text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
eigenvalues = 1 and the rest all = 0. So Pis a rank-dprojector.
|
It remains to show that the POVM corresponding to a given rank- dprojector
|
is unique up to unitary equivalence. To prove this let Pbe a rank-dprojector, let
|
|ξr/an}bracketri}htbe the vectors defined by Eq. ( 40), and let |η1/an}bracketri}ht,...,|ηd2/an}bracketri}htbe any other set of
|
vectors such that
|
/an}bracketle{tηr|ηs/an}bracketri}ht=Prs (53)
|
for allr,s. Define
|
ηar=/an}bracketle{tηr|a/an}bracketri}ht (54)
|
Then
|
d2/summationdisplay
|
r=1η∗
|
arηbr=/an}bracketle{ta|
|
d2/summationdisplay
|
r=1|ηr/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{tηr|
|
|b/an}bracketri}ht=δab (55)
|
(because |ηr/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{tηr|is a POVM) and
|
d/summationdisplay
|
a=1ηarη∗
|
as=Prs (56)
|
(because the |ηr/an}bracketri}hthave Gram matrix P). So thedcolumn vectors
|
|
η11
|
η12
|
...
|
η1d2
|
,
|
η21
|
η22
|
...
|
η2d2
|
,...,
|
ηd1
|
ηd2
|
...
|
ηdd2
|
(57)10
|
are an orthonormal basis for the subspace onto which Pprojects. But the column
|
vectors
|
ξ11
|
ξ12
|
...
|
ξ1d2
|
,
|
ξ21
|
ξ22
|
...
|
ξ2d2
|
,...,
|
ξd1
|
ξd2
|
...
|
ξdd2
|
(58)
|
are also an orthonormal basis for this subspace. So there must ex ist ad×dunitary
|
matrixUabsuch that
|
ηar=d/summationdisplay
|
b=1Uabξbr (59)
|
for alla,r. Define
|
U=d/summationdisplay
|
a,b=1U∗
|
ab|a/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{tb| (60)
|
Then
|
|ηr/an}bracketri}ht=U|ξr/an}bracketri}ht (61)
|
for allr. /square
|
In the case of a SIC-POVM we have
|
|ξr/an}bracketri}ht=1√
|
d|ψr/an}bracketri}ht (62)
|
where the vectors |ψr/an}bracketri}htare normalized, and
|
Prs=1
|
dGrs=1
|
dKrseiθrs(63)
|
whereGis the Gram matrix of the vectors |ψr/an}bracketri}htandθrsis the order-2 angle tensor.
|
In the sequel we will distinguish these matrices by referring to Gas the Gram
|
matrix and Pas the Gram projector.
|
We have
|
Corollary 2. Letθrsbe a real anti-symmetric tensor. Then the following state-
|
ments are equivalent:
|
(1)θrsis an order- 2angle tensor corresponding to a SIC-family.
|
(2)θrssatisfies
|
d2/summationdisplay
|
t=1KrtKtsei(θrt+θts)=dKrseiθrs(64)
|
for allr,s.
|
(3)θrssatisfies
|
d2/summationdisplay
|
r,s,t=1KrsKstKtrei(θrs+θst+θtr)=d4(65)
|
and
|
d2/summationdisplay
|
r,s,t,u=1KrsKstKtuKurei(θrs+θst+θtu+θur)=d5(66)11
|
LetΠr,Π′
|
rbe two different SIC-sets, and let θrs,θ′
|
rsbe corresponding order- 2
|
angle tensors. Then there exists a unitary Usuch that
|
Π′
|
r=UΠrU†(67)
|
for allrif and only if
|
θ′
|
rs=θrs−φr+φs (68)
|
for some arbitrary set of phase angles φr(in other words two SIC-sets are unitarily
|
equivalent if and only if their order- 2angle tensors are gauge equivalent).
|
A SIC-family can be reconstructed from its order- 2angle tensor θrsby calculating
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.