id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA4700 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what is the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 11600.0
Question: what about the total sales?
| 13280.0 |
CONVFINQA4701 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what is the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 11600.0
Question: what about the total sales?
Answer: 13280.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
| 0.87349 |
CONVFINQA4702 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what is the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 11600.0
Question: what about the total sales?
Answer: 13280.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.87349
Question: what about the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2011, in millions?
| 8600.0 |
CONVFINQA4703 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what is the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 11600.0
Question: what about the total sales?
Answer: 13280.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.87349
Question: what about the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2011, in millions?
Answer: 8600.0
Question: what portion is this from the total sales in 2011?
| 0.82454 |
CONVFINQA4704 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at january 1</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional authorizations ( a )</td><td>45541057</td><td>86269178</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share repurchases ( b )</td><td>-65516126 ( 65516126 )</td><td>-42424014 ( 42424014 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at december 31</td><td>43071613</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>$ 18.80</td><td>$ 14.82</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what was the change in the average price paid per share from 2012 to 2013?
| 3.98 |
CONVFINQA4705 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at january 1</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional authorizations ( a )</td><td>45541057</td><td>86269178</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share repurchases ( b )</td><td>-65516126 ( 65516126 )</td><td>-42424014 ( 42424014 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at december 31</td><td>43071613</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>$ 18.80</td><td>$ 14.82</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what was the change in the average price paid per share from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 3.98
Question: and what was this change as a portion of that average price in 2012?
| 0.26856 |
CONVFINQA4706 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at january 1</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional authorizations ( a )</td><td>45541057</td><td>86269178</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share repurchases ( b )</td><td>-65516126 ( 65516126 )</td><td>-42424014 ( 42424014 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at december 31</td><td>43071613</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>$ 18.80</td><td>$ 14.82</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what was the change in the average price paid per share from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 3.98
Question: and what was this change as a portion of that average price in 2012?
Answer: 0.26856
Question: and in the last year of that period, what was the total amount spent on the repurchase of shares?
| 809746324.4 |
CONVFINQA4707 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at january 1</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional authorizations ( a )</td><td>45541057</td><td>86269178</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share repurchases ( b )</td><td>-65516126 ( 65516126 )</td><td>-42424014 ( 42424014 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at december 31</td><td>43071613</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>$ 18.80</td><td>$ 14.82</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what was the change in the average price paid per share from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 3.98
Question: and what was this change as a portion of that average price in 2012?
Answer: 0.26856
Question: and in the last year of that period, what was the total amount spent on the repurchase of shares?
Answer: 809746324.4
Question: how much is that in millions?
| 809.74632 |
CONVFINQA4708 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ -26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>$ 26.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>-33.7 ( 33.7 )</td><td>34.7</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .
Question: what was the change in the interest income from 2015 to 2016?
| -2.7 |
CONVFINQA4709 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ -26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>$ 26.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>-33.7 ( 33.7 )</td><td>34.7</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .
Question: what was the change in the interest income from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what percentage did this change represent in relation to that income in 2015?
| -0.11842 |
CONVFINQA4710 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 93% ( 93 % ) and 89% ( 89 % ) as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ -26.3 ( 26.3 )</td><td>$ 26.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>-33.7 ( 33.7 )</td><td>34.7</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . we had $ 1100.6 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2016 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2016 and 2015 , we had interest income of $ 20.1 and $ 22.8 , respectively . based on our 2016 results , a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 11.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2016 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the foreign currencies that most impacted our results during 2016 included the british pound sterling and , to a lesser extent , the argentine peso , brazilian real and japanese yen . based on 2016 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2016 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures . we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .
Question: what was the change in the interest income from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what percentage did this change represent in relation to that income in 2015?
Answer: -0.11842
Question: in that same period, what would be the decline in the debt fair market value if the market interest rate decreases by 10%?
| 7.8 |
CONVFINQA4711 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
strategy our mission is to achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth through providing superior solutions to our customers . our strategy to achieve this has been and will continue to be built on the following pillars : 2022 expand client relationships 2014 the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-product purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can drive meaningful value and cost savings to our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and speed for our clients' customers . 2022 buy , build or partner to add solutions to cross-sell 2014 we continue to invest in growth through internal product development , as well as through product-focused or market-centric acquisitions that complement and extend our existing capabilities and provide us with additional solutions to cross-sell . we also partner from time to time with other entities to provide comprehensive offerings to our customers . by investing in solution innovation and integration , we continue to expand our value proposition to clients . 2022 support our clients through market transformation 2014 the changing market dynamics are transforming the way our clients operate , which is driving incremental demand for our leveraged solutions , consulting expertise , and services around intellectual property . our depth of services capabilities enables us to become involved earlier in the planning and design process to assist our clients as they manage through these changes . 2022 continually improve to drive margin expansion 2014 we strive to optimize our performance through investments in infrastructure enhancements and other measures that are designed to drive organic revenue growth and margin expansion . 2022 build global diversification 2014 we continue to deploy resources in emerging global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fsg</td><td>$ 2246.4</td><td>$ 2076.8</td><td>$ 1890.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>psg</td><td>2380.6</td><td>2372.1</td><td>2354.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>isg</td><td>1180.5</td><td>1177.6</td><td>917.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate & other</td><td>0.1</td><td>-0.9 ( 0.9 )</td><td>-16.4 ( 16.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 5807.6</td><td>$ 5625.6</td><td>$ 5145.6</td></tr></table> financial solutions group the focus of fsg is to provide the most comprehensive software and services for the core processing , customer channel , treasury services , cash management , wealth management and capital market operations of our financial institution customers in north america . we service the core and related ancillary processing needs of north american banks , credit unions , automotive financial companies , commercial lenders , and independent community and savings institutions . fis offers a broad selection of in-house and outsourced solutions to banking customers that span the range of asset sizes . fsg customers are typically committed under multi-year contracts that provide a stable , recurring revenue base and opportunities for cross-selling additional financial and payments offerings . we employ several business models to provide our solutions to our customers . we typically deliver the highest value to our customers when we combine our software applications and deliver them in one of several types of outsourcing arrangements , such as an application service provider , facilities management processing or an application management arrangement . we are also able to deliver individual applications through a software licensing arrangement . based upon our expertise gained through the foregoing arrangements , some clients also retain us to manage their it operations without using any of our proprietary software . our solutions in this segment include: .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2012?
| 5807.6 |
CONVFINQA4712 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
strategy our mission is to achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth through providing superior solutions to our customers . our strategy to achieve this has been and will continue to be built on the following pillars : 2022 expand client relationships 2014 the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-product purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can drive meaningful value and cost savings to our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and speed for our clients' customers . 2022 buy , build or partner to add solutions to cross-sell 2014 we continue to invest in growth through internal product development , as well as through product-focused or market-centric acquisitions that complement and extend our existing capabilities and provide us with additional solutions to cross-sell . we also partner from time to time with other entities to provide comprehensive offerings to our customers . by investing in solution innovation and integration , we continue to expand our value proposition to clients . 2022 support our clients through market transformation 2014 the changing market dynamics are transforming the way our clients operate , which is driving incremental demand for our leveraged solutions , consulting expertise , and services around intellectual property . our depth of services capabilities enables us to become involved earlier in the planning and design process to assist our clients as they manage through these changes . 2022 continually improve to drive margin expansion 2014 we strive to optimize our performance through investments in infrastructure enhancements and other measures that are designed to drive organic revenue growth and margin expansion . 2022 build global diversification 2014 we continue to deploy resources in emerging global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fsg</td><td>$ 2246.4</td><td>$ 2076.8</td><td>$ 1890.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>psg</td><td>2380.6</td><td>2372.1</td><td>2354.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>isg</td><td>1180.5</td><td>1177.6</td><td>917.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate & other</td><td>0.1</td><td>-0.9 ( 0.9 )</td><td>-16.4 ( 16.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 5807.6</td><td>$ 5625.6</td><td>$ 5145.6</td></tr></table> financial solutions group the focus of fsg is to provide the most comprehensive software and services for the core processing , customer channel , treasury services , cash management , wealth management and capital market operations of our financial institution customers in north america . we service the core and related ancillary processing needs of north american banks , credit unions , automotive financial companies , commercial lenders , and independent community and savings institutions . fis offers a broad selection of in-house and outsourced solutions to banking customers that span the range of asset sizes . fsg customers are typically committed under multi-year contracts that provide a stable , recurring revenue base and opportunities for cross-selling additional financial and payments offerings . we employ several business models to provide our solutions to our customers . we typically deliver the highest value to our customers when we combine our software applications and deliver them in one of several types of outsourcing arrangements , such as an application service provider , facilities management processing or an application management arrangement . we are also able to deliver individual applications through a software licensing arrangement . based upon our expertise gained through the foregoing arrangements , some clients also retain us to manage their it operations without using any of our proprietary software . our solutions in this segment include: .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2012?
Answer: 5807.6
Question: what about in 2011?
| 5625.6 |
CONVFINQA4713 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
strategy our mission is to achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth through providing superior solutions to our customers . our strategy to achieve this has been and will continue to be built on the following pillars : 2022 expand client relationships 2014 the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-product purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can drive meaningful value and cost savings to our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and speed for our clients' customers . 2022 buy , build or partner to add solutions to cross-sell 2014 we continue to invest in growth through internal product development , as well as through product-focused or market-centric acquisitions that complement and extend our existing capabilities and provide us with additional solutions to cross-sell . we also partner from time to time with other entities to provide comprehensive offerings to our customers . by investing in solution innovation and integration , we continue to expand our value proposition to clients . 2022 support our clients through market transformation 2014 the changing market dynamics are transforming the way our clients operate , which is driving incremental demand for our leveraged solutions , consulting expertise , and services around intellectual property . our depth of services capabilities enables us to become involved earlier in the planning and design process to assist our clients as they manage through these changes . 2022 continually improve to drive margin expansion 2014 we strive to optimize our performance through investments in infrastructure enhancements and other measures that are designed to drive organic revenue growth and margin expansion . 2022 build global diversification 2014 we continue to deploy resources in emerging global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fsg</td><td>$ 2246.4</td><td>$ 2076.8</td><td>$ 1890.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>psg</td><td>2380.6</td><td>2372.1</td><td>2354.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>isg</td><td>1180.5</td><td>1177.6</td><td>917.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate & other</td><td>0.1</td><td>-0.9 ( 0.9 )</td><td>-16.4 ( 16.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 5807.6</td><td>$ 5625.6</td><td>$ 5145.6</td></tr></table> financial solutions group the focus of fsg is to provide the most comprehensive software and services for the core processing , customer channel , treasury services , cash management , wealth management and capital market operations of our financial institution customers in north america . we service the core and related ancillary processing needs of north american banks , credit unions , automotive financial companies , commercial lenders , and independent community and savings institutions . fis offers a broad selection of in-house and outsourced solutions to banking customers that span the range of asset sizes . fsg customers are typically committed under multi-year contracts that provide a stable , recurring revenue base and opportunities for cross-selling additional financial and payments offerings . we employ several business models to provide our solutions to our customers . we typically deliver the highest value to our customers when we combine our software applications and deliver them in one of several types of outsourcing arrangements , such as an application service provider , facilities management processing or an application management arrangement . we are also able to deliver individual applications through a software licensing arrangement . based upon our expertise gained through the foregoing arrangements , some clients also retain us to manage their it operations without using any of our proprietary software . our solutions in this segment include: .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2012?
Answer: 5807.6
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 5625.6
Question: what is the increase in consolidated revenue?
| 182.0 |
CONVFINQA4714 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
strategy our mission is to achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth through providing superior solutions to our customers . our strategy to achieve this has been and will continue to be built on the following pillars : 2022 expand client relationships 2014 the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-product purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can drive meaningful value and cost savings to our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and speed for our clients' customers . 2022 buy , build or partner to add solutions to cross-sell 2014 we continue to invest in growth through internal product development , as well as through product-focused or market-centric acquisitions that complement and extend our existing capabilities and provide us with additional solutions to cross-sell . we also partner from time to time with other entities to provide comprehensive offerings to our customers . by investing in solution innovation and integration , we continue to expand our value proposition to clients . 2022 support our clients through market transformation 2014 the changing market dynamics are transforming the way our clients operate , which is driving incremental demand for our leveraged solutions , consulting expertise , and services around intellectual property . our depth of services capabilities enables us to become involved earlier in the planning and design process to assist our clients as they manage through these changes . 2022 continually improve to drive margin expansion 2014 we strive to optimize our performance through investments in infrastructure enhancements and other measures that are designed to drive organic revenue growth and margin expansion . 2022 build global diversification 2014 we continue to deploy resources in emerging global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fsg</td><td>$ 2246.4</td><td>$ 2076.8</td><td>$ 1890.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>psg</td><td>2380.6</td><td>2372.1</td><td>2354.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>isg</td><td>1180.5</td><td>1177.6</td><td>917.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>corporate & other</td><td>0.1</td><td>-0.9 ( 0.9 )</td><td>-16.4 ( 16.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 5807.6</td><td>$ 5625.6</td><td>$ 5145.6</td></tr></table> financial solutions group the focus of fsg is to provide the most comprehensive software and services for the core processing , customer channel , treasury services , cash management , wealth management and capital market operations of our financial institution customers in north america . we service the core and related ancillary processing needs of north american banks , credit unions , automotive financial companies , commercial lenders , and independent community and savings institutions . fis offers a broad selection of in-house and outsourced solutions to banking customers that span the range of asset sizes . fsg customers are typically committed under multi-year contracts that provide a stable , recurring revenue base and opportunities for cross-selling additional financial and payments offerings . we employ several business models to provide our solutions to our customers . we typically deliver the highest value to our customers when we combine our software applications and deliver them in one of several types of outsourcing arrangements , such as an application service provider , facilities management processing or an application management arrangement . we are also able to deliver individual applications through a software licensing arrangement . based upon our expertise gained through the foregoing arrangements , some clients also retain us to manage their it operations without using any of our proprietary software . our solutions in this segment include: .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2012?
Answer: 5807.6
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 5625.6
Question: what is the increase in consolidated revenue?
Answer: 182.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.03235 |
CONVFINQA4715 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: as of december 31, 2015, what percentage did the 2016 non-cancelable operating leases represent in relation to the total minimum future lease payments?
| 0.12108 |
CONVFINQA4716 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: as of december 31, 2015, what percentage did the 2016 non-cancelable operating leases represent in relation to the total minimum future lease payments?
Answer: 0.12108
Question: and throughout that same year, what was the change in those operating leases, counted in millions?
| 3.4 |
CONVFINQA4717 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: as of december 31, 2015, what percentage did the 2016 non-cancelable operating leases represent in relation to the total minimum future lease payments?
Answer: 0.12108
Question: and throughout that same year, what was the change in those operating leases, counted in millions?
Answer: 3.4
Question: what is this change as a portion of those leases in the beginning of 2015?
| 1.0303 |
CONVFINQA4718 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
capital resources and liquidity capital resources overview capital is generally generated via earnings from operating businesses . this is augmented through issuance of common stock , convertible preferred stock , preferred stock , subordinated debt , and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans . capital is used primarily to support assets in the company 2019s businesses and to absorb unexpected market , credit or operational losses . the company 2019s uses of capital , particularly to pay dividends and repurchase common stock , became severely restricted during the latter half of 2008 . see 201cthe company , 201d 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 2013 events in 2008 , 201d 201ctarp and other regulatory programs , 201d 201crisk factors 201d and 201ccommon equity 201d on pages 2 , 9 , 44 , 47 and 95 , respectively . citigroup 2019s capital management framework is designed to ensure that citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the company 2019s risk profile , all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines , and external rating agency considerations . the capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated , legal entity , and country level . senior management oversees the capital management process of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through citigroup 2019s finance and asset and liability committee ( finalco ) . the committee is composed of the senior-most management of citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity items . among other things , the committee 2019s responsibilities include : determining the financial structure of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries ; ensuring that citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized ; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for citigroup and individual businesses ; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for citigroup ; and monitoring interest-rate risk , corporate and bank liquidity , the impact of currency translation on non-u.s . earnings and capital . the finalco has established capital targets for citigroup and for significant subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2008 , these targets exceeded the regulatory standards . common and preferred stock issuances as discussed under 201cevents in 2008 201d on page 9 , during 2008 , the company issued $ 45 billion in preferred stock and warrants under tarp , $ 12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock in a private offering , $ 11.7 billion of non-convertible preferred stock in public offerings , $ 3.2 billion of convertible preferred stock in public offerings , and $ 4.9 billion of common stock in public offerings . on january 23 , 2009 , pursuant to our prior agreement with the purchasers of the $ 12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in the private offering , the conversion price was reset from $ 31.62 per share to $ 26.35 per share . the reset will result in citigroup 2019s issuing approximately 79 million additional common shares if converted . there will be no impact to net income , total stockholders 2019 equity or capital ratios due to the reset . however , the reset will result in a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital of $ 1.2 billion to reflect the benefit of the reset to the preferred stockholders . capital ratios citigroup is subject to risk-based capital ratio guidelines issued by the federal reserve board ( frb ) . capital adequacy is measured via two risk- based ratios , tier 1 and total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) . tier 1 capital is considered core capital while total capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and loan loss reserves . both measures of capital are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets . risk-weighted assets are measured primarily on their perceived credit risk and include certain off-balance-sheet exposures , such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit , and the notional amounts of derivative and foreign- exchange contracts . citigroup is also subject to the leverage ratio requirement , a non-risk-based asset ratio , which is defined as tier 1 capital as a percentage of adjusted average assets . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , a bank holding company must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) , and a leverage ratio of at least 3% ( 3 % ) , and not be subject to an frb directive to maintain higher capital levels . as noted in the following table , citigroup maintained a 201cwell capitalized 201d position during both 2008 and 2007 . citigroup regulatory capital ratios at year end 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>at year end</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>11.92% ( 11.92 % )</td><td>7.12% ( 7.12 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>15.70</td><td>10.70</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>leverage ( 1 )</td><td>6.08</td><td>4.03</td></tr></table> leverage ( 1 ) 6.08 4.03 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets . events occurring during 2008 , including the transactions with the u.s . government , affected citigroup 2019s capital ratios , and any additional u.s . government financial involvement with the company could further impact the company 2019s capital ratios . in addition , future operations will affect capital levels , and changes that the fasb has proposed regarding off-balance-sheet assets , consolidation and sale treatment could also have an impact on capital ratios . see also note 23 to the consolidated financial statements on page 175 , including 201cfunding liquidity facilities and subordinate interests . 201d .
Question: what was the net change in value of the citigroup regulatory capital ratios total capital (tier 1 and tier 2) from 2007 to 2008?
| 5.0 |
CONVFINQA4719 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
capital resources and liquidity capital resources overview capital is generally generated via earnings from operating businesses . this is augmented through issuance of common stock , convertible preferred stock , preferred stock , subordinated debt , and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans . capital is used primarily to support assets in the company 2019s businesses and to absorb unexpected market , credit or operational losses . the company 2019s uses of capital , particularly to pay dividends and repurchase common stock , became severely restricted during the latter half of 2008 . see 201cthe company , 201d 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 2013 events in 2008 , 201d 201ctarp and other regulatory programs , 201d 201crisk factors 201d and 201ccommon equity 201d on pages 2 , 9 , 44 , 47 and 95 , respectively . citigroup 2019s capital management framework is designed to ensure that citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the company 2019s risk profile , all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines , and external rating agency considerations . the capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated , legal entity , and country level . senior management oversees the capital management process of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through citigroup 2019s finance and asset and liability committee ( finalco ) . the committee is composed of the senior-most management of citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity items . among other things , the committee 2019s responsibilities include : determining the financial structure of citigroup and its principal subsidiaries ; ensuring that citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized ; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for citigroup and individual businesses ; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for citigroup ; and monitoring interest-rate risk , corporate and bank liquidity , the impact of currency translation on non-u.s . earnings and capital . the finalco has established capital targets for citigroup and for significant subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2008 , these targets exceeded the regulatory standards . common and preferred stock issuances as discussed under 201cevents in 2008 201d on page 9 , during 2008 , the company issued $ 45 billion in preferred stock and warrants under tarp , $ 12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock in a private offering , $ 11.7 billion of non-convertible preferred stock in public offerings , $ 3.2 billion of convertible preferred stock in public offerings , and $ 4.9 billion of common stock in public offerings . on january 23 , 2009 , pursuant to our prior agreement with the purchasers of the $ 12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in the private offering , the conversion price was reset from $ 31.62 per share to $ 26.35 per share . the reset will result in citigroup 2019s issuing approximately 79 million additional common shares if converted . there will be no impact to net income , total stockholders 2019 equity or capital ratios due to the reset . however , the reset will result in a reclassification from retained earnings to additional paid-in capital of $ 1.2 billion to reflect the benefit of the reset to the preferred stockholders . capital ratios citigroup is subject to risk-based capital ratio guidelines issued by the federal reserve board ( frb ) . capital adequacy is measured via two risk- based ratios , tier 1 and total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) . tier 1 capital is considered core capital while total capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and loan loss reserves . both measures of capital are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets . risk-weighted assets are measured primarily on their perceived credit risk and include certain off-balance-sheet exposures , such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit , and the notional amounts of derivative and foreign- exchange contracts . citigroup is also subject to the leverage ratio requirement , a non-risk-based asset ratio , which is defined as tier 1 capital as a percentage of adjusted average assets . to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , a bank holding company must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) , and a leverage ratio of at least 3% ( 3 % ) , and not be subject to an frb directive to maintain higher capital levels . as noted in the following table , citigroup maintained a 201cwell capitalized 201d position during both 2008 and 2007 . citigroup regulatory capital ratios at year end 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>at year end</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>11.92% ( 11.92 % )</td><td>7.12% ( 7.12 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )</td><td>15.70</td><td>10.70</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>leverage ( 1 )</td><td>6.08</td><td>4.03</td></tr></table> leverage ( 1 ) 6.08 4.03 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets . events occurring during 2008 , including the transactions with the u.s . government , affected citigroup 2019s capital ratios , and any additional u.s . government financial involvement with the company could further impact the company 2019s capital ratios . in addition , future operations will affect capital levels , and changes that the fasb has proposed regarding off-balance-sheet assets , consolidation and sale treatment could also have an impact on capital ratios . see also note 23 to the consolidated financial statements on page 175 , including 201cfunding liquidity facilities and subordinate interests . 201d .
Question: what was the net change in value of the citigroup regulatory capital ratios total capital (tier 1 and tier 2) from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.46729 |
CONVFINQA4720 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what was the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2009?
| 5.82 |
CONVFINQA4721 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what was the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2009?
Answer: 5.82
Question: and what was it in 2007?
| 11.59 |
CONVFINQA4722 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what was the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2009?
Answer: 5.82
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 11.59
Question: what was, then, the change over the years?
| -5.77 |
CONVFINQA4723 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what was the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2009?
Answer: 5.82
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 11.59
Question: what was, then, the change over the years?
Answer: -5.77
Question: how much does that change represent in relation to the average crack spread for sweet/sour differential in 2007, in percentage?
| -0.49784 |
CONVFINQA4724 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 51637</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>52253</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>247500</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>392640</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>295226</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 97414</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were the future minimum lease payments in 2016?
| 52253.0 |
CONVFINQA4725 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 51637</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>52253</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>247500</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>392640</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>295226</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 97414</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were the future minimum lease payments in 2016?
Answer: 52253.0
Question: and what were they in 2015?
| 13750.0 |
CONVFINQA4726 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 51637</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>52253</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>247500</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>392640</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>295226</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 97414</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were the future minimum lease payments in 2016?
Answer: 52253.0
Question: and what were they in 2015?
Answer: 13750.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 38503.0 |
CONVFINQA4727 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 51637</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>52253</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>13750</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years thereafter</td><td>247500</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>392640</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>295226</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 97414</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were the future minimum lease payments in 2016?
Answer: 52253.0
Question: and what were they in 2015?
Answer: 13750.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 38503.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those future minimum lease payments in 2015, in percentage?
| 2.80022 |
CONVFINQA4728 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
business subsequent to the acquisition . the liabilities for these payments are classified as level 3 liabilities because the related fair value measurement , which is determined using an income approach , includes significant inputs not observable in the market . financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value our debt is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at cost . based on market conditions as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the fair value of our credit agreement borrowings reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 1.7 billion and $ 2.0 billion , respectively . in addition , based on market conditions , the fair values of the outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 110 million and $ 100 million at december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the u.s . notes ( 2023 ) were approximately $ 574 million and $ 615 million , respectively , compared to a carrying value of $ 600 million at each date . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the euro notes ( 2024 ) were approximately $ 586 million and $ 658 million compared to carrying values of $ 573 million and $ 600 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the fair value of the euro notes ( 2026/28 ) approximated the carrying value of $ 1.1 billion . the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2018 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our u.s . notes ( 2023 ) is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair values of our euro notes ( 2024 ) and euro notes ( 2026/28 ) are determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in markets that are not active , and therefore are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 13 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2018 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 294269</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>256172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>210632</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>158763</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>131518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>777165</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1828519</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 300 million , $ 247 million , and $ 212 million during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2018 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 76 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: what is the sum of rental expense for 2017 and 2018?
| 547.0 |
CONVFINQA4729 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
business subsequent to the acquisition . the liabilities for these payments are classified as level 3 liabilities because the related fair value measurement , which is determined using an income approach , includes significant inputs not observable in the market . financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value our debt is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at cost . based on market conditions as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the fair value of our credit agreement borrowings reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 1.7 billion and $ 2.0 billion , respectively . in addition , based on market conditions , the fair values of the outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 110 million and $ 100 million at december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the u.s . notes ( 2023 ) were approximately $ 574 million and $ 615 million , respectively , compared to a carrying value of $ 600 million at each date . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the euro notes ( 2024 ) were approximately $ 586 million and $ 658 million compared to carrying values of $ 573 million and $ 600 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the fair value of the euro notes ( 2026/28 ) approximated the carrying value of $ 1.1 billion . the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2018 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our u.s . notes ( 2023 ) is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair values of our euro notes ( 2024 ) and euro notes ( 2026/28 ) are determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in markets that are not active , and therefore are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 13 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2018 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 294269</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>256172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>210632</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>158763</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>131518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>777165</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1828519</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 300 million , $ 247 million , and $ 212 million during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2018 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 76 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: what is the sum of rental expense for 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 547.0
Question: what is the sum including 2016?
| 759.0 |
CONVFINQA4730 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td><td>$ 9223</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .
Question: what was the change in the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 and 2016?
| -6117.0 |
CONVFINQA4731 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td><td>$ 9223</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .
Question: what was the change in the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 and 2016?
Answer: -6117.0
Question: what was the percentage change during this time?
| -0.15321 |
CONVFINQA4732 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td><td>$ 9223</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .
Question: what was the change in the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 and 2016?
Answer: -6117.0
Question: what was the percentage change during this time?
Answer: -0.15321
Question: what was the change in the system energy 2019s receivables form the money pool between 2014 and 2015?
| 37553.0 |
CONVFINQA4733 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million . the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment . 23 . acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 . dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) . additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers . the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s . utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection . the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana . aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition . the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>agreed enterprise value</td><td>$ 4719</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>less : fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding net</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash consideration paid to dpl 2019s common stockholders</td><td>3464</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>add : cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total cash consideration paid</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of acquisition?
| 3.5 |
CONVFINQA4734 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million . the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment . 23 . acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 . dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) . additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers . the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s . utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection . the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana . aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition . the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>agreed enterprise value</td><td>$ 4719</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>less : fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding net</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash consideration paid to dpl 2019s common stockholders</td><td>3464</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>add : cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total cash consideration paid</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of acquisition?
Answer: 3.5
Question: what is that times 1000?
| 3500.0 |
CONVFINQA4735 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million . the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment . 23 . acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 . dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) . additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers . the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s . utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection . the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana . aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition . the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>agreed enterprise value</td><td>$ 4719</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>less : fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding net</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash consideration paid to dpl 2019s common stockholders</td><td>3464</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>add : cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total cash consideration paid</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of acquisition?
Answer: 3.5
Question: what is that times 1000?
Answer: 3500.0
Question: what is the value of new borrowings over the acquisition product?
| 0.07171 |
CONVFINQA4736 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2010 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 222 million , $ 211 million , and $ 193 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings were remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 50 million in 2013 , $ 45 million in 2012 , and $ 41 million in 2011 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 787 million in 2013 , $ 890 million in 2012 , and $ 722 million in 2011 . our 2013 net payments reflect a $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarter of 2012 ; our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback claim ; and our 2011 net payments reflect a $ 250 million refund from the irs related to estimated taxes paid for 2010 . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had federal and foreign taxes receivable of $ 313 million and $ 662 million recorded within other current assets on our balance sheet , primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012 and our debt exchange transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012 . note 9 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>930</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>notes with a rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due 2013</td><td>2014</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other debt</td><td>476</td><td>478</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7034</td><td>7200</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6152</td><td>6308</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>2014</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6152</td><td>$ 6158</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in september 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering and in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had in place with a group of banks a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that expires in august 2016 . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility through december 31 , 2013 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject .
Question: in 2012, what percentage of the total premium associated with the exchange for new notes was paid in cash?
| 0.57252 |
CONVFINQA4737 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2010 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 222 million , $ 211 million , and $ 193 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings were remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 50 million in 2013 , $ 45 million in 2012 , and $ 41 million in 2011 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 787 million in 2013 , $ 890 million in 2012 , and $ 722 million in 2011 . our 2013 net payments reflect a $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarter of 2012 ; our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback claim ; and our 2011 net payments reflect a $ 250 million refund from the irs related to estimated taxes paid for 2010 . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had federal and foreign taxes receivable of $ 313 million and $ 662 million recorded within other current assets on our balance sheet , primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012 and our debt exchange transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012 . note 9 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>930</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>notes with a rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due 2013</td><td>2014</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other debt</td><td>476</td><td>478</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7034</td><td>7200</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6152</td><td>6308</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>2014</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6152</td><td>$ 6158</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in september 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering and in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had in place with a group of banks a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that expires in august 2016 . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility through december 31 , 2013 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject .
Question: in 2012, what percentage of the total premium associated with the exchange for new notes was paid in cash?
Answer: 0.57252
Question: and from the previous year to this one, what was the change in the total long-term debt net, in millions?
| -6.0 |
CONVFINQA4738 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 291 therefore , are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets until settlement date . the unsettled reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements predominantly consist of agreements with regular-way settlement periods . loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications mortgage repurchase liability in connection with the firm 2019s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with the gses , as described in note 16 , the firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements . the firm has been , and may be , required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the gses ( e.g. , with 201cmake-whole 201d payments to reimburse the gses for their realized losses on liquidated loans ) . to the extent that repurchase demands that are received relate to loans that the firm purchased from third parties that remain viable , the firm typically will have the right to seek a recovery of related repurchase losses from the third party . generally , the maximum amount of future payments the firm would be required to make for breaches of these representations and warranties would be equal to the unpaid principal balance of such loans that are deemed to have defects that were sold to purchasers ( including securitization-related spes ) plus , in certain circumstances , accrued interest on such loans and certain expense . the following table summarizes the change in the mortgage repurchase liability for each of the periods presented . summary of changes in mortgage repurchase liability ( a ) year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 repurchase liability at beginning of period $ 681 $ 2811 $ 3557 net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b ) 53 ( 1561 ) ( 1158 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>repurchase liability at beginning of period</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td><td>$ 3557</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b )</td><td>53</td><td>-1561 ( 1561 )</td><td>-1158 ( 1158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassification to litigation reserve</td><td>2014</td><td>-179 ( 179 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c )</td><td>-459 ( 459 )</td><td>-390 ( 390 )</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repurchase liability at end of period</td><td>$ 275</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td></tr></table> ( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c ) ( 459 ) ( 390 ) 412 repurchase liability at end of period $ 275 $ 681 $ 2811 ( a ) on october 25 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 1.1 billion agreement with the fhfa to resolve , other than certain limited types of exposures , outstanding and future mortgage repurchase demands associated with loans sold to the gses from 2000 to 2008 . ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . private label securitizations the liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the firm in establishing its litigation reserves . on november 15 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 4.5 billion agreement with 21 major institutional investors to make a binding offer to the trustees of 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by j.p.morgan , chase , and bear stearns ( 201crmbs trust settlement 201d ) to resolve all representation and warranty claims , as well as all servicing claims , on all trusts issued by j.p . morgan , chase , and bear stearns between 2005 and 2008 . the seven trustees ( or separate and successor trustees ) for this group of 330 trusts have accepted the rmbs trust settlement for 319 trusts in whole or in part and excluded from the settlement 16 trusts in whole or in part . the trustees 2019 acceptance is subject to a judicial approval proceeding initiated by the trustees , which is pending in new york state court . in addition , from 2005 to 2008 , washington mutual made certain loan level representations and warranties in connection with approximately $ 165 billion of residential mortgage loans that were originally sold or deposited into private-label securitizations by washington mutual . of the $ 165 billion , approximately $ 78 billion has been repaid . in addition , approximately $ 49 billion of the principal amount of such loans has liquidated with an average loss severity of 59% ( 59 % ) . accordingly , the remaining outstanding principal balance of these loans as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 38 billion , of which $ 8 billion was 60 days or more past due . the firm believes that any repurchase obligations related to these loans remain with the fdic receivership . for additional information regarding litigation , see note 31 . loans sold with recourse the firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis . in nonrecourse servicing , the principal credit risk to the firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds ( i.e. , normal servicing advances ) . in recourse servicing , the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans , such as fannie mae or freddie mac or a private investor , insurer or guarantor . losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance , plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property . the firm 2019s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse , thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse totaled $ 6.1 billion and $ 7.7 billion , respectively . the carrying value of the related liability that the firm has recorded , which is representative of the firm 2019s view of the likelihood it .
Question: what was the amount of the repurchase liability at end of period for 2012?
| 2811.0 |
CONVFINQA4739 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 291 therefore , are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets until settlement date . the unsettled reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements predominantly consist of agreements with regular-way settlement periods . loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications mortgage repurchase liability in connection with the firm 2019s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with the gses , as described in note 16 , the firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements . the firm has been , and may be , required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the gses ( e.g. , with 201cmake-whole 201d payments to reimburse the gses for their realized losses on liquidated loans ) . to the extent that repurchase demands that are received relate to loans that the firm purchased from third parties that remain viable , the firm typically will have the right to seek a recovery of related repurchase losses from the third party . generally , the maximum amount of future payments the firm would be required to make for breaches of these representations and warranties would be equal to the unpaid principal balance of such loans that are deemed to have defects that were sold to purchasers ( including securitization-related spes ) plus , in certain circumstances , accrued interest on such loans and certain expense . the following table summarizes the change in the mortgage repurchase liability for each of the periods presented . summary of changes in mortgage repurchase liability ( a ) year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 repurchase liability at beginning of period $ 681 $ 2811 $ 3557 net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b ) 53 ( 1561 ) ( 1158 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>repurchase liability at beginning of period</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td><td>$ 3557</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b )</td><td>53</td><td>-1561 ( 1561 )</td><td>-1158 ( 1158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassification to litigation reserve</td><td>2014</td><td>-179 ( 179 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c )</td><td>-459 ( 459 )</td><td>-390 ( 390 )</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repurchase liability at end of period</td><td>$ 275</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td></tr></table> ( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c ) ( 459 ) ( 390 ) 412 repurchase liability at end of period $ 275 $ 681 $ 2811 ( a ) on october 25 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 1.1 billion agreement with the fhfa to resolve , other than certain limited types of exposures , outstanding and future mortgage repurchase demands associated with loans sold to the gses from 2000 to 2008 . ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . private label securitizations the liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the firm in establishing its litigation reserves . on november 15 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 4.5 billion agreement with 21 major institutional investors to make a binding offer to the trustees of 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by j.p.morgan , chase , and bear stearns ( 201crmbs trust settlement 201d ) to resolve all representation and warranty claims , as well as all servicing claims , on all trusts issued by j.p . morgan , chase , and bear stearns between 2005 and 2008 . the seven trustees ( or separate and successor trustees ) for this group of 330 trusts have accepted the rmbs trust settlement for 319 trusts in whole or in part and excluded from the settlement 16 trusts in whole or in part . the trustees 2019 acceptance is subject to a judicial approval proceeding initiated by the trustees , which is pending in new york state court . in addition , from 2005 to 2008 , washington mutual made certain loan level representations and warranties in connection with approximately $ 165 billion of residential mortgage loans that were originally sold or deposited into private-label securitizations by washington mutual . of the $ 165 billion , approximately $ 78 billion has been repaid . in addition , approximately $ 49 billion of the principal amount of such loans has liquidated with an average loss severity of 59% ( 59 % ) . accordingly , the remaining outstanding principal balance of these loans as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 38 billion , of which $ 8 billion was 60 days or more past due . the firm believes that any repurchase obligations related to these loans remain with the fdic receivership . for additional information regarding litigation , see note 31 . loans sold with recourse the firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis . in nonrecourse servicing , the principal credit risk to the firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds ( i.e. , normal servicing advances ) . in recourse servicing , the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans , such as fannie mae or freddie mac or a private investor , insurer or guarantor . losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance , plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property . the firm 2019s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse , thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse totaled $ 6.1 billion and $ 7.7 billion , respectively . the carrying value of the related liability that the firm has recorded , which is representative of the firm 2019s view of the likelihood it .
Question: what was the amount of the repurchase liability at end of period for 2012?
Answer: 2811.0
Question: and in that same year, what was the total of the make-whole settlements?
| 524.0 |
CONVFINQA4740 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 291 therefore , are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets until settlement date . the unsettled reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements predominantly consist of agreements with regular-way settlement periods . loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications mortgage repurchase liability in connection with the firm 2019s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with the gses , as described in note 16 , the firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements . the firm has been , and may be , required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the gses ( e.g. , with 201cmake-whole 201d payments to reimburse the gses for their realized losses on liquidated loans ) . to the extent that repurchase demands that are received relate to loans that the firm purchased from third parties that remain viable , the firm typically will have the right to seek a recovery of related repurchase losses from the third party . generally , the maximum amount of future payments the firm would be required to make for breaches of these representations and warranties would be equal to the unpaid principal balance of such loans that are deemed to have defects that were sold to purchasers ( including securitization-related spes ) plus , in certain circumstances , accrued interest on such loans and certain expense . the following table summarizes the change in the mortgage repurchase liability for each of the periods presented . summary of changes in mortgage repurchase liability ( a ) year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 repurchase liability at beginning of period $ 681 $ 2811 $ 3557 net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b ) 53 ( 1561 ) ( 1158 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>repurchase liability at beginning of period</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td><td>$ 3557</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b )</td><td>53</td><td>-1561 ( 1561 )</td><td>-1158 ( 1158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassification to litigation reserve</td><td>2014</td><td>-179 ( 179 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c )</td><td>-459 ( 459 )</td><td>-390 ( 390 )</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repurchase liability at end of period</td><td>$ 275</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td></tr></table> ( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c ) ( 459 ) ( 390 ) 412 repurchase liability at end of period $ 275 $ 681 $ 2811 ( a ) on october 25 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 1.1 billion agreement with the fhfa to resolve , other than certain limited types of exposures , outstanding and future mortgage repurchase demands associated with loans sold to the gses from 2000 to 2008 . ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . private label securitizations the liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the firm in establishing its litigation reserves . on november 15 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 4.5 billion agreement with 21 major institutional investors to make a binding offer to the trustees of 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by j.p.morgan , chase , and bear stearns ( 201crmbs trust settlement 201d ) to resolve all representation and warranty claims , as well as all servicing claims , on all trusts issued by j.p . morgan , chase , and bear stearns between 2005 and 2008 . the seven trustees ( or separate and successor trustees ) for this group of 330 trusts have accepted the rmbs trust settlement for 319 trusts in whole or in part and excluded from the settlement 16 trusts in whole or in part . the trustees 2019 acceptance is subject to a judicial approval proceeding initiated by the trustees , which is pending in new york state court . in addition , from 2005 to 2008 , washington mutual made certain loan level representations and warranties in connection with approximately $ 165 billion of residential mortgage loans that were originally sold or deposited into private-label securitizations by washington mutual . of the $ 165 billion , approximately $ 78 billion has been repaid . in addition , approximately $ 49 billion of the principal amount of such loans has liquidated with an average loss severity of 59% ( 59 % ) . accordingly , the remaining outstanding principal balance of these loans as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 38 billion , of which $ 8 billion was 60 days or more past due . the firm believes that any repurchase obligations related to these loans remain with the fdic receivership . for additional information regarding litigation , see note 31 . loans sold with recourse the firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis . in nonrecourse servicing , the principal credit risk to the firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds ( i.e. , normal servicing advances ) . in recourse servicing , the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans , such as fannie mae or freddie mac or a private investor , insurer or guarantor . losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance , plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property . the firm 2019s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse , thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse totaled $ 6.1 billion and $ 7.7 billion , respectively . the carrying value of the related liability that the firm has recorded , which is representative of the firm 2019s view of the likelihood it .
Question: what was the amount of the repurchase liability at end of period for 2012?
Answer: 2811.0
Question: and in that same year, what was the total of the make-whole settlements?
Answer: 524.0
Question: what became, then, that liability with this total of settlements?
| 3335.0 |
CONVFINQA4741 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 291 therefore , are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets until settlement date . the unsettled reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements predominantly consist of agreements with regular-way settlement periods . loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications mortgage repurchase liability in connection with the firm 2019s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with the gses , as described in note 16 , the firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements . the firm has been , and may be , required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the gses ( e.g. , with 201cmake-whole 201d payments to reimburse the gses for their realized losses on liquidated loans ) . to the extent that repurchase demands that are received relate to loans that the firm purchased from third parties that remain viable , the firm typically will have the right to seek a recovery of related repurchase losses from the third party . generally , the maximum amount of future payments the firm would be required to make for breaches of these representations and warranties would be equal to the unpaid principal balance of such loans that are deemed to have defects that were sold to purchasers ( including securitization-related spes ) plus , in certain circumstances , accrued interest on such loans and certain expense . the following table summarizes the change in the mortgage repurchase liability for each of the periods presented . summary of changes in mortgage repurchase liability ( a ) year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 repurchase liability at beginning of period $ 681 $ 2811 $ 3557 net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b ) 53 ( 1561 ) ( 1158 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>repurchase liability at beginning of period</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td><td>$ 3557</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net realized gains/ ( losses ) ( b )</td><td>53</td><td>-1561 ( 1561 )</td><td>-1158 ( 1158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassification to litigation reserve</td><td>2014</td><td>-179 ( 179 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c )</td><td>-459 ( 459 )</td><td>-390 ( 390 )</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repurchase liability at end of period</td><td>$ 275</td><td>$ 681</td><td>$ 2811</td></tr></table> ( benefit ) /provision for repurchase ( c ) ( 459 ) ( 390 ) 412 repurchase liability at end of period $ 275 $ 681 $ 2811 ( a ) on october 25 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 1.1 billion agreement with the fhfa to resolve , other than certain limited types of exposures , outstanding and future mortgage repurchase demands associated with loans sold to the gses from 2000 to 2008 . ( b ) presented net of third-party recoveries and included principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans , 201cmake-whole 201d settlements , settlements with claimants , and certain related expense . make-whole settlements were $ 11 million , $ 414 million and $ 524 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . ( c ) included a provision related to new loan sales of $ 4 million , $ 20 million and $ 112 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . private label securitizations the liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the firm in establishing its litigation reserves . on november 15 , 2013 , the firm announced that it had reached a $ 4.5 billion agreement with 21 major institutional investors to make a binding offer to the trustees of 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by j.p.morgan , chase , and bear stearns ( 201crmbs trust settlement 201d ) to resolve all representation and warranty claims , as well as all servicing claims , on all trusts issued by j.p . morgan , chase , and bear stearns between 2005 and 2008 . the seven trustees ( or separate and successor trustees ) for this group of 330 trusts have accepted the rmbs trust settlement for 319 trusts in whole or in part and excluded from the settlement 16 trusts in whole or in part . the trustees 2019 acceptance is subject to a judicial approval proceeding initiated by the trustees , which is pending in new york state court . in addition , from 2005 to 2008 , washington mutual made certain loan level representations and warranties in connection with approximately $ 165 billion of residential mortgage loans that were originally sold or deposited into private-label securitizations by washington mutual . of the $ 165 billion , approximately $ 78 billion has been repaid . in addition , approximately $ 49 billion of the principal amount of such loans has liquidated with an average loss severity of 59% ( 59 % ) . accordingly , the remaining outstanding principal balance of these loans as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 38 billion , of which $ 8 billion was 60 days or more past due . the firm believes that any repurchase obligations related to these loans remain with the fdic receivership . for additional information regarding litigation , see note 31 . loans sold with recourse the firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis . in nonrecourse servicing , the principal credit risk to the firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds ( i.e. , normal servicing advances ) . in recourse servicing , the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans , such as fannie mae or freddie mac or a private investor , insurer or guarantor . losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance , plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property . the firm 2019s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse , thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust . at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse totaled $ 6.1 billion and $ 7.7 billion , respectively . the carrying value of the related liability that the firm has recorded , which is representative of the firm 2019s view of the likelihood it .
Question: what was the amount of the repurchase liability at end of period for 2012?
Answer: 2811.0
Question: and in that same year, what was the total of the make-whole settlements?
Answer: 524.0
Question: what became, then, that liability with this total of settlements?
Answer: 3335.0
Question: and was this sum two years later, in 2014?
| 64.0 |
CONVFINQA4742 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .
Question: what was the price of common stock at closing of march 18, 2005?
| 18.79 |
CONVFINQA4743 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .
Question: what was the price of common stock at closing of march 18, 2005?
Answer: 18.79
Question: what was the lowest value of stock during the 4th quarter 2004?
| 15.19 |
CONVFINQA4744 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .
Question: what was the price of common stock at closing of march 18, 2005?
Answer: 18.79
Question: what was the lowest value of stock during the 4th quarter 2004?
Answer: 15.19
Question: what is the net difference in price?
| 3.6 |
CONVFINQA4745 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .
Question: what was the price of common stock at closing of march 18, 2005?
Answer: 18.79
Question: what was the lowest value of stock during the 4th quarter 2004?
Answer: 15.19
Question: what is the net difference in price?
Answer: 3.6
Question: what was the lowest value of stock during the 4th quarter 2004?
| 15.19 |
CONVFINQA4746 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .
Question: what was the price of common stock at closing of march 18, 2005?
Answer: 18.79
Question: what was the lowest value of stock during the 4th quarter 2004?
Answer: 15.19
Question: what is the net difference in price?
Answer: 3.6
Question: what was the lowest value of stock during the 4th quarter 2004?
Answer: 15.19
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.237 |
CONVFINQA4747 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the combined total number of vested units and granted ones?
| 341.0 |
CONVFINQA4748 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the combined total number of vested units and granted ones?
Answer: 341.0
Question: and what is the total of forfeited ones?
| -114.0 |
CONVFINQA4749 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the combined total number of vested units and granted ones?
Answer: 341.0
Question: and what is the total of forfeited ones?
Answer: -114.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total of vested, granted and forfeited units, in thousands?
| 227.0 |
CONVFINQA4750 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) failure of the company to develop new products and product enhancements on a timely basis or within budget could harm the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition . for additional risks that may affect the company 2019s business and prospects following completion of the merger , see 201crisk factors 201d in item 1a of the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 29 , 2007 . goodwill the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895100 . the factors contributing to the recognition of this amount of goodwill are based upon several strategic and synergistic benefits that are expected to be realized from the combination . these benefits include the expectation that the company 2019s complementary products and technologies will create a leading women 2019s healthcare company with an enhanced presence in hospitals , private practices and healthcare organizations . the company also expects to realize substantial synergies through the use of cytyc 2019s ob/gyn and breast surgeon sales channel to cross-sell the company 2019s existing and future products . the merger provides the company broader channel coverage within the united states and expanded geographic reach internationally , as well as increased scale and scope for further expanding operations through product development and complementary strategic transactions . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company and cytyc as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2007 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( approximate amounts in thousands except per share data )</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 1472400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 62600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income per share 2014basic</td><td>$ 0.52</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income per share 2014assuming dilution</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr></table> the $ 368200 charge for acquired in-process research and development that was a direct result of the transaction is excluded from the unaudited pro forma information above . the unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that the company would have attained had the acquisitions of cytyc occurred at the beginning of the periods presented . prior to the close of the merger the board of directors of both hologic and cytyc approved a modification to certain outstanding equity awards for cytyc employees . the modification provided for the acceleration of vesting upon the close of merger for those awards that did not provide for acceleration upon a change of control as part of the original terms of the award . this modification was made so that the company will not incur stock based compensation charges that it otherwise would have if the awards had continued to vest under their original terms . credit agreement on october 22 , 2007 , company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries , entered into a senior secured credit agreement with goldman sachs credit partners l.p . and certain other lenders , ( collectively , the 201clenders 201d ) . pursuant to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement , the lenders have committed to provide senior secured financing in an aggregate amount of up to $ 2550000 . as of the closing of the cytyc merger , the company borrowed $ 2350000 under the credit facilities. .
Question: considering the acquisitions of the company and cytyc at the beginning of fiscal 2007, how much did the net income represent in relation to the net revenue in that year?
| 0.04252 |
CONVFINQA4751 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) failure of the company to develop new products and product enhancements on a timely basis or within budget could harm the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition . for additional risks that may affect the company 2019s business and prospects following completion of the merger , see 201crisk factors 201d in item 1a of the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 29 , 2007 . goodwill the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895100 . the factors contributing to the recognition of this amount of goodwill are based upon several strategic and synergistic benefits that are expected to be realized from the combination . these benefits include the expectation that the company 2019s complementary products and technologies will create a leading women 2019s healthcare company with an enhanced presence in hospitals , private practices and healthcare organizations . the company also expects to realize substantial synergies through the use of cytyc 2019s ob/gyn and breast surgeon sales channel to cross-sell the company 2019s existing and future products . the merger provides the company broader channel coverage within the united states and expanded geographic reach internationally , as well as increased scale and scope for further expanding operations through product development and complementary strategic transactions . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company and cytyc as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2007 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( approximate amounts in thousands except per share data )</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 1472400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 62600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income per share 2014basic</td><td>$ 0.52</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income per share 2014assuming dilution</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr></table> the $ 368200 charge for acquired in-process research and development that was a direct result of the transaction is excluded from the unaudited pro forma information above . the unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that the company would have attained had the acquisitions of cytyc occurred at the beginning of the periods presented . prior to the close of the merger the board of directors of both hologic and cytyc approved a modification to certain outstanding equity awards for cytyc employees . the modification provided for the acceleration of vesting upon the close of merger for those awards that did not provide for acceleration upon a change of control as part of the original terms of the award . this modification was made so that the company will not incur stock based compensation charges that it otherwise would have if the awards had continued to vest under their original terms . credit agreement on october 22 , 2007 , company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries , entered into a senior secured credit agreement with goldman sachs credit partners l.p . and certain other lenders , ( collectively , the 201clenders 201d ) . pursuant to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement , the lenders have committed to provide senior secured financing in an aggregate amount of up to $ 2550000 . as of the closing of the cytyc merger , the company borrowed $ 2350000 under the credit facilities. .
Question: considering the acquisitions of the company and cytyc at the beginning of fiscal 2007, how much did the net income represent in relation to the net revenue in that year?
Answer: 0.04252
Question: and considering that net income and the eps, what can be concluded to have been the number of outstanding shares in that year?
| 120384.61538 |
CONVFINQA4752 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets was as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>localization</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>3</td></tr></table> software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the useful life in years for purchased technology?
| 5.0 |
CONVFINQA4753 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets was as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>localization</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>3</td></tr></table> software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the useful life in years for purchased technology?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the life in years for customer contracts and relationships?
| 10.0 |
CONVFINQA4754 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets was as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>localization</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>3</td></tr></table> software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the useful life in years for purchased technology?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the life in years for customer contracts and relationships?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what is the sum number of years?
| 15.0 |
CONVFINQA4755 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets was as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>localization</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>3</td></tr></table> software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the useful life in years for purchased technology?
Answer: 5.0
Question: what is the life in years for customer contracts and relationships?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what is the sum number of years?
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is the average number of years?
| 7.5 |
CONVFINQA4756 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company recorded equity earnings , net of taxes , related to ilim of $ 290 million in 2018 , compared with earnings of $ 183 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . operating results recorded in 2018 included an after-tax non-cash foreign exchange loss of $ 82 million , compared with an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 15 million in 2017 and an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 25 million in 2016 , primarily on the remeasurement of ilim's u.s . dollar denominated net debt . ilim delivered outstanding performance in 2018 , driven largely by higher price realization and strong demand . sales volumes for the joint venture increased year over year for shipments to china of softwood pulp and linerboard , but were offset by decreased sales of hardwood pulp to china . sales volumes in the russian market increased for softwood pulp and hardwood pulp , but decreased for linerboard . average sales price realizations were significantly higher in 2018 for sales of softwood pulp , hardwood pulp and linerboard to china and other export markets . average sales price realizations in russian markets increased year over year for all products . input costs were higher in 2018 , primarily for wood , fuel and chemicals . distribution costs were negatively impacted by tariffs and inflation . the company received cash dividends from the joint venture of $ 128 million in 2018 , $ 133 million in 2017 and $ 58 million in entering the first quarter of 2019 , sales volumes are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2018 , due to the seasonal slowdown in china and fewer trading days . based on pricing to date in the current quarter , average sales prices are expected to decrease for hardwood pulp , softwood pulp and linerboard to china . input costs are projected to be relatively flat , while distribution costs are expected to increase . equity earnings - gpip international paper recorded equity earnings of $ 46 million on its 20.5% ( 20.5 % ) ownership position in gpip in 2018 . the company received cash dividends from the investment of $ 25 million in 2018 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operating cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy , raw material , mill outage and transportation costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our focus on pricing and cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . cash uses during 2018 were primarily focused on working capital requirements , capital spending , debt reductions and returning cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases under the company's share repurchase program . cash provided by operating activities cash provided by operations , including discontinued operations , totaled $ 3.2 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 1.8 billion for 2017 , and $ 2.5 billion for 2016 . cash used by working capital components ( accounts receivable , contract assets and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , interest payable and other ) totaled $ 439 million in 2018 , compared with cash used by working capital components of $ 402 million in 2017 , and cash provided by working capital components of $ 71 million in 2016 . investment activities including discontinued operations , investment activities in 2018 increased from 2017 , as 2018 included higher capital spending . in 2016 , investment activity included the purchase of weyerhaeuser's pulp business for $ 2.2 billion in cash , the purchase of the holmen business for $ 57 million in cash , net of cash acquired , and proceeds from the sale of the asia packaging business of $ 108 million , net of cash divested . the company maintains an average capital spending target around depreciation and amortization levels , or modestly above , due to strategic plans over the course of an economic cycle . capital spending was $ 1.6 billion in 2018 , or 118% ( 118 % ) of depreciation and amortization , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2017 , or 98% ( 98 % ) of depreciation and amortization , and $ 1.3 billion , or 110% ( 110 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2016 . across our segments , capital spending as a percentage of depreciation and amortization ranged from 69.8% ( 69.8 % ) to 132.1% ( 132.1 % ) in 2018 . the following table shows capital spending for operations by business segment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , excluding amounts related to discontinued operations of $ 111 million in 2017 and $ 107 million in 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial packaging</td><td>$ 1061</td><td>$ 836</td><td>$ 832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>global cellulose fibers</td><td>183</td><td>188</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>printing papers</td><td>303</td><td>235</td><td>215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal</td><td>1547</td><td>1259</td><td>1221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>25</td><td>21</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>capital spending</td><td>$ 1572</td><td>$ 1280</td><td>$ 1241</td></tr></table> capital expenditures in 2019 are currently expected to be about $ 1.4 billion , or 104% ( 104 % ) of depreciation and amortization , including approximately $ 400 million of strategic investments. .
Question: what is the ratio of industrial packaging in 2018 to 2017?
| 1.26914 |
CONVFINQA4757 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company recorded equity earnings , net of taxes , related to ilim of $ 290 million in 2018 , compared with earnings of $ 183 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . operating results recorded in 2018 included an after-tax non-cash foreign exchange loss of $ 82 million , compared with an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 15 million in 2017 and an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 25 million in 2016 , primarily on the remeasurement of ilim's u.s . dollar denominated net debt . ilim delivered outstanding performance in 2018 , driven largely by higher price realization and strong demand . sales volumes for the joint venture increased year over year for shipments to china of softwood pulp and linerboard , but were offset by decreased sales of hardwood pulp to china . sales volumes in the russian market increased for softwood pulp and hardwood pulp , but decreased for linerboard . average sales price realizations were significantly higher in 2018 for sales of softwood pulp , hardwood pulp and linerboard to china and other export markets . average sales price realizations in russian markets increased year over year for all products . input costs were higher in 2018 , primarily for wood , fuel and chemicals . distribution costs were negatively impacted by tariffs and inflation . the company received cash dividends from the joint venture of $ 128 million in 2018 , $ 133 million in 2017 and $ 58 million in entering the first quarter of 2019 , sales volumes are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2018 , due to the seasonal slowdown in china and fewer trading days . based on pricing to date in the current quarter , average sales prices are expected to decrease for hardwood pulp , softwood pulp and linerboard to china . input costs are projected to be relatively flat , while distribution costs are expected to increase . equity earnings - gpip international paper recorded equity earnings of $ 46 million on its 20.5% ( 20.5 % ) ownership position in gpip in 2018 . the company received cash dividends from the investment of $ 25 million in 2018 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operating cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy , raw material , mill outage and transportation costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our focus on pricing and cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . cash uses during 2018 were primarily focused on working capital requirements , capital spending , debt reductions and returning cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases under the company's share repurchase program . cash provided by operating activities cash provided by operations , including discontinued operations , totaled $ 3.2 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 1.8 billion for 2017 , and $ 2.5 billion for 2016 . cash used by working capital components ( accounts receivable , contract assets and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , interest payable and other ) totaled $ 439 million in 2018 , compared with cash used by working capital components of $ 402 million in 2017 , and cash provided by working capital components of $ 71 million in 2016 . investment activities including discontinued operations , investment activities in 2018 increased from 2017 , as 2018 included higher capital spending . in 2016 , investment activity included the purchase of weyerhaeuser's pulp business for $ 2.2 billion in cash , the purchase of the holmen business for $ 57 million in cash , net of cash acquired , and proceeds from the sale of the asia packaging business of $ 108 million , net of cash divested . the company maintains an average capital spending target around depreciation and amortization levels , or modestly above , due to strategic plans over the course of an economic cycle . capital spending was $ 1.6 billion in 2018 , or 118% ( 118 % ) of depreciation and amortization , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2017 , or 98% ( 98 % ) of depreciation and amortization , and $ 1.3 billion , or 110% ( 110 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2016 . across our segments , capital spending as a percentage of depreciation and amortization ranged from 69.8% ( 69.8 % ) to 132.1% ( 132.1 % ) in 2018 . the following table shows capital spending for operations by business segment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , excluding amounts related to discontinued operations of $ 111 million in 2017 and $ 107 million in 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial packaging</td><td>$ 1061</td><td>$ 836</td><td>$ 832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>global cellulose fibers</td><td>183</td><td>188</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>printing papers</td><td>303</td><td>235</td><td>215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal</td><td>1547</td><td>1259</td><td>1221</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>25</td><td>21</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>capital spending</td><td>$ 1572</td><td>$ 1280</td><td>$ 1241</td></tr></table> capital expenditures in 2019 are currently expected to be about $ 1.4 billion , or 104% ( 104 % ) of depreciation and amortization , including approximately $ 400 million of strategic investments. .
Question: what is the ratio of industrial packaging in 2018 to 2017?
Answer: 1.26914
Question: what is that less 1?
| 0.26914 |
CONVFINQA4758 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .
Question: what was the net change in cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received from 2016 to 2017?
| 25.0 |
CONVFINQA4759 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .
Question: what was the net change in cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what was this value in 2016?
| 15.0 |
CONVFINQA4760 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 11</td></tr></table> all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .
Question: what was the net change in cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what was this value in 2016?
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2016 value?
| 1.66667 |
CONVFINQA4761 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
68 2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ ( 30 ) million , $ 98 million and $ 65 million , respectively . the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 960 million and $ 990 million , respectively . there was no tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ ( 0.2 ) million and $ 0.6 million , respectively . the tax benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 4 million , $ 19 million and $ 1 million , respectively . 18 . employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s . employees . the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan , at management's discretion , based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations . for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to participant savings up to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation . for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement . the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession . effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature . this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements . on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees and this level was maintained throughout 2012 . compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 28 million , $ 26 million and $ 9 million , respectively . a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan . as a result , the dividends on ppg shares held by that portion of the savings plan totaling $ 18 million , $ 20 million and $ 24 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , were tax deductible to the company for u.s . federal tax purposes . 19 . other earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>royalty income</td><td>$ 51</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>share of net earnings of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )</td><td>11</td><td>37</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain on sale of assets</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>83</td><td>73</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 180</td></tr></table> 20 . stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return . all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc . amended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 . shares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 8.5 million as of december 31 , 2012 . total stock-based compensation cost was $ 73 million , $ 36 million and $ 52 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . stock-based compensation expense increased year over year due to the increase in the expected payout percentage of the 2010 performance-based rsu grants and ppg's total shareholder return performance in 2012 in comparison with the standard & poors ( s&p ) 500 index , which has increased the expense related to outstanding grants of contingent shares . the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 25 million , $ 13 million and $ 18 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc . stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan . under the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted . the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years . upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock . the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that allows an optionee to exercise options and satisfy the option cost by certifying ownership of mature shares of ppg common stock with a market value equal to the option cost . the fair value of stock options issued to employees is measured on the date of grant and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period . ppg estimates the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the risk- free interest rate is determined by using the u.s . treasury yield table of contents .
Question: what was the difference in stock-based compensation costs between 2012 and 2011?
| 37.0 |
CONVFINQA4762 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
68 2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ ( 30 ) million , $ 98 million and $ 65 million , respectively . the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 960 million and $ 990 million , respectively . there was no tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ ( 0.2 ) million and $ 0.6 million , respectively . the tax benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 4 million , $ 19 million and $ 1 million , respectively . 18 . employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s . employees . the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan , at management's discretion , based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations . for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to participant savings up to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation . for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement . the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession . effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature . this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements . on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees and this level was maintained throughout 2012 . compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 28 million , $ 26 million and $ 9 million , respectively . a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan . as a result , the dividends on ppg shares held by that portion of the savings plan totaling $ 18 million , $ 20 million and $ 24 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , were tax deductible to the company for u.s . federal tax purposes . 19 . other earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>royalty income</td><td>$ 51</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>share of net earnings of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )</td><td>11</td><td>37</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain on sale of assets</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>83</td><td>73</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 180</td></tr></table> 20 . stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return . all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc . amended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 . shares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 8.5 million as of december 31 , 2012 . total stock-based compensation cost was $ 73 million , $ 36 million and $ 52 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . stock-based compensation expense increased year over year due to the increase in the expected payout percentage of the 2010 performance-based rsu grants and ppg's total shareholder return performance in 2012 in comparison with the standard & poors ( s&p ) 500 index , which has increased the expense related to outstanding grants of contingent shares . the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 25 million , $ 13 million and $ 18 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc . stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan . under the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted . the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years . upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock . the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that allows an optionee to exercise options and satisfy the option cost by certifying ownership of mature shares of ppg common stock with a market value equal to the option cost . the fair value of stock options issued to employees is measured on the date of grant and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period . ppg estimates the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the risk- free interest rate is determined by using the u.s . treasury yield table of contents .
Question: what was the difference in stock-based compensation costs between 2012 and 2011?
Answer: 37.0
Question: and the value for 2011 again?
| 36.0 |
CONVFINQA4763 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
68 2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ ( 30 ) million , $ 98 million and $ 65 million , respectively . the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was approximately $ 960 million and $ 990 million , respectively . there was no tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ ( 0.2 ) million and $ 0.6 million , respectively . the tax benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 4 million , $ 19 million and $ 1 million , respectively . 18 . employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s . employees . the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan , at management's discretion , based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations . for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to participant savings up to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation . for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement . the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession . effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature . this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements . on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees and this level was maintained throughout 2012 . compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 totaled $ 28 million , $ 26 million and $ 9 million , respectively . a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan . as a result , the dividends on ppg shares held by that portion of the savings plan totaling $ 18 million , $ 20 million and $ 24 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , were tax deductible to the company for u.s . federal tax purposes . 19 . other earnings . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>royalty income</td><td>$ 51</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>share of net earnings of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )</td><td>11</td><td>37</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain on sale of assets</td><td>4</td><td>12</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>83</td><td>73</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 149</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 180</td></tr></table> 20 . stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return . all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc . amended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 . shares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 8.5 million as of december 31 , 2012 . total stock-based compensation cost was $ 73 million , $ 36 million and $ 52 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . stock-based compensation expense increased year over year due to the increase in the expected payout percentage of the 2010 performance-based rsu grants and ppg's total shareholder return performance in 2012 in comparison with the standard & poors ( s&p ) 500 index , which has increased the expense related to outstanding grants of contingent shares . the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 25 million , $ 13 million and $ 18 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc . stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan . under the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted . the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years . upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock . the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that allows an optionee to exercise options and satisfy the option cost by certifying ownership of mature shares of ppg common stock with a market value equal to the option cost . the fair value of stock options issued to employees is measured on the date of grant and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period . ppg estimates the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the risk- free interest rate is determined by using the u.s . treasury yield table of contents .
Question: what was the difference in stock-based compensation costs between 2012 and 2011?
Answer: 37.0
Question: and the value for 2011 again?
Answer: 36.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 1.02778 |
CONVFINQA4764 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 743</td><td>$ 877</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>434</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>391</td><td>409</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest payable</td><td>208</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>181</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>105</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends payable [a]</td><td>-</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>550</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2612</td><td>$ 3303</td></tr></table> [a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .
Question: what was the amount of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2015?
| 2612.0 |
CONVFINQA4765 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 743</td><td>$ 877</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>434</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>391</td><td>409</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest payable</td><td>208</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>181</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>105</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends payable [a]</td><td>-</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>550</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2612</td><td>$ 3303</td></tr></table> [a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .
Question: what was the amount of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2015?
Answer: 2612.0
Question: and what was it in 2014?
| 3303.0 |
CONVFINQA4766 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 743</td><td>$ 877</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>434</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>391</td><td>409</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest payable</td><td>208</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>181</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>105</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends payable [a]</td><td>-</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>550</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2612</td><td>$ 3303</td></tr></table> [a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .
Question: what was the amount of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2015?
Answer: 2612.0
Question: and what was it in 2014?
Answer: 3303.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that amount over the year?
| -691.0 |
CONVFINQA4767 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 743</td><td>$ 877</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>434</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>391</td><td>409</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest payable</td><td>208</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>181</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>105</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends payable [a]</td><td>-</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>550</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2612</td><td>$ 3303</td></tr></table> [a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .
Question: what was the amount of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2015?
Answer: 2612.0
Question: and what was it in 2014?
Answer: 3303.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that amount over the year?
Answer: -691.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that amount in 2014, in percentage?
| -0.2092 |
CONVFINQA4768 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asia-pacific acquisition on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc . this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region . the business includes hsbc 2019s payment processing operations in the following ten countries and territories : brunei , china , hong kong , india , macau , malaysia , maldives , singapore , sri lanka and taiwan . under the terms of the agreement , we initially paid hsbc $ 67.2 million in cash to acquire our ownership interest . we paid an additional $ 1.4 million under this agreement during fiscal 2007 , for a total purchase price of $ 68.6 million to acquire our ownership interest . in conjunction with this acquisition , we entered into a transition services agreement with hsbc that may be terminated at any time . under this agreement , we expect hsbc will continue to perform payment processing operations and related support services until we integrate these functions into our own operations , which we expect will be completed in 2010 . the operating results of this acquisition are included in our consolidated statements of income from the date of the acquisition . business description we are a leading payment processing and consumer money transfer company . as a high-volume processor of electronic transactions , we enable merchants , multinational corporations , financial institutions , consumers , government agencies and other profit and non-profit business enterprises to facilitate payments to purchase goods and services or further other economic goals . our role is to serve as an intermediary in the exchange of information and funds that must occur between parties so that a payment transaction or money transfer can be completed . we were incorporated in georgia as global payments inc . in september 2000 , and we spun-off from our former parent company on january 31 , 2001 . including our time as part of our former parent company , we have provided transaction processing services since 1967 . we market our products and services throughout the united states , canada , europe and the asia-pacific region . we operate in two business segments , merchant services and money transfer , and we offer various products through these segments . our merchant services segment targets customers in many vertical industries including financial institutions , gaming , government , health care , professional services , restaurants , retail , universities and utilities . our money transfer segment primarily targets immigrants in the united states and europe . see note 10 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional segment information and 201citem 1a 2014risk factors 201d for a discussion of risks involved with our international operations . total revenues from our merchant services and money transfer segments , by geography and sales channel , are as follows ( amounts in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>domestic direct</td><td>$ 558026</td><td>$ 481273</td><td>$ 410047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>224570</td><td>208126</td><td>175190</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia-pacific</td><td>48449</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>central and eastern europe</td><td>51224</td><td>47114</td><td>40598</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>domestic indirect and other</td><td>46873</td><td>51987</td><td>62033</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>merchant services</td><td>929142</td><td>788500</td><td>687868</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>domestic</td><td>115416</td><td>109067</td><td>91448</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>europe</td><td>16965</td><td>10489</td><td>5015</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>money transfer</td><td>132381</td><td>119556</td><td>96463</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total revenues</td><td>$ 1061523</td><td>$ 908056</td><td>$ 784331</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the portion of total revenues in 2006 made up of merchant services?
| 0.86834 |
CONVFINQA4769 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
asia-pacific acquisition on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc . this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region . the business includes hsbc 2019s payment processing operations in the following ten countries and territories : brunei , china , hong kong , india , macau , malaysia , maldives , singapore , sri lanka and taiwan . under the terms of the agreement , we initially paid hsbc $ 67.2 million in cash to acquire our ownership interest . we paid an additional $ 1.4 million under this agreement during fiscal 2007 , for a total purchase price of $ 68.6 million to acquire our ownership interest . in conjunction with this acquisition , we entered into a transition services agreement with hsbc that may be terminated at any time . under this agreement , we expect hsbc will continue to perform payment processing operations and related support services until we integrate these functions into our own operations , which we expect will be completed in 2010 . the operating results of this acquisition are included in our consolidated statements of income from the date of the acquisition . business description we are a leading payment processing and consumer money transfer company . as a high-volume processor of electronic transactions , we enable merchants , multinational corporations , financial institutions , consumers , government agencies and other profit and non-profit business enterprises to facilitate payments to purchase goods and services or further other economic goals . our role is to serve as an intermediary in the exchange of information and funds that must occur between parties so that a payment transaction or money transfer can be completed . we were incorporated in georgia as global payments inc . in september 2000 , and we spun-off from our former parent company on january 31 , 2001 . including our time as part of our former parent company , we have provided transaction processing services since 1967 . we market our products and services throughout the united states , canada , europe and the asia-pacific region . we operate in two business segments , merchant services and money transfer , and we offer various products through these segments . our merchant services segment targets customers in many vertical industries including financial institutions , gaming , government , health care , professional services , restaurants , retail , universities and utilities . our money transfer segment primarily targets immigrants in the united states and europe . see note 10 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional segment information and 201citem 1a 2014risk factors 201d for a discussion of risks involved with our international operations . total revenues from our merchant services and money transfer segments , by geography and sales channel , are as follows ( amounts in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>domestic direct</td><td>$ 558026</td><td>$ 481273</td><td>$ 410047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>224570</td><td>208126</td><td>175190</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia-pacific</td><td>48449</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>central and eastern europe</td><td>51224</td><td>47114</td><td>40598</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>domestic indirect and other</td><td>46873</td><td>51987</td><td>62033</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>merchant services</td><td>929142</td><td>788500</td><td>687868</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>domestic</td><td>115416</td><td>109067</td><td>91448</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>europe</td><td>16965</td><td>10489</td><td>5015</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>money transfer</td><td>132381</td><td>119556</td><td>96463</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total revenues</td><td>$ 1061523</td><td>$ 908056</td><td>$ 784331</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the portion of total revenues in 2006 made up of merchant services?
Answer: 0.86834
Question: and in 2007?
| 0.87529 |
CONVFINQA4770 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what was the difference in the cash from operations between 2009 and 2010?
| 283.0 |
CONVFINQA4771 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what was the difference in the cash from operations between 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 283.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| 0.32604 |
CONVFINQA4772 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value of total financial assets in 2018?
| 22181.0 |
CONVFINQA4773 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value of total financial assets in 2018?
Answer: 22181.0
Question: what was the value in 2017?
| 19201.0 |
CONVFINQA4774 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value of total financial assets in 2018?
Answer: 22181.0
Question: what was the value in 2017?
Answer: 19201.0
Question: what was the difference?
| 2980.0 |
CONVFINQA4775 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the value of total financial assets in 2018?
Answer: 22181.0
Question: what was the value in 2017?
Answer: 19201.0
Question: what was the difference?
Answer: 2980.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.1552 |
CONVFINQA4776 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 29 2012</td><td>december 28 2013</td><td>january 3 2015</td><td>january 2 2016</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.87</td><td>$ 158.46</td><td>$ 228.88</td><td>$ 217.49</td><td>$ 244.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>114.07</td><td>152.98</td><td>174.56</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>122.23</td><td>178.55</td><td>196.06</td><td>245.31</td><td>256.69</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of s&p 500 index from january 2015 to january 2016?
| 2.45 |
CONVFINQA4777 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 29 2012</td><td>december 28 2013</td><td>january 3 2015</td><td>january 2 2016</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.87</td><td>$ 158.46</td><td>$ 228.88</td><td>$ 217.49</td><td>$ 244.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>114.07</td><td>152.98</td><td>174.56</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>122.23</td><td>178.55</td><td>196.06</td><td>245.31</td><td>256.69</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of s&p 500 index from january 2015 to january 2016?
Answer: 2.45
Question: and what was the value of that stock in january 2015?
| 174.56 |
CONVFINQA4778 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 29 2012</td><td>december 28 2013</td><td>january 3 2015</td><td>january 2 2016</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>advance auto parts</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.87</td><td>$ 158.46</td><td>$ 228.88</td><td>$ 217.49</td><td>$ 244.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>114.07</td><td>152.98</td><td>174.56</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p retail index</td><td>100.00</td><td>122.23</td><td>178.55</td><td>196.06</td><td>245.31</td><td>256.69</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of s&p 500 index from january 2015 to january 2016?
Answer: 2.45
Question: and what was the value of that stock in january 2015?
Answer: 174.56
Question: how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 value?
| 0.01404 |
CONVFINQA4779 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
| 2.2 |
CONVFINQA4780 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
| 24.8 |
CONVFINQA4781 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
Answer: 24.8
Question: what is, then, the total amount concerning the two segments?
| 27.0 |
CONVFINQA4782 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
Answer: 24.8
Question: what is, then, the total amount concerning the two segments?
Answer: 27.0
Question: and what was that overall purchase value of star pizza?
| 34.6 |
CONVFINQA4783 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
Answer: 24.8
Question: what is, then, the total amount concerning the two segments?
Answer: 27.0
Question: and what was that overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 34.6
Question: what percentage, then, of this value, does that total amount represent?
| 0.78035 |
CONVFINQA4784 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
Answer: 24.8
Question: what is, then, the total amount concerning the two segments?
Answer: 27.0
Question: and what was that overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 34.6
Question: what percentage, then, of this value, does that total amount represent?
Answer: 0.78035
Question: in that same period, what was the value of trademarks and tradenames from the recognized value of the period's acquisition?
| 15.2 |
CONVFINQA4785 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
Answer: 24.8
Question: what is, then, the total amount concerning the two segments?
Answer: 27.0
Question: and what was that overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 34.6
Question: what percentage, then, of this value, does that total amount represent?
Answer: 0.78035
Question: in that same period, what was the value of trademarks and tradenames from the recognized value of the period's acquisition?
Answer: 15.2
Question: and what was this total recognized value?
| 1026.4 |
CONVFINQA4786 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) the following table summarizes the weighted average life and the allocation to intangible assets recognized in the mps acquisition , excluding goodwill ( in millions ) : weighted avg . amounts recognized as the acquisition . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted avg.life</td><td>amountsrecognized as ofthe acquisitiondate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>14.6</td><td>$ 1008.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademarks and tradenames</td><td>3.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>photo library</td><td>10.0</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14.4</td><td>$ 1026.4</td></tr></table> none of the intangibles has significant residual value . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 13 to 16 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . star pizza acquisition on march 13 , 2017 , we completed the star pizza acquisition . the transaction provided us with a leadership position in the fast growing small-run pizza box market and increases our vertical integration . the purchase price was $ 34.6 million , net of a $ 0.7 million working capital settlement . we have fully integrated the approximately 22000 tons of containerboard used by star pizza annually . we have included the financial results of the acquired assets since the date of the acquisition in our corrugated packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 24.8 million of customer relationship intangible assets and $ 2.2 million of goodwill . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over 10 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles are amortizable for income tax purposes . packaging acquisition on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . the purchase price was $ 94.1 million , net of cash received of $ 1.7 million , a working capital settlement and a $ 3.5 million escrow receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 . the transaction is subject to an election under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the code that increases the u.s . tax basis in the acquired u.s . entities . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities since the date of the acquisition in our consumer packaging segment . the purchase price allocation for the acquisition primarily included $ 55.0 million of property , plant and equipment , $ 10.5 million of customer relationship intangible assets , $ 9.3 million of goodwill and $ 25.8 million of liabilities , including $ 1.3 million of debt . we are amortizing the customer relationship intangibles over estimated useful lives ranging from 9 to 15 years based on a straight-line basis because the amortization pattern was not reliably determinable . the fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to buyer-specific synergies expected to arise after the acquisition ( e.g. , enhanced reach of the combined organization and other synergies ) , and the assembled work force . the goodwill and intangibles of the u.s . entities are amortizable for income tax purposes . sp fiber on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition in a stock purchase . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in gps . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . the purchase price was $ 278.8 million , net of cash received of $ 9.2 million and a working capital .
Question: what was the amount of goodwill from the overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and was the amount of customer relationship intangible assets from that same value?
Answer: 24.8
Question: what is, then, the total amount concerning the two segments?
Answer: 27.0
Question: and what was that overall purchase value of star pizza?
Answer: 34.6
Question: what percentage, then, of this value, does that total amount represent?
Answer: 0.78035
Question: in that same period, what was the value of trademarks and tradenames from the recognized value of the period's acquisition?
Answer: 15.2
Question: and what was this total recognized value?
Answer: 1026.4
Question: what is, then, that value of trademarks and tradenames as a percentage of this total recognized one?
| 0.01481 |
CONVFINQA4787 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>plant ( including nuclear fuel )</td><td>$ 727</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decommissioning trust funds</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power agreement ( below market )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decommissioning liability</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 336</td></tr></table> subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a "cessation event" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2009?
| 53.0 |
CONVFINQA4788 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>plant ( including nuclear fuel )</td><td>$ 727</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decommissioning trust funds</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power agreement ( below market )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decommissioning liability</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 336</td></tr></table> subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a "cessation event" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2009?
Answer: 53.0
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2008?
| 76.0 |
CONVFINQA4789 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>plant ( including nuclear fuel )</td><td>$ 727</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decommissioning trust funds</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power agreement ( below market )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decommissioning liability</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 336</td></tr></table> subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a "cessation event" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2009?
Answer: 53.0
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2008?
Answer: 76.0
Question: what was the sum for 2008 and 2009?
| 129.0 |
CONVFINQA4790 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>plant ( including nuclear fuel )</td><td>$ 727</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decommissioning trust funds</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power agreement ( below market )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decommissioning liability</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 336</td></tr></table> subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a "cessation event" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2009?
Answer: 53.0
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2008?
Answer: 76.0
Question: what was the sum for 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 129.0
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2007?
| 50.0 |
CONVFINQA4791 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>plant ( including nuclear fuel )</td><td>$ 727</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decommissioning trust funds</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power agreement ( below market )</td><td>420</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decommissioning liability</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>684</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 336</td></tr></table> subsequent to the closing , entergy received approximately $ 6 million from consumers energy company as part of the post-closing adjustment defined in the asset sale agreement . the post-closing adjustment amount resulted in an approximately $ 6 million reduction in plant and a corresponding reduction in other liabilities . for the ppa , which was at below-market prices at the time of the acquisition , non-utility nuclear will amortize a liability to revenue over the life of the agreement . the amount that will be amortized each period is based upon the difference between the present value calculated at the date of acquisition of each year's difference between revenue under the agreement and revenue based on estimated market prices . amounts amortized to revenue were $ 53 million in 2009 , $ 76 million in 2008 , and $ 50 million in 2007 . the amounts to be amortized to revenue for the next five years will be $ 46 million for 2010 , $ 43 million for 2011 , $ 17 million in 2012 , $ 18 million for 2013 , and $ 16 million for 2014 . nypa value sharing agreements non-utility nuclear's purchase of the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 plants from nypa included value sharing agreements with nypa . in october 2007 , non-utility nuclear and nypa amended and restated the value sharing agreements to clarify and amend certain provisions of the original terms . under the amended value sharing agreements , non-utility nuclear will make annual payments to nypa based on the generation output of the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants from january 2007 through december 2014 . non-utility nuclear will pay nypa $ 6.59 per mwh for power sold from indian point 3 , up to an annual cap of $ 48 million , and $ 3.91 per mwh for power sold from fitzpatrick , up to an annual cap of $ 24 million . the annual payment for each year's output is due by january 15 of the following year . non-utility nuclear will record its liability for payments to nypa as power is generated and sold by indian point 3 and fitzpatrick . an amount equal to the liability will be recorded to the plant asset account as contingent purchase price consideration for the plants . in 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , non-utility nuclear recorded $ 72 million as plant for generation during each of those years . this amount will be depreciated over the expected remaining useful life of the plants . in august 2008 , non-utility nuclear entered into a resolution of a dispute with nypa over the applicability of the value sharing agreements to its fitzpatrick and indian point 3 nuclear power plants after the planned spin-off of the non-utility nuclear business . under the resolution , non-utility nuclear agreed not to treat the separation as a "cessation event" that would terminate its obligation to make the payments under the value sharing agreements . as a result , after the spin-off transaction , enexus will continue to be obligated to make payments to nypa under the amended and restated value sharing agreements. .
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2009?
Answer: 53.0
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2008?
Answer: 76.0
Question: what was the sum for 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 129.0
Question: what was the amount of revenue to be amortized in 2007?
Answer: 50.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2007?
| 179.0 |
CONVFINQA4792 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .
Question: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?
| 4457.0 |
CONVFINQA4793 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .
Question: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?
Answer: 4457.0
Question: what about the total operating expenses in 2008?
| 13900.0 |
CONVFINQA4794 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .
Question: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?
Answer: 4457.0
Question: what about the total operating expenses in 2008?
Answer: 13900.0
Question: what portion of is related to compensation and benefits?
| 0.32065 |
CONVFINQA4795 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .
Question: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?
Answer: 4457.0
Question: what about the total operating expenses in 2008?
Answer: 13900.0
Question: what portion of is related to compensation and benefits?
Answer: 0.32065
Question: what is the sum of total operating expenses for 2009 and 2010?
| 22748.0 |
CONVFINQA4796 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .
Question: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?
Answer: 4457.0
Question: what about the total operating expenses in 2008?
Answer: 13900.0
Question: what portion of is related to compensation and benefits?
Answer: 0.32065
Question: what is the sum of total operating expenses for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 22748.0
Question: what about the sum for three years if 2008 is inlcuded?
| 36648.0 |
CONVFINQA4797 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>$ 4063</td><td>$ 4457</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>( 9 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>2486</td><td>1763</td><td>3983</td><td>41</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>1836</td><td>1644</td><td>1928</td><td>12</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1487</td><td>1427</td><td>1366</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1142</td><td>1180</td><td>1326</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>719</td><td>687</td><td>840</td><td>5</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>$ 10764</td><td>$ 13900</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td><td>( 23 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 1.2 billion in 2010 versus 2009 . our fuel price per gallon increased 31% ( 31 % ) during the year , accounting for $ 566 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , depreciation , volume-related costs , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses during 2010 compared to 2009 . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . operating expenses decreased $ 3.1 billion in 2009 versus 2008 . our fuel price per gallon declined 44% ( 44 % ) during 2009 , decreasing operating expenses by $ 1.3 billion compared to 2008 . cost savings from lower volume , productivity improvements , and better resource utilization also decreased operating expenses in 2009 . in addition , lower casualty expense resulting primarily from improving trends in safety performance decreased operating expenses in 2009 . conversely , wage and benefit inflation partially offset these reductions . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wage and benefit inflation increased costs by approximately $ 190 million in 2010 compared to 2009 . volume- related expenses and higher equity and incentive compensation also drove costs up during the year . workforce levels declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 as network efficiencies and ongoing productivity initiatives enabled us to effectively handle the 13% ( 13 % ) increase in volume levels with fewer employees . lower volume and productivity initiatives led to a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in our workforce in 2009 compared to 2008 , saving $ 516 million during the year . conversely , general wage and benefit inflation increased expenses , partially offsetting these savings . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.29 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2010 compared to $ 1.75 per gallon in 2009 , increased expenses by $ 566 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2010 versus 2009 , driving fuel expense up by $ 166 million . conversely , the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , our fuel conservation programs and efficient network operations drove a 3% ( 3 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate in 2010 , resulting in $ 40 million of cost savings versus 2009 at the 2009 average fuel price . lower diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 1.75 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2009 compared to $ 3.15 per gallon in 2008 , reduced expenses by $ 1.3 billion in 2009 . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 17% ( 17 % ) in 2009 , lowering expenses by $ 664 million compared to 2008 . our fuel consumption rate improved 4% ( 4 % ) in 2009 , resulting in $ 147 million of cost savings versus 2008 at the 2008 average fuel price . the consumption rate savings versus 2008 using the lower 2009 fuel price was $ 68 million . newer , more fuel efficient locomotives , reflecting locomotive acquisitions in recent years and the impact of a smaller fleet due to storage of some of our older locomotives ; increased use of 2010 operating expenses .
Question: what are the operating expenses for compensation and benefits in 2008?
Answer: 4457.0
Question: what about the total operating expenses in 2008?
Answer: 13900.0
Question: what portion of is related to compensation and benefits?
Answer: 0.32065
Question: what is the sum of total operating expenses for 2009 and 2010?
Answer: 22748.0
Question: what about the sum for three years if 2008 is inlcuded?
Answer: 36648.0
Question: what is the yearly average for this period?
| 12216.0 |
CONVFINQA4798 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.05</td><td>$ 97.04</td><td>$ 121.73</td><td>$ 161.39</td><td>$ 170.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj us containers & packaging</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 106.73</td><td>$ 66.91</td><td>$ 93.98</td><td>$ 110.23</td><td>$ 110.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.49</td><td>$ 66.46</td><td>$ 84.05</td><td>$ 96.71</td><td>$ 98.75</td></tr></table> copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .
Question: what was the value of ball corporation in 2008?
| 97.04 |
CONVFINQA4799 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.05</td><td>$ 97.04</td><td>$ 121.73</td><td>$ 161.39</td><td>$ 170.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj us containers & packaging</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 106.73</td><td>$ 66.91</td><td>$ 93.98</td><td>$ 110.23</td><td>$ 110.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.49</td><td>$ 66.46</td><td>$ 84.05</td><td>$ 96.71</td><td>$ 98.75</td></tr></table> copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .
Question: what was the value of ball corporation in 2008?
Answer: 97.04
Question: what is the change in value from the initial $100 investment?
| -2.96 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.