id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA7200 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
net cash used by investing activities in 2013 also included $ 38.2 million for the may 13 , 2013 acquisition of challenger . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the challenger acquisition . capital expenditures in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 70.6 million , $ 79.4 million and $ 61.2 million , respectively . capital expenditures in 2013 included continued investments related to the company 2019s execution of its strategic value creation processes around safety , quality , customer connection , innovation and rci initiatives . capital expenditures in all three years included spending to support the company 2019s strategic growth initiatives . in 2013 , the company continued to invest in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives to expand and improve its manufacturing capabilities worldwide . in 2012 , the company completed the construction of a fourth factory in kunshan , china , following the 2011 construction of a new engineering and research and development facility in kunshan . capital expenditures in all three years also included investments , particularly in the united states , in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives , as well as investments in new production and machine tooling to enhance manufacturing operations , and ongoing replacements of manufacturing and distribution equipment . capital spending in all three years also included spending for the replacement and enhancement of the company 2019s global enterprise resource planning ( erp ) management information systems , as well as spending to enhance the company 2019s corporate headquarters and research and development facilities in kenosha , wisconsin . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , as well as its available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s capital expenditure requirements in 2014 . financing activities net cash used by financing activities was $ 137.8 million in 2013 , $ 127.0 million in 2012 and $ 293.7 million in 2011 . net cash used by financing activities in 2011 reflects the august 2011 repayment of $ 200 million of unsecured 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes upon maturity with available cash . proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises totaled $ 29.2 million in 2013 , $ 46.8 million in 2012 and $ 25.7 million in 2011 . snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and franchisee stock purchase plans , stock options and other corporate purposes . in 2013 , snap-on repurchased 926000 shares of its common stock for $ 82.6 million under its previously announced share repurchase programs . as of 2013 year end , snap-on had remaining availability to repurchase up to an additional $ 191.7 million in common stock pursuant to its board of directors 2019 ( the 201cboard 201d ) authorizations . the purchase of snap-on common stock is at the company 2019s discretion , subject to prevailing financial and market conditions . snap-on repurchased 1180000 shares of its common stock for $ 78.1 million in 2012 ; snap-on repurchased 628000 shares of its common stock for $ 37.4 million in 2011 . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand , and funds available from its credit facilities , will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s share repurchases , if any , in 2014 . snap-on has paid consecutive quarterly cash dividends , without interruption or reduction , since 1939 . cash dividends paid in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 92.0 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 76.7 million , respectively . on november 8 , 2013 , the company announced that its board increased the quarterly cash dividend by 15.8% ( 15.8 % ) to $ 0.44 per share ( $ 1.76 per share per year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2013 were $ 0.44 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.38 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.58 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2012 were $ 0.38 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.34 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.40 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends in 2011 were $ 0.34 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.32 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.30 per share for the year ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash dividends paid per common share</td><td>$ 1.58</td><td>$ 1.40</td><td>$ 1.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td></tr></table> cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to pay dividends in 2014 . off-balance-sheet arrangements except as included below in the section labeled 201ccontractual obligations and commitments 201d and note 15 to the consolidated financial statements , the company had no off-balance-sheet arrangements as of 2013 year end . 2013 annual report 49 .
Question: what was the value of cash dividends paid in 2013?
| 92.0 |
CONVFINQA7201 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
net cash used by investing activities in 2013 also included $ 38.2 million for the may 13 , 2013 acquisition of challenger . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the challenger acquisition . capital expenditures in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 70.6 million , $ 79.4 million and $ 61.2 million , respectively . capital expenditures in 2013 included continued investments related to the company 2019s execution of its strategic value creation processes around safety , quality , customer connection , innovation and rci initiatives . capital expenditures in all three years included spending to support the company 2019s strategic growth initiatives . in 2013 , the company continued to invest in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives to expand and improve its manufacturing capabilities worldwide . in 2012 , the company completed the construction of a fourth factory in kunshan , china , following the 2011 construction of a new engineering and research and development facility in kunshan . capital expenditures in all three years also included investments , particularly in the united states , in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives , as well as investments in new production and machine tooling to enhance manufacturing operations , and ongoing replacements of manufacturing and distribution equipment . capital spending in all three years also included spending for the replacement and enhancement of the company 2019s global enterprise resource planning ( erp ) management information systems , as well as spending to enhance the company 2019s corporate headquarters and research and development facilities in kenosha , wisconsin . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , as well as its available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s capital expenditure requirements in 2014 . financing activities net cash used by financing activities was $ 137.8 million in 2013 , $ 127.0 million in 2012 and $ 293.7 million in 2011 . net cash used by financing activities in 2011 reflects the august 2011 repayment of $ 200 million of unsecured 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes upon maturity with available cash . proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises totaled $ 29.2 million in 2013 , $ 46.8 million in 2012 and $ 25.7 million in 2011 . snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and franchisee stock purchase plans , stock options and other corporate purposes . in 2013 , snap-on repurchased 926000 shares of its common stock for $ 82.6 million under its previously announced share repurchase programs . as of 2013 year end , snap-on had remaining availability to repurchase up to an additional $ 191.7 million in common stock pursuant to its board of directors 2019 ( the 201cboard 201d ) authorizations . the purchase of snap-on common stock is at the company 2019s discretion , subject to prevailing financial and market conditions . snap-on repurchased 1180000 shares of its common stock for $ 78.1 million in 2012 ; snap-on repurchased 628000 shares of its common stock for $ 37.4 million in 2011 . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand , and funds available from its credit facilities , will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s share repurchases , if any , in 2014 . snap-on has paid consecutive quarterly cash dividends , without interruption or reduction , since 1939 . cash dividends paid in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 92.0 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 76.7 million , respectively . on november 8 , 2013 , the company announced that its board increased the quarterly cash dividend by 15.8% ( 15.8 % ) to $ 0.44 per share ( $ 1.76 per share per year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2013 were $ 0.44 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.38 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.58 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2012 were $ 0.38 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.34 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.40 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends in 2011 were $ 0.34 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.32 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.30 per share for the year ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash dividends paid per common share</td><td>$ 1.58</td><td>$ 1.40</td><td>$ 1.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td></tr></table> cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to pay dividends in 2014 . off-balance-sheet arrangements except as included below in the section labeled 201ccontractual obligations and commitments 201d and note 15 to the consolidated financial statements , the company had no off-balance-sheet arrangements as of 2013 year end . 2013 annual report 49 .
Question: what was the value of cash dividends paid in 2013?
Answer: 92.0
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
| 92000000.0 |
CONVFINQA7202 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
net cash used by investing activities in 2013 also included $ 38.2 million for the may 13 , 2013 acquisition of challenger . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the challenger acquisition . capital expenditures in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 70.6 million , $ 79.4 million and $ 61.2 million , respectively . capital expenditures in 2013 included continued investments related to the company 2019s execution of its strategic value creation processes around safety , quality , customer connection , innovation and rci initiatives . capital expenditures in all three years included spending to support the company 2019s strategic growth initiatives . in 2013 , the company continued to invest in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives to expand and improve its manufacturing capabilities worldwide . in 2012 , the company completed the construction of a fourth factory in kunshan , china , following the 2011 construction of a new engineering and research and development facility in kunshan . capital expenditures in all three years also included investments , particularly in the united states , in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives , as well as investments in new production and machine tooling to enhance manufacturing operations , and ongoing replacements of manufacturing and distribution equipment . capital spending in all three years also included spending for the replacement and enhancement of the company 2019s global enterprise resource planning ( erp ) management information systems , as well as spending to enhance the company 2019s corporate headquarters and research and development facilities in kenosha , wisconsin . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , as well as its available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s capital expenditure requirements in 2014 . financing activities net cash used by financing activities was $ 137.8 million in 2013 , $ 127.0 million in 2012 and $ 293.7 million in 2011 . net cash used by financing activities in 2011 reflects the august 2011 repayment of $ 200 million of unsecured 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes upon maturity with available cash . proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises totaled $ 29.2 million in 2013 , $ 46.8 million in 2012 and $ 25.7 million in 2011 . snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and franchisee stock purchase plans , stock options and other corporate purposes . in 2013 , snap-on repurchased 926000 shares of its common stock for $ 82.6 million under its previously announced share repurchase programs . as of 2013 year end , snap-on had remaining availability to repurchase up to an additional $ 191.7 million in common stock pursuant to its board of directors 2019 ( the 201cboard 201d ) authorizations . the purchase of snap-on common stock is at the company 2019s discretion , subject to prevailing financial and market conditions . snap-on repurchased 1180000 shares of its common stock for $ 78.1 million in 2012 ; snap-on repurchased 628000 shares of its common stock for $ 37.4 million in 2011 . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand , and funds available from its credit facilities , will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s share repurchases , if any , in 2014 . snap-on has paid consecutive quarterly cash dividends , without interruption or reduction , since 1939 . cash dividends paid in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 92.0 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 76.7 million , respectively . on november 8 , 2013 , the company announced that its board increased the quarterly cash dividend by 15.8% ( 15.8 % ) to $ 0.44 per share ( $ 1.76 per share per year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2013 were $ 0.44 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.38 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.58 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2012 were $ 0.38 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.34 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.40 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends in 2011 were $ 0.34 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.32 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.30 per share for the year ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash dividends paid per common share</td><td>$ 1.58</td><td>$ 1.40</td><td>$ 1.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td></tr></table> cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to pay dividends in 2014 . off-balance-sheet arrangements except as included below in the section labeled 201ccontractual obligations and commitments 201d and note 15 to the consolidated financial statements , the company had no off-balance-sheet arrangements as of 2013 year end . 2013 annual report 49 .
Question: what was the value of cash dividends paid in 2013?
Answer: 92.0
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
Answer: 92000000.0
Question: what was the amount paid per common share?
| 1.58 |
CONVFINQA7203 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
net cash used by investing activities in 2013 also included $ 38.2 million for the may 13 , 2013 acquisition of challenger . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the challenger acquisition . capital expenditures in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 70.6 million , $ 79.4 million and $ 61.2 million , respectively . capital expenditures in 2013 included continued investments related to the company 2019s execution of its strategic value creation processes around safety , quality , customer connection , innovation and rci initiatives . capital expenditures in all three years included spending to support the company 2019s strategic growth initiatives . in 2013 , the company continued to invest in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives to expand and improve its manufacturing capabilities worldwide . in 2012 , the company completed the construction of a fourth factory in kunshan , china , following the 2011 construction of a new engineering and research and development facility in kunshan . capital expenditures in all three years also included investments , particularly in the united states , in new product , efficiency , safety and cost reduction initiatives , as well as investments in new production and machine tooling to enhance manufacturing operations , and ongoing replacements of manufacturing and distribution equipment . capital spending in all three years also included spending for the replacement and enhancement of the company 2019s global enterprise resource planning ( erp ) management information systems , as well as spending to enhance the company 2019s corporate headquarters and research and development facilities in kenosha , wisconsin . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , as well as its available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s capital expenditure requirements in 2014 . financing activities net cash used by financing activities was $ 137.8 million in 2013 , $ 127.0 million in 2012 and $ 293.7 million in 2011 . net cash used by financing activities in 2011 reflects the august 2011 repayment of $ 200 million of unsecured 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes upon maturity with available cash . proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises totaled $ 29.2 million in 2013 , $ 46.8 million in 2012 and $ 25.7 million in 2011 . snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and franchisee stock purchase plans , stock options and other corporate purposes . in 2013 , snap-on repurchased 926000 shares of its common stock for $ 82.6 million under its previously announced share repurchase programs . as of 2013 year end , snap-on had remaining availability to repurchase up to an additional $ 191.7 million in common stock pursuant to its board of directors 2019 ( the 201cboard 201d ) authorizations . the purchase of snap-on common stock is at the company 2019s discretion , subject to prevailing financial and market conditions . snap-on repurchased 1180000 shares of its common stock for $ 78.1 million in 2012 ; snap-on repurchased 628000 shares of its common stock for $ 37.4 million in 2011 . snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand , and funds available from its credit facilities , will be sufficient to fund the company 2019s share repurchases , if any , in 2014 . snap-on has paid consecutive quarterly cash dividends , without interruption or reduction , since 1939 . cash dividends paid in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 92.0 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 76.7 million , respectively . on november 8 , 2013 , the company announced that its board increased the quarterly cash dividend by 15.8% ( 15.8 % ) to $ 0.44 per share ( $ 1.76 per share per year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2013 were $ 0.44 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.38 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.58 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends declared in 2012 were $ 0.38 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.34 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.40 per share for the year ) . quarterly dividends in 2011 were $ 0.34 per share in the fourth quarter and $ 0.32 per share in the first three quarters ( $ 1.30 per share for the year ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash dividends paid per common share</td><td>$ 1.58</td><td>$ 1.40</td><td>$ 1.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td><td>4.4% ( 4.4 % )</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td></tr></table> cash dividends paid as a percent of prior-year retained earnings 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) snap-on believes that its cash generated from operations , available cash on hand and funds available from its credit facilities will be sufficient to pay dividends in 2014 . off-balance-sheet arrangements except as included below in the section labeled 201ccontractual obligations and commitments 201d and note 15 to the consolidated financial statements , the company had no off-balance-sheet arrangements as of 2013 year end . 2013 annual report 49 .
Question: what was the value of cash dividends paid in 2013?
Answer: 92.0
Question: what is that value times 1000000?
Answer: 92000000.0
Question: what was the amount paid per common share?
Answer: 1.58
Question: what is the total value divided by the amount per share?
| 58227848.10127 |
CONVFINQA7204 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . stock options in addition , in connection with the ipo , the company issued 1268986 stock options to the class b common unit holders to preserve their fully diluted equity ownership percentage . these options were issued with a per-share exercise price equal to the ipo price of $ 17.00 and are also subject to the same vesting provisions as the class b common units to which they relate . the company also granted 19412 stock options under the 2013 ltip during the year ended december 31 , 2013 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) in connection with the ipo , the company granted 1416543 rsus under the 2013 ltip at a weighted- average grant-date fair value of $ 17.03 per unit . the rsus cliff-vest at the end of four years . valuation information the company attributes the value of equity-based compensation awards to the various periods during which the recipient must perform services in order to vest in the award using the straight-line method . post-ipo equity awards the company has elected to use the black-scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted . the black-scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility , expected term , risk-free interest rates and dividend yields . the assumptions used to value the stock options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2013 are presented below . year ended december 31 , assumptions 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>year ended december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td><td>$ 4.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average volatility ( 1 )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average risk-free rate ( 2 )</td><td>1.58% ( 1.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 3 )</td><td>5.4</td></tr></table> expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 ( 1 ) based upon an assessment of the two-year , five-year and implied volatility for the company 2019s selected peer group , adjusted for the company 2019s leverage . ( 2 ) based on a composite u.s . treasury rate . ( 3 ) the expected term is calculated using the simplified method . the simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the option 2019s contractual term and the option 2019s weighted-average vesting period . the company utilizes this method as it has limited historical stock option data that is sufficient to derive a reasonable estimate of the expected stock option term. .
Question: how many common units were not vested at the time fo distribution?
| 5931.0 |
CONVFINQA7205 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . stock options in addition , in connection with the ipo , the company issued 1268986 stock options to the class b common unit holders to preserve their fully diluted equity ownership percentage . these options were issued with a per-share exercise price equal to the ipo price of $ 17.00 and are also subject to the same vesting provisions as the class b common units to which they relate . the company also granted 19412 stock options under the 2013 ltip during the year ended december 31 , 2013 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) in connection with the ipo , the company granted 1416543 rsus under the 2013 ltip at a weighted- average grant-date fair value of $ 17.03 per unit . the rsus cliff-vest at the end of four years . valuation information the company attributes the value of equity-based compensation awards to the various periods during which the recipient must perform services in order to vest in the award using the straight-line method . post-ipo equity awards the company has elected to use the black-scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted . the black-scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility , expected term , risk-free interest rates and dividend yields . the assumptions used to value the stock options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2013 are presented below . year ended december 31 , assumptions 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>year ended december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td><td>$ 4.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average volatility ( 1 )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average risk-free rate ( 2 )</td><td>1.58% ( 1.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 3 )</td><td>5.4</td></tr></table> expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 ( 1 ) based upon an assessment of the two-year , five-year and implied volatility for the company 2019s selected peer group , adjusted for the company 2019s leverage . ( 2 ) based on a composite u.s . treasury rate . ( 3 ) the expected term is calculated using the simplified method . the simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the option 2019s contractual term and the option 2019s weighted-average vesting period . the company utilizes this method as it has limited historical stock option data that is sufficient to derive a reasonable estimate of the expected stock option term. .
Question: how many common units were not vested at the time fo distribution?
Answer: 5931.0
Question: what about the number of shares of restricted stock vested/settled?
| 1200544.0 |
CONVFINQA7206 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . stock options in addition , in connection with the ipo , the company issued 1268986 stock options to the class b common unit holders to preserve their fully diluted equity ownership percentage . these options were issued with a per-share exercise price equal to the ipo price of $ 17.00 and are also subject to the same vesting provisions as the class b common units to which they relate . the company also granted 19412 stock options under the 2013 ltip during the year ended december 31 , 2013 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) in connection with the ipo , the company granted 1416543 rsus under the 2013 ltip at a weighted- average grant-date fair value of $ 17.03 per unit . the rsus cliff-vest at the end of four years . valuation information the company attributes the value of equity-based compensation awards to the various periods during which the recipient must perform services in order to vest in the award using the straight-line method . post-ipo equity awards the company has elected to use the black-scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted . the black-scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility , expected term , risk-free interest rates and dividend yields . the assumptions used to value the stock options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2013 are presented below . year ended december 31 , assumptions 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>year ended december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td><td>$ 4.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average volatility ( 1 )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average risk-free rate ( 2 )</td><td>1.58% ( 1.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 3 )</td><td>5.4</td></tr></table> expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 ( 1 ) based upon an assessment of the two-year , five-year and implied volatility for the company 2019s selected peer group , adjusted for the company 2019s leverage . ( 2 ) based on a composite u.s . treasury rate . ( 3 ) the expected term is calculated using the simplified method . the simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the option 2019s contractual term and the option 2019s weighted-average vesting period . the company utilizes this method as it has limited historical stock option data that is sufficient to derive a reasonable estimate of the expected stock option term. .
Question: how many common units were not vested at the time fo distribution?
Answer: 5931.0
Question: what about the number of shares of restricted stock vested/settled?
Answer: 1200544.0
Question: what is the total of these two?
| 1206475.0 |
CONVFINQA7207 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . stock options in addition , in connection with the ipo , the company issued 1268986 stock options to the class b common unit holders to preserve their fully diluted equity ownership percentage . these options were issued with a per-share exercise price equal to the ipo price of $ 17.00 and are also subject to the same vesting provisions as the class b common units to which they relate . the company also granted 19412 stock options under the 2013 ltip during the year ended december 31 , 2013 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) in connection with the ipo , the company granted 1416543 rsus under the 2013 ltip at a weighted- average grant-date fair value of $ 17.03 per unit . the rsus cliff-vest at the end of four years . valuation information the company attributes the value of equity-based compensation awards to the various periods during which the recipient must perform services in order to vest in the award using the straight-line method . post-ipo equity awards the company has elected to use the black-scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted . the black-scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility , expected term , risk-free interest rates and dividend yields . the assumptions used to value the stock options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2013 are presented below . year ended december 31 , assumptions 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>year ended december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td><td>$ 4.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average volatility ( 1 )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average risk-free rate ( 2 )</td><td>1.58% ( 1.58 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.00% ( 1.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term ( in years ) ( 3 )</td><td>5.4</td></tr></table> expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 ( 1 ) based upon an assessment of the two-year , five-year and implied volatility for the company 2019s selected peer group , adjusted for the company 2019s leverage . ( 2 ) based on a composite u.s . treasury rate . ( 3 ) the expected term is calculated using the simplified method . the simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the option 2019s contractual term and the option 2019s weighted-average vesting period . the company utilizes this method as it has limited historical stock option data that is sufficient to derive a reasonable estimate of the expected stock option term. .
Question: how many common units were not vested at the time fo distribution?
Answer: 5931.0
Question: what about the number of shares of restricted stock vested/settled?
Answer: 1200544.0
Question: what is the total of these two?
Answer: 1206475.0
Question: what proportion of total restricted stock does this represent?
| 0.31762 |
CONVFINQA7208 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2017 form 10-k | 27 the short term . we do , however , view the long term economics of the lng industry as positive given our outlook for supply and demand . 2022 refinery , petrochemical and industrial projects : in refining , we believe large , complex refineries should gain advantage in a more competitive , oversupplied landscape in 2018 as the industry globalizes and refiners position to meet local demand and secure export potential . in petrochemicals , we continue to see healthy demand and cost-advantaged supply driving projects forward in 2018 . the industrial market continues to grow as outdated infrastructure is replaced , policy changes come into effect and power is decentralized . we continue to see growing demand across these markets in 2018 . we have other segments in our portfolio that are more correlated with different industrial metrics such as our digital solutions business . overall , we believe our portfolio is uniquely positioned to compete across the value chain , and deliver unique solutions for our customers . we remain optimistic about the long-term economics of the industry , but are continuing to operate with flexibility given our expectations for volatility and changing assumptions in the near term . in 2016 , solar and wind net additions exceeded coal and gas for the first time and it continued throughout 2017 . governments may change or may not continue incentives for renewable energy additions . in the long term , renewables' cost decline may accelerate to compete with new-built fossil capacity , however , we do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business in the foreseeable future . despite the near-term volatility , the long-term outlook for our industry remains strong . we believe the world 2019s demand for energy will continue to rise , and the supply of energy will continue to increase in complexity , requiring greater service intensity and more advanced technology from oilfield service companies . as such , we remain focused on delivering innovative cost-efficient solutions that deliver step changes in operating and economic performance for our customers . business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . amounts reported in millions in graphs within this report are computed based on the amounts in hundreds . as a result , the sum of the components reported in millions may not equal the total amount reported in millions due to rounding . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td><td>$ 52.32</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td><td>48.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td><td>2.62</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 54.12 $ 43.64 $ 52.32 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 50.80 43.29 48.66 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 2.99 2.52 2.62 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel .
Question: what was the net change in the wti oil price from 2016 to 2017?
| 7.51 |
CONVFINQA7209 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2017 form 10-k | 27 the short term . we do , however , view the long term economics of the lng industry as positive given our outlook for supply and demand . 2022 refinery , petrochemical and industrial projects : in refining , we believe large , complex refineries should gain advantage in a more competitive , oversupplied landscape in 2018 as the industry globalizes and refiners position to meet local demand and secure export potential . in petrochemicals , we continue to see healthy demand and cost-advantaged supply driving projects forward in 2018 . the industrial market continues to grow as outdated infrastructure is replaced , policy changes come into effect and power is decentralized . we continue to see growing demand across these markets in 2018 . we have other segments in our portfolio that are more correlated with different industrial metrics such as our digital solutions business . overall , we believe our portfolio is uniquely positioned to compete across the value chain , and deliver unique solutions for our customers . we remain optimistic about the long-term economics of the industry , but are continuing to operate with flexibility given our expectations for volatility and changing assumptions in the near term . in 2016 , solar and wind net additions exceeded coal and gas for the first time and it continued throughout 2017 . governments may change or may not continue incentives for renewable energy additions . in the long term , renewables' cost decline may accelerate to compete with new-built fossil capacity , however , we do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business in the foreseeable future . despite the near-term volatility , the long-term outlook for our industry remains strong . we believe the world 2019s demand for energy will continue to rise , and the supply of energy will continue to increase in complexity , requiring greater service intensity and more advanced technology from oilfield service companies . as such , we remain focused on delivering innovative cost-efficient solutions that deliver step changes in operating and economic performance for our customers . business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . amounts reported in millions in graphs within this report are computed based on the amounts in hundreds . as a result , the sum of the components reported in millions may not equal the total amount reported in millions due to rounding . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td><td>$ 52.32</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td><td>48.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td><td>2.62</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 54.12 $ 43.64 $ 52.32 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 50.80 43.29 48.66 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 2.99 2.52 2.62 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel .
Question: what was the net change in the wti oil price from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 7.51
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2016 value?
| 0.17348 |
CONVFINQA7210 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?
| 70.0 |
CONVFINQA7211 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?
Answer: 70.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
| 68.0 |
CONVFINQA7212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?
Answer: 70.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that number over the year?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA7213 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?
Answer: 70.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that number over the year?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2016?
| 68.0 |
CONVFINQA7214 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>vehicles</td><td>$ 70</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft</td><td>2291</td><td>2291</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>buildings</td><td>285</td><td>190</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated amortization</td><td>-990 ( 990 )</td><td>-896 ( 896 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>property plant and equipment subject to capital leases</td><td>$ 1656</td><td>$ 1653</td></tr></table> these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2017?
Answer: 70.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was, then, the change in that number over the year?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what was the number of vehicles under capital lease in 2016?
Answer: 68.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this number, in percentage?
| 0.02941 |
CONVFINQA7215 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 102 jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 28302</td><td>$ 26363</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>1294</td><td>1423</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>23271</td><td>17177</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>4939</td><td>5529</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6272</td><td>9185</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>64078</td><td>59677</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td><td>-16580 ( 16580 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 41373</td><td>$ 43097</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 64.1 billion and $ 59.7 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 22.7 billion and $ 16.6 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . the change in derivative receivables was predominantly related to client-driven market-making activities in cib . the increase in derivative receivables reflected the impact of market movements , which increased foreign exchange receivables , partially offset by reduced commodity derivative receivables . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 31.1 billion and $ 32.4 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 41.4 billion and $ 43.1 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit .
Question: what was the foreign exchange amount in 2016?
| 23271.0 |
CONVFINQA7216 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 102 jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 28302</td><td>$ 26363</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>1294</td><td>1423</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>23271</td><td>17177</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>4939</td><td>5529</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6272</td><td>9185</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>64078</td><td>59677</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td><td>-16580 ( 16580 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 41373</td><td>$ 43097</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 64.1 billion and $ 59.7 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 22.7 billion and $ 16.6 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . the change in derivative receivables was predominantly related to client-driven market-making activities in cib . the increase in derivative receivables reflected the impact of market movements , which increased foreign exchange receivables , partially offset by reduced commodity derivative receivables . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 31.1 billion and $ 32.4 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 41.4 billion and $ 43.1 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit .
Question: what was the foreign exchange amount in 2016?
Answer: 23271.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
| 17177.0 |
CONVFINQA7217 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 102 jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 28302</td><td>$ 26363</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>1294</td><td>1423</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>23271</td><td>17177</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>4939</td><td>5529</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6272</td><td>9185</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>64078</td><td>59677</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td><td>-16580 ( 16580 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 41373</td><td>$ 43097</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 64.1 billion and $ 59.7 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 22.7 billion and $ 16.6 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . the change in derivative receivables was predominantly related to client-driven market-making activities in cib . the increase in derivative receivables reflected the impact of market movements , which increased foreign exchange receivables , partially offset by reduced commodity derivative receivables . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 31.1 billion and $ 32.4 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 41.4 billion and $ 43.1 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit .
Question: what was the foreign exchange amount in 2016?
Answer: 23271.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 17177.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2016 amount represent in relation to this 2015 one?
| 1.35478 |
CONVFINQA7218 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 102 jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange- traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate</td><td>$ 28302</td><td>$ 26363</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>credit derivatives</td><td>1294</td><td>1423</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange</td><td>23271</td><td>17177</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity</td><td>4939</td><td>5529</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>commodity</td><td>6272</td><td>9185</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>64078</td><td>59677</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-22705 ( 22705 )</td><td>-16580 ( 16580 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 41373</td><td>$ 43097</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained . derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 64.1 billion and $ 59.7 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 22.7 billion and $ 16.6 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . the change in derivative receivables was predominantly related to client-driven market-making activities in cib . the increase in derivative receivables reflected the impact of market movements , which increased foreign exchange receivables , partially offset by reduced commodity derivative receivables . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative transactions , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 31.1 billion and $ 32.4 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 41.4 billion and $ 43.1 billion at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit .
Question: what was the foreign exchange amount in 2016?
Answer: 23271.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 17177.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2016 amount represent in relation to this 2015 one?
Answer: 1.35478
Question: and in that same year of 2016, how much did the avg exposure represent in relation to the derivative receivables?
| 0.75121 |
CONVFINQA7219 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected stock price volatility</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>31.4% ( 31.4 % )</td><td>28.0% ( 28.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.8% ( 1.8 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.8% ( 4.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr></table> .
Question: combined, what was the risk-free interest rate in 2008 and 2009?
| 4.6 |
CONVFINQA7220 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected stock price volatility</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>31.4% ( 31.4 % )</td><td>28.0% ( 28.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.8% ( 1.8 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.8% ( 4.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr></table> .
Question: combined, what was the risk-free interest rate in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 4.6
Question: and in 2007?
| 4.8 |
CONVFINQA7221 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected stock price volatility</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>31.4% ( 31.4 % )</td><td>28.0% ( 28.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.8% ( 1.8 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.8% ( 4.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr></table> .
Question: combined, what was the risk-free interest rate in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 4.6
Question: and in 2007?
Answer: 4.8
Question: what was the total for all three years?
| 9.4 |
CONVFINQA7222 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>0.0% ( 0.0 % )</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected stock price volatility</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>31.4% ( 31.4 % )</td><td>28.0% ( 28.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.8% ( 1.8 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.8% ( 4.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr></table> .
Question: combined, what was the risk-free interest rate in 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 4.6
Question: and in 2007?
Answer: 4.8
Question: what was the total for all three years?
Answer: 9.4
Question: so what was the average value during this time?
| 3.13333 |
CONVFINQA7223 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 4 m a n a g e m e n t 2019 s d i s c u s s i o n notes to table ( continued ) ( a ) ( continued ) management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , are effective indicators of blackrock 2019s financial performance over time . as such , management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , provide useful disclosure to investors . operating income , as adjusted : bgi transaction and integration costs recorded in 2010 and 2009 consist principally of certain advisory payments , compensation expense , legal fees , marketing and promotional , occupancy and consulting expenses incurred in conjunction with the bgi transaction . restructuring charges recorded in 2009 and 2008 consist of compensation costs , occupancy costs and professional fees . the expenses associated with restructuring and bgi transaction and integration costs have been deemed non-recurring by management and have been excluded from operating income , as adjusted , to help enhance the comparability of this information to the current reporting periods . as such , management believes that operating margins exclusive of these costs are useful measures in evaluating blackrock 2019s operating performance for the respective periods . the portion of compensation expense associated with certain long-term incentive plans ( 201cltip 201d ) that will be funded through the distribution to participants of shares of blackrock stock held by pnc and a merrill lynch cash compensation contribution , a portion of which has been received , have been excluded because these charges ultimately do not impact blackrock 2019s book value . compensation expense associated with appreciation/ ( depreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans has been excluded as returns on investments set aside for these plans , which substantially offset this expense , are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) . operating margin , as adjusted : operating income used for measuring operating margin , as adjusted , is equal to operating income , as adjusted , excluding the impact of closed-end fund launch costs and commissions . management believes that excluding such costs and commissions is useful because these costs can fluctuate considerably and revenues associated with the expenditure of these costs will not fully impact the company 2019s results until future periods . operating margin , as adjusted , allows the company to compare performance from period-to-period by adjusting for items that may not recur , recur infrequently or may fluctuate based on market movements , such as restructuring charges , transaction and integration costs , closed-end fund launch costs , commissions paid to certain employees as compensation and fluctua- tions in compensation expense based on mark-to-market movements in investments held to fund certain compensation plans . the company also uses operating margin , as adjusted , to monitor corporate performance and efficiency and as a benchmark to compare its performance to other companies . management uses both the gaap and non-gaap financial measures in evaluating the financial performance of blackrock . the non-gaap measure by itself may pose limitations because it does not include all of the company 2019s revenues and expenses . revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , excludes distribution and servicing costs paid to related parties and other third parties . management believes that excluding such costs is useful to blackrock because it creates consistency in the treatment for certain contracts for similar services , which due to the terms of the contracts , are accounted for under gaap on a net basis within investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue . amortization of deferred sales commissions is excluded from revenue used for operating margin measurement , as adjusted , because such costs , over time , offset distribution fee revenue earned by the company . reimbursable property management compensation represented com- pensation and benefits paid to personnel of metric property management , inc . ( 201cmetric 201d ) , a subsidiary of blackrock realty advisors , inc . ( 201crealty 201d ) . prior to the transfer in 2008 , these employees were retained on metric 2019s payroll when certain properties were acquired by realty 2019s clients . the related compensation and benefits were fully reimbursed by realty 2019s clients and have been excluded from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , because they did not bear an economic cost to blackrock . for each of these items , blackrock excludes from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , the costs related to each of these items as a proxy for such offsetting revenues . ( b ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests , as adjusted : non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests ( 201cnci 201d ) , as adjusted , equals non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , gaap basis , adjusted for compensation expense associated with depreciation/ ( appreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans . the compensation expense offset is recorded in operating income . this compensation expense has been included in non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , to offset returns on investments set aside for these plans , which are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2010</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2009</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ 23</td><td>$ -6 ( 6 )</td><td>$ -577 ( 577 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>22</td><td>-155 ( 155 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 )</td><td>36</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td><td>-422 ( 422 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) /depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted</td><td>$ 25</td><td>$ -46 ( 46 )</td><td>$ -384 ( 384 )</td></tr></table> non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) 36 ( 28 ) ( 422 ) compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) / depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 11 ) ( 18 ) 38 non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted $ 25 ( $ 46 ) ( $ 384 ) ( 1 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests . management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides for comparability of this information to prior periods and is an effective measure for reviewing blackrock 2019s non-operating contribution to its results . as compensation expense associated with ( appreciation ) /depreciation on investments related to certain deferred compensation plans , which is included in operating income , offsets the gain/ ( loss ) on the investments set aside for these plans , management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides a useful measure , for both management and investors , of blackrock 2019s non-operating results that impact book value. .
Question: what was the non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted in 2010?
| 25.0 |
CONVFINQA7224 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 4 m a n a g e m e n t 2019 s d i s c u s s i o n notes to table ( continued ) ( a ) ( continued ) management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , are effective indicators of blackrock 2019s financial performance over time . as such , management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , provide useful disclosure to investors . operating income , as adjusted : bgi transaction and integration costs recorded in 2010 and 2009 consist principally of certain advisory payments , compensation expense , legal fees , marketing and promotional , occupancy and consulting expenses incurred in conjunction with the bgi transaction . restructuring charges recorded in 2009 and 2008 consist of compensation costs , occupancy costs and professional fees . the expenses associated with restructuring and bgi transaction and integration costs have been deemed non-recurring by management and have been excluded from operating income , as adjusted , to help enhance the comparability of this information to the current reporting periods . as such , management believes that operating margins exclusive of these costs are useful measures in evaluating blackrock 2019s operating performance for the respective periods . the portion of compensation expense associated with certain long-term incentive plans ( 201cltip 201d ) that will be funded through the distribution to participants of shares of blackrock stock held by pnc and a merrill lynch cash compensation contribution , a portion of which has been received , have been excluded because these charges ultimately do not impact blackrock 2019s book value . compensation expense associated with appreciation/ ( depreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans has been excluded as returns on investments set aside for these plans , which substantially offset this expense , are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) . operating margin , as adjusted : operating income used for measuring operating margin , as adjusted , is equal to operating income , as adjusted , excluding the impact of closed-end fund launch costs and commissions . management believes that excluding such costs and commissions is useful because these costs can fluctuate considerably and revenues associated with the expenditure of these costs will not fully impact the company 2019s results until future periods . operating margin , as adjusted , allows the company to compare performance from period-to-period by adjusting for items that may not recur , recur infrequently or may fluctuate based on market movements , such as restructuring charges , transaction and integration costs , closed-end fund launch costs , commissions paid to certain employees as compensation and fluctua- tions in compensation expense based on mark-to-market movements in investments held to fund certain compensation plans . the company also uses operating margin , as adjusted , to monitor corporate performance and efficiency and as a benchmark to compare its performance to other companies . management uses both the gaap and non-gaap financial measures in evaluating the financial performance of blackrock . the non-gaap measure by itself may pose limitations because it does not include all of the company 2019s revenues and expenses . revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , excludes distribution and servicing costs paid to related parties and other third parties . management believes that excluding such costs is useful to blackrock because it creates consistency in the treatment for certain contracts for similar services , which due to the terms of the contracts , are accounted for under gaap on a net basis within investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue . amortization of deferred sales commissions is excluded from revenue used for operating margin measurement , as adjusted , because such costs , over time , offset distribution fee revenue earned by the company . reimbursable property management compensation represented com- pensation and benefits paid to personnel of metric property management , inc . ( 201cmetric 201d ) , a subsidiary of blackrock realty advisors , inc . ( 201crealty 201d ) . prior to the transfer in 2008 , these employees were retained on metric 2019s payroll when certain properties were acquired by realty 2019s clients . the related compensation and benefits were fully reimbursed by realty 2019s clients and have been excluded from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , because they did not bear an economic cost to blackrock . for each of these items , blackrock excludes from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , the costs related to each of these items as a proxy for such offsetting revenues . ( b ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests , as adjusted : non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests ( 201cnci 201d ) , as adjusted , equals non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , gaap basis , adjusted for compensation expense associated with depreciation/ ( appreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans . the compensation expense offset is recorded in operating income . this compensation expense has been included in non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , to offset returns on investments set aside for these plans , which are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2010</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2009</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ 23</td><td>$ -6 ( 6 )</td><td>$ -577 ( 577 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>22</td><td>-155 ( 155 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 )</td><td>36</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td><td>-422 ( 422 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) /depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted</td><td>$ 25</td><td>$ -46 ( 46 )</td><td>$ -384 ( 384 )</td></tr></table> non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) 36 ( 28 ) ( 422 ) compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) / depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 11 ) ( 18 ) 38 non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted $ 25 ( $ 46 ) ( $ 384 ) ( 1 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests . management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides for comparability of this information to prior periods and is an effective measure for reviewing blackrock 2019s non-operating contribution to its results . as compensation expense associated with ( appreciation ) /depreciation on investments related to certain deferred compensation plans , which is included in operating income , offsets the gain/ ( loss ) on the investments set aside for these plans , management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides a useful measure , for both management and investors , of blackrock 2019s non-operating results that impact book value. .
Question: what was the non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted in 2010?
Answer: 25.0
Question: and what was it in 2009?
| 46.0 |
CONVFINQA7225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 4 m a n a g e m e n t 2019 s d i s c u s s i o n notes to table ( continued ) ( a ) ( continued ) management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , are effective indicators of blackrock 2019s financial performance over time . as such , management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , provide useful disclosure to investors . operating income , as adjusted : bgi transaction and integration costs recorded in 2010 and 2009 consist principally of certain advisory payments , compensation expense , legal fees , marketing and promotional , occupancy and consulting expenses incurred in conjunction with the bgi transaction . restructuring charges recorded in 2009 and 2008 consist of compensation costs , occupancy costs and professional fees . the expenses associated with restructuring and bgi transaction and integration costs have been deemed non-recurring by management and have been excluded from operating income , as adjusted , to help enhance the comparability of this information to the current reporting periods . as such , management believes that operating margins exclusive of these costs are useful measures in evaluating blackrock 2019s operating performance for the respective periods . the portion of compensation expense associated with certain long-term incentive plans ( 201cltip 201d ) that will be funded through the distribution to participants of shares of blackrock stock held by pnc and a merrill lynch cash compensation contribution , a portion of which has been received , have been excluded because these charges ultimately do not impact blackrock 2019s book value . compensation expense associated with appreciation/ ( depreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans has been excluded as returns on investments set aside for these plans , which substantially offset this expense , are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) . operating margin , as adjusted : operating income used for measuring operating margin , as adjusted , is equal to operating income , as adjusted , excluding the impact of closed-end fund launch costs and commissions . management believes that excluding such costs and commissions is useful because these costs can fluctuate considerably and revenues associated with the expenditure of these costs will not fully impact the company 2019s results until future periods . operating margin , as adjusted , allows the company to compare performance from period-to-period by adjusting for items that may not recur , recur infrequently or may fluctuate based on market movements , such as restructuring charges , transaction and integration costs , closed-end fund launch costs , commissions paid to certain employees as compensation and fluctua- tions in compensation expense based on mark-to-market movements in investments held to fund certain compensation plans . the company also uses operating margin , as adjusted , to monitor corporate performance and efficiency and as a benchmark to compare its performance to other companies . management uses both the gaap and non-gaap financial measures in evaluating the financial performance of blackrock . the non-gaap measure by itself may pose limitations because it does not include all of the company 2019s revenues and expenses . revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , excludes distribution and servicing costs paid to related parties and other third parties . management believes that excluding such costs is useful to blackrock because it creates consistency in the treatment for certain contracts for similar services , which due to the terms of the contracts , are accounted for under gaap on a net basis within investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue . amortization of deferred sales commissions is excluded from revenue used for operating margin measurement , as adjusted , because such costs , over time , offset distribution fee revenue earned by the company . reimbursable property management compensation represented com- pensation and benefits paid to personnel of metric property management , inc . ( 201cmetric 201d ) , a subsidiary of blackrock realty advisors , inc . ( 201crealty 201d ) . prior to the transfer in 2008 , these employees were retained on metric 2019s payroll when certain properties were acquired by realty 2019s clients . the related compensation and benefits were fully reimbursed by realty 2019s clients and have been excluded from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , because they did not bear an economic cost to blackrock . for each of these items , blackrock excludes from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , the costs related to each of these items as a proxy for such offsetting revenues . ( b ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests , as adjusted : non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests ( 201cnci 201d ) , as adjusted , equals non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , gaap basis , adjusted for compensation expense associated with depreciation/ ( appreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans . the compensation expense offset is recorded in operating income . this compensation expense has been included in non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , to offset returns on investments set aside for these plans , which are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2010</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2009</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ 23</td><td>$ -6 ( 6 )</td><td>$ -577 ( 577 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>22</td><td>-155 ( 155 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 )</td><td>36</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td><td>-422 ( 422 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) /depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted</td><td>$ 25</td><td>$ -46 ( 46 )</td><td>$ -384 ( 384 )</td></tr></table> non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) 36 ( 28 ) ( 422 ) compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) / depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 11 ) ( 18 ) 38 non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted $ 25 ( $ 46 ) ( $ 384 ) ( 1 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests . management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides for comparability of this information to prior periods and is an effective measure for reviewing blackrock 2019s non-operating contribution to its results . as compensation expense associated with ( appreciation ) /depreciation on investments related to certain deferred compensation plans , which is included in operating income , offsets the gain/ ( loss ) on the investments set aside for these plans , management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides a useful measure , for both management and investors , of blackrock 2019s non-operating results that impact book value. .
Question: what was the non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted in 2010?
Answer: 25.0
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 71.0 |
CONVFINQA7226 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 4 m a n a g e m e n t 2019 s d i s c u s s i o n notes to table ( continued ) ( a ) ( continued ) management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , are effective indicators of blackrock 2019s financial performance over time . as such , management believes that operating income , as adjusted , and operating margin , as adjusted , provide useful disclosure to investors . operating income , as adjusted : bgi transaction and integration costs recorded in 2010 and 2009 consist principally of certain advisory payments , compensation expense , legal fees , marketing and promotional , occupancy and consulting expenses incurred in conjunction with the bgi transaction . restructuring charges recorded in 2009 and 2008 consist of compensation costs , occupancy costs and professional fees . the expenses associated with restructuring and bgi transaction and integration costs have been deemed non-recurring by management and have been excluded from operating income , as adjusted , to help enhance the comparability of this information to the current reporting periods . as such , management believes that operating margins exclusive of these costs are useful measures in evaluating blackrock 2019s operating performance for the respective periods . the portion of compensation expense associated with certain long-term incentive plans ( 201cltip 201d ) that will be funded through the distribution to participants of shares of blackrock stock held by pnc and a merrill lynch cash compensation contribution , a portion of which has been received , have been excluded because these charges ultimately do not impact blackrock 2019s book value . compensation expense associated with appreciation/ ( depreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans has been excluded as returns on investments set aside for these plans , which substantially offset this expense , are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) . operating margin , as adjusted : operating income used for measuring operating margin , as adjusted , is equal to operating income , as adjusted , excluding the impact of closed-end fund launch costs and commissions . management believes that excluding such costs and commissions is useful because these costs can fluctuate considerably and revenues associated with the expenditure of these costs will not fully impact the company 2019s results until future periods . operating margin , as adjusted , allows the company to compare performance from period-to-period by adjusting for items that may not recur , recur infrequently or may fluctuate based on market movements , such as restructuring charges , transaction and integration costs , closed-end fund launch costs , commissions paid to certain employees as compensation and fluctua- tions in compensation expense based on mark-to-market movements in investments held to fund certain compensation plans . the company also uses operating margin , as adjusted , to monitor corporate performance and efficiency and as a benchmark to compare its performance to other companies . management uses both the gaap and non-gaap financial measures in evaluating the financial performance of blackrock . the non-gaap measure by itself may pose limitations because it does not include all of the company 2019s revenues and expenses . revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , excludes distribution and servicing costs paid to related parties and other third parties . management believes that excluding such costs is useful to blackrock because it creates consistency in the treatment for certain contracts for similar services , which due to the terms of the contracts , are accounted for under gaap on a net basis within investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue . amortization of deferred sales commissions is excluded from revenue used for operating margin measurement , as adjusted , because such costs , over time , offset distribution fee revenue earned by the company . reimbursable property management compensation represented com- pensation and benefits paid to personnel of metric property management , inc . ( 201cmetric 201d ) , a subsidiary of blackrock realty advisors , inc . ( 201crealty 201d ) . prior to the transfer in 2008 , these employees were retained on metric 2019s payroll when certain properties were acquired by realty 2019s clients . the related compensation and benefits were fully reimbursed by realty 2019s clients and have been excluded from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , because they did not bear an economic cost to blackrock . for each of these items , blackrock excludes from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , the costs related to each of these items as a proxy for such offsetting revenues . ( b ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests , as adjusted : non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests ( 201cnci 201d ) , as adjusted , equals non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , gaap basis , adjusted for compensation expense associated with depreciation/ ( appreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans . the compensation expense offset is recorded in operating income . this compensation expense has been included in non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , to offset returns on investments set aside for these plans , which are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2010</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2009</td><td>yearended december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ 23</td><td>$ -6 ( 6 )</td><td>$ -577 ( 577 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>22</td><td>-155 ( 155 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 )</td><td>36</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td><td>-422 ( 422 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) /depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted</td><td>$ 25</td><td>$ -46 ( 46 )</td><td>$ -384 ( 384 )</td></tr></table> non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) 36 ( 28 ) ( 422 ) compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) / depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 11 ) ( 18 ) 38 non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted $ 25 ( $ 46 ) ( $ 384 ) ( 1 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests . management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides for comparability of this information to prior periods and is an effective measure for reviewing blackrock 2019s non-operating contribution to its results . as compensation expense associated with ( appreciation ) /depreciation on investments related to certain deferred compensation plans , which is included in operating income , offsets the gain/ ( loss ) on the investments set aside for these plans , management believes that non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides a useful measure , for both management and investors , of blackrock 2019s non-operating results that impact book value. .
Question: what was the non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted in 2010?
Answer: 25.0
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 71.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2009 value, in percentage?
| 1.54348 |
CONVFINQA7227 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the operating profit of 2007?
| 1410.0 |
CONVFINQA7228 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the operating profit of 2007?
Answer: 1410.0
Question: and that of 2006?
| 1264.0 |
CONVFINQA7229 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the operating profit of 2007?
Answer: 1410.0
Question: and that of 2006?
Answer: 1264.0
Question: what is the total operating profit of 2007 and 2006?
| 2674.0 |
CONVFINQA7230 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the operating profit of 2007?
Answer: 1410.0
Question: and that of 2006?
Answer: 1264.0
Question: what is the total operating profit of 2007 and 2006?
Answer: 2674.0
Question: then what is the total operating profit if we also include 2005?
| 3752.0 |
CONVFINQA7231 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the operating profit of 2007?
Answer: 1410.0
Question: and that of 2006?
Answer: 1264.0
Question: what is the total operating profit of 2007 and 2006?
Answer: 2674.0
Question: then what is the total operating profit if we also include 2005?
Answer: 3752.0
Question: what is the average of these 3 years?
| 1250.66667 |
CONVFINQA7232 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3266</td><td>761</td><td>583</td><td>463</td><td>422</td><td>1690</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3408</td><td>$ 867</td><td>$ 667</td><td>$ 526</td><td>$ 467</td><td>$ 1781</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december 31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit .
Question: what was the total amount of lease obligations in 2015?
| 142.0 |
CONVFINQA7233 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3266</td><td>761</td><td>583</td><td>463</td><td>422</td><td>1690</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3408</td><td>$ 867</td><td>$ 667</td><td>$ 526</td><td>$ 467</td><td>$ 1781</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december 31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit .
Question: what was the total amount of lease obligations in 2015?
Answer: 142.0
Question: and what were the total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations in that year?
| 3408.0 |
CONVFINQA7234 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3266</td><td>761</td><td>583</td><td>463</td><td>422</td><td>1690</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3408</td><td>$ 867</td><td>$ 667</td><td>$ 526</td><td>$ 467</td><td>$ 1781</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december 31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit .
Question: what was the total amount of lease obligations in 2015?
Answer: 142.0
Question: and what were the total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations in that year?
Answer: 3408.0
Question: what percentage, then, of these total future minimum commitments does that total amount represent?
| 0.04167 |
CONVFINQA7235 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 142</td><td>$ 106</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3266</td><td>761</td><td>583</td><td>463</td><td>422</td><td>1690</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3408</td><td>$ 867</td><td>$ 667</td><td>$ 526</td><td>$ 467</td><td>$ 1781</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december 31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit .
Question: what was the total amount of lease obligations in 2015?
Answer: 142.0
Question: and what were the total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations in that year?
Answer: 3408.0
Question: what percentage, then, of these total future minimum commitments does that total amount represent?
Answer: 0.04167
Question: and what is this same percentage representation of the lease obligations for the year of 2016?
| 0.12226 |
CONVFINQA7236 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: what was the share price in november 2017?
| 81.21 |
CONVFINQA7237 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: what was the share price in november 2017?
Answer: 81.21
Question: what was it in october 2017?
| 77.15 |
CONVFINQA7238 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: what was the share price in november 2017?
Answer: 81.21
Question: what was it in october 2017?
Answer: 77.15
Question: what is the net change?
| 4.06 |
CONVFINQA7239 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: what was the share price in november 2017?
Answer: 81.21
Question: what was it in october 2017?
Answer: 77.15
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 4.06
Question: what was the october price?
| 77.15 |
CONVFINQA7240 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .
Question: what was the share price in november 2017?
Answer: 81.21
Question: what was it in october 2017?
Answer: 77.15
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 4.06
Question: what was the october price?
Answer: 77.15
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.05262 |
CONVFINQA7241 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2018 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) default for unsecured financing arrangements , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 30 , 2017 , and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements as of december 31 , 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption , except that the floating rate notes due 2021 may not be redeemed until on or after march 20 , 2019 and such notes do not have any applicable make-whole premium . in addition , we may redeem , at our option , the 2.700% ( 2.700 % ) senior notes due 2020 , the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 , the 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) senior notes due 2022 , the 3.700% ( 3.700 % ) senior notes due 2023 , the 3.550% ( 3.550 % ) senior notes due 2025 , the 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) senior notes due 2035 and the 4.450% ( 4.450 % ) senior notes due 2045 without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2018 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 7798.9 million . the estimated fair value of japan term loan a and japan term loan b , in the aggregate , as of december 31 , 2018 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 294.7 million . the carrying values of u.s . term loan b and u.s . term loan c approximate fair value as they bear interest at short-term variable market rates . we entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed-rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . these fair value hedges were settled in 2016 . in 2016 , we entered into various variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements that were accounted for as cash flow hedges of u.s . term loan b . in 2018 , we entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that we designated as net investment hedges . the excluded component of these net investment hedges is recorded in interest expense , net . see note 13 for additional information regarding our interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 55.0 million . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the weighted average interest rate for our borrowings was 3.1 percent and 2.9 percent , respectively . we paid $ 282.8 million , $ 317.5 million , and $ 363.1 million in interest during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . 12 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income aoci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in aoci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our aoci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , including unrealized gains and losses on net investment hedges , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in aoci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . see note 14 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of aoci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges defined benefit plan items . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td><td>total aoci</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 121.5</td><td>$ -66.5 ( 66.5 )</td><td>$ -138.2 ( 138.2 )</td><td>$ -83.2 ( 83.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aoci before reclassifications</td><td>-135.4 ( 135.4 )</td><td>68.2</td><td>-29.7 ( 29.7 )</td><td>-96.9 ( 96.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to retained earnings ( note 2 )</td><td>-17.4 ( 17.4 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-42.9 ( 42.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>-</td><td>23.6</td><td>12.0</td><td>35.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2018</td><td>$ -31.3 ( 31.3 )</td><td>$ 20.9</td><td>$ -177.0 ( 177.0 )</td><td>$ -187.4 ( 187.4 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the positive balance of the foreign currency translation at the end of 2018?
| -31.3 |
CONVFINQA7242 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2018 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) default for unsecured financing arrangements , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 30 , 2017 , and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements as of december 31 , 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption , except that the floating rate notes due 2021 may not be redeemed until on or after march 20 , 2019 and such notes do not have any applicable make-whole premium . in addition , we may redeem , at our option , the 2.700% ( 2.700 % ) senior notes due 2020 , the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 , the 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) senior notes due 2022 , the 3.700% ( 3.700 % ) senior notes due 2023 , the 3.550% ( 3.550 % ) senior notes due 2025 , the 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) senior notes due 2035 and the 4.450% ( 4.450 % ) senior notes due 2045 without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2018 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 7798.9 million . the estimated fair value of japan term loan a and japan term loan b , in the aggregate , as of december 31 , 2018 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 294.7 million . the carrying values of u.s . term loan b and u.s . term loan c approximate fair value as they bear interest at short-term variable market rates . we entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed-rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . these fair value hedges were settled in 2016 . in 2016 , we entered into various variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements that were accounted for as cash flow hedges of u.s . term loan b . in 2018 , we entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that we designated as net investment hedges . the excluded component of these net investment hedges is recorded in interest expense , net . see note 13 for additional information regarding our interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 55.0 million . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the weighted average interest rate for our borrowings was 3.1 percent and 2.9 percent , respectively . we paid $ 282.8 million , $ 317.5 million , and $ 363.1 million in interest during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . 12 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income aoci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in aoci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our aoci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , including unrealized gains and losses on net investment hedges , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in aoci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . see note 14 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of aoci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges defined benefit plan items . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td><td>total aoci</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 121.5</td><td>$ -66.5 ( 66.5 )</td><td>$ -138.2 ( 138.2 )</td><td>$ -83.2 ( 83.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aoci before reclassifications</td><td>-135.4 ( 135.4 )</td><td>68.2</td><td>-29.7 ( 29.7 )</td><td>-96.9 ( 96.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to retained earnings ( note 2 )</td><td>-17.4 ( 17.4 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-42.9 ( 42.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>-</td><td>23.6</td><td>12.0</td><td>35.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2018</td><td>$ -31.3 ( 31.3 )</td><td>$ 20.9</td><td>$ -177.0 ( 177.0 )</td><td>$ -187.4 ( 187.4 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the positive balance of the foreign currency translation at the end of 2018?
Answer: -31.3
Question: what was the value at the end of 2017?
| 121.5 |
CONVFINQA7243 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2018 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) default for unsecured financing arrangements , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 30 , 2017 , and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements as of december 31 , 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption , except that the floating rate notes due 2021 may not be redeemed until on or after march 20 , 2019 and such notes do not have any applicable make-whole premium . in addition , we may redeem , at our option , the 2.700% ( 2.700 % ) senior notes due 2020 , the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 , the 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) senior notes due 2022 , the 3.700% ( 3.700 % ) senior notes due 2023 , the 3.550% ( 3.550 % ) senior notes due 2025 , the 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) senior notes due 2035 and the 4.450% ( 4.450 % ) senior notes due 2045 without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2018 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 7798.9 million . the estimated fair value of japan term loan a and japan term loan b , in the aggregate , as of december 31 , 2018 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 294.7 million . the carrying values of u.s . term loan b and u.s . term loan c approximate fair value as they bear interest at short-term variable market rates . we entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed-rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . these fair value hedges were settled in 2016 . in 2016 , we entered into various variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements that were accounted for as cash flow hedges of u.s . term loan b . in 2018 , we entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that we designated as net investment hedges . the excluded component of these net investment hedges is recorded in interest expense , net . see note 13 for additional information regarding our interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 55.0 million . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the weighted average interest rate for our borrowings was 3.1 percent and 2.9 percent , respectively . we paid $ 282.8 million , $ 317.5 million , and $ 363.1 million in interest during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . 12 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income aoci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in aoci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our aoci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , including unrealized gains and losses on net investment hedges , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in aoci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . see note 14 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of aoci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges defined benefit plan items . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td><td>total aoci</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 121.5</td><td>$ -66.5 ( 66.5 )</td><td>$ -138.2 ( 138.2 )</td><td>$ -83.2 ( 83.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aoci before reclassifications</td><td>-135.4 ( 135.4 )</td><td>68.2</td><td>-29.7 ( 29.7 )</td><td>-96.9 ( 96.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to retained earnings ( note 2 )</td><td>-17.4 ( 17.4 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-42.9 ( 42.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>-</td><td>23.6</td><td>12.0</td><td>35.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2018</td><td>$ -31.3 ( 31.3 )</td><td>$ 20.9</td><td>$ -177.0 ( 177.0 )</td><td>$ -187.4 ( 187.4 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the positive balance of the foreign currency translation at the end of 2018?
Answer: -31.3
Question: what was the value at the end of 2017?
Answer: 121.5
Question: what is the net change?
| -152.8 |
CONVFINQA7244 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 98</td><td>$ 114</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 139</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of lkq corp in 2012?
| 201.0 |
CONVFINQA7245 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 98</td><td>$ 114</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 139</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of lkq corp in 2012?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what was the value in 2007?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA7246 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 98</td><td>$ 114</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 139</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of lkq corp in 2012?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what was the value in 2007?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value?
| 101.0 |
CONVFINQA7247 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2007</td><td>12/31/2008</td><td>12/31/2009</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 93</td><td>$ 108</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 201</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 86</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 98</td><td>$ 114</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 139</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 210</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of lkq corp in 2012?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what was the value in 2007?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: 101.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 1.01 |
CONVFINQA7248 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 2022 amend certain material agreements governing bcp crystal 2019s indebtedness ; 2022 change the business conducted by celanese holdings and its subsidiaries ; and 2022 enter into hedging agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . the maturation of the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in$ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2008</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2009</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>3163</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3437</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . defined benefit pension plans exist at certain locations in north america and europe . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 85% ( 85 % ) and 75% ( 75 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . actuarial valuations for these plans are prepared annually . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in europe and north america covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . contributions to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and they aggregated $ 12 million for the year ended decem- ber 31 , 2005 , $ 8 million for the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 3 million for the three months ended march 31 , 2004 and $ 11 million for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in connection with the acquisition of cag , the purchaser agreed to pre-fund $ 463 million of certain pension obligations . during the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 409 million was pre-funded to the company 2019s pension plans . the company contributed an additional $ 54 million to the non-qualified pension plan 2019s rabbi trusts in february 2005 . in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of vinamul and acetex , the company assumed certain assets and obligations related to the acquired pension plans . the company recorded liabilities of $ 128 million for these pension plans . total pension assets acquired amounted to $ 85 million. .
Question: what was the total amount of debt maturities from 2006 to 2010?
| 274.0 |
CONVFINQA7249 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 2022 amend certain material agreements governing bcp crystal 2019s indebtedness ; 2022 change the business conducted by celanese holdings and its subsidiaries ; and 2022 enter into hedging agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . the maturation of the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total ( in$ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2008</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2009</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter ( 1 )</td><td>3163</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>3437</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . defined benefit pension plans exist at certain locations in north america and europe . as of december 31 , 2005 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 85% ( 85 % ) and 75% ( 75 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . actuarial valuations for these plans are prepared annually . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in europe and north america covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . contributions to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and they aggregated $ 12 million for the year ended decem- ber 31 , 2005 , $ 8 million for the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 3 million for the three months ended march 31 , 2004 and $ 11 million for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in connection with the acquisition of cag , the purchaser agreed to pre-fund $ 463 million of certain pension obligations . during the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 , $ 409 million was pre-funded to the company 2019s pension plans . the company contributed an additional $ 54 million to the non-qualified pension plan 2019s rabbi trusts in february 2005 . in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of vinamul and acetex , the company assumed certain assets and obligations related to the acquired pension plans . the company recorded liabilities of $ 128 million for these pension plans . total pension assets acquired amounted to $ 85 million. .
Question: what was the total amount of debt maturities from 2006 to 2010?
Answer: 274.0
Question: what was the average amount per year?
| 54.8 |
CONVFINQA7250 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
92 | 2017 form 10-k finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired . in 2016 , gross customer relationship intangibles of $ 96 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 27 million as well as gross intellectual property intangibles of $ 111 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 48 million from the resource industries segment were impaired . the fair value of these intangibles was determined to be insignificant based on an income approach using expected cash flows . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . the total impairment of $ 132 million was a result of restructuring activities and is included in other operating ( income ) expense in statement 1 . see note 25 for information on restructuring costs . amortization expense related to intangible assets was $ 323 million , $ 326 million and $ 337 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be : ( millions of dollars ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ 316</td><td>$ 305</td><td>$ 287</td><td>$ 268</td><td>$ 613</td></tr></table> b . goodwill there were no goodwill impairments during 2017 or 2015 . our annual impairment tests completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated the fair value of each reporting unit was substantially above its respective carrying value , including goodwill , with the exception of our surface mining & technology reporting unit . the surface mining & technology reporting unit , which primarily serves the mining industry , is a part of our resource industries segment . the goodwill assigned to this reporting unit is largely from our acquisition of bucyrus international , inc . in 2011 . its product portfolio includes large mining trucks , electric rope shovels , draglines , hydraulic shovels and related parts . in addition to equipment , surface mining & technology also develops and sells technology products and services to provide customer fleet management , equipment management analytics and autonomous machine capabilities . the annual impairment test completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated that the fair value of surface mining & technology was below its carrying value requiring the second step of the goodwill impairment test process . the fair value of surface mining & technology was determined primarily using an income approach based on a discounted ten year cash flow . we assigned the fair value to surface mining & technology 2019s assets and liabilities using various valuation techniques that required assumptions about royalty rates , dealer attrition , technological obsolescence and discount rates . the resulting implied fair value of goodwill was below the carrying value . accordingly , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 595 million , which resulted in goodwill of $ 629 million remaining for surface mining & technology as of october 1 , 2016 . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . there was a $ 17 million tax benefit associated with this impairment charge. .
Question: what is the expected change in the amortization expense related to intangible assets from 2017 to 2018?
| -1.0 |
CONVFINQA7251 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
92 | 2017 form 10-k finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired . in 2016 , gross customer relationship intangibles of $ 96 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 27 million as well as gross intellectual property intangibles of $ 111 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 48 million from the resource industries segment were impaired . the fair value of these intangibles was determined to be insignificant based on an income approach using expected cash flows . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . the total impairment of $ 132 million was a result of restructuring activities and is included in other operating ( income ) expense in statement 1 . see note 25 for information on restructuring costs . amortization expense related to intangible assets was $ 323 million , $ 326 million and $ 337 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be : ( millions of dollars ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ 316</td><td>$ 305</td><td>$ 287</td><td>$ 268</td><td>$ 613</td></tr></table> b . goodwill there were no goodwill impairments during 2017 or 2015 . our annual impairment tests completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated the fair value of each reporting unit was substantially above its respective carrying value , including goodwill , with the exception of our surface mining & technology reporting unit . the surface mining & technology reporting unit , which primarily serves the mining industry , is a part of our resource industries segment . the goodwill assigned to this reporting unit is largely from our acquisition of bucyrus international , inc . in 2011 . its product portfolio includes large mining trucks , electric rope shovels , draglines , hydraulic shovels and related parts . in addition to equipment , surface mining & technology also develops and sells technology products and services to provide customer fleet management , equipment management analytics and autonomous machine capabilities . the annual impairment test completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated that the fair value of surface mining & technology was below its carrying value requiring the second step of the goodwill impairment test process . the fair value of surface mining & technology was determined primarily using an income approach based on a discounted ten year cash flow . we assigned the fair value to surface mining & technology 2019s assets and liabilities using various valuation techniques that required assumptions about royalty rates , dealer attrition , technological obsolescence and discount rates . the resulting implied fair value of goodwill was below the carrying value . accordingly , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 595 million , which resulted in goodwill of $ 629 million remaining for surface mining & technology as of october 1 , 2016 . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . there was a $ 17 million tax benefit associated with this impairment charge. .
Question: what is the expected change in the amortization expense related to intangible assets from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: -1.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that expense in 2017?
| -0.0031 |
CONVFINQA7252 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
92 | 2017 form 10-k finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired . in 2016 , gross customer relationship intangibles of $ 96 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 27 million as well as gross intellectual property intangibles of $ 111 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 48 million from the resource industries segment were impaired . the fair value of these intangibles was determined to be insignificant based on an income approach using expected cash flows . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . the total impairment of $ 132 million was a result of restructuring activities and is included in other operating ( income ) expense in statement 1 . see note 25 for information on restructuring costs . amortization expense related to intangible assets was $ 323 million , $ 326 million and $ 337 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be : ( millions of dollars ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ 316</td><td>$ 305</td><td>$ 287</td><td>$ 268</td><td>$ 613</td></tr></table> b . goodwill there were no goodwill impairments during 2017 or 2015 . our annual impairment tests completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated the fair value of each reporting unit was substantially above its respective carrying value , including goodwill , with the exception of our surface mining & technology reporting unit . the surface mining & technology reporting unit , which primarily serves the mining industry , is a part of our resource industries segment . the goodwill assigned to this reporting unit is largely from our acquisition of bucyrus international , inc . in 2011 . its product portfolio includes large mining trucks , electric rope shovels , draglines , hydraulic shovels and related parts . in addition to equipment , surface mining & technology also develops and sells technology products and services to provide customer fleet management , equipment management analytics and autonomous machine capabilities . the annual impairment test completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated that the fair value of surface mining & technology was below its carrying value requiring the second step of the goodwill impairment test process . the fair value of surface mining & technology was determined primarily using an income approach based on a discounted ten year cash flow . we assigned the fair value to surface mining & technology 2019s assets and liabilities using various valuation techniques that required assumptions about royalty rates , dealer attrition , technological obsolescence and discount rates . the resulting implied fair value of goodwill was below the carrying value . accordingly , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 595 million , which resulted in goodwill of $ 629 million remaining for surface mining & technology as of october 1 , 2016 . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . there was a $ 17 million tax benefit associated with this impairment charge. .
Question: what is the expected change in the amortization expense related to intangible assets from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: -1.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that expense in 2017?
Answer: -0.0031
Question: and in the previous year, what was the total of pre impairment goodwill in millions for surface mining & technology?
| 1224.0 |
CONVFINQA7253 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2013 , 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 56 mmboe from december 31 , 2012 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2013 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>571</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>627</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 included 72 mmboe in the eagle ford and 49 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 57 mmboe in the eagle ford , 18 mmboe in the bakken and 7 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 2536 million , $ 1995 million and $ 1107 million . a total of 59 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2013 , 24 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled late 2014 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time as proved undeveloped reserves in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to be developed , is being executed by the operator and encompasses a continuous drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region led to an expected project execution of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes in 2013 have extended the project duration . there are no other significant undeveloped reserves expected to be developed more than five years after their original booking . as of december 31 , 2013 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2014 through 2018 are projected to be $ 2894 million , $ 2567 million , $ 2020 million , $ 1452 million and $ 575 million . the timing of future projects and estimated future development costs relating to the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves are forward-looking statements and are based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , presently known physical data concerning size and character of the reservoirs , economic recoverability , technology developments , future drilling success , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , production experience and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries , timing and development costs could be different than current estimates. .
Question: what was the total of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 and 2013, combined, in millions?
| 4531.0 |
CONVFINQA7254 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2013 , 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 56 mmboe from december 31 , 2012 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2013 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>571</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>627</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 included 72 mmboe in the eagle ford and 49 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 57 mmboe in the eagle ford , 18 mmboe in the bakken and 7 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 2536 million , $ 1995 million and $ 1107 million . a total of 59 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2013 , 24 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled late 2014 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time as proved undeveloped reserves in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to be developed , is being executed by the operator and encompasses a continuous drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region led to an expected project execution of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes in 2013 have extended the project duration . there are no other significant undeveloped reserves expected to be developed more than five years after their original booking . as of december 31 , 2013 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2014 through 2018 are projected to be $ 2894 million , $ 2567 million , $ 2020 million , $ 1452 million and $ 575 million . the timing of future projects and estimated future development costs relating to the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves are forward-looking statements and are based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , presently known physical data concerning size and character of the reservoirs , economic recoverability , technology developments , future drilling success , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , production experience and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries , timing and development costs could be different than current estimates. .
Question: what was the total of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2012 and 2013, combined, in millions?
Answer: 4531.0
Question: including 2011, what would then be the total of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in the three years, also in millions?
| 5638.0 |
CONVFINQA7255 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit . obligations and commitments as part of its ongoing operations , the company enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements , lease agreements , and unconditional purchase obligations ( i.e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices , such as 201ctake-or-pay 201d contracts ) . the unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the company . capital lease and debt obligations , which totaled $ 3.5 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are currently recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations , which totaled $ 1.7 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet , in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . a summary of the company 2019s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2008 was as follows ( including obligations of discontinued operations ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions ) contractual obligations</td><td>( $ in millions ) total</td><td>( $ in millions ) less than 1 year</td><td>( $ in millions ) 1-3 years</td><td>( $ in millions ) 3-5 years</td><td>after 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 3531.4</td><td>$ 15.4</td><td>$ 521.6</td><td>$ 751.8</td><td>$ 2242.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>514.9</td><td>89.2</td><td>148.1</td><td>106.9</td><td>170.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1199.6</td><td>1078.6</td><td>104.0</td><td>16.3</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5245.9</td><td>$ 1183.2</td><td>$ 773.7</td><td>$ 875.0</td><td>$ 2414.0</td></tr></table> the purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect approximately $ 374 million of open purchase orders , some of which are not legally binding . these purchase orders are settlable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year . the company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations . the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of may 25 , 2008 was approximately 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) . the company consolidates the assets and liabilities of certain entities from which it leases corporate aircraft . these entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities . the amounts reflected in contractual obligations of long-term debt , in the table above , include $ 54 million of liabilities of these variable interest entities to the creditors of such entities . the long-term debt recognized as a result of consolidating these entities does not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities . as of may 25 , 2008 , the company was obligated to make rental payments of $ 67 million to the variable interest entities , of which $ 7 million is due in less than one year , $ 13 million is due in one to three years , and $ 47 million is due in three to five years . such amounts are not reflected in the table , above . as part of its ongoing operations , the company also enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event ( e.g. , guarantee debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform ) . in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles , the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s .
Question: what was the percentage of total contractual obligations was due to long-term debt at the end of 2008?
| 0.67317 |
CONVFINQA7256 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these entities do not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities to which they have advanced credit . obligations and commitments as part of its ongoing operations , the company enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future payments under contracts such as debt agreements , lease agreements , and unconditional purchase obligations ( i.e. , obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices , such as 201ctake-or-pay 201d contracts ) . the unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into by the company in its normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available to the company . capital lease and debt obligations , which totaled $ 3.5 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are currently recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations , which totaled $ 1.7 billion at may 25 , 2008 , are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet , in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles . a summary of the company 2019s contractual obligations at the end of fiscal 2008 was as follows ( including obligations of discontinued operations ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions ) contractual obligations</td><td>( $ in millions ) total</td><td>( $ in millions ) less than 1 year</td><td>( $ in millions ) 1-3 years</td><td>( $ in millions ) 3-5 years</td><td>after 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 3531.4</td><td>$ 15.4</td><td>$ 521.6</td><td>$ 751.8</td><td>$ 2242.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>514.9</td><td>89.2</td><td>148.1</td><td>106.9</td><td>170.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1199.6</td><td>1078.6</td><td>104.0</td><td>16.3</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5245.9</td><td>$ 1183.2</td><td>$ 773.7</td><td>$ 875.0</td><td>$ 2414.0</td></tr></table> the purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect approximately $ 374 million of open purchase orders , some of which are not legally binding . these purchase orders are settlable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year . the company is also contractually obligated to pay interest on its long-term debt obligations . the weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of may 25 , 2008 was approximately 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) . the company consolidates the assets and liabilities of certain entities from which it leases corporate aircraft . these entities have been determined to be variable interest entities and the company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of these entities . the amounts reflected in contractual obligations of long-term debt , in the table above , include $ 54 million of liabilities of these variable interest entities to the creditors of such entities . the long-term debt recognized as a result of consolidating these entities does not represent additional claims on the general assets of the company . the creditors of these entities have claims only on the assets of the specific variable interest entities . as of may 25 , 2008 , the company was obligated to make rental payments of $ 67 million to the variable interest entities , of which $ 7 million is due in less than one year , $ 13 million is due in one to three years , and $ 47 million is due in three to five years . such amounts are not reflected in the table , above . as part of its ongoing operations , the company also enters into arrangements that obligate the company to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event ( e.g. , guarantee debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform ) . in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles , the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in the company 2019s .
Question: what was the percentage of total contractual obligations was due to long-term debt at the end of 2008?
Answer: 0.67317
Question: and what percentage was due to lease obligations?
| 0.09815 |
CONVFINQA7257 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
m . employee retirement plans 2013 ( continued ) of equities and fixed-income investments , and would be less liquid than financial instruments that trade on public markets . potential events or circumstances that could have a negative effect on estimated fair value include the risks of inadequate diversification and other operating risks . to mitigate these risks , investments are diversified across and within asset classes in support of investment objectives . policies and practices to address operating risks include ongoing manager oversight , plan and asset class investment guidelines and instructions that are communicated to managers , and periodic compliance and audit reviews to ensure adherence to these policies . in addition , the company periodically seeks the input of its independent advisor to ensure the investment policy is appropriate . the company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans that provide medical , dental and life insurance coverage for eligible retirees and dependents in the united states based upon age and length of service . the aggregate present value of the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $ 13 million at both december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . cash flows at december 31 , 2010 , the company expected to contribute approximately $ 30 million to $ 35 million to its qualified defined-benefit pension plans to meet erisa requirements in 2011 . the company also expected to pay benefits of $ 3 million and $ 10 million to participants of its unfunded foreign and non-qualified ( domestic ) defined-benefit pension plans , respectively , in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years , and in aggregate for the five years thereafter , relating to the company 2019s defined-benefit pension plans , were as follows , in millions : qualified non-qualified . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>qualified plans</td><td>non-qualified plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 38</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>$ 235</td><td>$ 59</td></tr></table> n . shareholders 2019 equity in july 2007 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase for retirement of up to 50 million shares of the company 2019s common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , the company repurchased and retired three million shares of company common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . the company repurchased and retired two million common shares in 2009 and nine million common shares in 2008 for cash aggregating $ 11 million and $ 160 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . on the basis of amounts paid ( declared ) , cash dividends per common share were $ .30 ( $ .30 ) in 2010 , $ .46 ( $ .30 ) in 2009 and $ .925 ( $ .93 ) in 2008 , respectively . in 2009 , the company decreased its quarterly cash dividend to $ .075 per common share from $ .235 per common share . masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the authorized repurchase of shares for retirement remains to be purchased as of december 31, 2010?
| 0.54 |
CONVFINQA7258 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
m . employee retirement plans 2013 ( continued ) of equities and fixed-income investments , and would be less liquid than financial instruments that trade on public markets . potential events or circumstances that could have a negative effect on estimated fair value include the risks of inadequate diversification and other operating risks . to mitigate these risks , investments are diversified across and within asset classes in support of investment objectives . policies and practices to address operating risks include ongoing manager oversight , plan and asset class investment guidelines and instructions that are communicated to managers , and periodic compliance and audit reviews to ensure adherence to these policies . in addition , the company periodically seeks the input of its independent advisor to ensure the investment policy is appropriate . the company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans that provide medical , dental and life insurance coverage for eligible retirees and dependents in the united states based upon age and length of service . the aggregate present value of the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $ 13 million at both december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . cash flows at december 31 , 2010 , the company expected to contribute approximately $ 30 million to $ 35 million to its qualified defined-benefit pension plans to meet erisa requirements in 2011 . the company also expected to pay benefits of $ 3 million and $ 10 million to participants of its unfunded foreign and non-qualified ( domestic ) defined-benefit pension plans , respectively , in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years , and in aggregate for the five years thereafter , relating to the company 2019s defined-benefit pension plans , were as follows , in millions : qualified non-qualified . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>qualified plans</td><td>non-qualified plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 38</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>$ 235</td><td>$ 59</td></tr></table> n . shareholders 2019 equity in july 2007 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase for retirement of up to 50 million shares of the company 2019s common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , the company repurchased and retired three million shares of company common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . the company repurchased and retired two million common shares in 2009 and nine million common shares in 2008 for cash aggregating $ 11 million and $ 160 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . on the basis of amounts paid ( declared ) , cash dividends per common share were $ .30 ( $ .30 ) in 2010 , $ .46 ( $ .30 ) in 2009 and $ .925 ( $ .93 ) in 2008 , respectively . in 2009 , the company decreased its quarterly cash dividend to $ .075 per common share from $ .235 per common share . masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the authorized repurchase of shares for retirement remains to be purchased as of december 31, 2010?
Answer: 0.54
Question: what is the amount of qualified plans in 2015?
| 43.0 |
CONVFINQA7259 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
m . employee retirement plans 2013 ( continued ) of equities and fixed-income investments , and would be less liquid than financial instruments that trade on public markets . potential events or circumstances that could have a negative effect on estimated fair value include the risks of inadequate diversification and other operating risks . to mitigate these risks , investments are diversified across and within asset classes in support of investment objectives . policies and practices to address operating risks include ongoing manager oversight , plan and asset class investment guidelines and instructions that are communicated to managers , and periodic compliance and audit reviews to ensure adherence to these policies . in addition , the company periodically seeks the input of its independent advisor to ensure the investment policy is appropriate . the company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans that provide medical , dental and life insurance coverage for eligible retirees and dependents in the united states based upon age and length of service . the aggregate present value of the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $ 13 million at both december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . cash flows at december 31 , 2010 , the company expected to contribute approximately $ 30 million to $ 35 million to its qualified defined-benefit pension plans to meet erisa requirements in 2011 . the company also expected to pay benefits of $ 3 million and $ 10 million to participants of its unfunded foreign and non-qualified ( domestic ) defined-benefit pension plans , respectively , in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years , and in aggregate for the five years thereafter , relating to the company 2019s defined-benefit pension plans , were as follows , in millions : qualified non-qualified . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>qualified plans</td><td>non-qualified plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 38</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>$ 235</td><td>$ 59</td></tr></table> n . shareholders 2019 equity in july 2007 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase for retirement of up to 50 million shares of the company 2019s common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , the company repurchased and retired three million shares of company common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . the company repurchased and retired two million common shares in 2009 and nine million common shares in 2008 for cash aggregating $ 11 million and $ 160 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . on the basis of amounts paid ( declared ) , cash dividends per common share were $ .30 ( $ .30 ) in 2010 , $ .46 ( $ .30 ) in 2009 and $ .925 ( $ .93 ) in 2008 , respectively . in 2009 , the company decreased its quarterly cash dividend to $ .075 per common share from $ .235 per common share . masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the authorized repurchase of shares for retirement remains to be purchased as of december 31, 2010?
Answer: 0.54
Question: what is the amount of qualified plans in 2015?
Answer: 43.0
Question: what about the non-qualified?
| 12.0 |
CONVFINQA7260 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
m . employee retirement plans 2013 ( continued ) of equities and fixed-income investments , and would be less liquid than financial instruments that trade on public markets . potential events or circumstances that could have a negative effect on estimated fair value include the risks of inadequate diversification and other operating risks . to mitigate these risks , investments are diversified across and within asset classes in support of investment objectives . policies and practices to address operating risks include ongoing manager oversight , plan and asset class investment guidelines and instructions that are communicated to managers , and periodic compliance and audit reviews to ensure adherence to these policies . in addition , the company periodically seeks the input of its independent advisor to ensure the investment policy is appropriate . the company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans that provide medical , dental and life insurance coverage for eligible retirees and dependents in the united states based upon age and length of service . the aggregate present value of the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $ 13 million at both december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . cash flows at december 31 , 2010 , the company expected to contribute approximately $ 30 million to $ 35 million to its qualified defined-benefit pension plans to meet erisa requirements in 2011 . the company also expected to pay benefits of $ 3 million and $ 10 million to participants of its unfunded foreign and non-qualified ( domestic ) defined-benefit pension plans , respectively , in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years , and in aggregate for the five years thereafter , relating to the company 2019s defined-benefit pension plans , were as follows , in millions : qualified non-qualified . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>qualified plans</td><td>non-qualified plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 38</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>$ 235</td><td>$ 59</td></tr></table> n . shareholders 2019 equity in july 2007 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase for retirement of up to 50 million shares of the company 2019s common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , the company repurchased and retired three million shares of company common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . the company repurchased and retired two million common shares in 2009 and nine million common shares in 2008 for cash aggregating $ 11 million and $ 160 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . on the basis of amounts paid ( declared ) , cash dividends per common share were $ .30 ( $ .30 ) in 2010 , $ .46 ( $ .30 ) in 2009 and $ .925 ( $ .93 ) in 2008 , respectively . in 2009 , the company decreased its quarterly cash dividend to $ .075 per common share from $ .235 per common share . masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the authorized repurchase of shares for retirement remains to be purchased as of december 31, 2010?
Answer: 0.54
Question: what is the amount of qualified plans in 2015?
Answer: 43.0
Question: what about the non-qualified?
Answer: 12.0
Question: what is the ratio of qualified to non-qualified?
| 3.58333 |
CONVFINQA7261 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity in net earnings of affiliated companies equity income from the m-i swaco joint venture in 2010 represents eight months of equity income through the closing of the smith transaction . interest expense interest expense of $ 298 million in 2011 increased by $ 91 million compared to 2010 primarily due to the $ 4.6 billion of long-term debt that schlumberger issued during 2011 . interest expense of $ 207 million in 2010 decreased by $ 14 million compared to 2009 primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rates , from 3.9% ( 3.9 % ) to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) . research & engineering and general & administrative expenses , as a percentage of revenue , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research & engineering</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>general & administrative</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr></table> although research & engineering decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2011 as compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 , it has increased in absolute dollars by $ 154 million and $ 117 million , respectively . these increases in absolute dollars were driven in large part by the impact of the smith acquisition . income taxes the schlumberger effective tax rate was 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) in 2011 , 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) in 2010 , and 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) in 2009 . the schlumberger effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic mix of earnings . when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america increases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally decrease . conversely , when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america decreases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally increase . the effective tax rate for both 2011 and 2010 was impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements . excluding the impact of these charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) compared to 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) in 2010 . this increase in the effective tax rate , excluding the impact of the charges and credits , was primarily attributable to the fact that schlumberger generated a larger proportion of its pretax earnings in north america in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of improved market conditions and the effect of a full year 2019s activity from the acquired smith businesses . the effective tax rate for 2009 was also impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements , but to a much lesser extent . excluding charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2010 was 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) compared to 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) in 2009 . this increase is largely attributable to the geographic mix of earnings as well as the inclusion of four months 2019 results from the acquisition of smith , which served to increase the schlumberger effective tax charges and credits schlumberger recorded significant charges and credits in continuing operations during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . these charges and credits , which are summarized below , are more fully described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in the schlumberger interest expense from 2010 to 2011?
| 207.0 |
CONVFINQA7262 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity in net earnings of affiliated companies equity income from the m-i swaco joint venture in 2010 represents eight months of equity income through the closing of the smith transaction . interest expense interest expense of $ 298 million in 2011 increased by $ 91 million compared to 2010 primarily due to the $ 4.6 billion of long-term debt that schlumberger issued during 2011 . interest expense of $ 207 million in 2010 decreased by $ 14 million compared to 2009 primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rates , from 3.9% ( 3.9 % ) to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) . research & engineering and general & administrative expenses , as a percentage of revenue , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research & engineering</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>general & administrative</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr></table> although research & engineering decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2011 as compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 , it has increased in absolute dollars by $ 154 million and $ 117 million , respectively . these increases in absolute dollars were driven in large part by the impact of the smith acquisition . income taxes the schlumberger effective tax rate was 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) in 2011 , 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) in 2010 , and 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) in 2009 . the schlumberger effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic mix of earnings . when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america increases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally decrease . conversely , when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america decreases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally increase . the effective tax rate for both 2011 and 2010 was impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements . excluding the impact of these charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) compared to 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) in 2010 . this increase in the effective tax rate , excluding the impact of the charges and credits , was primarily attributable to the fact that schlumberger generated a larger proportion of its pretax earnings in north america in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of improved market conditions and the effect of a full year 2019s activity from the acquired smith businesses . the effective tax rate for 2009 was also impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements , but to a much lesser extent . excluding charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2010 was 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) compared to 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) in 2009 . this increase is largely attributable to the geographic mix of earnings as well as the inclusion of four months 2019 results from the acquisition of smith , which served to increase the schlumberger effective tax charges and credits schlumberger recorded significant charges and credits in continuing operations during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . these charges and credits , which are summarized below , are more fully described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in the schlumberger interest expense from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 207.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that interest expense in 2010?
| 0.43961 |
CONVFINQA7263 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity in net earnings of affiliated companies equity income from the m-i swaco joint venture in 2010 represents eight months of equity income through the closing of the smith transaction . interest expense interest expense of $ 298 million in 2011 increased by $ 91 million compared to 2010 primarily due to the $ 4.6 billion of long-term debt that schlumberger issued during 2011 . interest expense of $ 207 million in 2010 decreased by $ 14 million compared to 2009 primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rates , from 3.9% ( 3.9 % ) to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) . research & engineering and general & administrative expenses , as a percentage of revenue , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research & engineering</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>general & administrative</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr></table> although research & engineering decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2011 as compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 , it has increased in absolute dollars by $ 154 million and $ 117 million , respectively . these increases in absolute dollars were driven in large part by the impact of the smith acquisition . income taxes the schlumberger effective tax rate was 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) in 2011 , 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) in 2010 , and 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) in 2009 . the schlumberger effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic mix of earnings . when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america increases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally decrease . conversely , when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america decreases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally increase . the effective tax rate for both 2011 and 2010 was impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements . excluding the impact of these charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) compared to 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) in 2010 . this increase in the effective tax rate , excluding the impact of the charges and credits , was primarily attributable to the fact that schlumberger generated a larger proportion of its pretax earnings in north america in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of improved market conditions and the effect of a full year 2019s activity from the acquired smith businesses . the effective tax rate for 2009 was also impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements , but to a much lesser extent . excluding charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2010 was 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) compared to 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) in 2009 . this increase is largely attributable to the geographic mix of earnings as well as the inclusion of four months 2019 results from the acquisition of smith , which served to increase the schlumberger effective tax charges and credits schlumberger recorded significant charges and credits in continuing operations during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . these charges and credits , which are summarized below , are more fully described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in the schlumberger interest expense from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 207.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that interest expense in 2010?
Answer: 0.43961
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the research & engineering as a percent of revenue?
| -0.6 |
CONVFINQA7264 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity in net earnings of affiliated companies equity income from the m-i swaco joint venture in 2010 represents eight months of equity income through the closing of the smith transaction . interest expense interest expense of $ 298 million in 2011 increased by $ 91 million compared to 2010 primarily due to the $ 4.6 billion of long-term debt that schlumberger issued during 2011 . interest expense of $ 207 million in 2010 decreased by $ 14 million compared to 2009 primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rates , from 3.9% ( 3.9 % ) to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) . research & engineering and general & administrative expenses , as a percentage of revenue , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research & engineering</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>general & administrative</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr></table> although research & engineering decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2011 as compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 , it has increased in absolute dollars by $ 154 million and $ 117 million , respectively . these increases in absolute dollars were driven in large part by the impact of the smith acquisition . income taxes the schlumberger effective tax rate was 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) in 2011 , 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) in 2010 , and 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) in 2009 . the schlumberger effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic mix of earnings . when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america increases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally decrease . conversely , when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america decreases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally increase . the effective tax rate for both 2011 and 2010 was impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements . excluding the impact of these charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) compared to 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) in 2010 . this increase in the effective tax rate , excluding the impact of the charges and credits , was primarily attributable to the fact that schlumberger generated a larger proportion of its pretax earnings in north america in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of improved market conditions and the effect of a full year 2019s activity from the acquired smith businesses . the effective tax rate for 2009 was also impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements , but to a much lesser extent . excluding charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2010 was 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) compared to 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) in 2009 . this increase is largely attributable to the geographic mix of earnings as well as the inclusion of four months 2019 results from the acquisition of smith , which served to increase the schlumberger effective tax charges and credits schlumberger recorded significant charges and credits in continuing operations during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . these charges and credits , which are summarized below , are more fully described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in the schlumberger interest expense from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 207.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that interest expense in 2010?
Answer: 0.43961
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the research & engineering as a percent of revenue?
Answer: -0.6
Question: what was that percent in 2010?
| 3.3 |
CONVFINQA7265 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity in net earnings of affiliated companies equity income from the m-i swaco joint venture in 2010 represents eight months of equity income through the closing of the smith transaction . interest expense interest expense of $ 298 million in 2011 increased by $ 91 million compared to 2010 primarily due to the $ 4.6 billion of long-term debt that schlumberger issued during 2011 . interest expense of $ 207 million in 2010 decreased by $ 14 million compared to 2009 primarily due to a decline in the weighted average borrowing rates , from 3.9% ( 3.9 % ) to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) . research & engineering and general & administrative expenses , as a percentage of revenue , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research & engineering</td><td>2.7% ( 2.7 % )</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>general & administrative</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr></table> although research & engineering decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2011 as compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 , it has increased in absolute dollars by $ 154 million and $ 117 million , respectively . these increases in absolute dollars were driven in large part by the impact of the smith acquisition . income taxes the schlumberger effective tax rate was 24.4% ( 24.4 % ) in 2011 , 17.3% ( 17.3 % ) in 2010 , and 19.6% ( 19.6 % ) in 2009 . the schlumberger effective tax rate is sensitive to the geographic mix of earnings . when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america increases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally decrease . conversely , when the percentage of pretax earnings generated outside of north america decreases , the schlumberger effective tax rate will generally increase . the effective tax rate for both 2011 and 2010 was impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements . excluding the impact of these charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2011 was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) compared to 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) in 2010 . this increase in the effective tax rate , excluding the impact of the charges and credits , was primarily attributable to the fact that schlumberger generated a larger proportion of its pretax earnings in north america in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a result of improved market conditions and the effect of a full year 2019s activity from the acquired smith businesses . the effective tax rate for 2009 was also impacted by the charges and credits described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements , but to a much lesser extent . excluding charges and credits , the effective tax rate in 2010 was 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) compared to 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) in 2009 . this increase is largely attributable to the geographic mix of earnings as well as the inclusion of four months 2019 results from the acquisition of smith , which served to increase the schlumberger effective tax charges and credits schlumberger recorded significant charges and credits in continuing operations during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . these charges and credits , which are summarized below , are more fully described in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in the schlumberger interest expense from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 207.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that interest expense in 2010?
Answer: 0.43961
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the research & engineering as a percent of revenue?
Answer: -0.6
Question: what was that percent in 2010?
Answer: 3.3
Question: what percentage, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2010 percent of revenue?
| -0.18182 |
CONVFINQA7266 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .
Question: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?
| 338.5 |
CONVFINQA7267 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .
Question: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?
Answer: 338.5
Question: and for 2006?
| 247.4 |
CONVFINQA7268 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .
Question: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?
Answer: 338.5
Question: and for 2006?
Answer: 247.4
Question: and the combined value for these two years?
| 585.9 |
CONVFINQA7269 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .
Question: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?
Answer: 338.5
Question: and for 2006?
Answer: 247.4
Question: and the combined value for these two years?
Answer: 585.9
Question: and for 2005?
| 173.6 |
CONVFINQA7270 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .
Question: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?
Answer: 338.5
Question: and for 2006?
Answer: 247.4
Question: and the combined value for these two years?
Answer: 585.9
Question: and for 2005?
Answer: 173.6
Question: combined, what was the total value for all three years?
| 759.5 |
CONVFINQA7271 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
new accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a "well-known seasoned issuer" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .
Question: in 2007, how much did the total debt represent in relation to the total of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities?
| 1.66497 |
CONVFINQA7272 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
new accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a "well-known seasoned issuer" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .
Question: in 2007, how much did the total debt represent in relation to the total of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities?
Answer: 1.66497
Question: and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the working capital?
| 2.853 |
CONVFINQA7273 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
new accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a "well-known seasoned issuer" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .
Question: in 2007, how much did the total debt represent in relation to the total of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities?
Answer: 1.66497
Question: and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the working capital?
Answer: 2.853
Question: what was that working capital in 2006?
| 1.623 |
CONVFINQA7274 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
new accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a "well-known seasoned issuer" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .
Question: in 2007, how much did the total debt represent in relation to the total of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities?
Answer: 1.66497
Question: and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the working capital?
Answer: 2.853
Question: what was that working capital in 2006?
Answer: 1.623
Question: what percentage, then, does that variation represent in relation to this 2006 amount?
| 1.75786 |
CONVFINQA7275 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 295413</td><td>$ 235000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>119017</td><td>142462</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 215560</td><td>$ 197789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned ( d )</td><td>23582</td><td>14214</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. .
Question: what is the securities borrowed cost basis at december 31, 2012 in millions?
| 119017.0 |
CONVFINQA7276 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 295413</td><td>$ 235000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>119017</td><td>142462</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 215560</td><td>$ 197789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned ( d )</td><td>23582</td><td>14214</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. .
Question: what is the securities borrowed cost basis at december 31, 2012 in millions?
Answer: 119017.0
Question: and what is that in billions?
| 119.017 |
CONVFINQA7277 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 295413</td><td>$ 235000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>119017</td><td>142462</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 215560</td><td>$ 197789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned ( d )</td><td>23582</td><td>14214</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. .
Question: what is the securities borrowed cost basis at december 31, 2012 in millions?
Answer: 119017.0
Question: and what is that in billions?
Answer: 119.017
Question: what is the securities borrowed at december 31, 2012 in billions?
| 10.2 |
CONVFINQA7278 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 295413</td><td>$ 235000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>119017</td><td>142462</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 215560</td><td>$ 197789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned ( d )</td><td>23582</td><td>14214</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. .
Question: what is the securities borrowed cost basis at december 31, 2012 in millions?
Answer: 119017.0
Question: and what is that in billions?
Answer: 119.017
Question: what is the securities borrowed at december 31, 2012 in billions?
Answer: 10.2
Question: what is the difference between that securities borrowed cost basis and that securities borrowed?
| 108.817 |
CONVFINQA7279 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the railroad collected approximately $ 18.8 billion and $ 16.3 billion of receivables during the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the receivables securitization facility include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the costs of the receivables securitization facility are included in interest expense and were $ 4 million and $ 6 million for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . prior to adoption of the new accounting standard , the costs of the receivables securitization facility were included in other income and were $ 9 million for 2009 . the investors have no recourse to the railroad 2019s other assets , except for customary warranty and indemnity claims . creditors of the railroad do not have recourse to the assets of upri . in august 2011 , the receivables securitization facility was renewed for an additional 364-day period at comparable terms and conditions . contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and as referenced in the tables below , we have contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial condition . based on our assessment of the underlying provisions and circumstances of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments , including material sources of off-balance sheet and structured finance arrangements , other than the risks that we and other similarly situated companies face with respect to the condition of the capital markets ( as described in item 1a of part ii of this report ) , there is no known trend , demand , commitment , event , or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . in addition , our commercial obligations , financings , and commitments are customary transactions that are similar to those of other comparable corporations , particularly within the transportation industry . the following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 : payments due by december 31 , contractual obligations after millions total 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 other . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligationsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>payments due by december 31 2012</td><td>payments due by december 31 2013</td><td>payments due by december 31 2014</td><td>payments due by december 31 2015</td><td>payments due by december 31 2016</td><td>payments due by december 31 after 2016</td><td>payments due by december 31 other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt [a]</td><td>$ 12516</td><td>$ 538</td><td>$ 852</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 652</td><td>$ 8972</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases [b]</td><td>4528</td><td>525</td><td>489</td><td>415</td><td>372</td><td>347</td><td>2380</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations [c]</td><td>2559</td><td>297</td><td>269</td><td>276</td><td>276</td><td>262</td><td>1179</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations [d]</td><td>5137</td><td>2598</td><td>568</td><td>560</td><td>276</td><td>245</td><td>858</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other post retirement benefits [e]</td><td>249</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>119</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax contingencies [f]</td><td>107</td><td>31</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractualobligations</td><td>$ 25096</td><td>$ 4015</td><td>$ 2204</td><td>$ 2164</td><td>$ 1565</td><td>$ 1532</td><td>$ 13508</td><td>$ 108</td></tr></table> [a] excludes capital lease obligations of $ 1874 million and unamortized discount of $ 364 million . includes an interest component of $ 5120 million . [b] includes leases for locomotives , freight cars , other equipment , and real estate . [c] represents total obligations , including interest component of $ 685 million . [d] purchase obligations include locomotive maintenance contracts ; purchase commitments for fuel purchases , locomotives , ties , ballast , and rail ; and agreements to purchase other goods and services . for amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement , they are reflected in the other column . [e] includes estimated other post retirement , medical , and life insurance payments and payments made under the unfunded pension plan for the next ten years . no amounts are included for funded pension obligations as no contributions are currently required . [f] future cash flows for income tax contingencies reflect the recorded liability for unrecognized tax benefits , including interest and penalties , as of december 31 , 2011 . where we can reasonably estimate the years in which these liabilities may be settled , this is shown in the table . for amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement , they are reflected in the other column. .
Question: what was the amount of receivables collected by the railroad in 2011, in billions?
| 18.8 |
CONVFINQA7280 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the railroad collected approximately $ 18.8 billion and $ 16.3 billion of receivables during the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the receivables securitization facility include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the costs of the receivables securitization facility are included in interest expense and were $ 4 million and $ 6 million for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . prior to adoption of the new accounting standard , the costs of the receivables securitization facility were included in other income and were $ 9 million for 2009 . the investors have no recourse to the railroad 2019s other assets , except for customary warranty and indemnity claims . creditors of the railroad do not have recourse to the assets of upri . in august 2011 , the receivables securitization facility was renewed for an additional 364-day period at comparable terms and conditions . contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and as referenced in the tables below , we have contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial condition . based on our assessment of the underlying provisions and circumstances of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments , including material sources of off-balance sheet and structured finance arrangements , other than the risks that we and other similarly situated companies face with respect to the condition of the capital markets ( as described in item 1a of part ii of this report ) , there is no known trend , demand , commitment , event , or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . in addition , our commercial obligations , financings , and commitments are customary transactions that are similar to those of other comparable corporations , particularly within the transportation industry . the following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 : payments due by december 31 , contractual obligations after millions total 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 other . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligationsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>payments due by december 31 2012</td><td>payments due by december 31 2013</td><td>payments due by december 31 2014</td><td>payments due by december 31 2015</td><td>payments due by december 31 2016</td><td>payments due by december 31 after 2016</td><td>payments due by december 31 other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt [a]</td><td>$ 12516</td><td>$ 538</td><td>$ 852</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 652</td><td>$ 8972</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases [b]</td><td>4528</td><td>525</td><td>489</td><td>415</td><td>372</td><td>347</td><td>2380</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations [c]</td><td>2559</td><td>297</td><td>269</td><td>276</td><td>276</td><td>262</td><td>1179</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations [d]</td><td>5137</td><td>2598</td><td>568</td><td>560</td><td>276</td><td>245</td><td>858</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other post retirement benefits [e]</td><td>249</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>119</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax contingencies [f]</td><td>107</td><td>31</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractualobligations</td><td>$ 25096</td><td>$ 4015</td><td>$ 2204</td><td>$ 2164</td><td>$ 1565</td><td>$ 1532</td><td>$ 13508</td><td>$ 108</td></tr></table> [a] excludes capital lease obligations of $ 1874 million and unamortized discount of $ 364 million . includes an interest component of $ 5120 million . [b] includes leases for locomotives , freight cars , other equipment , and real estate . [c] represents total obligations , including interest component of $ 685 million . [d] purchase obligations include locomotive maintenance contracts ; purchase commitments for fuel purchases , locomotives , ties , ballast , and rail ; and agreements to purchase other goods and services . for amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement , they are reflected in the other column . [e] includes estimated other post retirement , medical , and life insurance payments and payments made under the unfunded pension plan for the next ten years . no amounts are included for funded pension obligations as no contributions are currently required . [f] future cash flows for income tax contingencies reflect the recorded liability for unrecognized tax benefits , including interest and penalties , as of december 31 , 2011 . where we can reasonably estimate the years in which these liabilities may be settled , this is shown in the table . for amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement , they are reflected in the other column. .
Question: what was the amount of receivables collected by the railroad in 2011, in billions?
Answer: 18.8
Question: if there were 4 inventory turns per year, what would be the 2012 cash flow from the balance of these receivables, also in billions?
| 4.7 |
CONVFINQA7281 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the railroad collected approximately $ 18.8 billion and $ 16.3 billion of receivables during the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility . the costs of the receivables securitization facility include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability . the costs of the receivables securitization facility are included in interest expense and were $ 4 million and $ 6 million for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . prior to adoption of the new accounting standard , the costs of the receivables securitization facility were included in other income and were $ 9 million for 2009 . the investors have no recourse to the railroad 2019s other assets , except for customary warranty and indemnity claims . creditors of the railroad do not have recourse to the assets of upri . in august 2011 , the receivables securitization facility was renewed for an additional 364-day period at comparable terms and conditions . contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and as referenced in the tables below , we have contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial condition . based on our assessment of the underlying provisions and circumstances of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments , including material sources of off-balance sheet and structured finance arrangements , other than the risks that we and other similarly situated companies face with respect to the condition of the capital markets ( as described in item 1a of part ii of this report ) , there is no known trend , demand , commitment , event , or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . in addition , our commercial obligations , financings , and commitments are customary transactions that are similar to those of other comparable corporations , particularly within the transportation industry . the following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of december 31 , 2011 : payments due by december 31 , contractual obligations after millions total 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 other . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligationsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>payments due by december 31 2012</td><td>payments due by december 31 2013</td><td>payments due by december 31 2014</td><td>payments due by december 31 2015</td><td>payments due by december 31 2016</td><td>payments due by december 31 after 2016</td><td>payments due by december 31 other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt [a]</td><td>$ 12516</td><td>$ 538</td><td>$ 852</td><td>$ 887</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 652</td><td>$ 8972</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases [b]</td><td>4528</td><td>525</td><td>489</td><td>415</td><td>372</td><td>347</td><td>2380</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease obligations [c]</td><td>2559</td><td>297</td><td>269</td><td>276</td><td>276</td><td>262</td><td>1179</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations [d]</td><td>5137</td><td>2598</td><td>568</td><td>560</td><td>276</td><td>245</td><td>858</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other post retirement benefits [e]</td><td>249</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>26</td><td>119</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax contingencies [f]</td><td>107</td><td>31</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total contractualobligations</td><td>$ 25096</td><td>$ 4015</td><td>$ 2204</td><td>$ 2164</td><td>$ 1565</td><td>$ 1532</td><td>$ 13508</td><td>$ 108</td></tr></table> [a] excludes capital lease obligations of $ 1874 million and unamortized discount of $ 364 million . includes an interest component of $ 5120 million . [b] includes leases for locomotives , freight cars , other equipment , and real estate . [c] represents total obligations , including interest component of $ 685 million . [d] purchase obligations include locomotive maintenance contracts ; purchase commitments for fuel purchases , locomotives , ties , ballast , and rail ; and agreements to purchase other goods and services . for amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement , they are reflected in the other column . [e] includes estimated other post retirement , medical , and life insurance payments and payments made under the unfunded pension plan for the next ten years . no amounts are included for funded pension obligations as no contributions are currently required . [f] future cash flows for income tax contingencies reflect the recorded liability for unrecognized tax benefits , including interest and penalties , as of december 31 , 2011 . where we can reasonably estimate the years in which these liabilities may be settled , this is shown in the table . for amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement , they are reflected in the other column. .
Question: what was the amount of receivables collected by the railroad in 2011, in billions?
Answer: 18.8
Question: if there were 4 inventory turns per year, what would be the 2012 cash flow from the balance of these receivables, also in billions?
Answer: 4.7
Question: and for the receivables collected in 2010, what would be, in billions, the cash flow in 2011 for their balance?
| 5.43333 |
CONVFINQA7282 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating cash flow from continuing operations for 2017 was $ 2.7 billion , a $ 191 million , or 8 percent increase compared with 2016 , reflecting higher earnings and favorable changes in working capital . operating cash flow from continuing operations of $ 2.5 billion in 2016 was a 23 percent increase compared to $ 2.0 billion in 2015 , as comparisons benefited from income taxes of $ 424 million paid on the gains from divestitures in 2015 . at september 30 , 2017 , operating working capital as a percent of sales increased to 6.6 percent due to higher levels of working capital in the acquired valves & controls business , compared with 5.2 percent and 7.2 percent in 2016 and 2015 , respectively . operating cash flow from continuing operations funded capital expenditures of $ 476 million , dividends of $ 1239 million , common stock purchases of $ 400 million , and was also used to partially pay down debt in 2017 . proceeds of $ 5.1 billion from the sales of the network power systems and power generation , motors and drives businesses funded acquisitions of $ 2990 million , cash used for discontinued operations of $ 778 million and repayments of short-term borrowings and long-term debt of approximately $ 1.3 billion . contributions to pension plans were $ 45 million in 2017 , $ 66 million in 2016 and $ 53 million in 2015 . capital expenditures related to continuing operations were $ 476 million , $ 447 million and $ 588 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . free cash flow from continuing operations ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures ) was $ 2.2 billion in 2017 , up 8 percent . free cash flow was $ 2.1 billion in 2016 , compared with $ 1.5 billion in 2015 . the company is targeting capital spending of approximately $ 550 million in 2018 . net cash paid in connection with acquisitions was $ 2990 million , $ 132 million and $ 324 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . proceeds from divestitures not classified as discontinued operations were $ 39 million in 2017 and $ 1812 million in 2015 . dividends were $ 1239 million ( $ 1.92 per share ) in 2017 , compared with $ 1227 million ( $ 1.90 per share ) in 2016 and $ 1269 million ( $ 1.88 per share ) in 2015 . in november 2017 , the board of directors voted to increase the quarterly cash dividend 1 percent , to an annualized rate of $ 1.94 per share . purchases of emerson common stock totaled $ 400 million , $ 601 million and $ 2487 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , at average per share prices of $ 60.51 , $ 48.11 and $ 57.68 . the board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 70 million common shares in november 2015 , and 56.9 million shares remain available for purchase under this authorization . the company purchased 6.6 million shares in 2017 under the november 2015 authorization . in 2016 , the company purchased 12.5 million shares under a combination of the november 2015 authorization and the remainder of the may 2013 authorization . a total of 43.1 million shares were purchased in 2015 under the may 2013 authorization . leverage/capitalization ( dollars in millions ) 2015 2016 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total assets</td><td>$ 22088</td><td>21732</td><td>19589</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4289</td><td>4051</td><td>3794</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>common stockholders' equity</td><td>$ 8081</td><td>7568</td><td>8718</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt-to-total capital ratio</td><td>45.8% ( 45.8 % )</td><td>46.7% ( 46.7 % )</td><td>34.8% ( 34.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt-to-net capital ratio</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>15.4% ( 15.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating cash flow-to-debt ratio</td><td>29.8% ( 29.8 % )</td><td>37.7% ( 37.7 % )</td><td>57.8% ( 57.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>interest coverage ratio</td><td>20.2x</td><td>11.8x</td><td>12.6x</td></tr></table> total debt , which includes long-term debt , current maturities of long-term debt , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings , was $ 4.7 billion , $ 6.6 billion and $ 6.8 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . during the year , the company repaid $ 250 million of 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) notes that matured in december 2016 . in 2015 , the company issued $ 500 million of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) notes due december 2021 and $ 500 million of 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) notes due june 2025 , and repaid $ 250 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes that matured in december 2014 and $ 250 million of 4.125% ( 4.125 % ) notes that matured in april 2015 . the total debt-to-capital ratio and the net debt-to-net capital ratio ( less cash and short-term investments ) decreased in 2017 due to lower total debt outstanding and higher common stockholders 2019 equity from changes in other comprehensive income . the total debt-to-capital ratio and the net debt-to-net capital ratio ( less cash and short-term investments ) increased in 2016 due to lower common stockholders 2019 equity from share repurchases and changes in other comprehensive income . the operating cash flow from continuing operations-to-debt ratio increased in 2017 primarily due to lower debt in the current year . the operating cash flow from continuing operations-to- debt ratio increased in 2016 primarily due to taxes paid in 2015 on the divestiture gains and lower debt in 2016 . the interest coverage ratio is computed as earnings from continuing operations before income taxes plus interest expense , divided by interest expense . the increase in interest coverage in 2017 reflects lower interest expense in the current year . the decrease in interest coverage in 2016 reflects lower pretax earnings , largely due to the divestiture gains of $ 1039 million in 2015 , and slightly higher interest expense . in april 2014 , the company entered into a $ 3.5 billion five- year revolving backup credit facility with various banks , which replaced the december 2010 $ 2.75 billion facility . the credit facility is maintained to support general corporate purposes , including commercial paper borrowing . the company has not incurred any borrowings under this or previous facilities . the credit facility contains no financial covenants and is not subject to termination based on a change of credit rating or material adverse changes . the facility is unsecured and may be accessed under various interest rate and currency denomination alternatives at the company 2019s option . fees to maintain the facility are immaterial . the company also maintains a universal shelf registration statement on file with the sec under which .
Question: what is the value of total debt times 1000?
| 4700.0 |
CONVFINQA7283 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating cash flow from continuing operations for 2017 was $ 2.7 billion , a $ 191 million , or 8 percent increase compared with 2016 , reflecting higher earnings and favorable changes in working capital . operating cash flow from continuing operations of $ 2.5 billion in 2016 was a 23 percent increase compared to $ 2.0 billion in 2015 , as comparisons benefited from income taxes of $ 424 million paid on the gains from divestitures in 2015 . at september 30 , 2017 , operating working capital as a percent of sales increased to 6.6 percent due to higher levels of working capital in the acquired valves & controls business , compared with 5.2 percent and 7.2 percent in 2016 and 2015 , respectively . operating cash flow from continuing operations funded capital expenditures of $ 476 million , dividends of $ 1239 million , common stock purchases of $ 400 million , and was also used to partially pay down debt in 2017 . proceeds of $ 5.1 billion from the sales of the network power systems and power generation , motors and drives businesses funded acquisitions of $ 2990 million , cash used for discontinued operations of $ 778 million and repayments of short-term borrowings and long-term debt of approximately $ 1.3 billion . contributions to pension plans were $ 45 million in 2017 , $ 66 million in 2016 and $ 53 million in 2015 . capital expenditures related to continuing operations were $ 476 million , $ 447 million and $ 588 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . free cash flow from continuing operations ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures ) was $ 2.2 billion in 2017 , up 8 percent . free cash flow was $ 2.1 billion in 2016 , compared with $ 1.5 billion in 2015 . the company is targeting capital spending of approximately $ 550 million in 2018 . net cash paid in connection with acquisitions was $ 2990 million , $ 132 million and $ 324 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . proceeds from divestitures not classified as discontinued operations were $ 39 million in 2017 and $ 1812 million in 2015 . dividends were $ 1239 million ( $ 1.92 per share ) in 2017 , compared with $ 1227 million ( $ 1.90 per share ) in 2016 and $ 1269 million ( $ 1.88 per share ) in 2015 . in november 2017 , the board of directors voted to increase the quarterly cash dividend 1 percent , to an annualized rate of $ 1.94 per share . purchases of emerson common stock totaled $ 400 million , $ 601 million and $ 2487 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , at average per share prices of $ 60.51 , $ 48.11 and $ 57.68 . the board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 70 million common shares in november 2015 , and 56.9 million shares remain available for purchase under this authorization . the company purchased 6.6 million shares in 2017 under the november 2015 authorization . in 2016 , the company purchased 12.5 million shares under a combination of the november 2015 authorization and the remainder of the may 2013 authorization . a total of 43.1 million shares were purchased in 2015 under the may 2013 authorization . leverage/capitalization ( dollars in millions ) 2015 2016 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total assets</td><td>$ 22088</td><td>21732</td><td>19589</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4289</td><td>4051</td><td>3794</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>common stockholders' equity</td><td>$ 8081</td><td>7568</td><td>8718</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt-to-total capital ratio</td><td>45.8% ( 45.8 % )</td><td>46.7% ( 46.7 % )</td><td>34.8% ( 34.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt-to-net capital ratio</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>15.4% ( 15.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating cash flow-to-debt ratio</td><td>29.8% ( 29.8 % )</td><td>37.7% ( 37.7 % )</td><td>57.8% ( 57.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>interest coverage ratio</td><td>20.2x</td><td>11.8x</td><td>12.6x</td></tr></table> total debt , which includes long-term debt , current maturities of long-term debt , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings , was $ 4.7 billion , $ 6.6 billion and $ 6.8 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . during the year , the company repaid $ 250 million of 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) notes that matured in december 2016 . in 2015 , the company issued $ 500 million of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) notes due december 2021 and $ 500 million of 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) notes due june 2025 , and repaid $ 250 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes that matured in december 2014 and $ 250 million of 4.125% ( 4.125 % ) notes that matured in april 2015 . the total debt-to-capital ratio and the net debt-to-net capital ratio ( less cash and short-term investments ) decreased in 2017 due to lower total debt outstanding and higher common stockholders 2019 equity from changes in other comprehensive income . the total debt-to-capital ratio and the net debt-to-net capital ratio ( less cash and short-term investments ) increased in 2016 due to lower common stockholders 2019 equity from share repurchases and changes in other comprehensive income . the operating cash flow from continuing operations-to-debt ratio increased in 2017 primarily due to lower debt in the current year . the operating cash flow from continuing operations-to- debt ratio increased in 2016 primarily due to taxes paid in 2015 on the divestiture gains and lower debt in 2016 . the interest coverage ratio is computed as earnings from continuing operations before income taxes plus interest expense , divided by interest expense . the increase in interest coverage in 2017 reflects lower interest expense in the current year . the decrease in interest coverage in 2016 reflects lower pretax earnings , largely due to the divestiture gains of $ 1039 million in 2015 , and slightly higher interest expense . in april 2014 , the company entered into a $ 3.5 billion five- year revolving backup credit facility with various banks , which replaced the december 2010 $ 2.75 billion facility . the credit facility is maintained to support general corporate purposes , including commercial paper borrowing . the company has not incurred any borrowings under this or previous facilities . the credit facility contains no financial covenants and is not subject to termination based on a change of credit rating or material adverse changes . the facility is unsecured and may be accessed under various interest rate and currency denomination alternatives at the company 2019s option . fees to maintain the facility are immaterial . the company also maintains a universal shelf registration statement on file with the sec under which .
Question: what is the value of total debt times 1000?
Answer: 4700.0
Question: what was long term debt in 2017?
| 3794.0 |
CONVFINQA7284 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating cash flow from continuing operations for 2017 was $ 2.7 billion , a $ 191 million , or 8 percent increase compared with 2016 , reflecting higher earnings and favorable changes in working capital . operating cash flow from continuing operations of $ 2.5 billion in 2016 was a 23 percent increase compared to $ 2.0 billion in 2015 , as comparisons benefited from income taxes of $ 424 million paid on the gains from divestitures in 2015 . at september 30 , 2017 , operating working capital as a percent of sales increased to 6.6 percent due to higher levels of working capital in the acquired valves & controls business , compared with 5.2 percent and 7.2 percent in 2016 and 2015 , respectively . operating cash flow from continuing operations funded capital expenditures of $ 476 million , dividends of $ 1239 million , common stock purchases of $ 400 million , and was also used to partially pay down debt in 2017 . proceeds of $ 5.1 billion from the sales of the network power systems and power generation , motors and drives businesses funded acquisitions of $ 2990 million , cash used for discontinued operations of $ 778 million and repayments of short-term borrowings and long-term debt of approximately $ 1.3 billion . contributions to pension plans were $ 45 million in 2017 , $ 66 million in 2016 and $ 53 million in 2015 . capital expenditures related to continuing operations were $ 476 million , $ 447 million and $ 588 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . free cash flow from continuing operations ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures ) was $ 2.2 billion in 2017 , up 8 percent . free cash flow was $ 2.1 billion in 2016 , compared with $ 1.5 billion in 2015 . the company is targeting capital spending of approximately $ 550 million in 2018 . net cash paid in connection with acquisitions was $ 2990 million , $ 132 million and $ 324 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . proceeds from divestitures not classified as discontinued operations were $ 39 million in 2017 and $ 1812 million in 2015 . dividends were $ 1239 million ( $ 1.92 per share ) in 2017 , compared with $ 1227 million ( $ 1.90 per share ) in 2016 and $ 1269 million ( $ 1.88 per share ) in 2015 . in november 2017 , the board of directors voted to increase the quarterly cash dividend 1 percent , to an annualized rate of $ 1.94 per share . purchases of emerson common stock totaled $ 400 million , $ 601 million and $ 2487 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , at average per share prices of $ 60.51 , $ 48.11 and $ 57.68 . the board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 70 million common shares in november 2015 , and 56.9 million shares remain available for purchase under this authorization . the company purchased 6.6 million shares in 2017 under the november 2015 authorization . in 2016 , the company purchased 12.5 million shares under a combination of the november 2015 authorization and the remainder of the may 2013 authorization . a total of 43.1 million shares were purchased in 2015 under the may 2013 authorization . leverage/capitalization ( dollars in millions ) 2015 2016 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total assets</td><td>$ 22088</td><td>21732</td><td>19589</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4289</td><td>4051</td><td>3794</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>common stockholders' equity</td><td>$ 8081</td><td>7568</td><td>8718</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt-to-total capital ratio</td><td>45.8% ( 45.8 % )</td><td>46.7% ( 46.7 % )</td><td>34.8% ( 34.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt-to-net capital ratio</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>15.4% ( 15.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating cash flow-to-debt ratio</td><td>29.8% ( 29.8 % )</td><td>37.7% ( 37.7 % )</td><td>57.8% ( 57.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>interest coverage ratio</td><td>20.2x</td><td>11.8x</td><td>12.6x</td></tr></table> total debt , which includes long-term debt , current maturities of long-term debt , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings , was $ 4.7 billion , $ 6.6 billion and $ 6.8 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . during the year , the company repaid $ 250 million of 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) notes that matured in december 2016 . in 2015 , the company issued $ 500 million of 2.625% ( 2.625 % ) notes due december 2021 and $ 500 million of 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) notes due june 2025 , and repaid $ 250 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes that matured in december 2014 and $ 250 million of 4.125% ( 4.125 % ) notes that matured in april 2015 . the total debt-to-capital ratio and the net debt-to-net capital ratio ( less cash and short-term investments ) decreased in 2017 due to lower total debt outstanding and higher common stockholders 2019 equity from changes in other comprehensive income . the total debt-to-capital ratio and the net debt-to-net capital ratio ( less cash and short-term investments ) increased in 2016 due to lower common stockholders 2019 equity from share repurchases and changes in other comprehensive income . the operating cash flow from continuing operations-to-debt ratio increased in 2017 primarily due to lower debt in the current year . the operating cash flow from continuing operations-to- debt ratio increased in 2016 primarily due to taxes paid in 2015 on the divestiture gains and lower debt in 2016 . the interest coverage ratio is computed as earnings from continuing operations before income taxes plus interest expense , divided by interest expense . the increase in interest coverage in 2017 reflects lower interest expense in the current year . the decrease in interest coverage in 2016 reflects lower pretax earnings , largely due to the divestiture gains of $ 1039 million in 2015 , and slightly higher interest expense . in april 2014 , the company entered into a $ 3.5 billion five- year revolving backup credit facility with various banks , which replaced the december 2010 $ 2.75 billion facility . the credit facility is maintained to support general corporate purposes , including commercial paper borrowing . the company has not incurred any borrowings under this or previous facilities . the credit facility contains no financial covenants and is not subject to termination based on a change of credit rating or material adverse changes . the facility is unsecured and may be accessed under various interest rate and currency denomination alternatives at the company 2019s option . fees to maintain the facility are immaterial . the company also maintains a universal shelf registration statement on file with the sec under which .
Question: what is the value of total debt times 1000?
Answer: 4700.0
Question: what was long term debt in 2017?
Answer: 3794.0
Question: what is that divided by the value of total debt?
| 0.80723 |
CONVFINQA7285 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td><td>12/31/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 176</td><td>$ 202</td><td>$ 247</td><td>$ 287</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 114</td><td>$ 115</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 173</td><td>$ 191</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the highest change in the performance price for the first year?
| 40.0 |
CONVFINQA7286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td><td>12/31/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hum</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 176</td><td>$ 202</td><td>$ 247</td><td>$ 287</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 114</td><td>$ 115</td><td>$ 129</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 128</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 173</td><td>$ 191</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the highest change in the performance price for the first year?
Answer: 40.0
Question: and what was the lowest?
| 14.0 |
CONVFINQA7287 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>340</td><td>49</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>467</td><td>425</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 2062</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
| 2062.0 |
CONVFINQA7288 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>340</td><td>49</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>467</td><td>425</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 2062</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2062.0
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
| 1375.0 |
CONVFINQA7289 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>340</td><td>49</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>467</td><td>425</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 2062</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2062.0
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 687.0 |
CONVFINQA7290 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>340</td><td>49</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>467</td><td>425</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 2062</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2062.0
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 687.0
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
| 1375.0 |
CONVFINQA7291 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>340</td><td>49</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>467</td><td>425</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 2062</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2062.0
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 687.0
Question: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2012 total, in percentage?
| 0.49964 |
CONVFINQA7292 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
15 . leases in january 1996 , the company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for a new corporate office facility , which the company occupied in february 1997 . in may 2004 , the company entered into the first amendment to this lease agreement , effective january 1 , 2004 . the lease was extended from an original period of 10 years , with an option for five additional years , to a period of 18 years from the inception date , with an option for five additional years . the company incurred lease rental expense related to this facility of $ 1.3 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the future minimum lease payments are $ 1.4 million per annum from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2014 . the future minimum lease payments from january 1 , 2015 through december 31 , 2019 will be determined based on prevailing market rental rates at the time of the extension , if elected . the amended lease also provided for the lessor to reimburse the company for up to $ 550000 in building refurbishments completed through march 31 , 2006 . these amounts have been recorded as a reduction of lease expense over the remaining term of the lease . the company has also entered into various noncancellable operating leases for equipment and office space . office space lease expense totaled $ 9.3 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 4.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space in effect at december 31 , 2008 are $ 8.8 million in 2009 , $ 6.6 million in 2010 , $ 3.0 million in 2011 , $ 1.8 million in 2012 and $ 1.1 million in 2013 . 16 . royalty agreements the company has entered into various renewable , nonexclusive license agreements under which the company has been granted access to the licensor 2019s technology and the right to sell the technology in the company 2019s product line . royalties are payable to developers of the software at various rates and amounts , which generally are based upon unit sales or revenue . royalty fees are reported in cost of goods sold and were $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . 17 . geographic information revenue to external customers is attributed to individual countries based upon the location of the customer . revenue by geographic area is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2007</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 151688</td><td>$ 131777</td><td>$ 94282</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>germany</td><td>68390</td><td>50973</td><td>34567</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>japan</td><td>66960</td><td>50896</td><td>35391</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada</td><td>8033</td><td>4809</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other european</td><td>127246</td><td>108971</td><td>70184</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other international</td><td>56022</td><td>37914</td><td>24961</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 478339</td><td>$ 385340</td><td>$ 263640</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were royalty fees for 2007 and 2008?
| 11.5 |
CONVFINQA7293 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
15 . leases in january 1996 , the company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for a new corporate office facility , which the company occupied in february 1997 . in may 2004 , the company entered into the first amendment to this lease agreement , effective january 1 , 2004 . the lease was extended from an original period of 10 years , with an option for five additional years , to a period of 18 years from the inception date , with an option for five additional years . the company incurred lease rental expense related to this facility of $ 1.3 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the future minimum lease payments are $ 1.4 million per annum from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2014 . the future minimum lease payments from january 1 , 2015 through december 31 , 2019 will be determined based on prevailing market rental rates at the time of the extension , if elected . the amended lease also provided for the lessor to reimburse the company for up to $ 550000 in building refurbishments completed through march 31 , 2006 . these amounts have been recorded as a reduction of lease expense over the remaining term of the lease . the company has also entered into various noncancellable operating leases for equipment and office space . office space lease expense totaled $ 9.3 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 4.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space in effect at december 31 , 2008 are $ 8.8 million in 2009 , $ 6.6 million in 2010 , $ 3.0 million in 2011 , $ 1.8 million in 2012 and $ 1.1 million in 2013 . 16 . royalty agreements the company has entered into various renewable , nonexclusive license agreements under which the company has been granted access to the licensor 2019s technology and the right to sell the technology in the company 2019s product line . royalties are payable to developers of the software at various rates and amounts , which generally are based upon unit sales or revenue . royalty fees are reported in cost of goods sold and were $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . 17 . geographic information revenue to external customers is attributed to individual countries based upon the location of the customer . revenue by geographic area is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2008</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2007</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>$ 151688</td><td>$ 131777</td><td>$ 94282</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>germany</td><td>68390</td><td>50973</td><td>34567</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>japan</td><td>66960</td><td>50896</td><td>35391</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada</td><td>8033</td><td>4809</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other european</td><td>127246</td><td>108971</td><td>70184</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other international</td><td>56022</td><td>37914</td><td>24961</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 478339</td><td>$ 385340</td><td>$ 263640</td></tr></table> .
Question: what were royalty fees for 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 11.5
Question: what were they including 2006?
| 15.4 |
CONVFINQA7294 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the seven year notes issued in january 2016?
| 13.0 |
CONVFINQA7295 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the seven year notes issued in january 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: what is the aggregate principal three year fixed rate note issued in january 2016?
| 400.0 |
CONVFINQA7296 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the seven year notes issued in january 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: what is the aggregate principal three year fixed rate note issued in january 2016?
Answer: 400.0
Question: and it's coupon rate?
| 0.02 |
CONVFINQA7297 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the seven year notes issued in january 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: what is the aggregate principal three year fixed rate note issued in january 2016?
Answer: 400.0
Question: and it's coupon rate?
Answer: 0.02
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the three year notes issued in january 2016?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA7298 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 550</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>397</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>300</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1017</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>497</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the seven year notes issued in january 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: what is the aggregate principal three year fixed rate note issued in january 2016?
Answer: 400.0
Question: and it's coupon rate?
Answer: 0.02
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the three year notes issued in january 2016?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what is the total yearly interest expense related to the notes issued in january 2016?
| 21.0 |
CONVFINQA7299 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 . the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid . on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 . the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s . credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the "2017 facility" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s . credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the "2020 facility" ) . the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility . each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs . in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly . at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 . effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>1422</td><td>1431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>273</td><td>255</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>267</td><td>334</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation of fixed assets</td><td>229</td><td>242</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of intangible assets</td><td>314</td><td>352</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ebitda</td><td>2505</td><td>2614</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total debt</td><td>5737</td><td>5582</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total debt-to-ebitda ratio</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.1</td></tr></table> we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure . this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto . shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities . our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. .
Question: what was the interest expense in 2015?
| 273.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.