaps and credit options . a credit default swap is a contract in which , for a fee , a protection seller ( guarantor ) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer ( beneficiary ) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity . if there is no credit default event or settlement trigger , as defined by the specific derivative contract , then the guarantor makes no payments to the beneficiary and receives only the contractually specified fee . however , if a credit event occurs and in accordance with the specific derivative contract sold , the guarantor will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary . a total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset , which includes all associated cash flows , as well as capital appreciation or depreciation . the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller ( guarantor ) , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset , plus any appreciation . thus , the beneficiary will be obligated to make a payment any time the floating interest rate payment according to the total return swap agreement and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset . a total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions in the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller ( guarantor ) and the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) . .
Question: what portion of total maximum potential amount of future payments is related to financial standby letters of credit?
| 0.30895 |
CONVFINQA3246 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
billion at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $ 27 billion and $ 54 billion , the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications . the decrease from the prior year is in line with the decrease in the notional amount of these indemnifications , which are collateralized . additionally , letters of credit in favor of the company held as collateral amounted to $ 503 million and $ 370 million at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . other property may also be available to the company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications ; however , the value of such property has not been determined . performance risk citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings . where external ratings are used , investment-grade ratings are considered to be baa/bbb and above , while anything below is considered non-investment grade . the citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system . on certain underlying referenced credits or entities , ratings are not available . such referenced credits are included in the 201cnot-rated 201d category . the maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts , which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed . presented in the table below is the maximum potential amount of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of december 31 , 2008 . as previously mentioned , the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged . such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses , if any , on these guarantees. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments non-investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments not rated</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>financial standby letters of credit</td><td>$ 49.2</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>$ 16.4</td><td>$ 94.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance guarantees</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.6</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>67.9</td><td>67.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loans sold with recourse</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securities lending indemnifications</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>47.6</td><td>47.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card merchant processing</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>56.7</td><td>56.7</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>custody indemnifications and other</td><td>18.5</td><td>3.1</td><td>2014</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 73.4</td><td>$ 36.7</td><td>$ 194.8</td><td>$ 304.9</td></tr></table> credit derivatives a credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller sells protection against the credit risk of a particular entity ( 201creference entity 201d or 201creference credit 201d ) . credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events ( commonly referred to as 201csettlement triggers 201d ) . these settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and , in a more limited range of transactions , debt restructuring . credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium . in certain transactions , protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities . the seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount . the company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives , both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account . through these contracts , the company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits . the company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions , to take proprietary trading positions , and to facilitate client transactions . the range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps , total return swaps and credit options . a credit default swap is a contract in which , for a fee , a protection seller ( guarantor ) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer ( beneficiary ) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity . if there is no credit default event or settlement trigger , as defined by the specific derivative contract , then the guarantor makes no payments to the beneficiary and receives only the contractually specified fee . however , if a credit event occurs and in accordance with the specific derivative contract sold , the guarantor will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary . a total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset , which includes all associated cash flows , as well as capital appreciation or depreciation . the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller ( guarantor ) , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset , plus any appreciation . thus , the beneficiary will be obligated to make a payment any time the floating interest rate payment according to the total return swap agreement and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset . a total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions in the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller ( guarantor ) and the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) . .
Question: what portion of total maximum potential amount of future payments is related to financial standby letters of credit?
Answer: 0.30895
Question: what about the total maximum potential amount of future payments for performance guarantees?
| 16.3 |
CONVFINQA3247 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
billion at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $ 27 billion and $ 54 billion , the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications . the decrease from the prior year is in line with the decrease in the notional amount of these indemnifications , which are collateralized . additionally , letters of credit in favor of the company held as collateral amounted to $ 503 million and $ 370 million at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . other property may also be available to the company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications ; however , the value of such property has not been determined . performance risk citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings . where external ratings are used , investment-grade ratings are considered to be baa/bbb and above , while anything below is considered non-investment grade . the citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system . on certain underlying referenced credits or entities , ratings are not available . such referenced credits are included in the 201cnot-rated 201d category . the maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts , which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed . presented in the table below is the maximum potential amount of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of december 31 , 2008 . as previously mentioned , the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged . such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses , if any , on these guarantees. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments non-investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments not rated</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>financial standby letters of credit</td><td>$ 49.2</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>$ 16.4</td><td>$ 94.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance guarantees</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.6</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>67.9</td><td>67.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loans sold with recourse</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securities lending indemnifications</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>47.6</td><td>47.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card merchant processing</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>56.7</td><td>56.7</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>custody indemnifications and other</td><td>18.5</td><td>3.1</td><td>2014</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 73.4</td><td>$ 36.7</td><td>$ 194.8</td><td>$ 304.9</td></tr></table> credit derivatives a credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller sells protection against the credit risk of a particular entity ( 201creference entity 201d or 201creference credit 201d ) . credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events ( commonly referred to as 201csettlement triggers 201d ) . these settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and , in a more limited range of transactions , debt restructuring . credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium . in certain transactions , protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities . the seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount . the company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives , both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account . through these contracts , the company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits . the company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions , to take proprietary trading positions , and to facilitate client transactions . the range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps , total return swaps and credit options . a credit default swap is a contract in which , for a fee , a protection seller ( guarantor ) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer ( beneficiary ) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity . if there is no credit default event or settlement trigger , as defined by the specific derivative contract , then the guarantor makes no payments to the beneficiary and receives only the contractually specified fee . however , if a credit event occurs and in accordance with the specific derivative contract sold , the guarantor will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary . a total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset , which includes all associated cash flows , as well as capital appreciation or depreciation . the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller ( guarantor ) , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset , plus any appreciation . thus , the beneficiary will be obligated to make a payment any time the floating interest rate payment according to the total return swap agreement and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset . a total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions in the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller ( guarantor ) and the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) . .
Question: what portion of total maximum potential amount of future payments is related to financial standby letters of credit?
Answer: 0.30895
Question: what about the total maximum potential amount of future payments for performance guarantees?
Answer: 16.3
Question: and the total maximum potential amount of future payments?
| 304.9 |
CONVFINQA3248 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
billion at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $ 27 billion and $ 54 billion , the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications . the decrease from the prior year is in line with the decrease in the notional amount of these indemnifications , which are collateralized . additionally , letters of credit in favor of the company held as collateral amounted to $ 503 million and $ 370 million at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . other property may also be available to the company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications ; however , the value of such property has not been determined . performance risk citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings . where external ratings are used , investment-grade ratings are considered to be baa/bbb and above , while anything below is considered non-investment grade . the citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system . on certain underlying referenced credits or entities , ratings are not available . such referenced credits are included in the 201cnot-rated 201d category . the maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts , which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed . presented in the table below is the maximum potential amount of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of december 31 , 2008 . as previously mentioned , the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged . such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses , if any , on these guarantees. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments non-investment grade</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments not rated</td><td>maximum potential amount of future payments total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>financial standby letters of credit</td><td>$ 49.2</td><td>$ 28.6</td><td>$ 16.4</td><td>$ 94.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>performance guarantees</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.6</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>67.9</td><td>67.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loans sold with recourse</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securities lending indemnifications</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>47.6</td><td>47.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card merchant processing</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>56.7</td><td>56.7</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>custody indemnifications and other</td><td>18.5</td><td>3.1</td><td>2014</td><td>21.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 73.4</td><td>$ 36.7</td><td>$ 194.8</td><td>$ 304.9</td></tr></table> credit derivatives a credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller sells protection against the credit risk of a particular entity ( 201creference entity 201d or 201creference credit 201d ) . credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events ( commonly referred to as 201csettlement triggers 201d ) . these settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and , in a more limited range of transactions , debt restructuring . credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium . in certain transactions , protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities . the seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount . the company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives , both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account . through these contracts , the company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits . the company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions , to take proprietary trading positions , and to facilitate client transactions . the range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps , total return swaps and credit options . a credit default swap is a contract in which , for a fee , a protection seller ( guarantor ) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer ( beneficiary ) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity . if there is no credit default event or settlement trigger , as defined by the specific derivative contract , then the guarantor makes no payments to the beneficiary and receives only the contractually specified fee . however , if a credit event occurs and in accordance with the specific derivative contract sold , the guarantor will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary . a total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset , which includes all associated cash flows , as well as capital appreciation or depreciation . the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller ( guarantor ) , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset , plus any appreciation . thus , the beneficiary will be obligated to make a payment any time the floating interest rate payment according to the total return swap agreement and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset . a total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions in the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller ( guarantor ) and the protection buyer ( beneficiary ) . .
Question: what portion of total maximum potential amount of future payments is related to financial standby letters of credit?
Answer: 0.30895
Question: what about the total maximum potential amount of future payments for performance guarantees?
Answer: 16.3
Question: and the total maximum potential amount of future payments?
Answer: 304.9
Question: what portion us related to performance guarantees?
| 0.05346 |
CONVFINQA3249 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company has also encountered various quality issues on its aircraft carrier construction and overhaul programs and its virginia-class submarine construction program at its newport news location . these primarily involve matters related to filler metal used in pipe welds identified in 2007 , and issues associated with non-nuclear weld inspection and the installation of weapons handling equipment on certain submarines , and certain purchased material quality issues identified in 2009 . the company does not believe that resolution of these issues will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . environmental matters 2014the estimated cost to complete environmental remediation has been accrued where it is probable that the company will incur such costs in the future to address environmental conditions at currently or formerly owned or leased operating facilities , or at sites where it has been named a potentially responsible party ( 201cprp 201d ) by the environmental protection agency , or similarly designated by another environmental agency , and these costs can be estimated by management . these accruals do not include any litigation costs related to environmental matters , nor do they include amounts recorded as asset retirement obligations . to assess the potential impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements , management estimates the range of reasonably possible remediation costs that could be incurred by the company , taking into account currently available facts on each site as well as the current state of technology and prior experience in remediating contaminated sites . these estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect changes in facts and technical and legal circumstances . management estimates that as of december 31 , 2011 , the probable future costs for environmental remediation is $ 3 million , which is accrued in other current liabilities . factors that could result in changes to the company 2019s estimates include : modification of planned remedial actions , increases or decreases in the estimated time required to remediate , changes to the determination of legally responsible parties , discovery of more extensive contamination than anticipated , changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements , and improvements in remediation technology . should other prps not pay their allocable share of remediation costs , the company may have to incur costs exceeding those already estimated and accrued . in addition , there are certain potential remediation sites where the costs of remediation cannot be reasonably estimated . although management cannot predict whether new information gained as projects progress will materially affect the estimated liability accrued , management does not believe that future remediation expenditures will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . financial arrangements 2014in the ordinary course of business , hii uses standby letters of credit issued by commercial banks and surety bonds issued by insurance companies principally to support the company 2019s self-insured workers 2019 compensation plans . at december 31 , 2011 , there were $ 121 million of standby letters of credit issued but undrawn and $ 297 million of surety bonds outstanding related to hii . u.s . government claims 2014from time to time , the u.s . government advises the company of claims and penalties concerning certain potential disallowed costs . when such findings are presented , the company and u.s . government representatives engage in discussions to enable hii to evaluate the merits of these claims as well as to assess the amounts being claimed . the company does not believe that the outcome of any such matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . collective bargaining agreements 2014the company believes that it maintains good relations with its approximately 38000 employees of which approximately 50% ( 50 % ) are covered by a total of 10 collective bargaining agreements . the company expects to renegotiate renewals of each of its collective bargaining agreements between 2013 and 2015 as they approach expiration . collective bargaining agreements generally expire after three to five years and are subject to renegotiation at that time . it is not expected that the results of these negotiations , either individually or in the aggregate , will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated results of operations . operating leases 2014rental expense for operating leases was $ 44 million in 2011 , $ 44 million in 2010 , and $ 48 million in 2009 . these amounts are net of immaterial amounts of sublease rental income . minimum rental commitments under long- term non-cancellable operating leases for the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 124</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the average operating leases 2014 rental expense for operating leases for 2011 and 2010?
| 88.0 |
CONVFINQA3250 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company has also encountered various quality issues on its aircraft carrier construction and overhaul programs and its virginia-class submarine construction program at its newport news location . these primarily involve matters related to filler metal used in pipe welds identified in 2007 , and issues associated with non-nuclear weld inspection and the installation of weapons handling equipment on certain submarines , and certain purchased material quality issues identified in 2009 . the company does not believe that resolution of these issues will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . environmental matters 2014the estimated cost to complete environmental remediation has been accrued where it is probable that the company will incur such costs in the future to address environmental conditions at currently or formerly owned or leased operating facilities , or at sites where it has been named a potentially responsible party ( 201cprp 201d ) by the environmental protection agency , or similarly designated by another environmental agency , and these costs can be estimated by management . these accruals do not include any litigation costs related to environmental matters , nor do they include amounts recorded as asset retirement obligations . to assess the potential impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements , management estimates the range of reasonably possible remediation costs that could be incurred by the company , taking into account currently available facts on each site as well as the current state of technology and prior experience in remediating contaminated sites . these estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect changes in facts and technical and legal circumstances . management estimates that as of december 31 , 2011 , the probable future costs for environmental remediation is $ 3 million , which is accrued in other current liabilities . factors that could result in changes to the company 2019s estimates include : modification of planned remedial actions , increases or decreases in the estimated time required to remediate , changes to the determination of legally responsible parties , discovery of more extensive contamination than anticipated , changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements , and improvements in remediation technology . should other prps not pay their allocable share of remediation costs , the company may have to incur costs exceeding those already estimated and accrued . in addition , there are certain potential remediation sites where the costs of remediation cannot be reasonably estimated . although management cannot predict whether new information gained as projects progress will materially affect the estimated liability accrued , management does not believe that future remediation expenditures will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . financial arrangements 2014in the ordinary course of business , hii uses standby letters of credit issued by commercial banks and surety bonds issued by insurance companies principally to support the company 2019s self-insured workers 2019 compensation plans . at december 31 , 2011 , there were $ 121 million of standby letters of credit issued but undrawn and $ 297 million of surety bonds outstanding related to hii . u.s . government claims 2014from time to time , the u.s . government advises the company of claims and penalties concerning certain potential disallowed costs . when such findings are presented , the company and u.s . government representatives engage in discussions to enable hii to evaluate the merits of these claims as well as to assess the amounts being claimed . the company does not believe that the outcome of any such matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . collective bargaining agreements 2014the company believes that it maintains good relations with its approximately 38000 employees of which approximately 50% ( 50 % ) are covered by a total of 10 collective bargaining agreements . the company expects to renegotiate renewals of each of its collective bargaining agreements between 2013 and 2015 as they approach expiration . collective bargaining agreements generally expire after three to five years and are subject to renegotiation at that time . it is not expected that the results of these negotiations , either individually or in the aggregate , will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated results of operations . operating leases 2014rental expense for operating leases was $ 44 million in 2011 , $ 44 million in 2010 , and $ 48 million in 2009 . these amounts are net of immaterial amounts of sublease rental income . minimum rental commitments under long- term non-cancellable operating leases for the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 124</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the average operating leases 2014 rental expense for operating leases for 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 88.0
Question: what is the sum including 2009?
| 136.0 |
CONVFINQA3251 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company has also encountered various quality issues on its aircraft carrier construction and overhaul programs and its virginia-class submarine construction program at its newport news location . these primarily involve matters related to filler metal used in pipe welds identified in 2007 , and issues associated with non-nuclear weld inspection and the installation of weapons handling equipment on certain submarines , and certain purchased material quality issues identified in 2009 . the company does not believe that resolution of these issues will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . environmental matters 2014the estimated cost to complete environmental remediation has been accrued where it is probable that the company will incur such costs in the future to address environmental conditions at currently or formerly owned or leased operating facilities , or at sites where it has been named a potentially responsible party ( 201cprp 201d ) by the environmental protection agency , or similarly designated by another environmental agency , and these costs can be estimated by management . these accruals do not include any litigation costs related to environmental matters , nor do they include amounts recorded as asset retirement obligations . to assess the potential impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements , management estimates the range of reasonably possible remediation costs that could be incurred by the company , taking into account currently available facts on each site as well as the current state of technology and prior experience in remediating contaminated sites . these estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect changes in facts and technical and legal circumstances . management estimates that as of december 31 , 2011 , the probable future costs for environmental remediation is $ 3 million , which is accrued in other current liabilities . factors that could result in changes to the company 2019s estimates include : modification of planned remedial actions , increases or decreases in the estimated time required to remediate , changes to the determination of legally responsible parties , discovery of more extensive contamination than anticipated , changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements , and improvements in remediation technology . should other prps not pay their allocable share of remediation costs , the company may have to incur costs exceeding those already estimated and accrued . in addition , there are certain potential remediation sites where the costs of remediation cannot be reasonably estimated . although management cannot predict whether new information gained as projects progress will materially affect the estimated liability accrued , management does not believe that future remediation expenditures will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . financial arrangements 2014in the ordinary course of business , hii uses standby letters of credit issued by commercial banks and surety bonds issued by insurance companies principally to support the company 2019s self-insured workers 2019 compensation plans . at december 31 , 2011 , there were $ 121 million of standby letters of credit issued but undrawn and $ 297 million of surety bonds outstanding related to hii . u.s . government claims 2014from time to time , the u.s . government advises the company of claims and penalties concerning certain potential disallowed costs . when such findings are presented , the company and u.s . government representatives engage in discussions to enable hii to evaluate the merits of these claims as well as to assess the amounts being claimed . the company does not believe that the outcome of any such matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . collective bargaining agreements 2014the company believes that it maintains good relations with its approximately 38000 employees of which approximately 50% ( 50 % ) are covered by a total of 10 collective bargaining agreements . the company expects to renegotiate renewals of each of its collective bargaining agreements between 2013 and 2015 as they approach expiration . collective bargaining agreements generally expire after three to five years and are subject to renegotiation at that time . it is not expected that the results of these negotiations , either individually or in the aggregate , will have a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated results of operations . operating leases 2014rental expense for operating leases was $ 44 million in 2011 , $ 44 million in 2010 , and $ 48 million in 2009 . these amounts are net of immaterial amounts of sublease rental income . minimum rental commitments under long- term non-cancellable operating leases for the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 124</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the average operating leases 2014 rental expense for operating leases for 2011 and 2010?
Answer: 88.0
Question: what is the sum including 2009?
Answer: 136.0
Question: what is the average value per year?
| 45.33333 |
CONVFINQA3252 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .
Question: what percentage of total future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable was due in 2015?
| 0.06211 |
CONVFINQA3253 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .
Question: what percentage of total future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable was due in 2015?
Answer: 0.06211
Question: what is the total amount of future minimum rental payments in the next 24 months?
| 512546.0 |
CONVFINQA3254 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .
Question: what percentage of total future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable was due in 2015?
Answer: 0.06211
Question: what is the total amount of future minimum rental payments in the next 24 months?
Answer: 512546.0
Question: so what portion does this make up out of the total future minimum rental payments?
| 0.13373 |
CONVFINQA3255 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were net sales in 2002?
| 5742.0 |
CONVFINQA3256 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were net sales in 2002?
Answer: 5742.0
Question: what were net sales in 2001?
| 5363.0 |
CONVFINQA3257 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were net sales in 2002?
Answer: 5742.0
Question: what were net sales in 2001?
Answer: 5363.0
Question: what was the net change?
| 379.0 |
CONVFINQA3258 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled "factors that may affect future results and financial condition." there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were net sales in 2002?
Answer: 5742.0
Question: what were net sales in 2001?
Answer: 5363.0
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2001 value?
| 0.07067 |
CONVFINQA3259 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .
Question: what is the value for total specified items in 2015?
| 1186.0 |
CONVFINQA3260 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .
Question: what is the value for total specified items in 2015?
Answer: 1186.0
Question: what is the value in 2014?
| 153.0 |
CONVFINQA3261 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .
Question: what is the value for total specified items in 2015?
Answer: 1186.0
Question: what is the value in 2014?
Answer: 153.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 1033.0 |
CONVFINQA3262 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .
Question: what is the value for total specified items in 2015?
Answer: 1186.0
Question: what is the value in 2014?
Answer: 153.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 1033.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2014 value?
| 6.75163 |
CONVFINQA3263 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 27 , 2007 , may 28 , 2006 , and may 29 , 2005 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts due to the purchase price of the cattle feeding business being entirely financed by the company , the legal divestiture of the cattle feeding operation was not recognized as a divestiture for accounting purposes , and the assets , liabilities and results of operations of the cattle feeding business were reflected in continuing operations in the company 2019s financial statements prior to october 15 , 2004 . on september 24 , 2004 , the company reached an agreement with affiliates of swift foods by which the company took control and ownership of approximately $ 300 million of the net assets of the cattle feeding business , including feedlots and live cattle . on october 15 , 2004 , the company sold the feedlots to smithfield foods for approximately $ 70 million . these transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $ 19 million ( net of taxes of $ 11.6 million ) . the company retained live cattle inventory and related derivative instruments and liquidated those assets in an orderly manner over the succeeding several months . beginning september 24 , 2004 , the assets , liabilities and results of operations , including the gain on sale , of the cattle feeding business are classified as discontinued operations . culturelle business during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed its divestiture of its nutritional supplement business for proceeds of approximately $ 8.2 million , resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $ 6.2 million ( $ 3.5 million after tax ) . the company reflects this gain within discontinued operations . the results of the aforementioned businesses which have been divested are included within discontinued operations . the summary comparative financial results of discontinued operations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 727.6</td><td>$ 2690.0</td><td>$ 4131.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-lived asset impairment charge</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-240.9 ( 240.9 )</td><td>-59.4 ( 59.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>92.5</td><td>179.7</td><td>157.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net gain from disposal of businesses</td><td>64.3</td><td>115.5</td><td>26.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income before income taxes</td><td>135.7</td><td>54.3</td><td>124.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-54.9 ( 54.9 )</td><td>-109.8 ( 109.8 )</td><td>-41.8 ( 41.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ -55.5 ( 55.5 )</td><td>$ 82.8</td></tr></table> the effective tax rate for discontinued operations is significantly higher than the statutory rate due to the nondeductibility of certain goodwill of divested businesses . other assets held for sale during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 , the company initiated a plan to dispose of a refrigerated pizza business with annual revenues of less than $ 70 million . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company disposed of this business for proceeds of approximately $ 22.0 million , resulting in no significant gain or loss . due to the company 2019s expected significant continuing cash flows associated with this business , the results of operations of this business are included in continuing operations for all periods presented . the assets and liabilities of this business are classified as assets and liabilities held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods prior to the sale . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed the disposal of an oat milling business for proceeds of approximately $ 35.8 million , after final working capital adjustments made during the third quarter .
Question: what was the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax in 2007?
| 80.8 |
CONVFINQA3264 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 27 , 2007 , may 28 , 2006 , and may 29 , 2005 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts due to the purchase price of the cattle feeding business being entirely financed by the company , the legal divestiture of the cattle feeding operation was not recognized as a divestiture for accounting purposes , and the assets , liabilities and results of operations of the cattle feeding business were reflected in continuing operations in the company 2019s financial statements prior to october 15 , 2004 . on september 24 , 2004 , the company reached an agreement with affiliates of swift foods by which the company took control and ownership of approximately $ 300 million of the net assets of the cattle feeding business , including feedlots and live cattle . on october 15 , 2004 , the company sold the feedlots to smithfield foods for approximately $ 70 million . these transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $ 19 million ( net of taxes of $ 11.6 million ) . the company retained live cattle inventory and related derivative instruments and liquidated those assets in an orderly manner over the succeeding several months . beginning september 24 , 2004 , the assets , liabilities and results of operations , including the gain on sale , of the cattle feeding business are classified as discontinued operations . culturelle business during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed its divestiture of its nutritional supplement business for proceeds of approximately $ 8.2 million , resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $ 6.2 million ( $ 3.5 million after tax ) . the company reflects this gain within discontinued operations . the results of the aforementioned businesses which have been divested are included within discontinued operations . the summary comparative financial results of discontinued operations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 727.6</td><td>$ 2690.0</td><td>$ 4131.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-lived asset impairment charge</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-240.9 ( 240.9 )</td><td>-59.4 ( 59.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>92.5</td><td>179.7</td><td>157.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net gain from disposal of businesses</td><td>64.3</td><td>115.5</td><td>26.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income before income taxes</td><td>135.7</td><td>54.3</td><td>124.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-54.9 ( 54.9 )</td><td>-109.8 ( 109.8 )</td><td>-41.8 ( 41.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ -55.5 ( 55.5 )</td><td>$ 82.8</td></tr></table> the effective tax rate for discontinued operations is significantly higher than the statutory rate due to the nondeductibility of certain goodwill of divested businesses . other assets held for sale during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 , the company initiated a plan to dispose of a refrigerated pizza business with annual revenues of less than $ 70 million . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company disposed of this business for proceeds of approximately $ 22.0 million , resulting in no significant gain or loss . due to the company 2019s expected significant continuing cash flows associated with this business , the results of operations of this business are included in continuing operations for all periods presented . the assets and liabilities of this business are classified as assets and liabilities held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods prior to the sale . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed the disposal of an oat milling business for proceeds of approximately $ 35.8 million , after final working capital adjustments made during the third quarter .
Question: what was the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax in 2007?
Answer: 80.8
Question: and what was it in 2005?
| 82.8 |
CONVFINQA3265 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 27 , 2007 , may 28 , 2006 , and may 29 , 2005 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts due to the purchase price of the cattle feeding business being entirely financed by the company , the legal divestiture of the cattle feeding operation was not recognized as a divestiture for accounting purposes , and the assets , liabilities and results of operations of the cattle feeding business were reflected in continuing operations in the company 2019s financial statements prior to october 15 , 2004 . on september 24 , 2004 , the company reached an agreement with affiliates of swift foods by which the company took control and ownership of approximately $ 300 million of the net assets of the cattle feeding business , including feedlots and live cattle . on october 15 , 2004 , the company sold the feedlots to smithfield foods for approximately $ 70 million . these transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $ 19 million ( net of taxes of $ 11.6 million ) . the company retained live cattle inventory and related derivative instruments and liquidated those assets in an orderly manner over the succeeding several months . beginning september 24 , 2004 , the assets , liabilities and results of operations , including the gain on sale , of the cattle feeding business are classified as discontinued operations . culturelle business during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed its divestiture of its nutritional supplement business for proceeds of approximately $ 8.2 million , resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $ 6.2 million ( $ 3.5 million after tax ) . the company reflects this gain within discontinued operations . the results of the aforementioned businesses which have been divested are included within discontinued operations . the summary comparative financial results of discontinued operations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 727.6</td><td>$ 2690.0</td><td>$ 4131.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-lived asset impairment charge</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-240.9 ( 240.9 )</td><td>-59.4 ( 59.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>92.5</td><td>179.7</td><td>157.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net gain from disposal of businesses</td><td>64.3</td><td>115.5</td><td>26.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income before income taxes</td><td>135.7</td><td>54.3</td><td>124.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-54.9 ( 54.9 )</td><td>-109.8 ( 109.8 )</td><td>-41.8 ( 41.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ -55.5 ( 55.5 )</td><td>$ 82.8</td></tr></table> the effective tax rate for discontinued operations is significantly higher than the statutory rate due to the nondeductibility of certain goodwill of divested businesses . other assets held for sale during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 , the company initiated a plan to dispose of a refrigerated pizza business with annual revenues of less than $ 70 million . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company disposed of this business for proceeds of approximately $ 22.0 million , resulting in no significant gain or loss . due to the company 2019s expected significant continuing cash flows associated with this business , the results of operations of this business are included in continuing operations for all periods presented . the assets and liabilities of this business are classified as assets and liabilities held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods prior to the sale . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed the disposal of an oat milling business for proceeds of approximately $ 35.8 million , after final working capital adjustments made during the third quarter .
Question: what was the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax in 2007?
Answer: 80.8
Question: and what was it in 2005?
Answer: 82.8
Question: what was, then, the total income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax for both years combined?
| 163.6 |
CONVFINQA3266 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 27 , 2007 , may 28 , 2006 , and may 29 , 2005 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts due to the purchase price of the cattle feeding business being entirely financed by the company , the legal divestiture of the cattle feeding operation was not recognized as a divestiture for accounting purposes , and the assets , liabilities and results of operations of the cattle feeding business were reflected in continuing operations in the company 2019s financial statements prior to october 15 , 2004 . on september 24 , 2004 , the company reached an agreement with affiliates of swift foods by which the company took control and ownership of approximately $ 300 million of the net assets of the cattle feeding business , including feedlots and live cattle . on october 15 , 2004 , the company sold the feedlots to smithfield foods for approximately $ 70 million . these transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $ 19 million ( net of taxes of $ 11.6 million ) . the company retained live cattle inventory and related derivative instruments and liquidated those assets in an orderly manner over the succeeding several months . beginning september 24 , 2004 , the assets , liabilities and results of operations , including the gain on sale , of the cattle feeding business are classified as discontinued operations . culturelle business during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed its divestiture of its nutritional supplement business for proceeds of approximately $ 8.2 million , resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $ 6.2 million ( $ 3.5 million after tax ) . the company reflects this gain within discontinued operations . the results of the aforementioned businesses which have been divested are included within discontinued operations . the summary comparative financial results of discontinued operations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 727.6</td><td>$ 2690.0</td><td>$ 4131.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-lived asset impairment charge</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-240.9 ( 240.9 )</td><td>-59.4 ( 59.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>92.5</td><td>179.7</td><td>157.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net gain from disposal of businesses</td><td>64.3</td><td>115.5</td><td>26.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income before income taxes</td><td>135.7</td><td>54.3</td><td>124.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-54.9 ( 54.9 )</td><td>-109.8 ( 109.8 )</td><td>-41.8 ( 41.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ -55.5 ( 55.5 )</td><td>$ 82.8</td></tr></table> the effective tax rate for discontinued operations is significantly higher than the statutory rate due to the nondeductibility of certain goodwill of divested businesses . other assets held for sale during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 , the company initiated a plan to dispose of a refrigerated pizza business with annual revenues of less than $ 70 million . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company disposed of this business for proceeds of approximately $ 22.0 million , resulting in no significant gain or loss . due to the company 2019s expected significant continuing cash flows associated with this business , the results of operations of this business are included in continuing operations for all periods presented . the assets and liabilities of this business are classified as assets and liabilities held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods prior to the sale . during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 , the company completed the disposal of an oat milling business for proceeds of approximately $ 35.8 million , after final working capital adjustments made during the third quarter .
Question: what was the income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax in 2007?
Answer: 80.8
Question: and what was it in 2005?
Answer: 82.8
Question: what was, then, the total income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax for both years combined?
Answer: 163.6
Question: including 2006, what then becomes that total for the three years combined?
| 108.1 |
CONVFINQA3267 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
| 161.0 |
CONVFINQA3268 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
Answer: 161.0
Question: and what was the change in its value since 2008?
| 61.0 |
CONVFINQA3269 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
Answer: 161.0
Question: and what was the change in its value since 2008?
Answer: 61.0
Question: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?
| 331.0 |
CONVFINQA3270 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
Answer: 161.0
Question: and what was the change in its value since 2008?
Answer: 61.0
Question: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2008?
| 3.31 |
CONVFINQA3271 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
Answer: 161.0
Question: and what was the change in its value since 2008?
Answer: 61.0
Question: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2008?
Answer: 3.31
Question: also in that period, what was the change in the value of the s&p computer hardware index?
| 97.0 |
CONVFINQA3272 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
Answer: 161.0
Question: and what was the change in its value since 2008?
Answer: 61.0
Question: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2008?
Answer: 3.31
Question: also in that period, what was the change in the value of the s&p computer hardware index?
Answer: 97.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of the 2008 value?
| 0.97 |
CONVFINQA3273 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p index in 2013?
Answer: 161.0
Question: and what was the change in its value since 2008?
Answer: 61.0
Question: in that same six year period, what was the change in the value of the apple inc . stock?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2008?
Answer: 3.31
Question: also in that period, what was the change in the value of the s&p computer hardware index?
Answer: 97.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of the 2008 value?
Answer: 0.97
Question: what, then, is the difference between the apple inc . change as a portion of the 2008 value and the s&p computer hardware index?
| 2.34 |
CONVFINQA3274 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?
| 65.0 |
CONVFINQA3275 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?
Answer: 65.0
Question: and for the period as of 12/31/07?
| 69.0 |
CONVFINQA3276 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?
Answer: 65.0
Question: and for the period as of 12/31/07?
Answer: 69.0
Question: combining these two values, what is the total?
| 134.0 |
CONVFINQA3277 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?
Answer: 65.0
Question: and for the period as of 12/31/07?
Answer: 69.0
Question: combining these two values, what is the total?
Answer: 134.0
Question: and the gross utb balance as of 1/107?
| 691.0 |
CONVFINQA3278 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?
Answer: 65.0
Question: and for the period as of 12/31/07?
Answer: 69.0
Question: combining these two values, what is the total?
Answer: 134.0
Question: and the gross utb balance as of 1/107?
Answer: 691.0
Question: so what was the percentage of interest and penalties in the gross utb balance?
| 0.19392 |
CONVFINQA3279 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
| 2856.0 |
CONVFINQA3280 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what about in 2011?
| 2040.0 |
CONVFINQA3281 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 2040.0
Question: what net change does this represent?
| 816.0 |
CONVFINQA3282 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 2040.0
Question: what net change does this represent?
Answer: 816.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.4 |
CONVFINQA3283 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 2040.0
Question: what net change does this represent?
Answer: 816.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.4
Question: what is the balance of foreign currency exchange contracts in 2012?
| 570.0 |
CONVFINQA3284 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 2040.0
Question: what net change does this represent?
Answer: 816.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.4
Question: what is the balance of foreign currency exchange contracts in 2012?
Answer: 570.0
Question: what about the balance of total derivative instruments?
| 2856.0 |
CONVFINQA3285 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 570</td><td>$ 1265</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2150</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>136</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2856</td><td>$ 2040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 . the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what is the balance of the derivative instruments in 2012?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 2040.0
Question: what net change does this represent?
Answer: 816.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.4
Question: what is the balance of foreign currency exchange contracts in 2012?
Answer: 570.0
Question: what about the balance of total derivative instruments?
Answer: 2856.0
Question: what proportion does this represent?
| 0.19958 |
CONVFINQA3286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the audited consolidated financial statements director stock compensation subplan eastman's 2016 director stock compensation subplan ( "directors' subplan" ) , a component of the 2012 omnibus plan , remains in effect until terminated by the board of directors or the earlier termination of thf e 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan provides for structured awards of restricted shares to non-employee members of the board of directors . restricted shares awarded under the directors' subplan are subject to the same terms and conditions of the 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan does not constitute a separate source of shares for grant of equity awards and all shares awarded are part of the 10 million shares authorized under the 2012 omnibus plan . shares of restricted stock are granted on the first day of a non-f employee director's initial term of service and shares of restricted stock are granted each year to each non-employee director on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders . general the company is authorized by the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan tof provide awards to employees and non- employee members of the board of directors . it has been the company's practice to issue new shares rather than treasury shares for equity awards that require settlement by the issuance of common stock and to withhold or accept back shares awarded to cover the related income tax obligations of employee participants . shares of unrestricted common stock owned by non-d employee directors are not eligible to be withheld or acquired to satisfy the withholding obligation related to their income taxes . aa shares of unrestricted common stock owned by specified senior management level employees are accepted by the company to pay the exercise price of stock options in accordance with the terms and conditions of their awards . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , total share-based compensation expense ( before tax ) of approximately $ 36 million , $ 36 million , and $ 28 million , respectively , was recognized in selling , general and administrative exd pense in the consolidated statements of earnings , comprehensive income and retained earnings for all share-based awards of which approximately $ 7 million , $ 7 million , and $ 4 million , respectively , related to stock options . the compensation expense is recognized over the substantive vesting period , which may be a shorter time period than the stated vesting period for qualifying termination eligible employees as defined in the forms of award notice . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , approximately $ 2 million , $ 2 million , and $ 1 million , respectively , of stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility preceding the requisite vesting period . stock option awards options have been granted on an annual basis to non-employee directors under the directors' subplan and predecessor plans and by the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan and predecessor plans to employees . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term of options is 10 years with vesting periods thf at vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably over the vesting period or at the end of the vesting period . the company utilizes the black scholes merton option valuation model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 are provided in the table below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility rate</td><td>23.71% ( 23.71 % )</td><td>24.11% ( 24.11 % )</td><td>25.82% ( 25.82 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.31% ( 2.31 % )</td><td>1.75% ( 1.75 % )</td><td>1.70% ( 1.70 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.23% ( 1.23 % )</td><td>1.45% ( 1.45 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected term years</td><td>5.0</td><td>4.8</td><td>4.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference in total share-based compensation expense between 2014 and 2015?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA3287 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the audited consolidated financial statements director stock compensation subplan eastman's 2016 director stock compensation subplan ( "directors' subplan" ) , a component of the 2012 omnibus plan , remains in effect until terminated by the board of directors or the earlier termination of thf e 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan provides for structured awards of restricted shares to non-employee members of the board of directors . restricted shares awarded under the directors' subplan are subject to the same terms and conditions of the 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan does not constitute a separate source of shares for grant of equity awards and all shares awarded are part of the 10 million shares authorized under the 2012 omnibus plan . shares of restricted stock are granted on the first day of a non-f employee director's initial term of service and shares of restricted stock are granted each year to each non-employee director on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders . general the company is authorized by the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan tof provide awards to employees and non- employee members of the board of directors . it has been the company's practice to issue new shares rather than treasury shares for equity awards that require settlement by the issuance of common stock and to withhold or accept back shares awarded to cover the related income tax obligations of employee participants . shares of unrestricted common stock owned by non-d employee directors are not eligible to be withheld or acquired to satisfy the withholding obligation related to their income taxes . aa shares of unrestricted common stock owned by specified senior management level employees are accepted by the company to pay the exercise price of stock options in accordance with the terms and conditions of their awards . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , total share-based compensation expense ( before tax ) of approximately $ 36 million , $ 36 million , and $ 28 million , respectively , was recognized in selling , general and administrative exd pense in the consolidated statements of earnings , comprehensive income and retained earnings for all share-based awards of which approximately $ 7 million , $ 7 million , and $ 4 million , respectively , related to stock options . the compensation expense is recognized over the substantive vesting period , which may be a shorter time period than the stated vesting period for qualifying termination eligible employees as defined in the forms of award notice . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , approximately $ 2 million , $ 2 million , and $ 1 million , respectively , of stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility preceding the requisite vesting period . stock option awards options have been granted on an annual basis to non-employee directors under the directors' subplan and predecessor plans and by the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan and predecessor plans to employees . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term of options is 10 years with vesting periods thf at vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably over the vesting period or at the end of the vesting period . the company utilizes the black scholes merton option valuation model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 are provided in the table below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility rate</td><td>23.71% ( 23.71 % )</td><td>24.11% ( 24.11 % )</td><td>25.82% ( 25.82 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.31% ( 2.31 % )</td><td>1.75% ( 1.75 % )</td><td>1.70% ( 1.70 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.23% ( 1.23 % )</td><td>1.45% ( 1.45 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected term years</td><td>5.0</td><td>4.8</td><td>4.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference in total share-based compensation expense between 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent from 2014?
| 0.28571 |
CONVFINQA3288 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in value of pmi in 2015, assuming a $100 initial investment?
| 86.2 |
CONVFINQA3289 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>$ 139.80</td><td>$ 114.10</td><td>$ 102.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 154.60</td><td>$ 128.00</td><td>$ 118.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 163.60</td><td>$ 156.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 164.20</td><td>$ 170.10</td><td>$ 178.30</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 186.20</td><td>$ 179.20</td><td>$ 180.80</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in value of pmi in 2015, assuming a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 86.2
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.862 |
CONVFINQA3290 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the long term . in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a . and vodafone group plc . we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward . in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn . our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td><td>5260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td><td>1260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td><td>485</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td><td>6065</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of the number of sites acquired and constructed during 2014 in the us and asia?
| 2460.0 |
CONVFINQA3291 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the long term . in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a . and vodafone group plc . we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward . in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn . our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td><td>5260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td><td>1260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td><td>485</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td><td>6065</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of the number of sites acquired and constructed during 2014 in the us and asia?
Answer: 2460.0
Question: what is the sum including emea sites?
| 2650.0 |
CONVFINQA3292 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the long term . in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a . and vodafone group plc . we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward . in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn . our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>11595</td><td>900</td><td>5260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asia</td><td>2330</td><td>1560</td><td>1260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>emea</td><td>4910</td><td>190</td><td>485</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>6535</td><td>5800</td><td>6065</td></tr></table> property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of the number of sites acquired and constructed during 2014 in the us and asia?
Answer: 2460.0
Question: what is the sum including emea sites?
Answer: 2650.0
Question: what is the total sum including latin america?
| 8450.0 |
CONVFINQA3293 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is the short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims as a percentage of the long-term receivable remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers?
| 0.35047 |
CONVFINQA3294 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is the short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims as a percentage of the long-term receivable remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers?
Answer: 0.35047
Question: what is the value of outstanding borrowings, in millions?
| 2500.0 |
CONVFINQA3295 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is the short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims as a percentage of the long-term receivable remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers?
Answer: 0.35047
Question: what is the value of outstanding borrowings, in millions?
Answer: 2500.0
Question: so what is the percentage of the $500 million in principal paid in 2015 out of the outstanding borrowings?
| 0.2 |
CONVFINQA3296 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td><td>september 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ 254</td><td>$ 294</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 194</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 183</td></tr></table> apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .
Question: what is the net change of an investment in apple from 2010 to 2015?
| 194.0 |
CONVFINQA3297 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td><td>september 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ 254</td><td>$ 294</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 194</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 183</td></tr></table> apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .
Question: what is the net change of an investment in apple from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 194.0
Question: what is the initial investment?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA3298 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td><td>september 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ 254</td><td>$ 294</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 194</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 183</td></tr></table> apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .
Question: what is the net change of an investment in apple from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 194.0
Question: what is the initial investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
| 1.94 |
CONVFINQA3299 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td><td>september 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ 254</td><td>$ 294</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 194</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 183</td></tr></table> apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .
Question: what is the net change of an investment in apple from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 194.0
Question: what is the initial investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what rate of return does this represent?
Answer: 1.94
Question: what about the net change of an investment in s&p500 index from 2010 to 2015?
| 87.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.