text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
eigenvalues = 1 and the rest all = 0. So Pis a rank-dprojector. |
It remains to show that the POVM corresponding to a given rank- dprojector |
is unique up to unitary equivalence. To prove this let Pbe a rank-dprojector, let |
|ξr/an}bracketri}htbe the vectors defined by Eq. ( 40), and let |η1/an}bracketri}ht,...,|ηd2/an}bracketri}htbe any other set of |
vectors such that |
/an}bracketle{tηr|ηs/an}bracketri}ht=Prs (53) |
for allr,s. Define |
ηar=/an}bracketle{tηr|a/an}bracketri}ht (54) |
Then |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1η∗ |
arηbr=/an}bracketle{ta| |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1|ηr/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{tηr| |
|b/an}bracketri}ht=δab (55) |
(because |ηr/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{tηr|is a POVM) and |
d/summationdisplay |
a=1ηarη∗ |
as=Prs (56) |
(because the |ηr/an}bracketri}hthave Gram matrix P). So thedcolumn vectors |
|
η11 |
η12 |
... |
η1d2 |
, |
η21 |
η22 |
... |
η2d2 |
,..., |
ηd1 |
ηd2 |
... |
ηdd2 |
(57)10 |
are an orthonormal basis for the subspace onto which Pprojects. But the column |
vectors |
ξ11 |
ξ12 |
... |
ξ1d2 |
, |
ξ21 |
ξ22 |
... |
ξ2d2 |
,..., |
ξd1 |
ξd2 |
... |
ξdd2 |
(58) |
are also an orthonormal basis for this subspace. So there must ex ist ad×dunitary |
matrixUabsuch that |
ηar=d/summationdisplay |
b=1Uabξbr (59) |
for alla,r. Define |
U=d/summationdisplay |
a,b=1U∗ |
ab|a/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{tb| (60) |
Then |
|ηr/an}bracketri}ht=U|ξr/an}bracketri}ht (61) |
for allr. /square |
In the case of a SIC-POVM we have |
|ξr/an}bracketri}ht=1√ |
d|ψr/an}bracketri}ht (62) |
where the vectors |ψr/an}bracketri}htare normalized, and |
Prs=1 |
dGrs=1 |
dKrseiθrs(63) |
whereGis the Gram matrix of the vectors |ψr/an}bracketri}htandθrsis the order-2 angle tensor. |
In the sequel we will distinguish these matrices by referring to Gas the Gram |
matrix and Pas the Gram projector. |
We have |
Corollary 2. Letθrsbe a real anti-symmetric tensor. Then the following state- |
ments are equivalent: |
(1)θrsis an order- 2angle tensor corresponding to a SIC-family. |
(2)θrssatisfies |
d2/summationdisplay |
t=1KrtKtsei(θrt+θts)=dKrseiθrs(64) |
for allr,s. |
(3)θrssatisfies |
d2/summationdisplay |
r,s,t=1KrsKstKtrei(θrs+θst+θtr)=d4(65) |
and |
d2/summationdisplay |
r,s,t,u=1KrsKstKtuKurei(θrs+θst+θtu+θur)=d5(66)11 |
LetΠr,Π′ |
rbe two different SIC-sets, and let θrs,θ′ |
rsbe corresponding order- 2 |
angle tensors. Then there exists a unitary Usuch that |
Π′ |
r=UΠrU†(67) |
for allrif and only if |
θ′ |
rs=θrs−φr+φs (68) |
for some arbitrary set of phase angles φr(in other words two SIC-sets are unitarily |
equivalent if and only if their order- 2angle tensors are gauge equivalent). |
A SIC-family can be reconstructed from its order- 2angle tensor θrsby calculating |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.