Datasets:

binhng

/

scoring_ielts_dataset_v1

like 1

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many students find it difficult to learn subjects like mathematics and philosophy and hence they should be optional in schools. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Are all subjects that we learn in school really necessary? Is it even worth studying math if you know that you are going to fail the exam? In present day there is an opinion that the students should be able to choose the subjects they want to study. I disagree with this, since I hence all lessons in school give you something. Firstly, to challenge yourself is something that you will have to all your life. For instance, moving to a new city, working at a new job or starting at collage. This can be hard and it may take a while until you reach the point where you are sadisfyed. However, your future is full of challenges that you will have to concure. By making students work hard in subjects they find difficult, you prepar them for dareing with upcoming events in their life. They will develop a fighting spirite, since they have fought with difficulities before. They will learn not give up in first hand. Secondly, the subjects in school are there for a reason. Even if you find it hard to achieve good grades in some of them, all of the experience you get by studying them is valuable. It is common knowlegde to know simple maths, even if you do not get the highest mark in the subject. Who knows, someday your lessons might be useful. Maybe you end up being a math teacher? To conclude, all lessons in school are valuable in one or another way. Meaning that, all the subjects in school are a part of common knowledge. Everyone should know at least the basics of it. You may not achieve a great mark in all of them, but at least you tried. Trying and developping a fighting spirite is a useful experience. This is not only great in school, but also for the rest of you life. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many students find it difficult to learn subjects like mathematics and philosophy and hence they should be optional in schools. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Are all subjects that we learn in school really necessary? Is it even worth studying math if you know that you are going to fail the exam? In present day there is an opinion that the students should be able to choose the subjects they want to study. I disagree with this, since I hence all lessons in school give you something. Firstly, to challenge yourself is something that you will have to all your life. For instance, moving to a new city, working at a new job or starting at collage. This can be hard and it may take a while until you reach the point where you are sadisfyed. However, your future is full of challenges that you will have to concure. By making students work hard in subjects they find difficult, you prepar them for dareing with upcoming events in their life. They will develop a fighting spirite, since they have fought with difficulities before. They will learn not give up in first hand. Secondly, the subjects in school are there for a reason. Even if you find it hard to achieve good grades in some of them, all of the experience you get by studying them is valuable. It is common knowlegde to know simple maths, even if you do not get the highest mark in the subject. Who knows, someday your lessons might be useful. Maybe you end up being a math teacher? To conclude, all lessons in school are valuable in one or another way. Meaning that, all the subjects in school are a part of common knowledge. Everyone should know at least the basics of it. You may not achieve a great mark in all of them, but at least you tried. Trying and developping a fighting spirite is a useful experience. This is not only great in school, but also for the rest of you life. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many students find it difficult to learn subjects like mathematics and philosophy and hence they should be optional in schools. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Are all subjects that we learn in school really necessary? Is it even worth studying math if you know that you are going to fail the exam? In present day there is an opinion that the students should be able to choose the subjects they want to study. I disagree with this, since I hence all lessons in school give you something. Firstly, to challenge yourself is something that you will have to all your life. For instance, moving to a new city, working at a new job or starting at collage. This can be hard and it may take a while until you reach the point where you are sadisfyed. However, your future is full of challenges that you will have to concure. By making students work hard in subjects they find difficult, you prepar them for dareing with upcoming events in their life. They will develop a fighting spirite, since they have fought with difficulities before. They will learn not give up in first hand. Secondly, the subjects in school are there for a reason. Even if you find it hard to achieve good grades in some of them, all of the experience you get by studying them is valuable. It is common knowlegde to know simple maths, even if you do not get the highest mark in the subject. Who knows, someday your lessons might be useful. Maybe you end up being a math teacher? To conclude, all lessons in school are valuable in one or another way. Meaning that, all the subjects in school are a part of common knowledge. Everyone should know at least the basics of it. You may not achieve a great mark in all of them, but at least you tried. Trying and developping a fighting spirite is a useful experience. This is not only great in school, but also for the rest of you life. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many students find it difficult to learn subjects like mathematics and philosophy and hence they should be optional in schools. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Are all subjects that we learn in school really necessary? Is it even worth studying math if you know that you are going to fail the exam? In present day there is an opinion that the students should be able to choose the subjects they want to study. I disagree with this, since I hence all lessons in school give you something. Firstly, to challenge yourself is something that you will have to all your life. For instance, moving to a new city, working at a new job or starting at collage. This can be hard and it may take a while until you reach the point where you are sadisfyed. However, your future is full of challenges that you will have to concure. By making students work hard in subjects they find difficult, you prepar them for dareing with upcoming events in their life. They will develop a fighting spirite, since they have fought with difficulities before. They will learn not give up in first hand. Secondly, the subjects in school are there for a reason. Even if you find it hard to achieve good grades in some of them, all of the experience you get by studying them is valuable. It is common knowlegde to know simple maths, even if you do not get the highest mark in the subject. Who knows, someday your lessons might be useful. Maybe you end up being a math teacher? To conclude, all lessons in school are valuable in one or another way. Meaning that, all the subjects in school are a part of common knowledge. Everyone should know at least the basics of it. You may not achieve a great mark in all of them, but at least you tried. Trying and developping a fighting spirite is a useful experience. This is not only great in school, but also for the rest of you life. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK. Write at least 150 words. Anwser: The images depicts the information of a certain salary and consumption on food and clothes by a middle family in the town of Britain between three years from 2010 to 2013 in propotion of percentages relating to five categories of products. Overall,the three major categories , fruit and vegetables , meat and other food has the most significance consumption proportion of 26 %, 29% and 18% respectively in 2010 with income of $ 29000 . However , the expenditure of fruit and vegetables increased significantly in 2013 making it to be the most highest used category whilst other food remained constant through the years and there was a slight decrease on meat and fish in 2013 . In 2010 , meat and fish is the category that the family spent much on with 29% however , it decreased slightly with 6% in 2013 making it to 23 % . Nonetheless , the income also reduced from $ 29 000 to $25000 with a variance of $ 4000 in 2010 and 2013 respectively. To add on , fruit and vegetables it increased little with a margin of 1% grading it to be the highest consumed in 2013. Nevertheless , otherfood group , remained persistent between 2010 and 2013. Other variety class, Dairy products and clothes were the least consumed sort among the others however , there was insignificant change from 12 % to 16% 2010 and 2013 appropiately. In addition , the family used 15 % on clothes and 13 % in 2013. There was a minor decrease making it to be the least product to be used . Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK. Write at least 150 words. Anwser: The images depicts the information of a certain salary and consumption on food and clothes by a middle family in the town of Britain between three years from 2010 to 2013 in propotion of percentages relating to five categories of products. Overall,the three major categories , fruit and vegetables , meat and other food has the most significance consumption proportion of 26 %, 29% and 18% respectively in 2010 with income of $ 29000 . However , the expenditure of fruit and vegetables increased significantly in 2013 making it to be the most highest used category whilst other food remained constant through the years and there was a slight decrease on meat and fish in 2013 . In 2010 , meat and fish is the category that the family spent much on with 29% however , it decreased slightly with 6% in 2013 making it to 23 % . Nonetheless , the income also reduced from $ 29 000 to $25000 with a variance of $ 4000 in 2010 and 2013 respectively. To add on , fruit and vegetables it increased little with a margin of 1% grading it to be the highest consumed in 2013. Nevertheless , otherfood group , remained persistent between 2010 and 2013. Other variety class, Dairy products and clothes were the least consumed sort among the others however , there was insignificant change from 12 % to 16% 2010 and 2013 appropiately. In addition , the family used 15 % on clothes and 13 % in 2013. There was a minor decrease making it to be the least product to be used . Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK. Write at least 150 words. Anwser: The images depicts the information of a certain salary and consumption on food and clothes by a middle family in the town of Britain between three years from 2010 to 2013 in propotion of percentages relating to five categories of products. Overall,the three major categories , fruit and vegetables , meat and other food has the most significance consumption proportion of 26 %, 29% and 18% respectively in 2010 with income of $ 29000 . However , the expenditure of fruit and vegetables increased significantly in 2013 making it to be the most highest used category whilst other food remained constant through the years and there was a slight decrease on meat and fish in 2013 . In 2010 , meat and fish is the category that the family spent much on with 29% however , it decreased slightly with 6% in 2013 making it to 23 % . Nonetheless , the income also reduced from $ 29 000 to $25000 with a variance of $ 4000 in 2010 and 2013 respectively. To add on , fruit and vegetables it increased little with a margin of 1% grading it to be the highest consumed in 2013. Nevertheless , otherfood group , remained persistent between 2010 and 2013. Other variety class, Dairy products and clothes were the least consumed sort among the others however , there was insignificant change from 12 % to 16% 2010 and 2013 appropiately. In addition , the family used 15 % on clothes and 13 % in 2013. There was a minor decrease making it to be the least product to be used . Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK. Write at least 150 words. Anwser: The images depicts the information of a certain salary and consumption on food and clothes by a middle family in the town of Britain between three years from 2010 to 2013 in propotion of percentages relating to five categories of products. Overall,the three major categories , fruit and vegetables , meat and other food has the most significance consumption proportion of 26 %, 29% and 18% respectively in 2010 with income of $ 29000 . However , the expenditure of fruit and vegetables increased significantly in 2013 making it to be the most highest used category whilst other food remained constant through the years and there was a slight decrease on meat and fish in 2013 . In 2010 , meat and fish is the category that the family spent much on with 29% however , it decreased slightly with 6% in 2013 making it to 23 % . Nonetheless , the income also reduced from $ 29 000 to $25000 with a variance of $ 4000 in 2010 and 2013 respectively. To add on , fruit and vegetables it increased little with a margin of 1% grading it to be the highest consumed in 2013. Nevertheless , otherfood group , remained persistent between 2010 and 2013. Other variety class, Dairy products and clothes were the least consumed sort among the others however , there was insignificant change from 12 % to 16% 2010 and 2013 appropiately. In addition , the family used 15 % on clothes and 13 % in 2013. There was a minor decrease making it to be the least product to be used . Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now. What problems will this cause? What can be done to solve these problems? Anwser: Few people believe that the old buildings which were constructed in the old age period are prefect to living in this world. The main problem of current generation are causing often health issue and increase in cost of living . To avoid this problem people can build a residence with more space and limiting their utilisation on automation devices. Starting with the problem point of view, the primary reason why people wants to live in the previous era is because to avoid breathing issue and frequent rise in the cost of living. In these days, people are adapted to the latest technology like air conditioner and other machines to controlling air temperatures. Furthermore, due to these automation devices, children are oftenly get sick and it lead to fatal conditions. Apart from that, cost of living are also increased rapidly in the recent years. Therefore, the people who live under the proverty line are suffering a lot to cover up their living expenses. For example, most data scientists were found that millionaires percentage are dropped into half when compared to past years. On the other hand with the solution, The public can invest their savings on the land instead of spend on unnecessay items and also they can restrict their dependence on automation gadgets. The public can invest a huge part of their resources on build a spacious house instead of buying technology, if they build a spacious home, then they can inhale fresh air to the body which helps to prevent from sickness. Besides, instead of buying machines, they can invest on gold, stock market, mutal funds and much more. As a result, it will helps them during their retirement period without expecting for helping hands. For instance, most financial advisor said that the person who plan in advance on financial matter, will be always secured in the future. In conclusion, cost of living and spend their resources on unnecessay items are the main issues to the people who want to living in the pervious decade. Instead of thinking about the past, they can start invest on valuable items and on the land, which helps them to create a brightful future. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now. What problems will this cause? What can be done to solve these problems? Anwser: Few people believe that the old buildings which were constructed in the old age period are prefect to living in this world. The main problem of current generation are causing often health issue and increase in cost of living . To avoid this problem people can build a residence with more space and limiting their utilisation on automation devices. Starting with the problem point of view, the primary reason why people wants to live in the previous era is because to avoid breathing issue and frequent rise in the cost of living. In these days, people are adapted to the latest technology like air conditioner and other machines to controlling air temperatures. Furthermore, due to these automation devices, children are oftenly get sick and it lead to fatal conditions. Apart from that, cost of living are also increased rapidly in the recent years. Therefore, the people who live under the proverty line are suffering a lot to cover up their living expenses. For example, most data scientists were found that millionaires percentage are dropped into half when compared to past years. On the other hand with the solution, The public can invest their savings on the land instead of spend on unnecessay items and also they can restrict their dependence on automation gadgets. The public can invest a huge part of their resources on build a spacious house instead of buying technology, if they build a spacious home, then they can inhale fresh air to the body which helps to prevent from sickness. Besides, instead of buying machines, they can invest on gold, stock market, mutal funds and much more. As a result, it will helps them during their retirement period without expecting for helping hands. For instance, most financial advisor said that the person who plan in advance on financial matter, will be always secured in the future. In conclusion, cost of living and spend their resources on unnecessay items are the main issues to the people who want to living in the pervious decade. Instead of thinking about the past, they can start invest on valuable items and on the land, which helps them to create a brightful future. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now. What problems will this cause? What can be done to solve these problems? Anwser: Few people believe that the old buildings which were constructed in the old age period are prefect to living in this world. The main problem of current generation are causing often health issue and increase in cost of living . To avoid this problem people can build a residence with more space and limiting their utilisation on automation devices. Starting with the problem point of view, the primary reason why people wants to live in the previous era is because to avoid breathing issue and frequent rise in the cost of living. In these days, people are adapted to the latest technology like air conditioner and other machines to controlling air temperatures. Furthermore, due to these automation devices, children are oftenly get sick and it lead to fatal conditions. Apart from that, cost of living are also increased rapidly in the recent years. Therefore, the people who live under the proverty line are suffering a lot to cover up their living expenses. For example, most data scientists were found that millionaires percentage are dropped into half when compared to past years. On the other hand with the solution, The public can invest their savings on the land instead of spend on unnecessay items and also they can restrict their dependence on automation gadgets. The public can invest a huge part of their resources on build a spacious house instead of buying technology, if they build a spacious home, then they can inhale fresh air to the body which helps to prevent from sickness. Besides, instead of buying machines, they can invest on gold, stock market, mutal funds and much more. As a result, it will helps them during their retirement period without expecting for helping hands. For instance, most financial advisor said that the person who plan in advance on financial matter, will be always secured in the future. In conclusion, cost of living and spend their resources on unnecessay items are the main issues to the people who want to living in the pervious decade. Instead of thinking about the past, they can start invest on valuable items and on the land, which helps them to create a brightful future. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now. What problems will this cause? What can be done to solve these problems? Anwser: Few people believe that the old buildings which were constructed in the old age period are prefect to living in this world. The main problem of current generation are causing often health issue and increase in cost of living . To avoid this problem people can build a residence with more space and limiting their utilisation on automation devices. Starting with the problem point of view, the primary reason why people wants to live in the previous era is because to avoid breathing issue and frequent rise in the cost of living. In these days, people are adapted to the latest technology like air conditioner and other machines to controlling air temperatures. Furthermore, due to these automation devices, children are oftenly get sick and it lead to fatal conditions. Apart from that, cost of living are also increased rapidly in the recent years. Therefore, the people who live under the proverty line are suffering a lot to cover up their living expenses. For example, most data scientists were found that millionaires percentage are dropped into half when compared to past years. On the other hand with the solution, The public can invest their savings on the land instead of spend on unnecessay items and also they can restrict their dependence on automation gadgets. The public can invest a huge part of their resources on build a spacious house instead of buying technology, if they build a spacious home, then they can inhale fresh air to the body which helps to prevent from sickness. Besides, instead of buying machines, they can invest on gold, stock market, mutal funds and much more. As a result, it will helps them during their retirement period without expecting for helping hands. For instance, most financial advisor said that the person who plan in advance on financial matter, will be always secured in the future. In conclusion, cost of living and spend their resources on unnecessay items are the main issues to the people who want to living in the pervious decade. Instead of thinking about the past, they can start invest on valuable items and on the land, which helps them to create a brightful future. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things? Anwser: In present day children spends more time watching television rather then d. Nowadays they spend their time in front of a screen doing active and creative things. In the past First and foremost, the main reason for this is the digitalization wave that has affected our society. During these last 15 years we have started to do everything on our computers. For instans, we chat with our friends online, have work-meetings on zoom, read the news on our smartphone and kids even play online. The games and activity on the smartphone attracts the childrens attention, even more then going out playing does. But is this really the optimal ways to entertain our children? We should encourage our children to be more active and creative. Studies has shown that the effects of a lifestyle in front of a screen leads to a road of deseases, such as, over weight, heart probelms and much more. If we activate our children more, the risk of these sickdoms would decrease significant. As a parent you can easily encourage movement and creativity by signing them up in "clubs". For instans, a soccer-club, dancing-club or maybe a painting-club. The effects of this would be that the children get new hobbys. They will also sociolize more than they would infront of a computer. To summarize, due to the digitalization wave that has affected our socitiy, children spend more time watching television then playing. This has a lot of bad effects on their health. But as a parent that is much to do for the benefit of your childrens well being. By making them join, for example, a sportsclub, you activate them. The followings of this will not only be good for their health, but also for their creative side. It is important to encourage them to be active, insead of watching television. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things? Anwser: In present day children spends more time watching television rather then d. Nowadays they spend their time in front of a screen doing active and creative things. In the past First and foremost, the main reason for this is the digitalization wave that has affected our society. During these last 15 years we have started to do everything on our computers. For instans, we chat with our friends online, have work-meetings on zoom, read the news on our smartphone and kids even play online. The games and activity on the smartphone attracts the childrens attention, even more then going out playing does. But is this really the optimal ways to entertain our children? We should encourage our children to be more active and creative. Studies has shown that the effects of a lifestyle in front of a screen leads to a road of deseases, such as, over weight, heart probelms and much more. If we activate our children more, the risk of these sickdoms would decrease significant. As a parent you can easily encourage movement and creativity by signing them up in "clubs". For instans, a soccer-club, dancing-club or maybe a painting-club. The effects of this would be that the children get new hobbys. They will also sociolize more than they would infront of a computer. To summarize, due to the digitalization wave that has affected our socitiy, children spend more time watching television then playing. This has a lot of bad effects on their health. But as a parent that is much to do for the benefit of your childrens well being. By making them join, for example, a sportsclub, you activate them. The followings of this will not only be good for their health, but also for their creative side. It is important to encourage them to be active, insead of watching television. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things? Anwser: In present day children spends more time watching television rather then d. Nowadays they spend their time in front of a screen doing active and creative things. In the past First and foremost, the main reason for this is the digitalization wave that has affected our society. During these last 15 years we have started to do everything on our computers. For instans, we chat with our friends online, have work-meetings on zoom, read the news on our smartphone and kids even play online. The games and activity on the smartphone attracts the childrens attention, even more then going out playing does. But is this really the optimal ways to entertain our children? We should encourage our children to be more active and creative. Studies has shown that the effects of a lifestyle in front of a screen leads to a road of deseases, such as, over weight, heart probelms and much more. If we activate our children more, the risk of these sickdoms would decrease significant. As a parent you can easily encourage movement and creativity by signing them up in "clubs". For instans, a soccer-club, dancing-club or maybe a painting-club. The effects of this would be that the children get new hobbys. They will also sociolize more than they would infront of a computer. To summarize, due to the digitalization wave that has affected our socitiy, children spend more time watching television then playing. This has a lot of bad effects on their health. But as a parent that is much to do for the benefit of your childrens well being. By making them join, for example, a sportsclub, you activate them. The followings of this will not only be good for their health, but also for their creative side. It is important to encourage them to be active, insead of watching television. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things? Anwser: In present day children spends more time watching television rather then d. Nowadays they spend their time in front of a screen doing active and creative things. In the past First and foremost, the main reason for this is the digitalization wave that has affected our society. During these last 15 years we have started to do everything on our computers. For instans, we chat with our friends online, have work-meetings on zoom, read the news on our smartphone and kids even play online. The games and activity on the smartphone attracts the childrens attention, even more then going out playing does. But is this really the optimal ways to entertain our children? We should encourage our children to be more active and creative. Studies has shown that the effects of a lifestyle in front of a screen leads to a road of deseases, such as, over weight, heart probelms and much more. If we activate our children more, the risk of these sickdoms would decrease significant. As a parent you can easily encourage movement and creativity by signing them up in "clubs". For instans, a soccer-club, dancing-club or maybe a painting-club. The effects of this would be that the children get new hobbys. They will also sociolize more than they would infront of a computer. To summarize, due to the digitalization wave that has affected our socitiy, children spend more time watching television then playing. This has a lot of bad effects on their health. But as a parent that is much to do for the benefit of your childrens well being. By making them join, for example, a sportsclub, you activate them. The followings of this will not only be good for their health, but also for their creative side. It is important to encourage them to be active, insead of watching television. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: As countries develop, their populations tend to live individually or in small family units. What are the causes of this trend and what are the effects on society？ Anwser: Nowadays, citizens are more willing to live individually or in a small family unit. Based on my observations, technology has advanced in the past few decades. It encourages people to live independently or in tiny family units. With this trend, it will possibly brings negative effects on society. Firstly, communication technology improved a lot. People can easily talk with others by calling them. There is no necessarily need to live in a big family anymore. For instance, I have a family group in WhatsApp. My sister is living in Taiwan. However, we still have a lot of conversation. In other words, distance no longer a barrier in families. Therefore, with the technology improved nowadays, it allows residents live individually or in a tiny family unit. On the other hand, living alone or in a small family unit are possibly bring negative effects on society. It will let people abandon the style of staying in big family, which weaken the bond of family. Thus, when parents got old, they will require more help from the society. Meanwhile, it escalated the burden of the government. For instance, there are lots of elderly being sent to caring centre in Hong Kong. Those elderly have no ability to afford the payment of the caring centre, which requires the government to provide allowances for them. Therefore, with the trend of populations tend to live individually or in a small family unit will bring detrimental effects to the society. To sum up, new generations are more desiring to live alone or in a small family unit. It affect the bonding of people in society and could harming peoples’ relationship. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: As countries develop, their populations tend to live individually or in small family units. What are the causes of this trend and what are the effects on society？ Anwser: Nowadays, citizens are more willing to live individually or in a small family unit. Based on my observations, technology has advanced in the past few decades. It encourages people to live independently or in tiny family units. With this trend, it will possibly brings negative effects on society. Firstly, communication technology improved a lot. People can easily talk with others by calling them. There is no necessarily need to live in a big family anymore. For instance, I have a family group in WhatsApp. My sister is living in Taiwan. However, we still have a lot of conversation. In other words, distance no longer a barrier in families. Therefore, with the technology improved nowadays, it allows residents live individually or in a tiny family unit. On the other hand, living alone or in a small family unit are possibly bring negative effects on society. It will let people abandon the style of staying in big family, which weaken the bond of family. Thus, when parents got old, they will require more help from the society. Meanwhile, it escalated the burden of the government. For instance, there are lots of elderly being sent to caring centre in Hong Kong. Those elderly have no ability to afford the payment of the caring centre, which requires the government to provide allowances for them. Therefore, with the trend of populations tend to live individually or in a small family unit will bring detrimental effects to the society. To sum up, new generations are more desiring to live alone or in a small family unit. It affect the bonding of people in society and could harming peoples’ relationship. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: As countries develop, their populations tend to live individually or in small family units. What are the causes of this trend and what are the effects on society？ Anwser: Nowadays, citizens are more willing to live individually or in a small family unit. Based on my observations, technology has advanced in the past few decades. It encourages people to live independently or in tiny family units. With this trend, it will possibly brings negative effects on society. Firstly, communication technology improved a lot. People can easily talk with others by calling them. There is no necessarily need to live in a big family anymore. For instance, I have a family group in WhatsApp. My sister is living in Taiwan. However, we still have a lot of conversation. In other words, distance no longer a barrier in families. Therefore, with the technology improved nowadays, it allows residents live individually or in a tiny family unit. On the other hand, living alone or in a small family unit are possibly bring negative effects on society. It will let people abandon the style of staying in big family, which weaken the bond of family. Thus, when parents got old, they will require more help from the society. Meanwhile, it escalated the burden of the government. For instance, there are lots of elderly being sent to caring centre in Hong Kong. Those elderly have no ability to afford the payment of the caring centre, which requires the government to provide allowances for them. Therefore, with the trend of populations tend to live individually or in a small family unit will bring detrimental effects to the society. To sum up, new generations are more desiring to live alone or in a small family unit. It affect the bonding of people in society and could harming peoples’ relationship. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: As countries develop, their populations tend to live individually or in small family units. What are the causes of this trend and what are the effects on society？ Anwser: Nowadays, citizens are more willing to live individually or in a small family unit. Based on my observations, technology has advanced in the past few decades. It encourages people to live independently or in tiny family units. With this trend, it will possibly brings negative effects on society. Firstly, communication technology improved a lot. People can easily talk with others by calling them. There is no necessarily need to live in a big family anymore. For instance, I have a family group in WhatsApp. My sister is living in Taiwan. However, we still have a lot of conversation. In other words, distance no longer a barrier in families. Therefore, with the technology improved nowadays, it allows residents live individually or in a tiny family unit. On the other hand, living alone or in a small family unit are possibly bring negative effects on society. It will let people abandon the style of staying in big family, which weaken the bond of family. Thus, when parents got old, they will require more help from the society. Meanwhile, it escalated the burden of the government. For instance, there are lots of elderly being sent to caring centre in Hong Kong. Those elderly have no ability to afford the payment of the caring centre, which requires the government to provide allowances for them. Therefore, with the trend of populations tend to live individually or in a small family unit will bring detrimental effects to the society. To sum up, new generations are more desiring to live alone or in a small family unit. It affect the bonding of people in society and could harming peoples’ relationship. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In some areas of the US, a "curfew" is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a partcular time at night unless they are accompained by an adult. What is your opinion about this? Anwser: In some regions of the US, compulsary rules exist about curfew and youngsters must not to be out of the doors after a certain time at night unless they spend time with adults. I strongly agree with this statement, because the majority of crimes occur at night and midnight, also, it may have bed consequences on thier life and future. Nowadays, people heard about different crimes that the majority of occur at night. Youngsters, try to do somthing exciting without focussing on their consequences like struggle and driving when they drunk, because they have no experiences and would rather have joyful time. These kinds of activities can be harmful for other community and their life. As a result, The government of US make strong regulation to make limitation for being out of the doors at midnight. For instance, teenagers who are under 18 in the UK can not spend time out of the doors after 11 midnight without thier parents. In addition, spending time out of the doors after midnight is not purposeful activity. In other words, by being out of the doors at midnight the waste their time and do not do any useful activities. As a consequence, it will be their habbit and the can not abondon this activity and it may affect their education efficiency and family relationships. Due to that if they spend time out of the doors with adults, parents can control them to prevent bad effects on thier life. For example, in Iran, adolecense spend most of their time in street to find girl or boy friend and it can be seen they can not concentrate on their professional life. In conclusion, spending time out of the doors at midnight is dangrous acitivity for teenagers unless spend time with their parents, because the may perpetrate crime or do harmful activities, moreover, they can not focus their professional life because they waste time and parents can controlthem. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In some areas of the US, a "curfew" is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a partcular time at night unless they are accompained by an adult. What is your opinion about this? Anwser: In some regions of the US, compulsary rules exist about curfew and youngsters must not to be out of the doors after a certain time at night unless they spend time with adults. I strongly agree with this statement, because the majority of crimes occur at night and midnight, also, it may have bed consequences on thier life and future. Nowadays, people heard about different crimes that the majority of occur at night. Youngsters, try to do somthing exciting without focussing on their consequences like struggle and driving when they drunk, because they have no experiences and would rather have joyful time. These kinds of activities can be harmful for other community and their life. As a result, The government of US make strong regulation to make limitation for being out of the doors at midnight. For instance, teenagers who are under 18 in the UK can not spend time out of the doors after 11 midnight without thier parents. In addition, spending time out of the doors after midnight is not purposeful activity. In other words, by being out of the doors at midnight the waste their time and do not do any useful activities. As a consequence, it will be their habbit and the can not abondon this activity and it may affect their education efficiency and family relationships. Due to that if they spend time out of the doors with adults, parents can control them to prevent bad effects on thier life. For example, in Iran, adolecense spend most of their time in street to find girl or boy friend and it can be seen they can not concentrate on their professional life. In conclusion, spending time out of the doors at midnight is dangrous acitivity for teenagers unless spend time with their parents, because the may perpetrate crime or do harmful activities, moreover, they can not focus their professional life because they waste time and parents can controlthem. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In some areas of the US, a "curfew" is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a partcular time at night unless they are accompained by an adult. What is your opinion about this? Anwser: In some regions of the US, compulsary rules exist about curfew and youngsters must not to be out of the doors after a certain time at night unless they spend time with adults. I strongly agree with this statement, because the majority of crimes occur at night and midnight, also, it may have bed consequences on thier life and future. Nowadays, people heard about different crimes that the majority of occur at night. Youngsters, try to do somthing exciting without focussing on their consequences like struggle and driving when they drunk, because they have no experiences and would rather have joyful time. These kinds of activities can be harmful for other community and their life. As a result, The government of US make strong regulation to make limitation for being out of the doors at midnight. For instance, teenagers who are under 18 in the UK can not spend time out of the doors after 11 midnight without thier parents. In addition, spending time out of the doors after midnight is not purposeful activity. In other words, by being out of the doors at midnight the waste their time and do not do any useful activities. As a consequence, it will be their habbit and the can not abondon this activity and it may affect their education efficiency and family relationships. Due to that if they spend time out of the doors with adults, parents can control them to prevent bad effects on thier life. For example, in Iran, adolecense spend most of their time in street to find girl or boy friend and it can be seen they can not concentrate on their professional life. In conclusion, spending time out of the doors at midnight is dangrous acitivity for teenagers unless spend time with their parents, because the may perpetrate crime or do harmful activities, moreover, they can not focus their professional life because they waste time and parents can controlthem. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In some areas of the US, a "curfew" is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a partcular time at night unless they are accompained by an adult. What is your opinion about this? Anwser: In some regions of the US, compulsary rules exist about curfew and youngsters must not to be out of the doors after a certain time at night unless they spend time with adults. I strongly agree with this statement, because the majority of crimes occur at night and midnight, also, it may have bed consequences on thier life and future. Nowadays, people heard about different crimes that the majority of occur at night. Youngsters, try to do somthing exciting without focussing on their consequences like struggle and driving when they drunk, because they have no experiences and would rather have joyful time. These kinds of activities can be harmful for other community and their life. As a result, The government of US make strong regulation to make limitation for being out of the doors at midnight. For instance, teenagers who are under 18 in the UK can not spend time out of the doors after 11 midnight without thier parents. In addition, spending time out of the doors after midnight is not purposeful activity. In other words, by being out of the doors at midnight the waste their time and do not do any useful activities. As a consequence, it will be their habbit and the can not abondon this activity and it may affect their education efficiency and family relationships. Due to that if they spend time out of the doors with adults, parents can control them to prevent bad effects on thier life. For example, in Iran, adolecense spend most of their time in street to find girl or boy friend and it can be seen they can not concentrate on their professional life. In conclusion, spending time out of the doors at midnight is dangrous acitivity for teenagers unless spend time with their parents, because the may perpetrate crime or do harmful activities, moreover, they can not focus their professional life because they waste time and parents can controlthem. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live. Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a ‘fat tax’ is unfair and unnecessary. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: These days, it is considered that it has negative impact for people and their society to eat unhealthy food. Some argue that a ‘fat tax’ should be determined by government, while others think the task is not necessary because it will be unfair. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion for this unhealthy food tax matter. To begin with, many people say that it is unfair for companies which produce fat foods when governments decide the tax. There are some people who buy foods such as chips, candies or meets, because they are cheaper than healthy foods. However if the tax is made, people will not purchase that kind of foods, and then, the companies' income will decline. As a result, some individuals will lose their jobs, and moreover, many people cannot but foods because all kind of foods can be expensive for them. However, I believe eating unhealthy foods is adverse for human and society and government should tax for them. There are many positive impacts when people stop eating them because of the cost. For example, people can avoid diabetes which is the reason for many illness, which is not only advantage for human's health but also the best way for society to cut cost for medical care, and they will can invest other facilities finally. In conclusion, I consider that government should tax unhealthy food, although sometimes it looks unfair. It will leads people and society where they live to more healthy in the future. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live. Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a ‘fat tax’ is unfair and unnecessary. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: These days, it is considered that it has negative impact for people and their society to eat unhealthy food. Some argue that a ‘fat tax’ should be determined by government, while others think the task is not necessary because it will be unfair. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion for this unhealthy food tax matter. To begin with, many people say that it is unfair for companies which produce fat foods when governments decide the tax. There are some people who buy foods such as chips, candies or meets, because they are cheaper than healthy foods. However if the tax is made, people will not purchase that kind of foods, and then, the companies' income will decline. As a result, some individuals will lose their jobs, and moreover, many people cannot but foods because all kind of foods can be expensive for them. However, I believe eating unhealthy foods is adverse for human and society and government should tax for them. There are many positive impacts when people stop eating them because of the cost. For example, people can avoid diabetes which is the reason for many illness, which is not only advantage for human's health but also the best way for society to cut cost for medical care, and they will can invest other facilities finally. In conclusion, I consider that government should tax unhealthy food, although sometimes it looks unfair. It will leads people and society where they live to more healthy in the future. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live. Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a ‘fat tax’ is unfair and unnecessary. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: These days, it is considered that it has negative impact for people and their society to eat unhealthy food. Some argue that a ‘fat tax’ should be determined by government, while others think the task is not necessary because it will be unfair. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion for this unhealthy food tax matter. To begin with, many people say that it is unfair for companies which produce fat foods when governments decide the tax. There are some people who buy foods such as chips, candies or meets, because they are cheaper than healthy foods. However if the tax is made, people will not purchase that kind of foods, and then, the companies' income will decline. As a result, some individuals will lose their jobs, and moreover, many people cannot but foods because all kind of foods can be expensive for them. However, I believe eating unhealthy foods is adverse for human and society and government should tax for them. There are many positive impacts when people stop eating them because of the cost. For example, people can avoid diabetes which is the reason for many illness, which is not only advantage for human's health but also the best way for society to cut cost for medical care, and they will can invest other facilities finally. In conclusion, I consider that government should tax unhealthy food, although sometimes it looks unfair. It will leads people and society where they live to more healthy in the future. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live. Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a ‘fat tax’ is unfair and unnecessary. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: These days, it is considered that it has negative impact for people and their society to eat unhealthy food. Some argue that a ‘fat tax’ should be determined by government, while others think the task is not necessary because it will be unfair. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion for this unhealthy food tax matter. To begin with, many people say that it is unfair for companies which produce fat foods when governments decide the tax. There are some people who buy foods such as chips, candies or meets, because they are cheaper than healthy foods. However if the tax is made, people will not purchase that kind of foods, and then, the companies' income will decline. As a result, some individuals will lose their jobs, and moreover, many people cannot but foods because all kind of foods can be expensive for them. However, I believe eating unhealthy foods is adverse for human and society and government should tax for them. There are many positive impacts when people stop eating them because of the cost. For example, people can avoid diabetes which is the reason for many illness, which is not only advantage for human's health but also the best way for society to cut cost for medical care, and they will can invest other facilities finally. In conclusion, I consider that government should tax unhealthy food, although sometimes it looks unfair. It will leads people and society where they live to more healthy in the future. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Tourism has two opposite sides,the first one can bring sharply increased fields and maintain the economy among countries,however,the second side of tourism can bring potential drawbacks to local folks and impact on the environment poorly. I totally disagree with this statement that tourism impacts poorly on the environment and culture,because tourism can bring opportunities for countries to be popular in international areas. Also established wages for hotels and maintained the economy of the country. First of all, tourists are an established economy of many countries today. They make regular income to owners of hotels and this maintains the economy of the country. Moreover,many countries rely on tourism,which has the highest percentage of income. For example,Turkey is one of the most popular country for vacation and the economy of this country in many cases consists of a percentage of tourists. Furthermore, the increase of tourist numbers can lead to studying of foreign languages,especially English,German,Russian which are most popular among tourists and can upgrade their knowledge of language and are able to find a second job with ability. Hence, these qualities can lead countries to have potential income and establish their name in the international area of travel. However,the opposite side of this stream can be dangerous to culture and have environmental consequences. Many of the tourists,who have reached their destination, can start to discipline themselves and this can be the cause of misunderstanding between citizens and foreign people. For example,the world cup in France in 2016,when many supporters came to France and destroyed facilities such as cafes,restaurants and metros. This problem consists of two problems with contamination,which were made in this country and show the misunderstanding between people who lived in this country and who came to the World Cup. To sum up, this statement has advantages to economics with the highest percentage of income and studying of foreign languages,however, it has disadvantages to local green and local culture. In my point of view,despite the disadvantages,these opportunities have potential benefits for the government and good for the economy. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Tourism has two opposite sides,the first one can bring sharply increased fields and maintain the economy among countries,however,the second side of tourism can bring potential drawbacks to local folks and impact on the environment poorly. I totally disagree with this statement that tourism impacts poorly on the environment and culture,because tourism can bring opportunities for countries to be popular in international areas. Also established wages for hotels and maintained the economy of the country. First of all, tourists are an established economy of many countries today. They make regular income to owners of hotels and this maintains the economy of the country. Moreover,many countries rely on tourism,which has the highest percentage of income. For example,Turkey is one of the most popular country for vacation and the economy of this country in many cases consists of a percentage of tourists. Furthermore, the increase of tourist numbers can lead to studying of foreign languages,especially English,German,Russian which are most popular among tourists and can upgrade their knowledge of language and are able to find a second job with ability. Hence, these qualities can lead countries to have potential income and establish their name in the international area of travel. However,the opposite side of this stream can be dangerous to culture and have environmental consequences. Many of the tourists,who have reached their destination, can start to discipline themselves and this can be the cause of misunderstanding between citizens and foreign people. For example,the world cup in France in 2016,when many supporters came to France and destroyed facilities such as cafes,restaurants and metros. This problem consists of two problems with contamination,which were made in this country and show the misunderstanding between people who lived in this country and who came to the World Cup. To sum up, this statement has advantages to economics with the highest percentage of income and studying of foreign languages,however, it has disadvantages to local green and local culture. In my point of view,despite the disadvantages,these opportunities have potential benefits for the government and good for the economy. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Tourism has two opposite sides,the first one can bring sharply increased fields and maintain the economy among countries,however,the second side of tourism can bring potential drawbacks to local folks and impact on the environment poorly. I totally disagree with this statement that tourism impacts poorly on the environment and culture,because tourism can bring opportunities for countries to be popular in international areas. Also established wages for hotels and maintained the economy of the country. First of all, tourists are an established economy of many countries today. They make regular income to owners of hotels and this maintains the economy of the country. Moreover,many countries rely on tourism,which has the highest percentage of income. For example,Turkey is one of the most popular country for vacation and the economy of this country in many cases consists of a percentage of tourists. Furthermore, the increase of tourist numbers can lead to studying of foreign languages,especially English,German,Russian which are most popular among tourists and can upgrade their knowledge of language and are able to find a second job with ability. Hence, these qualities can lead countries to have potential income and establish their name in the international area of travel. However,the opposite side of this stream can be dangerous to culture and have environmental consequences. Many of the tourists,who have reached their destination, can start to discipline themselves and this can be the cause of misunderstanding between citizens and foreign people. For example,the world cup in France in 2016,when many supporters came to France and destroyed facilities such as cafes,restaurants and metros. This problem consists of two problems with contamination,which were made in this country and show the misunderstanding between people who lived in this country and who came to the World Cup. To sum up, this statement has advantages to economics with the highest percentage of income and studying of foreign languages,however, it has disadvantages to local green and local culture. In my point of view,despite the disadvantages,these opportunities have potential benefits for the government and good for the economy. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Tourism has two opposite sides,the first one can bring sharply increased fields and maintain the economy among countries,however,the second side of tourism can bring potential drawbacks to local folks and impact on the environment poorly. I totally disagree with this statement that tourism impacts poorly on the environment and culture,because tourism can bring opportunities for countries to be popular in international areas. Also established wages for hotels and maintained the economy of the country. First of all, tourists are an established economy of many countries today. They make regular income to owners of hotels and this maintains the economy of the country. Moreover,many countries rely on tourism,which has the highest percentage of income. For example,Turkey is one of the most popular country for vacation and the economy of this country in many cases consists of a percentage of tourists. Furthermore, the increase of tourist numbers can lead to studying of foreign languages,especially English,German,Russian which are most popular among tourists and can upgrade their knowledge of language and are able to find a second job with ability. Hence, these qualities can lead countries to have potential income and establish their name in the international area of travel. However,the opposite side of this stream can be dangerous to culture and have environmental consequences. Many of the tourists,who have reached their destination, can start to discipline themselves and this can be the cause of misunderstanding between citizens and foreign people. For example,the world cup in France in 2016,when many supporters came to France and destroyed facilities such as cafes,restaurants and metros. This problem consists of two problems with contamination,which were made in this country and show the misunderstanding between people who lived in this country and who came to the World Cup. To sum up, this statement has advantages to economics with the highest percentage of income and studying of foreign languages,however, it has disadvantages to local green and local culture. In my point of view,despite the disadvantages,these opportunities have potential benefits for the government and good for the economy. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: There is conflicting argument whether senior citizens bring problems for governments. In my opinion, the advantages outweight the disadvantages because they have a crucial role in maintaining and diseminating cultural values and become independent people. The increasing number of elderly people in certain country are more likely to decrease national income duo to the fact that the government should alocate their budget for their living. In Nordic countries, such as Findland and Sweden, that well-known as welfare state countries, government spent more budget for their senior citizens. Although this policy bring them to be one of the most happiness countries of the world and the most convinience places for aged population, it also lead to financial problem for the government. Furthermore, the fact that elderly citizens are unproductive, compared to young people, it is clear that their existance bring more disadvantages than advantages. Those on the other side of the argument say that senior citizens have a pivotal role for society, particularly in maintaining traditional values. In many developing countries in Asia, such as Indonesia and India, senior citizens have a significant role in maintaining cultural values and preaching these norms to younger citizens. They tend to be cultural broker between traditional norms that rooted from their ancestor and modern world where young population have to fight to this phenomenon. Additionally, it is important to note that they tend to be independent people who do not depent their live from state's budget or financial support from their sons and daughters. Therefore, it is clear that the advantages of senior citizens outweight the disadvantages. In conclusion, the number of senior citizens are not a problem for government since they play an important part of culural values and more likely to become independent citizens. Therefore, the advantages outweight the disadvantages. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: There is conflicting argument whether senior citizens bring problems for governments. In my opinion, the advantages outweight the disadvantages because they have a crucial role in maintaining and diseminating cultural values and become independent people. The increasing number of elderly people in certain country are more likely to decrease national income duo to the fact that the government should alocate their budget for their living. In Nordic countries, such as Findland and Sweden, that well-known as welfare state countries, government spent more budget for their senior citizens. Although this policy bring them to be one of the most happiness countries of the world and the most convinience places for aged population, it also lead to financial problem for the government. Furthermore, the fact that elderly citizens are unproductive, compared to young people, it is clear that their existance bring more disadvantages than advantages. Those on the other side of the argument say that senior citizens have a pivotal role for society, particularly in maintaining traditional values. In many developing countries in Asia, such as Indonesia and India, senior citizens have a significant role in maintaining cultural values and preaching these norms to younger citizens. They tend to be cultural broker between traditional norms that rooted from their ancestor and modern world where young population have to fight to this phenomenon. Additionally, it is important to note that they tend to be independent people who do not depent their live from state's budget or financial support from their sons and daughters. Therefore, it is clear that the advantages of senior citizens outweight the disadvantages. In conclusion, the number of senior citizens are not a problem for government since they play an important part of culural values and more likely to become independent citizens. Therefore, the advantages outweight the disadvantages. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: There is conflicting argument whether senior citizens bring problems for governments. In my opinion, the advantages outweight the disadvantages because they have a crucial role in maintaining and diseminating cultural values and become independent people. The increasing number of elderly people in certain country are more likely to decrease national income duo to the fact that the government should alocate their budget for their living. In Nordic countries, such as Findland and Sweden, that well-known as welfare state countries, government spent more budget for their senior citizens. Although this policy bring them to be one of the most happiness countries of the world and the most convinience places for aged population, it also lead to financial problem for the government. Furthermore, the fact that elderly citizens are unproductive, compared to young people, it is clear that their existance bring more disadvantages than advantages. Those on the other side of the argument say that senior citizens have a pivotal role for society, particularly in maintaining traditional values. In many developing countries in Asia, such as Indonesia and India, senior citizens have a significant role in maintaining cultural values and preaching these norms to younger citizens. They tend to be cultural broker between traditional norms that rooted from their ancestor and modern world where young population have to fight to this phenomenon. Additionally, it is important to note that they tend to be independent people who do not depent their live from state's budget or financial support from their sons and daughters. Therefore, it is clear that the advantages of senior citizens outweight the disadvantages. In conclusion, the number of senior citizens are not a problem for government since they play an important part of culural values and more likely to become independent citizens. Therefore, the advantages outweight the disadvantages. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: There is conflicting argument whether senior citizens bring problems for governments. In my opinion, the advantages outweight the disadvantages because they have a crucial role in maintaining and diseminating cultural values and become independent people. The increasing number of elderly people in certain country are more likely to decrease national income duo to the fact that the government should alocate their budget for their living. In Nordic countries, such as Findland and Sweden, that well-known as welfare state countries, government spent more budget for their senior citizens. Although this policy bring them to be one of the most happiness countries of the world and the most convinience places for aged population, it also lead to financial problem for the government. Furthermore, the fact that elderly citizens are unproductive, compared to young people, it is clear that their existance bring more disadvantages than advantages. Those on the other side of the argument say that senior citizens have a pivotal role for society, particularly in maintaining traditional values. In many developing countries in Asia, such as Indonesia and India, senior citizens have a significant role in maintaining cultural values and preaching these norms to younger citizens. They tend to be cultural broker between traditional norms that rooted from their ancestor and modern world where young population have to fight to this phenomenon. Additionally, it is important to note that they tend to be independent people who do not depent their live from state's budget or financial support from their sons and daughters. Therefore, it is clear that the advantages of senior citizens outweight the disadvantages. In conclusion, the number of senior citizens are not a problem for government since they play an important part of culural values and more likely to become independent citizens. Therefore, the advantages outweight the disadvantages. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: With the advent of technological improvements, most children have been inclined to allocate most of their time on their mobile phones. A lack of social skills is the major reason behind this prevalence. I believe that this is a negative development because spending hours on screen can adversely impact children’s physical health. There are many juveniles around the world who suffer from developing social skills, and, therefore, they might find more effective and easier to give the preference to use their phones instead of being sociable. For example, when children who are obsessed with their voices and appearance encounter difficulties to find friends outside, they tend to prefer creating friendships in the Internet because online acquaintances do not demand communication abilities and revealing their appearance. In addition, finding foreigner friends is also accessible online, and it may give juveniles more chances in order to avoid being alone and unsociable. I consider this trend as a negative development because allocating several hours to the smartphones exerts some adverse effects on the minors’ well-being. First of all, watching screens for a long time are highly likely to damage children’s eye. The particular research in the UK proves that most of the various visual problems in the patients stem from electronical devices such as phones and computers apart from natural factors. In conclusion, higher possibility for the minors to create strong friendships in the Internet are the main cause that underlying this tendency. However, I think that this can contribute to the negative consequences in terms of their health. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: With the advent of technological improvements, most children have been inclined to allocate most of their time on their mobile phones. A lack of social skills is the major reason behind this prevalence. I believe that this is a negative development because spending hours on screen can adversely impact children’s physical health. There are many juveniles around the world who suffer from developing social skills, and, therefore, they might find more effective and easier to give the preference to use their phones instead of being sociable. For example, when children who are obsessed with their voices and appearance encounter difficulties to find friends outside, they tend to prefer creating friendships in the Internet because online acquaintances do not demand communication abilities and revealing their appearance. In addition, finding foreigner friends is also accessible online, and it may give juveniles more chances in order to avoid being alone and unsociable. I consider this trend as a negative development because allocating several hours to the smartphones exerts some adverse effects on the minors’ well-being. First of all, watching screens for a long time are highly likely to damage children’s eye. The particular research in the UK proves that most of the various visual problems in the patients stem from electronical devices such as phones and computers apart from natural factors. In conclusion, higher possibility for the minors to create strong friendships in the Internet are the main cause that underlying this tendency. However, I think that this can contribute to the negative consequences in terms of their health. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: With the advent of technological improvements, most children have been inclined to allocate most of their time on their mobile phones. A lack of social skills is the major reason behind this prevalence. I believe that this is a negative development because spending hours on screen can adversely impact children’s physical health. There are many juveniles around the world who suffer from developing social skills, and, therefore, they might find more effective and easier to give the preference to use their phones instead of being sociable. For example, when children who are obsessed with their voices and appearance encounter difficulties to find friends outside, they tend to prefer creating friendships in the Internet because online acquaintances do not demand communication abilities and revealing their appearance. In addition, finding foreigner friends is also accessible online, and it may give juveniles more chances in order to avoid being alone and unsociable. I consider this trend as a negative development because allocating several hours to the smartphones exerts some adverse effects on the minors’ well-being. First of all, watching screens for a long time are highly likely to damage children’s eye. The particular research in the UK proves that most of the various visual problems in the patients stem from electronical devices such as phones and computers apart from natural factors. In conclusion, higher possibility for the minors to create strong friendships in the Internet are the main cause that underlying this tendency. However, I think that this can contribute to the negative consequences in terms of their health. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: With the advent of technological improvements, most children have been inclined to allocate most of their time on their mobile phones. A lack of social skills is the major reason behind this prevalence. I believe that this is a negative development because spending hours on screen can adversely impact children’s physical health. There are many juveniles around the world who suffer from developing social skills, and, therefore, they might find more effective and easier to give the preference to use their phones instead of being sociable. For example, when children who are obsessed with their voices and appearance encounter difficulties to find friends outside, they tend to prefer creating friendships in the Internet because online acquaintances do not demand communication abilities and revealing their appearance. In addition, finding foreigner friends is also accessible online, and it may give juveniles more chances in order to avoid being alone and unsociable. I consider this trend as a negative development because allocating several hours to the smartphones exerts some adverse effects on the minors’ well-being. First of all, watching screens for a long time are highly likely to damage children’s eye. The particular research in the UK proves that most of the various visual problems in the patients stem from electronical devices such as phones and computers apart from natural factors. In conclusion, higher possibility for the minors to create strong friendships in the Internet are the main cause that underlying this tendency. However, I think that this can contribute to the negative consequences in terms of their health. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Public transport is essential but problematic. Describe some of problems connected to public transport and suggest some solutions. Anwser: It is an admitted fact that cities population is increasing day by day. And there is no proper mechnanism to resolve this issue. Increased population need a proper infrastructure to channelise the public. Public transport is the most important issue in megacities because every populated city always needs a well-managed transport system. As we talk about some metropolitan cities without public transport system, they may be collapsed. Although public transport is necessary for the convenience of the masses there are also some problems which may need to be resolved at the government level. Firstly, I would like to talk about the people moving from towns to cities, the transport system needs some mega changes. according to the population of the city, there should be more public transport for them. Secondly, The fare of public transport should be monitored and fixed by the officials, so that people can afford the facility because the services are used by the common man and daily wagers. Thirdly, most of the transports moving around the city are old models, having different types of issues and need to be repaired, so such typesof vehicles may replaced or be repaired as soon as possible. Lastly, I would like to point out that staff including drivers should be given proper knowledge of traffic rules and should also be educated about treating the passengers,, especially the older age people, females and kids. I conclude the essay with the statement that public transport is essential for the development and beauty of the cities . Government should use its authority to make it more and more problem-free. So that public transport may be useful for the people living in the city. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Public transport is essential but problematic. Describe some of problems connected to public transport and suggest some solutions. Anwser: It is an admitted fact that cities population is increasing day by day. And there is no proper mechnanism to resolve this issue. Increased population need a proper infrastructure to channelise the public. Public transport is the most important issue in megacities because every populated city always needs a well-managed transport system. As we talk about some metropolitan cities without public transport system, they may be collapsed. Although public transport is necessary for the convenience of the masses there are also some problems which may need to be resolved at the government level. Firstly, I would like to talk about the people moving from towns to cities, the transport system needs some mega changes. according to the population of the city, there should be more public transport for them. Secondly, The fare of public transport should be monitored and fixed by the officials, so that people can afford the facility because the services are used by the common man and daily wagers. Thirdly, most of the transports moving around the city are old models, having different types of issues and need to be repaired, so such typesof vehicles may replaced or be repaired as soon as possible. Lastly, I would like to point out that staff including drivers should be given proper knowledge of traffic rules and should also be educated about treating the passengers,, especially the older age people, females and kids. I conclude the essay with the statement that public transport is essential for the development and beauty of the cities . Government should use its authority to make it more and more problem-free. So that public transport may be useful for the people living in the city. Your lexical resource score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Public transport is essential but problematic. Describe some of problems connected to public transport and suggest some solutions. Anwser: It is an admitted fact that cities population is increasing day by day. And there is no proper mechnanism to resolve this issue. Increased population need a proper infrastructure to channelise the public. Public transport is the most important issue in megacities because every populated city always needs a well-managed transport system. As we talk about some metropolitan cities without public transport system, they may be collapsed. Although public transport is necessary for the convenience of the masses there are also some problems which may need to be resolved at the government level. Firstly, I would like to talk about the people moving from towns to cities, the transport system needs some mega changes. according to the population of the city, there should be more public transport for them. Secondly, The fare of public transport should be monitored and fixed by the officials, so that people can afford the facility because the services are used by the common man and daily wagers. Thirdly, most of the transports moving around the city are old models, having different types of issues and need to be repaired, so such typesof vehicles may replaced or be repaired as soon as possible. Lastly, I would like to point out that staff including drivers should be given proper knowledge of traffic rules and should also be educated about treating the passengers,, especially the older age people, females and kids. I conclude the essay with the statement that public transport is essential for the development and beauty of the cities . Government should use its authority to make it more and more problem-free. So that public transport may be useful for the people living in the city. Your grammatical range score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Public transport is essential but problematic. Describe some of problems connected to public transport and suggest some solutions. Anwser: It is an admitted fact that cities population is increasing day by day. And there is no proper mechnanism to resolve this issue. Increased population need a proper infrastructure to channelise the public. Public transport is the most important issue in megacities because every populated city always needs a well-managed transport system. As we talk about some metropolitan cities without public transport system, they may be collapsed. Although public transport is necessary for the convenience of the masses there are also some problems which may need to be resolved at the government level. Firstly, I would like to talk about the people moving from towns to cities, the transport system needs some mega changes. according to the population of the city, there should be more public transport for them. Secondly, The fare of public transport should be monitored and fixed by the officials, so that people can afford the facility because the services are used by the common man and daily wagers. Thirdly, most of the transports moving around the city are old models, having different types of issues and need to be repaired, so such typesof vehicles may replaced or be repaired as soon as possible. Lastly, I would like to point out that staff including drivers should be given proper knowledge of traffic rules and should also be educated about treating the passengers,, especially the older age people, females and kids. I conclude the essay with the statement that public transport is essential for the development and beauty of the cities . Government should use its authority to make it more and more problem-free. So that public transport may be useful for the people living in the city. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both veiws and give your opinion. Anwser: In contemporary society, the debate surrounding the online reading versus the using printed materials is ongoing. While some argue that children learn their best from online materials ,others contend that only printed materials can help to read . This essay will explore both perspectives. One significant point of using online materials to develop children reading skills is interactive elements such as animations, videos, and audio clips, which can capture children's attention and make the reading experience more engaging. This engagement can enhance comprehension and retention of reading materials. However, online reading materials often come with distractions such as advertisements, pop-up notifications which can divert children's attention away from the main content and hinder comprehension. For instance Epic! provides a vast library of digital books with interactive elements such as audio narration and comprehension quizzes, keeping children actively engaged in the reading experience. Additionally, while reading an article on a news website, a pop-up ad may appear, interrupting the reading experience and disrupting comprehension. Online reading materials offer advantages such as interactive engagement and accessibility, yet they also present limitations like potential distractions and screen fatigue. On the other hand unlike online reading platforms, printed materials offer a distraction-free environment that allows children to focus solely on the text. Without the allure of pop-up ads or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the narrative and develop sustained attention span.Furthermore purchasing printed books can be costly, especially for families on a tight budget. The expense of buying new books or maintaining a library collection may pose financial challenges for some families, limiting their access to reading materials. For example without the distractions of electronic devices or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the storyline and remain engaged for longer periods. In addition hardcover editions of popular children's books may be priced higher than digital versions or paperback editions, making them less accessible to economically disadvantaged families. As a consequence learning to read from printed materials offers tactile engagement and enhanced focus, but it may pose challenges such as shortage of budgets In conclusion, while learning to read from online materials offers advantages such as tactile engagement it also presents challenges such as distractions while printed materials are more good but at the same time not everyone can afford books as they are expensive. I believe that access to printed materials should be a priority, especially in underserved communities where internet access may be limited Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both veiws and give your opinion. Anwser: In contemporary society, the debate surrounding the online reading versus the using printed materials is ongoing. While some argue that children learn their best from online materials ,others contend that only printed materials can help to read . This essay will explore both perspectives. One significant point of using online materials to develop children reading skills is interactive elements such as animations, videos, and audio clips, which can capture children's attention and make the reading experience more engaging. This engagement can enhance comprehension and retention of reading materials. However, online reading materials often come with distractions such as advertisements, pop-up notifications which can divert children's attention away from the main content and hinder comprehension. For instance Epic! provides a vast library of digital books with interactive elements such as audio narration and comprehension quizzes, keeping children actively engaged in the reading experience. Additionally, while reading an article on a news website, a pop-up ad may appear, interrupting the reading experience and disrupting comprehension. Online reading materials offer advantages such as interactive engagement and accessibility, yet they also present limitations like potential distractions and screen fatigue. On the other hand unlike online reading platforms, printed materials offer a distraction-free environment that allows children to focus solely on the text. Without the allure of pop-up ads or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the narrative and develop sustained attention span.Furthermore purchasing printed books can be costly, especially for families on a tight budget. The expense of buying new books or maintaining a library collection may pose financial challenges for some families, limiting their access to reading materials. For example without the distractions of electronic devices or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the storyline and remain engaged for longer periods. In addition hardcover editions of popular children's books may be priced higher than digital versions or paperback editions, making them less accessible to economically disadvantaged families. As a consequence learning to read from printed materials offers tactile engagement and enhanced focus, but it may pose challenges such as shortage of budgets In conclusion, while learning to read from online materials offers advantages such as tactile engagement it also presents challenges such as distractions while printed materials are more good but at the same time not everyone can afford books as they are expensive. I believe that access to printed materials should be a priority, especially in underserved communities where internet access may be limited Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both veiws and give your opinion. Anwser: In contemporary society, the debate surrounding the online reading versus the using printed materials is ongoing. While some argue that children learn their best from online materials ,others contend that only printed materials can help to read . This essay will explore both perspectives. One significant point of using online materials to develop children reading skills is interactive elements such as animations, videos, and audio clips, which can capture children's attention and make the reading experience more engaging. This engagement can enhance comprehension and retention of reading materials. However, online reading materials often come with distractions such as advertisements, pop-up notifications which can divert children's attention away from the main content and hinder comprehension. For instance Epic! provides a vast library of digital books with interactive elements such as audio narration and comprehension quizzes, keeping children actively engaged in the reading experience. Additionally, while reading an article on a news website, a pop-up ad may appear, interrupting the reading experience and disrupting comprehension. Online reading materials offer advantages such as interactive engagement and accessibility, yet they also present limitations like potential distractions and screen fatigue. On the other hand unlike online reading platforms, printed materials offer a distraction-free environment that allows children to focus solely on the text. Without the allure of pop-up ads or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the narrative and develop sustained attention span.Furthermore purchasing printed books can be costly, especially for families on a tight budget. The expense of buying new books or maintaining a library collection may pose financial challenges for some families, limiting their access to reading materials. For example without the distractions of electronic devices or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the storyline and remain engaged for longer periods. In addition hardcover editions of popular children's books may be priced higher than digital versions or paperback editions, making them less accessible to economically disadvantaged families. As a consequence learning to read from printed materials offers tactile engagement and enhanced focus, but it may pose challenges such as shortage of budgets In conclusion, while learning to read from online materials offers advantages such as tactile engagement it also presents challenges such as distractions while printed materials are more good but at the same time not everyone can afford books as they are expensive. I believe that access to printed materials should be a priority, especially in underserved communities where internet access may be limited Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both veiws and give your opinion. Anwser: In contemporary society, the debate surrounding the online reading versus the using printed materials is ongoing. While some argue that children learn their best from online materials ,others contend that only printed materials can help to read . This essay will explore both perspectives. One significant point of using online materials to develop children reading skills is interactive elements such as animations, videos, and audio clips, which can capture children's attention and make the reading experience more engaging. This engagement can enhance comprehension and retention of reading materials. However, online reading materials often come with distractions such as advertisements, pop-up notifications which can divert children's attention away from the main content and hinder comprehension. For instance Epic! provides a vast library of digital books with interactive elements such as audio narration and comprehension quizzes, keeping children actively engaged in the reading experience. Additionally, while reading an article on a news website, a pop-up ad may appear, interrupting the reading experience and disrupting comprehension. Online reading materials offer advantages such as interactive engagement and accessibility, yet they also present limitations like potential distractions and screen fatigue. On the other hand unlike online reading platforms, printed materials offer a distraction-free environment that allows children to focus solely on the text. Without the allure of pop-up ads or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the narrative and develop sustained attention span.Furthermore purchasing printed books can be costly, especially for families on a tight budget. The expense of buying new books or maintaining a library collection may pose financial challenges for some families, limiting their access to reading materials. For example without the distractions of electronic devices or notifications, children can immerse themselves in the storyline and remain engaged for longer periods. In addition hardcover editions of popular children's books may be priced higher than digital versions or paperback editions, making them less accessible to economically disadvantaged families. As a consequence learning to read from printed materials offers tactile engagement and enhanced focus, but it may pose challenges such as shortage of budgets In conclusion, while learning to read from online materials offers advantages such as tactile engagement it also presents challenges such as distractions while printed materials are more good but at the same time not everyone can afford books as they are expensive. I believe that access to printed materials should be a priority, especially in underserved communities where internet access may be limited Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: It is undeniable truth that , life is not imaginable without communication. However, certain Human thinks that , Staying in abroad and speak their native language instead of mother language can create several issuses. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in following Paragraphs. First and formemost point which aid me to support is flexibility. Every human upbringing is done with the mind set of flexibility in every situation. This kind of mindset not only assist individual to stay in difficult situation. but also motivate . For instance, a Student want to have his higher education country like canada where the native languure is English, hence the student will learn the English language to complete the dream. The another most vital point which can not be overlooked is quick adapting nature of mankind. In Simple words, people are so adaptive that, they can fit themselves into new culture of foreing People quickly. The reason behind that is having good communication as well as conver Sation with foreign people. If the individual will not learn the culture of other nation, might feel lonely. On the flip side, numerous individual find that burdensome to learn different language as well as to adapt new Culture. However, every humans Should try to go beyond their comfortzone because, they will learn different Culture and language which uphold them to enhance their communication and take it to a great level. All in all, to speak new language can not lead any mankind to major problem socially as well a Practically. It create new skills and enhance the ability to adapt new things quickly. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: It is undeniable truth that , life is not imaginable without communication. However, certain Human thinks that , Staying in abroad and speak their native language instead of mother language can create several issuses. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in following Paragraphs. First and formemost point which aid me to support is flexibility. Every human upbringing is done with the mind set of flexibility in every situation. This kind of mindset not only assist individual to stay in difficult situation. but also motivate . For instance, a Student want to have his higher education country like canada where the native languure is English, hence the student will learn the English language to complete the dream. The another most vital point which can not be overlooked is quick adapting nature of mankind. In Simple words, people are so adaptive that, they can fit themselves into new culture of foreing People quickly. The reason behind that is having good communication as well as conver Sation with foreign people. If the individual will not learn the culture of other nation, might feel lonely. On the flip side, numerous individual find that burdensome to learn different language as well as to adapt new Culture. However, every humans Should try to go beyond their comfortzone because, they will learn different Culture and language which uphold them to enhance their communication and take it to a great level. All in all, to speak new language can not lead any mankind to major problem socially as well a Practically. It create new skills and enhance the ability to adapt new things quickly. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: It is undeniable truth that , life is not imaginable without communication. However, certain Human thinks that , Staying in abroad and speak their native language instead of mother language can create several issuses. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in following Paragraphs. First and formemost point which aid me to support is flexibility. Every human upbringing is done with the mind set of flexibility in every situation. This kind of mindset not only assist individual to stay in difficult situation. but also motivate . For instance, a Student want to have his higher education country like canada where the native languure is English, hence the student will learn the English language to complete the dream. The another most vital point which can not be overlooked is quick adapting nature of mankind. In Simple words, people are so adaptive that, they can fit themselves into new culture of foreing People quickly. The reason behind that is having good communication as well as conver Sation with foreign people. If the individual will not learn the culture of other nation, might feel lonely. On the flip side, numerous individual find that burdensome to learn different language as well as to adapt new Culture. However, every humans Should try to go beyond their comfortzone because, they will learn different Culture and language which uphold them to enhance their communication and take it to a great level. All in all, to speak new language can not lead any mankind to major problem socially as well a Practically. It create new skills and enhance the ability to adapt new things quickly. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: It is undeniable truth that , life is not imaginable without communication. However, certain Human thinks that , Staying in abroad and speak their native language instead of mother language can create several issuses. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in following Paragraphs. First and formemost point which aid me to support is flexibility. Every human upbringing is done with the mind set of flexibility in every situation. This kind of mindset not only assist individual to stay in difficult situation. but also motivate . For instance, a Student want to have his higher education country like canada where the native languure is English, hence the student will learn the English language to complete the dream. The another most vital point which can not be overlooked is quick adapting nature of mankind. In Simple words, people are so adaptive that, they can fit themselves into new culture of foreing People quickly. The reason behind that is having good communication as well as conver Sation with foreign people. If the individual will not learn the culture of other nation, might feel lonely. On the flip side, numerous individual find that burdensome to learn different language as well as to adapt new Culture. However, every humans Should try to go beyond their comfortzone because, they will learn different Culture and language which uphold them to enhance their communication and take it to a great level. All in all, to speak new language can not lead any mankind to major problem socially as well a Practically. It create new skills and enhance the ability to adapt new things quickly. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals. Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos. What do you think? Explain, giving specific reasons for your choice. Anwser: In the third millennium, protecting of animals is one of most burning issues. Openinions about how ought to keep species are divided as to wheter keep them inside an isolated environment or leave animals alone in nature. Hence, this essay will delve into details of both point of view and provide some tentalizing reasons why zoos have better condition. On the one hand, proponent of keeping animals in zoos would claim that it is more advantageous for them. One justification often given for this is the role of protection. To clarify, nowadays, many species are at the risk of extincation likewise, Persian tigers and African lions. Therefore, zoos might be a sutitable home to feeding them appropriatly, providing medicine equipments, keeping them in safe, and ultimately ensuring of their survive. Furthermore, another factore which has led choose zoos as a acceptable envronment for faunas is the value of investigation. Needless to say, the burden responsibility for researching on animal kins lies in the hands of zoos. Thus, many scinetists and biologists work in zoos' area in order to discover a new exploration. For example, the cutting-edge technology of DNA have been extracted by studying on species. On the other hand, although many people are generally agree to positive implications of zoos, just a few would deny the nature as the first home of animals. Clearly, faunas born in the nature environment and have inherited attachment to their inborn conditions. As a result, some abnormallies may be accured when a creature hase been seprated from nature. Subsequently, it may be conceded living animals in their own habitat can keep the balance of nature. Moreover, zoos are proved as a costly environment for the government. Undeniebly, taking care of various kinds need experts and advanced equipments, need financial support and human resources. Subsequently, spending huge money to protecting all of kinds of creaturs may be considered as waste for people and governments while the nature is free and available for any kinds of animals. To sum up, with regard to the foregoing paragraphs it can be stated that nature is free and acessible with ease for species while zoos are money spending. Nevertheless, my firm conviction is that zoos situation would be more acceptable for animal in many facets like invetigation and protection. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals. Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos. What do you think? Explain, giving specific reasons for your choice. Anwser: In the third millennium, protecting of animals is one of most burning issues. Openinions about how ought to keep species are divided as to wheter keep them inside an isolated environment or leave animals alone in nature. Hence, this essay will delve into details of both point of view and provide some tentalizing reasons why zoos have better condition. On the one hand, proponent of keeping animals in zoos would claim that it is more advantageous for them. One justification often given for this is the role of protection. To clarify, nowadays, many species are at the risk of extincation likewise, Persian tigers and African lions. Therefore, zoos might be a sutitable home to feeding them appropriatly, providing medicine equipments, keeping them in safe, and ultimately ensuring of their survive. Furthermore, another factore which has led choose zoos as a acceptable envronment for faunas is the value of investigation. Needless to say, the burden responsibility for researching on animal kins lies in the hands of zoos. Thus, many scinetists and biologists work in zoos' area in order to discover a new exploration. For example, the cutting-edge technology of DNA have been extracted by studying on species. On the other hand, although many people are generally agree to positive implications of zoos, just a few would deny the nature as the first home of animals. Clearly, faunas born in the nature environment and have inherited attachment to their inborn conditions. As a result, some abnormallies may be accured when a creature hase been seprated from nature. Subsequently, it may be conceded living animals in their own habitat can keep the balance of nature. Moreover, zoos are proved as a costly environment for the government. Undeniebly, taking care of various kinds need experts and advanced equipments, need financial support and human resources. Subsequently, spending huge money to protecting all of kinds of creaturs may be considered as waste for people and governments while the nature is free and available for any kinds of animals. To sum up, with regard to the foregoing paragraphs it can be stated that nature is free and acessible with ease for species while zoos are money spending. Nevertheless, my firm conviction is that zoos situation would be more acceptable for animal in many facets like invetigation and protection. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals. Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos. What do you think? Explain, giving specific reasons for your choice. Anwser: In the third millennium, protecting of animals is one of most burning issues. Openinions about how ought to keep species are divided as to wheter keep them inside an isolated environment or leave animals alone in nature. Hence, this essay will delve into details of both point of view and provide some tentalizing reasons why zoos have better condition. On the one hand, proponent of keeping animals in zoos would claim that it is more advantageous for them. One justification often given for this is the role of protection. To clarify, nowadays, many species are at the risk of extincation likewise, Persian tigers and African lions. Therefore, zoos might be a sutitable home to feeding them appropriatly, providing medicine equipments, keeping them in safe, and ultimately ensuring of their survive. Furthermore, another factore which has led choose zoos as a acceptable envronment for faunas is the value of investigation. Needless to say, the burden responsibility for researching on animal kins lies in the hands of zoos. Thus, many scinetists and biologists work in zoos' area in order to discover a new exploration. For example, the cutting-edge technology of DNA have been extracted by studying on species. On the other hand, although many people are generally agree to positive implications of zoos, just a few would deny the nature as the first home of animals. Clearly, faunas born in the nature environment and have inherited attachment to their inborn conditions. As a result, some abnormallies may be accured when a creature hase been seprated from nature. Subsequently, it may be conceded living animals in their own habitat can keep the balance of nature. Moreover, zoos are proved as a costly environment for the government. Undeniebly, taking care of various kinds need experts and advanced equipments, need financial support and human resources. Subsequently, spending huge money to protecting all of kinds of creaturs may be considered as waste for people and governments while the nature is free and available for any kinds of animals. To sum up, with regard to the foregoing paragraphs it can be stated that nature is free and acessible with ease for species while zoos are money spending. Nevertheless, my firm conviction is that zoos situation would be more acceptable for animal in many facets like invetigation and protection. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals. Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos. What do you think? Explain, giving specific reasons for your choice. Anwser: In the third millennium, protecting of animals is one of most burning issues. Openinions about how ought to keep species are divided as to wheter keep them inside an isolated environment or leave animals alone in nature. Hence, this essay will delve into details of both point of view and provide some tentalizing reasons why zoos have better condition. On the one hand, proponent of keeping animals in zoos would claim that it is more advantageous for them. One justification often given for this is the role of protection. To clarify, nowadays, many species are at the risk of extincation likewise, Persian tigers and African lions. Therefore, zoos might be a sutitable home to feeding them appropriatly, providing medicine equipments, keeping them in safe, and ultimately ensuring of their survive. Furthermore, another factore which has led choose zoos as a acceptable envronment for faunas is the value of investigation. Needless to say, the burden responsibility for researching on animal kins lies in the hands of zoos. Thus, many scinetists and biologists work in zoos' area in order to discover a new exploration. For example, the cutting-edge technology of DNA have been extracted by studying on species. On the other hand, although many people are generally agree to positive implications of zoos, just a few would deny the nature as the first home of animals. Clearly, faunas born in the nature environment and have inherited attachment to their inborn conditions. As a result, some abnormallies may be accured when a creature hase been seprated from nature. Subsequently, it may be conceded living animals in their own habitat can keep the balance of nature. Moreover, zoos are proved as a costly environment for the government. Undeniebly, taking care of various kinds need experts and advanced equipments, need financial support and human resources. Subsequently, spending huge money to protecting all of kinds of creaturs may be considered as waste for people and governments while the nature is free and available for any kinds of animals. To sum up, with regard to the foregoing paragraphs it can be stated that nature is free and acessible with ease for species while zoos are money spending. Nevertheless, my firm conviction is that zoos situation would be more acceptable for animal in many facets like invetigation and protection. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Besides a lot of advantages, some people think that the internet creates many problems. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: While it is thought that the internet has several benefits on the community,others believe that many problems related to the usage of it. In my opinion, I think internet is a double-edged sword , as it simplifies the communication regarding of the challenges that it contains. Firstly, the Internet has revolutionized communication, making it easier for people to connect globally. Whether through email, social media, or video calls, we can stay in touch with friends and family regardless of distance. For example, my cousin who lives abroad and I communicate regularly through video calls, allowing us to maintain a close relationship despite the geographical distance. Additionally, the Internet is a vast source of information, enabling us to learn about diverse topics and access educational resources. From online courses to academic databases, knowledge is now more accessible than ever before. However, despite these advantages, the Internet presents various problems. One issue is the spread of misinformation and fake news, which can mislead people and harm society. Moreover, the Internet can contribute to cybercrime, including identity theft and online scams, posing risks to individuals' security and privacy. Furthermore, excessive use of the Internet, especially social media, can have negative effects on mental health, leading to feelings of loneliness and anxiety. To conclude, although the internet presents several advantages and disadvantages, I think by the advance of technology, Developers should take care of protection so that other issues do not spread. Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Besides a lot of advantages, some people think that the internet creates many problems. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: While it is thought that the internet has several benefits on the community,others believe that many problems related to the usage of it. In my opinion, I think internet is a double-edged sword , as it simplifies the communication regarding of the challenges that it contains. Firstly, the Internet has revolutionized communication, making it easier for people to connect globally. Whether through email, social media, or video calls, we can stay in touch with friends and family regardless of distance. For example, my cousin who lives abroad and I communicate regularly through video calls, allowing us to maintain a close relationship despite the geographical distance. Additionally, the Internet is a vast source of information, enabling us to learn about diverse topics and access educational resources. From online courses to academic databases, knowledge is now more accessible than ever before. However, despite these advantages, the Internet presents various problems. One issue is the spread of misinformation and fake news, which can mislead people and harm society. Moreover, the Internet can contribute to cybercrime, including identity theft and online scams, posing risks to individuals' security and privacy. Furthermore, excessive use of the Internet, especially social media, can have negative effects on mental health, leading to feelings of loneliness and anxiety. To conclude, although the internet presents several advantages and disadvantages, I think by the advance of technology, Developers should take care of protection so that other issues do not spread. Your lexical resource score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Besides a lot of advantages, some people think that the internet creates many problems. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: While it is thought that the internet has several benefits on the community,others believe that many problems related to the usage of it. In my opinion, I think internet is a double-edged sword , as it simplifies the communication regarding of the challenges that it contains. Firstly, the Internet has revolutionized communication, making it easier for people to connect globally. Whether through email, social media, or video calls, we can stay in touch with friends and family regardless of distance. For example, my cousin who lives abroad and I communicate regularly through video calls, allowing us to maintain a close relationship despite the geographical distance. Additionally, the Internet is a vast source of information, enabling us to learn about diverse topics and access educational resources. From online courses to academic databases, knowledge is now more accessible than ever before. However, despite these advantages, the Internet presents various problems. One issue is the spread of misinformation and fake news, which can mislead people and harm society. Moreover, the Internet can contribute to cybercrime, including identity theft and online scams, posing risks to individuals' security and privacy. Furthermore, excessive use of the Internet, especially social media, can have negative effects on mental health, leading to feelings of loneliness and anxiety. To conclude, although the internet presents several advantages and disadvantages, I think by the advance of technology, Developers should take care of protection so that other issues do not spread. Your grammatical range score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Besides a lot of advantages, some people think that the internet creates many problems. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: While it is thought that the internet has several benefits on the community,others believe that many problems related to the usage of it. In my opinion, I think internet is a double-edged sword , as it simplifies the communication regarding of the challenges that it contains. Firstly, the Internet has revolutionized communication, making it easier for people to connect globally. Whether through email, social media, or video calls, we can stay in touch with friends and family regardless of distance. For example, my cousin who lives abroad and I communicate regularly through video calls, allowing us to maintain a close relationship despite the geographical distance. Additionally, the Internet is a vast source of information, enabling us to learn about diverse topics and access educational resources. From online courses to academic databases, knowledge is now more accessible than ever before. However, despite these advantages, the Internet presents various problems. One issue is the spread of misinformation and fake news, which can mislead people and harm society. Moreover, the Internet can contribute to cybercrime, including identity theft and online scams, posing risks to individuals' security and privacy. Furthermore, excessive use of the Internet, especially social media, can have negative effects on mental health, leading to feelings of loneliness and anxiety. To conclude, although the internet presents several advantages and disadvantages, I think by the advance of technology, Developers should take care of protection so that other issues do not spread. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people say that extinction is a natural process and a plethora of species evolve to replace each other. They assume that there is no reason to focus on such phenomenon and waste any effort to end it. From my perspective, it is a partial reality to explain vanishing of the animals and the issue needs some attention to slow it down or completely end it which will be examined further in the essay. To begin with, humans are entering some unchartered territories of the nature. They are recklessly poaching animals. For instance, the turtle species are under continuous threat. Not only adult turtle gets killed for its flesh but also people use its eggs to sell them in the black markets. There are numerous animals whose existence got threatened due to the killings to satiate the human avarice such as white tiger and even some of the bird species. Hence, hunting is not a natural process but it is an illegal activity. So, stringent regulations have to be placed to encounter hunting and it could slow down the evasion of the species. Moreover, the food chain is disturbed due to unnatural disappearances of many species. These species are a part of an ecosystem which is interconnected for each others needs. If one creature disappears then other parts of its food chain will be affected. For instance, if tiger will completely vanish then deers population will explode and they will become burden on the environment for their food. The forest cannot accommodate the food needs for an outnumbered deer populace. As a result, many species will automatically die in this struggle. Hence, the unnatural causes for the animal's death should be identified and deterred. In conclusion, natural extinction is a slow process and nature itself adapts to the changes it makes. However, man-made disasters like poaching should be undone or investigated otherwise its consequences might be detrimental for the earth. Your coherence and cohesion score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people say that extinction is a natural process and a plethora of species evolve to replace each other. They assume that there is no reason to focus on such phenomenon and waste any effort to end it. From my perspective, it is a partial reality to explain vanishing of the animals and the issue needs some attention to slow it down or completely end it which will be examined further in the essay. To begin with, humans are entering some unchartered territories of the nature. They are recklessly poaching animals. For instance, the turtle species are under continuous threat. Not only adult turtle gets killed for its flesh but also people use its eggs to sell them in the black markets. There are numerous animals whose existence got threatened due to the killings to satiate the human avarice such as white tiger and even some of the bird species. Hence, hunting is not a natural process but it is an illegal activity. So, stringent regulations have to be placed to encounter hunting and it could slow down the evasion of the species. Moreover, the food chain is disturbed due to unnatural disappearances of many species. These species are a part of an ecosystem which is interconnected for each others needs. If one creature disappears then other parts of its food chain will be affected. For instance, if tiger will completely vanish then deers population will explode and they will become burden on the environment for their food. The forest cannot accommodate the food needs for an outnumbered deer populace. As a result, many species will automatically die in this struggle. Hence, the unnatural causes for the animal's death should be identified and deterred. In conclusion, natural extinction is a slow process and nature itself adapts to the changes it makes. However, man-made disasters like poaching should be undone or investigated otherwise its consequences might be detrimental for the earth. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people say that extinction is a natural process and a plethora of species evolve to replace each other. They assume that there is no reason to focus on such phenomenon and waste any effort to end it. From my perspective, it is a partial reality to explain vanishing of the animals and the issue needs some attention to slow it down or completely end it which will be examined further in the essay. To begin with, humans are entering some unchartered territories of the nature. They are recklessly poaching animals. For instance, the turtle species are under continuous threat. Not only adult turtle gets killed for its flesh but also people use its eggs to sell them in the black markets. There are numerous animals whose existence got threatened due to the killings to satiate the human avarice such as white tiger and even some of the bird species. Hence, hunting is not a natural process but it is an illegal activity. So, stringent regulations have to be placed to encounter hunting and it could slow down the evasion of the species. Moreover, the food chain is disturbed due to unnatural disappearances of many species. These species are a part of an ecosystem which is interconnected for each others needs. If one creature disappears then other parts of its food chain will be affected. For instance, if tiger will completely vanish then deers population will explode and they will become burden on the environment for their food. The forest cannot accommodate the food needs for an outnumbered deer populace. As a result, many species will automatically die in this struggle. Hence, the unnatural causes for the animal's death should be identified and deterred. In conclusion, natural extinction is a slow process and nature itself adapts to the changes it makes. However, man-made disasters like poaching should be undone or investigated otherwise its consequences might be detrimental for the earth. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people say that extinction is a natural process and a plethora of species evolve to replace each other. They assume that there is no reason to focus on such phenomenon and waste any effort to end it. From my perspective, it is a partial reality to explain vanishing of the animals and the issue needs some attention to slow it down or completely end it which will be examined further in the essay. To begin with, humans are entering some unchartered territories of the nature. They are recklessly poaching animals. For instance, the turtle species are under continuous threat. Not only adult turtle gets killed for its flesh but also people use its eggs to sell them in the black markets. There are numerous animals whose existence got threatened due to the killings to satiate the human avarice such as white tiger and even some of the bird species. Hence, hunting is not a natural process but it is an illegal activity. So, stringent regulations have to be placed to encounter hunting and it could slow down the evasion of the species. Moreover, the food chain is disturbed due to unnatural disappearances of many species. These species are a part of an ecosystem which is interconnected for each others needs. If one creature disappears then other parts of its food chain will be affected. For instance, if tiger will completely vanish then deers population will explode and they will become burden on the environment for their food. The forest cannot accommodate the food needs for an outnumbered deer populace. As a result, many species will automatically die in this struggle. Hence, the unnatural causes for the animal's death should be identified and deterred. In conclusion, natural extinction is a slow process and nature itself adapts to the changes it makes. However, man-made disasters like poaching should be undone or investigated otherwise its consequences might be detrimental for the earth. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems in the local community and should therefore be stopped. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is indeed fact that every individual Should have to do work to live life without facing any problems. However Certain mankind think that nation Should only Proffer jobs to local People instead of foreign People. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in upcoming Paragraphs. The first and foremost reason which aid me to stay in my thinking is quality work. In simple words, some Workers have great skills and have ability to Proffer top quality work which can enhance the growth of nation's economy. For instance, country like India which wants to develop excellent road, therefor It require good machines which can be operated only by foreign People and have Skills to operate it perfectly instead of native workers. Another Point which can not be Overlooked is learning new skills as well as techniques by foreign people to enhance work of native People. A native people can learn the way of working of other country worker, this can be taken as example of learning new Skills. Furthermore, a worker of other nation has the extra ability which can not be find in local worker, this can aid many company as well as nation. On the flip side, numerous humans are against to provide jobs to the people of foreign people. The only reasor behind this statement is, they think Other country's worker can create unemployment for native People. However, in some case to provide jobs to foreign worker is aidful because he had that skills. To sum up, bringing foreign workers can not affect the jobs of local workers as well as can not create any problems. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems in the local community and should therefore be stopped. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is indeed fact that every individual Should have to do work to live life without facing any problems. However Certain mankind think that nation Should only Proffer jobs to local People instead of foreign People. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in upcoming Paragraphs. The first and foremost reason which aid me to stay in my thinking is quality work. In simple words, some Workers have great skills and have ability to Proffer top quality work which can enhance the growth of nation's economy. For instance, country like India which wants to develop excellent road, therefor It require good machines which can be operated only by foreign People and have Skills to operate it perfectly instead of native workers. Another Point which can not be Overlooked is learning new skills as well as techniques by foreign people to enhance work of native People. A native people can learn the way of working of other country worker, this can be taken as example of learning new Skills. Furthermore, a worker of other nation has the extra ability which can not be find in local worker, this can aid many company as well as nation. On the flip side, numerous humans are against to provide jobs to the people of foreign people. The only reasor behind this statement is, they think Other country's worker can create unemployment for native People. However, in some case to provide jobs to foreign worker is aidful because he had that skills. To sum up, bringing foreign workers can not affect the jobs of local workers as well as can not create any problems. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems in the local community and should therefore be stopped. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is indeed fact that every individual Should have to do work to live life without facing any problems. However Certain mankind think that nation Should only Proffer jobs to local People instead of foreign People. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in upcoming Paragraphs. The first and foremost reason which aid me to stay in my thinking is quality work. In simple words, some Workers have great skills and have ability to Proffer top quality work which can enhance the growth of nation's economy. For instance, country like India which wants to develop excellent road, therefor It require good machines which can be operated only by foreign People and have Skills to operate it perfectly instead of native workers. Another Point which can not be Overlooked is learning new skills as well as techniques by foreign people to enhance work of native People. A native people can learn the way of working of other country worker, this can be taken as example of learning new Skills. Furthermore, a worker of other nation has the extra ability which can not be find in local worker, this can aid many company as well as nation. On the flip side, numerous humans are against to provide jobs to the people of foreign people. The only reasor behind this statement is, they think Other country's worker can create unemployment for native People. However, in some case to provide jobs to foreign worker is aidful because he had that skills. To sum up, bringing foreign workers can not affect the jobs of local workers as well as can not create any problems. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems in the local community and should therefore be stopped. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: It is indeed fact that every individual Should have to do work to live life without facing any problems. However Certain mankind think that nation Should only Proffer jobs to local People instead of foreign People. I Partially disagree with this statement and uphold my point of view in upcoming Paragraphs. The first and foremost reason which aid me to stay in my thinking is quality work. In simple words, some Workers have great skills and have ability to Proffer top quality work which can enhance the growth of nation's economy. For instance, country like India which wants to develop excellent road, therefor It require good machines which can be operated only by foreign People and have Skills to operate it perfectly instead of native workers. Another Point which can not be Overlooked is learning new skills as well as techniques by foreign people to enhance work of native People. A native people can learn the way of working of other country worker, this can be taken as example of learning new Skills. Furthermore, a worker of other nation has the extra ability which can not be find in local worker, this can aid many company as well as nation. On the flip side, numerous humans are against to provide jobs to the people of foreign people. The only reasor behind this statement is, they think Other country's worker can create unemployment for native People. However, in some case to provide jobs to foreign worker is aidful because he had that skills. To sum up, bringing foreign workers can not affect the jobs of local workers as well as can not create any problems. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: In recent days, it is a noticeable phenomenon that more people prefer to use various medicines and treatments rather than go to their usual doctors. Such a modern trend, in my point of view, does more harm than good. Admittedly, there are some benifits brought by this situation. It is commonly recognized that seeing doctors requires more amount of money comparing to trying alternative medicines and treatments. If peopke prefer to try different types of medicines or treatments on their own, they may gain a conservation of money. Hence, they may have the opportunity to use these amount of money on other aspects like travel or education. However, I strongly believe that the disadvantages of this phenomenon far outweigh the aforementioned advantages. Generally speaking, doctors no wonder are more well-trained and professional comparing to common people. When it comes to dealing with illness, the doctors will be aware of the most accurate and suitable solutions, and therefore, healing the patients completely with a high efficiency. For example, in the ages of covid-19, there are rumors in China saying that one kind of Chinese medicine can heal the disease. However, with a healthy express being published by professional doctors, the rumor was officially broke down. Therefore, people find out that taking that typical Chinese medicine was totally useless, instead, with the vaccine been designed by the doctors, the coronavirus was finnaly been able to deal with. Moreover, as the doctors were well-trained, they were aware of all kinds of medicines and how it will affect on human body. Consequently, they can offer the most proper therapy proposal. As people always willing to heal the diseases as fast as possible, doctors may be able to helping people healing in a safer way, which may do less harm to them. Additionally, usual doctor are more familiar with the situation people may be suffering, furthermore dealing with emergencies just on time. For example, when a patient who suddenly suffered some severe illness like heart attack, usual doctor who used to deal with all the problems the patient had before can easily named all the medicines the patient may be allergic to, therefore offers the best therapy plan. As time may be the most valuable thing during an emergency therapy. To summarize, althogh view on this issue vary from person to person, I tend to believe that seeing people's usual doctors is a safer and proper way to deal with their illness. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: In recent days, it is a noticeable phenomenon that more people prefer to use various medicines and treatments rather than go to their usual doctors. Such a modern trend, in my point of view, does more harm than good. Admittedly, there are some benifits brought by this situation. It is commonly recognized that seeing doctors requires more amount of money comparing to trying alternative medicines and treatments. If peopke prefer to try different types of medicines or treatments on their own, they may gain a conservation of money. Hence, they may have the opportunity to use these amount of money on other aspects like travel or education. However, I strongly believe that the disadvantages of this phenomenon far outweigh the aforementioned advantages. Generally speaking, doctors no wonder are more well-trained and professional comparing to common people. When it comes to dealing with illness, the doctors will be aware of the most accurate and suitable solutions, and therefore, healing the patients completely with a high efficiency. For example, in the ages of covid-19, there are rumors in China saying that one kind of Chinese medicine can heal the disease. However, with a healthy express being published by professional doctors, the rumor was officially broke down. Therefore, people find out that taking that typical Chinese medicine was totally useless, instead, with the vaccine been designed by the doctors, the coronavirus was finnaly been able to deal with. Moreover, as the doctors were well-trained, they were aware of all kinds of medicines and how it will affect on human body. Consequently, they can offer the most proper therapy proposal. As people always willing to heal the diseases as fast as possible, doctors may be able to helping people healing in a safer way, which may do less harm to them. Additionally, usual doctor are more familiar with the situation people may be suffering, furthermore dealing with emergencies just on time. For example, when a patient who suddenly suffered some severe illness like heart attack, usual doctor who used to deal with all the problems the patient had before can easily named all the medicines the patient may be allergic to, therefore offers the best therapy plan. As time may be the most valuable thing during an emergency therapy. To summarize, althogh view on this issue vary from person to person, I tend to believe that seeing people's usual doctors is a safer and proper way to deal with their illness. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: In recent days, it is a noticeable phenomenon that more people prefer to use various medicines and treatments rather than go to their usual doctors. Such a modern trend, in my point of view, does more harm than good. Admittedly, there are some benifits brought by this situation. It is commonly recognized that seeing doctors requires more amount of money comparing to trying alternative medicines and treatments. If peopke prefer to try different types of medicines or treatments on their own, they may gain a conservation of money. Hence, they may have the opportunity to use these amount of money on other aspects like travel or education. However, I strongly believe that the disadvantages of this phenomenon far outweigh the aforementioned advantages. Generally speaking, doctors no wonder are more well-trained and professional comparing to common people. When it comes to dealing with illness, the doctors will be aware of the most accurate and suitable solutions, and therefore, healing the patients completely with a high efficiency. For example, in the ages of covid-19, there are rumors in China saying that one kind of Chinese medicine can heal the disease. However, with a healthy express being published by professional doctors, the rumor was officially broke down. Therefore, people find out that taking that typical Chinese medicine was totally useless, instead, with the vaccine been designed by the doctors, the coronavirus was finnaly been able to deal with. Moreover, as the doctors were well-trained, they were aware of all kinds of medicines and how it will affect on human body. Consequently, they can offer the most proper therapy proposal. As people always willing to heal the diseases as fast as possible, doctors may be able to helping people healing in a safer way, which may do less harm to them. Additionally, usual doctor are more familiar with the situation people may be suffering, furthermore dealing with emergencies just on time. For example, when a patient who suddenly suffered some severe illness like heart attack, usual doctor who used to deal with all the problems the patient had before can easily named all the medicines the patient may be allergic to, therefore offers the best therapy plan. As time may be the most valuable thing during an emergency therapy. To summarize, althogh view on this issue vary from person to person, I tend to believe that seeing people's usual doctors is a safer and proper way to deal with their illness. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Write about the following topic: Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: In recent days, it is a noticeable phenomenon that more people prefer to use various medicines and treatments rather than go to their usual doctors. Such a modern trend, in my point of view, does more harm than good. Admittedly, there are some benifits brought by this situation. It is commonly recognized that seeing doctors requires more amount of money comparing to trying alternative medicines and treatments. If peopke prefer to try different types of medicines or treatments on their own, they may gain a conservation of money. Hence, they may have the opportunity to use these amount of money on other aspects like travel or education. However, I strongly believe that the disadvantages of this phenomenon far outweigh the aforementioned advantages. Generally speaking, doctors no wonder are more well-trained and professional comparing to common people. When it comes to dealing with illness, the doctors will be aware of the most accurate and suitable solutions, and therefore, healing the patients completely with a high efficiency. For example, in the ages of covid-19, there are rumors in China saying that one kind of Chinese medicine can heal the disease. However, with a healthy express being published by professional doctors, the rumor was officially broke down. Therefore, people find out that taking that typical Chinese medicine was totally useless, instead, with the vaccine been designed by the doctors, the coronavirus was finnaly been able to deal with. Moreover, as the doctors were well-trained, they were aware of all kinds of medicines and how it will affect on human body. Consequently, they can offer the most proper therapy proposal. As people always willing to heal the diseases as fast as possible, doctors may be able to helping people healing in a safer way, which may do less harm to them. Additionally, usual doctor are more familiar with the situation people may be suffering, furthermore dealing with emergencies just on time. For example, when a patient who suddenly suffered some severe illness like heart attack, usual doctor who used to deal with all the problems the patient had before can easily named all the medicines the patient may be allergic to, therefore offers the best therapy plan. As time may be the most valuable thing during an emergency therapy. To summarize, althogh view on this issue vary from person to person, I tend to believe that seeing people's usual doctors is a safer and proper way to deal with their illness. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, people who commit less serious crimes are made to undertake community service* instead of a prison sentence. Some people believe that all people who have committed a crime should be sent to prison. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In a few nations, individual who commit less serious crime, like stealing or breaking any law, is made to undertake community service instead of a jail. While others think that all individuals who have committed a crime might be sent to jail. I am completely convinced with the first view because if a person steals something, it is a crime but he can not be counted in the category of criminal, however, to kill someone, or plan/do a big robbery is a big crime. The people who agreed with the fact that a person who have committed a crime should be sent to jail is not worth it. In other words, not every crime is counted as crime, for instance, if a person steals something, he commit a crime but he should not be sentenced to prison becasue stealing is small crime to compare with robbery or to kill someone. The environment of prison is not good for the people who committed a small crime, this can lead to encourage them to commit blunder. They should have given a chance to improve themselves by doing some community service work, so that they will not repeat that again. Moving towards another notion, the criminals who commit a big crime, such as murder, robbery, should be sentenced to prison because these criminals are threat to society. Their mentality is different from normal human beings. The chance to work in community service could not help them to change their mentality. Therefore, the actual criminals deserved to stay away from our community. In conclusion, people who commit small crime should be given a chance for improvement rather than to jail sentence. I am completely convined with this idea because criminals who commit big crime are more likely to sent in jail. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, people who commit less serious crimes are made to undertake community service* instead of a prison sentence. Some people believe that all people who have committed a crime should be sent to prison. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In a few nations, individual who commit less serious crime, like stealing or breaking any law, is made to undertake community service instead of a jail. While others think that all individuals who have committed a crime might be sent to jail. I am completely convinced with the first view because if a person steals something, it is a crime but he can not be counted in the category of criminal, however, to kill someone, or plan/do a big robbery is a big crime. The people who agreed with the fact that a person who have committed a crime should be sent to jail is not worth it. In other words, not every crime is counted as crime, for instance, if a person steals something, he commit a crime but he should not be sentenced to prison becasue stealing is small crime to compare with robbery or to kill someone. The environment of prison is not good for the people who committed a small crime, this can lead to encourage them to commit blunder. They should have given a chance to improve themselves by doing some community service work, so that they will not repeat that again. Moving towards another notion, the criminals who commit a big crime, such as murder, robbery, should be sentenced to prison because these criminals are threat to society. Their mentality is different from normal human beings. The chance to work in community service could not help them to change their mentality. Therefore, the actual criminals deserved to stay away from our community. In conclusion, people who commit small crime should be given a chance for improvement rather than to jail sentence. I am completely convined with this idea because criminals who commit big crime are more likely to sent in jail. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, people who commit less serious crimes are made to undertake community service* instead of a prison sentence. Some people believe that all people who have committed a crime should be sent to prison. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In a few nations, individual who commit less serious crime, like stealing or breaking any law, is made to undertake community service instead of a jail. While others think that all individuals who have committed a crime might be sent to jail. I am completely convinced with the first view because if a person steals something, it is a crime but he can not be counted in the category of criminal, however, to kill someone, or plan/do a big robbery is a big crime. The people who agreed with the fact that a person who have committed a crime should be sent to jail is not worth it. In other words, not every crime is counted as crime, for instance, if a person steals something, he commit a crime but he should not be sentenced to prison becasue stealing is small crime to compare with robbery or to kill someone. The environment of prison is not good for the people who committed a small crime, this can lead to encourage them to commit blunder. They should have given a chance to improve themselves by doing some community service work, so that they will not repeat that again. Moving towards another notion, the criminals who commit a big crime, such as murder, robbery, should be sentenced to prison because these criminals are threat to society. Their mentality is different from normal human beings. The chance to work in community service could not help them to change their mentality. Therefore, the actual criminals deserved to stay away from our community. In conclusion, people who commit small crime should be given a chance for improvement rather than to jail sentence. I am completely convined with this idea because criminals who commit big crime are more likely to sent in jail. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, people who commit less serious crimes are made to undertake community service* instead of a prison sentence. Some people believe that all people who have committed a crime should be sent to prison. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In a few nations, individual who commit less serious crime, like stealing or breaking any law, is made to undertake community service instead of a jail. While others think that all individuals who have committed a crime might be sent to jail. I am completely convinced with the first view because if a person steals something, it is a crime but he can not be counted in the category of criminal, however, to kill someone, or plan/do a big robbery is a big crime. The people who agreed with the fact that a person who have committed a crime should be sent to jail is not worth it. In other words, not every crime is counted as crime, for instance, if a person steals something, he commit a crime but he should not be sentenced to prison becasue stealing is small crime to compare with robbery or to kill someone. The environment of prison is not good for the people who committed a small crime, this can lead to encourage them to commit blunder. They should have given a chance to improve themselves by doing some community service work, so that they will not repeat that again. Moving towards another notion, the criminals who commit a big crime, such as murder, robbery, should be sentenced to prison because these criminals are threat to society. Their mentality is different from normal human beings. The chance to work in community service could not help them to change their mentality. Therefore, the actual criminals deserved to stay away from our community. In conclusion, people who commit small crime should be given a chance for improvement rather than to jail sentence. I am completely convined with this idea because criminals who commit big crime are more likely to sent in jail. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? Anwser: Some argue that punishments are crucial for helping children distinguish between right and wrong. I somewhat disagree with this as there are better teaching methods for youngsters. However, there are two light-type punishments that might be effective in certain situations, and educators and parents should be allowed to use them. There are several reasons why, in my opinion, some punishments might cause more damage to good on children. The most important one is that aggression might cause psychological issues on them. This is because kids do not understand why they are being punish for as they usually get distorted assumptions regarding conflicts. For example, recent studies show that yelling at children may cause low-confidence issues, anxiety, and sadness. Moreover, children can learn best by knowing cause and consequence. This is due to them understanding what happens once they spill their juice on the floor, and have to clean it afterwards, for example. However, there are two types of punishments that parents and educators should be permited to do in certain situations. Firstly, it might be useful to restrict toys and devices, such as TV or smartphones, to teach children to follow schedules. For instance, when youngsters do not do their homework, parents should take their favourite toy away to show it is time to focus on studies. Additionally, telling kids to clean their disorder would also teach them deal with their actions. This may help them understand how they are supposed to do things and not make the same mistakes again, as there might be consequences to it. In conclusion, the reasons why I somewhat disagree with punishing children are that it might cause negative effects on their mental health and learning by cause and consequence is often more effective. However, there are some light-type punishments that familiars and teachers should be allowed to do, such as toy restrictions and making kids correct their mistakes whenever possible. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? Anwser: Some argue that punishments are crucial for helping children distinguish between right and wrong. I somewhat disagree with this as there are better teaching methods for youngsters. However, there are two light-type punishments that might be effective in certain situations, and educators and parents should be allowed to use them. There are several reasons why, in my opinion, some punishments might cause more damage to good on children. The most important one is that aggression might cause psychological issues on them. This is because kids do not understand why they are being punish for as they usually get distorted assumptions regarding conflicts. For example, recent studies show that yelling at children may cause low-confidence issues, anxiety, and sadness. Moreover, children can learn best by knowing cause and consequence. This is due to them understanding what happens once they spill their juice on the floor, and have to clean it afterwards, for example. However, there are two types of punishments that parents and educators should be permited to do in certain situations. Firstly, it might be useful to restrict toys and devices, such as TV or smartphones, to teach children to follow schedules. For instance, when youngsters do not do their homework, parents should take their favourite toy away to show it is time to focus on studies. Additionally, telling kids to clean their disorder would also teach them deal with their actions. This may help them understand how they are supposed to do things and not make the same mistakes again, as there might be consequences to it. In conclusion, the reasons why I somewhat disagree with punishing children are that it might cause negative effects on their mental health and learning by cause and consequence is often more effective. However, there are some light-type punishments that familiars and teachers should be allowed to do, such as toy restrictions and making kids correct their mistakes whenever possible. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? Anwser: Some argue that punishments are crucial for helping children distinguish between right and wrong. I somewhat disagree with this as there are better teaching methods for youngsters. However, there are two light-type punishments that might be effective in certain situations, and educators and parents should be allowed to use them. There are several reasons why, in my opinion, some punishments might cause more damage to good on children. The most important one is that aggression might cause psychological issues on them. This is because kids do not understand why they are being punish for as they usually get distorted assumptions regarding conflicts. For example, recent studies show that yelling at children may cause low-confidence issues, anxiety, and sadness. Moreover, children can learn best by knowing cause and consequence. This is due to them understanding what happens once they spill their juice on the floor, and have to clean it afterwards, for example. However, there are two types of punishments that parents and educators should be permited to do in certain situations. Firstly, it might be useful to restrict toys and devices, such as TV or smartphones, to teach children to follow schedules. For instance, when youngsters do not do their homework, parents should take their favourite toy away to show it is time to focus on studies. Additionally, telling kids to clean their disorder would also teach them deal with their actions. This may help them understand how they are supposed to do things and not make the same mistakes again, as there might be consequences to it. In conclusion, the reasons why I somewhat disagree with punishing children are that it might cause negative effects on their mental health and learning by cause and consequence is often more effective. However, there are some light-type punishments that familiars and teachers should be allowed to do, such as toy restrictions and making kids correct their mistakes whenever possible. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? Anwser: Some argue that punishments are crucial for helping children distinguish between right and wrong. I somewhat disagree with this as there are better teaching methods for youngsters. However, there are two light-type punishments that might be effective in certain situations, and educators and parents should be allowed to use them. There are several reasons why, in my opinion, some punishments might cause more damage to good on children. The most important one is that aggression might cause psychological issues on them. This is because kids do not understand why they are being punish for as they usually get distorted assumptions regarding conflicts. For example, recent studies show that yelling at children may cause low-confidence issues, anxiety, and sadness. Moreover, children can learn best by knowing cause and consequence. This is due to them understanding what happens once they spill their juice on the floor, and have to clean it afterwards, for example. However, there are two types of punishments that parents and educators should be permited to do in certain situations. Firstly, it might be useful to restrict toys and devices, such as TV or smartphones, to teach children to follow schedules. For instance, when youngsters do not do their homework, parents should take their favourite toy away to show it is time to focus on studies. Additionally, telling kids to clean their disorder would also teach them deal with their actions. This may help them understand how they are supposed to do things and not make the same mistakes again, as there might be consequences to it. In conclusion, the reasons why I somewhat disagree with punishing children are that it might cause negative effects on their mental health and learning by cause and consequence is often more effective. However, there are some light-type punishments that familiars and teachers should be allowed to do, such as toy restrictions and making kids correct their mistakes whenever possible. Your task achievement score is 7.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects. While others believe to focus studying to get a particular qualification. This essay will explain both perspective between learn additional subject out of the priority course or focus on specific skills. The students want to learn other subjects in addition their main subjects due to their curiosity or they find out the main subjects is not their passion. One of the benefits is they can learn new things and broaden their knowledge. Furthermore, it is beneficial for them to see something from the different perspective. This circumstance fits for generalist jobs that require broad knowledge but just the surface information. For instance, public relation, news anchor, and manager. On the other hand, others believe to focus on the main subjects. It will be beneficial to master the skills and keep the students focus to pursue the specific qualifications. Consequently, they can be an expert or specialist on the specific field. It is important for jobs that require the particular skills such as doctor, engineer, and lawyer. In conclusion, between learn the new subjects or focus on the main subjects can be beneficial for students. In my perspective, it is more important for student to know their main goals, as result they can choose between this two circumstances. It depend on career goals that will be pursued since people have different aims. To be a generalist can study others subjects to see from helicopter view, but a specialist should focus to learn a particular skills. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects. While others believe to focus studying to get a particular qualification. This essay will explain both perspective between learn additional subject out of the priority course or focus on specific skills. The students want to learn other subjects in addition their main subjects due to their curiosity or they find out the main subjects is not their passion. One of the benefits is they can learn new things and broaden their knowledge. Furthermore, it is beneficial for them to see something from the different perspective. This circumstance fits for generalist jobs that require broad knowledge but just the surface information. For instance, public relation, news anchor, and manager. On the other hand, others believe to focus on the main subjects. It will be beneficial to master the skills and keep the students focus to pursue the specific qualifications. Consequently, they can be an expert or specialist on the specific field. It is important for jobs that require the particular skills such as doctor, engineer, and lawyer. In conclusion, between learn the new subjects or focus on the main subjects can be beneficial for students. In my perspective, it is more important for student to know their main goals, as result they can choose between this two circumstances. It depend on career goals that will be pursued since people have different aims. To be a generalist can study others subjects to see from helicopter view, but a specialist should focus to learn a particular skills. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects. While others believe to focus studying to get a particular qualification. This essay will explain both perspective between learn additional subject out of the priority course or focus on specific skills. The students want to learn other subjects in addition their main subjects due to their curiosity or they find out the main subjects is not their passion. One of the benefits is they can learn new things and broaden their knowledge. Furthermore, it is beneficial for them to see something from the different perspective. This circumstance fits for generalist jobs that require broad knowledge but just the surface information. For instance, public relation, news anchor, and manager. On the other hand, others believe to focus on the main subjects. It will be beneficial to master the skills and keep the students focus to pursue the specific qualifications. Consequently, they can be an expert or specialist on the specific field. It is important for jobs that require the particular skills such as doctor, engineer, and lawyer. In conclusion, between learn the new subjects or focus on the main subjects can be beneficial for students. In my perspective, it is more important for student to know their main goals, as result they can choose between this two circumstances. It depend on career goals that will be pursued since people have different aims. To be a generalist can study others subjects to see from helicopter view, but a specialist should focus to learn a particular skills. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects. While others believe to focus studying to get a particular qualification. This essay will explain both perspective between learn additional subject out of the priority course or focus on specific skills. The students want to learn other subjects in addition their main subjects due to their curiosity or they find out the main subjects is not their passion. One of the benefits is they can learn new things and broaden their knowledge. Furthermore, it is beneficial for them to see something from the different perspective. This circumstance fits for generalist jobs that require broad knowledge but just the surface information. For instance, public relation, news anchor, and manager. On the other hand, others believe to focus on the main subjects. It will be beneficial to master the skills and keep the students focus to pursue the specific qualifications. Consequently, they can be an expert or specialist on the specific field. It is important for jobs that require the particular skills such as doctor, engineer, and lawyer. In conclusion, between learn the new subjects or focus on the main subjects can be beneficial for students. In my perspective, it is more important for student to know their main goals, as result they can choose between this two circumstances. It depend on career goals that will be pursued since people have different aims. To be a generalist can study others subjects to see from helicopter view, but a specialist should focus to learn a particular skills. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think most crimes are the result of circumstances like poverty and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals think some offences are committed due to social issues but others have difference of opinion with this. They believe that a person's nature decides whether he will indulge in crime in the future or not. From my perspective, crime can be ascribed to an individual's beliefs and learnings happened during his life. Both viewpoints will be examined further in this essay. On the one hand, an individuals conditions could compel him to involve in some illegal activities such as burglaries and trafficking. For instance, in some poor countries, people cannot fulfill their basic necessities and get tempted to do robbery. They sometime loot banks and luxurious goods. There are some evidences which suggest that disadvantaged individuals are more tempted to shoplift stuff from a shopping center than a person who can afford it. Hence, it is an agreeable fact that sometimes lack of money causes poor individuals to do some offences. On the other hand, a few people opine that an individual's character lead him to the criminal activities. For instance, a young person who has certain wrong learnings during the course of his life such as discriminatory attitudes are more likely to commit crime. To exemplify, a person killed a Muslim family in London just because he believes that all the Muslims are terrorists. Besides this, many unscientific belief systems exist in society which can result in the abuses and social offences. In conclusion, not only poor living conditions can cause an individual to commit crimes but also an individual character plays an important role in it. In my opinion, I believe that poor people are mostly hard working but generally human's personality plays big role in crimnal offences. Because all these things happen only due to one's mental attitude and physical conditions have a minor role to play. Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think most crimes are the result of circumstances like poverty and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals think some offences are committed due to social issues but others have difference of opinion with this. They believe that a person's nature decides whether he will indulge in crime in the future or not. From my perspective, crime can be ascribed to an individual's beliefs and learnings happened during his life. Both viewpoints will be examined further in this essay. On the one hand, an individuals conditions could compel him to involve in some illegal activities such as burglaries and trafficking. For instance, in some poor countries, people cannot fulfill their basic necessities and get tempted to do robbery. They sometime loot banks and luxurious goods. There are some evidences which suggest that disadvantaged individuals are more tempted to shoplift stuff from a shopping center than a person who can afford it. Hence, it is an agreeable fact that sometimes lack of money causes poor individuals to do some offences. On the other hand, a few people opine that an individual's character lead him to the criminal activities. For instance, a young person who has certain wrong learnings during the course of his life such as discriminatory attitudes are more likely to commit crime. To exemplify, a person killed a Muslim family in London just because he believes that all the Muslims are terrorists. Besides this, many unscientific belief systems exist in society which can result in the abuses and social offences. In conclusion, not only poor living conditions can cause an individual to commit crimes but also an individual character plays an important role in it. In my opinion, I believe that poor people are mostly hard working but generally human's personality plays big role in crimnal offences. Because all these things happen only due to one's mental attitude and physical conditions have a minor role to play. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think most crimes are the result of circumstances like poverty and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals think some offences are committed due to social issues but others have difference of opinion with this. They believe that a person's nature decides whether he will indulge in crime in the future or not. From my perspective, crime can be ascribed to an individual's beliefs and learnings happened during his life. Both viewpoints will be examined further in this essay. On the one hand, an individuals conditions could compel him to involve in some illegal activities such as burglaries and trafficking. For instance, in some poor countries, people cannot fulfill their basic necessities and get tempted to do robbery. They sometime loot banks and luxurious goods. There are some evidences which suggest that disadvantaged individuals are more tempted to shoplift stuff from a shopping center than a person who can afford it. Hence, it is an agreeable fact that sometimes lack of money causes poor individuals to do some offences. On the other hand, a few people opine that an individual's character lead him to the criminal activities. For instance, a young person who has certain wrong learnings during the course of his life such as discriminatory attitudes are more likely to commit crime. To exemplify, a person killed a Muslim family in London just because he believes that all the Muslims are terrorists. Besides this, many unscientific belief systems exist in society which can result in the abuses and social offences. In conclusion, not only poor living conditions can cause an individual to commit crimes but also an individual character plays an important role in it. In my opinion, I believe that poor people are mostly hard working but generally human's personality plays big role in crimnal offences. Because all these things happen only due to one's mental attitude and physical conditions have a minor role to play. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think most crimes are the result of circumstances like poverty and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: A group of individuals think some offences are committed due to social issues but others have difference of opinion with this. They believe that a person's nature decides whether he will indulge in crime in the future or not. From my perspective, crime can be ascribed to an individual's beliefs and learnings happened during his life. Both viewpoints will be examined further in this essay. On the one hand, an individuals conditions could compel him to involve in some illegal activities such as burglaries and trafficking. For instance, in some poor countries, people cannot fulfill their basic necessities and get tempted to do robbery. They sometime loot banks and luxurious goods. There are some evidences which suggest that disadvantaged individuals are more tempted to shoplift stuff from a shopping center than a person who can afford it. Hence, it is an agreeable fact that sometimes lack of money causes poor individuals to do some offences. On the other hand, a few people opine that an individual's character lead him to the criminal activities. For instance, a young person who has certain wrong learnings during the course of his life such as discriminatory attitudes are more likely to commit crime. To exemplify, a person killed a Muslim family in London just because he believes that all the Muslims are terrorists. Besides this, many unscientific belief systems exist in society which can result in the abuses and social offences. In conclusion, not only poor living conditions can cause an individual to commit crimes but also an individual character plays an important role in it. In my opinion, I believe that poor people are mostly hard working but generally human's personality plays big role in crimnal offences. Because all these things happen only due to one's mental attitude and physical conditions have a minor role to play. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while other argue that the aid money is misspent by governments that recieve it, so the international aid should not be given to the poor countries in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: Do rich countries have the duty to help the less strong economies? In present day, many people argue that the aid money is misspent. I agree that the budget sent does often not fulfill the use it is supposed to. But should we really not give any contribution to the ones in need? First and foremost, the poor countries are often printed by corruption. For example, in North Korea there are a lot of residences who's financially situation has collapsed. For instance, the people in the country are starving. But by giving money to the government would not help them. The resources that North Korea would receive would instead go to the people in charge of the country. However, there are other things that can be done. On the other hand, money may not be the solution of the problem here. As earlier mentioned money is often misspent by the government. The richer countries can support by exporting other forms of needs, for instance food. To transport boxes with food directly to the ones starving, we can make a big difference. Then the government would not have the opportunity to misuse our help. To conclude, it is important that countries who's financially situation is stable help the poor ones. But the most optimal way to do this is not by offering money, since it is often misspent. Instead they can support the residences in other ways. By sending food, clothes and other necessaries we can make difference. In this way it is garantied that the help is used as it is supposed to. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while other argue that the aid money is misspent by governments that recieve it, so the international aid should not be given to the poor countries in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: Do rich countries have the duty to help the less strong economies? In present day, many people argue that the aid money is misspent. I agree that the budget sent does often not fulfill the use it is supposed to. But should we really not give any contribution to the ones in need? First and foremost, the poor countries are often printed by corruption. For example, in North Korea there are a lot of residences who's financially situation has collapsed. For instance, the people in the country are starving. But by giving money to the government would not help them. The resources that North Korea would receive would instead go to the people in charge of the country. However, there are other things that can be done. On the other hand, money may not be the solution of the problem here. As earlier mentioned money is often misspent by the government. The richer countries can support by exporting other forms of needs, for instance food. To transport boxes with food directly to the ones starving, we can make a big difference. Then the government would not have the opportunity to misuse our help. To conclude, it is important that countries who's financially situation is stable help the poor ones. But the most optimal way to do this is not by offering money, since it is often misspent. Instead they can support the residences in other ways. By sending food, clothes and other necessaries we can make difference. In this way it is garantied that the help is used as it is supposed to. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while other argue that the aid money is misspent by governments that recieve it, so the international aid should not be given to the poor countries in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: Do rich countries have the duty to help the less strong economies? In present day, many people argue that the aid money is misspent. I agree that the budget sent does often not fulfill the use it is supposed to. But should we really not give any contribution to the ones in need? First and foremost, the poor countries are often printed by corruption. For example, in North Korea there are a lot of residences who's financially situation has collapsed. For instance, the people in the country are starving. But by giving money to the government would not help them. The resources that North Korea would receive would instead go to the people in charge of the country. However, there are other things that can be done. On the other hand, money may not be the solution of the problem here. As earlier mentioned money is often misspent by the government. The richer countries can support by exporting other forms of needs, for instance food. To transport boxes with food directly to the ones starving, we can make a big difference. Then the government would not have the opportunity to misuse our help. To conclude, it is important that countries who's financially situation is stable help the poor ones. But the most optimal way to do this is not by offering money, since it is often misspent. Instead they can support the residences in other ways. By sending food, clothes and other necessaries we can make difference. In this way it is garantied that the help is used as it is supposed to. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while other argue that the aid money is misspent by governments that recieve it, so the international aid should not be given to the poor countries in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Anwser: Do rich countries have the duty to help the less strong economies? In present day, many people argue that the aid money is misspent. I agree that the budget sent does often not fulfill the use it is supposed to. But should we really not give any contribution to the ones in need? First and foremost, the poor countries are often printed by corruption. For example, in North Korea there are a lot of residences who's financially situation has collapsed. For instance, the people in the country are starving. But by giving money to the government would not help them. The resources that North Korea would receive would instead go to the people in charge of the country. However, there are other things that can be done. On the other hand, money may not be the solution of the problem here. As earlier mentioned money is often misspent by the government. The richer countries can support by exporting other forms of needs, for instance food. To transport boxes with food directly to the ones starving, we can make a big difference. Then the government would not have the opportunity to misuse our help. To conclude, it is important that countries who's financially situation is stable help the poor ones. But the most optimal way to do this is not by offering money, since it is often misspent. Instead they can support the residences in other ways. By sending food, clothes and other necessaries we can make difference. In this way it is garantied that the help is used as it is supposed to. Your task achievement score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Children have more and more tests and exams to do at school, sometimes starting from the age of five or six, right up until the age of 18. What are the advantages and disadvantages of making children do exam ? Anwser: In many schools, students are examined by tests and exams from pupils who are about 5 or six until senior high school and they have to just surround themselves with books and consume much time for studying for getting a good score. Children are involved with a pile of tests and exams in the period of school time that start at ages 5 and keep going to 18. In this essay , I will explore the pros and cons of testing children from the early to advances ages at school. Let’s begin by looking at the benefit of examining students from the early ages. examine build-up motivation and encouragement for learning further. As an example, when people in the period of childhood got the acceptable score in the exam, they lovely like to study more and got the better, and even if they got an unacceptable grade, they had to get a better grade to compensate it and prove themselves to others. Moreover, taking a test will make that don’t forget information and details of knowledge, in other words, it helps to permanence of lessons that are red. Because, when children are away from the exam, they don’t have to study hard and it might lead to forgetting it. Turning on the other side of the argument, forcing teenagers to take regular exams causes children don’t have a leisure time to hang out with their friends and do things that they love to do, such as playing football and going park. As a mental influence, it can make children depressed. Another disadvantage is that nvolving teenager with exams and overwhelming them into study leads to spoiling their talent and carelessness to their abilities can be so demanding, because for growing up, you need to discover your ability and talent. All in all, as can be seen from the points in this essay, you need to weigh up the positive and negative points. In my opinion, compulsion teenagers to do exams has so many cons rather than pros. It will be better to make children free and have free time for themselves. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Children have more and more tests and exams to do at school, sometimes starting from the age of five or six, right up until the age of 18. What are the advantages and disadvantages of making children do exam ? Anwser: In many schools, students are examined by tests and exams from pupils who are about 5 or six until senior high school and they have to just surround themselves with books and consume much time for studying for getting a good score. Children are involved with a pile of tests and exams in the period of school time that start at ages 5 and keep going to 18. In this essay , I will explore the pros and cons of testing children from the early to advances ages at school. Let’s begin by looking at the benefit of examining students from the early ages. examine build-up motivation and encouragement for learning further. As an example, when people in the period of childhood got the acceptable score in the exam, they lovely like to study more and got the better, and even if they got an unacceptable grade, they had to get a better grade to compensate it and prove themselves to others. Moreover, taking a test will make that don’t forget information and details of knowledge, in other words, it helps to permanence of lessons that are red. Because, when children are away from the exam, they don’t have to study hard and it might lead to forgetting it. Turning on the other side of the argument, forcing teenagers to take regular exams causes children don’t have a leisure time to hang out with their friends and do things that they love to do, such as playing football and going park. As a mental influence, it can make children depressed. Another disadvantage is that nvolving teenager with exams and overwhelming them into study leads to spoiling their talent and carelessness to their abilities can be so demanding, because for growing up, you need to discover your ability and talent. All in all, as can be seen from the points in this essay, you need to weigh up the positive and negative points. In my opinion, compulsion teenagers to do exams has so many cons rather than pros. It will be better to make children free and have free time for themselves. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Children have more and more tests and exams to do at school, sometimes starting from the age of five or six, right up until the age of 18. What are the advantages and disadvantages of making children do exam ? Anwser: In many schools, students are examined by tests and exams from pupils who are about 5 or six until senior high school and they have to just surround themselves with books and consume much time for studying for getting a good score. Children are involved with a pile of tests and exams in the period of school time that start at ages 5 and keep going to 18. In this essay , I will explore the pros and cons of testing children from the early to advances ages at school. Let’s begin by looking at the benefit of examining students from the early ages. examine build-up motivation and encouragement for learning further. As an example, when people in the period of childhood got the acceptable score in the exam, they lovely like to study more and got the better, and even if they got an unacceptable grade, they had to get a better grade to compensate it and prove themselves to others. Moreover, taking a test will make that don’t forget information and details of knowledge, in other words, it helps to permanence of lessons that are red. Because, when children are away from the exam, they don’t have to study hard and it might lead to forgetting it. Turning on the other side of the argument, forcing teenagers to take regular exams causes children don’t have a leisure time to hang out with their friends and do things that they love to do, such as playing football and going park. As a mental influence, it can make children depressed. Another disadvantage is that nvolving teenager with exams and overwhelming them into study leads to spoiling their talent and carelessness to their abilities can be so demanding, because for growing up, you need to discover your ability and talent. All in all, as can be seen from the points in this essay, you need to weigh up the positive and negative points. In my opinion, compulsion teenagers to do exams has so many cons rather than pros. It will be better to make children free and have free time for themselves. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Children have more and more tests and exams to do at school, sometimes starting from the age of five or six, right up until the age of 18. What are the advantages and disadvantages of making children do exam ? Anwser: In many schools, students are examined by tests and exams from pupils who are about 5 or six until senior high school and they have to just surround themselves with books and consume much time for studying for getting a good score. Children are involved with a pile of tests and exams in the period of school time that start at ages 5 and keep going to 18. In this essay , I will explore the pros and cons of testing children from the early to advances ages at school. Let’s begin by looking at the benefit of examining students from the early ages. examine build-up motivation and encouragement for learning further. As an example, when people in the period of childhood got the acceptable score in the exam, they lovely like to study more and got the better, and even if they got an unacceptable grade, they had to get a better grade to compensate it and prove themselves to others. Moreover, taking a test will make that don’t forget information and details of knowledge, in other words, it helps to permanence of lessons that are red. Because, when children are away from the exam, they don’t have to study hard and it might lead to forgetting it. Turning on the other side of the argument, forcing teenagers to take regular exams causes children don’t have a leisure time to hang out with their friends and do things that they love to do, such as playing football and going park. As a mental influence, it can make children depressed. Another disadvantage is that nvolving teenager with exams and overwhelming them into study leads to spoiling their talent and carelessness to their abilities can be so demanding, because for growing up, you need to discover your ability and talent. All in all, as can be seen from the points in this essay, you need to weigh up the positive and negative points. In my opinion, compulsion teenagers to do exams has so many cons rather than pros. It will be better to make children free and have free time for themselves. Your task achievement score is 5.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: As English becomes more widespread as a lingua franca, there is concern that the values and culture of the English-speaking world will displace native values and cultures. To what extend is this fear justified? Anwser: There is no doubt that English is becoming increasingly important as a language of international communication in the fields of science, trade, entertainment and as well as others. So, there are many debates about whether English will alter a country's nature. In my point of view, this fear is justified but i believe that people can manage this situation which in this essay, I will outline why i think so. It is true that throughout human history, English is becoming more common ,fluencial, and can be found in almost every country, while some languages died out, hanged or even replaced. In the ancient Egypt, hieroglyph used to be widely written but it disappeared along time ago and only traces are left behind. To some extent, this process may be inevitable. However, there are many examples in many nations of people trying to preserve their languages and even revive it. For example, the Ainu Language in Japan has been preserved by Japanese Government Policy on social media, propagating the language. Language actually is one way of identifying a nation. This can help people be strong in adversity. Where this sense of identity and cohension has been lost in Malaysia. Some people only speak Malasian; or India; or Mandarin instead of having a langiage in common. This leads to problems such as : low self-esteem, lack of confidence, and loss of initiative. Retaining the language of a community often means that other forms of culture exist and remain through songs, literature, story and local traditions. Therefore, it will be passed down through generations. However, in modern society, english only serves to make human's life becomes more convenient in trade and tourism. Nevertheless, it does not bring anything in terms of tradition, culture and nature. To summarize, English plays a vital role in globalization to fulfill human's demands. After all, it cannot replace any country's value and culture because language displays a nation's identity and tradition. In many countries, governments also have gradually becomr aware of the importance of the position of language and try to protect theirs from any threat. Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: As English becomes more widespread as a lingua franca, there is concern that the values and culture of the English-speaking world will displace native values and cultures. To what extend is this fear justified? Anwser: There is no doubt that English is becoming increasingly important as a language of international communication in the fields of science, trade, entertainment and as well as others. So, there are many debates about whether English will alter a country's nature. In my point of view, this fear is justified but i believe that people can manage this situation which in this essay, I will outline why i think so. It is true that throughout human history, English is becoming more common ,fluencial, and can be found in almost every country, while some languages died out, hanged or even replaced. In the ancient Egypt, hieroglyph used to be widely written but it disappeared along time ago and only traces are left behind. To some extent, this process may be inevitable. However, there are many examples in many nations of people trying to preserve their languages and even revive it. For example, the Ainu Language in Japan has been preserved by Japanese Government Policy on social media, propagating the language. Language actually is one way of identifying a nation. This can help people be strong in adversity. Where this sense of identity and cohension has been lost in Malaysia. Some people only speak Malasian; or India; or Mandarin instead of having a langiage in common. This leads to problems such as : low self-esteem, lack of confidence, and loss of initiative. Retaining the language of a community often means that other forms of culture exist and remain through songs, literature, story and local traditions. Therefore, it will be passed down through generations. However, in modern society, english only serves to make human's life becomes more convenient in trade and tourism. Nevertheless, it does not bring anything in terms of tradition, culture and nature. To summarize, English plays a vital role in globalization to fulfill human's demands. After all, it cannot replace any country's value and culture because language displays a nation's identity and tradition. In many countries, governments also have gradually becomr aware of the importance of the position of language and try to protect theirs from any threat. Your lexical resource score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: As English becomes more widespread as a lingua franca, there is concern that the values and culture of the English-speaking world will displace native values and cultures. To what extend is this fear justified? Anwser: There is no doubt that English is becoming increasingly important as a language of international communication in the fields of science, trade, entertainment and as well as others. So, there are many debates about whether English will alter a country's nature. In my point of view, this fear is justified but i believe that people can manage this situation which in this essay, I will outline why i think so. It is true that throughout human history, English is becoming more common ,fluencial, and can be found in almost every country, while some languages died out, hanged or even replaced. In the ancient Egypt, hieroglyph used to be widely written but it disappeared along time ago and only traces are left behind. To some extent, this process may be inevitable. However, there are many examples in many nations of people trying to preserve their languages and even revive it. For example, the Ainu Language in Japan has been preserved by Japanese Government Policy on social media, propagating the language. Language actually is one way of identifying a nation. This can help people be strong in adversity. Where this sense of identity and cohension has been lost in Malaysia. Some people only speak Malasian; or India; or Mandarin instead of having a langiage in common. This leads to problems such as : low self-esteem, lack of confidence, and loss of initiative. Retaining the language of a community often means that other forms of culture exist and remain through songs, literature, story and local traditions. Therefore, it will be passed down through generations. However, in modern society, english only serves to make human's life becomes more convenient in trade and tourism. Nevertheless, it does not bring anything in terms of tradition, culture and nature. To summarize, English plays a vital role in globalization to fulfill human's demands. After all, it cannot replace any country's value and culture because language displays a nation's identity and tradition. In many countries, governments also have gradually becomr aware of the importance of the position of language and try to protect theirs from any threat. Your grammatical range score is 4.0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: As English becomes more widespread as a lingua franca, there is concern that the values and culture of the English-speaking world will displace native values and cultures. To what extend is this fear justified? Anwser: There is no doubt that English is becoming increasingly important as a language of international communication in the fields of science, trade, entertainment and as well as others. So, there are many debates about whether English will alter a country's nature. In my point of view, this fear is justified but i believe that people can manage this situation which in this essay, I will outline why i think so. It is true that throughout human history, English is becoming more common ,fluencial, and can be found in almost every country, while some languages died out, hanged or even replaced. In the ancient Egypt, hieroglyph used to be widely written but it disappeared along time ago and only traces are left behind. To some extent, this process may be inevitable. However, there are many examples in many nations of people trying to preserve their languages and even revive it. For example, the Ainu Language in Japan has been preserved by Japanese Government Policy on social media, propagating the language. Language actually is one way of identifying a nation. This can help people be strong in adversity. Where this sense of identity and cohension has been lost in Malaysia. Some people only speak Malasian; or India; or Mandarin instead of having a langiage in common. This leads to problems such as : low self-esteem, lack of confidence, and loss of initiative. Retaining the language of a community often means that other forms of culture exist and remain through songs, literature, story and local traditions. Therefore, it will be passed down through generations. However, in modern society, english only serves to make human's life becomes more convenient in trade and tourism. Nevertheless, it does not bring anything in terms of tradition, culture and nature. To summarize, English plays a vital role in globalization to fulfill human's demands. After all, it cannot replace any country's value and culture because language displays a nation's identity and tradition. In many countries, governments also have gradually becomr aware of the importance of the position of language and try to protect theirs from any threat. Your task achievement score is 6.0