id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA6700 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans ( continued ) benefit payments the following table sets forth amounts of benefits expected to be paid over the next ten years from the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans as of december 31 , 2004: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>pension benefits</td><td>other postretirement benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>132</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>143</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>154</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>166</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010-2014</td><td>1052</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1772</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> 18 . stock compensation plans on may 18 , 2000 , the shareholders of the hartford approved the hartford incentive stock plan ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , which replaced the hartford 1995 incentive stock plan ( the 201c1995 plan 201d ) . the terms of the 2000 plan were substantially similar to the terms of the 1995 plan except that the 1995 plan had an annual award limit and a higher maximum award limit . under the 2000 plan , awards may be granted in the form of non-qualified or incentive stock options qualifying under section 422a of the internal revenue code , performance shares or restricted stock , or any combination of the foregoing . in addition , stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or part of any stock options granted under the 2000 plan . in december 2004 , the 2000 plan was amended to allow for grants of restricted stock units effective as of january 1 , 2005 . the aggregate number of shares of stock , which may be awarded , is subject to a maximum limit of 17211837 shares applicable to all awards for the ten-year duration of the 2000 plan . all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , and an option 2019s maximum term is ten years and two days . certain options become exercisable over a three year period commencing one year from the date of grant , while certain other options become exercisable upon the attainment of specified market price appreciation of the company 2019s common shares . for any year , no individual employee may receive an award of options for more than 1000000 shares . as of december 31 , 2004 , the hartford had not issued any incentive stock options under the 2000 plan . performance awards of common stock granted under the 2000 plan become payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals achieved over a period of not less than one nor more than five years , and the restricted stock granted is subject to a restriction period . on a cumulative basis , no more than 20% ( 20 % ) of the aggregate number of shares which may be awarded under the 2000 plan are available for performance shares and restricted stock awards . also , the maximum award of performance shares for any individual employee in any year is 200000 shares . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , the company granted shares of common stock of 315452 , 333712 and 40852 with weighted average prices of $ 64.93 , $ 38.13 and $ 62.28 , respectively , related to performance share and restricted stock awards . in 1996 , the company established the hartford employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) . under this plan , eligible employees of the hartford may purchase common stock of the company at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount from the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly offering period . the company may sell up to 5400000 shares of stock to eligible employees under the espp . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , 345262 , 443467 and 408304 shares were sold , respectively . the per share weighted average fair value of the discount under the espp was $ 9.31 , $ 11.96 , and $ 11.70 in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . additionally , during 1997 , the hartford established employee stock purchase plans for certain employees of the company 2019s international subsidiaries . under these plans , participants may purchase common stock of the hartford at a fixed price at the end of a three-year period . the activity under these programs is not material. .
Question: what was the expected payment for all benefits in 2007?
| 174.0 |
CONVFINQA6701 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans ( continued ) benefit payments the following table sets forth amounts of benefits expected to be paid over the next ten years from the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans as of december 31 , 2004: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>pension benefits</td><td>other postretirement benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>132</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>143</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>154</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>166</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010-2014</td><td>1052</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1772</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> 18 . stock compensation plans on may 18 , 2000 , the shareholders of the hartford approved the hartford incentive stock plan ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , which replaced the hartford 1995 incentive stock plan ( the 201c1995 plan 201d ) . the terms of the 2000 plan were substantially similar to the terms of the 1995 plan except that the 1995 plan had an annual award limit and a higher maximum award limit . under the 2000 plan , awards may be granted in the form of non-qualified or incentive stock options qualifying under section 422a of the internal revenue code , performance shares or restricted stock , or any combination of the foregoing . in addition , stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or part of any stock options granted under the 2000 plan . in december 2004 , the 2000 plan was amended to allow for grants of restricted stock units effective as of january 1 , 2005 . the aggregate number of shares of stock , which may be awarded , is subject to a maximum limit of 17211837 shares applicable to all awards for the ten-year duration of the 2000 plan . all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , and an option 2019s maximum term is ten years and two days . certain options become exercisable over a three year period commencing one year from the date of grant , while certain other options become exercisable upon the attainment of specified market price appreciation of the company 2019s common shares . for any year , no individual employee may receive an award of options for more than 1000000 shares . as of december 31 , 2004 , the hartford had not issued any incentive stock options under the 2000 plan . performance awards of common stock granted under the 2000 plan become payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals achieved over a period of not less than one nor more than five years , and the restricted stock granted is subject to a restriction period . on a cumulative basis , no more than 20% ( 20 % ) of the aggregate number of shares which may be awarded under the 2000 plan are available for performance shares and restricted stock awards . also , the maximum award of performance shares for any individual employee in any year is 200000 shares . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , the company granted shares of common stock of 315452 , 333712 and 40852 with weighted average prices of $ 64.93 , $ 38.13 and $ 62.28 , respectively , related to performance share and restricted stock awards . in 1996 , the company established the hartford employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) . under this plan , eligible employees of the hartford may purchase common stock of the company at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount from the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly offering period . the company may sell up to 5400000 shares of stock to eligible employees under the espp . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , 345262 , 443467 and 408304 shares were sold , respectively . the per share weighted average fair value of the discount under the espp was $ 9.31 , $ 11.96 , and $ 11.70 in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . additionally , during 1997 , the hartford established employee stock purchase plans for certain employees of the company 2019s international subsidiaries . under these plans , participants may purchase common stock of the hartford at a fixed price at the end of a three-year period . the activity under these programs is not material. .
Question: what was the expected payment for all benefits in 2007?
Answer: 174.0
Question: and what was that expected payment for all years?
| 2124.0 |
CONVFINQA6702 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans ( continued ) benefit payments the following table sets forth amounts of benefits expected to be paid over the next ten years from the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans as of december 31 , 2004: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>pension benefits</td><td>other postretirement benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>132</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>143</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>154</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>166</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010-2014</td><td>1052</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1772</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> 18 . stock compensation plans on may 18 , 2000 , the shareholders of the hartford approved the hartford incentive stock plan ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , which replaced the hartford 1995 incentive stock plan ( the 201c1995 plan 201d ) . the terms of the 2000 plan were substantially similar to the terms of the 1995 plan except that the 1995 plan had an annual award limit and a higher maximum award limit . under the 2000 plan , awards may be granted in the form of non-qualified or incentive stock options qualifying under section 422a of the internal revenue code , performance shares or restricted stock , or any combination of the foregoing . in addition , stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or part of any stock options granted under the 2000 plan . in december 2004 , the 2000 plan was amended to allow for grants of restricted stock units effective as of january 1 , 2005 . the aggregate number of shares of stock , which may be awarded , is subject to a maximum limit of 17211837 shares applicable to all awards for the ten-year duration of the 2000 plan . all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , and an option 2019s maximum term is ten years and two days . certain options become exercisable over a three year period commencing one year from the date of grant , while certain other options become exercisable upon the attainment of specified market price appreciation of the company 2019s common shares . for any year , no individual employee may receive an award of options for more than 1000000 shares . as of december 31 , 2004 , the hartford had not issued any incentive stock options under the 2000 plan . performance awards of common stock granted under the 2000 plan become payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals achieved over a period of not less than one nor more than five years , and the restricted stock granted is subject to a restriction period . on a cumulative basis , no more than 20% ( 20 % ) of the aggregate number of shares which may be awarded under the 2000 plan are available for performance shares and restricted stock awards . also , the maximum award of performance shares for any individual employee in any year is 200000 shares . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , the company granted shares of common stock of 315452 , 333712 and 40852 with weighted average prices of $ 64.93 , $ 38.13 and $ 62.28 , respectively , related to performance share and restricted stock awards . in 1996 , the company established the hartford employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) . under this plan , eligible employees of the hartford may purchase common stock of the company at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount from the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly offering period . the company may sell up to 5400000 shares of stock to eligible employees under the espp . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , 345262 , 443467 and 408304 shares were sold , respectively . the per share weighted average fair value of the discount under the espp was $ 9.31 , $ 11.96 , and $ 11.70 in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . additionally , during 1997 , the hartford established employee stock purchase plans for certain employees of the company 2019s international subsidiaries . under these plans , participants may purchase common stock of the hartford at a fixed price at the end of a three-year period . the activity under these programs is not material. .
Question: what was the expected payment for all benefits in 2007?
Answer: 174.0
Question: and what was that expected payment for all years?
Answer: 2124.0
Question: what portion of this payment was represented by pension benefits?
| 0.83427 |
CONVFINQA6703 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the change in cash instruments from 2017 to 2018, in millions?
| 1832.0 |
CONVFINQA6704 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the change in cash instruments from 2017 to 2018, in millions?
Answer: 1832.0
Question: and what was the total of cash instruments in 2017, in millions?
| 15395.0 |
CONVFINQA6705 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2018</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash instruments</td><td>$ 17227</td><td>$ 15395</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives</td><td>4948</td><td>3802</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other financial assets</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 22181</td><td>$ 19201</td></tr></table> level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what was the change in cash instruments from 2017 to 2018, in millions?
Answer: 1832.0
Question: and what was the total of cash instruments in 2017, in millions?
Answer: 15395.0
Question: how much does that change represent, in percentage, in relation to this 2017 total?
| 0.119 |
CONVFINQA6706 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on november 1 , 2016 , management evaluated the net assets of alcoa corporation for potential impairment and determined that no impairment charge was required . the cash flows related to alcoa corporation have not been segregated and are included in the statement of consolidated cash flows for 2016 . the following table presents depreciation , depletion and amortization , restructuring and other charges , and purchases of property , plant and equipment of the discontinued operations related to alcoa corporation: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>$ 593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring and other charges</td><td>$ 102</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 298</td></tr></table> w . subsequent events management evaluated all activity of arconic and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , except as noted below : on january 22 , 2019 , the company announced that its board of directors ( the board ) had determined to no longer pursue a potential sale of arconic as part of its strategy and portfolio review . on february 6 , 2019 , the company announced that the board appointed john c . plant , current chairman of the board , as chairman and chief executive officer of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 , to succeed chip blankenship , who ceased to serve as chief executive officer of the company and resigned as a member of the board , in each case as of that date . in addition , the company announced that the board appointed elmer l . doty , current member of the board , as president and chief operating officer , a newly created position , effective february 6 , 2019 . mr . doty will remain a member of the board . the company also announced that arthur d . collins , jr. , current member of the board , has been appointed interim lead independent director of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 . on february 8 , 2019 , the company announced the following key initiatives as part of its ongoing strategy and portfolio review : plans to reduce operating costs , designed to maximize the impact in 2019 ; the planned separation of its portfolio into engineered products and forgings ( ep&f ) and global rolled products ( grp ) , with a spin-off of one of the businesses ; the potential sale of businesses that do not best fit into ep&f or grp ; execute its previously authorized $ 500 share repurchase program in the first half of 2019 ; the board authorized an additional $ 500 of share repurchases , effective through the end of 2020 ; and plans to reduce its quarterly common stock dividend from $ 0.06 to $ 0.02 per share . on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . the final number of shares to be repurchased will be based on the volume-weighted average price of arconic 2019s common stock during the term of the transaction , less a discount . the asr agreement is expected to be completed during the first half of the company will evaluate its organizational structure in conjunction with the planned separation of its portfolio and changes to its reportable segments are expected in the first half of 2019. .
Question: what was the value of depreciation, depletion and amortization?
| 593.0 |
CONVFINQA6707 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on november 1 , 2016 , management evaluated the net assets of alcoa corporation for potential impairment and determined that no impairment charge was required . the cash flows related to alcoa corporation have not been segregated and are included in the statement of consolidated cash flows for 2016 . the following table presents depreciation , depletion and amortization , restructuring and other charges , and purchases of property , plant and equipment of the discontinued operations related to alcoa corporation: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>$ 593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring and other charges</td><td>$ 102</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 298</td></tr></table> w . subsequent events management evaluated all activity of arconic and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , except as noted below : on january 22 , 2019 , the company announced that its board of directors ( the board ) had determined to no longer pursue a potential sale of arconic as part of its strategy and portfolio review . on february 6 , 2019 , the company announced that the board appointed john c . plant , current chairman of the board , as chairman and chief executive officer of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 , to succeed chip blankenship , who ceased to serve as chief executive officer of the company and resigned as a member of the board , in each case as of that date . in addition , the company announced that the board appointed elmer l . doty , current member of the board , as president and chief operating officer , a newly created position , effective february 6 , 2019 . mr . doty will remain a member of the board . the company also announced that arthur d . collins , jr. , current member of the board , has been appointed interim lead independent director of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 . on february 8 , 2019 , the company announced the following key initiatives as part of its ongoing strategy and portfolio review : plans to reduce operating costs , designed to maximize the impact in 2019 ; the planned separation of its portfolio into engineered products and forgings ( ep&f ) and global rolled products ( grp ) , with a spin-off of one of the businesses ; the potential sale of businesses that do not best fit into ep&f or grp ; execute its previously authorized $ 500 share repurchase program in the first half of 2019 ; the board authorized an additional $ 500 of share repurchases , effective through the end of 2020 ; and plans to reduce its quarterly common stock dividend from $ 0.06 to $ 0.02 per share . on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . the final number of shares to be repurchased will be based on the volume-weighted average price of arconic 2019s common stock during the term of the transaction , less a discount . the asr agreement is expected to be completed during the first half of the company will evaluate its organizational structure in conjunction with the planned separation of its portfolio and changes to its reportable segments are expected in the first half of 2019. .
Question: what was the value of depreciation, depletion and amortization?
Answer: 593.0
Question: what was total capital expenditures?
| 298.0 |
CONVFINQA6708 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on november 1 , 2016 , management evaluated the net assets of alcoa corporation for potential impairment and determined that no impairment charge was required . the cash flows related to alcoa corporation have not been segregated and are included in the statement of consolidated cash flows for 2016 . the following table presents depreciation , depletion and amortization , restructuring and other charges , and purchases of property , plant and equipment of the discontinued operations related to alcoa corporation: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>$ 593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring and other charges</td><td>$ 102</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 298</td></tr></table> w . subsequent events management evaluated all activity of arconic and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , except as noted below : on january 22 , 2019 , the company announced that its board of directors ( the board ) had determined to no longer pursue a potential sale of arconic as part of its strategy and portfolio review . on february 6 , 2019 , the company announced that the board appointed john c . plant , current chairman of the board , as chairman and chief executive officer of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 , to succeed chip blankenship , who ceased to serve as chief executive officer of the company and resigned as a member of the board , in each case as of that date . in addition , the company announced that the board appointed elmer l . doty , current member of the board , as president and chief operating officer , a newly created position , effective february 6 , 2019 . mr . doty will remain a member of the board . the company also announced that arthur d . collins , jr. , current member of the board , has been appointed interim lead independent director of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 . on february 8 , 2019 , the company announced the following key initiatives as part of its ongoing strategy and portfolio review : plans to reduce operating costs , designed to maximize the impact in 2019 ; the planned separation of its portfolio into engineered products and forgings ( ep&f ) and global rolled products ( grp ) , with a spin-off of one of the businesses ; the potential sale of businesses that do not best fit into ep&f or grp ; execute its previously authorized $ 500 share repurchase program in the first half of 2019 ; the board authorized an additional $ 500 of share repurchases , effective through the end of 2020 ; and plans to reduce its quarterly common stock dividend from $ 0.06 to $ 0.02 per share . on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . the final number of shares to be repurchased will be based on the volume-weighted average price of arconic 2019s common stock during the term of the transaction , less a discount . the asr agreement is expected to be completed during the first half of the company will evaluate its organizational structure in conjunction with the planned separation of its portfolio and changes to its reportable segments are expected in the first half of 2019. .
Question: what was the value of depreciation, depletion and amortization?
Answer: 593.0
Question: what was total capital expenditures?
Answer: 298.0
Question: what is the ratio of depreciation, depletion and amortization to capital expenditures?
| 1.98993 |
CONVFINQA6709 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on november 1 , 2016 , management evaluated the net assets of alcoa corporation for potential impairment and determined that no impairment charge was required . the cash flows related to alcoa corporation have not been segregated and are included in the statement of consolidated cash flows for 2016 . the following table presents depreciation , depletion and amortization , restructuring and other charges , and purchases of property , plant and equipment of the discontinued operations related to alcoa corporation: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31,</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>depreciation depletion and amortization</td><td>$ 593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring and other charges</td><td>$ 102</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 298</td></tr></table> w . subsequent events management evaluated all activity of arconic and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , except as noted below : on january 22 , 2019 , the company announced that its board of directors ( the board ) had determined to no longer pursue a potential sale of arconic as part of its strategy and portfolio review . on february 6 , 2019 , the company announced that the board appointed john c . plant , current chairman of the board , as chairman and chief executive officer of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 , to succeed chip blankenship , who ceased to serve as chief executive officer of the company and resigned as a member of the board , in each case as of that date . in addition , the company announced that the board appointed elmer l . doty , current member of the board , as president and chief operating officer , a newly created position , effective february 6 , 2019 . mr . doty will remain a member of the board . the company also announced that arthur d . collins , jr. , current member of the board , has been appointed interim lead independent director of the company , effective february 6 , 2019 . on february 8 , 2019 , the company announced the following key initiatives as part of its ongoing strategy and portfolio review : plans to reduce operating costs , designed to maximize the impact in 2019 ; the planned separation of its portfolio into engineered products and forgings ( ep&f ) and global rolled products ( grp ) , with a spin-off of one of the businesses ; the potential sale of businesses that do not best fit into ep&f or grp ; execute its previously authorized $ 500 share repurchase program in the first half of 2019 ; the board authorized an additional $ 500 of share repurchases , effective through the end of 2020 ; and plans to reduce its quarterly common stock dividend from $ 0.06 to $ 0.02 per share . on february 19 , 2019 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( 201casr 201d ) agreement with jpmorgan chase bank to repurchase $ 700 of its common stock , pursuant to the share repurchase program previously authorized by the board . under the asr agreement , arconic will receive initial delivery of approximately 32 million shares on february 21 , 2019 . the final number of shares to be repurchased will be based on the volume-weighted average price of arconic 2019s common stock during the term of the transaction , less a discount . the asr agreement is expected to be completed during the first half of the company will evaluate its organizational structure in conjunction with the planned separation of its portfolio and changes to its reportable segments are expected in the first half of 2019. .
Question: what was the value of depreciation, depletion and amortization?
Answer: 593.0
Question: what was total capital expenditures?
Answer: 298.0
Question: what is the ratio of depreciation, depletion and amortization to capital expenditures?
Answer: 1.98993
Question: what is that less 1?
| 0.98993 |
CONVFINQA6710 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 1000000</td><td>$ 793000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>725000</td><td>700000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>325075</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>-</td><td>160252</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>728507</td><td>726754</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>704596</td><td>773058</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>59838</td><td>60365</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3543016</td><td>3613429</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-253907 ( 253907 )</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term obligations</td><td>$ 3289109</td><td>$ 3451276</td></tr></table> credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . in february 2007 , the company secured an additional $ 550.0 million under its credit facilities and drew down $ 250.0 million of the existing revolving loans under the american tower credit facility . ( see note 19. ) during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company drew down the remaining amount available under the delayed draw term loan component of the american tower credit facility and drew down $ 25.0 million of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite credit facility to finance debt redemptions and repurchases . in addition , on october 27 , 2006 , the remaining $ 175.0 million undrawn portion of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite facility was canceled pursuant to its terms . as of december 31 , 2006 , the american tower credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 300.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 17.8 million of undrawn letters of credit are outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; 2022 a $ 750.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; and 2022 a $ 250.0 million delayed draw term loan , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 . the borrowers under the american tower credit facility include ati , american tower , l.p. , american tower international , inc . and american tower llc . the company and the borrowers 2019 restricted subsidiaries ( as defined in the loan agreement ) have guaranteed all of the loans under the credit facility . these loans are secured by liens on and security interests in substantially all assets of the borrowers and the restricted subsidiaries , with a carrying value aggregating approximately $ 4.5 billion at december 31 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the spectrasite credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 250.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 4.6 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010; .
Question: as of december 31, 2005, what was the amount from the total of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements that was current?
| 162153.0 |
CONVFINQA6711 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 1000000</td><td>$ 793000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>725000</td><td>700000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>325075</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>-</td><td>160252</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>728507</td><td>726754</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>704596</td><td>773058</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>59838</td><td>60365</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3543016</td><td>3613429</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-253907 ( 253907 )</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term obligations</td><td>$ 3289109</td><td>$ 3451276</td></tr></table> credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . in february 2007 , the company secured an additional $ 550.0 million under its credit facilities and drew down $ 250.0 million of the existing revolving loans under the american tower credit facility . ( see note 19. ) during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company drew down the remaining amount available under the delayed draw term loan component of the american tower credit facility and drew down $ 25.0 million of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite credit facility to finance debt redemptions and repurchases . in addition , on october 27 , 2006 , the remaining $ 175.0 million undrawn portion of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite facility was canceled pursuant to its terms . as of december 31 , 2006 , the american tower credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 300.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 17.8 million of undrawn letters of credit are outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; 2022 a $ 750.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; and 2022 a $ 250.0 million delayed draw term loan , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 . the borrowers under the american tower credit facility include ati , american tower , l.p. , american tower international , inc . and american tower llc . the company and the borrowers 2019 restricted subsidiaries ( as defined in the loan agreement ) have guaranteed all of the loans under the credit facility . these loans are secured by liens on and security interests in substantially all assets of the borrowers and the restricted subsidiaries , with a carrying value aggregating approximately $ 4.5 billion at december 31 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the spectrasite credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 250.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 4.6 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010; .
Question: as of december 31, 2005, what was the amount from the total of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements that was current?
Answer: 162153.0
Question: and what was that total of outstanding amounts?
| 3613429.0 |
CONVFINQA6712 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 1000000</td><td>$ 793000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>725000</td><td>700000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>325075</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>-</td><td>160252</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>728507</td><td>726754</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>704596</td><td>773058</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>59838</td><td>60365</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3543016</td><td>3613429</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-253907 ( 253907 )</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term obligations</td><td>$ 3289109</td><td>$ 3451276</td></tr></table> credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . in february 2007 , the company secured an additional $ 550.0 million under its credit facilities and drew down $ 250.0 million of the existing revolving loans under the american tower credit facility . ( see note 19. ) during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company drew down the remaining amount available under the delayed draw term loan component of the american tower credit facility and drew down $ 25.0 million of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite credit facility to finance debt redemptions and repurchases . in addition , on october 27 , 2006 , the remaining $ 175.0 million undrawn portion of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite facility was canceled pursuant to its terms . as of december 31 , 2006 , the american tower credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 300.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 17.8 million of undrawn letters of credit are outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; 2022 a $ 750.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; and 2022 a $ 250.0 million delayed draw term loan , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 . the borrowers under the american tower credit facility include ati , american tower , l.p. , american tower international , inc . and american tower llc . the company and the borrowers 2019 restricted subsidiaries ( as defined in the loan agreement ) have guaranteed all of the loans under the credit facility . these loans are secured by liens on and security interests in substantially all assets of the borrowers and the restricted subsidiaries , with a carrying value aggregating approximately $ 4.5 billion at december 31 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the spectrasite credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 250.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 4.6 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010; .
Question: as of december 31, 2005, what was the amount from the total of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements that was current?
Answer: 162153.0
Question: and what was that total of outstanding amounts?
Answer: 3613429.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that current amount represent?
| 0.04488 |
CONVFINQA6713 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 1000000</td><td>$ 793000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>725000</td><td>700000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>325075</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>-</td><td>160252</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>728507</td><td>726754</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>704596</td><td>773058</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>59838</td><td>60365</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3543016</td><td>3613429</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-253907 ( 253907 )</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term obligations</td><td>$ 3289109</td><td>$ 3451276</td></tr></table> credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . in february 2007 , the company secured an additional $ 550.0 million under its credit facilities and drew down $ 250.0 million of the existing revolving loans under the american tower credit facility . ( see note 19. ) during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company drew down the remaining amount available under the delayed draw term loan component of the american tower credit facility and drew down $ 25.0 million of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite credit facility to finance debt redemptions and repurchases . in addition , on october 27 , 2006 , the remaining $ 175.0 million undrawn portion of the delayed draw term loan component of the spectrasite facility was canceled pursuant to its terms . as of december 31 , 2006 , the american tower credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 300.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 17.8 million of undrawn letters of credit are outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; 2022 a $ 750.0 million term loan a , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 ; and 2022 a $ 250.0 million delayed draw term loan , which is fully drawn , maturing on october 27 , 2010 . the borrowers under the american tower credit facility include ati , american tower , l.p. , american tower international , inc . and american tower llc . the company and the borrowers 2019 restricted subsidiaries ( as defined in the loan agreement ) have guaranteed all of the loans under the credit facility . these loans are secured by liens on and security interests in substantially all assets of the borrowers and the restricted subsidiaries , with a carrying value aggregating approximately $ 4.5 billion at december 31 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the spectrasite credit facility consists of the following : 2022 a $ 250.0 million revolving credit facility , against which approximately $ 4.6 million of undrawn letters of credit were outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , maturing on october 27 , 2010; .
Question: as of december 31, 2005, what was the amount from the total of outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements that was current?
Answer: 162153.0
Question: and what was that total of outstanding amounts?
Answer: 3613429.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that current amount represent?
Answer: 0.04488
Question: and what was this percentage representation in the next year, in 2006?
| 0.07166 |
CONVFINQA6714 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
location approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?
| 75000.0 |
CONVFINQA6715 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
location approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?
Answer: 75000.0
Question: and what is that number for mullingar ireland?
| 74000.0 |
CONVFINQA6716 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
location approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?
Answer: 75000.0
Question: and what is that number for mullingar ireland?
Answer: 74000.0
Question: what is, then, the total square feet leased by the company in both locations?
| 149000.0 |
CONVFINQA6717 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
location approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?
Answer: 75000.0
Question: and what is that number for mullingar ireland?
Answer: 74000.0
Question: what is, then, the total square feet leased by the company in both locations?
Answer: 149000.0
Question: and what is that number for mosta malta?
| 73000.0 |
CONVFINQA6718 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
location approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?
Answer: 75000.0
Question: and what is that number for mullingar ireland?
Answer: 74000.0
Question: what is, then, the total square feet leased by the company in both locations?
Answer: 149000.0
Question: and what is that number for mosta malta?
Answer: 73000.0
Question: including, then, mosta malta, what becomes the total square feet leased for the three locations?
| 222000.0 |
CONVFINQA6719 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 8.718 billion in 2003 from 2002 and $ 367 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increases in the oerb segment were primarily a result of higher natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon costs . the increases in the rm&t segment primarily reflected higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 107 million in 2003 from 2002 and $ 125 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increase in 2003 was primarily a result of increased employee benefits ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . also , marathon changed assumptions in the health care cost trend rate from 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) , resulting in higher retiree health care costs . additionally , during 2003 , marathon recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . the increase in 2002 primarily reflected increased employee related costs . inventory market valuation reserve is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . for additional information on this adjustment , see 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of critical accounting estimates 2013 net realizable value of inventories 201d on page 31 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 , following an increase of $ 96 million in 2002 from 2001 . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . the increase in 2002 was primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from acquisitions and the separation . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2003 and 2002 and losses of $ 5 million for 2001 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . as a result of the adoption of statement of financial accounting standards no . 145 201crescission of fasb statements no . 4 , 44 , and 64 , amendment of fasb statement no . 13 , and technical corrections 201d ( 201csfas no . 145 201d ) , the loss from early extinguishment of debt that was previously reported as an extraordinary item ( net of taxes of $ 20 million ) has been reclassified into income before income taxes . the adoption of sfas no . 145 had no impact on net income for 2002 . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 531 million in 2002 from 2001 . map income was higher in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . map income was significantly lower in 2002 compared to 2001 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . provision for income taxes increased by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 458 million in 2002 from 2001 , primarily due to $ 720 million increase and $ 1.356 billion decrease in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2003 was 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) compared to 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) and 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) for 2002 and 2001 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , marathon recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory tax rate</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations ( a )</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>5.6</td><td>-0.7 ( 0.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects</td><td>2.2</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other federal tax effects</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>42.1% ( 42.1 % )</td><td>37.1% ( 37.1 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2003?
| 2.2 |
CONVFINQA6720 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 8.718 billion in 2003 from 2002 and $ 367 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increases in the oerb segment were primarily a result of higher natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon costs . the increases in the rm&t segment primarily reflected higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 107 million in 2003 from 2002 and $ 125 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increase in 2003 was primarily a result of increased employee benefits ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . also , marathon changed assumptions in the health care cost trend rate from 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) , resulting in higher retiree health care costs . additionally , during 2003 , marathon recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . the increase in 2002 primarily reflected increased employee related costs . inventory market valuation reserve is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . for additional information on this adjustment , see 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of critical accounting estimates 2013 net realizable value of inventories 201d on page 31 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 , following an increase of $ 96 million in 2002 from 2001 . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . the increase in 2002 was primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from acquisitions and the separation . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2003 and 2002 and losses of $ 5 million for 2001 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . as a result of the adoption of statement of financial accounting standards no . 145 201crescission of fasb statements no . 4 , 44 , and 64 , amendment of fasb statement no . 13 , and technical corrections 201d ( 201csfas no . 145 201d ) , the loss from early extinguishment of debt that was previously reported as an extraordinary item ( net of taxes of $ 20 million ) has been reclassified into income before income taxes . the adoption of sfas no . 145 had no impact on net income for 2002 . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 531 million in 2002 from 2001 . map income was higher in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . map income was significantly lower in 2002 compared to 2001 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . provision for income taxes increased by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 458 million in 2002 from 2001 , primarily due to $ 720 million increase and $ 1.356 billion decrease in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2003 was 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) compared to 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) and 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) for 2002 and 2001 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , marathon recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory tax rate</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations ( a )</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>5.6</td><td>-0.7 ( 0.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects</td><td>2.2</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other federal tax effects</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>42.1% ( 42.1 % )</td><td>37.1% ( 37.1 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2003?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2002?
| 3.9 |
CONVFINQA6721 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 8.718 billion in 2003 from 2002 and $ 367 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increases in the oerb segment were primarily a result of higher natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon costs . the increases in the rm&t segment primarily reflected higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 107 million in 2003 from 2002 and $ 125 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increase in 2003 was primarily a result of increased employee benefits ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . also , marathon changed assumptions in the health care cost trend rate from 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) , resulting in higher retiree health care costs . additionally , during 2003 , marathon recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . the increase in 2002 primarily reflected increased employee related costs . inventory market valuation reserve is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . for additional information on this adjustment , see 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of critical accounting estimates 2013 net realizable value of inventories 201d on page 31 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 , following an increase of $ 96 million in 2002 from 2001 . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . the increase in 2002 was primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from acquisitions and the separation . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2003 and 2002 and losses of $ 5 million for 2001 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . as a result of the adoption of statement of financial accounting standards no . 145 201crescission of fasb statements no . 4 , 44 , and 64 , amendment of fasb statement no . 13 , and technical corrections 201d ( 201csfas no . 145 201d ) , the loss from early extinguishment of debt that was previously reported as an extraordinary item ( net of taxes of $ 20 million ) has been reclassified into income before income taxes . the adoption of sfas no . 145 had no impact on net income for 2002 . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 531 million in 2002 from 2001 . map income was higher in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . map income was significantly lower in 2002 compared to 2001 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . provision for income taxes increased by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 458 million in 2002 from 2001 , primarily due to $ 720 million increase and $ 1.356 billion decrease in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2003 was 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) compared to 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) and 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) for 2002 and 2001 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , marathon recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory tax rate</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations ( a )</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>5.6</td><td>-0.7 ( 0.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects</td><td>2.2</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other federal tax effects</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>42.1% ( 42.1 % )</td><td>37.1% ( 37.1 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2003?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2002?
Answer: 3.9
Question: what is the net change?
| -1.7 |
CONVFINQA6722 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 8.718 billion in 2003 from 2002 and $ 367 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increases in the oerb segment were primarily a result of higher natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon costs . the increases in the rm&t segment primarily reflected higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 107 million in 2003 from 2002 and $ 125 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increase in 2003 was primarily a result of increased employee benefits ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . also , marathon changed assumptions in the health care cost trend rate from 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) , resulting in higher retiree health care costs . additionally , during 2003 , marathon recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . the increase in 2002 primarily reflected increased employee related costs . inventory market valuation reserve is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . for additional information on this adjustment , see 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of critical accounting estimates 2013 net realizable value of inventories 201d on page 31 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 , following an increase of $ 96 million in 2002 from 2001 . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . the increase in 2002 was primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from acquisitions and the separation . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2003 and 2002 and losses of $ 5 million for 2001 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . as a result of the adoption of statement of financial accounting standards no . 145 201crescission of fasb statements no . 4 , 44 , and 64 , amendment of fasb statement no . 13 , and technical corrections 201d ( 201csfas no . 145 201d ) , the loss from early extinguishment of debt that was previously reported as an extraordinary item ( net of taxes of $ 20 million ) has been reclassified into income before income taxes . the adoption of sfas no . 145 had no impact on net income for 2002 . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 531 million in 2002 from 2001 . map income was higher in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . map income was significantly lower in 2002 compared to 2001 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . provision for income taxes increased by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 458 million in 2002 from 2001 , primarily due to $ 720 million increase and $ 1.356 billion decrease in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2003 was 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) compared to 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) and 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) for 2002 and 2001 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , marathon recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory tax rate</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations ( a )</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>5.6</td><td>-0.7 ( 0.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects</td><td>2.2</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other federal tax effects</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>42.1% ( 42.1 % )</td><td>37.1% ( 37.1 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2003?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2002?
Answer: 3.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -1.7
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2002?
| 3.9 |
CONVFINQA6723 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 8.718 billion in 2003 from 2002 and $ 367 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increases in the oerb segment were primarily a result of higher natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon costs . the increases in the rm&t segment primarily reflected higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 107 million in 2003 from 2002 and $ 125 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increase in 2003 was primarily a result of increased employee benefits ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . also , marathon changed assumptions in the health care cost trend rate from 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) , resulting in higher retiree health care costs . additionally , during 2003 , marathon recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . the increase in 2002 primarily reflected increased employee related costs . inventory market valuation reserve is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . for additional information on this adjustment , see 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of critical accounting estimates 2013 net realizable value of inventories 201d on page 31 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 , following an increase of $ 96 million in 2002 from 2001 . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . the increase in 2002 was primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from acquisitions and the separation . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2003 and 2002 and losses of $ 5 million for 2001 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . as a result of the adoption of statement of financial accounting standards no . 145 201crescission of fasb statements no . 4 , 44 , and 64 , amendment of fasb statement no . 13 , and technical corrections 201d ( 201csfas no . 145 201d ) , the loss from early extinguishment of debt that was previously reported as an extraordinary item ( net of taxes of $ 20 million ) has been reclassified into income before income taxes . the adoption of sfas no . 145 had no impact on net income for 2002 . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 531 million in 2002 from 2001 . map income was higher in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . map income was significantly lower in 2002 compared to 2001 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . provision for income taxes increased by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 458 million in 2002 from 2001 , primarily due to $ 720 million increase and $ 1.356 billion decrease in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2003 was 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) compared to 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) and 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) for 2002 and 2001 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , marathon recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>statutory tax rate</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td><td>35.0% ( 35.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effects of foreign operations ( a )</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>5.6</td><td>-0.7 ( 0.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects</td><td>2.2</td><td>3.9</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other federal tax effects</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>36.6% ( 36.6 % )</td><td>42.1% ( 42.1 % )</td><td>37.1% ( 37.1 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2003?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2002?
Answer: 3.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -1.7
Question: what was the state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects in 2002?
Answer: 3.9
Question: what was the percent change?
| -0.4359 |
CONVFINQA6724 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?
| 139.82 |
CONVFINQA6725 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?
Answer: 139.82
Question: what was the price in 2006?
| 147.04 |
CONVFINQA6726 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?
Answer: 139.82
Question: what was the price in 2006?
Answer: 147.04
Question: what was the net change?
| -7.22 |
CONVFINQA6727 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?
Answer: 139.82
Question: what was the price in 2006?
Answer: 147.04
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: -7.22
Question: what was the 2006 price?
| 147.04 |
CONVFINQA6728 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?
Answer: 139.82
Question: what was the price in 2006?
Answer: 147.04
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: -7.22
Question: what was the 2006 price?
Answer: 147.04
Question: what was the percent change?
| -0.0491 |
CONVFINQA6729 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( "special items" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within "other non- operating income ( expense ) , net" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .
Question: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?
| 1.37795 |
CONVFINQA6730 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( "special items" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within "other non- operating income ( expense ) , net" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .
Question: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?
Answer: 1.37795
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.37795 |
CONVFINQA6731 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( "special items" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within "other non- operating income ( expense ) , net" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .
Question: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?
Answer: 1.37795
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.37795
Question: in that same year of 2019, what were the pension expenses?
| 91.8 |
CONVFINQA6732 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( "special items" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within "other non- operating income ( expense ) , net" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .
Question: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?
Answer: 1.37795
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.37795
Question: in that same year of 2019, what were the pension expenses?
Answer: 91.8
Question: and what were they in 2018?
| 27.6 |
CONVFINQA6733 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense including special items noted below</td><td>$ 27.6</td><td>$ 91.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( "special items" )</td><td>7.2</td><td>48.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within "other non- operating income ( expense ) , net" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .
Question: how much is the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 expected to represent in relation to that pension expense's amortization in 2019?
Answer: 1.37795
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.37795
Question: in that same year of 2019, what were the pension expenses?
Answer: 91.8
Question: and what were they in 2018?
Answer: 27.6
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 64.2 |
CONVFINQA6734 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what was the change in the length of the cash conversion cycle from 2013 to 2014?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA6735 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what was the change in the length of the cash conversion cycle from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 2.0
Question: and what was that length in 2013?
| 21.0 |
CONVFINQA6736 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what was the change in the length of the cash conversion cycle from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 2.0
Question: and what was that length in 2013?
Answer: 21.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2013 length of the cash conversion cycle?
| 0.09524 |
CONVFINQA6737 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what was the change in the length of the cash conversion cycle from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 2.0
Question: and what was that length in 2013?
Answer: 21.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2013 length of the cash conversion cycle?
Answer: 0.09524
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 9.52381 |
CONVFINQA6738 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the rental expense in 2004?
| 4660.0 |
CONVFINQA6739 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the rental expense in 2004?
Answer: 4660.0
Question: what was the rental expense in 2003?
| 4963.0 |
CONVFINQA6740 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the rental expense in 2004?
Answer: 4660.0
Question: what was the rental expense in 2003?
Answer: 4963.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| -303.0 |
CONVFINQA6741 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the rental expense in 2004?
Answer: 4660.0
Question: what was the rental expense in 2003?
Answer: 4963.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: -303.0
Question: what was the rental expense in 2003?
| 4963.0 |
CONVFINQA6742 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the rental expense in 2004?
Answer: 4660.0
Question: what was the rental expense in 2003?
Answer: 4963.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: -303.0
Question: what was the rental expense in 2003?
Answer: 4963.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.06105 |
CONVFINQA6743 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
credit agency ratings our long-term debt credit ratings as of february 16 , 2007 were ba3 with negative outlook , b creditwatch negative and b with negative outlook , as reported by moody 2019s investors service , standard & poor 2019s and fitch ratings , respectively . a downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to access capital and could result in more stringent covenants and higher interest rates under the terms of any new indebtedness . contractual obligations the following summarizes our estimated contractual obligations at december 31 , 2006 , and their effect on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt1</td><td>$ 2.6</td><td>$ 2.8</td><td>$ 257.0</td><td>$ 240.9</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>$ 1247.9</td><td>$ 2251.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments</td><td>122.0</td><td>116.1</td><td>107.1</td><td>93.6</td><td>75.1</td><td>74.1</td><td>588.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cancelable operating lease obligations</td><td>292.3</td><td>265.2</td><td>237.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>181.9</td><td>861.2</td><td>2045.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contingent acquisition payments2</td><td>47.2</td><td>34.2</td><td>20.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.1</td><td>109.8</td></tr></table> contingent acquisition payments 2 47.2 34.2 20.8 2.5 2.0 3.1 109.8 1 holders of our $ 400.0 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes may require us to repurchase their notes for cash at par in march 2008 . these notes will mature in 2023 if not converted or repurchased . 2 we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information . we have not included obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans in the contractual obligations table . our funding policy regarding our funded pension plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the plans 2019 funded status . the funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors , including returns on invested assets , level of market interest rates and levels of voluntary contributions to the plans . declines in long-term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans . for 2007 , we do not expect to contribute to our domestic pension plans , and expect to contribute $ 20.6 to our foreign pension plans . we have not included our deferred tax obligations in the contractual obligations table as the timing of any future payments in relation to these obligations is uncertain . derivatives and hedging activities we periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements and forward contracts to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to mitigate foreign exchange volatility . in may of 2005 , we terminated all of our long-term interest rate swap agreements covering the $ 350.0 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured notes and $ 150.0 of the $ 500.0 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior unsecured notes . in connection with the interest rate swap termination , our net cash receipts were $ 1.1 , which is recorded as an offset to interest expense over the remaining life of the related debt . we have entered into foreign currency transactions in which various foreign currencies are bought or sold forward . these contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions . the changes in value of these forward contracts have been recorded in other income or expense . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had contracts covering $ 0.2 and $ 6.2 , respectively , of notional amount of currency and the fair value of the forward contracts was negligible . the terms of the 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes include two embedded derivative instruments and the terms of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes and our series b preferred stock each include one embedded derivative instrument . the fair value of these derivatives on december 31 , 2006 was negligible . the interpublic group of companies , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : y31000 pcn : 036000000 ***%%pcmsg|36 |00005|yes|no|02/28/2007 01:12|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the total in long-term debt and interest payments, combined, in 2007?
| 124.6 |
CONVFINQA6744 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
credit agency ratings our long-term debt credit ratings as of february 16 , 2007 were ba3 with negative outlook , b creditwatch negative and b with negative outlook , as reported by moody 2019s investors service , standard & poor 2019s and fitch ratings , respectively . a downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to access capital and could result in more stringent covenants and higher interest rates under the terms of any new indebtedness . contractual obligations the following summarizes our estimated contractual obligations at december 31 , 2006 , and their effect on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt1</td><td>$ 2.6</td><td>$ 2.8</td><td>$ 257.0</td><td>$ 240.9</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>$ 1247.9</td><td>$ 2251.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments</td><td>122.0</td><td>116.1</td><td>107.1</td><td>93.6</td><td>75.1</td><td>74.1</td><td>588.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cancelable operating lease obligations</td><td>292.3</td><td>265.2</td><td>237.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>181.9</td><td>861.2</td><td>2045.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contingent acquisition payments2</td><td>47.2</td><td>34.2</td><td>20.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.1</td><td>109.8</td></tr></table> contingent acquisition payments 2 47.2 34.2 20.8 2.5 2.0 3.1 109.8 1 holders of our $ 400.0 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes may require us to repurchase their notes for cash at par in march 2008 . these notes will mature in 2023 if not converted or repurchased . 2 we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information . we have not included obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans in the contractual obligations table . our funding policy regarding our funded pension plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the plans 2019 funded status . the funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors , including returns on invested assets , level of market interest rates and levels of voluntary contributions to the plans . declines in long-term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans . for 2007 , we do not expect to contribute to our domestic pension plans , and expect to contribute $ 20.6 to our foreign pension plans . we have not included our deferred tax obligations in the contractual obligations table as the timing of any future payments in relation to these obligations is uncertain . derivatives and hedging activities we periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements and forward contracts to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to mitigate foreign exchange volatility . in may of 2005 , we terminated all of our long-term interest rate swap agreements covering the $ 350.0 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured notes and $ 150.0 of the $ 500.0 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior unsecured notes . in connection with the interest rate swap termination , our net cash receipts were $ 1.1 , which is recorded as an offset to interest expense over the remaining life of the related debt . we have entered into foreign currency transactions in which various foreign currencies are bought or sold forward . these contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions . the changes in value of these forward contracts have been recorded in other income or expense . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had contracts covering $ 0.2 and $ 6.2 , respectively , of notional amount of currency and the fair value of the forward contracts was negligible . the terms of the 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes include two embedded derivative instruments and the terms of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes and our series b preferred stock each include one embedded derivative instrument . the fair value of these derivatives on december 31 , 2006 was negligible . the interpublic group of companies , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : y31000 pcn : 036000000 ***%%pcmsg|36 |00005|yes|no|02/28/2007 01:12|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the total in long-term debt and interest payments, combined, in 2007?
Answer: 124.6
Question: and what was the amount in non-cancelable operating lease obligations in that same year?
| 292.3 |
CONVFINQA6745 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
credit agency ratings our long-term debt credit ratings as of february 16 , 2007 were ba3 with negative outlook , b creditwatch negative and b with negative outlook , as reported by moody 2019s investors service , standard & poor 2019s and fitch ratings , respectively . a downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to access capital and could result in more stringent covenants and higher interest rates under the terms of any new indebtedness . contractual obligations the following summarizes our estimated contractual obligations at december 31 , 2006 , and their effect on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt1</td><td>$ 2.6</td><td>$ 2.8</td><td>$ 257.0</td><td>$ 240.9</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>$ 1247.9</td><td>$ 2251.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments</td><td>122.0</td><td>116.1</td><td>107.1</td><td>93.6</td><td>75.1</td><td>74.1</td><td>588.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cancelable operating lease obligations</td><td>292.3</td><td>265.2</td><td>237.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>181.9</td><td>861.2</td><td>2045.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contingent acquisition payments2</td><td>47.2</td><td>34.2</td><td>20.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.1</td><td>109.8</td></tr></table> contingent acquisition payments 2 47.2 34.2 20.8 2.5 2.0 3.1 109.8 1 holders of our $ 400.0 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes may require us to repurchase their notes for cash at par in march 2008 . these notes will mature in 2023 if not converted or repurchased . 2 we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information . we have not included obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans in the contractual obligations table . our funding policy regarding our funded pension plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the plans 2019 funded status . the funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors , including returns on invested assets , level of market interest rates and levels of voluntary contributions to the plans . declines in long-term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans . for 2007 , we do not expect to contribute to our domestic pension plans , and expect to contribute $ 20.6 to our foreign pension plans . we have not included our deferred tax obligations in the contractual obligations table as the timing of any future payments in relation to these obligations is uncertain . derivatives and hedging activities we periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements and forward contracts to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to mitigate foreign exchange volatility . in may of 2005 , we terminated all of our long-term interest rate swap agreements covering the $ 350.0 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured notes and $ 150.0 of the $ 500.0 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior unsecured notes . in connection with the interest rate swap termination , our net cash receipts were $ 1.1 , which is recorded as an offset to interest expense over the remaining life of the related debt . we have entered into foreign currency transactions in which various foreign currencies are bought or sold forward . these contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions . the changes in value of these forward contracts have been recorded in other income or expense . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had contracts covering $ 0.2 and $ 6.2 , respectively , of notional amount of currency and the fair value of the forward contracts was negligible . the terms of the 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes include two embedded derivative instruments and the terms of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes and our series b preferred stock each include one embedded derivative instrument . the fair value of these derivatives on december 31 , 2006 was negligible . the interpublic group of companies , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : y31000 pcn : 036000000 ***%%pcmsg|36 |00005|yes|no|02/28/2007 01:12|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the total in long-term debt and interest payments, combined, in 2007?
Answer: 124.6
Question: and what was the amount in non-cancelable operating lease obligations in that same year?
Answer: 292.3
Question: including this amount, what then becomes that total?
| 416.9 |
CONVFINQA6746 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
credit agency ratings our long-term debt credit ratings as of february 16 , 2007 were ba3 with negative outlook , b creditwatch negative and b with negative outlook , as reported by moody 2019s investors service , standard & poor 2019s and fitch ratings , respectively . a downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to access capital and could result in more stringent covenants and higher interest rates under the terms of any new indebtedness . contractual obligations the following summarizes our estimated contractual obligations at december 31 , 2006 , and their effect on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt1</td><td>$ 2.6</td><td>$ 2.8</td><td>$ 257.0</td><td>$ 240.9</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>$ 1247.9</td><td>$ 2251.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest payments</td><td>122.0</td><td>116.1</td><td>107.1</td><td>93.6</td><td>75.1</td><td>74.1</td><td>588.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cancelable operating lease obligations</td><td>292.3</td><td>265.2</td><td>237.4</td><td>207.9</td><td>181.9</td><td>861.2</td><td>2045.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contingent acquisition payments2</td><td>47.2</td><td>34.2</td><td>20.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>2.0</td><td>3.1</td><td>109.8</td></tr></table> contingent acquisition payments 2 47.2 34.2 20.8 2.5 2.0 3.1 109.8 1 holders of our $ 400.0 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes may require us to repurchase their notes for cash at par in march 2008 . these notes will mature in 2023 if not converted or repurchased . 2 we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information . we have not included obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans in the contractual obligations table . our funding policy regarding our funded pension plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the plans 2019 funded status . the funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors , including returns on invested assets , level of market interest rates and levels of voluntary contributions to the plans . declines in long-term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans . for 2007 , we do not expect to contribute to our domestic pension plans , and expect to contribute $ 20.6 to our foreign pension plans . we have not included our deferred tax obligations in the contractual obligations table as the timing of any future payments in relation to these obligations is uncertain . derivatives and hedging activities we periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements and forward contracts to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to mitigate foreign exchange volatility . in may of 2005 , we terminated all of our long-term interest rate swap agreements covering the $ 350.0 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured notes and $ 150.0 of the $ 500.0 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior unsecured notes . in connection with the interest rate swap termination , our net cash receipts were $ 1.1 , which is recorded as an offset to interest expense over the remaining life of the related debt . we have entered into foreign currency transactions in which various foreign currencies are bought or sold forward . these contracts were entered into to meet currency requirements arising from specific transactions . the changes in value of these forward contracts have been recorded in other income or expense . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had contracts covering $ 0.2 and $ 6.2 , respectively , of notional amount of currency and the fair value of the forward contracts was negligible . the terms of the 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) notes include two embedded derivative instruments and the terms of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes and our series b preferred stock each include one embedded derivative instrument . the fair value of these derivatives on december 31 , 2006 was negligible . the interpublic group of companies , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : y31000 pcn : 036000000 ***%%pcmsg|36 |00005|yes|no|02/28/2007 01:12|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the total in long-term debt and interest payments, combined, in 2007?
Answer: 124.6
Question: and what was the amount in non-cancelable operating lease obligations in that same year?
Answer: 292.3
Question: including this amount, what then becomes that total?
Answer: 416.9
Question: and including the contingent acquisition payments in 2007, what then becomes the total?
| 464.1 |
CONVFINQA6747 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shares of common stock issued , in treasury , and outstanding were ( in thousands of shares ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares issued</td><td>treasury shares</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 29 2013</td><td>376832</td><td>2014</td><td>376832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other</td><td>178</td><td>2014</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 28 2014</td><td>377010</td><td>2014</td><td>377010</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>exercise of warrants</td><td>20480</td><td>2014</td><td>20480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issuance of common stock to sponsors</td><td>221666</td><td>2014</td><td>221666</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition of kraft foods group inc .</td><td>592898</td><td>2014</td><td>592898</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other</td><td>2338</td><td>-413 ( 413 )</td><td>1925</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at january 3 2016</td><td>1214392</td><td>-413 ( 413 )</td><td>1213979</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other</td><td>4555</td><td>-2058 ( 2058 )</td><td>2497</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>1218947</td><td>-2471 ( 2471 )</td><td>1216476</td></tr></table> note 13 . financing arrangements we routinely enter into accounts receivable securitization and factoring programs . we account for transfers of receivables pursuant to these programs as a sale and remove them from our consolidated balance sheet . at december 31 , 2016 , our most significant program in place was the u.s . securitization program , which was amended in may 2016 and originally entered into in october of 2015 . under the program , we are entitled to receive cash consideration of up to $ 800 million ( which we elected to reduce to $ 500 million , effective february 21 , 2017 ) and a receivable for the remainder of the purchase price ( the 201cdeferred purchase price 201d ) . this securitization program utilizes a bankruptcy- remote special-purpose entity ( 201cspe 201d ) . the spe is wholly-owned by a subsidiary of kraft heinz and its sole business consists of the purchase or acceptance , through capital contributions of receivables and related assets , from a kraft heinz subsidiary and subsequent transfer of such receivables and related assets to a bank . although the spe is included in our consolidated financial statements , it is a separate legal entity with separate creditors who will be entitled , upon its liquidation , to be satisfied out of the spe's assets prior to any assets or value in the spe becoming available to kraft heinz or its subsidiaries . the assets of the spe are not available to pay creditors of kraft heinz or its subsidiaries . this program expires in may 2017 . in addition to the u.s . securitization program , we have accounts receivable factoring programs denominated in australian dollars , new zealand dollars , british pound sterling , euros , and japanese yen . under these programs , we generally receive cash consideration up to a certain limit and a receivable for the deferred purchase price . there is no deferred purchase price associated with the japanese yen contract . related to these programs , our aggregate cash consideration limit , after applying applicable hold-backs , was $ 245 million u.s . dollars at december 31 , 2016 . generally , each of these programs automatically renews annually until terminated by either party . the cash consideration and carrying amount of receivables removed from the consolidated balance sheets in connection with the above programs were $ 904 million at december 31 , 2016 and $ 267 million at january 3 , 2016 . the fair value of the deferred purchase price for the programs was $ 129 million at december 31 , 2016 and $ 583 million at january 3 , 2016 . the deferred purchase price is included in sold receivables on the consolidated balance sheets and had a carrying value which approximated its fair value at december 31 , 2016 and january 3 , 2016 . the proceeds from these sales are recognized on the consolidated statements of cash flows as a component of operating activities . we act as servicer for these arrangements and have not recorded any servicing assets or liabilities for these arrangements as of december 31 , 2016 and january 3 , 2016 because they were not material to the financial statements. .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what portion of the total of issued shares was reported as treasury stock?
| 0.00203 |
CONVFINQA6748 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shares of common stock issued , in treasury , and outstanding were ( in thousands of shares ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares issued</td><td>treasury shares</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 29 2013</td><td>376832</td><td>2014</td><td>376832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other</td><td>178</td><td>2014</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 28 2014</td><td>377010</td><td>2014</td><td>377010</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>exercise of warrants</td><td>20480</td><td>2014</td><td>20480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issuance of common stock to sponsors</td><td>221666</td><td>2014</td><td>221666</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition of kraft foods group inc .</td><td>592898</td><td>2014</td><td>592898</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other</td><td>2338</td><td>-413 ( 413 )</td><td>1925</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at january 3 2016</td><td>1214392</td><td>-413 ( 413 )</td><td>1213979</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other</td><td>4555</td><td>-2058 ( 2058 )</td><td>2497</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2016</td><td>1218947</td><td>-2471 ( 2471 )</td><td>1216476</td></tr></table> note 13 . financing arrangements we routinely enter into accounts receivable securitization and factoring programs . we account for transfers of receivables pursuant to these programs as a sale and remove them from our consolidated balance sheet . at december 31 , 2016 , our most significant program in place was the u.s . securitization program , which was amended in may 2016 and originally entered into in october of 2015 . under the program , we are entitled to receive cash consideration of up to $ 800 million ( which we elected to reduce to $ 500 million , effective february 21 , 2017 ) and a receivable for the remainder of the purchase price ( the 201cdeferred purchase price 201d ) . this securitization program utilizes a bankruptcy- remote special-purpose entity ( 201cspe 201d ) . the spe is wholly-owned by a subsidiary of kraft heinz and its sole business consists of the purchase or acceptance , through capital contributions of receivables and related assets , from a kraft heinz subsidiary and subsequent transfer of such receivables and related assets to a bank . although the spe is included in our consolidated financial statements , it is a separate legal entity with separate creditors who will be entitled , upon its liquidation , to be satisfied out of the spe's assets prior to any assets or value in the spe becoming available to kraft heinz or its subsidiaries . the assets of the spe are not available to pay creditors of kraft heinz or its subsidiaries . this program expires in may 2017 . in addition to the u.s . securitization program , we have accounts receivable factoring programs denominated in australian dollars , new zealand dollars , british pound sterling , euros , and japanese yen . under these programs , we generally receive cash consideration up to a certain limit and a receivable for the deferred purchase price . there is no deferred purchase price associated with the japanese yen contract . related to these programs , our aggregate cash consideration limit , after applying applicable hold-backs , was $ 245 million u.s . dollars at december 31 , 2016 . generally , each of these programs automatically renews annually until terminated by either party . the cash consideration and carrying amount of receivables removed from the consolidated balance sheets in connection with the above programs were $ 904 million at december 31 , 2016 and $ 267 million at january 3 , 2016 . the fair value of the deferred purchase price for the programs was $ 129 million at december 31 , 2016 and $ 583 million at january 3 , 2016 . the deferred purchase price is included in sold receivables on the consolidated balance sheets and had a carrying value which approximated its fair value at december 31 , 2016 and january 3 , 2016 . the proceeds from these sales are recognized on the consolidated statements of cash flows as a component of operating activities . we act as servicer for these arrangements and have not recorded any servicing assets or liabilities for these arrangements as of december 31 , 2016 and january 3 , 2016 because they were not material to the financial statements. .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what portion of the total of issued shares was reported as treasury stock?
Answer: 0.00203
Question: and what was the change in that total since the year of 2014?
| 842115.0 |
CONVFINQA6749 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquisitions</td><td>6</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 86</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was, in millions, the variation observed in the foreign currency translation?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA6750 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquisitions</td><td>6</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 86</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was, in millions, the variation observed in the foreign currency translation?
Answer: 8.0
Question: and concerning this same period, how much did the liability for interest in 2009 represent in relation to the one in 2008?
| 1.28571 |
CONVFINQA6751 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquisitions</td><td>6</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 86</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was, in millions, the variation observed in the foreign currency translation?
Answer: 8.0
Question: and concerning this same period, how much did the liability for interest in 2009 represent in relation to the one in 2008?
Answer: 1.28571
Question: what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2008 amount?
| 0.28571 |
CONVFINQA6752 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?
| 2047.0 |
CONVFINQA6753 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?
Answer: 2047.0
Question: and what was the one used in financing activities?
| 752.0 |
CONVFINQA6754 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?
Answer: 2047.0
Question: and what was the one used in financing activities?
Answer: 752.0
Question: how much, then, did the investing cash represent in relation to this financing one?
| 2.72207 |
CONVFINQA6755 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?
Answer: 2047.0
Question: and what was the one used in financing activities?
Answer: 752.0
Question: how much, then, did the investing cash represent in relation to this financing one?
Answer: 2.72207
Question: in that same year, what was the total debt?
| 745.0 |
CONVFINQA6756 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?
Answer: 2047.0
Question: and what was the one used in financing activities?
Answer: 752.0
Question: how much, then, did the investing cash represent in relation to this financing one?
Answer: 2.72207
Question: in that same year, what was the total debt?
Answer: 745.0
Question: and what was it in the previous year?
| 699.0 |
CONVFINQA6757 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .
Question: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?
Answer: 2047.0
Question: and what was the one used in financing activities?
Answer: 752.0
Question: how much, then, did the investing cash represent in relation to this financing one?
Answer: 2.72207
Question: in that same year, what was the total debt?
Answer: 745.0
Question: and what was it in the previous year?
Answer: 699.0
Question: what was, then the 2005 amount as a portion of the 2004 one?
| 1.06581 |
CONVFINQA6758 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
leveraged performance units during fiscal 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as leveraged performance units , or lpus . lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , one-third of any earned units converts to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds convert to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . total shareholder return units before fiscal 2015 , certain of our executives were granted total shareholder return ( 201ctsr 201d ) units , which are performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on our total shareholder return over a three-year performance period compared to companies in the s&p 500 . once the performance results are certified , tsr units convert into unrestricted common stock . depending on our performance , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . the target number of tsr units for each executive is set by the compensation committee . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the tsr units , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>$ 37.25</td></tr></table> including the restricted stock , performance units and tsr units described above , the total fair value of share- based awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 17.4 million , $ 15.0 million and $ 28.7 million , respectively . for these share-based awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 28.8 million , $ 19.8 million and $ 28.2 million in the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . our share-based award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 4.8 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of our common stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on 84 2013 global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the number of unvested shares as of may 31, 2016?
| 1606.0 |
CONVFINQA6759 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
leveraged performance units during fiscal 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as leveraged performance units , or lpus . lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , one-third of any earned units converts to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds convert to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . total shareholder return units before fiscal 2015 , certain of our executives were granted total shareholder return ( 201ctsr 201d ) units , which are performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on our total shareholder return over a three-year performance period compared to companies in the s&p 500 . once the performance results are certified , tsr units convert into unrestricted common stock . depending on our performance , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . the target number of tsr units for each executive is set by the compensation committee . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the tsr units , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>$ 37.25</td></tr></table> including the restricted stock , performance units and tsr units described above , the total fair value of share- based awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 17.4 million , $ 15.0 million and $ 28.7 million , respectively . for these share-based awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 28.8 million , $ 19.8 million and $ 28.2 million in the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . our share-based award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 4.8 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of our common stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on 84 2013 global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the number of unvested shares as of may 31, 2016?
Answer: 1606.0
Question: what about the weighted-average grant-date fair value?
| 37.25 |
CONVFINQA6760 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
leveraged performance units during fiscal 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as leveraged performance units , or lpus . lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , one-third of any earned units converts to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds convert to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . total shareholder return units before fiscal 2015 , certain of our executives were granted total shareholder return ( 201ctsr 201d ) units , which are performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on our total shareholder return over a three-year performance period compared to companies in the s&p 500 . once the performance results are certified , tsr units convert into unrestricted common stock . depending on our performance , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . the target number of tsr units for each executive is set by the compensation committee . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the tsr units , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>$ 37.25</td></tr></table> including the restricted stock , performance units and tsr units described above , the total fair value of share- based awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 17.4 million , $ 15.0 million and $ 28.7 million , respectively . for these share-based awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 28.8 million , $ 19.8 million and $ 28.2 million in the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . our share-based award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 4.8 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of our common stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on 84 2013 global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the number of unvested shares as of may 31, 2016?
Answer: 1606.0
Question: what about the weighted-average grant-date fair value?
Answer: 37.25
Question: what is the total value of the balance of unvested shares at may 31, 2016?
| 59823.5 |
CONVFINQA6761 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
leveraged performance units during fiscal 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as leveraged performance units , or lpus . lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , one-third of any earned units converts to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds convert to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . total shareholder return units before fiscal 2015 , certain of our executives were granted total shareholder return ( 201ctsr 201d ) units , which are performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on our total shareholder return over a three-year performance period compared to companies in the s&p 500 . once the performance results are certified , tsr units convert into unrestricted common stock . depending on our performance , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . the target number of tsr units for each executive is set by the compensation committee . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the tsr units , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>$ 37.25</td></tr></table> including the restricted stock , performance units and tsr units described above , the total fair value of share- based awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 17.4 million , $ 15.0 million and $ 28.7 million , respectively . for these share-based awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 28.8 million , $ 19.8 million and $ 28.2 million in the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . our share-based award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 4.8 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of our common stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on 84 2013 global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the number of unvested shares as of may 31, 2016?
Answer: 1606.0
Question: what about the weighted-average grant-date fair value?
Answer: 37.25
Question: what is the total value of the balance of unvested shares at may 31, 2016?
Answer: 59823.5
Question: what about the value of the balance of unvested shares at may 31, 2014?
| 39850.88 |
CONVFINQA6762 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
leveraged performance units during fiscal 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as leveraged performance units , or lpus . lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , one-third of any earned units converts to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds convert to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . total shareholder return units before fiscal 2015 , certain of our executives were granted total shareholder return ( 201ctsr 201d ) units , which are performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on our total shareholder return over a three-year performance period compared to companies in the s&p 500 . once the performance results are certified , tsr units convert into unrestricted common stock . depending on our performance , the grantee may earn up to 200% ( 200 % ) of the target number of shares . the target number of tsr units for each executive is set by the compensation committee . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the tsr units , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested share-based awards for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 ( shares in thousands ) : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at may 31 2014</td><td>1754</td><td>$ 22.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>954</td><td>36.21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-648 ( 648 )</td><td>23.17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>27.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at may 31 2015</td><td>1848</td><td>28.97</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>461</td><td>57.04</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-633 ( 633 )</td><td>27.55</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>34.69</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested at may 31 2016</td><td>1606</td><td>$ 37.25</td></tr></table> including the restricted stock , performance units and tsr units described above , the total fair value of share- based awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 17.4 million , $ 15.0 million and $ 28.7 million , respectively . for these share-based awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 28.8 million , $ 19.8 million and $ 28.2 million in the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of may 31 , 2016 , there was $ 42.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years . our share-based award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 4.8 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of our common stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on 84 2013 global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the number of unvested shares as of may 31, 2016?
Answer: 1606.0
Question: what about the weighted-average grant-date fair value?
Answer: 37.25
Question: what is the total value of the balance of unvested shares at may 31, 2016?
Answer: 59823.5
Question: what about the value of the balance of unvested shares at may 31, 2014?
Answer: 39850.88
Question: what is the net change in the value?
| 19972.62 |
CONVFINQA6763 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . equity compensation plans 2019 information is incorporated by reference from part iii , item 12 , 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters , 201d of this document , and should be considered an integral part of item 5 . at january 31 , 2016 , there were 84607 shareholders of record . 3m 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange , inc . ( nyse ) , the chicago stock exchange , inc. , and the swx swiss exchange . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 1.025 per share for each of the second , third , and fourth quarters of 2015 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2014 included a dividend paid in november 2014 of $ 0.855 per share and a dividend paid in march 2015 of $ 1.025 per share . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 0.855 per share for each of the second and third quarters of 2014 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2013 include a dividend paid in march 2014 of $ 0.855 per share . stock price comparisons follow : stock price comparisons ( nyse composite transactions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( per share amounts )</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 high</td><td>$ 170.50</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 157.94</td><td>$ 160.09</td><td>$ 170.50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015 low</td><td>157.74</td><td>153.92</td><td>134.00</td><td>138.57</td><td>134.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014 high</td><td>$ 139.29</td><td>$ 145.53</td><td>$ 147.87</td><td>$ 168.16</td><td>$ 168.16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014 low</td><td>123.61</td><td>132.02</td><td>138.43</td><td>130.60</td><td>123.61</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities repurchases of 3m common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2014 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 12 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date . in february 2016 , 3m 2019s board of directors replaced the company 2019s february 2014 repurchase program with a new repurchase program . this new program authorizes the repurchase of up to $ 10 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date. .
Question: what was the change in the amount of shares authorized for repurchase between 2014 and 2016?
| -2.0 |
CONVFINQA6764 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . equity compensation plans 2019 information is incorporated by reference from part iii , item 12 , 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters , 201d of this document , and should be considered an integral part of item 5 . at january 31 , 2016 , there were 84607 shareholders of record . 3m 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange , inc . ( nyse ) , the chicago stock exchange , inc. , and the swx swiss exchange . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 1.025 per share for each of the second , third , and fourth quarters of 2015 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2014 included a dividend paid in november 2014 of $ 0.855 per share and a dividend paid in march 2015 of $ 1.025 per share . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 0.855 per share for each of the second and third quarters of 2014 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2013 include a dividend paid in march 2014 of $ 0.855 per share . stock price comparisons follow : stock price comparisons ( nyse composite transactions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( per share amounts )</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 high</td><td>$ 170.50</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 157.94</td><td>$ 160.09</td><td>$ 170.50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015 low</td><td>157.74</td><td>153.92</td><td>134.00</td><td>138.57</td><td>134.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014 high</td><td>$ 139.29</td><td>$ 145.53</td><td>$ 147.87</td><td>$ 168.16</td><td>$ 168.16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014 low</td><td>123.61</td><td>132.02</td><td>138.43</td><td>130.60</td><td>123.61</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities repurchases of 3m common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2014 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 12 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date . in february 2016 , 3m 2019s board of directors replaced the company 2019s february 2014 repurchase program with a new repurchase program . this new program authorizes the repurchase of up to $ 10 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date. .
Question: what was the change in the amount of shares authorized for repurchase between 2014 and 2016?
Answer: -2.0
Question: and the specific amount authorized in 2014?
| 12.0 |
CONVFINQA6765 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . equity compensation plans 2019 information is incorporated by reference from part iii , item 12 , 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters , 201d of this document , and should be considered an integral part of item 5 . at january 31 , 2016 , there were 84607 shareholders of record . 3m 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange , inc . ( nyse ) , the chicago stock exchange , inc. , and the swx swiss exchange . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 1.025 per share for each of the second , third , and fourth quarters of 2015 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2014 included a dividend paid in november 2014 of $ 0.855 per share and a dividend paid in march 2015 of $ 1.025 per share . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 0.855 per share for each of the second and third quarters of 2014 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2013 include a dividend paid in march 2014 of $ 0.855 per share . stock price comparisons follow : stock price comparisons ( nyse composite transactions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( per share amounts )</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 high</td><td>$ 170.50</td><td>$ 167.70</td><td>$ 157.94</td><td>$ 160.09</td><td>$ 170.50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015 low</td><td>157.74</td><td>153.92</td><td>134.00</td><td>138.57</td><td>134.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014 high</td><td>$ 139.29</td><td>$ 145.53</td><td>$ 147.87</td><td>$ 168.16</td><td>$ 168.16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014 low</td><td>123.61</td><td>132.02</td><td>138.43</td><td>130.60</td><td>123.61</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities repurchases of 3m common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2014 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 12 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date . in february 2016 , 3m 2019s board of directors replaced the company 2019s february 2014 repurchase program with a new repurchase program . this new program authorizes the repurchase of up to $ 10 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date. .
Question: what was the change in the amount of shares authorized for repurchase between 2014 and 2016?
Answer: -2.0
Question: and the specific amount authorized in 2014?
Answer: 12.0
Question: so what was the percentage change?
| -0.16667 |
CONVFINQA6766 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rates</td><td>4.93% ( 4.93 % )</td><td>3.72% ( 3.72 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>37.02% ( 37.02 % )</td><td>26.06% ( 26.06 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yields</td><td>0.19% ( 0.19 % )</td><td>0.34% ( 0.34 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected lives</td><td>3 months</td><td>3 months</td></tr></table> the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. .
Question: what was the compensation to be used on stock purchases if the employees used 20% of their compensation in 2008?
| 1.14 |
CONVFINQA6767 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rates</td><td>4.93% ( 4.93 % )</td><td>3.72% ( 3.72 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>37.02% ( 37.02 % )</td><td>26.06% ( 26.06 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yields</td><td>0.19% ( 0.19 % )</td><td>0.34% ( 0.34 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected lives</td><td>3 months</td><td>3 months</td></tr></table> the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. .
Question: what was the compensation to be used on stock purchases if the employees used 20% of their compensation in 2008?
Answer: 1.14
Question: what was the change in weighted-average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007?
| 9.0 |
CONVFINQA6768 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rates</td><td>4.93% ( 4.93 % )</td><td>3.72% ( 3.72 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>37.02% ( 37.02 % )</td><td>26.06% ( 26.06 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yields</td><td>0.19% ( 0.19 % )</td><td>0.34% ( 0.34 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected lives</td><td>3 months</td><td>3 months</td></tr></table> the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. .
Question: what was the compensation to be used on stock purchases if the employees used 20% of their compensation in 2008?
Answer: 1.14
Question: what was the change in weighted-average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: 9.0
Question: and the percentage change?
| 0.25 |
CONVFINQA6769 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .
Question: what was the combined estimated 2014 amortization of loss for both the uk and the us?
| 97.0 |
CONVFINQA6770 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .
Question: what was the combined estimated 2014 amortization of loss for both the uk and the us?
Answer: 97.0
Question: and including the other region?
| 107.0 |
CONVFINQA6771 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the silicon systems revenue for 2015?
| 1720.0 |
CONVFINQA6772 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the silicon systems revenue for 2015?
Answer: 1720.0
Question: and for 2014?
| 1400.0 |
CONVFINQA6773 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the silicon systems revenue for 2015?
Answer: 1720.0
Question: and for 2014?
Answer: 1400.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
| 320.0 |
CONVFINQA6774 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the silicon systems revenue for 2015?
Answer: 1720.0
Question: and for 2014?
Answer: 1400.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 320.0
Question: so what was the growth rate for this segment during this time?
| 0.22857 |
CONVFINQA6775 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value change in citi common stock between 2010 and 2015?
| 10.14 |
CONVFINQA6776 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value change in citi common stock between 2010 and 2015?
Answer: 10.14
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.1014 |
CONVFINQA6777 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value change in citi common stock between 2010 and 2015?
Answer: 10.14
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 0.1014
Question: what was the value change in the s&p financials index price between 2010 and 2015?
| 64.39 |
CONVFINQA6778 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value change in citi common stock between 2010 and 2015?
Answer: 10.14
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 0.1014
Question: what was the value change in the s&p financials index price between 2010 and 2015?
Answer: 64.39
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.6439 |
CONVFINQA6779 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value change in citi common stock between 2010 and 2015?
Answer: 10.14
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 0.1014
Question: what was the value change in the s&p financials index price between 2010 and 2015?
Answer: 64.39
Question: what is the percent change?
Answer: 0.6439
Question: what is the net percent change between citi common stock and the s&p financials?
| -0.5425 |
CONVFINQA6780 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .
Question: what was the change in the total derivatives for level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value throughout 2013, in millions?
| -1365.0 |
CONVFINQA6781 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .
Question: what was the change in the total derivatives for level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value throughout 2013, in millions?
Answer: -1365.0
Question: in that same year, what was the aggregate amount of losses reported in 201cmarket making 201d, in billions?
| 1.29 |
CONVFINQA6782 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .
Question: what was the change in the total derivatives for level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value throughout 2013, in millions?
Answer: -1365.0
Question: in that same year, what was the aggregate amount of losses reported in 201cmarket making 201d, in billions?
Answer: 1.29
Question: how much is that in millions?
| 1290.0 |
CONVFINQA6783 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements level 3 rollforward if a derivative was transferred to level 3 during a reporting period , its entire gain or loss for the period is included in level 3 . transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur . in the tables below , negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities . gains and losses on level 3 derivatives should be considered in the context of the following : 2030 a derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input . 2030 if there is one significant level 3 input , the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs ( i.e. , level 1 and level 2 inputs ) is classified as level 3 . 2030 gains or losses that have been reported in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1 , level 2 and level 3 cash instruments . as a result , gains/ ( losses ) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm 2019s results of operations , liquidity or capital resources . the tables below present changes in fair value for all derivatives categorized as level 3 as of the end of the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance beginning of year</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net realized gains/ ( losses )</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 net unrealized gains/ ( losses ) relating to instruments still held at year-end</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 purchases</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 sales</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 settlements</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers into level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 transfers out of level 3</td><td>level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value for the year ended december 2013 asset/ ( liability ) balance endof year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates 2014 net</td><td>$ -355 ( 355 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 168</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ -86 ( 86 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit 2014 net</td><td>6228</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-977 ( 977 )</td><td>201</td><td>-315 ( 315 )</td><td>-1508 ( 1508 )</td><td>695</td><td>-147 ( 147 )</td><td>4176</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currencies 2014 net</td><td>35</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>-419 ( 419 )</td><td>22</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>169</td><td>139</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>-200 ( 200 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodities 2014 net</td><td>-304 ( 304 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>58</td><td>21</td><td>-48 ( 48 )</td><td>281</td><td>50</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equities 2014 net</td><td>-1248 ( 1248 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>77</td><td>-472 ( 472 )</td><td>1020</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td><td>-52 ( 52 )</td><td>-959 ( 959 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total derivatives 2014 net</td><td>$ 4356</td><td>$ ( 245 ) 1</td><td>$ ( 1372 ) 1</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ -849 ( 849 )</td><td>$ 158</td><td>$ 860</td><td>$ -239 ( 239 )</td><td>$ 2991</td></tr></table> 1 . the aggregate amounts include losses of approximately $ 1.29 billion and $ 324 million reported in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions , 201d respectively . the net unrealized loss on level 3 derivatives of $ 1.37 billion for 2013 principally resulted from changes in level 2 inputs and was primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives , principally due to the impact of tighter credit spreads , and losses on certain currency derivatives , primarily due to changes in foreign exchange rates . transfers into level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of credit derivative assets from level 2 , principally due to reduced transparency of upfront credit points and correlation inputs used to value these derivatives . transfers out of level 3 derivatives during 2013 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivatives to level 2 , principally due to unobservable credit spread and correlation inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and unobservable inputs not being significant to the net risk of certain portfolios . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 143 .
Question: what was the change in the total derivatives for level 3 derivative assets and liabilities at fair value throughout 2013, in millions?
Answer: -1365.0
Question: in that same year, what was the aggregate amount of losses reported in 201cmarket making 201d, in billions?
Answer: 1.29
Question: how much is that in millions?
Answer: 1290.0
Question: and what is the difference between this amount and the 201cother principal transactions 201d in that year, in millions?
| 966.0 |
CONVFINQA6784 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquisitions</td><td>6</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 86</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .
Question: how much does the liability for interest in 2009 represent in relation to the one in 2008?
| 1.28571 |
CONVFINQA6785 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>acquisitions</td><td>6</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 86</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .
Question: how much does the liability for interest in 2009 represent in relation to the one in 2008?
Answer: 1.28571
Question: and what was is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.28571 |
CONVFINQA6786 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2011, multiplied by 1000?
| 8600.0 |
CONVFINQA6787 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2011, multiplied by 1000?
Answer: 8600.0
Question: what is that as a percent of total industrial packaging sales?
| 0.82454 |
CONVFINQA6788 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holders of grupo gondi manage the joint venture and we provide technical and commercial resources . we believe the joint venture is helping us to grow our presence in the attractive mexican market . we have included the financial results of the joint venture in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of formation . we are accounting for the investment on the equity method . on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities in our consumer packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in green power solutions of georgia , llc ( fffdgps fffd ) , which we consolidate . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . subsequent to the transaction , we announced the permanent closure of the newberg mill due to the decline in market conditions of the newsprint business and our need to balance supply and demand in our containerboard system . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . see fffdnote 2 . mergers , acquisitions and investment fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . see also item 1a . fffdrisk factors fffd fffdwe may be unsuccessful in making and integrating mergers , acquisitions and investments and completing divestitures fffd . business . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 16285.1</td><td>$ 14859.7</td><td>$ 14171.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment income</td><td>$ 1685.0</td><td>$ 1193.5</td><td>$ 1226.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , we continued to pursue our strategy of offering differentiated paper and packaging solutions that help our customers win . we successfully executed this strategy in fiscal 2018 in a rapidly changing cost and price environment . net sales of $ 16285.1 million for fiscal 2018 increased $ 1425.4 million , or 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) , compared to fiscal 2017 . the increase was primarily a result of an increase in corrugated packaging segment sales , driven by higher selling price/mix and the contributions from acquisitions , and increased consumer packaging segment sales , primarily due to the contribution from acquisitions ( primarily the mps acquisition ) . these increases were partially offset by the absence of net sales from hh&b in fiscal 2018 due to the sale of hh&b in april 2017 and lower land and development segment sales compared to the prior year period due to the timing of real estate sales as we monetize the portfolio and lower merchandising display sales in the consumer packaging segment . segment income increased $ 491.5 million in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 , primarily due to increased corrugated packaging segment income . with respect to segment income , we experienced higher levels of cost inflation during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 , which was partially offset by recycled fiber deflation . the primary inflationary items were freight costs , chemical costs , virgin fiber costs and wage and other costs . productivity improvements in fiscal 2018 more than offset the net impact of cost inflation . while it is difficult to predict specific inflationary items , we expect higher cost inflation to continue through fiscal 2019 . our corrugated packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 695.1 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 9103.4 million from $ 8408.3 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase in net sales was primarily due to higher corrugated selling price/mix and higher corrugated volumes ( including acquisitions ) , which were partially offset by lower net sales from recycling operations due to lower recycled fiber costs , lower sales related to the deconsolidation of a foreign joint venture in fiscal 2017 and the impact of foreign currency . north american box shipments increased 4.1% ( 4.1 % ) on a per day basis in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 . segment income attributable to the corrugated packaging segment in fiscal 2018 increased $ 454.0 million to $ 1207.9 million compared to $ 753.9 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase was primarily due to higher selling price/mix , lower recycled fiber costs and productivity improvements which were partially offset by higher levels of cost inflation and other items , including increased depreciation and amortization . our consumer packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 838.9 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 7291.4 million from $ 6452.5 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase in net sales was primarily due to an increase in net sales from acquisitions ( primarily the mps acquisition ) and higher selling price/mix partially offset by the absence of net sales from hh&b in fiscal 2018 due to the hh&b sale in april 2017 and lower volumes . segment income attributable to .
Question: what is the difference between the net sales of year ended september 30 2018 and the net sales increase of consumer packaging segment?
| 8993.7 |
CONVFINQA6789 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holders of grupo gondi manage the joint venture and we provide technical and commercial resources . we believe the joint venture is helping us to grow our presence in the attractive mexican market . we have included the financial results of the joint venture in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of formation . we are accounting for the investment on the equity method . on january 19 , 2016 , we completed the packaging acquisition . the entities acquired provide value-added folding carton and litho-laminated display packaging solutions . we believe the transaction has provided us with attractive and complementary customers , markets and facilities . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities in our consumer packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . on october 1 , 2015 , we completed the sp fiber acquisition . the transaction included the acquisition of mills located in dublin , ga and newberg , or , which produce lightweight recycled containerboard and kraft and bag paper . the newberg mill also produced newsprint . as part of the transaction , we also acquired sp fiber's 48% ( 48 % ) interest in green power solutions of georgia , llc ( fffdgps fffd ) , which we consolidate . gps is a joint venture providing steam to the dublin mill and electricity to georgia power . subsequent to the transaction , we announced the permanent closure of the newberg mill due to the decline in market conditions of the newsprint business and our need to balance supply and demand in our containerboard system . we have included the financial results of the acquired entities in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . see fffdnote 2 . mergers , acquisitions and investment fffdtt of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . see also item 1a . fffdrisk factors fffd fffdwe may be unsuccessful in making and integrating mergers , acquisitions and investments and completing divestitures fffd . business . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2017</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 16285.1</td><td>$ 14859.7</td><td>$ 14171.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment income</td><td>$ 1685.0</td><td>$ 1193.5</td><td>$ 1226.2</td></tr></table> in fiscal 2018 , we continued to pursue our strategy of offering differentiated paper and packaging solutions that help our customers win . we successfully executed this strategy in fiscal 2018 in a rapidly changing cost and price environment . net sales of $ 16285.1 million for fiscal 2018 increased $ 1425.4 million , or 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) , compared to fiscal 2017 . the increase was primarily a result of an increase in corrugated packaging segment sales , driven by higher selling price/mix and the contributions from acquisitions , and increased consumer packaging segment sales , primarily due to the contribution from acquisitions ( primarily the mps acquisition ) . these increases were partially offset by the absence of net sales from hh&b in fiscal 2018 due to the sale of hh&b in april 2017 and lower land and development segment sales compared to the prior year period due to the timing of real estate sales as we monetize the portfolio and lower merchandising display sales in the consumer packaging segment . segment income increased $ 491.5 million in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 , primarily due to increased corrugated packaging segment income . with respect to segment income , we experienced higher levels of cost inflation during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 , which was partially offset by recycled fiber deflation . the primary inflationary items were freight costs , chemical costs , virgin fiber costs and wage and other costs . productivity improvements in fiscal 2018 more than offset the net impact of cost inflation . while it is difficult to predict specific inflationary items , we expect higher cost inflation to continue through fiscal 2019 . our corrugated packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 695.1 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 9103.4 million from $ 8408.3 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase in net sales was primarily due to higher corrugated selling price/mix and higher corrugated volumes ( including acquisitions ) , which were partially offset by lower net sales from recycling operations due to lower recycled fiber costs , lower sales related to the deconsolidation of a foreign joint venture in fiscal 2017 and the impact of foreign currency . north american box shipments increased 4.1% ( 4.1 % ) on a per day basis in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 . segment income attributable to the corrugated packaging segment in fiscal 2018 increased $ 454.0 million to $ 1207.9 million compared to $ 753.9 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase was primarily due to higher selling price/mix , lower recycled fiber costs and productivity improvements which were partially offset by higher levels of cost inflation and other items , including increased depreciation and amortization . our consumer packaging segment increased its net sales by $ 838.9 million in fiscal 2018 to $ 7291.4 million from $ 6452.5 million in fiscal 2017 . the increase in net sales was primarily due to an increase in net sales from acquisitions ( primarily the mps acquisition ) and higher selling price/mix partially offset by the absence of net sales from hh&b in fiscal 2018 due to the hh&b sale in april 2017 and lower volumes . segment income attributable to .
Question: what is the difference between the net sales of year ended september 30 2018 and the net sales increase of consumer packaging segment?
Answer: 8993.7
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to that net sales of year ended september 30 2018?
| 0.55227 |
CONVFINQA6790 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships and rabbi trusts . limited partnerships are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reinsurance receivables and premium receivables</td><td>$ 29497</td><td>$ 29905</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in value of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?
| -408.0 |
CONVFINQA6791 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships and rabbi trusts . limited partnerships are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reinsurance receivables and premium receivables</td><td>$ 29497</td><td>$ 29905</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in value of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: -408.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2013 value?
| -0.01364 |
CONVFINQA6792 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .
Question: what was the change in value of fidelity national information systems common stock from 12/07 to 12/12?
| 57.38 |
CONVFINQA6793 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .
Question: what was the change in value of fidelity national information systems common stock from 12/07 to 12/12?
Answer: 57.38
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.5738 |
CONVFINQA6794 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
| 477.0 |
CONVFINQA6795 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
Answer: 477.0
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?
| 4066.0 |
CONVFINQA6796 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
Answer: 477.0
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?
Answer: 4066.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
| 0.11731 |
CONVFINQA6797 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
Answer: 477.0
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?
Answer: 4066.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.11731
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for capital leases?
| 2200.0 |
CONVFINQA6798 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
Answer: 477.0
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?
Answer: 4066.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.11731
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for capital leases?
Answer: 2200.0
Question: what percentage is related to locomatives?
| 0.94 |
CONVFINQA6799 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on december 19 , 2011 , we redeemed the remaining $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 , and all $ 300 million of our outstanding 6.125% ( 6.125 % ) notes due january 15 , 2012 . the redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded $ 0 and $ 100 million , respectively , as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.3 billion as of december 31 , 2013 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 included $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2013 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 272</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>477</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>438</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>400</td><td>247</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>332</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1907</td><td>957</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4066</td><td>$ 2200</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-498 ( 498 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1702</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 618 million in 2013 , $ 631 million in 2012 , and $ 637 million in 2011 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the value of the remaining non-cancelable operating leases that is due in 2015?
Answer: 477.0
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?
Answer: 4066.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.11731
Question: what is the total minimum lease payments for capital leases?
Answer: 2200.0
Question: what percentage is related to locomatives?
Answer: 0.94
Question: what is the total value related to locomotives?
| 2068.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.