text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
that are not too far from the antipode of the center of the visible disk. In
|
order to complete the farside maps, other skip geometries are required (Braun &
|
Lindsey 2001). The 1+3 skip geometry targets active regions closer to the limb.
|
In this geometry, the wave packets only skip once before they reach the target
|
location, and then skip three times before they are observed again. Oslund &
|
Scherrer (2006, unpublished) combined farside maps from the 2+2 and 1+3 skip
|
geometries to make maps of the entire farside of the Sun. These farside maps are
|
produced daily using the MDI/SOHO data and are available online (see Related
|
Resources ).
|
Figure 22bandSupplemental Movies 9 and 10 and shows a sequence
|
of farside maps that show a large active region moving across the farside and
|
front-side of the Sun. This active region, NOAA 9503, was seen to form on
|
the farside of the Sun before appearing on the visible disk about 12 days later.
|
Magnetic maps of the farside provide up to two weeks of advance warning before
|
large active regions rotate onto the visible disk, and thus are expected to play an
|
important role in predicting space weather.
|
In order to interpret the farside maps in terms of physical variables, such as the
|
total unsigned magnetic
|
ux, Gonz alez Hern andez, Hill & Lindsey (2007) have
|
proposed to calibrate the farside images using long lived active regions that are
|
seen before and after they appear on the farside. Future Sun-orbiting spacecraft
|
carrying solar and magnetic imagers (e.g., Solar Orbiter) will provide enhanced
|
opportunities for detailed farside calibration.36 Gizon, Birch & Spruit
|
Figure 6: ( a) Measured cross-covariance function for MDI medium-degree data
|
as a function of separation distance and time-lag (Kosovichev, Duvall & Scherrer
|
2000). Positive values are white, negative values black. The observation duration
|
isT= 144 days starting in May 1996. ( b) Example ray paths for acoustic wave
|
packets. In both panels ( a) and ( b) the blue lines correspond to single skip ray
|
paths, the red lines are for two skip paths, and the green lines are for three-skip
|
paths.Local Helioseismology 37
|
Figure 7: Maps of the travel times using the annulus/quadrant geometry and
|
MDI/SOHO high-resolution data (Duvall et al. 1997). The observation duration
|
isT= 8:5 hr. Each frame is 370 Mm on a side. Each row corresponds to a dier-
|
ent annulus radius from 12 Mm to 27 Mm. The columns show the four types of
|
travel-time measurements. From left to right: (i) travel-time dierence between
|
the outward-going waves and the inward-going waves, (ii) travel-time dierence
|
between the westward- and eastward-going waves, (iii) travel-time dierence be-
|
tween the northward- and southward-going waves, and (iv) mean of the travel
|
times of the inward- and outward going waves. The average magnetogram and
|
the average Dopplergram are shown in the right most column. The travel-time
|
perturbations are mostly due to the supergranular scale horizontal
|
ows.38 Gizon, Birch & Spruit
|
Figure 8: Linear sensitivity of a single-skip mean travel-time shift to local changes
|
in the square of the sound speed. The observation points are located at ( x;y;z ) =
|
(12:5;0; 0:2) Mm. The top panel shows a horizontal slice at a depth of 5 Mm.
|
The bottom panel shows a vertical slice at y= 0. The heavy black line in the
|
lower panel shows the single-skip ray path connecting the observation points. The
|
kernel has been scaled with the background speed to enhance the visibility of the
|
subsurface structure. The ringing away from the ray path is due to the band-
|
limited nature of solar oscillations. The linear sensitivity is almost zero along the
|
ray path, this a generic feature of sound-speed kernels in three dimensions, and
|
is well known in seismology (Dahlen, Hung & Nolet 2000; Marquering, Dahlen &
|
Nolet 1999).Local Helioseismology 39
|
Figure 9: Averaging kernels, K, from 1D RLS inversions for ring-diagram analysis
|
(depth sensitivity to horizontal
|
ows). The numbers (in units of Mm) refer to the
|
average depths of the averaging kernels. Courtesy of Irene Gonz alez-Hern andez.40 Gizon, Birch & Spruit
|
Figure 10: Ray paths in model surface layers with 2 kG uniform magnetic eld
|
inclined at30respectively to the vertical, as shown by the background gray
|
lines. The incoming 5 mHz rays (arrows) have lower turning points at z= 5 Mm
|
and are shown in red. The two frames correspond to two dierent attack angles.
|
The horizontal gray line indicates where the sound speed and the Alfv en speed
|
coincide, which is approximately where mode conversion happens. The fractional
|
energy remaining in each resulting ray is indicated by the color legend. The dots
|
on the ray paths indicate 1 min group travel time intervals. The thin black curve
|
represents the acoustic ray that would be there in the absence of magnetic eld.
|
Note that the fast ray is faster through the surface layers than the non-magnetic
|
ray. Figure and caption from Cally (2007). Figure copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag
|
GmbH & Co. KGaA . Reproduced with permission.Local Helioseismology 41
|
Figure 11: Numerical simulation of the propagation of a p 1plane wave packet
|
through a model sunspot using the MHD code of Cameron, Gizon & Daiallah
|
(2007). The sunspot model is similar to the model of Schl uter & Temesv ary
|
(1958) with a maximum vertical eld Bz= 3 kG at the surface; it is embedded
|
in a Model S background atmosphere, stabilized with respect to convection. The
|
wave packet is initially located 40 Mm to the left of the sunspot and propagates to
|
the right. The x-component of velocity is shown at times t= 0, 80, and 130 min
|
(positive values in red, negative values in yellow). The a=clevel is represented
|
by the blue curve. The computational domain is 40 Mm< x < 105 Mm,
|