id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e2540d0864d42bbf | Considering I spell properly and you're just a racist... go soak your head. OR do some real research rather than being a censor monger. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
4dcedc9ff7bc0b37 | I have also found a page in English of the association that re-enacts the Battle of Tolentino. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3460df885f63f5ee | I will do Whatever i want and it is my right, what is both of yous Problem Asshole. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
43a94a0fb8f0704b | ::: We should use the actual numbers, and clearly state which review those numbers come from. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
314298b744c35668 | of the biggest bitches on the universe | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
3e691139fcd7386d | Content dispute note
George has taken this content dispute to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Sugar-Baby-Love (note to those involved). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a5f1360a8d7b1af8 | oooioioiknkjbjmb nmkb jnvhgbvbn vnmnmvmn vbnvbn b bnmnvnmbvcg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75a28519016f5dbd | I agree. I also think that we shouldn't put states that have been annexed, dismembered, etc at the bottom of the page, which I find annoying. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
bbfdbb0ac895748d | If you decide to go for it I wish you all the luck in the world. Jza84 got through pretty much unscathed, and you very likely would as well I think. All I'd say is that you need to be absolutely certain that on the off-chance it didn't go the right way you'd still be here doing what you're doing now. Unless you've been through the RfA mincer it's difficult to appreciate just how much of an ego bruiser it can be. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e7212ac20feeb532 | Company. Looks like 'problem solved'. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
463f4158bba5f6cc | ==Peer Edits II==
I focused specifically on the Behavior section of this article.
Hyperlinks I added: Shoaling, olfactory, altruistic, alertness, northern pike
From the section “Alarm substance”:
“The production and release of this alarm substance are altruistic because the sender of the signal, who does not directly benefit from the signal released upon its injury has to pay the cost for the production and release of the chemical”
I found this sentence to be extremely confusing so I tried to fix it up. The author should go back and try to further clarify it, though. I also made quite a few wording edits to this section.
I added in spaces between the paragraphs, which were absent before. This should make everything in the article look a little cleaner.
The section on Predator inspection was very good and thorough. I just made some sentence structure and wording changes. The author may want to consider clearing up the second paragraph about the minnows’ interactions with the Northern Pike.
Overall, this was very well written and pretty thorough. I made minor wording changes but did not do anything major. My suggestions for the author are below.
Suggestions for the author:
• In the Shoaling section, clarify what you mean by “increased risk of infection.” Are there specific diseases or parasites that affect this minnow?
• Clarify where you talk about how “naïve common minnows”
• The shoaling section was very broad and could probably be expanded upon to be more specific to minnows. Right now, it seems like it is just talking about fish in general.
• In the section, “Shoaling adjustment in response to predation risk”, talk about why those individuals in the central group are in the best position.
• Expand on the Foraging section, perhaps talk about their diet and how that relates to shoaling behavior being beneficial. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
aea59d4e6865423e | d
hi i am new to wikipedia and im just wondering what was so bad about my edit on red hot chili peppers? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9d63e29d4d54a2b1 | , 13 March 2012 (UTC)
The dancer thing was a bit of a joke but exemplifies POV and lack of definition accuracy communication humours. 99.251.114.120 21:23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9daa484bc22e472f | OK, getting started on this, I think I'll have to tag it with 'npov' myself, got any sources for the RAB's popularity? I'm mainly using the BBC and Human Rights Organisations, which have no such information. Also I can't read the official website, it being in Bengali S. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
d26bd49d05f7d819 | , is wacko in my book | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92d95b74cfd6c8e | :You operate under a very puzzling understanding of what constitutes abuse.
:How does me posting a civil discussion on your Talk page constitute any violation of anything?
:Very strange indeed. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f46e0c8d6d638eaa | "
Retail stores are not a reliable source for video game release dates. The gamestop clerk was guessing as the myriad of game pre-order websites have (almost all showing their own ""release date""). June 2nd is by know means ""confirmed"" because a gamestop clerk said so. We link to the section explaining all the discussion regarding the release date because there has been no official date given. Wikipedia is not for original research, and picking the likely date out of the options is original research. We simply supply all the information, but thanks for your contributions, and I didn't know they were reserving copies yet, I'll be reserving mine soon ). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3d9a3defe58ad18b | Don't give me bs Emeraude, you have been reported for harassment.
My message is what the title said. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
66ad3c03e04e1949 | Support. 'America' usually refers to the United States, and is different from 'the Americas' (which refers to North and South America). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f1921b9cb73f25bc | . the real vandals are mikka and jaysweet, both of them have been using the rules of wikipedia in bad faith to crush viewpoints they do not agree with. you should look into their activities surrounding cannabis culture and how they love to push information they dont agree with into the memory hole. my conduct on his talk page was inappropriate, it was a mistake, but it was made because i am EXTREMELY frustrated at the fact that a person who has openly displayed their bias against a certain subject is trying to use the rules of wikipedia in a way intended to destroy the article on said subject. THIS IS MERELY A MORE SUBTLE FORM OF VANDALISM. one that, in my opinion, is far more damaging than some silly words on a users talk page }} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fbd8edc24a81836b | Thanks, i dont mean to bother you but i would like to use the undercover source over the other one for a few sale amounts, they are
mariah carey -daydream (mariah carey album)-25M instead of 22M
Mariah Carey-Music Box (album)-32M instead of 28M
and those two on the mariah carey discography and also these on the discography
charmbeacelet-4.2M to 5M
butterfly-12 to 15.5M
teom-10 to 10.2 M
thanks,if you approve the changes that will be great, thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
58b2f717de211f90 | "
The situation is not analogous. The definition of ""Palestinian People"" is not a purely a historical question so there is no need to cite only historians on that point, citing experts in diverse academic disciplines is appropriate. Unlike the Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus, which is a historical question on which copious academic experts have been published. Secondly if something is ""prima facie"" RS, it does not mean that it necessarily meets RS requirements when we look closely at the source (for instance if we see that the source is a non-expert in the field citing a known propaganda source). Thirdly Sundquist has only just been added to the article, so the source should stay out until consensus is established. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
85ee238c00c5248a | Wow the internet has made life better, but have you thought about how much easier it is to just have computers. Imagine 200 years ago when it was even difficult to make paper. Now we just have to type things on a wikipedia page to share them with others. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8255bc0ae1463fc9 | Many thanks for the additional Google map sources. I have included them in the article. I do not believe there are any other outstanding issues with the article based on your assessment. Could you please check? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
07bb20810d92fd25 | I have been looking and discussed it with my colleagues but we can't find any reliable source for this statement. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
cfaa06ef68be3171 | "
Copyright problem: Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from Caravaggio by Timothy Wilson-Smith, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio) and send an email with confirmation of permission to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ""under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Penitent Magdalene (Caravaggio) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7cc20060de4c6cb2 | Hi,
I was one of the first editors to point out the problem and try to give you an unofficial headsup of impending issues after you first started editing under that user name. I was saddened when you did not respond to my warnings right away, nor to the editor who tagged your article as he did, and figured you may not have known how to use talk pages then. It appears that you may have gone through the wiki-wringer but I think you will look back on your rather turbulent passage and know it made you a stronger and better editor for having survived it.
Apparently you have not forgotten your real world manners about Please and Thank You. The fact that you took the time to find your helpers under a new user ID and reach out to us speaks well of your character. Stay strong!
Cheers, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
384ef852986dc35f | photo request
Booker T. Washington National Monument near Roanoke could use a photo, if you're in the area. Thanks in advance, regardless of whether you can help. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4928a85f25294883 | "
:The real issue is that your fantasy theory is not validated by any source whatsoever (while the cornerstone of wikipedia is verifiability, not truth, in this case verifiability not ""truth""). Heck, it is not even validated by logic and common sense, and in fact reads like a political agenda doctoring data on what 'Latin Europe' and all related concepts mean, but those are too complex points to make in such a clear-cut case of WP:OR and WP:NPOV as your commentary is. As for what you can't stand, I really don't and shouldn't care, but I'm letting you know again that calls to harassment may result in a block. Continue like this and I'll ask for admin intervention. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9f7c002b1ce1caa8 | "Al Gore is not some sort of political God who can do no wrong. There are several valid arguements backing the controversies that surround him. His blatant overuse of energy in his Tenessee Mansion despite his anti-global warming stance is an undeniable fact that deserves to be mentioned in this article. (Don't try and tell me it's OK because he buys carbon Indulgences; this man should change his lifestyle before he tells everyone else to) The fact that his only scientific traing was an earthscience class he took in college in which he received a ""D"" thus making him unqualified to rant and rave about global warming should also be mentioned. (Why don't scientists tell us about Global Warming?! Why does everyone listen to this Moron?! I'll tell you why. Gore is trying to make himself look good and his opponents look bad. If Global arming is a bipartisan issue, then why does he badmouth republicans in An Inaconvenient Truth?! Huh?! Why?! Answer that, Liberal Elite!)
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c90724fc19a70daa | Don't accuse me of vandalism you psychopath
You are not Lord God of editing wikipedia and your word isn't law. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
d58eb242fd7a0da2 | == Accepted ==
I could cleary hear the wilhelm scream in accepted, and i think it should be mentioned. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
666eb6f2ed4006fa | According to record, Peter was crowned as King of Jerusalem only on 5.4.1360, at St.Nicholas Cathedral, Famagusta. 1360 was after his father's death. This fact supports that Peter did not become k of J due to abdication. (Or, he delayed coronation.) 23:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
caeb39e401aacb30 | "
Move or eliminate Cast section?
The Featured Article Review comments (above) suggest that the Cast section ""can be eliminated without much tweaking of the previous section."" What do people think about integrating this section into List of characters in Kung Fu Hustle?
Steve, if you see this, would that be appropriate? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a23101b4d2e8c964 | "
Scientology
Scientology was designed for you and all that you hold dear. Religion is as old as man. Man has believed far longer that he is a spirit than a piece of mud. In this age of materialism, he is being put into total effect, but in his common-sense book The Way to Happiness L. Ron Hubbard points out that materialism is not necessarily true and that evolution could just be a way that ""other factors"" fill the species of body. Materialistic science has not disproven God or the spirit, they just say there isn't one.
96.48.13.234 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4ef787362ca17946 | " 2013 (UTC)
::Not just difficult: impossible. Some contributions to that discussion hinge on distinguishing a ""language"" from a ""dialect"", a distinction without scientific basis. To quote Dialect#Dialect_or_language [refs & flags deleted, text abridged, bolding added; my comments italicized in square brackets]:
::*There is no universally accepted criterion for distinguishing a language from a dialect. A number of rough measures exist, sometimes leading to contradictory results. Some linguists do not differentiate between languages and dialects, i.e. languages are dialects and vice versa. The distinction is therefore subjective and depends on the user's frame of reference. Note also that the terms are not always treated as mutually exclusive…
::*Language varieties are often called dialects rather than languages … [four causes listed]
::*Anthropological linguists define dialect as the specific form of a language used by a speech community. From this perspective, everyone speaks a dialect. Those who identify a particular dialect as the ""standard"" or ""proper"" version of a language are seeking to make a social distinction. …
::*The status of language is not solely determined by linguistic criteria, but it is also the result of a historical and political development. [Examples]
::See also Dialect continuum.
:: 04:46, 13 July" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
82ed03dde832b430 | ::Before we transfer this discussion to the article's talk page, I want to say that I'm entirely ok about omitting the orgasm part because I don't have sources for that (only the knowledge that the connection with genitals is present in males too, and some anecdotal evidence - that doesn't count here, I know - that it is possible for a male to orgasm through it, and not at all rare to orgasm through strong mixed stimulation of nipples and anus), but I still find the section on their, uh, sexiness, a bit of a double standard. The design of the male chests around the nipple area can be aesthetically pleasing and a fetish too, some males of a mostly queer* audience are interested in heightening these aspects, and not only males appreciate women's breasts. Combined with this and the impression that only nipples were erogenous, the impression that section gave me was that there was an unawareness of the fact that male bodies can be appreciated in an about equal manner and of the existence of homosexuality. If we can get sources for that (and I'm pretty sure it is nowhere near hard, no pun intended), I don't see many reasons to comment over it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
62d557da48efda39 | :I also spotted this, but Brendan Guilfoyle of Treaty City Titans is not the same person as Brendan Guilfoyle of P&A; Partnership, it's a strange rugby league related coincidence though. As an aside, he's not Brendan Guilfoyle of the Department of Computing and Mathematics in the Institute of Technology, Tralee, County Kerry, Ireland either, tee-hee. Best Regards. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ec52867415f6e59 | "
-I was planning to hand these out on the 22nd of Dec. but things got in the way.... Happy holidays! —¡fanSign here? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
571018f376b0d343 | to the admins when he could not provide reference material for his claims. That was his strategy of blocking anyone who disagrees with his views. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6de95afd4003033a | Hi
I'm just curious, why do you keep reverting my edits that are removing spam and advertising from articles? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
050fff5fb8ab0df2 | Talk:Sukhoi_Superjet_100#Vote_on_flag_removal
This (inofficial) voting about flags and country info in orders might concern even this article. It is proposed to remove about 10.000 flags related to aircraft orders and articles including country info. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
033cf25013e93b5c | == wtf ==
whoever removed all the great images on here should be shot dead and have their corpse raped. one of them was so nice i made it my backround | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
20401e1d1a8982e4 | "
Phyllis Schlafly
All that collection of jerks do is threaten me. I tried to come and suggest improvements and I get them calling me names, claiming I misrepresent sources (I DO NOT) and threatening me if I ""misrepresent sources"" again meaning if I speak and I'm not agreeing with them. This whole place is fucking corrupt." | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
9e1db5e70a78b608 | I just don't have such information on Territorial Defence Force. You are free to add any related and verifiable information you wish. Yes, we can dispute hundreds or thousands. I can provide 450 names of Lithuanians killed by AK right now. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a23c6be40b763ecf | Precisely, and he does not appear to be very active on his talk page ;) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
86bf258f55af3431 | "
The hallmark of a fraud rather than an ""alternative practitioner""
Since there is another burst of rehabilitation, and reduction of the usefulness of WP as a reference work, going on at present, let me point this out:- ""Alternative practitioners"" not uncommonly claim that conventional medicine and conventional doctors are all wrong, or know nothing of higher things. What they don't do is claim to be qualified conventional doctors from Heidelberg. That takes him firmly over the boundary from someone who might be thought to be a quackish practitioner with some ""ideas"" that are not accepted conventionally for trivial reasons such as having been demonstrated to be wholly unfounded, wrong and empirically ineffective ... into the territory of the fraudster which he inhabited. Fraud is common, and health fraud is a common variety of it, and WP:IS not a tool to confuse people abut whether demonstrated fraudsters might actually be as careful and sensible as any proper doctor from Heidelberg, whether mit scars or sans Francisco. Got that? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10cfcbff534791d6 | RE: Your comments to 767-249ER
Those messages that you left on their talk page, is considered vandalism. Please refraing from doing that or you will be blocked indefinately, you old mull.
Khukri | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0bf8742c53ca9400 | "
The primary objective of Wikipedia?
From, ""Wikipedia exists for the people who read it, not for the people who edit it. Every edit should either improve the factual accuracy of Wikipedia or make it easier and more useful for the reader. Any edit which does not serve these goals is a waste of time and energy, and quite possibly counterproductive.""
-adapted from Beyond My Ken.
It is not true that wikipedia exists only for the readers, editors have a role to play too. Should Wikipedia become nothing but a bunch
of quotations cut and pasted here and there? Besides, I am unable to think of any encyclopedia that is free from original research.
Furthermore, who made you guys the Wikipedia police? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b2731366d1f5a348 | "
Additions
In characteristics: The tribe never played an important role in Israel among the other tribes. They disappeared early in Hebrew history. {See: ""The founders and rulers of United Israel: from the death of Moses to the division of the Hebrew Kingdom""} (p. 30) They are remembered for being tent dwellers whose most notable construction was a single stone to serve as a landmark for their tribe, while producing no figures of significance in theology, the judiciary, gallantry, royalty, or celebrity. They were said to be news gossipers content with herding and spoiled as descendants of Jacob's first child, while being unstable and weak. {See: ""A dictionary of the Bible: comprising its antiquities, biography, geography, and natural history""} (p. 1033) {See: ""The sons of Jacob and their tribal blessings character studies: A series of Sunday afternoon addresses""} (p. 1-21)
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5b230b2e4967ad82 | * Dennis Kincaid (Dennis Charles Alexander Kincaid ∗1905-10-16 †1937-06-10)
**
**
So that you should not in any way feel underworked, the Bourbons led to this missing subject, too, via his father Charles Augustus Kincaid (whose article is fairly pitiful). I don't think that there's enough source material on the grandfather, William (∗1832 †1910), though, unless has more. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2800fe0c3464d443 | Smalley's postion on these matters is essentially the same in his most recent work - he is still writing on the subject. Moreover, Smalley's perception is also that of many other leading authorities on the Gospels in the early church; such as [[Christopher Rowland (theologian)|Christopher Rowland), who may not (unlike Smalley), be specialists in the Johannine literature. The pespectives reperesented in the article as it is currently, represent (to my reading) one particular strand of the 'redaction critical' approach. Broadly, this approach shares with Smalley/Rowland, a decreased tendency to regard the Synoptic Gospels as transmitting a 'historical' source. But the corollary is to treat both the gospel genre; and much of the charactersistic gospel content; as a theological construct - specifically due to the author of Mark. But if Mark 'invented' the feeding in the wilderness as a theological construct, then the presence of the same story in John shows dependence. But this view of Mark is not by any means a consensus; many scholars (like Smalley and Rowland) would maintain that there were indeed independent 'historical' accounts of Jesus's ministry and gospel message that preceded both the Synpoptics and John, and provided the basis for their common narrative material. This is not reflected in the article at present | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3862fa533f5373c2 | == Confirmed ==
Two things to say:
#In response to your message at my talk page I have given your account confirmed status, so that you can edit this talk page. Sorry for the inconvenience.
#Unfortunately the whole situation regarding your account, your unban request, etc, is a mess. I was convinced that the trolling (via IPs and at least one new account) was from you, but now I am not so sure. If it was you then I think your ban should stay, but if it wasn't then I would be prepared to go back to my support for unbanning. I have the following to suggest. Keep off Wikipedia for a few months. During that time don't use any other accounts, nor editing anonymously. Then come back and contact an administrator who has a reasonable chance of being willing to support a new request for unblock. Basically, follow the standard offer. That offer suggests six months. Personally I might be willing to consider it after three months, but the chances of getting a consensus in favour of unbanning would probably be much better after six, so if you can bear to wait that long it would be much better. Jayron32 has invited you above to take up the standard offer, and DMacks and Dweller have both indicated a willingness to consider it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, so presumably any of those would be sympathetic, and naturally I would. I will keep this page on my watchlist, and if you like you can enable email in your preferences, and then you will be able to email a specific admin, rather than rely on a general public request here. Of course there is no guarantee that any such attempt would succeed, but it might stand a reasonable chance, and at present I don't see anything else that stands any chance at all. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
75a18fe6d286c4c9 | "
{| style=""background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;"" cellpadding=""0""
|-
| style=""border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;""|
Hello, 78.87.229.43, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;""
|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored
How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article
Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention
Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on
Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13ad2a7d97889657 | ": I understand quite well the situation in Albanian because it occurs also in my native Romanian and other Balkan languages (e.g. in Romanian ""great man"" is usually omul mare or un om mare, but it also can be marele om). It is related to compound names and nouns, and actually you brought it up when you started lecturing on Albanian ""structures"" in a post-scriptum.
All your examples come from modern Albanian, not from Proto-Albanian whatever language it was. I can add some etymologies such as the one Orel provided for thënukël = ""dogberry"", from earlier *thënubël < PAlb. *tsunu-abōla, cf. Lith. šúnobuolas, Dacian kinouboila (= ""dog's apple"").
In what you quoted so far, Hamp did not claim anything about Proto-Albanian compound nouns or syntax. Please provide relevant bibliography, otherwise I don't see why should we be dismissive of other scholars' theories. Orel, Georgiev and many others are also linguists.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
39e4a30fe5cc9372 | ==This article is degenerating into a list==
One or two examples of well-known sidekicks should be sufficient. This article is degenerating into a list of sidekick, of which there are thousands of examples in just American popular culture. I recommend deleting this list as it serves no real purpose. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b0235f0103150e06 | == Please sign your comments ==
I don't understand why you are dicking with my personal pages, but if you insist on doing so, please sign your comments. Unsigned comments will be deleted without comment. And please do not threaten me with illusory reprimands for editing my own personal pages. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8390c3e3802e7149 | == A couple of things... ==
Hi Dongutteridge!
Thank you for your contributions to the article on Don Gutteridge. Going by your username, it looks like you may have a conflict of interest with this article. If so: it isn't really a problem - and doesn't stop you editing the article - but you should probably be aware of Wikipedia's policy on this which you can find here. Also, the last couple of edits that you have made to this page you have provided information without a reference to a reliable source that allows this information to be verified. I think the edits you have made are just about okay, but, generally speaking, Wikipedia's Policy on Biographies of Living Persons requires that any statement made in such an article be backed up with a reference.
Feel free to drop me a note on my talk page if you have any questions, or visit the Teahouse where you can get advice from expert editors.
With all best wishes, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4f424edba71b3bd4 | "
Can you find anything more on Nicky Blair's?♦ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
754228b65f85d45f | "
THERE ARE AT LEAST 50 MILLION BAHAIS IN THE WORLD ALONE, WHO REVERE NOAH AS A PROPHET, THAT ALONE IS SUFFICIENT TO QUALIFY FOR A ""SIGNIFICANT VIEWPOINT"" BUT WIKIPEDIA CONSIDERS IT ""NEUTRAL"" TO TELL THEM THEIR BELIEFS ARE MYTHOLOGY. THERE ARE 1.4 BILLION MUSLIMS IN THE WORLD WHO ALSO REVERE NOAH AS A PROPHET, ANOTHER SIGNIFICANT VIEWPOINT. I HAVEN'T EVEN ATTEMPTED TO COUNT THE NUMBERS OF CHRISTIANS WHO HAVE THIS VIEWPOINT YET. (ውይይት) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
373cb3b413c6ffd2 | In answer to your recent question on my talk page, no. And annoying me is not helping. I am disrupting Wikipedia no more than the deletionist cretins. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5bd9c5758d854ab3 | Regarding edits made during February 24 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2af747221079a300 | Good riddance Allah monkey. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0caebe0b742efb14 | Wow, how dumb could you be?
They're everywhere, stupid person. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
c82ae4d99f77cc0e | Cyberbot I not clerking WP:RFPP
Hasn't been around to clerk for slightly over 12 hours, not really sure why but giving you the heads up on that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
54578b2b04faa746 | 'Have you Got proof of suckpoppetry? whats that even mean? on LittleBigPlanet there is a Introduction Before The main story path Levels
' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c2ae47b29437a482 | "Wikipedia sucks and so do you you loser. By the way, I previously editted under that IP (regarding the most recent ""warning"" you sent me) before changing my IP so I can vandalize again haha.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3c89c93495ceaad7 | (Or should I follow your example and delete things I don't like from other people's talk pages ?) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3ec9dce331839e31 | "
Sinn Féin 1986 Ard Fheis post not a ""Party Political Statement"" but a personal view
The argument I wrote under the title ""The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis"" was not a party political statement but my own composition. As I am not even a member of any political party it is difficult to see how my contribution could be regarded as a ""Party Political statement."" An editor deleted my argument and gives a link to a political debate site where I also posted the same argument. Why should Wikipedia users be directed to a political debate site to read arguments that were composed for this site and then, later, posted on the debate site. That my composition was posted first here on this site can be seen by checking the time of posting my argument here and checking the time I posted it on Politics i.e. I think ""genuine Wikipedia"" users can make up their own mind about the motives for deleteing my composition. Needless to say it casts doubt on the accuracy of the Wikipedia ""Republican Sinn Féin"" article. Fortunately readers can review the history of this page by pressing the ""History"" button." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f8c3d2cfb51034ea | "
:I like the style of play section but it is even more subjective than career descriptions. Certainly at Leicester City Heskey showed high levels of skill on the ground and would not have been regarded as a ""blunt instrument"" (THe_IRB) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
04ab7b3931d8fdc6 | We only list permanent fleet assignments that lasts for a good portion of a decade or so. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
873ab51efc93e9df | Thanks mate. It seems that is willing and able to make the barnstars and awards also, so that should hopefully be done soon. Cheers, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7d36bf9885886ded | "
Another Silk Purse Award
Silk Purse AwardI am both pleased and honored to present you with another Silk Purse Award in appreciation for your superb improvements to the Fire from the Heartland article, essentially changing what was seen as a sow's ear stub into a terrific silk purse start. '''' Michael Q.'' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
40ba857a1d2fc911 | it has to be either 87 or 88 as he was 17 in 2005, his birth month would be required to know for sure. though 87 seems more logical. 210.50.6.166 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5079a653f2afb3a9 | Your article
Hi, I don't know you, but I thought you might be Wikipedia notable, so I had your article moved to my space after it was deleted ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8091930bb991bcf4 | "
See also: Mitchell Henderson. He was a inspiration.
There comes a time in every man's life when situations spiral out of control and he finds his back against a wall. Maybe somebody stole his iPod. Maybe he just killed his wife and kids. Maybe he looked in the mirror and saw a Fucktard. Maybe you can't live with the fact that you're a washed-up actor who's addicted to sex with Thai ladyboys. Whatever the reason, you can either get up and face the music, or you can tell the world and whatever deity you believe in to fuck off. In the latter case, pull out your list of final solutions and place a check in the suicide box, because tonight, you dine in hell.
Simply pwning oneself IRL is no cause to become ""An Hero"". Without exceptions, ""An Heroes"" are made, not born. When otherwise normal and rational people fondly eulogize and honor those that have killed themselves before them, that's when ""An Hero"" is made. Like it or not, somebody out there probably gives a shit about Kurt Cobain (moar liek Kurt Gobang amirite?). Could anyone say the same about you? That's why you'll never amount to anything. You'll never be ""An Hero"". Don't let us stop you from trying, though. Having said that, becoming an hero is shit because you won't get to see the results of your successful endeavors. However, if you do a school shooting and don't kill yourself, you just might. With a lot of luck. Don't expect not to get raped and murdered in prison, or executed in the electric chair. There is no half/almost/soon An Hero. Either you blow your brains out and become An Hero or don't, but in your case, please do.
The phrase ""An Hero"" dates back to 2006, in reference to the prototypical An Hero, Mitchell Henderson, who famously shot himself after losing his iPod. /b/tards jumped on a grammatical error made by many of his MySpace friends, and it is now immortalized as the banner under which we mock those courteous enough to remove themselves from the gene pool. Since then, an heroes of all ages have bravely been removing themselves from the gene pool, including 3 year olds.
== You and Your Potential An Hero ==
You hate life, you have no friends, your dad is a(n) insert problem here, your mom is a slut, school sucks, you get molested after class, you couldn't get a Wii two years ago or today, you lost your iPod (which BTW had terrible music on it), you're gay, you get bullied, noone loves you, everyone hates you, you lost ""the game"". You've been thinking about becoming an hero for a while now, but are not sure. Will anyone care? Have you given the military a try? Will anyone remember you? No, because you're a sick fuck. Now you have to get set on changing that.
== IRL usage of an Hero prior to the 20th century fagification of the Engrish language ==
While ""an Hero"" is regarded as a grammatical error by modern linguists, usage of the quantifier an before words that started with a morpheme of the pattern CV that began with an h in the onset was common usage before the 17th20th century.
A Dictionary of the English Language (1824), defines the word heroical as something befitting an hero.
The Gentleman's Magazine (1787) uses an hero like a pro, and also includes many references to Johnfon.
== ""An Hero"" ==
{{quote|I'm not a boy, I'm just an hero, I'm not a man, I'm an hero.|Gerard Way of [[My C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e5ff9ce387609519 | "
Sometimes NE2 doesn't understand people's questions. He thinks I know everything; while I don't. I don't know much about highways other than California, because most other states I never been to besdie DC, and Chicago/Denver Ariport. And also, he gets upset when people ask him background questions. He say he's not in California, Yea, but doens't mean its true. Also only becasue people say something doesn't mean its neccessairly true. he can be living in Sacramento, or any mountainside. T C " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
39bf089151ae5feb | Title Looks Like...
I just realized about how similar the title to this game looks like the legend of zelda one | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7e3755515079b4d3 | 18:14, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5a2a7c7a087f2192 | How about you read your diffs and see how many of them mention moving the section down in the article? Spoiler: 4. Anyway, please sift through your dozens upon dozens of comments that do nothing to further the conversation on this page. You will probably find more than 5. I really didn't even have to look. I am done arguing with you for tonight. ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
691ac47362be3d63 | "
So I guess you're saying that once an issue has been resolved it cannot be removed from ""Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.""
I didn't know I was ""disruptive editing."" I thought I was cleaning things up.
You people sure have a lot of rules that you bother explaining to anyone.
How long does it take for an item to be removed from that particular noticeboard?
Is it possible for me to delete my account in a manner in which it disappears as though it never existed?
Your users have made this an unbearable nightmare of an experience and I don't care to return nor do I think they should be able to post their rude comments on my ""talk page."" Can I have them reprimanded in some way?
Thanks for you help." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b3ef21b722e49c05 | :Judaism considers only one born to a Jewish mother (or having undergone a conversion) as being a Jew. His mother was not Jewish. Furthermore, he himself identified as a Christian and had also been baptized. Thus, he was not a Jew. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15b56f19105eadcf | I think they found the last one in a ditch somewhere. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c6e5e92beaa96de3 | Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. ~ TC
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Alistair hendry. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ~ TC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
642c3c0fcfb8b8f6 | YOU LITTLE SHIT
WHAT IS IT WITH YOU PAKIS ALL STICKING TOGETHER?????? | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
1d5c3381e27f1d3d | There is no reason to treat AFF and SF the same. The neutrality policy, which explicitly states that it is not to be confused with “all views deserve equal time no matter how many or how few people hold them”, certainly requires nothing of the sort – look it up yourself, I won’t do your homework for you.
Moreover, the merits of AFF and the merits of SF are two entirely separate and independent things. No amount of slamming AFF – even if your charges are accurate, which I doubt as your behaviour here strongly suggests your perceptions on such things cannot be trusted – can ever, by itself, make SF worth including. SF must stand or fall on its own merits.
There are many serious strikes against including SF, none of which you have even tried to address. First of all it borders on being a blog, which is already an almost-decisive point against it (there was talk of banning links to blogs entirely at one point though it isn’t actually policy to do so as far as I know – certainly “it’s a blog” has stood uncontested as sufficient reason for deleting links on many pages, including the same one we’re fighting over). Equally importantly, having read parts of SF... though I do not myself agree with the characterization, I can see why others have gone so far as to call it a hate site. To be blunt, it's largely the chronicle of one person's persecution complex. As I said elsewhere, it verges on conspiracy theory in the kookiest sense. And then there is the painfully bad prose and screechy hysterical tone most of it is written in – it is simply not in any way a quality site and would not be even if I could credit the actual content. These three points – heck, any two of them – are sufficient reason leave the link off Wikipedia.
And I haven’t even mentioned the most important reason yet. Your site simply is not notable. As far as I can honestly tell, you are the only person on Earth who considers it an important site. If it was worth linking to, someone other than the site's owner would have done so by now, or at least spoken up in favour of such. That last part, at least, is well-documented Wikipedia policy; look it up yourself as I once again refuse to do your homework for you.
I am sorry – sort of – if some of this comes across as harsh. Though you will no doubt characterize this note as a personal attack, it is not intended as such (and compared to some of the things you’ve posted about others, including me, it’s not even close to qualifying as one). I wish only to lay out as clearly as possible why there is little hope of SF being linked from that or any other Wikipedia page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1ae294bdc1174aaf | Stephen King: The Dark Tower Series
The Dark Tower Series of books by Stephen King Are quite loosly connected with the idea of falling into another world, possibly dream-like, on many levels and i think the series is a worthy note to this page. Anybody else who has read the series agree? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f02b55cc90d69521 | "==COI==
This article seems to be very promotional in tone, is entirely positive, the references don't seem to reflect any in depth coverage of the topic, and the primary contributor is an WP:SPA. It therefor seems likely that the primary contributor has some undisclosed connection to the topic of the article. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
bed5f568121c4fe2 | You are welcome to leave a message. I may not reply immediately. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dd18568449c921d7 | You think 166 years is old? The house I live in is around 600 years old. Worcester is much much older with a rich history. The present situation is WP:NOTBROKEN so leave it alone and find something useful to do instead. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e32f05dce390c2b1 | I'm a freelance journalist who has written for a number of magazines, content providers and periodicals including Ink 19, In-Site, The Orlando Weekly, Connections, Prodigy Service, CitySearch.com, Focus-In, Juggernaut, Jam Magazine and Buzz. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ebe8a916ad56beae | I only smiled, I mean it. - I looked at other Vicar generals and their fancy titles ... - what's Demut in English? That's what he stands for. (I was one of 140 singing in the farewell service.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dcb5085267717224 | == Thanks and happy holidays ==
A good while back, when I was just starting out here (and fairly clueless), I posted an entry about Charles Walcott (MP). You took the time to point out on my talk page that I hadn't provided any references. You were dead-on, and that made me take the time to learn how to do wiki footnotes. Thank you for taking the time to actually point out my error to me, instead of simply deleting what I'd written (which would have been understandable). Thanks to you, I've gone on to post many more entries with footnotes! -) Thanks again, and the best of holidays to you and your loved ones. Regards, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9a844cbab4f1d0e6 | ==Math edits (Nbarth)==
Hi Jack—glad you enjoyed the contributions, and thanks for the kind words.
I'd just wanted to understand Clifford algebras, and way lead to way. (Ok, numerical polynomials are not part of that—I just remember Peter May talking about them. But I hope the article grows!)
I've thought a lot more about dicyclic groups and understand the connection to pin groups much better, so I'll shortly (tomorrow, I plan) write up the connections (and the center of the pin groups).
Thanks again for the support! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ccabf27b12c159ee | "
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ring " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fa19e779a11f486d | "
Hmmmmm? Sounds like discrimination there? Will you be deleted? (and that's been offered before here) That's just my point, could I get a lawyer to sue you? No. But you could get one in vice versa. Liberals just want to use the system to steal and kill by unfair rules and lies. True criminals. If Wiki had not written liberal lies about me I would not have been here. It all is summed up as this: Give me a fair reason for ""liberalism"". It has never been forwarded, so go home and stop the insanity." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5cd25874de62da0f | hmm i want to do some edits on the battle of kursk, is it possible that somebody reviews my request? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
989f2a4686f9424f | re: vancouver
seriously, what part of vancouver not being in the pacific northwest do you not understand. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
adb04a0438a83d30 | :Richard, watch your step. For someone who makes defamatory claims that I have made your life a living hell (if you can't handle being told that you are a fucking disgrace for the way you and WMUK handled the Fae issue, you need to toughen up Princess), you sure do like to put yourself right in the middle of issues relating to me, don't you? Same thing to who has possibly been acting in concert with you in recent times elsewhere. It could be seen as you acting in a vindictive way. Wikipediots aren't vindictive people though, are they? If you want to bring up the global ban tell that this is due to my pushing the issue of CU abuse on Commons and the WMF's lack of interest in investigating (I wonder on who's behalf Herbythyme did it for).
:Anyway, the image is now back in the article Richard. Put there by someone who actually cares about the content. Stop acting like an enormous douche. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5a16b4673c05a1ec | Darwinian Theory Pushing
Please do not delete commentaries merely because you personally feel they offend your personal point of view about Darwin and the theory of evolution and your rainbow-colored view of Christianity. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research) to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view) and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Refrain from vandalism of the page on Charles Darwin and refrain from deleting entries in your discussion page which you are clearly doing to hide the truth about your non-neutral edits.
Refrain from vandalism of the page on Charles Darwin and refrain from deleting entries in your discussion page which you are clearly doing to hide the truth about your non-neutral edits. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits