id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA7700 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents 17 . unconditional purchase obligations the company has entered into various unconditional purchase obligations which primarily include software licenses and long- term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services . the company expended $ 7.2 million , $ 5.3 million and $ 2.9 million related to unconditional purchase obligations that existed as of the beginning of each year for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . future expenditures under unconditional purchase obligations in effect as of december 31 , 2016 are as follows : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 14134</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>10288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>9724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>2617</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>652</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 37415</td></tr></table> 18 . restructuring during the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company initiated workforce realignment activities . the company incurred $ 3.4 million in restructuring charges , or $ 2.4 million net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the company expects to incur additional charges of $ 10 million - $ 15 million , or $ 7 million - $ 10 million net of tax , primarily during the first quarter of 2017 . 19 . employment-related settlement on february 15 , 2017 , the company entered into an employment-related settlement agreement . in connection with the settlement agreement , the company will make a lump-sum payment of $ 4.7 million . the charges related to this agreement are included in selling , general and administrative expense in the 2016 consolidated statement of income . as part of the settlement agreement , all the claims initiated against the company will be withdrawn and a general release of all claims in favor of the company and all of its related entities was executed . 20 . contingencies and commitments the company is subject to various investigations , claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business , including commercial disputes , labor and employment matters , tax audits , alleged infringement of intellectual property rights and other matters . in the opinion of the company , the resolution of pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company's consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position . however , each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these proceedings could materially affect the company's results of operations , cash flows or financial position . an indian subsidiary of the company has several service tax audits pending that have resulted in formal inquiries being received on transactions through mid-2012 . the company could incur tax charges and related liabilities , including those related to the service tax audit case , of approximately $ 7 million . the service tax issues raised in the company 2019s notices and inquiries are very similar to the case , m/s microsoft corporation ( i ) ( p ) ltd . vs commissioner of service tax , new delhi , wherein the delhi customs , excise and service tax appellate tribunal ( cestat ) has passed a favorable ruling to microsoft . the company can provide no assurances on whether the microsoft case 2019s favorable ruling will be challenged in higher courts or on the impact that the present microsoft case 2019s decision will have on the company 2019s cases . the company is uncertain as to when these service tax matters will be concluded . a french subsidiary of the company received notice that the french taxing authority rejected the company's 2012 research and development credit . the company has contested the decision . however , if the company does not receive a favorable outcome , it could incur charges of approximately $ 0.8 million . in addition , an unfavorable outcome could result in the authorities reviewing or rejecting $ 3.8 million of similar research and development credits for 2013 through the current year that are currently reflected as an asset . the company can provide no assurances on the timing or outcome of this matter. .
Question: what was the value of expenditures in 2017?
Answer: 14134.0
Question: what was the value in 2018?
| 10288.0 |
CONVFINQA7701 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents 17 . unconditional purchase obligations the company has entered into various unconditional purchase obligations which primarily include software licenses and long- term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services . the company expended $ 7.2 million , $ 5.3 million and $ 2.9 million related to unconditional purchase obligations that existed as of the beginning of each year for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . future expenditures under unconditional purchase obligations in effect as of december 31 , 2016 are as follows : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 14134</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>10288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>9724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>2617</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>652</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 37415</td></tr></table> 18 . restructuring during the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company initiated workforce realignment activities . the company incurred $ 3.4 million in restructuring charges , or $ 2.4 million net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the company expects to incur additional charges of $ 10 million - $ 15 million , or $ 7 million - $ 10 million net of tax , primarily during the first quarter of 2017 . 19 . employment-related settlement on february 15 , 2017 , the company entered into an employment-related settlement agreement . in connection with the settlement agreement , the company will make a lump-sum payment of $ 4.7 million . the charges related to this agreement are included in selling , general and administrative expense in the 2016 consolidated statement of income . as part of the settlement agreement , all the claims initiated against the company will be withdrawn and a general release of all claims in favor of the company and all of its related entities was executed . 20 . contingencies and commitments the company is subject to various investigations , claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business , including commercial disputes , labor and employment matters , tax audits , alleged infringement of intellectual property rights and other matters . in the opinion of the company , the resolution of pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company's consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position . however , each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these proceedings could materially affect the company's results of operations , cash flows or financial position . an indian subsidiary of the company has several service tax audits pending that have resulted in formal inquiries being received on transactions through mid-2012 . the company could incur tax charges and related liabilities , including those related to the service tax audit case , of approximately $ 7 million . the service tax issues raised in the company 2019s notices and inquiries are very similar to the case , m/s microsoft corporation ( i ) ( p ) ltd . vs commissioner of service tax , new delhi , wherein the delhi customs , excise and service tax appellate tribunal ( cestat ) has passed a favorable ruling to microsoft . the company can provide no assurances on whether the microsoft case 2019s favorable ruling will be challenged in higher courts or on the impact that the present microsoft case 2019s decision will have on the company 2019s cases . the company is uncertain as to when these service tax matters will be concluded . a french subsidiary of the company received notice that the french taxing authority rejected the company's 2012 research and development credit . the company has contested the decision . however , if the company does not receive a favorable outcome , it could incur charges of approximately $ 0.8 million . in addition , an unfavorable outcome could result in the authorities reviewing or rejecting $ 3.8 million of similar research and development credits for 2013 through the current year that are currently reflected as an asset . the company can provide no assurances on the timing or outcome of this matter. .
Question: what was the value of expenditures in 2017?
Answer: 14134.0
Question: what was the value in 2018?
Answer: 10288.0
Question: what is the 2017 value less the 2018?
| 3846.0 |
CONVFINQA7702 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents 17 . unconditional purchase obligations the company has entered into various unconditional purchase obligations which primarily include software licenses and long- term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services . the company expended $ 7.2 million , $ 5.3 million and $ 2.9 million related to unconditional purchase obligations that existed as of the beginning of each year for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . future expenditures under unconditional purchase obligations in effect as of december 31 , 2016 are as follows : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 14134</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>10288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>9724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>2617</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>652</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 37415</td></tr></table> 18 . restructuring during the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company initiated workforce realignment activities . the company incurred $ 3.4 million in restructuring charges , or $ 2.4 million net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the company expects to incur additional charges of $ 10 million - $ 15 million , or $ 7 million - $ 10 million net of tax , primarily during the first quarter of 2017 . 19 . employment-related settlement on february 15 , 2017 , the company entered into an employment-related settlement agreement . in connection with the settlement agreement , the company will make a lump-sum payment of $ 4.7 million . the charges related to this agreement are included in selling , general and administrative expense in the 2016 consolidated statement of income . as part of the settlement agreement , all the claims initiated against the company will be withdrawn and a general release of all claims in favor of the company and all of its related entities was executed . 20 . contingencies and commitments the company is subject to various investigations , claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business , including commercial disputes , labor and employment matters , tax audits , alleged infringement of intellectual property rights and other matters . in the opinion of the company , the resolution of pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company's consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position . however , each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these proceedings could materially affect the company's results of operations , cash flows or financial position . an indian subsidiary of the company has several service tax audits pending that have resulted in formal inquiries being received on transactions through mid-2012 . the company could incur tax charges and related liabilities , including those related to the service tax audit case , of approximately $ 7 million . the service tax issues raised in the company 2019s notices and inquiries are very similar to the case , m/s microsoft corporation ( i ) ( p ) ltd . vs commissioner of service tax , new delhi , wherein the delhi customs , excise and service tax appellate tribunal ( cestat ) has passed a favorable ruling to microsoft . the company can provide no assurances on whether the microsoft case 2019s favorable ruling will be challenged in higher courts or on the impact that the present microsoft case 2019s decision will have on the company 2019s cases . the company is uncertain as to when these service tax matters will be concluded . a french subsidiary of the company received notice that the french taxing authority rejected the company's 2012 research and development credit . the company has contested the decision . however , if the company does not receive a favorable outcome , it could incur charges of approximately $ 0.8 million . in addition , an unfavorable outcome could result in the authorities reviewing or rejecting $ 3.8 million of similar research and development credits for 2013 through the current year that are currently reflected as an asset . the company can provide no assurances on the timing or outcome of this matter. .
Question: what was the value of expenditures in 2017?
Answer: 14134.0
Question: what was the value in 2018?
Answer: 10288.0
Question: what is the 2017 value less the 2018?
Answer: 3846.0
Question: what is the 2018 value?
| 14134.0 |
CONVFINQA7703 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents 17 . unconditional purchase obligations the company has entered into various unconditional purchase obligations which primarily include software licenses and long- term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services . the company expended $ 7.2 million , $ 5.3 million and $ 2.9 million related to unconditional purchase obligations that existed as of the beginning of each year for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . future expenditures under unconditional purchase obligations in effect as of december 31 , 2016 are as follows : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 14134</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>10288</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>9724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>2617</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>652</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 37415</td></tr></table> 18 . restructuring during the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company initiated workforce realignment activities . the company incurred $ 3.4 million in restructuring charges , or $ 2.4 million net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the company expects to incur additional charges of $ 10 million - $ 15 million , or $ 7 million - $ 10 million net of tax , primarily during the first quarter of 2017 . 19 . employment-related settlement on february 15 , 2017 , the company entered into an employment-related settlement agreement . in connection with the settlement agreement , the company will make a lump-sum payment of $ 4.7 million . the charges related to this agreement are included in selling , general and administrative expense in the 2016 consolidated statement of income . as part of the settlement agreement , all the claims initiated against the company will be withdrawn and a general release of all claims in favor of the company and all of its related entities was executed . 20 . contingencies and commitments the company is subject to various investigations , claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business , including commercial disputes , labor and employment matters , tax audits , alleged infringement of intellectual property rights and other matters . in the opinion of the company , the resolution of pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company's consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position . however , each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these proceedings could materially affect the company's results of operations , cash flows or financial position . an indian subsidiary of the company has several service tax audits pending that have resulted in formal inquiries being received on transactions through mid-2012 . the company could incur tax charges and related liabilities , including those related to the service tax audit case , of approximately $ 7 million . the service tax issues raised in the company 2019s notices and inquiries are very similar to the case , m/s microsoft corporation ( i ) ( p ) ltd . vs commissioner of service tax , new delhi , wherein the delhi customs , excise and service tax appellate tribunal ( cestat ) has passed a favorable ruling to microsoft . the company can provide no assurances on whether the microsoft case 2019s favorable ruling will be challenged in higher courts or on the impact that the present microsoft case 2019s decision will have on the company 2019s cases . the company is uncertain as to when these service tax matters will be concluded . a french subsidiary of the company received notice that the french taxing authority rejected the company's 2012 research and development credit . the company has contested the decision . however , if the company does not receive a favorable outcome , it could incur charges of approximately $ 0.8 million . in addition , an unfavorable outcome could result in the authorities reviewing or rejecting $ 3.8 million of similar research and development credits for 2013 through the current year that are currently reflected as an asset . the company can provide no assurances on the timing or outcome of this matter. .
Question: what was the value of expenditures in 2017?
Answer: 14134.0
Question: what was the value in 2018?
Answer: 10288.0
Question: what is the 2017 value less the 2018?
Answer: 3846.0
Question: what is the 2018 value?
Answer: 14134.0
Question: what is the difference over the 2018 value?
| 0.27211 |
CONVFINQA7704 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
restrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total of estimated interest expense payments in 2018?
| 226815.0 |
CONVFINQA7705 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
restrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total of estimated interest expense payments in 2018?
Answer: 226815.0
Question: and what was it in 2019?
| 218019.0 |
CONVFINQA7706 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
restrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total of estimated interest expense payments in 2018?
Answer: 226815.0
Question: and what was it in 2019?
Answer: 218019.0
Question: what was, then, the decline in that total over the year?
| 8796.0 |
CONVFINQA7707 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
restrictive covenants the terms of the 2017 credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges , a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that , we will not during any time when a default is continuing , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable the company to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures in june a02005 , the company and the operating partnership issued $ 100.0 a0million in unsecured trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust , sl a0green capital trust i , or the trust , which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership . the securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a floating rate of 125 a0basis points over the three-month libor . interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if the operating partnership exercises its right to defer such payments . the trust preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the operating partnership , in whole or in part , with no prepayment premium . we do not consolidate the trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary . because the trust is not consolidated , we have recorded the debt on our consolidated balance sheets and the related payments are classified as interest expense . interest rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt . our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instru- ments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments . a hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for a02017 would increase our consolidated annual interest cost , net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments , by $ 2.7 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by $ 17.2 a0million . at december a031 , 2017 , 61.5% ( 61.5 % ) of our $ 2.1 a0bil- lion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to libor . we recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is considered a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recog- nized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is immediately recognized in a0earnings . our long-term debt of $ 4.3 a0billion bears interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . our variable rate debt and variable rate joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2017 bore interest based on a spread of libor plus 100 a0basis points to libor plus 415 a0basis points . contractual obligations the combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , the 2017 credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options and put options , estimated interest expense , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2017 are as follows ( in a0thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages and other loans</td><td>$ 153593</td><td>$ 42289</td><td>$ 703018</td><td>$ 11656</td><td>$ 208003</td><td>$ 1656623</td><td>$ 2775182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mra facilities</td><td>90809</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>90809</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>40000</td><td>40000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured term loans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>1500000</td><td>1500000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>250000</td><td>2014</td><td>800000</td><td>100000</td><td>1400000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capital lease</td><td>2387</td><td>2411</td><td>2620</td><td>2794</td><td>2794</td><td>819894</td><td>832900</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ground leases</td><td>31049</td><td>31066</td><td>31436</td><td>31628</td><td>29472</td><td>703254</td><td>857905</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>226815</td><td>218019</td><td>184376</td><td>163648</td><td>155398</td><td>281694</td><td>1229950</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>200250</td><td>717682</td><td>473809</td><td>449740</td><td>223330</td><td>2119481</td><td>4184292</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total</td><td>$ 954903</td><td>$ 1011467</td><td>$ 1645259</td><td>$ 659466</td><td>$ 1418997</td><td>$ 7320946</td><td>$ 13011038</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the total of estimated interest expense payments in 2018?
Answer: 226815.0
Question: and what was it in 2019?
Answer: 218019.0
Question: what was, then, the decline in that total over the year?
Answer: 8796.0
Question: and how much does this decline represent in relation to that total in 2018?
| 0.03878 |
CONVFINQA7708 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level and begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by gaap . for those reporting units where it is required , the first step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value . if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount , goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary . to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , a second step is performed , wherein the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill . to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value , impairment exists and must be recognized . the calculation of estimated fair value is based on two valuation techniques , a discounted cash flow model ( income approach ) and a market adjusted multiple of earnings and revenues ( market approach ) , with each method being weighted in the calculation . the implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit ( including any unrecognized intangible assets ) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit , as determined in the first step of the goodwill impairment test , was the price paid to acquire that reporting unit . recoverability of other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives ( i.e . trademarks ) is determined on a relief from royalty methodology ( income approach ) , which is based on the implied royalty paid , at an appropriate discount rate , to license the use of an asset rather than owning the asset . the present value of the after-tax cost savings ( i.e . royalty relief ) indicates the estimated fair value of the asset . any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss equal to that excess . intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trademarks</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>completed technology/patents</td><td>10</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr></table> recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 80.6 million . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: what is the sum of years for customer relationships and trademarks?
| 50.0 |
CONVFINQA7709 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level and begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by gaap . for those reporting units where it is required , the first step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value . if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount , goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary . to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , a second step is performed , wherein the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill . to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value , impairment exists and must be recognized . the calculation of estimated fair value is based on two valuation techniques , a discounted cash flow model ( income approach ) and a market adjusted multiple of earnings and revenues ( market approach ) , with each method being weighted in the calculation . the implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit ( including any unrecognized intangible assets ) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit , as determined in the first step of the goodwill impairment test , was the price paid to acquire that reporting unit . recoverability of other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives ( i.e . trademarks ) is determined on a relief from royalty methodology ( income approach ) , which is based on the implied royalty paid , at an appropriate discount rate , to license the use of an asset rather than owning the asset . the present value of the after-tax cost savings ( i.e . royalty relief ) indicates the estimated fair value of the asset . any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss equal to that excess . intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trademarks</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>completed technology/patents</td><td>10</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr></table> recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 80.6 million . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: what is the sum of years for customer relationships and trademarks?
Answer: 50.0
Question: what is the number of years for other intangible assets?
| 25.0 |
CONVFINQA7710 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level and begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by gaap . for those reporting units where it is required , the first step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value . if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount , goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary . to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , a second step is performed , wherein the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill . to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value , impairment exists and must be recognized . the calculation of estimated fair value is based on two valuation techniques , a discounted cash flow model ( income approach ) and a market adjusted multiple of earnings and revenues ( market approach ) , with each method being weighted in the calculation . the implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit ( including any unrecognized intangible assets ) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit , as determined in the first step of the goodwill impairment test , was the price paid to acquire that reporting unit . recoverability of other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives ( i.e . trademarks ) is determined on a relief from royalty methodology ( income approach ) , which is based on the implied royalty paid , at an appropriate discount rate , to license the use of an asset rather than owning the asset . the present value of the after-tax cost savings ( i.e . royalty relief ) indicates the estimated fair value of the asset . any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss equal to that excess . intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trademarks</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>completed technology/patents</td><td>10</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr></table> recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 80.6 million . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: what is the sum of years for customer relationships and trademarks?
Answer: 50.0
Question: what is the number of years for other intangible assets?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the number of years for completed technology/patents?
| 10.0 |
CONVFINQA7711 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level and begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by gaap . for those reporting units where it is required , the first step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value . if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount , goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary . to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , a second step is performed , wherein the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill . to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value , impairment exists and must be recognized . the calculation of estimated fair value is based on two valuation techniques , a discounted cash flow model ( income approach ) and a market adjusted multiple of earnings and revenues ( market approach ) , with each method being weighted in the calculation . the implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit ( including any unrecognized intangible assets ) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit , as determined in the first step of the goodwill impairment test , was the price paid to acquire that reporting unit . recoverability of other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives ( i.e . trademarks ) is determined on a relief from royalty methodology ( income approach ) , which is based on the implied royalty paid , at an appropriate discount rate , to license the use of an asset rather than owning the asset . the present value of the after-tax cost savings ( i.e . royalty relief ) indicates the estimated fair value of the asset . any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss equal to that excess . intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trademarks</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>completed technology/patents</td><td>10</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr></table> recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 80.6 million . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: what is the sum of years for customer relationships and trademarks?
Answer: 50.0
Question: what is the number of years for other intangible assets?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the number of years for completed technology/patents?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what is the sum number of years?
| 35.0 |
CONVFINQA7712 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level and begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by gaap . for those reporting units where it is required , the first step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value . if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount , goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary . to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , a second step is performed , wherein the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill . to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value , impairment exists and must be recognized . the calculation of estimated fair value is based on two valuation techniques , a discounted cash flow model ( income approach ) and a market adjusted multiple of earnings and revenues ( market approach ) , with each method being weighted in the calculation . the implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit ( including any unrecognized intangible assets ) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit , as determined in the first step of the goodwill impairment test , was the price paid to acquire that reporting unit . recoverability of other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives ( i.e . trademarks ) is determined on a relief from royalty methodology ( income approach ) , which is based on the implied royalty paid , at an appropriate discount rate , to license the use of an asset rather than owning the asset . the present value of the after-tax cost savings ( i.e . royalty relief ) indicates the estimated fair value of the asset . any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss equal to that excess . intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trademarks</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>completed technology/patents</td><td>10</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr></table> recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 80.6 million . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: what is the sum of years for customer relationships and trademarks?
Answer: 50.0
Question: what is the number of years for other intangible assets?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the number of years for completed technology/patents?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what is the sum number of years?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what is the total sum number of years?
| 85.0 |
CONVFINQA7713 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level and begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test prescribed by gaap . for those reporting units where it is required , the first step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value . if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount , goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary . to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , a second step is performed , wherein the reporting unit's carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill . to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value , impairment exists and must be recognized . the calculation of estimated fair value is based on two valuation techniques , a discounted cash flow model ( income approach ) and a market adjusted multiple of earnings and revenues ( market approach ) , with each method being weighted in the calculation . the implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit ( including any unrecognized intangible assets ) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit , as determined in the first step of the goodwill impairment test , was the price paid to acquire that reporting unit . recoverability of other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives ( i.e . trademarks ) is determined on a relief from royalty methodology ( income approach ) , which is based on the implied royalty paid , at an appropriate discount rate , to license the use of an asset rather than owning the asset . the present value of the after-tax cost savings ( i.e . royalty relief ) indicates the estimated fair value of the asset . any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss equal to that excess . intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>customer relationships</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trademarks</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>completed technology/patents</td><td>10</td><td>years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>25</td><td>years</td></tr></table> recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 80.6 million . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: what is the sum of years for customer relationships and trademarks?
Answer: 50.0
Question: what is the number of years for other intangible assets?
Answer: 25.0
Question: what is the number of years for completed technology/patents?
Answer: 10.0
Question: what is the sum number of years?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what is the total sum number of years?
Answer: 85.0
Question: what is the total sum divided by 4?
| 21.25 |
CONVFINQA7714 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the basis point increase in 2010?
| 35.0 |
CONVFINQA7715 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the basis point increase in 2010?
Answer: 35.0
Question: and what was it in 2009?
| 39.0 |
CONVFINQA7716 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the basis point increase in 2010?
Answer: 35.0
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 39.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2010 basis point increase represent in relation to this 2009 one?
| 0.89744 |
CONVFINQA7717 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the basis point increase in 2010?
Answer: 35.0
Question: and what was it in 2009?
Answer: 39.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2010 basis point increase represent in relation to this 2009 one?
Answer: 0.89744
Question: in that same year of 2010, on what percentage of the full amount of trading days were there market gains above $ 210 million?
| 0.04598 |
CONVFINQA7718 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .
Question: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?
| 2489.0 |
CONVFINQA7719 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .
Question: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?
Answer: 2489.0
Question: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?
| 3483.0 |
CONVFINQA7720 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .
Question: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?
Answer: 2489.0
Question: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?
Answer: 3483.0
Question: what, then, is that amount as a percentage of this total?
| 0.71461 |
CONVFINQA7721 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .
Question: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?
Answer: 2489.0
Question: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?
Answer: 3483.0
Question: what, then, is that amount as a percentage of this total?
Answer: 0.71461
Question: in that same period, what was the combined total of the cash and the accounts receivable, in millions?
| 394.0 |
CONVFINQA7722 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .
Question: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?
Answer: 2489.0
Question: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?
Answer: 3483.0
Question: what, then, is that amount as a percentage of this total?
Answer: 0.71461
Question: in that same period, what was the combined total of the cash and the accounts receivable, in millions?
Answer: 394.0
Question: adding the inventory, what becomes that total?
| 518.0 |
CONVFINQA7723 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>inventory</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>2549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intangible assets 2014indefinite-lived</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>regulatory assets</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other noncurrent assets</td><td>58</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-401 ( 401 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-recourse debt</td><td>-1255 ( 1255 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>regulatory liabilities</td><td>-117 ( 117 )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>other noncurrent liabilities</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>redeemable preferred stock</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>net identifiable assets acquired</td><td>994</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>goodwill</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 3483</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2011 , the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded at provisional amounts based on the preliminary purchase price allocation . the company is in the process of obtaining additional information to identify and measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition within the measurement period , which could be up to one year from the date of acquisition . such provisional amounts will be retrospectively adjusted to reflect any new information about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that , if known , would have affected the measurement of these amounts . additionally , key input assumptions and their sensitivity to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are currently being reviewed by management . it is likely that the value of the generation business related property , plant and equipment , the intangible asset related to the electric security plan with its regulated customers and long-term coal contracts , the 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) equity ownership interest in the ohio valley electric corporation , and deferred taxes could change as the valuation process is finalized . dpler , dpl 2019s wholly-owned competitive retail electric service ( 201ccres 201d ) provider , will also likely have changes in its initial purchase price allocation for the valuation of its intangible assets for the trade name , and customer relationships and contracts . as noted in the table above , the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in the recognition of $ 2.5 billion of goodwill . factors primarily contributing to a price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets include , but are not limited to : the ability to expand the u.s . utility platform in the mid-west market , the ability to capitalize on utility management experience gained from ipl , enhanced ability to negotiate with suppliers of fuel and energy , the ability to capture value associated with aes 2019 u.s . tax position , a well- positioned generating fleet , the ability of dpl to leverage its assembled workforce to take advantage of growth opportunities , etc . our ability to realize the benefit of dpl 2019s goodwill depends on the realization of expected benefits resulting from a successful integration of dpl into aes 2019 existing operations and our ability to respond to the changes in the ohio utility market . for example , utilities in ohio continue to face downward pressure on operating margins due to the evolving regulatory environment , which is moving towards a market-based competitive pricing mechanism . at the same time , the declining energy prices are also reducing operating .
Question: what amount of the net assets acquired is from goodwill?
Answer: 2489.0
Question: and what is the total of those net assets acquired?
Answer: 3483.0
Question: what, then, is that amount as a percentage of this total?
Answer: 0.71461
Question: in that same period, what was the combined total of the cash and the accounts receivable, in millions?
Answer: 394.0
Question: adding the inventory, what becomes that total?
Answer: 518.0
Question: and including the other current assets, what then becomes this total of current assets acquired, in millions?
| 559.0 |
CONVFINQA7724 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 17590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>12724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>6951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>5649</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>3669</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>19472</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 66055</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the net change in e total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees from 2010 to 2011?
| 1.4 |
CONVFINQA7725 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 17590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>12724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>6951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>5649</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>3669</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>19472</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 66055</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the net change in e total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what is the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees in 2010?
| 20.5 |
CONVFINQA7726 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 17590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>12724</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>6951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>5649</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>3669</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>19472</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 66055</td></tr></table> 12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the net change in e total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what is the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees in 2010?
Answer: 20.5
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.06829 |
CONVFINQA7727 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations results of operations 2013 highmount 2013 ( continued ) highmount 2019s revenues , profitability and future growth depend substantially on natural gas and ngl prices and highmount 2019s ability to increase its natural gas and ngl production . in recent years , there has been significant price volatility in natural gas and ngl prices due to a variety of factors highmount cannot control or predict . these factors , which include weather conditions , political and economic events , and competition from other energy sources , impact supply and demand for natural gas , which determines the pricing . in recent months , natural gas prices decreased significantly due largely to increased onshore natural gas production , plentiful levels of working gas in storage and reduced commercial demand . the increase in the onshore natural gas production was due largely to increased production from 201cunconventional 201d sources of natural gas such as shale gas , coalbed methane , tight sandstones and methane hydrates , made possible in recent years by modern technology in creating extensive artificial fractures around well bores and advances in horizontal drilling technology . other key factors contributing to the softness of natural gas prices likely included a lower level of industrial demand for natural gas , as a result of the ongoing economic downturn , and relatively low crude oil prices . due to industry conditions , in february of 2009 highmount elected to terminate contracts for five drilling rigs at its permian basin property in the sonora , texas area . the estimated fee payable to the rig contractor for exercising this early termination right will be approximately $ 23 million . in light of these developments , highmount will reduce 2009 production volumes through decreased drilling activity . in addition , the price highmount realizes for its gas production is affected by highmount 2019s hedging activities as well as locational differences in market prices . highmount 2019s decision to increase its natural gas production is dependent upon highmount 2019s ability to realize attractive returns on its capital investment program . returns are affected by commodity prices , capital and operating costs . highmount 2019s operating income , which represents revenues less operating expenses , is primarily affected by revenue factors , but is also a function of varying levels of production expenses , production and ad valorem taxes , as well as depreciation , depletion and amortization ( 201cdd&a 201d ) expenses . highmount 2019s production expenses represent all costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities . the principal components of highmount 2019s production expenses are , among other things , direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits , repairs and maintenance , materials , supplies and fuel . in general , during 2008 highmount 2019s labor costs increased primarily due to higher salary levels and continued upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the increased competition for skilled workers . in response to these market conditions , in 2008 highmount implemented retention programs , including increases in compensation . production expenses during 2008 were also affected by increases in the cost of fuel , materials and supplies . the higher cost environment discussed above continued during all of 2008 . during the fourth quarter of 2008 the price of natural gas declined significantly while operating expenses remained high . this environment of low commodity prices and high operating expenses continued until december of 2008 when highmount began to see evidence of decreasing operating expenses and drilling costs . highmount 2019s production and ad valorem taxes increase primarily when prices of natural gas and ngls increase , but they are also affected by changes in production , as well as appreciated property values . highmount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method , which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties . highmount 2019s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs , as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs , well performance , and revisions due to changing commodity prices . presented below are production and sales statistics related to highmount 2019s operations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gas production ( bcf )</td><td>78.9</td><td>34.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gas sales ( bcf )</td><td>72.5</td><td>31.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>351.3</td><td>114.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ngl production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>3507.4</td><td>1512.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equivalent production ( bcfe )</td><td>102.0</td><td>43.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equivalent sales ( bcfe )</td><td>95.7</td><td>41.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average realized prices without hedging results:</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>gas ( per mcf )</td><td>$ 8.25</td><td>$ 5.95</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>ngl ( per bbl )</td><td>51.26</td><td>51.02</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>oil ( per bbl )</td><td>95.26</td><td>83.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>equivalent ( per mcfe )</td><td>8.48</td><td>6.65</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the growth rate in gas production between the years of 2007 and 2008?
| 2.32059 |
CONVFINQA7728 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations results of operations 2013 highmount 2013 ( continued ) highmount 2019s revenues , profitability and future growth depend substantially on natural gas and ngl prices and highmount 2019s ability to increase its natural gas and ngl production . in recent years , there has been significant price volatility in natural gas and ngl prices due to a variety of factors highmount cannot control or predict . these factors , which include weather conditions , political and economic events , and competition from other energy sources , impact supply and demand for natural gas , which determines the pricing . in recent months , natural gas prices decreased significantly due largely to increased onshore natural gas production , plentiful levels of working gas in storage and reduced commercial demand . the increase in the onshore natural gas production was due largely to increased production from 201cunconventional 201d sources of natural gas such as shale gas , coalbed methane , tight sandstones and methane hydrates , made possible in recent years by modern technology in creating extensive artificial fractures around well bores and advances in horizontal drilling technology . other key factors contributing to the softness of natural gas prices likely included a lower level of industrial demand for natural gas , as a result of the ongoing economic downturn , and relatively low crude oil prices . due to industry conditions , in february of 2009 highmount elected to terminate contracts for five drilling rigs at its permian basin property in the sonora , texas area . the estimated fee payable to the rig contractor for exercising this early termination right will be approximately $ 23 million . in light of these developments , highmount will reduce 2009 production volumes through decreased drilling activity . in addition , the price highmount realizes for its gas production is affected by highmount 2019s hedging activities as well as locational differences in market prices . highmount 2019s decision to increase its natural gas production is dependent upon highmount 2019s ability to realize attractive returns on its capital investment program . returns are affected by commodity prices , capital and operating costs . highmount 2019s operating income , which represents revenues less operating expenses , is primarily affected by revenue factors , but is also a function of varying levels of production expenses , production and ad valorem taxes , as well as depreciation , depletion and amortization ( 201cdd&a 201d ) expenses . highmount 2019s production expenses represent all costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities . the principal components of highmount 2019s production expenses are , among other things , direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits , repairs and maintenance , materials , supplies and fuel . in general , during 2008 highmount 2019s labor costs increased primarily due to higher salary levels and continued upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the increased competition for skilled workers . in response to these market conditions , in 2008 highmount implemented retention programs , including increases in compensation . production expenses during 2008 were also affected by increases in the cost of fuel , materials and supplies . the higher cost environment discussed above continued during all of 2008 . during the fourth quarter of 2008 the price of natural gas declined significantly while operating expenses remained high . this environment of low commodity prices and high operating expenses continued until december of 2008 when highmount began to see evidence of decreasing operating expenses and drilling costs . highmount 2019s production and ad valorem taxes increase primarily when prices of natural gas and ngls increase , but they are also affected by changes in production , as well as appreciated property values . highmount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method , which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties . highmount 2019s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs , as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs , well performance , and revisions due to changing commodity prices . presented below are production and sales statistics related to highmount 2019s operations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gas production ( bcf )</td><td>78.9</td><td>34.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gas sales ( bcf )</td><td>72.5</td><td>31.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>351.3</td><td>114.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ngl production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>3507.4</td><td>1512.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equivalent production ( bcfe )</td><td>102.0</td><td>43.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equivalent sales ( bcfe )</td><td>95.7</td><td>41.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average realized prices without hedging results:</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>gas ( per mcf )</td><td>$ 8.25</td><td>$ 5.95</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>ngl ( per bbl )</td><td>51.26</td><td>51.02</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>oil ( per bbl )</td><td>95.26</td><td>83.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>equivalent ( per mcfe )</td><td>8.48</td><td>6.65</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the growth rate in gas production between the years of 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 2.32059
Question: and what was the gas production in 2008?
| 78.9 |
CONVFINQA7729 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations results of operations 2013 highmount 2013 ( continued ) highmount 2019s revenues , profitability and future growth depend substantially on natural gas and ngl prices and highmount 2019s ability to increase its natural gas and ngl production . in recent years , there has been significant price volatility in natural gas and ngl prices due to a variety of factors highmount cannot control or predict . these factors , which include weather conditions , political and economic events , and competition from other energy sources , impact supply and demand for natural gas , which determines the pricing . in recent months , natural gas prices decreased significantly due largely to increased onshore natural gas production , plentiful levels of working gas in storage and reduced commercial demand . the increase in the onshore natural gas production was due largely to increased production from 201cunconventional 201d sources of natural gas such as shale gas , coalbed methane , tight sandstones and methane hydrates , made possible in recent years by modern technology in creating extensive artificial fractures around well bores and advances in horizontal drilling technology . other key factors contributing to the softness of natural gas prices likely included a lower level of industrial demand for natural gas , as a result of the ongoing economic downturn , and relatively low crude oil prices . due to industry conditions , in february of 2009 highmount elected to terminate contracts for five drilling rigs at its permian basin property in the sonora , texas area . the estimated fee payable to the rig contractor for exercising this early termination right will be approximately $ 23 million . in light of these developments , highmount will reduce 2009 production volumes through decreased drilling activity . in addition , the price highmount realizes for its gas production is affected by highmount 2019s hedging activities as well as locational differences in market prices . highmount 2019s decision to increase its natural gas production is dependent upon highmount 2019s ability to realize attractive returns on its capital investment program . returns are affected by commodity prices , capital and operating costs . highmount 2019s operating income , which represents revenues less operating expenses , is primarily affected by revenue factors , but is also a function of varying levels of production expenses , production and ad valorem taxes , as well as depreciation , depletion and amortization ( 201cdd&a 201d ) expenses . highmount 2019s production expenses represent all costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities . the principal components of highmount 2019s production expenses are , among other things , direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits , repairs and maintenance , materials , supplies and fuel . in general , during 2008 highmount 2019s labor costs increased primarily due to higher salary levels and continued upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the increased competition for skilled workers . in response to these market conditions , in 2008 highmount implemented retention programs , including increases in compensation . production expenses during 2008 were also affected by increases in the cost of fuel , materials and supplies . the higher cost environment discussed above continued during all of 2008 . during the fourth quarter of 2008 the price of natural gas declined significantly while operating expenses remained high . this environment of low commodity prices and high operating expenses continued until december of 2008 when highmount began to see evidence of decreasing operating expenses and drilling costs . highmount 2019s production and ad valorem taxes increase primarily when prices of natural gas and ngls increase , but they are also affected by changes in production , as well as appreciated property values . highmount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method , which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties . highmount 2019s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs , as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs , well performance , and revisions due to changing commodity prices . presented below are production and sales statistics related to highmount 2019s operations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gas production ( bcf )</td><td>78.9</td><td>34.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gas sales ( bcf )</td><td>72.5</td><td>31.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>351.3</td><td>114.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ngl production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>3507.4</td><td>1512.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equivalent production ( bcfe )</td><td>102.0</td><td>43.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equivalent sales ( bcfe )</td><td>95.7</td><td>41.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average realized prices without hedging results:</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>gas ( per mcf )</td><td>$ 8.25</td><td>$ 5.95</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>ngl ( per bbl )</td><td>51.26</td><td>51.02</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>oil ( per bbl )</td><td>95.26</td><td>83.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>equivalent ( per mcfe )</td><td>8.48</td><td>6.65</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the growth rate in gas production between the years of 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 2.32059
Question: and what was the gas production in 2008?
Answer: 78.9
Question: considering that same growth for 2009, what would then be the gas production in that year?
| 183.09441 |
CONVFINQA7730 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with over five years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2015 , 603 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 125 mmboe from december 31 , 2014 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2015 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>728</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-223 ( 223 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>603</td></tr></table> the revisions to previous estimates were largely due to a result of reductions to our capital development program which deferred proved undeveloped reserves beyond the 5-year plan . a total of 139 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions and revisions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the observed statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved developed locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 47 mmboe in the eagle ford , 14 mmboe in the bakken and 5 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1415 million , $ 3149 million and $ 2536 million . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 603 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2015 , 26% ( 26 % ) of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , fabrication of the new platform began in 2013 and installation of the platform at the alba field occurred in january 2016 . commissioning is currently underway , with first production expected by mid-2016 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development is being executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region leads to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil and political unrest have also extended the project duration . operations were interrupted in mid-2013 as a result of the shutdown of the es sider crude oil terminal , and although temporarily re-opened during the second half of 2014 , production remains shut-in through early 2016 . the operator is committed to the project 2019s completion and continues to assign resources in order to execute the project . our conversion rate for proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves for 2015 was 11% ( 11 % ) . however , excluding the aforementioned long-term projects in e.g . and libya , our 2015 conversion rate would be 15% ( 15 % ) . furthermore , our .
Question: what is the sum of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2015 and 2014?
| 4564.0 |
CONVFINQA7731 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with over five years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2015 , 603 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 125 mmboe from december 31 , 2014 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2015 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>728</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-223 ( 223 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>175</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>603</td></tr></table> the revisions to previous estimates were largely due to a result of reductions to our capital development program which deferred proved undeveloped reserves beyond the 5-year plan . a total of 139 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions and revisions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the observed statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved developed locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 47 mmboe in the eagle ford , 14 mmboe in the bakken and 5 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1415 million , $ 3149 million and $ 2536 million . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 603 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2015 , 26% ( 26 % ) of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , fabrication of the new platform began in 2013 and installation of the platform at the alba field occurred in january 2016 . commissioning is currently underway , with first production expected by mid-2016 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development is being executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region leads to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil and political unrest have also extended the project duration . operations were interrupted in mid-2013 as a result of the shutdown of the es sider crude oil terminal , and although temporarily re-opened during the second half of 2014 , production remains shut-in through early 2016 . the operator is committed to the project 2019s completion and continues to assign resources in order to execute the project . our conversion rate for proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves for 2015 was 11% ( 11 % ) . however , excluding the aforementioned long-term projects in e.g . and libya , our 2015 conversion rate would be 15% ( 15 % ) . furthermore , our .
Question: what is the sum of costs incurred relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2015 and 2014?
Answer: 4564.0
Question: what is the sum including the costs from 2013?
| 7100.0 |
CONVFINQA7732 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of warranty claims</td><td>-281 ( 281 )</td><td>-267 ( 267 )</td><td>-188 ( 188 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals for product warranties</td><td>227</td><td>363</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 230</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> the company generally does not indemnify end-users of its operating system and application software against legal claims that the software infringes third-party intellectual property rights . other agreements entered into by the company sometimes include indemnification provisions under which the company could be subject to costs and/or damages in the event of an infringement claim against the company or an indemnified third-party . however , the company has not been required to make any significant payments resulting from such an infringement claim asserted against itself or an indemnified third-party and , in the opinion of management , does not have a potential liability related to unresolved infringement claims subject to indemnification that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or operating results . therefore , the company did not record a liability for infringement costs as of either september 29 , 2007 or september 30 , 2006 . concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product certain key components including , but not limited to , microprocessors , enclosures , certain lcds , certain optical drives , and application-specific integrated circuits ( 2018 2018asics 2019 2019 ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources which subjects the company to supply and pricing risks . many of these and other key components that are available from multiple sources including , but not limited to , nand flash memory , dram memory , and certain lcds , are at times subject to industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations . in addition , the company has entered into certain agreements for the supply of critical components at favorable pricing , and there is no guarantee that the company will be able to extend or renew these agreements when they expire . therefore , the company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and/or price increases that can adversely affect gross margins and operating margins . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the global personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries , and new products introduced by the company often utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed , or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company 2019s ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company 2019s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company 2019s requirements . finally , significant portions of the company 2019s cpus , ipods , iphones , logic boards , and other assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , primarily in various parts of asia . a significant concentration of this outsourced manufacturing is currently performed by only a few of the company 2019s outsourcing partners , often in single locations . certain of these outsourcing partners are the sole-sourced supplier of components and manufacturing outsourcing for many of the company 2019s key products , including but not limited to , assembly .
Question: what is the ent change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?
| 96.0 |
CONVFINQA7733 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of warranty claims</td><td>-281 ( 281 )</td><td>-267 ( 267 )</td><td>-188 ( 188 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals for product warranties</td><td>227</td><td>363</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 230</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> the company generally does not indemnify end-users of its operating system and application software against legal claims that the software infringes third-party intellectual property rights . other agreements entered into by the company sometimes include indemnification provisions under which the company could be subject to costs and/or damages in the event of an infringement claim against the company or an indemnified third-party . however , the company has not been required to make any significant payments resulting from such an infringement claim asserted against itself or an indemnified third-party and , in the opinion of management , does not have a potential liability related to unresolved infringement claims subject to indemnification that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or operating results . therefore , the company did not record a liability for infringement costs as of either september 29 , 2007 or september 30 , 2006 . concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product certain key components including , but not limited to , microprocessors , enclosures , certain lcds , certain optical drives , and application-specific integrated circuits ( 2018 2018asics 2019 2019 ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources which subjects the company to supply and pricing risks . many of these and other key components that are available from multiple sources including , but not limited to , nand flash memory , dram memory , and certain lcds , are at times subject to industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations . in addition , the company has entered into certain agreements for the supply of critical components at favorable pricing , and there is no guarantee that the company will be able to extend or renew these agreements when they expire . therefore , the company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and/or price increases that can adversely affect gross margins and operating margins . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the global personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries , and new products introduced by the company often utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed , or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company 2019s ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company 2019s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company 2019s requirements . finally , significant portions of the company 2019s cpus , ipods , iphones , logic boards , and other assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , primarily in various parts of asia . a significant concentration of this outsourced manufacturing is currently performed by only a few of the company 2019s outsourcing partners , often in single locations . certain of these outsourcing partners are the sole-sourced supplier of components and manufacturing outsourcing for many of the company 2019s key products , including but not limited to , assembly .
Question: what is the ent change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what percentage change does this represents?
| 0.51064 |
CONVFINQA7734 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of warranty claims</td><td>-281 ( 281 )</td><td>-267 ( 267 )</td><td>-188 ( 188 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals for product warranties</td><td>227</td><td>363</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 230</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> the company generally does not indemnify end-users of its operating system and application software against legal claims that the software infringes third-party intellectual property rights . other agreements entered into by the company sometimes include indemnification provisions under which the company could be subject to costs and/or damages in the event of an infringement claim against the company or an indemnified third-party . however , the company has not been required to make any significant payments resulting from such an infringement claim asserted against itself or an indemnified third-party and , in the opinion of management , does not have a potential liability related to unresolved infringement claims subject to indemnification that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or operating results . therefore , the company did not record a liability for infringement costs as of either september 29 , 2007 or september 30 , 2006 . concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product certain key components including , but not limited to , microprocessors , enclosures , certain lcds , certain optical drives , and application-specific integrated circuits ( 2018 2018asics 2019 2019 ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources which subjects the company to supply and pricing risks . many of these and other key components that are available from multiple sources including , but not limited to , nand flash memory , dram memory , and certain lcds , are at times subject to industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations . in addition , the company has entered into certain agreements for the supply of critical components at favorable pricing , and there is no guarantee that the company will be able to extend or renew these agreements when they expire . therefore , the company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and/or price increases that can adversely affect gross margins and operating margins . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the global personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries , and new products introduced by the company often utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed , or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company 2019s ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company 2019s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company 2019s requirements . finally , significant portions of the company 2019s cpus , ipods , iphones , logic boards , and other assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , primarily in various parts of asia . a significant concentration of this outsourced manufacturing is currently performed by only a few of the company 2019s outsourcing partners , often in single locations . certain of these outsourcing partners are the sole-sourced supplier of components and manufacturing outsourcing for many of the company 2019s key products , including but not limited to , assembly .
Question: what is the ent change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what percentage change does this represents?
Answer: 0.51064
Question: what about the ending accrued warranty and related costs in 2007?
| 230.0 |
CONVFINQA7735 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of warranty claims</td><td>-281 ( 281 )</td><td>-267 ( 267 )</td><td>-188 ( 188 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals for product warranties</td><td>227</td><td>363</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 230</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> the company generally does not indemnify end-users of its operating system and application software against legal claims that the software infringes third-party intellectual property rights . other agreements entered into by the company sometimes include indemnification provisions under which the company could be subject to costs and/or damages in the event of an infringement claim against the company or an indemnified third-party . however , the company has not been required to make any significant payments resulting from such an infringement claim asserted against itself or an indemnified third-party and , in the opinion of management , does not have a potential liability related to unresolved infringement claims subject to indemnification that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or operating results . therefore , the company did not record a liability for infringement costs as of either september 29 , 2007 or september 30 , 2006 . concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product certain key components including , but not limited to , microprocessors , enclosures , certain lcds , certain optical drives , and application-specific integrated circuits ( 2018 2018asics 2019 2019 ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources which subjects the company to supply and pricing risks . many of these and other key components that are available from multiple sources including , but not limited to , nand flash memory , dram memory , and certain lcds , are at times subject to industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations . in addition , the company has entered into certain agreements for the supply of critical components at favorable pricing , and there is no guarantee that the company will be able to extend or renew these agreements when they expire . therefore , the company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and/or price increases that can adversely affect gross margins and operating margins . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the global personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries , and new products introduced by the company often utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed , or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company 2019s ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company 2019s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company 2019s requirements . finally , significant portions of the company 2019s cpus , ipods , iphones , logic boards , and other assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , primarily in various parts of asia . a significant concentration of this outsourced manufacturing is currently performed by only a few of the company 2019s outsourcing partners , often in single locations . certain of these outsourcing partners are the sole-sourced supplier of components and manufacturing outsourcing for many of the company 2019s key products , including but not limited to , assembly .
Question: what is the ent change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what percentage change does this represents?
Answer: 0.51064
Question: what about the ending accrued warranty and related costs in 2007?
Answer: 230.0
Question: what about in 2006?
| 284.0 |
CONVFINQA7736 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s accrued warranties and related costs ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of warranty claims</td><td>-281 ( 281 )</td><td>-267 ( 267 )</td><td>-188 ( 188 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals for product warranties</td><td>227</td><td>363</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending accrued warranty and related costs</td><td>$ 230</td><td>$ 284</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> the company generally does not indemnify end-users of its operating system and application software against legal claims that the software infringes third-party intellectual property rights . other agreements entered into by the company sometimes include indemnification provisions under which the company could be subject to costs and/or damages in the event of an infringement claim against the company or an indemnified third-party . however , the company has not been required to make any significant payments resulting from such an infringement claim asserted against itself or an indemnified third-party and , in the opinion of management , does not have a potential liability related to unresolved infringement claims subject to indemnification that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or operating results . therefore , the company did not record a liability for infringement costs as of either september 29 , 2007 or september 30 , 2006 . concentrations in the available sources of supply of materials and product certain key components including , but not limited to , microprocessors , enclosures , certain lcds , certain optical drives , and application-specific integrated circuits ( 2018 2018asics 2019 2019 ) are currently obtained by the company from single or limited sources which subjects the company to supply and pricing risks . many of these and other key components that are available from multiple sources including , but not limited to , nand flash memory , dram memory , and certain lcds , are at times subject to industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations . in addition , the company has entered into certain agreements for the supply of critical components at favorable pricing , and there is no guarantee that the company will be able to extend or renew these agreements when they expire . therefore , the company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and/or price increases that can adversely affect gross margins and operating margins . in addition , the company uses some components that are not common to the rest of the global personal computer , consumer electronics and mobile communication industries , and new products introduced by the company often utilize custom components obtained from only one source until the company has evaluated whether there is a need for and subsequently qualifies additional suppliers . if the supply of a key single-sourced component to the company were to be delayed or curtailed , or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipments of completed products to the company , the company 2019s ability to ship related products in desired quantities and in a timely manner could be adversely affected . the company 2019s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source , or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source . continued availability of these components may be affected if producers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the company 2019s requirements . finally , significant portions of the company 2019s cpus , ipods , iphones , logic boards , and other assembled products are now manufactured by outsourcing partners , primarily in various parts of asia . a significant concentration of this outsourced manufacturing is currently performed by only a few of the company 2019s outsourcing partners , often in single locations . certain of these outsourcing partners are the sole-sourced supplier of components and manufacturing outsourcing for many of the company 2019s key products , including but not limited to , assembly .
Question: what is the ent change in accrued warranties and related costs from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what percentage change does this represents?
Answer: 0.51064
Question: what about the ending accrued warranty and related costs in 2007?
Answer: 230.0
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 284.0
Question: what is the net change in these years?
| -54.0 |
CONVFINQA7737 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .
Question: what was the change in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
| 11.9 |
CONVFINQA7738 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .
Question: what was the change in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 11.9
Question: and what percentage of this change was due to rider revenue?
| 0.5042 |
CONVFINQA7739 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>attala costs</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base revenue</td><td>5.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-4.0 ( 4.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.7 ( 2.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 498.8</td></tr></table> the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .
Question: what was the change in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 11.9
Question: and what percentage of this change was due to rider revenue?
Answer: 0.5042
Question: and what was this change as a portion of that net revenue in 2007?
| 0.02444 |
CONVFINQA7740 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
instruments at fair value and to recognize the effective and ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges . ( 2 ) for the year ended december 31 , 2000 , earnings available to common stockholders includes reductions of $ 2371 of preferred stock dividends and $ 16266 for the redemption of pca 2019s 123 20448% ( 20448 % ) preferred stock . ( 3 ) on october 13 , 2003 , pca announced its intention to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.15 per share , or $ 0.60 per share annually , on its common stock . the first quarterly dividend of $ 0.15 per share was paid on january 15 , 2004 to shareholders of record as of december 15 , 2003 . pca did not declare any dividends on its common stock in 2000 - 2002 . ( 4 ) total long-term obligations include long-term debt , short-term debt and the current maturities of long-term debt . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report . overview on april 12 , 1999 , pca acquired the containerboard and corrugated products business of pactiv corporation ( the 201cgroup 201d ) , formerly known as tenneco packaging inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of tenneco , inc . the group operated prior to april 12 , 1999 as a division of pactiv , and not as a separate , stand-alone entity . from its formation in january 1999 and through the closing of the acquisition on april 12 , 1999 , pca did not have any significant operations . the april 12 , 1999 acquisition was accounted for using historical values for the contributed assets . purchase accounting was not applied because , under the applicable accounting guidance , a change of control was deemed not to have occurred as a result of the participating veto rights held by pactiv after the closing of the transactions under the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into in connection with the transactions . results of operations year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december , 31 2004 and 2003 are set forth the below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1890.1</td><td>$ 1735.5</td><td>$ 154.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income before interest and taxes</td><td>$ 140.5</td><td>$ 96.9</td><td>$ 43.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-29.6 ( 29.6 )</td><td>-121.8 ( 121.8 )</td><td>92.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income ( loss ) before taxes</td><td>110.9</td><td>-24.9 ( 24.9 )</td><td>135.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>( provision ) benefit for income taxes</td><td>-42.2 ( 42.2 )</td><td>10.5</td><td>-52.7 ( 52.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 68.7</td><td>$ -14.4 ( 14.4 )</td><td>$ 83.1</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2004, which one was higher: the interest expense net or the ( provision ) benefit for income taxes?
| yes |
CONVFINQA7741 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
instruments at fair value and to recognize the effective and ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges . ( 2 ) for the year ended december 31 , 2000 , earnings available to common stockholders includes reductions of $ 2371 of preferred stock dividends and $ 16266 for the redemption of pca 2019s 123 20448% ( 20448 % ) preferred stock . ( 3 ) on october 13 , 2003 , pca announced its intention to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.15 per share , or $ 0.60 per share annually , on its common stock . the first quarterly dividend of $ 0.15 per share was paid on january 15 , 2004 to shareholders of record as of december 15 , 2003 . pca did not declare any dividends on its common stock in 2000 - 2002 . ( 4 ) total long-term obligations include long-term debt , short-term debt and the current maturities of long-term debt . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report . overview on april 12 , 1999 , pca acquired the containerboard and corrugated products business of pactiv corporation ( the 201cgroup 201d ) , formerly known as tenneco packaging inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of tenneco , inc . the group operated prior to april 12 , 1999 as a division of pactiv , and not as a separate , stand-alone entity . from its formation in january 1999 and through the closing of the acquisition on april 12 , 1999 , pca did not have any significant operations . the april 12 , 1999 acquisition was accounted for using historical values for the contributed assets . purchase accounting was not applied because , under the applicable accounting guidance , a change of control was deemed not to have occurred as a result of the participating veto rights held by pactiv after the closing of the transactions under the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into in connection with the transactions . results of operations year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december , 31 2004 and 2003 are set forth the below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1890.1</td><td>$ 1735.5</td><td>$ 154.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income before interest and taxes</td><td>$ 140.5</td><td>$ 96.9</td><td>$ 43.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-29.6 ( 29.6 )</td><td>-121.8 ( 121.8 )</td><td>92.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income ( loss ) before taxes</td><td>110.9</td><td>-24.9 ( 24.9 )</td><td>135.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>( provision ) benefit for income taxes</td><td>-42.2 ( 42.2 )</td><td>10.5</td><td>-52.7 ( 52.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 68.7</td><td>$ -14.4 ( 14.4 )</td><td>$ 83.1</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2004, which one was higher: the interest expense net or the ( provision ) benefit for income taxes?
Answer: yes
Question: and concerning the income before interest and taxes, what was the variation between this year and the one before?
| 43.6 |
CONVFINQA7742 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
instruments at fair value and to recognize the effective and ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges . ( 2 ) for the year ended december 31 , 2000 , earnings available to common stockholders includes reductions of $ 2371 of preferred stock dividends and $ 16266 for the redemption of pca 2019s 123 20448% ( 20448 % ) preferred stock . ( 3 ) on october 13 , 2003 , pca announced its intention to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.15 per share , or $ 0.60 per share annually , on its common stock . the first quarterly dividend of $ 0.15 per share was paid on january 15 , 2004 to shareholders of record as of december 15 , 2003 . pca did not declare any dividends on its common stock in 2000 - 2002 . ( 4 ) total long-term obligations include long-term debt , short-term debt and the current maturities of long-term debt . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report . overview on april 12 , 1999 , pca acquired the containerboard and corrugated products business of pactiv corporation ( the 201cgroup 201d ) , formerly known as tenneco packaging inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of tenneco , inc . the group operated prior to april 12 , 1999 as a division of pactiv , and not as a separate , stand-alone entity . from its formation in january 1999 and through the closing of the acquisition on april 12 , 1999 , pca did not have any significant operations . the april 12 , 1999 acquisition was accounted for using historical values for the contributed assets . purchase accounting was not applied because , under the applicable accounting guidance , a change of control was deemed not to have occurred as a result of the participating veto rights held by pactiv after the closing of the transactions under the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into in connection with the transactions . results of operations year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december , 31 2004 and 2003 are set forth the below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1890.1</td><td>$ 1735.5</td><td>$ 154.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income before interest and taxes</td><td>$ 140.5</td><td>$ 96.9</td><td>$ 43.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-29.6 ( 29.6 )</td><td>-121.8 ( 121.8 )</td><td>92.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income ( loss ) before taxes</td><td>110.9</td><td>-24.9 ( 24.9 )</td><td>135.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>( provision ) benefit for income taxes</td><td>-42.2 ( 42.2 )</td><td>10.5</td><td>-52.7 ( 52.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 68.7</td><td>$ -14.4 ( 14.4 )</td><td>$ 83.1</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2004, which one was higher: the interest expense net or the ( provision ) benefit for income taxes?
Answer: yes
Question: and concerning the income before interest and taxes, what was the variation between this year and the one before?
Answer: 43.6
Question: what percentage does this variation represent in relation to that income in the year before?
| 0.44995 |
CONVFINQA7743 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended may 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 136800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademark</td><td>10000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other long-lived assets</td><td>864</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 147664</td></tr></table> net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, how much did the goodwill amount represent in relation to the total impairment charge?
| 0.92643 |
CONVFINQA7744 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended may 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 136800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademark</td><td>10000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other long-lived assets</td><td>864</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 147664</td></tr></table> net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, how much did the goodwill amount represent in relation to the total impairment charge?
Answer: 0.92643
Question: and in that year, what was the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax?
| 28.9 |
CONVFINQA7745 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended may 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 136800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademark</td><td>10000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other long-lived assets</td><td>864</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 147664</td></tr></table> net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, how much did the goodwill amount represent in relation to the total impairment charge?
Answer: 0.92643
Question: and in that year, what was the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax?
Answer: 28.9
Question: what was it in 2008?
| 8.1 |
CONVFINQA7746 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended may 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 136800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademark</td><td>10000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other long-lived assets</td><td>864</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 147664</td></tr></table> net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, how much did the goodwill amount represent in relation to the total impairment charge?
Answer: 0.92643
Question: and in that year, what was the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax?
Answer: 28.9
Question: what was it in 2008?
Answer: 8.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 20.8 |
CONVFINQA7747 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended may 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 136800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademark</td><td>10000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other long-lived assets</td><td>864</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 147664</td></tr></table> net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .
Question: as of may 31, 2009, how much did the goodwill amount represent in relation to the total impairment charge?
Answer: 0.92643
Question: and in that year, what was the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax?
Answer: 28.9
Question: what was it in 2008?
Answer: 8.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 20.8
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2008 net income?
| 2.5679 |
CONVFINQA7748 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .
Question: what was the total net of cash collateral in the years of 2017 and 2018, in billions??
| 31.4 |
CONVFINQA7749 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .
Question: what was the total net of cash collateral in the years of 2017 and 2018, in billions??
Answer: 31.4
Question: and what was the average net of cash collateral between those two years, also in billions?
| 15.7 |
CONVFINQA7750 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .
Question: what was the total net of cash collateral in the years of 2017 and 2018, in billions??
Answer: 31.4
Question: and what was the average net of cash collateral between those two years, also in billions?
Answer: 15.7
Question: how much would that average be, in thousands of dollars?
| 15700000.0 |
CONVFINQA7751 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .
Question: what was the total net of cash collateral in the years of 2017 and 2018, in billions??
Answer: 31.4
Question: and what was the average net of cash collateral between those two years, also in billions?
Answer: 15.7
Question: how much would that average be, in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 15700000.0
Question: and how much would that be in dollars?
| 15700000000.0 |
CONVFINQA7752 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company . one consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written . statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2014 201cdowngrades in our financial strength or credit ratings , which may make our products less attractive , could increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt , which would have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations and liquidity . 201d statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013</td><td>$ 7157</td><td>$ 6639</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and casualty insurance subsidiaries</td><td>8069</td><td>8022</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 15226</td><td>$ 14661</td></tr></table> statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 , increased by $ 518 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of $ 788 , net income from non-variable annuity business of $ 187 , increases in unrealized gains from other invested assets carrying values of $ 138 , partially offset by returns of capital of $ 500 , and changes in reserves on account of change in valuation basis of $ 100 . effective april 30 , 2014 the last domestic captive ceased operations . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance increased by $ 47 , primarily due to statutory net income of $ 1.1 billion , and unrealized gains on investments of $ 1.4 billion , largely offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 2.5 billion . the company also held regulatory capital and surplus for its former operations in japan until the sale of those operations on june 30 , 2014 . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what is the sum of u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 and 2014?
| 13796.0 |
CONVFINQA7753 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company . one consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written . statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2014 201cdowngrades in our financial strength or credit ratings , which may make our products less attractive , could increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt , which would have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations and liquidity . 201d statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013</td><td>$ 7157</td><td>$ 6639</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and casualty insurance subsidiaries</td><td>8069</td><td>8022</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 15226</td><td>$ 14661</td></tr></table> statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 , increased by $ 518 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of $ 788 , net income from non-variable annuity business of $ 187 , increases in unrealized gains from other invested assets carrying values of $ 138 , partially offset by returns of capital of $ 500 , and changes in reserves on account of change in valuation basis of $ 100 . effective april 30 , 2014 the last domestic captive ceased operations . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance increased by $ 47 , primarily due to statutory net income of $ 1.1 billion , and unrealized gains on investments of $ 1.4 billion , largely offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 2.5 billion . the company also held regulatory capital and surplus for its former operations in japan until the sale of those operations on june 30 , 2014 . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what is the sum of u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 13796.0
Question: what is the average for these years?
| 6898.0 |
CONVFINQA7754 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
| 1.01339 |
CONVFINQA7755 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
Answer: 1.01339
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.01339 |
CONVFINQA7756 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
Answer: 1.01339
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.01339
Question: and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?
| 1390.0 |
CONVFINQA7757 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
Answer: 1.01339
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.01339
Question: and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?
Answer: 1390.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
| 15244.0 |
CONVFINQA7758 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
Answer: 1.01339
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.01339
Question: and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?
Answer: 1390.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 15244.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total for both years?
| 16634.0 |
CONVFINQA7759 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
Answer: 1.01339
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.01339
Question: and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?
Answer: 1390.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 15244.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total for both years?
Answer: 16634.0
Question: including 2006, what becomes this total?
| 29441.0 |
CONVFINQA7760 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
Answer: 1.01339
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
Answer: 0.01339
Question: and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?
Answer: 1390.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 15244.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total for both years?
Answer: 16634.0
Question: including 2006, what becomes this total?
Answer: 29441.0
Question: and what were the average deductions between the three years?
| 9813.66667 |
CONVFINQA7761 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what is the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
| 62.1 |
CONVFINQA7762 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what is the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Answer: 62.1
Question: what about in 2014?
| 45.45 |
CONVFINQA7763 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what is the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Answer: 62.1
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 45.45
Question: what is the change in grant date fair value per share from 2014 to 2015?
| 16.65 |
CONVFINQA7764 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what is the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Answer: 62.1
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 45.45
Question: what is the change in grant date fair value per share from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 16.65
Question: what is the is the grant date fair value per share in 2014?
| 45.45 |
CONVFINQA7765 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what is the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Answer: 62.1
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 45.45
Question: what is the change in grant date fair value per share from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 16.65
Question: what is the is the grant date fair value per share in 2014?
Answer: 45.45
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.36634 |
CONVFINQA7766 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2001?
| 2832.0 |
CONVFINQA7767 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2001?
Answer: 2832.0
Question: what about in 2000?
| 2665.0 |
CONVFINQA7768 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2001?
Answer: 2832.0
Question: what about in 2000?
Answer: 2665.0
Question: what is the change in total fee revenue between 2000 and 2001?
| 167.0 |
CONVFINQA7769 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2001?
Answer: 2832.0
Question: what about in 2000?
Answer: 2665.0
Question: what is the change in total fee revenue between 2000 and 2001?
Answer: 167.0
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2000?
| 2665.0 |
CONVFINQA7770 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
an average of 7.1 in 2000 . the top 100 largest clients used an average of 11.3 products in 2001 , up from an average of 11.2 in 2000 . state street benefits significantly from its ability to derive revenue from the transaction flows of clients . this occurs through the management of cash positions , including deposit balances and other short-term investment activities , using state street 2019s balance sheet capacity . significant foreign currency transaction volumes provide potential for foreign exchange trading revenue as well . fee revenue total operating fee revenuewas $ 2.8 billion in 2001 , compared to $ 2.7 billion in 2000 , an increase of 6% ( 6 % ) . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , the growth in fee revenue was 8% ( 8 % ) . growth in servicing fees of $ 199million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , was the primary contributor to the increase in fee revenue . this growth primarily reflects several large client wins installed starting in the latter half of 2000 and continuing throughout 2001 , and strength in fee revenue from securities lending . declines in equity market values worldwide offset some of the growth in servicing fees . management fees were down 5% ( 5 % ) , adjusted for the formation of citistreet , reflecting the decline in theworldwide equitymarkets . foreign exchange trading revenue was down 5% ( 5 % ) , reflecting lower currency volatility , and processing fees and other revenue was up 21% ( 21 % ) , primarily due to gains on the sales of investment securities . servicing and management fees are a function of several factors , including the mix and volume of assets under custody and assets under management , securities positions held , and portfolio transactions , as well as types of products and services used by clients . state street estimates , based on a study conducted in 2000 , that a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in worldwide equity values would cause a corresponding change in state street 2019s total revenue of approximately 2% ( 2 % ) . if bond values were to increase or decrease by 10% ( 10 % ) , state street would anticipate a corresponding change of approximately 1% ( 1 % ) in its total revenue . securities lending revenue in 2001 increased approximately 40% ( 40 % ) over 2000 . securities lending revenue is reflected in both servicing fees and management fees . securities lending revenue is a function of the volume of securities lent and interest rate spreads . while volumes increased in 2001 , the year-over-year increase is primarily due to wider interest rate spreads resulting from the unusual occurrence of eleven reductions in the u.s . federal funds target rate during 2001 . f e e r e v e n u e ( dollars in millions ) 2001 ( 1 ) 2000 1999 ( 2 ) change adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td><td>2000</td><td>1999 ( 2 )</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>servicing fees</td><td>$ 1624</td><td>$ 1425</td><td>$ 1170</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>management fees</td><td>511</td><td>581</td><td>600</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign exchange trading</td><td>368</td><td>387</td><td>306</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>processing fees and other</td><td>329</td><td>272</td><td>236</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total fee revenue</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 2665</td><td>$ 2312</td><td>6</td><td>8</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2001 results exclude the write-off of state street 2019s total investment in bridge of $ 50 million ( 2 ) 1999 results exclude the one-time charge of $ 57 million related to the repositioning of the investment portfolio ( 3 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet 4 state street corporation .
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2001?
Answer: 2832.0
Question: what about in 2000?
Answer: 2665.0
Question: what is the change in total fee revenue between 2000 and 2001?
Answer: 167.0
Question: what is the total fee revenue in 2000?
Answer: 2665.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.06266 |
CONVFINQA7771 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 2014related party transactions in the course of settling money transfer transactions , we purchase foreign currency from consultoria internacional casa de cambio ( 201ccisa 201d ) , a mexican company partially owned by certain of our employees . as of march 31 , 2008 , mr . ra fal lim f3n cortes , a 10% ( 10 % ) shareholder of cisa , was no longer an employee , and we no longer considered cisa a related party . we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa . we believe these currency transactions were executed at prevailing market exchange rates . also from time to time , money transfer transactions are settled at destination facilities owned by cisa . we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.5 million in the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 . in fiscal 2007 and 2006 , we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.7 and $ 0.6 million , respectively . in the normal course of business , we periodically utilize the services of contractors to provide software development services . one of our employees , hired in april 2005 , is also an employee , officer , and part owner of a firm that provides such services . the services provided by this firm primarily relate to software development in connection with our planned next generation front-end processing system in the united states . during fiscal 2008 , we capitalized fees paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million . as of may 31 , 2008 and 2007 , capitalized amounts paid to this firm of $ 4.9 million and $ 4.6 million , respectively , were included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 13 2014commitments and contingencies leases we conduct a major part of our operations using leased facilities and equipment . many of these leases have renewal and purchase options and provide that we pay the cost of property taxes , insurance and maintenance . rent expense on all operating leases for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 30.4 million , $ 27.1 million , and $ 24.4 million , respectively . future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 22883</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>16359</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>11746</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>5277</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>3365</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>7816</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 67446</td></tr></table> we are party to a number of other claims and lawsuits incidental to our business . in the opinion of management , the reasonably possible outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations. .
Question: what was the amount of mexican pesos purchased, converted to the thousands?
| 6100.0 |
CONVFINQA7772 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 2014related party transactions in the course of settling money transfer transactions , we purchase foreign currency from consultoria internacional casa de cambio ( 201ccisa 201d ) , a mexican company partially owned by certain of our employees . as of march 31 , 2008 , mr . ra fal lim f3n cortes , a 10% ( 10 % ) shareholder of cisa , was no longer an employee , and we no longer considered cisa a related party . we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa . we believe these currency transactions were executed at prevailing market exchange rates . also from time to time , money transfer transactions are settled at destination facilities owned by cisa . we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.5 million in the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 . in fiscal 2007 and 2006 , we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.7 and $ 0.6 million , respectively . in the normal course of business , we periodically utilize the services of contractors to provide software development services . one of our employees , hired in april 2005 , is also an employee , officer , and part owner of a firm that provides such services . the services provided by this firm primarily relate to software development in connection with our planned next generation front-end processing system in the united states . during fiscal 2008 , we capitalized fees paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million . as of may 31 , 2008 and 2007 , capitalized amounts paid to this firm of $ 4.9 million and $ 4.6 million , respectively , were included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 13 2014commitments and contingencies leases we conduct a major part of our operations using leased facilities and equipment . many of these leases have renewal and purchase options and provide that we pay the cost of property taxes , insurance and maintenance . rent expense on all operating leases for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 30.4 million , $ 27.1 million , and $ 24.4 million , respectively . future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 22883</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>16359</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>11746</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>5277</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>3365</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>7816</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 67446</td></tr></table> we are party to a number of other claims and lawsuits incidental to our business . in the opinion of management , the reasonably possible outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations. .
Question: what was the amount of mexican pesos purchased, converted to the thousands?
Answer: 6100.0
Question: and the value of this purchase?
| 560.3 |
CONVFINQA7773 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 2014related party transactions in the course of settling money transfer transactions , we purchase foreign currency from consultoria internacional casa de cambio ( 201ccisa 201d ) , a mexican company partially owned by certain of our employees . as of march 31 , 2008 , mr . ra fal lim f3n cortes , a 10% ( 10 % ) shareholder of cisa , was no longer an employee , and we no longer considered cisa a related party . we purchased 6.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 560.3 million during the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 and 8.1 billion mexican pesos for $ 736.0 million during fiscal 2007 from cisa . we believe these currency transactions were executed at prevailing market exchange rates . also from time to time , money transfer transactions are settled at destination facilities owned by cisa . we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.5 million in the ten months ended march 31 , 2008 . in fiscal 2007 and 2006 , we incurred related settlement expenses , included in cost of service in the accompanying consolidated statements of income of $ 0.7 and $ 0.6 million , respectively . in the normal course of business , we periodically utilize the services of contractors to provide software development services . one of our employees , hired in april 2005 , is also an employee , officer , and part owner of a firm that provides such services . the services provided by this firm primarily relate to software development in connection with our planned next generation front-end processing system in the united states . during fiscal 2008 , we capitalized fees paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million . as of may 31 , 2008 and 2007 , capitalized amounts paid to this firm of $ 4.9 million and $ 4.6 million , respectively , were included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . in addition , we expensed amounts paid to this firm of $ 0.3 million , $ 0.1 million and $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 13 2014commitments and contingencies leases we conduct a major part of our operations using leased facilities and equipment . many of these leases have renewal and purchase options and provide that we pay the cost of property taxes , insurance and maintenance . rent expense on all operating leases for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 30.4 million , $ 27.1 million , and $ 24.4 million , respectively . future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2008 were as follows : operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 22883</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>16359</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>11746</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>5277</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>3365</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>7816</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 67446</td></tr></table> we are party to a number of other claims and lawsuits incidental to our business . in the opinion of management , the reasonably possible outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations. .
Question: what was the amount of mexican pesos purchased, converted to the thousands?
Answer: 6100.0
Question: and the value of this purchase?
Answer: 560.3
Question: so what was the exchange rate of pesos to the dollar?
| 10.88702 |
CONVFINQA7774 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 included $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of amortization , and $ 2062 million , net of $ 887 million of amortization , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the amortization for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 188</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>614</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>580</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>465</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>389</td><td>152</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>3204</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5909</td><td>$ 1898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>628</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1270</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 747 million in 2008 , $ 810 million in 2007 , and $ 798 million in 2006 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 88% ( 88 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 12% ( 12 % ) related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2008 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from .
Question: what are total minimum payments for operating leases?
| 5909.0 |
CONVFINQA7775 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 included $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of amortization , and $ 2062 million , net of $ 887 million of amortization , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the amortization for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 188</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>614</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>580</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>465</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>389</td><td>152</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>3204</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5909</td><td>$ 1898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>628</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1270</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 747 million in 2008 , $ 810 million in 2007 , and $ 798 million in 2006 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 88% ( 88 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 12% ( 12 % ) related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2008 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from .
Question: what are total minimum payments for operating leases?
Answer: 5909.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
| 1898.0 |
CONVFINQA7776 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 included $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of amortization , and $ 2062 million , net of $ 887 million of amortization , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the amortization for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 188</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>614</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>580</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>465</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>389</td><td>152</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>3204</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5909</td><td>$ 1898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>628</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1270</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 747 million in 2008 , $ 810 million in 2007 , and $ 798 million in 2006 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 88% ( 88 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 12% ( 12 % ) related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2008 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from .
Question: what are total minimum payments for operating leases?
Answer: 5909.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
Answer: 1898.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 7807.0 |
CONVFINQA7777 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 included $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of amortization , and $ 2062 million , net of $ 887 million of amortization , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the amortization for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 657</td><td>$ 188</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>614</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>580</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>465</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>389</td><td>152</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>3204</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5909</td><td>$ 1898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>628</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1270</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 747 million in 2008 , $ 810 million in 2007 , and $ 798 million in 2006 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 88% ( 88 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 12% ( 12 % ) related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2008 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from .
Question: what are total minimum payments for operating leases?
Answer: 5909.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
Answer: 1898.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 7807.0
Question: what is the ratio of capital leases to the sum?
| 0.24312 |
CONVFINQA7778 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>americas</td><td>$ 78.5</td><td>$ 66.9</td><td>$ 56.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe</td><td>57.0</td><td>60.7</td><td>46.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>25.6</td><td>22.7</td><td>18.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>global operations and corporate functions</td><td>114.0</td><td>79.7</td><td>75.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 275.1</td><td>$ 230.0</td><td>$ 197.4</td></tr></table> 15 . leases future minimum rental commitments under non- cancelable operating leases in effect as of december 31 , 2008 were $ 38.2 million for 2009 , $ 30.1 million for 2010 , $ 20.9 million for 2011 , $ 15.9 million for 2012 , $ 14.3 million for 2013 and $ 29.9 million thereafter . total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively . 16 . commitments and contingencies intellectual property and product liability-related litigation in july 2008 , we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the durom bb acetabular component ( durom cup ) in the u.s . to allow us to update product labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to surgeons and implement a surgical training program in the u.s . following our announcement , product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us , some of which we have settled . there are a number of claims still pending and we expect additional claims will be submitted . we recorded a provision of $ 47.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 , representing management 2019s estimate of these durom cup-related claims . we increased that provision by $ 21.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 . the provision is limited to revisions within two years of an original surgery that occurred prior to july 2008 . these parameters are consistent with our data which indicates that cup loosenings associated with surgical technique are most likely to occur within that time period . any claims received outside of these defined parameters will be managed in the normal course and reflected in our standard product liability accruals . on february 15 , 2005 , howmedica osteonics corp . filed an action against us and an unrelated party in the united states district court for the district of new jersey alleging infringement of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; 6664308 ; and 6818020 . on june 13 , 2007 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; and 6664308 by ruling that all of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness . on august 19 , 2008 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment of non- infringement of certain claims of u.s . patent no . 6818020 , reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five . we continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the remaining claims are valid and meritorious , and we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously . in addition to certain claims related to the durom cup discussed above , we are also subject to product liability and other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business , for which we maintain insurance , subject to self- insured retention limits . we establish accruals for product liability and other claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims , related fees and claims incurred but not reported . while it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these cases , it is the opinion of management that , upon ultimate resolution , liabilities from these cases in excess of those recorded , if any , will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . government investigations in march 2005 , the u.s . department of justice through the u.s . attorney 2019s office in newark , new jersey commenced an investigation of us and four other orthopaedic companies pertaining to consulting contracts , professional service agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons . on september 27 , 2007 , we reached a settlement with the government to resolve all claims related to this investigation . as part of the settlement , we entered into a settlement agreement with the u.s . through the u.s . department of justice and the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services ( the 201coig-hhs 201d ) . in addition , we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ( the 201cdpa 201d ) with the u.s . attorney 2019s office for the district of new jersey ( the 201cu.s . attorney 201d ) and a corporate integrity agreement ( the 201ccia 201d ) with the oig- hhs . we did not admit any wrongdoing , plead guilty to any criminal charges or pay any criminal fines as part of the settlement . we settled all civil and administrative claims related to the federal investigation by making a settlement payment to the u.s . government of $ 169.5 million . under the terms of the dpa , the u.s . attorney filed a criminal complaint in the u.s . district court for the district of new jersey charging us with conspiracy to commit violations of the anti-kickback statute ( 42 u.s.c . a7 1320a-7b ) during the years 2002 through 2006 . the court deferred prosecution of the criminal complaint during the 18-month term of the dpa . the u.s . attorney will seek dismissal of the criminal complaint after the 18-month period if we comply with the provisions of the dpa . the dpa provides for oversight by a federally-appointed monitor . under the cia , which has a term of five years , we agreed , among other provisions , to continue the operation of our enhanced corporate compliance program , designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 060000000 ***%%pcmsg|60 |00012|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2007?
| 37.1 |
CONVFINQA7779 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>americas</td><td>$ 78.5</td><td>$ 66.9</td><td>$ 56.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe</td><td>57.0</td><td>60.7</td><td>46.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>25.6</td><td>22.7</td><td>18.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>global operations and corporate functions</td><td>114.0</td><td>79.7</td><td>75.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 275.1</td><td>$ 230.0</td><td>$ 197.4</td></tr></table> 15 . leases future minimum rental commitments under non- cancelable operating leases in effect as of december 31 , 2008 were $ 38.2 million for 2009 , $ 30.1 million for 2010 , $ 20.9 million for 2011 , $ 15.9 million for 2012 , $ 14.3 million for 2013 and $ 29.9 million thereafter . total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively . 16 . commitments and contingencies intellectual property and product liability-related litigation in july 2008 , we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the durom bb acetabular component ( durom cup ) in the u.s . to allow us to update product labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to surgeons and implement a surgical training program in the u.s . following our announcement , product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us , some of which we have settled . there are a number of claims still pending and we expect additional claims will be submitted . we recorded a provision of $ 47.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 , representing management 2019s estimate of these durom cup-related claims . we increased that provision by $ 21.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 . the provision is limited to revisions within two years of an original surgery that occurred prior to july 2008 . these parameters are consistent with our data which indicates that cup loosenings associated with surgical technique are most likely to occur within that time period . any claims received outside of these defined parameters will be managed in the normal course and reflected in our standard product liability accruals . on february 15 , 2005 , howmedica osteonics corp . filed an action against us and an unrelated party in the united states district court for the district of new jersey alleging infringement of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; 6664308 ; and 6818020 . on june 13 , 2007 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; and 6664308 by ruling that all of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness . on august 19 , 2008 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment of non- infringement of certain claims of u.s . patent no . 6818020 , reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five . we continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the remaining claims are valid and meritorious , and we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously . in addition to certain claims related to the durom cup discussed above , we are also subject to product liability and other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business , for which we maintain insurance , subject to self- insured retention limits . we establish accruals for product liability and other claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims , related fees and claims incurred but not reported . while it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these cases , it is the opinion of management that , upon ultimate resolution , liabilities from these cases in excess of those recorded , if any , will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . government investigations in march 2005 , the u.s . department of justice through the u.s . attorney 2019s office in newark , new jersey commenced an investigation of us and four other orthopaedic companies pertaining to consulting contracts , professional service agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons . on september 27 , 2007 , we reached a settlement with the government to resolve all claims related to this investigation . as part of the settlement , we entered into a settlement agreement with the u.s . through the u.s . department of justice and the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services ( the 201coig-hhs 201d ) . in addition , we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ( the 201cdpa 201d ) with the u.s . attorney 2019s office for the district of new jersey ( the 201cu.s . attorney 201d ) and a corporate integrity agreement ( the 201ccia 201d ) with the oig- hhs . we did not admit any wrongdoing , plead guilty to any criminal charges or pay any criminal fines as part of the settlement . we settled all civil and administrative claims related to the federal investigation by making a settlement payment to the u.s . government of $ 169.5 million . under the terms of the dpa , the u.s . attorney filed a criminal complaint in the u.s . district court for the district of new jersey charging us with conspiracy to commit violations of the anti-kickback statute ( 42 u.s.c . a7 1320a-7b ) during the years 2002 through 2006 . the court deferred prosecution of the criminal complaint during the 18-month term of the dpa . the u.s . attorney will seek dismissal of the criminal complaint after the 18-month period if we comply with the provisions of the dpa . the dpa provides for oversight by a federally-appointed monitor . under the cia , which has a term of five years , we agreed , among other provisions , to continue the operation of our enhanced corporate compliance program , designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 060000000 ***%%pcmsg|60 |00012|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2007?
Answer: 37.1
Question: what was the expense in 2006?
| 31.1 |
CONVFINQA7780 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>americas</td><td>$ 78.5</td><td>$ 66.9</td><td>$ 56.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe</td><td>57.0</td><td>60.7</td><td>46.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>25.6</td><td>22.7</td><td>18.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>global operations and corporate functions</td><td>114.0</td><td>79.7</td><td>75.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 275.1</td><td>$ 230.0</td><td>$ 197.4</td></tr></table> 15 . leases future minimum rental commitments under non- cancelable operating leases in effect as of december 31 , 2008 were $ 38.2 million for 2009 , $ 30.1 million for 2010 , $ 20.9 million for 2011 , $ 15.9 million for 2012 , $ 14.3 million for 2013 and $ 29.9 million thereafter . total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively . 16 . commitments and contingencies intellectual property and product liability-related litigation in july 2008 , we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the durom bb acetabular component ( durom cup ) in the u.s . to allow us to update product labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to surgeons and implement a surgical training program in the u.s . following our announcement , product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us , some of which we have settled . there are a number of claims still pending and we expect additional claims will be submitted . we recorded a provision of $ 47.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 , representing management 2019s estimate of these durom cup-related claims . we increased that provision by $ 21.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 . the provision is limited to revisions within two years of an original surgery that occurred prior to july 2008 . these parameters are consistent with our data which indicates that cup loosenings associated with surgical technique are most likely to occur within that time period . any claims received outside of these defined parameters will be managed in the normal course and reflected in our standard product liability accruals . on february 15 , 2005 , howmedica osteonics corp . filed an action against us and an unrelated party in the united states district court for the district of new jersey alleging infringement of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; 6664308 ; and 6818020 . on june 13 , 2007 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; and 6664308 by ruling that all of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness . on august 19 , 2008 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment of non- infringement of certain claims of u.s . patent no . 6818020 , reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five . we continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the remaining claims are valid and meritorious , and we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously . in addition to certain claims related to the durom cup discussed above , we are also subject to product liability and other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business , for which we maintain insurance , subject to self- insured retention limits . we establish accruals for product liability and other claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims , related fees and claims incurred but not reported . while it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these cases , it is the opinion of management that , upon ultimate resolution , liabilities from these cases in excess of those recorded , if any , will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . government investigations in march 2005 , the u.s . department of justice through the u.s . attorney 2019s office in newark , new jersey commenced an investigation of us and four other orthopaedic companies pertaining to consulting contracts , professional service agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons . on september 27 , 2007 , we reached a settlement with the government to resolve all claims related to this investigation . as part of the settlement , we entered into a settlement agreement with the u.s . through the u.s . department of justice and the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services ( the 201coig-hhs 201d ) . in addition , we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ( the 201cdpa 201d ) with the u.s . attorney 2019s office for the district of new jersey ( the 201cu.s . attorney 201d ) and a corporate integrity agreement ( the 201ccia 201d ) with the oig- hhs . we did not admit any wrongdoing , plead guilty to any criminal charges or pay any criminal fines as part of the settlement . we settled all civil and administrative claims related to the federal investigation by making a settlement payment to the u.s . government of $ 169.5 million . under the terms of the dpa , the u.s . attorney filed a criminal complaint in the u.s . district court for the district of new jersey charging us with conspiracy to commit violations of the anti-kickback statute ( 42 u.s.c . a7 1320a-7b ) during the years 2002 through 2006 . the court deferred prosecution of the criminal complaint during the 18-month term of the dpa . the u.s . attorney will seek dismissal of the criminal complaint after the 18-month period if we comply with the provisions of the dpa . the dpa provides for oversight by a federally-appointed monitor . under the cia , which has a term of five years , we agreed , among other provisions , to continue the operation of our enhanced corporate compliance program , designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 060000000 ***%%pcmsg|60 |00012|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2007?
Answer: 37.1
Question: what was the expense in 2006?
Answer: 31.1
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA7781 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>americas</td><td>$ 78.5</td><td>$ 66.9</td><td>$ 56.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>europe</td><td>57.0</td><td>60.7</td><td>46.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia pacific</td><td>25.6</td><td>22.7</td><td>18.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>global operations and corporate functions</td><td>114.0</td><td>79.7</td><td>75.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 275.1</td><td>$ 230.0</td><td>$ 197.4</td></tr></table> 15 . leases future minimum rental commitments under non- cancelable operating leases in effect as of december 31 , 2008 were $ 38.2 million for 2009 , $ 30.1 million for 2010 , $ 20.9 million for 2011 , $ 15.9 million for 2012 , $ 14.3 million for 2013 and $ 29.9 million thereafter . total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively . 16 . commitments and contingencies intellectual property and product liability-related litigation in july 2008 , we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the durom bb acetabular component ( durom cup ) in the u.s . to allow us to update product labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to surgeons and implement a surgical training program in the u.s . following our announcement , product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us , some of which we have settled . there are a number of claims still pending and we expect additional claims will be submitted . we recorded a provision of $ 47.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 , representing management 2019s estimate of these durom cup-related claims . we increased that provision by $ 21.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 . the provision is limited to revisions within two years of an original surgery that occurred prior to july 2008 . these parameters are consistent with our data which indicates that cup loosenings associated with surgical technique are most likely to occur within that time period . any claims received outside of these defined parameters will be managed in the normal course and reflected in our standard product liability accruals . on february 15 , 2005 , howmedica osteonics corp . filed an action against us and an unrelated party in the united states district court for the district of new jersey alleging infringement of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; 6664308 ; and 6818020 . on june 13 , 2007 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; and 6664308 by ruling that all of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness . on august 19 , 2008 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment of non- infringement of certain claims of u.s . patent no . 6818020 , reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five . we continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the remaining claims are valid and meritorious , and we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously . in addition to certain claims related to the durom cup discussed above , we are also subject to product liability and other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business , for which we maintain insurance , subject to self- insured retention limits . we establish accruals for product liability and other claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims , related fees and claims incurred but not reported . while it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these cases , it is the opinion of management that , upon ultimate resolution , liabilities from these cases in excess of those recorded , if any , will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . government investigations in march 2005 , the u.s . department of justice through the u.s . attorney 2019s office in newark , new jersey commenced an investigation of us and four other orthopaedic companies pertaining to consulting contracts , professional service agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons . on september 27 , 2007 , we reached a settlement with the government to resolve all claims related to this investigation . as part of the settlement , we entered into a settlement agreement with the u.s . through the u.s . department of justice and the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services ( the 201coig-hhs 201d ) . in addition , we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ( the 201cdpa 201d ) with the u.s . attorney 2019s office for the district of new jersey ( the 201cu.s . attorney 201d ) and a corporate integrity agreement ( the 201ccia 201d ) with the oig- hhs . we did not admit any wrongdoing , plead guilty to any criminal charges or pay any criminal fines as part of the settlement . we settled all civil and administrative claims related to the federal investigation by making a settlement payment to the u.s . government of $ 169.5 million . under the terms of the dpa , the u.s . attorney filed a criminal complaint in the u.s . district court for the district of new jersey charging us with conspiracy to commit violations of the anti-kickback statute ( 42 u.s.c . a7 1320a-7b ) during the years 2002 through 2006 . the court deferred prosecution of the criminal complaint during the 18-month term of the dpa . the u.s . attorney will seek dismissal of the criminal complaint after the 18-month period if we comply with the provisions of the dpa . the dpa provides for oversight by a federally-appointed monitor . under the cia , which has a term of five years , we agreed , among other provisions , to continue the operation of our enhanced corporate compliance program , designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 060000000 ***%%pcmsg|60 |00012|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2007?
Answer: 37.1
Question: what was the expense in 2006?
Answer: 31.1
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2006 value?
| 0.19293 |
CONVFINQA7782 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co . 162 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report note 25 2013 accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) includes the after-tax change in sfas 115 unrealized gains and losses on afs securities , sfas 52 foreign currency translation adjustments ( including the impact of related derivatives ) , sfas 133 cash flow hedging activities and sfas 158 net loss and prior service cost ( credit ) related to the firm 2019s defined benefit pension and opeb plans . net loss and accumulated translation prior service ( credit ) of other unrealized gains ( losses ) adjustments , cash defined benefit pension comprehensive ( in millions ) on afs securities ( a ) net of hedges flow hedges and opeb plans ( e ) income ( loss ) balance at december 31 , 2004 $ ( 61 ) $ ( 8 ) $ ( 139 ) $ 2014 $ ( 208 ) net change ( 163 ) ( b ) 2014 ( 255 ) 2014 ( 418 ) balance at december 31 , 2005 ( 224 ) ( 8 ) ( 394 ) 2014 ( 626 ) net change 253 ( c ) 13 ( 95 ) 2014 171 adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 ( 1102 ) ( 1102 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>unrealized gains ( losses ) on afs securities ( a )</td><td>translation adjustments net of hedges</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>net loss andprior service ( credit ) of defined benefit pension and opeb plans ( e )</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2004</td><td>$ -61 ( 61 )</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ -139 ( 139 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -208 ( 208 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net change</td><td>( 163 ) ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>-255 ( 255 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-418 ( 418 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2005</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-394 ( 394 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-626 ( 626 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change</td><td>253 ( c )</td><td>13</td><td>-95 ( 95 )</td><td>2014</td><td>171</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 net of taxes</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>29</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1557 ( 1557 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles ( sfas 159 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at january 1 2007 adjusted</td><td>28</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1558 ( 1558 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net change</td><td>352 ( d )</td><td>3</td><td>-313 ( 313 )</td><td>599</td><td>641</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 380</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ -802 ( 802 )</td><td>$ -503 ( 503 )</td><td>$ -917 ( 917 )</td></tr></table> net change 352 ( d ) 3 ( 313 ) 599 641 balance at december 31 , 2007 $ 380 $ 8 $ ( 802 ) $ ( 503 ) $ ( 917 ) ( a ) represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of the afs securities portfolio and retained interests in securitizations recorded in other assets . ( b ) the net change during 2005 was due primarily to higher interest rates , partially offset by the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( c ) the net change during 2006 was due primarily to the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( d ) the net change during 2007 was due primarily to a decline in interest rates . ( e ) for further discussion of sfas 158 , see note 9 on pages 124 2013130 of this annual report. .
Question: what was the difference in unrealized gains on afs securities between 12/31/06 and 12/31/07?
| 351.0 |
CONVFINQA7783 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co . 162 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report note 25 2013 accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) includes the after-tax change in sfas 115 unrealized gains and losses on afs securities , sfas 52 foreign currency translation adjustments ( including the impact of related derivatives ) , sfas 133 cash flow hedging activities and sfas 158 net loss and prior service cost ( credit ) related to the firm 2019s defined benefit pension and opeb plans . net loss and accumulated translation prior service ( credit ) of other unrealized gains ( losses ) adjustments , cash defined benefit pension comprehensive ( in millions ) on afs securities ( a ) net of hedges flow hedges and opeb plans ( e ) income ( loss ) balance at december 31 , 2004 $ ( 61 ) $ ( 8 ) $ ( 139 ) $ 2014 $ ( 208 ) net change ( 163 ) ( b ) 2014 ( 255 ) 2014 ( 418 ) balance at december 31 , 2005 ( 224 ) ( 8 ) ( 394 ) 2014 ( 626 ) net change 253 ( c ) 13 ( 95 ) 2014 171 adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 ( 1102 ) ( 1102 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>unrealized gains ( losses ) on afs securities ( a )</td><td>translation adjustments net of hedges</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>net loss andprior service ( credit ) of defined benefit pension and opeb plans ( e )</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2004</td><td>$ -61 ( 61 )</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ -139 ( 139 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -208 ( 208 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net change</td><td>( 163 ) ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>-255 ( 255 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-418 ( 418 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2005</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-394 ( 394 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-626 ( 626 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change</td><td>253 ( c )</td><td>13</td><td>-95 ( 95 )</td><td>2014</td><td>171</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 net of taxes</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>29</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1557 ( 1557 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles ( sfas 159 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at january 1 2007 adjusted</td><td>28</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1558 ( 1558 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net change</td><td>352 ( d )</td><td>3</td><td>-313 ( 313 )</td><td>599</td><td>641</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 380</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ -802 ( 802 )</td><td>$ -503 ( 503 )</td><td>$ -917 ( 917 )</td></tr></table> net change 352 ( d ) 3 ( 313 ) 599 641 balance at december 31 , 2007 $ 380 $ 8 $ ( 802 ) $ ( 503 ) $ ( 917 ) ( a ) represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of the afs securities portfolio and retained interests in securitizations recorded in other assets . ( b ) the net change during 2005 was due primarily to higher interest rates , partially offset by the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( c ) the net change during 2006 was due primarily to the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( d ) the net change during 2007 was due primarily to a decline in interest rates . ( e ) for further discussion of sfas 158 , see note 9 on pages 124 2013130 of this annual report. .
Question: what was the difference in unrealized gains on afs securities between 12/31/06 and 12/31/07?
Answer: 351.0
Question: and the specific balance as of 12/31/06?
| 29.0 |
CONVFINQA7784 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co . 162 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report note 25 2013 accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) includes the after-tax change in sfas 115 unrealized gains and losses on afs securities , sfas 52 foreign currency translation adjustments ( including the impact of related derivatives ) , sfas 133 cash flow hedging activities and sfas 158 net loss and prior service cost ( credit ) related to the firm 2019s defined benefit pension and opeb plans . net loss and accumulated translation prior service ( credit ) of other unrealized gains ( losses ) adjustments , cash defined benefit pension comprehensive ( in millions ) on afs securities ( a ) net of hedges flow hedges and opeb plans ( e ) income ( loss ) balance at december 31 , 2004 $ ( 61 ) $ ( 8 ) $ ( 139 ) $ 2014 $ ( 208 ) net change ( 163 ) ( b ) 2014 ( 255 ) 2014 ( 418 ) balance at december 31 , 2005 ( 224 ) ( 8 ) ( 394 ) 2014 ( 626 ) net change 253 ( c ) 13 ( 95 ) 2014 171 adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 ( 1102 ) ( 1102 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>unrealized gains ( losses ) on afs securities ( a )</td><td>translation adjustments net of hedges</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>net loss andprior service ( credit ) of defined benefit pension and opeb plans ( e )</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2004</td><td>$ -61 ( 61 )</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ -139 ( 139 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -208 ( 208 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net change</td><td>( 163 ) ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>-255 ( 255 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-418 ( 418 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2005</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-394 ( 394 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-626 ( 626 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change</td><td>253 ( c )</td><td>13</td><td>-95 ( 95 )</td><td>2014</td><td>171</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 net of taxes</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>29</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1557 ( 1557 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles ( sfas 159 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at january 1 2007 adjusted</td><td>28</td><td>5</td><td>-489 ( 489 )</td><td>-1102 ( 1102 )</td><td>-1558 ( 1558 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net change</td><td>352 ( d )</td><td>3</td><td>-313 ( 313 )</td><td>599</td><td>641</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 380</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ -802 ( 802 )</td><td>$ -503 ( 503 )</td><td>$ -917 ( 917 )</td></tr></table> net change 352 ( d ) 3 ( 313 ) 599 641 balance at december 31 , 2007 $ 380 $ 8 $ ( 802 ) $ ( 503 ) $ ( 917 ) ( a ) represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of the afs securities portfolio and retained interests in securitizations recorded in other assets . ( b ) the net change during 2005 was due primarily to higher interest rates , partially offset by the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( c ) the net change during 2006 was due primarily to the reversal of unrealized losses from securities sales . ( d ) the net change during 2007 was due primarily to a decline in interest rates . ( e ) for further discussion of sfas 158 , see note 9 on pages 124 2013130 of this annual report. .
Question: what was the difference in unrealized gains on afs securities between 12/31/06 and 12/31/07?
Answer: 351.0
Question: and the specific balance as of 12/31/06?
Answer: 29.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 12.10345 |
CONVFINQA7785 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in particular , we have received commitments for $ 30.0 billion in debt financing to fund the transactions which is comprised of ( i ) a $ 4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility , ( ii ) a $ 7.0 billion term loan credit facility and ( iii ) a $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility . our reliance on the financing from the $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility commitment is intended to be reduced through one or more secured note offerings or other long-term financings prior to the merger closing . however , there can be no assurance that we will be able to issue any such secured notes or other long-term financings on terms we find acceptable or at all , especially in light of the recent debt market volatility , in which case we may have to exercise some or all of the commitments under the secured bridge facility to fund the transactions . accordingly , the costs of financing for the transactions may be higher than expected . credit rating downgrades could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t-mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings , and , as a result , cost of capital . our current ratings reflect each rating agency 2019s opinion of our financial strength , operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligations or , following the completion of the transactions , obligations to the combined company 2019s obligors . each rating agency reviews these ratings periodically and there can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future . a downgrade in the rating of us and/or sprint could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t- mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . we have incurred , and will incur , direct and indirect costs as a result of the transactions . we have incurred , and will incur , substantial expenses in connection with and as a result of completing the transactions , and over a period of time following the completion of the transactions , the combined company also expects to incur substantial expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating our and sprint 2019s businesses , operations , policies and procedures . a portion of the transaction costs related to the transactions will be incurred regardless of whether the transactions are completed . while we have assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses will be incurred , factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses . many of the expenses that will be incurred , by their nature , are difficult to estimate accurately . these expenses will exceed the costs historically borne by us . these costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations prior to the transactions and the financial condition and results of operations of the combined company following the transactions . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2018 , our significant properties that we primarily lease and use in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>approximate number</td><td>approximate size in square feet</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>switching centers</td><td>61</td><td>1300000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>data centers</td><td>6</td><td>500000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call center</td><td>17</td><td>1300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warehouses</td><td>21</td><td>500000</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , we primarily leased : 2022 approximately 64000 macro towers and 21000 distributed antenna system and small cell sites . 2022 approximately 2200 t-mobile and metro by t-mobile retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet . 2022 office space totaling approximately 1000000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington . in january 2019 , we executed leases totaling approximately 170000 additional square feet for our corporate headquarters . we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes . 2022 office space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1700000 square feet , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes. .
Question: as of december 31, 2018, how much did the warehouse space represent in relation to the switching centers one, measured in square feet?
| 2.6 |
CONVFINQA7786 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in particular , we have received commitments for $ 30.0 billion in debt financing to fund the transactions which is comprised of ( i ) a $ 4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility , ( ii ) a $ 7.0 billion term loan credit facility and ( iii ) a $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility . our reliance on the financing from the $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility commitment is intended to be reduced through one or more secured note offerings or other long-term financings prior to the merger closing . however , there can be no assurance that we will be able to issue any such secured notes or other long-term financings on terms we find acceptable or at all , especially in light of the recent debt market volatility , in which case we may have to exercise some or all of the commitments under the secured bridge facility to fund the transactions . accordingly , the costs of financing for the transactions may be higher than expected . credit rating downgrades could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t-mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings , and , as a result , cost of capital . our current ratings reflect each rating agency 2019s opinion of our financial strength , operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligations or , following the completion of the transactions , obligations to the combined company 2019s obligors . each rating agency reviews these ratings periodically and there can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future . a downgrade in the rating of us and/or sprint could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t- mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . we have incurred , and will incur , direct and indirect costs as a result of the transactions . we have incurred , and will incur , substantial expenses in connection with and as a result of completing the transactions , and over a period of time following the completion of the transactions , the combined company also expects to incur substantial expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating our and sprint 2019s businesses , operations , policies and procedures . a portion of the transaction costs related to the transactions will be incurred regardless of whether the transactions are completed . while we have assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses will be incurred , factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses . many of the expenses that will be incurred , by their nature , are difficult to estimate accurately . these expenses will exceed the costs historically borne by us . these costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations prior to the transactions and the financial condition and results of operations of the combined company following the transactions . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2018 , our significant properties that we primarily lease and use in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>approximate number</td><td>approximate size in square feet</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>switching centers</td><td>61</td><td>1300000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>data centers</td><td>6</td><td>500000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call center</td><td>17</td><td>1300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warehouses</td><td>21</td><td>500000</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , we primarily leased : 2022 approximately 64000 macro towers and 21000 distributed antenna system and small cell sites . 2022 approximately 2200 t-mobile and metro by t-mobile retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet . 2022 office space totaling approximately 1000000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington . in january 2019 , we executed leases totaling approximately 170000 additional square feet for our corporate headquarters . we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes . 2022 office space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1700000 square feet , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes. .
Question: as of december 31, 2018, how much did the warehouse space represent in relation to the switching centers one, measured in square feet?
Answer: 2.6
Question: and what was the average square feet for each of those 61 switching centers?
| 21311.47541 |
CONVFINQA7787 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: what was the 2015 net revenue?
| 1666.0 |
CONVFINQA7788 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: what was the 2015 net revenue?
Answer: 1666.0
Question: and in 2014?
| 2224.0 |
CONVFINQA7789 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: what was the 2015 net revenue?
Answer: 1666.0
Question: and in 2014?
Answer: 2224.0
Question: so what was the change in this value between the two years?
| -558.0 |
CONVFINQA7790 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: what was the 2015 net revenue?
Answer: 1666.0
Question: and in 2014?
Answer: 2224.0
Question: so what was the change in this value between the two years?
Answer: -558.0
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
| -0.2509 |
CONVFINQA7791 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was net tax expense related to the change in the pension and other postretirement items in 2007?
| 31.3 |
CONVFINQA7792 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was net tax expense related to the change in the pension and other postretirement items in 2007?
Answer: 31.3
Question: and in 2006?
| 2.9 |
CONVFINQA7793 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was net tax expense related to the change in the pension and other postretirement items in 2007?
Answer: 31.3
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 2.9
Question: what was the total value for these two years combined?
| 34.2 |
CONVFINQA7794 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was net tax expense related to the change in the pension and other postretirement items in 2007?
Answer: 31.3
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 2.9
Question: what was the total value for these two years combined?
Answer: 34.2
Question: and in 2005?
| 27.3 |
CONVFINQA7795 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was net tax expense related to the change in the pension and other postretirement items in 2007?
Answer: 31.3
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 2.9
Question: what was the total value for these two years combined?
Answer: 34.2
Question: and in 2005?
Answer: 27.3
Question: combining all three years, what was the total value?
| 6.9 |
CONVFINQA7796 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2010?
| 2.36 |
CONVFINQA7797 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2010?
Answer: 2.36
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2009?
| 1.96 |
CONVFINQA7798 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2010?
Answer: 2.36
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2009?
Answer: 1.96
Question: what is the net difference?
| 0.4 |
CONVFINQA7799 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2010?
Answer: 2.36
Question: what was net earnings per diluted share in 2009?
Answer: 1.96
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 0.4
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.20408 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.