Datasets:

binhng

/

scoring_ielts_dataset_v2

like 0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Anwser: Some say that earning important quantities of cash as well as having fewer intervals of leisure is better than having less money with more free time. This essay will suggest that owning loads of it is necessary in order to have quality relaxation periods and having more spare time allows you to feel, overall, more relaxed. It is thought that thanks to having a large capital, individuals can enjoy the small amount of it they have. Furthermore, when having a lot of money, people are able to book extravagant trips to foreign countries and live countless and luxurious experiences. For instance, my uncle has only 2 weeks per year of vacation because he spends all of his hours working towards building an empire. Though he might seem tortured, he is one of the happiest men alive as a consequence of how perfectly he manages those two weeks and creates unforgettable memories with the cash he owns. People also believe that money is not a crucial factor in having the knowledge of how to spend a free stretch. Moreover, it is possible to enjoy most of life with not much in capital since having a pleasure in life is accessible to everyone. For example, in the 2023 annual Harvard Social study, the results illustrated that all in all, individuals with less cash were happier than those possessing a lot of it. Between the first category, 50% explained that their happiness was due to the simple yet qualitative life they have thanks to the important amount of leisure periods. To conclude, I personally think that having an important capital with little relaxation time is better than the opposite since it is possible to know how to organise these small periods of leisure in order to enjoy the most of it. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the amount of money spent on library is a waste as a new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern world, many countries incur a huge amount of expenses to maintain their libraries. Whilst certain individuals claim that splurging money on libraries is a waste of resources, others contend the notion that new emerging technologies are capable of being a plausible substitute for libraries. It is my notion that although advancements in technology can furnish readers with the digitalized version of books, it is the environment and preservation of certain ancient books that cannot be replicated by technology. First and foremost, as we live on the edge of technology, people should be more reluctant to head towards digitalized and more environmentally-friendly options when it comes to reading books in libraries. Now that many breakthrough inventions accomplished in this era, readers can now have access to the rarest readings and books in the world through numerous websites and online libraries. Countries and universities that are spending millions of dollars each year to maintain libraries can basically switch to digitalized solutions, therefore, decreasing the operation expenses and diverting the resulting funds towards other shortcomings of society and students. For example, universities all across the world now closing their libraries and establishing centralized information management servers where readers can freely benefit from the resources available from the comfort of home. On the contrary side, libraries have always been a cultural centre for many societies, encompassing historical information and artefacts that are worth beyond the monetary valuation. It should be underlined that restoring or keeping these libraries in pristine condition is a challenging work which necessitates well-planned coordination and financial resources. Furthermore, the one thing that is impossible to create in an artificial environment is the ambience in these old libraries where you can almost travel back in time to feel these time periods through the centuries-old buildings and books that have been well taken care of. To exemplify this statement, the Egypt government spends thousands of dollars each year to preserve and maintain the condition of one of the oldest libraries in the world, known as the Library of Alexandria. In conclusion, despite digitalized libraries being a more economically advantageous and pragmatic solution compared to physical ones, there are some properties such as historical importance. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Anwser: Regarding the growth in technology, the number of kids who have access to these technological sources is increasing rapidly, as a great number of them tend to spend most of their daily time on their virtual lives. From my perspective, this statement is the result of upgraded technological devices that the companies are providing for individuals. Although I find this statement to be an extremely negative development for various reasons. With a comparison between the way of communication by the last generations and nowadays, virtual communication is becoming more and more popular every day, as people tend to show more interest in this way of talking to others and this made the path for these technology companies to provide and upgrade their devices. As a result, most children are showing more interest in using them than before. Nowadays, a great number of kids own their own smartphones and mostly are using them to communicate with their friends through them which causes them to waste a significantly greater amount of their time to be involved in their friend's community and not be left behind. Smartphones are now an inseparable part of adolescents' lives. These devices, moreover, consist of some interesting features such as the capability of watching movies, playing video games, and reading e-books which seem mesmerising to many youngsters and grab their attention to spend hours on their phones. In my opinion, this statement has various drawbacks. Firstly, it is extremely time-consuming as children may find themselves scrolling through social media for many hours without any reason which will take their time that has to be spent outside of the house playing with their friends and doing homework. On the contrary, the blue light of these devices will eventually have a damaging effect on their brain and their ability to think properly, as well as their ability to solve problems and deal with difficulties. This statement, furthermore, may lead youngsters to become unsociable and depressed over time. For instance, if a child only speaks to his friends through texting them, he would not be able to express his ideas clearly when it comes to face-to-face communication, which will make him depressed and anxious. To sum up, to me, that is a horrible decision to let the kids use their phones as much as they want to since this will bring a variety of unforgettable damages while they are growing up, as this is the time when their brains are forming and can have huge drawbacks to their future. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification. Anwser: The majority of university students opt for learning various fields as well as their major while others believe paying attention solely to their qualification is more crucial. This essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the latter. On the one hand, focusing and doing one's utmost to qualify is considerable as it leads to profound education. To be specific, the more students concentrate on their fields, the more they are exposed to higher-quality knowledge and information. For example, a student who spends 10,000 hours reading a biology thesis is likely to understand the lecture and the textbooks easily compared to others who only studied for 1000 hours and learned other subjects. Thus, concentrating on their subject only and studying hard for their qualification often result in excelling and obtaining a deep knowledge in their fields. On the other hand, seeking various subjects in addition to their department enables people to experience various studies and to broaden their insight. Furthermore, studying a wide range of fields leads to flexible perspectives. For instance, people who learn Korean literature, social science, and biology will effectively comprehend social, environmental, and gender disparity issues as they have widened their knowledge and understanding. Hence, learning many subjects helps individuals to cultivate multi-abilities and deter them from having narrow perspectives. However, in my view, I believe that doing one's best and endeavouring to a qualification is needed since I highly benefit from obtaining my master's degree. I was able to learn an in-depth section of law, which is my major. Also, I found a job with a high salary and work-life balance. It was possible because I was more outstanding than other applicants as I studied further and harder. In conclusion, although some individuals think that studying different departments is favourable, I stress that solely focusing on qualifying is crucial. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people say that the main environmental problem of our times is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Anwser: To begin, most people think that the loss of specific species of plants and animals is a main environmental problem. On the other hand, others believe that there are several more important problems. It has some bullet points which I will discuss in the forthcoming paragraph. However, the loss of flora and fauna is due to human activity to explore businesses and companies so they have to do deforestation of this many plants are lost. The plant is a good source of oxygen, if continued deforestation occurs it will lead to serious consequences. Apart from, animals play a vital role in human life, if they also low extinct it is an environmental problem because it finishes the one Kingdom of species. For instance, building a factory of plastic bottles of tree cuts, and the garbage from industries returned by pets, and lost both species. Moreover, pollution is a major environmental problem that leads to many health-related problems, especially for children and old age groups. Additionally, climate change occurs because of the greenhouse effect and as a result, the melting of glaciers and variation of seasons occur many other factors like global warming, water scarcity, and ozone depletion leading to ecological problems. To conclude, some claim that the extinction of specific plants and animals is the primary environmental issue facing over time, and some claim that there are more pressing ecological concepts. In my opinion, other environmental issues like climate variation lead to loss of food, season variation, and scarcity of things which is serious for human beings. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example for your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Academic studies have become a gateway to skills and prospective jobs. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether concentrating on qualifying in merely main subjects or pursuing some other related knowledge. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that gaining as much information as possible related to the main subjects is more advisable. Two primary reasons for this are as follows. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that extending the horizon of knowledge could play a complementary role in fulfilling the future profession. According to my own experiences, a salient example of this could be learning Python programming language geographic information systems and remote sensing students at universities, which can broaden their analytical skills in processing satellite images. So, rather than concentrating on the main subjects, learning about other subjects is likely to be more constructive in the future job. Secondly and even more importantly, though, is the fact that focusing solely on the issue is likely to be insufficient as the pace of life increases significantly. For instance, having a grasp of psychological principles could provide a better company for doctors with their patients which, would climb the process of treatment. So, having grown up in a technology era, insisting on such a limited attitude would result in unsatisfying consequences. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that although studying for a qualification would lead to being an expert in a future job, spending time learning related subjects would be accompanied by significant advantages for the betterment of societies. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries today, women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is reasonable to share housework equally between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. Anwser: The trend of full-time labour among women has created a balance of chores and responsibilities with their spouses. Personally, I am completely in the same boat with this notion. This phenomenon can lessen the degree of patriarchalism and reduce the fatherless issue in a family. I will try to explain both benefits based on the condition of my country, Indonesia. A current shift where mothers can achieve the same career opportunities as men might diminish the effect of patriarchism. It is a belief that exists in many regions, and consistently puts males as the top priority in any relations. To illustrate, in the early 1900s in Indonesia, females are entitled only to three places with three duties. Kitchen for cooking, bed for mating, and well for house working. However, since girls are able to enter the workforce, a lot has changed. Those who previously held patriarchy and overshadowed women all the time already realized that women are as capable as men. Thus, if initially, mothers were the only ones to handle housework, then nowadays fathers should be able to do it equally. On the other hand, this alteration has the likelihood to alleviate the troublesome fatherless problems. As its name implies, fatherless means the lack of involvement or dad figure in daily life. Usually ensued as the breadwinner image being invoked on males. For example, a job can take up to 8 to 9 hours per day. It is true that from this, a husband can fulfil the financial needs of his youngsters. Nevertheless, it is also a hard pill to swallow that he will not have sufficient time to play with the children. Therefore, the psychological void will emerge within them. Fortunately, modern belief has countered it, hence men can spend more moments with their sons or daughters. A family's income is not confined to one source anymore. Overall, once again, I am fully aligned with this concept. Two benefits have evidently been generated since females have even-handed circumstances with their spouses at work. The social issue of patriarchy and fatherless parents can be lowered. In the future, I assume that this lifestyle will be proliferated in more countries. The advantages are really invaluable. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. Anwser: The debate surrounding an ageing population has garnered considerable attention globally, with opinions sharply divided. On one hand, an ageing demographic is perceived as a challenge for governments; on the other, it is seen as a societal asset. This essay posits that the benefits brought by an elderly populace significantly outweigh the drawbacks, given their wealth of experience and continued economic contributions. Firstly, senior citizens are invaluable repositories of wisdom and experience, which they impart to younger generations. Their perspectives, shaped by years of diverse experiences, are crucial in guiding the youth and in policy formulation. Take, for instance, their role in shaping historical consciousness — many elders lived through pivotal events, such as the technological boom or significant political upheavals. Their firsthand accounts and insights are irreplaceable, ensuring that lessons from the past are not just remembered but integrated into current societal norms and decision-making processes. This intergenerational exchange fosters a society that is well-grounded in its history and more resilient to future challenges. Moreover, contrary to the belief that retirees are a strain on economic resources, many continue to contribute actively to the workforce. In countries like Japan, where the ageing population is notably high, older workers are not just participating but are essential in addressing labour shortages. Their presence in various sectors brings a balance of skills and perspectives, often leading to more innovative and empathetic workplace cultures. Additionally, their mentorship roles in organizations enhance knowledge transfer, ensuring business continuity and growth. In conclusion, though the phenomenon of people living longer than ever before is posing some challenges, these are far outweighed by the societal contributions made by the elderly. Their involvement in cultural preservation and continuous economic participation affirms their invaluable role. Societies rich in elderly citizens benefit from a wealth of history and experience, fostering more resilient and dynamic economic and social frameworks. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The most importan aim of science is to should be to improve people's life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this estatement. Anwser: Owing to the rapid growth of research and innovation in science, it is believed that the aim of science is to ameliorate living standards in society. I completely agree that scientific discoveries and technological inventions should be solutions for any problems human beings may be or are currently facing in order to have a much better life. To begin with, numerous inventions since the past have directly contributed to humankind and provided an easier life in the modern age. These inventions come in a variety of domains ranging from the health sector to telecommunications. Telephones invented by Alexander Graham Bell, for instance, have altered the way pupils communicate as the technology allows them to have two-way immediate conversations despite distance. Furthermore, the form and function of telephones have evolved exponentially as mobile phones nowadays are multifunctional with a wide range of activities accommodated, including internet and social media access. In addition, fostering and accelerating the betterment of human lives through scientific efforts are actually the responsibility of scientists. They carry an enormous obligation to put their knowledge and expertise into service for the greater good, especially since human beings keep on witnessing challenges such as climate change, potential global or wide-scale infectious diseases, and poverty. One perfect example was the development of COVID-19 vaccines that involved a substantial number of scientists worldwide joining forces. It was proof of their commitment to saving lives and the way to showcase the immense influence of science during a humanitarian crisis. To sum up, scientific exploration, in fact, possesses multiple aims. However, the aim of enhancing people’s lives is undoubtedly the central mission as more and more discoveries and innovations ease people in doing their activities as well as it is an obligation for the scientific community.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The most importan aim of science is to should be to improve people's life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this estatement. Anwser: Owing to the rapid growth of research and innovation in science, it is believed that the aim of science is to ameliorate living standards in society. I completely agree that scientific discoveries and technological inventions should be solutions for any problems human beings may be or are currently facing in order to have a much better life. To begin with, numerous inventions since the past have directly contributed to humankind and provided an easier life in the modern age. These inventions come in a variety of domains ranging from the health sector to telecommunications. Telephones invented by Alexander Graham Bell, for instance, have altered the way pupils communicate as the technology allows them to have two-way immediate conversations despite distance. Furthermore, the form and function of telephones have evolved exponentially as mobile phones nowadays are multifunctional with a wide range of activities accommodated, including internet and social media access. In addition, fostering and accelerating the betterment of human lives through scientific efforts are actually the responsibility of scientists. They carry an enormous obligation to put their knowledge and expertise into service for the greater good, especially since human beings keep on witnessing challenges such as climate change, potential global or wide-scale infectious diseases, and poverty. One perfect example was the development of COVID-19 vaccines that involved a substantial number of scientists worldwide joining forces. It was proof of their commitment to saving lives and the way to showcase the immense influence of science during a humanitarian crisis. To sum up, scientific exploration, in fact, possesses multiple aims. However, the aim of enhancing people’s lives is undoubtedly the central mission as more and more discoveries and innovations ease people in doing their activities as well as it is an obligation for the scientific community. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The most importan aim of science is to should be to improve people's life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this estatement. Anwser: Owing to the rapid growth of research and innovation in science, it is believed that the aim of science is to ameliorate living standards in society. I completely agree that scientific discoveries and technological inventions should be solutions for any problems human beings may be or are currently facing in order to have a much better life. To begin with, numerous inventions since the past have directly contributed to humankind and provided an easier life in the modern age. These inventions come in a variety of domains ranging from the health sector to telecommunications. Telephones invented by Alexander Graham Bell, for instance, have altered the way pupils communicate as the technology allows them to have two-way immediate conversations despite distance. Furthermore, the form and function of telephones have evolved exponentially as mobile phones nowadays are multifunctional with a wide range of activities accommodated, including internet and social media access. In addition, fostering and accelerating the betterment of human lives through scientific efforts are actually the responsibility of scientists. They carry an enormous obligation to put their knowledge and expertise into service for the greater good, especially since human beings keep on witnessing challenges such as climate change, potential global or wide-scale infectious diseases, and poverty. One perfect example was the development of COVID-19 vaccines that involved a substantial number of scientists worldwide joining forces. It was proof of their commitment to saving lives and the way to showcase the immense influence of science during a humanitarian crisis. To sum up, scientific exploration, in fact, possesses multiple aims. However, the aim of enhancing people’s lives is undoubtedly the central mission as more and more discoveries and innovations ease people in doing their activities as well as it is an obligation for the scientific community.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The most importan aim of science is to should be to improve people's life. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this estatement. Anwser: Owing to the rapid growth of research and innovation in science, it is believed that the aim of science is to ameliorate living standards in society. I completely agree that scientific discoveries and technological inventions should be solutions for any problems human beings may be or are currently facing in order to have a much better life. To begin with, numerous inventions since the past have directly contributed to humankind and provided an easier life in the modern age. These inventions come in a variety of domains ranging from the health sector to telecommunications. Telephones invented by Alexander Graham Bell, for instance, have altered the way pupils communicate as the technology allows them to have two-way immediate conversations despite distance. Furthermore, the form and function of telephones have evolved exponentially as mobile phones nowadays are multifunctional with a wide range of activities accommodated, including internet and social media access. In addition, fostering and accelerating the betterment of human lives through scientific efforts are actually the responsibility of scientists. They carry an enormous obligation to put their knowledge and expertise into service for the greater good, especially since human beings keep on witnessing challenges such as climate change, potential global or wide-scale infectious diseases, and poverty. One perfect example was the development of COVID-19 vaccines that involved a substantial number of scientists worldwide joining forces. It was proof of their commitment to saving lives and the way to showcase the immense influence of science during a humanitarian crisis. To sum up, scientific exploration, in fact, possesses multiple aims. However, the aim of enhancing people’s lives is undoubtedly the central mission as more and more discoveries and innovations ease people in doing their activities as well as it is an obligation for the scientific community. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>