id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA3500 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
152 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k in addition to the proceedings or other matters described above , pnc and persons to whom we may have indemnification obligations , in the normal course of business , are subject to various other pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted . we do not anticipate , at the present time , that the ultimate aggregate liability , if any , arising out of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position . however , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period . note 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet . the following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . table 98 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commitments to extend credit</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total commercial lending</td><td>$ 112125</td><td>$ 108256</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>home equity lines of credit</td><td>17852</td><td>17438</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit card</td><td>24911</td><td>22095</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>4753</td><td>4192</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total commitments to extend credit</td><td>159641</td><td>151981</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net outstanding standby letters ofcredit ( a )</td><td>8651</td><td>8324</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reinsurance agreements ( b )</td><td>1654</td><td>1835</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standby bond purchase agreements ( c )</td><td>843</td><td>790</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other commitments ( d )</td><td>1732</td><td>967</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total commitments to extendcredit and other commitments</td><td>$ 172521</td><td>$ 163897</td></tr></table> commitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions . these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates . net outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution . approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 94% ( 94 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively , with the remainder rated as below pass . an internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of below pass indicates a higher degree of risk . if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them . the standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2017 had terms ranging from less than one year to seven years . as of december 31 , 2017 , assets of $ 1.3 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit . in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us . the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2017 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. .
Question: what was the change in total commitments to extend credit from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 7660.0
Question: and what were the total commitments to extend credit in 2016?
Answer: 151981.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2016 total commitments?
| 0.0504 |
CONVFINQA3501 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2014 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1955024 $ 36.06 4078093 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 644321 were subject to stock options , 539742 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , and 63022 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 33571 stock rights , 11046 restricted stock rights and 663322 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 644321 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .
Question: what was the total value of the equity compensation plan?
| 6033117.0 |
CONVFINQA3502 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2014 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1955024 $ 36.06 4078093 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 644321 were subject to stock options , 539742 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , and 63022 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 33571 stock rights , 11046 restricted stock rights and 663322 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 644321 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .
Question: what was the total value of the equity compensation plan?
Answer: 6033117.0
Question: what amount from that value is to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
| 1955024.0 |
CONVFINQA3503 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2014 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1955024 $ 36.06 4078093 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1955024</td><td>$ 36.06</td><td>4078093</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 644321 were subject to stock options , 539742 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , and 63022 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 33571 stock rights , 11046 restricted stock rights and 663322 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 644321 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .
Question: what was the total value of the equity compensation plan?
Answer: 6033117.0
Question: what amount from that value is to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 1955024.0
Question: and how much does this amount represent in relation to the value?
| 0.32405 |
CONVFINQA3504 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the aggregate purchase price consideration was approximately us$ 417.0 million . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 373519</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of shares to be acquired through a follow-on merger</td><td>34054</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>9383</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>247482</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>108867</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>137222</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>-76615 ( 76615 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 247.5 million , which is generally not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of springsoft 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to eight years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $ 6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . these costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services . fair value of equity awards : pursuant to the merger agreement , the company assumed all the unvested outstanding stock options of springsoft upon the completion of the merger and the vested options were exchanged for cash in the merger . on october 1 , 2012 , the date of the completion of the tender offer , the fair value of the awards to be assumed and exchanged was $ 9.9 million , calculated using the black-scholes option pricing model . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . non-controlling interest : non-controlling interest represents the fair value of the 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) of outstanding springsoft shares that were not acquired during the tender offer process completed on october 1 , 2012 and the fair value of the option awards that were to be assumed or exchanged for cash upon the follow-on merger . the fair value of the non-controlling interest included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration was $ 42.8 million and is disclosed as a separate line in the october 31 , 2012 consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity . during the period between the completion of the tender offer and the end of the company 2019s fiscal year on october 31 , 2012 , the non-controlling interest was adjusted by $ 0.5 million to reflect the non-controlling interest 2019s share of the operating loss of springsoft in that period . as the amount is not significant , it has been included as part of other income ( expense ) , net , in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the value of goodwill?
| 247482.0 |
CONVFINQA3505 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the aggregate purchase price consideration was approximately us$ 417.0 million . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 373519</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of shares to be acquired through a follow-on merger</td><td>34054</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>9383</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>247482</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>108867</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>137222</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>-76615 ( 76615 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 247.5 million , which is generally not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of springsoft 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to eight years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $ 6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . these costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services . fair value of equity awards : pursuant to the merger agreement , the company assumed all the unvested outstanding stock options of springsoft upon the completion of the merger and the vested options were exchanged for cash in the merger . on october 1 , 2012 , the date of the completion of the tender offer , the fair value of the awards to be assumed and exchanged was $ 9.9 million , calculated using the black-scholes option pricing model . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . non-controlling interest : non-controlling interest represents the fair value of the 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) of outstanding springsoft shares that were not acquired during the tender offer process completed on october 1 , 2012 and the fair value of the option awards that were to be assumed or exchanged for cash upon the follow-on merger . the fair value of the non-controlling interest included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration was $ 42.8 million and is disclosed as a separate line in the october 31 , 2012 consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity . during the period between the completion of the tender offer and the end of the company 2019s fiscal year on october 31 , 2012 , the non-controlling interest was adjusted by $ 0.5 million to reflect the non-controlling interest 2019s share of the operating loss of springsoft in that period . as the amount is not significant , it has been included as part of other income ( expense ) , net , in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the value of goodwill?
Answer: 247482.0
Question: what was the value of intangible assets?
| 108867.0 |
CONVFINQA3506 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the aggregate purchase price consideration was approximately us$ 417.0 million . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 373519</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of shares to be acquired through a follow-on merger</td><td>34054</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>9383</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>247482</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>108867</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>137222</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>-76615 ( 76615 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 247.5 million , which is generally not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of springsoft 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to eight years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $ 6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . these costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services . fair value of equity awards : pursuant to the merger agreement , the company assumed all the unvested outstanding stock options of springsoft upon the completion of the merger and the vested options were exchanged for cash in the merger . on october 1 , 2012 , the date of the completion of the tender offer , the fair value of the awards to be assumed and exchanged was $ 9.9 million , calculated using the black-scholes option pricing model . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . non-controlling interest : non-controlling interest represents the fair value of the 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) of outstanding springsoft shares that were not acquired during the tender offer process completed on october 1 , 2012 and the fair value of the option awards that were to be assumed or exchanged for cash upon the follow-on merger . the fair value of the non-controlling interest included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration was $ 42.8 million and is disclosed as a separate line in the october 31 , 2012 consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity . during the period between the completion of the tender offer and the end of the company 2019s fiscal year on october 31 , 2012 , the non-controlling interest was adjusted by $ 0.5 million to reflect the non-controlling interest 2019s share of the operating loss of springsoft in that period . as the amount is not significant , it has been included as part of other income ( expense ) , net , in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the value of goodwill?
Answer: 247482.0
Question: what was the value of intangible assets?
Answer: 108867.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 356349.0 |
CONVFINQA3507 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the aggregate purchase price consideration was approximately us$ 417.0 million . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 373519</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of shares to be acquired through a follow-on merger</td><td>34054</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>9383</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>247482</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>108867</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>137222</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>-76615 ( 76615 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 247.5 million , which is generally not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of springsoft 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to eight years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $ 6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . these costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services . fair value of equity awards : pursuant to the merger agreement , the company assumed all the unvested outstanding stock options of springsoft upon the completion of the merger and the vested options were exchanged for cash in the merger . on october 1 , 2012 , the date of the completion of the tender offer , the fair value of the awards to be assumed and exchanged was $ 9.9 million , calculated using the black-scholes option pricing model . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . non-controlling interest : non-controlling interest represents the fair value of the 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) of outstanding springsoft shares that were not acquired during the tender offer process completed on october 1 , 2012 and the fair value of the option awards that were to be assumed or exchanged for cash upon the follow-on merger . the fair value of the non-controlling interest included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration was $ 42.8 million and is disclosed as a separate line in the october 31 , 2012 consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity . during the period between the completion of the tender offer and the end of the company 2019s fiscal year on october 31 , 2012 , the non-controlling interest was adjusted by $ 0.5 million to reflect the non-controlling interest 2019s share of the operating loss of springsoft in that period . as the amount is not significant , it has been included as part of other income ( expense ) , net , in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the value of goodwill?
Answer: 247482.0
Question: what was the value of intangible assets?
Answer: 108867.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 356349.0
Question: what is the value of total purchase allocation?
| 416956.0 |
CONVFINQA3508 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the aggregate purchase price consideration was approximately us$ 417.0 million . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 373519</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fair value of shares to be acquired through a follow-on merger</td><td>34054</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of equity awards allocated to purchase consideration</td><td>9383</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase consideration</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>247482</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>identifiable intangibles assets acquired</td><td>108867</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash and other assets acquired</td><td>137222</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>liabilities assumed</td><td>-76615 ( 76615 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total purchase allocation</td><td>$ 416956</td></tr></table> goodwill of $ 247.5 million , which is generally not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of springsoft 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to eight years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $ 6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations . these costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services . fair value of equity awards : pursuant to the merger agreement , the company assumed all the unvested outstanding stock options of springsoft upon the completion of the merger and the vested options were exchanged for cash in the merger . on october 1 , 2012 , the date of the completion of the tender offer , the fair value of the awards to be assumed and exchanged was $ 9.9 million , calculated using the black-scholes option pricing model . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . non-controlling interest : non-controlling interest represents the fair value of the 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) of outstanding springsoft shares that were not acquired during the tender offer process completed on october 1 , 2012 and the fair value of the option awards that were to be assumed or exchanged for cash upon the follow-on merger . the fair value of the non-controlling interest included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration was $ 42.8 million and is disclosed as a separate line in the october 31 , 2012 consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity . during the period between the completion of the tender offer and the end of the company 2019s fiscal year on october 31 , 2012 , the non-controlling interest was adjusted by $ 0.5 million to reflect the non-controlling interest 2019s share of the operating loss of springsoft in that period . as the amount is not significant , it has been included as part of other income ( expense ) , net , in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the value of goodwill?
Answer: 247482.0
Question: what was the value of intangible assets?
Answer: 108867.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 356349.0
Question: what is the value of total purchase allocation?
Answer: 416956.0
Question: what is the percent of goodwill and intangible assets to the total purchase allocation?
| 0.85464 |
CONVFINQA3509 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of $ 494 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting declines in the united states , europe and asia . our average daily volumes during 2012 were lower in each of these regions compared with 2011 , consistent with listed cash equity market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre- tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments , some of which are consolidated , and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 3930</td><td>$ 2800</td><td>$ 603</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>1947</td><td>1850</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1141</td><td>1241</td><td>1443</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>7018</td><td>5891</td><td>2142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2684</td><td>2666</td><td>2673</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )</td><td>$ 4334</td><td>$ 3225</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td></tr></table> 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.68 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . 52 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .
Question: what portion of total revenues is generated through equity securities in 2013?
| 0.55999 |
CONVFINQA3510 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of $ 494 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting declines in the united states , europe and asia . our average daily volumes during 2012 were lower in each of these regions compared with 2011 , consistent with listed cash equity market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre- tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments , some of which are consolidated , and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 3930</td><td>$ 2800</td><td>$ 603</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>1947</td><td>1850</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1141</td><td>1241</td><td>1443</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>7018</td><td>5891</td><td>2142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2684</td><td>2666</td><td>2673</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )</td><td>$ 4334</td><td>$ 3225</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td></tr></table> 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.68 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . 52 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .
Question: what portion of total revenues is generated through equity securities in 2013?
Answer: 0.55999
Question: what percentage were pre-tax earnings higher in 2013?
| 0.34 |
CONVFINQA3511 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of $ 494 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting declines in the united states , europe and asia . our average daily volumes during 2012 were lower in each of these regions compared with 2011 , consistent with listed cash equity market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre- tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments , some of which are consolidated , and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 3930</td><td>$ 2800</td><td>$ 603</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>1947</td><td>1850</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1141</td><td>1241</td><td>1443</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>7018</td><td>5891</td><td>2142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2684</td><td>2666</td><td>2673</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )</td><td>$ 4334</td><td>$ 3225</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td></tr></table> 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.68 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . 52 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .
Question: what portion of total revenues is generated through equity securities in 2013?
Answer: 0.55999
Question: what percentage were pre-tax earnings higher in 2013?
Answer: 0.34
Question: what about as a percentage of 2013?
| 0.66 |
CONVFINQA3512 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of $ 494 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting declines in the united states , europe and asia . our average daily volumes during 2012 were lower in each of these regions compared with 2011 , consistent with listed cash equity market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre- tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments , some of which are consolidated , and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td><td>year ended december 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 3930</td><td>$ 2800</td><td>$ 603</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>1947</td><td>1850</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>1141</td><td>1241</td><td>1443</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>7018</td><td>5891</td><td>2142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2684</td><td>2666</td><td>2673</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )</td><td>$ 4334</td><td>$ 3225</td><td>$ -531 ( 531 )</td></tr></table> 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.68 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . 52 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .
Question: what portion of total revenues is generated through equity securities in 2013?
Answer: 0.55999
Question: what percentage were pre-tax earnings higher in 2013?
Answer: 0.34
Question: what about as a percentage of 2013?
Answer: 0.66
Question: what total revenue would this provide?
| 2.8578 |
CONVFINQA3513 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
| 155.99 |
CONVFINQA3514 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
Answer: 155.99
Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?
| 55.99 |
CONVFINQA3515 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
Answer: 155.99
Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?
Answer: 55.99
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?
| 0.5599 |
CONVFINQA3516 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
Answer: 155.99
Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?
Answer: 55.99
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?
Answer: 0.5599
Question: and what would be that change if 1000000 dollars were invested in 2009?
| 559900.0 |
CONVFINQA3517 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
Answer: 155.99
Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?
Answer: 55.99
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?
Answer: 0.5599
Question: and what would be that change if 1000000 dollars were invested in 2009?
Answer: 559900.0
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the nasdaq composite?
| 39.32 |
CONVFINQA3518 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
Answer: 155.99
Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?
Answer: 55.99
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?
Answer: 0.5599
Question: and what would be that change if 1000000 dollars were invested in 2009?
Answer: 559900.0
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the nasdaq composite?
Answer: 39.32
Question: what is this change as a portion of the 2009 performance price?
| 0.3932 |
CONVFINQA3519 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>155.99</td><td>215.10</td><td>270.83</td><td>350.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.32</td><td>164.84</td><td>167.06</td><td>187.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>151.58</td><td>198.02</td><td>174.88</td><td>201.26</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
Answer: 155.99
Question: and what was the change in that price since 2009?
Answer: 55.99
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?
Answer: 0.5599
Question: and what would be that change if 1000000 dollars were invested in 2009?
Answer: 559900.0
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the nasdaq composite?
Answer: 39.32
Question: what is this change as a portion of the 2009 performance price?
Answer: 0.3932
Question: if, in 2009, that same amount of 1000000 dollars had been invested in this stock, what would be that change?
| 393200.0 |
CONVFINQA3520 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the fluctuation of the value of the cadence design system from 2006 to 2007?
| -7.22 |
CONVFINQA3521 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the fluctuation of the value of the cadence design system from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: -7.22
Question: and what was that fluctuation as a portion of the value of that stock in 2006?
| -0.0491 |
CONVFINQA3522 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the fluctuation of the value of the cadence design system from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: -7.22
Question: and what was that fluctuation as a portion of the value of that stock in 2006?
Answer: -0.0491
Question: in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the s&p500?
| 9.53 |
CONVFINQA3523 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the fluctuation of the value of the cadence design system from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: -7.22
Question: and what was that fluctuation as a portion of the value of that stock in 2006?
Answer: -0.0491
Question: in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the s&p500?
Answer: 9.53
Question: and how much did this fluctuation represent in relation to the 2006 value of this stock?
| 0.05498 |
CONVFINQA3524 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the difference in net cash used in investing activities between 2011 and 2012?
| 587.0 |
CONVFINQA3525 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the difference in net cash used in investing activities between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 587.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 4.52811 |
CONVFINQA3526 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what was the total number of shares repurchased in 2018, in millions?
| 57.66975 |
CONVFINQA3527 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased [a]</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]</td><td>maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oct . 1 through oct . 31</td><td>6091605</td><td>$ 158.20</td><td>6087727</td><td>32831024</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nov . 1 through nov . 30</td><td>3408467</td><td>147.91</td><td>3402190</td><td>29428834</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dec . 1 through dec . 31</td><td>3007951</td><td>148.40</td><td>3000715</td><td>26428119</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>12508023</td><td>$ 153.04</td><td>12490632</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> [a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what was the total number of shares repurchased in 2018, in millions?
Answer: 57.66975
Question: and what was the full amount spent in the repurchase of that total number of shares?
| 8287.1425 |
CONVFINQA3528 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average u.s . short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
| 384.0 |
CONVFINQA3529 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average u.s . short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 384.0
Question: and what were those advances in 2012?
| 1972.0 |
CONVFINQA3530 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average u.s . short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 384.0
Question: and what were those advances in 2012?
Answer: 1972.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to these 2012 advances, in percentage?
| 0.19473 |
CONVFINQA3531 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
capital asset purchases associated with the retail segment were $ 294 million in 2007 , bringing the total capital asset purchases since inception of the retail segment to $ 1.0 billion . as of september 29 , 2007 , the retail segment had approximately 7900 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of $ 1.1 billion . the company would incur substantial costs if it were to close multiple retail stores . such costs could adversely affect the company 2019s financial condition and operating results . other segments the company 2019s other segments , which consists of its asia pacific and filemaker operations , experienced an increase in net sales of $ 406 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) during 2007 compared to 2006 . this increase related primarily to a 58% ( 58 % ) increase in sales of mac portable products and strong ipod sales in the company 2019s asia pacific region . during 2006 , net sales in other segments increased 35% ( 35 % ) compared to 2005 primarily due to an increase in sales of ipod and mac portable products . strong sales growth was a result of the introduction of the updated ipods featuring video-playing capabilities and the new intel-based mac portable products that translated to a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in mac unit sales during 2006 compared to 2005 . gross margin gross margin for each of the last three fiscal years are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 24006</td><td>$ 19315</td><td>$ 13931</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>15852</td><td>13717</td><td>9889</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8154</td><td>$ 5598</td><td>$ 4042</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>34.0% ( 34.0 % )</td><td>29.0% ( 29.0 % )</td><td>29.0% ( 29.0 % )</td></tr></table> gross margin percentage of 34.0% ( 34.0 % ) in 2007 increased significantly from 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) in 2006 . the primary drivers of this increase were more favorable costs on certain commodity components , including nand flash memory and dram memory , higher overall revenue that provided for more leverage on fixed production costs and a higher percentage of revenue from the company 2019s direct sales channels . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margins of the personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries will be subject to pressure due to price competition . the company expects gross margin percentage to decline sequentially in the first quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of the full-quarter impact of product transitions and reduced pricing that were effected in the fourth quarter of 2007 , lower sales of ilife and iwork in their second quarter of availability , seasonally higher component costs , and a higher mix of indirect sales . these factors are expected to be partially offset by higher sales of the company 2019s mac os x operating system due to the introduction of mac os x version 10.5 leopard ( 2018 2018mac os x leopard 2019 2019 ) that became available in october 2007 . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage are forward-looking . there can be no assurance that current gross margin percentage will be maintained or targeted gross margin percentage levels will be achieved . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to these competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to effectively manage product quality and warranty costs and to stimulate .
Question: what was the net change in sales from 2005 to 2006?
| 5384.0 |
CONVFINQA3532 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
capital asset purchases associated with the retail segment were $ 294 million in 2007 , bringing the total capital asset purchases since inception of the retail segment to $ 1.0 billion . as of september 29 , 2007 , the retail segment had approximately 7900 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of $ 1.1 billion . the company would incur substantial costs if it were to close multiple retail stores . such costs could adversely affect the company 2019s financial condition and operating results . other segments the company 2019s other segments , which consists of its asia pacific and filemaker operations , experienced an increase in net sales of $ 406 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) during 2007 compared to 2006 . this increase related primarily to a 58% ( 58 % ) increase in sales of mac portable products and strong ipod sales in the company 2019s asia pacific region . during 2006 , net sales in other segments increased 35% ( 35 % ) compared to 2005 primarily due to an increase in sales of ipod and mac portable products . strong sales growth was a result of the introduction of the updated ipods featuring video-playing capabilities and the new intel-based mac portable products that translated to a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in mac unit sales during 2006 compared to 2005 . gross margin gross margin for each of the last three fiscal years are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 24006</td><td>$ 19315</td><td>$ 13931</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>15852</td><td>13717</td><td>9889</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8154</td><td>$ 5598</td><td>$ 4042</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>34.0% ( 34.0 % )</td><td>29.0% ( 29.0 % )</td><td>29.0% ( 29.0 % )</td></tr></table> gross margin percentage of 34.0% ( 34.0 % ) in 2007 increased significantly from 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) in 2006 . the primary drivers of this increase were more favorable costs on certain commodity components , including nand flash memory and dram memory , higher overall revenue that provided for more leverage on fixed production costs and a higher percentage of revenue from the company 2019s direct sales channels . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margins of the personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries will be subject to pressure due to price competition . the company expects gross margin percentage to decline sequentially in the first quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of the full-quarter impact of product transitions and reduced pricing that were effected in the fourth quarter of 2007 , lower sales of ilife and iwork in their second quarter of availability , seasonally higher component costs , and a higher mix of indirect sales . these factors are expected to be partially offset by higher sales of the company 2019s mac os x operating system due to the introduction of mac os x version 10.5 leopard ( 2018 2018mac os x leopard 2019 2019 ) that became available in october 2007 . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage are forward-looking . there can be no assurance that current gross margin percentage will be maintained or targeted gross margin percentage levels will be achieved . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to these competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to effectively manage product quality and warranty costs and to stimulate .
Question: what was the net change in sales from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 5384.0
Question: what was the value of sales in 2005?
| 13931.0 |
CONVFINQA3533 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
capital asset purchases associated with the retail segment were $ 294 million in 2007 , bringing the total capital asset purchases since inception of the retail segment to $ 1.0 billion . as of september 29 , 2007 , the retail segment had approximately 7900 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of $ 1.1 billion . the company would incur substantial costs if it were to close multiple retail stores . such costs could adversely affect the company 2019s financial condition and operating results . other segments the company 2019s other segments , which consists of its asia pacific and filemaker operations , experienced an increase in net sales of $ 406 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) during 2007 compared to 2006 . this increase related primarily to a 58% ( 58 % ) increase in sales of mac portable products and strong ipod sales in the company 2019s asia pacific region . during 2006 , net sales in other segments increased 35% ( 35 % ) compared to 2005 primarily due to an increase in sales of ipod and mac portable products . strong sales growth was a result of the introduction of the updated ipods featuring video-playing capabilities and the new intel-based mac portable products that translated to a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in mac unit sales during 2006 compared to 2005 . gross margin gross margin for each of the last three fiscal years are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 24006</td><td>$ 19315</td><td>$ 13931</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>15852</td><td>13717</td><td>9889</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8154</td><td>$ 5598</td><td>$ 4042</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>34.0% ( 34.0 % )</td><td>29.0% ( 29.0 % )</td><td>29.0% ( 29.0 % )</td></tr></table> gross margin percentage of 34.0% ( 34.0 % ) in 2007 increased significantly from 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) in 2006 . the primary drivers of this increase were more favorable costs on certain commodity components , including nand flash memory and dram memory , higher overall revenue that provided for more leverage on fixed production costs and a higher percentage of revenue from the company 2019s direct sales channels . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margins of the personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries will be subject to pressure due to price competition . the company expects gross margin percentage to decline sequentially in the first quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of the full-quarter impact of product transitions and reduced pricing that were effected in the fourth quarter of 2007 , lower sales of ilife and iwork in their second quarter of availability , seasonally higher component costs , and a higher mix of indirect sales . these factors are expected to be partially offset by higher sales of the company 2019s mac os x operating system due to the introduction of mac os x version 10.5 leopard ( 2018 2018mac os x leopard 2019 2019 ) that became available in october 2007 . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage are forward-looking . there can be no assurance that current gross margin percentage will be maintained or targeted gross margin percentage levels will be achieved . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to these competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to effectively manage product quality and warranty costs and to stimulate .
Question: what was the net change in sales from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 5384.0
Question: what was the value of sales in 2005?
Answer: 13931.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.38648 |
CONVFINQA3534 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>1231868</td><td>$ 20.74</td><td>1230394</td><td>$ 214001430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1723139</td><td>$ 18.89</td><td>1722246</td><td>$ 181474975</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1295639</td><td>$ 20.25</td><td>1285000</td><td>$ 155459545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>4250646</td><td>$ 19.84</td><td>4237640</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the average price paid per share october 1-31?
| 20.74 |
CONVFINQA3535 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>1231868</td><td>$ 20.74</td><td>1230394</td><td>$ 214001430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1723139</td><td>$ 18.89</td><td>1722246</td><td>$ 181474975</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1295639</td><td>$ 20.25</td><td>1285000</td><td>$ 155459545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>4250646</td><td>$ 19.84</td><td>4237640</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the average price paid per share october 1-31?
Answer: 20.74
Question: and for november 1-30?
| 18.89 |
CONVFINQA3536 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>1231868</td><td>$ 20.74</td><td>1230394</td><td>$ 214001430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1723139</td><td>$ 18.89</td><td>1722246</td><td>$ 181474975</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1295639</td><td>$ 20.25</td><td>1285000</td><td>$ 155459545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>4250646</td><td>$ 19.84</td><td>4237640</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the average price paid per share october 1-31?
Answer: 20.74
Question: and for november 1-30?
Answer: 18.89
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
| 1.85 |
CONVFINQA3537 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>1231868</td><td>$ 20.74</td><td>1230394</td><td>$ 214001430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1723139</td><td>$ 18.89</td><td>1722246</td><td>$ 181474975</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1295639</td><td>$ 20.25</td><td>1285000</td><td>$ 155459545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>4250646</td><td>$ 19.84</td><td>4237640</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the average price paid per share october 1-31?
Answer: 20.74
Question: and for november 1-30?
Answer: 18.89
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: 1.85
Question: and the percentage decrease?
| 0.0892 |
CONVFINQA3538 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>1231868</td><td>$ 20.74</td><td>1230394</td><td>$ 214001430</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1723139</td><td>$ 18.89</td><td>1722246</td><td>$ 181474975</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1295639</td><td>$ 20.25</td><td>1285000</td><td>$ 155459545</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>4250646</td><td>$ 19.84</td><td>4237640</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the average price paid per share october 1-31?
Answer: 20.74
Question: and for november 1-30?
Answer: 18.89
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: 1.85
Question: and the percentage decrease?
Answer: 0.0892
Question: and converted to a percentage?
| 8.91996 |
CONVFINQA3539 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the value of the carrying amount at the start of 2017?
| 912926.0 |
CONVFINQA3540 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the value of the carrying amount at the start of 2017?
Answer: 912926.0
Question: what is that value divided by 1000?
| 912.926 |
CONVFINQA3541 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the value of the carrying amount at the start of 2017?
Answer: 912926.0
Question: what is that value divided by 1000?
Answer: 912.926
Question: what was the value of proved oil and gas properties in 2017?
| 370.0 |
CONVFINQA3542 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what was the value of the carrying amount at the start of 2017?
Answer: 912926.0
Question: what is that value divided by 1000?
Answer: 912.926
Question: what was the value of proved oil and gas properties in 2017?
Answer: 370.0
Question: what is that value divided by the total carrying amount value?
| 0.40529 |
CONVFINQA3543 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what were rental lease expenses in 2019?
| 92.3 |
CONVFINQA3544 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what were rental lease expenses in 2019?
Answer: 92.3
Question: what were they in 2017?
| 58.8 |
CONVFINQA3545 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what were rental lease expenses in 2019?
Answer: 92.3
Question: what were they in 2017?
Answer: 58.8
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 33.5 |
CONVFINQA3546 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what were rental lease expenses in 2019?
Answer: 92.3
Question: what were they in 2017?
Answer: 58.8
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 33.5
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.56973 |
CONVFINQA3547 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what is the difference between earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma and 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?
| 0.04 |
CONVFINQA3548 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what is the difference between earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma and 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?
Answer: 0.04
Question: what is the earnings per share of 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?
| 3.75 |
CONVFINQA3549 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what is the difference between earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma and 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?
Answer: 0.04
Question: what is the earnings per share of 2013 diluted pro forma in 2005?
Answer: 3.75
Question: what is difference divided by the 2013 diluted pro forma value?
| 0.01067 |
CONVFINQA3550 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
| 331.0 |
CONVFINQA3551 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and the percentage growth?
| 3.31 |
CONVFINQA3552 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and the percentage growth?
Answer: 3.31
Question: and the difference for the s&p computer hardware index over the same period?
| 97.0 |
CONVFINQA3553 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and the percentage growth?
Answer: 3.31
Question: and the difference for the s&p computer hardware index over the same period?
Answer: 97.0
Question: and the starting price for the index?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA3554 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and the percentage growth?
Answer: 3.31
Question: and the difference for the s&p computer hardware index over the same period?
Answer: 97.0
Question: and the starting price for the index?
Answer: 100.0
Question: so what was the percentage growth?
| 0.97 |
CONVFINQA3555 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>september 30 2009</td><td>september 30 2010</td><td>september 30 2011</td><td>september 30 2012</td><td>september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 250</td><td>$ 335</td><td>$ 589</td><td>$ 431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p computer hardware index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 255</td><td>$ 197</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones us technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 124</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 175</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in price for apple between 2008 and 2013?
Answer: 331.0
Question: and the percentage growth?
Answer: 3.31
Question: and the difference for the s&p computer hardware index over the same period?
Answer: 97.0
Question: and the starting price for the index?
Answer: 100.0
Question: so what was the percentage growth?
Answer: 0.97
Question: and the difference between these two growth rates?
| 2.34 |
CONVFINQA3556 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1095.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>march 2002 settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-7.7 ( 7.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>16.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>7.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 998.7</td></tr></table> the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. .
Question: what was the change in net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2002 to 2003, in millions?
| -97.2 |
CONVFINQA3557 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1095.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>march 2002 settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-7.7 ( 7.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>16.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>7.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 998.7</td></tr></table> the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. .
Question: what was the change in net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2002 to 2003, in millions?
Answer: -97.2
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to the net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. in 2002?
| -0.08869 |
CONVFINQA3558 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenues</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total operating expenses net</td><td>19</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loss from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision ( benefit ) for income taxes</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -7 ( 7 )</td><td>$ -2 ( 2 )</td></tr></table> the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .
Question: what was the change in operating profits from 2013 to 2014?
| -10.0 |
CONVFINQA3559 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenues</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total operating expenses net</td><td>19</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loss from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision ( benefit ) for income taxes</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -7 ( 7 )</td><td>$ -2 ( 2 )</td></tr></table> the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .
Question: what was the change in operating profits from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: -10.0
Question: and what were the total operating profits in 2013?
| 23.0 |
CONVFINQA3560 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenues</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total operating expenses net</td><td>19</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loss from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision ( benefit ) for income taxes</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>loss from discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>$ -7 ( 7 )</td><td>$ -2 ( 2 )</td></tr></table> the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .
Question: what was the change in operating profits from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: -10.0
Question: and what were the total operating profits in 2013?
Answer: 23.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2013 total?
| -0.43478 |
CONVFINQA3561 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 29 part ii item 5 2013 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities ( a ) ( 1 ) our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange and is traded under the symbol 201cpnc . 201d at the close of business on february 15 , 2019 , there were 53986 common shareholders of record . holders of pnc common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for this purpose . our board of directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of outstanding preferred stock and certain outstanding capital securities issued by the parent company have been paid or declared and set apart for payment . the board of directors presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends . the amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market conditions , our financial condition and operating results , and other factors , including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies ( such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations ) . the amount of our dividend is also currently subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve and our primary bank regulators as part of the comprehensive capital analysis and review ( ccar ) process as described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . the federal reserve has the power to prohibit us from paying dividends without its approval . for further information concerning dividend restrictions and other factors that could limit our ability to pay dividends , as well as restrictions on loans , dividends or advances from bank subsidiaries to the parent company , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 , item 1a risk factors , the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 , and note 10 borrowed funds , note 15 equity and note 18 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , which we include here by reference . we include here by reference the information regarding our compensation plans under which pnc equity securities are authorized for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 in the table ( with introductory paragraph and notes ) in item 12 of this report . our stock transfer agent and registrar is : computershare trust company , n.a . 250 royall street canton , ma 02021 800-982-7652 www.computershare.com/pnc registered shareholders may contact computershare regarding dividends and other shareholder services . we include here by reference the information that appears under the common stock performance graph caption at the end of this item 5 . ( a ) ( 2 ) none . ( b ) not applicable . ( c ) details of our repurchases of pnc common stock during the fourth quarter of 2018 are included in the following table : in thousands , except per share data 2018 period total shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018 period</td><td>total shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b )</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 31</td><td>1204</td><td>$ 128.43</td><td>1189</td><td>25663</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 30</td><td>1491</td><td>$ 133.79</td><td>1491</td><td>24172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 31</td><td>3458</td><td>$ 119.43</td><td>3458</td><td>20714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6153</td><td>$ 124.67</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes pnc common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans generally related to forfeitures of unvested restricted stock awards and shares used to cover employee payroll tax withholding requirements . note 11 employee benefit plans and note 12 stock based compensation plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report include additional information regarding our employee benefit and equity compensation plans that use pnc common stock . ( b ) on march 11 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorization in the amount of 100 million shares of pnc common stock , effective april 1 , 2015 . repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the timing and exact amount of common stock repurchases will depend on a number of factors including , among others , market and general economic conditions , regulatory capital considerations , alternative uses of capital , the potential impact on our credit ratings , and contractual and regulatory limitations , including the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve as part of the ccar process . in june 2018 , we announced share repurchase programs of up to $ 2.0 billion for the four quarter period beginning with the third quarter of 2018 , including repurchases of up to $ 300 million related to stock issuances under employee benefit plans , in accordance with pnc's 2018 capital plan . in november 2018 , we announced an increase to these previously announced programs in the amount of up to $ 900 million in additional common share repurchases . the aggregate repurchase price of shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2018 was $ .8 billion . see the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 of this report for more information on the authorized share repurchase programs for the period july 1 , 2018 through june 30 , 2019 . http://www.computershare.com/pnc .
Question: what is the number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced programs as of october 31, 2013?
| 15.0 |
CONVFINQA3562 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 29 part ii item 5 2013 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities ( a ) ( 1 ) our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange and is traded under the symbol 201cpnc . 201d at the close of business on february 15 , 2019 , there were 53986 common shareholders of record . holders of pnc common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for this purpose . our board of directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of outstanding preferred stock and certain outstanding capital securities issued by the parent company have been paid or declared and set apart for payment . the board of directors presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends . the amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market conditions , our financial condition and operating results , and other factors , including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies ( such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations ) . the amount of our dividend is also currently subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve and our primary bank regulators as part of the comprehensive capital analysis and review ( ccar ) process as described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . the federal reserve has the power to prohibit us from paying dividends without its approval . for further information concerning dividend restrictions and other factors that could limit our ability to pay dividends , as well as restrictions on loans , dividends or advances from bank subsidiaries to the parent company , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 , item 1a risk factors , the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 , and note 10 borrowed funds , note 15 equity and note 18 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , which we include here by reference . we include here by reference the information regarding our compensation plans under which pnc equity securities are authorized for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 in the table ( with introductory paragraph and notes ) in item 12 of this report . our stock transfer agent and registrar is : computershare trust company , n.a . 250 royall street canton , ma 02021 800-982-7652 www.computershare.com/pnc registered shareholders may contact computershare regarding dividends and other shareholder services . we include here by reference the information that appears under the common stock performance graph caption at the end of this item 5 . ( a ) ( 2 ) none . ( b ) not applicable . ( c ) details of our repurchases of pnc common stock during the fourth quarter of 2018 are included in the following table : in thousands , except per share data 2018 period total shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018 period</td><td>total shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b )</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 31</td><td>1204</td><td>$ 128.43</td><td>1189</td><td>25663</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 30</td><td>1491</td><td>$ 133.79</td><td>1491</td><td>24172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 31</td><td>3458</td><td>$ 119.43</td><td>3458</td><td>20714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6153</td><td>$ 124.67</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes pnc common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans generally related to forfeitures of unvested restricted stock awards and shares used to cover employee payroll tax withholding requirements . note 11 employee benefit plans and note 12 stock based compensation plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report include additional information regarding our employee benefit and equity compensation plans that use pnc common stock . ( b ) on march 11 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorization in the amount of 100 million shares of pnc common stock , effective april 1 , 2015 . repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the timing and exact amount of common stock repurchases will depend on a number of factors including , among others , market and general economic conditions , regulatory capital considerations , alternative uses of capital , the potential impact on our credit ratings , and contractual and regulatory limitations , including the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve as part of the ccar process . in june 2018 , we announced share repurchase programs of up to $ 2.0 billion for the four quarter period beginning with the third quarter of 2018 , including repurchases of up to $ 300 million related to stock issuances under employee benefit plans , in accordance with pnc's 2018 capital plan . in november 2018 , we announced an increase to these previously announced programs in the amount of up to $ 900 million in additional common share repurchases . the aggregate repurchase price of shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2018 was $ .8 billion . see the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 of this report for more information on the authorized share repurchase programs for the period july 1 , 2018 through june 30 , 2019 . http://www.computershare.com/pnc .
Question: what is the number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced programs as of october 31, 2013?
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is the total number of shares purchased as of october 31, 2013?
| 1204.0 |
CONVFINQA3563 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 29 part ii item 5 2013 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities ( a ) ( 1 ) our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange and is traded under the symbol 201cpnc . 201d at the close of business on february 15 , 2019 , there were 53986 common shareholders of record . holders of pnc common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for this purpose . our board of directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of outstanding preferred stock and certain outstanding capital securities issued by the parent company have been paid or declared and set apart for payment . the board of directors presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends . the amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market conditions , our financial condition and operating results , and other factors , including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies ( such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations ) . the amount of our dividend is also currently subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve and our primary bank regulators as part of the comprehensive capital analysis and review ( ccar ) process as described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . the federal reserve has the power to prohibit us from paying dividends without its approval . for further information concerning dividend restrictions and other factors that could limit our ability to pay dividends , as well as restrictions on loans , dividends or advances from bank subsidiaries to the parent company , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 , item 1a risk factors , the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 , and note 10 borrowed funds , note 15 equity and note 18 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , which we include here by reference . we include here by reference the information regarding our compensation plans under which pnc equity securities are authorized for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 in the table ( with introductory paragraph and notes ) in item 12 of this report . our stock transfer agent and registrar is : computershare trust company , n.a . 250 royall street canton , ma 02021 800-982-7652 www.computershare.com/pnc registered shareholders may contact computershare regarding dividends and other shareholder services . we include here by reference the information that appears under the common stock performance graph caption at the end of this item 5 . ( a ) ( 2 ) none . ( b ) not applicable . ( c ) details of our repurchases of pnc common stock during the fourth quarter of 2018 are included in the following table : in thousands , except per share data 2018 period total shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018 period</td><td>total shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b )</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 31</td><td>1204</td><td>$ 128.43</td><td>1189</td><td>25663</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 30</td><td>1491</td><td>$ 133.79</td><td>1491</td><td>24172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 31</td><td>3458</td><td>$ 119.43</td><td>3458</td><td>20714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6153</td><td>$ 124.67</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes pnc common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans generally related to forfeitures of unvested restricted stock awards and shares used to cover employee payroll tax withholding requirements . note 11 employee benefit plans and note 12 stock based compensation plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report include additional information regarding our employee benefit and equity compensation plans that use pnc common stock . ( b ) on march 11 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorization in the amount of 100 million shares of pnc common stock , effective april 1 , 2015 . repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the timing and exact amount of common stock repurchases will depend on a number of factors including , among others , market and general economic conditions , regulatory capital considerations , alternative uses of capital , the potential impact on our credit ratings , and contractual and regulatory limitations , including the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve as part of the ccar process . in june 2018 , we announced share repurchase programs of up to $ 2.0 billion for the four quarter period beginning with the third quarter of 2018 , including repurchases of up to $ 300 million related to stock issuances under employee benefit plans , in accordance with pnc's 2018 capital plan . in november 2018 , we announced an increase to these previously announced programs in the amount of up to $ 900 million in additional common share repurchases . the aggregate repurchase price of shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2018 was $ .8 billion . see the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 of this report for more information on the authorized share repurchase programs for the period july 1 , 2018 through june 30 , 2019 . http://www.computershare.com/pnc .
Question: what is the number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced programs as of october 31, 2013?
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is the total number of shares purchased as of october 31, 2013?
Answer: 1204.0
Question: what proportion does this represent?
| 0.01246 |
CONVFINQA3564 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what were the debt securities in 2018?
| 49.0 |
CONVFINQA3565 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what were the debt securities in 2018?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
| 28.0 |
CONVFINQA3566 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what were the debt securities in 2018?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
| 21.0 |
CONVFINQA3567 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what were the debt securities in 2018?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
Answer: 21.0
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2017 debt securities?
| 0.75 |
CONVFINQA3568 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what were the debt securities in 2018?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what were they in 2017?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?
Answer: 21.0
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the 2017 debt securities?
Answer: 0.75
Question: and in that same year of 2018, how much did the debt securities represent in relation to the equity ones?
| 1.44118 |
CONVFINQA3569 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining .
Question: what is the sum of pp&e for 2016 and 2014?
| 248.6 |
CONVFINQA3570 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining .
Question: what is the sum of pp&e for 2016 and 2014?
Answer: 248.6
Question: what is the total sum including 2015?
| 378.7 |
CONVFINQA3571 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
wood products sales in the united states in 2005 of $ 1.6 billion were up 3% ( 3 % ) from $ 1.5 billion in 2004 and 18% ( 18 % ) from $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . average price realiza- tions for lumber were up 6% ( 6 % ) and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2005 compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . lumber sales volumes in 2005 were up 5% ( 5 % ) versus 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) versus 2003 . average sales prices for plywood were down 4% ( 4 % ) from 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than in 2003 . plywood sales volumes in 2005 were slightly higher than 2004 and 2003 . operating profits in 2005 were 18% ( 18 % ) lower than 2004 , but nearly three times higher than 2003 . lower average plywood prices and higher raw material costs more than offset the effects of higher average lumber prices , volume increases and a positive sales mix . in 2005 , log costs were up 9% ( 9 % ) versus 2004 , negatively im- pacting both plywood and lumber profits . lumber and plywood operating costs also reflected substantially higher glue and natural gas costs versus both 2004 and looking forward to the first quarter of 2006 , a con- tinued strong housing market , combined with low prod- uct inventory in the distribution chain , should translate into continued strong lumber and plywood demand . however , a possible softening of housing starts and higher interest rates later in the year could put down- ward pressure on pricing in the second half of 2006 . specialty businesses and other the specialty businesses and other segment in- cludes the operating results of arizona chemical , euro- pean distribution and , prior to its closure in 2003 , our natchez , mississippi chemical cellulose pulp mill . also included are certain divested businesses whose results are included in this segment for periods prior to their sale or closure . this segment 2019s 2005 net sales declined 18% ( 18 % ) and 26% ( 26 % ) from 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were down substantially from both 2004 and 2003 . the decline in sales principally reflects declining contributions from businesses sold or closed . operating profits were also affected by higher energy and raw material costs in our chemical business . specialty businesses and other in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 915</td><td>$ 1120</td><td>$ 1235</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 38</td><td>$ 23</td></tr></table> chemicals sales were $ 692 million in 2005 , com- pared with $ 672 million in 2004 and $ 625 million in 2003 . although demand was strong for most arizona chemical product lines , operating profits in 2005 were 84% ( 84 % ) and 83% ( 83 % ) lower than in 2004 and 2003 , re- spectively , due to higher energy costs in the u.s. , and higher prices and reduced availability for crude tall oil ( cto ) . in the united states , energy costs increased 41% ( 41 % ) compared to 2004 due to higher natural gas prices and supply interruption costs . cto prices increased 26% ( 26 % ) compared to 2004 , as certain energy users turned to cto as a substitute fuel for high-cost alternative energy sources such as natural gas and fuel oil . european cto receipts decreased 30% ( 30 % ) compared to 2004 due to lower yields following the finnish paper industry strike and a swedish storm that limited cto throughput and corre- sponding sales volumes . other businesses in this operating segment include operations that have been sold , closed , or are held for sale , principally the european distribution business , the oil and gas and mineral royalty business , decorative products , retail packaging , and the natchez chemical cellulose pulp mill . sales for these businesses were ap- proximately $ 223 million in 2005 ( mainly european distribution and decorative products ) compared with $ 448 million in 2004 ( mainly european distribution and decorative products ) , and $ 610 million in 2003 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operat- ing cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy and raw material costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our strong focus on cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . as a result , we believe that we are well positioned for improvements in operating cash flow should prices and worldwide economic conditions im- prove in the future . as part of our continuing focus on improving our return on investment , we have focused our capital spending on improving our key platform businesses in north america and in geographic areas with strong growth opportunities . spending levels have been kept below the level of depreciation and amortization charges for each of the last three years , and we anticipate con- tinuing this approach in 2006 . with the low interest rate environment in 2005 , financing activities have focused largely on the repay- ment or refinancing of higher coupon debt , resulting in a net reduction in debt of approximately $ 1.7 billion in 2005 . we plan to continue this program , with addi- tional reductions anticipated as our previously an- nounced transformation plan progresses in 2006 . our liquidity position continues to be strong , with approx- imately $ 3.2 billion of committed liquidity to cover fu- ture short-term cash flow requirements not met by operating cash flows. .
Question: in 2005, what percentage of specialty businesses sales were due to chemicals sales?
| 0.75628 |
CONVFINQA3572 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
wood products sales in the united states in 2005 of $ 1.6 billion were up 3% ( 3 % ) from $ 1.5 billion in 2004 and 18% ( 18 % ) from $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . average price realiza- tions for lumber were up 6% ( 6 % ) and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2005 compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . lumber sales volumes in 2005 were up 5% ( 5 % ) versus 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) versus 2003 . average sales prices for plywood were down 4% ( 4 % ) from 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than in 2003 . plywood sales volumes in 2005 were slightly higher than 2004 and 2003 . operating profits in 2005 were 18% ( 18 % ) lower than 2004 , but nearly three times higher than 2003 . lower average plywood prices and higher raw material costs more than offset the effects of higher average lumber prices , volume increases and a positive sales mix . in 2005 , log costs were up 9% ( 9 % ) versus 2004 , negatively im- pacting both plywood and lumber profits . lumber and plywood operating costs also reflected substantially higher glue and natural gas costs versus both 2004 and looking forward to the first quarter of 2006 , a con- tinued strong housing market , combined with low prod- uct inventory in the distribution chain , should translate into continued strong lumber and plywood demand . however , a possible softening of housing starts and higher interest rates later in the year could put down- ward pressure on pricing in the second half of 2006 . specialty businesses and other the specialty businesses and other segment in- cludes the operating results of arizona chemical , euro- pean distribution and , prior to its closure in 2003 , our natchez , mississippi chemical cellulose pulp mill . also included are certain divested businesses whose results are included in this segment for periods prior to their sale or closure . this segment 2019s 2005 net sales declined 18% ( 18 % ) and 26% ( 26 % ) from 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were down substantially from both 2004 and 2003 . the decline in sales principally reflects declining contributions from businesses sold or closed . operating profits were also affected by higher energy and raw material costs in our chemical business . specialty businesses and other in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 915</td><td>$ 1120</td><td>$ 1235</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 38</td><td>$ 23</td></tr></table> chemicals sales were $ 692 million in 2005 , com- pared with $ 672 million in 2004 and $ 625 million in 2003 . although demand was strong for most arizona chemical product lines , operating profits in 2005 were 84% ( 84 % ) and 83% ( 83 % ) lower than in 2004 and 2003 , re- spectively , due to higher energy costs in the u.s. , and higher prices and reduced availability for crude tall oil ( cto ) . in the united states , energy costs increased 41% ( 41 % ) compared to 2004 due to higher natural gas prices and supply interruption costs . cto prices increased 26% ( 26 % ) compared to 2004 , as certain energy users turned to cto as a substitute fuel for high-cost alternative energy sources such as natural gas and fuel oil . european cto receipts decreased 30% ( 30 % ) compared to 2004 due to lower yields following the finnish paper industry strike and a swedish storm that limited cto throughput and corre- sponding sales volumes . other businesses in this operating segment include operations that have been sold , closed , or are held for sale , principally the european distribution business , the oil and gas and mineral royalty business , decorative products , retail packaging , and the natchez chemical cellulose pulp mill . sales for these businesses were ap- proximately $ 223 million in 2005 ( mainly european distribution and decorative products ) compared with $ 448 million in 2004 ( mainly european distribution and decorative products ) , and $ 610 million in 2003 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operat- ing cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy and raw material costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our strong focus on cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . as a result , we believe that we are well positioned for improvements in operating cash flow should prices and worldwide economic conditions im- prove in the future . as part of our continuing focus on improving our return on investment , we have focused our capital spending on improving our key platform businesses in north america and in geographic areas with strong growth opportunities . spending levels have been kept below the level of depreciation and amortization charges for each of the last three years , and we anticipate con- tinuing this approach in 2006 . with the low interest rate environment in 2005 , financing activities have focused largely on the repay- ment or refinancing of higher coupon debt , resulting in a net reduction in debt of approximately $ 1.7 billion in 2005 . we plan to continue this program , with addi- tional reductions anticipated as our previously an- nounced transformation plan progresses in 2006 . our liquidity position continues to be strong , with approx- imately $ 3.2 billion of committed liquidity to cover fu- ture short-term cash flow requirements not met by operating cash flows. .
Question: in 2005, what percentage of specialty businesses sales were due to chemicals sales?
Answer: 0.75628
Question: and what was that percentage in 2004?
| 0.6 |
CONVFINQA3573 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what are the investment advisory revenues in 2008, in millions?
| 1760.0 |
CONVFINQA3574 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what are the investment advisory revenues in 2008, in millions?
Answer: 1760.0
Question: what about in 2007?
| 1878.0 |
CONVFINQA3575 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what are the investment advisory revenues in 2008, in millions?
Answer: 1760.0
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 1878.0
Question: what is the value of net revenues in 2008, in billions?
| 2.12 |
CONVFINQA3576 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what are the investment advisory revenues in 2008, in millions?
Answer: 1760.0
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 1878.0
Question: what is the value of net revenues in 2008, in billions?
Answer: 2.12
Question: what about in millions?
| 2120.0 |
CONVFINQA3577 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what are the investment advisory revenues in 2008, in millions?
Answer: 1760.0
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 1878.0
Question: what is the value of net revenues in 2008, in billions?
Answer: 2.12
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2120.0
Question: what about in 2007?
| 2232.0 |
CONVFINQA3578 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) and ticona llc ( 45% ( 45 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) . polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( "pps" ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china as follows : nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 31% ( 31 % ) ) , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we received cash dividends of $ 83 million , $ 78 million and $ 71 million , respectively . during 2012 , our venture's nantong facility completed an expansion of its acetate flake and acetate tow capacity , each by 30000 tons . we made contributions of $ 29 million over three years related to the capacity expansion in nantong . similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company . according to the euromonitor database services , china is estimated to have a 42% ( 42 % ) share of the world's 2011 cigarette consumption and is the fastest growing area for cigarette consumption at an estimated growth rate of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) per year from 2011 through 2016 . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and we believe we are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv ventures are as follows : as of december 31 , 2012 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2012 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> raw materials and energy we purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes . we have a policy of maintaining , when available , multiple sources of supply for materials . however , some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials , such as carbon monoxide , steam and acetaldehyde . although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials , there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply . even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material , there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier . it is also possible profitability will be adversely affected if we are required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier . in addition , the price of raw materials varies , often substantially , from year to year. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash dividends received from 2010 to 2011?
| 7.0 |
CONVFINQA3579 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) and ticona llc ( 45% ( 45 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) . polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( "pps" ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china as follows : nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 31% ( 31 % ) ) , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we received cash dividends of $ 83 million , $ 78 million and $ 71 million , respectively . during 2012 , our venture's nantong facility completed an expansion of its acetate flake and acetate tow capacity , each by 30000 tons . we made contributions of $ 29 million over three years related to the capacity expansion in nantong . similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company . according to the euromonitor database services , china is estimated to have a 42% ( 42 % ) share of the world's 2011 cigarette consumption and is the fastest growing area for cigarette consumption at an estimated growth rate of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) per year from 2011 through 2016 . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and we believe we are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv ventures are as follows : as of december 31 , 2012 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2012 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> raw materials and energy we purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes . we have a policy of maintaining , when available , multiple sources of supply for materials . however , some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials , such as carbon monoxide , steam and acetaldehyde . although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials , there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply . even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material , there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier . it is also possible profitability will be adversely affected if we are required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier . in addition , the price of raw materials varies , often substantially , from year to year. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash dividends received from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 7.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.09859 |
CONVFINQA3580 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>route</td><td>31838</td><td>31868</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other main line</td><td>6766</td><td>6715</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>passing lines and turnouts</td><td>3167</td><td>3124</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>switching and classification yard lines</td><td>9090</td><td>9046</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total miles</td><td>50861</td><td>50753</td></tr></table> headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .
Question: what was the percentage of the owned and operated part of the rail network route miles?
| 0.81692 |
CONVFINQA3581 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>route</td><td>31838</td><td>31868</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other main line</td><td>6766</td><td>6715</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>passing lines and turnouts</td><td>3167</td><td>3124</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>switching and classification yard lines</td><td>9090</td><td>9046</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total miles</td><td>50861</td><td>50753</td></tr></table> headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .
Question: what was the percentage of the owned and operated part of the rail network route miles?
Answer: 0.81692
Question: what was the portion of total track miles that were route miles as of 12/31/13?
| 0.62598 |
CONVFINQA3582 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>138</td><td>185</td><td>229</td><td>266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>99</td><td>116</td><td>148</td><td>187</td><td>199</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .
Question: what is the change value of the s&p healthcare index from 2010 to 2015?
| 99.0 |
CONVFINQA3583 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>138</td><td>185</td><td>229</td><td>266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>99</td><td>116</td><td>148</td><td>187</td><td>199</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .
Question: what is the change value of the s&p healthcare index from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 99.0
Question: what is the change in value of the s&p 500 from 2010 to 2015?
| 81.0 |
CONVFINQA3584 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>138</td><td>185</td><td>229</td><td>266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>99</td><td>116</td><td>148</td><td>187</td><td>199</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .
Question: what is the change value of the s&p healthcare index from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 99.0
Question: what is the change in value of the s&p 500 from 2010 to 2015?
Answer: 81.0
Question: what is the difference between the two values?
| 18.0 |
CONVFINQA3585 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the interest income 2014?
| 27.4 |
CONVFINQA3586 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the interest income 2014?
Answer: 27.4
Question: what about in 2013?
| 24.7 |
CONVFINQA3587 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the interest income 2014?
Answer: 27.4
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 24.7
Question: what is the net change?
| 2.7 |
CONVFINQA3588 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the interest income 2014?
Answer: 27.4
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 24.7
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.10931 |
CONVFINQA3589 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the interest income 2014?
Answer: 27.4
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 24.7
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.10931
Question: what about the balance of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2014?
| 1667.2 |
CONVFINQA3590 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )</td><td>$ 36.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>-26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>27.9</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the interest income 2014?
Answer: 27.4
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 24.7
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.10931
Question: what about the balance of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2014?
Answer: 1667.2
Question: what average rate would this represent?
| 0.01643 |
CONVFINQA3591 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 89 $ 65.35 billion and $ 87.20 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . table 29 : components of average hqla by type of ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>excess central bank balances</td><td>$ 33584</td><td>$ 48407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . treasuries</td><td>10278</td><td>17770</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other investment securities</td><td>13422</td><td>15442</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign government</td><td>8064</td><td>5585</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 65348</td><td>$ 87204</td></tr></table> with respect to highly liquid short-term investments presented in the preceding table , due to the continued elevated level of client deposits as of december 31 , 2017 , we maintained cash balances in excess of regulatory requirements governing deposits with the federal reserve of approximately $ 33.58 billion at the federal reserve , the ecb and other non-u.s . central banks , compared to $ 48.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . the lower levels of deposits with central banks as of december 31 , 2017 compared to december 31 , 2016 was due to normal deposit volatility . liquid securities carried in our asset liquidity include securities pledged without corresponding advances from the frbb , the fhlb , and other non- u.s . central banks . state street bank is a member of the fhlb . this membership allows for advances of liquidity in varying terms against high-quality collateral , which helps facilitate asset-and-liability management . access to primary , intra-day and contingent liquidity provided by these utilities is an important source of contingent liquidity with utilization subject to underlying conditions . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , we had no outstanding primary credit borrowings from the frbb discount window or any other central bank facility , and as of the same dates , no fhlb advances were outstanding . in addition to the securities included in our asset liquidity , we have significant amounts of other unencumbered investment securities . the aggregate fair value of those securities was $ 66.10 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , compared to $ 54.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . these securities are available sources of liquidity , although not as rapidly deployed as those included in our asset liquidity . measures of liquidity include lcr , nsfr and tlac which are described in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 , business , of this form 10-k . uses of liquidity significant uses of our liquidity could result from the following : withdrawals of client deposits ; draw- downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or to purchase securities , generally provided through lines of credit ; and short-duration advance facilities . such circumstances would generally arise under stress conditions including deterioration in credit ratings . a recurring significant use of our liquidity involves our deployment of hqla from our investment portfolio to post collateral to financial institutions and participants in our agency lending program serving as sources of securities under our enhanced custody program . we had unfunded commitments to extend credit with gross contractual amounts totaling $ 26.49 billion and $ 26.99 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . these amounts do not reflect the value of any collateral . as of december 31 , 2017 , approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year . since many of our commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . information about our resolution planning and the impact actions under our resolution plans could have on our liquidity is provided in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 . business , of this form 10-k . funding deposits we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our average client deposit balances were denominated in u.s . dollars , approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in eur , 10% ( 10 % ) in gbp and 10% ( 10 % ) in all other currencies . for the past several years , we have frequently experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of each fiscal quarter or the end of the fiscal year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances. .
Question: what is the ratio of 2017 excess central bank balances to 2016 balances?
| 0.69378 |
CONVFINQA3592 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation | 89 $ 65.35 billion and $ 87.20 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . table 29 : components of average hqla by type of ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>excess central bank balances</td><td>$ 33584</td><td>$ 48407</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . treasuries</td><td>10278</td><td>17770</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other investment securities</td><td>13422</td><td>15442</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign government</td><td>8064</td><td>5585</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 65348</td><td>$ 87204</td></tr></table> with respect to highly liquid short-term investments presented in the preceding table , due to the continued elevated level of client deposits as of december 31 , 2017 , we maintained cash balances in excess of regulatory requirements governing deposits with the federal reserve of approximately $ 33.58 billion at the federal reserve , the ecb and other non-u.s . central banks , compared to $ 48.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . the lower levels of deposits with central banks as of december 31 , 2017 compared to december 31 , 2016 was due to normal deposit volatility . liquid securities carried in our asset liquidity include securities pledged without corresponding advances from the frbb , the fhlb , and other non- u.s . central banks . state street bank is a member of the fhlb . this membership allows for advances of liquidity in varying terms against high-quality collateral , which helps facilitate asset-and-liability management . access to primary , intra-day and contingent liquidity provided by these utilities is an important source of contingent liquidity with utilization subject to underlying conditions . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , we had no outstanding primary credit borrowings from the frbb discount window or any other central bank facility , and as of the same dates , no fhlb advances were outstanding . in addition to the securities included in our asset liquidity , we have significant amounts of other unencumbered investment securities . the aggregate fair value of those securities was $ 66.10 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , compared to $ 54.40 billion as of december 31 , 2016 . these securities are available sources of liquidity , although not as rapidly deployed as those included in our asset liquidity . measures of liquidity include lcr , nsfr and tlac which are described in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 , business , of this form 10-k . uses of liquidity significant uses of our liquidity could result from the following : withdrawals of client deposits ; draw- downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or to purchase securities , generally provided through lines of credit ; and short-duration advance facilities . such circumstances would generally arise under stress conditions including deterioration in credit ratings . a recurring significant use of our liquidity involves our deployment of hqla from our investment portfolio to post collateral to financial institutions and participants in our agency lending program serving as sources of securities under our enhanced custody program . we had unfunded commitments to extend credit with gross contractual amounts totaling $ 26.49 billion and $ 26.99 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . these amounts do not reflect the value of any collateral . as of december 31 , 2017 , approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year . since many of our commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements . information about our resolution planning and the impact actions under our resolution plans could have on our liquidity is provided in "supervision and regulation" included under item 1 . business , of this form 10-k . funding deposits we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our average client deposit balances were denominated in u.s . dollars , approximately 20% ( 20 % ) in eur , 10% ( 10 % ) in gbp and 10% ( 10 % ) in all other currencies . for the past several years , we have frequently experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of each fiscal quarter or the end of the fiscal year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances. .
Question: what is the ratio of 2017 excess central bank balances to 2016 balances?
Answer: 0.69378
Question: what is 1 less that value?
| 0.30622 |
CONVFINQA3593 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2009 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.51% ( 3.51 % ) on a contractual basis and 3.91% ( 3.91 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>citigroup parent company</td><td>$ 18030</td><td>$ 20435</td><td>$ 29706</td><td>$ 17775</td><td>$ 18916</td><td>$ 92942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other citigroup subsidiaries</td><td>18710</td><td>29316</td><td>17214</td><td>5177</td><td>12202</td><td>14675</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>citigroup global markets holdings inc .</td><td>1315</td><td>1030</td><td>1686</td><td>388</td><td>522</td><td>8481</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>citigroup funding inc .</td><td>9107</td><td>8875</td><td>20738</td><td>4792</td><td>3255</td><td>8732</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 47162</td><td>$ 59656</td><td>$ 69344</td><td>$ 28132</td><td>$ 34895</td><td>$ 124830</td></tr></table> long-term debt at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 includes $ 19345 million and $ 24060 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 , unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. .
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2011?
| 20435.0 |
CONVFINQA3594 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2009 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.51% ( 3.51 % ) on a contractual basis and 3.91% ( 3.91 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>citigroup parent company</td><td>$ 18030</td><td>$ 20435</td><td>$ 29706</td><td>$ 17775</td><td>$ 18916</td><td>$ 92942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other citigroup subsidiaries</td><td>18710</td><td>29316</td><td>17214</td><td>5177</td><td>12202</td><td>14675</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>citigroup global markets holdings inc .</td><td>1315</td><td>1030</td><td>1686</td><td>388</td><td>522</td><td>8481</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>citigroup funding inc .</td><td>9107</td><td>8875</td><td>20738</td><td>4792</td><td>3255</td><td>8732</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 47162</td><td>$ 59656</td><td>$ 69344</td><td>$ 28132</td><td>$ 34895</td><td>$ 124830</td></tr></table> long-term debt at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 includes $ 19345 million and $ 24060 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 , unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. .
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2011?
Answer: 20435.0
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2012?
| 18030.0 |
CONVFINQA3595 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2009 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.51% ( 3.51 % ) on a contractual basis and 3.91% ( 3.91 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>citigroup parent company</td><td>$ 18030</td><td>$ 20435</td><td>$ 29706</td><td>$ 17775</td><td>$ 18916</td><td>$ 92942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other citigroup subsidiaries</td><td>18710</td><td>29316</td><td>17214</td><td>5177</td><td>12202</td><td>14675</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>citigroup global markets holdings inc .</td><td>1315</td><td>1030</td><td>1686</td><td>388</td><td>522</td><td>8481</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>citigroup funding inc .</td><td>9107</td><td>8875</td><td>20738</td><td>4792</td><td>3255</td><td>8732</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 47162</td><td>$ 59656</td><td>$ 69344</td><td>$ 28132</td><td>$ 34895</td><td>$ 124830</td></tr></table> long-term debt at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 includes $ 19345 million and $ 24060 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 , unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. .
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2011?
Answer: 20435.0
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2012?
Answer: 18030.0
Question: what is the change in value?
| 2405.0 |
CONVFINQA3596 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2009 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.51% ( 3.51 % ) on a contractual basis and 3.91% ( 3.91 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>citigroup parent company</td><td>$ 18030</td><td>$ 20435</td><td>$ 29706</td><td>$ 17775</td><td>$ 18916</td><td>$ 92942</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other citigroup subsidiaries</td><td>18710</td><td>29316</td><td>17214</td><td>5177</td><td>12202</td><td>14675</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>citigroup global markets holdings inc .</td><td>1315</td><td>1030</td><td>1686</td><td>388</td><td>522</td><td>8481</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>citigroup funding inc .</td><td>9107</td><td>8875</td><td>20738</td><td>4792</td><td>3255</td><td>8732</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 47162</td><td>$ 59656</td><td>$ 69344</td><td>$ 28132</td><td>$ 34895</td><td>$ 124830</td></tr></table> long-term debt at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 includes $ 19345 million and $ 24060 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 , unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. .
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2011?
Answer: 20435.0
Question: what was value of aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations for the citigroup parent company in 2012?
Answer: 18030.0
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: 2405.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.13339 |
CONVFINQA3597 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the total combined square footage of the locations in seguin texas and longview texas?
| 134000.0 |
CONVFINQA3598 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the total combined square footage of the locations in seguin texas and longview texas?
Answer: 134000.0
Question: and what is the square footage of the location in waco texas?
| 666000.0 |
CONVFINQA3599 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the total combined square footage of the locations in seguin texas and longview texas?
Answer: 134000.0
Question: and what is the square footage of the location in waco texas?
Answer: 666000.0
Question: including, then, this location, what would be the total combined square footage of the three spots?
| 800000.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.